As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2008
Registration No. 333-117367
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
Pre-Effective Amendment 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13
to
FORM S-11
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Governing Instruments)
326 Third Street
Lakewood, New Jersey 08701
(Address, Including Zip Code and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
David Lichtenstein
c/o The Lightstone Group
326 Third Street
Lakewood, New Jersey 08701
(732) 367-0129
(Name and Address, Including Zip Code and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
With Copies to:
![]() | ![]() | |
Peter M. Fass, Esq. Proskauer Rose LLP 1585 Broadway New York, New York 10036-8299 (212) 969-3000 | Joseph E. Teichman, Esq. c/o The Lightstone Group 326 Third Street Lakewood, New Jersey 08701 (732) 612-1444 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
This Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 consists of the following:
• | Supplement No. 1 dated April 17, 2008 to the Prospectus of the Company dated January 23, 2008, included herewith, which will be delivered as an unattached document along with the Prospectus. |
• | The Registrant’s final form of Prospectus dated January 23, 2008, previously filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) on January 23, 2008 and refiled herewith; |
• | Part II, included herewith. |
• | Signatures, included herewith. |
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 DATED APRIL 17, 2008
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED JANUARY 23, 2008
This prospectus supplement (this “Supplement”) is part of the prospectus of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”), dated January 23, 2008 (the “Prospectus”). This Supplement supplements, modifies or supersedes certain information contained in our Prospectus and must be read in conjunction with our Prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained herein is current as of the filing date of the prospectus supplement in which the Company initially disclosed such information. This Supplement will be delivered with the Prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
STATUS OF THE OFFERING
We commenced our initial public offering of 30,000,000 shares of common stock on May 23, 2005. As of March 31, 2008, we had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of approximately $167.6 from the sale of approximately 17.3 million shares in our initial public offering. Additionally, Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of The Lightstone Group LLC (our “Sponsor”), has contributed $16.8 million to the operating partnership pursuant to the arrangement described in the “Compensation Table” and “Capital Resources” sections of our Prospectus. After allowing for the payment of approximately $13.4 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and $3.4 million in other organization and offering expenses, as of March 31, 2008, we had raised aggregate net offering proceeds of approximately $167.6 million.
EXTENSION OF THE OFFERING PERIOD
Our Board of Directors has authorized the further extension of the termination date of this offering from April 22, 2008 to December 1, 2008. Accordingly, all references in the Prospectus to the termination of the offering indicating that the offering will terminate on or before April 22, 2008 are revised to state that “the offering will terminate on the earlier of achieving our maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares sold or December 1, 2008.”
SHARES CURRENTLY OUTSTANDING
Page 11 of the Prospectus captioned “Shares Currently Outstanding” is replaced in its entirety by the following:
As of March 31, 2008, there were approximately 17.3 million shares of our common stock outstanding. The number of shares of our common stock outstanding prior to this date does not include shares issuable upon exercise of options which have been or may be granted under our stock option plan.
1
SPECIFIED INVESTMENTS
Florida Factory Outlet Mall
As previously disclosed in the Prospectus, we plan to renovate and expand the Belz Outlet mall in St. Augustine, Florida. We also disclosed that numerous established retail brands have expressed interest in establishing a presence in the expanded and renovated outlet mall. To update the status of our expansion, renovations and tenants, the penultimate paragraph in the section of the Prospectus captioned “Specified Investments — Florida Factory Outlet Mall” is replaced in its entirety by the following:
On October 2, 2007, the REIT closed on the acquisition of an 8.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land for $2.75 million, for further development of the adjacent Belz Outlet mall. Development rights to the land parcel were purchased at an additional cost of $1.3 million. We have started the construction of the expansion which will add approximately 90,000 square feet to the existing center. Upon completion of the expansion and renovation to the existing property, the center’s gross leaseable area will approximate 343,000 square feet. The cost for the renovation and expansion of the outlet mall is expected to approximate $35.2 million. Numerous established retail brands have executed lease agreements and will occupy the expanded and renovated outlet mall, including Saks 5th Avenue, Ann Taylor, Juicy Couture, Kate Spade, Lucky Brand Jeans, Papaya Clothing and BCBG Max Azaria. These tenants will occupy approximately 53,000 square feet. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these tenants.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space(1) | Annual Gross Rent Payments | Lease Term (In Yrs) | Tenant Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Saks 5th Avenue | Department store | 28,000 | 8.16 | % | $ | 479,920.00 | 15.0 | 3 – 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
Ann Taylor Loft | Clothing retailer | 6,500 | 1.90 | % | $ | 202,280.00 | 10.0 | 2 – 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
Juicy Couture(2) | Clothing retailer | 2,500 | 0.73 | % | $ | 78,100.00 | 10.0 | 1 – 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
Kate Spade(2) | Handbag and accessories retailer | 1,977 | 0.58 | % | $ | 61,761.48 | 10.0 | 1 – 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
Lucky Brand Jeans(3) | Clothing retailer | 3,000 | 0.87 | % | $ | 61,500.00 | 0.8 | 4 – 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
Papaya Clothing | Clothing retailer | 6,085 | 1.77 | % | $ | 192,894.50 | 10.0 | None | ||||||||||||||||
BCBG Max Azaria | Clothing retailer | 4,500 | 1.31 | % | $ | 150,210.00 | 10.0 | None | ||||||||||||||||
52,562 | 15.33 | % | $ | 1,226,665.98 |
(1) | Based on post-construction leasable area of 342,964 square feet |
(2) | Assumes tenant’s sales are greater than $400 per square foot |
(3) | Tenant will occupy part of the space currently occupied by Liz Claiborne |
2
RISK FACTORS
The risk factor captioned “The current debt market volatility may affect the availability and amount of financing for our acquisitions” on page 41 of the Prospectus is replaced in its entirety by the following:
Current state of debt markets could have a material adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition. The commercial real estate debt markets are currently experiencing volatility as a result of certain factors including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities in the market. Credit spreads for major sources of capital have widened significantly as investors have demanded a higher risk premium. This is resulting in lenders increasing the cost for debt financing. Should the overall cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to factor such increases into the economics of our acquisitions. This may result in our acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing cash flow available for distribution.
The recent dislocations in the debt markets has reduced the amount of capital that is available to finance real estate, which, in turn, (a) will no longer allow real estate investors to rely on capitalization rate compression to generate returns and (b) has slowed real estate transaction activity, all of which may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition and operations of real properties and mortgage loans. Investors will need to focus on market-specific growth dynamics, operating performance, asset management and the long-term quality of the underlying real estate.
In addition, the state of the debt markets could have an impact on the overall amount of capital investing in real estate which may result in price or value decreases of real estate assets.
USE OF PROCEEDS
The following information replaces the sections of our Prospectus captioned “Estimated Use of Proceeds” on page 5 of the Prospectus and “ESTIMATED USE OF PROCEEDS” on page 68 of the Prospectus.
The proceeds from this offering will be used in connection with the purchase of real estate. The amounts listed in the table below represent our current estimates concerning the use of the offering proceeds. Since these are estimates, they may not accurately reflect the actual receipt or application of the offering proceeds. This first scenario indicates approximate actual proceeds as of December 31, 2007, and the second scenario assumes that we sell the maximum of 30,000,000 shares in this offering at $10 per share. Under the second scenario, we have not given effect to the following:
• | any special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions; or |
• | the sale of the maximum of 4,000,000 shares of common stock in our distribution reinvestment program at $9.50 per share. |
3
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Dollar Amount as of December 31, 2007 | Percent | Maximum Dollar Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Gross offering proceeds | $ | 131,500,000 | 100.0 | % | $ | 300,000,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Less Offering Expenses:(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fee(2) | $ | 9,468,297 | 7.2 | % | 24,000,000 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Organization and other offering costs(3) | $ | 3,706,724 | 2.8 | % | 6,000,000 | 2 | % | |||||||||
Amount available for investment(4) | 118,324,979 | 90.0 | % | 270,000,000 | 90 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition fees(5) | 9,323,888 | 7.1 | % | 8,250,000 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition expenses(6) | 635,848 | 0.5 | % | 3,000,000 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Initial working capital reserves | — | — | 1,500,000 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||
Total offering of proceeds available for investment | 108,365,243 | 82.4 | % | 257,250,000 | 85.7 | % | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of interests to Sponsor(1) | 12,953,936 | — | 30,000,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Total proceeds available for investment | $ | 121,319,179 | — | $ | 287,250,000 | — |
(1) | All dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses in an aggregate amount of up to $30,000,000 will be paid using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. In consideration for its agreement to purchase the special general partner interests of our operating partnership, at a cost of $100,000 per unit, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, Lightstone SLP, LLC will be entitled to a portion of any regular distributions made by the operating partnership, but only after our stockholders receive a stated preferred return. To the extent that dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses exceed $30,000,000, Lightstone SLP, LLC will pay such fees, commissions and expenses directly and shall not receive any special general partner interests in connection with such payments. |
(2) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $24,000,000 of selling commissions and dealer manager fees using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. This includes selling commissions generally equal to 7% of aggregate gross offering proceeds and a dealer manager fee of up to 1% of aggregate gross offering proceeds, both of which are payable to Lightstone Securities, our affiliate. See “Plan of Distribution — Volume Discounts” for a description of volume discounts. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, intends to reallow selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds to unaffiliated broker-dealers participating in this offering attributable to the amount of shares sold by them. In addition, Lightstone Securities may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee to participating dealers in the aggregate amount of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating dealers as marketing fees, based upon such factors as the volume of sales of such participating dealers, the level of marketing support provided by such participating dealers and the assistance of such participating dealers in marketing the offering, or to reimburse representatives of such participating dealers for the costs and expenses of attending our educational conferences and seminars. The amount of selling commissions may often be reduced under certain circumstances for volume discounts. See the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus for a description of such provisions. |
(3) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $6,000,000 of organization and other offering costs using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. Organization costs consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, including, but not limited to, salaries and direct expenses incurred by our advisor while engaged in registering the shares, other organization costs, technology costs and expenses attributable to the offering, and the costs and payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. Our advisor will be responsible for the payment of such organization costs and we will reimburse our advisor for such costs to the extent that the total organization and offering expenses, including selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and all other underwriting compensation, does not exceed |
4
10% of the gross offering proceeds from our offering. Any costs in excess of this amount will be paid exclusively by our advisor without recourse against or reimbursement by us. We currently estimate that approximately $6,000,000 of organization costs, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will be incurred if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. |
(4) | Until required in connection with the acquisition and development of properties, substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering and, thereafter, the working capital reserves of the Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., may be invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments including government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts or other authorized investments as determined by our board of directors. |
(5) | Acquisition and advisory fees do not include acquisition expenses. Acquisition fees exclude any construction fee paid to a person who is not our affiliate in connection with construction of a project after our acquisition of the property. Although we assume that all the foregoing fees will be paid by the sellers of property, sellers generally fix the selling price at a level sufficient to cover the cost of any acquisition fee so that, in effect, we, as purchaser, will bear such fee as part of the purchase price. The “Maximum Dollar Amount” presentation in the table is based on the assumption that we will not borrow any money to purchase properties. If we borrow money, the Maximum Dollar Amount for our acquisition fees could increase to $33,000,000, or 11.5%, and our acquisition expenses could increase to $12,000,000, or 4%. Accordingly, the total proceeds available for investment would decrease to $253,500,000. |
(6) | Acquisition expenses include legal fees and expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of appraisals, nonrefundable option payments on property not acquired, accounting fees and expenses, title insurance premiums and other closing costs and miscellaneous expenses relating to the selection, acquisition and development of real estate properties, whether or not acquired. Costs related to the origination of loans for the purchase or refinancing of a property are excluded from this amount. We will reimburse our advisor for acquisition expenses up to a maximum amount which, collectively with all acquisitions fees and expenses, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the gross contract price. |
PRIOR PERFORMANCE OF AFFILIATES OF OUR SPONSOR
Prior Performance Summary
The following paragraphs contain information on prior programs sponsored by its owner, David Lichtenstein (“Sponsor” or “The Lightstone Group”), to invest in real estate. This discussion includes a narrative summary of our Sponsor’s experience in the last ten years for (i) all programs sponsored by him, all of which have been nonpublic, that have invested in real estate regardless of the investment objectives of the program and (ii) its investments for its own account. The information set forth is current as of December 31, 2007, except where a different date is specified.
For purposes of this summary and the tables included in this Prospectus, we have divided the information into two separate sections. One section deals with the investment performance of our Sponsor, investing for its own account. These investments are referred to as “Non-Program Properties”. The other section deals with the eighteen private real estate investment programs sponsored by our Sponsor and its affiliates which raised funds from outside investors during the 10 years ended December 31, 2007. These investments are referred to as “Program Properties.”
The information contained herein is included solely to provide prospective investors with background to be used to evaluate the real estate experience of our Sponsor and its affiliates. The information summarized below is set forth in greater detail in the Prior Performance Tables for Program and Non-Program Properties included in this Prospectus. Investors should direct their attention to the Prior Performance Tables for Program and Non-Program Properties for further information regarding the prior performance of the Sponsor and its affiliates. In addition, as part of its Registration Statement, we have filed certain tables with the Securities and Exchange Commission which report more detailed information regarding Program Property acquisitions by prior programs. Investors can obtain copies of such tables, without charge, by requesting Table VI from Part II of this registration statement from us.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS SECTION AND THE TABLES REFERENCED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATIVE OF HOW WE WILL PERFORM. THIS DISCUSSION REFERS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF PRIOR PROGRAMS SPONSORED BY OUR SPONSOR OR ITS AFFILIATES OVER THE PERIODS LISTED THEREIN. IN ADDITION, THE TABLES INCLUDED WITH THIS
5
PROSPECTUS (WHICH REFLECT RESULTS OVER THE PERIODS SPECIFIED IN EACH TABLE) DO NOT MEAN THAT WE WILL MAKE INVESTMENTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN SUCH TABLES. IF YOU PURCHASE SHARES IN LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC., YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN ANY OF THE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS DESCRIBED IN THE TABLES (UNLESS YOU ARE ALSO AN INVESTOR IN THOSE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS).
Our Sponsor
Our Sponsor does business as The Lightstone Group and wholly owns the limited liability company of that name, and is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today. Our sponsor is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today, with a portfolio of over 22,000 residential units, 700 extended stay hotels and approximately 25,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 27 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Based in New York, and supported by regional offices in New Jersey, Illinois, South Carolina and Maryland, our Sponsor employs approximately 14,000 staff and professionals.
Our Sponsor and its affiliates have acquired over 190 projects including numerous properties and portfolios from major national public and privately-held real estate companies such as Home Properties (NYSE:HME), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR), Liberty Property Trust (NYSE:LRY), The Rouse Company (NYSE:RSE), Prime Retail Inc. (NASDAQ:PMRE), Prime Group Realty Trust (NYSE:PGE), F & W Management Company, United Dominion Realty Trust (NYSE:UDR), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI), Archon Group, an affiliate of Polaris Capital, and The Blackstone Group.
During the past ten years, our Sponsor has invested in numerous real estate properties. Generally, our Sponsor acquired such properties for its own account. Such personal account investment returns have consistently, on average, produced higher returns than the leading real estate indices. (These personal account investments are referred to as “Non-Program Properties”.) Additionally, our Sponsor also purchased certain real estate properties through 18 private programs in which it raised funds from outside investors during the last ten years. (Since outside investors are included, these are referred to as “Program Properties”.)
Non-Program Properties
The following is a summary of the investment performance of our Sponsor. It represents the results of investments made for its own account (“Non-Program Properties”) since 2003. Mr. Lichtenstein has been in the real estate business since 1985 and has been operating independently since 1995. Prior to that date, Mr. Lichtenstein operated in an organization that was controlled by a group over which he did not have operational control. This information is presented to show our Sponsor’s experience investing in Non-Program Properties. For all Non-Program Properties, our Sponsor has operational control, including making all material property decisions.
The following definitions are applicable to the Non-Program Properties summaries below:
“Acquisition Costs” include a Non-Program Properties total purchase price including closing costs (e.g., legal fees and expenses, appraisals, accounting fees, due diligence expenses, title insurance and similar and related costs).
“Cumulative Capital Advanced” is the total cash capital contributed or loans advanced to the owning entities by our Sponsor and its affiliates.
“Cumulative Cash Distributions” is the aggregate amount of cash distributed by the owning entities from operating cash flow and sale and refinancing to our Sponsor and its affiliates.
These Non-Program Properties have similar investment objectives as the REIT, capital appreciation with a secondary objective of income. The Non-Program Properties differ from those of the REIT in that: (i) a substantial portion of our Sponsor’s returns have come from refinancing proceeds; (ii) our Sponsor utilizes more leverage than the REIT is permitted to use; (iii) the Non-Program Properties owning entities generally do not pay any Acquisition Fees, Asset Management Fees or other fees to our Sponsor which the REIT does
6
pay; and (iv) the Non-Program Properties owning entities operational documents generally do not contain the prohibitions of self-dealing activities and the operational and investment limitations that are applicable to the REIT. YOU SHOULD NOT CONSTRUE INCLUSION OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IMPLYING IN ANY MANNER THAT WE WILL HAVE RESULTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN THE INFORMATION BELOW BECAUSE THE YIELD AND CASH AVAILABLE AND OTHER FACTORS COULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT IN OUR PROPERTIES.
At December 31, 2007, the aggregate acquisition cost of the Non-Program Properties owned is approximately $1.9 billion. Such cost is the actual total acquisition costs of the Non-Program Properties and does not represent the current fair market value of such properties. The Cumulative Capital Advanced in the Non-Program Properties is approximately $295.7 million with no capital advanced in such properties (after taking into account all cash distributions through December 31, 2007 from operating cash flow, sale proceeds and refinancing proceeds, which aggregate approximately $314.1 million). We believe, based on appraisals and other valuations, that the value of the equity in these Non-Program Properties as of December 31, 2007 is substantially in excess of the Cumulative Capital Advanced.
For the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007, the Non-Program Properties owned by our Sponsor made aggregate cash distributions to our Sponsor from operations, sales and refinancing proceeds of approximately $314.1 million. Information on such Non-Program Properties owned is set forth in the table below.
7
During the period 2005 through 2007, our Sponsor sold one multi-family Non-Program Property and 6 commercial Non-Program Properties (which were part of larger portfolios which our Sponsor still owns). Information on such Non-Program Sold Properties is set forth in the table below.
Aggregate Cash Distributions from Non-Program Properties
for the Period January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2007
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Non-Program Real Estate Properties Owned | 56 | 61 | 76 | 100 | 129 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative Acquisition Costs to date(1) | $ | 263,702,089 | $ | 263,702,089 | $ | 1,332,727,089 | $ | 1,640,447,392 | $ | 1,901,263,338 | ||||||||||
Cumulative Capital Advanced as of the end of the period(2) | $ | 35,251,434 | $ | 37,201,786 | $ | 247,598,614 | $ | 270,952,381 | $ | 295,316,428 | ||||||||||
Cumulative Cash Distributions as of the end of the period(3) | $ | 44,356,005 | $ | 55,585,489 | $ | 150,812,489 | $ | 303,098,044 | $ | 314,054,088 | ||||||||||
Total Acquisition Costs during the period | $ | 10,991,619 | $ | — | $ | 1,069,025,000 | $ | 307,720,303 | $ | 260,815,946 | ||||||||||
Original Mortgage | $ | 7,928,714 | $ | — | $ | 865,393,953 | $ | 286,573,360 | $ | 237,550,000 | ||||||||||
Cash down Payment | $ | 3,062,904 | $ | 203,631,047 | $ | 21,146,943 | $ | 23,265,946 | ||||||||||||
Capital Invested during the period | $ | 4,370,745 | $ | 1,950,353 | $ | 210,396,827 | $ | 23,353,767 | $ | 24,364,047 | ||||||||||
Total Cash distributions during the period | $ | 8,006,044 | $ | 11,229,484 | $ | 95,227,001 | $ | 152,285,555 | $ | 10,956,043 | ||||||||||
From operating cash flow | $ | 3,385,682 | $ | 3,414,127 | $ | 1,981,368 | $ | 4,470,024 | $ | 7,968,543 | ||||||||||
From sales | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 67,476,682 | $ | — | ||||||||||
From refinancing | $ | 4,620,362 | $ | 7,815,357 | $ | 93,245,633 | $ | 80,338,849 | $ | 2,987,500 | ||||||||||
Non Program Debt at December 31, | $ | 472,907,843 | $ | 547,819,174 | $ | 1,280,058,727 | $ | 1,737,270,977 | $ | 2,080,651,294 |
(1) | Costs for all years include Acquisition costs in the amount of 83.7 million which were for the properties sold shown in the following table – Non-Program Properties Sales for 2005-2007. |
(2) | Cumulative Capital Advanced as of 12/31/07, included $10.4 million of capital contributed for the properties sold shown in the following table – Non-Program Properties Sales for 2005-2007. |
(3) | Cumulative Capital Distributed as of 12/31/07 included $83.1 million of capital distributed for the properties sold shown in the following table – Non-Program Properties Sales for 2005-2007. |
8
Non-Program Properties Sales for 2005 to 2007
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Property | Six Properties from the Original Acadia Portfolio(1) | Fairfield Towers | ||||||
Date Acquired | Dec-02 | Feb-99 | ||||||
Date Sold | Dec-06 | Jul-06 | ||||||
Total costs of properties, including closing and soft costs | $ | 11,782,027 | $ | 31,000,000 | ||||
Original Mortgage Financing | $ | 11,569,200 | $ | 28,500,000 | ||||
Total Cumulative Capital Advanced during period owned | $ | 212,827 | $ | 2,179,011 | ||||
Total Selling Price, Net of Closing Costs | $ | 15,499,465 | $ | 78,696,008 | ||||
Mortgage Balance at time of Sale(2) | $ | 11,261,367 | $ | 23,665,110 | ||||
Total Cumulative Cash Distributions during period owned from operations | $ | 1,166,892 | $ | 2,484,057 | ||||
Total Cumulative Cash Distributions during period owned from refinancings | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Cash received Net of Closing Costs | $ | 4,238,098 | $ | 51,977,217 | ||||
Total cash distributions | $ | 5,404,990 | $ | 54,461,274 |
(1) | The Acadia Portfolio was purchased as a portfolio and treated as a portfolio purchase with no individual allocations to properties. |
(2) | In contemplation of the sale of properties from the Acadia portfolio, the entire portfolio of 17 properties was refinanced in December 2005. The mortgage balance represents the amount that was paid off as part of the portfolio refinancing. The actual sale occurred in 2006. |
Narrative Summary of Acquisitions of Non-Program Properties for the period 1998 through 2007
In 1998, our Sponsor acquired Towne Oaks, a 99 unit residential property located in Boundbrook, New Jersey, Liberty Gardens, a 232 unit residential property located in Bergenfield, New Jersey (sold in 2004), Plaza Village, a 114 unit residential property located in Morrisville, Pennsylvania and Lakewood Mazal, a 26 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey. During the same year our Sponsor also acquired 150 Grand Street, a 84,770 square foot office property located in White Plains, New York and Matawan Mall, a 20,585 square foot retail property located in Matawan, New Jersey.
In 1999, our Sponsor acquired 801 Madison, a 46 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey, Fairfield Towers, a 983 unit residential property located in Brooklyn, New York (sold in 2006), Pinewood Chase, a 492 unit residential property located in Suitland, Maryland, and Reisterstown Square, a 493 unit residential property located in Baltimore, Maryland. It also acquired Burrstone and Midtown, each of which are 100 unit residential properties located in New York.
In 2000, our Sponsor acquired two industrial properties containing 263,979 square feet located in Maryland and a portfolio of four shopping centers containing 379,686 square feet, located in Connecticut and Massachusetts. In addition, our Sponsor acquired 15 residential properties located in central New Jersey which consisted of 3,334 units.
In 2001, our Sponsor acquired Belford Towers, a 467 unit residential property located in Takoma Park, Maryland. In addition, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of over 730,000 square feet of office properties in Pennsylvania and Florida.
In 2002, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of 17 shopping centers (6 centers were sold in 2006) located in the Eastern U.S. containing approximately 2,300,000 square feet and Lakewood Plaza, a 98 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey.
In 2003, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of 19 apartment buildings in Virginia containing 1,808 units. Finally, it acquired a six-building high-tech industrial complex, containing approximately 375,000 square feet, located in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico, and three shopping centers containing approximately 193,000 square feet, located in New Jersey.
9
In 2005, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of two full price malls of over 1.1 million square feet of retail space located in Macon, Georgia and Burlington, North Carolina. In addition, our Sponsor acquired 101,000 square feet of retail space located in Egg Harbor, New Jersey. Finally, our Sponsor acquired 11 office buildings totaling 4.6 million square feet, a 120,000-square-foot industrial property, and 9.3 acres of developable land, in addition to three joint venture interests in office properties totaling 2.8 million square feet, all located primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area.
In 2006, our Sponsor acquired fifteen residential properties in three private programs in Detroit, Michigan which consisted of over 4,000 units.
In 2007, our Sponsor acquired eighteen industrial, office and flex use properties in the gulf coast area in two private programs containing over 1.4 million square feet. Our Sponsor also acquired land and associated ground leases for 17 hotel properties in 2007, which included over 70,000 available rooms.
Program Properties
Generally our Sponsor acquired properties for its own account and neither our Sponsor nor its affiliates have operated any public programs. As of December 31, 2007, our Sponsor and its affiliates have raised approximately $782.0 million in 18 private programs that have acquired interests in Program Properties with an aggregate investment in excess of $9.4 billion. Our Sponsor has financed these programs with institutional first mortgages. The cumulative capital advanced or contributed for Program Properties (both investors and our Sponsor) was 782.0 at December 31, 2007; $147.3 million at December 31, 2006; $116.8 million at December 31, 2005; $72.6 million at December 31, 2004; $63.9 million at December 31, 2003; and $27.0 million at December 31, 2002. These Program Properties are located throughout the United States. 87.2% of the Program Properties acquired are hospitality, 11.2% of the Program Properties acquired are retail, 1.1% of the Program Properties acquired are residential and .5% of the Program Properties acquired are office and industrial. None of the Program Properties included in such figures were newly constructed, and only one of them has been sold. Each of these programs is similar to our program because they invested in the same property types, (i.e., retail, residential, industrial and office). We believe, based on appraisals and other valuations, that the value of the equity in these Program Properties as of December 31, 2007 is substantially in excess of the cumulative capital advanced or contributed.
Narrative Summary of Program Properties for the period 2005 through 2007
In 2005, our Sponsor acquired two retail outlet properties located in Orlando, Florida, and one regional mall located in Minot, North Dakota, totaling approximately 1.3 million square feet of retail space. In addition, our Sponsor acquired four industrial properties, two located in New Jersey, one in Pennsylvania and one in Maryland totaling approximately 253,000 square feet. Our Sponsor has financed these programs with institutional first mortgages.
In 2006, our Sponsor acquired one retail outlet property located in Williamsburg, Virginia which totaled 65,000 square feet of retail space. Our Sponsor is currently expanding and renovating and developing this space and our Sponsor has financed these programs with a construction loan.
In 2007, our Sponsor acquired 684 hotels located in various locations in the United States and Canada and one office building located in Charleston, South Carolina. Our Sponsor has financed these programs with institutional first mortgages, mezzanine debt, assumed subordinated debt and assumed capital lease obligations.
Adverse Business Developments
The Program Properties and Non-Program Properties sponsored by The Lightstone Group and its affiliates have met and continue to meet their principal investment objectives. Over time some of these programs have acquired troubled properties or mortgage bonds or loans; however, none of the troubled properties or mortgage bonds or loans have prevented the programs from meeting their objectives.
Additional Information on Programs
We will provide, upon request, for no fee, a copy of the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the previous 24 months by any prior public program sponsored by our sponsor or any of its affiliates to the extent the same are required to be filed. We will also
10
provide, upon request, for a reasonable fee, the exhibits to each such Form 10-K. A request for an Annual Report on Form 10-K should be addressed to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., 326 Third Street, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701, Attention: Investor Relations.
Undertakings
Potential investors are encouraged to examine the and Program Properties Prior Performance Tables included in this prospectus and the Non-Program Properties narrative for more detailed information regarding the prior experience of The Lightstone Group and its affiliates with respect to such Non-Program Properties and Program Properties. Table VI is not a part of this prospectus and is contained in Part II of the registration statement of which it is a part.
Dividends Declared by the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has declared dividends for the periods listed below, payable to shareholders of record at the close of business each day during the applicable period:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Period | Annualized Rate Declared(1) | Date Paid / Payable | ||||||
February 1, 2006 – March 31, 2006 | 7 | % | April 2006 | |||||
April 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006 | 7 | % | July 2006 | |||||
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006 | 7 | % | October 2006 | |||||
October 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006 | 7 | % | January 2007 | |||||
January 1, 2007 – March 31, 2007 | 7 | % | April 2007 | |||||
April 1, 2007 – June 30, 2007 | 7 | % | July 2007 | |||||
July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 | 7 | % | October 2006 | |||||
October 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007 | 7 | % | January 2008 | |||||
January 1, 2008 – March 31, 2008 | 7 | % | April 2008 |
(1) | Dividends were declared in an amount of $0.0019178 per share per day. The annualized rate declared represents the annualized rate of return on an investment of $10.00 per share attributable to these daily amounts, if paid for each day for a 365 day period. |
11
CAPITALIZATION
The following replaces the table in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Capitalization” on page 124 of the Prospectus.
The following table sets forth our historical capitalization as of December 31, 2007, and our pro forma capitalization as of that date as adjusted to give effect to the sale of the maximum offering as if 30,000,000 shares were sold, and the application of the estimated net proceeds from such sales as described in “Estimated Use of Proceeds.” The information set forth in the following table excludes our historical results of operations and the financial impact of accounting for offering costs, and should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
December 31, 2007 Historical | Maximum Offering | |||||||
Minority Interest in Partnership | $ | 12,954,715 | $ | 2,000 | (1) | |||
Stockholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 authorized, none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 authorized, 13,606,608 shares issued and outstanding (historical only) | 136,066 | 300,000 | (2) | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 120,297,590 | 299,700,000 | ||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (1,199,278 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated distributions in addition to net loss | (19,122,180 | ) | — | |||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 100,112,198 | 300,000,000 | ||||||
Total capitalization | $ | 113,066,913 | $ | 300,002,000 |
(1) | Excludes any future issuance of limited partnership units by the operating partnership in exchange for cash or property. In addition, does not include the special general partner interests issued to Lightstone SLP, LLC at a cost of $100,000 per unit, the proceeds of which will be used to pay all dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses. |
(2) | We are authorized to issue 60,000,000 shares of common stock of which 13,600,000 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007. Does not include 200 shares of common stock reserved for issuance on exchange of 200 outstanding limited partnership units of the operating partnership, up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock available pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan or 75,000 shares of common stock that are reserved for issuance under our stock option plan. |
OTHER REVISIONS
(1) | The following information replaces the portion of the cover page that follows the bulleted risk factors and precedes the footnotes at the bottom of such cover page: |
This offering will end on the earlier of December 1, 2008 or the date we achieve the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares.
(2) | The following replaces (a) the first paragraph on page 1 of the Prospectus in the section captioned “Prospectus Summary — Our Sponsor, Promoters, Advsor, Dealer Manager, Property Manager and Operating Partnership” and (b) the first three sentences of the second paragraph on Page 50 of the Prospectus in the section captioned “How We Operate”. |
Our sponsor, David Lichtenstein, who does business as The Lightstone Group and wholly owns the limited liability company of that name, is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today. Our sponsor is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today, with a portfolio of over 22,000 residential units, 700 extended stay hotels and approximately 25,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 27 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Based in New York, and supported by regional offices in New Jersey, Illinois, South Carolina and Maryland, our sponsor employees approximately 14,000 staff and professionals.
12
(3) | The following suitability standards replace the suitability standards for residents of the states of Arizona, California, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas on the second page of the Registration Statement: |
The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $70,000 and an annual gross income of at least $70,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $250,000.
(4) | The second page of the Registration Statement is supplemented with the following suitability standards for residents of the states of Oregon, Pennsylvania and Washington: |
Standards for investors from Oregon, Pennsylvania and Washington
The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $70,000 and an annual gross income of at least $70,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $250,000.
(5) | Effective on April 15, 2008, Joshua Kornberg was terminated from the positions of our Vice President of Acquisitions and Senior Vice President and Director of Acquisitions of our Advisor. The references to Joshua Kornberg on pages 77, 78 and 81 of the prospectus shall be deleted. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
All of the following selected consolidated and combined financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” 126 of our Prospectus.
The following selected consolidated and combined financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004(1) | |||||||||||||
Operating Data: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 25,259,655 | $ | 8,262,667 | — | — | ||||||||||
Loss from investment in unconsolidated Joint Venture | (7,267,949 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Net loss before loss allocated to minority interest | (9,242,416 | ) | (1,536,430 | ) | (117,571 ) | — | ||||||||||
Loss allocated to minority interest | 26 | 86 | 1,164 | — | ||||||||||||
Net loss applicable to common shares | (9,242,390 | ) | (1,536,344 | ) | (116,407 ) | — | ||||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share | (0.98 ) | (0.96 ) | (5.82 ) | — | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared per common share | 7,125,331 | 1,101,708 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted | 9,195,369 | 1,594,060 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 369,701,354 | $ | 140,708,217 | $ | 430,996 | $ | 205,489 | ||||||||
Long-term obligations | $ | 243,435,657 | $ | 95,475,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Stockholder’s Equity | $ | 100,112,198 | $ | 35,975,704 | $ | 83,593 | $ | 200,000 |
(1) | For the period from June 8, 2004 (date of inception) through December 31, 2004 for operating data, and as of December 31, 2004 for balance sheet data. |
13
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Lightstone REIT” or “Company”) intends to acquire and operate commercial, residential and hospitality properties, principally in the United States. Principally through the Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LP, (the “Operating Partnership”), Our acquisitions may include both portfolios and individual properties. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes. We intend to acquire fee interests in multi-tenanted, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers, and in malls located in highly trafficked retail corridors, high-barrier to entry markets, and sub- markets with constraints on the amount of additional property supply. Additionally, we seek to acquire mid-scale, extended stay lodging properties and multi-tenanted industrial properties located near major transportation arteries and distribution corridors; multi-tenanted office properties located near major transportation arteries; and market-rate, middle market multifamily properties at a discount to replacement cost. We do not intend to invest in single family residential properties; leisure home sites; farms; ranches; timberlands; unimproved properties not intended to be developed; or mining properties.
Investments in real estate will be made through the purchase of all or part of a fee simple ownership, or all or part of a leasehold interest. We may also purchase limited partnership interests, limited liability company interests and other equity securities. We may also enter into joint ventures with affiliated entities for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties as well as general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of developing, owning and operating real properties. We will not enter into a joint venture to make an investment that we would not be permitted to make on our own. Not more than 10% of our total assets will be invested in unimproved real property. For purposes of this paragraph, “unimproved real properties” does not include properties acquired for the purpose of producing rental or other operating income, properties under construction and properties for which development or construction is planned within one year. Additionally, we will not invest in contracts for the sale of real estate unless in recordable form and appropriately recorded. As of December 31, 2007, Lightstone REIT has completed nine acquisitions as of December 31, 2007: the Belz Factory Outlet World, a retail outlet shopping mall in St. Augustine, Florida, on March 31, 2006; four multi-family communities in Southeast Michigan on June 29, 2006; the Oakview Plaza, a retail shopping mall located in Omaha, Nebraska, on December 21, 2006; a 49% equity interest in a joint venture, formed to purchase a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building in New York, NY, on January 4, 2007; a portfolio of 12 industrial and 2 office buildings in Louisiana and Texas, on February 1, 2007; and a land parcel in Lake Jackson, TX, intended for immediate development as a power retail center, on June 29, 2007, two hotels in Houston, Texas on October 17, 2007, five multi family apartment communities, one in Tampa, Florida, two in Greensboro, North Carolina and two in Charlotte, North Carolina on November 16, 2007, and an industrial building in Sarasota, Florida on November 13, 2007.
Although we are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations, we intend to invest in properties located near the existing operations of our Sponsor, in order to achieve economies of scale where possible. Our Sponsor currently maintains operations throughout the United States (Hawaii, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming excluded), the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada.
We have and will continue to utilize leverage in acquiring our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. Aggregate long-term permanent borrowings in excess of 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties, currently exceeds 75% and was appropriately approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders.
14
We may finance our property acquisitions through a variety of means, including but not limited to individual non-recourse mortgages and through the exchange of an interest in the property for limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership. At December 31, 2006, we qualified as a REIT and have elected to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 and 2006. We plan to own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through the Operating Partnership. The Company has assessed it qualified as a REIT for the year ended December 31, 2007.
We do not have employees. We entered into an advisory agreement dated April 22, 2005 with Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which we refer to as the “Advisor,” pursuant to which the Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects our real estate and real estate related investments, subject to oversight by our board of directors. We pay the Advisor fees for services related to the investment and management of our assets, and we will reimburse the Advisor for certain expenses incurred on our behalf.
The Company intends to sell a maximum of 30 million common shares, at a price of $10 per share (exclusive of 4 million shares available pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 600,000 shares that could be obtained through the exercise of selling dealer warrants when and if issued and 75,000 shares that are reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock option plan). The Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (the “Registration Statement”) was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 on April 22, 2005, and on May 24, 2005, the Lightstone REIT began offering its common shares for sale to the public. Lightstone Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Sponsor, is serving as the dealer manager of the Company’s public offering (the “Offering”). As of December 31, 2005, the Company had reached its minimum offering of $2.0 million by receiving subscriptions for approximately 226,000 of its common shares, representing gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.3 million. On February 1, 2006, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.7 million were released to the Company from escrow and invested in the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2007, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $131.5 million have been released to the Lightstone REIT and used for the purchase of a 99.99% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company expects that its ownership percentage in the Operating Partnership will remain significant as it plans to continue to invest all net proceeds from the Offering in the Operating Partnership.
Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor, intends to periodically purchase special general partner interests (“SLP Units”) in the Operating Partnership at a cost of $100,000 per unit for each $1.0 million in offering subscriptions. Proceeds from the sale of the SLP Units will be used to fund organizational and offering costs incurred by the Company. As of December 31, 2007, offering costs of $13.2 million have been substantially offset by $13.0 million of proceeds from the sale of SLP Units. Lightstone SLP, LLC has purchased an additional $0.2 million of SLP Units subsequent to December 31, 2007
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of real estate and real estate related investments, other than those referred to in this Prospectus.
Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Accordingly, no provision for income tax was recorded to date. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will then be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a
15
REIT and intends to operate in such a manner so that the Company will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has complied with the requirements for maintaining its REIT status.
2007 Acquisitions
Manhattan Office Building
On January 4, 2007, the Company, through LVP 1407 Broadway LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of the Sponsor (the “Joint Venture”). On the same date, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Sublease Interest”). The seller of the Sublease Interest, Gettinger Associates, L.P., is not an affiliate of the Company, its Sponsor or its subsidiaries. The property, a 42 story office building built in 1952, fronts on Broadway, 7th Avenue and 39th Street in midtown Manhattan. The property has approximately 915,000 leasable square feet, and as of the acquisition date, was 87.6% occupied (approximately 300 tenants) and leased by tenants generally engaged in the female apparel business. The ground lease, dated as of January 14, 1954, provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The Sublease Interest runs concurrently with this ground lease.
The acquisition price for the Sublease Interest was $122 million, exclusive of acquisition-related costs incurred by the Joint Venture ($3.5 million), pro rated operating expenses paid at closing ($4.1 million), financing-related costs ($1.9 million) and construction, insurance and tax reserves ($1.0 million). The acquisition was funded through a combination of $26.5 million of capital and a $106.0 million advance on a $127.3 million variable rate mortgage loan funded by Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. As an inducement to Lender to make the loan, Owner has agreed to provide Lender with a 35% net profit interest in the project, which is contingent upon a capital transaction, as defined as any transaction involving the sale, assignment, transfer, liquidation, condemnation or settlement in lieu thereof, disposition, financing, refinancing or any other conversion to cash of all or any portion of the property or equity or membership interests in Borrower, directly, other than the leasing of space for occupancy and/or any other transaction with respect to the Property or the direct or indirect ownership interests in Borrower outside the ordinary course of business. To date, the lender did not share in any net profits of the project. The lender also has a conversion option, which if upon exercised, would grant the lender a special membership interest in the Joint Venture whereby the lender will receive 35% of all distributions resulting from a Capital transaction after the return of the member’s equity investment plus the member’s allowed returns as specified in the “Net Profits Agreement”. In addition, the Company paid $1.6 million to the Advisor as an acquisition fee and legal fees to its attorney of approximately $0.1 million. The acquisition and legal fees were charged to expense by the Company during the first quarter of 2007, and are included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The Company accounted for the investment in this unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities. Initial equity from our co-venturer totaled $13.5 million (representing a 51% ownership interest). Our initial capital investment, funded with proceeds from our common stock offering, was $13.0 million (representing a 49% ownership interest). This $13.0 million investment was recorded initially at cost and will be subsequently adjusted for cash contributions and distributions, and the Company’s share of earnings and losses. The Company contributed an additional $0.6 million in 2007. Earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with this investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s results included a $7.3 million loss from investment in this unconsolidated joint venture, resulting in a net investment balance of approximately $6.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The Joint Venture plans to continue an ongoing renovation project at the property that consists of lobby, elevator and window redevelopment projects. Additional loan proceeds of up to $16.4 million are available to fund these improvements.
16
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and average occupancy for the property at December 31, 2007 was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 36.4 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 89.7 | % |
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
On February 1, 2007, the Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, acquired a portfolio of industrial and office properties located in New Orleans, LA (5 industrial and 2 office properties), Baton Rouge, LA (3 industrial properties) and San Antonio, TX (4 industrial properties). As a group, the properties were 92% occupied at the acquisition, and represent approximately 1.0 million leasable square feet principally suitable for flexible industrial (54%), distribution (36%) and office (10%) uses. The properties were independently appraised at $70.7 million.
The acquisition price for the properties was $63.9 million, exclusive of approximately $1.9 million of closing costs, escrow funding for immediate repairs ($0.9 million) and insurance ($0.1 million), and financing related costs of approximately $0.6 million. In connection with the transaction, the Advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.8 million. The acquisition was funded through a combination of $14.4 million in offering proceeds and approximately $53.0 million in loan proceeds from a fixed rate mortgage loan secured by the properties. The Company does not intend to make significant renovations or improvements to the properties. The Company believes the properties are adequately insured.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and occupancy for the properties at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 6.3 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 94.9 | % |
Brazos Crossing Mall
On June 29, 2007, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership acquired a 6.0 acre land parcel in Lake Jackson, Texas for immediate development of a 61,287 square foot power center. The land was purchased for $1.65 million cash and was funded 100% from the proceeds of the Company’s offering. The center was completed in March 2008 and is occupied by three triple net tenants: Pet Smart, Office Depot and Best Buy.
The purchase and sale agreement (the “Land Agreement”) for this transaction was negotiated between Lake Jackson Crossing Limited Partnership (formerly an affiliate of the Sponsor) and Starplex Operating, LP, an unaffiliated entity (the “Land Seller”). Prior to the closing, a 99% limited partnership interest in the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership was assigned to the Operating Partnership and the membership interests in Brazos Crossing LLC (the 1% general partner of the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership) were assigned to the Company.
The land parcel was acquired at what represents a $2.1 million discount from the expressed $3.75 million purchase price, with such difference being subsidized and funded by a retail affiliate of the Sponsor. The sale of the land parcel was a condition of the Seller’s agreement to execute a new movie theater lease at the Sponsor affiliate’s nearby retail mall. The Company owns a 100% fee simple interest in the land parcel and retail power center. The Sponsor’s affiliate will receive no future benefit or ownership interests from this transaction.
The Company entered into a construction loan to fund the development of the power retail center at its Lake Jackson, Texas Location. The loan requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months and bears interest at 150 basis points (1.5%) in excess of LIBOR. For the second twelve months, principal payments shall be made in monthly installments in amounts equal to one-twelfth of the principal
17
component of an annual amortization of the principal of the loan on the basis of an assumed interest rate of 6.82% and a thirty year term. The loan is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company. The total cost of the project, inclusive of project construction, tenant incentives, leasing costs, and land is estimated at $10.2 million. Because the debt financing for the acquisition may exceed certain leverage limitations of the REIT, the Board, including all of its independent directors has approved any leverage exceptions as required by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
Three tenants will occupy 100% of the property’s rentable square footage. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these major tenants:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space | Annual Rent Payments | Lease Term from Commencement | Party with Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Best Buy | Electronics Retailer | 20,200 | 32.90 | % | $ | 260,000 | 10 years | Tenant | ||||||||||||||||
Office Depot | Office Supplies Retailer | 21,000 | 34.30 % | $ | 277,200 | 10 years | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Petsmart | Pet Supply Retailer | 20,087 | 32.80 | % | $ | 231,001 | 10 years | Tenant |
Houston Extended Stay Hotels
On October 17, 2007, the Company, through TLG Hotel Acquisitions LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (together with such subsidiary, the “Houston Partnership”), acquired two hotels located in Houston, TX (the “Katy Hotel”) and Sugar Land, TX (the “Sugar Land Hotel” and together with the Katy Hotel, the “Hotels”) from Morning View Hotels — Katy, LP, Morning View Hotels — Sugar Land, LP and Point of Southwest Gardens, Ltd., pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. The seller is not an affiliate of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Prior to the acquisition of the Hotels, our board of directors expanded the Company’s eligible investments to include the acquisition, holding and disposition of hotels (primarily extended stay hotels). The reasons for such change include the expertise of our sponsor who acquired the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies (“ESH”) and control of its management company (HVM L.L.C.) which operates 684 extended stay hotels. The ability to draw upon their expertise, the intense competition in the real estate market for all types of assets and the ability to better diversify the Company’s portfolio, caused our board of directors to review the Company’s investment objectives and expand them to include lodging facilities.
The Hotels were recently remodeled by the previous owner; however the Company intends to make a $2.8 million dollar investment in capital expenditures to convert the Hotels to Extended Stay Deluxe (“ESD”) brand properties. The ESD brand is under license from an affiliate within the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies. The Company expects these additional renovations to be conducted over a 1-year period and will include implementing ESD’s national reservation system, new carpeting, new paint, new signage, exterior façade improvements, re-striping parking lot, guest room upgrades, landscaping and constructing pools.
The acquisition price for the Hotels was $16 million inclusive of closing costs. In connection with the transaction, the Company’s advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the contract price ($15.2 million), or approximately $0.4 million.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of $6.0 million in offering proceeds and approximately $10 million in loan proceeds from a floating rate mortgage loan secured by the Hotels.
The Company has established a taxable REIT subsidiary, LVP Acquisitions Corp. (“LVP Corp”), which has entered into operating lease agreements with each of the Katy Hotel and the Sugar Land Hotel, respectively, and LVP Corp. has entered into management agreements with HVM L.L.C., a controlled affiliate of our sponsor, for the management of the hotels.
In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 — Houston — Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 - Houston - Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal
18
amount of $12.85 million, which includes up to an additional $2.8 million of renovation proceeds which will be borrowed as the renovation proceeds.
The mortgage loan has a term of one year with the option of a 6-month term extension, bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association Libor Daily Floating Rate plus one hundred seventy-five basis points (1.75%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months. The mortgage loan will mature on October 16, 2008, subject to the 6-month extension option described above, at which time payment of the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable thereunder will be due. The mortgage loan will be secured by the Hotels and will be non-recourse to the Company. The Company intends to extend, repay or refinance this loan upon its maturity in October of 2008.
In connection with the Loan, the Company guaranteed the complete performance of the Houston Borrowers’ obligations with respect to the renovations and certain other customary guarantees.
Camden Properties
On November 16, 2007, the Company through wholly owned subsidiaries of the partnership acquired five apartment communities (“Camden Properties”) located in Tampa, Florida (one property), Charlotte, North Carolina (two properties) and Greensboro, North Carolina (two properties) from Camden Operating, L.P. (the “Seller”). The Seller is not affiliated with the Company or its subsidiaries.
The Properties, built between 1980 and 1987, are comprised of 1,576 apartment units, in the aggregate, contain a total of 1,124,249 net rentable square feet, and were 94% occupied at acquisition.
The aggregate acquisition price for the Camden Properties was approximately $99.3 million, including acquisition-related transaction costs. Approximately $20.0 million of the acquisition cost was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock and approximately $79.3 million was funded with five substantially similar fixed rate loans with Fannie Mae secured by each of the Camden Properties.
In connection with the acquisition of the properties, our Advisor received an acquisition fee of 2.75% of the gross contract price for the Camden Properties or approximately $2.65 million.
On November 16, 2007, in connection with the acquisition of the Camden Properties, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiaries obtained from Fannie Mae five substantially similar fixed rate mortgages aggregating $79.3 million (the “Loans”). The loans have a 30 year amortization period, mature in 7 years, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% per annum. The loans require monthly installments of interest only through the first three years and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of their stated terms. The Loans will mature on December 1, 2014, at which time a balance of approximately $75.0 million will be due. Although the loans were allocated among the Camden Properties, the aggregate loan amount is secured by all of the Properties.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and occupancy for the properties at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 10.5 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 86.9 | % |
Sarasota, Florida
On March 1, 2007, the Company entered into an option agreement to participate in a joint-venture with its Sponsor (the “JV Option” with respect to the potential joint venture, the “Joint Venture”) for the purchase of a property located at 2150 Whitfield Avenue, Sarasota, Florida (the “Sarasota Property”). On November 15, 2007, the Company exercised the JV Option and, through a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company’s operating partnership, entered into the Joint Venture and acquired the Sarasota Property.
19
In July, 2007, CAD Funding, LLC (“CAD”), an affiliate of Park Avenue Funding, LLC, had the highest bid on the Sarasota Property in a foreclosure action. Park Avenue Funding, LLC, is a real estate lending company founded in 2004 and an affiliate of the Company’s Advisor and Sponsor. CAD initiated the foreclosure action following the default of an unaffiliated third party on a loan made to the third party by CAD, for which the Sarasota Property served as security. Prior to the entry of the foreclosure judgment, the Sponsor expressed an interest in bidding at the foreclosure sale in anticipation that the Registrant would exercise the JV Option. On August 6, 2007, the Sarasota Property was indirectly acquired by the Sponsor. The Sarasota Property was contributed to the Joint Venture prior to the Registrant’s exercise of the JV Option. The contribution to the Joint Venture by the Company was $13.1 million of offering proceeds used to acquire the Sarasota Property. The property was independently appraised in May of 2006 for $17.4 million. At December 31, 2007, the Company holds a 100% interest in the Joint Venture, and the Sponsor remains a member in the joint venture The Company now owns 100% of the joint venture and the joint venture is fully consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In evaluating the Sarasota Property as a potential acquisition, we have considered a variety of factors, and determined that the acquisition cost was at a substantial discount to current market value. The Sarasota Property is subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. The Sarasota Property currently does not possess a tenant and is experiencing negative cash flows, however the Venture is currently negotiating with prospective tenants.
As of December 31, 2007, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals from the Company’s commercial real estate properties, excluding Brazos Crossing which was not yet open at December 31, 2007, are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Building | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Beyond 2012 | Total Min. Rent | |||||||||||||||||||||
St Augustine | $ | 1,848,478 | $ | 1,319,168 | $ | 659,593 | $ | 242,863 | $ | 24,516 | $ | 9,842 | $ | 4,104,460 | ||||||||||||||
Oakview Plaza | 2,543,280 | 2,432,693 | 1,929,906 | 1,592,466 | 1,592,466 | 1,633,716 | 11,724,527 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gulf Industrial Portfolio | 5,833,708 | 4,478,402 | 2,458,461 | 1,483,635 | 433,669 | 28,274 | 14,716,149 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 10,225,466 | $ | 8,230,263 | $ | 5,047,960 | $ | 3,318,964 | $ | 2,050,651 | $ | 1,671,832 | $ | 30,545,136 |
Critical Accounting Policies
General. The consolidated financial statements of the Lightstone REIT included in this annual report include the accounts of Lightstone REIT and the Operating Partnership (over which Lightstone REIT exercises financial and operating control). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments about the effects of matters or future events that are inherently uncertain. These estimates and judgments may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including contingencies and litigation. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
To assist in understanding our results of operations and financial position, we have identified our critical accounting policies and discussed them below. These accounting policies are most important to the portrayal of our results and financial position, either because of the significance of the financial statement items to which they relate or because they require our management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.
20
Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Related Receivables. Our revenue, which will be comprised largely of rental income, will include rents that tenants pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since our leases may provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting will require us to record as an asset, and include in revenue, unbilled rent that we will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. Accordingly, we must determine, in our judgment, to what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We will review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collection of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the allowance is increased or the direct write-off is recorded and would decrease our total assets and stockholders’ equity.
Investments in Real Estate. We will record investments in real estate at cost and will capitalize improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. We will expense costs of repairs and maintenance as incurred. We will compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our real estate assets, which we expect will be approximately 39 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for equipment and fixtures and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.
We will be required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to record on an annual basis with respect to our investments in real estate. These assessments will have a direct impact on our net income because, if we were to shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in real estate, we would depreciate these investments over fewer years, resulting in more depreciation expense and lower net income on an annual basis.
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which we refer to as SFAS 144, and which establishes a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets including discontinued operations. SFAS 144 requires that the operations related to properties that have been sold or that we intend to sell, be presented as discontinued operations in the statement of income for all periods presented, and properties we intend to sell be designated as “held for sale” on our balance sheet.
When circumstances such as adverse market conditions indicate a possible impairment of the value of a property, we will review the recoverability of the property’s carrying value. The review of recoverability will be based on our estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. Our forecast of these cash flows will consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss will be recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.
We will be required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the values of our investments in real estate. We will evaluate our ability to collect both interest and principal related to any real estate related investments in which we may invest. If circumstances indicate that such investment is impaired, we will reduce the carrying value of the investment to its net realizable value. Such reduction in value will be reflected as a charge to operations in the period in which the determination is made.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), assumed debt issued in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”), at the date of acquisition, based on evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, the Company allocates the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is
21
received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation. The allocations are finalized within twelve months of the acquisition date.
We will allocate the purchase price of an acquired property to tangible assets (which includes land, buildings and tenant improvements) based on the estimated fair values of those tangible assets assuming the building was vacant. We will record above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. We will amortize any capitalized above-market lease values as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. We will amortize any capitalized below-market lease values as an increase to rental income over the initial term and any fixed-rate renewal periods in the respective leases.
We will measure the aggregate value of other intangible assets acquired based on the difference between (1) the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (2) the property valued as if vacant. Our estimates of value are expected to be made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors we may consider in our analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We will also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, we will also include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods. We will also estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.
The total amount of other intangible assets acquired will be further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship intangible values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics we will consider in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.
We will amortize the value of in-place leases to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which we would not expect to exceed 20 years. Currently, our leases range from one month to 11 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles will be amortized to expense over the initial term in the respective leases, but in no event will the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles will be charged to expense.
Joint Venture Investments. We will evaluate our joint venture investments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which we refer to as FIN 46R. If we determine that the joint venture is a “variable interest entity,” or a “VIE,” and that we are the “primary beneficiary” as defined in FIN 46R, we would account for such investment as if it were a consolidated subsidiary. For a joint venture investment which is not a VIE or in which we are not the primary beneficiary, we will consider Accounting Principle Board Opinion 18 — The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, Statement of Opinion 78-9 — Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 96 – 16 — Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has the Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Partners have Certain Approval or Veto Rights, to determine the method of accounting for each of our partially-owned entities.
In accordance with the above pronouncements, we will account for our investments in partially-owned entities under the equity method when we do not exercise direct or indirect control of the entity and our ownership interest is more than 3% but less than 50%, in the case of a partially-owned limited partnership, or
22
more than 20% but less than 50%, in the case of all other partially-owned entities. Factors that we will consider in determining whether or not we exercise control include substantive participating rights of partners on significant business decisions, including dispositions and acquisitions of assets, financing and operating and capital budgets, board and management representatives and authority and other contractual rights of our partners. To the extent that we are deemed to control an entity, such entities will be consolidated.
On a periodic basis we will evaluate whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in partially owned entities are impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying amount. The ultimate realization of our investment in partially owned entities is dependent on a number of factors including the performance of that entity and market conditions. If we determine that a decline in the value of a partially owned entity is other than temporary, we will record an impairment charge.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Investments and Hedging Activities. We will account for our derivative and hedging activities, if any, using SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133,” and SFAS 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which require all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, will be considered cash flow hedges. We will formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk- management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. We will periodically review the effectiveness of each hedging transaction, which involves estimating future cash flows. Cash flow hedges will be accounted for by recording the fair value of the derivative instrument on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability, with a corresponding amount recorded in other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. Amounts will be reclassified from other comprehensive income to the income statement in the period or periods the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, will be considered fair value hedges under SFAS 133. We are not currently a party to any derivatives contracts.
Inflation
Our long-term leases are expected to contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on our operating results. Such provisions will include clauses entitling us to receive scheduled base rent increases and base rent increases based upon the consumer price index. In addition, our leases are expected to require tenants to pay a negotiated share of operating expenses, including maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in cost and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest
Management of our operations is outsourced to our Advisor and certain other affiliates of our Sponsor. Fees related to each of these services are accounted for based on the nature of such service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Lightstone REIT are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees associated with the purchase of a joint venture interest, asset management fees paid to our Advisor and property management fees paid to our Property Manager.
Our Property Manager may also perform fee-based construction management services for both our re-development activities and tenant construction projects. These fees are considered incremental to the construction effort and will be capitalized to the associated real estate project as incurred in accordance with SFAS 67,Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects. Costs incurred for tenant construction will be depreciated over the shorter of their useful life or the term of the related lease. Costs related to redevelopment activities will be depreciated over the estimated useful life of the associated project.
23
Leasing activity at our properties has also been outsourced to our Property Manager. Any corresponding leasing fees we pay will be capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 91,Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.
Expense reimbursements made to both our Advisor and Property Manager will be expensed or capitalized to the basis of acquired assets, as appropriate.
Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of our Sponsor, has and continues to purchase special general partner interests in the Operating Partnership. These special general partner interests, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC to a portion of any regular distributions made by the Operating Partnership. Such distributions will always be subordinated until stockholders receive a stated preferred return. Lightstone SLP LLC has not received any portion of regular distributions made by the Operating Partnership through March 14, 2008.
Our Advisor is responsible for offering and organizational costs exceeding 10% of the gross offering proceeds without recourse to the Company. As of December 31, 2007, offering costs of $13.2 million have been substantially offset by $13.0 million of proceeds from the sale of SLP Units. Lightstone SLP, LLC has purchased an additional $0.2 million of SLP Units subsequent to December 31, 2007
Income Taxes
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code in conjunction with the filing of our 2006 federal tax return. In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual ordinary taxable income to stockholders. REITs are generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that they distribute to their stockholders. It is our intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain our REIT status.
As such, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the Lightstone REIT consolidated financial statements. As a REIT, we still may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The availability of such loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2026. As the Company does not consider it likely that it will realize any future benefit from its loss carry-forward, any deferred asset resulting from the final determination of its tax losses will be fully offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
Results of Operations
We commenced operations on February 1, 2006 upon the release of our offering proceeds from escrow. We acquired our three initial real estate properties on March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, and December 21, 2006, respectively. We continued to acquire properties throughout 2008, on January 4, 2007; a portfolio of 12 industrial and 2 office buildings in Louisiana and Texas, on February 1, 2007; and a land parcel in Lake Jackson, TX, intended for immediate development as a power retail center, on June 29, 2007, two hotels in Houston, Texas on October 17, 2007, five multi family apartment communities, one in Tampa, Florida, two in Greensboro, North Carolina and two in Charlotte, North Carolina on November 16, 2007, and an industrial building in Sarasota, Florida on November 13, 2007. Our management is not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of real estate and real estate related investments.
The analysis included in the management discussion and analysis below is not on a property by property basis. As we have a limited operating history, and we have completed our first nine acquisitions over the past two years, the majority of any all fluctuations are the result of these acquisitions.
24
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Versus the Year Ended December 31, 2006
Revenues
Total revenues more than tripled as compared to 2006. Total Revenues for 2007 were $25.3 million compared to $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Rental income increased by approximately $14.3 million primarily as a result of our acquiring the Belz Outlets in St. Augustine, Florida on March 31, 2006 and the southeastern Michigan multi-family properties on June 29, 2006, a portfolio of 12 industrial and 2 office buildings in Louisiana and Texas, on February 1, 2007; and a land parcel in Lake Jackson, TX, intended for immediate development as a power retail center, on June 29, 2007, two hotels in Houston, Texas on October 17, 2007, five multi family apartment communities, one in Tampa, Florida, two in Greensboro, North Carolina and two in Charlotte, North Carolina on November 16, 2007. Tenant recovery income increased by approximately $2.7 million primarily as a result of our acquiring the Belz Outlets in St. Augustine, Florida, the Oakview Center in Omaha, Nebraska, and the portfolio of 12 industrial and 2 office buildings in Louisiana and Texas.
Total Property Expenses
Total expenses increased by $14.2 million to approximately $22.2 million, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $8.0 million for the same period last year. Increases in property operating expenses ($5.9 million), real estate taxes ($1.9 million), and depreciation and amortization ($3.5 million) were primarily the result of the acquisition of a full year of expenses for the 2006 acquisitions, and the additional expenses associated with all of the 2007 acquisitions.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative costs increased by $2.9 million to $3.7 million, primarily as a result of the payment of acquisition and legal fees in the amount of $1.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the Lightstone REIT’s investment in the sub lease interest to a ground lease of a Manhattan office building payment, and asset management fees in the amount of $1.0 million, and costs incurred related to outside consulting fees to advise the Company regarding Sarbanes Oxley compliance testing performed in 2007. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 totaled $0.8 million, which included asset management fees of $0.3 million. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as a result of acquisitions in future periods.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $3.5 million, in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily due to the inclusion of a full year of expenses for the 2006 acquisitions, and the additional expenses associated with all of the 2007 acquisitions.
Interest Income
Interest income increased by approximately $1.4 million, due primarily to the increase in interest and dividend income recorded on the short-term investments and marketable securities. The Cash and cash equivalents, including marketable securities at December 31, 2007, was $40.3 million, or a $21.0 million increase over the balance at December 31, 2006.
Other Income
Other income increased by approximately $0.8 million due to increases in vending and other ancillary revenue sources at primarily our multi family properties acquired in June of 2006 and November of 2007.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to 2006, due to the inclusion of a full year of expenses for the 2006 acquisitions, and the additional expenses associated with all of the 2007 acquisitions.
Minority interest
The loss allocated to minority interests of approximately $26 and $86 for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, relates to the interests in the Operating Partnership held by our Sponsor.
25
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 versus the year ended December 31, 2005
Revenues
Total revenues increased 100%, or $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $0 for the same period last year. Rental income increased by approximately $7.3 million primarily as a result of our acquiring the Belz Outlets in St. Augustine, Florida on March 31, 2006 and the southeastern Michigan multi-family properties on June 29, 2006. Tenant recovery income increased by approximately $1.0 million primarily as a result of our acquiring the Belz Outlets in St. Augustine, Florida. The Lightstone REIT also acquired a retail property in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006. Due to the limited period of ownership, it did not have a significant impact on our 2006 financial results.
Total Property Expenses
Total expenses increased by $7.9 million to approximately $8.0 million, for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $0.1 million for the same period last year. Increases in property operating expenses ($3.7 million), real estate taxes ($0.9 million), and depreciation and amortization ($2.7 million) were primarily the result of the acquisition of two new properties on March 31, 2006 and June 29, 2006, respectively. The Lightstone REIT also acquired a retail property in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006. Due to the limited period of ownership, it did not have a significant impact on our 2006 financial results.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative costs increased by $0.7 million to $0.8 million, primarily as a result of the payment of asset management fees, director’s and officer’s liability insurance and fees to our board of directors, auditors and attorneys. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $117,571. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as a result of acquisitions in future periods. No fees of any kind were paid to the Advisor for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.7 million, in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to the acquisition and financing of two new properties on March 31, 2006 and June 29, 2006, respectively. The Lightstone REIT also acquired a retail property in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006. Due to the limited period of ownership, it did not have a significant impact on our 2006 financial results.
Interest Income
Interest income increased by approximately $0.5 million, due to the increase in the Company’s average balance of cash and cash equivalents for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2006.
Other Income
Other income increased by approximately $0.4 million related to vending and other ancillary revenue sources primarily at our south eastern Michigan multi-family properties acquired on June 29, 2006.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased 100%, or approximately $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of the acquisition and financing of two new properties on March 31, 2006 and June 29, 2006, respectively. The Lightstone REIT also acquired a retail property in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006. Due to the limited period of ownership, it did not have a significant impact on our 2006 financial results.
Minority interest
The loss allocated to minority interests of approximately $86 and $1,164 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, relates to the interests in the Operating Partnership held by our Sponsor.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview:
We intend that rental revenue will be the principal source of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and dividends, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures. To the extent that our
26
cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to finance non-recurring capital expenditures such as property acquisitions, development and construction costs and other capital expenditures, we are dependent upon the net proceeds to be received from our public offering to conduct such proposed activities. We have financed and expect to continue to finance such activities through debt and equity financings. The capital required to purchase real estate investments will be obtained from our offering and from any indebtedness that we may incur in connection with the acquisition and operations of any real estate investments thereafter.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through funds received in our public offering, working capital, and net cash provided by operating activities. We frequently examine potential property acquisitions and development projects and, at any given time, one or more acquisitions or development projects may be under consideration. Accordingly, the ability to fund property acquisitions and development projects is a major part of our financing requirements. We expect to meet our financing requirements through funds generated from our public offering and long-term and short-term borrowings.
We intend to utilize leverage in acquiring our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time.
Our source of funds in the future will primarily be the net proceeds of our offering, operating cash flows and borrowings. We believe that these cash resources will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other than these sources within the next twelve months. We have two loans which mature in 2008, which had an outstanding balance of $10.4 million at December 31, 2007. The Company intends to extend, repay or refinance this loan upon its maturity in October of 2008.
We currently have $237.6 million of outstanding mortgage debt, and an additional $5.8 million of outstanding notes payable. We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less.
The Company has two development projects which were ongoing at December 31, 2007. The Company is in the process of expanding and renovating its St. Augustine center. The Company expects to complete the expansion and renovation in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company purchased the land adjacent to the existing center and the related development rights in the fourth quarter of 2007, and began the renovation and expansion. Total project costs to date at December 31, 2007 totaled approximately $5.0 million, including the purchase of the land and the development rights. Total project costs are expected to estimate approximately $35.2 million. The Company intends to fund the costs of this project using a portion of the proceeds from our offering.
In addition, the Company completed it development of its Brazos Crossing Center in March of 2008. The total project costs are estimated to be approximately $10.2 million, and will be funded primarily with the $8.2 million of notes payable. The Company had drawn $5.8 million as of December 31, 2007. The remainder of the costs will be funded using proceeds of the offering. Other than those discussed above, the Company does not have any other significant capital plans for 2008.
Our charter provides that the aggregate amount of borrowing, both secured and unsecured, may not exceed 300% of net assets in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level is appropriate, the approval of our board of directors and disclosure to stockholders. Net assets means our total assets, other than intangibles, at cost before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves less our total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly on a basis consistently applied. Any excess in borrowing over such 300% of net assets level must be approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report to stockholders, along with justification for such excess. As of December 31, 2007, our total borrowings represented 216% of net assets.
27
Borrowings may consist of single-property mortgages as well as mortgages cross-collateralized by a pool of properties. Such mortgages may be put in place either at the time we acquire a property or subsequent to our purchasing a property for cash. In addition, we may acquire properties that are subject to existing indebtedness where we choose to assume the existing mortgages. Generally, though not exclusively, we intend to seek to encumber our properties with debt, which will be on a non-recourse basis. This means that a lender’s rights on default will generally be limited to foreclosing on the property. However, we may, at our discretion, secure recourse financing or provide a guarantee to lenders if we believe this may result in more favorable terms. When we give a guaranty for a property owning entity, we will be responsible to the lender for the satisfaction of the indebtedness if it is not paid by the property owning entity.
We intend to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year. Accordingly, we expect that some of the mortgages on our property will provide for fixed interest rates. However, we expect that most of the mortgages on our properties will provide for a so-called “balloon” payment and that certain of our mortgages will provide for variable interest rates. Any mortgages secured by a property will comply with the restrictions set forth by the Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California.
We may also obtain lines of credit to be used to acquire properties. These lines of credit will be at prevailing market terms and will be repaid from offering proceeds, proceeds from the sale or refinancing of properties, working capital or permanent financing. Our Sponsor or its affiliates may guarantee the lines of credit although they will not be obligated to do so. We may draw upon the lines of credit to acquire properties pending our receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering. We expect that such properties may be purchased by our Sponsor’s affiliates on our behalf, in our name, in order to avoid the imposition of a transfer tax upon a transfer of such properties to us.
In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we expect to use our capital resources to make certain payments to our Advisor, our Dealer Manager, and our Property Manager during the various phases of our organization and operation. During the organizational and offering stage, these payments will include payments to our Dealer Manager for selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, and payments to our Advisor for the reimbursement of organization and offering costs. During the acquisition and development stage, these payments will include asset acquisition fees and asset management fees, and the reimbursement of acquisition related expenses to our Advisor. During the operational stage, we will pay our Property Manager a property management fee and our Advisor an asset management fee. We will also reimburse our Advisor and its affiliates for actual expenses it incurs for administrative and other services provided to us. Additionally, the Operating Partnership may be required to make distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor. Total property management fees of $1.1 million, $0.3 million and $0 were recorded for amounts due to the Advisor or its affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Total asset management and acquisition fees to the Advisor of $7.6 million, $3.0 million and $0 were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, there were less than $0.1 million due to an affiliate of our Advisor, for the reimbursement of property level operating expenses. As of December 31, 2006, approximately $0.5 million was due to our Property Manager, an affiliate of our Advisor, for the reimbursement of property level operating expenses. As of December 31, 2005, approximately $0.3 million was due to the Advisor for the reimbursement of commissions and dealer manager fees ($181,000), offering expenses ($45,000), expenses incurred in connection with our administration and ongoing operations ($80,000), and advances of working capital for use by the Lightstone REIT ($3,000). This amount was fully repaid during the year ended December 31, 2006.
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $29.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and $9.6 million of refundable escrow deposits. In addition, we held marketable securities in the amount of $10.8 million at December 31, 2007. Our cash and cash equivalents on hand resulted primarily from proceeds from our Offering.
28
Summary of Cash Flows. The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on the consolidated statements of cash flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 6,651,989 | $ | 1,722,853 | $ | (80,060 ) | ||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities | (227,971,386 | ) | (119,467,655 | ) | — | |||||||
Cash flows provided by financing activities | 231,628,502 | 136,820,482 | 79,601 | |||||||||
Cash, beginning of the period | 19,280,710 | 205,030 | 205,489 | |||||||||
Cash, end of the period | $ | 29,589,815 | $ | 19,280,710 | $ | 205,030 |
Our principal source of cash flow is currently derived from the issuance of our common stock and the operation of our rental properties. We intend that our properties will provide a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that provides us with resources to fund operating expenses, debt service and quarterly dividends. Cash flows from operating activities were generated primarily from our retail property in St. Augustine, Florida acquired in March of 2006, the four residential apartment communities we acquired in June of 2006, the Oakview Plaza in Omaha, Nebraska acquired on December 21, 2006 and the Gulf Coast industrial portfolio acquired on February 1, 2007, two hotels acquired in Houston, Texas on October 17, 2007, five multi family apartment communities acquired on November 16, 2007, substantially offset by the payment of a $1.6 million acquisition fee related to our investment in a joint venture which acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York.
Our principal demands for liquidity are our property operating expenses, real estate taxes, insurance, tenant improvements, leasing costs, acquisition and development activities, debt service and distributions to our stockholders. The principal sources of funding for our operations are operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of equity and debt securities and the placement of mortgage loans.
Cash used in investing activities of $228.0 million resulted primarily from the purchases of the Gulf Coast Industrial portfolio on February 1, 2007, the investment in the unconsolidated joint venture, two hotels acquired in Houston, Texas on October 17, 2007, five multi family apartment communities acquired on November 16, 2007, as well as the purchase of an industrial building in Sarasota, Florida, the purchase of marketable securities of $27.7 million offset by the proceeds from the sale of Marketable securities of $17.0 million.
Cash provided by financing activities is primarily the proceeds from mortgage financing and notes payable ($148.2 million) and the proceeds from the issuance of common stock ($88.6 million), and the proceeds from the sale of general partnership units ($8.9 million).
29
Mortgages payable, totaling approximately $237.6 million at December 31, 2007, consists of the following:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Property | Loan Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | Amount Due at Maturity | ||||||||||||
St. Augustine | $ | 27,051,571 | 6.09 | % | April 2016 | $ | 23,747,523 | |||||||||
Southeastern Michigan Multi Family Properties | 40,725,000 | 5.96 | % | July 2016 | 38,138,605 | |||||||||||
Oakview Plaza | 27,500,000 | 5.49 | % | January 2017 | 25,583,137 | |||||||||||
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio | 53,025,000 | 5.83 | % | February 2017 | 49,556,985 | |||||||||||
Houston Extended Stay Hotels (Two Individual Loans) | 10,040,000 | LIBOR + 1.75 | % | October 2008 | 10,040,000 | |||||||||||
Camden Multi Family Properties – (Five Individual Loans) | 79,268,800 | 5.44 | % | December 2014 | 74,955,771 | |||||||||||
Total of eleven outstanding mortgage loans at December 31, 2007 | $ | 237,610,371 | $ | 222,022,021 |
LIBOR at December 31, 2007 was 4.60%. Monthly installments of interest only are required through the first 12 months for the St. Augustine loan, and monthly installments of principal and interest are required throughout the remainder of its stated term. Monthly installments of interest only are required through the first 60 months for the Southeastern Michigan multi-family properties, and through the first 48 months for the Camden Multi-Family properties’ loans, and monthly installments of principal and interest are required throughout the remainder of its stated term. The remaining loans are interest only until their maturity, when the amounts listed in the table above are due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. Each of the loans is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company
The following table shows the mortgage debt maturing during the next five years and thereafter at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate mortgages | $ | 10,353,360 | $ | 338,052 | $ | 359,526 | $ | 1,586,957 | $ | 2,781,012 | $ | 222,191,464 | $ | 237,610,371 |
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value (such as a pricing model) and/or risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions also include assumptions about the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. This Statement also clarifies that a fair value measurement for a liability reflects its nonperformance risk. The statement is effective in the fiscal first quarter of 2008 except for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, for which the effective date is fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157, but does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 07-1, “Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide, Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity
30
Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies.” SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, “Investment Companies” (the “Guide”) and when companies that own or have significant stakes in investment companies should and should not retain, in their financial statements, the specialized industry accounting under the Guide. On February 14, 2008, the FASB delayed indefinitely the effective date of SOP 07-1. Management does not anticipate that the application of SOP 07-1 will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements when SOP 07-1 becomes effective.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 141(R) which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer shall recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FASB No. 141(R) will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued No. 160, which establishes and expands accounting and reporting standards for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, in a subsidiary and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FASB 160 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FASB No. 160 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and 2005, included in this Supplement have been audited by Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C., independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated balance sheet of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statement of operations, members’ capital and cash flows for the period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007, included in this Supplement have been audited by Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C., independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
31
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)
INDEX
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC and SUBSIDIARIES
For The Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Schedules not filed:
All schedules other than the one listed in the Index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and its Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company’) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited the consolidated financial statement schedule, Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, as of December 31, 2007. In our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
March 28, 2008
Edison, New Jersey
33
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Investment property: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 62,032,138 | $ | 20,141,357 | ||||
Building | 240,221,044 | 82,217,115 | ||||||
Construction in Progress | 7,499,319 | — | ||||||
309,752,501 | 102,358,472 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (5,455,550 | ) | (1,184,590 | ) | ||||
Net investment property | 304,296,951 | 101,173,882 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture | 6,284,675 | — | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 29,589,815 | 19,280,710 | ||||||
Marketable Securities | 10,752,910 | — | ||||||
Restricted escrows | 9,595,453 | 6,912,578 | ||||||
Deposit for purchase of real estate | — | 8,435,000 | ||||||
Due from escrow agent | — | 163,949 | ||||||
Tenant and other accounts receivable, net | 1,531,180 | 316,232 | ||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $2,646,629 and $1,365,512, respectively) | 1,982,292 | 1,801,678 | ||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $373,175 and $75,258, respectively) | 830,727 | 601,987 | ||||||
Deferred intangible leasing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $605,093 and $119,807, respectively) | 1,153,712 | 735,079 | ||||||
Deferred leasing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $50,606 and $3,423, respectively) | 154,879 | 23,359 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $172,939 and $26,813, respectively) | 2,154,560 | 691,777 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 1,374,200 | 571,986 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 369,701,354 | $ | 140,708,217 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Mortgage payable | $ | 237,610,371 | $ | 95,475,000 | ||||
Note payable | 5,825,286 | — | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 6,332,962 | 1,980,052 | ||||||
Tenant allowances and deposits payable | 943,854 | 301,970 | ||||||
Distributions payable | 2,463,361 | 601,286 | ||||||
Prepaid rental revenues | 1,066,724 | 81,020 | ||||||
Acquired below market lease intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $1,874,843 and $953,435, respectively) | 2,391,883 | 2,011,063 | ||||||
256,634,441 | 100,450,391 | |||||||
Minority interest in partnership | 12,954,715 | 4,282,122 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred shares, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 13,606,609 and 4,316,389 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 136,066 | 43,170 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 120,297,590 | 38,686,993 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,199,278 | ) | — | |||||
Accumulated distributions in addition to net loss | (19,122,180 | ) | (2,754,459 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 100,112,198 | 35,975,704 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 369,701,354 | $ | 140,708,217 |
The Company’s notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
34
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 21,530,205 | $ | 7,271,738 | $ | — | ||||||
Tenant recovery income | 3,729,450 | 990,929 | — | |||||||||
25,259,655 | 8,262,667 | — | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 9,579,830 | 3,656,914 | — | |||||||||
Real estate taxes | 2,739,866 | 882,212 | — | |||||||||
General and administrative costs | 3,710,363 | 808,502 | 117,571 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,163,437 | 2,674,819 | — | |||||||||
22,193,496 | 8,022,447 | 117,571 | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 3,066,159 | 240,220 | (117,571 | ) | ||||||||
Other income | 1,162,040 | 350,961 | — | |||||||||
Interest income | 1,879,768 | 459,916 | — | |||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | 1,301,949 | — | — | |||||||||
Interest expense | (9,384,383 ) | (2,587,527 ) | — | |||||||||
Loss from investment in unconsolidated Joint Venture | (7,267,949 ) | — | — | |||||||||
Minority interest | 26 | 86 | 1,164 | |||||||||
Net loss applicable to common shares | $ | (9,242,390 ) | $ | (1,536,344 ) | $ | (116,407 | ) | |||||
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (1.01 | ) | $ | (0.96 | ) | $ | (5.82 | ) | |||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 9,195,369 | 1,594,060 | 20,000 |
The Company’s notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
35
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Shares | Common Shares | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Accumulated Distribtions in Net Addition to Loss | Total Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Shares | Amount | Common Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2005 | — | $ | — | 20,000 | $ | 200 | $ | 199,800 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | (116,407 | ) | (116,407 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 | — | — | 20,000 | 200 | 199,800 | — | (116,407 | ) | 83,593 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,536,344 | ) | (1,536,344 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,101,708 | ) | (1,101,708 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from offering | — | — | 4,276,165 | 42,762 | 42,570,940 | — | — | 42,613,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | — | — | — | — | (3,337,501 | ) | — | — | (3,337,501 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other offering costs | — | — | — | — | (943,869 | ) | — | — | (943,869 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from distribution reinvestment program | — | — | 20,824 | 208 | 197,623 | — | — | 197,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 | — | — | 4,316,989 | 43,170 | 38,686,993 | — | (2,754,459 ) | 35,975,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | (9,242,390 ) | (9,242,390 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities | — | — | — | — | — | (1,199,278 ) | — | (1,199,278 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | — | — | — | — | — | (1,199,278 ) | (9,242,390 ) | (10,441,668 ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | — | — | — | (7,125,331 ) | (7,125,331 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from offering | — | — | 9,082,793 | 90,828 | 88,541,468 | — | — | 88,632,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | — | — | — | — | (6,130,796 | ) | — | — | (6,130,796 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other offering costs | — | — | — | — | (2,762,855 | ) | — | — | (2,762,855 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from distribution reinvestment program | — | — | 206,826 | 2,068 | 1,962,780 | — | — | 1,964,848 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 | — | $ | — | 13,606,608 | $ | 136,066 | $ | 120,297,590 | $ | (1,199,278 ) | $ | (19,122,180 ) | $ | 100,112,198 |
The Company’s notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and December 31, 2005
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (9,242,390 ) | $ | (1,536,344 ) | $ | (116,407 | ) | |||||
Loss allocated to minority interests | (26 | ) | (86 | ) | (1,164 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,617,908 | 1,186,076 | — | |||||||||
Gain on sale of marketable securities | (1,301,949 ) | — | — | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 146,126 | 26,813 | — | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred leasing costs | 545,529 | 123,230 | — | |||||||||
Amortization of above and below-market lease intangibles | (628,150 | ) | 487,335 | — | ||||||||
Net equity in loss from investment in unconcolidated joint venture | 7,267,949 | — | — | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets | (518,555 | ) | (573,470 | ) | — | |||||||
Increase in tenant and other accounts receivable | (1,214,948 ) | (316,232 | ) | — | ||||||||
Increase in tenant allowance and security deposits payable | 641,884 | 301,970 | — | |||||||||
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses | 4,352,908 | 1,942,541 | 37,511 | |||||||||
Increase in prepaid rents | 985,703 | 81,020 | — | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 6,651,989 | 1,722,853 | (80,060 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Purchase of investment property, net | (201,085,650 ) | (104,120,077 ) | — | |||||||||
Purchase of marketable securities | (27,689,153 ) | — | — | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities | 17,038,915 | — | — | |||||||||
Investment in unconcolidated joint venture | (13,552,623 ) | — | — | |||||||||
Funding of restricted escrows | (2,682,875 ) | (6,912,578 | ) | — | ||||||||
Refundable deposit for investment in real estate | — | (8,435,000 | ) | — | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (227,971,386 ) | (119,467,655 ) | — | |||||||||
Cash flows from Financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from mortgage financing | 142,333,800 | 95,475,000 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable | 5,825,286 | — | — | |||||||||
Mortgage payments | (198,429 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Payment of loan fees and expenses | (1,608,909 ) | (718,590 | ) | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 88,632,296 | 42,613,702 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of special general partnership units | 8,672,567 | 4,281,369 | — | |||||||||
Payment of offering costs | (8,893,651 ) | (4,055,404 | ) | (225,966 ) | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in amounts due from escrow agent | 163,949 | (163,949 | ) | — | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in amounts due to affiliates, net | — | (309,055 | ) | 305,567 | ||||||||
Distributions paid | (3,298,407 ) | (302,591 | ) | — | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 231,628,502 | 136,820,482 | 79,601 | |||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 10,309,105 | 19,075,680 | (459 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 19,280,710 | 205,030 | 205,489 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 29,589,815 | $ | 19,280,710 | $ | 205,030 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 8,696,812 | $ | 2,329,904 | $ | — | ||||||
Dividends declared | $ | 7,125,331 | $ | 1,101,708 | $ | — | ||||||
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities | $ | (1,199,278 ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Proceeds from shares issued in distribution reinvestment program | $ | 1,964,848 | $ | 197,831 | $ | — |
The Company’s notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
1. Organization
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Lightstone REIT” and, together with the Operating Partnership (as defined below), the “Company”) was formed on June 8, 2004 and subsequently qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) during the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company was formed primarily for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial and residential real estate properties located throughout the United States and Puerto Rico.
The Lightstone REIT is structured as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, and substantially all of the Lightstone REIT’s current and future business is and will be conducted through Lightstone Value Plus REIT, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2004 (the “Operating Partnership”). The Lightstone REIT is managed by Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Lightstone Group (the “Sponsor”), under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. The Sponsor and Advisor are owned and controlled by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors and its Chief Executive Officer.
The Company intends to sell a maximum of 30 million common shares, at a price of $10 per share (exclusive of 4 million shares available pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 600,000 shares that could be obtained through the exercise of selling dealer warrants when and if issued and 75,000 shares that are reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock option plan). The Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (the “Registration Statement”) was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 on April 22, 2005, and on May 24, 2005, the Lightstone REIT began offering its common shares for sale to the public. Lightstone Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Sponsor, is serving as the dealer manager of the Company’s public offering (the “Offering”).
The Company sold 20,000 shares to the Advisor on July 6, 2004, for $10 per share. The Company invested the proceeds from this sale in the Operating Partnership, and as a result, held a 99.9% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The Advisor also contributed $2,000 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 200 limited partner units in the Operating Partnership. The limited partner has the right to convert operating partnership units into cash or, at the option of the Company, an equal number of common shares of the Company, as allowed by the limited partnership agreement.
A Post-Effective Amendment to the Lightstone REIT’s Registration Statement was declared effective on October 17, 2005. The Post-Effective Amendment reduced the minimum offering from 1 million shares of common stock to 200,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had reached its minimum offering by receiving subscriptions for approximately 226,000 of its common shares, representing gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.3 million. On February 1, 2006, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.7 million were released to the Company from escrow and invested in the Operating Partnership.
As of December 31, 2007, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $131.5 million have been released to the Lightstone REIT and used for the purchase of a 99.99% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company expects that its ownership percentage in the Operating Partnership will remain significant as it plans to continue to invest all net proceeds from the Offering in the Operating Partnership.
Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor, intends to periodically purchase special general partner interests (“SLP Units”) in the Operating Partnership at a cost of $100,000 per unit for each $1.0 million in offering subscriptions. Proceeds from the sale of the SLP Units will be used to fund organizational and offering costs incurred by the Company. As of December 31, 2007, offering costs of $13.2 million have been substantially offset by $13.0 million of proceeds from the sale of SLP Units. Lightstone SLP, LLC has purchased an additional $0.2 million of SLP Units subsequent to December 31, 2007
38
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
1. Organization – (continued)
The Advisor is responsible for offering and organizational costs exceeding 10% of the gross offering proceeds without recourse to the Company. Since its inception, and through December 31, 2007, the Advisor has not allocated any organizational costs to the Company. Advances for offering costs in excess of the 10% will only be reimbursed to the Advisor as additional offering proceeds are received by the Company. As of December 31, 2007, offering costs incurred were approximately $0.5 million in excess of 10%.
Through its Operating Partnership, the Company will seek to acquire and operate commercial, residential, and hospitality properties, principally in the United States. Primarily all such properties may be acquired and operated by the Company alone or jointly with another party. Since inception, the Company has completed the acquisition of the Belz Factory Outlet World in St. Augustine, Florida, four multi-family communities in Southeast Michigan, a retail power center and raw land in Omaha, Nebraska and a portfolio of industrial and office properties located in New Orleans, LA (5 industrial and 2 office properties), Baton Rouge, LA (3 industrial properties) and San Antonio, TX (4 industrial properties). In addition, the Company has made an investment in a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway in New York, NY, purchased a land parcel in Lake Jackson, TX on which it completed the development of a retail power center in the first quarter of 2008, an 8.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land, including development rights, which is intended to be used for further development of the adjacent Belz Outlet mall, five apartment communities located in Tampa, FL (one property), Charlotte, North Carolina (two properties) and Greensboro, North Carolina (two properties), and two hotels located in Houston, TX. All of the acquired properties and development activities are managed by affiliates of Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC (the “Property Manager”).
The Company’s Advisor, Property Manager and Dealer Manager are each related parties. Each of these entities will receive compensation and fees for services related to the offering and for the investment and management of the Company’s assets. These entities will receive fees during the offering, acquisition, operational and liquidation stages. The compensation levels during the offering, acquisition and operational stages are based on percentages of the offering proceeds sold, the cost of acquired properties and the annual revenue earned from such properties, and other such fees outlined in each of the respective agreements. (See Note 9, Related Party Transactions).
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries (over which Lightstone REIT exercises financial and operating control). As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a 99.99% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during a reporting period. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate, depreciable lives, revenue recognition, the collectability of trade accounts receivable and the realizability of deferred tax assets. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investments in real estate partnerships where the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but does not exercise financial and operating control, are accounted for using the equity method. See further discussion in Note 3.
39
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. All cash and cash equivalents are held in commercial paper and money market funds. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents.
Marketable Securities
Our marketable securities consist of equity securities that are designated as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Unrealized holding gains or losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains or losses resulting from the sale of these securities are determined based on the specific identification of the securities sold. Marketable securities with original maturities greater than three months and less than one year are classified as short-term; otherwise they are classified as long-term. An impairment charge is recognized when the decline in the fair value of a security below the amortized cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary. We consider various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the duration and severity of any decline in fair value below our amortized cost basis, any adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuers’ and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. The Board has authorized the Company to from time to time to invest the Company’s available cash in marketable securities of real estate related companies. The Board has approved investments up to 30% of the Company’s total assets to be made at the Company’s discretion, subject to compliance with any REIT or other restrictions. At December 31, 2007, the Company has included $1.2 million of unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The following is a summary of the Company’s available for sale securities at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | 11,952,188 | $ | (1,199,278 | ) | $ | 10,752,910 |
Revenue Recognition
Minimum rents are recognized on an accrual basis, over the terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis. The capitalized above-market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the initial lease term. Percentage rents, which are based on commercial tenants’ sales, are recognized once the sales reported by such tenants exceed any applicable breakpoints as specified in the tenants’ leases. Recoveries from commercial tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, and from residential tenants for utility costs, are recognized as revenues in the period that the applicable costs are incurred. The Company recognizes differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year.
Accounts Receivable
The Company makes estimates of the uncollectability of its accounts receivable related to base rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. The Company analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims. The Company’s reported net income is directly affected by management’s estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable. The total allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.2 million and $0 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
40
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Investment in Real Estate
Accounting for Acquisitions
The Company accounts for acquisitions of Properties in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”). The fair value of the real estate acquired is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. Purchase accounting is applied to assets and liabilities related to real estate entities acquired based upon the percentage of interest acquired. Fees incurred related to acquisitions are generally capitalized. Fees incurred in the acquisition of joint venture interest are expensed as incurred.
Upon the acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), and assumed debt in accordance with SFAS No. 141, at the date of acquisition, based on evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, the Company allocates the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation. The allocations are finalized within twelve months of the acquisition date.
In determining the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the initial non-cancelable lease term.
The aggregate value of in-place leases is determined by evaluating various factors, including an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions and similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. The value assigned to this intangible asset is amortized over the remaining lease terms ranging from one month to approximately 11 years. Optional renewal periods are not considered.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets includes tenant relationships. Factors considered by management in assigning a value to these relationships include: assumptions of probability of lease renewals, investment in tenant improvements, leasing commissions and an approximate time lapse in rental income while a new tenant is located. The value assigned to this intangible asset is amortized over the remaining lease terms ranging from one month to approximately 11 years.
Carrying Value of Assets
The amounts to be capitalized as a result of periodic improvements and additions to real estate property, and the periods over which the assets are depreciated or amortized, are determined based on the application of accounting standards that may require estimates as to fair value and the allocation of various costs to the individual assets. Differences in the amount attributed to the assets can be significant based upon the assumptions made in calculating these estimates.
41
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Impairment Evaluation
Management evaluates the recoverability of its investment in real estate assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS No. 144). This statement requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that recoverability of the asset is not assured.
The Company evaluates the long-lived assets, in accordance with SFAS No. 144 on a quarterly basis and will record an impairment charge when there is an indicator of impairment and the undiscounted projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount for a particular property. Management concluded no impairment adjustment was required through December 31, 2007. The estimated cash flows used for the impairment analysis and the determination of estimated fair value are based on the Company’s plans for the respective assets and the Company’s views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider matters such as current and historical rental rates, occupancies for the respective Properties and comparable properties, and recent sales data for comparable properties. Changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in the Company’s plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition of impairment losses, which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expense for real estate assets is computed using a straight-line method using a weighted average composite life of thirty-nine years for buildings and improvements and five to ten years for equipment and fixtures. Expenditures for tenant improvements and construction allowances paid to commercial tenants are capitalized and amortized over the initial term of each lease, currently one month to 11 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Deferred Costs
The Company capitalizes initial direct costs in accordance with SFAS No. 91, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.” The costs are capitalized upon the execution of the loan or lease and amortized over the initial term of the corresponding loan or lease. Amortization of deferred loan costs begins in the period during which the loan was originated. Deferred leasing costs are not amortized to expense until the earlier of the store opening date or the date the tenant’s lease obligation begins.
Income Taxes
The Company made an election in 2006 to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with its first taxable year, which ended December 31, 2005. Accordingly, no provision for income tax has been recorded.
We elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code in conjunction with the filing of our 2006 federal tax return. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will then be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it will be organized and operate in such a manner as to maintain treatment as a REIT and
42
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
intends to operate in such a manner so that the Company will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Through December 31, 2007, the Company has complied with the requirements for maintaining its REIT status.
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The availability of such loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2026. As the Company does not consider it likely that it will realize any future benefit from its loss carry-forward, any deferred asset resulting from the final determination of its tax losses will be fully offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operation, or cash flows. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years 2004 through 2007 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
Organization and Offering Costs
The Company estimates offering costs of approximately $300,000 if the minimum offering of 200,000 shares is sold, and approximately $30,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. Subject to limitations in terms of the maximum percentage of costs to offering proceeds that may be incurred by the Company, third-party offering expenses such as registration fees, due diligence fees, marketing costs, and professional fees, along with selling commissions and dealer manager fees paid to the Dealer Manager, are accounted for as a reduction against additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) as offering proceeds are released to the Company.
Through December 31, 2007, the Advisor has advanced approximately $13.0 million to the Company for offering costs, including commission and dealer manager fees, and the Company has directly funded an additional $0.2 million of offering costs pending further advances from the Advisor which has been subsequently repaid in January 2008. Based on gross proceeds of approximately $131.5 million from its public offering as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s responsibility for the reimbursement of advances for commissions and dealer manager fees was limited to approximately $10.6 million (or 8% of the gross offering proceeds), and its obligation for advances for organization and third-party offering costs was limited to approximately $2.7 million (or 2% of the gross offering proceeds).
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the fixed-rate mortgage debt and notes payable as of December 31, 2007 approximated the book value of approximately $243.4 million. The fair value of the mortgage debt and notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
43
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128,Earnings per Share by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. The Company has 9,000 options issued and outstanding, and does not have any warrants outstanding. As such, the numerator and the denominator used in computing both basic and diluted net loss per share allocable to common stockholders for each year presented are equal due to the net operating loss. The 9,000 options are not included in the dilutive calculation as they are anti dilutive as a result of the net operating loss applicable to stockholders.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value (such as a pricing model) and/or risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions also include assumptions about the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. This Statement also clarifies that a fair value measurement for a liability reflects its nonperformance risk. The statement is effective in the fiscal first quarter of 2008 except for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, for which the effective date is fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157, but does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 07-1, “Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide, Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies.” SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, “Investment Companies” (the “Guide”) and when companies that own or have significant stakes in investment companies should and should not retain, in their financial statements, the specialized industry accounting under the Guide. Management does not anticipate, the application of SOP 07-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 141(R) which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer shall recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued No. 160, which establishes and expands accounting and reporting standards for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, in a subsidiary and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FASB 160 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
44
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FASB No. 160 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
3. Acquisitions
St Augustine Retail Outlet Mall
On November 30, 2005, Prime Outlets Acquisition Company LLC (“Prime”), an affiliate of the Advisor, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with St. Augustine Outlet World, Ltd, an unaffiliated third party, to purchase Belz Outlets at St. Augustine, Florida. On March 31, 2006, Prime assigned its interest in the Purchase and Sale Agreement to LVP St. Augustine Outlets, LLC (“LVP St. Augustine”), a single purpose, wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, and LVP St. Augustine simultaneously completed the acquisition of the property. The total acquisition price, including acquisition-related transaction costs, was $26,921,450. In connection with the transaction, the Advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or $715,000.
Approximately $22.4 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a mortgage loan from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”) and approximately $4.5 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock. Loan proceeds from Wachovia were also used to fund approximately $4.8 million of escrows for future leasing-related expenditures, real estate taxes, insurance and debt service.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 2.6 million | $ | 2.8 million | ||||
Occupancy Percentage | 60.33 | % | 69.42 | % |
At December 31, 2007, the Company has also temporarily leased 33% of the property. The Company is in the process of expanding and renovating its St. Augustine center. The Company expects to complete the expansion and renovation in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company purchased the land adjacent to the existing center and the related development rights in the fourth quarter of 2007, and began the renovation and expansion. Total project costs to date at December 31, 2007 totaled approximately $5.0 million, including the purchase of the land and the development rights. Total project costs are expected to estimate approximately $35.2 million. The Company intends to fund the costs of this project using a portion of the proceeds from our offering.
Southeastern Michigan Multi-Family Properties
On April 26, 2006, the Sponsor entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Home Properties, L.P. and Home Properties WMF I, LLC, affiliates of Home Properties, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed real estate investment trust (collectively, “Sellers”), each an unaffiliated third party, to purchase 19 multifamily apartment communities. On June 29, 2006, the Sponsor assigned the purchaser’s interest in the Purchase and Sale Agreement with respect to four of the apartment communities to each of four single purpose, wholly owned subsidiaries of LVP Michigan Multifamily Portfolio LLC (“LVP MMP”), and the LVP MMP subsidiaries simultaneously completed the acquisition of the four properties. The Operating Partnership holds a 99% membership interest in LVP MMP, while the Lightstone REIT holds a 1% membership interest in LVP MMP. The properties are located in Southeast Michigan and were valued by an independent third-party appraiser retained by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (“Citigroup”) at an aggregate value equal to $54.3 million.
45
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
The total acquisition price, excluding acquisition-related transaction costs, was approximately $42.2 million. In connection with the transaction, the Advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.1 million. Other closing and financing related costs totaled approximately $400,000, and net pro ration adjustments for assumed liabilities, prepaid rents, real estate taxes and interest totaled $500,000.
Approximately $40.7 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a mortgage loan from Citigroup, and approximately $4.6 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock. Loan proceeds from Citigroup were also used to fund approximately $1.1 million of escrows for capital improvements, real estate taxes, and insurance.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and average occupancy for the four properties as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 7.9 million | $ | 8.6 million | ||||
Occupancy Percentage | 91.50 | % | 91.60 | % |
Oakview Plaza
On December 21, 2006, the Company, through LVP Oakview Strip Center LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, acquired a retail shopping mall in Omaha, Nebraska from Oakview Plaza North, LLC (“Oakview”), Frank R. Krejci, Vera Jane Krejci, George W. Venteicher and Susan J. Venteicher (Oakview, Mr. and Mrs. Krejci and Mr. and Mrs. Venteicher, collectively, “Seller”), none of whom are affiliated with the Company.
The property was purchased subject to a commitment to acquire a 2.1 acre parcel of land (the “Option Land”) located immediately adjacent to the property. The unimproved Option Land was subsequently acquired in July of 2007 by a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership from Oakview for a fixed contract price of $650,000. The acquisition price for the property, exclusive of the Option Land, was $33.5 million, including an acquisition fee paid to the Advisor of $0.9 million and $47,000 in other acquisition-related transaction costs. Approximately $6.0 million of the acquisition cost was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock and the remainder was funded with a $27.5 million fixed rate loan from Wachovia secured by the property. Offering proceeds were also used to fund financing related costs ($.2 million) and insurance and tax reserves ($.2 million), as well as the acquisition of the Option Land. The Property was independently appraised at $38.0 million.
Manhattan Office Building
On January 4, 2007, the Company, through LVP 1407 Broadway LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of the Sponsor (the “Joint Venture”). On the same date, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Sublease Interest”). The seller of the Sublease Interest, Gettinger Associates, L.P., is not an affiliate of the Company, its Sponsor or its subsidiaries. The property, a 42 story office building built in 1952, fronts on Broadway, 7th Avenue and 39th Street in midtown Manhattan. The property has approximately 915,000 leasable square feet, and as of the acquisition date, was 87.6% occupied (approximately 300 tenants) and leased by tenants generally engaged in the female apparel business. The ground lease, dated as of January 14, 1954, provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The Sublease Interest runs concurrently with this ground lease.
46
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
The acquisition price for the Sublease Interest was $122 million, exclusive of acquisition-related costs incurred by the Joint Venture ($3.5 million), pro rated operating expenses paid at closing ($4.1 million), financing-related costs ($1.9 million) and construction, insurance and tax reserves ($1.0 million). The acquisition was funded through a combination of $26.5 million of capital and a $106.0 million advance on a $127.3 million variable rate mortgage loan funded by Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. As an inducement to Lender to make the loan, Owner has agreed to provide Lender with a 35% net profit interest in the project, which is contingent upon a capital transaction, as defined as any transaction involving the sale, assignment, transfer, liquidation, condemnation or settlement in lieu thereof, disposition, financing, refinancing or any other conversion to cash of all or any portion of the property or equity or membership interests in Borrower, directly, other than the leasing of space for occupancy and/or any other transaction with respect to the Property or the direct or indirect ownership interests in Borrower outside the ordinary course of business. To date, the lender did not share in any net profits of the project. The lender also has a conversion option, which if upon exercised, would grant the lender a special membership interest in the Joint Venture whereby the lender will receive 35% of all distributions resulting from a capital transaction after the return of the member’s equity investment plus the member’s allowed return’s as specified in the “Net Profits Agreement”. In addition, the Company paid $1.6 million to the Advisor as an acquisition fee and legal fees to its attorney of approximately $0.1 million. The acquisition and legal fees were charged to expense by the Company during the first quarter of 2007, and are included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The Company accounted for the investment in this unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities. Initial equity from our co-venturer totaled $13.5 million (representing a 51% ownership interest). Our initial capital investment, funded with proceeds from our common stock offering, was $13.0 million (representing a 49% ownership interest). This $13.0 million investment was recorded initially at cost and will be subsequently adjusted for cash contributions and distributions, and the Company’s share of earnings and losses. The Company contributed an additional $0.6 million in 2007. Earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with this investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s results included a $7.3 million loss from investment in this unconsolidated joint venture, resulting in a net investment balance of approximately $6.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The Joint Venture plans to continue an ongoing renovation project at the property that consists of lobby, elevator and window redevelopment projects. Additional loan proceeds of up to $16.4 million are available to fund these improvements.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and average occupancy for the property at December 31, 2007 was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 36.4 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 89.7 | % |
47
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
The following table represents the condensed income statement for the unconsolidated joint venture for the period from January 4, 2007(date of inception) through December 31, 2007 (information derived from audited financial statements as of December 31, 2007):
![]() | ![]() | |||
For Period from January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) through December 31, 2007 | ||||
Total revenue | $ | 37,447,442 | ||
Total property expenses | 26,701,480 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 16,214,919 | |||
Interest expense | 9,490,576 | |||
Operating loss | (14,959,533 | ) | ||
Other income | 126,985 | |||
Net loss | (14,832,548 | ) | ||
Company’s share of net operating loss (49%) | $ | (7,267,949 | ) |
The following table represents the condensed balance sheet for the unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2007 (information derived from audited financial statements as of December 31, 2007):
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
Real estate, at cost (net): | $ | 120,370,913 | ||
Cash and restricted cash | 11,458,097 | |||
Other assets | 9,475,857 | |||
Total assets | $ | 141,304,867 | ||
Mortgage note payable | 110,847,201 | |||
Other liabilities | 17,640,362 | |||
Members’ capital | 12,817,304 | |||
Total liabilities and members’ capital | $ | 141,304,867 | ||
49% Investment in Joint Venture | $ | 6,284,675 |
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
On February 1, 2007, the Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, acquired a portfolio of industrial and office properties located in New Orleans, LA (5 industrial and 2 office properties), Baton Rouge, LA (3 industrial properties) and San Antonio, TX (4 industrial properties). As a group, the properties were 92% occupied at the acquisition, and represent approximately 1.0 million leasable square feet principally suitable for flexible industrial (54%), distribution (36%) and office (10%) uses. The properties were independently appraised at $70.7 million.
The acquisition price for the properties was $63.9 million, exclusive of approximately $1.9 million of closing costs, escrow funding for immediate repairs ($0.9 million) and insurance ($0.1 million), and financing related costs of approximately $0.6 million. In connection with the transaction, the Advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.8 million. The acquisition was funded through a combination of $14.4 million in offering proceeds and approximately $53.0 million in loan proceeds
48
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
from a fixed rate mortgage loan secured by the properties. The Company does not intend to make significant renovations or improvements to the properties. The Company believes the properties are adequately insured.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and occupancy for the properties at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 6.3 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 94.9 | % |
Brazos Crossing Mall
On June 29, 2007, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership acquired a 6.0 acre land parcel in Lake Jackson, Texas for immediate development of a 61,287 square foot power center. The land was purchased for $1.65 million cash and was funded 100% from the proceeds of the Company’s offering. Upon completion in March 2008, the center opened and is occupied by three triple net tenants: Pet Smart, Office Depot and Best Buy.
The purchase and sale agreement (the “Land Agreement”) for this transaction was negotiated between Lake Jackson Crossing Limited Partnership (formerly an affiliate of the Sponsor) and Starplex Operating, LP, an unaffiliated entity (the “Land Seller”). Prior to the closing, a 99% limited partnership interest in the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership was assigned to the Operating Partnership and the membership interests in Brazos Crossing LLC (the 1% general partner of the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership) were assigned to the Company.
The land parcel was acquired at what represents a $2.1 million discount from the expressed $3.75 million purchase price, with such difference being subsidized and funded by a retail affiliate of the Sponsor. The sale of the land parcel was a condition of the Seller’s agreement to execute a new movie theater lease at the Sponsor affiliate’s nearby retail mall. The Company owns a 100% fee simple interest in the land parcel and retail power center. The Sponsor’s affiliate will receive no future benefit or ownership interests from this transaction.
The Company entered into a construction loan in December 2007 to fund the development of the power retail center at its Lake Jackson, Texas Location. The loan requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months and bears interest at 150 basis points (1.5%) in excess of LIBOR. For the second twelve months, principal payments shall be made in monthly installments in amounts equal to one-twelfth of the principal component of an annual amortization of the principal of the loan on the basis of an assumed interest rate of 6.82% and a thirty year term. The loan is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company. The loan allows the Company to draw up to $8.2 million, and then will require monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months and bears interest at 150 basis points (1.5%) in excess of LIBOR. For the second twelve months, principal payments shall be made in monthly installments in amounts equal to one-twelfth of the principal component of an annual amortization of the principal of the loan on the basis of an assumed interest rate of 6.82% and a thirty year term. The loan is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company. The loan is guaranteed by the Company. The balance at December 31, 2007 was $5.8 million. The loan matures on December 4, 2009.
The total cost of the project, inclusive of project construction, tenant incentives, leasing costs, and land is estimated at $10.2 million. Because the debt financing for the acquisition may exceed certain leverage limitations of the REIT, the Board, including all of its independent directors has approved any leverage exceptions as required by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
49
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
Three tenants will occupy 100% of the property’s rentable square footage. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these major tenants:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space | Annual Rent Payments | Lease Term from Commencement | Party With Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Best Buy | Electronics Retailer | 20,200 | 32.90 | % | $ | 260,000 | 10 years | Tenant | ||||||||||||||||
Office Depot | Office Supplies Retailer | 21,000 | 34.30 | % | $ | 277,200 | 10 years | Tenant | ||||||||||||||||
Petsmart | Pet Supply Retailer | 20,087 | 32.80 | % | $ | 231,001 | 10 years | Tenant |
Houston Extended Stay Hotels
On October 17, 2007, the Company, through TLG Hotel Acquisitions LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (together with such subsidiary, the “Houston Partnership”), acquired two hotels located in Houston, TX (the “Katy Hotel”) and Sugar Land, TX (the “Sugar Land Hotel” and together with the Katy Hotel, the “Hotels”) from Morning View Hotels - Katy, LP, Morning View Hotels — Sugar Land, LP and Point of Southwest Gardens, Ltd., pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. The seller is not an affiliate of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Prior to the acquisition of the Hotels, our board of directors expanded the Company’s eligible investments to include the acquisition, holding and disposition of hotels (primarily extended stay hotels). The reasons for such change include the expertise of our sponsor who acquired the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies (“ESH”) and control of its management company (HVM L.L.C.) which operates 684 extended stay hotels. The ability to draw upon their expertise, the intense competition in the real estate market for all types of assets and the ability to better diversify the Company’s portfolio, caused our board of directors to review the Company’s investment objectives and expand them to include lodging facilities.
The Hotels were recently remodeled by the previous owner; however the Company intends to make a $2.8 million dollar investment in capital expenditures in 2008 to convert the Hotels to Extended Stay Deluxe (“ESD”) brand properties. The ESD brand is under license from an affiliate within the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies. The Company expects these additional renovations to be conducted over a 1-year period and will include implementing ESD’s national reservation system, new carpeting, new paint, new signage, exterior façade improvements, re-striping parking lot, guest room upgrades, landscaping and constructing pools.
The acquisition price for the Hotels was $16 million inclusive of closing costs. In connection with the transaction, the Company’s advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the contract price ($15.2 million), or approximately $0.4 million.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of $6.0 million in offering proceeds and approximately $10 million in loan proceeds from a floating rate mortgage loan secured by the Hotels.
The Company has established a taxable REIT subsidiary, LVP Acquisitions Corp. (“LVP Corp”), which has entered into operating lease agreements with each of the Katy Hotel and the Sugar Land Hotel, respectively, and LVP Corp. has entered into management agreements with HVM L.L.C., a controlled affiliate of our sponsor, for the management of the hotels.
In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 — Houston - Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 — Houston - Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $12.85 million, which includes up to an additional $2.8 million of renovation proceeds which will be borrowed as the renovation proceeds.
50
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
The mortgage loan has a term of one year with the option of a 6-month term extension, bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association Libor Daily Floating Rate plus one hundred seventy-five basis points (1.75%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months. The mortgage loan will mature on October 16, 2008, subject to the 6-month extension option described above, at which time payment of the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable thereunder will be due. The mortgage loan will be secured by the Hotels and will be non-recourse to the Registrant.
In connection with the Loan, the Company guaranteed the complete performance of the Houston Borrowers’ obligations with respect to the renovations and certain other customary guarantees.
Camden Properties
On November 16, 2007, the Company through wholly owned subsidiaries of the partnership acquired five apartment communities (“Camden Properties”) located in Tampa, Florida (one property), Charlotte, North Carolina (two properties) and Greensboro, North Carolina (two properties) from Camden Operating, L.P. (the “Seller”). The Seller is not affiliated with the Company or its subsidiaries.
The Properties, built between 1980 and 1987, are comprised of 1,576 apartment units, in the aggregate, contain a total of 1,124,249 net rentable square feet, and were 94% occupied at acquisition.
The aggregate acquisition price for the Camden Properties was approximately $99.3 million, including acquisition-related transaction costs. Approximately $20.0 million of the acquisition cost was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock and approximately $79.3 million was funded with five substantially similar fixed rate loans with Fannie Mae secured by each of the Camden Properties.
In connection with the acquisition of the properties, our Advisor received an acquisition fee of 2.75% of the gross contract price for the Camden Properties or approximately $2.65 million.
On November 16, 2007, in connection with the acquisition of the Camden Properties, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiaries obtained from Fannie Mae five substantially similar fixed rate mortgages aggregating $79.3 million (the “Loans”). The loans have a 30 year amortization period, mature in 7 years, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% per annum. The loans require monthly installments of interest only through the first three years and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of their stated terms. The Loans will mature on December 1, 2014, at which time a balance of approximately $75.0 million will be due. Although the loans were allocated among the Camden Properties, the aggregate loan amount is secured by all of the Properties.
In-place rents, net of rent concessions, and occupancy for the properties at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||
In-place annualized rents | $ | 10.5 million | ||
Occupancy Percentage | 86.9 | % |
Sarasota, Florida
On March 1, 2007, the Company entered into an option agreement to participate in a joint-venture with its Sponsor (the “JV Option” with respect to the potential joint venture, the “Joint Venture”) for the purchase of a property located at 2150 Whitfield Avenue, Sarasota, Florida (the “Sarasota Property”). On November 15, 2007, the Company exercised the JV Option and, through a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company’s operating partnership, entered into the Joint Venture and acquired the Sarasota Property.
51
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
3. Acquisitions – (continued)
In July, 2007, CAD Funding, LLC (“CAD”), an affiliate of Park Avenue Funding, LLC, had the highest bid on the Sarasota Property in a foreclosure action. Park Avenue Funding, LLC, is a real estate lending company founded in 2004 and an affiliate of the Company’s Advisor and Sponsor. CAD initiated the foreclosure action following the default of an unaffiliated third party on a loan made to the third party by CAD, for which the Sarasota Property served as security. Prior to the entry of the foreclosure judgment, the Sponsor expressed an interest in bidding at the foreclosure sale in anticipation that the Registrant would exercise the JV Option. On August 6, 2007, the Sarasota Property was indirectly acquired by the Sponsor. The Sarasota Property was contributed to the Joint Venture prior to the Registrant’s exercise of the JV Option. The contribution to the Joint Venture by the Company was $13.1 million of offering proceeds used to acquire the Sarasota Property. The property was independently appraised in May of 2006 for $17.4 million. At December 31, 2007, the Company holds a 100% interest in the Joint Venture, and the Sponsor remains a member in the joint venture The Company now owns 100% of the joint venture and the joint venture is fully consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In evaluating the Sarasota Property as a potential acquisition, the Company has considered a variety of factors, and determined that the acquisition cost was at a substantial discount to current market value. The Sarasota Property is subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. The Sarasota Property currently does not possess a tenant and is experiencing negative cash flows; however the Venture is currently negotiating with prospective tenants. The Company evaluated the asset in accordance with SFAS 144, and determined that its valuation exceeded its carrying value at December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals from the Company’s commercial real estate properties, excluding Brazos Crossing which was not yet open at December 31, 2007, are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Building | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Beyond 2012 | Total Min. Rent | |||||||||||||||||||||
St Augustine | 1,848,478 | 1,319,168 | 659,593 | 242,863 | 24,516 | 9,842 | 4,104,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Oakview Plaza | 2,543,280 | 2,432,693 | 1,929,906 | 1,592,466 | 1,592,466 | 1,633,716 | 11,724,527 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gulf Industrial Portfolio | 5,833,708 | 4,478,402 | 2,458,461 | 1,483,635 | 433,669 | 28,274 | 14,716,149 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 10,225,466 | 8,230,263 | 5,047,960 | 3,318,964 | 2,050,651 | 1,671,832 | 30,545,136 |
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations set forth the consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, as if the above described acquisitions had occurred at January 1, 2006. The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for the year ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, or for any future period.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Real estate revenues | $ | 39,256,808 | $ | 39,825,189 | ||||
Equty in loss from investment in unconsolidated joint venture | (7,267,949 | ) | (8,548,062 | ) | ||||
Net loss | (9,993,332 | ) | (16,380,741 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per share | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (2.97 | ) |
52
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
4. Mortgages Payable
Mortgages payable, totaling approximately $237.6 million at December 31, 2007, consists of the following:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Property | Loan Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | Amounts due at Maturity | ||||||||||||
St. Augustine | $ | 27,051,571 | 6.09 | % | April 2016 | $ | 23,747,523 | |||||||||
Southeastern Michigan Multi Family Properties | 40,725,000 | 5.96 | % | July 2016 | 38,138,605 | |||||||||||
Oakview Plaza | 27,500,000 | 5.49 | % | January 2017 | 25,583,137 | |||||||||||
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio | 53,025,000 | 5.83 | % | February 2017 | 49,556,985 | |||||||||||
Houston Extended Stay Hotels (Two Individual Loans) | 10,040,000 | LIBOR + 1.75 | % | October 2008 | 10,040,000 | |||||||||||
Camden Multi Family Properties – (Five Individual Loans) | 79,268,800 | 5.44 | % | December 2014 | 74,955,771 | |||||||||||
Total of eleven outstanding mortgage loans at December 31, 2007 | $ | 237,610,371 | $ | 222,022,021 |
LIBOR at December 31, 2007 was 4.60%. Monthly installments of interest only are required through the first 12 months for the St. Augustine loan, and monthly installments of principal and interest are required throughout the remainder of its stated term. Monthly installments of interest only are required through the first 60 months for the Southeastern Michigan multi-family properties, and through the first 48 months for the Camden Multi-Family properties’ loans, and monthly installments of principal and interest are required throughout the remainder of its stated term. The remaining loans are interest only until their maturity, when the amounts listed in the table above are due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. Each of the loans is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company.
The following table shows the mortgage debt maturing during the next five years and thereafter at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate mortgages | $ | 10,353,360 | $ | 338,052 | $ | 359,526 | $ | 1,586,957 | $ | 2,781,012 | $ | 222,191,464 | $ | 237,610,371 |
Lightstone Holdings, LLC (“Guarantor”), a company wholly owned by the Advisor, has guaranteed to the extent of a $27.2 million mortgage loan on the St. Augustine, Florida property, the payment of losses that the lender (“Wachovia”) may sustain as a result of fraud, misappropriation, misuse of loan proceeds or other acts of misconduct by the Company and/or its principals or affiliates. Such losses are recourse to the Guarantor under the guaranty regardless of whether Wachovia has attempted to procure payment from the Company or any other party. Further, in the event of the Company’s voluntary bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency, or the interference by the Company or its affiliates in any foreclosure proceedings or other remedy exercised by Wachovia, Guarantor has guaranteed the payment of any unpaid loan amounts. The Company has agreed, to the maximum extent permitted by its Charter, to indemnify Guarantor for any liability that it incurs under this guaranty.
Pursuant to the Company’s loan agreements, escrows in the amount of $9.6 million were held in restricted escrow accounts at December 31, 2007. These escrows will be released in accordance with the loan agreements as payments of real estate taxes, insurance and capital improvement transactions, as required. Our mortgage debt also contains clauses providing for prepayment penalties.
53
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
4. Mortgages Payable – (continued)
In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 — Houston — Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 — Houston — Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $12.85 million, which includes up to an additional $2.8 million of renovation proceeds which will be borrowed as the renovation proceeds.
The mortgage loan has a term of one year with the option of a 6-month term extension, bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association Libor Daily Floating Rate plus one hundred seventy-five basis points (1.75%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months. The mortgage loan will mature on October 16, 2008, subject to the 6-month extension option described above, at which time payment of the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable thereunder will be due. The mortgage loan is secured by the Hotels and will be non-recourse to the Company. The Company intends to extend, repay or refinance this loan upon its maturity in October of 2008.
On November 16, 2007, in connection with the acquisition of the Camden Properties, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiaries obtained from Fannie Mae five substantially similar fixed rate mortgages aggregating $79.3 million (the “Loans”). The loans have a 30 year amortization period, mature in 7 years, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% per annum. The loans require monthly installments of interest only through the first three years and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of their stated terms. The Loans will mature on December 1, 2014, at which time a balance of approximately $75.0 million will be due. Although the loans were allocated among the Camden Properties, the aggregate loan amount is secured by all of the Properties.
The Company is required to maintain minimum debt service coverage ratios as defined in the loan documents for the St. Augustine, Houston extended stay hotels and Southeastern Michigan multi family properties. The Company was in compliance with its financial covenants at December 31, 2007.
5. Notes Payable
On December 5, 2007, the Company entered into a construction loan to fund the development of the power retail center at its Lake Jackson, Texas Location. The loan allows the Company to draw up to $8.2 million, and then will require monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months and bears interest at 150 basis points (1.5%) in excess of LIBOR. For the second twelve months, principal payments shall be made in monthly installments in amounts equal to one-twelfth of the principal component of an annual amortization of the principal of the loan on the basis of an assumed interest rate of 6.82% and a thirty year term. The loan is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company. The loan is guaranteed by the Company. The balance at December 31, 2007 was $5.8 million. The loan matures on December 4, 2009.
6. Intangible Assets
At December 31, 2007, the Company had intangible assets relating to above-market leases from property acquisitions, intangible assets related to leases in place at the time of acquisition, intangible assets related to leasing costs, and intangible liabilities relating to below-market leases from property acquisitions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, during the fourth quarter of 2006, based on additional information obtained subsequent to the close of the St. Augustine, Florida property, the Company adjusted the purchase price allocation for this property.
54
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
6. Intangible Assets – (continued)
The following table sets forth the Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2007 | At December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Net | Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles | $ | 4,628,921 | $ | (2,646,629 | ) | $ | 1,982,292 | $ | 3,167,190 | $ | (1,365,512 | ) | $ | 1,801,678 | ||||||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles | 1,203,902 | (373,175 | ) | 830,727 | 677,245 | (75,258 | ) | 601,987 | ||||||||||||||||
Acquired leasing costs | 1,758,805 | (605,093 | ) | 1,153,712 | 854,886 | (119,807 | ) | 735,079 | ||||||||||||||||
Acquired below market lease intangibles | 4,266,726 | (1,874,843 | ) | 2,391,883 | 2,964,498 | (953,435 | ) | 2,011,063 |
The following table presents the amortization of the acquired in-place lease intangibles, acquired above market lease costs and the below market lease costs for properties owned at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of: | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired above market lease value | $ | 386,759 | $ | 206,755 | $ | 97,974 | $ | 53,943 | $ | 23,379 | $ | 61,917 | $ | 830,727 | ||||||||||||||
Acquired below market lease value | (1,116,755 | ) | (578,214 | ) | (282,515 | ) | (137,611 | ) | (94,455 | ) | (182,333 | ) | (2,391,883 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Projected future net rental income decrease | $ | (729,997 | ) | $ | (371,458 | ) | $ | (184,541 | ) | $ | (83,668 | ) | $ | (71,076 | ) | $ | (120,416 | ) | $ | (1,561,156 | ) | |||||||
Acquired in-place lease value | $ | 812,091 | $ | 520,951 | $ | 228,538 | $ | 113,896 | $ | 72,985 | $ | 233,831 | $ | 1,982,292 |
Actual total amortization expense included in depreciation and amortization expense in our statement of operations was $1.9 million, $1.5 million and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Amortization of acquired above and below market lease values is included in total revenues on our statement of operations was $0.6 million, $0.9 million and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
7. Distributions Payable
On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend for the three-month period ending December 31, 2007. The dividend was calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day. If paid each day for a 365-day period, the dividend represented a 7.0 percent annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00. The dividend in the amount of $2.2 million was paid in full in January 2008 using a combination of cash ($1.3 million), and pursuant to the Company’s Distribution Reinvestment Program, shares of the Company’s stock at a discounted price of $9.50 per share ($0.9 million). The amount of dividends to be distributed to stockholders in the future will be determined by the Board of Directors and are dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of dividends, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors also declared dividends for its special general partner interests. The
55
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
7. Distributions Payable – (continued)
distribution for the fourth quarter 2007 in the amount of $0.2 million was included in distributions payable at December 31, 2007 and was paid in January 2008.
8. Deposit for Real Estate Purchase
At December 31, 2006, the Company recorded $8.4 million as a refundable deposit for two real estate transactions that subsequently closed in the first quarter. Deposits for real estate were returned to the Company upon the conclusion of its due diligence where such properties are deemed infeasible for acquisition. At December 31, 2007, there were no refundable deposits recorded.
9. Stockholder’s Equity
Preferred Shares
Shares of preferred stock may be issued in the future in one or more series as authorized by the Lightstone REIT’s board of directors. Prior to the issuance of shares of any series, the board of directors is required by the Lightstone REIT’s charter to fix the number of shares to be included in each series and the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each series. Because the Lightstone REIT’s board of directors has the power to establish the preferences, powers and rights of each series of preferred stock, it may provide the holders of any series of preferred stock with preferences, powers and rights, voting or otherwise, senior to the rights of holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Lightstone REIT, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Lightstone REIT had no outstanding preferred shares.
Common Shares
All of the common stock being offered by the Lightstone REIT will be duly authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of stock and to the provisions of its charter regarding the restriction on the ownership and transfer of shares of our stock, holders of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock will be entitled to receive distributions if authorized by the board of directors and to share ratably in the Lightstone REIT’s assets available for distribution to the stockholders in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Each outstanding share of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election, and the holders of the remaining common stock will not be able to elect any directors.
Holders of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock have no conversion, sinking fund, redemption or exchange rights, and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of its securities. Maryland law provides that a stockholder has appraisal rights in connection with some transactions. However, the Lightstone REIT’s charter provides that the holders of its stock do not have appraisal rights unless a majority of the board of directors determines that such rights shall apply. Shares of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock have equal dividend, distribution, liquidation and other rights.
Under its charter, the Lightstone REIT cannot make some material changes to its business form or operations without the approval of stockholders holding at least a majority of the shares of our stock entitled to vote on the matter. These include (1) amendment of its charter, (2) its liquidation or dissolution, (3) its reorganization, and (4) its merger, consolidation or the sale or other disposition of its assets. Share exchanges in
56
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
9. Stockholder’s Equity – (continued)
which the Lightstone REIT is the acquirer, however, do not require stockholder approval. The Lightstone REIT had 13.6 million and 4.3 million shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Equity Compensation Plan
The Lightstone REIT has adopted a stock option plan under which its independent directors are eligible to receive annual nondiscretionary awards of nonqualified stock options. The Lightstone REIT’s stock option plan is designed to enhance the Lightstone REIT’s profitability and value for the benefit of stockholders by enabling the Lightstone REIT to offer independent directors stock-based incentives, thereby creating a means to raise the level of equity ownership by such individuals in order to attract, retain and reward such individuals and strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and the Lightstone REIT’s stockholders.
The Lightstone REIT has authorized and reserved 75,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under the stock option plan. The board of directors may make appropriate adjustments to the number of shares available for awards and the terms of outstanding awards under the stock option plan to reflect any change in the Lightstone REIT’s capital structure or business, stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of its assets.
The Lightstone REIT’s stock option plan provides for the automatic grant of a nonqualified stock option to each of the Lightstone REIT’s independent directors, without any further action by the board of directors or the stockholders, to purchase 3,000 shares of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock on the date of each annual stockholders meeting. The exercise price for all stock options granted under the stock option plan will be fixed at $10 per share until the termination of the Lightstone REIT’s initial public offering, and thereafter the exercise price for stock options granted to the independent directors will be equal to the fair market value of a share on the last business day preceding the annual meeting of stockholders. The term of each such option will be 10 years. Options granted to non-employee directors will vest and become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the independent director is a director on the board of directors on that date. The Company granted 9,000 options to its independent directors on the date of the annual stockholder’s meeting on July 9, 2007 under the Lightstone REIT’s current plan. The expense required to be recorded by the Company
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of, and accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with, FAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)). Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. The Company has applied the modified prospective method of adoption, under which prior periods are not restated for comparative purposes. Under the modified prospective method, FAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2005 that are subsequently modified, repurchased or cancelled. There were no options grants prior to 2007, and as such, there was no compensation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. The compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007, was insignificant. Stock-based compensation is classified within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures, which is an immaterial adjustment. FAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Lightstone REIT’s stock option plan to the contrary, no stock option issued pursuant thereto may be exercised if such exercise would jeopardize the Lightstone REIT’s status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.
57
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
9. Stockholder’s Equity – (continued)
Dividends
The Board of Directors of the Lightstone REIT declared a dividend for each quarter in 2007, 2006 and for the quarter ending March 31, 2008. The dividends have been calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this three-month period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day, which, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 7.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00. Total dividends declared for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $7.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The dividend declared for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 will be paid in cash, in April 2008, to stockholders of record as of March 31, 2008.
10. Related Party Transactions
The Lightstone REIT has agreements with the Dealer Manager, Advisor and Property Manager to pay certain fees, as follows, in exchange for services performed by these entities and other affiliated entities. The Lightstone REIT’s ability to secure financing and subsequent real estate operations are dependent upon its Advisor, Property Manager, Dealer Manager and their affiliates to perform such services as provided in these agreements.
![]() | ![]() | |
Selling Commission | The Dealer Manager will be paid up to 7% of the gross offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. Selling commissions are expected to be approximately $21,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30 million shares is sold. | |
Dealer Management Fee | The Dealer Manager will be paid up to 1% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers. The estimated dealer management fee is expected to be approximately $3,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30 million shares is sold. | |
Soliciting Dealer Warrants | The Dealer Manager may buy up to 600,000 warrants at a purchase price of $.0008 per warrant. Each warrant will be exercisable for one share of the Lightstone REIT’s common stock at an exercise price of $12.00 per share. | |
Reimbursement of Offering Expenses | Reimbursement of all offering costs, including the commissions and dealer management fees indicated above, are estimated at approximately $30 million if the maximum offering of 30 million shares is sold. The Lightstone REIT will sell a special general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC (an affiliate of the Sponsor) and apply all the sales proceeds to offset such costs. | |
Acquisition Fee | The Advisor will be paid an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the gross contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of each property purchased. The Advisor will also be reimbursed for expenses that it incurs in connection with the purchase of a property. The Lightstone REIT anticipates that acquisition expenses will be between 1% and 1.5% of a property’s purchase price, and acquisition fees and expenses are capped at 5% of the gross contract purchase price of the property. The actual amounts of these fees and reimbursements depend upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. However, $33,000,000 may be paid as an acquisition fee and for the reimbursement of acquisition expenses if the maximum offering is sold, assuming aggregate long-term permanent leverage of approximately 75%. |
58
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
10. Related Party Transactions – (continued)
![]() | ![]() | |
Fees | Amount | |
Property Management – Residential/Retail/ Hospitality | The Property Manager will be paid a monthly management fee of up to 5% of the gross revenues from residential, hospitality and retail properties. Lightstone REIT may pay the Property Manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. | |
Property Management – Office/Industrial | The Property Manager will be paid monthly property management and leasing fees of up to 4.5% of gross revenues from office and industrial properties. In addition, the Lightstone REIT may pay the Property Manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. | |
Asset Management Fee | The Advisor or its affiliates will be paid an asset management fee of 0.55% of the Lightstone REIT’s average invested assets, as defined, payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1375 of 1% of average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceeding quarter. | |
Reimbursement of Other expenses | For any year in which the Lightstone REIT qualifies as a REIT, the Advisor must reimburse the Lightstone REIT for the amounts, if any, by which the total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of 2% of average invested assets, as defined, for that fiscal year, or, 25% of net income for that fiscal year. Items such as property operating expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, interest payments, taxes, non-cash expenditures, the special liquidation distribution, the special termination distribution, organization and offering expenses, and acquisition fees and expenses are excluded from the definition of total operating expenses, which otherwise includes the aggregate expense of any kind paid or incurred by the Lightstone REIT. | |
The Advisor or its affiliates will be reimbursed for expenses that may include costs of goods and services, administrative services and non-supervisory services performed directly for the Lightstone REIT by independent parties. |
Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of our Sponsor, has and continues to purchase special General partner interests in the Operating Partnership. These special general partner interests, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC to a portion of any regular distributions made by the Operating Partnership. Distributions of $0.7 million were declared and $0.5 million were paid during the year ended December 31, 2007. The distribution for the fourth quarter 2007 in the amount of $0.2 million was paid in January 2008. Such distributions, paid current at a 7% annualized rate of return to Lightstone SLP, LLC through December 31, 2007 and will always be subordinated until stockholders receive a stated preferred return, as described below:
59
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
10. Related Party Transactions – (continued)
The special general partner interests will also entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC to a portion of any liquidating distributions made by the Operating Partnership. The value of such distributions will depend upon the net sale proceeds upon the liquidation of the Lightstone REIT and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. Liquidating distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC will always be subordinated until stockholders receive a distribution equal to their initial investment plus a stated preferred return, as described below:
![]() | ![]() | |
Liquidating Stage Distributions | Amount of Distribution | |
7% Stockholder Return Threshold | Once stockholders have received liquidation distributions, and a cumulative non-compounded 7% return per year on their initial net investment, Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive available distributions until it has received an amount equal to its initial purchase price of the special general partner interests plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year. | |
12% Stockholder Return Threshold | Once stockholders have received liquidation distributions, and a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their initial net investment (including amounts equaling a 7% return on their net investment as described above), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions from the Operating Partnership will be payable to the stockholders, and 30% of such amount will be payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | |
Returns in Excess of 12% | After stockholders and Lightstone LP, LLC have received liquidation distributions, and a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their initial net investment, 60% of any remaining distributions from the Operating Partnership will be distributable to stockholders, and 40% of such amount will be payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC. |
![]() | ![]() | |
Operating Stage Distributions | Amount of Distribution | |
7% stockholder Return Threshold | Once a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% return on their net investment is realized by stockholders, Lightstone SLP, LLC is eligible to receive available distributions from the Operating Partnership until it has received an amount equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on the purchase price of the special general partner interests. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of the Lightstone REIT’s assets. | |
12% Stockholder Return Threshold | Once a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year is realized by stockholders on their net investment (including amounts equaling a 7% return on their net investment as described above), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions from the Operating Partnership will be payable to the stockholders, and 30% of such amount will be payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | |
Returns in Excess of 12% | After the 12% return threshold is realized by stockholders and Lightstone SLP, LLC, 60% of any remaining distributions from the Operating Partnership will be distributable to stockholders, and 40% of such amount will be payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC. |
60
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
10. Related Party Transactions – (continued)
The Lightstone REIT pursuant to the arrangements described above has recorded the following amounts as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Acquisition fees | $ | 6,551,896 | $ | 2,771,992 | — | |||||||
Asset management fees | 1,033,371 | 274,724 | — | |||||||||
Property management fees | 1,057,272 | 328,532 | — | |||||||||
Acquisition expenses reimbursed to Advisor | 635,848 | — | — | |||||||||
Total | $ | 9,278,387 | $ | 3,375,248 | — |
In July of 2007, the Company purchased a $16.0 million certificate of deposit with an affiliate of the Advisor. The certificate of deposit matured in less than three months, and earned interest at 10 percent. The Company redeemed the certificate of deposit in September of 2007, and has included $0.3 million in interest income from this investment.
11. Segment Information
The Company currently operates in five business segments as of December 31, 2007: (i) retail real estate, (ii) residential real estate, (iii) industrial real estate (iv) office real estate and (v) hospitality. The Company’s advisor and its affiliates provide leasing, property and facilities management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its portfolio. The Company’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were exclusively derived from activities in the United States. No revenues from foreign countries were received or reported. The Company had no long-lived assets in foreign locations as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, excluding depreciation and amortization.
The Company evaluates performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in each real estate segment.
61
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
11. Segment Information – (continued)
Selected results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and selected asset information regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Residential | Industrial | Hospitality | Office | Corporate | Year Ended December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 5,870,238 | $ | 9,115,538 | $ | 6,010,341 | $ | 534,088 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 21,530,205 | ||||||||||||||
Tenant recovery income | 2,077,295 | 129,533 | 1,520,368 | 2,254 | — | — | 3,729,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,947,533 | 9,245,071 | 7,530,709 | 536,342 | — | — | 25,259,655 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 2,735,067 | 4,431,535 | 1,805,789 | 607,439 | — | — | 9,579,830 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 949,572 | 1,056,977 | 698,489 | 34,828 | — | — | 2,739,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative costs | 6,205 | 252,591 | 5,919 | 1,568 | — | 3,444,080 | 3,710,363 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,210,951 | 1,306,107 | 2,579,386 | 66,993 | — | — | 6,163,437 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 5,901,795 | 7,047,210 | 5,089,583 | 710,828 | — | 3,444,080 | 22,193,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net property operations | 2,045,738 | 2,197,861 | 2,441,126 | (174,486 | ) | — | (3,444,080 | ) | 3,066,159 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income/(expense) | 25,020 | 1,151,017 | 13,021 | 259,661 | — | (286,679 | ) | 1,162,040 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 99,779 | 4,413 | 12,047 | 1,763,529 | 1,879,768 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Sale of Securities | 1,301,949 | 1,301,949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (3,276,738 | ) | (3,045,229 | ) | (2,900,529 | ) | (161,887 | ) | — | — | (9,384,383 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss in Unconsolidated joint ventures | — | — | — | — | (7,267,949 | ) | — | (7,267,949 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss applicable to common shares | $ | (1,106,201 | ) | $ | 308,062 | $ | (434,335 | ) | $ | (76,712 | ) | $ | (7,267,949 | ) | $ | (665,255 | ) | $ | (9,242,390 | ) | ||||||||
Balance sheet financial data at December 31, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate assets, net | $ | 70,071,922 | $ | 141,155,304 | $ | 76,820,677 | $ | 16,249,048 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 304,296,951 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted escrows | 5,937,368 | 2,665,972 | 992,113 | — | — | — | 9,595,453 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture | — | — | — | — | 6,284,675 | — | 6,284,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due from Affiliate | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant and other accounts receivable | 758,060 | 338,685 | 372,683 | 61,752 | — | — | 1,531,180 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net | 1,079,320 | — | 902,972 | — | — | — | 1,982,292 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net | 437,907 | 116,077 | 276,743 | — | — | — | 830,727 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred leasing costs, net | 634,205 | — | 674,386 | — | — | — | 1,308,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 676,163 | 1,060,173 | 312,298 | 105,926 | — | — | 2,154,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 126,652 | 676,521 | 200,877 | 251,786 | — | 118,364 | 1,374,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-segmented assets | — | — | — | — | — | 40,342,725 | 40,342,725 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 79,721,597 | $ | 146,012,732 | $ | 80,552,749 | $ | 16,668,512 | $ | 6,284,675 | $ | 40,461,089 | $ | 369,701,354 | ||||||||||||||
Total Mortgage and Note Payable | $ | 60,376,858 | $ | 119,993,800 | $ | 53,025,000 | $ | 10,040,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 243,435,658 |
62
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
11. Segment Information – (continued)
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Residential | Industrial | Hospitality | Office | Corporate | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 3,292,292 | $ | 3,979,446 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,271,738 | ||||||||||||||
Tenant recovery income | 990,929 | — | — | — | — | — | 990,929 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,283,221 | 3,979,446 | — | — | — | — | 8,262,667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 1,666,335 | 1,990,579 | — | — | — | — | 3,656,914 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 400,968 | 481,244 | — | — | — | — | 882,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,279,376 | 1,395,443 | — | — | — | — | 2,674,819 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative costs | — | — | — | — | — | 808,502 | 808,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 3,346,679 | 3,867,266 | — | — | — | 808,502 | 8,022,447 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net property operations | 936,542 | 112,180 | — | — | — | (808,502 ) | 240,220 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income | 59,256 | 291,705 | — | — | — | — | 350,961 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 70,339 | — | — | — | — | 389,577 | 459,916 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (1,322,050 ) | (1,265,477 ) | — | — | — | — | (2,587,527 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest | — | — | — | — | — | 86 | 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income applicable to common shares | $ | (255,913 ) | $ | (861,592 ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (418,839 ) | $ | (1,536,344 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance sheet financial data at December 31, 2006: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate assets, net | $ | 59,195,731 | $ | 41,978,151 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 101,173,882 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted escrows | 5,167,687 | 1,744,891 | — | — | — | — | 6,912,578 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit for real estate purchase | — | — | — | — | — | 8,435,000 | 8,435,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant and other accounts receivable | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net | 1,553,340 | 248,338 | — | — | — | — | 1,801,678 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net | 601,987 | — | 601,987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 758,438 | — | — | — | — | — | 758,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 113,426 | 446,900 | — | — | — | 11,660 | 571,986 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-segmented assets | — | — | 20,452,668 | 20,452,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 67,390,609 | $ | 44,418,280 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,899,328 | $ | 140,708,217 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage and note payable | $ | 54,750,000 | $ | 40,725,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 95,475,000 |
63
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
11. Segment Information – (continued)
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Multi Family | Industrial | Hospitality | Office | Corporate | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Tenant recovery income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and adminsitrative costs | — | — | — | — | — | 117,571 | 117,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | — | — | — | — | — | 117,571 | 117,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net property operations | — | — | — | — | — | (117,571 | ) | (117,571 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest | — | — | — | — | — | 1,164 | 1,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income applicable to common shares | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (116,407 ) | $ | (116,407 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance sheet financial data at December 31, 2005: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate assets, net | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Restricted escrows | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit for real estate purchase | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant and other accounts receivable | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-segmented assets | — | — | — | — | — | 430,996 | 430,996 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 430,996 | $ | 430,996 |
64
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
12. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ynded December 31, | Quarter Ended December 31, | Quarter Ended September 30, | Quarter Ended June 30, | Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 25,259,655 | $ | 7,985,616 | $ | 6,051,962 | $ | 6,006,174 | $ | 5,215,903 | ||||||||||
Net loss | (9,242,390 | ) | (543,596 | ) | (1,884,211 | ) | (2,451,828 | ) | (4,362,755 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (1.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | Quarter Ended December 31, | Quarter Ended September 30, | Quarter Ended June 30, | Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 8,262,667 | $ | 3,698,776 | $ | 3,071,771 | $ | 1,479,310 | $ | 12,810 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (1,536,344 | ) | (739,636 | ) | (822,606 | ) | 116,060 | (90,162 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.96 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.37 | ) |
13. Legal Proceedings
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Lightstone REIT may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes.
On March 29, 2006, Jonathan Gould, a former member of our Board of Directors and Senior Vice-President-Acquisitions, filed a lawsuit against us in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit alleges, among other things, that Mr. Gould was insufficiently compensated for his services to us as director and officer. Mr. Gould sought damages of (i) up to $11,500,000 or (ii) a 2.5% ownership interest in all properties that we acquire and an option to acquire up to 5% of the membership interests of Lightstone SLP, LLC. We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. After review of the motion to dismiss, counsel for Mr. Gould represented that Mr. Gould was dropping his claim for ownership interest in the properties we acquire and his claim for membership interests. Mr. Gould’s counsel represented that he would be suing only under theories of quantum merit and unjust enrichment seeking the value of work he performed. Counsel for the Lightstone REIT made motion to dismiss Mr. Gould’s complaint, which was granted by Judge Sweeney. Mr. Gould has filed an appeal of the decision dismissing his case, which is pending. Management believes that this suit is frivolous and entirely without merit and intends to defend against these charges vigorously.
On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC (“Office Owner”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC (“Mezz II”), consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest (the “Sublease Interest”) in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Office Property”). Mezz II is a joint venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC (“LVP LLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC (“Manager”), which is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.
The Sublease Interest was acquired pursuant to a Sale and Purchase of Leasehold Agreement with Gettinger Associates, L.P. (“Gettinger”). In July 2006, Abraham Kamber Company, as sublessor under the sublease (“Sublessor”), served two notices of default on Gettinger (the “Default Notices”). The first alleged
65
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
13. Legal Proceedings – (continued)
that Gettinger had failed to satisfy its obligations in performing certain renovations and the second asserted numerous defaults relating to Gettinger’s purported failure to maintain the Office Property in compliance with its contractual obligations.
In response to the Default Notices, Gettinger commenced legal action and obtained an injunction that extends its time to cure any default, prohibits interference with its leasehold interest and prohibits Sublessor from terminating its sublease pending resolution of the litigation. A motion by Sublessor for partial summary judgment, alleging that certain work on the Office Property required its prior approval, was denied by the Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, by agreement of the parties, a stay was entered precluding the termination of the Sublease Interest pending a final decision on Sublessor’s claim of defaults under the Sublease Interest. In addition, the parties stipulated to the intervention of Office Owner as a party to the proceedings. The parties have been directed to engage in and complete discovery. We consider the litigation to be without merit.
Prior to consummating the acquisition of the Sublease Interest, Office Owner received a letter from Sublessor indicating that Sublessor would consider such acquisition a default under the original sublease, which prohibits assignments of the Sublease Interest when there is an outstanding default there under. On February 16, 2007, Office Owner received a Notice to Cure from Sublessor stating the transfer of the Sublease Interest occurred in violation of the Sublease given Sublessor’s position that Office Seller is in default. Office Owner will commence and vigorously pursue litigation in order to challenge the default, receive an injunction and toll the termination period provided for in the Sublease.
On September 4, 2007, Office Owner commenced a new action against Sublessor alleging a number claims, including the claims that Sublessor has breached the sublease and committed intentional torts against Office Owner by (among other things) issuing multiple groundless default notices, with the aim of prematurely terminating the sublease and depriving Office Owner of its valuable interest in the sublease. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that Office Owner has not defaulted under the sublease, damages for the losses Office Owner has incurred as a result of Sublessor’s wrongful conduct, and an injunction to prevent Sublessor from issuing further default notices without valid grounds or in bad faith.
As of the date hereof, we are not a party to any other material pending legal proceedings.
66
Lightstone Value Plus REIT, Inc.
(A Maryland Corporation)
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost(A) | Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition | Gross Amount at Which Carried at End of Period | Accumulated Depreciation(C) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrance | Land | Buildings and Improvements | Land and Improvements | Buildings and Improvements | Total(B) | Date Acquired | Depreciable Life(D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belz Factory Outlet St Augustine, FL | 27,051,571 | $ | 5,384,290 | $ | 22,374,795 | $ | 38,595 | $ | 5,384,290 | $ | 22,413,390 | $ | 27,797,680 | $ | (1,512,275 | ) | 3/29/2006 | (D) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Four Residential Communities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southeatern, Michigan | 40,725,000 | 8,051,125 | 34,297,538 | 413,552 | 8,116,520 | 34,645,695 | 42,762,215 | (1,318,109 | ) | 6/29/2006 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakview Plaza | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omaha, Nebraska | 27,500,000 | 6,705,942 | 25,462,968 | 660,521 | 7,355,942 | 25,473,490 | 32,829,432 | (804,789 | ) | 12/21/2006 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gulfcoast Industrial Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Orleans/Baton Rouge, Louisiana & San Antonio, Texas | 53,025,000 | 12,767,476 | 51,648,719 | 482,798 | 12,767,476 | 52,131,516 | 64,898,992 | (1,552,037 | ) | 2/1/2007 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brazos Crossing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake Jackson, Texas | — | 1,688,326 | — | — | 1,688,326 | — | 1,688,326 | — | 6/29/2007 | (D) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belz Factory Outlet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St Augustine, FL | — | 2,842,650 | — | — | 2,842,650 | — | 2,842,650 | — | 10/2/2007 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston ES Hotels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas | 10,040,000 | 1,900,546 | 14,359,818 | — | 1,900,546 | 14,359,818 | 16,260,364 | (62,315 | ) | 10/17/2007 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sarasota | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sarasota, Florida | — | 2,000,000 | 11,291,586 | — | 2,000,000 | 11,291,586 | 13,291,586 | (35,286 | ) | 11/15/2007 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Camden Apartments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida | 79,268,800 | 19,976,388 | 79,905,549 | — | 19,976,388 | 79,905,549 | 99,881,937 | (170,739 | ) | 11/16/2007 | (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 237,610,371 | $ | 61,316,743 | $ | 239,340,973 | $ | 1,595,466 | $ | 62,032,138 | $ | 240,221,044 | $ | 302,253,182 | $ | (5,455,550 | ) |
Notes To Schedule III:
(A) | The initial cost to the Company represents the original purchase price of the property, including amounts incurred subsequent to acquisition which were contemplated at the time the property was acquired. |
F-67
(B) | Reconciliation of total real estate owned: |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 102,358,472 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Purchases of investment properties | 201,484,789 | 104,093,295 | — | |||||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles | (1,461,731 | ) | (3,167,190 | ) | — | |||||||
Acquired in-place lease intangibles (commissions) | (903,919 | ) | (677,245 | ) | — | |||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles | (526,657 | ) | (854,886 | ) | — | |||||||
Acquired below market lease intangibles | 1,302,228 | 2,964,498 | — | |||||||||
Balance at end of year | $ | 302,253,182 | $ | 102,358,472 | $ | — |
(C) | Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation, note amortization is not included for purposes of this disclosure: |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1,184,590 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Depreciation expense | 4,298,367 | 1,184,590 | — | |||||||||
Disposals | (27,407 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 5,455,550 | $ | 1,184,590 | $ | — |
(D) | Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives: |
![]() | ![]() | |||
Buildings and improvements | 15 – 39 years | |||
Tenant improvements and equipment | 5 – 10 years |
F-68
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Members
1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC and Subsidiaries (the ”Company”) as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statement of operations, members’ capital and cash flows for the period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
March 28, 2008
Edison, New Jersey
69
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2007
![]() | ![]() | |||
ASSETS | ||||
Real estate, at cost | ||||
Building and improvements | $ | 106,394,693 | ||
Tenant improvements | 12,461,728 | |||
118,856,421 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (7,495,184 ) | |||
111,361,237 | ||||
In-place lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $7,159,460 | 6,891,569 | |||
Above-market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $1,335,085 | 2,118,107 | |||
Total real estate | 120,370,913 | |||
Cash | 1,986,588 | |||
Restricted cash escrows | 9,471,509 | |||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $393,382 | 1,344,327 | |||
Accrued straight lined rent | 950,788 | |||
Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,029,572 | 3,319,757 | |||
Prepaid real estate taxes | 3,033,932 | |||
Prepaid and other assets | 827,053 | |||
Total assets | $ | 141,304,867 | ||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL | ||||
Mortgage note payable | $ | 110,847,201 | ||
Accrued interest payable | 431,418 | |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2,725,770 | |||
Accrued tenant improvement allowances | 987,680 | |||
Deferred rental income | 456,262 | |||
Below-market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $1,526,150 | 4,876,419 | |||
Tenant security deposits | 8,162,813 | |||
Total liabilities | 128,487,563 | |||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Members’ Capital | 12,817,304 | |||
Total liabilities and members’ capital | $ | 141,304,867 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
70
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
![]() | ![]() | |||
Revenue | ||||
Rental | $ | 36,119,292 | ||
Tenant reimbursements | 1,328,150 | |||
Total revenue | 37,447,442 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Property operations | 20,290,118 | |||
Real estate taxes | 6,411,362 | |||
Depreciation | 7,495,184 | |||
Amortization | 8,719,735 | |||
Interest, including amortization of deferred financing costs of $469,297 | 9,490,576 | |||
Total expenses | 52,406,975 | |||
Operating loss | (14,959,533 ) | |||
Other income | 126,985 | |||
Net loss | $ | (14,832,548 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
71
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Lightstone 1407 Manager, LLC | LVP 1407 Broadway LLC | Total Members’ Capital | ||||||||||
Initial contributions at date of inception on January 4, 2007 | $ | 13,511,866 | $ | 12,981,989 | $ | 26,493,855 | ||||||
Contributions | 589,558 | 566,439 | 1,155,997 | |||||||||
Net loss | (7,564,599 | ) | (7,267,949 | ) | (14,832,548 | ) | ||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 | $ | 6,536,825 | $ | 6,280,479 | $ | 12,817,304 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
72
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Period from January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
![]() | ![]() | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||
Net loss | $ | (14,832,548 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities | ||||
Amortization of above/below-market lease intangibles (included in rental revenue) | (191,065 ) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 16,214,919 | |||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 469,297 | |||
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities | ||||
Accounts receivable | (1,344,327 | ) | ||
Accrued straight lined rent | (950,788 | ) | ||
Prepaid real estate tax | (3,033,932 | ) | ||
Prepaid and other assets | (827,053 | ) | ||
Accrued interest payable | 431,418 | |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2,725,770 | |||
Deferred rental income | 456,262 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | (882,047 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||
Expenditures for real estate | (132,489,505 | ) | ||
Increase in restricted cash escrows, primarily security deposits | (9,471,509 | ) | ||
Security deposits | 8,162,813 | |||
Payment of leasing costs | (251,803 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities | (134,050,004 | ) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||
Payment of fnancing costs | (1,578,414 | ) | ||
Proceeds from mortgage note payable | 110,847,201 | |||
Contributions from Members | 27,649,852 | |||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 136,918,639 | |||
Net increase in cash | 1,986,588 | |||
Cash at beginning of period | — | |||
Cash at end of period | $ | 1,986,588 | ||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 8,589,861 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
73
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 1 — Formation and Organization of the Company
On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC (“NY Owner”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC (“Mezz II”), consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “NY Property”). Mezz II is a joint venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC (“LVP LLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the operating partnership of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC (“Manager”), which is wholly-owned by David Lichtenstein, member, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.
The Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. is managed by Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Lightstone Group (the “Sponsor”), under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. The Sponsor and Advisor are owned and controlled by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of the Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. board of directors and its Chief Executive Officer.
Mezz II (the “Company”) is a Delaware limited liability company that through NY Owner owns, leases and operates a 42-story office building containing approximately 914,762 square feet located in New York, New York (the “Property”).
Under the terms of the Contribution Agreement, 51.0% of the Company is owned by Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC and 49.0% of the Company is owned by LVP 1407 Broadway LLC (collectively, the “Members”).
The Operating Agreement provides that additional capital contributions, allocations of profit and loss, and distributions to members are generally made in accordance with each member’s percentage interest in the Company.
In accordance with the Operating Agreement, the Company has perpetual existence unless sooner dissolved upon the occurrence of a defined termination event. No member can transfer its interest in any part of the Company without obtaining the prior written consent of the other member.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries over which the Company exercises financial and operating control. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during a reporting period. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate, depreciable lives, revenue recognition, the collectability of tenant accounts receivable and the realizability of deferred tax assets. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investment in Real Estate
Accounting for Acquisitions
The Company accounts for acquisitions of Properties in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”). The fair value of the real estate acquired is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. Purchase accounting is applied to
74
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
assets and liabilities related to real estate entities acquired based upon the percentage of interest acquired. Fees incurred related to acquisitions are generally capitalized.
Upon the acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), and assumed debt in accordance with SFAS No. 141, at the date of acquisition, based on evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, the Company allocates the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation. The allocations are finalized within twelve months of the acquisition date.
In determining the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above- market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the initial non-cancelable lease term.
The aggregate value of in-place leases is determined by evaluating various factors, including an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions and similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. The value assigned to this intangible asset is amortized over the remaining lease terms ranging from one month to approximately 10 years. Optional renewal periods are not considered.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets includes tenant relationships. Factors considered by management in assigning a value to these relationships include: assumptions of probability of lease renewals, investment in tenant improvements, leasing commissions and an approximate time lapse in rental income while a new tenant is located. The value assigned to this intangible asset is amortized over the remaining lease terms ranging from one month to approximately 10 years.
Carrying Value of Assets
The amounts to be capitalized as a result of periodic improvements and additions to real estate property, and the periods over which the assets are depreciated or amortized, are determined based on the application of accounting standards that may require estimates as to fair value and the allocation of various costs to the individual assets. Differences in the amount attributed to the assets can be significant based upon the assumptions made in calculating these estimates.
Impairment Evaluation
Management evaluates the recoverability of its investment in real estate assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS No. 144). This statement requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that recoverability of the asset is not assured.
The Company evaluates the long-lived assets, in accordance with SFAS No. 144 on a quarterly basis and will record an impairment charge when there is an indicator of impairment and the undiscounted projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount for a particular property. Management concluded no impairment adjustment was required through December 31, 2007. The estimated cash flows used for the impairment analysis and the determination of estimated fair value are based on the Company’s plans for the respective
75
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
assets and the Company’s views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider matters such as current and historical rental rates, occupancies for the respective Properties and comparable properties, and recent sales data for comparable properties. Changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in the Company’s plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition of impairment losses, which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial.
Real Estate
Real estate is carried at depreciated cost. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements, which improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life.
Depreciation and amortization are calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets, which are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |
Asset Description | Life | |
Building | 39 years | |
Building improvements | 10 to 30 years | |
Tenants improvements | Term of related lease | |
In-place lease intangibles | Term of related lease | |
Above/below-market lease intangibles | Term of related lease |
Restricted Cash Escrows
Restricted cash consists primarily of tenant security deposits, as well as cash held for real estate taxes and building improvements as required by the loan agreement.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The liquidity and creditworthiness of the tenants are monitored on an ongoing basis. Allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained using the specific identification method for estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain tenants to make payments required by the terms of their respective leases. No general reserve is recorded. If the financial condition of the tenants were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.
Deferred Costs
Costs incurred in connection with financings or debt modifications are capitalized as deferred financing costs and are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of the related loans. Leasing commissions and other leasing costs directly attributable to tenant leases are capitalized as deferred leasing costs and are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of the related lease agreements.
Intangible Assets
In determining the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of the Property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) the estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining lease term.
The aggregate value of in-place leases is determined by evaluating various factors, including an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions and similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental
76
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand are included. Costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs, are also estimated. The in-place lease value is amortized over the remaining lease term.
The above-market lease and below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining lease term while in-place lease values are amortized to expense over the remaining lease term.
Interest Rate Protection Agreement
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives. The Company requires that hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. This effectiveness is essential for qualifying for hedge accounting. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.
The Company has a policy of only entering into derivative contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from its derivative instrument nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position or earnings in the future from the use of derivatives. The Company’s interest rate cap hedges the future cash flows on the Company’s mortgage note payable and represents a cash flow hedge. If the term of the underlying transaction is modified or the underlying hedged item ceases to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in earnings each period until the instrument matures, unless the instrument is redesignated as a hedge of another transaction. If a derivative instrument is terminated or the hedging transaction is no longer determined to be effective, amounts held in accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified into earnings over the term of the future cash outflows on the related underlying transaction. In the future, if the hedging relationship is not highly effective, then all or a portion of the offsetting gains and losses would be reported in earnings. Over time, the unrealized gains and losses held in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be reclassified into earnings. This reclassification is consistent when the hedged items are also recognized into earnings.
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue is recorded on the straight-line method over the terms of the related lease agreements. Differences between rental revenue earned and amounts due per the respective lease agreements are credited or charged, as applicable, to accrued straight-lined rent. Rental payments received prior to their recognition as income are classified as deferred rental income.
Lease incentives, which may include cash payments to or on behalf of tenants, the buyout of a prospective tenant’s existing lease or the funding of an improvement that is owned by the tenant are amortized as a reduction to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Tenant Reimbursements
Estimates are used to record cost reimbursements from tenants for real estate taxes and operating expenses. Revenue is recognized based upon the amounts to be reimbursed from our tenants in the same period these reimbursable expenses are incurred. Differences between estimated recoveries and final amounts billed are recognized in the subsequent year. Leases are not uniform in dealing with such cost reimbursements and variations exist in computations between tenants. Adjustments are also made throughout the year to these receivables and the related cost recovery income based upon the best estimate of the final amounts to be billed and collected. The balance of the estimated accounts receivable for real estate taxes and operating expenses is also analyzed by comparing actual recoveries versus actual expenses.
77
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Income Taxes
The Company is a limited liability company that has elected to be taxed as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, Federal and state taxable income is reportable on the income tax return of the Members. As a result of the entity being taxed as a partnership, there is no federal or state income tax provision.
Concentration of Risk
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements . This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value (such as a pricing model) and/or risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions also include assumptions about the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. This Statement also clarifies that a fair value measurement for a liability reflects its nonperformance risk. The statement is effective in the fiscal first quarter of 2008 except for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, for which the effective date is fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157, but does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 07-1, “Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide, Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies.” SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, “Investment Companies” (the “Guide”) and when companies that own or have significant stakes in investment companies should and should not retain, in their financial statements, the specialized industry accounting under the Guide. Management does not anticipate, the application of SOP 07-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 141(R) which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer shall recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued No. 160, which establishes and expands accounting and reporting standards for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, in a subsidiary and
78
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FASB 160 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FASB No. 160 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
Note 3 — Acquisition
On January 4, 2007, the Company, through NY Owner, acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Sublease Interest”). The seller of the Sublease Interest, Gettinger Associates, L.P., is not an affiliate of the Company, its Members or its subsidiaries. The property, a 42 story office building built in 1952, fronts on Broadway, 7th Avenue and 39th Street in midtown Manhattan. The property has approximately 915,000 leasable square feet, and as of the acquisition date, was 87.6% occupied (approximately 300 tenants) and leased by tenants generally engaged in the female apparel business. The ground lease, dated as of January 14, 1954, provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The Sublease Interest runs concurrently with this ground lease.
The acquisition price for the Sublease Interest was $122 million, exclusive of acquisition-related costs incurred by the Joint Venture ($3.5 million), pro rated operating expenses paid at closing ($4.1 million), financing-related costs ($1.9 million) and construction, insurance and tax reserves ($1.0 million). The acquisition was funded through a combination of $26.5 million of capital and a $106.0 million advance on a $127.3 million variable rate mortgage loan funded by Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. As an inducement to Lender to make the loan, Owner has agreed to provide Lender with a 35% net profit interest in the project, which is contingent upon a capital transaction, as defined as any transaction involving the sale, assignment, transfer, liquidation, condemnation or settlement in lieu thereof, disposition, financing, refinancing or any other conversion to cash of all or any portion of the property or equity or membership interests in Borrower, directly, other than the leasing of space for occupancy and/or any other transaction with respect to the Property or the direct or indirect ownership interests in Borrower outside the ordinary course of business. To date, the lender did not share in any net profits of the project. The lender also has a conversion option, which if upon exercised, would grant the lender a special membership interest in the Joint Venture whereby the lender will receive 35% of all distributions resulting from a capital transaction after the return of the member’s equity investment plus the member’s allowed return’s as specified in the “Net Profits Agreement”.
The Company plans to continue an ongoing renovation project at the property that consists of lobby, elevator and window redevelopment projects. Additional loan proceeds of up to $16.4 million are available to fund these improvements.
79
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 4 — Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Intangible Asset Category | Carrying Amount Gross | Accumulated Amortization | Carrying Amount-Net | |||||||||
In-place lease intangibles | $ | 14,051,029 | $ | (7,159,460 | ) | $ | 6,891,569 | |||||
Above-market lease intangibles | 3,453,192 | (1,335,085 | ) | 2,118,107 | ||||||||
Below-market lease intangibles | (6,402,569 | ) | 1,526,150 | (4,876,419 | ) | |||||||
$ | 11,101,652 | $ | (6,968,395 ) | $ | 4,133,257 |
Actual amortization for period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007 was:
![]() | ![]() | |||
In-place lease intangibles | $ | 7,159,460 | ||
Above-market lease intangibles | 1,335,085 | |||
Below-market lease intangibles | (1,526,150 ) | |||
$ | 6,968,395 |
Estimated amortization for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Year Ending December 31, | In-Place Lease Intangibles | Above-Market Lease Intangibles | Below-Market Lease Intangibles | |||||||||
2008 | $ | 3,673,004 | $ | 871,399 | $ | (1,173,213 | ) | |||||
2009 | 1,728,313 | 581,428 | (802,917 | ) | ||||||||
2010 | 710,810 | 278,326 | (782,827 | ) | ||||||||
2011 | 320,309 | 144,355 | (593,966 | ) | ||||||||
2012 | 152,823 | 77,661 | (481,110 | ) |
Note 5 — Deferred Costs
Deferred costs consist of the following at December 31, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Leasing Costs | $ | 3,770,915 | ||
Financing Fees | 1,578,414 | |||
Less Accumulated Amortization | (2,029,572 ) | |||
$ | 3,319,757 |
Estimated amortization for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Year Ending December 31, | Leasing Costs | Financing Fees | ||||||
2008 | $ | 1,053,947 | $ | 554,558 | ||||
2009 | 612,385 | 554,558 | ||||||
2010 | 295,881 | — | ||||||
2011 | 138,244 | — | ||||||
2012 | 41,266 | — | ||||||
Thereafter | 68,918 | — | ||||||
$ | 2,210,641 | $ | 1,109,116 |
Amortization expense for the period January 4, 2007 through December 31, 2007 was $2,029,572, of which $469,297 related to the financing fees and is included in interest expense on the consolidated statement
80
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 5 — Deferred Costs – (continued)
of operations, and $1,560,275 related to leasing costs which is included in depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statement of operations for the period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007.
Note 6 — Mortgage Note Payable
On January 4, 2007, the Company obtained a loan in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $127,250,000 secured by a first mortgage encumbering the Property; provided, however, that at closing, the lender shall only disburse to the Company an amount equal to $106,000,000. The loan is collateralized by the Property and is subject to various covenants, including maintaining a cash escrow account for the payment of real estate taxes. The loan bears interest at various LIBOR rates, as defined (5.03% at December 31, 2007), plus 3.00% (the “Applicable Interest Rate”) totaling 8.03% at December 31, 2007, with monthly payments of interest only through maturity on January 9, 2010. The agreement also required the Company to obtain an interest rate cap of LIBOR at 6.5% for the term of the loan. At closing, the Company paid the lender a financing fee of 1.2% of the principal amount of the loan. The loan has two one-year extension options exercisable for a fee of 0.125% of the amount of the respective loan for each extension. In conjunction with the extension options, the Company must also secure an interest rate cap of LIBOR at 6.5%. Due to the fact that interest rates during 2007 were below the 6.5% interest rate cap, the interest rate cap had a zero value.
Upon the Company’s request and upon submission of a capital improvements budget (the “Budget”) to the lender, lender shall advance funds equal to 85% of the line item cost set forth in the Budget and in the aggregate not to exceed $21,250,000 (the “Future Fundings”) for (i) tenant improvements and leasing commissions associated with new leases and (ii) capital improvements at the property approved by the lender. Any disbursements from the Future Fundings shall be added to the outstanding principal balance of the loan and shall bear interest at the Applicable Interest Rate. Interest at the Applicable Interest Rate will be charged on any disbursed portion of the Future Fundings as and when advanced, but interest will not be charged on the undisbursed portion of the Future Fundings. The Future Fundings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, totaled $4,847,201, bringing the December 31, 2007 balance of the loan to $110,847,201.
The Company shall pay an administrative fee to the lender in the amount of $20,000 per annum, which is payable quarterly in equal installments on the first day of January, April, July and October of each year. This $20,000 expense for the period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007 is included in interest expense in the statement of operations.
Lightstone Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Lightstone Group LLC (“Lightstone”), has guaranteed the principal amount of the loan.
The above loan agreements include various covenants. As of December 31, 2007, the Company is in compliance with the requirements of all financial covenants.
For the period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007, the Company incurred interest expense totaling $9,021,279, including the administrative fee discussed above.
Note 7 — Related-Party Transactions
Effective January 4, 2007, the Company engaged PGRS 1407 BWAY LLC (the “Advisor”) to provide asset management, development and related advisory services in connection with the management, marketing, leasing, operating and redevelopment of the Property. The Advisor is entitled to receive fees (the “Advisor Fees”) in an amount equal to $500,000 per year for services performed on behalf of the Company. The Advisor Fees shall increase by 3.5% of the prior year’s fees on each anniversary of the date of the agreement.
81
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 7 — Related-Party Transactions – (continued)
In addition, in connection with any capital improvements to the Property relating to any redevelopment of the Property, Advisor shall be entitled to a fee (the “Redevelopment Fees”) of 2.5% of all hard and soft costs for capital improvements to the Property.
The Advisor is a subsidiary of Prime Group Realty, L.P. (“PGRLP”), which was acquired by Lightstone on July 1, 2005. As a result, Prime Office Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Lightstone, owned 100.0% of the common shares and 99.1% of the common units in PGRLP.
Amounts incurred for period January 4, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007, are summarized as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Advisor Fees(1) | $ | 500,000 | ||
Redevelopment Fees(2) | $ | 119,225 |
(1) | Included in property operations on the statement of operations. |
(2) | Included in building and improvements on the balance sheet. |
Included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet is a due to affiliate balance in the amount of $922,138. This amount was advanced from Lightstone to reimburse operating expenses, which were paid by Lightstone Group LLC, on behalf of the Company, in December 2007 and subsequently repaid in January 2008.
Note 8 — Leases
The Company has entered into lease agreements with tenants with lease terms ranging from 1 to 15 years at lease inception. The leases generally provide for tenants to share in increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes in excess of specified base amounts.
The total future minimum rental to be received under such non-cancelable operating leases executed at December 31, 2007, exclusive of tenant reimbursements and contingent rentals, are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Year Ending December 31, | ||||
2008 | $ | 32,873,887 | ||
2009 | 23,200,550 | |||
2010 | 14,341,492 | |||
2011 | 7,951,001 | |||
2012 | 4,315,454 | |||
Thereafter | 2,694,521 | |||
Total | $ | 85,376,905 |
Note 9 — Fair Values of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments ,” and SFAS No. 119, “Disclosure About Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments ,” require disclosure of the fair value of certain on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate. Fair value is defined by SFAS No. 107 as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale.
82
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 9 — Fair Values of Financial Instruments – (continued)
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash escrows, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate debt (including accrued interest) approximates fair value. The fair value of the mortgage note payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.
Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes.
On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC (“Office Owner”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest (the “Sublease Interest”) in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Office Property”). The Company is a joint venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC (“LVP LLC”), and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC (“Manager”), which is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, member, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.
The Sublease Interest was acquired pursuant to a Sale and Purchase of Leasehold Agreement with Gettinger Associates, L.P. (“Gettinger”). In July 2006, Abraham Kamber Company, as sublessor under the sublease (“Sublessor”), served two notices of default on Gettinger (the “Default Notices”). The first alleged that Gettinger had failed to satisfy its obligations in performing certain renovations and the second asserted numerous defaults relating to Gettinger’s purported failure to maintain the Office Property in compliance with its contractual obligations.
In response to the Default Notices, Gettinger commenced legal action and obtained an injunction that extends its time to cure any default, prohibits interference with its leasehold interest and prohibits Sublessor from terminating its sublease pending resolution of the litigation. A motion by Sublessor for partial summary judgment, alleging that certain work on the Office Property required its prior approval, was denied by the Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, by agreement of the parties, a stay was entered precluding the termination of the Sublease Interest pending a final decision on Sublessor’s claim of defaults under the Sublease Interest. In addition, the parties stipulated to the intervention of Office Owner as a party to the proceedings. The parties have been directed to engage in and complete discovery. We consider the litigation to be without merit.
Prior to consummating the acquisition of the Sublease Interest, Office Owner received a letter from Sublessor indicating that Sublessor would consider such acquisition a default under the original sublease, which prohibits assignments of the Sublease Interest when there is an outstanding default there under. On February 16, 2007, Office Owner received a Notice to Cure from Sublessor stating the transfer of the Sublease Interest occurred in violation of the Sublease given Sublessor’s position that Office Seller is in default. Office Owner will commence and vigorously pursue litigation in order to challenge the default, receive an injunction and toll the termination period provided for in the Sublease.
On September 4, 2007, Office Owner commenced a new action against Sublessor alleging a number claims, including the claims that Sublessor has breached the sublease and committed intentional torts against Office Owner by (among other things) issuing multiple groundless default notices, with the aim of prematurely terminating the sublease and depriving Office Owner of its valuable interest in the sublease. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that Office Owner has not defaulted under the sublease, damages for the losses Office Owner has incurred as a result of Sublessor’s wrongful conduct, and an injunction to prevent Sublessor from issuing further default notices without valid grounds or in bad faith.
As of the date hereof, we are not a party to any other material pending legal proceedings.
83
1407 BROADWAY MEZZ II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Period January 4, 2007 (Date of Inception) Through December 31, 2007
Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies – (continued)
Operating Leases
The Company, through NY Owner, acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease on January 4, 2007, (as discussed in Note 3) for annual rent of $7,500,000 through 2030, which provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The rent expense under this lease for period January 4, 2007 through December 31, 2007 was approximately $7,500,000, included in property operating expenses on the consolidated statement of operations.
Future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases, excluding the renewal period, are as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Year Ending December 31, | ||||
2008 | $ | 7,500,000 | ||
2009 | 7,500,000 | |||
2010 | 7,500,000 | |||
2011 | 7,500,000 | |||
2012 | 7,500,000 | |||
Thereafter | 134,375,000 |
84
Prior Performance for Program Properties
Our Sponsor’s private Programs can and do report their results on a full accrual income tax basis, not a GAAP basis. All of the program data in the Prior Performance Tables included in the Prospectus and this Supplement is reported on a full accrual income tax basis only. Neither our Sponsor nor its affiliates have operated any public programs that would be required to be reported according to GAAP, as explained in more detail in our Prior Performance Summary above. All of the Program Properties data included in this Prospectus and in the Prior Performance Tables below is reported on a full accrual income tax basis only.
Investors should understand that the results of private programs may be different if they were reported on a GAAP basis. Some of the major differences between GAAP accounting and income tax accounting that impact the accounting for investments in real estate are described in the following paragraphs:
• | GAAP requires that, when reporting lease revenue, the minimum annual rental revenue be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease, whereas the cash method of accounting for income tax purposes requires recognition of income when cash payments are actually received from tenants, and the accrual method of accounting for income tax purposes requires recognition of income when the income is earned pursuant to the lease contract. |
• | GAAP requires that when an asset is considered held for sale, depreciation ceases to be recognized on that asset, whereas for income tax purposes, depreciation continues until the asset either is sold or is no longer in service. |
• | GAAP requires that when a building is purchased certain intangible assets (such as above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships and in-place lease costs) are allocated separately from the building and are amortized over significantly shorter lives than the depreciation recognized on the building. These intangible assets are not recognized for income tax purposes and are not allocated separate from the building for purposes of tax depreciation. |
Prior Performance Tables for Program Properties
The following introduction provides information relating to real estate investment Program Properties sponsored by the Sponsor or its affiliates (“Prior Programs”). Neither our Sponsor nor its affiliates have operated any public programs and these tables aggregate all 18 of their prior private programs to which third parties contributed capital. These programs are substantially similar to our program because they invested in the same property types (i.e., retail, residential, industrial and office) that we have acquired or intend to acquire and had the same objectives as we do. These tables provide information for use in evaluating the programs, the results of the operations of the programs, and compensation paid by the programs. Information in the tables is current as of December 31, 2007. The tables are furnished solely to provide prospective investors with information concerning the past performance of entities formed by The Lightstone Group that raised capital from third parties. During the five years ending December 31, 2007, The Lightstone Group sponsored programs that invested in Program Properties that have investment objectives similar to ours.
Prospective investors should read these tables carefully together with the summary information concerning the prior programs as set forth in “Prior Performance Summary” elsewhere in this Prospectus.
INVESTORS IN LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. WILL NOT OWN ANY INTEREST IN THE PRIOR PROGRAM PROPERTIES AND SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THEY WILL EXPERIENCE RETURNS, IF ANY, COMPARABLE TO THOSE EXPERIENCED BY INVESTORS IN SUCH PRIOR PROGRAMS.
Additional information about these tables can be obtained by calling us at (732) 367-0129.
The following tables use certain financial terms. The following paragraphs briefly describe the meanings of these terms.
• | “Acquisition Costs” means fees related to the purchase of property, cash down payments, acquisition fees, and legal and other costs related to property acquisitions. |
85
• | “Cash Generated From Operations” means the excess (or the deficiency in the case of a negative number) of operating cash receipts, including interest on investments, over operating cash expenditures, including debt service payments. |
• | “GAAP” refers to “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” in the United States. |
• | “Recapture” means the portion of taxable income from property sales or other dispositions that is taxed as ordinary income. |
• | “Reserves” refers to offering proceeds designated for repairs and renovations to properties and offering proceeds not committed for expenditure and held for potential unforeseen cash requirements. |
• | “Return of Capital” refers to distributions to investors in excess of net income. |
TABLE I
EXPERIENCE IN RAISING AND INVESTING FUNDS FOR PROGRAM PROPERTIES(1)
(Unaudited)
Table I provides a summary of the experience of The Lightstone Group as a sponsor in raising and investing funds in programs that invested in Program Properties for which the offerings closed between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2007. Information is provided as to the manner in which the proceeds of the offerings have been applied, the timing and length of these offerings and the time period over which the proceeds have been invested.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
Dollar Amount Offered (total equity) | $ | 39,825,885 | $ | 3,615,938 | $ | 627,900,000 | ||||||||||
Dollar Amount Raised from Investors | $ | 16,547,212 | $ | 172,220 | $ | 410,000,000 | ||||||||||
Dollar Amount Raised from Sponsor and Affiliates | $ | 23,278,673 | $ | 3,443,718 | $ | 217,900,000 | ||||||||||
Total Dollar Amount | ||||||||||||||||
Less offering expenses: | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Selling commissions and discounts | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Retained by affiliates | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Organizational expenses | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other (explain) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Reserves: | ||||||||||||||||
Percent available for investment | 100.0 % | 100.0 % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Prepaid items and fees related to purchase of property | 5.2 % | 11.3 % | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash down payment — (deposit) | 19.4 % | 7.3 % | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Acquisition fees | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other (explain) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Total acquisition cost (purchase price + closing costs) | $ | 182,563,245 | $ | 14,907,226 | $ | 8,271,434,000 | ||||||||||
Percent leverage (mortgage financing divided by total) | 74.6 % | 81.4 % | 91.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Number of Offerings in the Year | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Length of offerings (in months) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Month(s) to invest 90% of amount available for investment | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(1) | This table only includes information regarding programs with respect to which The Lightstone Group raised capital from third parties. |
(2) | All of the Program Properties were acquired by our Sponsor before it identified investors to invest in the properties. As such, the concept of a time period during which our Sponsor invested 90% of the amount available for investment is inapplicable here. However, the periods provided in the “Length of offerings |
86
(in months)” row indicate the time spent raising money after our Sponsor entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a property but before closing on the acquisition (and during which it received investments from third parties). |
TABLE II
COMPENSATION TO SPONSOR FROM PROGRAM PROPERTIES(1)
(Unaudited)
Table II summarizes the amount and type of compensation paid to Lightstone and its affiliates from prior programs that invested in Program Properties during the three years ended December 31, 2007.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation for 3 Programs that Closed in 2005 | Compensation for 1 Program that was Received in 2006 | Compensation for 1 Program that Closed in 2007 | Compensation for All Other Programs that was Received in 2005 | Compensation for All Other Programs that was Received in 2006 | Compensation for All Other Programs that was Received in 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Date offering commenced | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised | $ | 39,825,885 | $ | 3,615,938 | $ | 627,900,000 | $ | 2,381,593 | $ | 2,828,606 | $ | 6,798,781 | ||||||||||||
Amount paid to sponsor from proceeds of offering: | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Underwriting fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commissions | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (identify and quantify) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Dollar amount of cash generated from operations before deducting payments to sponsor | $ | 3,108,844 | $ | 3,005,034 | $ | 45,711,000 | $ | (7,403,722 | ) | $ | 47,942,112 | $ | 37,197,107 | |||||||||||
Actual amount paid to sponsor from operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property management fees | $ | — | $ | 38,579 | — | $ | 2,537,216 | $ | 7,939,573 | $ | 11,207,279 | |||||||||||||
Partnership management fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Reimbursements | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing commissions | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other — Distributions from operations | 4,944 | — | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 2,073,430 | $ | 5,678,854 | $ | 2,570,250 | ||||||||||||||
Dollar amount of property sales and refinancing and construction loans before deducting payment to sponsor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | — | — | — | 216,253,680 | 161,712,840 | 94,335,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount paid to sponsor from property sale and refinancing: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commissions | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Incentive fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other — Distributions from refinancing | — | — | — | 174,972,564 | 21,885,576 | 5,000,000 |
(1) | This table only includes information regarding programs with respect to which The Lightstone Group raised capital from third parties. |
87
TABLE III
OPERATING RESULTS OF PRIOR PROGRAM PROPERTIES(1)
(Unaudited)
Table III summarizes the operating results of The Lightstone Group’s prior programs that invested in Program Properties, the offerings of which have closed since December 31, 2002. All figures are as of December 31 of the year indicated.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of Programs(2) | 5 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenues | $ | 14,515,623 | $ | 33,234,959 | $ | 166,295,573 | $ | 191,811,627 | $ | 228,543,799 | $ | 893,641,554 | ||||||||||||
Profit (loss) on sales of properties | n/a | (240,725 | ) | 2,883,232 | 3,577,921 | 2,361,668 | (36,722,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Operating expenses | 4,765,461 | 13,794,966 | 83,776,450 | 102,358,957 | 91,583,271 | 429,723,672 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 5,786,056 | 11,092,363 | 46,529,294 | 85,097,857 | 83,633,680 | 418,776,395 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 2,672,698 | 8,458,862 | 33,119,208 | 44,710,453 | 44,002,077 | 291,731,224 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Income — Tax Basis, before minority interest | 1,291,408 | (351,957 | ) | 5,753,853 | (3) | (36,777,719 | ) | 11,686,439 | (282,830,390 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Taxable Income (Loss) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
From operations | 1,291,408 | (111,232 | )(4) | 2,870,621 | (4) | (40,355,640 | ) | 9,324,771 | (246,107,506 | ) | ||||||||||||||
From gain (loss) on sale | — | (240,725 | ) | 2,883,232 | 3,577,921 | 2,361,668 | (36,722,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from operations | 3,389,144 | 6,389,172 | 30,630,051 | (4,294,877 | ) | 50,947,146 | 81,908,107 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from sales | — | — | 2,599,020 | 5,048,636 | 12,984,649 | 39,990,117 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from refinancing and construction loans | — | — | 27,943,052 | 216,253,680 | 161,712,840 | 94,335,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from operations, sales and refinancing | 3,389,144 | 6,389,172 | 61,041,809 | 217,007,438 | 225,644,635 | 216,233,755 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Cash distribution to investors | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
From operating cash flow | 678,000 | 1,408,749 | 2,115,465 | 3,251,260 | 1,408,749 | 79,424,689 | ||||||||||||||||||
From sales and refinancing | — | — | 7,853,825 | 174,972,564 | 21,885,576 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
From other | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions | 2,711,144 | 4,980,423 | 51,072,519 | 38,783,615 | 202,350,310 | 131,809,065 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Special items | n/a | n/a | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions and special items | 2,711,144 | 4,980,423 | 51,072,519 | 38,783,615 | 202,350,310 | 131,809,065 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax and distribution data per $1,000 invested | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal income tax results: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 1,291,408 | (111,232 | )(4) | 2,870,621 | (4) | (40,355,640 | ) | 9,324,771 | (246,107,506 | ) | ||||||||||||||
from recapture | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital gain (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions to investors Source (on Tax basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | 678,000 | 1,408,749 | 9,969,290 | 174,023,824 | 23,294,325 | 84,424,689 | ||||||||||||||||||
Return of capital | — | — | — | 4,200,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Source (on cash basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Refinancing | — | — | 7,853,825 | 174,972,564 | 21,885,576 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operations | 678,000 | 1,408,749 | 2,115,465 | 3,251,260 | 1,408,749 | 79,424,689 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount (in percentage terms) remaining invested in program properties at the end of the last year reported in the table (original total acquisition cost of properties retained divided by original total acquisition cost of all properties in program) | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.6 | % | 96.6 | % | 95.7 | % |
(1) | This table only includes information regarding programs with respect to which The Lightstone Group raised capital from third parties. |
(2) | Including prior years. |
88
(3) | Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, Lightstone was required to purchase the entire Prime portfolio. However, its acquisition strategy contemplated retaining only some of the assets and the release of other properties to the lenders. Impairment charges, net of gains from early extinguishments of debt, have been recognized on assets that have been surrendered to lenders through deed in lieu of foreclosure transactions or foreclosure transactions. |
(4) | Lightstone’s 2003 tax loss was due, for the most part, to cost segregation studies that were performed in connection with its acquisition of the Prime Portfolio for the purpose of increasing its depreciation deductions. |
89
TABLE IV
RESULTS OF COMPLETED PROGRAMS OF THE SPONSOR AND ITS AFFILIATES
NOT APPLICABLE
90
TABLE V
SALES OR DISPOSALS OF PROGRAM PROPERTIES
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
Selling Price, Net of Closing Costs and GAAP Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date Acquired | Date of Sale | Cash Received Net of Closing Costs | Mortgage Balance at Time of Sale | Total | |||||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Anderson | December-03 | Jul-05 | $ | 941,088 | $ | 8,739,063 | $ | 9,680,151 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Odessa | December-03 | Dec-05 | $ | 4,107,549 | — | $ | 4,107,549 | |||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Morrisville | December-03 | Mar-06 | $ | 1,562,128 | $ | 6,081,400 | $ | 7,643,528 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Warehouse Row | June-04 | Oct-06 | $ | 13,131,821 | $ | — | $ | 13,131,821 | ||||||||||||
Liberty Gardens | February-98 | Oct-04 | $ | 12,138,460 | $ | 9,590,310 | $ | 21,728,770 | ||||||||||||
Northwood Apartments | March-96 | Jan-06 | $ | 2,323,531 | $ | 9,990,528 | $ | 12,314,059 | ||||||||||||
ASC Capital Holdings | November-98 | Aug-07 | $ | 2,564,782 | $ | 3,900,474 | $ | 6,465,256 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets-Hilsboro | December-03 | May-07 | $ | 17,806,634 | $ | —** | $ | 17,806,634 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Tracy | December-03 | Apr-07 | $ | 20,173,617 | $ | —** | $ | 20,173,617 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Burlington | December-03 | Aug-07 | $ | 1,656,101 | $ | 20,008,746 | $ | 21,664,847 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Fremont | December-03 | Aug-07 | $ | 1,104,213 | $ | 13,340,930 | $ | 14,445,143 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Oshkosh | December-03 | Aug-07 | $ | 1,623,224 | $ | 19,611,537 | $ | 21,234,762 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Lodi | December-03 | Aug-07 | $ | (2,373,673 | ) | $ | 21,145,608 | $ | 18,771,935 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of Properties Including Closing and Soft Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Original Mortgage Financing | Cash Acquisition Costs, Capital Improvements, Closing and Soft Costs | Total | Excess (Deficiency) Cash over Cash Expenditures | ||||||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Anderson | $ | 3,988,173 | $ | 7,666,150 | $ | 11,654,323 | $ | 12,011,132 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Odessa | $ | — | $ | 2,887,658 | $ | 2,887,658 | $ | 4,099,509 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Morrisville | $ | — | $ | 19,780,805 | $ | 19,780,805 | $ | 5,606,723 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Warehouse Row | $ | — | $ | 5,882,710 | $ | 5,882,710 | $ | 5,569,861 | ||||||||||||
Liberty Gardens | $ | 9,150,000 | $ | 1,673,014 | $ | 10,823,014 | $ | 534,892 | ||||||||||||
Northwood Apartments | $ | 7,888,000 | $ | 10,379,543 | $ | 8,000,000 | $ | 212,320 | ||||||||||||
ASC Capital Holdings | $ | $4,625,000 | $ | 2,948,899 | $ | 7,573,899 | $ | (1,113,436 | ) | |||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Hilsboro | $ | 28,257,364 | $ | 32,314,665 | $ | 60,572,029 | $ | 18,308,069 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Tracy | $ | 12,114,635 | $ | 11,125,045 | $ | 23,239,680 | $ | 21,127,506 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Burlington | $ | 12,971,187 | $ | 12,646,131 | $ | 25,617,318 | $ | 14,792,344 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Fremont | $ | 12,467,079 | $ | 15,327,382 | $ | 27,794,461 | $ | 33,372,145 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Oshkosh | $ | 12,833,669 | $ | 18,800,752 | $ | 31,634,421 | $ | 18,322,583 | ||||||||||||
Prime Outlets — Lodi | $ | 23,481,000 | $ | 3,868,966 | $ | 27,349,966 | $ | 18,671,603 |
** | Mortgage balances paid off in 10/11/06 refinance. Outstanding amount at 10/11/06 was $37.2 million. Mortgage proceeds were sent to partnership |
91
30,000,000 shares of common stock — maximum offering
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
$10.00 PER SHARE Minimum Initial Purchase — 100 Shares
(300 shares for tax-exempt entities)
We are offering up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock to investors who meet our suitability standards and up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock to participants in our distribution reinvestment plan. Pursuant to a Warrant Purchase Agreement, we may issue to our affiliate, Lightstone Securities, LLC, warrants to purchase 600,000 shares, which warrants will be transferred to the participating broker-dealers. We are registering these 600,000 warrants for sale as soliciting dealer warrants, as well as 600,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of those warrants.
Investing in us involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 23 for a discussion of the risks which should be considered in connection with your investment in our common stock. Some of these risks include:
• | Except as described in “Real Property Investments — Specified Investments,” we do not currently own any properties, we have not identified any properties to acquire with the offering proceeds and we have limited operating history and no established financing sources; |
• | No public market currently exists for our shares of common stock, no public market for those shares may ever exist and our shares are illiquid; |
• | There are substantial conflicts between the interests of our investors, our interests and the interests of our advisor, sponsor and our respective affiliates regarding affiliate compensation, investment opportunities and management resources because David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of our board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer, is the sole owner of our sponsor, our advisor and our property manager. The sponsor and advisor may compete with us and acquire properties that suit our investment objectives; we have no employees that do not also work for our sponsor or advisor and the advisor is not obligated to devote any fixed, minimum amount of time or effort to management of our operations; |
• | We may maintain a level of leverage as high as 300% of our net assets, as permitted under our charter; |
• | There are limitations on ownership and transferability of our shares that prohibit five or fewer individuals from beneficially owning more than 50% of our outstanding shares during the last half of each taxable year and, subject to exceptions, restrict any person from beneficially owning more than 9.8% in value of our aggregate outstanding stock or more than 9.8% in number of shares or value of our common stock; |
• | Our investment policies and strategies may be changed without stockholder consent; |
• | We are obligated to pay substantial fees to our advisor and its affiliates, including fees payable upon the sale of properties, and our incentive advisor fee structure may result in our advisor recommending riskier or more speculative investments; |
• | We may make distributions that include a return of principal and may need to borrow to make these distributions; |
• | These are speculative securities and this investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase these securities only if you can afford a complete loss of your investment. |
This offering will end on or before June 30, 2008, unless extended to a date not later than December 1, 2008. As we have achieved the minimum offering, we no longer deposit subscription payments in an escrow account held by the escrow agent, Trust Company of America.
The dealer manager of the offering, Lightstone Securities, LLC, is not required to sell a specific number or dollar amount of shares but will use its best efforts to sell 30,000,000 of our shares.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The use of forecasts in this offering is prohibited. Any representation to the contrary and any predictions, written or oral, as to the amount or certainty of any present or future cash benefit or tax consequence which may flow from an investment in us is not permitted.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Per Share | Max. Offering | |||||||
Public offering price | $ | 10.00 | (1) | $ | 300,000,000 | |||
Selling commissions(2) | $ | — | — | |||||
Dealer manager fee(2) | $ | — | — | |||||
Proceeds, before expenses, to us | $ | 10.00 | $ | 300,000,000 |
(1) | The offering price per share of common stock issuable pursuant to our distribution reinvestment program is initially $9.50. |
(2) | All dealer manager fees, selling commissions and organization and offering expenses will be paid for with the proceeds of our sale to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, of special general partner interests from Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP, our operating partnership. Distributions with respect to these special general partner interests will be made only after stockholders have received a stated preferred return. |
PROSPECTUS DATED January 23, 2008
92
SUITABILITY STANDARDS
Because an investment in our common stock is risky and is a long-term investment, it is suitable and appropriate for you only if you have adequate financial means to make this investment, you have no immediate need for liquidity in your investment and you can bear the loss of your investment.
Therefore, we have established financial suitability standards for investors who purchase shares of our common stock, which we sometimes refer to as the “shares.” In addition, residents of some states must meet higher suitability standards under state law. These standards require you to meet the applicable criteria below. In determining your net worth, do not include your home, home furnishings or your automobile.
General Standards for all Investors
• | The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $150,000, or, (ii) an annual gross income of $45,000 and a minimum net worth of $45,000. |
Standards for Investors from Arizona, California, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas
• | The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $60,000 and an annual gross income of at least $60,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $225,000. |
Standards for Investors from Maine
• | The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $50,000 and an annual gross income of at least $50,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $200,000. |
Standards for investors from Minnesota
• | The investor has either (a) a net worth of at least $95,000 and an annual gross income of at least $95,000, or (b) a net worth of at least $250,000. |
Standards for Investors from Kansas and Missouri
• | the investor (i) invests no more than 10% of the investor’s net worth in us and (ii) has either (a) a net worth of at least $70,000 and an annual gross income of at least $70,000, or (b) a net worth of at least $250,000.“It is recommended by the Office of the Kansas Securities Commissioner that Kansas investors not invest, in the aggregate, more than 10% of their liquid net worth in this and similar direct participation investments. Liquid net worth is defined as that portion of net worth which consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable Securities.” |
Standards for Investors from New Hampshire
• | The investor has either (i) a net worth of at least $125,000 and an annual gross income of at least $50,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $250,000. |
Standards for subscribers from New Mexico
• | The investor has either (a) a net worth of at lease $70,000 and an annual income of at least $70,000, or (b) a net worth of at least $250,000 (exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles). |
The foregoing suitability standards must be met by the investor who purchases the shares. In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts, these minimum standards must be met by the beneficiary, the fiduciary account, or by the donor or grantor who directly or indirectly supplies the funds to purchase the common stock if the donor or the grantor is the fiduciary.Investors with investment discretion over assets of an employee benefit plan covered by ERISA should carefully review the information in the section entitled “ERISA Considerations.”
In the case of gifts to minors, the suitability standards must be met by the custodian of the account or by the donor.
In order to ensure adherence to the suitability standards described above, requisite criteria must be met, as set forth in the subscription agreement in the form attached hereto as Appendix C. In addition, our sponsor, our dealer manager and the soliciting dealers, as our agents, must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of our shares is a suitable and appropriate investment for an investor. In making this determination, the soliciting dealers will rely on relevant information provided by the investor, including information as to the investor’s age, investment objectives, investment experience, income, net worth, financial situation, other investments, and any other pertinent information. Executed subscription agreements will be maintained in our records for six years.
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
The date of this Prospectus is January 23, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
ii
iii
iv
v
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. Because this is a summary, it does not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should read this entire prospectus and its appendices carefully before you decide to invest in our shares of common stock.
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
We are a Maryland corporation incorporated on June 8, 2004. Beginning with 2005, our first taxable year, we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or a “REIT”, for federal and state income tax purposes. We were formed as a corporation with perpetual existence; however, our corporate existence may be terminated upon our dissolution and the liquidation of our assets in accordance with the terms of our charter.
Our principal executive offices are located at 326 Third Street, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701, our telephone number is (732) 367-0129 and our website address is www.lightstonereit.com.
The Types of Real Estate that We Plan to Acquire and Manage
We intend to acquire residential and commercial properties, principally in the continental United States. Our acquisitions may include both portfolios and individual properties. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes. For a definition of “Class B” properties, see “Investment Objectives and Policies — Real Estate Investments.”
Some of our properties may be acquired through our affiliates. As of the date of this prospectus, we have made six real property acquisitions, each described in “Real Property Investments — Specified Investments.”
Our Sponsor, Promoters, Advisor, Dealer Manager, Property Manager and Operating Partnership
Our sponsor, David Lichtenstein, who does business as The Lightstone Group and wholly owns the limited liability company of that name, is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today. Our sponsor has a portfolio of over 18,000 residential units, 687 extended stay hotels, and approximately 29,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. Based in New York, and supported by regional offices in New Jersey, Illinois, South Carolina and Maryland, our sponsor employees approximately 14,000 staff and professionals.
Our sponsor and its affiliates have acquired over 190 projects including numerous properties and portfolios from major national public and privately-held real estate companies such as Home Properties (NYSE:HME), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR), Liberty Property Trust (NYSE:LRY), The Rouse Company (NYSE:RSE), Prime Retail Inc. (NASDAQ:PMRE), Prime Group Realty Trust (NYSE:PGE), F & W Management Company, United Dominion Realty Trust (NYSE:UDR) Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI), Archon Group, an affiliate of Polaris Capital, and The Blackstone Group.
Certain officers and directors of The Lightstone Group and its affiliates also have senior management positions with us. These directors and executive officers, whose positions and biographical information can be found under the heading “Our Directors and Executive Officers,” below, are David Lichtenstein, Bruno de Vinck, Jenniffer Collins, Joseph Teichman and Stephen Hamrick.
Assuming we sell 30,000,000 shares in this offering, the organization and offering expenses, including selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, are expected to be approximately $30,000,000. We will sell special general partner interests in Lightstone REIT LP, our operating partnership, which we sometimes refer to as the “special general partner interests,” to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor. We will use the proceeds from this sale to pay all costs and expenses of this offering (including organizational expenses, dealer manager fees and selling commissions). These special general partner interests will not require an initial cash investment by us and are not exchangeable for shares of our common stock. Thus, unlike other REITs, which do not have a public trading market and typically invest 85% – 90% of the gross proceeds of their offerings in the purchase of properties, we expect to use all of the gross proceeds of our
1
offering in connection with the purchase of properties, the payment of fees and expenses associated with such properties and the establishment of reserves. However, while not assured, Lightstone SLP, LLC receives distributions after stockholders receive a 7% cumulative return, including up to 40% of proceeds after stockholders receive a 12% cumulative return upon sale or other disposition of our properties, while sponsors of other REITs typically receive up to 15% of proceeds after their stockholders receive a 6% or more cumulative return. Although Lightstone SLP, LLC will not receive any distributions until our stockholders receive a 7% cumulative return, any distributions it does receive will lower distributions made to our stockholders. See “Compensation Table.”
Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the sole owner of The Lightstone Group, our sponsor, and is our advisor. Our advisor, together with our board of directors (see “Our Directors and Senior Management”), will be primarily responsible for making investment decisions. Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC is also wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the sole owner of our sponsor, and is our property manager. Mr. Lichtenstein also owns and controls Lightstone SLP, LLC, the special general partner of our operating partnership, and acts as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. As a result, he controls both the general partner and special general partner of our operating partnership and is thus the sole ultimate decision-maker of our operating partnership.
Our structure is generally referred to as an “UPREIT” structure. Substantially all of our assets will be held through Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP, a Delaware limited partnership, which we sometimes refer to as the “operating partnership.” This structure will enable us to acquire assets from other partnerships and individual owners in a manner that will defer the recognition of gain to the partners of the acquired partnerships or the individual owners, assuming certain conditions are met. We will provide our stockholders with appropriate tax information including a Form 1099.
We do not have and will not have any employees that are not also employed by our sponsor or its affiliates. We depend substantially on our advisor, which generally has responsibility for our day-to-day operations. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, the advisor also undertakes to use its commercially reasonable best efforts to present to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by our board of directors.
Certain of our affiliates, including our sponsor, promoters, advisor, dealer manager and property manager will receive substantial fees and profits in connection with this offering. Such compensation is described more fully below under the heading “Compensation Table” and includes: selling commissions and a dealer manager fee payable to the dealer manager, acquisition fees, asset management fees, regular and liquidation distributions with respect to the special general partner interests, reimbursement of certain expenses, and property management fees payable to our property manager.
The principal executive offices of our advisor are located at 326 Third Street, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701 and their telephone number is (732) 367-0129.
2
Our Structure
The following chart depicts the services that affiliates or the sponsor will render to us, and our structure:
3
Summary Risk Factors
Investment in shares of our common stock involves risks which are described in detail under “Risk Factors.” If we are unable to effectively manage the impact of these risks, we may not meet our investment objectives and, therefore, you may lose some or all of your investment. The most significant risks relating to this offering and an investment in our shares include:
• | You may not have the opportunity to evaluate all of our investments before you make your purchase of our common stock, which makes your investment more speculative; |
• | There are numerous conflicts of interest between the interests of investors and our interests or the interests of our advisor, our sponsor, and their respective affiliates; |
• | The special general partner interests will entitle a wholly owned subsidiary of our sponsor to certain payments and distributions that will significantly reduce the distributions available to stockholders after they receive a 7% cumulative return on their net investment; |
• | Except as described in “Real Property Investments — Specified Investments,” we do not currently own any properties and we have not identified any properties to acquire with the offering proceeds; |
• | We may not be able to continue to make distributions and we may borrow to make distributions, which could reduce the cash available to us, and these distributions made with borrowed funds may constitute a return of capital to stockholders; |
• | The profitability of attempted acquisitions is uncertain; |
• | The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant would adversely impact us; |
• | There are limitations on ownership and transferability of our shares; |
• | We have limited operating history and no established financing sources; |
• | Our investment policies and strategies may be changed without stockholder consent; |
• | We are obligated to pay substantial fees to our advisor and its affiliates, including fees payable upon the sale of properties; |
• | The incentive advisor fee structure may result in our advisor recommending riskier or more speculative investments; |
• | No public market currently exists for our shares of common stock, no public market for our shares may ever exist and our shares are illiquid; |
• | There are significant risks associated with maintaining as high level of leverage as permitted under our charter (which permits leverage of up to 300% of our net assets); |
• | Our advisor may have an incentive to incur high levels of leverage due to the fact that asset management fees payable to our advisor are based on total assets, including assets purchased with indebtedness; |
• | Our dealer manager has not conducted an independent review of this prospectus; |
• | Our property manager has no direct experience as a property manager and relies on affiliated and unaffiliated, fully established management companies to provide all property management services to our properties; |
• | We may fail to continue to qualify as a REIT for taxation purposes; |
• | Our share repurchase program is subject to numerous restrictions, may be cancelled at any time and should not be relied upon as a means of liquidity; and |
• | We may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and thus subject to regulation under that Act. |
4
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest may exist between us and some of our affiliates, including our advisor. Some of these potential conflicts include:
• | The possibility that our affiliates may invest in properties that meet our investment profile; |
• | competition for the time and services of personnel that work for us and our affiliates; |
• | substantial compensation payable by us to our advisor, property manager, dealer manager and affiliates for their various services, which may not be on market terms and is payable, in some cases, whether or not our stockholders receive distributions; |
• | the possibility that we may acquire or consolidate with our advisor or property manager; and |
• | the possibility that we may do business with entities that have pre-existing relationships with our affiliates which may result in a conflict between our business and the ongoing business relationships our affiliates have with each other. |
Conflicts of interest may also arise in connection with the potential sale or refinancing of our properties or the enforcement of agreements.
See “Conflicts of Interest” for more details of these and other conflicts of interest.
Factors Used to Determine Offering Price
Our board of directors determined the offering price of the common stock and such price bears no relationship to any established criteria for valuing issued or outstanding shares. It determined the offering price of our shares of common stock based primarily on the range of offering prices of other REITs that do not have a public trading market. In addition, our board of directors set the offering price of our shares at $10, a round number, in order to facilitate calculations relating to the offering price of our shares. However, the offering price of our shares of common stock may not reflect the price at which the shares may trade if they were listed on an exchange or actively traded by brokers, nor of the proceeds that a stockholder may receive if we were liquidated or dissolved.
Estimated Use of Proceeds
The proceeds from this offering will be used in connection with the purchase of real estate. The amounts listed in the table below represent our current estimates concerning the use of the offering proceeds. Since these are estimates, they may not accurately reflect the actual receipt or application of the offering proceeds. This first scenario indicates approximate actual proceeds as of September 30, 2007, and the second scenario assumes that we sell the maximum of 30,000,000 shares in this offering at $10 per share. Under the second scenario, we have not given effect to the following:
• | any special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions; or |
• | the sale of the maximum of 4,000,000 shares of common stock in our distribution reinvestment program at $9.50 per share. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Dollar Amount as of September 30, 2007 | Percent | Maximum Dollar Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Gross offering proceeds | $ | 114,350,000 | 100.0 | % | $ | 300,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Less Offering Expenses:(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fee(2) | 8,107,000 | 7.1 | % | 24,000,000 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||
Organization and other offering costs(3) | 3,335,000 | 2.9 | % | 6,000,000 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||
Amount available for investment(4) | 102,908,000 | 90 | % | 270,000,000 | 90 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition fees(5) | 6,173,000 | 5.3 | % | 8,250,000 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition expenses(6) | 910,000 | 0.79 | % | 3,000,000 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Initial working capital reserves | — | 0 | % | 1,500,000 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||
Total offering proceeds available for investment | 95,825,000 | 83.91 | % | 257,250,000 | 85.7 | % | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of interests to Sponsor(1) | 11,442,000 | — | 30,000,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Total proceeds available for investment | $ | 107,267,000 | — | $ | 287,250,000 | — |
5
(1) | All dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses in an aggregate amount of up to $30,000,000 will be paid using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. In consideration for its agreement to purchase the special general partner interests of our operating partnership, at a cost of $100,000 per unit, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, Lightstone SLP, LLC will be entitled to a portion of any regular distributions made by the operating partnership, but only after our stockholders receive a stated preferred return. To the extent that dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses exceed $30,000,000, Lightstone SLP, LLC will pay such fees, commissions and expenses directly and shall not receive any special general partner interests in connection with such payments. |
(2) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $24,000,000 of selling commissions and dealer manager fees using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. This includes selling commissions generally equal to 7% of aggregate gross offering proceeds and a dealer manager fee of up to 1% of aggregate gross offering proceeds, both of which are payable to Lightstone Securities, our affiliate. See “Plan of Distribution — Volume Discounts” for a description of volume discounts. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, intends to reallow selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds to unaffiliated broker-dealers participating in this offering attributable to the amount of shares sold by them. In addition, Lightstone Securities may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee to participating dealers in the aggregate amount of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating dealers as marketing fees, based upon such factors as the volume of sales of such participating dealers, the level of marketing support provided by such participating dealers and the assistance of such participating dealers in marketing the offering, or to reimburse representatives of such participating dealers for the costs and expenses of attending our educational conferences and seminars. The amount of selling commissions may often be reduced under certain circumstances for volume discounts. See the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus for a description of such provisions. |
(3) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $6,000,000 of organization and other offering costs using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. Organization costs consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, including, but not limited to, salaries and direct expenses incurred by our advisor while engaged in registering the shares, other organization costs, technology costs and expenses attributable to the offering, and the costs and payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. Our advisor will be responsible for the payment of such organization costs and we will reimburse our advisor for such costs to the extent that the total organization and offering expenses, including selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and all other underwriting compensation, does not exceed 10% of the gross offering proceeds from our offering. Any costs in excess of this amount will be paid exclusively by our advisor without recourse against or reimbursement by us. We currently estimate that approximately $6,000,000 of organization costs, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will be incurred if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. |
(4) | Until required in connection with the acquisition and development of properties, substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering and, thereafter, the working capital reserves of the Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., may be invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments including government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts or other authorized investments as determined by our board of directors. |
(5) | Acquisition and advisory fees do not include acquisition expenses. Acquisition fees exclude any construction fee paid to a person who is not our affiliate in connection with construction of a project after our acquisition of the property. Although we assume that all the foregoing fees will be paid by the sellers of property, sellers generally fix the selling price at a level sufficient to cover the cost of any acquisition fee so that, in effect, we, as purchaser, will bear such fee as part of the purchase price. The “Maximum Dollar Amount” presentation in the table is based on the assumption that we will not borrow any money to purchase properties. |
(6) | Acquisition expenses include legal fees and expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of appraisals, nonrefundable option payments on property not acquired, accounting fees and expenses, title insurance premiums and other closing costs and miscellaneous expenses relating to the selection, acquisition and development of real estate properties, whether or not acquired. Costs related to the origination of loans for the purchase or refinancing of a property are excluded from this amount. We will reimburse our |
6
advisor for acquisition expenses up to a maximum amount which, collectively with all acquisitions fees and expenses, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the gross contract price. |
Primary Business Objectives and Strategies
Our primary objective is to achieve capital appreciation with a secondary objective of income without subjecting principal to undue risk. We intend to achieve this goal primarily through investments in real estate properties.
Unlike other REITs, which typically specialize in one sector of the real estate market, we intend to invest in both residential and commercial properties to provide a more general risk profile and take advantage of our sponsor’s expertise in acquiring larger properties and portfolios of both residential and commercial properties.
The following is descriptive of our investment objectives and policies:
• | Reflecting aflexible operating style, our portfolio is likely to be diverse and include properties of different types (such as retail, lodging, office, industrial and residential properties); both passive and active investments; and joint venture transactions. The portfolio is likely to be determined largely by the purchase opportunities that the market offers, whether on an upward or downward trend. This is in contrast to those funds that are more likely to hold investments of a single type, usually as outlined in their charters. |
• | We may invest in properties that are not sold through conventional marketing and auction processes. Our investments may be at a dollar cost level lower than levels that attract those funds that hold investments of a single type. |
• | We may be more likely to make investments that are in need of rehabilitation, redirection, remarketing and/or additional capital investment. |
• | We may place major emphasis on abargain element in our purchases, and often on the individual circumstances and motivations of the sellers. We will search for bargains that become available due to circumstances that occur when real estate cannot support the mortgages securing the property. |
• | We intend to pursue returns in excess of the returns targeted by real estate investors who target a single type of property investment. |
We cannot assure you that we will attain these objectives.
If we have not provided some form of liquidity for our stockholders or if our company is not liquidated, generally within seven to ten years after the proceeds from the offering are fully invested, we will cease reinvesting our capital and sell the properties and other assets, either on a portfolio basis or individually, or engage in another transaction approved by our board of directors, market conditions permitting, unless the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) determine that, in light of our expected life at any given time, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the stockholders to reinvest proceeds from property sales or refinancings. Alternatively, we may merge with, or otherwise be acquired by, our sponsor or its affiliates. We expect that in connection with such merger or acquisition transaction, our stockholders would receive cash or shares of a publicly traded company. The terms of any such transaction must be approved by a majority of our board of directors which includes a majority of our independent directors. Such merger or acquisition transaction would also require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock. To assist with this process, the board of directors or a special committee of the board of directors established to consider the transaction will retain a recognized financial advisor or institution providing valuation services to serve as its financial advisor. The financial advisor will be required to render an opinion to the board of directors or special committee with respect to the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of the consideration to be paid in the merger or acquisition transaction.
We intend to provide stockholders with regular quarterly distributions. Our ability to pay regular distributions will depend upon a variety of factors, and we cannot assure that distributions will be made. As such, we are unable to determine the maximum time from the closing date that an investor may have to wait to receive distributions.
7
Distribution Reinvestment and Share Repurchase Programs
Our distribution reinvestment program provides investors with an opportunity to purchase additional shares of our common stock at a discount, by reinvesting distributions. Our share repurchase program may, subject to restrictions, provide investors with limited, interim liquidity by enabling them to sell their shares back to us. However, our board of directors reserves the right to terminate either program for any reason without cause by providing written notice of termination of the distribution reinvestment program to all participants or written notice of termination of the share repurchase program to all stockholders, in the case of the share repurchase program. Both programs are described in greater detail under the headingDistribution Reinvestment and Share Repurchase Programs, below.
Acquisition Strategy
We intend to acquire residential and commercial properties principally, substantially all of which will be located in the continental United States. Our acquisitions may include both portfolios and individual properties. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes.
We expect that we will acquire the following types of real estate interests:
• | Fee interests in market-rate, middle market multifamily properties at a discount to replacement cost located either in emerging markets or near major metropolitan areas. We will attempt to identify those sub-markets with job growth opportunities and demand demographics which support potential long-term value appreciation for multifamily properties. |
• | Fee interests in well-located, multi-tenanted, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers and malls located in highly trafficked retail corridors, in selected high-barrier to entry markets and sub-markets. We will attempt to identify those sub-markets with constraints on the amount of additional property supply will make future competition less likely. |
• | Fee interests in improved, multi-tenanted, industrial properties located near major transportation arteries and distribution corridors with limited management responsibilities. |
• | Fee interests in improved, multi-tenanted, office properties located near major transportation arteries in urban and suburban areas. |
• | Fee interests in lodging properties located near major transportation arteries in urban and suburban areas. |
We expect that all of the properties will be owned by subsidiary limited partnerships or limited liability companies. These subsidiaries will be single-purpose entities that we create to own a single property, and each will have no assets other than the property it owns. These entities represent a useful means of shielding our operating partnership from liability under state laws and will make the underlying properties easier to transfer. However, tax law disregards single-member LLCs and so it will be as if the operating partnership owns the underlying properties for tax purposes. Use of single-purpose entities in this manner is customary for REITs.
Our independent directors are not required to approve all transactions involving the creation of subsidiary limited liability companies and limited partnerships that we intend to use for investment in properties on our behalf. These subsidiary arrangements are intended to ensure that no environmental or other liabilities associated with any particular property can be attributed against other properties that the operating partnership or we will own. The limited liability aspect of a subsidiary’s form will shield parent and affiliated (but not subsidiary) companies, including the operating partnership and us, from liability assessed against it. No additional fees will be imposed upon the REIT by the subsidiary companies’ managers and these subsidiaries will not affect our stockholders’ voting rights.
Summary of Current Portfolio
The following table summarizes the properties acquired by the REIT as of the date of this prospectus, for further information regarding the properties, see “Real Property Investments,” beginning on page 103:
8
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Property | Location | Total Square Feet/Number of Units Occupied(1) | Date Acquired | |||
Florida factory outlet mall | St. Augustine, Florida | 312,000 | March 31, 2006 | |||
Portfolio of four apartment communities | Dearborn Heights, MI (2 properties) Roseville Heights, MI (1 property) Westland, MI (1 property) | 1,017 | June 29, 2006 | |||
Nebraska retail shopping mall | Omaha, NE | 177,303 | December 21, 2006 | |||
Sub-leasehold interest in a Manhattan office building | New York, NY | 915,000 | January 4, 2007 | |||
Portfolio of industrial and office properties | New Orleans, LA (7 properties) Baton Rouge, LA (3 properties) San Antonio, TX (4 properties) | 1,000,000 | February 1, 2007 | |||
Brazos Crossing retail mall | Lake Jackson, TX | 61,287 | June 29, 2007 | |||
Sarasota industrial property | Sarasota, FL | 281,000 | November 15, 2007 | |||
Portfolio of five apartment communities | Charlotte, NC (2 properties) Greensboro, NC (2 properties) Tampa, FL | 1,576 | November 16, 2007 | |||
Two Houston extended stay hotels | Houston, TX Sugar Land, TX | 290 | October 17, 2007 |
(1) | All figures for total square footage and number of units occupied are approximations. |
Financing Strategy
Our financing strategy is as follows:
We intend to utilize leverage to acquire our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in any single property or on the amount we can borrow for the purchase of any property.
Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, will be reasonable in relation to our net assets and will be reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. The maximum amount of these borrowings in relation to net assets will not exceed 300% of net assets in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level of borrowing is appropriate, approval by a majority of the independent directors and disclosure to our stockholders. Net assets means our total assets, other than intangibles, at cost before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves less our total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly on a basis consistently applied. Any excess in borrowing over this 300% level will be approved by a majority of independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess.
Further, our charter limits our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less.
9
In addition, our charter prohibits us from making or investing in mortgage loans, including construction loans, on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loans, would exceed 85% of the property’s appraised value, unless substantial justification exists and the loans would not exceed the property’s appraised value.
By operating on a leveraged basis, we will have more funds available for investment in properties. This will allow us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. Although our liability for the repayment of indebtedness is expected to be limited to the value of the property securing the liability and the rents or profits derived therefrom, our use of leveraging increases the risk of default on the mortgage payments and a resulting foreclosure of a particular property. To the extent that we do not obtain mortgage loans on our properties, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted. We will endeavor to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available. Lenders may have recourse to assets not securing the repayment of the indebtedness. Our sponsor may refinance properties during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and/or an increase in property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
Operations
Our property manager will manage and lease substantially all of the properties that we acquire with the existing management and leasing staff of its affiliates and where appropriate, it may acquire and incorporate the existing management and leasing staffs of the portfolio properties we acquire.
Although we are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations, we intend to invest in properties located near our sponsor’s existing operations to achieve economies of scale where possible. Our sponsor currently maintains operations throughout the United States (Hawaii, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming excluded), as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. The number and mix of properties we acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering. We will consider relevant real estate property and financial factors, including the location of the property, its income-producing capacity, its suitability for any future development the prospects for long-range appreciation, its liquidity and income tax considerations. In this regard, our obligation to close the purchase of any investment will generally be conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
• | leases, licenses and temporary tenants; |
• | plans and specifications; |
• | occupancy history; |
• | sales reports; |
• | zoning analyses and future development potential; |
• | traffic flow, car count and parking studies; |
• | trends in area; |
• | tenant mix; |
• | environmental and engineering reports; |
• | projections, surveys and appraisals; |
• | evidence of marketable title subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to our advisor; |
10
• | audited financial statements covering recent operations of properties having operating histories unless such statements are not required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to our stockholders; and |
• | title and liability insurance policies. |
Terms of the Offering
We are offering a maximum of 30,000,000 shares of our common stock in this offering. We are offering these shares on a best efforts basis through the dealer manager at $10.00 per share, subject to volume discounts in some cases. An offering on a best efforts basis is one in which the securities dealers participating in the offering are under no obligation to purchase any of the securities being offered and, therefore, no specified number of securities are guaranteed to be sold and no specified amount of money is guaranteed to be raised from the offering. In addition, 75,000 shares have been authorized and reserved for issuance under our stock option plan for independent directors.
See the “Plan of Distribution” for a description of the terms of the offering.
Suitability Standards
In order to purchase shares, you must meet the financial suitability standards we have established for this offering. In general you must have either $45,000 in annual gross income and a minimum net worth of $45,000 or $150,000 minimum net worth. Residents of Arizona, California, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas must meet higher financial standards, however. Employee benefit plans covered by ERISA must consider additional factors before investing. To invest in this offering, you must complete a subscription agreement which, in part, provides that you meet these standards.
Shares Currently Outstanding
As of December 31,2007, there were approximately 13.6 million shares of our common stock outstanding. The number of shares of our common stock outstanding prior to this date does not include shares issuable upon exercise of options which may be granted under our stock option plan.
Distributions
Federal income tax law requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income. In order to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. For a discussion of the tax treatment of distributions to you, see “Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
Distributions will be at the discretion of the board of directors. While we intend to commence distributions within 60 days after an acquisition of a property, distributions might not commence for up to one year after a particular property acquisition. Our ability to pay regular distributions and the size of these distributions will depend upon a variety of factors. For example, our borrowing policy permits us to incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less, and we may have to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. We cannot assure that regular distributions will continue to be made or that we will maintain any particular level of distributions that we may establish.
We will be an accrual basis taxpayer, and as such our REIT taxable income could be higher than the cash available to us. We may therefore borrow to make distributions, which could reduce the cash available to us, in order to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income as a condition to our election to be taxed as a REIT. These distributions made with borrowed funds may constitute a return of capital to stockholders. “Return of capital” refers to distributions to investors in excess of net income. To the extent that distributions to stockholders exceed earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes, although such distributions might not reduce stockholders’ aggregate invested capital. Because our earnings and profits are reduced for depreciation and other non-cash items, it is likely that a portion of each distribution will constitute a tax-deferred return of capital for federal income tax purposes.
11
Is an Investment in Us Appropriate for You?
An investment in us might be appropriate as part of your investment portfolio if you are looking for regular distributions. Our goal is to pay regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders. We are planning to achieve this goal by acquiring and managing a portfolio of commercial and residential properties. We cannot guarantee that we will achieve this goal. Moreover, distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, and we cannot assure that regular distributions will be made or that any particular level of distributions established in the future, if any, will be maintained. In order to be qualified as a REIT, we are required under federal income tax law to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. If we fail to make such distributions, we will not be able to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
An investment in us will not be appropriate for you unless you are prepared to retain our shares for approximately seven to ten years. There is no public trading market for our shares and we do not expect a public trading market for our shares to develop in the near term. The absence of an active public market for our shares could impair your ability to sell our stock at a profit or at all. Within seven to ten years after the net proceeds of this offering are fully invested, our board of directors may determine that it is in our best interests to apply to have the shares listed on a national stock exchange or included for quotation on a national market system if we meet the applicable listing requirements at that time. Alternatively, our board of directors may decide that it is in our best interests to liquidate or to merge or otherwise consolidate with a publicly-traded REIT or merge with, or otherwise be acquired by, our sponsor or its affiliates. Therefore, our shares should be purchased as a long term investment only.
Compensation Table
The following table discloses the compensation which we may pay to our advisor, property manager, dealer manager, The Lightstone Group and their affiliates. For methods of calculation and definitions of terms used in this table, see “Compensation Table.”For a description of an undertaking that we have made to limit compensation paid to our affiliates, see “Compensation Restrictions” and “Reports to Stockholders.”
Non-subordinated Payments
The following aggregate amounts of compensation, allowances and fees we may pay to our affiliates are not subordinated to the returns on initial investments that we are required to pay to our stockholders.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Organizational and Offering Stage | ||||
Selling commissions paid to Lightstone Securities. | Up to 7% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities, our dealer manager, intends to reallow 100% of commissions earned for those transactions that involve participating broker-dealers. | We currently estimate selling commissions of $21,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold (without giving effect to any special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions). | ||
We will sell special general partner interests of our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, and use the sale proceeds to pay all selling commissions. |
12
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Dealer manager fee paid to Lightstone Securities. | Up to 1% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 1% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers. This fee is in addition to the reimbursement of other organization and offering expenses described below. | We currently estimate a dealer manager fee of approximately $3,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. | ||
We will sell special general partner interests of our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, and use the sale proceeds to pay all selling commissions. | ||||
Note: Our unique compensation arrangement. | The selling commissions, all of which Lightstone Securities will reallow to unaffiliated broker-dealers, and dealer manager fee are unsubordinated payments that we are contractually obligated to make regardless of our sale of the special general partner interests. In a separate agreement, however, Lightstone SLP, LLC committed to purchase special general partner interests, which will be issued each time a closing occurs, at a price of $100,000 for each $1,000,000 in subscriptions that we accept. Our sponsor will independently finance Lightstone SLP’s purchases of these units without using any funds that we receive from the sale of our common stock. As a result, we will be able to use all of the proceeds from the sale of our common stock to invest in real properties. | |||
We will use the funds received for the special general partner interests to pay the unsubordinated selling commissions and dealer manager fee described above and the additional offering and organization expenses discussed below. |
13
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
In consideration of its purchase of special general partner interests, Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive an interest in our regular and liquidation distributions. See “Compensation Table — Subordinated Payments.” These distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC are always subordinated to our stockholders’ receipt of a stated preferred return and are unrelated to the payments to our dealer manager and unaffiliated soliciting dealers discussed above. | ||||
Reimbursement of organization and other offering costs. | Our advisor or affiliates will advance all organization and other offering costs, which consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable expenses (including sales literature and the prospectus), other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee. We will reimburse our advisor or affiliates for organization costs of up to 2% of gross offering proceeds, using the proceeds from the sale of the special general partner units to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | We currently estimate organization and offering expenses, including the selling commissions and dealer manager fees discussed above, of approximately $30,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. | ||
If organization and offering expenses, including the selling commissions and dealer manager fee discussed above, exceed 10% of the proceeds raised in this offering, the excess will be paid by our advisor without recourse to us and will not be exchangeable into special general partner interests of our operating partnership. | ||||
Acquisition Stage | ||||
Acquisition fee and expenses paid to our advisor. | Our advisor will be paid an amount, equal to 2.75% of the gross contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of the property purchased, as an acquisition fee. Our advisor will also be reimbursed for expenses that it incurs in connection with purchase of the property. The acquisition fee and expenses for any particular property, including amounts payable to affiliates, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the gross contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of the property. | The following amounts may be paid as an acquisition fee and for the reimbursement of acquisition expenses: $33,000,000 if 30,000,000 shares are sold (assuming aggregate long-term permanent leverage of approximately 75%) |
14
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
If we request additional services, the compensation will be provided on separate agreed-upon terms and the rate will be approved by a majority of disinterested directors, including a majority of the disinterested independent directors, as fair and reasonable for us. | However, the actual amounts cannot be determined at the present time. | |||
Operational Stage | ||||
Property management fee paid to our property manager, Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC. This fee will be paid for services in connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of the properties and the supervision of any third parties that are engaged by our property manager to provide such services. | Residential and Retail Properties: Our property manager will be paid a monthly management fee of 5% of the gross revenues from our residential and retail properties. Office and Industrial Properties: For the management and leasing of our office and industrial properties, we will pay to our property manager, property management and leasing fees of up to 4.5% of gross revenues from our office and industrial properties. In addition, we may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. | The actual amounts are dependent upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. | ||
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our property manager may be entitled to receive higher fees in the event our property manager demonstrates to the satisfaction of a majority of the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) that a higher competitive fee is justified for the services rendered. | ||||
The property manager may subcontract its duties for a fee that may be less than the fee provided for in the management services agreements. In the event that the property manager subcontracts its duties with respect to some or all of our properties, the fees payable to such parties for such services will be deducted from the monthly management fee payable to our property manager by us or paid directly by our property manager. |
15
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Operational Stage | ||||
Asset management fee paid to our advisor. | Our advisor will be paid an advisor asset management fee of 0.55% of our average invested assets. Average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in equity interests in, and loans secured by, real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. We will compute the average invested assets by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the quarter for which we are calculating the fee. The fee will be payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1375 of 1% of average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. | The amount of the fee depends on the cost of the average invested assets at the time the fee is payable and, therefore, cannot be determined now. | ||
Our advisor must reimburse us for the amounts, if any, by which our total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses, paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of: (1) 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year, or (2) 25% of our net income for that fiscal year; Items such as interest payments, taxes, non-cash expenditures, the special liquidation distribution, organization and offering expenses, and acquisition fees and expenses are excluded from the definition of total operating expenses, which otherwise includes the aggregate expenses of any kind paid or incurred by us. See “Management — Our Advisory Agreement” for an explanation of circumstances where the excess amount specified in clause (1) may not need to be reimbursed. |
16
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Reimbursable expenses to our advisor. These may include costs of goods and services, administrative services and non-supervisory services performed directly for us by independent parties. | We will reimburse some expenses of the advisor. The compensation and reimbursements to our advisor will be approved by a majority of our directors and a majority of our independent directors as fair and reasonable for us. | The actual amounts of reimbursable expenses in connection with this offering are dependent upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. The reimbursable expenses are subject to aggregate limitations on our operating expenses referred to under “Non-Subordinating Payments — Operational Stage — Asset Management Fee” above. | ||
Subordinated Payments | Operational Stage | |||
Note: We structure the allocation of distributions and other subordinated payments differently than most REITs. In order to facilitate a complete understanding of our allocation structure, please see “Subordinated Distribution Chart” below for a basic table that illustrates how we will allocate these subordinated payments. | We cannot assure investors of the cumulative non-compounded returns discussed below, which we disclose solely as a measure for the incentive compensation of our sponsor, advisor and affiliates. | |||
Distributions with respect to the special general partner interests, payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor. | This section describes the apportionment of any regular distributions that the operating partnership may make. At each stage of distributions, a different apportionment method commences or terminates, as applicable, when a particular party or parties have received a specific amount of distributions. The return calculations described below take into account all regular distributions received and not the specific distribution being made. | The actual amounts are dependent upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. | ||
Achievement of a particular threshold, therefore, is determined with reference to all prior distributions made by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, which distributions we will distribute to holders of our common stock. Once a threshold is reached, the operating partnership will make all subsequent regular distributions pursuant to the allocation method triggered by that or later thresholds. |
17
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(i)Before Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold Regular distributions will be made initially to us, which we will then distribute to the holders of our common stock, until these holders have received dividends equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on their net investment. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Until this 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will not pay to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, any distributions with respect to the purchase price of the special general partner interests that it received in exchange for agreeing to pay the costs and expenses of this offering, including dealer manager fees and selling commissions. | ||||
(ii)After Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold After the first 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will make all of its distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC until that entity receives an amount equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on the purchase price of the special general partner interests. |
18
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(iii)Before Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this second 7% threshold is reached and until the holders of our common stock have received dividends in an amount equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their net investment (including, for the purpose of the calculation of such amount, the amounts equaling a 7% return on their net investment described in paragraph (i) of this section), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 30% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. | ||||
(iv)After Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this 12% threshold is reached, 60% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 40% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | ||||
Liquidation Stage | ||||
We cannot assure investors of the cumulative non-compounded returns discussed below, which we disclose solely as a measure for the incentive compensation of our sponsor, advisor and affiliates. |
19
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Special liquidation distribution, payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor. | This section describes the apportionment of any liquidation distributions that we make. At each stage of distributions, a different apportionment method commences or terminates, as applicable, when a particular party or parties have received a specific amount of distributions. The return calculations described below take into account all regular and liquidation distributions received and not just distributions made upon liquidation. Achievement of a particular threshold, therefore, is determined with reference to all prior distributions made by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. | The actual amounts to be received depend upon the net sale proceeds upon our liquidation and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. | ||
(i.)Before Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold Distributions in connection with our liquidation will be made initially to us, which we will distribute to holders of our common stock, until these holders have received liquidation distributions equal to their initial investment plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on their net investment. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Until this 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will not pay to Lightstone SLP, LLC any special liquidation distribution in connection with our liquidation. | ||||
(ii.)After Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold After the first 7% threshold is reached, Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive special liquidation distributions with respect to the purchase price of the special general partner interests that it received in exchange for agreeing to pay the costs and expenses of this offering, including dealer manager fees and selling commissions, until it receives an amount equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interests plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on the purchase price of those interests; |
20
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(iii.)Before Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this second 7% threshold is reached and until the holders of our common stock have received an amount equal to their initial investment plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their net investment (“net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties) (including, for the purpose of the calculation of such amount, the amounts described in paragraph (i) of this section), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 30% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC; and | ||||
(iv.)After Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this 12% threshold is reached, 60% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 40% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | ||||
If the advisory agreement is terminated, the special general partner interests will be converted into cash equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interest. |
21
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Compensation to Officers and Directors | ||||
Independent Director fees. | Each of our independent directors receives an annual fee of $30,000 and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred. Our officers who are also our directors do not receive director fees. These fees are subject to change from time to time. | We will pay the three independent directors, annually, $90,000 in the aggregate. | ||
Stock options to our independent directors. | Each of our independent directors receives each year on the date of the stockholders’ annual meeting, an option to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the then fair market value per share. For additional information on this option plan, see “Management — Stock Option Plan.” | This form of compensation is not paid in cash. |
Distribution Chart
We intend to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, the special general partner interests will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, to certain distributions from our operating partnership, but only after our stockholders have received a stated preferred return. The following table sets forth information with respect to the apportionment of any regular and liquidation distributions that the operating partnership may make among Lightstone SLP, LLC and us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. The return calculations outlined below account for all regular and liquidation distributions that our operating partnership has made to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. For a more detailed discussion of distribution apportionment, see “Operating Partnership Agreement.”
Note that the chart reads chronologically from top to bottom, so that all distributions are initially made to stockholders in accordance with row (i), until the stockholders have received a return of 7% on their net investment. For purposes of the preceding sentence, “net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Then, all distributions will be made to Lightstone SLP, LLC in accordance with row (ii) until that entity has received 7% on its net investment. Row (iii) will then apply, and after that row (iv).
We cannot assure investors of the cumulative non-compounded returns discussed below, which we disclose solely as a measure for the incentive compensation of our sponsor, advisor and affiliates.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Recipient(s) of Distribution (Listed Chronologically) | Apportionment of Distributions | Cumulative Non-Compounded Return Threshold (That Initiates Next Level of Distributions) | ||
(i) Stockholders | 100% | 7% per year on stockholders’ net investment (and, in the case of liquidation, an amount equal to the stockholders’ initial investment) | ||
(ii) Lightstone SLP, LLC | 100% | 7% per year on special general partner purchase price (and, in the case of liquidation, an amount equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interest) | ||
(iii) Stockholders/ Lightstone SLP, LLC | 70% to stockholders; 30% to Lightstone SLP, LLC | Until 12% per year on stockholders’ net investment | ||
(iv) Stockholders/ Lightstone SLP, LLC | 60% to stockholders; 40% to Lightstone SLP, LLC | Above 12% on stockholders’ net investment (remainder of regular distributions apportioned in this manner) |
22
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our shares involves significant risks and therefore is suitable only for persons who understand those risks and their consequences, and are able to bear the risk of loss of their investment. While we believe that all material risks are presented in this section, you should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this prospectus before making your investment decisions.
Risks Related to the Offering and the Common Stock
You may not have the opportunity to evaluate our investments before we make them, which makes your investment more speculative. You will be unable to evaluate the economic merit of real estate projects before we invest in them and will be entirely relying on the ability of our advisor to select well-performing investment properties. Furthermore, our board of directors will have broad discretion in implementing policies regarding tenant or mortgagor creditworthiness, and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate potential tenants, managers or borrowers. These factors increase the risk that your investment may not generate returns comparable to our competitors.
We are a company with a limited operating history upon which to evaluate our likely performance. Except as described in “Real Property Investments — Specified Investments,” we do not currently own properties or other investments, we have not obtained any financing and we do not currently conduct any operations. Therefore, we have a limited operating history upon which to evaluate our likely performance. We may not be able to implement our business plan successfully.
Our dealer manager has no previous experience in public offerings. Our dealer manager, Lightstone Securities, LLC, has never conducted a public offering such as this. This lack of experience may affect the way in which Lightstone Securities conducts the offering. However, the President and CEO of our dealer manager has 33 years of experience in the financial services business, including extensive experience in national sales and marketing, the creation of asset management firms and the management of dramatic growth.
The price of our common stock is subjective and may not bear any relationship to what a stockholder could receive if it was sold. Our board of directors arbitrarily determined the offering price of the common stock and such price bears no relationship to any established criteria for valuing issued or outstanding shares. It determined the offering price of our shares of common stock based primarily on the range of offering prices of other REITs that do not have a public trading market. In addition, our board of directors set the offering price of our shares at $10, a round number, in order to facilitate calculations relating to the offering price of our shares. However, the offering price of our shares of common stock may not reflect the price at which the shares may trade if they were listed on an exchange or actively traded by brokers, nor of the proceeds that a stockholder may receive if we were liquidated or dissolved.
Exercise of options and warrants prior to dissolution could dilute our common stock value. We have authorized and reserved 75,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our stock option plan. This stock option plan provides for the automatic grant of a nonqualified stock option to each of our independent directors, without any further action by our board of directors or the stockholders, to purchase 3,000 shares of our common stock (or a pro rata portion for less than a full year of service) on the date of each annual stockholder’s meeting. Options to purchase 3,000 shares were granted to each of our three independent directors at the annual stockholders meeting in July 9, 2007. The exercise price for stock options granted to our independent directors is fixed at $10 per share until the termination of our initial public offering, and thereafter the exercise price for stock options granted to our independent directors will be equal to the fair market value of a share on the last business day preceding the annual meeting of stockholders. The term of each such option is 10 years. Options granted to non-employee directors will vest and become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the independent director is a director on the board of directors on that date. If we issue warrants or options, our independent directors may be in a position to exercise their warrants or options immediately prior to an expected liquidation, merger or form of liquidity. Any exercise could diminish our stockholders’ pro rata ownership in us and thus distributions made to stockholders.
23
The dealer manager has not made an independent review of us or this prospectus. Our dealer manager, Lightstone Securities, LLC, which we sometimes refer to as “Lightstone Securities,” is one of our affiliates and has not and will not make an independent due diligence review of us or the offering. Therefore, you will not have the benefit of a due diligence review conducted by an unaffiliated managing dealer in connection with your investment in this offering.
Our common stock is not currently listed on an exchange or trading market and are illiquid. There is currently no public trading market for the shares. Following this offering, our common stock will not be listed on a stock exchange. Accordingly, we do not expect a public trading market for our shares to develop. We may never list the shares for trading on a national stock exchange or include the shares for quotation on a national market system. The absence of an active public market for our shares could impair your ability to sell our stock at a profit or at all. Therefore, our shares should be purchased as a long term investment only.
Distributions to stockholders may be reduced or not made at all. The amount of cash available for distributions will be affected by many factors, such as our ability to buy properties as offering proceeds become available, the operating performance of the properties we acquire and many other variables. We may not be able to pay or maintain distributions or increase distributions over time. Therefore, we cannot determine what amount of cash will be available for distributions. Some of the following factors, which we believe are the material factors that can affect our ability to make distributions, are beyond our control, and a change in any one factor could adversely affect our ability to pay future distributions:
• | Cash available for distributions may be reduced if we are required to make capital improvements to properties. |
• | Cash available to make distributions may decrease if the assets we acquire have lower cash flows than expected. |
• | A substantial period of time (i.e. up to one year) may pass between the sale of the common stock through this offering and our purchase of real properties. During that time, we may invest in lower yielding short term instruments, which could result in a lower yield on your investment. See “Investment Objectives and Policies — Distributions” for a discussion of borrowing in order to make distributions and maintain our status as a REIT. |
• | In connection with future property acquisitions, we may issue additional shares of common stock and/or operating partnership units or interests in the entities that own our properties. We cannot predict the number of shares of common stock, units or interests that we may issue, or the effect that these additional shares might have on cash available for distributions to you. If we issue additional shares, that issuance could reduce the cash available for distributions to you. |
• | We make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and to eliminate, or at least minimize, exposure to federal income taxes and the nondeductible REIT excise tax. Differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the effect of required debt payments, could require us to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. |
Our board of directors may amend or terminate the distribution reinvestment program. The directors, including a majority of independent directors, may by majority vote amend or terminate the distribution reinvestment program upon 30 days notice to participants. Our distribution reinvestment program is described in greater detail below under the heading “Distribution Reinvestment and Share Repurchase Programs.”
You may not be able to receive liquidity on your investment through our share repurchase program. Limitations on participation in our share repurchase program, and the ability of our board of directors to modify or terminate the plan, may restrict your ability to participate in and receive liquidity on your investment through this program. Our share repurchase program is described in greater detail below under the heading “Distribution Reinvestment and Share Repurchase Programs.”
24
Your percentage of ownership may become diluted if we issue new shares of stock. Stockholders have no rights to buy additional shares of stock in the event we issue new shares of stock. We may issue common stock, convertible debt or preferred stock pursuant to a subsequent public offering or a private placement, upon exercise of options, or to sellers of properties we directly or indirectly acquire instead of, or in addition to, cash consideration. We may also issue common stock upon the exercise of the warrants issued and to be issued to participating broker-dealers. Investors purchasing common stock in this offering who do not participate in any future stock issues will experience dilution in the percentage of the issued and outstanding stock they own.
Our operations could be restricted if we become subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940. While we intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, we may have to forego certain investments which could produce more favorable returns. Should we fail to qualify for an exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, we would be subject to numerous restrictions under this Act, which would have a material adverse affect on our ability to deliver returns to our stockholders.
We do not believe that we or our operating partnership will be considered an “investment company” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 because we do not intend to engage in the types of business that characterize an investment company under that law. Investments in real estate will represent the substantial majority of our business, which would not subject us to investment company status. While a company that owns investment securities having a value exceeding 40 percent of its total assets could be considered an investment company, we believe that if we make investments in joint ventures they will be structured so that they are not considered “investment securities” for purposes of the law. However, if an examination of this type of our investments by the SEC or a court deem them to be investment securities, we could be deemed to be an investment company and subject to additional restrictions.
Even if we or our operating partnership are deemed an investment company, we may qualify for an exemption from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, such as the exemption that applies generally to companies that purchase or otherwise acquire interests in real estate. Under Section 3(c)(5)(C), the Investment Company Act exempts entities that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” The staff of the SEC has provided guidance on the availability of this exemption. Specifically, the staff’s position generally requires us to maintain at least 55% of our assets directly in qualifying real estate interests (“qualifying assets”). To constitute a qualifying real estate interest under this 55% requirement, a real estate interest must meet various criteria. We intend to invest only in fee or leasehold interests in real estate. Fee interests in real estate are considered “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act and leasehold interests in real estate may be considered “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. We do not intend to invest in mezzanine loans, subordinate interests in whole loans (B Notes), distressed debt, preferred equity or multi-class (first loss) mortgage-back securities. Investments in such assets may not be deemed “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act and, as a result, any such investments may have to be limited. There can be no assurance that our investments will continue to qualify for an exemption from investment company status.
If we fail to maintain an exemption or exclusion from registration as an investment company, we could, among other things, be required either (a) to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company, or (b) to register as an investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common stock. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters.
We intend to monitor our compliance with the exemptions under the Investment Company Act on an ongoing basis.
25
The special general partner interests will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is directly owned and controlled by our sponsor, to certain payments and distributions that will significantly reduce the distributions available to you after a 7% return. Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive returns on its special general partner interests that are subordinated to stockholders’ 7% return on their net investment. Distributions to stockholders will be reduced after they have received this 7% return because of the payments and distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC in connection with its special general partner interests that will be issued as more proceeds are raised in this offering. In addition, we may eventually repay Lightstone SLP, LLC up to $30,000,000 for its investment in the special general partner interests, which will result in a smaller pool of assets available for distribution to you.
Conflicts of Interest
There are conflicts of interest between our dealer manager, advisor, property manager and their affiliates and us. David Lichtenstein, our sponsor, founded both American Shelter Corporation and The Lightstone Group, LLC. Mr. Lichtenstein wholly owns The Lightstone Group and does business in his individual capacity under that name. Through The Lightstone Group, Mr. Lichtenstein controls and indirectly owns our advisor, our property manager, our operating partnership, our dealer manager and affiliates, except for us. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Lichtenstein owns 20,000 (less than a ¼ of 1%) of our shares indirectly through our advisor. Mr. Lichtenstein is one of our directors and The Lightstone Group or an affiliated entity controlled by Mr. Lichtenstein employs Bruno de Vinck, our other non-independent director, and each of our officers. As a result, our operation and management may be influenced or affected by conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with our affiliates. However, except as described in “Real Property Investments — Specified Investments,” we do not currently own properties or other investments, we have not obtained any financing and we do not currently conduct any other operations.
There is competition for the time and services of the personnel of our advisor and its affiliates. Our sponsor and its affiliates may compete with us for the time and services of the personnel of our advisor and its other affiliates in connection with our operation and the management of our assets. Specifically, employees of our sponsor, the advisor and the property manager will face conflicts of interest relating to time management and the allocation of resources and investment opportunities.
We do not have employees. Likewise, our advisor will rely on the employees of the sponsor and its affiliates to manage and operate our business. The sponsor is not restricted from acquiring, developing, operating, managing, leasing or selling real estate through entities other than us and will continue to be actively involved in operations and activities other than our operations and activities. The sponsor currently controls and/or operates other entities that own properties in many of the markets in which we may seek to invest. The sponsor spends a material amount of time managing these properties and other assets unrelated to our business. Our business may suffer as a result because we lack the ability to manage it without the time and attention of our sponsor’s employees. We encourage you to read the “Conflicts of Interest” section of this prospectus for a further discussion of these topics.
Our sponsor and its affiliates are general partners and sponsors of other real estate programs having investment objectives and legal and financial obligations similar to ours. Because the sponsor and its affiliates have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other business activities, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among our business and these other activities. Our officers and directors, as well as those of the advisor, may own equity interests in entities affiliated with our sponsor from which we may buy properties. These individuals may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions, which could result in conflicts of interest. Likewise, such individuals could make substantial profits as the result of investment opportunities allocated to entities affiliated with the sponsor other than us. As a result of these interests, they could pursue transactions that may not be in our best interest. Also, if our sponsor suffers financial or operational problems as the result of any of its activities, whether or not related to our business, the ability of our sponsor and its affiliates, our advisor and property manager to operate our business could be adversely impacted.
26
Certain of our affiliates who provide services to us may be engaged in competitive activities. Our advisor, property manager and their respective affiliates may, in the future, be engaged in other activities that could result in potential conflicts of interest with the services that they will provide to us. In addition, the sponsor may compete with us for both the acquisition and/or refinancing of properties of a type suitable for our investment following the final closing of this offering, and after 75% of the total gross proceeds from the offering of the shares offered for sale pursuant to this offering have been invested or committed for investment in real properties.
If we invest in joint ventures, the objectives of our partners may conflict with our objectives.In accordance with one of our acquisition strategies, we may make investments in joint ventures or other partnership arrangements between us and affiliates of our sponsor or with unaffiliated third parties. Investments in joint ventures which own real properties may involve risks otherwise not present when we purchase real properties directly. For example, our co-venturer may file for bankruptcy protection, may have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our interests or goals, or may take actions contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives. Among other things, actions by a co-venturer might subject real properties owned by the joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by the terms of the joint venture or other adverse consequences.
These diverging interests could result in, among other things, exposing us to liabilities of the joint venture in excess of our proportionate share of these liabilities. The participation rights of each owner in a jointly owned property could reduce the value of each portion of the divided property. Moreover, there is an additional risk that the co-venturers may not be able to agree on matters relating to the property they jointly own. In addition, the fiduciary obligation that our sponsor or our board of directors may owe to our partner in an affiliated transaction may make it more difficult for us to enforce our rights.
We may purchase real properties from persons with whom affiliates of our advisor have prior business relationships. If we purchase properties from third parties who have sold, or may sell, properties to our advisors or its affiliates, our advisor will experience a conflict between our current interests and its interest in preserving any ongoing business relationship with these sellers.
Property management services are being provided by an affiliated party. Our property manager is owned by our sponsor, and is thus subject to an inherent conflict of interest. In addition, our advisor may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property we own that is managed by the property manager because the property manager may lose fees associated with the management of the property. Specifically, because the property manager will receive significant fees for managing our properties, our advisor may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should sell properties under circumstances where the property manager would no longer manage the property after the transaction. As a result of this conflict of interest, we may not dispose of properties when it would be in our best interests to do so.
Our advisor and its affiliates receive commissions, fees and other compensation based upon our investments. Some compensation is payable to our advisor whether or not there is cash available to make distributions to our stockholders. To the extent this occurs, our advisor and its affiliates benefit from us retaining ownership of our assets and leveraging our assets, while our stockholders may be better served by sale or disposition or not leveraging the assets. In addition, the advisor’s ability to receive fees and reimbursements depends on our continued investment in real properties. Therefore, the interest of the advisor and its affiliates in receiving fees may conflict with the interest of our stockholders in earning income on their investment in our common stock. Because asset management fees payable to our advisor are based on total assets under management, including assets purchased using debt, our advisor may have an incentive to incur a high level of leverage in order to increase the total amount of assets under management.
Our sponsor may face conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our day-to-day operations and in the enforcement of agreements between our sponsor and its affiliates. The property manager and the advisor will manage our day-to-day operations and properties pursuant to a management agreement and an advisory agreement. These agreements were not negotiated at arm’s length and certain fees payable by us under such agreements are paid regardless of our performance. Our sponsor and its affiliates may be in a conflict of interest position as to matters relating to these agreements. Examples include the computation of fees and reimbursements under such agreements, the enforcement and/or termination of the
27
agreements and the priority of payments to third parties as opposed to amounts paid to our sponsor’s affiliates. These fees may be higher than fees charged by third parties in an arm’s-length transaction as a result of these conflicts.
We may compete with other entities affiliated with our sponsor for tenants. The sponsor and its affiliates are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, management, leasing or sale of real estate projects. The sponsor or its affiliates may own and/or manage properties in most if not all geographical areas in which we expect to acquire real estate assets. Therefore, our properties may compete for tenants with other properties owned and/or managed by the sponsor and its affiliates. The sponsor may face conflicts of interest when evaluating tenant opportunities for our properties and other properties owned and/or managed by the sponsor and its affiliates and these conflicts of interest may have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain tenants.
We have the same legal counsel as our sponsor and its affiliates. Proskauer Rose LLP serves as our general legal counsel, as well as special counsel to our sponsor and various affiliates including, our advisor. The interests of our sponsor and its affiliates, including our sponsor, may become adverse to ours in the future. Under legal ethics rules, Proskauer Rose LLP may be precluded from representing us due to any conflict of interest between us and our sponsor and its affiliates, including our advisor.
The “Conflicts of Interest” section discusses in more detail the more significant of these potential conflicts of interest, as well as the procedures that have been established to resolve a number of these potential conflicts.
Risks Related to our Organization, Structure and Management
We do not have any management experience organizing and operating a REIT. Although our sponsor has substantial experience investing in and managing real estate, neither we nor our sponsor has participated in the organization or operation of a REIT.
Limitations on Changes in Control (Anti-Takeover Provisions). Because of the way we are organized, we would be a difficult takeover target. Certain provisions in our charter, bylaws, operating partnership agreement, advisory agreement and Maryland law may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal and could thereby depress the price of our stock and inhibit a management change. Provisions which may have an anti-takeover effect and inhibit a change in our management include:
There are ownership limits and restrictions on transferability and ownership in our charter. In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year. To make sure that we will not fail to qualify as a REIT under this test, our charter provides that, subject to some exceptions, no person may beneficially own (i) more than 9.8% in value of our aggregate outstanding stock or (ii) more than 9.8% in terms of the number of outstanding shares or the value of our common stock. Our board of directors may exempt a person from the 9.8% ownership limit upon such conditions as the board of directors may direct. However, our board of directors may not grant an exemption from the 9.8% ownership limit to any proposed transferee if it would result in the termination of our status as a REIT.
This restriction may:
• | have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock; or |
• | compel a stockholder who had acquired more than 9.8% of our stock to dispose of the additional shares and, as a result, to forfeit the benefits of owning the additional shares. |
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue preferred stock with terms that may discourage a third party from acquiring us. Our charter authorizes us to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. Our board of directors could establish a series of Preferred Stock that could delay or
28
prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for the Common Stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
The operating partnership agreement contains provisions that may discourage a third party from acquiring us. A limited partner in Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP, a Delaware limited partnership and our operating partnership, has the option to exchange his or her limited partnership units for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock. Those exchange rights are generally not exercisable until the limited partner has held those limited partnership units for more than one year. However, if we or the operating partnership propose to engage in any merger, consolidation or other combination with or into another person or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or a liquidation, or any reclassification, recapitalization or change of common and preferred stock into which a limited partnership common unit may be exchanged, each holder of a limited partnership unit will have the right to exchange the partnership unit into cash or, at our option, shares of common stock, prior to the stockholder vote on the transaction. As a result, limited partnership unit holders who timely exchange their units prior to the record date for the stockholder vote on any transaction will be entitled to vote their shares of common stock with respect to the transaction. The additional shares that might be outstanding as a result of these exchanges of limited partnership units may deter an acquisition proposal.
Maryland law may discourage a third party from acquiring us. Maryland law restricts mergers and other business combinations and provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have limited voting rights. These provisions of Maryland law are more fully described below under the heading “Provisions of Maryland Law and of our Charter and Bylaws.” The business combination statute could have the effect of discouraging offers from third parties to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of successfully completing this type of offer. The control share statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by the sponsor and its affiliates of shares of our stock, however, this provision may be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.
Management and Policy Changes
We may not be reimbursed by our advisor for certain operational stage expenses. Our advisor may be required to reimburse us for certain operational stage expenses. In the event our advisor’s net worth or cash flow is not sufficient to cover these expenses, we will not be reimbursed. This may adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to pay distributions.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against the directors and the advisor are limited. Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Subject to the restrictions discussed below, our charter, in the case of our directors, officers, employees and agents, and the advisory agreement, in the case of the advisor, require us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents and the advisor for actions taken on our behalf, in good faith and in our best interest and without negligence or misconduct or, in the case of independent directors, without gross negligence or willful misconduct. As a result, we and the stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents, and the advisor than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents or the advisor in some cases.
Stockholders have limited control over changes in our policies. Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our investment objectives, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Subject to the investment objections and limitations set forth in our charter, our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies. Although stockholders will have limited control over changes in our policies, our charter requires the concurrence of a majority of our outstanding stock in order for the board of directors to amend our charter (except for amendments that do not adversely affect stockholders’ rights, preferences and privileges), sell all or substantially all of our assets other than in the ordinary course of business or in connection with our liquidation or dissolution, cause our merger or other reorganization, or dissolve or liquidate us, other than before our initial investment in property.
29
Certain of our affiliates will receive substantial fees prior to the payment of dividends to our stockholders. We will pay or cause to be paid substantial compensation to our dealer manager, advisor, property manager, management and affiliates and their employees. We will pay various types of compensation to affiliates of The Lightstone Group and such affiliates’ employees, including salaries, and other cash compensation. In addition, our affiliates, Lightstone Securities and Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, will receive compensation for acting, respectively, as our dealer manager and advisor (although we will pay dealer manager fees and selling commissions with the proceeds from the sale of the special general partner interests in our operating partnership to the sponsor or an affiliate). In general, this compensation will not be dependent on our success or profitability. These payments are payable before the payment of dividends to the stockholders and none of these payments are subordinated to a specified return to the stockholders. Also, Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC, our property manager and an affiliate of The Lightstone Group, will receive compensation under the Management Agreement though, in general, this compensation would be dependent on our gross revenues. In addition, other affiliates may from time to time provide services to us if and as approved by the disinterested directors. It is possible that we could obtain such goods and services from unrelated persons at a lesser price.
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification
The liability of directors and officers is limited. Our directors and officers will not be liable for monetary damages unless the director or officer actually received an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services, or is adjudged to be liable to us or our stockholders based on a finding that his or her action, or failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding.
Our directors are also required to act in good faith in a manner believed by them to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. A director who performs his or her duties in accordance with the foregoing standards should not be liable to us or any other person for failure to discharge his obligations as a director. We are permitted to purchase and maintain insurance or provide similar protection on behalf of any directors, officers, employees and agents, including our advisor and its affiliates, against any liability asserted which was incurred in any such capacity with us or arising out of such status, except as limited by our charter. This may result in us having to expend significant funds, which will reduce the available cash for distribution to our stockholders.
Our charter prohibits us from indemnifying or holding harmless, for any loss or liability that we suffer, any director, officer, employee, agent or the advisor or its affiliates. For details regarding these restrictions, their effect on our ability to indemnify or hold harmless for liability and circumstances under which we are required or authorized to indemnify and to advance expenses to our directors, officers or the advisor, see “Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Our Advisor.”
We may indemnify our directors, officers and agents against loss. Under our charter, we will, under specified conditions, indemnify and pay or reimburse reasonable expenses to our directors, officers, employees and other agents, including our advisor and its affiliates, against all liabilities incurred in connection with their serving in such capacities, subject to the limitations set forth in our charter. We may also enter into any contract for indemnity and advancement of expenses in this regard. This may result in us having to expend significant funds, which will reduce the available cash for distribution to our stockholders.
Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market
Real Estate Investment Risks
Operating Risks
Our cash flows from real estate investments may become insufficient to pay our operating expenses and to cover the dividends we have paid and/or declared. Although our operating cash flows have been sufficient to pay both our expenses and dividends at our historical per-share amounts, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain sufficient cash flows to fund operating expenses and dividend at any particular level, if at all.
30
As we continue to raise proceeds from this offering, the sufficiency of cash flow to fund future dividend payments with respect to an increased number of outstanding shares will depend on the pace at which we are able to identify and close on suitable cash-generating real property investments. Because the accrual of offering proceeds may outpace the investment of these funds in real property acquisitions, cash generated from such investments may become insufficient to fund operating expenses and continued dividend payments at historical levels.
Failure to generate revenue may reduce distributions to stockholders. The cash flow from equity investments in commercial and residential properties depends on the amount of revenue generated and expenses incurred in operating the properties. If our properties do not generate revenue sufficient to meet operating expenses, debt service, and capital expenditures, our income and ability to make distributions to you will be adversely affected.
Economic conditions may adversely affect our income. A commercial or residential property’s income and value may be adversely affected by national and regional economic conditions, local real estate conditions such as an oversupply of properties or a reduction in demand for properties, availability of “for sale” properties, competition from other similar properties, our ability to provide adequate maintenance, insurance and management services, increased operating costs (including real estate taxes), the attractiveness and location of the property and changes in market rental rates. Our income will be adversely affected if a significant number of tenants are unable to pay rent or if our properties cannot be rented on favorable terms. Our performance is linked to economic conditions in the regions where our properties will be located and in the market for residential, office, retail and industrial space generally. Therefore, to the extent that there are adverse economic conditions in those regions, and in these markets generally, that impact the applicable market rents, such conditions could result in a reduction of our income and cash available for distributions and thus affect the amount of distributions we can make to you.
The profitability of attempted acquisitions is uncertain. We intend to acquire properties selectively. Acquisition of properties entails risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations. In undertaking these acquisitions, we will incur certain risks, including the expenditure of funds on, and the devotion of management’s time to, transactions that may not come to fruition. Additional risks inherent in acquisitions include risks that the properties will not achieve anticipated occupancy levels and that estimates of the costs of improvements to bring an acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property may prove inaccurate.
