UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number 001-34688
Tengion, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 20-0214813 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3929 Westpoint Boulevard, Suite G Winston-Salem, NC 27103 (Address of principal executive offices) (336) 722-5855 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
As of November 10, 2014, there were 36,620,124 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
TENGION, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
INDEX
Part I. Financial Information
| Item 1. | Financial Statements (unaudited) | |
| | Balance Sheets | |
| | Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss | |
| | Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit | |
| | Statements of Cash Flows | |
| | Notes to Financial Statements | |
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | |
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | |
| | | |
Part II. Other Information | |
| | | |
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | |
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
| Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | |
| Item 5. | Other Information | |
| Item 6. | Exhibits | |
| | | |
Signature Page | |
NOTE REGARDING COMPANY REFERENCES
Throughout this report, "Tengion," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Tengion, Inc.
NOTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS
Tengion® and the Tengion logo® are our registered trademarks and Tengion Neo-Urinary Conduit™, Tengion Neo-Kidney™, Tengion Neo-Kidney Augment™, Tengion Neo-Vessel™, Tengion Neo-Vessel Replacement™, Tengion Neo-Bladder Replacement™, Neo-Bladder Augment™, Tengion Organ Regeneration Platform™ and Organ Regeneration Platform™ are our trademarks. Other names are for informational purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
TENGION, INC.
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| | September 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
ASSETS |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,728 | | | $ | 21,510 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 443 | | | | 334 | |
Total current assets | | | 6,171 | | | | 21,844 | |
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $13,496 and $13,339 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | | | 509 | | | | 454 | |
Other assets | | | 2,941 | | | | 3,426 | |
Total assets | | $ | 9,621 | | | $ | 25,724 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt discount of $52 as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,329 | |
Current portion of lease liability | | | 680 | | | | 665 | |
Accounts payable | | | 610 | | | | 853 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 2,236 | | | | 2,366 | |
Warrant liability | | | 56,023 | | | | 11,425 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 59,549 | | | | 16,638 | |
Long-term debt and embedded derivative, net of debt discount of $4,602 and $7,814 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | | | 33,326 | | | | 25,623 | |
Lease liability | | | 116 | | | | 307 | |
Other liabilities | | | 12 | | | | 12 | |
Total liabilities | | | 93,003 | | | | 42,580 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ deficit: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued or outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares and 750,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively; 26,050 and 6,822 and shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | | | 26 | | | | 7 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 253,157 | | | | 249,237 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (336,565 | ) | | | (266,100 | ) |
Total stockholders’ deficit | | | (83,382 | ) | | | (16,856 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | | $ | 9,621 | | | $ | 25,724 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
TENGION, INC.
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | $ | 3,046 | | | $ | 2,169 | | | $ | 8,296 | | | $ | 6,829 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,603 | | | | 1,520 | | | | 5,165 | | | | 4,815 | |
Depreciation | | | 55 | | | | 59 | | | | 157 | | | | 204 | |
Other expense, net | | | 149 | | | | 156 | | | | 453 | | | | 277 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 4,853 | | | | 3,904 | | | | 14,071 | | | | 12,125 | |
Loss from operations | | | (4,853 | ) | | | (3,904 | ) | | | (14,071 | ) | | | (12,125 | ) |
Interest income | | | 1 | | | | 19 | | | | 15 | | | | 26 | |
Interest expense | | | (1,859 | ) | | | (2,246 | ) | | | (5,704 | ) | | | (5,503 | ) |
Change in fair value of embedded derivative and derivative liability | | | (2,856 | ) | | | 53 | | | | (6,631 | ) | | | (4,385 | ) |
Change in fair value of warrant liability | | | (8,785 | ) | | | (1,179 | ) | | | (44,074 | ) | | | (2,979 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (18,352 | ) | | $ | (7,257 | ) | | $ | (70,465 | ) | | $ | (24,966 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (18,352) | | | $ | (7,257 | ) | | $ | (70,465 | ) | | $ | (24,966 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per share | | $ | (0.73) | | | $ | (1.70 | ) | | $ | (3.49 | ) | | $ | (7.24 | ) |
Weighted-average common stock outstanding – basic and diluted | | | 25,171 | | | | 4,261 | | | | 20,174 | | | | 3,449 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
TENGION, INC.
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | Common stock | | | Additional paid-in capital | | | Accumulated deficit | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | | 6,822 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 249,237 | | | $ | (266,100 | ) | | $ | (16,856 | ) |
Issuance of common stock for payment of interest | | | 9,326 | | | | 9 | | | | 1,887 | | | | — | | | | 1,896 | |
Repurchase of restricted stock to employees | | | (3 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of 2012 and 2013 Convertible Notes, net | | | 9,905 | | | | 10 | | | | 1,683 | | | | — | | | | 1,693 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 351 | | | | — | | | | 351 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (70,465 | ) | | | (70,465 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2014 | | | 26,050 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 253,157 | | | $ | (336,565 | ) | | $ | (83,382 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
TENGION, INC.
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | $ | (70,465 | ) | | $ | (24,966 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 157 | | | | 204 | |
Change in fair value of embedded derivative and derivative liability | | 6,631 | | | | 4,385 | |
Change in fair value of warrant liability | | 44,074 | | | | 2,979 | |
Charge related to lease liability | | 453 | | | | 386 | |
Noncash interest expense | | 5,666 | | | | 4,400 | |
Noncash rent expense | | — | | | | 3 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 351 | | | | 404 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | (109 | ) | | | (54 | ) |
Accounts payable | | (240 | ) | | | 686 | |
Accrued expenses and other | | (702 | ) | | | (732 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | | (14,184 | ) | | | (12,305 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Change in restricted cash | | — | | | | 1,000 | |
Cash paid for property and equipment | | (215 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (215 | ) | | | 998 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from warrant exercises, net | | — | | | | 278 | |
Repurchase of restricted stock to employees | | (1 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Proceeds from Celgene Collaboration and Option Agreement and | | | | | | | |
Right of First Negotiation Agreement, net of expenses | | — | | | | 14,661 | |
Proceeds from long-term debt and warrants, net of issuance costs | | — | | | | 17,599 | |
Payments on long-term debt | | (1,382 | ) | | | (1,281 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | (1,383 | ) | | | 31,250 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | (15,782 | ) | | | 19,943 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 21,510 | | | | 7,536 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 5,728 | | | $ | 27,479 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
TENGION, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
(1) | Organization and Nature of Operations |
Tengion, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on July 10, 2003. The Company is a regenerative medicine company focused on discovering, developing, manufacturing and commercializing a range of neo-organs, or products composed of living cells, with or without synthetic or natural materials, implanted or injected into the body to engraft into, regenerate, or replace a damaged tissue or organ. Using its Organ Regeneration Platform, the Company creates these neo-organs using a patient’s own cells, or autologous cells. The Company’s mission is to: (i) utilize its Organ Regeneration Platform to extend the lives of patients suffering from life-threatening diseases; (ii) improve the quality of patients' lives while providing cost-saving treatments; and (iii) create value for the Company’s stakeholders.
