Background and Basis of Presentation (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Basis of Consolidation and Presentation | Basis of Consolidation and Presentation These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, in accordance with those rules and regulations, do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate for a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim periods presented herein. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results may vary from these estimates. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Neenah and its subsidiaries included herein are unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
Earnings per Share (“EPS”) | Earnings per Share (“EPS”) The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS (dollars in millions except per share amounts, shares in thousands): Earnings (Loss) Per Basic Common Share Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Income from continuing operations $ 16.4 $ 13.5 $ 57.0 $ 46.0 Amounts attributable to participating securities (0.2 ) (0.2 ) (0.6 ) (0.5 ) Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders 16.2 13.3 56.4 45.5 Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes — (7.4 ) (0.4 ) (6.9 ) Amounts attributable to participating securities — 0.1 — 0.1 Net income available to common stockholders $ 16.2 $ 6.0 $ 56.0 $ 38.7 Weighted-average basic shares outstanding 16,771 16,738 16,774 16,737 Basic earnings (loss) per share Continuing operations $ 0.97 $ 0.79 $ 3.36 $ 2.72 Discontinued operations — (0.43 ) (0.02 ) (0.41 ) $ 0.97 $ 0.36 $ 3.34 $ 2.31 Earnings (Loss) Per Diluted Common Share Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Income from continuing operations $ 16.4 $ 13.5 $ 57.0 $ 46.0 Amounts attributable to participating securities (0.2 ) (0.2 ) (0.6 ) (0.5 ) Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders 16.2 13.3 56.4 45.5 Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes — (7.4 ) (0.4 ) (6.9 ) Amounts attributable to participating securities — 0.1 — 0.1 Net income available to common stockholders $ 16.2 $ 6.0 $ 56.0 $ 38.7 Weighted-average basic shares outstanding 16,771 16,738 16,774 16,737 Add: Assumed incremental shares under stock compensation plans (a) 317 211 294 254 Weighted-average diluted shares 17,088 16,949 17,068 16,991 Diluted earnings (loss) per share Continuing operations $ 0.95 $ 0.78 $ 3.30 $ 2.68 Discontinued operations — (0.43 ) (0.02 ) (0.40 ) $ 0.95 $ 0.35 $ 3.28 $ 2.28 (a) For the three months ended September 30, 2016 , there were no antidilutive options. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 , approximately 90,000 potentially dilutive options were excluded from the computation of dilutive common shares because the exercise price of such options exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , approximately 47,000 and 45,000 potentially dilutive options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of dilutive common shares because the exercise price of such options exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the respective nine month periods during which the options were outstanding. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company measures the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”) which establishes a framework for measuring fair value. ASC Topic 820 provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). As of September 30, 2016 , the Company had $3.5 million in marketable securities classified as “Other Assets” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The cost of such marketable securities was $3.4 million . Fair value for the Company’s marketable securities was estimated from Level 1 inputs. The Company’s marketable securities are designated for the payment of benefits under its supplemental employee retirement plan (“SERP”). As of September 30, 2016 , Neenah Germany had investments of $1.7 million that were restricted to the payment of certain post-retirement employee benefits of which $0.6 million and $1.1 million are classified as “Prepaid and other current assets” and “Other Assets”, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
Accounting Standard Changes | Accounting Standard Changes In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606). This guidance specifies how and when an entity will recognize revenue arising from contracts with customers and requires entities to disclose information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has subsequently issued additional, clarifying standards to address issues arising from implementation of the new revenue recognition standard. The new revenue recognition standard and clarifying standards are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018, and may be adopted earlier, but not before January 1, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the new standards and does not believe there will be a material impact from adoption on its consolidated financial statements. The Company believes it will adopt the new standards using the modified retrospective method as of January 1, 2018. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to current lease accounting. The guidance also eliminates current real estate-specific provisions for all entities. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 modifies the accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies associated with share-based payments and amends the associated cash flow presentation. ASU 2016-09 (i) eliminates the requirement to recognize excess tax benefits in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”), (ii) eliminates the requirement to evaluate tax deficiencies for APIC or income tax expense classification and (iii) provides for these benefits or deficiencies to be recorded as an income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Additionally, the tax benefits related to dividends paid on share-based payment awards will be reflected as an income tax benefit in the income statement. With these changes, tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments will be classified as operating activities as opposed to financing activities, as currently presented. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The company has elected to early adopt the standard in the three month period ended September 30, 2016, effective as if adopted on the first day of the fiscal year, January 1, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, there were no unrecognized deferred tax assets attributable to excess tax benefits. The adoption of the new standard decreased the provision for income taxes and increased income from continuing operations by $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2016. In addition, we recast our previously reported provision for income taxes and increased income from continuing operations by $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the first and second quarter of 2016, respectively. Further, as part of the adoption, the Company elected to account for forfeitures in compensation cost as they occur. The cumulative impact for the change in election was not material. The Company elected to adopt prospectively the classification of tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments in operating cash flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230 or "ASU 2016-15"), a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company does not expect a material impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2016 , no other amendments to the ASC have been issued that will have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |