ReachLocal (RLOC) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

Table Of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant    ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐Preliminary Proxy Statement	☐Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☑Definitive Proxy Statement
☐Definitive Additional Materials
☐Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

REACHLOCAL, INC. 

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant) 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☑	No fee required.
☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount previously paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

March 25, 2015

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to join us at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ReachLocal, Inc., which will be held at 9:00 a.m. (PDT) on April 29, 2015, at the Fairmont Miramar Hotel & Bungalows, 101 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90401.

At the meeting, we will ask our stockholders to vote on a proposal to elect Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve three-year terms as members of our board of directors. We will also ask our stockholders to ratify the audit committee’s appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

Our board of directors unanimously believes that each of the proposals is in the best interests of ReachLocal and its stockholders, and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve as directors, and a vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

We hope that you will take this opportunity to participate in the affairs of the company. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote on the Internet, by telephone or by completing and mailing a proxy card. If you hold your shares in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive instructions on how to vote your shares from your broker, bank or other nominee. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by submitting a proxy card or voting instructions will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting. Additional information about voting your shares is included in the proxy statement.

We look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting.

Sincerely,

Jim Geiger Chairman of the Board of Directors  Sharon T. Rowlands
Chief Executive Officer

REACHLOCAL, INC.

21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600
Woodland Hills, California 91367

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 29, 2015

To the Stockholders of ReachLocal, Inc.:

The 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ReachLocal, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held on April 29, 2015, at the Fairmont Miramar Hotel & Bungalows, 101 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90401,at 9:00 a.m. (PDT), for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following:

1. The election of Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve as members of our board of directors until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2. Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015; and

3. The transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2015 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any continuations, adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders eligible to vote at the annual meeting will be available for inspection at the meeting and at the executive offices of ReachLocal during regular business hours for at least ten days prior to the meeting.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting in person. Your vote is important to us, and we hope that you will take this opportunity to participate in the affairs of the company. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to read the accompanying materials regarding matters to be voted on at the meeting and follow the instructions provided to submit your proxy card or voting instructions. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by completing and mailing the proxy card enclosed with the proxy statement, or you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you hold your shares in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive instructions on how to vote your shares from such broker, bank or other nominee.

You may revoke your proxy delivered pursuant to this solicitation at any time prior to the annual meeting. If you attend the meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so automatically by voting in person at the meeting. If your shares are held in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee.We look forward to your participation.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Tenlay Naliboff

Secretary

Dated: March 25, 2015

TABLEOF CONTENTS

Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting	1
Ownership of the Company	5
Corporate Governance	7
Report of the Audit Committee	12
Audit Matters	13
Executive Officers of the Company	14
Report of the Compensation Committee	15
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	16
Executive Compensation Tables	27
Equity Compensation Plan Information	40
Proposal 1 — Election of Directors	41
Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	44
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions	45
Other Matters	46

i 

Table Of Contents

REACHLOCAL, INC.

21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600
Woodland Hills, California 91367

Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors (or the “Board”) of ReachLocal, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ReachLocal,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the company”), for use at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, April 29, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. PDT, at the Fairmont Miramar Hotel & Bungalows, 101 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90401, or at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof, for the purposes discussed in this proxy statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and any business properly brought before the annual meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the meeting. This proxy statement is first being released to stockholders on or about March 25, 2015.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON April 29, 2015

The following proxy materials are available for review at http://investors.reachlocal.com/annuals.cfm:

● our 2015 proxy statement;

● the proxy card;

● our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014; and

● any amendments to the foregoing materials that are required to be furnished to stockholders.

You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement?

You have been sent this proxy statement because you were a stockholder of record, or held ReachLocal stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, at the close of business on March 17, 2015, which is the record date for stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

What proposals will be considered at the annual meeting?

At the annual meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon the following proposals:

1. The election of Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve as members of the Board until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2. Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015; and

3. The transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any continuations, adjournments or postponements thereof.

We are not aware of any other business to be brought before the meeting. If any additional business is properly brought before the meeting, the designated officers serving as proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment.

The Board unanimously believes that each of the proposals is in the best interests of ReachLocal and its stockholders, and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve as directors, and a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

1

Table Of Contents

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

We have set March 17, 2015 as the record date for this year’s annual meeting. All stockholders of record who owned our stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to this notice and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

As of the record date, there were 29,297,843 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

How many votes do I have?

Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote at the annual meeting. You have one vote per share that you owned at the close of business on the record date.

How do I vote my shares?

You may vote by attending the annual meeting and voting in person, or you may vote by submitting a proxy card or voting instructions. The method of voting by proxy differs for shares held as a record holder and shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder, you may vote your shares by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that was included with the proxy statement and promptly returning it in the preaddressed, postage paid envelope provided to you, or by submitting a proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you hold your shares of common stock in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive the proxy materials from your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or other nominee may allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the Internet and may also permit you to vote by telephone.

Internet and telephone voting for record holders will end at 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on April 28, 2015. If you vote by Internet or telephone, then you need not return a written proxy card by mail.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. You should submit your proxy even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. If you properly give your proxy and submit it to us in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed.

What happens if I vote my shares by proxy?

If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us in time to vote, or vote your shares by telephone or Internet, you authorize our officers listed on the proxy card to vote your shares on your behalf as you direct.

If you sign and return a proxy card, but do not provide instructions on how to vote your shares, the designated officers will vote on each of the presented proposals on your behalf as follows:

● “FOR” Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz to serve as directors; and

● “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

2

Table Of Contents

Can I change or revoke my vote after I return my proxy card or voting instructions?

If you choose to vote your shares by giving a proxy pursuant to this solicitation, you may revoke or change your proxy instructions at any time prior to the casting of votes at the annual meeting if you take any of the following actions:

● Execute and submit a new proxy card;

● Submit new voting instructions through telephonic or Internet voting, if available to you;

● Notify Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary of ReachLocal, in writing at the address provided on page , that you wish to revoke your proxy; or

● Attend the annual meeting and vote your shares in person if you are a record holder.

If your shares are held in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee.

Who pays for the proxy solicitation and how will ReachLocal solicit votes?

We pay all costs associated with the solicitation of proxies. We will also pay any costs incurred by brokers and other fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners.

Proxies may be solicited by any of our directors, officers or employees on behalf of the Board by mail or in person, by telephone, via facsimile or e-mail. Additionally, we have retained the firm of MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies and will pay a fee of $5,000 for this service, plus reasonable costs and expenses.

How many votes must be present to hold the annual meeting?

In order to conduct business and have a valid vote at the annual meeting, a quorum must be present in person or represented by proxies. A quorum is defined as a majority of the shares outstanding on the record date and entitled to vote. In accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “bylaws”) and Delaware law, proxies reflecting broker “non-votes” and abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.

What are broker “non-votes”?

Brokers who hold shares for the accounts of their clients may vote such shares either as directed by their clients, or in the absence of such direction, in their own discretion if permitted by the stock exchange or other organization of which they are members. As members of the New York Stock Exchange, most banks, brokers or other nominees are permitted to vote their clients’ proxies in their own discretion as to certain “routine” proposals. If a broker votes shares for which a client has not given voting instructions for or against a routine proposal, those shares are considered present and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Those shares will be counted towards determining whether or not a quorum is present and will also be taken into account in determining the outcome of the routine proposals. However, where a proposal is not routine, a broker who has received no instructions from its client generally does not have discretion to vote its clients’ uninstructed shares on that proposal. When a broker indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular proposal, the missing votes are referred to as broker “non-votes.” Those shares will be considered present for the purpose of determining whether or not a quorum is present, but will not be considered entitled to vote on the non-routine proposals and, therefore, will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the non-routine proposals. For this meeting, only Proposal 2 (ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine matter. Proposal 1 (election of directors) is not considered a routine matter, and without your instructions, your broker cannot vote your shares on that proposal.

3

Table Of Contents

How many votes are required to approve the proposals?

Proposal	Vote Required	Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed
Proposal 1 — Election of Directors	Plurality of Votes Cast	NO
Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	Majority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by Proxy	YES

Detailed information regarding each of the proposals to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting, and the means for stockholders to present proposals to be considered at the 2016 Annual Meeting, are presented on the following pages. Additional information about us, our Board and its committees, equity ownership, compensation of officers and directors and other matters can be found starting at page .

What does it mean if I receive more than one set of materials?

If you receive more than one set of materials, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. In order to vote all the shares you own, you must either sign and return all of the proxy cards or voting instruction forms or follow the instructions for any alternative voting procedure on each of the proxy cards or voting instruction forms you receive.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?

 Voting results will be announced by the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the annual meeting. If final voting results are unavailable at that time, we will file an amended Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the day the final results are available.

Whom can I contact for assistance?

If you need assistance in voting over the Internet, by telephone or by completing your proxy card or have questions regarding the annual meeting, please contact Tenlay Naliboff at (818) 274-0260 or write to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600, Woodland Hills, California 91367. 

4

Table Of Contents

OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY

Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 17, 2015 by:

● each person who we believe beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock based on our records and our review of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings;

● our directors, director nominees and named executive officers; and

● all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership, which is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, means the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose or direct the disposition of our common stock. The number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by a person includes shares of common stock issuable with respect to options held by the person that are exercisable within 60 days. The percentage of our common stock beneficially owned by a person assumes that the person has exercised all options the person holds which are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015 and that no other persons exercised any of their options.

Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table or in cases where community property laws apply, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that each person identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the person.

Except as otherwise indicated, the business address for each of the following persons is 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600, Woodland Hills, California 91367.

	Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of March 17,
	2015
	Number of Shares		Percent
Greater Than 5% Stockholders:
VantagePoint Capital Partners (1)		12,822,377		43.4	%
Rho Ventures (2)		2,797,911		9.5	%
Trigran Investments (3)		2,023,037		6.9	%
Morgan Stanley (4)		1,875,327		6.4	%
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Sharon Rowlands (5)		320,000		1.1	%
Ross Landsbaum (6)		91,374		*
Kris Barton (7)		35,965		*
Adam Wergeles (8)		75,030		*
David Carlick (9)		296,259		1.0	%
Joshua Claman	–			*
James Geiger (10)		228,892		*
Thomas Hale	–			*
Habib Kairouz (2)		2,797,911		9.5	%
Lawrence Kutscher	–			*
Alan Salzman (1)		12,822,377		43.4	%
Edward Thompson (11)		63,987		*
Directors and Officers as a Group (12 persons) (12)		16,731,795		55.2	%

* Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding common stock.

(1) Includes 22,046 shares held by VantagePoint Management, Inc., 237,775 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners III, L.P., 1,952,995 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners III (Q), L.P., 846,099 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners IV, L.P., 8,451,641 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners IV(Q), L.P., 30,789 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners IV Principals Fund, L.P., 1,021,222 shares held by VantagePoint Venture Partners 2006(Q), L.P., 3,851 shares held by Mr. Salzman, 180,959 shares subject to options held by Mr. Salzman that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015, and 75,000 shares subject to options held by Jason Whitt, a former director of the company who was affiliated with VantagePoint, that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015. Each entity listed above shares voting power with respect to the shares held by it. Mr. Salzman, one of our directors, is the chief executive officer of VantagePoint Management, Inc. and also a managing member of the general partners of the limited partnerships listed above, and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares. Mr. Salzman disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to all shares beneficially owned by entities affiliated with VantagePoint Capital Partners, except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein. The address of the entities and Mr. Salzman is 1001 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300, San Bruno, CA 94066.

5

Table Of Contents

(2) Includes 2,362,930 shares held by Rho Ventures V, L.P. (“RV V”), 207,465 shares held by Rho Ventures V Affiliates, L.L.C. (“RV V Affiliates”), 46,557 shares held by Mr. Kairouz and 180,959 shares subject to options held by Mr. Kairouz that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015. These stockholders are affiliated with RMV V, L.L.C. (“RMV”). RMV is the general partner of RV V and the managing member of RV V Affiliates. Rho Capital Partners LLC (“RCP LLC”) is the managing member of RMV. As such, RCP LLC and RMV possess power to direct the voting and disposition of the shares owned by RV V and RV V Affiliates and may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the shares held by RV V and RV V Affiliates. RCP LLC and RMV hold no shares of the Issuer directly. Mr. Kairouz, one of our directors, Mark Leschly and Joshua Ruch are the managing members of RCP LLC, the managing member of RMV. As such, Messrs.Kairouz, Leschly and Ruch possess power to direct the voting and disposition of the shares owned by RV V and RV V Affiliates and may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the shares held by RV V and RV V Affiliates. Mr. Kairouz disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address of Rho Capital Partners, Inc. is Carnegie Hall Tower, 152 West 57th Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10019.