The Company believes its proprietary product candidates harness the intrinsic regenerative pathways of the body to regenerate a range of native-like organs and tissues. The Company’s product candidates are intended to delay or eliminate the need for chronic disease therapies, organ transplantation, and the administration of anti-rejection medications. In addition, the Company’s neo-organs are designed to replace the need to substitute other tissues of the body for a purpose to which they are poorly suited.
Building on its clinical and preclinical experience, the Company has utilized its Organ Regeneration Platform in the conduct of its Neo-Kidney Augment development program for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and its Neo-Urinary Conduit development program for bladder cancer patients who are in need of a urinary diversion. The Company operates as a single business segment. Operations of the Company are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among others, uncertainty of product candidate development; technological uncertainty; dependence on collaborative partners; uncertainty regarding patents and proprietary rights; comprehensive government regulations; having no commercial manufacturing experience, marketing or sales capability or experience; and dependence on key personnel.
(2) | Management’s Plans to Continue as a Going Concern |
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company anticipates incurring losses and deficits in operating cash flows until such time, if ever, that it can generate significant sales of its therapeutic product candidates currently in development or enters into cash flow positive business development transactions.
Based upon the Company’s current expected level of operating expenditures and required debt repayments, and assuming the Company is not required to settle any outstanding warrants in cash or redeem, or pay cash interest on, any of its convertible notes, the Company expects to be able to fund operations through mid-December 2014; however, this period could be shortened if there are any unanticipated increases in planned spending on development programs, general and administrative expenses or other unforeseen events. The Company intends to pursue additional funds through collaborative arrangements, private sales of debt or equity securities, commercial loan facilities, the sale of rights (such as option rights) to our programs or to acquire the Company, or some combination thereof. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed to allow the Company to continue its operations or, if available, on terms acceptable to the Company.
In the event financing is not obtained, the Company would pursue additional headcount reductions and other cost cutting measures to preserve cash as well as explore the sale of selected assets to generate additional funds. If the Company is required to significantly reduce operating expenses and delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its development programs, these events would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. If financing is still not obtained following these events, the Company will not be able to remain in business and will likely need to seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
These factors raise significant concerns about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
(3) | Summary of Accounting Policies |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915) – Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation (ASU 2014-10). ASU 2014-10 eliminates the concept of a development stage entity in its entirety from current accounting guidance. The new guidance eliminates the requirements for development stage entities to (i) present inception-to-date information in the statement of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows, (ii) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (iii) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (iv) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. ASU 2014-10 is effective prospectively for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those annual periods but early adoption is permitted. The Company evaluated and elected to adopt ASU 2014-10 as permitted, and, accordingly, has not included the inception-to-date disclosures and other previously required disclosures for development stage entities in these financial statements.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. For all periods presented, the outstanding shares of unvested restricted stock as well as the number of common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and conversion of notes payable have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Therefore, the weighted-average shares used to calculate both basic and dilutive loss per share are the same.
The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the three and nine month computations of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive:
| | Three and nine months ended September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Shares underlying warrants outstanding | | | 776,568,251 | | | 481,733,641 |
Shares underlying options outstanding | | | 228,721 | | | 231,575 |
Unvested restricted stock | | | 35,574 | | | 54,721 |
Shares underlying convertible notes payable | | | 172,760,108 | | | 115,590,720 |
(4) | Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
The following table contains additional supplemental cash flow information for the periods reported (in thousands).
| | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: | | | | | | |
Fair value of embedded derivatives and derivatives issued with issuance of long-term debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 732 | |
Fair value of warrants issued with issuance of long-term debt | | | — | | | | 9,657 | |
Fair value of warrants issued pursuant to Celgene Collaboration and Option Agreement | | | — | | | | 3,796 | |
Cashless exercise of warrant liability | | | — | | | | 15 | |
Conversion of 2012 and 2013 Convertible Notes to common stock, net | | | 1,693 | | | | 36 | |
Issuance of common stock and warrants for payment of interest | | | 2,420 | | | | 1,120 | |
The fair value guidance requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| · | Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
| · | Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; |
| · | Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity). |
The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about each major category of the Company’s financial assets and liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (in thousands).
| Fair value measurement at reporting date using: | | |
| Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) | | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
At September 30, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,728 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 5,728 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Embedded derivative liability | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 6,831 | | | | $ | 6,831 | |
Warrant liability | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 56,023 | | | | | 56,023 | |
| | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 62,854 | | | | $ | 62,854 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, 2013: |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 21,510 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 21,510 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Embedded derivative liability | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 226 | | | | $ | 226 | |
Warrant liability | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 11,425 | | | | | 11,425 | |
| | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 11,651 | | | | $ | 11,651 | |
The Company issued notes in 2012 and 2013 that are convertible into common stock at the option of the holder (collectively, the Conversion Options). See Note 10 for further discussion of these Conversion Options, which are accounted for as embedded derivative liabilities. These Conversion Options are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs and available market data to support the fair value (Level 3). A reconciliation of the embedded derivative liabilities is as follows (in thousands):
| | 2012 Notes | | 2013 Notes | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 125 | | | $ | 226 | |
Conversion of notes | | | (22 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (26 | ) |
Change in fair value of derivative liability | | | 3,068 | | | | 3,563 | | | | 6,631 | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | | $ | 3,147 | | | $ | 3,684 | | | $ | 6,831 | |
The Company has issued warrants to purchase common stock that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs and available market data to support the fair value (Level 3). See Note 11 for further discussion of the warrant liability. A reconciliation of the warrant liability is as follows (in thousands):
| | 2011 Warrants | | | 2012 Warrants | | | 2013 Warrants | | | 2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 720 | | | $ | 3,430 | | | $ | 5,139 | | | $ | 2,083 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 11,425 | |
Issuance of warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 524 | | | | 524 | |
Change in fair value of warrant liability | | | 4,091 | | | | 13,574 | | | | 19,068 | | | | 7,726 | | | | (385 | ) | | | 44,074 | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | | $ | 4,811 | | | $ | 17,004 | | | $ | 24,207 | | | $ | 9,809 | | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 56,023 | |
The fair value of the Conversion Options, 2011 Warrants, 2012 Warrants, 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants, and 2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, was determined using a risk-neutral framework within a Monte Carlo analysis. The valuation of the Conversion Options and Warrants is subjective and is affected by changes in inputs to the valuation model including the assumptions regarding the aggregate value of the Company’s debt and equity instruments; assumptions regarding the expected amounts and dates of future debt and equity financing activities; assumptions regarding the likelihood and timing of Fundamental Transactions or Major Transactions (as defined in the agreements); the historical and prospective volatility in the value of the company’s debt and equity instruments; risk-free rates based on U.S. Treasury security yields; and the Company’s dividend yield.
