LOANS | NOTE C - LOANS The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30 was as follows: (in thousands) 2020 2019 Residential real estate One- to four-family $ 222,489 $ 216,066 Multi-family 12,373 15,928 Construction 4,045 3,757 Land 765 852 Farm 2,354 3,157 Nonresidential real estate 33,503 30,419 Commercial and industrial 2,214 2,075 Consumer and other Loans on deposits 1,245 1,415 Home equity 7,645 8,214 Automobile 67 91 Unsecured 675 451 287,375 282,425 Allowance for loan losses (1,488 ) (1,456 ) $ 285,887 $ 280,969 The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio class and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2020 and 2019. There were $751,000 and $949,000 in loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. June 30, 2020: (in thousands) Loans individually evaluated Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality* Ending loans balance Ending allowance attributed to loans Unallocated allowance Total allowance Loans individually evaluated for impairment: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 3,983 $ 751 $ 4,734 $ -- $ -- $ -- Multi-family 671 -- 671 -- -- -- Construction 63 -- 63 -- -- -- Farm 309 -- 309 -- -- -- Nonresidential real estate 660 -- 660 -- -- -- 5,686 751 6,437 -- -- -- Loans collectively evaluated for impairment: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 217,755 $ 671 $ -- $ 671 Multi-family 11,702 184 -- 184 Construction 3,982 6 -- 6 Land 765 1 -- 1 Farm 2,045 4 -- 4 Nonresidential real estate 32,843 405 -- 405 Commercial and industrial 2,214 3 -- 3 Consumer and other Loans on deposits 1,245 2 -- 2 Home equity 7,645 11 -- 11 Automobile 67 -- -- -- Unsecured 675 1 -- 1 Unallocated -- -- 200 200 280,938 1,288 200 1,488 $ 287,375 $ 1,288 $ 200 $ 1,488 * These loans were evaluated at acquisition date at their estimated fair value and there has been no subsequent deterioration since acquisition. June 30, 2019: (in thousands) Loans individually evaluated Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality* Ending loans balance Ending allowance attributed to loans Unallocated allowance Total allowance Loans individually evaluated for impairment: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 3,837 $ 949 $ 4,786 $ -- $ -- $ -- Multi-family 685 -- 685 -- -- -- Farm 309 -- 309 -- -- -- Nonresidential real estate 683 -- 683 -- -- -- 5,514 949 6,463 -- -- -- Loans collectively evaluated for impairment: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 210,595 $ 685 $ -- $ 685 Multi-family 15,928 200 -- 200 Construction 3,757 6 -- 6 Land 852 1 -- 1 Farm 2,848 6 -- 6 Nonresidential real estate 29,736 336 -- 336 Commercial and industrial 2,075 5 -- 5 Consumer and other Loans on deposits 1,415 3 -- 3 Home equity 8,214 14 -- 14 Automobile 91 -- -- -- Unsecured 451 -- -- -- Unallocated -- -- 200 200 275,962 1,256 200 1,456 $ 282,425 $ 1,256 $ 200 $ 1,456 * These loans were evaluated at acquisition date at their estimated fair value and there has been no subsequent deterioration since acquisition. The following tables present impaired loans by class of loans as of and for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019: June 30, 2020: (in thousands) Unpaid Principal Balance and Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis Income Recognized With no related allowance recorded: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 4,734 $ -- $ 4,713 $ 172 $ 172 Multi-family 671 -- 679 32 32 Construction 63 -- 13 -- -- Farm 309 -- 309 11 11 Nonresidential real estate 660 -- 701 47 47 Total $ 6,437 $ -- $ 6,415 $ 262 $ 262 June 30, 2019: (in thousands) Unpaid Principal Balance and Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis Income Recognized With no related allowance recorded: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 4,786 $ -- $ 4,449 $ 226 $ 226 Multi-family 685 -- 343 26 26 Farm 309 -- 310 -- -- Nonresidential real estate 683 -- 403 7 7 Total $ 6,463 $ -- $ 5,505 $ 259 $ 259 The following tables present the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due over 90 days still on accrual status by class of loans as of June 30, 2020 and 2019. The tables include loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality. At June 30, 2020, the table below includes approximately $508,000 of loans on nonaccrual and no loans past due over 90 days and still accruing of loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality, while at June 30, 2019, approximately $369,000 of loans on nonaccrual and no loans past due over 90 days and still accruing represent such loans. June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 (in thousands) Nonaccrual Loans Past Due Over 90 Days Still Accruing Nonaccrual Loans Past Due Over 90 Days Still Accruing Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 4,458 $ 1,135 $ 4,545 $ 1,747 Multi-family 671 -- 685 -- Construction 63 -- -- -- Farm 309 -- 309 -- Nonresidential real