(3) The 2,023,037 shares shown as beneficially owned are as reported by Trigran Investments, Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC and dated February 13, 2015. Trigran also filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of Douglas Granat, Lawrence A. Oberman, Steven G. Simon and Bradley F. Simon. Messrs. Granat, Oberman, Simon and Simon are the controlling shareholders and/or sole directors of Trigran Investments, Inc. and thus may be considered the beneficial owners of shares beneficially owned by Trigran Investments, Inc. Trigran Investments, Inc. and Messrs. Granat, Oberman, Simon and Simon share voting and dispositive power with respect to all 2,023,037 shares shown as beneficially owned. The address of Trigran and each individual is 630 Dundee Road, Suite 230, Northbrook, IL 60062.

(4) The 1,875,327 shares shown as beneficially owned are as reported by Morgan Stanley in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC and dated February 5, 2015. Morgan Stanley filed the Schedule 13G/A on behalf of itself and its wholly owned subsidiary Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC. Morgan Stanley has shared voting power with respect to 1,100 of such shares, and Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC share dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. The address of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC is 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.

(5) Includes 150,000 restricted shares subject to forfeiture.

(6) Includes 44,731 restricted shares subject to forfeiture and 46,643 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015.

(7) Consists of 35,965 restricted shares subject to forfeiture.

(8) Includes 27,720 restricted shares subject to forfeiture and 47,310 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015.

(9) Includes 230,959 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015.

(10) Includes 201,792 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015.

(11) Consists of 53,987 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015.

(12) Includes an aggregate of 1,017,609 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2015 that are held by our directors and officers as a group.

6

Table Of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Composition of the Board

Our Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines to establish the company’s overall governance practices. These guidelines can be found in the corporate governance section of our website at http://investors.reachlocal.com. In addition, these guidelines are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Please direct all requests to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600, Woodland Hills, California 91367. The Board does not believe that its members should be prohibited from serving on boards of other organizations. In accordance with the corporate governance guidelines, however, a member of our Board may serve as a director of another company only to the extent such position does not conflict or interfere with such person’s service as our director, and the nominating and corporate governance committee takes into account the nature of and time involved in a director’s service on other boards and/or committees in evaluating the suitability of individual director candidates and current directors and making its recommendations to our company’s stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Jim Geiger is our non-executive Chairman and has served in that role since December 2014. In making the determination to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO, our Board did not make a general determination that such separation is necessarily a better or more effective Board leadership structure for our company. Rather, based on the historical relationships among our directors, the contemplated make-up of our Board in the near-term, and Mr. Geiger’s substantial experience as a member of the Board, our Board determined that appointing Mr. Geiger as non-executive Chairman is the appropriate Board leadership structure for our company and our stockholders at this time.

Our Board currently has six independent members and one non-independent member, our Chief Executive Officer.     

A number of our independent Board members are currently serving or have served as members of senior management of other public companies and have served as directors of other public companies. We have three standing Board committees comprised solely of directors who are considered independent under the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) standards. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up our Board, along with the independent oversight of the Board by the non-executive Chairman, benefits our company and our stockholders.

Our Board is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. Our Board, as a whole, determines the appropriate level of risk for the company, assesses the specific risks that we face and reviews management’s strategies for adequately mitigating and managing the identified risks. Although our Board administers this risk management oversight function, each of our three standing Board committees supports our Board in discharging its oversight duties and addresses risks inherent in its respective area. We believe this division of responsibilities is an effective approach for addressing the risks we face and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach. In particular, the audit committee is responsible for considering and discussing our significant accounting and financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to control and monitor these exposures, and the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for considering and discussing our significant corporate governance risk exposures and the actions management has taken to control and monitor these exposures. The audit and nominating and corporate governance committees receive periodic reports from management with regard to these types of risks. While the Board oversees our risk management, company management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. Our Board expects company management to consider risk and risk management in each business decision, to pro-actively develop and monitor risk management strategies and processes for day-to-day activities and to effectively implement risk management strategies adopted by the audit committee and the Board.

Our compensation committee, with input from our management, assists our Board in reviewing and assessing whether any of our compensation policies and programs could potentially encourage excessive risk-taking. In considering our employee compensation policies and practices, the compensation committee reviews, in depth, our policies related to payment of salaries and wages, commissions, benefits, bonuses, stock-based compensation and other compensation-related practices and considers the relationship between risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and compensation. A primary focus of our compensation program for 2014 was to incentivize and reward growth in revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, among other metrics. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Summary—2014 Performance” for our definition of Adjusted EBITDA. We believe these metrics are positive indicators of our long-term growth, operating results and increased stockholder value and therefore believe that our compensation program does not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.

7

Table Of Contents

Board Independence

In accordance with Nasdaq standards and ReachLocal’s corporate governance guidelines, our Board has determined that the nominees for election to the Board at the annual meeting and all continuing directors, other than Ms. Rowlands, are independent under Nasdaq standards. In making this determination, the Board considered all relationships between ReachLocal and each director and each director’s family members.

Board Meetings

Our Board held ten meetings during 2014. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served. The Chairman of the Board, Mr. Geiger, or his designee, determines the order of business and the procedure at each meeting, including the regulation of the manner of voting and the conduct of business. The Board frequently meets in executive session without management or other employees present. The Chairman of the Board presides over these meetings. We encourage our directors and nominees for director to attend our annual meetings of stockholders, and all of our directors attended our 2014 Annual Meeting.

Board Committees

Our Board maintains a standing audit committee, nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation committee. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board. To view the charter of each of these committees please visit the corporate governance section of our website athttp://investors.reachlocal.com. The membership of all of our standing Board committees as of the record date is as follows:

Director	Audit Committee		NominatingandCorporateGovernance Committee		Compensation Committee
James Geiger				M		C
Thomas Hale		M
Habib Kairouz		M		M
Lawrence Kutscher						M
Alan Salzman				C		M
Edward Thompson		C

“M”      Member 

“C”      Chairperson

8

Table Of Contents

Audit Committee

We have an audit committee that has responsibility for, among other things:

● overseeing management’s maintenance of the reliability and integrity of our accounting policies and financial reporting and our disclosure practices;

● overseeing management’s establishment and maintenance of processes to assure that an adequate system of internal control is functioning;

● reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements;

● appointing and evaluating the independent accountants and considering and approving any non-audit services proposed to be performed by the independent accountants; and

● discussing with management and our Board our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, as well as our significant financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such exposures, if any.

The current members of our audit committee are Messrs. Hale, Kairouz and Thompson, with Mr. Thompson serving as the committee’s chair. All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy, and the requirements for independence, under Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. Our Board has determined that Mr. Thompson is an audit committee “financial expert,” as that term is defined by the applicable rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The audit committee met 11 times during 2014.

Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq. A copy of the audit committee charter is available in the corporate governance section of our website athttp://investors.reachlocal.com.

Compensation Committee

We have a compensation committee that has responsibility for, among other things:

● reviewing management and employee compensation policies, plans and programs;

● monitoring performance and compensation of our executive officers and other key employees;

● preparing recommendations and periodic reports to our Board concerning these matters; and

● administering our equity incentive plans.

The compensation committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the compensation committee, but only to the extent consistent with our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Nasdaq rules and other applicable law.

The members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Geiger, Kutscher and Salzman, with Mr. Geiger serving as the committee’s chair. All of the members of our compensation committee are “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, “outside directors” as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code and satisfy the independence requirements of Nasdaq. In concluding that each of its compensation committee members is independent under applicable Nasdaq rules, the Board considered whether members have relationships with the company that are material to members’ ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including each member’s source of compensation and whether members are affiliated with the company, one of the company’s subsidiaries, or an affiliate of a company subsidiary. The compensation committee met seven times during 2014.

Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq. A copy of the compensation committee’s charter is available in the corporate governance section of our website athttp://investors.reachlocal.com.

9

Table Of Contents

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We have a nominating and corporate governance committee that has responsibility for, among other things:

● recommending persons to be selected by our Board as nominees for election as directors and to fill any vacancies on our Board;

● considering and recommending to our Board qualifications for the position of director and policies concerning the term of office of directors and the composition of our Board; and

● considering and recommending to our Board other actions relating to corporate governance.

The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Messrs. Geiger, Kairouz and Salzman, with Mr. Salzman serving as the committee’s chair. All members of our nominating and corporate governance committee meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq. When recommending persons to be selected by the Board as nominees for election as directors, the nominating and corporate governance committee considers such factors as the individual’s personal and professional integrity, ethics and values, experience in corporate management, experience in our company’s industry and with relevant social policy concerns, experience as a board member of another publicly held company, academic expertise in an area of our company’s operations and practical and mature business judgment. In addition, although the nominating and corporate governance committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, the nominating and corporate governance committee considers diversity of relevant experience, expertise and background in identifying nominees for directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee met four times during 2014.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq. A copy of the nominating and corporate governance committee charter is available in the corporate governance section of our website athttp://investors.reachlocal.com.

The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. For a stockholder to make any nomination for election to the Board at an annual meeting, the stockholder must provide notice, which notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, that if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered, or mailed and received, not earlier than the 120^th and not later than the 90^th day prior to the date of the annual meeting or, if later, the 10^th day following the date on which public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is made. Further updates and supplements to such notice may be required at the times and in the forms required under our bylaws.As set forth in our bylaws, submissions must include, among other things, the name and address of the proposed nominee; the class or series and number of shares of the company that are, directly or indirectly, owned of record or beneficially owned by such proposed nominee; information regarding the proposed nominee that is required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings in a contested election pursuant to Section 14(a) under the Exchange Act; a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements during the past three years between the nominating person and the proposed nominee; and a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement of the proposed nominee. Our bylaws also specify further requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. We recommend that any stockholder wishing to make a nomination for director review a copy of our bylaws, as amended and restated to date, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367. The nominating and corporate governance committee did not receive any director recommendations from stockholders for consideration at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Communication with the Board

Interested persons, including stockholders, may communicate with our Board, including the non-employee directors, by sending a letter to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367. Our Secretary will submit all correspondence to the Chairman of our Board and to any specific director to whom the correspondence is directed.

10

Table Of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our compensation committee is currently, or has been at any time, one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, as a member of the compensation committee of the board of directors (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve as members of our compensation committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct, anti-bribery and corruption, and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The code of business conduct, anti-bribery and corruption, and ethics is available in the corporate governance section of our website at http://investors.reachlocal.com. Any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website as required by applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.

11

Table Of Contents

report of the audit committee

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ReachLocal, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

The primary purpose of the audit committee is to oversee our financial reporting processes on behalf of our Board. The audit committee’s functions are more fully described in its charter, which is available under the corporate governance section of our website athttp://investors.reachlocal.com. Management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements and reporting processes, including our systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed with management ReachLocal’s audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

The audit committee has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP, our company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16. In addition, the audit committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Grant Thornton LLP’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its independence from us. Finally, the audit committee discussed with Grant Thornton LLP, with and without management present, the scope and results of Grant Thornton LLP’s audit of such financial statements.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the audit committee has recommended to our Board that such audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for filing with the SEC. The audit committee also has engaged Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 and is seeking ratification of such selection by the stockholders.

Audit Committee of the Board

Ed Thompson (Chair)

Thomas Hale

Habib Kairouz 

12

Table Of Contents

audit matters

Independent Public Accountants

The audit committee approved all audit and non-audit services provided by Grant Thornton LLP, our principal accountant, during the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years. The total fees paid or payable to Grant Thornton LLP for the last two fiscal years are as follows:

Type of Fees	Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2013
Audit Fees	$	1,010,066	$	1,205,829
Audit-Related Fees		—		17,280
Tax Fees		3,280		—
All Other Feess		51,923		—
Total	$	1,065,269	$	1,223,109

Audit Fees

This category includes fees billed for the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years for the audits of our annual consolidated financial statements and the reviews of each of the quarterly consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, services rendered in connection with our S-8, audit of internal control over financial reporting related to requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and other matters related to the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

This category includes fees associated with agreed upon procedures related to the computation of our underclassmen expense for the 2013 fiscal year.

Tax Fees

This category represents fees primarily incurred in connection withprofessional services for tax compliance.

All Other Fees

Other fees include professional services related to due diligence services performed by Grant Thornton LLP in connection with our acquisitions.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The audit committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by its independent registered public accounting firm.  This policy is set forth in our audit committee charter, which is available on our website.

The audit committee considered whether the non-audit services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP were compatible with maintaining Grant Thornton LLP’s independence as our independent registered public accounting firm and concluded that they were. 

13

Table Of Contents

executiveofficers of the company

Set forth below is information regarding our executive officers as of March 19, 2015:

Name	Age	Position
Sharon Rowlands	56	Chief Executive Officer, Director
Ross G. Landsbaum	52	Chief Financial Officer
Kris Barton	39	Chief Product Officer
Paras Maniar	37	Chief Strategy Officer

Sharon Rowlands has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board since April 2014. For additional information regarding Ms. Rowlands, see “Proposal 1—Election of Directors—Director Biographical Information—Directors Continuing in Office until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

Ross G. Landsbaumhas served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Landsbaum held various executive positions at MacAndrews and Forbes’ Panavision, a service provider to the motion picture and television industries, including Chief Financial Officer from 2005 to 2007 and Chief Operating Officer in 2007. Prior to Panavision, Mr. Landsbaum served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial Officer for Miramax Films, the art-house and independent film division of The Walt Disney Company, from 2001 to 2005. Prior to that, he served in various capacities, including as the Chief Financial Officer at Spelling Entertainment Group, a diversified entertainment concern, and in various capacities at Arthur Andersen. Mr. Landsbaum currently serves on the board of directors of Outerwall, a leading provider of automated retail solutions. Mr. Landsbaum holds a Master of Accounting and a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Southern California.

Kris Bartonhas served as our Chief Product Officer since February 2012. Previously, he was Chief Operating Officer of multimedia software and platform company Nero AG from 2010 to 2012 and was Nero’s Executive Vice President of Global Products, overseeing all product development, from 2006 to 2010. Prior to Nero, Mr. Barton served in multiple management roles at Microsoft Corporation from 2001 to 2006, overseeing the product development efforts for the MSN online properties including MSN.com and MSN network channels. Mr. Barton has also held product positions at Omniture and Novell Corporation. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in business administration and marketing communications from Brigham Young University.

Paras Maniar has served as our Chief Strategy Officer since March 2015. Before joining us, from 2013 to 2014 Mr. Maniar was Principal and Head of North America at WPSChallenger, an investment firm focused on the digital media, online and social gaming, and data science sectors. Prior to that, Mr. Maniar was a founding executive of EQAL, a media startup acquired by Everyday Health. While at EQAL from 2008 to 2012, Mr. Maniar served in various executive roles including Chief Strategy Officer, EVP of Corporate Development, Chief Operating Officer and board member. Mr. Maniar was also a member of McKinsey and Company’s Telecomm, Media and Technology practice from 2004 to 2008. He has an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management, a Juris Doctor from the Northwestern University School of Law, and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Political Economies from the University of California, Berkeley.

14

Table Of Contents

report of the compensation committee

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ReachLocal, Inc. under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The compensation committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Compensation Committee of the Board

Jim Geiger (Chair)

Larry Kutscher

Alan Salzman 

15

Table Of Contents

compensation discussion and analysis

This section discusses the principles underlying our policies and decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” and the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions. The “named executive officers” for 2014 include Sharon Rowlands, Chief Executive Officer; David Carlick, former Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board; Ross G. Landsbaum, Chief Financial Officer; Kris Barton, Chief Product Officer; Adam F. Wergeles, Former Chief Legal Officer; and Joshua Claman, former President. Mr. Wergeles resigned in March 2015, Mr. Claman resigned in May 2014, and Mr. Carlick resigned as Interim CEO in April 2014 and as a board member in December 2014.

Executive Summary

Our compensation strategy generally focuses on providing a total compensation package that will not only attract and retain high-caliber executive officers and employees, but will also be utilized as a tool to communicate and align employee contributions with our corporate objectives and stockholder interests. It is our philosophy to provide a competitive total compensation package that enables our named executive officers, as well as our other employees, to share our success when our objectives are met. In 2014, given the challenges confronting the business, there was also a need to focus on compensatory tools to encourage retention.

Pay for Performance

Pay for performance is an important component of our compensation philosophy. Consistent with this focus, our compensation program includes annual performance-based bonuses and long-term equity-based compensation, primarily in the form of stock options. We have not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between long-term and short-term compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of cash and non-cash compensation. For 2014, on average, approximately 65% of our named executive officers’ (excluding Mr. Carlick, who only served as Chief Executive Officer on an interim basis) potential compensation came from variable, performance-based pay consisting of performance-based bonuses and incentive stock option awards. Non-variable pay included base salaries and other perquisites and benefits. The chart below shows the mix between potential variable performance-based pay and non-variable pay for our named executive officers in 2014 (excluding Mr. Carlick). Our calculations of variable and non-variable pay, and the pay mix chart below, do not include the one-time special bonuses paid in April 2014 or the extension of time to exercise of one of Mr. Landsbaum’s underwater stock options, each as described below, because they occurred outside of our normal compensation program, and we do not anticipate making similar bonuses or option extensions a standard component of our compensation program.

Annual Cash Bonus Plan. For 2014, the compensation committee adopted the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan. In contrast to prior years when the bonus plan included both formulaic and discretionary components, the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan included only a formulaic component. The compensation committee believed that removing the discretionary component to our annual bonus program would ensure our executives’ continued focus on achieving results important to our stockholders, and was more consistent with the annual bonus programs of our peers.

16

Table Of Contents

As is more fully discussed under “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” below, the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, or the bonus plan, established a target bonus pool, which was divided into two component target bonus pools: (i) 50% of the total bonus pool was tied to achievement of certain revenue objectives, and (ii) 50% of the total bonus pool was tied to achievement of certain Adjusted EBITDA, or AEBITDA, objectives (for information regarding our definition of Adjusted EBITDA, see “Determination of Compensation—Compensation Philosophy” below). The company’s achievement against the applicable targets would determine multipliers to be applied to the component target bonus pools. Neither Ms. Rowlands nor Mr. Carlick were eligible to participate in the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan.

Neither the minimum revenue target nor the minimum AEBITDA target was met for 2014, and accordingly, no bonuses were paid under the bonus plan.

Ms. Rowlands, who joined the company in April 2014, instead was eligible to receive a prorated bonus of up to $468,750 for 2014. In light of the company’s performance, however, Ms. Rowlands was not paid a bonus for 2014.

Alignment with Stockholder Interests—Equity Awards

We believe that our equity compensation program supports a long-term performance orientation by aligning interests between our executives and our stockholders. In addition, equity compensation awards with multi-year vesting requirements are intended to serve as a retention tool. We therefore view equity compensation as an important component of our executive compensation program. We provide long-term incentive awards to executives primarily through grants of stock options and restricted stock awards. Equity-based awards represented between 30% and 84% of our named executive officers’ (other than Mr. Carlick) compensation opportunities for 2014.

Ordinary Course Equity Awards. We generally use stock options to compensate our named executive officers both in the form of initial grants in connection with the commencement of employment and additional or “refresher” grants. Although the compensation committee typically grants annual refresher grants, we have not established a formula or program for determining the size of any equity award, including any annual refresher grants, and our compensation committee retains discretion to make stock option awards to employees at any time, including in connection with the promotion of an employee, to reward an employee, for retention purposes or in other circumstances recommended by management. In February 2014, each of Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman received a “refresher” stock option grant in accordance with our past practices. In May 2014, Mr. Carlick received a stock option in accordance with our non-employee director compensation program following his resignation as Interim Chief Executive Officer. In November 2014, Mr. Barton received an additional stock option grant to incentivize him to meet additional demands on the product and technology organization, which he manages.

Grants to Ms. Rowlands. Upon joining the company as CEO in April 2014, and as a result of arms-length negotiations, Ms. Rowlands received options to purchase a total of 850,000 shares at an exercise price of $10.30 per share. In order to reinforce the retention value of the equity awards granted to Ms. Rowlands, given our deteriorating operating performance that the compensation committee believed was primarily attributable to events and circumstances that predated the commencement of her tenure, the compensation committee also granted to Ms. Rowlands 150,000 shares of restricted stock on May 21, 2014.See“Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Equity Incentives—2014 Equity Awards” for more information.

StockOption Exchange. As more fully described below, on November 24, 2014, our stockholders approved a one-time stock option exchange for eligible employees that permitted such employees, including our executive officers, to surrender certain underwater stock options for cancellation in exchange for the grant of new replacement options to purchase the same number of shares having an exercise price equal to the greater of $6.00 per share and the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the offer expiration date. The closing price of our common stock on the offer expiration date (January 9, 2015) was less than $6.00, and as a result each replacement option has an exercise price of $6.00, which was 94% above the fair market value of our common stock on that day. The options granted under the exchange vest over a four-year period. The stock option exchange was implemented because approximately 99% of our outstanding options were underwater (and most significantly so) and we believed they were not serving the intended purpose of providing meaningful incentives to motivate and retain our employees, including our executive officers.

17

Table Of Contents

One-Time Special Bonus

In view of the significant management changes that took place at the end of 2013, which culminated in the appointment of Ms. Rowlands in April 2014, the compensation committee exercised its discretion to grant bonuses in April 2014 to Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman, who each assumed significantly greater responsibility for managing the company while the company was seeking a permanent Chief Executive Officer.

Good Governance and Best Practices

In furtherance of our objective of implementing policies and practices that are mindful of the concerns of our stockholders, (i) our compensation committee is comprised solely of independent directors, (ii) our compensation committee retained an independent compensation consultant to provide it with advice on matters related to executive compensation, non-employee director remuneration and assistance with preparing compensation disclosure for inclusion in our SEC filings, and (iii) our compensation committee meets frequently so as to be certain that it remains current with the performance of our senior management team and addresses compensation matters in a timely manner.

We also endeavor to structure our executive compensation program in a manner that reflects best practices, including the following:

● Our current compensation programs limit cash severance payments to not more than six months’ base salary upon a termination of employment without cause or for good reason;

● We do not provide for the payment of excise tax gross-ups on severance or other change in control payments; and

● We maintain compensation arrangements that provide only for “double trigger” (and not “single trigger”) cash severance provisions in connection with a change in control of the company.

We provide our stockholders with the opportunity to cast a triennial advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (a “say-on-pay proposal”). A substantial majority of the votes cast at our 2014 Annual Meeting, our most recent annual meeting at which a say-on-pay proposal was presented to our stockholders, voted in favor of our say-on-pay proposal. In evaluating our executive compensation program, the compensation committee considered the results of the say-on-pay proposal and other factors as discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The compensation committee will consider the outcome of the company’s next say-on-pay vote, which will be cast at our 2017 Annual Meeting.

Determination of Compensation 

Roles of Our Board of Directors, Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions

Our compensation committee oversees our executive compensation program. Our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to our compensation committee with respect to salary adjustments, annual cash incentive bonus targets (if applicable), and awards and equity incentive awards for the named executive officers (excluding herself) and the other executive officers that report to her. Our compensation committee meets with our Chief Executive Officer at least annually to discuss and review her recommendations, together with the market data provided by its independent compensation consultant regarding executive compensation for our executive officers (excluding him). Our policy has been that our compensation committee considers these recommendations in determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and our other senior officers, and has the ability to increase or decrease amounts of compensation payable to our executive officers pursuant to those recommendations.

18

Table Of Contents

Competitive Market Data and Use of Compensation Consultants

Since 2010, our compensation committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., or Cook, to advise on executive compensation matters. For 2014, the compensation committee again retained Cook, who compiled a peer group of companies against which to assess the three key components comprising our named executive officers’ compensation: base salary, cash bonus and equity incentives. The peer group consisted of the following 16 publicly-traded Internet and distribution companies:

Active Network	Dealer Track	Vistaprint
Angies List	Marchex	Web.com Group
Boingo Wireless	OpenTable	Wed MD Group
cBeyond	QuinStreet	Yelp
Com.Score	Shutterfly
Constant Contact	ValueClick

This peer group was largely identical to the peer group we used in 2013, with the only change being the removal of Kenexa due to its acquisition by IBM in December 2012 (meaning that compensation data was no longer publicly available). Our trailing 12-month revenues approximate the 80th percentile of the 2014 peer group’s then most recently reported trailing 12-month revenues.

For 2014, our compensation committee considered peer group data, but only as one element of the compensation committee’s overall consideration of the appropriate compensation levels. Our compensation committee does not aim to set total compensation, or any compensation element, at a specified level as compared to the companies in this peer group. Although our compensation committee considered Cook’s peer group analysis in considering our executive compensation program in 2014, our compensation committee ultimately made their own decisions about these matters, based on the peer group analysis and their own business experience and judgment.

For the 2015 peer group, the compensation committee made some fairly significant changes to add companies that better reflected the company’s evolving business model. Boingo Wireless, Shutterfly and WebMD were removed as their business models are not sufficiently similar to the company’s and the following nine companies were added: Digital River, Endurance International, Marketo, Millennial Media, Rocket Fuel, Rubicon Project, Sizmek, TechTarget and Tremor Video. Our trailing 12-month revenues approximate the 82^nd percentile of the 2015 peer group’s then most recently reported trailing 12-month revenues.

Cook performs services solely on behalf of the compensation committee and, except as it may relate to the performance of such services, did not provide any other services to the company or company management in 2014. Cook provided the following services to the compensation committee in 2014: advising on the design of the company’s option exchange program, development of an applicable peer group, providing comparative data regarding compensation levels and practice, and assistance with the design of our incentive programs. Our compensation committee has assessed the independence of Cook pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Cook from independently representing the compensation committee.

Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation philosophy has been driven by a number of factors that are closely linked with our broader strategic objectives. Our ability to excel depends on the skill, creativity, integrity and teamwork of our employees. To this end, we strive to create an environment of mutual respect, encouragement and teamwork that rewards commitment and performance while ensuring that the interests of the management team are aligned both internally, and with our strategic plan and the interests of our stockholders. In that regard, a primary focus of our compensation program has been to incentivize and reward growth in revenue and Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA, or AEBITDA, as net income (loss) from continuing operations before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses, excluding, when applicable, stock-based compensation, the effects of accounting for business combinations (including any impairment of acquired intangibles and, in the case of the acquisition of SMB:LIVE, the deferred cash consideration), restructuring charges, and other non-operating income or expense.

19

Table Of Contents

Compensation for our named executive officers generally consists of the elements identified in the following table:

Compensation Element	Primary Objective
Base salary	To recognize ongoing performance of job responsibilities and as a necessary tool in attracting and retaining employees
Annual incentive cash compensation (bonuses)	To focus employees on corporate and individual objectives and link compensation opportunities for our named executive officers (and employees generally) to achievement of key business and individual objectives
Equity incentive compensation	To incentivize and reward increases in stockholder value and to emphasize and reinforce our focus on team success and to assist with the attraction and retention of key employees
Severance and change of control benefits	To provide income protection in the event of involuntary loss of employment and to focus named executive officers on stockholder interests when considering strategic alternatives
Retirement savings (401(k)) plan	To provide retirement savings in a tax-efficient manner
Health and welfare benefits	To provide a basic level of protection from health, dental, life and disability risks

Each of the primary elements of our executive compensation program is discussed in more detail below. While we have identified particular compensation objectives that each element of executive compensation serves, our compensation programs are designed to be flexible and complementary and to collectively serve all of the executive compensation objectives described above. Accordingly, whether or not specifically mentioned below, we believe that, as a part of our overall executive compensation policy, each individual element, to a greater or lesser extent, serves each of our objectives. The compensation levels of our named executive officers reflect to a significant degree the varying roles and responsibilities of such executives, as well as the length of time those executives have served our company.

Elements of Compensation

The following is a discussion of the primary elements of the compensation for each of our named executive officers.

Base Salaries

The initial base salaries of Ms. Rowlands and Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman were the result of an arms-length negotiation at the time we initially retained them. Mr. Carlick, the former Chairman of our Board, served as Interim Chief Executive Officer from September 2013 to April 2014, with annual base compensation of $400,000, which was the same base compensation paid to his predecessor. While serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Carlick was not eligible to participate in ReachLocal’s non-employee director compensation program in respect of his service as a Board Member.

Base salaries of our named executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer) are recommended and reviewed periodically by our Chief Executive Officer, and the base salary for each named executive officer is approved by our compensation committee. Adjustments to base salaries are based on the scope of an executive’s responsibilities, individual contribution, experience and sustained performance. Decisions regarding salary increases may take into account the named executive officer’s current salary, equity ownership and the amounts paid to individuals in comparable positions at our peer companies. No formulaic base salary increases are provided to our named executive officers. This strategy is consistent with our intent of offering compensation that is cost-effective, competitive and contingent on the achievement of performance objectives.

20

Table Of Contents

Effective January 1, 2014, Messrs. Landsbaum, Wergeles and Barton received a 3% increase in their base salaries, which was consistent with peer group practice, and Mr. Claman received a 10% increase in his base salary in connection with his promotion to President in November 2013.

The actual base salaries paid to all of our named executive officers during 2014 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Cash Bonuses

In addition to base salaries, our executives are also eligible to receive annual cash bonuses. Target bonuses are expressed as a percentage of base compensation. The targets, set forth below, for all our named executive officers did not change from 2013, except that Mr. Claman’s target moved from 50% of his base salary to 70% in connection with his promotion to President. Mr. Carlick, as Interim Chief Executive officer, and Ms. Rowlands, who joined the company after adoption of the bonus plan, did not participate in the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan.

Executive	2014 Target Bonus (as a % of Base Salary)	2014 Target Bonus
Sharon Rowlands	125%	$468,750 (1)
Ross G. Landsbaum	50%	192,610
Kris Barton	30%	111,395
Adam F. Wergeles	50%	150,123
Josh Claman	70%	308,000

(1) Ms. Rowlands was not eligible to participate in the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, but was eligible to receive a bonus in respect of 2014 service based on her partial-year of service with us in 2014.

In 2014 the compensation committee recommended, and our Board adopted, our 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, or the bonus plan, in which Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman participated and had an opportunity to earn an annual bonus based on the target bonuses set forth above. The plan established a target bonus pool, which was divided into two equal component target bonus pools—one based on achievement of an annual consolidated revenue target, and one based on achievement of an annual AEBITDA target—so that 50% of the executive’s target bonus opportunity was based on the achievement of goals under each pool. The targets were derived from the 2014 operating plan adopted by our Board. Our compensation committee developed this bonus plan to motivate achievement of both the revenue target and the AEBITDA target. The targets were as follows:

Component	Threshold	Target	Maximum
Revenue	$580 million	$596.8 million	$626.6 million
AEBITDA	$23.0 million	$27.4 million	$32.5 million

21

Table Of Contents

The company’s achievement against the applicable targets would determine multipliers to be applied to the component target bonus pools. The multipliers were as follows:

Multipliers (% ofTarget Bonus)	2014Targets
0	Below Threshold
60%	At Threshold
100%	At Target
200%	At or Above Maximum

The percentage of target bonus payable between threshold and target or target and maximum was to be determined using linear interpolation. However, no amounts would be payable under the bonus plan if the company failed to achieve either the revenue or AEBITDA guidance published in the first earnings release issued in 2014.

For 2014, we ended the year with revenue of $474.9 million and AEBITDA of $(9.4) million. Accordingly, neither threshold was met and we did not achieve our initial guidance, so no bonuses were paid under the bonus plan. Similarly, due to our operating performance in general, Ms. Rowlands was not paid a bonus for 2014.

2015 Executive Bonus Plan. For 2015, the compensation committee recommended, and the board adopted, a new bonus paradigm, with 40% of each executive’s bonus opportunity tied to AEBITDA objectives, 40% tied to revenue objectives, and 20% tied to cash flow objectives. As with the 2014 bonus plan, achievement of threshold, target and maximum performance goals will result in target bonus multipliers of 60%, 100% and 200% of the executive’s target bonus opportunity applicable to that goal. In addition, achievement of the AEBITDA target objective will result in payment of an additional 25% of the executive’s aggregate target bonus. The board also reserved the right to grant other bonuses to the named executive officers as may be necessary for retention or other purposes.

One-Time Special Bonus.In view of the significant management changes that took place at the end of 2013 culminating in the appointment of Ms. Rowlands in April 2014, the compensation committee exercised its discretion to grant bonuses in April 2014 to Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman, in recognition of the significantly greater responsibility for managing the company they each assumed while the company was seeking a permanent Chief Executive Officer. The bonuses granted these named executive officers were as follows: Mr. Landsbaum: $200,000; Mr. Barton: $90,000; Mr. Wergeles: $150,000; and Mr. Claman: $220,000. In determining the size of such one-time bonuses, the compensation committee considered each individual’s contributions to the company during the time the company was seeking a permanent Chief Executive Officer and the degree of heightened responsibility each individual undertook.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

The goals of our long-term, equity-based incentive awards are to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Because vesting is based on continued employment, our equity-based incentives also encourage the retention of our named executive officers during the award vesting period. In determining the size of the long-term equity incentives to be awarded to our named executive officers, we take into account a number of factors, such as the relative job scope, the value of existing stockholdings and long-term incentive awards, individual performance history, and the size of prior grants.

To reward and retain our named executive officers in a manner that aligns their interests with stockholders’ interests, we have historically used stock options as the primary incentive vehicle for long-term compensation. Because employees realize value from stock options only if our stock price increases relative to the stock option’s exercise price, we believe stock options provide meaningful incentives to achieve increases in the value of our stock over time.We will also, from time to time, grant restricted stock to our named executive officers, which we believe incentivizes future growth, and also delivers value to these officers in excess of simple future appreciation. These awards are further intended to enable our executive officers to establish or augment meaningful equity stakes in our company.

22

Table Of Contents

We generally use stock options to compensate our named executive officers both in the form of initial grants in connection with the commencement of employment and additional or “refresher” grants. Although the compensation committee typically grants annual refresher grants, we have not established a formula or program for determining the size of any equity award, including any annual refresher grants, and our compensation committee retains discretion to make stock option awards to employees at any time, including in connection with the promotion of an employee, to reward an employee, for retention purposes or in other circumstances recommended by management. The exercise price of each stock option grant is at or above the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, for which we use the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq on the grant date.

Stock option awards typically vest over a four-year period as follows: 25% of the shares underlying the option vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and the remainder of the shares underlying the option vest in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. The restrictions pertaining to the restricted stock grants generally lapse with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date, and lapse with respect to 1/12th of the shares on each three month anniversary of the grant date thereafter, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. We believe these vesting schedules appropriately encourage continued service with the company while allowing our executives to realize compensation in line with the value they have created for our stockholders.

2014 Equity Awards. During 2014, we made the following grants of stock options and restricted stock to our named executive officers. Except as described below, the options and restricted stock vest in accordance with the vesting schedules described above.

Executive	2014 Stock Option Grants (# of Shares)		2014Restricted Stock Grants (# of Shares)
Sharon Rowlands		850,000		150,000
David Carlick		43,998 (1)		–
Ross G. Landsbaum		90,000		–
Kris Barton		60,000		–
Adam F. Wergeles		40,000		–
Josh Claman		165,000		–

(1) This award was made after Mr. Carlick’s resignation as Interim Chief Executive Officer and was granted under our non-executive director compensation program.

The foregoing equity awards granted to our named executive officers for the 2014 fiscal year are also set forth in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”

In connection with hiring Ms. Rowlands as our Chief Executive Officer, on April 1, 2014, Ms. Rowlands was granted: (i) an option to purchase 650,000 shares of ReachLocal’s common stock pursuant to ReachLocal’s Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, and (ii) an option to purchase 200,000 shares of ReachLocal’s common stock as an “employment inducement” award granted to Ms. Rowlands as a material inducement to her entering into employment with the company, pursuant to NASDAQ rules. Each option had an exercise price equal to $10.30, and vested with respect to 12.5% on October 1, 2014, 12.5% on April 1, 2015, and in equal monthly installments over the three years thereafter, subject to Ms. Rowlands’ continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The number of options was arrived at through an arms-length negotiation between Ms. Rowlands and the compensation committee. As further discussed below, Ms. Rowlands elected to participate in the option exchange program and thereby exchanged these options for replacement options.

23

Table Of Contents

On May 21, 2014, the compensation committee granted Ms. Rowlands 150,000 shares of restricted stock whose restrictions will lapse annually over a three-year period, subject to her continued employment through each applicable vesting date. This subsequent grant was made by the compensation committee, on its own initiative (it was not requested by Ms. Rowlands) given the precipitous decline in our stock from $10.30 per share on April 1, 2014 to $6.72 per share by May 21, 2014, as the result of factors affecting the company prior to her commencement. The compensation committee wanted to ensure that Ms. Rowlands remained fully incented to drive shareholder value.

In February 2014, as part of our normal cycle of “refresher grants,” each of Messrs. Landsbaum, Barton, Wergeles and Claman was granted a stock option covering the amount of shares set forth above, with the exception of Mr. Barton whose refresher grant covered 40,000 shares. The compensation committee also granted Mr. Barton an additional stock option covering 20,000 shares in November 2014 to award Mr. Barton for the incremental demands being made on the product and technology organization, which he manages.