In performing the valuation of the Conversion Options, 2011 Warrants, 2012 Warrants, 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants, and 2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants, the Company believed the common stock price has not fully adjusted for the potential future dilution from the private placement transactions in 2012 and 2013. Therefore, the Company used an implied enterprise value considering potential future values for the Company contingent on the outcome of its research programs in conjunction with a Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the range of possible outcomes within each scenario and to allocate value to the securities in accordance with the terms of the agreements. The valuation resulted in a model-derived common stock value of $0.02 per share as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, primarily due to the preference rights of the debt holders and the anti-dilution and net cash settlement features of warrants issued in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
Certain assets and liabilities, including property and equipment, severance benefits and the lease liability, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be impaired or in the period in which the liability is incurred. None of these assets were measured at fair value as of December 31, 2013 or September 30, 2014.
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Accrued interest on convertible notes | | $ | 787 | | | $ | 843 | |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | | 719 | | | | 757 | |
Accrued consulting and professional fees | | | 269 | | | | 138 | |
Accrued research and development | | | 379 | | | | 535 | |
Other | | | 82 | | | | 93 | |
Total accrued expenses | | $ | 2,236 | | | $ | 2,366 | |
The Company entered into an agreement in February 2006 to lease warehouse space from March 1, 2011 through February 28, 2016. On March 1, 2011, the Company determined it was not likely to utilize the space during the five-year lease term. Therefore, the Company recorded a liability as of March 1, 2011, the cease-use date, for the fair value of its obligations under the lease. The most significant assumptions used in determining the amount of the estimated lease liability are the potential sublease revenues and the credit-adjusted risk-free rate utilized to discount the estimated future cash flows.
In connection with the 2011 restructuring, the Company determined it was not likely to utilize substantially all of the leased office and manufacturing space in its East Norriton, Pennsylvania facility during the remainder of the lease term which ends February 28, 2016. Therefore, the Company recorded a liability as of November 30, 2011, the cease-use date, for the fair value of its obligations under the lease.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the lease liability for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands).
| | Warehouse space | | Office and manufacturing space | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 472 | | | $ | 972 | |
Charges utilized | | | (193 | ) | | | (436 | ) | | | (629 | ) |
Additional charges to operations | | | 38 | | | | 415 | | | | 453 | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | | | 345 | | | | 451 | | | | 796 | |
Less current portion | | | 248 | | | | 432 | | | | 680 | |
Total long-term lease liability at September 30, 2014 | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 116 | |
Senior Secured Convertible Notes
2013 Financing
On June 28, 2013, the Company completed a private placement (the 2013 Financing) of an aggregate principal amount of $18,576,000 of Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the 2013 Convertible Notes) along with warrants to the holders of the Convertible Notes (2013 Warrants) to purchase 26,921,741 shares of our common stock exercisable for a period of five years from the date of their issuance and warrants to purchase 53,843,479 shares of our common stock exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of their issuance. The initial conversion price of the 2013 Convertible Notes was $0.69 per share and the initial exercise price of the 2013 Warrants was $0.69 per share. The 2013 Convertible Notes mature on June 30, 2016 and bear interest at 10% per annum, which is payable quarterly beginning on October 1, 2013. The 2013 Convertible Notes were initially convertible into 26,921,741 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.69 per share. The Company recorded an embedded derivative liability for the Conversion Option (the Conversion Option-2013 Notes). The Conversion Option-2013 Notes is presented on the Balance Sheet, included with long-term debt. See Note 10 for further discussion of this embedded derivative liability.
We may, at our option, pay interest by the issuance of common stock (or, in certain circumstances, warrants to purchase shares of common stock), provided that an event of default has not occurred and we have publicly disclosed all material information about the Company. If we elect to pay interest on the 2013 Convertible Notes through the issuance of shares of our common stock, the number of shares that would be issued is calculated by dividing the amount of the interest payment by the lesser of: (1) the volume weighted-average price (VWAP) for our common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the date the interest payment is due or (2) the closing bid price for our common stock as of the last trading day of the VWAP period. All shares of common stock issuable to the holders in lieu of interest payments will be allocated pro rata among the holders based on the outstanding principal amount of the 2013 Convertible Notes.
On January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014, we made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes (as defined below) and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of shares of common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for nominal consideration. The January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 issuances of the shares and warrants were dilutive to the holders of the 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants, 2013 Convertible Notes, 2012 Warrants, 2012 Convertible Notes, and 2011 Warrants, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. As of September 30, 2014, the conversion price of the 2013 Convertible Notes was adjusted to $0.18 per share and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the 2013 Convertible Notes was increased to 93,175,377 shares.
2012 Financing
On October 2, 2012, the Company completed a private placement of an aggregate principal amount of $15,005,251 of Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the 2012 Convertible Notes) along with warrants to the holders of the Convertible Notes (2012 Warrants) to purchase 1,118,722 shares of our common stock exercisable for a period of two years from the date of their issuance, warrants to purchase 16,672,145 shares of our common stock exercisable for a period of five years from the date of their issuance and warrants to purchase 33,344,293 shares of our common stock exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of their issuance at an initial exercise price of $0.75 per share. The 2012 Convertible Notes mature on October 2, 2015 and bear interest at 10% per annum. The Company recorded an embedded derivative liability for the Conversion Option (the Conversion Option-2012 Notes). The Conversion Option-2012 Notes is presented on the Balance Sheet, included with long-term debt. See Note 10 for further discussion of this embedded derivative liability.
On January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014, we made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of shares of common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for nominal consideration. The January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 issuances of the shares and warrants were dilutive to the holders of the 2013 Warrants, 2013 Convertible Notes, 2013 Celgene Warrants, 2012 Warrants, 2012 Convertible Notes, and 2011 Warrants, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. As of September 30, 2014, the conversion price of the 2012 Convertible Notes was adjusted to $0.18 per share and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the 2012 Convertible Notes was increased to 79,584,731 shares.
Total debt outstanding consists of the following (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Senior Secured 2012 Convertible Notes | | $ | 14,325 | | | $ | 14,634 | |
Embedded derivative liability-2012 Notes | | | 3,147 | | | | 101 | |
Senior Secured 2013 Convertible Notes | | | 16,772 | | | | 18,576 | |
Embedded derivative liability-2013 Notes | | | 3,684 | | | | 125 | |
Working Capital Note | | | — | | | | 1,382 | |
Unamortized debt discount | | | (4,602 | ) | | | (7,866 | ) |
| | | 33,326 | | | | 26,952 | |
Less current portion | | | (— | ) | | | (1,329 | ) |
Total long-term debt and embedded derivative, net of debt discount | | $ | 33,326 | | | $ | 25,623 | |
The Company recorded interest expense of $1.9 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 is $0.4 million of amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount related to the 2013 Convertible Notes, $0.7 million in amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount on the 2012 Convertible Notes and Working Capital Note and $0.8 million of interest expense on the 2012 Convertible Notes, Working Capital Note and 2013 Convertible Notes. The Company recorded interest expense of $5.7 million and $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Included in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is $1.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount related to the 2013 Convertible Notes, $2.2 million in amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount on the 2012 Convertible Notes and Working Capital Note and $2.4 million of interest expense on the 2012 Convertible Notes, Working Capital Note and 2013 Convertible Notes.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, approximately $0.3 million of the 2012 Convertible Notes were converted into 1,638,480 shares of our common stock and approximately $1.8 million of the 2013 Convertible Notes were converted into 8,266,359 shares of our common stock.