Real estate investments are illiquid. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions will be limited. In addition, certain significant expenditures, such as debt service, real estate taxes, and operating and maintenance costs generally are not reduced in circumstances resulting in a reduction in income from the investment. The foregoing and any other factor or event that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our investments could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Rising expenses could reduce cash flow and funds available for future acquisitions. Our properties will be subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance, administrative and other expenses. While some of our properties may be leased on a triple-net-lease basis or require the tenants to pay a portion of the expenses, renewals of leases or future leases may not be negotiated on that basis, in which event we will have to pay those costs. If we are unable to lease properties on a triple-net-lease basis or on a basis requiring the tenants to pay all or some of the expenses, we would be required to pay those costs, which could adversely affect funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions.
We will depend on tenants who lease from us on a triple-net basis to pay the appropriate portion of expenses. If tenants of properties that we lease on a triple-net basis fail to pay required tax, utility and other impositions, we could be required to pay those costs, which would adversely affect funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions. If we lease properties on a triple-net basis, we run the risk of tenant default or downgrade in the tenant’s credit, which could lead to default and foreclosure on the underlying property.
31
If we purchase assets at a time when the commercial and residential real estate market is experiencing substantial influxes of capital investment and competition for properties, the real estate we purchase may not appreciate or may decrease in value. The commercial and residential real estate markets are currently experiencing a substantial influx of capital from investors. This substantial flow of capital, combined with significant competition for real estate, may result in inflated purchase prices for such assets. To the extent we purchase real estate in such an environment, we are subject to the risk that if the real estate market ceases to attract the same level of capital investment in the future as it is currently attracting, or if the number of companies seeking to acquire such assets decreases, our returns will be lower and the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major commercial tenant would adversely impact us. Any or all of our commercial tenants, or a guarantor of a commercial tenant’s lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant commercial tenant or a number of smaller commercial tenants would have an adverse impact on our income and our ability to pay dividends because a tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could delay efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. Such an event could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments which would mean a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to you.
Generally, under bankruptcy law, a tenant has the option of continuing or terminating any unexpired lease. In the event of a bankruptcy, we cannot assure you that the tenant or its trustee will continue our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distributions to you may be adversely affected. If the tenant continues its current lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant terminates the lease, we will lose future rent under the lease and our claim for past due amounts owing under the lease will be treated as a general unsecured claim and may be subject to certain limitations. General unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore this claim could be paid only in the event funds were available, and then only in the same percentage as that realized on other unsecured claims. While the bankruptcy of any tenant and the rejection of its lease may provide us with an opportunity to lease the vacant space to another more desirable tenant on better terms, there can be no assurance that we would be able to do so.
The terms of new leases may adversely impact our income. Even if the tenants of our properties do renew their leases or we relet the units to new tenants, the terms of renewal or reletting may be less favorable than current lease terms. If the lease rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. As noted above, certain significant expenditures associated with each equity investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs) are generally not reduced when circumstances result in a reduction in rental income.
We may depend on commercial tenants for our revenue and therefore our revenue may depend on the success and economic viability of our commercial tenants. Our reliance on single or significant commercial tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space. Our financial results will depend in part on leasing space in the properties we acquire to tenants on economically favorable terms. A default by a commercial tenant, the failure of a guarantor to fulfill its obligations or other premature termination of a lease, or a commercial tenant’s election not to extend a lease upon its expiration could have an adverse effect on our income, general financial condition and ability to pay distributions. Therefore, our financial success is indirectly dependent on the success of the businesses operated by the commercial tenants of our properties.
Lease payment defaults by commercial tenants would most likely cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to stockholders. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. A default by a significant commercial tenant or a substantial number of commercial tenants at any one time on lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such lease(s) and cause us to have to
32
find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. Therefore, lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to stockholders.
Commercial tenants may have the right to terminate their leases upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default and, in other circumstances, may not renew their leases or, because of market conditions, may be able to renew their leases on terms that are less favorable to us than the terms of the current leases. If a lease is terminated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Therefore, the weakening of the financial condition of a significant commercial tenant or a number of smaller commercial tenants and vacancies caused by defaults of tenants or the expiration of leases may adversely affect our operations.
A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to re-lease. A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. If we terminate any lease following a default by a lessee, we will have to re-lease the affected property in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. If a tenant vacates a property, we may be unable either to re-lease the property for the rent due under the prior lease or to re-lease the property without incurring additional expenditures relating to the property. In addition, we could experience delays in enforcing our rights against, and collecting rents (and, in some cases, real estate taxes and insurance costs) due from a defaulting tenant. Any delay we experience in re-leasing a property or difficulty in re-leasing at acceptable rates may reduce cash available to make distributions to our stockholders.
In many cases, tenant leases contain provisions giving the tenant the exclusive right to sell particular types of merchandise or provide specific types of services within the particular retail center, or limit the ability of other tenants to sell such merchandise or provide such services. When re-leasing space after a vacancy is necessary, these provisions may limit the number and types of prospective tenants for the vacant space.
We also may have to incur substantial expenditures in connection with any re-leasing. A number of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of our tenants. Therefore, we may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space we have in our properties, particularly if the floor plan of the vacant space limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation. If the vacancy continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash dividends to be distributed to stockholders. As noted above, certain significant expenditures associated with each equity investment (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs) are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. The failure to re-lease or to re-lease on satisfactory terms could result in a reduction of our income, funds from operations and cash available for distributions and thus affect the amount of distributions to you. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so. We may give some commercial tenants the right, but not the obligation, to purchase their properties from us beginning a specified number of years after the date of the lease. Some of our leases also generally provide the tenant with a right of first refusal on any proposed sale provisions. These policies may lessen the ability of the advisor and our board of directors to freely control the sale of the property.
Although we may grant a lessee a right of first offer or option to purchase a property, there is no assurance that the lessee will exercise that right or that the price offered by the lessee in the case of a right of first offer will be adequate. In connection with the acquisition of a property, we may agree on restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. Even absent such restrictions, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We may not be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, and prices or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser may not be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser
33
and to close the sale of a property. We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We may not have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
We may not make a profit if we sell a property. The prices that we can obtain when we determine to sell a property will depend on many factors that are presently unknown, including the operating history, tax treatment of real estate investments, demographic trends in the area and available financing. There is a risk that we will not realize any significant appreciation on our investment in a property. Accordingly, your ability to recover all or any portion of your investment under such circumstances will depend on the amount of funds so realized and claims to be satisfied therefrom.
Our properties may not be diversified. Because this offering will be made on a best efforts basis, our potential profitability and our ability to diversify our investments, both geographically and by type of properties purchased, will be limited by the amount of funds we raise. We will be able to purchase additional properties only as additional funds are raised. Even if we sell 30,000,000 shares of common stock for $300,000,000, our properties may not be well diversified and their economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions.
Our current strategy is to acquire interests primarily in industrial facilities, retail space (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), office buildings, residential apartment communities and other income-producing real estate. As a result, we are subject to the risks inherent in investing in these industries. A downturn in the office, industrial, retail, lodging or residential industry may have more pronounced effects on the amount of cash available to us for distribution or on the value of our assets than if we had diversified our investments.
Our performance is therefore linked to economic conditions in the regions in which we will acquire properties and in the market for real estate properties generally. Therefore, to the extent that there are adverse economic conditions in the regions in which our properties are located and in the market for real estate properties, such conditions could result in a reduction of our income and cash to return capital and thus affect the amount of distributions we can make to you.
We may incur liabilities in connection with properties we acquire. Our anticipated acquisition activities are subject to many risks. We may acquire properties or entities that are subject to liabilities or that have problems relating to environmental condition, state of title, physical condition or compliance with zoning laws, building codes, or other legal requirements. In each case, our acquisition may be without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities or conditions. As a result, if any liability were asserted against us relating to those properties or entities, or if any adverse condition existed with respect to the properties or entities, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or cure it, which could adversely affect our cash flow and operating results. However, some of these liabilities may be covered by insurance. In addition, we intend to perform customary due diligence regarding each property or entity we acquire. We also will attempt to obtain appropriate representations and indemnities from the sellers of the properties or entities we acquire, although it is possible that the sellers may not have the resources to satisfy their indemnification obligations if a liability arises. Unknown liabilities to third parties with respect to properties or entities acquired might include:
• | liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination; |
• | claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the former owners of the properties; |
• | liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; and |
• | claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties. |
Competition with third parties in acquiring and operating properties may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment. We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, many of which have greater resources than we do. Specifically, there are numerous commercial developers, real estate companies, real estate investment trusts and U.S. institutional and foreign investors that operate in the markets in which we may operate, that will compete with us in acquiring residential, office,
34
retail, lodging, industrial and other properties that will be seeking investments and tenants for these properties. Many of these entities have significant financial and other resources, including operating experience, allowing them to compete effectively with us. Competitors with substantially greater financial resources than us may generally be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of entities in which investments may be made or risks attendant to a geographic concentration of investments. In addition, those competitors that are not REITs may be at an advantage to the extent they can utilize working capital to finance projects, while we (and our competitors that are REITs) will be required by the annual distribution provisions under the Internal Revenue Code to distribute significant amounts of cash from operations to our stockholders. Demand from third parties for properties that meet our investment objectives could result in an increase of the price of such properties. If we pay higher prices for properties, our profitability may be reduced and you may experience a lower return on your investment. In addition, our properties may be located in close proximity to other properties that will compete against our properties for tenants. Many of these competing properties may be better located and/or appointed than the properties that we will acquire, giving these properties a competitive advantage over our properties, and we may, in the future, face additional competition from properties not yet constructed or even planned. This competition could adversely affect our business. The number of competitive properties could have a material effect on our ability to rent space at our properties and the amount of rents charged. We could be adversely affected if additional competitive properties are built in locations competitive with our properties, causing increased competition for residential renters, retail customer traffic and creditworthy commercial tenants. In addition, our ability to charge premium rental rates to tenants may be negatively impacted. This increased competition may increase our costs of acquisitions or lower the occupancies and the rent we may charge tenants. This could result in decreased cash flow from tenants and may require us to make capital improvements to properties which we would not have otherwise made, thus affecting cash available for distributions to you.
We may not have control over costs arising from rehabilitation of properties. We may elect to acquire properties which may require rehabilitation. In particular, we may acquire affordable properties that we will rehabilitate and convert to market rate properties. Consequently, we intend to retain independent general contractors to perform the actual physical rehabilitation work and will be subject to risks in connection with a contractor’s ability to control rehabilitation costs, the timing of completion of rehabilitation, and a contractor’s ability to build in conformity with plans and specification.
We may incur losses as result of defaults by the purchasers of properties we sell in certain circumstances. If we decide to sell any of our properties, we will use our best efforts to sell them for cash. However, we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk of default by the purchaser and will be subject to remedies provided by law. There are no limitations or restrictions on our ability to take purchase money obligations. We may incur losses as a result of such defaults, which may adversely affect our available cash and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
We may experience energy shortages and allocations. There may be shortages or increased costs of fuel, natural gas, water, electric power or allocations thereof by suppliers or governmental regulatory bodies in the areas where we purchase properties, in which event the operation of our properties may be adversely affected.
We may acquire properties with lock-out provisions which may prohibit us from selling a property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties. We may acquire properties in exchange for operating partnership units and agree to restrictions on sales or refinancing, called “lock-out” provisions that are intended to preserve favorable tax treatment for the owners of such properties who sell them to us. Lock-out provisions may restrict sales or refinancings for a certain period in order to comply with the applicable government regulations. Lock-out provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing properties. This would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus affect cash available to return capital to you. Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take actions during the lock-out period that would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders and, therefore, might have an adverse impact on the value of the shares, relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from
35
participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control even though that disposition or change in control might be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Changes in applicable laws may adversely affect the income and value of our properties. The income and value of a property may be affected by such factors as environmental, rent control and other laws and regulations, changes in applicable general and real estate tax laws (including the possibility of changes in the federal income tax laws or the lengthening of the depreciation period for real estate) and interest rates, the availability of financing, acts of nature (such as hurricanes and floods) and other factors beyond our control.
We may be affected by foreign government regulations and actions and foreign conditions. If we pursue investment opportunities in international markets, foreign laws and governmental regulations may be applicable to us, our affiliates and our investors. Changes in these laws and governmental regulations, or their interpretation by agencies or the courts, could occur. Further, economic and political factors, including civil unrest, governmental changes and restrictions on the ability to transfer capital across borders in the United States, but primarily in the foreign countries in which we may invest, can have a major impact on us.
Retail Industry Risks
Some of the properties that we own and intend to own and operate consist of retail properties (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers). Our retail properties are and will be subject to the various risks discussed above. In addition, they are and will be subject to the risks discussed below.
Retail conditions may adversely affect our income. A retail property’s revenues and value may be adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which apply to real estate investment generally, but which also include trends in the retail industry and perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the retail property. In addition, to the extent that the investing public has a negative perception of the retail sector, the value of our common stock may be negatively impacted.
Some of our leases may provide for base rent plus contractual base rent increases. A number of our retail leases may also include a percentage rent clause for additional rent above the base amount based upon a specified percentage of the sales our tenants generate. Under those leases which contain percentage rent clauses, our revenue from tenants may increase as the sales of our tenants increase. Generally, retailers face declining revenues during downturns in the economy. As a result, the portion of our revenue which we may derive from percentage rent leases could decline upon a general economic downturn.
Our revenue will be impacted by the success and economic viability of our anchor retail tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space. In the retail sector, any tenant occupying a large portion of the gross leasable area of a retail center, a tenant of any of the triple-net single-user retail properties outside the primary geographical area of investment, commonly referred to as an anchor tenant, or a tenant that is our anchor tenant at more than one retail center, may become insolvent, may suffer a downturn in business, or may decide not to renew its lease. Any of these events would result in a reduction or cessation in rental payments to us and would adversely affect our financial condition. A lease termination by an anchor tenant could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants whose leases permit cancellation or rent reduction if another tenant’s lease is terminated. We may own properties where the tenants may have rights to terminate their leases if certain other tenants are no longer open for business. These “co-tenancy” provisions may also exist in some leases where we own a portion of a retail property and one or more of the anchor tenants leases space in that portion of the center not owned or controlled by us. If such tenants were to vacate their space, tenants with co-tenancy provisions would have the right to terminate their leases with us or seek a rent reduction from us. In such event, we may be unable to re-lease the vacated space. Similarly, the leases of some anchor tenants may permit the anchor tenant to transfer its lease to another retailer. The transfer to a new anchor tenant could cause customer traffic in the retail center to decrease and thereby reduce the income generated by that retail center. A lease transfer to a new anchor tenant could also allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases at the retail center. In the event that we are unable to re-lease the vacated space to a new anchor tenant, we may incur additional expenses in order to re-model the space to be able to re-lease the space to more than one tenant.
36
Competition with other retail channels may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.Our retail tenants face potentially changing consumer preferences and increasing competition from other forms of retailing, such as discount shopping centers, outlet centers, upscale neighborhood strip centers, catalogues, discount shopping clubs, internet and telemarketing. Other retail centers within the market area of our properties will compete with our properties for customers, affecting their tenants’ cash flows and thus affecting their ability to pay rent. In addition, some of our tenants’ rent payments may be based on the amount of sales revenue that they generate. If these tenants experience competition, the amount of their rent may decrease and our cash flow will decrease.
Residential Industry Risks
Some of the properties that we own and operate consist of residential properties. Our residential properties are subject to the various risks discussed above. In addition, they will be subject to the risks discussed below.
The short-term nature of our residential leases may adversely impact our income. If our residents decide not to renew their leases upon expiration, we may not be able to relet their units. Because substantially all of our residential leases will be for apartments, they will generally be for terms of no more than one or two years. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the units then our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. Certain significant expenditures associated with each equity investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs) are generally not reduced when circumstances result in a reduction in rental income.
An economic downturn could adversely affect the residential industry and may affect operations for the residential properties that we acquire. As a result of the effects of an economic downturn, including increased unemployment rates, the residential industry may experience a significant decline in business caused by a reduction in overall renters. Moreover, low residential mortgage interest rates could accompany an economic downturn and encourage potential renters to purchase residences rather than lease them. The residential properties we acquire may experience declines in occupancy rate due to any such decline in residential mortgage interest rates.
Lodging Industry Risks
Some of the properties that we own and intend to own and operate consist of lodging properties. Our lodging properties are an d will be subject to the various risks discussed above. In addition, they are subject to the risks discussed below.
We may be subject to the risks of hotel operations. Our sponsor has acquired Extended Stay Hotels and our board of directors has expanded our eligible investments to include the acquisition, holding and disposition of hotels. Our hotels will be subject to all of the risks common to the hotel industry. These risks could adversely affect hotel occupancy and the rates that can be charged for hotel rooms as well as hotel operating expenses, and generally include:
• | increases in supply of hotel rooms that exceed increases in demand; |
• | increases in energy costs and other travel expenses that reduce business and leisure travel; |
• | reduced business and leisure travel due to continued geo-political uncertainty, including terrorism; |
• | adverse effects of declines in general and local economic activity; |
• | adverse effects of a downturn in the hotel industry; and |
• | risks generally associated with the ownership of hotels and real estate, as discussed below. |
If we invest in lodging properties, such properties will be operated by a third-party management company and could be adversely affected if that third-party management company, or its affiliated brands, experiences negative publicity or other adverse developments. Any lodging properties we may acquire are expected to be operated under brands owned by an affiliate of our sponsor and managed by a management company that is affiliated with such brands. Because of this concentration, negative publicity or other adverse developments that affect that operator and/or its affiliated brands generally may adversely affect our results of
37
operations, financial condition, and consequently cash flows thereby impacting our ability to service debt, and to make distributions to our stockholders.
We cannot and will not directly operate our lodging properties and, as a result, our results of operations, financial position, ability to service debt and our ability to make distributions to stockholders are dependent on the ability of our third-party management companies and our tenants to operate our extended stay hotel properties successfully. In order for us to satisfy certain REIT qualification rules, we cannot directly operate any lodging properties we may acquire or actively participate in the decisions affecting their daily operations. Instead, through a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), we must enter into management agreements with a third-party management company, or we must lease our lodging properties to third-party tenants on a triple-net lease basis. We cannot and will not control this third-party management company or the tenants who operate and are responsible for maintenance and other day-to-day management of our lodging properties, including, but not limited to, the implementation of significant operating decisions. Thus, even if we believe our lodging properties are being operated inefficiently or in a manner that does not result in satisfactory operating results, we may not be able to require the third-party management company or the tenants to change their method of operation of our lodging properties. Our results of operations, financial position, cash flows and our ability to service debt and to make distributions to stockholders are, therefore, dependent on the ability of our third-party management company and tenants to operate our lodging properties successfully.
We will rely on a third-party hotel management company to establish and maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting at our lodging properties. In doing this, the property manager should have policies and procedures in place which allows them to effectively monitor and report to us the operating results of our lodging properties which ultimately are included in our consolidated financial statements. Because the operations of our lodging properties ultimately become a component of our consolidated financial statements, we evaluate the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting at all of our properties, including our lodging properties, in connection with the certifications we provide in our quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, respectively, pursuant to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. However, we will not control the design or implementation of or changes to internal controls at any of our lodging properties. Thus, even if we believe that our lodging properties are being operated without effective internal controls, we may not be able to require the third-party management company to change its internal control structure. This could require us to implement extensive and possibly inefficient controls at a parent level in an attempt to mitigate such deficiencies. If such controls are not effective, the accuracy of the results of our operations that we report could be affected. Accordingly, our ability to conclude that, as a company, our internal controls are effective is significantly dependent upon the effectiveness of internal controls that our third-party management company will implement at our lodging properties. While we do not consider it likely, it is possible that we could have a significant deficiency or material weakness as a result of the ineffectiveness of the internal controls at one or more of our lodging properties.
If we replace a third-party management company or tenant, we may be required by the terms of the relevant management agreement or lease to pay substantial termination fees, and we may experience significant disruptions at the affected lodging properties. While it is our intent to enter into management agreements with a third-party management company or tenants with substantial prior lodging experience, we may not be able to make such arrangements in the future. If we experience such disruptions, it may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and our cash flows, including our ability to service debt and to make distributions to our stockholders.
A TRS structure will subject us to the risk of increased lodging operating expenses. The performance of our TRS lessees will be based on the operations of our lodging properties. Our operating risks include not only changes in hotel revenues and changes to our TRS lessees’ ability to pay the rent due to us under the leases, but also increased hotel operating expenses, including, but not limited to, the following cost elements:
• | wage and benefit costs; |
• | repair and maintenance expenses; |
• | energy costs; |
• | property taxes; |
38
• | insurance costs; and |
• | other operating expenses. |
Any increases in one or more these operating expenses could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
A TRS structure will subject us to the risk that the leases with our TRS lessees do not qualify for tax purposes as arms-length which would expose us to potentially significant tax penalties. Our TRS lessees will incur taxes or accrue tax benefits consistent with a “C” corporation. If the leases between us and our TRS lessees were deemed by the Internal Revenue Service to not reflect an arms-length transaction as that term is defined by tax law, we may be subject to tax penalties as the lessor that would adversely impact our profitability and our cash flows.
Our inability or that of our third-party management company or our third-party tenants to maintain franchise licenses could decrease our revenues. Maintenance of franchise licenses for our lodging properties is subject to maintaining our franchisor’s operating standards and other terms and conditions. Franchisors periodically inspect lodging properties to ensure that we, our third-party tenants or our third-party management company maintain their standards. Failure by us or one of our third-party tenants or our third-party management company to maintain these standards or comply with other terms and conditions of the applicable franchise agreement could result in a franchise license being canceled. If a franchise license terminates due to our failure to make required improvements or to otherwise comply with its terms, we may also be liable to the franchisor for a termination fee. As a condition to the maintenance of a franchise license, our franchisor could also require us to make capital expenditures, even if we do not believe the capital improvements are necessary, desirable, or likely to result in an acceptable return on our investment. We may risk losing a franchise license if we do not make franchisor-required capital expenditures.
If our franchisor terminates the franchise license, we may try either to obtain a suitable replacement franchise or to operate the lodging property without a franchise license. The loss of a franchise license could materially and adversely affect the operations or the underlying value of the lodging property because of the loss associated with the brand recognition and/or the marketing support and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor. A loss of a franchise license for one or more lodging properties could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and our cash flows, including our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.
We will generally be subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel employees. Any lodging properties we acquire will be leased to a wholly-owned TRS entity and be subject to management agreements with a third-party manager to operate the properties. Hotel operating revenues and expenses for these properties will be included in our consolidated results of operations. As a result, although we do not directly employ or manage the labor force at our lodging properties, we are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force. Our third-party manager will be responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our lodging properties and for establishing and maintaining the appropriate processes and controls over such activities. From time to time, the operations of our lodging properties may be disrupted through strikes, public demonstrations or other labor actions and related publicity. We may also incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of the aforementioned disruptions, or contract disputes or other events. Our third-party manager may be targeted by union actions or adversely impacted by the disruption caused by organizing activities. Significant adverse disruptions caused by union activities and/or increased costs affiliated with such activities could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and our cash flows, including our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.
The most recent economic slowdown, terrorist attacks, military activity in the Middle East, natural disasters and other world events impacting the global economy had adversely affected the travel and hotel industries, including extended stay hotel properties, in the past and these adverse effects may continue or occur in the future. As a result of terrorist attacks around the world, the war in Iraq and the effects of the economic recession, subsequent to 2001 the lodging industry experienced a significant decline in business caused by a reduction in both business and leisure travel. We cannot presently determine the impact that
39
future events such as military or police activities in the U.S. or foreign countries, future terrorist activities or threats of such activities, natural disasters or health epidemics could have on our business. Our business and lodging properties may continue to be affected by such events, including our hotel occupancy levels and average daily rates, and, as a result, our revenues may decrease or not increase to levels we expect. In addition, other terrorist attacks, natural disasters, health epidemics, acts of war, prolonged U.S. involvement in Iraq or other significant military activity could have additional adverse effects on the economy in general, and the travel and lodging industry in particular. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows, thereby impacting our ability to service debt and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We do not have control over the market and business conditions that affect the value of our lodging properties, and adverse changes with respect to such conditions could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Hotel properties, including extended stay hotels, are subject to varying degrees of risk generally common to the ownership of hotels, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
• | increased competition from other existing hotels in our markets; |
• | new hotels entering our markets, which may adversely affect the occupancy levels and average daily rates of our lodging properties; |
• | declines in business and leisure travel; |
• | increases in energy costs, increased threat of terrorism, terrorist events, airline strikes or other factors that may affect travel patterns and reduce the number of business and leisure travelers; |
• | increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors that may not be offset by increased room rates; |
• | changes in, and the related costs of compliance with, governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances; and |
• | adverse effects of international, national, regional and local economic and market conditions. |
Adverse changes in any or all of these factors could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, thereby adversely impacting our ability to service debt and to make distributions to our stockholders.
The hotel industry is intensely competitive, and, as a result, if our third-party management company and our third-party tenants are unable to compete successfully or if our competitors’ marketing strategies are more effective, our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows including our ability to service debt and to make distributions to our stockholders, may be adversely affected. The hotel industry is intensely competitive. Our lodging properties compete with other existing and new hotels in their geographic markets. Since we do not operate our lodging properties, our revenues depend on the ability of our third-party management company and our-third party tenants to compete successfully with other hotels in their respective markets. Some of our competitors have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than we do. If our third-party management company and our third-party tenants are unable to compete successfully or if our competitors’ marketing strategies are effective, our results of operations, financial condition, ability to service debt and ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.
The hotel industry is seasonal in nature, and, as a result, our lodging properties may be adversely affected. The seasonality of the hotel industry can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in our revenues. In addition, our quarterly earnings may be adversely affected by factors outside our control, such as extreme or unexpectedly mild weather conditions or natural disasters, terrorist attacks or alerts, outbreaks of contagious diseases, airline strikes, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. To the extent that cash flows from operations are insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenues, we may attempt to borrow in order to make distributions to our stockholders or be required to reduce other expenditures or distributions to stockholders.
40
The increasing use of internet travel intermediaries by consumers may experience fluctuations in operating performance during the year and otherwise adversely affect our profitability and cash flows. Our third party hotel management company will rely upon Internet travel intermediaries such as Travelocity.com, Expedia.com, Orbitz.com, Hotels.com and Priceline.com to generate demand for our lodging properties. As Internet bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from our third-party management company. Moreover, some of these Internet travel intermediaries are attempting to offer hotel rooms as a commodity, by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality (such as “three-star downtown hotel”) at the expense of brand identification. Consumers may eventually develop brand loyalties to their reservations system rather than to our third-party management company and/or our brands, which could have an adverse effect on our business because we will rely heavily on brand identification. If the amount of sales made through Internet intermediaries increases significantly and our third-party management company and our third-party tenants fail to appropriately price room inventory in a manner that maximizes the opportunity for enhanced profit margins, room revenues may flatten or decrease and our profitability may be adversely affected.
Real Estate Financing Risks
General Financing Risks
We plan to incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks. We intend to acquire properties subject to existing financing or by borrowing new funds. In addition, we intend to incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans secured by selected or all of the real properties to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties. We may also borrow funds if necessary to satisfy the requirement that we distribute to stockholders as dividends at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, or otherwise as is necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
We intend to incur mortgage debt on a particular real property if we believe the property’s projected cash flow is sufficient to service the mortgage debt. However, if there is a shortfall in cash flow, requiring us to use cash from other sources to make the mortgage payments on the property, then the amount available for distributions to stockholders may be affected. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by properties may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and our loss of the property securing the loan which is in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds. We may, in some circumstances, give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties. In these cases, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, there is a risk that more than one real property may be affected by a default.
Any mortgage debt which we place on properties may contain clauses providing for prepayment penalties. If a lender invokes these penalties upon the sale of a property or the prepayment of a mortgage on a property, the cost to us to sell the property could increase substantially, and may even be prohibitive. This could lead to a reduction in our income, which would reduce cash available for distribution to stockholders and may prevent us from borrowing more money. Moreover, if we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, such financing arrangements will involve greater risks than financing arrangements whose principal amount is amortized over the term of the loan. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment.
The current debt market volatility may affect the availability and amount of financing for our acquisitions. The commercial real estate debt markets are currently experiencing volatility as a result of certain factors including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities in the market. This is resulting in lenders increasing the cost for debt financing. As our existing debt is fixed rate debt, we do not believe that our current portfolio is materially impacted by the current debt market environment. However, should the
41
overall cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to factor such increases into the economics of future acquisitions. This may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution.
In addition, the state of the debt markets could have an impact on the overall amount of capital investing in real estate which may result in price or value decreases of real estate assets. Although this may benefit us for future acquisitions, it could negatively impact the current value of our existing assets.
If we have insufficient working capital reserves, we will have to obtain financing from other sources. We have established working capital reserves that we believe are adequate to cover our cash needs. However, if these reserves are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing to fund our cash requirements. Sufficient financing may not be available or, if available, may not be available on economically feasible terms or on terms acceptable to us. If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we will not be able to place financing on the properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of distributions per share. If we place mortgage debt on the properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, our income could be reduced, which would reduce cash available for distribution to stockholders and may prevent us from borrowing more money. Additional borrowing for working capital purposes will increase our interest expense, and therefore our financial condition and our ability to pay distributions may be adversely affected.
We may not have funding or capital resources for future improvements. When a commercial tenant at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for leasing costs, tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space. We will incur certain fixed operating costs during the time the space is vacant as well as leasing commissions and related costs to re-lease the vacated space. We may also have similar future capital needs in order to renovate or refurbish any of our properties for other reasons.
Also, in the event we need to secure funding sources in the future but are unable to secure such sources or are unable to secure funding on terms we feel are acceptable, we may be required to defer capital improvements or refurbishment to a property. This may cause such property to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value and/or produce decreased cash flow as the result of our inability to attract tenants to the property. If this happens, we may not be able to maintain projected rental rates for affected properties, and our results of operations may be negatively impacted. Or, we may be required to secure funding on unfavorable terms.
We may be adversely affected by limitations in our charter on the aggregate amount we may borrow. Our charter limits the aggregate amount we may borrow, absent approval by our independent directors and justification for such excess. That limitation could have adverse business consequences such as:
• | limiting our ability to purchase additional properties; |
• | causing us to lose our REIT status if additional borrowing was necessary to pay the required minimum amount of cash distributions to our stockholders to maintain our status as a REIT; |
• | causing operational problems if there are cash flow shortfalls for working capital purposes; and |
• | resulting in the loss of a property if, for example, financing was necessary to repay a default on a mortgage. |
Any excess borrowing over the 300% level will be disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess.
42
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations. In connection with obtaining financing, a bank or other lender could impose restrictions on us affecting our ability to incur additional debt and our distribution and operating policies. Loan documents we enter into may contain negative covenants limiting our ability to, among other things, further mortgage our properties, discontinue insurance coverage or replace Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC as our advisor. In addition, prepayment penalties imposed by banks or other lenders could affect our ability to sell properties when we want.
Financing Risks on the Property Level
Some of our mortgage loans may have “due on sale” provisions.In purchasing properties subject to financing, we may obtain financing with “due-on-sale” and/or “due-on-encumbrance” clauses. Due-on-sale clauses in mortgages allow a mortgage lender to demand full repayment of the mortgage loan if the borrower sells the mortgaged property. Similarly, due-on-encumbrance clauses allow a mortgage lender to demand full repayment if the borrower uses the real estate securing the mortgage loan as security for another loan. These clauses may cause the maturity date of such mortgage loans to be accelerated and such financing to become due. In such event, we may be required to sell our properties on an all-cash basis, to acquire new financing in connection with the sale, or to provide seller financing. It is not our intent to provide seller financing, although it may be necessary or advisable for us to do so in order to facilitate the sale of a property. It is unknown whether the holders of mortgages encumbering our properties will require such acceleration or whether other mortgage financing will be available. Such factors will depend on the mortgage market and on financial and economic conditions existing at the time of such sale or refinancing.
Lenders may be able to recover against our other properties under our mortgage loans.We will seek secured loans (which are nonrecourse) to acquire properties. However, only recourse financing may be available, in which event, in addition to the property securing the loan, the lender may look to our other assets for satisfaction of the debt. Thus, should we be unable to repay a recourse loan with the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of the property securing the loan, the lender could look to one or more of our other properties for repayment. Also, in order to facilitate the sale of a property, we may allow the buyer to purchase the property subject to an existing loan whereby we remain responsible for the debt.
Our mortgage loans may charge variable interest. Some of our mortgage loans will be subject to fluctuating interest rates based on certain index rates, such as the prime rate. Future increases in the index rates would result in increases in debt service on variable rate loans and thus reduce funds available for acquisitions of properties and dividends to the stockholders.
Insurance Risks
We may suffer losses that are not covered by insurance. If we suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of insurance coverage, we could lose invested capital and anticipated profits. We intend to cause comprehensive insurance to be obtained for our properties, including casualty, liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss customarily obtained for similar properties in amounts which our advisor determines are sufficient to cover reasonably foreseeable losses, with policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances. Some of our commercial tenants may be responsible for insuring their goods and premises and, in some circumstances, may be required to reimburse us for a share of the cost of acquiring comprehensive insurance for the property, including casualty, liability, fire and extended coverage customarily obtained for similar properties in amounts which our advisor determines are sufficient to cover reasonably foreseeable losses. Material losses may occur in excess of insurance proceeds with respect to any property as insurance proceeds may not provide sufficient resources to fund the losses. However, there are types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses due to wars, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, environmental matters, mold or, in the future, terrorism which are either uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments.
Insurance companies have recently begun to exclude acts of terrorism from standard coverage. Terrorism insurance is currently available at an increased premium, and it is possible that the premium will increase in the future or that terrorism coverage will become unavailable. Mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial owners as a condition for providing
43
loans. We intend to obtain terrorism insurance if required by our lenders, but the terrorism insurance that we obtain may not be sufficient to cover loss for damages to our properties as a result of terrorist attacks. In addition, we may not be able to obtain insurance against the risk of terrorism because it may not be available or may not be available on terms that are economically feasible. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure you that we will have adequate coverage for such losses. If such an event occurred to, or caused the destruction of, one or more of our properties, we could lose both our invested capital and anticipated profits from such property. In addition, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable and others may not be covered by our terrorism insurance. Terrorism insurance may not be available at a reasonable price or at all.
In addition, many insurance carriers are excluding asbestos-related claims from standard policies, pricing asbestos endorsements at prohibitively high rates or adding significant restrictions to this coverage. Because of our inability to obtain specialized coverage at rates that correspond to the perceived level of risk, we may not obtain insurance for acts of terrorism or asbestos-related claims. We will continue to evaluate the availability and cost of additional insurance coverage from the insurance market. If we decide in the future to purchase insurance for terrorism or asbestos, the cost could have a negative impact on our results of operations. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs on a property, we could lose our capital invested in the property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property and, in the case of debt that is recourse to us, would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. Any loss of this nature would adversely affect us.
Although we intend to adequately insure our properties, we cannot assure that we will successfully do so.
Compliance with Laws
The costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions. All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner, developer or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, on, under or in its property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. In addition, the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowing.
Environmental laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic materials. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination arising from that site. The presence of hazardous or toxic materials, or the failure to address conditions relating to their presence properly, may adversely affect the ability to rent or sell the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Persons who dispose of or arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic materials may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such materials, or for related natural resource damages, at or from an off-site disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is or ever was owned or operated by those persons. In addition, environmental laws today can impose liability on a previous owner or operator of a property that owned or operated the property at a time when hazardous or toxic substances were disposed on, or released from, the property. A conveyance of the property, therefore, does not relieve the owner or operator from liability.
44
There may be potential liability associated with lead-based paint arising from lawsuits alleging personal injury and related claims. Typically, the existence of lead paint is more of a concern in residential units than in commercial properties. Although a structure built prior to 1978 may contain lead-based paint and may present a potential for exposure to lead, structures built after 1978 are not likely to contain lead-based paint.
Properties’ values may also be affected by their proximity to electric transmission lines. Electric transmission lines are one of many sources of electro-magnetic fields (“EMFs”) to which people may be exposed. Research completed regarding potential health concerns associated with exposure to EMFs has produced inconclusive results. Notwithstanding the lack of conclusive scientific evidence, some states now regulate the strength of electric and magnetic fields emanating from electric transmission lines, and other states have required transmission facilities to measure for levels of EMFs. On occasion, lawsuits have been filed (primarily against electric utilities) that allege personal injuries from exposure to transmission lines and EMFs, as well as from fear of adverse health effects due to such exposure. This fear of adverse health effects from transmission lines has been considered both when property values have been determined to obtain financing and in condemnation proceedings. We may not, in certain circumstances, search for electric transmission lines near our properties, but are aware of the potential exposure to damage claims by persons exposed to EMFs.
Recently, indoor air quality issues, including mold, have been highlighted in the media and the industry is seeing mold claims from lessees rising. To date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or abating mold conditions. However, due to the recent increase in mold claims and given that the law relating to mold is unsettled and subject to change, we could incur losses from claims relating to the presence of, or exposure to, mold or other microbial organisms, particularly if we are unable to maintain adequate insurance to cover such losses. We may also incur unexpected expenses relating to the abatement of mold on properties that we may acquire.
Limited quantities of asbestos-containing materials are present in various building materials such as floor coverings, ceiling texture material, acoustical tiles and decorative treatment. Environmental laws govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos. These laws could be used to impose liability for release of, and exposure to, hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials, into the air. Such laws require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos (1) properly manage and maintain the asbestos, (2) notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos and (3) undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements. These laws may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. As the owner of our properties, we may be potentially liable for any such costs.
We cannot assure you that properties which we acquire in the future will not have any material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns. Accordingly, we have no way of determining at this time the magnitude of any potential liability to which we may be subject arising out of environmental conditions or violations with respect to the properties we own.
The costs of compliance with laws and regulations relating to our lodging and residential properties may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions.
Various laws, ordinances, and regulations affect multi-family residential properties, including regulations relating to recreational facilities, such as activity centers and other common areas. We intend for our properties to have all material permits and approvals to operate. In addition, rent control laws may also be applicable to any of our residential properties.
Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations, stricter interpretation of existing laws or the future discovery of environmental contamination may require material expenditures by us. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liabilities, and the current environmental condition of our properties might be affected by the operations of the tenants, by the existing condition of the land, by operations in the vicinity of the properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or by the activities of unrelated third parties.
45
These laws typically allow liens to be placed on the affected property. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations which we may be required to comply with, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance.
Any newly acquired or developed lodging or multi-family residential properties must comply with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” and/or “commercial facilities” as defined by the ADA. Compliance with the ADA requires removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in certain public areas of the properties where such removal is “readily achievable.” We intend for our properties to comply in all material respects with all present requirements under the ADA and applicable state laws. We will attempt to acquire properties which comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller to ensure compliance with the ADA. We may not be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages to private litigants. The cost of defending against any claims of liability under the ADA or the payment of any fines or damages could adversely affect our financial condition and affect cash available to return capital and the amount of distributions to you.
The Fair Housing Act (the FHA) requires, as part of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, apartment communities first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the FHA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. We intend for any of our properties that are subject to the FHA to be in compliance with such law. The cost of defending against any claims of liability under the FHA or the payment of any fines or damages could adversely affect our financial condition.
Risks Related to General Economic Conditions and Terrorism
Adverse economic conditions may negatively affect our returns and profitability. The timing, length and severity of any economic slowdown that the nation may experience cannot be predicted with certainty. Since we may liquidate within seven to ten years after the proceeds from the offering are fully invested, there is a risk that depressed economic conditions at that time could cause cash flow and appreciation upon the sale of our properties, if any, to be insufficient to allow sufficient cash remaining after payment of our expenses for a significant return on your investment.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the United States negatively impacted the U.S. economy and the U.S. financial markets. Any future terrorist attacks and the anticipation of any such attacks, or the consequences of the military or other response by the U.S. and its allies, may have further adverse impacts on the U.S. financial markets and the economy and may adversely affect our operations and our profitability. It is not possible to predict the severity of the effect that any of these future events would have on the U.S. financial markets and economy.
It is possible that the economic impact of the terrorist attacks may have an adverse effect on the ability of the tenants of our properties to pay rent. In addition, insurance on our real estate may become more costly and coverage may be more limited due to these events. The instability of the U.S. economy may also reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and may slow the pace at which those investments are made. In addition, armed hostilities and further acts of terrorism may directly impact our properties. These developments may subject us to increased risks and, depending on their magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business and your investment.
Tax Risks
Your investment has various federal income tax risks. Although the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relevant to your investment are generally described in the section of the prospectus titled “Federal Income Tax Considerations,” we strongly urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the effects of federal, state and local income tax law on an investment and on your individual tax situation.
46
If we fail to maintain our REIT status, our dividends will not be deductible to us, and our income will be subject to taxation. We have elected to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code which will afford us significant tax advantages. The requirements for this qualification, however, are complex. If we fail to meet these requirements, our dividends will not be deductible to us and we will have to pay a corporate level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and your yield on your investment. In addition, tax liability might cause us to borrow funds, liquidate some of our investments or take other steps which could negatively affect our operating results. Moreover, if our REIT status is terminated because of our failure to meet a technical REIT test or if we voluntarily revoke our election, we would be disqualified from electing treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which REIT status is lost. This could materially and negatively affect your investment by causing a loss of common stock value.
Investment in lodging facilities requires special REIT compliance. As discussed above in “Risk Factors — Lodging Industry Risks” and below in “Federal Income Tax Considerations” we have invested in lodging facilities and may invest in lodging facilities in the future. The Internal Revenue Code restricts the way in which a REIT can own, operate and manage lodging facilities in order for it to qualify as a REIT. In general, subject to some very complex rules, a lodging facility owned by a REIT must be leased to a taxable REIT subsidiary. In addition, the lodging facility must also be operated and managed by a third-party management company that meets certain independent contractor requirements; primarily that it not be a related party with respect to the taxable REIT subsidiary or the REIT. As a result, the rental income from such lease would be good income to the REIT. However, failure to maintain the proper operation and management of lodging facilities as required by the Internal Revenue Code, could jeopardize our REIT status subjecting you to the consequences described in the previous paragraph.
You may have tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in common stock. If you participate in our distribution reinvestment program, you will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in common stock. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the common stock received.
The opinion of Proskauer Rose LLP regarding our status as a REIT does not guarantee our ability to remain a REIT. Our legal counsel, Proskauer Rose LLP, has rendered its opinion that we will qualify as a REIT, based upon our representations as to the manner in which we are and will be owned, invest in assets and operate, among other things. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, through investments, actual operating results, distributions and satisfaction of specific stockholder rules, the various tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Proskauer Rose LLP will not review these operating results or compliance with the qualification standards. We may not satisfy the REIT requirements in the future. Also, this opinion represents Proskauer Rose LLP’s legal judgment based on the law in effect as of the date of this prospectus and is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts, and could be subject to modification or withdrawal based on future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the federal income tax laws, any of which could be applied retroactively. Failure to qualify as a REIT or to maintain such qualification could materially and negatively impact your investment and its yield to you by causing a loss of common share value and by substantially reducing our cash available to pay distributions.
If the operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation. We intend to maintain the status of the operating partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service were to successfully challenge the status of the operating partnership as a partnership, it would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. This would also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on your investment. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the operating partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.
47
Even REITS are subject to federal and state income taxes. Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to federal income taxes and related state taxes. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. This will result in our stockholders being treated for tax purposes as though they had received their proportionate shares of such retained income. However, to the extent we have already paid income taxes directly on such income, our stockholders will also be credited with their proportionate share of such taxes already paid by us. Stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the operating partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets.
We may not be able to continue to satisfy the REIT requirements, and it may cease to be in our best interests to continue to do so in the future.
Future changes in the income tax laws could adversely affect our profitability. Future events, such as court decisions, administrative rulings and interpretations and changes in the tax laws or regulations, including the REIT rules, that change or modify these provisions could result in treatment under the federal income tax laws for us and/or our stockholders that differs materially and adversely from that described in this prospectus; both for taxable years arising before and after such event. Future legislation, administrative interpretations or court decisions may be retroactive in effect.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the federal income tax laws applicable to investments in REITs and similar entities. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and may adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders.
In view of the complexity of the tax aspects of the offering, particularly in light of the fact that some of the tax aspects of the offering will not be the same for all investors, prospective investors are strongly advised to consult their tax advisors with specific reference to their own tax situation prior to an investment in shares of our common stock.
Employee Benefit Plan Risks
An investment in our common stock may not satisfy the requirements of ERISA or other applicable laws. When considering an investment in our common stock, an individual with investment discretion over assets of any pension plan, profit-sharing plan, retirement plan, IRA or other employee benefit plan covered by ERISA or other applicable laws should consider whether the investment satisfies the requirements of Section 404 of ERISA or other applicable laws. In particular, attention should be paid to the diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA in light of all the facts and circumstances, including the portion of the plan’s portfolio of which the investment will be a part. All plan investors should also consider whether the investment is prudent and meets plan liquidity requirements as there may be only a limited market in which to sell or otherwise dispose of our common stock, and whether the investment is permissible under the plan’s governing instrument. We have not, and will not, evaluate whether an investment in our common stock is suitable for any particular plan. Rather, we will accept entities as stockholders if an entity otherwise meets the suitability standards.
The annual statement of value that we will be sending to stockholders subject to ERISA and stockholders is only an estimate and may not reflect the actual value of our shares. The annual statement of value will report the value of each common share as of the close of our fiscal year. The value will be based upon an estimated amount we determine would be received if our properties and other assets were sold as of the close of our fiscal year and if such proceeds, together with our other funds, were distributed pursuant to a liquidation. However, the net asset value of each share of common stock will be deemed to be $10 until the end of the first year following the completion of this offering. Thereafter, our advisor or its affiliates will determine
48
the net asset value of each share of common stock. Because this is only an estimate, we may subsequently revise any annual valuation that is provided. It is possible that:
• | a value included in the annual statement may not actually be realized by us or by our stockholders upon liquidation; |
• | stockholders may not realize that value if they were to attempt to sell their common stock; or |
• | an annual statement of value might not comply with any reporting and disclosure or annual valuation requirements under ERISA or other applicable law. We will stop providing annual statements of value if the common stock becomes listed for trading on a national stock exchange or included for quotation on a national market system. |
49
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements. We based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. The following factors could cause our actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this prospectus:
• | changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; |
• | legislative/regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts); |
• | availability of capital, changes in interest rates and interest rate spreads; and |
• | changes in generally accepted accounting principles and policies and guidelines applicable to REITs. |
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this prospectus are more fully described in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results.
HOW WE OPERATE
We intend to operate as a REIT for federal and state income tax purposes. Our sponsor is David Lichtenstein, doing business as The Lightstone Group. Our sponsor was instrumental in our organization.
Our sponsor, David Lichtenstein, founded The Lightstone Group as a limited liability company and often does business in his individual capacity under that name. Our sponsor is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today, with a portfolio of over 18,000 residential units, 687 extended stay hotels and approximately 29,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. With five regional offices across the country, our sponsor employs approximately 14,000 employees. Our sponsor and its affiliates have acquired over 190 projects including numerous properties and portfolios from major national public and privately-held real estate companies such as Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR), Liberty Property Trust (NYSE:LRY), The Rouse Company (NYSE:RSE), Prime Retail Inc. (NASDAQ:PMRE), F & W Management Company, United Dominion Realty Trust (NYSE:UDR), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), PREIT or Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI), Archon Group, an affiliate of Polaris Capital, and the Blackstone Group.
We contract with Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC for its services as our advisor. Our advisor is owned by The Lightstone Group and has the responsibility for our day-to-day operations and the management of our assets.
In addition to the services of our advisor, we contract with Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC for its services as our property manager. Our property manager may provide the day-to-day property management services for our properties. In addition, our property manager may engage one or more third parties to provide the day-to-day property management services for some or all of our properties, in which case our property manager will supervise the services provided by such parties. Our property manager is owned by The Lightstone Group.
50
Through The Lightstone Group, Mr. Lichtenstein controls and indirectly owns our advisor, our property manager, our operating partnership, our dealer manager and affiliates, except for us. As of December 31, 2007 Mr. Lichtenstein owned 20,000 (less than a ¼ of 1%) of our shares indirectly through our advisor. Mr. Lichtenstein is one of our directors and The Lightstone Group or an affiliated entity controlled by Mr. Lichtenstein employs Bruno de Vinck, our other non-independent director, and each of our officers. Neither The Lightstone Group nor any of our other affiliates has been or currently is the subject of any regulatory action or proceeding.
Our structure is generally referred to as an “UPREIT” structure. Substantially all of our assets will be held through Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP, a Delaware limited partnership and our operating partnership. This structure will enable us to acquire assets from other partnerships and individual owners that will defer the recognition of gain to the partners of the acquired partnerships or the individual owners, assuming certain conditions are met.
We will be the general partner of the operating partnership. As the general partner of the operating partnership, we generally have the exclusive power under the partnership agreement to manage and conduct the business of the operating partnership, subject to the consent of the special general partner as to management decisions.
The partnership interests in the operating partnership will be owned by us and any persons who transfer interests in properties to the operating partnership in exchange for units in the operating partnership. We will own one unit in the operating partnership for each outstanding share of our common stock. Our interest in the operating partnership will entitle us to share in cash distributions from, and in profits and losses of, the operating partnership. Holders of limited partnership units in the operating partnership will have the same rights to distributions as our holders of common stock. In addition, each limited partnership interest will be exchangeable by the holder for cash at the-then fair market value or, at our option, one share of common stock. For a detailed discussion of the structure and operation of the operating partnership, including the responsibilities of the partners thereof, please see the section titled “Operating Partnership Agreement,” below.
We expect that all of the properties will be owned by subsidiary limited partnerships or limited liability companies. These subsidiaries will be single-purpose entities that we create to own a single property, and each will have no assets other than the single investment property it owns. These entities represent a useful means of shielding our operating partnership from liability under the state laws and will make the underlying properties easier to transfer. These subsidiary arrangements are intended to ensure that no environmental or other liabilities associated with any particular property can be attributed against other properties that the operating partnership or we will own. The limited liability aspect of a subsidiary’s form will shield parent and affiliated (but not subsidiary) companies, including the operating partnership and us, from liability assessed against it.
Tax law disregards single-member LLCs and so it will be as if the operating partnership owns the underlying properties for tax purposes. Use of single-purpose entities in this manner is customary for REITs.
Our independent directors are not required to approve all transactions involving the creation of subsidiary limited liability companies and limited partnerships that we intend to use for investment in properties on our behalf. No additional fees will be imposed upon the REIT by the subsidiary companies’ managers and these subsidiaries will not affect our stockholders’ voting rights. Because our operating partnership will be the direct parent company of these subsidiaries, it will directly own their assets. As such, their assets will be subject to the structure for distributions by the operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, and then by us to our stockholders, as discussed elsewhere in this prospectus.
51
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our sponsor, advisor, property manager and their affiliates. All of our agreements and arrangements with such parties, including those relating to compensation, are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations. Some of the conflicts inherent in our transactions with our sponsor, advisor, property manager and their affiliates, and the limitations on such parties adopted to address these conflicts, are described below. Our sponsor, advisor, property manager and their affiliates will try to balance our interests with their own. However, to the extent that such parties take actions that are more favorable to other entities than to us, these actions could have a negative impact on our financial performance and, consequently, on distributions to you and the value of our stock.
We may purchase real properties from persons with whom affiliates of our advisor have prior business relationships. We may purchase properties from third parties who have sold properties in the past, or who may sell properties in the future, to our advisor or its affiliates. If we purchase properties from these third parties, our advisor will experience a conflict between our current interests and its interest in preserving any ongoing business relationship with these sellers. Nevertheless, our advisor has a fiduciary obligation to us.
We may compete with other entities affiliated with our sponsor for tenants. The sponsor and its affiliates are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, management, leasing or sale of real estate projects. The sponsor or its affiliates may own and/or manage properties in most if not all geographical areas in which we expect to acquire real estate assets. Therefore, our properties may compete for tenants with other properties owned and/or managed by the sponsor and its affiliates. The sponsor may face conflicts of interest when evaluating tenant opportunities for our properties and other properties owned and/or managed by the sponsor and its affiliates and these conflicts of interest may have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain tenants.
Property management services are being provided by a company owned by The Lightstone Group.
Our property manager, which is owned by our sponsor, may provide property management services to us or may engage one or more third parties to provide such services for some or all of our properties, in which case our property manager will supervise the services provided by such parties. Our property management services agreement provides that we pay our property manager a monthly management fee of 5% of the gross revenues from our residential and retail properties. In addition, for the management and leasing of our office and industrial properties, we will pay to our property manager, property management and leasing fees of up to 4.5% of gross revenues from our office and industrial properties. In addition, we may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed office and industrial properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our property manager may be entitled to receive higher fees in the event our property manager demonstrates to the satisfaction of a majority of the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) that a higher competitive fee is justified for the services rendered. In the event that our property manager engages one or more third parties to perform the day-to-day property management services for some or all of our properties, the fees payable to such parties for such services will be deducted from the monthly management fee payable to our property manager pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence or paid by our property manager.
The advisor and the property manager believe that the property manager has sufficient personnel and other required resources to discharge all responsibilities to us.
Our advisor and its affiliates receive commissions, fees and other compensation based upon our investments. We believe that the compensation we pay to our advisor and its affiliates is no more than what we would pay for similar services performed by independent firms. Some compensation is payable whether or not there is cash available to make distributions to our stockholders. To the extent this occurs, our advisor and its affiliates benefit from us retaining ownership of our assets and leveraging our assets, while our stockholders may be better served by the sale, disposition or avoidance of new or additional debt on the assets. In addition, the advisor’s ability to receive fees and reimbursements depends on our continued investment in
52
properties and in other assets which generate fees. Therefore, the interest of the advisor and its affiliates in receiving fees may conflict with the interest of our stockholders in earning income on their investment in our common stock. Because asset management fees payable to our advisor are based on total assets under management, including assets purchased using debt, our advisor may have an incentive to incur a high level of leverage in order to increase the total amount of assets under management. Our advisor and its affiliates recognize that they have a fiduciary duty to us and our stockholders, and have represented to us that their actions and decisions will be made in the manner taking into account our interests and those of our stockholders.
While we will not make loans to our advisor or its affiliates, we may borrow money from them for various purposes, including funding working capital requirements and funding acquisitions before we receive the proceeds of this offering. If we do, the terms, such as the interest rate, security, fees and other charges, will be at least as favorable to us as those which would be charged by unaffiliated lending institutions in the same locality on comparable loans.
Our advisor and its affiliates may do business with others who also do business with us, although presently there are no instances of this. However, our advisor or its affiliates may not receive rebates or participate in any reciprocal business arrangements which would have the effect of circumventing our agreement with our advisor.
Our advisor may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire properties with its affiliates. Our advisor may cause us to acquire an interest in a property through a joint venture with its affiliates. In these circumstances, our advisor will have a fiduciary duty to both us and its affiliates participating in the joint venture. In order to minimize the conflict between these fiduciary duties, the advisory agreement provides guidelines for investments in joint ventures with affiliates. In addition, our charter requires a majority of our disinterested directors to determine that the transaction is fair and reasonable to us and is on terms and conditions no less favorable than from unaffiliated third parties entering into the venture.
There is competition for the time and services of our advisor. We rely on our advisor and its affiliates for our daily operation and the management of our assets. Personnel of our advisor and its affiliates have conflicts in allocating their management time, services and functions among our sponsor, the real estate investment programs it currently services and any future real estate investment programs or other business ventures which they may organize or serve, as applicable. Our advisor and its affiliates believe they have enough staff to perform their responsibilities in connection with all of the real estate programs and other business ventures in which they are involved. In addition, other persons employed by the advisor may devote such time to our business as is necessary.
Our advisor may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property. Our advisor may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property we own that is managed by the property manager because the property manager may lose fees associated with the management of the property. Specifically, because the property manager will receive significant fees for managing our properties, our advisor may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should sell properties under circumstances where the property manager would no longer manage the property after the transaction. As a result of this conflict of interest, we may not dispose of properties when it would be in our best interests to do so.
We do not have arm’s-length agreements with our advisor, property manager and dealer manager. As we have noted, our agreements and arrangements with our advisor, property manager, dealer manager, or any of their affiliates, including those relating to compensation, are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations. However, we believe these agreements and arrangements approximate the terms of arm’s-length transactions, as they contain similar terms as recent similar agreements and arrangements with unaffiliated third parties.
Our dealer manager is affiliated with us and will not perform an independent due diligence review. Because our dealer manager is affiliated with us, we will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in connection with the offering of securities, although the participating broker-dealers will perform a due diligence
53
review of us and the offering. The participating broker-dealers will be qualified independent underwriters within the meaning of Rule 2720 issued by the National Association of Securities Dealers.
We may acquire our advisor or property manager without further action by our stockholders. During the term of our agreements with our advisor and property manager, we have the option to cause the businesses conducted by our advisor and property manager (including all assets) to be acquired by us, under certain circumstances, without any consent of our stockholders, the advisor, the property manager or their boards of directors or stockholders. We may elect to exercise such right at any time after the effectiveness of this prospectus. Our decision to exercise such right will be determined by a vote of a majority of our directors not otherwise interested in the transaction (including a majority of our independent directors). The advisor, the property manager and their equity holders will receive shares of our common stock, in connection with such an acquisition, in exchange for the transfer of all of their stock or assets, termination of contractual relationships with us and the release or waiver of all unpaid fees payable under the provisions of any contractual arrangements until their stated termination. We will be obligated to pay any fees accrued under such contractual arrangements for services rendered through the closing of such acquisitions. See “Management — The Advisory Agreement” for an explanation of how the number of shares will be determined. In the event such an acquisition transaction is structured as a purchase of assets by us or a share exchange in which we are the acquiring corporation, our articles and Maryland corporate law permit us to enter into and to consummate such a transaction without obtaining the approval of our stockholders. Any such transaction will occur, if at all, only if our board of directors obtains a fairness opinion from a recognized financial advisor or institution providing valuation services to the effect that the consideration to be paid therefore is fair, from a financial point of view, to our stockholders.
There may be conflicting investment opportunities among us and affiliates of our advisor and The Lightstone Group. Our advisor does not advise any entity other than us. However, our advisor may, in the future, advise entities that invest in properties that meet our investment criteria. Likewise, David W. Lichtenstein, a principal of our sponsor may, in the future, invest in properties that meet our investment criteria. Therefore, our sponsor, our advisor and their affiliates could, in the future, face conflicts of interest in determining which investment programs or joint ventures will finance or acquire real properties and other assets as they become available. Such conflicts could result in a particular property being offered to an affiliate rather than to us. If our advisor, in the future, offers our sponsor or its other affiliates the opportunity to acquire or finance such properties, they may decide not to pursue investments in such properties. In such case these investments may be offered to us.
The method for allocation of the acquisition of properties by two or more programs of our sponsor or advisor that seek to acquire similar types of assets must be reasonable. Under our charter and the advisory agreement, before our advisor may take advantage of an investment opportunity for its own account or recommend it to others, it is obligated to present such opportunity to us if (i) such opportunity is compatible with our investment objectives and policies (including our requirements relating to all pertinent factors, including diversification, size of the investment, property type and location), (ii) such opportunity is of a character which could be taken by us, and (iii) we have the financial resources to take advantage of such opportunity. In addition, neither our advisor nor any affiliate of our advisor may make any investment in property where the investment objective is substantially similar to our investment objectives until such time as 75% of the total gross proceeds from the offering of the shares offered for sale pursuant to this offering, following the final closing of this offering, have been invested or committed for investment in properties.
Our sponsor and advisor will each use their respective best efforts to present suitable investments to us consistent with our investment procedures, objectives and policies. If our sponsor or advisor or any of their respective affiliates is presented with a potential investment in a property which might be made by more than one investment entity which it advises or manages, the decision as to the suitability of the property for investment by a particular entity will be based upon a review of the investment portfolio of each entity and upon factors such as:
• | cash flow from the property; |
• | the effect of the acquisition of the property on the diversification of each entity’s portfolio; |
54
• | the amount of equity required to make the investment; |
• | the policies of each entity relating to leverage; |
• | the funds of each entity available for investment; and |
• | the length of time the funds have been available for investment and the manner in which the potential investment can be structured by each entity. |
To the extent that a particular property might be determined to be suitable for more than one investment entity, priority generally will be given to the investment entity that has held funds available for investment for the longest period of time. In addition, our advisor currently believes that sufficient investment opportunities exist so that we and any REITs, programs and joint ventures that our sponsor may form in the future will have enough properties meeting our respective investment objectives in which to invest.
Finally, all actions that occur between us and our advisor or its affiliates that present potential conflicts with us must be approved by a majority of our independent directors.
We have the same legal counsel as our advisor. Proskauer Rose LLP serves as our general legal counsel, as well as special counsel to our sponsor and various affiliates. The interests of our advisor may become adverse to ours in the future. Under legal ethics rules, Proskauer Rose LLP may be precluded from representing us due to any conflict of interest between us and our advisor. If any situation arises in which our interests appear to be in conflict with those of our advisor or its affiliates, other counsel may be retained for one or more parties. Proskauer Rose LLP is not representing the prospective investors in connection with the transactions contemplated by this prospectus.
Title insurance services are being provided by an affiliated party. From time to time, Lightstone purchases title insurance from an agent in which our sponsor owns a fifty percent limited partnership interest. Because this title insurance agent receives significant fees for providing title insurance, our advisor may face a conflict of interest when considering the terms of purchasing title insurance from this agent. However, prior to the purchase by Lightstone of any title insurance, an independent title consultant with more than 25 years of experience in the title insurance industry reviews the transaction, and performs market research and competitive analysis on our behalf. This process results in terms similar to those that would be negotiated at an arm’s-length basis.
55
COMPENSATION TABLE
The compensation arrangements between us, our advisor, property manager, dealer manager, The Lightstone Group and their affiliates were not determined by arm’s-length negotiations. See “Conflicts of Interest.” The following table discloses the compensation which we may pay such parties. In those instances in which there are maximum amounts or ceilings on the compensation which may be received, our affiliates may not recover any excess amounts for those services by reclassifying them under a different compensation or fee category.
We define net income as total revenues less expenses other than additions to reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves. When we use the term “net income” for purposes of calculating some expenses and fees, it excludes the gain from the sale of our assets. However, this net income definition is not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, because we do not deduct depreciation and other non-cash reserves in determining net income.
We define the term “net investment” to mean the original issue price paid for our common stock, reduced by distributions from the sale or financing of our properties.
For description of an undertaking that we have made to limit compensation paid to our affiliates, see “Compensation Restrictions” and “Reports to Stockholders.”