Stock Option Exchange Program. On November 24, 2014, our stockholders approved a one-time stock option exchange for eligible employees that permitted such employees, including our executive officers, to surrender certain underwater stock options for cancellation in exchange for the grant of new replacement options to purchase the same number of shares having an exercise price equal to the greater of $6.00 per share and the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the offer expiration date. The closing price of our common stock on the offer expiration date (January 9, 2015) was less than $6.00, and as a result each replacement option has an exercise price of $6.00, which was 94% above the fair market value of our common stock on that day. The replacement options granted pursuant to the stock option exchange vest over four years as follows:  12.5% vest on the six-month anniversary of the replacement option grant date (January 9, 2015) and the balance vest in substantially equal monthly installments thereafter over the subsequent 42 months, subject to the option holder’s continued service with the company or any of our subsidiaries.  The stock option exchange was implemented because approximately 99% of our outstanding options were underwater (and most significantly so) and we believed that they were not serving the intended purpose of providing meaningful incentives to motivate and retain our employees. The following table shows the number of options exchanged by our named executive officers:

Executive	Aggregate Stock Options Exchanged
Sharon Rowlands		850,000
Ross G. Landsbaum		463,079
Kris Barton		134,880
Adam F. Wergeles		163,395

Other. Equity-based awards held by our named executive officers are also subject to accelerated vesting in the event of certain terminations of the named executive officer or a change in control. For more information, see “Severance and Change in Control Benefits” below. We do not currently have any formal stock ownership requirements for our named executive officers.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management

We maintain a Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management, which our Board adopted because it believes that change in control and severance benefits are essential for us to fulfill our objective of attracting and retaining key managerial talent. The Change in Control and Severance Policy was adopted, and is maintained, to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of members of management to their assigned duties without the distraction arising from the possibility of a change in control, and to enable and encourage management to focus their attention on obtaining the best possible outcome for our stockholders without being influenced by their personal concerns regarding the possible impact of various transactions on the security of their jobs and benefits. In addition to providing severance benefits to any participant who incurs a termination of employment under certain circumstances following a change in control, the policy provides for severance payments in the event of termination without cause or termination by the employee for good reason under circumstances not involving a change in control. The Change in Control and Severance Policy provides that “Group A Participants” receive 12 months of benefits and “Group B Participants” receive six months of benefits. In the event of a change in control or a qualifying termination, an eligible participant in the policy may be entitled to receive salary continuation payments, equity award acceleration and certain other benefits as more fully described in the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below. Payments under the policy are subject to the participant delivering an effective general release of claims in a form acceptable to us.

24

Table Of Contents

The company currently has no Group A Participants. Ms. Rowlands and Messrs. Landsbaum and Barton are each Group B Participants. Messrs. Wergeles and Claman were Group B Participants prior to leaving the company, and Mr. Carlick did not participate in this policy. In addition, as part of the negotiations regarding the retention of Ms. Rowlands as our Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee agreed to provide full acceleration of the equity grants awarded to Ms. Rowlands in the event of a “change in control” of the company, irrespective of whether her employment is terminated.

Retention Awards

In connection with the changing of our leadership, in November 2013, the compensation committee implemented a retention program intended to ensure that the key personnel needed to manage the company during the transitional period remained with the company. This retention program had two components: the grant of time-based vesting restricted stock awards (the Retention Awards) and the amendment of the performance-vesting restricted stock awards granted in February 2013 (the Performance Awards) to provide time-based vesting as well. The Retention Awards and, after amendment, the Performance Awards, granted to named executive officers are each subject to immediate acceleration in full in the event the holder is terminated by us other than for “cause” or resigns for “good reason.”

Retirement Savings

All of our full-time employees in the United States, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. Pursuant to our 401(k) plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit, which was $17,500 in 2014 and to have the amount of this reduction contributed to our 401(k) plan.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

All of our full-time employees in the United States, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans. For employees generally, we bear some portion of the premium costs for such plans and the employee bears some of the premium costs. For Messrs. Landsbaum and Wergeles, however, we bear all of the premium costs. The incremental cost to our company related to bearing such costs for Messrs. Landsbaum and Wergeles for 2014 is reflected under “All Other Compensation” in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Pursuant to her employment letter, Ms. Rowlands is entitled to be reimbursed up to (i) $50,000 for reasonable expenses incurred by Ms. Rowlands with respect to her commuting and relocation to the Los Angeles, California greater metropolitan area, and (ii) $10,000 per month (and any related gross-up payment to cover associated taxes) for temporary living expenses through August 1, 2015. Such amounts paid to Ms. Rowlands for 2014 are reflected under “All Other Compensation” in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

We do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a material component of our executive compensation program. In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual executive officer in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive officers more efficient and effective, and for recruitment, motivation and/or retention purposes. Future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits for our named executive officers will be approved and subject to periodic review by the compensation committee.

25

Table Of Contents

Entry into Separation Agreement withJoshua Claman,FormerPresident

On May 30, 2014, ReachLocal entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Claman (the “Claman Separation Agreement”) consistent with ReachLocal’s Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management, pursuant to which Mr. Claman received the following benefits: (i) continuation payments of his base salary for 6 months for a total of $220,000, (ii) six months of continued health benefits, and (iii) immediate acceleration of all unvested equity awards that would have vested during the six-month period following May 30, 2014, except for the performance-vesting restricted stock award granted to Mr. Claman in August 2012 which Mr. Claman forfeited.For additional information, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Letters” below.

Entry intoConsulting Agreement withDavid Carlick,FormerChairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer

On December 11, 2014, David Carlick, formerly chairman of our Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer, submitted his resignation from our Board effective that same day. In connection with his resignation, ReachLocal entered into a consulting agreement (the “Carlick Consulting Agreement”) with Mr. Carlick pursuant to which he will provide up to 10 hours of consulting service to ReachLocal each month through September 30, 2015. As consideration for the consulting services, Mr. Carlick will receive continued vesting of his unvested stock option granted May 30, 2014 and additional time to exercise his stock options during the term of the consulting period. For additional information, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Letters” below.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Section 162(m) of the Code disallows a tax deduction for any publicly held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1.0 million in any taxable year for its named executive officers, other than its Chief Financial Officer, unless compensation is performance-based. Where reasonably practicable and to the extent that the Code Section 162(m) deduction disallowance becomes applicable to our company, our compensation committee may seek to qualify the variable compensation paid to our named executive officers for an exemption from the deductibility limitations. As such, in approving the amount and form of compensation for our named executive officers in the future, our compensation committee will consider all elements of the cost to our company of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, our compensation committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m) of the Code when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code

Section 409A of the Code requires that “nonqualified deferred compensation” be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the statute with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. Failure to satisfy these requirements can expose employees and other service providers to accelerated income tax liabilities and penalty taxes and interest on their vested compensation under such plans. Accordingly, we generally intend to design and administer our compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of our employees and other service providers, including our named executive officers, so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A of the Code.

Accounting Standards

ASC Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718, requires us to recognize an expense for the fair value of equity-based compensation awards. Grants of stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units under our equity incentive award plans are accounted for under ASC Topic 718. Our compensation committee regularly considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

26

Table Of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation of our named executive officers:

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)			Bonus ($)			Option Awards ($) (1)		Stock Awards ($) (2)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)			Total ($)
Sharon Rowlands	2014		377,885	(3)	–				4,019,565		1,008,000	–			109,922	(4)		5,515,372
Chief Executive Officer
David Carlick	2014		168,825	(5)	–				150,206	–		–			6,720	(6)		325,751
Former Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board	2013		216,696		–				150,121		649,000	–		–				1,015,817
Ross G. Landsbaum	2014		385,220			200,000	(7)		438,093	–		–			690,089	(8)		1,713,402
Chief Financial Officer	2013		374,000		–				123,546		647,274	–			8,305			1,153,125
	2012		340,000			82,500			195,000		51,090		79,530		7,169			755,289
Kris Barton	2014		371,315			90,000	(7)		230,992	–		–		–				692,307
Chief Technology Officer	2013		360,500		–				89,284		467,929	–		–				917,713
Adam Wergeles	2014		300,245			150,000	(7)		194,708	–		–			9,330	(9)		654,283
Former Chief Legal Officer
Josh Claman	2014		181,923			220,000	(7)		803,171	–		–			548,735	(10)		1,753,828
Former President	2013		400,000		–				123,546		692,262	–		–				1,215,808
	2012		183,333			45,834			919,150		238,600		44,184	–				1,431,101

(1) Amounts represent the full grant date fair value of stock options granted during 2012, 2013 and 2014 calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2015.

(2) Amount represents the full grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the relevant fiscal year, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the value of all restricted stock awards made to named executive officers, refer to Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 13, 2015.

(3) Amount represents Ms. Rowland’s base salary for the partial-year of service with us in 2014. Ms. Rowland’s annual base salary was equal to $500,000.

(4) Amount represents $71,298 of temporary housing allowance and $38,624 of tax gross-up payment related to the temporary housing allowance.

(5) Amount includes $97,692 of salary in respect of service as our Interim Chief Executive Officer from January 2014 through March 2014 and $71,133 of cash retainer fees in respect of Board service from April 2014 through December 11, 2014 pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program.

(6) Amount represents fair value attributable to additional time to exercise equity awards pursuant to the Carlick Consulting Agreement.

(7) Amount represents a one-time cash bonus for assuming significantly greater responsibility for managing the company while the company did not have a permanent Chief Executive Officer.

(8) Amount includes $680,759 of incremental fair value attributable to extending the time to exercise from seven to ten years for a stock option granted during 2008 with a strike price of $10.91, and $9,330 of health and welfare plan premium costs in excess of company-paid health and welfare premiums paid on behalf of other company employees.

(9) Amount represents health and welfare plan premium costs in excess of company-paid health and welfare premiums paid on behalf of other company employees.

(10) Amount includes $220,000 of salary continuation payments, $319,998 of fair value attributable to equity-award acceleration, and $8,737 of health and welfare plan premium costs, each pursuant to the Claman Separation Agreement.

27

Table Of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2014

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2014:

		Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying			Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards			Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option
Name	Grant Date	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		or Units (#)		Options (#)			Per Share ($)			Awards ($)
Sharon Rowlands	4/1/2014										650,000			10.30			3,073,785	(2)
	4/1/2014										200,000			10.30			945,780	(2)
	5/21/2014								150,000								1,008,000	(3)
		–		–		–
David Carlick	5/30/2014										43,988			6.68			150,206	(2)
	12/11/2014										(4	)		(4	)		6,720	(4)
		–		–		–
Ross G. Landsbaum	2/13/2014										90,000			10.61			438,093	(2)
	3/27/2014										(5	)		(5	)		680,759	(5)
			57,783		192,610		385,220
Kris Barton	2/13/2014										40,000			10.61			194,708	(2)
	11/6/2014										20,000			3.82			36,284	(2)
			33,419		111,395		222,790
Adam Wergeles	2/13/2014										40,000			10.61			194,708	(2)
			45,037		150,123		300,246
Josh Claman	2/13/2014										165,000			10.61			803,171	(2)
			92,400		308,000		616,000

(1) Amounts shown in these columns represent each named executive officer’s incentive bonus opportunity under our 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, other than Ms. Rowlands and Mr. Carlick, who did not participate in the plan. The “Target” amount represents the named executive officer’s target bonus if the performance goals under the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan were achieved at the target levels, and the “Threshold” and “Maximum” amounts represents the named executive officer’s minimum and maxim bonuses, respectively, if the performance goals under the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan were achieved at the minimum 60% levels or the maximum 200% levels.

(2) Amount represents the full grant date fair value of the stock option calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in this column, refer to Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2015.

(3) Amount represents the full grant date fair value of the restricted stock award, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the value of all restricted stock awards made to named executive officers, refer to Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2015.

(4) Pursuant to the Carlick Consulting Agreement, Mr. Carlick received additional time to exercise his stock options during the term of the consulting period. The amount shown represents fair value attributable to such additional time to exercise equity awards covering an aggregate of 230,959 shares.

(5) During 2014, we extended the time to exercise from seven to ten years for certain stock options granted during 2008 and 2009 with a strike price of $10.91. The amount shown represents fair value attributable to such additional time to exercise a stock option held by Mr. Landsbaum covering 272,489 shares.

28

Table Of Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Letters

We have entered into employment letters with each of our named executive officers other than Mr. Carlick. The principal elements of these employment letters are summarized below.

Sharon Rowlands

In March 2014 we entered into an employment letter with Ms. Rowlands, pursuant to which she serves as our Chief Executive Officer. Under the employment letter, Ms. Rowlands is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $500,000 per year. The employment letter also provides that Ms. Rowlands is eligible to participate in our Executive Bonus Plan. For additional information on bonuses, see “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” above.

During her employment, Ms. Rowlands is eligible to participate in our health and welfare, retirement and other plans and programs that we make available to our senior executives from time to time. In addition, the employment letter provides that Ms. Rowlands is entitled to be reimbursed up to (i) $50,000 for reasonable expenses incurred by Ms. Rowlands with respect to her commuting and relocation to the Los Angeles, California greater metropolitan area and (ii) $10,000 per month (and any related gross-up payment to cover associated taxes) for temporary living expenses through August 1, 2015.