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, the Company had issued 9,326,065 Interest Shares and 2,625,930 Interest Warrants to satisfy approximately $2.4 million in interest obligations for the 2012 Convertible Notes and 2013 Convertible Notes.
Common Stock
Since inception, the Company has sold common stock to certain officers, directors, employees, consultants, Scientific Advisory Board members and investors. As of September 30, 2014, the Company was authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of common stock. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held. The Company will, at all times, reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock sufficient shares to effect the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants.
Preferred Stock
The Company was authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences and privileges could include dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of common stock. The issuance of the Company’s preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of the Company or other corporate action. There are no shares issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2014.
Registration Rights Agreements
In connection with the 2013 Financing and the Celgene Collaboration and Option Agreement, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the 2013 Registration Rights Agreement) with the 2013 investors and Celgene. The 2013 Registration Rights Agreement provided that, within 30 days of the closing of the 2013 Financing, we would file a “resale” registration statement (the Registration Statement) covering up to the maximum number of shares underlying the 2013 Notes, 2013 Warrants and the Celgene Warrants that we were able to register pursuant to applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) limitations. We filed the Registration Statement on July 26, 2013 and it was declared effective by the SEC on September 18, 2013. Under the terms of the 2013 Registration Rights Agreement, we are obligated to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement until all securities therein are sold or otherwise can be sold without registration and without any restrictions.
In connection with the private placement we completed in October 2012 (the 2012 Financing), we entered into a registration rights agreement, which has since been amended, with the investors in the 2012 Financing (as amended, the 2012 Registration Rights Agreement). The 2012 Registration Rights Agreement provided that, within 30 days of the closing of the 2012 Financing, we would file a “resale” registration statement covering up to the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon (i) the conversion of the senior secured convertible notes that were issued in the 2012 Financing and (ii) the exercise of the warrants issued in the 2012 Financing. We filed the registration statement on November 5, 2012 and it was declared effective by the SEC on March 28, 2013. Under the terms of the 2012 Registration Rights Agreement, we are obligated to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statements until all securities therein are sold or otherwise can be sold without registration and without any restrictions.
(10) | Embedded Derivative Conversion Options |
The Company accounts for Conversion Options on the 2012 and 2013 Convertible Notes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). Under this accounting guidance, the Company is required to bifurcate the embedded derivative from the host instrument and account for it as a derivative financial instrument. These Conversion Options are classified with debt on the balance sheet and remeasured to fair value at each reporting date, with any changes in fair value being recorded on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
The following table summarizes the calculated aggregate fair values using a risk-neutral framework within a Monte Carlo analysis of the Conversion Options as of the dates indicated along with assumptions utilized in each calculation.
| | Embedded Derivative Liability | |
| | Conversion Option-2012 Notes | | | Conversion Option-2013 Notes | |
| | September 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | | | September 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
Calculated aggregate value (in thousands) | | $ | 3,147 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 3,684 | | | $ | 125 | |
Weighted-average equity volatility | | | 112 | % | | | 120 | % | | | 112 | % | | | 120 | % |
Weighted-average asset volatility | | | 85 | % | | | 95 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 95 | % |
Probability of a Major Transaction | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
Dividend yield. | | None | | | None | | | None | | | None | |
The Company accounts for stock warrants as either equity instruments or derivative liabilities depending on the specific terms of the warrant agreement. Stock warrants are accounted for as derivative liabilities if the stock warrants allow for cash settlement or provide for modification of the warrant exercise price in the event subsequent sales of common stock are at a lower price per share than the then-current warrant exercise price. The Company classifies derivative warrant liabilities on the balance sheet as a current liability, which is revalued at each balance sheet date subsequent to the initial issuance of the stock warrant.
The following table summarizes outstanding warrants to purchase common stock:
| | Shares Exercisable as of | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | | | Weighted-average exercise Price | | Expiration |
Equity-classified warrants | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued to lenders and vendors | | | 18,157 | | | | 18,375 | | | $ | 157.33 | | December 2014 through September 2019 |
| | | 18,157 | | | | 18,375 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability-classified warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants | | | 3,683,874 | | | | 1,057,944 | | | $ | 0.001 | | July 2023 through July 2024 |
2013 Warrants (1) | | | 308,066,691 | | | | 191,213,801 | | | $ | 0.18 | | June 2018 through June 2023 |
2013 Celgene Warrants (1) | | | 125,000,000 | | | | 77,586,207 | | | $ | 0.18 | | June 2018 through June 2023 |
2012 Warrants (1) | | | 220,180,579 | | | | 136,663,804 | | | $ | 0.18 | | October 2014 through October 2022 |
2011 Warrants (2) | | | 119,618,950 | | | | 74,761,830 | | | $ | 0.25 | | March 2016 |
| | | 776,550,094 | | | | 481,283,586 | | | | | | |
Total | | | 776,568,251 | | | | 481,301,961 | | | | | | |
(1) | As of December 31, 2013 the 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants and 2012 Warrants had an exercise price of $0.29 per share. |
(2) | As of December 31, 2013 the 2011 Warrants had an exercise price of $0.40 per share. |
2012 Warrants, 2013 Warrants and 2013 Celgene Warrants
On October 2, 2012, as part of the 2012 Financing, the Company issued the 2012 Warrants to holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes. The 2012 Warrants were exercisable at an exercise price of $0.75 per share subject to certain adjustments as specified in the warrant agreement. The Company valued the 2012 Warrants as derivative financial instruments as of the date of issuance and will record their changes in fair value at each reporting date, with any changes in fair value being recorded on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. On January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014, the Company made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of shares of common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for nominal consideration. Each of the January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 issuances of the shares and warrants were dilutive to the holders of the 2012 Warrants and 2012 Convertible Notes, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. As of September 30, 2014, the exercise price of the 2012 Warrants was adjusted to $0.18 per share, and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the 2012 Warrants was increased to 220,180,579 shares.
