Significant agreements | 7. Significant agreements Celgene Corporation Original Collaboration Agreement On March 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Master Collaboration Agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”) to discover, develop and commercialize potentially disease-altering gene therapies in oncology. The collaboration is focused on applying gene therapy technology to genetically modify a patient’s own T cells, known as chimeric antigen receptor, or CAR T cells, to target and destroy cancer cells. Additionally, on March 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Platform Technology Sublicense Agreement (the “Sublicense Agreement”) with Celgene pursuant to which the Company obtained a sublicense to certain intellectual property from Celgene, originating under Celgene’s license from Baylor College of Medicine, for use in the collaboration. Under the terms of the Collaboration Agreement, the Company received a $75.0 million up-front, non-refundable cash payment. The Company is responsible for conducting discovery, research and development activities through completion of Phase I clinical studies, if any, during the initial term of the agreement, or three years. The collaboration is governed by a joint steering committee (“JSC”) formed by an equal number of representatives from the Company and Celgene. The JSC, among other activities, review the collaboration program, review and evaluate product candidates and approve regulatory plans. In addition to the JSC, the Collaboration Agreement provides that the Company and Celgene each appoint representatives to a patent committee, which is responsible for managing the intellectual property developed and used during the collaboration. Summary of the Amended Collaboration Agreement On June 3, 2015, the Company and Celgene amended and restated the Collaboration Agreement (the “Amended Collaboration Agreement”). Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the parties will now focus the collaboration exclusively on anti- B-cell maturation antigen (“BCMA”) product candidates for an additional three-year term. In connection with the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the Company received an upfront, one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable payment of $25.0 million to fund research and development under the collaboration. The collaboration will continue to be governed by the JSC. Under the terms of the Amended Collaboration Agreement, for up to two product candidates selected for development under the collaboration, the Company is responsible for conducting and funding all research and development activities performed up through completion of the initial Phase I clinical study, if any, of such product candidate. On a product candidate-by-product candidate basis, up through a specified period following enrollment of the first patient in an initial Phase I clinical study for such product candidate (the “Option Period”), the Company has granted Celgene an option to obtain an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize such product candidate pursuant to a written agreement, the form of which the Company has already agreed upon, provided that, if Celgene does not exercise its option with respect to the first product candidate under the Amended Collaboration Agreement prior to the expiration of the applicable Option Period then it will not be permitted to exercise its option with respect to any future product candidates under the Amended Collaboration Agreement. In the event that Celgene exercises its option with respect to any product candidate, the Company may elect to co-develop and co-promote the product candidate in the United States, provided that, if the Company does not exercise its option co-develop and co-promote the first product candidate in-licensed by Celgene under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, then the Company will not be permitted to exercise its option to co-develop and co-promote any future product candidates under the Amended Collaboration Agreement. If Celgene elects to exercise its option to exclusively in-license a product candidate, it must pay the Company an option fee in the amount of $10.0 million for the first product candidate and $15.0 million for any additional product candidates, plus an additional fee in the amount of $10.0 million in the event the Company does not exercise its option to co-develop and co-promote that product candidate in the United States. In addition to the applicable option fee, for each product candidate that is in-licensed by Celgene, and for which the Company does not exercise its option to the Company will be eligible to receive up to $10.0 million in clinical milestone payments, up to $117.0 million in regulatory milestone payments and up to $78.0 million in commercial milestone payments. The Company will also be eligible to receive If the Company elects to co-develop and co-promote a product candidate licensed by Celgene, then the Company and Celgene would share equally in all costs incurred relating to the development, commercialization and manufacturing of the product candidate within the United States and share equally in the profits generated by such product candidate in the United States. Additionally, if the Company elects to co-develop and co-promote a product candidate, then the milestones and royalties would decrease compared to those described above. Under this scenario, the Company would receive, per product, up to $10.0 million in clinical milestone payments and, outside of the United States, up to $54.0 million in regulatory milestone payments and up to $36.0 million in commercial milestone payments. In addition, to the extent any of the product candidates licensed by Celgene and co-developed and co-promoted by the Company are commercialized, the Company would be entitled to receive tiered royalty payments ranging from the mid-single digits to low-teens based on a percentage of net sales from sales generated outside of the United States. The royalties payable to the Company are subject to certain reductions, including for any royalty payments required to be made by Celgene to acquire patent rights, with an aggregate minimum floor. The co-development and co-promotion agreement would be governed by a joint governance committee, or JGC, formed by representatives from the Company and Celgene. The JGC will, among other activities, supervise the overall performance of the development and commercialization of elected product candidates and licensed products for United States administration. Celgene is solely responsible for the manufacture and supply of drug product for any optioned product candidate. Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, subject to customary “back-up” supply rights granted to Celgene, the Company has the sole right to manufacture or have manufactured supplies of vectors and associated payloads manufactured for incorporation into the optioned product candidate. Celgene would reimburse the Company for its costs to manufacture and supply such vectors and associated payloads, plus a mid-single digit mark-up. If Celgene does not exercise its option with respect to any product candidate prior to expiration of the applicable option period, then the Company has the right to develop that product candidate outside the scope of the Amended Collaboration Agreement. Either party may terminate the Amended Collaboration Agreement upon written notice to the other party in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach. Celgene may terminate the Amended Collaboration Agreement for any reason upon prior written notice to the Company. If the agreement is terminated, rights to product candidates in development at the time of such termination will be allocated to the parties through a mechanism included in the agreement. In addition, if Celgene terminates the agreement for the Company’s breach, any then-existing co-development and co-promotion agreement will be automatically terminated and replaced with a license agreement for such product candidate and any amounts payable by Celgene under any then-existing product license agreements will be reduced. Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the so-called “call option” under the prior collaboration agreement, pursuant to which Celgene had the option to terminate the collaboration agreement and obtain fully paid-up licenses to product candidates in the event of a change of control transaction involving the Company, has been eliminated. Under the Sublicense Agreement, the Company will continue to have access to certain intellectual property rights in-licensed to Celgene pursuant to its collaboration agreement with the Baylor College of Medicine, which was first established in connection with the initiation of the original Collaboration Agreement between the Company and Celgene. Accounting Analysis The Company’s Amended Collaboration Agreement with Celgene contains the following deliverables: (i) research and development services, (ii) participation on the JSC, (iii) participation on the patent committee, (iv) a license to the first product candidate, (v) manufacture of vectors and associated payload for incorporation into the first optioned product candidate under the license, and (vi) participation on the JGC under the co-development and co-promotion agreement for the first optioned product candidate under the license. The license to the first product candidate is considered a deliverable at the inception of the arrangement and therefore the associated option fee is included in allocable arrangement consideration. The Company believes there is minimal risk with regard to whether Celgene will exercise the option based on the successful completion of preclinical activities and proximity of enrollment of the first patient in an initial Phase I clinical study for this product candidate. Further, Celgene loses the right to option any other product candidates if it does not agree to license the first product candidate. The Company has determined that the obligation within the license to manufacture or have manufactured supplies of vectors and associated payloads for incorporation into the first optioned product candidate is a deliverable, consistent with the option to license the first product candidate. However, the Company has determined that the options to license any additional product candidates are substantive options and therefore are not considered deliverables at execution of the Amended Collaboration Agreement. Celgene is not contractually obligated to exercise the options. Additionally, as a result of the uncertain outcome of the discovery, research and development activities, the Company is at risk with regard to whether Celgene will exercise the options to license additional product candidates. Moreover, the Company has determined that the options are not priced at a significant and incremental discount. Accordingly, the options to other product candidates are not considered deliverables at the inception of the arrangement and the associated option fees are not included in allocable arrangement consideration. The Company concluded that each of the three delivered elements at the inception of the agreement (research and development services, participation on the JSC and participation on the patent committee) has standalone value from the other undelivered elements. Additionally, the Amended Collaboration Agreement does not include return rights related to the collaboration term. Accordingly, each deliverable qualifies as a separate unit of accounting. The Company determined that each of the identified deliverables have the same period of performance (the three year term through projected initial Phase I study completion) and have the same pattern of revenue recognition, ratably over the period of performance as there is no other discernible pattern of recognition. The Company identified the allocable arrangement consideration as the $25.0 million up-front research and development funding payment, $10.0 million option fee for the first product candidate, $20.0 million related to remaining deferred revenue from the original Collaboration Agreement, and $54.1 million of contingent revenue related to the estimated amounts that will be received from Celgene for manufacturing services. The $109.0 million total allocable arrangement consideration was allocated based on the relative estimated selling price of the separate units of accounting at the inception of the amended agreement, resulting in $17.3 million allocated to the three delivered elements at the inception of the agreement, which will be recognized over an initial three year term. This initial term will be revisited as the development plan timing changes or other events that impact the period over which the Company’s obligations relate. The Company evaluated all of the milestones that may be received in connection with Celgene’s option to license a product candidate resulting from the collaboration. In evaluating if a milestone is substantive, the Company assesses whether: (i) the consideration is commensurate with either the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone, (ii) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (iii) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. All clinical and regulatory milestones that may be received under the option to the license agreement are considered substantive on the basis of the contingent nature of the milestone, specifically reviewing factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the milestone as well as the level of effort and investment required. Accordingly, such amounts will be recognized as revenue in full in the period in which the associated milestone is achieved, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. All commercial milestones will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties and recorded as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. During each of the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized $11.3 million and $12.5 million, respectively, of revenue associated with its collaboration with Celgene related to the recognition of discovery, research and development services. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was $44.4 million and $30.7 million, respectively, of total deferred revenue related to the Company’s collaboration with Celgene, which is classified as current or non-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, $16.9 million of which will be recognized over three years with the remaining amount deferred until a later date. |