In connection with the execution of the employment letter, Ms. Rowlands was granted: (i) an option to purchase 650,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, and (ii) an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock as an “employment inducement” award granted to Ms. Rowlands as a material inducement to her entering into employment with the company, pursuant to NASDAQ rules. Each option has an exercise price equal to $10.30, and vests 12.5% on October 1, 2014, 12.5% on April 1, 2015, and in equal monthly installments over the three years thereafter, subject to Ms. Rowlands’ continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

Under the employment letter, upon the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in the Change in Control and Severance Policy) of our company, the stock options granted to Ms. Rowlands in connection with the execution of the employment letter will, immediately prior to the occurrence of the change in control, vested and become exercisable with respect to 100% of the then-remaining outstanding unvested shares. Ms. Rowlands’ employment letter also provides that she will be eligible to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy as a Group B Participant.

Ross G. Landsbaum

In May 2008 we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Landsbaum, effective June 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Landsbaum serves as our Chief Financial Officer. The employment letter provides that Mr. Landsbaum will report to our Chief Executive Officer and that all of our finance-related employees will report directly or indirectly to him. Under the employment letter, Mr. Landsbaum was entitled to receive an initial annual base salary of $300,000, which is subject to review on an annual basis and which was raised to $385,220 effective as of January 1, 2014. The employment letter also provides that Mr. Landsbaum is eligible to participate in our Executive Bonus Plan. For additional information on bonuses, see “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” above.

During his employment, Mr. Landsbaum is eligible to participate in our health and welfare, retirement and other plans and programs that we make available to our senior executives from time to time. The employment letter also provides Mr. Landsbaum with certain indemnification rights in connection with his services as a director, officer or employee of our company.

Mr. Landsbaum’s employment letter also provides that he will be eligible to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy as a Group B Participant.

29

Table Of Contents

Kris Barton

In January 2012 we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Barton, pursuant to which Mr. Barton serves as our Chief Product Officer. Under the employment letter, Mr. Barton was entitled to receive an initial annual base salary of $350,000, which is subject to review on an annual basis and which was raised to $371,315 effective as of January 1, 2014. The employment letter also provides that Mr. Barton is eligible to participate in our Executive Bonus Plan. For additional information on bonuses, see “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” above.

During his employment, Mr. Barton is eligible to participate in our health and welfare, retirement and other plans and programs that we make available to our senior executives from time to time.

Mr. Barton’s employment letter also provides that he will be eligible to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy as a Group B Participant.

Adam Wergeles

In November 2007 we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Wergeles, effective December 2007 and subsequently amended in February 2010, pursuant to which Mr. Wergeles originally served as our General Counsel and served as our Chief Legal Officer from March 2013 until his resignation in March 2015, in each case reporting to our Chief Executive Officer. Under the employment letter, Mr. Wergeles was entitled to receive an initial annual base salary of $225,000, which was subject to review on an annual basis and which was raised to $300,245 effective as of January 1, 2014. The employment letter also provided that Mr. Wergeles is eligible to participate in our Executive Bonus Plan. For additional information on bonuses, see “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” above.

During his employment, Mr. Wergeles was eligible to participate in our health and welfare, retirement and other plans and programs that we make available to our senior executives from time to time. Mr. Wergeles’ was also eligible to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy as a Group B Participant.

Josh Claman

In May 2012 we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Claman, effective July 2012, pursuant to which Mr. Claman served as our Chief Revenue Officer. In November 2013, Mr. Claman was appointed President. Under the employment letter, Mr. Claman was entitled to receive an initial annual base salary of $400,000 per year, which was subject to review on an annual basis and which was raised to $440,000 effective as of January 1, 2014. The employment letter also provided that Mr. Claman is eligible to participate in our Executive Bonus Plan. For additional information on bonuses, see “Elements of Compensation—Cash Bonuses” above.

During his employment, Mr. Claman was eligible to participate in our health and welfare, retirement and other plans and programs that we make available to our senior executives from time to time.

In connection with the execution of the employment letter, Mr. Claman was granted: (i) an option to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $11.93, which vested (and was scheduled to vest) 25% on August 2, 2013 and in equal monthly installments over the three years thereafter; (ii) 20,000 restricted shares of our common stock whose restrictions lapsed (and were scheduled to lapse) 25% on August 2, 2013 and in equal quarterly installments over the three years thereafter; and (iii) an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $11.93, which was to vest upon the company’s common stock achieving an average closing price on the NASDAQ greater than or equal to $35 per share for 20 consecutive trading days after August 2, 2013, in each case subject to his continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

Mr. Claman’s employment letter also provided that he was eligible to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy as a Group B Participant.

30

Table Of Contents

On May 30, 2014, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Claman consistent with our Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management, pursuant to which Mr. Claman received the following benefits: (i) continuation payments of his base salary for 6 months for a total of $220,000, (ii) six months of continued health benefits, and (iii) immediate acceleration of all unvested equity awards that would have vested during the six-month period following May 30, 2014, except for the performance-vesting restricted stock award granted to Mr. Claman in August 2012 which Mr. Claman forfeited. Mr. Claman’s employment letter with ReachLocal terminated as of May 30, 2014, except to the extent otherwise expressly provided therein.

David Carlick

On December 11, 2014, David Carlick, formerly chairman of our Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer, submitted his resignation from our Board effective that same day. In connection with his resignation, we entered into the Carlick Consulting Agreement with Mr. Carlick pursuant to which he will provide up to 10 hours of consulting service as an independent contractor to us each month through September 30, 2015. As consideration for the consulting services, during the term of the consulting period, Mr. Carlick will receive continued vesting of his unvested stock option granted May 30, 2014 and all of his stock options will remain exercisable until three months following the termination of his consulting services.

31

Table Of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at2014 Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock underlying outstanding equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2014:

	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Names		Grant Date	Vesting Commencement Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock ThatHave Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (1)
Sharon Rowlands		4/1/2014	4/1/2014		81,250		568,750		10.30	3/31/2021 (2)(3)
		4/1/2014	4/1/2014		25,000		175,000		10.30	3/31/2021 (3)(4)
		5/21/2014	5/21/2014									150,000	(5)		516,000
David Carlick		9/19/2008	9/19/2008		75,000	–			10.91	9/18/2015
		6/15/2011	6/15/2011		11,209	–			17.32	6/14/2018
		5/22/2012	5/22/2012		81,402	–			9.00	5/21/2019
		5/22/2013	5/22/2013		19,360	–			14.61	5/21/2020
		5/30/2014	5/30/2014	–			43,988		6.68	5/29/2023 (6)
Ross G. Landsbaum		9/19/2008	6/2/2008		272,489	–			10.91	9/18/2018 (3)
		5/20/2010	5/20/2010		80,000	–			13.00	5/19/2017 (3)(7)
		2/17/2012	2/17/2012		11,917		15,167		7.86	2/16/2019 (3)(7)		2,032	(8)		6,990
		6/25/2012	6/25/2012		25,861		15,518		13.00	6/24/2019 (9)
		2/14/2013	2/14/2013		9,437		11,153		12.98	2/13/2020 (3)(7)		12,019	(10)		41,345
		11/7/2013	11/7/2013									12,915	(10)		44,428
		2/13/2014	2/13/2014	–			90,000		10.61	2/12/2021 (3)(7)
Kris Barton		5/3/2012	5/3/2012		51,666		28,334		9.42	5/2/2019 (3)(7)		3,750	(8)		12,900
		2/14/2013	2/14/2013		6,819		8,061		12.98	2/13/2020 (3)(7)		8,682	(10)		29,866
		11/7/2013	11/7/2013									9,344	(10)		32,143
		2/13/2014	2/13/2014	–			40,000		10.61	2/12/2021 (3)(7)
		11/6/2014	11/6/2014	–			20,000		3.82	11/5/2021 (7)
Adam Wergeles		12/18/2007	12/3/2007		48,515	–			9.23	12/17/2017 (3)
		5/20/2010	5/20/2010		60,000	–			13.00	5/19/2017 (3)(7)
		2/17/2012	2/17/2012		13,000		14,001		7.86	2/16/2019 (3)(7)		1,875	(8)		6,450
		6/25/2012	6/25/2012		25,861		15,518		13.00	6/24/2019 (9)
		2/14/2013	2/14/2013		6,819		8,061		12.98	2/13/2020 (3)(7)		8,682	(10)		29,866
		11/7/2013	11/7/2013									5,894	(10)		20,275
		2/13/2014	2/13/2014		0		40,000		10.61	2/12/2021 (3)(7)
Josh Claman		–	–	–		–		–		–	–			–

 

(1) Based on a market value of $3.44 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ on December 31, 2014.

(2) This option is scheduled to vest 12.5% on the six-month and one-year anniversaries of the vesting commencement date and as to the remaining 75% in monthly installments over the 36-month period thereafter.

32

Table Of Contents

(3) This option was surrendered pursuant to the stock option exchange we completed on January 9, 2015 and in exchange a new unvested option covering the same number of shares with an exercise price of $6.00 per share was granted to the holder. Replacement options will vest 12.5% on July 9, 2015 and the balance will vest in substantially equal monthly installments thereafter over the subsequent 42 months.

(4) This option is scheduled to vest 12.5% on the six-month and one-year anniversaries of the vesting commencement date and as to the remaining 75% in monthly installments over the 36-month period thereafter. This option was granted under a stand-alone option agreement to Ms. Rowlands as a material inducement to her entering into employment with ReachLocal.

(5) These restricted shares will vest, and the restrictions thereon will lapse, as to 1/3 on each of the first three anniversaries of the vesting commencement date.

(6) This option was issued to Mr. Carlick in his capacity as a director and will vest in full upon the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date and the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders.

(7) These options are scheduled to vest and become exercisable as to 25% of the option on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and as to the remaining 75% in monthly installments over the 36-month period thereafter.

(8) These restricted shares will vest, and the restrictions thereon will lapse, as to 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and as to the remaining 75% in quarterly installments over the 36-month period thereafter.

(9) These options were issued in exchange for surrendered options pursuant to the stock option exchange we completed on June 25, 2012. These options are scheduled to vest and become exercisable as to 12.5% of the option on the six-month anniversary of the vesting start date and as to the remaining 87.5% in monthly installments over the 42-month period thereafter.

(10) These restricted shares will vest, and the restrictions thereon will lapse, as to 50% of the total number of shares on the first and second anniversaries of November 7, 2013.

33

Table Of Contents

2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table summarizes stock option exercises by and vesting of stock applicable to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2014:

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise($)(1)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2)
Sharon Rowlands	–		–		–		–
David Carlick	–		–			50,000		184,500
Ross G. Landsbaum		2,167		13,522		26,558		102,882
Kris Barton	–		–			20,524		87,546
Adam Wergeles		20,000		96,458		16,074		63,817
Josh Claman	–		–			55,833		349,111

(1) Amounts are calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on exercise by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the exercise date, net of the respective exercise price.

(2) Amounts are calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the vesting date.

34

Table Of Contents

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management

In 2008, our Board approved the Change in Control and Severance Policy for Senior Management, which we amended in February 2010. Under the terms of this policy, eligible participants are entitled to the payments and benefits described below. A participant’s right to receive payments and benefits under the Change in Control and Severance Policy is conditioned upon his or her acknowledgement and agreement that any benefits provided under the policy are in lieu of, and not in addition to, any such benefits provided under the terms of his or her individual employment letter.

Change in Control. Upon a “change in control” (as defined in the Change in Control and Severance Policy), eligible participants are entitled to accelerated vesting, immediately prior to the change in control, of 25% of their then-unvested equity awards. Remaining unvested shares will continue to vest, if at all, to the extent provided in the terms of the original award.

Change in Control and Involuntary Termination. Upon a termination of an eligible participant by us other than for “cause” or by the participant for “good reason” (each, as defined in the Change in Control and Severance Policy) within one year following a “change in control,” eligible participants are entitled to:

● the payment of accrued salary and vacation;

● immediate acceleration of all unvested equity compensation; and

● continuation payments of the eligible participant’s then-current base salary for 12 months (Group A participants) or 6 months (Group B participants) and company-paid premiums for COBRA continuation coverage for up to 12 months (Group A participants) or 6 months (Group B participants) after the date of termination.