On June 28, 2013, as part of the 2013 Financing, the Company issued the 2013 Warrants to holders of the 2013 Convertible Notes. The 2013 Warrants were initially exercisable at an exercise price of $0.69 per share subject to certain adjustments as specified in the warrant agreement. In addition, on June 28, 2013, the Company entered into a Collaboration and Option Agreement with Celgene Corporation under which Celgene paid the Company $15 million in exchange for (i) five-year warrants to purchase 7,425,743 shares of common stock and ten-year warrants to purchase 14,851,485 shares of common stock (the Celgene Warrants); (ii) a right of first negotiation to the Company’s Neo-Kidney Augment Program; and (iii) entering into the Collaboration and Option Agreement. The Celgene Warrants were initially exercisable at an exercise price of $1.01 per share. The Company valued the 2013 Warrants and the Celgene Warrants as derivative financial instruments as of the date of issuance and will continue to do so at each reporting date, with any changes in fair value being recorded on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. On January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014, the Company made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of shares of common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for nominal consideration. Each of the January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 issuances of the shares and warrants were dilutive to the holders of the 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants and 2013 Convertible Notes, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. As of September 30, 2014, the exercise price of the 2013 Warrants and 2013 Celgene Warrants was adjusted to $0.18 per share, and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the 2013 Warrants and 2013 Celgene Warrants was increased to 308,066,691 shares and 125,000,000, respectively.
The 2012 Warrants, 2013 Warrants and 2013 Celgene Warrants contain provisions that require the modification of the exercise price and shares to be issued under certain circumstances, including in the event the Company completes subsequent equity financings at a price per share lower than the then-current warrant exercise price. In addition, the warrants contain a net cash settlement provision under which the warrant holders may require the Company to purchase the warrants in exchange for a cash payment following the announcement of specified events defined as Major Transactions involving the Company (e.g., merger, sale of all or substantially all assets, tender offer, or share exchange). The net cash settlement provision requires use of the Black-Scholes model in calculating the cash payment value in the event of a Major Transaction.
2011 Warrants
In March 2011, the Company issued warrants (2011 Warrants) to purchase 1,046,102 shares of common stock in connection with a private placement transaction. Each warrant was exercisable in whole or in part at any time until March 4, 2016 at a per share exercise price of $28.80, subject to certain adjustments as specified in the warrant agreement. The Company classified the warrants as derivative financial instruments as of the date of issuance (March 4, 2011) and will record the changes in their fair value at each reporting date, with any changes in fair value being recorded on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. On January 2, 2014 and April 1, 2014, the Company made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of shares of common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for nominal consideration. Each of the January 2, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 issuances of the shares and warrants were dilutive to the holders of the 2011 Warrants, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. As of September 30, 2014, the exercise price of the 2011 Warrants was adjusted to $0.25 per share, and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the 2011 Warrants was increased to 119,618,950 shares.
The warrants contain provisions that require the modification of the exercise price and shares to be issued under certain circumstances, including in the event the Company completes subsequent equity financings at a price per share lower than the then-current warrant exercise price. In addition, the warrants contain a net cash settlement provision under which the warrant holders may require the Company to purchase the warrants in exchange for a cash payment following the announcement of specified events defined as Fundamental Transactions involving the Company (e.g., merger, sale of all or substantially all assets, tender offer, or share exchange). The net cash settlement provision requires use of the Black-Scholes model in calculating the cash payment value in the event of a Fundamental Transaction.
The following tables summarize the calculated aggregate fair values for the liability-classified warrants as of the dates indicated along with the assumptions utilized in each calculation.
| | Fair value as of September 30, 2014 | |
| | 2011 Warrants | | | 2012 Warrants | | | 2013 Warrants | | | 2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants | |
Calculated aggregate value (in thousands) | | $ | 4,811 | | | $ | 17,004 | | | $ | 24,207 | | | $ | 9,809 | | | $ | 192 | |
Exercise price per share of warrant | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.001 | |
Weighted-average equity volatility | | | 112 | % | | | 112 | % | | | 112 | % | | | 112 | % | | | 112 | % |
Weighted-average asset volatility | | | 85 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 85 | % |
Probability of Fundamental or Major Transaction | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.8 | % |
| | Fair value as of December 31, 2013 | |
| | 2011 Warrants | | | 2012 Warrants | | | 2013 Warrants | | | 2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 2013 Interest Warrants | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Calculated aggregate value (in thousands) | | $ | 720 | | | $ | 3,430 | | | $ | 5,139 | | | $ | 2,083 | | | $ | 53 | |
Exercise price per share of warrant | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.001 | |
Equity volatility | | | 120 | % | | | 120 | % | | | 120 | % | | | 120 | % | | | 120 | % |
Asset volatility | | | 95 | % | | | 95 | % | | | 95 | % | | | 95 | % | | | 95 | % |
Probability of Fundamental or Major Transaction | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
The following table summarizes the calculated net cash settlement values for the liability-classified warrants as of September 30, 2014 along with the assumptions utilized in each calculation.
| | Net cash settlement as of September 30, 2014 | |
| | 2011 Warrants | | | 2012 Warrants | | | 2013 Warrants | | | 2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Calculated aggregate value (in thousands) (1) | | $ | 681 | | | $ | 7,383 | | | $ | 11,348 | | | $ | 4,598 | | | | — | |
Exercise price per share of warrant | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | | — | |
Closing price per share of warrant | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.05 | (2) | | $ | 0.05 | (2) | | $ | 0.05 | (2) | | | — | |
Equity volatility (3) | | | 104 | % | | | 101 | % | | | 101 | % | | | 101 | % | | | — | |
Expected term (years) | | | 1.4 | | | | 6.2 | | | | 7.1 | | | | 7.1 | | | | — | |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | | | 0.3 | % | | | 1.9 | % | | | 2.0 | % | | | 2.0 | % | | | — | |
Dividend yield | | None | | | None | | | None | | | None | | | | — | |
(1) | Represents the net cash settlement value of the warrant as of September 30, 2014, which value was calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes model specified in the warrant agreement. |
(2) | Represents the five-day Company stock VWAP used to calculate the net cash settlement value as of September 30, 2014. |
(3) | Represents the volatility assumption used to calculate the net cash settlement value as of September 30, 2014 based on the terms of the warrant agreement. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded non-operating expense of $44.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, due to a change in the estimated fair values of these warrants. During the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded non-operating expense of $8.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, due to a change in the estimated fair values of these warrants.