Non-subordinated Payments
The following aggregate amounts of compensation, allowances and fees we may pay to our affiliates are not subordinated to the returns on initial investments that we are required to pay to our stockholders.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Organizational and Offering Stage | ||||
Selling commissions paid to Lightstone Securities. | Up to 7% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities, our dealer manager, intends to reallow 100% of commissions earned for those transactions that involve participating broker-dealers. | We currently estimate selling commissions of $21,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold (without giving effect to any special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions). | ||
We will sell special general partner interests of our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and use the sale proceeds to pay all selling commissions. | ||||
Dealer manager fee paid to Lightstone Securities. | Up to 1% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 1% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers. This fee is in addition to the reimbursement of other organization and offering expenses described below. | We currently estimate a dealer manager fee of approximately $3,000,000 if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. | ||
We will sell special general partner interests of our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and use the sale proceeds to pay all dealer manager fees. |
56
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Note: Our unique compensation arrangement. | The selling commissions, all of which Lightstone Securities will reallow to unaffiliated broker-dealers, and dealer manager fee are unsubordinated payments that we are contractually obligated to make regardless of our sale of the special general partner interests. In a separate agreement, however, Lightstone SLP, LLC committed to purchase special general partner interests, which will be issued each time a closing occurs, at a price of $100,000 for each $1,000,000 in subscriptions that we accept. Our sponsor will independently finance Lightstone SLP’s purchases of these units without using any funds that we receive from the sale of our common stock. As a result, we will be able to use all of the proceeds from the sale of our common stock to invest in real properties. | |||
We will use the funds received for the special general partner interests to pay the unsubordinated selling commissions and dealer manager fee described above and the additional offering and organization expenses discussed below. | ||||
In consideration of its purchase of special general partner interests, Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive an interest in our regular and liquidation distributions. See “Compensation Table — Subordinated Payments.” These distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC are always subordinated to our stockholders’ receipt of a stated preferred return and are unrelated to the payments to our dealer manager and unaffiliated soliciting dealers discussed above. | ||||
Reimbursement of organization and offering expenses paid to our advisor or its affiliates. | Our advisor or affiliates will advance all organization and other offering costs, which consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable expenses (including sales literature and the prospectus), other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee. We will have reimbursed our advisor or affiliates for organization costs totaling 10% of gross offering proceeds, using the proceeds from the sale of the special general partner units to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | We currently estimate organization and offering expenses of approximately $30,000,000, including the selling commissions and dealer manager fee discussed above if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. |
57
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
If organization and offering expenses, including the selling commissions and dealer manager fee discussed above, exceed 10% of the proceeds raised in this offering, the excess will be paid by our advisor without recourse to us and will not be exchangeable into special general partner interests of our operating partnership. | ||||
Acquisition Stage | ||||
Acquisition fee and expenses paid to our advisor. | Our advisor will be paid an amount, equal to 2.75% of the gross contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of the property purchased, as an acquisition fee. Our advisor will also be reimbursed for expenses that it incurs in connection with purchase of the property. The acquisition fee and expenses for any particular property, including amounts payable to affiliates, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the gross contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of the property. If we request additional services, the compensation will be provided on separate agreed-upon terms and the rate will be approved by a majority of disinterested directors, including a majority of the disinterested independent directors, as fair and reasonable for us. | The following amounts may be paid as an acquisition fee and for the reimbursement of acquisition expenses: $33,000,000 if 30,000,000 shares are sold (assuming aggregate long-term permanent leverage of approximately 75%). However, the actual amounts cannot be determined at the present time. |
58
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Operational Stage | ||||
Property management fee paid to our property manager, Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC. This fee will be paid for services in connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of the properties and the supervision of any third parties that are engaged by our property manager to provide such services. | Residential and Retail Properties: Our property manager will be paid a monthly management fee of 5% of the gross revenues from our residential and retail properties. Office and Industrial Properties: For the management and leasing of our office and industrial properties, we will pay to our property manager, property management and leasing fees of up to 4.5% of gross revenues from our office and industrial properties. In addition, we may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. | The actual amounts are dependent upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. | ||
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our property manager may be entitled to receive higher fees in the event our property manager demonstrates to the satisfaction of a majority of the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) that a higher competitive fee is justified for the services rendered. | ||||
The property manager may subcontract its duties for a fee that may be less than the fee provided for in the management services agreements. In the event that the property manager subcontracts its duties with respect to some or all of our properties, the fees payable to such parties for such services will be deducted from the monthly management fee payable to our property manager by us or paid directly by our property manager. |
59
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Asset management fee paid to our advisor. | Our advisor will be paid an advisor asset management fee of 0.55% of our average invested assets. Average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in equity interests in, and loans secured by, real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. We will compute the average invested assets by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the quarter for which we are calculating the fee. The fee will be payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1375 of 1% of average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. | The amount of the fee depends on the cost of the average invested assets at the time the fee is payable and, therefore, cannot be determined now. | ||
Our advisor must reimburse us for the amounts, if any, by which our total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses, paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of: (1) 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year, or | ||||
(2) 25% of our net income for that fiscal year; | ||||
Items such as interest payments, taxes, non-cash expenditures, the special liquidation distribution, organization and offering expenses, and acquisition fees and expenses are excluded from the definition of total operating expenses, which otherwise includes the aggregate expenses of any kind paid or incurred by us. See “Management — Our Advisory Agreement” for an explanation of circumstances where the excess amount specified in clause (1) may not need to be reimbursed. | ||||
Reimbursable expenses to our advisor. These may include costs of goods and services, administrative services and non-supervisory services performed directly for us by independent parties. | We will reimburse some expenses of the advisor. The compensation and reimbursements to our advisor will be approved by a majority of our directors and a majority of our independent directors as fair and reasonable for us. | The actual amounts of reimbursable expenses in connection with this offering are dependent upon results of operations and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. The reimbursable expenses are subject to aggregate limitations on our operating expenses referred to under “Non-Subordinating Payments — Operational Stage — Asset Management Fee” above. |
60
61
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(i)Before Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold Regular distributions will be made initially to us, which we will then distribute to the holders of our common stock, until these holders have received dividends equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on their net investment. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Until this 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will not pay to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, any distributions with respect to the purchase price of the special general partner interests that it received in exchange for agreeing to pay the costs and expenses of this offering, including dealer manager fees and selling commissions. | ||||
(ii)After Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold After the first 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will make all of its distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC until that entity receives an amount equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on the purchase price of the special general partner interests. |
62
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(iii)Before Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this second 7% threshold is reached and until the holders of our common stock have received dividends in an amount equal to a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their net investment (including, for the purpose of the calculation of such amount, the amounts equaling a 7% return on their net investment described in paragraph (i) of this section), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 30% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC. | ||||
(iv)After Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this 12% threshold is reached, 60% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 40% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC. |
63
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
Liquidation Stage | ||||
Special liquidation distribution payable to Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor. | This section describes the apportionment of any liquidation distributions that we make. At each stage of distributions, a different apportionment method commences or terminates, as applicable, when a particular party or parties have received a specific amount of distributions. The return calculations described below take into account all regular and liquidation distributions received and not just distributions made upon liquidation. Achievement of a particular threshold, therefore, is determined with reference to all prior distributions made by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. | The actual amounts to be received depend upon the net sale proceeds upon our liquidation and, therefore, cannot be determined at the present time. | ||
(i.)Before Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold Distributions in connection with our liquidation will be made initially to us, which we will distribute to holders of our common stock, until these holders have received liquidation distributions equal to their initial investment plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on their net investment. “Net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Until this 7% threshold is reached, our operating partnership will not pay to Lightstone SLP, LLC any special liquidation distribution in connection with our liquidation. |
64
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Type of Compensation and Recipient | Method of Compensation | Estimated Maximum Dollar Amount | ||
(ii.)After Achieving the 7% Stockholder Return Threshold After the first 7% threshold is reached, Lightstone SLP, LLC will receive special liquidation distributions with respect to the purchase price of the special general partner interests that it received in exchange for agreeing to pay the costs and expenses of this offering, including dealer manager fees and selling commissions, until it receives an amount equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interests plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 7% per year on the purchase price of those interests; | ||||
(iii.)Before Achieving the 12% Stockholder Return Threshold After this second 7% threshold is reached and until the holders of our common stock have received an amount equal to their initial investment plus a cumulative non-compounded return of 12% per year on their net investment (“net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties) (including, for the purpose of the calculation of such amount, the amounts described in paragraph (i) of this section), 70% of the aggregate amount of any additional distributions by our operating partnership will be payable to us (and the limited partners entitled to such distributions under the terms of the operating partnership’s operating agreement), which we will distribute to the holders of our common stock, and 30% of such amount will be payable by our operating partnership to Lightstone SLP, LLC; and |
65
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/POS AM/0001144204-08-023031/line.gif)
Calculations of cumulative non-compounded returns in the above table are computed as follows: for the period for which the calculation is being made, the percentage resulting from dividing: (i) the total distributions paid on each distribution payment date during the designated period, by (ii) the product of (a) the average adjusted investor capital for such period (calculated on a daily basis), and (b) the number of years (including the fractions thereof) elapsed during the specified period.
66
Distribution Chart
We intend to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, the special general partner interests will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is controlled by our sponsor, to certain distributions from our operating partnership, but only after our stockholders have received a stated preferred return. The following table sets forth information with respect to the apportionment of any regular and liquidation distributions that the operating partnership may make among Lightstone SLP, LLC and us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. The return calculations outlined below account for all regular and liquidation distributions that our operating partnership has made to Lightstone SLP, LLC and to us, which we will distribute to our stockholders. For a more detailed discussion of distribution apportionment, see “Operating Partnership Agreement.”
Note that the chart reads chronologically from top to bottom, so that all distributions are initially made to stockholders in accordance with row (i), until the stockholders have received a return of 7% on their net investment. For purposes of the preceding sentence, “net investment” refers to $10 per share, less a pro rata share of any proceeds received from the sale or refinancing of properties. Then, all distributions will be made to Lightstone SLP, LLC in accordance with row (ii) until that entity has received 7% on its net investment. Row (iii) will then apply, and after that row (iv).
We cannot assure investors of the cumulative non-compounded returns discussed below, which we disclose solely as a measure for the incentive compensation of our sponsor, advisor and affiliates.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Recipient(s) of Distribution (Listed Chronologically) | Apportionment of Distributions | Cumulative Non-Compounded Return Threshold (That Initiates Next Level of Distributions) | ||
(i) Stockholders | 100% | 7% per year on stockholders’ net investment (and, inthe case of liquidation, an amount equal to the stockholders’ initial investment) | ||
(ii) Lightstone SLP, LLC | 100% | 7% per year on special general partner purchase price (and, in the case of liquidation, an amount equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interest) | ||
(iii) Stockholders/ Lightstone SLP, LLC | 70% to stockholders; 30% to Lightstone SLP, LLC | Until 12% per year on stockholders’ net investments | ||
(iv) Stockholders/ Lightstone SLP, LLC | 60% to stockholders; 40% to Lightstone SLP, LLC | Above 12% on stockholders’ net investment (remainder of regular distributions apportioned in this manner) |
67
ESTIMATED USE OF PROCEEDS
The proceeds from this offering will be used in connection with the purchase of real estate. The amounts listed in the table below represent our current estimates concerning the use of the offering proceeds. Since these are estimates, they may not accurately reflect the actual receipt or application of the offering proceeds. This first scenario indicates approximate actual proceeds as of September 30, 2007, and the second scenario assumes that we sell the maximum of 30,000,000 shares in this offering at $10 per share. Under the second scenario, we have not given effect to the following:
• | any special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions; or |
• | the sale of the maximum of 4,000,000 shares of common stock in our distribution reinvestment program at $9.50 per share. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Dollar Amount as of September 30, 2007 | Percent | Maximum Dollar Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Gross offering proceeds | $ | 114,350,000 | 100.0 | % | $ | 300,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Less Offering Expenses:(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fee(2) | 8,107,000 | 7.1 | % | 24,000,000 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||
Organization and other offering costs(3) | 3,335,000 | 2.9 | % | 6,000,000 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||
Amount available for investment(4) | 102,908,000 | 90 | % | 270,000,000 | 90 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition fees(5)(7) | 6,173,000 | 5.3 | % | 8,250,000 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition expenses(6)(7) | 910,000 | 0.79 | % | 3,000,000 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Initial working capital reserves | — | 0 | % | 1,500,000 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||
Total offering proceeds available for investment | 95,825,000 | 83.91 | % | 257,250,000 | 85.7 | % | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of interests to Sponsor(1) | 11,442,000 | — | 30,000,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Total proceeds available for investment | $ | 107,267,000 | — | $ | 287,250,000 | — |
(1) | All dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses in an aggregate amount of up to $30,000,000 will be paid using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. In consideration for its agreement to purchase the special general partner interests of our operating partnership, at a cost of $100,000 per unit, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, Lightstone SLP, LLC will be entitled to a portion of any regular distributions made by the operating partnership, but only after our stockholders receive a stated preferred return. To the extent that dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses exceed $30,000,000, Lightstone SLP, LLC will pay such fees, commissions and expenses directly and shall not receive any special general partner interests in connection with such payments. |
(2) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $24,000,000 of selling commissions and dealer manager fees using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. This includes selling commissions generally equal to 7% of aggregate gross offering proceeds and a dealer manager fee of up to 1% of aggregate gross offering proceeds, both of which are payable to Lightstone Securities, our affiliate. See “Plan of Distribution — Volume Discounts” for a description of volume discounts. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, intends to reallow selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds to unaffiliated broker-dealers participating in this offering attributable to the amount of shares sold by them. In addition, Lightstone Securities may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee to participating dealers in the aggregate amount of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating dealers as marketing fees, based upon such factors as the volume of sales of such participating dealers, the level of marketing support provided by such participating dealers and the assistance of such participating dealers in marketing the offering, or to reimburse representatives of such participating dealers for the costs and expenses of attending our educational conferences and seminars. The amount of selling commissions may often be reduced under certain circumstances for volume discounts. See the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus for a description of such provisions. |
68
(3) | We anticipate paying a maximum of $6,000,000 of organization and other offering costs using proceeds from the sale of special general partner interests to Lightstone SLP, LLC. Organization costs consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, including, but not limited to, salaries and direct expenses incurred by our advisor while engaged in registering the shares, other organization costs, technology costs and expenses attributable to the offering, and the costs and payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. Our advisor will be responsible for the payment of such organization costs and we will reimburse our advisor for such costs to the extent that the total organization and offering expenses, including selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and all other underwriting compensation, does not exceed 10% of the gross offering proceeds from our offering. Any costs in excess of this amount will be paid exclusively by our advisor without recourse against or reimbursement by us. We currently estimate that approximately $6,000,000 of organization costs, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will be incurred if the maximum offering of 30,000,000 shares is sold. |
(4) | Until required in connection with the acquisition and development of properties, substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering and, thereafter, the working capital reserves of the Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., may be invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments including government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts or other authorized investments as determined by our board of directors. |
(5) | Acquisition and advisory fees do not include acquisition expenses. Acquisition fees exclude any construction fee paid to a person who is not our affiliate in connection with construction of a project after our acquisition of the property. Although we assume that all the foregoing fees will be paid by the sellers of property, sellers generally fix the selling price at a level sufficient to cover the cost of any acquisition fee so that, in effect, we, as purchaser, will bear such fee as part of the purchase price. The “Maximum Dollar Amount” presentation in the table is based on the assumption that we will not borrow any money to purchase properties. |
(6) | Acquisition expenses include legal fees and expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of appraisals, nonrefundable option payments on property not acquired, accounting fees and expenses, title insurance premiums and other closing costs and miscellaneous expenses relating to the selection, acquisition and development of real estate properties, whether or not acquired. Costs related to the origination of loans for the purchase or refinancing of a property are excluded from this amount. We will reimburse our advisor for acquisition expenses up to a maximum amount which, collectively with all acquisitions fees and expenses, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the gross contract price. |
(7) | The dollar amount at September 30, 2007 of Acquisition Fees and Acquisition Expenses is calculated at 2.75% and 1% respectively of the purchase price of properties acquired. The maximum dollar amount of such fees and expenses is calculated in the table above without any mortgage proceeds and assumes all cash purchases. |
69
PRIOR PERFORMANCE OF AFFILIATES OF OUR SPONSOR
Prior Performance Summary
The following paragraphs contain information on prior programs sponsored by its owner, David Lichtenstein (“Sponsor” or “The Lightstone Group”), to invest in real estate. This discussion includes a narrative summary of our Sponsor’s experience in the last ten years for (i) all programs sponsored by him, all of which have been nonpublic, that have invested in real estate regardless of the investment objectives of the program and (ii) its investments for its own account. The information set forth is current as of December 31, 2006, except where a different date is specified.
For purposes of this summary and the tables included in this Prospectus, we have divided the information into two separate sections. One section deals with the investment performance of our Sponsor, investing for its own account. These investments are referred to as “Non-Program Properties”. The other section deals with the 18 private real estate investment programs sponsored by our Sponsor and its affiliates which raised funds from outside investors during the 10 years ended December 31, 2006. These investments are referred to as “Program Properties.”
The information contained herein is included solely to provide prospective investors with background to be used to evaluate the real estate experience of our Sponsor and its affiliates. The information summarized below is set forth in greater detail in the Prior Performance Tables for Program and Non-Program Properties included in this Prospectus. Investors should direct their attention to the Prior Performance Tables for Program and Non-Program Properties for further information regarding the prior performance of the Sponsor and its affiliates. In addition, as part of its Registration Statement, we have filed certain tables with the Securities and Exchange Commission which report more detailed information regarding Program Property acquisitions by prior programs. Investors can obtain copies of such tables, without charge, by requesting Table VI from Part II of this registration statement from us.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS SECTION AND THE TABLES REFERENCED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATIVE OF HOW WE WILL PERFORM. THIS DISCUSSION REFERS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF PRIOR PROGRAMS SPONSORED BY OUR SPONSOR OR ITS AFFILIATES OVER THE PERIODS LISTED THEREIN. IN ADDITION, THE TABLES INCLUDED WITH THIS PROSPECTUS (WHICH REFLECT RESULTS OVER THE PERIODS SPECIFIED IN EACH TABLE) DO NOT MEAN THAT WE WILL MAKE INVESTMENTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN SUCH TABLES. IF YOU PURCHASE SHARES IN LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC., YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN ANY OF THE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS DESCRIBED IN THE TABLES (UNLESS YOU ARE ALSO AN INVESTOR IN THOSE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS).
Our Sponsor
Our Sponsor does business as The Lightstone Group and wholly owns the limited liability company of that name, and is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today. Our Sponsor has a portfolio of over 18,000 residential units, 687 extended stay hotels and approximately 29,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. Based in New York, and supported by regional offices in New Jersey, Illinois, South Carolina and Maryland, our Sponsor employs approximately 14,000 staff and professionals.
Our Sponsor and its affiliates have acquired over 190 projects including numerous properties and portfolios from major national public and privately-held real estate companies such as Home Properties (NYSE:HME), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR), Liberty Property Trust (NYSE:LRY), The Rouse Company (NYSE:RSE), Prime Retail Inc. (NASDAQ:PMRE), Prime Group Realty Trust (NYSE:PGE), F & W Management Company, United Dominion Realty Trust (NYSE:UDR), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI), Archon Group, an affiliate of Polaris Capital, and The Blackstone Group.
70
During the past ten years, our Sponsor has invested in numerous real estate properties. Generally, our Sponsor acquired such properties for its own account. Such personal account investment returns have consistently, on average, produced higher returns than the leading real estate indices. (These personal account investments are referred to as “Non-Program Properties”.) Additionally, our Sponsor also purchased certain real estate properties through 18 private programs in which it raised funds from outside investors during the last ten years. (Since outside investors are included, these are referred to as “Program Properties”.)
Non-Program Properties
The following is a summary of the investment performance of our Sponsor. It represents the results of investments made for its own account (“Non-Program Properties”) since 2002. Mr. Lichtenstein has been in the real estate business since 1985 and has been operating independently since 1995. Prior to that date, Mr. Lichtenstein operated in an organization that was controlled by a group over which he did not have operational control. This information is presented to show our Sponsor’s experience investing in Non-Program Properties. For all Non-Program Properties, our Sponsor has operational control, including making all material property decisions.
The following definitions are applicable to the Non-Program Properties summaries below:
“Acquisition Costs” include a Non-Program Properties total purchase price including closing costs (e.g., legal fees and expenses, appraisals, accounting fees, due diligence expenses, title insurance and similar and related costs).
“Cumulative Capital Advanced” is the total cash capital contributed or loans advanced to the owning entities by our Sponsor and its affiliates.
“Cumulative Cash Distributions” is the aggregate amount of cash distributed by the owning entities from operating cash flow and sale and refinancing to our Sponsor and its affiliates.
These Non-Program Properties have similar investment objectives as the REIT, capital appreciation with a secondary objective of income. The Non-Program Properties differ from those of the REIT in that: (i) a substantial portion of our Sponsor’s returns have come from refinancing proceeds; (ii) our Sponsor utilizes more leverage than the REIT is permitted to use; (iii) the Non-Program Properties owning entities generally do not pay any Acquisition Fees, Asset Management Fees or other fees to our Sponsor which the REIT does pay; and (iv) the Non-Program Properties owning entities operational documents generally do not contain the prohibitions of self-dealing activities and the operational and investment limitations that are applicable to the REIT. YOU SHOULD NOT CONSTRUE INCLUSION OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IMPLYING IN ANY MANNER THAT WE WILL HAVE RESULTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN THE INFORMATION BELOW BECAUSE THE YIELD AND CASH AVAILABLE AND OTHER FACTORS COULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT IN OUR PROPERTIES.
At December 31, 2006, the aggregate acquisition cost of the Non-Program Properties owned is approximately $1.64 billion. Such cost is the actual total acquisition costs of the Non-Program Properties and does not represent the current fair market value of such properties. The Cumulative Capital Advanced in the Non-Program Properties is approximately $271.0 million with no capital advanced in such properties (after taking into account all cash distributions through December 31, 2006 from operating cash flow, sale proceeds and refinancing proceeds, which aggregate approximately $303.1 million). We believe, based on appraisals and other valuations, that the value of the equity in these Non-Program Properties as of December 31, 2006 is substantially in excess of the Cumulative Capital Advanced.
For the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2006, the Non-Program Properties owned by our Sponsor made aggregate cash distributions to our Sponsor from operations, sales and refinancing proceeds of approximately $303.1 million. Information on such Non-Program Properties owned is set forth in the table below.
During the period 2004 through 2006, our Sponsor sold one multi-family Non-Program Property and 6 commercial Non-Program Properties (which were part of larger portfolios which our Sponsor still owns). Information on such Non-Program Sold Properties is set forth in the table below.
71
Aggregate Cash Distributions from Non-Program Properties
for the Period January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Non-Program Real Estate Properties Owned | 49 | 50 | 50 | 65 | 84 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative Acquisition Costs to date(1) | $ | 252,710,470 | $ | 263,702,089 | $ | 263,702,089 | $ | 1,332,727,089 | $ | 1,640,447,392 | ||||||||||
Cumulative Capital Advanced as of the end of the period(2) | $ | 30,880,688 | $ | 35,251,434 | $ | 37,201,786 | $ | 247,598,614 | $ | 270,952,381 | ||||||||||
Cumulative Cash Distributions as of the end of the period(3) | $ | 36,349,961 | $ | 44,356,005 | $ | 55,585,489 | $ | 150,812,489 | $ | 303,098,044 | ||||||||||
Total Acquisition Costs during the period | $ | 55,250,000 | $ | 10,991,619 | $ | — | $ | 1,069,025,000 | $ | 307,720,303 | ||||||||||
Original Mortgage | $ | 50,859,643 | $ | 7,928,714 | $ | — | $ | 865,393,953 | $ | 286,573,360 | ||||||||||
Cash down Payment | $ | 4,390,357 | $ | 3,062,904 | $ | — | $ | 203,631,047 | $ | 21,146,943 | ||||||||||
Capital Invested during the period | $ | 7,056,830 | $ | 4,370,745 | $ | 1,950,353 | $ | 210,396,827 | $ | 23,353,767 | ||||||||||
Total Cash distributions during the period | $ | 10,845,242 | $ | 8,006,044 | $ | 11,229,484 | $ | 95,227,001 | $ | 152,285,555 | ||||||||||
From operating cash flow | $ | 5,089,975 | $ | 3,385,682 | $ | 3,414,127 | $ | 1,981,368 | $ | 4,470,024 | ||||||||||
From sales | $ | 1,829,070 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 67,476,682 | ||||||||||
From refinancing | $ | 3,926,197 | $ | 4,620,362 | $ | 7,815,357 | $ | 93,245,633 | $ | 80,338,849 | ||||||||||
Non-Program Debt at December 31, | $ | 425,467,019 | $ | 472,907,837 | $ | 431,619,163 | $ | 1,163,858,716 | $ | 1,615,573,995 |
(1) | Costs for all years include Acquisition costs in the amount of $83.7 million which were for the properties sold shown on the table titled “Non-Program Prospective Sales for 2004 to 2006” set forth below. |
(2) | Cumulative Capital Advanced as of 12/31/I, included $10.4 of capital contributed for the properties sold shown in the table titled “Non-Program Prospective Sales for 2004 to 2006” set forth below. |
(3) | Cumulative Capital Distributed as of 12/31/06 Included $83.1 of capital distributed for the properties sold shown in the table titled “Non-Program Prospective Sales for 2004 to 2006” set forth below. |
72
Non-Program Properties Sales for 2004 to 2006
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Property | Six Properties from the Original Acadia Portfolio(1) | Fairfield Towers | ||||||
Date Acquired | Dec-02 | Feb-99 | ||||||
Date Sold | Dec-06 | Jul-06 | ||||||
Total costs of properties, including closing and soft costs | $ | 11,782,027 | $ | 31,000,000 | ||||
Original Mortgage Financing | $ | 11,569,200 | $ | 28,500,000 | ||||
Total Cumulative Capital Advanced during period owned | $ | 212,827 | $ | 2,179,011 | ||||
Total Selling Price, Net of Closing Costs | $ | 15,499,465 | $ | 78,696,008 | ||||
Mortgage Balance at time of Sale(2) | $ | 11,261,367 | $ | 23,665,110 | ||||
Total Cumulative Cash Distributions during period owned from operations | $ | 1,166,892 | $ | 2,484,057 | ||||
Total Cumulative Cash Distributions during period owned from refinancings | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Cash received Net of Closing Costs | $ | 4,238,098 | $ | 51,977,217 | ||||
Total cash distributions | $ | 5,404,990 | $ | 54,461,274 |
(1) | The Acadia Portfolio was purchased as a portfolio and treated as a portfolio purchase with no individual allocations to properties. |
(2) | In contemplation of the sale of properties from the Acadia portfolio, the entire portfolio of 17 properties was refinanced in December 2005. The mortgage balance represents the amount that was paid off as part of the portfolio refinancing. The actual sale occurred in 2006. |
73
Narrative Summary of Acquisitions of Non-Program Properties for the period 1997 through 2006
In 1997, our Sponsor acquired Chelsea Village, a 261 unit residential property located in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
In 1998, our Sponsor acquired Towne Oaks, a 99 unit residential property located in Boundbrook, New Jersey, Liberty Gardens, a 232 unit residential property located in Bergenfield, New Jersey (sold in 2004), Plaza Village, a 114 unit residential property located in Morrisville, Pennsylvania and Lakewood Mazal, a 26 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey. During the same year our Sponsor also acquired 150 Grand Street, a 84,770 square foot office property located in White Plains, New York and Matawan Mall, a 20,585 square foot retail property located in Matawan, New Jersey.
In 1999, our Sponsor acquired 801 Madison, a 46 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey, Fairfield Towers, a 983 unit residential property located in Brooklyn, New York (sold in 2006), Pinewood Chase, a 492 unit residential property located in Suitland, Maryland, and Reisterstown Square, a 493 unit residential property located in Baltimore, Maryland. It also acquired Burrstone and Midtown, each of which are 100 unit residential properties located in New York.
In 2000, our Sponsor acquired two industrial properties containing 263,979 square feet located in Maryland and a portfolio of four shopping centers containing 379,686 square feet, located in Connecticut and Massachusetts. In addition, our Sponsor acquired 15 residential properties located in central New Jersey which consisted of 3,334 units.
In 2001, our Sponsor acquired Belford Towers, a 467 unit residential property located in Takoma Park, Maryland. In addition, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of over 730,000 square feet of office properties in Pennsylvania and Florida.
In 2002, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of 17 shopping centers (6 centers were sold in 2006) located in the Eastern U.S. containing approximately 2,300,000 square feet and Lakewood Plaza, a 98 unit residential property located in Lakewood, New Jersey.
In 2003, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of 19 apartment buildings in Virginia containing 1,808 units. Finally, it acquired a six-building high-tech industrial complex, containing approximately 375,000 square feet, located in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico, and three shopping centers containing approximately 193,000 square feet, located in New Jersey.
In 2005, our Sponsor acquired a portfolio of two full price malls of over 1.1 million square feet of retail space located in Macon, Georgia and Burlington, North Carolina. In addition, our Sponsor acquired 101,000 square feet of retail space located in Egg Harbor, New Jersey. Finally, our Sponsor acquired 11 office buildings totaling 4.6 million square feet, a 120,000-square-foot industrial property, and 9.3 acres of developable land, in addition to three joint venture interests in office properties totaling 2.8 million square feet, all located primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area.
In 2006, our Sponsor acquired fifteen residential properties in three private programs in Detroit, Michigan which consisted of over 4,000 units.
Program Properties
Generally our Sponsor acquired properties for its own account and neither our Sponsor nor its affiliates have operated any public programs. As of December 31, 2006, our Sponsor and its affiliates have raised approximately $147.3 million in 18 private programs that have acquired interests in Program Properties with an aggregate investment in excess of $1.22 billion. Our Sponsor has financed these programs with institutional first mortgages. The cumulative capital advanced or contributed for Program Properties (both investors and our Sponsor) was $147.3 million at December 31, 2006; $116.8 million at December 31, 2005; $72.6 million at December 31, 2004; $63.9 million at December 31, 2003; and $27.0 million at December 31, 2002. These Program Properties are located throughout the United States. 87% of the Program Properties acquired are retail, 9% of the Program Properties acquired are residential and 4% of the Program Properties acquired are office and industrial. None of the Program Properties included in such figures were newly constructed, and only one of them has been sold. Each of these programs is similar to our program because they invested in the same property types, (i.e., retail, residential, industrial and office). We believe, based on appraisals and
74
other valuations, that the value of the equity in these Program Properties as of December 31, 2006 is substantially in excess of the cumulative capital advanced or contributed.
Adverse Business Developments
The Program Properties and Non-Program Properties sponsored by The Lightstone Group and its affiliates have met and continue to meet their principal investment objectives. Over time some of these programs have acquired troubled properties or mortgage bonds or loans; however, none of the troubled properties or mortgage bonds or loans have prevented the programs from meeting their objectives.
Additional Information on Programs
We will provide, upon request, for no fee, a copy of the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the previous 24 months by any prior public program sponsored by our sponsor or any of its affiliates to the extent the same are required to be filed. We will also provide, upon request, for a reasonable fee, the exhibits to each such Form 10-K. A request for an Annual Report on Form 10-K should be addressed to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., 326 Third Street, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701, Attention: Investor Relations.
Undertakings
Potential investors are encouraged to examine the Non-Program Properties and Program Properties Prior Performance Tables included in this prospectus for more detailed information regarding the prior experience of The Lightstone Group and its affiliates with respect to such Non-Program Properties and Program Properties. Table VI is not a part of this prospectus and is contained in Part II of the registration statement of which it is a part.
75
MANAGEMENT
Our Affiliated Companies
Overview
Our sponsor, David Lichtenstein, founded The Lightstone Group as a limited liability company and often does business in his individual capacity under that name. Our sponsor is one of the largest private residential and commercial real estate owners and operators in the United States today, with a portfolio of over 18,000 residential units, 687 extended stay hotels and approximately 29,000,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial properties located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. With five regional offices across the country, our sponsor employs approximately 14,000 employees. Our sponsor and its affiliates have acquired over 190 projects including numerous properties and portfolios from major national public and privately-held real estate companies such as Home Properties (NYSE:HME), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR), Prime Group Realty Trust (NYSE:PGE), Liberty Property Trust (NYSE:LRY), The Rouse Company (NYSE:RSE), Prime Retail Inc. (NASDAQ:PMRE), F & W Management Company, United Dominion Realty Trust (NYSE:UDR) and Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI), Archon Group, an affiliate of Polaris Capital, and The Blackstone Group.
Our General Management
We operate under the direction of our board of directors. Our board of directors is responsible for the overall management and control of our affairs. Investment decisions will be made either by the advisor or by the board of directors. As described in greater detail under “Our Advisor,” below, our advisor will be responsible for making investment decisions where the purchase price of a particular property is less than $15,000,000 and the investment does not exceed stated leverage limitations. Where such leverage limitations are exceeded, or where the purchase price is equal to or greater than $15,000,000, investment decisions will be made by our board of directors.
Our Directors
The following table presents certain information as of June 30, 2007 concerning each of our directors serving in such capacity:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Positions Held | Year Term of Office Will Expire | Served as a Director Since | ||||
David Lichtenstein | 46 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | 2008 | 2004 | ||||
Edwin J. Glickman | 74 | Director | 2008 | 2005 | ||||
George R. Whittemore | 57 | Director | 2008 | 2006 | ||||
Shawn R. Tominus | 47 | Director | 2008 | 2006 | ||||
Bruno de Vinck | 61 | Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and Director | 2008 | 2005 |
David Lichtenstein is the Chairman of our board of directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lichtenstein has been a member of our board of directors since June 8, 2004. Mr. Lichtenstein founded both American Shelter Corporation and The Lightstone Group and directs all aspects of the acquisition, financing and management of a diverse portfolio of multi-family, lodging, retail and industrial properties located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. Mr. Lichtenstein is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers and NAREIT. Mr. Lichtenstein also serves as the Chairman of the board of trustees of Prime Group Realty Trust, a publicly registered REIT trading on the NYSE, as well as Prime Retail, a private company.
76
Edwin J. Glickman is one of our independent directors and the Chairman of our audit committee. In January 1995, Mr. Glickman co-founded Capital Lease Funding, a leading mortgage lender for properties net leased to investment grade tenants, where he remained as Executive Vice President until May 2003. Mr. Glickman was previously a trustee of publicly traded RPS Realty Trust from October 1980 through May 1996, and Atlantic Realty Trust from May 1996 to March 2006. Mr. Glickman graduated from Dartmouth College.
George R. Whittemore is one of our independent directors. Mr. Whittemore also serves as Audit Committee Chairman of Prime Group Realty Trust, as a Director of Village Bank & Trust in Richmond, Virginia and as a Director of Supertel Hospitality, Inc. in Norfolk, Nebraska, all publicly traded companies. Mr. Whittemore previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Supertel Hospitality Trust, Inc. from November 2001 until August 2004 and as Senior Vice President and Director of both Anderson & Strudwick, Incorporated, a brokerage firm based in Richmond, Virginia, and Anderson & Strudwick Investment Corporation, from October1996 until October 2001. Mr. Whittemore has also served as a Director, President and Managing Officer of Pioneer Federal Savings Bank and its parent, Pioneer Financial Corporation, from September 1982 until August 1994, and as President of Mills Value Adviser, Inc., a registered investment advisor. Mr. Whittemore is a graduate of the University of Richmond.
Shawn R. Tominus is one of our independent directors. Mr. Tominus is the founder and President of Metro Management, a real estate investment and management company founded in 1994 which specializes in the acquisition, financing, construction and redevelopment of residential, commercial and industrial properties. He also serves as a member of the audit committee of Prime Group Realty Trust, a publicly traded REIT located in Chicago. Mr. Tominus has over 25 years experience in real estate and serves as a national consultant focusing primarily on market and feasibility analysis. Prior to his time at Metro Management, Mr. Tominus held the position of Senior Vice President at Kamson Corporation, where he managed a portfolio of over 5,000 residential units as well as commercial and industrial properties.
Bruno De Vinck is our Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and a Director. Mr. de Vinck is also a Director of the privately held Park Avenue Bank, and Prime Group Realty Trust, a publicly registered REIT. Mr. de Vinck is a Senior Vice President with the Lightstone Group, and has been employed by Lightstone since April 1994. Mr. de Vinck was previously General Manager of JN Management Co. from November 1992 to January 1994, AKS Management Co., Inc. from September 1988 to July 1992 and Heritage Management Co., Inc. from May 1986 to September 1988. In addition, Mr. de Vinck worked as Senior Property Manager at Hekemien & Co. from May 1975 to May 1986, as a Property Manager at Charles H. Greenthal & Co. from July 1972 to June 1975 and in sales and residential development for McDonald & Phillips Real Estate Brokers from May 1970 to June 1972. From July 1982 to July 1984 Mr. de Vinck was the founding president of the Ramsey Homestead Corp., a not-for-profit senior citizen residential health care facility, and, from July 1984 until October 2004, was Chairman of its board of directors. Mr. de Vinck studied Architecture at Pratt Institute and then worked for the Bechtel Corporation from February 1966 to May 1970.
Our Executive Officers
The following table presents certain information as of March 1, 2007 concerning each of our executive officers serving in such capacities:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Positions Held | ||
David Lichtenstein | 46 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
Stephen Hamrick | 55 | President | ||
Bruno de Vinck | 61 | Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and Director | ||
Jennifer Collins | 38 | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer | ||
Joseph Teichman | 34 | General Counsel | ||
Joshua Kornberg | 34 | Vice President, Acquisitions |
David Lichtenstein for biographical information about Mr. Lichtenstein, see “Management — Directors.”
77
Stephen H. Hamrick is our President and the President and CEO of our broker dealer. Mr. Hamrick previously served as our Vice President of Investor Relations. Prior to joining us in July of 2006, Mr. Hamrick served five years as President of Carey Financial Corporation and Managing Director of W.P. Carey & Co. Mr. Hamrick is a member of the Committee on Securities for the American Stock Exchange and The Board of Trustees of The Saratoga Group of Funds. In the 1990s, Mr. Hamrick developed an electronic trading business utilized by the institutional customers of Cantor Fitzgerald, including brokerage firms and banks, to trade privately held securities; spent two years as CEO of a full-service, investment brokerage business at Wall Street Investor Services, where he executed a turnaround strategy and the ultimate sale of that business; and served as Chairman of Duroplas Corporation, a development stage company building on proprietary technology that enables the production of thermoplastic compounds. From 1988 until 1994, Mr. Hamrick headed up Private Investments at PaineWebber Incorporated and was a member of the firm’s Management Council. From 1975 until joining PaineWebber, he was associated with E.F. Hutton & Company, holding positions ranging from Account Executive to National Director of Private Placements. Mr. Hamrick has served on the Listings Panel for NASDAQ, as Chairman of the Securities Industry Association’s Direct Investment Committee and as Chairman of the Investment Program Association. He is a Certified Financial Planner and was graduated with degrees in English and Economics from Duke University.
Bruno De Vinck for biographical information about Mr. de Vinck, see “Management — Directors.”
Jenniffer Collins is our interim Chief Financial Officer and interim Treasurer and previously served as our Controller from October of 2006 until September of 2007. Prior to joining us, Mrs. Collins served as the Corporate Controller for Orchid Cellmark, Inc., a publicly traded bio-technology company, from February 2004 through October 2006. From August 2001 through January 2004, Mrs. Collins served as the Director of Finance and Investor Relations for Tellium, Inc., an optical switching company which was purchased by Zhone Technologies, Inc. in November of 2003. Prior to that, Mrs. Collins spent two years at Keynote Systems, Inc., a start up internet services company that went public in September of 1998. Mrs. Collins has over seven years experience in public accounting including a position with PricewaterhouseCoopers in the audit practice for the real estate group. She earned her CPA in New Jersey in 1993 and graduated with a B.S. in accounting from Lehigh University.
Joseph E. Teichman is our General Counsel and also serves as General Counsel of our advisor and sponsor. Prior to joining us in January 2007, Mr. Teichman practiced law at the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York, NY from September 2001 to January 2007. Mr. Teichman earned a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and a B.A. from Beth Medrash Govoha, Lakewood, NJ. Mr. Teichman is licensed to practice law in New York and New Jersey.
Joshua Kornberg is our Vice President, Acquisitions and is also Senior Vice President, Director of Acquisitions for The Lightstone Group. Prior to joining the Lightstone Group in 2006, Mr. Kornberg developed more than 10 years of experience in acquisitions, development, and asset management with The RREEF Funds, Morgan Stanley and TrizecHahn. Mr. Kornberg holds an MBA from York University with a dual specialization in Finance and Real Estate.
Other Principals of the Sponsor
Peyton Owen is President and Chief Operating Officer of The Lightstone Group. Prior to joining the Lightstone Group in July 2007, Mr. Owen served as President and CEO of Equity Office Properties LLC from February 2007 to June 2007, as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Equity Office Properties Trust from October 2003 to February 2007, and as Chief Operating Officer of Jones Lang LaSalle Inc’s Americas Region from April 1999 to October 2003. Prior to April 1999, Mr. Owen held positions as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief of Staff, and Leasing Director with LaSalle Partners, Inc., and as Regional Sales Director at Liebherr-America, Inc. Mr. Owen earned a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Virginia and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Virginia’s Darden School.
78
Robert A. Brvenik is President of The Lightstone Group’s retail subsidiary, Prime Retail, Inc. (“Prime”). Mr. Brvenik joined Prime in 2000 as its Chief Financial Officer and was promoted to President upon the Lightstone Group’s acquisition of Prime in November 2003. Prior to joining Prime, Mr. Brvenik served in several key capacities including chief financial officer, chief operating officer, director of development and senior leasing representative over a 13 year career at Pyramid Management Group, Inc. Mr. Brvenik also held positions at Arthur Andersen & Co. and Citicorp. Mr. Brvenik is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science in accounting from Utica College of Syracuse University.
Jeffrey A. Patterson is the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Lightstone Group’s office subsidiary, Prime Group Realty Trust (“PGRT”). Mr. Patterson has served in various capacities at PGRT since 1997 and had previously served as Executive Vice President at The Prime Group, Inc., as Director of Development at Tishman Speyer Properties and as a Senior Financial Analyst at Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s Real Estate Investment Group. Mr. Patterson is an associate member of the Urban Land Institute and a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.
Pamela Z. Meadows is Senior Vice President of Human Resources for The Lightstone Group and Prime. Ms. Meadows began her career in the accounting department of Prime in 1992, was instrumental in the formation of Prime’s human resources department in 1994 and on an ongoing basis, has helped to manage the integration of The Lightstone Group’s various acquired properties and businesses. Prior to joining Prime Retail, Ms. Meadows served in various capacities over a seven year period with Shopco Management. Ms. Meadows, a graduate of the University of Maryland, is an active member of the Society of Human Resources and the National Payroll Administration.
Committees of Our Board of Directors
Our charter authorizes our board of directors to establish such committees as it deems appropriate, so long as a majority of the members of each committee are independent directors, any applicable rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable regulations are complied with and, in the case of the audit committee, all members are independent directors. Currently, we have the committee listed below:
Audit Committee. Our board of directors has established an audit committee consisting of our three independent directors, Mr. Glickman, Mr. Whittemore and Mr. Tominus. These independent directors include at least one person who is a financial expert (Edwin J. Glickman), as defined by applicable rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our audit committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our board of directors. Among other things, the audit committee charter calls upon the audit committee to:
• | oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements on behalf of our board of directors and report the results of its activities to the board; |
• | be directly and solely responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, oversight, evaluation and, when appropriate, the termination and replacement of our independent auditors; |
• | review the annual engagement proposal and qualifications of our independent auditors; |
• | prepare an annual report as required by applicable SEC disclosure rules; |
• | review the integrity, adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and financial disclosure process; |
• | review and approve all related party transactions, including all transactions with our advisor; and |
• | manage our relationship with our advisor under the advisory agreement. |
The audit committee shall have such additional powers, duties and responsibilities as may be delegated by the board of directors or contained in the audit committee charter approved by the board of directors. A copy of our audit committee charter is available at www.lightstonereit.com.
79
Our charter provides that in order to be considered an independent director, the director may not, other than in his or her capacity as a director:
• | own any interest in the sponsor, the advisor or their affiliates, other than us; |
• | be or have been employed by the advisor, the sponsor or their affiliates, or by us or our affiliates, on the date of determination or for two years prior to the date of determination; |
• | serve as an officer or director of the sponsor, the advisor or any of their affiliates, other than as a member of our board of directors; |
• | perform services, other than as a member of our board of directors; |
• | serve as a director, including as a member of our board of directors, of more than three real estate investment trusts organized by the sponsor or advised by the advisor; or |
• | maintain a “material” business or professional relationship with the sponsor, the advisor or any of their affiliates. A business or professional relationship qualifies as “material” if the aggregate gross revenue derived by the director from the sponsor, the advisor and their affiliates exceeds five percent of either the director’s annual gross income during either of the last two years or the director’s net worth on a fair market value basis. |
In addition, an independent director may not maintain, or have maintained, any of these prohibited associations either directly or indirectly. According to our charter, an indirect association with the sponsor or the advisor includes circumstances in which a spouse, parent, child, sibling, mother- or father-in-law, son- or daughter-in-law or brother- or sister-in-law is or has been associated with the sponsor, the advisor, any of their affiliates or us.
Compensation of Directors
We pay each of our independent directors an annual fee of $30,000 and are responsible for the reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses, as incurred. In addition, under our stock option plan, our independent directors will receive options to purchase shares of our common stock.
Compensation of Officers
Our officers will not receive any cash or non-cash compensation from us for their services as our officers. Our officers are officers of one or more of our affiliates and are compensated by those entities (including our sponsor), in part, for their services rendered to us.
Stock Option Plan
We have adopted a stock option plan under which our independent directors are eligible to receive annual nondiscretionary awards of nonqualified stock options. Our stock option plan is designed to enhance our profitability and value for the benefit of our stockholders by enabling us to offer independent directors stock-based incentives, thereby creating a means to raise the level of equity ownership by such individuals in order to attract, retain and reward such individuals and strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and our stockholders.
We have authorized and reserved 75,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our stock option plan. The board of directors may make appropriate adjustments to the number of shares available for awards and the terms of outstanding awards under our stock option plan to reflect any change in our capital structure or business, stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.
Our stock option plan provides for the automatic grant of a nonqualified stock option to each of our independent directors, without any further action by our board of directors or the stockholders, to purchase 3,000 shares of our common stock on the date of each annual stockholder’s meeting. Options to purchase 3,000 shares were granted to each of our three independent directors at the annual stockholders meeting in July, 2007. The exercise price for all stock options granted under our stock option plan is fixed at $10 per share until the termination of our initial public offering, and thereafter the exercise price for stock options
80
granted to our independent directors will be equal to the fair market value of a share on the last business day preceding the annual meeting of stockholders. The term of each such option is 10 years. Options granted to non-employee directors vest and become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the independent director is a director on the board of directors on that date.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of our stock option plan to the contrary, no stock option issued pursuant thereto may be exercised if such exercise would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.
Corporate Governance
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our board of directors has established a code of business conduct and ethics. Among other matters, the code of business conduct and ethics was designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
• | honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; |
• | full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications; |
• | compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; |
• | prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to appropriate persons identified in the code; and |
• | accountability for adherence to the code. |
Waivers to the code of business conduct and ethics may only be granted by the independent directors of the board. In the event that the independent directors grant any waivers of the elements listed above to any of our officers, we expect to announce the waiver within five business days on the corporate governance section on our corporate website (www.lightstonereit.com). The information on that website will not be a part of this prospectus.
Our Advisor
Our advisor, Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company and is wholly owned by our sponsor. Our advisor was formed on June 28, 2004. The following table sets forth information regarding the executive officers of our advisor.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Name | Age | Position | ||
David Lichtenstein | 46 | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Bruno de Vinck | 61 | Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President and Secretary | ||
Joshua Kornberg | 43 | Senior Vice President and Director of Acquisitions | ||
Joseph E. Teichman | 34 | General Counsel |
The biographies of Messrs. Lichtenstein, de Vinck, Kornberg and Teichman are set forth above in “Our Directors and Executive Officers.”
Our Advisory Agreement
Experience of Our Advisor. The experience of our advisor, which is wholly owned by our sponsor, can be assessed by reference to our sponsor’s prior performance. For a summary of our sponsor’s prior performance, see “Prior Performance Summary” and the Non-Program Properties tables above and the Program Properties Prior Performance Tables included in the back of this prospectus at pages A-1 through A-7. In addition, David Lichtenstein has over 20 years of experience in identifying, acquiring financing, refinancing and operating real property investments. For a further discussion of the experience of Mr. Lichtenstein, see “Our Directors and Executive Officers.” The board of directors will determine that any successor advisor possesses sufficient qualifications to perform the advisory function for us and justify the compensation provided for in its contract with us.
81
Duties of Our Advisor. Under the terms of our advisory agreement, our advisor generally has responsibility for our day-to-day operations. Many of the services to be performed by the advisor in managing our day-to-day activities are summarized below. This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions which the advisor will perform for us as our advisor, and it is not intended to include all of the services which may be provided to us by the advisor or by third parties. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, the advisor undertakes to use its best efforts to present to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by our board of directors. In its performance of this undertaking, the advisor, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate or third party, shall, subject to the authority of the board of directors:
• | find, present and recommend to us real estate investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies, acquisition strategy and objectives; |
• | structure the terms and conditions of transactions pursuant to which acquisitions of properties will be made; |
• | acquire properties on our behalf in compliance with our investment objectives and policies; |
• | arrange for the financing and refinancing of properties; |
• | administer our bookkeeping and accounting functions; |
• | serve as our consultant in connection with policy decisions to be made by our board of directors, managing our properties or causing them to be managed by another party; and |
• | render other services as our board of directors deems appropriate. |
The advisor may not acquire any property with a purchase price that is equal to or greater than $15,000,000 or finance any such acquisition, on our behalf, without the prior approval of a majority of our board of directors. The actual terms and conditions of transactions involving investments in such properties will be determined in the sole discretion of the advisor, subject at all times to such board of directors approval. Conversely, the advisor may acquire any real property with purchase price that is lower than $15,000,000, or finance any such acquisition, on our behalf, without the prior approval of the board of directors, if the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the investment in the property would not, if consummated, violate our investment guidelines, (ii) the investment in the property would not, if consummated, violate any restrictions on indebtedness; and (iii) the consideration to be paid for such properties does not exceed the fair market value of such properties, as determined by a qualified independent real estate appraiser selected by the advisor.
Likewise, the advisor may not arrange for the financing and refinancing of properties without a satisfactory showing that such a higher level of borrowing is appropriate, the approval of the board of directors and disclosure to stockholders if such financing or refinancing, when consummated, causes the total long-term permanent leverage on all of our properties, in the aggregate, to exceed 75% of such properties’ fair market value. The actual terms and conditions of financing and refinancing transactions will be determined in the sole discretion of the advisor, subject at all times to board of directors approval. However, the advisor may arrange for the financing and refinancing of properties, without the approval of the board of directors, if such financing or refinancing, when consummated, does not cause the aggregate long-term permanent leverage on all of our properties, in the aggregate, to exceed 75% of such properties’ fair market value. The advisor can also arrange for short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less.
Finally, the advisor may not arrange for the financing and refinancing of properties without a satisfactory showing that such a higher level of borrowing is appropriate, the approval of the board of directors and disclosure to stockholders if such financing or refinancing, when consummated, causes the total leverage on all of our properties, in the aggregate, to exceed 300% of our net assets. In addition, our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, must be reasonable in relation to our net assets and reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. The actual terms and conditions of financing and refinancing will be determined in the sole discretion of the advisor, subject at all times to approval of our board of directors. However, the advisor may arrange for the financing and refinancing of properties, without the approval of the board of directors, if such financing or refinancing, when consummated, does not cause the total leverage on all of our properties, in the
82
aggregate, to exceed 300% of our net assets. In addition, the advisor may not arrange for mortgage loans, including construction loans, on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loans, would exceed 85% of the property’s appraised value, unless substantial justification exists and the loans would not exceed the property’s appraised value.
Term of the Advisory Agreement. The advisory agreement has an initial term of one year and is renewable for successive one-year terms upon the mutual consent of the parties. It may be terminated by either party, by mutual consent of the parties or by a majority of the independent directors or the advisor, as the case may be, upon 60 days’ written notice. If the advisory agreement is terminated, the advisor must cooperate with us and take all reasonable steps requested by our board of directors to assist it in making an orderly transition of the advisory function. We will also have to pay our advisor any accrued but unpaid fees and expenses, as set forth below.
Compensation to Advisor. The advisory agreement provides for the advisor to be paid fees in connection with services provided to us (see “Management Compensation”). These fees include acquisition and asset management fees.
We will not reimburse the advisor or its affiliates for services for which the advisor or its affiliates are entitled to compensation in the form of a separate fee. If the advisor or its affiliates perform services that are outside of the scope of the advisory agreement, we will compensate them at rates and in amounts agreed upon by the advisor and the independent directors.
Other than as set forth in the following paragraph, the advisor bears the expenses it incurs in connection with performing its duties under the advisory agreement. These include salaries and fringe benefits of its directors and officers, travel costs and other administrative expenses of its directors or officers.
We will reimburse the advisor for certain costs it incurs in connection with the services it provides to us including, but not limited to: (i) organization costs in an amount up to 2% of gross offering proceeds, which include actual legal, accounting, printing and expenses attributable to preparing the SEC registration statement, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by the advisor, as well as reimbursements for salaries and direct expenses of its employees, including, without limitation, employee benefits, while engaged in registering the shares and other organization costs, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee; (ii) advertising expenses, expense reimbursements, and legal and accounting fees; (iii) the actual cost of goods and materials used by us and obtained from entities not affiliated with the advisor; (iv) administrative services (including personnel costs; provided, however, that no reimbursement shall be made for costs of personnel to the extent that such personnel perform services in transactions for which the advisor receives a separate fee); (v) acquisition expenses, which include travel and expenses related to the selection and acquisition of properties and for goods and services provided by the advisor; (vi) rent, leasehold improvement costs, utilities or other administrative items generally constituting our advisor’s overhead; and (vi) expenses related to negotiating and servicing mortgage loans. We will not reimburse the advisor for any services for which we will pay the advisor a separate fee.
Fees Payable Upon Termination of the Advisory Agreement. If the advisory agreement is terminated for any reason, the advisor will be entitled to receive payment of any earned but unpaid compensation and expense reimbursements accrued as of the date of termination. In addition, our advisor may require that its special general partner interests be converted into cash in an amount equal to the purchase price of the special general partner interests, or may otherwise continue to hold such special general partnership interests after the termination of the advisory agreement.
The advisor will be entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid compensation in cash within 30 days of the effective date of the termination.
83
Reimbursement by Advisor. Unless our stockholders amend our charter, our advisor must reimburse us for the amounts, if any, by which our total REIT operating expenses paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of:
• | 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year; or |
• | 25% of our net income for that fiscal year; |
provided, however, only so much of the excess specified above will be required to be reimbursed as the board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors, determines should justifiably be reimbursed in light of such unanticipated, unusual or non-recurring factors which may have occurred within 60 days after the end of the quarter for which the excess occurred. In this event, the stockholders will be sent a written disclosure and explanation of the factors the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the higher total operating expenses were justified. Operating expenses are defined for this purpose as being exclusive of those expenses incurred in the operation of properties we have acquired, acquisition fees and related expenses paid to our advisor, depreciation and amortization expenses, and financing related expenses such as fees paid to lenders and interest expense paid on borrowings by the REIT or the operating partnership.
Liability and Indemnification of Advisor. Under the advisory agreement, we are also required to indemnify the advisor and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding with respect to the advisor’s acts or omissions. For details regarding these limitations and circumstances under which we are required or authorized to indemnify and to advance expenses to the advisor, see “Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Our Advisor.”
Other Activities of Advisor and its Affiliates. The advisor and its affiliates expect to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the advisory agreement, the advisor must devote sufficient resources to the administration of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. to discharge its obligations. The advisor may assign the advisory agreement to an affiliate upon approval of a majority of the independent directors. We may assign or transfer the advisory agreement to a successor entity.
Amendment of the Advisory Agreement. The advisory agreement can be amended by a written instrument that is signed by all of the parties to that agreement (or their successors or assigns, where applicable).
Potential Acquisition of Advisor and Property Manager. Many REITs which are listed on a national stock exchange or included for quotation on a national market system are considered “self-administered,” since the employees of such a REIT perform all significant management functions. In contrast, REITs that are not self-administered, like us, typically engage a third-party, such as our advisor and property manager, to perform management functions on its behalf. If for any reason our independent directors determine that we should become self-administered, the advisory agreement and the property management agreement each permit us to acquire the business conducted by the advisor and the property manager (including all of its assets). As the parent of our advisor and property manager and thus the recipient of the proceeds from such sales, our sponsor has an incentive to achieve our listing on a national stock exchange or inclusion for quotation on a national market system and thus cause the independent directors to determine that we should become self-administered. See “Conflicts of Interest.”
If we choose to acquire these businesses, their stockholders will receive in connection with such an acquisition, and in exchange for terminating any contractual arrangements and the release and waiver of all fees payable under their provisions until their stated termination, but not paid, such number of shares of our common stock as is determined in accordance with the following paragraph. We will be obligated to pay any fees accrued under such contractual arrangements for services rendered through the closing of such acquisitions.
The number of shares we may issue shall be determined as follows. We shall first send an election notice to the advisor or the property manager of our election to proceed with such a transaction. Next, the net income of the advisor or the property manager for the six month period immediately preceding the month in which the election notice is delivered, as determined by an independent audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, shall be annualized. (The advisor or the property manager shall bear the
84
cost of any such audit.) Such amount shall then be multiplied by nine-tenths (0.90) and then divided by our “Funds from Operations per Weighted Average Share.” “Funds from Operations per Weighted Average Share” shall be equal to the annualized Funds from Operations (as defined below; i.e., four times the Funds from Operations for the quarter immediately preceding the delivery of the election notice) per weighted average share for us for such quarter, all based upon our quarterly report delivered to our stockholders for such quarter. The resulting quotient shall constitute the number of shares of our common stock to be issued, with delivery thereof and the closing of the transaction to occur within 90 days of delivery of the election notice. “Funds from Operations” means generally net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus depreciation of real property and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Under some circumstances, we can enter into and consummate such transactions without seeking specific stockholder approval. See “Conflicts of Interest.” Any such transaction will occur, if at all, only if our board of directors obtains a fairness opinion from a recognized financial advisor or institution providing valuation services to the effect that the consideration to be paid therefore is fair, from a financial point of view, to our stockholders.
The Property Manager and the Management Agreement
Our property manager, Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC, provides property management services to us under the terms of the management agreement. Our property manager was formed in Delaware on June 30, 2004 and is wholly-owned by our sponsor. The property manager provides services in connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of our properties. We have agreed to pay the property manager a monthly management fee of 5% of the gross revenues from our residential and retail properties. In addition, for the management and leasing of our office and industrial properties, we will pay to our property manager, property management and leasing fees of up to 4.5% of gross revenues from our office and industrial properties. We may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed office and industrial properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our property manager may be entitled to receive higher fees in the event our property manager demonstrates to the satisfaction of a majority of the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) that a higher competitive fee is justified for the services rendered.
Our property manager will also be paid a monthly fee for any extra services equal to no more than that which would be payable to an unrelated party providing the services.
The property manager may subcontract its duties for a fee that may be less than the fee provided for in the management services agreements. In the event that the property manager subcontracts its duties with respect to some or all of our properties, the fees payable to such parties for such services will be deducted from the monthly management fee payable to our property manager by us or paid directly by our property manager.
The management agreement can be amended by written instrument executed by the party against whom the amendment is asserted. The management agreement can be terminated after one year and will terminate upon written notice from our operating partnership to the property manager of gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of its duties. The management agreement will also terminate upon our property manager’s bankruptcy, receivership, reorganization or similar financial difficulties relating to its insolvency.
We have the option to acquire our property manager. See “Conflicts of Interest” and “Management — Our Advisory Agreement — Potential acquisition of advisor and property manager” for a description of this right and the terms under which we may exercise it.
85
Lightstone Securities, LLC
Lightstone Securities, our dealer manager, is registered under the applicable federal and state securities laws and is qualified to do business as a securities broker-dealer throughout the United States. It does not render these services to anyone other than affiliates of The Lightstone Group, and it does not make sales directly to retail customers or maintain customer accounts. It is a member firm of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and has qualified as a broker-dealer in all 50 states.
We will pay Lightstone Securities selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities will provide wholesale marketing support in connection with this offering and expects to reallow 100% of commissions earned for those transactions that involve participating broker-dealers. We may also pay to Lightstone Securities a dealer manager fee of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers. Lightstone Securities, in its sole discretion, may reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 1% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers.
Set forth below is a table that demonstrates the approximate compensation that will be paid to our dealer manager, which will have no net effect on our total proceeds. Note that we have exceeded the minimum offering of 200,000 shares and the table reflects the shares sold through September 30, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Maximum Per Unit | Dollar Amount as of September 30, 2007 | Total Maximum | ||||||||||
Price to public | $ | 10.00 | $ | 114,350,000 | $ | 300,000,000 | ||||||
Selling commissions paid by us | (0.70 | ) | (6,963,500 | ) | (21,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Selling commissions funded using proceeds from sale of special general partner interests | 0.70 | 6,963,500 | 21,000,000 | |||||||||
Dealer manager fee paid by us | (0.10 | ) | (1,143,500 | ) | (3,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Dealer manager fee funded using proceeds from sale of special general partner interests | 0.10 | 1,143,500 | 3,000,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. | $ | 10.00 | $ | 114,350,000 | $ | 300,000,000 |
Lightstone SLP, LLC
Lightstone SLP, LLC was formed in Delaware on February 11, 2005, for the purpose of purchasing the special general partner interests from our operating partnership in exchange for proceeds sufficient to pay all offering and organization expenses and receiving special general partner distributions. Lightstone SLP, LLC is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of our sponsor.
86
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND OUR ADVISOR
Our charter provides that our advisor and directors are deemed to be in a fiduciary relationship to us and our stockholders and that our directors have a fiduciary duty to the stockholders to supervise our relationship with the advisor.
The liability of our directors and officers to us or our stockholders for money damages is limited to the fullest extent permitted. As a result, our directors and officers will not be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages unless:
• | the person actually received an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; and |
• | the person is adjudged to be liable based on a finding that the person’s action, or failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding. |
Except as described below, our charter authorizes and directs us to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses to any director, officer, employee or agent, and our advisor and its affiliates. Our charter currently prohibits us from indemnifying or holding harmless for any loss or liability that we suffer, any director, officer, employee, agent or the advisor or its affiliates unless:
• | the person seeking indemnification has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in our best interests; |
• | the person seeking indemnification was acting on our behalf or performing services for us; and |
• | the liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct on the part of the person seeking indemnification, except that if the person seeking indemnification is or was an independent director, the liability or loss will not have been the result of gross negligence or willful misconduct. |
In any such case, the indemnification or agreement to indemnify is recoverable only out of our net assets and not from the assets of our stockholders.
We will not indemnify any director, officer, employee, agent or the advisor, his, her or its affiliates for losses, liabilities or expenses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless one or more of the following conditions are met:
• | there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations; |
• | the claims have been dismissed with prejudice by a court of competent jurisdiction; or a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and the court considering the request has been advised of the position of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the published position of any state securities regulatory authority of a jurisdiction in which our securities were offered and sold as to indemnification for securities law violations. |
Subject to applicable law, our charter requires us to advance amounts to a person entitled to indemnification for legal and other expenses and costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
• | the legal action relates to acts or omissions relating to the performance of duties or services for us or on our behalf by the person seeking indemnification; |
• | the legal action is initiated by a third party who is not a stockholder or the legal action is initiated by a stockholder acting in his or her capacity as such and a court of competent jurisdiction specifically approves advancement; |
• | the person seeking indemnification provides us with a written affirmation of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification; and |
87
• | the person seeking indemnification undertakes in writing to repay us the advanced funds, together with interest at the applicable legal rate of interest, if the person seeking indemnification is found not to be entitled to indemnification. |
We may purchase and maintain insurance or provide similar protection on behalf of any director, officer, employee, agent or the advisor or its affiliates against any liability asserted which was incurred in any such capacity with us or arising out of such status;provided, however, that we may not incur the costs of any liability insurance which insures any person against liability for which he, she or it could not be indemnified under our charter. We may enter into any contract for indemnity and advancement of expenses with any officer, employee or agent who is not a director as may be determined by the board of directors and as permitted by law. Our sponsor has purchased directors and officers liability insurance on behalf of our officers and directors and we will reimburse our sponsor for the premiums incurred under such policy.
The Lightstone Group will enter into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and some of our executive officers. The indemnification agreements will require The Lightstone Group to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject to the limits referred to above. The Lightstone Group also may indemnify and advance expenses incurred by directors and officers seeking to enforce their rights under the indemnification agreements and cover directors and officers under The Lightstone Group’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, if any. Although the form of indemnification agreement will offer substantially the same scope of coverage afforded by provisions in our charter and bylaws, it will provide greater assurance to directors and officers that indemnification will be available, because as a contract, it cannot be unilaterally modified by The Lightstone Group’s or our boards of directors or by the stockholders to eliminate the rights it will provide.