Involuntary Termination. Upon a termination of an eligible participant by us other than for “cause” or by the participant for “good reason” at any time other than within the one-year period following a “change in control,” eligible participants are entitled to:

● the payment of accrued salary and vacation;

● immediate acceleration of unvested equity awards that would have vested during the 12-month period (Group A participants) or 6-month period (Group B participants) immediately following the date of termination; and

● continuation payments of the eligible participant’s then-current base salary for 12 months (Group A participants) or 6 months (Group B participants) and company-paid premiums for COBRA continuation coverage for up to 12 months (Group A participants) or 6 months (Group B participants) after the date of termination.

Ms. Rowlands and Messrs. Landsbaum and Barton participate in the Change in Control and Severance Policy as Group B participants. Messrs. Wergeles and Claman participated in the Change in Control and Severance Policy as Group B participants prior to leaving the company, and Mr. Carlick did not participate in the Change in Control and Severance Policy.

Retention Awards

The Retention Awards and the Performance Awards granted to named executive officers are each subject to immediate acceleration in full in the event the holder is terminated by us other than for “cause” or resigns for “good reason.”

35

Table Of Contents

Special Acceleration

As part of the negotiations regarding the retention of Ms. Rowlands as our Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee agreed to provide full acceleration of the stock options awarded to Ms. Rowlands pursuant to her employment agreement in the event of a “change in control” of the company, irrespective of whether her employment is terminated.

Summary of Potential Payments

The following table summarizes the payments that would have been made to our named executive officers (other than Messrs. Carlick and Claman) upon the occurrence of a qualifying termination of employment or change in control, assuming that each named executive officer’s termination of employment with our company occurred on December 31, 2014 or a “change in control” of our company occurred on December 31, 2014, as applicable. Amounts shown do not include (i) accrued but unpaid salary through the date of termination, and (ii) other benefits earned or accrued by the named executive officer during his employment that are available to all salaried employees, such as accrued vacation.

Name	Termination Without Cause or With Good Reason (No Change in Control) ($)		Termination Without Cause or With Good Reason (Within One Year After Change in Control) ($)		Change in Control (No Termination) ($)
Sharon Rowlands
Cash Severance (1)		250,000		250,000	–
Continued Health Benefits (2)		10,084		10,084	–
Acceleration of Equity Awards (3)		171,983		516,000		516,000
Total		432,067		776,084		516,000
Ross G. Landsbaum
Cash Severance (1)		192,610		192,610	–
Continued Health Benefits (2)		10,718		10,718	–
Acceleration of Equity Awards (3)		88,566		92,763		23,191
Total		291,894		296,091		23,191
Kris Barton
Cash Severance (1)		185,658		185,658	–
Continued Health Benefits (2)		10,084		10,084	–
Acceleration of Equity Awards (3)		66,309		74,909		18,727
Total		262,051		270,651		18,727
Adam Wergeles
Cash Severance (1)		150,123		150,123	–
Continued Health Benefits (2)		10,718		10,718	–
Acceleration of Equity Awards (3)		52,721		56,591		14,148
Total		213,562		217,432		14,148

(1) Represents six months of base-salary continuation payments to be paid during the severance period.

(2) Represents the aggregate full premium payments that would be paid to or on behalf of each named executive officer to provide continued health insurance coverage under COBRA (based on the executive’s health insurance coverage as of December 31, 2014) for six months.

(3) Represents the aggregate value of the named executive officer’s (i) accelerated stock options, determined by multiplying (x) the number of shares subject to acceleration by (y) the difference between the fair market value of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2014 ($3.44) and the per-share exercise price of the accelerated option; and (ii) accelerated restricted stock, determined by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock that would have been accelerated by the fair market value of our common stock on December 31, 2014 ($3.44).

36

Table Of Contents

Summary of Paymentsto Former Interim CEO and President

The following table summarizes the payments that were made to Messrs. Carlick and Claman pursuant to the Carlick Consulting Agreement and the Claman Separation Agreement, respectively. Amounts shown do not include (i) accrued but unpaid salary through the date of termination, and (ii) other benefits earned or accrued by the named executive officer during his employment that are available to all salaried employees, such as accrued vacation.

Name	Separation Agreement ($)
David Carlick
Salary Continuation Payments	–
Continued Health Benefits	–
Extension of time to exercise Equity Awards (1)		6,720
Total		6,720
Josh Claman
Salary Continuation Payments		220,000
Continued Health Benefits		8,737
Acceleration of Equity Awards (2)		319,998
Total		548,735

(1) Represents the fair value attributable to extending the time to exercise stock options during the consulting period.

(2) Represents the aggregate value of Mr. Claman’s restricted stock that vested on an accelerated basis, determined by multiplying (x) the number of shares of restricted stock that were accelerated by (y) the fair market value of our common stock on May 30, 2014 ($6.00), the date of the acceleration. No value was attributed to acceleration of Mr. Claman’s stock options because all had exercise prices in excess of the fair market value of our common stock at the time of acceleration.

37

Table Of Contents

2014 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2014: 

Name (1)	Fees Earned in Cash ($)			Option Awards ($) (2)		All Other Compensation ($) (3)		Total ($)
Robert Dykes		48,079	(4)		150,206		5,580		203,865
James Geiger		60,629			290,096	–			350,725
Thomas Hale		2,568			43,782	–			46,350
Habib Kairouz		47,500	(5)		150,206	–			197,706
Lawrence Kutscher		2,283			43,782	–			46,065
Alan Salzman		50,000	(5)		150,206	–			200,206
Ed Thompson		40,879			312,653	–			353,532

(1) Mr. Carlick, our Chairman and former Interim Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table because all of the compensation paid to him during 2014 is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2) Amounts represent the full grant date fair value of stock options granted during 2014 calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, Mr. Geiger held 280,959 unexercised stock options, Messrs. Dykes, Kairouz and Salzman each held 180,959 unexercised stock options, Mr. Thompson held 73,988 unexercised stock options, and Messrs. Kutscher and Hale each held 30,000 unexercised stock options.

(3) Amount represents fair value attributable to additional time to exercise equity awards pursuant to a consulting agreement entered into with Mr. Dykes in connection with his resignation.

(4) Pursuant to our Director Stock Plan, Mr. Dykes elected to receive his entire cash retainer fees in the form of deferred shares of our common stock (director stock units) having a value equal to the amount otherwise payable in cash. In connection with his resignation, all of Mr. Dykes director stock units were converted to shares of our common stock.

(5) Pursuant to our Director Stock Plan, Messrs. Salzman and Kairouz elected to receive their entire cash retainer fees in the form of fully-vested shares of our common stock having a value equal to the amount otherwise payable in cash.

38

Table Of Contents

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program 

The compensation program for our non-employee directors is intended to fairly compensate our directors for the time and effort necessary to serve as a member of our Board. Non-employee members of our Board receive a combination of cash and equity-based compensation.

Cash Compensation. For 2014, our non-employee director compensation program which provided for the following amounts, paid quarterly (all amounts are additive):

Service	Fees
Board Service
Annual retainer	$	35,000
Non-Executive Chairperson	$	65,000	(1)
Audit Committee
Committee member annual retainer	$	10,000
Chairperson annual retainer	$	15,000
Compensation Committee
Committee member annual retainer	$	5,000
Chairperson annual retainer	$	10,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Committee member annual retainer	$	2,500
Chairperson annual retainer	$	7,500

(1) On December 11, 2014, our board of directors amended our non-employee director compensation program to increase the Non-Executive Chairperson retainer from $65,000 to $100,000 annually, effective immediately.

Equity Compensation. Under the program, each non-employee director is entitled to receive an annual stock option award valued at $150,000 on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. Annual option awards will vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the grant date or the subsequent annual meeting, subject to continued service. In addition, each non-employee director receives an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock on or about the date he or she first becomes a member of our Board.

Non-employee directors are permitted to elect to receive some or all of their cash compensation in the form of shares of our common stock having an equal value. Participating directors may elect to receive such shares currently or on a deferred basis in accordance with the terms of the plan.

We pay reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by non-employee directors in connection with their attendance at board of directors and committee meetings and at other meetings to transact business of our company.

Dykes Consulting Agreement

On December 11, 2014, Robert Dykes, a director on our Board, submitted his resignation from our Board effective that same day. In connection with his resignation, ReachLocal entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Dykes pursuant to which he will provide up to 10 hours of consulting service to ReachLocal each month through September 30, 2015. As consideration for the consulting services, Mr. Dykes will receive continued vesting of his unvested stock options and additional time to exercise his stock options during the term of the consulting period. 

39

Table Of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2014 regarding compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights			Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($) (1)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (2)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (3)		6,666,000	(4)		11.21		1,934,665
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (5)		385,000			8.72		–
Total		7,051,000			11.06		1,934,665

(1) Represents the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and is calculated without taking into account shares of common stock subject to outstanding restricted stock units that become issuable as those units vest without any cash consideration or other payment required for such units.

(2) Excludes securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, restricted stock units, warrants or rights, and outstanding restricted shares.

(3) Consists of the Amended and Restated ReachLocal 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and the ReachLocal 2004 Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”). We terminated the 2004 Plan on June 6, 2008 in connection with the adoption of the 2008 Plan. No new awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan following its termination, but awards outstanding at the time of termination of the 2004 Plan remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.

(4) Consists of 6,096,000 shares of common stock underlying outstanding options and 570,000 shares of common stock underlying outstanding restricted stock units. This amount includes 250,000 shares underlying outstanding restricted stock units assumed in connection with our acquisition of Kickserv, Inc. in 2014.

(5) Consists of employment inducement option awards granted to new employees (including Ms. Rowlands, our Chief Executive Officer) during the second quarter of 2014.

Inducement Awards

In 2014, Ms. Rowlands and certain other employees were granted nonqualified stock options to purchase an aggregate 385,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. These option grants were provided as an inducement to their entering into employment with the Company and were granted outside of the 2004 Plan and the 2008 Plan, which are stockholder-approved equity plans pursuant to stock exchange rules. The inducement awards granted Ms. Rowlands were scheduled to vest as to 12.5% of the shares on the six-month and twelve-month anniversaries of the vesting commencement date and as to the remaining 75% in monthly installments over the 36-month period thereafter. However, Ms. Rowlands surrendered her inducement award stock option covering 200,000 shares as part of our stock option exchange completed on January 9, 2015; the replacement options were granted under the 2008 Plan and will vest 12.5% on July 9, 2015 and the balance will vest in substantially equal monthly installments thereafter over the subsequent 42 months. The inducement awards granted to employees other than Ms. Rowlands are scheduled to vest as to 25% of the shares underlying shares on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remainder in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date.

40

Table Of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Structure

Our bylaws provide that the number of directors which shall constitute the whole Board initially shall be seven, and, thereafter shall be fixed exclusively by one or more resolutions adopted from time to time by a majority of the Board. Our Board currently consists of seven members.

Our directors are divided into three classes. Each director serves a term of three years. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. Unless the Board determines that vacancies (including vacancies created by increases in the number of directors) shall be filled by the stockholders, and except as otherwise provided by law, vacancies on the Board may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy (including a vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors) shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified.

The nominees presented below, if elected, will serve as directors until the 2018 Annual Meeting and such director is succeeded by another qualified director, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal from the Board. Each nominee listed below has given his consent to be named as a nominee for election and has indicated his intention to serve if he is elected. The Board does not anticipate that either nominee will not be able to serve as a director, but in the event that a nominee is unable to serve, the Board may either propose an alternate nominee, in which case the proxies will be voted for the alternative nominee, or elect to reduce the size of the Board.

The Nominees

The class of directors with a term expiring at this annual meeting consists of two directors—Jim Geiger and Habib Kairouz. Based upon the recommendation of our nominating and corporate governance committee, our Board has nominated Messrs. Geiger and Kairouz for re-election to the Board. Biographical information on the nominees is furnished below under “Director Biographical Information.”

Set forth below is information as of March 17, 2015 regarding the nominees and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the annual meeting. There are no family relationships between the nominees and any of our directors or officers.

Name	Age	Position
James Geiger (1)(3)	55	Director, Director Nominee
Thomas Hale (2)	46	Director
Habib Kairouz (2)(3)	48	Director, Director Nominee
Lawrence Kutscher (1)	48	Director
Sharon Rowlands	56	Director, Chief Executive Officer
Alan Salzman (1)(3)	61	Director
Edward Thompson (2)	76	Director

(1) Member of the compensation committee

(2) Member of the audit committee

(3) Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee

41

Table Of Contents

Director Biographical Information

Nominees for Election at the2015Annual Meeting to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2018Annual Meeting of Stockholders

James Geigerhas served on our Board since 2007. Mr. Geiger is the founder of Cbeyond, a public company that provides Voice over Internet Protocol-based managed services, and has served as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer since its inception in 1999. Prior thereto, Mr. Geiger held various positions with Intermedia Communications, FiberNet, a metropolitan area network provider, Frontier Communications, a provider of telecommunications services, and Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers), a professional services firm. Mr. Geiger currently serves on the boards of directors of the Marist School, an independent Catholic School of the Marist Fathers and Brothers and the Hands On Network, a national volunteer organization that promotes civic engagement in communities. Mr. Geiger holds a Bachelor’s degree in accounting and pre-law from Clarkson University. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Geiger should serve on the Board based on his experience in the technology and advertising sectors, including his experience managing a public technology company, as well as his financial literacy.

Habib Kairouzhas served on our Board since 2007. Mr. Kairouz is a Managing Partner of Rho Capital Partners, an investment and venture capital management company, which he joined in 1993. Prior to joining Rho, Mr. Kairouz worked for five years in investment banking and leverage buyouts with Reich & Co. and Jesup & Lamont. Mr. Kairouz serves on the board of directors of IntraLinks Holdings, a publicly-held provider of information exchange solutions, Everyday Health, a leading provider of digital health and wellness solutions, and a number of privately-held companies. Mr. Kairouz previously served on the board of directors of iVillage, a publicly-held media company that operates a community website for women, and Bluefly, a publicly-held online retailer. Mr. Kairouz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in engineering from Cornell University and a Master of Business Administration in Finance from Columbia University. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Kairouz should serve on the Board based on his experience in working with and holding directorships with technology companies, his experience in finance and mergers and acquisitions and his financial literacy.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote“FOR” theelection of James Geigerand Habib Kairouzto serve as directors.

Our bylaws provide that at all meetings of stockholders for the election of directors at which a quorum is present, a plurality of the votes cast, which means the nominee receiving the highest number of “for” votes, is sufficient to elect a director.  Abstentions will have no effect in determining which nominee received a plurality of votes cast, because approval of a percentage of shares present or outstanding is not required for this proposal. Brokers are not empowered to vote on the election of directors without instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares. Resulting broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the nominee and therefore will not affect the outcome of the director elections.

Directors Continuing in Office until the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Thomas Hale has served on our Board since December 2014.Mr. Hale has served as the Chief Product Officer of HomeAway.com, a publicly held vacation rental marketplace, since 2010. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Hale served as the Chief Product Officer of Linden Lab, a privately held internet company. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Hale was an entrepreneur-in-residence at Redpoint Ventures focused on social networking and virtual goods marketplaces. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Hale was Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Knowledge Worker business unit of Adobe, a publicly held software firm, and from 1995 to 2005, Mr. Hale was Senior Vice President and General Manager of the communications, publishing and training division at Macromedia, a software firm that was later acquired by Adobe. Mr. Hale currently serves on the board of directors of IntraLinks Holdings, a publicly held provider of information exchange solutions. Mr. Hale holds a Bachelor of Arts in History and Literature from Harvard University. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Hale should serve on the Board based on his operating experience in product development, strategy, sales and marketing, and operations.

42

Table Of Contents

Sharon Rowlandshas served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since April 2014. She has more than 20 years of experience leading multi-billion dollar companies serving small and medium-sized businesses, financial markets and enterprise customers. Prior to joining ReachLocal, Ms. Rowlands served as Chief Executive Officer of Altegrity, a global risk consulting and information services company, from 2011 to 2013. From 2008 to 2011, Ms. Rowlands was the CEO of Penton Media, a business-to-business media company, which she led through a pre-packaged bankruptcy in February 2010. From 1997 to 2008, Ms. Rowlands held a variety of executive-level positions at Thomson Financial, a provider of information and technology solutions to the financial community and a business unit of The Thomson Corporation, including President and CEO from 2005 to 2008. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the Local Search Association, the largest trade organization of companies engaged in local advertising and marketing, and she was previously a member of the Board of Directors of Constant Contact, a publicly traded provider of online marketing tools, social media marketing and event marketing, and a member of the Board of Directors of Automatic Data Processing, a publicly traded leader in business outsourcing solutions including HR, payroll, tax and benefits administration. Ms. Rowlands received her Postgraduate Certificate in Education from the University of London and her Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Newcastle, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne. Our Board has concluded that Ms. Rowlands should serve on the Board based on her corporate management experience and position as Chief Executive Officer.

Alan Salzmanhas served on our Board since 2007 and served as our Chairman from 2009 to April 2012. Mr. Salzman is the co-founder of VantagePoint Capital Partners, a venture capital firm specializing in multi-stage investing, and has served as its Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner for more than the past five years. Mr. Salzman previously held a faculty appointment for more than 10 years as an Adjunct Professor of Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Companies at Stanford Law School. Mr. Salzman holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the London School of Economics and the University of Toronto, a Juris Doctor degree from Stanford Law School, and a Master of Laws degree in international business from Vrije Universiteit Brussels. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Salzman should serve on the Board based on his experience in working with entrepreneurial companies, his particular familiarity with technology companies, his experience in finance and mergers and acquisitions, his financial literacy and, as one of our early stage investors, his deep knowledge of ReachLocal.

Directors Continuing in Office until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

LawrenceKutscher has served on our Board since December 2014. Mr. Kutscher has served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and as a director of TravelClick, a privately held provider of solutions for the hospitality industry, since 2010. From 2006 to 2010, Mr. Kutscher served as the Chief Executive Officer of Register.com, a privately held web services company. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Kutscher served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Small Business Group at Dun & Bradstreet, a publicly held business information company. Prior to Dun & Bradstreet, Mr. Kutscher held senior positions at Goldman Sachs and American Express. Mr. Kutscher holds an A.B. in Political Science from Brown University and a Masters in Business Administration from Columbia Business School. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Kutscher should serve on the Board based on his considerable operating experience with a particular focus on serving small and medium-sized businesses.

Edward Thompson has served on our Board since April 2014. Mr. Thompson has served as a senior advisor to Fujitsu Limited, a leading information and communication technology company, and as a director of several Fujitsu subsidiaries or portfolio companies from 1995 to 2011. From 1976 to 1994, Mr. Thompson held a series of management positions with Amdahl Corporation, an information technology corporation, including Chief Financial Officer and Secretary from August 1983 to June 1994, and Chief Executive Officer of Amdahl Capital Corporation from October 1985 to June 1994. Mr. Thompson is a director and serves as the Chairman of the audit committee of InnoPath Software Inc., a software company that provides mobile device management technology, and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Shoretel, a publicly held provider of phone systems and unified communications systems, XBridge Systems, Inc., a mainframe DLP provider, and Glovia International Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Fujitsu Ltd.), a provider of enterprise resource management software solutions. He was also previously a director and Chairman of the audit committee of Aviat Networks, Inc. (formerly Harris Stratex Networks), a publicly held provider of microwave networking solutions. He is also a member of the Advisory Board of Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business. Mr. Thompson holds a B.S. in aeronautical engineering from the University of Illinois, and an M.B.A. with an emphasis in operations research from Santa Clara University. Our Board has concluded that Mr. Thompson should serve on the Board based on his corporate management experience and financial literacy.

43

Table Of Contents

 PROPOSAL2 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The audit committee has appointed Grant Thornton LLP to act as our independent registered public accounting firm and to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. This appointment will continue at the discretion of the audit committee and is presented to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the audit committee will consider that fact when it selects our independent auditor for the following fiscal year.

Grant Thornton LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2007, and one or more representatives of Grant Thornton LLP will be present at the annual meeting. These representatives will be provided an opportunity to make a statement at the annual meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote“FOR”the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares which are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the annual meeting, provided a quorum is present, is required for the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent auditors. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Brokers generally have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of our independent auditors, thus broker non-votes are not expected to result from the vote on this proposal. 

44

Table Of Contents

CERTAINRELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Since January 1, 2014, we have not been a party to, and we have no plans to be a party to, any transaction or series of similar transactions in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our capital stock or entities affiliated with them, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than in the transactions described below.

Investors’ Rights Agreement

We are party to an investors’ rights agreement which provides that certain holders of our common stock, including certain of our 5% holders or entities affiliated with them, have the right to demand that we file a registration statement or request that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we are otherwise filing.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered, or will enter, into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and officers. The indemnification agreements and our Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

Our Board has adopted a written related person transaction policy to set forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions. This policy covers any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or are to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $50,000 and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including, without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness or employment by us of a related person. While the policy covers related party transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $50,000, the policy states that related party transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 are required to be disclosed in applicable filings as required by the Securities Act, Exchange Act and related rules. Our Board set the $50,000 threshold for approval of related party transactions in the policy at an amount lower than that which is required to be disclosed under the Securities Act, Exchange Act and related rules because we believe it is appropriate for our audit committee to review transactions or potential transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $50,000, as opposed to $120,000.

Pursuant to this policy, our audit committee will (i) review the relevant facts and circumstances of each related party transaction, including if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction, and (ii) take into account the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of our code of business conduct and ethics. Management will present to our audit committee each proposed related party transaction, including all relevant facts and circumstances relating thereto, and will update the audit committee as to any material changes to any related party transaction. All related party transactions may only be consummated if our audit committee has approved or ratified such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy. Certain types of transactions are pre-approved by our audit committee under the policy. These pre-approved transactions include: (i) certain compensation arrangements; (ii) transactions in the ordinary course of business where the related party’s interest arises only (a) from his or her position as a director of another entity that is party to the transaction, and/or (b) from an equity interest of less than 5% in another entity that is party to the transaction, or (c) from a limited partnership interest of less than 5%, subject to certain limitations; and (iii) transactions in the ordinary course of business where the interest of the related party arises solely from the ownership of a class of equity securities of our company where all holders of such class of equity securities will receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis. No director may participate in the approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party. 

45

Table Of Contents

OTHERMATTERS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and anyone owning more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports detailing ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations also require these persons to provide us with a copy of all reports filed.

Based solely on our review of the copies of reports and related amendments we have received, we believe that during the 2014 fiscal year, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater-than-ten-percent owners were met, except that Messrs. Dykes, Kairouz and Salzman were one day late reporting shares granted to them in lieu of director fees on September 30, 2014, due to administrative error.

Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in the 2016 Proxy Statement

Stockholders wishing to present proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act must submit their proposals to us no later than November 26, 2015. Proposals should be sent to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367.

Other Proposals and Stockholder Nominations for Director

Under our bylaws, in order to nominate a director or bring any other business before the stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting that will not be included in our proxy statement, you must notify us in writing and such notice must be received by us no earlier than December 31, 2015 and no later than January 30, 2015; provided that if the date of the annual meeting is earlier than March 30, 2016 or later than June 28, 2016, you must give notice not earlier than the 120^th day and not later than the 90^th day prior to such annual meeting date or, if later, the 10^th day following the day on which public disclosure of the annual meeting date is first made (such notice within such time periods, “Timely Notice”). In addition, with respect to nominations for directors, if the number of directors to be elected at the annual meeting is increased and there is no public announcement by us naming all of the nominees for director by January 20, 2016, notice will also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to us not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by us. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board will consider suggestions from stockholders for potential Board nominees for election as directors to be presented at the annual meeting. The person recommending the nominee must be a stockholder entitled to vote at the annual meeting, and the recommendation must be made pursuant to Timely Notice. For proposals not made in accordance with Rule 14a-8, you must comply with specific procedures set forth in our bylaws and the nomination or proposal must contain the specific information required by our bylaws. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider nominees suggested by stockholders on the same terms as nominees selected by the nominating and corporate governance committee. You may write to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367, to deliver the notices discussed above and to request a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates pursuant to the bylaws.

Householding of Proxy Materials

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

This year, a number of banks and brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, please notify your bank or broker, direct your written request to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367 or contact us by telephone at (818) 274-0260.

46

Table Of Contents

Incorporation by Reference

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, which might incorporate future filings made by us under those statutes, neither the preceding Report of the Audit Committee nor the Report of the Compensation Committee will be incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings, nor will any such report be incorporated by reference into any future filings made by us under those statutes. In addition, information on our website, other than our proxy statement, notice and form of proxy, is not part of the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by reference.

Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which includes certain financial information about ReachLocal, is enclosed together with this proxy statement. Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the SEC (exclusive of exhibits and documents incorporated by reference) may also be obtained for free by directing written requests to Tenlay Naliboff, Secretary, ReachLocal, Inc., 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1600 Woodland Hills, California 91367. Copies of exhibits and basic documents filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K or referenced therein will be furnished to stockholders upon written request and payment of a nominal fee in connection with the furnishing of such documents. You may also obtain the Annual Report on Form 10-K over the Internet at the SEC’s website,http://www.sec.gov, or on our website,http://investors.reachlocal.com.

Other Matters

The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors 

/s/ Tenlay Naliboff

Tenlay Naliboff 

Secretary 

47 

Table Of Contents

48

 

49