(12) | Stock-based Compensation |
The 2010 Stock Incentive and Option Plan (2010 Plan) became effective upon the closing of the Company’s initial public offering. Under the 2010 Plan, stock awards may be granted to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company, in the form of restricted or unrestricted stock, stock appreciation rights, cash-based or performance share awards and stock options. The amounts and terms of options granted are determined by the Company’s compensation committee. The equity awards granted under the Plan generally vest over four years and have terms of up to ten years after the date of grant, and options are exercisable in cash or as otherwise determined by the board of directors. The 2010 Plan allows for the transfer of forfeited shares from the 2004 Plan. As of September 30, 2014, 157,275 shares of common stock were available for future grants under the 2010 Plan.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plans:
| | Number of shares | | | Weighted-average exercise price | | | Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) | | | Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | | | 230,725 | | | $ | 12.28 | | | | 7.5 | | | | |
Granted | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | |
Expired | | | (104 | ) | | $ | 15.95 | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (1,900 | ) | | $ | 16.72 | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 | | | 228,721 | | | $ | 12.25 | | | | 6.7 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2014 | | | 223,130 | | | $ | 12.40 | | | | 6.7 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 | | | 174,323 | | | $ | 14.16 | | | | 6.6 | | | $ | — | |
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for stock options to employees and non-employee directors for each of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0.1 million. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for stock options to employees and non-employee directors for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense, net of forfeitures, related to non-vested employee and non-employee director stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
Restricted Stock
The Company has issued restricted stock as compensation for the services of certain employees and other third parties. The grant date fair value of restricted stock was based on the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant, and compensation expense is recognized ratably as the restrictions lapse.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity under the Plans: |
| | Number of shares | | | Weighted-average grant date fair value | |
Nonvested at December 31, 2013 | | | 54,721 | | | $ | 7.59 | |
Granted | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Vested | | | (19,051 | ) | | $ | 8.28 | |
Forfeited | | | (96 | ) | | $ | 11.96 | |
Nonvested at September 30, 2014 | | | 35,574 | | | $ | 7.19 | |
Total stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock was $36,000 and $35,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock was $122,000 and $116,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years.
(13) | Commitments and Contingencies |
Leases
The Company leases office space and office equipment under operating leases, which expire at various times through February 2016. Excluding the lease liability activity described in Note 7, rent expense under these operating leases was $46,000 and $47,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $124,000 and $128,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The following table summarizes future minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| | | | |
2014 | | $ | 265 | |
2015 | | | 1,079 | |
2016 | | | 277 | |
Total minimum lease payments (1) | | $ | 1,621 | |
| (1) | The future minimum lease payments above do not include the impact of any potential sublease income discussed in Note 7 related to the Company’s lease liability. |
On October 1, 2014, the Company made interest payments to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes and the 2013 Convertible Notes by the issuance of 9,822,017 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,617,448 shares of common stock for nominal consideration to satisfy approximately $0.8 million in interest obligations. The October 1, 2014 issuance of the shares and warrants was dilutive to the holders of the 2013 Warrants, 2013 Celgene Warrants, 2013 Convertible Notes, 2012 Warrants, 2012 Convertible Notes, and 2011 Warrants, and the anti-dilution provisions of each were simultaneously triggered. The conversion price of the 2012 and 2013 Convertible Notes was adjusted to $0.05 per share. The adjustments to the exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants were as follows:
| | Shares exercisable as of October 1, 2014 | | | Weighted-average exercise price | |
| | | | | | |
2013 Warrants | | | 1,109,040,088 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 450,000,000 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
2012 Warrants | | | 792,650,084 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
2011 Warrants | | | 427,210,546 | | | $ | 0.07 | |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements herein or otherwise made in writing or orally by us with regard to our expectations as to financial results and other aspects of our business may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and may be identified by words like “believe,” “expect,” “designed,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seek,” or “anticipate,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: (i) our plans to develop and commercialize our product candidates; (ii) our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical trials; (iii) the timing of and our ability to obtain and maintain marketing approvals for our product candidates; (iv) the rate and degree of market acceptance and clinical utility of our products; (v) our plans to leverage our Organ Regeneration Platform to discover and develop product candidates; (vi) our ability to identify and develop product candidates; (vii) our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategy; (viii) our intellectual property position; (ix) our estimates regarding expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; and (x) other risks and uncertainties in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Item IA of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as in other documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are neither promises nor guarantees. Our business is subject to significant risks and uncertainties and there can be no assurance that our actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations set forth in our forward-looking statements are set forth in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Item IA of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and in Item IA of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as in other documents filed by us with the SEC and include, among others: :(i) we will need to raise additional funds through collaborative arrangements or the issuance of additional equity to execute our business plan beyond 2014, or seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws; (ii) patients enrolled in our clinical trials may experience adverse events related to our product candidates, which could delay our clinical trials or cause us to terminate the development of a product candidate; (iii) we may have difficulty enrolling patients in our clinical trials, including the Phase I clinical trial for our Neo-Kidney Augment and Neo-Urinary Conduit; (iv) we may be unable to progress our product candidates that are undergoing preclinical testing into clinical trials; and (v) we may not be able to reduce the net rental obligation for our Pennsylvania facility prior to the expiration of the existing lease.
The forward-looking statements made in this document are made only as of the date hereof and we do not intend to update any of these factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of our forward-looking statements other than as required under the federal securities laws.
Overview
Tengion, Inc. is a regenerative medicine company focused on discovering, developing, manufacturing and commercializing a range of neo-organs, or products composed of living cells, with or without synthetic or natural materials, implanted or injected into the body to engraft into, regenerate, or replace a damaged tissue or organ. Using our Organ Regeneration Platform, we create these neo-organs using a patient’s own cells, or autologous cells. Our mission is to utilize our Organ Regeneration Platform to: (i) extend the lives of patients suffering from life-threatening diseases; (ii) improve the quality of patients' lives while providing cost-saving treatments; and (iii) create value for our stakeholders.
We believe our proprietary product candidates harness the intrinsic regenerative pathways of the body to regenerate a range of native-like organs and tissues. Our product candidates are intended to delay or eliminate the need for chronic disease therapies, organ transplantation, and the administration of anti-rejection medications. In addition, our neo-organs are designed to replace the need to substitute other tissues of the body for a purpose to which they are poorly suited.
Building on our clinical and preclinical experience, we are utilizing our Organ Regeneration Platform in the conduct of our Neo-Kidney Augment development program for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and our Neo-Urinary Conduit development program for bladder cancer patients who are in need of a urinary diversion. We are working with key opinion leaders on future development plans for our Neo-Urinary Conduit, and will seek to execute a strategic or financial transaction to provide targeted funding for future development of our Neo-Urinary Conduit. In the absence of such funding, we have no current plans to continue independent development of the Neo-Urinary Conduit program.
To date, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the development of our Organ Regeneration Platform and product candidates, as well as to our facilities that we employ to manufacture our neo-organs. Since our inception in July 2003, we have had no revenue from product sales, and have funded our operations principally through the private and public sales of equity securities and debt financings. We have never been profitable and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we advance our product candidates from discovery through preclinical studies and clinical trials and seek marketing approval and eventual commercialization.