estate 660 -- 683 49 Commercial and industrial 4 -- 1 -- Consumer 95 -- 9 -- $ 6,260 $ 1,135 $ 6,232 $ 1,796 One- to four-family loans in process of foreclosure totaled $694,000 and $1.2 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Troubled Debt Restructurings: A Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) is the situation where the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that the Banks would not otherwise have considered due to the borrower’s financial difficulties. All TDRs are considered “impaired.” The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for troubled debt restructurings to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency. The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The Company elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the widespread economic downturn that immediately resulted, the Company adopted a loan forbearance plan in which then-current affected borrowers could request deferral of their loan payments for a period of three months. A total of $17.3 million in loans were accepted into the plan through June 30, 2020, of which approximately $14.1 million have reached their three-month deferral date. Of those loans which have reached the end of their deferral period approximately $13.8 million or 97.7% have returned to regular payment status. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had $1.9 million and $1.6 million of loans classified as TDRs, respectively. Of the TDRs at June 30, 2020, approximately 26.2% were related to the borrower’s completion of Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings with no reaffirmation of the debt to the Banks. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company had six loans restructured as TDRs. One borrower refinanced a piece of one- to four-family, non-owner occupied, residential property to bring to current amounts owed on other loans with the Bank. Because the borrower’s financial condition had deteriorated, it was unlikely that the borrower could have secured financing elsewhere. The restructured loan is collateralized and cross-collateralized by real estate. Three single family residential borrowers filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection and did not reaffirm the debts personally, although the Company’s collateral position remains intact. Finally, a first and second mortgage on an 8-plex were refinanced into a single loan with a slightly extended maturity term and a lower interest rate, which was consistent with similarly-priced comparable loans at the time of refinance. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the terms of two one- to four family residential real estate loans totaling $323,000 were modified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs.”) One loan totaling $248,000 was refinanced with $30,000 cash out because of cost overruns associated with construction of two four-plexes. This loan was part of an overall credit facility maintained for the construction project. The credit facility is secured by the project real estate as well as additional real estate. The loan was classified as a TDR because of payment delays experienced by the borrower. Subsequent to June 30, 2019, an updated appraisal showing adequate loan-to-value in support of the project was obtained. One loan totaling $75,000 was modified with $15,000 cash out and an extension of the loan term to enable the borrower to consolidate debts and establish acceptable debt service obligations after a period of unemployment. Although the interest rate on this loan was the same rate offered to other customers at the time, the credit was determined to be a TDR because the borrower’s credit worthiness had deteriorated. Because the restructured loan bears interest at the same rate offered to other such borrowers and the repayment period was extended slightly, the borrower is expected to be able to service the debt as restructured. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, we consider the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy. The Company had no allocated specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2020 or 2019. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, TDR loans on nonaccrual status totaled $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The Company had no commitments to lend additional amounts as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings. The Company had no TDR loans which defaulted during fiscal 2020 or during fiscal 2019. The following tables present the aging of the principal balance outstanding in accruing past due loans as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, by class of loans. The tables include loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality. At June 30, 2020, the table below includes $101,000 in loans 30-89 days past due and approximately $28,000 of loans past due over 90 days that were