We have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any indemnification that applies to liabilities arising under the Securities Act is contrary to public policy and, therefore, unenforceable.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2007 regarding the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each director, each executive officer, all directors and executive officers as a group and any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares. As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 3,162 stockholders of record and 13.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership includes outstanding shares and shares which are not outstanding that any person has the right to acquire within 60 days after the date of this table. However any such shares which are not outstanding are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares beneficially owned by any other person. Except as indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all shares beneficially owned by them.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||||||
The Lightstone Group(1) | 20,000 | .15 | % | |||||
Stephen Hamrick | 10,000 | .07 | % |
(1) | Includes 20,000 shares owned by our advisor. Our advisor is wholly owned by The Lightstone Group, LLC, which is controlled and wholly owned by David W. Lichtenstein, our sponsor. Lightstone SLP, LLC, which is also controlled and wholly owned by our sponsor, will receive special general partner interests of our operating partnership in exchange for $30,000,000, assuming 30,000,000 shares are sold pursuant to this offering, which we will use to defray all costs and expenses of this offering, including organization costs and selling commissions. |
88
OUR STRUCTURE AND FORMATION
We were formed on June 8, 2004 as a Maryland corporation. The operating partnership was formed on July 12, 2004 as a Delaware limited partnership.
Structure
We operate our business using what is commonly known as an UPREIT structure. This means that we have formed the operating partnership to own all of our assets, either directly or indirectly. Our advisor contributed $200,000 to us for 20,000 shares of our common stock to form us. We have contributed the $200,000 of proceeds we received from our advisor in exchange for 20,000 general partnership units in the operating partnership. As a result, we are the sole general partner of the operating partnership. We will contribute the net proceeds of this offering to the operating partnership. We are and will be the only holder of regular general partnership units in the operating partnership. As the general partner of the operating partnership, we will have the power to manage and conduct the business of the operating partnership, subject to the consent of the special general partner as to management decisions and other limited exceptions set forth in the operating partnership agreement. See “Operating Partnership Agreement.” The advisor holds 200 limited partnership units in the operating partnership valued at $10 each for its $2,000 capital contribution. As a result, the advisor is a limited partner in the operating partnership.
We will conduct substantially all of our business, and hold our interests in the properties in which we invest, directly or indirectly, through the operating partnership.
As a REIT, we may conduct some of our business and hold some of our interests in properties through “taxable REIT subsidiaries” or (“TRS”) which may be wholly or partially owned. We currently have one TRS to facilitate our ownership of lodging facilities. We may form another TRS or use our existing TRS to allow for our acquisition of additional lodging assets in the future. Additionally, we may in the future decide to conduct other business or hold some of our interests in properties in such subsidiaries.
See “Prospectus Summary — Organizational Chart” for a diagram depicting the services to be rendered by our affiliates to us, as well as our organizational structure and the organizational structure of the operating partnership.
Currently, the only properties that we own are described in “Specified Investments.” We will form entities to acquire properties. They will be owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the operating partnership. Properties that will be purchased by us in the future may be owned by entities that will be directly or indirectly owned by the operating partnership. In other instances, there likely will be other investors in the entities that own our properties, in addition to the operating partnership. These investors would be the former owners of properties that we acquired from them in exchange for interests in such entities.
We intend to comply with all of the corporate responsibility and disclosure rules related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
Benefits of the UPREIT Structure
The benefits of our REIT status and UPREIT structure include the following:
• | Access to capital. We believe our structure will provide us with access to capital for refinancing and growth. Sources of capital include the common stock sold in this offering and possible future issuances of debt or equity through public offerings or private placements. Our anticipated financial strength should enable us to obtain financing at advantageous rates and on acceptable terms. |
• | Growth. Our structure will allow stockholders through their ownership of common stock and the limited partners through their ownership of limited partnership units, an opportunity to participate in the growth of the real estate market through an ongoing business enterprise. In addition to the portfolio of initial real properties, we give stockholders an interest in all future investments in additional properties. |
• | Tax Deferral. The UPREIT structure will provide property owners who transfer their real properties to the operating partnership in exchange for limited partnership units the opportunity to defer the tax |
89
consequences that would arise from a sale of their real properties and other assets to us or to a third party. This will allow us to acquire assets without using as much of our cash and may allow us to acquire assets that the owner would otherwise be unwilling to sell because of tax considerations. |
Affiliates
Throughout this prospectus, we use the term “affiliate.” For purposes of this prospectus, an “affiliate” of any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, trust, limited liability or other legal entity (a “person”) includes any of the following:
(a) | any person directly or indirectly owning, controlling or holding, with power to vote 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of such other person; |
(b) | any person 10% or more of whose outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly owned, controlled, or held, with power to vote, by such other person; |
(c) | any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such other person; |
(d) | any executive officer, director, trustee or general partner of such other person; and |
(e) | any legal entity for which such person acts as an executive officer, director, trustee or general partner. |
COMPETITION
The retail, lodging, office, industrial and residential real estate markets are highly competitive. We compete in all of our markets with other owners and operators of retail, lodging, office, industrial and residential real estate. The continued development of new retail, lodging, office, industrial and residential properties has intensified the competition among owners and operators of these types of real estate in many market areas in which we intend to operate. We compete based on a number of factors that include location, rental rates, security, suitability of the property’s design to prospective tenants’ needs and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. The number of competing properties in a particular market could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on the operating expenses of certain of our properties.
In addition, we compete with other entities engaged in real estate investment activities to locate suitable properties to acquire and to locate tenants and purchasers for our properties. These competitors include other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, governmental bodies and other entities. There are also other REITs with asset acquisition objectives similar to ours and others may be organized in the future. Some of these competitors, including larger REITs, have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than we will have and generally may be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of tenants. In addition, these same entities seek financing through similar channels to our company. Therefore, we will compete for institutional investors in a market where funds for real estate investment may decrease.
Competition from these and other third party real estate investors may limit the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us. It may also result in higher prices, lower yields and a narrower spread of yields over our borrowing costs, making it more difficult for us to acquire new investments on attractive terms. In addition, competition for desirable investments could delay the investment of proceeds from this offering in desirable assets, which may in turn reduce our earnings per share and negatively affect our ability to commence or maintain distributions to stockholders.
We believe that our senior management’s experience, coupled with our financing, professionalism, diversity of properties and reputation in the industry will enable us to compete with the other real estate investment companies.
Because we are organized as an UPREIT, we are well-positioned within the industries in which we intend to operate to offer existing owners the opportunity to contribute those properties to our company in tax-deferred transactions using our operating partnership units as transactional currency. As a result, we have a
90
competitive advantage over most of our competitors that are structured as traditional REITs and non-REITs in pursuing acquisitions with tax-sensitive sellers.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
General
Our primary objective is to achieve capital appreciation with a secondary objective of income without subjecting principal to undue risk. We intend to achieve this goal primarily through investments in real estate properties.
We intend to acquire residential and commercial properties. Our acquisitions may include both portfolios and individual properties. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes.
Unlike other REITs, which typically specialize in one sector of the real estate market, we intend to invest in both residential and commercial properties to provide a more general risk profile and take advantage of our sponsor’s expertise in acquiring larger properties and portfolios of both residential and commercial properties.
The following is descriptive of our investment objectives and policies:
• | Reflecting aflexible operating style, our portfolio is likely to be diverse and include properties of different types (such as retail, office, industrial and residential properties); both passive and active investments; and joint venture transactions. The portfolio is likely to be determined largely by the purchase opportunities that the market offers, whether on an upward or downward trend. This is in contrast to those funds that are more likely to hold investments of a single type, usually as outlined in their charters. |
• | We may invest in properties that are not sold through conventional marketing and auction processes. Our investments may be at a dollar cost level lower than levels that attract those funds that hold investments of a single type. |
• | We may be more likely to make investments that are in need of rehabilitation, redirection, remarketing and/or additional capital investment. |
• | We may place major emphasis on abargain element in our purchases, and often on the individual circumstances and motivations of the sellers. We will search for bargains that become available due to circumstances that occur when real estate cannot support the mortgages securing the property. |
• | We intend to pursue returns in excess of the returns targeted by real estate investors who target a single type of property investment. |
We cannot assure you that we will attain these objectives.
Diversification
We will attempt to be diversified by property type. We may invest in retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), office, industrial and residential properties. The actual allocation to each property type is not predetermined and will ultimately depend on the relative attractiveness of the investments reviewed by our advisor and meeting our investment criteria and by the funds available to us to invest.
Sources of Investment Opportunities
We expect to originate transactions from real estate industry sources with whom our sponsor has built relationships over a number of years.
In addition, some of our purchases will be from domestic banks, insurance companies and other regulated financial institutions, which may come into possession of real property as the result of foreclosures or surrenders.
Set forth below are summary descriptions of the investments that we expect to make.
91
Real Estate Investments
We may make equity investments in real estate; such investments will be made through the purchase of all or part of a fee simple ownership or a more limited form of ownership, or all or part of a leasehold interest. Investment in an equity interest will give us a right to part or all of the cash flow and capital appreciation generated by the property after satisfaction of liens on the property. Liens usually include the payment of principal and interest on mortgage loans, real estate taxes and other assessments. We may also purchase limited partnership interests, limited liability company interests and other equity securities.
We will invest in real estate that our advisor believes is available for less than its estimated worth. During the period we hold real estate, we may develop or redevelop the property, make tenant improvements or make certain onsite and offsite improvements. We may be required to maintain the property, pay property taxes and carry insurance on the property. We may elect to finance or refinance some of our real estate holdings by borrowing against them on a nonrecourse basis. We intend to acquire both portfolios and individual properties on a geographically diverse basis.
Building classifications in most markets refer to Class “A”, “B”, “C” and sometimes “D” properties. Class “A”, “AA” and “AAA” properties are typically newer buildings with superior construction and finish in excellent locations with easy access, are attractive to creditworthy tenants and offer valuable amenities such as on-site management or covered parking. These buildings command the highest rental rates in their market. As the classification of a building decreases (e.g. Class “A” to Class “B”), one building attribute or another becomes less desirable. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes.
Asset Repositionings. We will attempt to identify and execute value-creation plans through a program of aggressive asset management. We will focus on opportunities characterized by properties that are under-performing relative to comparable assets due to inadequate management or unresolved conflicts among existing owners, lenders, tenants and managers. These situations often offer attractive risk-adjusted returns through recapitalization and the subsequent redevelopment or repositioning of the underlying real estate.
Money Market Investments
Pending the purchase of other permitted investments, or to provide the reserve described below, we will temporarily invest in one or more unaffiliated money market mutual funds or directly in certificates of deposit, commercial paper, interest-bearing government securities and other short-term instruments.
Reserve and Cash and Cash Equivalents
Reserves
A portion of the proceeds of this offering will be reserved to meet working capital needs and contingencies associated with our operations. We will initially allocate not less than 0.5% of the proceeds of the offering to our working capital reserve to provide for our anticipated obligations, including the payment of property taxes, insurance, improvements and maintenance costs associated with real estate held by us, the exercise of warrants and the payment of our other expenses. In addition, we may hold cash in reserve in order to maintain liquidity to take advantage of investment opportunities. If reserves and any other available income become insufficient to cover our operating expenses and liabilities, it may be necessary to obtain additional funds by borrowing, refinancing properties or liquidating our investment in one or more properties.
We cannot assure you that we will attain any of our objectives. If we have not facilitated liquidity in our shares either through listing them for trading on a national stock exchange, including them for quotation on a stock exchange or on Nasdaq or providing liquidity by some other means, generally within seven to ten years after the net proceeds of this offering are fully invested, we will start selling our properties and other assets, either on a portfolio basis or individually, or engage in another transaction approved by the board of directors, market conditions permitting, unless the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) determine that, in light of our expected life at any given time, it is in the best interest of the stockholders to reinvest proceeds from property sales or refinancings.
92
In making the decision to apply for listing of the shares or providing other forms of liquidity, the board of directors will try to determine whether listing the shares or liquidating will result in greater value for the stockholders. It cannot be determined at this time the circumstances, if any, under which the directors will agree to list the shares.
Even if liquidity has not been facilitated, we are under no obligation to liquidate our portfolio within this period since the precise timing will depend on real estate and financial markets, economic conditions of the areas in which the properties are located and federal income tax effects on stockholders which may prevail in the future. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to liquidate our portfolio and it should be noted that we will continue in existence until all properties are sold and our other assets are liquidated. Alternatively, as discussed above, we may merge with, or otherwise be acquired by, our sponsor or its affiliates. The independent directors shall review our investment policies at least annually, and with sufficient frequency to determine that such policies are in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our strategies for accomplishing these objectives are set forth below.
Acquisition Strategy
We intend to acquire residential and commercial properties. Our acquisitions may include both portfolios and individual properties. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes. Building classifications in most markets refer to Class “A”, “B”, “C” and sometimes “D” properties. Class “A”, “AA” and “AAA” properties are typically newer buildings with superior construction and finish in excellent locations with easy access, are attractive to creditworthy tenants and offer valuable amenities such as on-site management or covered parking. These buildings command the highest rental rates in their market. As the classification of a building decreases (e.g., Class “A” to Class “B”), one building attribute or another becomes less desirable.
We expect that we will acquire the following types of real estate interests:
• | Fee interests in market-rate, middle market multifamily properties at a discount to replacement cost located either in emerging markets or near major metropolitan areas. We will attempt to identify those sub-markets with job growth opportunities and demand demographics which support potential long-term value appreciation for multifamily properties. |
• | Fee interests in well-located, multi-tenanted, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers and malls located in highly trafficked retail corridors, in selected high-barrier to entry markets and sub-markets. We will attempt to identify those sub-markets with constraints on the amount of additional property supply will make future competition less likely. |
• | Fee interests in improved, multi-tenanted, industrial properties located near major transportation arteries and distribution corridors with limited management responsibilities. |
• | Fee interests in improved, multi-tenanted, office properties located near major transportation arteries with limited management responsibilities. |
• | Fee interests in lodging properties located near major transportation arteries in urban and suburban areas. |
Financing Strategy
We intend to utilize leverage to acquire our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in any single property or on the amount we can borrow for the purchase of any property.
We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or
93
less. By operating on a leveraged basis, we will have more funds available for investment in properties. This will allow us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. Although our liability for the repayment of indebtedness is expected to be limited to the value of the property securing the liability and the rents or profits derived therefrom, our use of leveraging increases the risk of default on the mortgage payments and a resulting foreclosure of a particular property. To the extent that we do not obtain mortgage loans on our properties, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted. We will endeavor to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available.
Lenders may have recourse to assets not securing the repayment of the indebtedness. Our sponsor may refinance properties during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and/or an increase in property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
Operations
Our property manager will manage and lease substantially all of the properties that we acquire with the existing management and leasing staff of its affiliates and where appropriate it may acquire and incorporate the existing management and leasing staffs of the portfolio properties we acquire.
Although we are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations, we intend to invest in properties located near our sponsor’s existing operations to achieve economies of scale where possible. Our sponsor currently maintains operations throughout the United States (Hawaii, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming excluded), the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. The number and mix of properties we acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering. We will consider relevant real estate property and financial factors, including the location of the property, its income-producing capacity, its suitability for any future development the prospects for long-range appreciation, its liquidity and income tax considerations. In this regard, our obligation to close the purchase of any investment will generally be conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
• | leases, licenses and temporary tenants; |
• | plans and specifications; |
• | occupancy history; |
• | sales reports; |
• | zoning analyses and future development potential; |
• | traffic flow, car count and parking studies; |
• | trends in area; |
• | tenant mix; |
• | environmental and engineering reports; |
• | projections, surveys and appraisals; |
• | evidence of marketable title subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to our advisor; |
• | audited financial statements covering recent operations of properties having operating histories unless such statements are not required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to our stockholders; and |
• | title and liability insurance policies. |
94
We will not close the acquisition of any property unless and until we obtain an environmental assessment (generally a minimum of a Phase I review) for each property acquired and are generally satisfied with the environmental status of the property. In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may, in accordance with customary practices, obtain an option on such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, is normally surrendered if the property is not purchased and is normally credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased. In acquiring, leasing and developing real estate properties, we will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
• | changes in general economic or local conditions; |
• | changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area; |
• | bankruptcies, financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants; |
• | changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds which may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive; |
• | changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; |
• | changes in the cost or availability of insurance, particularly after terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001; |
• | periods of high interest rates and tight money supply; |
• | tenant turnover; and |
• | general overbuilding or excess supply in the market area. |
Distributions
Federal income tax law requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding any net capital gains), although the board of directors, in its discretion, may increase that percentage as it deems appropriate. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation — Annual Distribution Requirements.” For a discussion of the tax treatment of distributions to you, see “Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
Distributions will be at the discretion of the board of directors and depends upon our distributable funds, current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations and other factors. Our ability to pay distributions and the size of these distributions will depend upon a variety of factors. For example, our borrowing policy permits us to incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less, and we may have to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. We cannot assure that distributions will continue to be made or that we will maintain any particular level of distributions that we may establish.
We intend to make regular distributions to stockholders. Distributions will be made to those stockholders who are stockholders as of the record date selected by the directors. The board of directors currently intends to declare distributions on a quarterly basis using the last day of the quarter as the record date. In order for an investor to receive a distribution, they must be a stockholder of record as of the record date. Therefore, newly admitted investors, or investors redeeming or transferring shares, will not receive a distribution for a record date that they are not considered a stockholder of record. It is the intent of the board of directors to declare and pay distributions quarterly during the offering period and thereafter. However, the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may determine to declare and pay distributions on another basis.. Distributions to stockholders began in April 2006 after the first release of funds from escrow. The interest, if any, earned on subscription proceeds before our first closing was distributed to each subscriber after being admitted as a stockholder. After the initial admission of stockholders in connection with the sale of the minimum offering, interest payments to subscribers was concluded.
Generally, income distributed will not be taxable to us under federal income tax laws if we comply with the provisions relating to electing taxation as a REIT. As we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income (excluding any net capital gains) to maintain our objective of being taxed as a REIT, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. If the cash
95
available to us is insufficient to pay such distributions, we may obtain the necessary funds by borrowing or selling assets. These methods of obtaining funds could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs. To the extent that distributions to stockholders exceed earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes, although such distributions might not reduce stockholders’ aggregate invested capital. Distributions in kind will not be permitted, except for distributions of readily marketable securities; distributions of beneficial interests in a liquidating trust established for our dissolution and the liquidation of our assets in accordance with the terms of the charter; or distributions of in-kind property, as long as, with respect to in-kind property, the board of directors advises each stockholder of the risks associated with direct ownership of the property; offers each stockholder the election of receiving in-kind property distributions; and distributes in-kind property only to those stockholders who accept the directors’ offer.
Distributions will be made at the discretion of the directors, depending primarily on net cash from operations (which includes cash received from tenants, distributions from joint ventures, and interest income from borrowers under loans, less expenses paid) and our general financial condition, subject to the obligation of the directors to cause us to qualify and remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We intend to increase distributions in accordance with increases in net cash from operations, if any.
Property Acquisition Standards
We generally intend to acquire properties located near our sponsor’s existing operations (as set forth under “Investment Objectives and Policies — Operations” above) in order to achieve economies of scale where possible. We intend to analyze relevant demographic, economic and financial data. Specifically, we will consider the following factors, among others, in the process of evaluating and performing due diligence on a piece of real property:
• | geographic location and type; |
• | barriers to entry which would limit competition; |
• | quality of tenants or customer base; |
• | construction quality, condition and design; |
• | current and projected cash flow and the ability to increase cash flow; |
• | occupancy levels at the property and stability; |
• | potential for capital appreciation; |
• | lease rent roll, including the potential for rent or rate increases; |
• | potential for economic growth in the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is located; |
• | potential for expanding the physical layout of the property and/or the number of sites; |
• | occupancy and demand by tenants or guests for properties of a similar type in the same geographic vicinity (the overall market and submarket); |
• | prospects for liquidity through sale, financing or refinancing of the property; and |
• | treatment under applicable federal, state and local tax and other laws and regulations. |
Before purchasing a property, we will examine and evaluate the potential value of the site, the financial condition and business history of the property, the demographics of the area in which the property is located or to be located, the proposed purchase price, geographic and market diversification and potential sales.
96
Description of Leases
Commercial Leases
The terms and conditions of any lease we enter into with our commercial tenants may vary substantially from those we describe in this prospectus. However, we expect that some of our industrial leases may be economically what are generally referred to as “triple-net” leases. A “triple-net” lease typically provides that, in addition to making its lease payments, the tenant will be required to pay or reimburse us for all real estate taxes, sales and use taxes, special assessments, maintenance, utilities, insurance and building repairs, and other building operation and management costs. As landlord, we will probably have responsibility for certain capital repairs or replacement of specific structural components of a property such as the roof of the building, the truck court and parking areas, as well as the interior floor or slab of the building.
We intend to include provisions in our commercial leases that increase the amount of base rent payable at various points during the lease term. In addition, we intend for our commercial leases to provide for the payment of additional rent calculated as a percentage of a tenant’s gross sales above predetermined thresholds in most leases. We expect that the leases with retail anchor tenants will generally have initial terms of 10 to 25 years, with one or more renewal options available to the tenant. By contrast, smaller commercial leases will typically have three- to ten-year terms.
Residential Leases
We expect that the majority of the leases at residential properties that we may acquire will be for a term of one or two years, which may enable us to seek increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or commencement of new leases. Such short-term leases generally minimize the risk to us of the adverse effects of inflation, although as a general rule these leases permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty.
Property Acquisition Structure
We anticipate acquiring fee interests in properties, although other methods of acquiring a property may be utilized if we deem it to be advantageous. For example, we may acquire properties through a joint venture or the acquisition of substantially all of the interests of an entity which in turn owns the real property. We may also use separate entities to acquire a property. Such entities will be formed solely for the purpose of acquiring a property or properties. See “— Acquisition Strategy” and “— Joint Ventures” in this section and “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation — Ownership of a Partnership Interest” and “— Ownership of a Qualified REIT Subsidiary.”
We may finance our property acquisitions through a variety of means, including but not limited to individual non-recourse mortgages and through the exchange of an interest in the property for limited partnership units of our operating partnership, Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP.
While our charter permits us to purchase property from affiliates in certain circumstances, we have determined not to acquire any properties from our advisor and its affiliates.
Borrowing
We plan to use leverage in the form of borrowings secured by our properties. The aggregate amount of long-term permanent borrowings secured by all of our properties will not exceed 75% of their combined fair market value in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level is appropriate, the approval of our board of directors and disclosure to stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less. In addition, our charter provides that the aggregate amount of borrowing, both secured and unsecured, may not exceed 300% of net assets in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level is appropriate, the approval of our board of directors and disclosure to stockholders. Net assets means our total assets, other than intangibles, at cost before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves less our total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly on a basis consistently applied. Any excess in borrowing over such 300% of net assets level must be approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report to stockholders, along with justification for such excess. In addition, our charter prohibits us from making or investing in mortgage loans, including construction loans, on
97
any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loans, would exceed 85% of the property’s appraised value, unless substantial justification exists and the loans would not exceed the property’s appraised value. The proceeds from such borrowings will generally be used to acquire additional properties or to finance improvements to existing properties.
Borrowings may consist of single-property mortgages as well as mortgages cross-collateralized by a pool of properties. Such mortgages may be put in place either at the time we acquire a property or subsequent to our purchasing a property for cash. In addition, we may acquire properties that are subject to existing indebtedness where we choose to assume the existing mortgages. Generally, though not exclusively, we intend to seek to encumber our properties with debt which will be on a non-recourse basis. This means that a lender’s rights on default will generally be limited to foreclosing on the property. However, we may, at our discretion, secure recourse financing or provide a guarantee to lenders if we believe this may result in more favorable terms. When we give a guaranty for a property owning entity, we will be responsible to the lender for the satisfaction of the indebtedness if it is not paid by the property owning entity. We also intend to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year. Accordingly, we expect that some of the mortgages on our property will provide for fixed interest rates. However, we expect that most of the mortgages on our properties will provide for a so-called “balloon” payment and that certain of our mortgages will provide for variable interest rates. Any mortgages secured by a property will comply with the restrictions set forth by the Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California.
We may also obtain lines of credit to be used to acquire properties. These lines of credit will be at prevailing market terms and will be repaid from offering proceeds, proceeds from the sale or refinancing of properties, working capital or permanent financing. Our sponsor or its affiliates may guarantee the lines of credit although they will not be obligated to do so. We may draw upon the lines of credit to acquire properties pending our receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering.
Sale or Disposition of Properties
Our board of directors will determine whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of after considering the relevant factors, including performance or projected performance of the property and market conditions, with a view toward achieving our principal investment objectives.
We currently intend to hold our properties for a minimum of seven to ten years prior to selling them. After seven to ten years, our board of directors may decide to liquidate us, list our shares on a national stock exchange or include them for quotation on a national market system (in each case if we meet the applicable listing requirements), sell our properties individually or merge or otherwise consolidate us with a publicly-traded REIT. Alternatively, as discussed above, we may merge with, or otherwise be acquired by, our sponsor or its affiliates. We may, however, sell properties prior to such time and if so, we may invest the proceeds from any sale, financing, refinancing or other disposition of our properties into additional properties. Alternatively, we may use these proceeds to fund maintenance or repair of existing properties or to increase reserves for such purposes. We may choose to reinvest the proceeds from the sale, financing and refinancing of our properties to increase our real estate assets and our net income. Notwithstanding this policy, the board of directors, in its discretion, may distribute all or part of the proceeds from the sale, financing, refinancing or other disposition of all or any of our properties to our stockholders. In determining whether to distribute these proceeds to stockholders, the board of directors will consider, among other factors, the desirability of properties available for purchase, real estate market conditions, the likelihood of the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange or including the shares for quotation on a national market system and compliance with the applicable requirements under federal income tax laws.
When we sell a property, we intend to obtain an all-cash sale price. However, we may take a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage on the property as partial payment, and there are no limitations or restrictions on our ability to take such purchase money obligations. The terms of payment to us will be affected by custom in the area in which the property being sold is located and the then prevailing economic conditions. If we receive notes and other property instead of cash from sales, these proceeds, other than any interest payable on these proceeds, will not be available for distributions until and to the extent the notes or other property are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed. Therefore, the distribution of the
98
proceeds of a sale to the stockholders may be delayed until that time. In these cases, we will receive payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
Loans
Our loan policies are subject to the restrictions contained in our charter and bylaws.
We will not make loans to persons or entities other than our subsidiaries, to which we will make capital contributions and may make loans as a means of providing those entities with sufficient capital to acquire single assets. For a description of the single-purpose entities that we intend to maintain as subsidiaries for the purpose of operating the properties that we purchase, see “How We Operate.”
Change in Investment Objectives and Policies
Our stockholders have no voting rights to implement our investment objectives and policies. Our board of directors has the responsibility for our investment objectives and policies. Our board of directors may not, however, make any material changes regarding the restrictions on investments set forth in our charter without amending the charter. Any such amendment to our charter requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock. See “Summary of the Organizational Documents — Restrictions on Investments.”
Investment Limitations
We will not:
• | invest more than 10% of our total assets in unimproved real property (and will only invest in unimproved real property intended to be developed) or in mortgage loans on unimproved real property; |
• | invest in commodities or commodity future contracts; |
• | issue redeemable shares of common stock; |
• | invest in or make mortgage loans unless an appraisal of an independent expert is obtained concerning the underlying property, except where the loan is insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency; |
• | issue shares on a deferred payment basis or other similar arrangement; |
• | operate in such a manner as to be classified as an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act. See “Summary of the Organizational Documents — Restrictions on Investments” for additional investment limitations; or |
• | issue debt securities unless the historical debt service coverage in the most recently completed fiscal year, as adjusted for known charges, is sufficient to properly service that higher level of debt. |
We do not engage in hedging or similar activities for speculative purposes.
We have no plans to invest any proceeds from this offering, or other funds, in the securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control over such other issuers. We do not intend to engage in the purchase and sale (or turnover) of properties.
We intend to invest in a manner so that we are not considered an “investment company” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940. See “Regulatory Aspects of Our Investment Strategy.”
Appraisals
To the extent we invest in properties, a majority of the directors will approve the consideration paid for such properties based on the fair market value of the properties. If a majority of independent directors so determines, or if an asset is acquired from our advisor, one or more of our directors, our sponsor or any of their affiliates, the fair market value will be determined by a qualified independent real estate appraiser selected by the independent directors. In addition, the advisor may purchase on our account, without the prior approval of the board of directors, properties whose purchase price is less than $15,000,000, if the following conditions are satisfied:
99
• | The investment in the property would not, if consummated, violate our investment guidelines; |
• | The investment in the property would not, if consummated, violate any restrictions on indebtedness; and |
• | The consideration to be paid for such properties does not exceed the fair market value of such properties, as determined by a qualified independent real estate appraiser selected by the advisor and acceptable to the independent directors. |
Appraisals are estimates of value and should not be relied on as measures of true worth or realizable value. We will maintain the appraisal in our records for at least five years, and copies of each appraisal will be available for review by stockholders upon their request.
Return of Uninvested Proceeds
Any of the proceeds of this offering allocable to investments in real property which are not invested in real property or committed for investment prior to 24 months from the termination of the offering will be distributed to the stockholders without interest. All funds we receive from the offering of our common stock will be available for our general use from the time we receive them until expiration of the period discussed in the prior sentence. In addition to using these funds for investments in real property, we may use these funds to:
• | fund expenses incurred to operate the properties which have been acquired; |
• | reimburse the advisor for our expenses, to the extent allowable under the advisory agreement; |
• | pay the advisor its compensation under the advisory agreement; and |
• | pay the property manager its property management fee under the management agreement. |
See “Estimated Use of Proceeds.” We will not segregate these funds separate from our other funds pending investment.
Liquidation, Listing, Sale of Properties or Merger
We anticipate that within seven to ten years after the net proceeds of this offering are fully invested, our board of directors will determine whether to:
• | apply to have our shares of common stock listed for trading on a national securities exchange or included for quotation on a national market system, provided we meet the then applicable listing requirements; |
• | sell our assets individually or otherwise; |
• | list our shares of common stock at a future date; |
• | commence the liquidation of our assets by a specified date; or |
• | merge or otherwise consolidate us with a publicly traded REIT. |
Many REITs that are listed on a national stock exchange or included for quotation on a national market system are considered “self-administered,” since the employees of such a REIT perform all significant management functions. In contrast, REITs that are not self-administered, like us, typically engage a third party, such as our advisor and property manager, to perform management functions on its behalf. If for any reason our independent directors determine that we should become self-administered, the advisory agreement and the property management agreement each permit us to acquire the business conducted by the advisor and the property manager (including all of its assets). See “Conflicts of Interest.”
If our shares of common stock are listed for trading on a national securities exchange or included for quotation on a national market system, we will acquire our advisor and property manager in exchange for our shares and become self-administered. As the parent of our advisor and thus the recipient of such sales proceeds, our sponsor has an incentive to direct the advisor to effect such listing or quotation. See “Management — Our Advisory Agreement — Potential Acquisition of Advisor and Property Manager.”
100
Alternatively, if we have not facilitated liquidity in our shares within seven to ten years after the net proceeds of this offering are fully invested, we may merge with, or otherwise be acquired by, our sponsor or its affiliates. We expect that in connection with such merger or acquisition transaction, our stockholders would receive cash or shares of a publicly traded company. The terms of such transaction must be approved by a special committee of our board of directors which will consist of our independent directors. Such merger or acquisition transaction would also require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock. To assist with this process, the special committee will retain a recognized financial advisor or institution providing valuation services serve as its financial advisor. The financial advisor will be required to render an opinion to the special committee with respect to the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of the consideration to be paid in the merger or acquisition transaction.
Joint Ventures and Preferred Equity Investments
We may enter into joint ventures in the future with affiliated entities for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties for the purpose of diversifying our portfolio of assets. We may also enter into joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of developing, owning and operating real properties (“preferred equity investments”). In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, we will evaluate the real property which such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this prospectus for the selection of our real estate property investments. We will not enter into a joint venture to make an investment that we would not be permitted to make on our own. In connection with such a joint investment, both we and our affiliates would be required to approve any material decisions concerning the investment, including refinancing and capital improvements. We may enter into joint ventures with our affiliates for the acquisition of properties, but we may only do so provided that:
• | a majority of our directors, including a majority of the independent directors, approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us; and |
• | the investment by us and the investment by our affiliate are on substantially the same terms and conditions. |
We expect to participate in preferred equity investments by acquiring limited partnership interests in partnerships or limited liability companies owning properties that are consistent with our investment objectives. The general partner or managing member of each such entity will generally be the developer of the property or an affiliate of the developer. Each such entity will be governed by a limited partnership agreement or, as applicable, an operating agreement, the terms of which will be negotiated between us and the general partner. Since the terms of these agreements have been or will be negotiated separately with each respective general partner it is not possible at this time to describe these agreements.
Other Policies
Before we purchase a particular property, we may obtain an option to purchase the property. The amount paid for the option, if any, usually would be surrendered if the property was not purchased and normally would be credited against the purchase price if the property was purchased. See “Real Property Investments — General” for a detailed description of the types of properties we may invest in.
We intend to hold substantially all funds, pending our investment in real estate, in assets which will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. These investments will be highly liquid and provide for appropriate safety of principal, such as cash, cash items and government securities. Cash items include cash on hand, cash deposited in time and demand accounts with financial institutions, receivables which arise in our ordinary course of operation, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Generally, government securities are any securities issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the United States federal government. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation — REIT Qualification Tests.”
We will not make distributions-in-kind, except for:
• | distributions of readily marketable securities; |
• | distributions of beneficial interests in a liquidating trust established for our dissolution and the liquidation of our assets in accordance with the terms of our charter; or |
101
• | distributions of in-kind property which meet all of the following conditions: |
• | our board of directors advises each stockholder of the risks associated with direct ownership of the in-kind property; and |
• | our board of directors offers each stockholder the election of receiving in-kind property distributions and we distribute in-kind property only to those stockholders who accept the directors’ offer. |
Although our charter and bylaws do not prohibit the following, we have no current plans to:
• | underwrite the securities of other issuers; |
• | invest in real estate mortgages; or |
• | invest the proceeds of the offering, other than on a temporary basis, in non-real estate related investments. |
We may change our current plans, without stockholder approval, if our board of directors determines that it would be in the best interests of our stockholders to engage in any such transactions.
Although we are authorized to issue senior securities, we have no current plans to do so. See “Description of Securities — Preferred Stock,” “Issuance of Additional Securities and Debt Instruments,” and “Restrictions on Issuance of Securities.”
Regulatory Aspects of Our Investment Strategy
We do not believe that we or our operating partnership will be considered an “investment company” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 because we do not intend to engage in the types of business that characterize an investment company under that law. Investments in real estate will represent the substantial majority of our business, which would not subject us to investment company status. We intend to invest only in fee or leasehold interests in real estate. Fee interests in real estate are considered “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act and leasehold interests in real estate may be considered “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. We do not intend to invest in mezzanine loans, subordinate interests in whole loans (B Notes), distressed debt, preferred equity or multi-class (first loss) mortgage-back securities. Investments in such assets may not be deemed “qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act and, as a result, any such investments may have to be limited.
If we fail to maintain an exemption or exclusion from registration as an investment company, we could, among other things, be required either (a) to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company, or (b) to register as an investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common stock. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters.
We intend to monitor our compliance with the exemptions under the Investment Company Act on an ongoing basis.
102
REAL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS
General
We intend to acquire a portfolio of residential and commercial properties, principally in the continental United States. We expect that our commercial holdings will consist of retail (primarily multi-tenanted shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties will be principally comprised of “Class B” multi-family complexes. For a definition of “Class B” properties, see “Investment Objectives and Policies — Real Estate Investments.” We do not intend to invest in:
• | single family residential properties; |
• | leisure home sites; |
• | farms; |
• | ranches; |
• | timberlands; |
• | unimproved properties not intended to be developed; or |
• | mining properties. |
See “Investment Objectives and Policies” generally pertaining to our policies relating to the maintenance, operation and disposition of our properties.
As indicated under “Real Property Investments”, we have invested in lodging facilities (primarily extended stay hotels and intend to invest in lodging facilities in the future). Our initial prospectus, dated May 23, 2005, indicated that we did not intend to invest in hotels or motels but subsequent events caused the board of directors to change our investment objectives and policies to include the possibility of investing in lodging facilities. The reasons for such change included the expertise of our sponsor who acquired Extended Stay Hotels and its management team which owns and operates 687 extended stay hotels. The ability to draw upon their expertise, the intense competition in the real estate market for all types of assets and the ability to better diversify the REIT’s portfolio, caused our board of directors to review our investment objectives and expand them to include lodging facilities.
Specified Investments
Florida Factory Outlet Mall
On November 30, 2005, Prime Outlets Acquisition Company LLC (“Prime”) entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Belz Agreement”) with St. Augustine Outlet World, Ltd. (“Seller”), an unaffiliated third party, to purchase the Belz Outlets at St. Augustine, Florida. On March 31, 2006, Prime assigned the purchaser’s interest in the Belz Agreement to LVP St. Augustine Outlets LLC (“Owner”), a single purpose, wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership.
Owner acquired the Belz Outlet mall pursuant to the Belz Agreement on March 31, 2006. Owner’s total acquisition price, including acquisition-related transaction costs, was $26,921,450. In connection with the transaction, our advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or $715,000.
Approximately $22.4 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a mortgage loan from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”) and approximately $4.5 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock. Loan proceeds from Wachovia were also used to fund approximately $4.8 million of escrows for future leasing-related expenditures, real estate taxes, insurance and debt service. Owner currently holds a fee simple interest in the Belz Outlet mall, subject to the encumbrances described below.
In connection with the acquisition, Owner secured a mortgage loan from Wachovia in the principal amount of $27,250,000. The loan has a 30 year amortization period, matures in 10 years, bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.09% per annum and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months, and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of its stated term. The loan will
103
mature on April 11, 2016, at which time a balance of approximately $23,427,000 will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. The loan will be secured by the Belz Outlet mall and will be non-recourse to the REIT and the operating partnership.
In connection with the mortgage loan on the Belz Outlet mall, Lightstone Holdings, LLC (“Guarantor”), a limited liability company that is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, has guaranteed payment of losses that Wachovia may sustain as a result of fraud, misappropriation, misuse of loan proceeds or other acts of misconduct by Owner and/or its principals or affiliates. Such losses are recourse to Guarantor under the guaranty regardless of whether Wachovia has attempted to procure payment from Owner or any other party. Further, in the event of Owner’s bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency, or the interference by Owner or its affiliates in any foreclosure proceedings or other remedy exercised by Wachovia, Guarantor has guaranteed the payment of any unpaid loan amounts. We have agreed, to the maximum extent permitted by our Charter, to indemnify Guarantor for any liability that it incurs under this guaranty.
The Belz Outlet mall is a factory outlet mall located off Interstate 95 in St. Augustine, Florida, which is 20 miles south of Jacksonville. Built in 1998, the Belz Outlet mall has 255,758 square feet of retail space. The Belz Outlet mall is leased to retail stores with the occupancy percentage set forth below. No single tenant occupies in excess of 10% of the Belz Outlet mall’s rentable square footage.
The percentage occupancy rate of the Belz Outlet mall was 77% on the date of its acquisition and the average effective annual rental per square foot was $22.48 at that time. Information relating to the Belz Outlet mall’s percentage occupancy rate and average effective annual rental per square foot for each of the last five years is unavailable, as Seller has been uncooperative and refused to provide Owner with the data that it needs to disclose such information. As of September 30, 2007, the percentage occupancy rate of the Belz Outlet mall was 93.3%, consisting of 60.3% permanent leases and 33% temporary leases and the property had an average effective annual rental rate of $10.50 per square foot, excluding temporary leasing.
The following was a 10-year schedule of lease expirations and related information prepared as of the acquisition date of the Belz Outlet mall:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Year | Number of Expiring Leases | Total Square Feet | Aggregate Annual Rental | Percentage of Gross Annual Rental | ||||||||||||
2008 | 6 | 36,334 | $ | 590,399.00 | 26.0 | % | ||||||||||
2009 | 14 | 47,857 | 898,234.00 | 39.5 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 8 | 27,963 | 379,953.00 | 16.7 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 4 | 12,479 | 294,093.00 | 12.9 | % | |||||||||||
2012 | 1 | 4,234 | 94,842.00 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 2 | 5,427 | 14,652.00 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||
Total | 35 | 134,294 | $ | 2,272,173.00 | 100.0 | % |
Realty taxes paid on the Property for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 were $598,855. The Belz Outlet mall was subject to a tax rate of 16.1951%.
The opening of a competing property across the street resulted in a majority of the major tenants leaving the Belz Outlet mall before its sale. The loss of these tenants directly impacted the level of rents that could be commanded from new tenants and left the property in a non-representative state of occupancy. Therefore, the appreciation potential of the Belz Outlet mall, rather than current rental or occupancy rates, was the primary factor that we considered when assessing the Belz Outlet mall for acquisition.
General competitive conditions affecting the Belz Outlet mall include those identified in the section of our prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Our property manager has executed a management agreement with Prime Retail Property Management, LLC, a limited liability company wholly owned by an affiliate of our advisor. The Belz Outlet mall is now operated as a Prime Outlets property. We believe that the Belz Outlet mall is adequately insured.
104
To the extent that a subsidiary of the operating partnership acquires properties for cash, the initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by the operating partnership. The operating partnership plans to depreciate each such depreciable property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 39 years.
On October 2, 2007, the REIT closed on the acquisition of an 8.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land for $2.75 million, for further development of the adjacent Belz Outlet mall. Development rights to the land parcel were purchased at an additional cost of $1.3 million. We currently expect to complete the planned expansion of the center, of approximately 62,000 square feet, and renovation the interior and exterior of the existing space, approximately 250,000 square feet, during the third quarter of 2008. The cost for the renovation and expansion of the outlet mall is expected to approximate $28 million. Numerous established retail brands have expressed interest in establishing a presence in the expanded and renovated outlet mall.
Although the REIT expects to fund the cost of the project from retained cash flow from operations or third party debt in the public or private capital markets, there can be no assurance that the REIT will be successful in obtaining the required amount of equity capital or debt financing for the planned project or that the terms of such capital raising activities will be as favorable as those experienced in prior periods. If adequate financing for the renovation and expansion is not available, the REIT may not be able to renovate and expand the center.
Michigan Apartment Communities
The following table provides information as of June 22, 2006 regarding four properties that we purchased from an unaffiliated third party (the Properties”).
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade Name of Property | Location of Property | Number of Apartment Units | Monthly Rents at Closing(1) | Purchase Price(2) | Permanent Mortgage | Mortgage Interest Rate | Property Management Agent(3) | Annual Property Management Fee(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carriage Hill Apartments | Dearborn Heights, Michigan | 168 | $ | 120,182 | $ | 7,852,723 | $ | 7,050,000 | 5.96 % | Beacon Property Management | 4.0 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carriage Park Apartments | Dearborn Heights, Michigan | 256 | $ | 179,392 | $ | 12,110,529 | $ | 10,950,000 | 5.96 % | Beacon Property Management | 4.0 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Macomb Apartments | Roseville, Michigan | 217 | $ | 140,862 | $ | 9,003,472 | $ | 8,175,000 | 5.96 % | Beacon Property Management | 4.0 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Scotsdale Apartments | Westland, Michigan | 376 | $ | 244,847 | $ | 15,868,596 | $ | 14,550,000 | 5.96 % | Beacon Property Management | 4.0 % |
(1) | Exclusive of additional amounts recoverable from tenants for utilities and rent concessions that may be offered to tenants. |
(2) | Includes acquisition and loan closing costs, a 2.75% acquisition fee paid to our advisor, and funds escrowed for renovation and other reserves. |
(3) | Each of the acquired properties will be operated under a management agreement with Beacon Property Management, LLC, an affiliate of our advisor. |
(4) | Beacon Property Management, LLC has agreed to fees of 4.0%, representing a 50 basis point reduction from fees previously negotiated with our property manager. |
On April 26, 2006, our sponsor entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Home Agreement”) with Home Properties, L.P. and Home Properties WMF I, LLC, affiliates of Home Properties, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed real estate investment trust (collectively, “Sellers”), each an unaffiliated third party, to purchase 19 multifamily apartment communities. On June 29, 2006, our sponsor assigned the purchaser’s interest in the Home Agreement with respect to each of the four apartment communities described below (collectively, the “Home Properties”) to each of four single purpose, wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Owners”) of LVP Michigan Multifamily Portfolio LLC (“LVP MMP”). Our operating partnership
105
holds a 99% membership interest in LVP MMP, while the REIT holds a 1% membership interest in LVP MMP. The Home Properties are located in Southeast Michigan and were valued by an independent third-party appraiser retained by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (“Citigroup”) at an aggregate value equal to $54.3 million. As of September 30, 2007, the percentage occupancy rate of the Home Properties was 94.3%.
The Owners acquired the Home Properties pursuant to the Home Agreement on June 30, 2006. The total acquisition price, excluding acquisition-related transaction costs, was approximately $42.2 million. A portion of this amount was allocated to each of the four Home Properties. In connection with the transaction, our advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.1 million. Other closing and financing related costs totaled approximately $400,000, and net pro ration adjustments for assumed liabilities, prepaid rents, real estate taxes and interest totaled $500,000.
Approximately $40.7 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a mortgage loan from Citigroup, and approximately $4.6 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock. Loan proceeds from Citigroup were also used to fund approximately $1.1 million of escrows for capital improvements, real estate taxes, and insurance. Owners currently hold a fee simple interest in the Home Properties, subject to the encumbrances described below.
In connection with the acquisition, the Owners secured a mortgage loan from Citigroup in the principal amount of $40.7 million. The loan has a 30 year amortization period, matures in 10 years, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.96% per annum and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 60 months, and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of its stated term. The loan will mature on July 11, 2016, at which time a balance of approximately $37.9 million will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment.
The loan is secured by all of the Home Properties and is non-recourse to the REIT, the operating partnership and LVP MMP.
To the extent that a subsidiary of the operating partnership acquires properties for cash, the initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by the operating partnership. The operating partnership plans to depreciate each such depreciable property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 27.5 years.
Nebraska Retail Shopping Mall
On November 1, 2006, the operating partnership deposited $250,000 in an escrow account, indicating its commitment to purchase a retail shopping mall located in Omaha, Nebraska (the “Omaha Property”). The deposit was made after completion of due diligence pursuant to an agreement (the “Omaha Agreement”), executed on September 20, 2006, to purchase the Omaha Property from Oakview Plaza North, LLC (“Oakview”), Frank R. Krejci, Vera Jane Krejci, George W. Venteicher and Susan J. Venteicher (Oakview, Mr. and Mrs. Krejci and Mr. and Mrs. Venteicher, collectively, “Seller”), each an unaffiliated third party. The operating partnership made an initial earnest money deposit of $500,000 on September 25, 2006, the effective date of the Agreement.
LVP Oakview Strip Center LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the operating partnership (“Omaha Owner”), acquired the Omaha Property on December 21, 2006 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Agreement, for an aggregate purchase price of $33,500,000, inclusive of transaction costs of approximately $900,000. The Omaha Property was independently appraised at $38 million. In connection with the transaction, our advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $896,500. Omaha Owner paid the purchase price with approximately $6.0 million in offering proceeds and a $27.5 million mortgage loan. Omaha Owner currently holds a fee simple interest in the Omaha Property, subject to the encumbrances described below.
In connection with the acquisition, Omaha Owner secured a mortgage loan from Wachovia Bank, National Association in the principal amount of $27.5 million. The loan has a term of 10 years, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.49% per annum, requires monthly installments of interest only through the first five years and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of its stated term. The loan will
106
mature on January 11, 2017, at which time a balance of approximately $22.6 million will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. The loan will be secured by the Omaha Property and will be non-recourse to the REIT and the operating partnership.
The Omaha Property is a retail center consisting of three single-story retail buildings, located on approximately 19.6 acres of land and containing approximately 177,303 rentable square feet, as well as a 2.1 acre site on which we can build an additional 15,000 square feet of retail space. The contract price for the Property was $32,600,000, excluding closing costs and the cost of a 2.1 acre parcel of land (the “Option Land”) located immediately adjacent to the Omaha Property. Pursuant to the Omaha Agreement, the operating partnership was required to purchase the Option Land on the commencement of rent under the lease for the Option Land or upon notice from Oakview. The operating partnership subsequently received notice from Oakview and completed the purchased of the unimproved Option Land on July 9, 2007 for the the contract price of $650,000.
As of the acquisition date of the Omaha Property, it was leased to retail stores with the occupancy percentage set forth below. Five tenants occupied at least 10% of the Property’s rentable square footage. As of September 30, 2007, the Omaha Property had a percentage occupancy rate of 99.2%. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these major tenants:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space | Annual Rent Payments | Lease Expiration | Party with Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Babies ‘R Us | Clothing retailer | 30,624 | 17.3 % | $ | 380,000 | January 31, 2015 | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Dick’s Sporting Goods | Clothing and sporting goods retailer | 45,000 | 25.4 % | $ | 618,750 | January 31, 2018 | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Famous Footwear | Footwear retailer | 17,585 | 10.0 % | $ | 272,568 | July 31, 2010 | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Old Navy | Clothing retailer | 24,800 | 14.0 % | $ | 309,957 | April 30, 2010 | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Petsmart | Pet supply retailer | 26,121 | 14.7 % | $ | 361,776 | January 31, 2015 | Tenant |
The percentage occupancy rate of the Property was 97% at the acquisition date. The Omaha Property’s year-end percentage occupancy rate and average effective rental per square foot for each of the last five years was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Year | Occupancy Rate | Average Effective Annual Rental Per Square Foot | ||||||
2006 | 97.1 | % | $ | 13.58 | ||||
2005 | 97.2 % | $ | 13.55 | |||||
2004 | 94.4 % | $ | 13.85 | |||||
2003 | 89.1 % | $ | 13.83 | |||||
2002 | 95.6 % | * |
* | The seller did not track this information beyond 2003. |
107
The following was a ten-year schedule of lease expirations and related information for the Omaha Property as of its acquisition date:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Year | Number of Expiring Leases | Total Square Feet | Aggregate Annual Rental | Percentage of Gross Annual Rental | ||||||||||||
2008 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2009 | 2 | 10,086 | $ | 184,035.00 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||
2010 | 4 | 54,297 | 794,981.00 | 31.8 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2012 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2014 | 1 | 4,861 | 70,485.00 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||
2015 | 2 | 56,745 | 741,776.00 | 29.6 | % | |||||||||||
2016 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2017 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2018 | 1 | 45,000 | 618,750.00 | 24.7 | % | |||||||||||
2019 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2020 | 1 | 4,914 | 92,003.00 | 3.7 | % | |||||||||||
Total | 11 | 175,903 | $ | 2,502,030.00 | 100.0 | % |
Depreciation is taken on the Omaha Property. To the extent that a subsidiary of the operating partnership acquires properties for cash, the initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by the operating partnership. The operating partnership plans to depreciate such depreciable property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 39 years.
General competitive conditions affecting the Omaha Property include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.” Risks associated with the Omaha Property are identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market.”
Beacon Property Management LLC is acting as the property manager of the Omaha Property. We believe that the Omaha Property is adequately insured.
In evaluating the Omaha Property as a potential acquisition and determining the appropriate amount of consideration to be paid for the Omaha Property, we considered a variety of factors, including the Omaha Property’s location, demographics, quality of tenants, duration of in-place leases, scheduled rent increases, strong occupancy and the fact that the overall rental rate at the Omaha Property is comparable to market rates. We believe the Omaha Property is well located, has acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Omaha Property is subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions.
Our purchase of the Option Land represents an opportunity for improved economic performance once the parcel is developed and leased by either Oakview or the operating partnership. Despite such potential, our investment decision was made assuming the Option Land would not be developed and pre-leased prior to the operating partnership’s purchase of the Omaha Property. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire this property.
Manhattan Office Building
On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC (“NY Owner”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC (“Mezz II”), consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “NY Property”). Mezz II is a joint
108
venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC (“LVP LLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC (“Manager”), which is wholly-owned by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.
Joint Venture
Equity from Manager totaled $13.5 million (representing a 51% managing member interest). Our capital investment, funded with proceeds from our common stock offering, was $13.0 million (representing a 49% membership interest), before $1.6 million paid outside of the closing as an acquisition fee to our advisor and other closing costs. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, Manager is responsible for day-to-day decision-making while we retain approval rights over certain major decisions. Mezz II contributed the aggregate $26.5 million capital investment (the “Capital Investment”) to 1407 Broadway Mezz I LLC (“Mezz”), its wholly owned subsidiary, which in turn contributed such amount to NY Owner, its wholly owned subsidiary.
NY Owner acquired a sub-leasehold interest in NY Property on January 4, 2007 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to a Sale and Purchase of Leasehold Agreement with Gettinger Associates, L.P. (“Seller”). The acquisition price for the Sublease Interest was $122 million, exclusive of acquisition-related costs incurred by Mezz II ($3.5 million), pro rated operating expenses paid at closing ($4.1 million), financing-related costs ($1.9 million) and construction, insurance and tax reserves ($1.0 million). Incremental acquisition costs of approximately $1.7 million, representing an acquisition fee to the advisor and legal fees for REIT counsel, were paid by the operating partnership outside of the closing.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of $26.5 of capital and a $106.0 million advance on a variable rate mortgage loan secured by the Sublease Interest (described below). After consideration of the business plan for the NY Property, and pro forma economics of this transaction, the independent directors of our Board of Directors approved the use of financing in excess of 75% of transaction cost and 300% of the Registrant’s total net assets. NY Owner currently holds a sub-leasehold interest in the Property (the “Sublease Interest”), subject to the encumbrances described below.
The Loans
In connection with the acquisition, NY Owner secured a mortgage loan (the “NY Loan”) from Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”) in the maximum principal amount of $127,250,000. Funding for the acquisition of the Sublease Interest was limited to $106.0 million and the remaining funds under the NY Loan will be advanced, at a funding rate representing 85% of actual cost, as Mezz II funds tenant improvement costs, leasing commissions and capital improvements at the NY Property.
The NY Loan matures in three years, bears a floating interest rate expressed as 30 day Libor plus 300 basis points (subject to a separately negotiated 6.5% Libor interest rate cap agreement) and requires monthly installments of interest throughout its stated term. The NY Loan has an initial maturity date of January 9, 2010 and provides options for two one-year extensions. Upon maturity, a balance of approximately $106.0 million will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment or further advances on the loan. The NY Loan will be secured by the Sublease Interest and will be non-recourse to the REIT and the operating partnership.
In connection with the NY Loan, Lightstone Holdings, LLC (the “Guarantor”), a limited liability company that is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the REIT, guaranteed payment of losses that Lehman may sustain as a result of fraud, misappropriation, misuse of loan proceeds or other acts of misconduct by Owner and/or its principals or affiliates. Such losses are recourse to the Guarantor under the guaranty regardless of whether Lehman has attempted to procure payment from the NY Owner or any other party. Further, the Guarantor has guaranteed the payment of any unpaid loan amounts in the event of the NY Owner’s bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency or the interference by the NY Owner or its affiliates in any foreclosure proceedings or other remedy exercised by Lehman. The REIT has agreed, to the maximum extent permitted by its Articles of Incorporation, to indemnify the Guarantor for up to 49% of any liability it incurs under this guaranty.
As an inducement to Lender to make the NY Loan, NY Owner has agreed to provide Lehman with a 35% net profit interest in the project.
109
Property Information
The NY Property, a 42 story office building built in 1952, fronts on Broadway, 7th Avenue and 39th Street in midtown Manhattan. The NY Property has approximately 915,000 rentable square feet, reported 89.68% occupancy (approximately 300 tenants) and an average annual effective rental rate per square foot of $39.44 as of September 30, 2007. On its acquisition date, it was leased by tenants engaged in the female apparel business. The ground lease, dated as of January 14, 1954, provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The Sublease Interest runs concurrently with this ground lease. As of its acquisition date, the NY Property’s percentage occupancy rate and average effective rental per square foot for each of the last five years was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Year | Occupancy Rate | Average Effective Annual Rental Per Square Foot | ||||||
2006 | 88.8 | % | $ | 37.15 | ||||
2005 | 86.6 % | $ | 41.35 | |||||
2004 | 87.5 % | $ | 40.78 | |||||
2003 | 89.2 % | $ | 41.70 | |||||
2002 | 93.8 % | $ | 39.67 |
The following was a 10-year schedule of lease expirations and related information for as of the NY Property’s acquisition date:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Year | Number of Expiring Leases | Total Square Feet | Aggregate Annual Rental | Percentage of Gross Annual Rental | ||||||||||||
2008 | 97 | 246,797 | $ | 11,657,407.00 | 31.1 | % | ||||||||||
2009 | 89 | 194,412 | 8,560,627.00 | 22.8 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 70 | 174,800 | 7,893,247.00 | 21.0 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 24 | 105,376 | 4,380,525.00 | 11.7 | % | |||||||||||
2012 | 12 | 45,633 | 2,120,682.00 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 2 | 7,976 | 460,691.00 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||
2014 | 2 | 17,249 | 825,682.00 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||
2015 | 1 | 12,650 | 932,412.00 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||
2016 | 3 | 5,607 | 413,132.00 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||
2017 | 1 | 1,800 | 267,096.00 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||
Total | 301 | 812,300 | $ | 37,511,501.00 | 100.0 | % |
Depreciation is taken on the NY Property. To the extent that a subsidiary of the operating partnership acquires properties for cash, the initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by the operating partnership. The operating partnership plans to depreciate such property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 39 years. We believe that the NY Property is adequately insured.
Renovation Plans
From 2007 through 2013, NY Owner intends to continue an ongoing renovation project on the NY Property that consists of lobby, elevator and window redevelopment projects at a total estimated cost of $21 million. In addition, based on current leasing projections and projected leasing costs, NY Owner expects to incur approximately $11.0 million of tenant improvement and leasing commission costs through 2013.
Competitive Factors and Risks
General competitive conditions affecting the NY Property include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.” The NY Property is located in the garment district, an area that continues to benefit from southward expansion of New York City’s Times Square. This expansion has resulted in a number of buildings being converted from use in the garment trade to alternative uses, primarily office.
110
Current litigation (described below) could result in the termination of the Sublease Interest or restrict NY Owner’s ability to refinance the Sublease on acceptable terms. Further, NY Owner’s rights to the NY Property under the Sublease Interest will terminate if the ground lease is not extended beyond its current expiration in 2048. Other risks associated with the NY Property are identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market.”
Subject to Lehman’s consent rights in connection with major decisions, the NY Property will be controlled by Lightstone Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), an affiliate of our sponsor. The NY Property will be managed by Trebor Management Corp., an affiliate of Seller. A subsidiary of Prime Group Realty Trust, also an affiliate of our sponsor, will provide asset management services and will coordinate redevelopment of the NY Property. NY Owner will pay market rate fees in exchange for these services.
In evaluating the NY Property as a potential acquisition and determining the appropriate amount of consideration to be paid for the NY Property, we have considered a variety of factors, including the NY Property’s location, demographics, quality of tenants, duration of in-place leases, scheduled rent increases, strong occupancy, the fact that the overall rental rate at the NY Property is comparable to the market rate for similar properties, the potential for a return from the redevelopment and repositioning of the NY Property and current strong demand for office space and other favorable market factors. We believe the NY Property is well located, has acceptable roadway and public transportation access and is well maintained. The NY Property is subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions.
Litigation
In February 1954, Webb & Knapp, as tenant under a ground lease with The Prudential Insurance Company of America that terminates in 2048, entered into a sublease with Seller. In April 1954, Webb & Knapp assigned its interest in this ground lease to Abraham Kamber Company, which consequently became sublessor under the sublease with Seller (“Sublessor”). In July 2006, Sublessor served two notices of default on Seller (the “Default Notices”). The first alleged that Seller had failed to satisfy its obligations in performing certain renovations and the second asserted numerous defaults relating to Seller’s purported failure to maintain the NY Property in compliance with its contractual obligations.
In response to the Default Notices, Seller commenced legal action and obtained an injunction that extends its time to cure any default, prohibits interference with its leasehold interest and prohibits Sublessor from terminating its sublease pending resolution of the litigation. A motion by Sublessor for partial summary judgment, alleging that certain work on the NY Property required its prior approval, was denied by the Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, by agreement of the parties, a stay was entered precluding the termination of the Sublease Interest pending a final decision on Sublessor’s claim of defaults under the Sublease Interest. In addition, the parties stipulated to the intervention of Office Owner as a party to the proceedings. The parties have been directed to engage in and complete discovery. We consider the litigation to be without merit.
Prior to consummating the acquisition of the Sublease Interest, Office Owner received a letter from Sublessor indicating that Sublessor would consider such acquisition a default under the original sublease, which prohibits assignments of the Sublease Interest when there is an outstanding default there under. On February 16, 2007, NY Owner received a Notice to Cure from Sublessor stating the transfer of the Sublease Interest occurred in violation of the Sublease given Sublessor’s position that Seller was in default. NY Owner will commence and vigorously pursue litigation in order to challenge the default, receive an injunction and toll the termination period provided for in the Sublease.
On September 4, 2007, NY Owner commenced a new action against Sublessor alleging a number claims, including the claims that Sublessor has breached the sublease and committed intentional torts against NY Owner by (among other things) issuing multiple groundless default notices, with the aim of prematurely terminating the sublease and depriving NY Owner of its valuable interest in the sublease. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that NY Owner has not defaulted under the sublease, damages for the losses NY Owner has incurred as a result of Sublessor’s wrongful conduct, and an injunction to prevent Sublessor from issuing further default notices without valid grounds or in bad faith.
111
Business Plan for the Property
The business plan of NY Owner consists of two components, one of which involves attempts to settle or otherwise dispose of the litigation with Sublessor, as described above. Because of the litigation, NY Owner acquired the Sublease Interest without receiving estoppels or consents of the ground lessor or Sublessor, which has impaired NY Owner’s ability to finance the transaction based upon the NY Property’s full appraised value. If NY Owner is successful in settling or disposing of the litigation with Sublessor, it anticipates refinancing the Sublease Interest at 75% loan to value. This refinancing would result in capital proceeds that could be distributed to stockholders of the REIT.
The second component will involve efforts to stabilize the NY Property’s net operating income. NY Owner will pursue this objective with aggressive, low-capital leasing and management of the NY Property, which NY Owner anticipates resulting in an increased occupancy rate and an eventual increase over the average modified gross rent of $40.50 per square foot that was in place as of the NY Property’s acquisition date.
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
The REIT and our sponsor, committed to purchase a portfolio of 32 industrial properties (the “Portfolio”) and on January 11, 2007, our sponsor secured this commitment by making a non-refundable deposit of $2,000,000 in an escrow account. Prior to making this deposit, our sponsor had conducted substantial due diligence pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Sealy Agreement”) dated as of December 14, 2006. The REIT had made an initial earnest money deposit of $2,000,000 on December 15, 2006, one day after executing the Sealy Agreement with Sealy SHV/NO, L.P., Sealy Ohio, L.P., Sealy Alamo Buildings, L.P., Sealy FRLA SBC, L.L.C., Sealy FRLA I, L.L.C., Sealy FRLA II, L.L.C., Sealy FRLA Office, L.L.C. and Sealy BR4, L.P. (each, a “Seller”) as sellers. No Seller was an affiliate of the REIT or its subsidiaries.
In pursuing this transaction, the REIT had initially intended to acquire 18 of the Portfolio properties (the “Proposed REIT Portfolio”) located in New Orleans, LA (12 properties), Baton Rouge, LA (4 properties) and San Antonio, TX (2 properties).Our sponsor had agreed to acquire the 14 remaining properties located in New Orleans, LA (5 properties), Columbus, OH (3 properties), Shreveport, LA (2 properties), Baton Rouge, LA (2 properties) and San Antonio, TX (2 properties). In determining the initial allocation of properties between the REIT and our sponsor, consideration was given to the REIT’s current dividend policy, its funds available for investment and its leverage limitations. The Board of Directors of the REIT (the “Board”), including all of the independent directors, considered these factors, as presented by our advisor, and approved the acquisition of the Proposed REIT Portfolio.