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2014 were $5.7 million, representing 59.5% of total assets. Based upon our current expected level of operating expenditures and debt repayment, and assuming we are not required to settle any outstanding warrants in cash or redeem, or pay cash interest on, any of our convertible notes, we expect to be able to fund operations through mid-December 2014. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available or, if available, on terms acceptable to us. Without additional capital, we will not be able to remain in business and will likely need to seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
Financial Operations Overview
Research and Development Expense
Our research and development expense consists of expenses incurred in developing and testing our product candidates and are expensed as incurred. Research and development expense include:
| · | personnel related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and other related expenses including stock-based compensation; |
| · | payments made to third-party contract research organizations for preclinical studies, investigative sites for clinical trials and consultants; |
| · | costs associated with regulatory filings and the advancement of our product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials; |
| · | laboratory and other supplies; |
| · | manufacturing development costs; and |
Preclinical study and clinical trial costs for our product candidates are a significant component of our current research and development expenses. We track and record information regarding external research and development expenses on a per-study basis. Preclinical studies are currently coordinated with third-party contract research organizations and expense is recognized based on the percentage completed by study at the end of each reporting period. Clinical trials are currently coordinated through a number of contracted sites and expense is recognized based on a number of factors, including actual and estimated patient enrollment and visits, direct pass-through costs and other clinical site fees. We utilize internal employees, resources and facilities across multiple product candidates. We do not allocate internal research and development expenses among product candidates.
We are working with key opinion leaders on future development plans for the Neo-Urinary Conduit, and will seek to execute a strategic or financial transaction to provide targeted funding for future development of the Neo-Urinary Conduit. In the absence of such funding, the Company has no current plans to continue independent development of the Neo-Urinary Conduit program.
The following table summarizes our research and development expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | Change | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | Change | |
Third-party direct program expenses: | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | |
Renal | | $ | 833 | | | $ | 169 | | | $ | 564 | | | $ | 1,661 | | | $ | 813 | | | $ | 848 | |
Urologic | | | 181 | | | | 182 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 683 | | | | 410 | | | | 273 | |
Total third-party direct program expenses | | | 1,014 | | | | 351 | | | | 563 | | | | 2,344 | | | | 1,223 | | | | 1,121 | |
Other research and development expense | | | 2,032 | | | | 1,818 | | | | 314 | | | | 5,952 | | | | 5,606 | | | | 346 | |
Total research and development expense | | $ | 3,046 | | | $ | 2,169 | | | $ | 877 | | | $ | 8,296 | | | $ | 6,829 | | | $ | 1,467 | |
We expect that a large percentage of our research and development expense in the future will be incurred in support of our current and future preclinical and clinical development programs. These expenditures are subject to numerous uncertainties in timing and cost to completion. We expect to continue to test our product candidates in preclinical studies for toxicology, safety and efficacy, and to conduct additional clinical trials for each product candidate. If we are not able to engage a partner prior to the commencement of later stage clinical trials, we may fund these trials ourselves. As we obtain results from clinical trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay clinical trials for certain product candidates or programs in order to focus our resources on more promising product candidates or programs. Completion of clinical trials by us or our future collaborators may take several years or more, but the length of time generally varies according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product candidate. The cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during clinical development, including, among others:
| · | the number of sites included in the trials; |
| · | the length of time required to enroll suitable patients; |
| · | the number of patients that participate in the trials; |
| · | the duration of patient follow-up; |
| · | the development stage of the product candidate; and |
| · | the efficacy and safety profile of the product candidate. |
None of our product candidates have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or foreign regulatory marketing approval. In order to grant marketing approval, the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies must conclude that clinical data establishes the safety and efficacy of our product candidates. Furthermore, our strategy includes entering into collaborations with third parties to participate in the development and commercialization of our product candidates. In the event that third parties have control over the clinical trial process for a product candidate, the estimated completion date would largely be under control of that third party rather than under our control. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which of our product candidates will be subject to future collaborations or how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements.
As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our development projects or when and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of an approved product candidate.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make significant judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Management bases these significant judgments and estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to be reasonable based upon information presently available. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies and use of estimates previously disclosed in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
Compensation and related expense | | $ | 1,259 | | | $ | 1,022 | | | $ | 237 | | | $ | 3,594 | | | $ | 2,998 | | | $ | 596 | |
External services – direct third parties | | | 1,014 | | | | 451 | | | | 563 | | | | 2,344 | | | | 1,223 | | | | 1,121 | |
External services – other | | | 71 | | | | 166 | | | | (95 | ) | | | 235 | | | | 588 | | | | (353 | ) |
Research materials and related expense | | | 367 | | | | 221 | | | | 146 | | | | 1,078 | | | | 864 | | | | 214 | |
Facilities and related expense | | | 335 | | | | 309 | | | | 26 | | | | 1,045 | | | | 1,156 | | | | (111 | ) |
Total research and development expense | | $ | 3,046 | | | $ | 2,169 | | | $ | 877 | | | $ | 8,296 | | | $ | 6,829 | | | $ | 1,467 | |
Research and development expense were $3.0 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $8.3 million and $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in research and development expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in compensation and related expenses resulting from additional employees, an increased use of regulatory consultants and an increase in external services related to the clinical trials for the Neo-Kidney Augment program.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
Compensation and related expense | | $ | 517 | | | $ | 541 | | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 1,605 | | | $ | 1,627 | | | $ | (22 | ) |
Professional fees | | | 777 | | | | 652 | | | | 125 | | | | 2,543 | | | | 2,260 | | | | 283 | |
Facilities and related expense | | | 148 | | | | 155 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 512 | | | | 461 | | | | 51 | |
Insurance, travel and other expenses | | | 161 | | | | 172 | | | | (11 | ) | | | 505 | | | | 467 | | | | 38 | |
Total general and administrative expense | | $ | 1,603 | | | $ | 1,520 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 5,165 | | | $ | 4,815 | | | $ | 350 | |
General and administrative expense was $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. General and administrative expense was $5.2 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in legal fees as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in an increase in legal fees and professional fees related to a market assessment of the Neo-Kidney Augment program.
Depreciation Expense. Depreciation expense was $55,000 and $59,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $157,000 and $204,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in depreciation expense is solely due to an increased number of fully depreciated assets in 2013.
Other Expense. Other expense was $149,000 and $156,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $453,000 and $277,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is due to a $0.3 million charge due to a change in assumption of sublease income related to the manufacturing space in our East Norriton, Pennsylvania facility offset by income of $0.1 million related to the sale of Pennsylvania research and development tax credits to a third party buyer which was recorded in the second quarter of 2013.
Interest Income (Expense). Interest income was $1,000 and $19,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $15,000 and $26,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Interest expense was $1.9 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $5.7 million and $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to non-cash interest expense associated with the 2012 Convertible Notes issued in the fourth quarter of 2012 and the 2013 Convertible Notes issued in the second quarter of 2013.