acquired with deteriorated credit quality, while at June 30, 2019, the table below includes no loans 30-89 days past due and approximately $13,000 of loans past due over 90 days of such loans. June 30, 2020: (in thousands) 30-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Loans Not Past Due Total Residential real estate: One-to four-family $ 2,546 $ 2,670 $ 5,216 $ 217,273 $ 222,489 Multi-family -- -- -- 12,373 12,373 Construction 192 63 255 3,790 4,045 Land -- -- -- 765 765 Farm 107 309 416 1,938 2,354 Nonresidential real estate 57 253 310 33,193 33,503 Commercial and industrial -- -- -- 2,214 2,214 Consumer and other: Loans on deposits -- -- -- 1,245 1,245 Home equity 255 90 345 7,300 7,645 Automobile -- -- -- 67 67 Unsecured -- -- -- 675 675 Total $ 3,157 $ 3,385 $ 6,542 $ 280,833 $ 287,375 June 30, 2019: (in thousands) 30-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Loans Not Past Due Total Residential real estate: One-to four-family $ 4,021 $ 3,479 $ 7,500 $ 208,566 $ 216,066 Multi-family -- 248 248 15,680 15,928 Construction 753 -- 753 3,004 3,757 Land -- -- -- 852 852 Farm 2 -- 2 3,155 3,157 Nonresidential real estate 362 49 411 30,008 30,419 Commercial and industrial -- -- -- 2,075 2,075 Consumer and other: Loans on deposits -- -- -- 1,415 1,415 Home equity 38 -- 38 8,176 8,214 Automobile 8 -- 8 83 91 Unsecured -- -- -- 451 451 Total $ 5,184 $ 3,776 $ 8,960 $ 273,465 $ 282,425 Credit Quality Indicators: The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on an annual basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings: Special Mention. Substandard. Doubtful. Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above-described process are considered to be pass rated loans. Loans listed that are not rated are included in groups of homogeneous loans and are evaluated for credit quality based on performing status. See the aging of past due loan table above. As of June 30, 2020, and 2019, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans was as follows: June 30, 2020: (in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 215,010 $ 742 $ 6,737 $ -- Multi-family 11,702 -- 671 -- Construction 3,982 -- 63 -- Land 765 -- -- -- Farm 2,045 -- 309 -- Nonresidential real estate 31,529 939 1,035 -- Commercial and industrial 2,188 -- 26 -- Consumer and other: Loans on deposits 1,245 -- -- -- Home equity 7,505 39 101 -- Automobile 67 -- -- -- Unsecured 670 -- 5 -- Total $ 276,708 $ 1,720 $ 8,947 $ -- June 30, 2019: (in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 206,489 $ 894 $ 8,683 $ -- Multi-family 15,243 -- 685 -- Construction 3,757 -- -- -- Land 852 -- -- -- Farm 2,848 -- 309 -- Nonresidential real estate 28,990 746 683 -- Commercial and industrial 1,584 -- 491 -- Consumer and other: Loans on deposits 1,415 -- -- -- Home equity 8,053 137 24 -- Automobile 91 -- -- -- Unsecured 446 -- 5 -- Total $ 269,768 $ 1,777 $ 10,880 $ -- The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019: June 30, 2020: (in thousands) Beginning balance Provision for loan losses Loans charged off Recoveries Ending balance Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 685 $ 49 $ (65 ) $ 2 $ 671 Multi-family 200 (16 ) -- -- 184 Construction 6 -- -- -- 6 Land 1 -- -- -- 1 Farm 6 (2 ) -- -- 4 Nonresidential real estate 336 69 -- -- 405 Commercial and industrial 5 (2 ) -- -- 3 Consumer and other: Loans on deposits 3 (1 ) -- -- 2 Home equity 14 (3 ) -- -- 11 Auto -- 8 (8 ) Unsecured -- 1 -- -- 1 Unallocated 200 -- -- -- 200 Totals $ 1,456 $ 103 $ (73 ) $ 2 $ 1,488 June 30, 2019: (in thousands) Beginning balance Provision for loan losses Loans charged off Recoveries Ending balance Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 795 $ 41 $ (190 ) $ 39 $ 685 Multi-family 225 (25 ) -- -- 200 Construction 8 (2 ) -- -- 6 Land 1 -- -- -- 1 Farm 6 -- -- -- 6 Nonresidential real estate 321 15 -- -- 336 Commercial and industrial 3 2 -- -- 5 Consumer and other: Loans on deposits 3 -- -- -- 3 Home equity 13 1 -- -- 14 Unsecured 1 (21 ) -- 20 -- Unallocated 200 -- -- -- 200 Totals $ 1,576 $ 11 $ (190 ) $ 59 $ 1,456 Purchased Loans: The Company purchased loans during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of those loans, net of a purchase credit discount of $351,000 and $351,000, at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, was as follows: (in thousands) 2020 2019 Residential real estate: One- to four-family $ 751 $ 949 Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected on loans purchased during fiscal year 2013, for the years ended June 30 was as follows: (in thousands) 2020 2019 Balance at beginning of year $ 544 $ 634 Accretion of income (97 ) (90 ) Balance at end of year $ 447 $ 544 For those purchased loans disclosed above, the Company made no increase in allowance for loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2020 or 2019, nor were any allowance for loan losses reversed during those years. . |