Subsequent to the determination of the Proposed REIT Portfolio, a second allocation of assets among the REIT and our sponsor was completed in order (i) to reduce the purchase price attributable to the REIT, permitting it to obtain sufficient financing, along with its currently available equity funds from the Offering, and (ii) to lower the REIT’s exposure to insurance deductible losses in the event of severe wind damage. In determining the final REIT portfolio (the “REIT Portfolio”), one property in Baton Rouge, LA and five properties in New Orleans, LA were removed, and two previously excluded properties in San Antonio, TX were added. Consistent with the initial allocation of properties, assets intended for sale (5 properties) and assets representing greater leasing risks were excluded in the determination of the REIT Portfolio.
A majority of the Board, including a majority of the independent directors, approved our acquisition of the REIT Portfolio, consisting of 12 industrial and 2 office properties (the “Sealy Properties”) located in New Orleans, LA (5 industrial and 2 office Properties), Baton Rouge, LA (3 industrial Properties) and San Antonio, TX (4 industrial Properties). Our sponsor agreed to acquire the remaining 18 properties located in New Orleans, LA (10 properties), Columbus, OH (3 properties), Shreveport, LA (2 properties) and Baton Rouge, LA (3 properties) (the “Lightstone Portfolio”).
As of the acquisition date, assets allocated to the REIT Portfolio were operating at a higher occupancy than those allocated to our sponsor. The REIT Portfolio reported an overall occupancy rate of 91.8% from approximately 1.0 million leasable square feet principally suitable for flexible industrial (54%), distribution (36%) and office (10%) uses. The Lightstone Portfolio reported an overall occupancy rate of 88.0% from
112
approximately 1.4 million leasable square feet principally suitable for flexible industrial (25%), distribution (72%) and office (3%) uses. As of September 30, 2007 the REIT Portfolio was operating at an occupancy rate of 93.8% and had an average effective annual rental rate per square foot of $6.30.
The final allocation of purchase price for each portfolio was determined based on the relationship of appraised value to the Portfolio price of approximately $138.0 million. Capitalization rates for the Portfolio ranged from 7.5% for properties in the San Antonio, TX market to 8.5% for those properties targeted for sale.
Portfolio Acquisition
On February 1, 2007, the REIT, through wholly owned subsidiaries of the operating partnership, consummated the acquisition of the REIT Portfolio for a total purchase price of approximately $63.9 million (the “REIT Purchase Price”), exclusive of approximately $1.9 million of closing costs, approximately $1.0 million of escrow funding for immediate repairs ($.9 million) and insurance ($.1 million), and financing related costs of approximately $.6 million. Concurrently with such acquisition, the REIT assigned the Lightstone Portfolio to its sponsor pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Agreement of Purchase and Sale. The REIT Portfolio was independently appraised at $70.7 million.
In connection with the transaction, the advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the REIT Purchase Price, or approximately $1.8 million. The operating partnership paid the REIT Purchase Price and related costs with approximately $14.4 million in offering proceeds and a mortgage loan of approximately $53.0 million (75% of appraised value). Because the debt financing for the acquisition exceeds certain leverage limitations of the REIT, the Board, including all of its independent directors, has approved the leverage exceptions as required by the REIT’s Articles of Incorporation. The operating partnership holds fee simple interests in the REIT Portfolio properties, subject to certain encumbrances, described below.
In evaluating the REIT Portfolio as a potential acquisition and determining the appropriate amount of consideration to be paid, we have considered a variety of factors, including each property’s location, demographics, quality of tenants, duration of in-place leases, strong occupancy and the fact that the overall rental rates of the REIT Portfolio are comparable to market rates, in addition to those factors described above.
We believe that the REIT Portfolio’s properties are well located, have acceptable roadway access and are well maintained. The REIT Portfolio properties are subject to competition from similar properties within their respective market areas and the economic performance of one or more the REIT Portfolio properties could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire the REIT Portfolio.
The Loan
In connection with the acquisition, the operating partnership secured a mortgage loan from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Lender”) in the principal amount of $53,025,000. The mortgage loan has a term of 10 years, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.83%, and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 60 months, and payments of principal and interest through the remainder of its stated 10-year term. The mortgage loan will mature on February 11, 2017, at which time a balance of $49.3 million will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. The mortgage loan will be secured by the REIT Portfolio and will be non-recourse to the REIT.
Property Information
As of its acquisition date, the REIT Portfolio’s percentage occupancy rate and average effective rental per square foot for each of the last five years was as follows:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Year | Occupancy Rate | Average Effective Annual Rental Per Square Foot | ||||||
2006 | 91.8 % | $ | 6.53 | |||||
2005 | 91.6 % | $ | 6.51 | |||||
2004 | 84.0 % | $ | 5.31 | |||||
2003 | 79.0 % | $ | 4.35 | |||||
2002 | 64.5 % | $ | 3.89 |
113
The following was a 10-year schedule of lease expirations for the REIT Portfolio as of its acquisition date:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||
Year | Number of Expiring Leases | Total Square Feet | Aggregate Annual Rental | Percentage of Gross Annual Rental | ||||||||||||
2008 | 27 | 149,515 | $ | 1,036,347.00 | 16.6 | % | ||||||||||
2009 | 40 | 300,561 | 1,915,086.00 | 30.6 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 32 | 205,193 | 1,628,177.00 | 26.1 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 14 | 185,182 | 1,109,493.00 | 17.8 | % | |||||||||||
2012 | 6 | 50,472 | 438,759.00 | 7.0 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 3 | 22,312 | 122,131.00 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||
Total | 122 | 913,235 | $ | 6,249,993.00 | 100.0 | % |
Depreciation is taken on the REIT Portfolio. To the extent that a subsidiary of the operating partnership acquires properties for cash, the initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by the operating partnership. The operating partnership plans to depreciate such property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 39 years.
Renovation Plans
There are no planned renovations for the REIT Portfolio.
Competitive Factors and Risks
General competitive conditions affecting the REIT Portfolio include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.” Other risks associated with the REIT Portfolio are identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market.” We believe that the REIT Portfolio is adequately insured.
Brazos Crossing Mall
On June 29, 2007, a subsidiary of our operating partnership acquired a six acre land parcel in Lake Jackson, Texas for immediate development of a 61,287 square foot power center. The land was purchased for $1.65 million cash and was funded 100% from the proceeds of our Offering. Upon completion in January 2008, the center will be occupied by three high quality triple net tenants: Pet Smart, Office Depot and Best Buy.
The purchase and sale agreement (the “Land Agreement”) for this transaction was negotiated between Lake Jackson Crossing Limited Partnership (formerly an affiliate of our sponsor) and Starplex Operating, LP, an unaffiliated entity (the “Land Seller”). Prior to the closing, a 99% limited partnership interest in the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership was assigned to our operating partnership, and the membership interests in Brazos Crossing LLC (the 1% general partner of the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership) were assigned to the REIT.
The land parcel was acquired at what represents a $2.1 million discount from the expressed $3.75 million purchase price, with such difference being subsidized and funded by a retail affiliate of our sponsor. The sale of the land parcel was a condition of the Land Seller’s agreement to execute a new movie theater lease at our sponsor affiliate’s nearby retail mall. The REIT and its operating partnership own a 100% fee simple interest in the land parcel and the improvements currently being constructed. Our sponsor’s affiliate will receive no future benefit or ownership interests from this transaction.
114
A loan for up to $8.2 million of construction to permanent financing has been received from Compass Bank. The interest rate on the loan is Libor plus 150 bps. The total cost of the project, inclusive of project construction, tenant incentives, leasing costs, and land is estimated at $10.2 million. Because the debt financing for the acquisition may exceed certain leverage limitations of the REIT, the Board, including all of its independent directors, will be required to approve any leverage exceptions as required by the REIT’s Articles of Incorporation.
Three tenants will occupy 100% of the property’s rentable square footage. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these major tenants:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space | Annual Rent Payments | Lease Term From Commencement | Party with Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Best Buy | Electronics retailer | 20,200 | 32.9 % | $ | 260,000 | 10 years | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Office Depot | Office supplies retailer | 21,000 | 34.3 % | $ | 277,200 | 10 years | Tenant | |||||||||||||||||
Petsmart | Pet supply retailer | 20,087 | 32.8 % | $ | 231,001 | 10 years | Tenant |
General competitive conditions affecting this property include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.” Other risks associated with the Properties are identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market.” We believe that this property is adequately insured.
Camden Properties
The following table provides information as of November 9, 2007 regarding five apartment properties that we purchased from an unaffiliated third party (the “Camden Properties” or “Properties”).
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade Name of Property | Location of Property | Number of Apartment Units | Monthly Effective Rent Collections at Closing(1) | Purchase Price(2) | Permanent Mortgage | Mortgage Interest Rate | Property Management Agent(3) | Annual Property Management Fee(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eastchase Apartments | Charlotte, North Carolina | 220 | $ | 118,826 | $ | 11.1 million | $ | 9.1 million | 5.44 % | Beacon Property Management | 4 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Timber Creek Apartments | Charlotte, North Carolina | 352 | $ | 201,493 | $ | 21.3 million | $ | 17.5 million | 5.44 % | Beacon Property Management | 4 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Wendover Apartments | Greensboro, North Carolina | 216 | $ | 126,635 | $ | 12.7 million | $ | 10.4 million | 5.44 % | Beacon Property Management | 4 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Glen Apartments | Greensboro, North Carolina | 304 | $ | 158,908 | $ | 17.8 million | $ | 14.6 million | 5.44 % | Beacon Property Management | 4 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Isles Apartments | Tampa, Florida | 484 | $ | 311,590 | $ | 33.8 million | $ | 27.7 million | 5.44 % | Beacon Property Management | 4 % |
(1) | Exclusive of vacancy loss, concessions, employee discounts, model rent, bad debt expense and other income recoverable from tenants for utilities and cable. |
(2) | Includes acquisition and loan closing costs, a 2.75% acquisition fee paid to our Advisor, and funds escrowed for renovation and other reserves. |
(3) | Each of the acquired properties will be operated under a management agreement with Beacon Property Management, LLC (the “Property Manager”), an affiliate of our Advisor. |
(4) | The Property Manager has agreed to fees of 4%. |
On October 15, 2007, the REIT, as general partner of Lightstone Value Plus REIT LP (the “Operating Partnership”), entered into an Improved Commercial Property Earnest Money Contract with Camden
115
Operating, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, for the acquisition of five apartment communities located in Tampa, Florida (one property), Charlotte, North Carolina (two properties) and Greensboro, North Carolina (two properties).
The Camden Properties, built between 1980 and 1987, are comprised of 1,576 apartment units, in the aggregate, contain a total of 1,124,249 net rentable square feet, and are 94% occupied. The Camden Properties include a wide range of amenities, including at lease one club house, tennis courts, fitness center, pool and on-site laundry facilities.
The Operating Partnership acquired the Camden Properties on November 16, 2007. The total acquisition price, including acquisition-related transaction costs, was approximately $99.3 million. A portion of this amount was allocated to each of the five Camden Properties, as described below. In connection with the transaction, Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, our advisor (the “Advisor”), received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $2.65 million. Closing and financing related costs totaled approximately $1.46 million.
Approximately $79.3 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by five substantially similar fixed rate loans with Fannie Mae secured by each of the properties and approximately $20 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock. The Operating Partnership currently holds a fee simple interest in the Camden Properties, subject to the mortgage described below.
In connection with the acquisition, the REIT secured five substantially similar mortgage loans from Fannie Mae aggregating $79.3 million (the “Loans”). The Loans have a 30 year amortization period, mature in 7 years, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% per annum. The Loans require monthly installments of interest only through the first three years and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of their stated terms. The Loans will mature on December 1, 2014, at which time a balance of approximately $74.6 million will be due, assuming no prior principal prepayment. The aggregate loan amount is secured by all of the Camden Properties.
The REIT intends to enhance unit interiors with minor renovations and installations of modern appliances.
The Operating Partnership plans to depreciate each property for federal income tax purposes on a straight-line basis using an estimated useful life of 27.5 years.
Description of the Camden Properties
Eastchase Apartments
Approximately $ 11.1 million of the total purchase price, and $9.1 million of the total loan amount, was allocated to the acquisition of Eastchase Apartments, which has an appraised value of $12.8 million. Built in 1985, Eastchase Apartments is an existing multifamily apartment complex consisting of 220 units located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The community consists of eleven two-story brick buildings on a 42.6 acre landscaped setting. The apartment units have an average size of 698 square feet and include 116 one-bedroom units and 104 two-bedroom units. No major renovations are planned. Renovations for Eastchase Apartments should be limited to interior material upgrades with only the addition of washers and dryers for the two-bedroom units.
All of the leased space is residential with leases ranging typically from six months to one year. The historical occupancy rate for the last five years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
At September 30, 2007 | 98.18 % | |||
At December 31, 2006 | 90.45 % | |||
At December 31, 2005 | 93.64 % | |||
At December 31, 2004 | 91.36 % | |||
At December 31, 2003 | 93.18 % |
The property is currently 92% occupied.
116
Average effective net annual rental revenue per unit at the Property is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | $ | 5,983 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 5,737 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 5,904 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 5,751 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | $ | 5,816 |
Realty taxes paid on Eastchase Apartments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $123,442. Eastchase Apartments was subject to a tax rate of 1.2775%.
General competitive conditions affecting Eastchase Apartments include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of Eastchase Apartments. We believe that Eastchase Apartments is adequately insured.
Timber Creek Apartments
Approximately $21.3 million of the total purchase price, and $17.5 million of the total loan amount, was allocated to the acquisition of Timber Creek Apartments, which has an appraised value of $24.5 million. Built in 1984, Timber Creek Apartments is an existing multifamily apartment complex consisting of 352 units located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The community consists of twenty-two two-story buildings on nearly 36.9 landscaped acres and is in walking distance of the brand new light rail system that leads directly to downtown Charlotte. Its apartment units have an average size of 706 square feet and include 176 one-bedroom units and 176 two-bedroom units. No major renovations are planned.
All of the leased space is residential with leases with leases ranging typically from six months to one year. The historical occupancy rate for the last five years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
At September 30, 2007 | 97.73 % | |||
At December 31, 2006 | 93.18 % | |||
At December 31, 2005 | 90.06 % | |||
At December 31, 2004 | 93.47 % | |||
At December 31, 2003 | 94.32 % |
The property is currently 95% occupied.
Average effective net annual rental revenue per unit at the Property is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | $ | 6,400 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 6,177 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 6,151 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 6,254 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | $ | 5,880 |
Realty taxes paid on Timber Creek Apartments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $181,705. Timber Creek Apartments was subject to a tax rate of 1.2775%.
General competitive conditions affecting Timber Creek Apartments include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of Timber Creek Apartments. We believe that Timber Creek Apartments is adequately insured.
The properties in Charlotte have excellent visibility with street frontage, good access to thoroughfares, are located in close proximity to a shopping mall and provide convenient access to the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport. Recently, the cost of construction has limited the addition of new apartments to the
117
market and the soft housing market caused by the residential credit crisis has eliminated many potential home buyers, leading to an increase in rental demand.
Wendover Apartments
Approximately $12.7 million of the total purchase price, and $10.4 million of the total loan amount, was allocated to the acquisition of Wendover Apartments, which has an appraised value of $13.5 million. Built in 1987, Wendover Apartments is an existing multifamily apartment complex consisting of 216 units located in Greensboro, North Carolina. The community consists of thirteen two and three story brick buildings on a 16.6 acre landscaped setting. Its apartment units have an average size of 789 square feet and include 104 one-bedroom units and 112 two-bedroom units. The community is within walking distance of the City Bus Service and is less than a 5 minute drive from I-40. No major renovations are planned.
All of the leased space is residential with leases ranging typically from six months to one year. The historical occupancy rate for the last five years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
At September 30, 2007 | 93.52 % | |||
At December 31, 2006 | 93.52 % | |||
At December 31, 2005 | 90.74 % | |||
At December 31, 2004 | 94.44 % | |||
At December 31, 2003 | 92.59 % |
The Property is currently 95% occupied.
Average effective net annual rental revenue per unit at the Property is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | $ | 6,768 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 6,725 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 6,675 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 6,410 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | $ | 6,407 |
Realty taxes paid on Wendover Apartments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $119,054. Wendover Apartments was subject to a tax rate of 1.2765%.
General competitive conditions affecting Wendover Apartments include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of Wendover Apartments. We believe that Wendover Apartments is adequately insured.
Glen Apartments
Approximately $17.8 million of the total purchase price, and $14.6 million of the total loan amount, was allocated to the acquisition of Glen Apartments, which has an appraised value of $18.2 million. Built in 1980, Glen Apartments is an existing multifamily apartment complex consisting of 304 units located in Greensboro, North Carolina. The community consists of twenty two-story buildings on a 20.8 acre landscaped setting. Its apartment units have an average size of 662 square feet and include 24 studio units, 168 one-bedroom units and 112 two-bedroom units. No major renovations are planned. The Property is within seven miles of 11 universities, which provides significant market depth. The apartments are an excellent housing option for graduate students due to lower than average annual rent. Renovations should be limited to material upgrades with the addition of washers and dryers for the two-bedrooms only.
118
All of the leased space is residential with leases ranging typically from six months to one year. The historical occupancy rate for the last five years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
At September 30, 2007 | 96.71 % | |||
At December 31, 2006 | 94.08 % | |||
At December 31, 2005 | 93.09 % | |||
At December 31, 2004 | 96.05 % | |||
At December 31, 2003 | 94.41 % |
The Property is currently 94% occupied.
Average effective net annual rental revenue per unit at the Property is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | $ | 6,180 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 6,198 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 6,037 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 5,977 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | $ | 5,809 |
Realty taxes paid on Glen Apartments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $128,012. Glen Apartments was subject to a tax rate of 1.2765%.
General competitive conditions affecting Glen Apartments include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of Glen Apartments. We believe that Glen Apartments is adequately insured.
The Piedmont Triad (Greensboro, Winston-Salem and High Point) has become an attractive location for companies. Historically, this area’s economy has been based in manufacturing but has diversified into white-collar, high-tech industries. Future economic development includes the construction of the new FedEx Mid-Atlantic Hub comprising 550,000 SF on 165 acres. It is projected that the FedEx Hub will generate 20,000 new jobs and will have a total economic impact of $9.3 billion.
Isles Apartments
Approximately $33.8 million of the total purchase price, and $27.7 million of the total loan amount, was allocated to the acquisition of Isles Apartments, which has an appraised value of $40.0 million. Built in 1984, Isles Apartments is an existing multifamily apartment complex consisting of 484 units located in Tampa, Florida. The community consists of thirty-three two-story buildings on a 27.0 acre landscaped setting. Its apartment units have an average size of 722 square feet and include 32 studio units, 240 one-bedroom units and 212 two-bedroom units. No major renovations are planned.
All of the leased space is residential with leases ranging typically from six months to one year. The historical occupancy rate for the last five years is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
At September 30, 2007 | 93.18 % | |||
At December 31, 2006 | 90.29 % | |||
At December 31, 2005 | 96.90 % | |||
At December 31, 2004 | 97.31 % | |||
At December 31, 2003 | 96.07 % |
The Property is currently 93% occupied.
119
Average effective net annual rental revenue per unit at the Property is as follows:
![]() | ![]() | |||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | $ | 7,765 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 7,884 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 7,253 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 6,736 | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | $ | 6,436 |
Isles Apartments provides convenient access to the Tampa International Airport. Tampa home prices have doubled in the past five years. Additionally, the conversion of many apartment communities to condominiums has decreased the supply of affordable rental options, which has created demand for apartments.
Realty taxes paid on Isles Apartments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $514,690. Isles Apartments was subject to a tax rate of 2.2036%.
General competitive conditions affecting Isles Apartments include a potential correction in the for-sale condominium market creating competition in the rental market and those other conditions identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of Isles Apartments. We believe that Isles Apartments is adequately insured.
Sarasota Property
Joint Venture
On March 15, 2007, the REIT entered into an option agreement to participate in a joint-venture with its Sponsor (the “JV Option” with respect to the potential joint venture, the “Joint Venture”) for the purchase of a property located at 2150 Whitfield Avenue, Sarasota, Florida (the “Sarasota Property”). On November 15, 2007, the REIT exercised the JV Option. Pursuant to the terms of the JV Option, the REIT agreed to pay all costs of investment and property carry costs in consideration for our Sponsor agreeing to assume the risk of ownership of the Sarasota Property on or after the date that title to such property was acquired through foreclosure. The Joint Venture is between LVP Sarasota Industrial LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, and Lightstone Sarasota Industrial LLC (the “Non-Managing Member”), an entity wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, our sponsor, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Joint Venture agreement, we are responsible for day-to-day decision-making while the Non-Managing Member retains approval rights over certain major decisions.
In July, 2007, CAD Funding, LLC (“CAD”), an affiliate of Park Avenue Funding, LLC, had the highest bid ($12,650,000) on the Sarasota Property in a foreclosure action. Park Avenue Funding, LLC, is a real estate lending company founded in 2004 and an affiliate of our sponsor. CAD initiated the foreclosure action following the default of an unaffiliated third party on a loan made to the third party by CAD, for which the Sarasota Property served as security. Prior to the entry of the foreclosure judgment, the sponsor expressed an interest in bidding at the foreclosure sale in anticipation that the REIT would exercise the JV Option. On August 6, 2007, the Sarasota Property was indirectly acquired by the sponsor.
The Sarasota Property was contributed to the Joint Venture prior to the REIT’s exercise of the JV Option. The Joint Venture currently holds a fee simple interest in the Sarasota Property. The contribution to the Joint Venture by the REIT was $13.1 million of offering proceeds used to acquire the Sarasota Property. The agreed contribution to the Joint Venture by our sponsor is $1.3 million. The property was independently appraised in June of 2006 for $17 million. The REIT holds a 90% interest in the Joint Venture and the Sponsor holds a 10% interest. Pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture agreement, the REIT is entitled to a one-time distribution equal to 10% per annum of its capital contribution on or before December 31, 2007 and has the authority to force a sale of the Sarasota Property at any time after seven years, or November 15, 2014.
120
Property Information
Completed in 1992, the Sarasota Property consists of four buildings and has approximately 281,000 rentable square feet, including approximately 16,000 rentable square feet suitable for office and showroom use. The Sarasota Property currently does not possess a tenant and is experiencing negative cash flows; however the Joint Venture is currently negotiating with a prospective tenant. The Joint Venture has signed a letter of intent to lease approximately 156,000 square feet of the space. The lease is expected to commence in the first quarter of 2008. The proposed lease has a 12-year term, and a total of $9.6 million in scheduled payments of basic rents over the term of the lease. We believe that the Sarasota Property is well maintained and suitable for industrial use, and the Joint Venture is aggressively seeking additional tenants. There are no planned renovations for the Sarasota Property.
In evaluating the Sarasota Property as a potential acquisition, we have considered a variety of factors and determined that the acquisition cost was at a substantial discount to current market value. The Sarasota Property is subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic and market conditions.
General competitive conditions affecting the Sarasota Property include those identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Competition.” Risks associated with the Sarasota Property are identified in the section of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated With our Properties and the Market.”
Beacon Property Management, LLC, a subsidiary of our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, will act as the property manager of the Sarasota Property. The property manager has agreed to a fee of 4%. We believe that the Sarasota Property is adequately insured.
Houston Extended Stay Hotels
On October 17, 2007, the REIT, through TLG Hotel Acquisitions LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (together with such subsidiary, the “Houston Partnership”), acquired two hotels located in Houston, TX (the “Katy Hotel”) and Sugar Land, TX (the “Sugar Land Hotel” and together with the Katy Hotel, the “Hotels”) from Morning View Hotels — Katy, LP, Morning View Hotels — Sugar Land, LP and Point of Southwest Gardens, Ltd., pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. The seller is not an affiliate of the REIT or its subsidiaries.
The Katy Hotel, built in 1998, is located on approximately 2.3 acres and has 145 rooms including 68 standard suites, 28 standard executive rooms, 14 deluxe standard rooms, 32 standard double rooms and 3 Deluxe Double Suites. The Sugar Land Hotel, built in 2000, is located on approximately 3.5 acres and has 145 rooms including 68 standard suites, 28 standard executive rooms, 14 deluxe standard rooms, 32 standard double rooms and 3 Deluxe Double Suites.
The Hotels were recently remodeled by the previous owner, however the REIT intends to make a $2.8 million dollar investment in capital expenditures to convert the Hotels to Extended Stay Deluxe (“ESD”) brand properties. The ESD brand is under license from an affiliate within the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies. Extended Stay Hotels group of companies The REIT expects these additional renovations to be conducted over a 1-year period and will include implementing ESD’s national reservation system, new carpeting, new paint, new signage, exterior façade improvements, re-stripping parking lot, guest room upgrades, landscaping and constructing pools.
Extended stay hotels are ideal for business travel, temporary housing or weekend getaways. Guests can count on clean, comfortable suites with wireless high-speed internet access, separate living, dining and sleeping areas, ample work space, a fully-equipped kitchen and on-site laundry. ESD offers larger upscale accommodations, an expanded cable television package, a DVD player in every room, printer stations in the lobby, pillow-top mattresses and MP3-ready alarm clocks. Most ESD hotels also include a combination of swimming pools, spas, exercise rooms, ovens and dishwashers.
The acquisition price for the Hotels was $16 million inclusive of closing costs. In connection with the transaction, the REIT’s advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the contract price ($15.2 million), or approximately $418,000.
121
The acquisition was funded through a combination of $6.0 million in offering proceeds and approximately $10 million in loan proceeds from a floating rate mortgage loan secured by the Hotels.
The REIT has established a taxable subsidiary, LVP Acquisitions Corp. (“LVP Corp”), which has entered into operating lease agreements with each of the Katy Hotel and the Sugar Land Hotel, respectively, and LVP Corp. has entered into management agreements with HVM L.L.C., a controlled affiliate of our sponsor, for the management of the hotels.
The Loan
In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 — Houston — Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 — Houston — Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $12.85 million, which includes up to an additional $2.8 million of renovation proceeds which will be borrowed as the renovation proceeds.
The mortgage loan has a term of one year with the option of a 6-month term extension, bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association Libor Daily Floating Rate plus one hundred seventy-five basis points (1.75%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months. The mortgage loan will mature on October 16, 2008, subject to the 6-month extension option described above, at which time payment of the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable thereunder will be due. The mortgage loan will be secured by the Hotels and will be non-recourse to the REIT.
In connection with the Loan, the REIT guaranteed the complete performance of the Houston Borrowers’ obligations with respect to the renovations and certain other customary guarantees.
Insurance Coverage on Properties
We will carry comprehensive general liability coverage and umbrella liability coverage on all of our properties with limits of liability which we deem adequate to insure against liability claims and provide for the costs of defense. Similarly, we are insured against the risk of direct physical damage in amounts we estimate to be adequate to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property, including loss of rental income during the rehabilitation period. We intend to obtain earthquake, mold and terrorism coverage, if deemed necessary, if such coverage is available in the marketplace at terms and costs which are commercially reasonable. These coverages are currently excluded by insurance companies in standard policies. Some, but not all insurance companies, may be willing to make this coverage available for a significantly increased premium. To the extent we decide to obtain such coverage or are required to do so in connection with financings, it could increase our cost of operations.
In December 2007, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2007 (“TRIEA”) was enacted into law. TRIEA extends the federal terrorism insurance backstop through 2014. TRIEA was adopted to ensure affordable terrorism insurance to commercial insureds, including real estate investment trusts. Its extension should increase availability of terrorism insurance coverage on our properties through 2014, and thus mitigate certain of the risks and concerns outlined in the sections of our Prospectus captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with our Properties and the Market — Insurance Risks” and “Real Property Investments — Insurance Coverage on Properties.”
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at such property, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. Such laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants, and the liability under such laws has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial,
122
and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate the contamination on such property, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral.
Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at a disposal or treatment facility also may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of a release of hazardous or toxic substances at such disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Liability for the cost of remediating releases of toxic or hazardous substances or petroleum products may adversely affect our cash flow available for distribution. Such liabilities may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy and may under some environmental laws result in a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination.
Finally, the owner of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Statutes of limitations applicable to liabilities arising from releases of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products generally are not based on the time of disposal. In connection with our acquisition, ownership and operation of residential properties we may be potentially liable for such costs. Although we may require the seller of a property to provide a current Phase I environmental report and, if necessary, a Phase II environmental report, and we may also choose to obtain these reports ourselves, it is possible that our assessments do not reveal all environmental liabilities or that there are material environmental liabilities.
Regulatory Matters
Our properties may be subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other common areas. Prior to acquiring a property, we will ascertain whether such property has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its business.
123
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our historical capitalization as of September 30, 2007, and our pro forma capitalization as of that date as adjusted to give effect to the sale of the maximum offering as if 30,000,000 shares were sold, and the application of the estimated net proceeds from such sales as described in “Estimated Use of Proceeds.” The information set forth in the following table excludes our historical results of operations and the financial impact of accounting for offering costs, and should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
September 30, 2007 Historical | Maximum Offering | |||||||
Minority Interest in Partnership | 11,428,083 | 2,000 | (1) | |||||
Stockholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 authorized, none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 authorized, 11,776,766 shares issued and outstanding (historical only) | 117,768 | 300,000 | (2) | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 101,104,816 | 299,700,000 | ||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 1,545,670 | — | ||||||
Accumulated distribution in addition to net loss | (16,115,211 ) | — | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 89,653,043 | $ | 300,000,000 | ||||
Total capitalization | $ | 159,807,293 | $ | 300,002,000 |
(1) | Excludes any future issuance of limited partnership units by the operating partnership in exchange for cash or property. In addition, does not include the special general partner interests issued to Lightstone SLP, LLC at a cost of $100,000 per unit, the proceeds of which will be used to pay all dealer manager fees, selling commissions and other organization and offering expenses. |
(2) | We are authorized to issue 60,000,000 shares of common stock of which approximately 13.6 million shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007. Does not include 200 shares of common stock reserved for issuance on exchange of 200 outstanding limited partnership units of the operating partnership, up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock available pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan or 75,000 shares of common stock that are reserved for issuance under our stock option plan. |
124
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
All of the following selected consolidated and combined financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | Period from June 8, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 17,274,040 | $ | 4,563,891 | $ | 8,262,667 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before equity in loss and minority interest | $ | (2,788,021 | ) | $ | (796,780 | ) | $ | (1,536,430 | ) | $ | (117,571 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
Loss from investment in unconsolidated joint venture | $ | (5,910,940 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Minority interest | $ | 168 | $ | 73 | $ | 86 | $ | 1,164 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (8,698,793 | ) | $ | (796,707 | ) | $ | (1,536,344 | ) | $ | (116,407 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
Loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (1.09 | ) | $ | (.82 | ) | $ | (.96 | ) | $ | (5.82 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | .52 | $ | .46 | $ | .64 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 7,954,063 | 975,986 | 1,594,060 | 20,000 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 259,281,808 | $ | 93,961,639 | $ | 140,708,217 | $ | 430,996 | $ | 205,489 | ||||||||||
Long-term obligations | $ | 148,379,210 | $ | 67,975,000 | $ | 95,475,000 | $ | — | $ | — |
125
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OUR
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
The following discussion and analysis should be read together with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and the notes thereto.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information included in this prospectus contains, and other materials filed or to be filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, contain or will contain, forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, including, among others, statements regarding our possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives, are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.
Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations which may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time unless required by law.
Overview
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Lightstone REIT” or “Company”), through the Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LP (the “Operating Partnership”), intends to acquire and operate commercial and residential properties, principally in the United States. We intend to acquire fee interests in multi-tenanted, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers, and in malls located in highly trafficked retail corridors, high-barrier to entry markets, and sub-markets with constraints on the amount of additional property supply. Additionally, we seek to acquire fee interests in lodging properties located near major transportation arteries in urban and suburban areas; multi-tenanted industrial properties located near major transportation arteries and distribution corridors; multi-tenanted office properties located near major transportation arteries; and market-rate, middle market multifamily properties at a discount to replacement cost. We do not intend to invest in single family residential properties; leisure home sites; farms; ranches; timberlands; unimproved properties not intended to be developed; or mining properties.
Investments in real estate will be made through the purchase of all or part of a fee simple ownership, or all or part of a leasehold interest. We may also purchase limited partnership interests, limited liability company interests and other equity securities. We may also enter into joint ventures with affiliated entities for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties as well as general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of developing, owning and operating real properties. We will not enter into a joint venture to make an investment that we would not be permitted to make on our own. Not more than 10% of our total assets will be invested in unimproved real property. For purposes of this paragraph, “unimproved real properties” does not include properties acquired for the purpose of producing rental or other operating income, properties under construction and properties for which development or construction is planned within one year. Additionally, we will not invest in contracts for the sale of real estate unless in recordable form and appropriately recorded.
126
The Lightstone REIT has completed six acquisitions as of September 30, 2007, three of which were completed prior to December 31, 2006. Belz Factory Outlet World, a retail outlet shopping mall in St. Augustine, Florida, was acquired on March 31, 2006, four multi-family communities in Southeast Michigan were acquired on June 29, 2006, and Oakview Plaza, a retail shopping mall located in Omaha, Nebraska, was acquired on December 21, 2006. Transactions closing after December 31, 2006 were as follows: the acquisition of a 49% equity interest in a joint venture, formed to purchase a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building in New York, NY; the acquisition of 12 industrial and office buildings in Louisiana and Texas; and the acquisition of a land parcel acquired for the Lightstone REIT’s development of a retail power center in Lake Jackson, TX.
Although we are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations, we intend to invest in properties located near the existing operations of our sponsor, in order to achieve economies of scale where possible. The Lightstone Group currently maintains operations throughout the United States (Hawaii, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming excluded), the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada.
We have and will continue to utilize leverage in acquiring our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders.
We may finance our property acquisitions through a variety of means, including but not limited to individual non-recourse mortgages and through the exchange of an interest in the property for limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2006, we have qualified as a REIT and will elect to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ending December 31, 2006.
We plan to own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through the Operating Partnership. We do not have employees. We entered into an advisory agreement dated April 22, 2005 with Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which we refer to as the “advisor,” pursuant to which the advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects our real estate and real estate related investments, subject to oversight by our board of directors. We pay the advisor fees for services related to the investment and management of our assets, and we will reimburse the advisor for certain expenses incurred on our behalf.
The Company intends to sell a maximum of 30 million common shares, at a price of $10 per share (exclusive of 4 million shares available pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, and 75,000 shares that are reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock option plan). The Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (the “Registration Statement”) was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 on April 22, 2005, and on May 24, 2005, the Lightstone REIT began offering its common shares for sale to the public. Lightstone Securities, LLC (the “dealer manager”), an affiliate of the sponsor, is serving as the dealer manager of the Company’s public offering (the “Offering”).
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had reached its minimum offering of $2.0 million by receiving subscriptions for approximately 226,000 of its common shares, representing gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.3 million. On February 1, 2006, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $2.7 million were released to the Company from escrow and invested in the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2007, cumulative gross offering proceeds of approximately $114.4 million have been released to the Lightstone REIT and used for the purchase of a 99.99% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company expects that its ownership percentage in the Operating Partnership will remain significant as it plans to continue to invest all net proceeds from the Offering in the Operating Partnership.
Through September 30, 2007, the advisor has advanced in excess of $11.6 million to the Company for its organization and other offering costs, which consist of actual legal, accounting, printing and other accountable expenses (including sales literature and the prospectus), as well as selling commissions and dealer manager fees. We have reimbursed such advances to the extent of 10% of our gross offering proceeds (approximately
127
$11.4 million as of September 30, 2007) using proceeds from the sale of general partnership interests to Lightstone SLP LLC, an affiliate of our advisor. Lightstone SLP, LLC has purchased an additional $ 0.2 million of SLP Units subsequent to September 30, 2007.
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of real estate and real estate related investments, other than those referred to herein.
For the year ending December 31, 2006, the Company qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Accordingly, no provision for income tax has been recorded. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will then be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intends to operate in such a manner so that the Company will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of September 30, 2007, the Company has complied with the requirements for maintaining its REIT status.
Acquisitions
St. Augustine, Florida
On March 31, 2006, we acquired the Belz Outlets at St. Augustine, Florida. The total acquisition price, including acquisition-related transaction costs, was approximately $26.9 million. In connection with the transaction, the advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or $0.7 million. Approximately $22.4 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a $27.2 million mortgage loan from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”) and approximately $4.5 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock. Loan proceeds from Wachovia were also used to fund approximately $4.8 million of escrows for future leasing-related expenditures, real estate taxes, insurance and debt service.
Prior to our acquisition of this property, a majority of its major tenants had relocated to a competing property. Since the acquisition date, no major tenants have vacated this property. Prime Retail Property Management, an affiliate of our sponsor, is strategically filling vacancies at the property with short-term agreements while it pursues a new redevelopment strategy. To date, 12 short-term in-line lease agreements have been signed, representing approximately 46,000 square feet of leasable area, and generating approximately $0.3 million in annualized revenues. The terms of these agreements vary, but typically expire within one to two years; however, we may terminate such lease agreements on short notice. The property reported an occupancy rate of 65.9% at June 30, 2007.
Southeast Michigan
On April 26, 2006, we acquired four multifamily apartment communities. The Operating Partnership holds a 99% membership interest and the Lightstone REIT holds a 1% membership interest. The properties are located in Southeast Michigan and were valued by an independent third-party appraiser retained by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. at an aggregate value equal to $54.3 million. The total acquisition price, excluding acquisition-related transaction costs, was approximately $42.2 million. In connection with the transaction, the advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.1 million. Other closing and financing related costs totaled approximately $400,000, and net pro ration adjustments for assumed liabilities, prepaid rents, real estate taxes and interest totaled $500,000.
128
Approximately $40.7 million of the total acquisition cost was funded by a mortgage loan from Citigroup, and approximately $4.6 million was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock. Loan proceeds from Citigroup were also used to fund approximately $1.1 million of escrows for capital improvements, real estate taxes, and insurance. The combined properties were 92% occupied at December 31, 2006, and are performing to our expectations.
Omaha, Nebraska
On December 21, 2006, we acquired a retail shopping mall in Omaha, Nebraska. This property is a retail center located in Omaha, Nebraska’s dominant retail area. The property consists of three single-story retail buildings, is located on approximately 19.6 acres of land and contains approximately 177,303 leasable square feet. Built in 1999 and progressively expanded through 2005, the property 97.1% occupied at June 30, 2007.
The acquisition price for the property was $33.5 million, including acquisition fee of $0.9 million paid to our advisor. Approximately $6.0 million of the acquisition cost was funded with offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock and the remainder was funded with a $27.5 million fixed rate loan from Wachovia that is secured by this property. Offering proceeds were also used to fund financing related costs ($.2 million) and insurance and tax reserves ($.2 million). The property was independently appraised at $38.0 million.
Acquisition of Equity Investment in a Joint Venture
On January 4, 2007, the Lightstone REIT, through LVP 1407 Broadway LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of the sponsor (the “Joint Venture”). On the same date, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the Joint Venture acquired a sub-leasehold interest in a ground lease to an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the “Sublease Interest”). The seller of the Sublease Interest, Gettinger Associates, L.P., is not an affiliate of the Lightstone REIT or its subsidiaries.
The property, a 42 story office building built in 1952, fronts on Broadway, 7th Avenue and 39th Street in midtown Manhattan. The property has approximately 915,000 leasable square feet, was 87.6% occupied (approximately 300 tenants) at acquisition by tenants primarily engaged in the female apparel business. The ground lease, dated as of January 14, 1954, provides for multiple renewal rights, with the last renewal period expiring on December 31, 2048. The Sublease Interest runs concurrently with the ground lease. The acquisition price for the Sublease Interest was $122 million, exclusive of acquisition-related costs incurred by the Joint Venture ($3.5 million), pro rated operating expenses paid at closing ($4.1 million), financing-related costs ($1.9 million) and construction, insurance and tax reserves ($1.0 million).
Incremental acquisition costs of approximately $1.7 million, representing an acquisition fee to the advisor and legal fees for our counsel, were paid outside of the closing. The acquisition was funded through a combination of $26.5 million of capital and a $106.0 million advance on a $127.3 million variable rate mortgage loan funded by Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. The loan is secured by the Sublease. Equity from our co-venturer totaled $13.5 million (representing a 51% ownership interest). Our capital investment, funded with proceeds from our common stock offering, was $13.0 million (representing a 49% ownership interest). We plan to continue an ongoing renovation project at the property that consists of lobby, elevator and window redevelopment projects. Additional loan proceeds of up to $21.3 million are available to fund these improvements.
The Company accounted for the investment in this unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities. This $13.0 million initial investment was recorded at cost and will be subsequently adjusted for cash contributions and distributions and the Company’s share of earnings and losses. Earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with this investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company’s results included a $5.9 million loss from investment in this unconsolidated joint venture.
The following table represents the unaudited condensed income statement for the unconsolidated joint venture for the period from January 4, 2007 through September 30, 2007:
129
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | |||||||
Total revenue | $ | 9,719,506 | $ | 27,665,542 | ||||
Total property expenses | 6,944,157 | 20,064,841 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 3,978,760 | 12,950,254 | ||||||
Interest expense | 2,310,755 | 6,713,591 | ||||||
Net operating loss | $ | (3,514,166 | ) | $ | (12,063,144 | ) | ||
Company’s share of net operating loss (49%) | $ | (1,721,940 | ) | $ | (5,910,940 | ) |
The following table represents the unaudited condensed balance sheet for the unconsolidated joint venture as of September 30, 2007:
![]() | ![]() | |||
As of September 30, 2007 | ||||
Real estate, at cost (net) | $ | 111,005,943 | ||
Intangible assets | 13,112,770 | |||
Cash and restricted cash | 13,088,435 | |||
Other assets | 5,027,762 | |||
Total assets | $ | 142,234,910 | ||
Mortgage note payable | 108,364,535 | |||
Other liabilities | 18,439,664 | |||
Members’ capital | 15,430,711 | |||
Total liabilities and members’ capital | $ | 142,234,910 |
Acquisition of Industrial and Office Portfolio
On February 1, 2007, the Lightstone REIT, through wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, acquired industrial and office properties located in New Orleans, LA (5 industrial and 2 office properties), Baton Rouge, LA (3 industrial properties) and San Antonio, TX (4 industrial properties). The properties were approximately 92% occupied at the acquisition date and represented approximately 1.0 million leasable square feet principally suitable for flexible industrial (54%), distribution (36%) and office (10%) uses. The properties were independently appraised at $70.7 million.
The acquisition price for the properties was $63.9 million, exclusive of approximately $1.9 million of closing costs, approximately $1.0 million of escrow funding for immediate repairs ($.9 million) and insurance ($.1 million), and financing related costs of approximately $.6 million. In connection with the transaction, the advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the purchase price, or approximately $1.8 million. The acquisition was funded through a combination of $14.4 million in offering proceeds and approximately $53.0 million in loan proceeds from a Wachovia fixed rate mortgage loan secured by the properties. The Lightstone REIT does not intend to make significant renovations or improvements to the properties. We believe the properties are adequately insured.
Acquisition of Land Parcel
On June 29, 2007, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership acquired a 6.0 acre land parcel in Lake Jackson, Texas for immediate development of a 61,287 square foot power center. The land was purchased for $1.65 million cash and was funded 100% from the proceeds of our Offering. Upon completion in January 2008, the center will be occupied by three high quality triple net tenants: Pet Smart, Office Depot and Best Buy.
The purchase and sale agreement (the “Land Agreement”) for this transaction was negotiated between Lake Jackson Crossing Limited Partnership (formerly an affiliate of the Sponsor) and Starplex Operating, LP, an unaffiliated entity (the “Land Seller”). Prior to the closing, a 99% limited partnership interest in the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership was assigned to the Operating Partnership and the membership interests in Brazos Crossing LLC (the 1% general partner of the Lake Jackson Limited Partnership) were assigned to the Lightstone REIT.
130
The land parcel was acquired at what represents a $2.1 million discount from the expressed $3.75 million purchase price, with such difference being subsidized and funded by a retail affiliate of the Sponsor. The sale of the land parcel was a condition of the Seller’s agreement to execute a new movie theater lease at the Sponsor affiliate’s nearby retail mall. The REIT and the Operating Partnership own a 100% fee simple interest in the land parcel and retail power center. The Sponsor’s affiliate will receive no future benefit or ownership interests from this transaction.
An application for up to $8.2 million of construction to permanent financing is underway. The interest rate on the loan is expected to be Libor plus 150 bps. The total cost of the project, inclusive of project construction, tenant incentives, leasing costs, and land is estimated at $10.2 million. Because the debt financing for the acquisition may exceed certain leverage limitations of the REIT, the Board, including all of its independent directors, will be required to approve any leverage exceptions as required by the REIT’s Articles of Incorporation.
Three tenants will occupy 100% of the property’s rentable square footage. The following table sets forth the name, business type, primary lease terms and certain other information with respect to each of these major tenants:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Name of Tenant | Business Type | Square Feet Leased | Percentage of Leasable Space | Annual Rent Payments | Lease Term from Commencement | Party with Renewal Rights | ||||||||||||||||||
Best Buy | Electronics Retailer | 20,200 | 32.9 | % | $ | 260,000 | 10 years | Tenant | ||||||||||||||||
Office Depot | Office Supplies Retailer | 21,000 | 34.3 | % | $ | 277,200 | 10 years | Tenant | ||||||||||||||||
Petsmart | Pet Supply Retailer | 20,087 | 32.8 | % | $ | 231,001 | 10 years | Tenant |
St. Augustine Expansion — Land Acquisition
St. Augustine — Land Acquisition
On October 2, 2007, the Company closed on the acquisition of an 8.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land for $2.75 million, which is intended to be used for further development of the adjacent Belz Outlet mall, owned by the Registrant. Development rights to the land parcel are to be purchased at an additional cost of $1.3 million. The Company currently expects to complete the planned renovation and expansion of the center, of approximately 65,000 square feet, during the second quarter of 2009. The cost for the renovation and expansion of the outlet mall is expected to approximate $28 million. Numerous established retail brands have expressed interest in establishing a presence in the expanded and renovated outlet mall.
Houston Extended Stay Hotels
On October 17, 2007, the Company, through TLG Hotel Acquisitions LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (together with such subsidiary, the “Houston Partnership”), acquired two hotels located in Houston, TX (the “Katy Hotel”) and Sugar Land, TX (the “Sugar Land Hotel” and together with the Katy Hotel, the “Hotels”) from Morning View Hotels — Katy, LP, Morning View Hotels — Sugar Land, LP and Point of Southwest Gardens, Ltd., pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. The seller is not an affiliate of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Prior to the acquisition of the Hotels, our board of directors expanded the Company’s eligible investments to include the acquisition, holding and disposition of hotels (primarily extended stay hotels). The reasons for such change include the expertise of our sponsor who acquired the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies (“ESH”) and control of its management company (HVM L.L.C.) which operates 684 extended stay hotels. The ability to draw upon their expertise, the intense competition in the real estate market for all types of assets and the ability to better diversify the Company’s portfolio, caused our board of directors to review the Company’s investment objectives and expand them to include lodging facilities.
The Hotels were recently remodeled by the previous owner, however the Company intends to make a $2.8 million dollar investment in capital expenditures to convert the Hotels to Extended Stay Deluxe (“ESD”) brand properties. The ESD brand is under license from an affiliate within the Extended Stay Hotels group of companies. Extended Stay Hotels group of companies The Company expects these additional renovations to be conducted over a 1-year period and will include implementing ESD’s national reservation system, new carpeting, new paint, new signage, exterior façade improvements, re-striping parking lot, guest room upgrades, landscaping and constructing pools.
131
The acquisition price for the Hotels was $16 million inclusive of closing costs. In connection with the transaction, the Company’s advisor received an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the contract price ($15.2 million), or approximately $0.4 million.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of $6.0 million in offering proceeds and approximately $10 million in loan proceeds from a floating rate mortgage loan secured by the Hotels.
The Company has established a taxable REIT subsidiary, LVP Acquisitions Corp. (“LVP Corp”), which has entered into operating lease agreements with each of the Katy Hotel and the Sugar Land Hotel, respectively, and LVP Corp. has entered into management agreements with HVM L.L.C., a controlled affiliate of our sponsor, for the management of the hotels.
In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 — Houston — Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 — Houston — Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $12.85 million, which includes up to an additional $2.8 million of renovation proceeds which will be borrowed as the renovation proceeds.
The mortgage loan has a term of one year with the option of a 6-month term extension, bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association Libor Daily Floating Rate plus one hundred seventy-five basis points (1.75%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest only through the first 12 months. The mortgage loan will mature on October 16, 2008, subject to the 6-month extension option described above, at which time payment of the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable thereunder will be due. The mortgage loan will be secured by the Hotels and will be non-recourse to the Registrant.
In connection with the Loan, the Registrant guaranteed the complete performance of the Houston Borrowers’ obligations with respect to the renovations and certain other customary guarantees.
Critical Accounting Policies
General. The consolidated financial statements of the Lightstone REIT include the accounts of Lightstone REIT and the Operating Partnership (over which Lightstone REIT exercises financial and operating control). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments about the effects of matters or future events that are inherently uncertain. These estimates and judgments may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including contingencies and litigation. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
To assist in understanding our results of operations and financial position, we have identified our critical accounting policies and discussed them below. These accounting policies are most important to the portrayal of our results and financial position, either because of the significance of the financial statement items to which they relate or because they require our management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.
Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Related Receivables. Our revenue, which will be comprised largely of rental income, will include rents that tenants pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since our leases may provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting will require us to record as an asset, and include in revenue, unbilled rent that we will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. Accordingly, we must determine, in our judgment, to
132
what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We will review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collection of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the allowance is increased or the direct write-off is recorded and would decrease our total assets and stockholders’ equity.
Investments in Real Estate. We will record investments in real estate at cost and will capitalize improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. We will expense costs of repairs and maintenance as incurred. We will compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our real estate assets, which we expect will be approximately 39 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for equipment and fixtures and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.
We will be required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to record on an annual basis with respect to our investments in real estate. These assessments will have a direct impact on our net income because, if we were to shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in real estate, we would depreciate these investments over fewer years, resulting in more depreciation expense and lower net income on an annual basis.
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which we refer to as SFAS 144, and which establishes a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets including discontinued operations. SFAS 144 requires that the operations related to properties that have been sold or that we intend to sell, be presented as discontinued operations in the statement of income for all periods presented, and properties we intend to sell be designated as “held for sale” on our balance sheet.
When circumstances such as adverse market conditions indicate a possible impairment of the value of a property, we will review the recoverability of the property’s carrying value. The review of recoverability will be based on our estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. Our forecast of these cash flows will consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss will be recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.
We will be required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the values of our investments in real estate. We will evaluate our ability to collect both interest and principal related to any real estate related investments in which we may invest. If circumstances indicate that such investment is impaired, we will reduce the carrying value of the investment to its net realizable value. Such reduction in value will be reflected as a charge to operations in the period in which the determination is made.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships) and assumed debt issued in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”), at the date of acquisition, based on evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, the Company allocates the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation. The allocations are finalized within twelve months of the acquisition date.
We will allocate the purchase price of an acquired property to tangible assets (which includes land, buildings and tenant improvements) based on the estimated fair values of those tangible assets assuming the
133
building was vacant. We will record above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. We will amortize any capitalized above-market lease values as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. We will amortize any capitalized below-market lease values as an increase to rental income over the initial term and any fixed-rate renewal periods in the respective leases.
We will measure the aggregate value of other intangible assets acquired based on the difference between (1) the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (2) the property valued as if vacant. Our estimates of value are expected to be made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors we may consider in our analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We will also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, we will also include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods. We will also estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.
The total amount of other intangible assets acquired will be further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship intangible values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics we will consider in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.
We will amortize the value of in-place leases to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which we would not expect to exceed 20 years. Currently, our leases range from one month to 11 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles will be amortized to expense over the initial term in the respective leases, but in no event will the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles will be charged to expense.
Joint Venture Investments. We will evaluate our joint venture investments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which we refer to as FIN 46R. If we determine that the joint venture is a “variable interest entity,” or a “VIE,” and that we are the “primary beneficiary” as defined in FIN 46R, we would account for such investment as if it were a consolidated subsidiary. For a joint venture investment which is not a VIE or in which we are not the primary beneficiary, we will consider Accounting Principle Board Opinion 18 — The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, Statement of Opinion 78-9 — Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 96-16 — Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has the Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Partners have Certain Approval or Veto Rights, to determine the method of accounting for each of our partially-owned entities.
In accordance with the above pronouncements, we will account for our investments in partially-owned entities under the equity method when we do not exercise direct or indirect control of the entity and our ownership interest is more than 3% but less than 50%, in the case of a partially-owned limited partnership, or more than 20% but less than 50%, in the case of all other partially-owned entities. Factors that we will consider in determining whether or not we exercise control include substantive participating rights of partners on significant business decisions, including dispositions and acquisitions of assets, financing and operating and capital budgets, board and management representatives and authority and other contractual rights of our partners. To the extent that we are deemed to control an entity, such entities will be consolidated.
134
On a periodic basis we will evaluate whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in partially owned entities are impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying amount. The ultimate realization of our investment in partially owned entities is dependent on a number of factors including the performance of that entity and market conditions. If we determine that a decline in the value of a partially owned entity is other than temporary, we will record an impairment charge.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Investments and Hedging Activities. We will account for our derivative and hedging activities, if any, using SFAS 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS 137,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, and SFAS 149,Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which require all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, will be considered cash flow hedges. We will formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk- management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. We will periodically review the effectiveness of each hedging transaction, which involves estimating future cash flows. Cash flow hedges will be accounted for by recording the fair value of the derivative instrument on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability, with a corresponding amount recorded in other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. Amounts will be reclassified from other comprehensive income to the income statement in the period or periods the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, will be considered fair value hedges under SFAS 133. We are not currently a party to any derivatives contracts.
Inflation
Our long-term leases are expected to contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on our operating results. Such provisions will include clauses entitling us to receive scheduled base rent increases and base rent increases based upon the consumer price index. In addition, our leases are expected to require tenants to pay a negotiated share of operating expenses, including maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in cost and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest
Management of our operations is outsourced to our advisor and certain other affiliates of our sponsor. Fees related to each of these services are accounted for based on the nature of such service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Lightstone REIT are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees associated with the purchase of a joint venture interest, asset management fees paid to our advisor and property management fees paid to our property manager.
Our property manager may also perform fee-based construction management services for both our re-development activities and tenant construction projects. These fees are considered incremental to the construction effort and will be capitalized to the associated real estate project as incurred in accordance with SFAS 67,Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects. Costs incurred for tenant construction will be depreciated over the shorter of their useful life or the term of the related lease. Costs related to redevelopment activities will be depreciated over the estimated useful life of the associated project.
Leasing activity at our properties has also been outsourced to our property manager. Any corresponding leasing fees we pay will be capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 91,Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.
135
Expense reimbursements made to both our advisor and property manager will be expensed or capitalized to the basis of acquired assets, as appropriate.
Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of our Sponsor, has and advises us that it intends to continue to purchase special general partner interests (“SLP Units”) in the Operating Partnership. These SLP Units, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC to a portion of any regular distributions made by the Operating Partnership. Such distributions will always be subordinated until stockholders receive a stated preferred return. Lightstone SLP, LLC has received its proportional share of distributions to date; representing a 7% annualized return on the value of its SLP Units, through September 30, 2007.
Proceeds from the sale of the SLP Units are used to fund organizational and offering costs incurred by the Lightstone REIT. As of September 30, 2007, offering costs of $11.6 million have been substantially offset by $11.4 million of proceeds from the sale of SLP Units. Lightstone SLP, LLC has purchased an additional $0.2 million of SLP Units subsequent to September 30, 2007.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code in conjunction with the filing of our 2006 federal tax return. In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual ordinary taxable income to stockholders. REITs are generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that they distribute to their stockholders. It is our intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain our REIT status.
As such, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the Lightstone REIT consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. As a REIT, we still may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.
Results of Operations
We commenced operations on February 1, 2006 upon the release of our offering proceeds from escrow. Additionally, we acquired our three initial real estate properties on March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, and December 21, 2006, respectively. Our management is not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of real estate and real estate related investments.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 vs. September 30, 2006
Revenues
Total revenues increased by approximately $12.7 million to approximately $17.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $4.6 million for the same period last year. Base rents increased by approximately $10.7 million primarily as a result of our acquisition of the Belz Outlets at St. Augustine, Florida on March 31, 2006,the southeastern Michigan multi-family properties on June 29, 2006, the Oakview Plaza in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006 and the gulf coast industrial portfolio on February 1, 2007. Tenant reimbursements increased by approximately $2.0 million, as a result of our acquiring the Belz Outlets at St. Augustine, Florida on March 31, 2006, the Oakview Plaza in Omaha, Nebraska on December 21, 2006 and the Gulf Coast industrial portfolio on February 1, 2007.
Property Operating Expenses
Total expenses increased by $4.2 million, to approximately $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to approximately $2.0 million for the same period last year. Increases in property operating expenses were primarily the result of the acquisition of new properties on March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, December 21, 2006 and February 1, 2007, respectively.
Real Estate Taxes
Total real estate taxes increased by $1.4 million, to approximately $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to approximately $0.5 million for the same period last year. Increases in real
136
estate taxes were primarily the result of the acquisition of new properties on March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, December 21, 2006 and February 1, 2007, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative costs increased by approximately $2.3 million to approximately $2.9 million, primarily as a result of the payment of acquisition and legal fees in the amount of $1.6 million and $50,000, respectively, related to the Lightstone REIT’s investment in the sub lease interest to a ground lease of a Manhattan office building. In addition, we incurred asset management fees in the amount of $0.5 million related to the Lightstone REIT’s assets at September 30, 2007. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $0.6 million. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as a result of acquisitions in future periods.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $4.5 million, as compared to $1.2 million at September 30, 2006 primarily due to the acquisition and financing of the properties on March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, December 21, 2006 and February 1, 2007, respectively.
Other Income
Other income increased by approximately $1.4 million due principally to $1.1 million of interest income on the short-term investment of cumulative Offering proceeds during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as well as approximately $0.3 million related to vending and other ancillary revenue sources at our properties.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased approximately $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to approximately $6.4 million, primarily as a result of the acquisition and financing of new properties on June 29, 2006, December 21, 2006 and February 1, 2007, respectively.
Equity in loss from investment in unconsolidated joint venture
A $5.9 million loss from investment in unconsolidated joint venture for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 relates to our investment in the sub lease interest to a ground lease of a Manhattan office building on January 4, 2007. There were no investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at September 30, 2006.
Minority Interest
The loss allocated to minority interests, representing approximately $168 and $73 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, relates to the interests in the Operating Partnership held by our Sponsor.
Comparison of the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 versus the twelve months ended December 31, 2005
Revenues
Total revenues increased 100%, or $8.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, compared to $0 for the same period last year. Rental income increased by approximately $7.3 million primarily as a result of a retail center in St. Augustine, FL on March 31, 2006 and a portfolio of residential properties in Southeast Michigan on June 29, 2006. Tenant recovery income increased by approximately $1.0 million primarily as a result of our acquisition of the St. Augustine, FL retail property. Revenues from a retail property in Omaha, NE, acquired on December 21, 2006, were not material to our 2006 financial results.
Total Property Expenses
Total expenses increased by $7.9 million, to approximately $8.0 million, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, compared to $0.1 million for the same period last year. Increases in property operating expenses ($3.7 million), real estate taxes ($0.9 million), and depreciation and amortization ($2.7 million) were primarily the result of the acquisition of two new properties. Expenses attributed to a retail property acquired on December 21, 2006 were not material to our 2006 results.
137
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative costs increased by $0.7 million, to $0.8 million, primarily as a result of the payment of asset management fees, director’s and officer’s liability insurance and fees to our board of directors, auditors and attorneys. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $117,571. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as a result of acquisitions in future periods. No fees of any kind were paid to the advisor for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.7 million in 2006, primarily due to the acquisition and financing of two new properties. Depreciation and amortization expenses of a retail property acquired on December 21, 2006 were not material to our 2006 results.
Other Income
Other income increased by approximately $0.8 million due principally to $0.5 million of interest income on the short-term investment of cumulative Offering proceeds during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2006 as well as $0.3 million related to vending and other ancillary revenue sources at our properties.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased 100%, or approximately $2.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of acquisition financings.
Minority Interest
The loss allocated to minority interests of approximately $86 and $1,164 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, relates to the interests in the Operating Partnership held by our sponsor.
Comparison of the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 versus the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
We commenced our public offering in May 2005; however, we did not receive and accept the minimum offering proceeds of $2,000,000 until February 1, 2006. On that date, we received the initial proceeds from our offering, acquired an interest in the Operating Partnership and commenced operations.
We had a net loss of approximately $116,407 for the year ended December 31, 2005 due primarily to general and administrative costs ($117,571) incurred subsequent to the commencement of our offering, but prior to our commencement of real estate operations.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $117,571 as compared to $0 in 2004. We expect these expenses to increase in the future based on a full year of operations as well as increased activity as we make additional real estate investments in future periods. No fees of any kind were paid to the advisor for the year ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The loss allocated to minority interests of approximately $1,164 for the year ended December 31, 2005 relates to the interests in the Operating Partnership held by our sponsor.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We intend that rental revenue will be the principal source of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and dividends, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures. To the extent that our cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to finance non-recurring capital expenditures such as property acquisitions, development and construction costs and other capital expenditures, we are dependent upon the net proceeds to be received from our public offering to conduct such proposed activities. We have financed and expect to continue to finance such activities through debt and equity financings. The capital required to purchase real estate investments will be obtained from our offering and from any indebtedness that we may incur in connection with the acquisition and operations of any real estate investments thereafter.
138
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through funds received in our public offering, working capital, and net cash provided by operating activities. We frequently examine potential property acquisitions and development projects and, at any given time, one or more acquisitions or development projects may be under consideration. Accordingly, the ability to fund property acquisitions and development projects is a major part of our financing requirements. We expect to meet our financing requirements through funds generated from our public offering and long-term and short-term borrowings.
We intend to utilize leverage in acquiring our properties. The number of different properties we will acquire will be affected by numerous factors, including, the amount of funds available to us. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on terms that are satisfactory to us, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time.
Our source of funds in the future will primarily be the net proceeds of our offering, operating cash flows and borrowings. We believe that these cash resources will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other than these sources within the next twelve months.
As of September 30, 2007, we had $148.5 million of outstanding mortgage debt. We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less.
Our charter provides that the aggregate amount of borrowing, both secured and unsecured, may not exceed 300% of net assets in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level is appropriate, the approval of our board of directors and disclosure to stockholders. Net assets means our total assets, other than intangibles, at cost before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves less our total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly on a basis consistently applied. Any excess in borrowing over such 300% of net assets level must be approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report to stockholders, along with justification for such excess. As of September 30, 2007, our total borrowings represented 157% of net assets.
Borrowings may consist of single-property mortgages as well as mortgages cross-collateralized by a pool of properties. Such mortgages may be put in place either at the time we acquire a property or subsequent to our purchasing a property for cash. In addition, we may acquire properties that are subject to existing indebtedness where we choose to assume the existing mortgages. Generally, though not exclusively, we intend to seek to encumber our properties with debt, which will be on a non-recourse basis. This means that a lender’s rights on default will generally be limited to foreclosing on the property. However, we may, at our discretion, secure recourse financing or provide a guarantee to lenders if we believe this may result in more favorable terms. When we give a guaranty for a property owning entity, we will be responsible to the lender for the satisfaction of the indebtedness if it is not paid by the property owning entity.
We intend to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year. Accordingly, we expect that some of the mortgages on our property will provide for fixed interest rates. However, we expect that most of the mortgages on our properties will provide for a so-called “balloon” payment and that certain of our mortgages will provide for variable interest rates. Any mortgages secured by a property will comply with the restrictions set forth by the Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California.
We may also obtain lines of credit to be used to acquire properties. These lines of credit will be at prevailing market terms and will be repaid from offering proceeds, proceeds from the sale or refinancing of properties, working capital or permanent financing. Our sponsor or its affiliates may guarantee the lines of credit although they will not be obligated to do so. We may draw upon the lines of credit to acquire properties pending our receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering. We expect that such properties may be purchased by our sponsor’s affiliates on our behalf, in our name, in order to avoid the imposition of a transfer tax upon a transfer of such properties to us.
139