Change in Fair Value of Embedded Derivative and Derivative Liability. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a non-cash charge of $2.9 million and $6.6 million, respectively, on our statements of operations due to a change in the fair value of the derivative liability for the October 2012 Convertible Notes conversion feature and the June 2013 Convertible Notes conversion feature. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a non-cash credit of $53,000 and non-cash charge $4.4 million, respectively, on our statements of operations due to a change in the fair value of the derivative liability for the October 2012 Convertible Notes conversion feature and the call option issued to the holders of the 2012 Convertible Notes.
Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability. Change in the fair value of warrant liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were comprised of the revaluation of the warrant liability as follows (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
2011 Warrants | | $ | 343 | | | $ | 289 | | | $ | 4,091 | | | $ | (623 | ) |
2012 Warrants | | | 3,165 | | | | 268 | | | | 13,574 | | | | 2,980 | |
2013 Warrants | | | 4,008 | | | | 417 | | | | 19,068 | | | | 417 | |
2013 Celgene Warrants | | | 1,618 | | | | 297 | | | | 7,726 | | | | 297 | |
2013 and 2014 Interest Warrants | | | (349 | ) | | | (92 | ) | | | (385 | ) | | | (92 | ) |
Total change in the fair value of warrant liability | | $ | 8,785 | | | $ | 1,179 | | | $ | 44,074 | | | $ | 2,979 | |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a non-operating charge of $8.8 million and $44.1 million, respectively, on our statements of operations due to a change in the fair value of the warrant liability for warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in March 2011, October 2012, June 2013 and the Interest Warrants. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a non-operating charge of $1.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, on our statements of operations due to a change in the fair value of the warrant liability for warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in March 2011 and October 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have incurred losses since our incorporation in 2003 as a result of our significant research and development expenditures and the lack of any approved products to generate product sales. We anticipate that we will continue to incur additional losses until such time that we can generate significant sales of our product candidates currently in development or we enter into cash flow positive business transactions. We have funded our operations principally with proceeds from equity and debt offerings.
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2014 were $5.7 million, representing 59.5% of total assets. Based upon our current expected level of operating expenditures and required debt repayments, and assuming we are not required to settle any outstanding warrants in cash or redeem, or pay cash interest on, any of its convertible notes, we expect to be able to fund operations through mid-December 2014; however, this period could be shortened if there are any unanticipated increases in spending on development programs or other unforeseen events. We plan to raise additional funds through collaborative arrangements, public or private sales of debt or equity securities, commercial loan facilities, the sale of rights (such as option rights) to our programs or to acquire the Company, or some combination thereof. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed to allow the Company to continue its operations or, if available, on terms acceptable to the Company.
In the event financing is not obtained, we would pursue additional headcount reductions and other cost cutting measures to preserve cash as well as explore the sale of selected assets to generate additional funds. If we are required to significantly reduce operating expenses and delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our development programs, these events would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If financing is still not obtained following these events, the Company will not be able to remain in business and will likely need to seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | Nine months ended September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
Statement of Cash Flows Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash (used in) provided by: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | (14,184 | ) | | $ | (12,305 | ) | | $ | (1,879 | ) |
Investing activities | | | (215 | ) | | | 998 | | | | (1,213 | ) |
Financing activities | | | (1,383 | ) | | | 31,250 | | | | (32,633 | ) |
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (15,782 | ) | | $ | 19,943 | | | $ | (35,725 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities increased $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to payments made in the 2014 period related to the clinical trials for the Neo-Kidney Augment program.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities decreased $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the release of the $1.0 million restricted cash in the 2013 period.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities decreased $32.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily due to $32.3 million of net proceeds received from the issuance of 2013 Convertible Notes and in connection with the Celgene Collaboration and Option Agreement and $0.3 million of net proceeds for warrant exercises in the 2013 period.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Company had previously reported a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting with respect to the misapplication of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for the classification of debt financing costs which was described in Item 9A including Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. This material weakness was the result of limited accounting and reporting resources and a lack of accounting expertise related to the initial classification of debt financing costs incurred for convertible debt issuances that included the issuance of derivatives such as warrants and call options. This material weakness did not have an impact on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 as we made the appropriate correcting journal entries. As a result of this material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for significant financing transactions, which was not remediated as of September 30, 2014, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2014.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company has continued to implement remediation steps to address the material weakness discussed above and to improve its internal control over accounting for significant financing transactions. Specifically, the Company has developed supplemental internal control procedures to properly evaluate the accounting implications of significant financing transactions and has identified qualified resources to execute the process and procedural enhancements; however, until such time as qualified internal resources are hired and successful remediation is demonstrated, we will continue to report the material weakness.
The measures described above should remediate the material weakness identified and strengthen our internal controls over the accounting for significant financing transactions. Management is committed to improving the Company’s internal control processes. As the Company continues to evaluate and improve its internal control over accounting for significant financing transactions, additional measures to address the material weakness or modifications to certain of the remediation procedures described above may be identified. The Company expects to complete the required remedial actions during 2014.
Other than as described above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None
If we are unable to raise additional financing by mid-December 2014, we will not be able to remain in business and will likely need to seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
Based upon our current expected level of operating expenditures and required debt repayments, and assuming we are not required to settle any outstanding warrants in cash or redeem, or pay cash interest on, any of our convertible notes, we expect to be able to fund operations through mid-December 2014; however, this period could be shortened if there are any unanticipated increases in planned spending on development programs, general and administrative expenses or other unforeseen events. We intend to pursue additional funds through collaborative arrangements, private sales of debt or equity securities, commercial loan facilities, the sale of rights (such as option rights) to our programs or to acquire the Company, or some combination thereof. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed to allow the Company to continue its operations or, if available, on terms acceptable to us.
In the event financing is not obtained, we would pursue additional headcount reductions and other cost cutting measures to preserve cash as well as explore the sale of selected assets to generate additional funds. If we are required to significantly reduce operating expenses and delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our development programs, these events would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If financing is still not obtained following these events, we will not be able to remain in business and will likely need to seek protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
In the event we seek bankruptcy protection, our creditors would have first claim on the value of our assets which, other than any remaining cash, would most likely be liquidated in a bankruptcy sale. We can give no assurance of the magnitude of the net proceeds of any such sale and whether such proceeds would be sufficient to satisfy our obligations to our creditors, let alone permit any distribution to our equity holders.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None
Item 4. Mine and Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information.
None
(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
31.1 | | |
| | |
31.2 | | |
| | |
32.1 | | |
| | |
32.2 | | |
| | |
101 | | The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Balance Sheets, (ii) Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit, (iii) the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iv) the Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Financial Statements.* |
| | |
| * | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed as part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | TENGION, INC. |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Date: November 14, 2014 | | By: | /s/ John L. Miclot |
| | | | John L. Miclot President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Date: November 14, 2014 | | By: | /s/ A. Brian Davis |
| | | | A. Brian Davis Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| | | | |