Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 | ||
or | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number:333-118149
American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 20-0573058 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2000 Las Vegas Boulevard South Las Vegas, NV (Address of principal executive offices) | 89104 (Zip Code) |
(702) 380-7777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
AMERICAN CASINO & ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 70,528 | $ | 54,912 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents — restricted | 271 | 269 | ||||||
Investments — restricted | 3,159 | 3,457 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 6,348 | 6,752 | ||||||
Related party receivables | 97 | 472 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 2,948 | 2,948 | ||||||
Other current assets | 15,316 | 16,773 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 98,667 | 85,583 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 440,801 | 445,788 | ||||||
Debt issuance and deferred financing costs, net | 5,435 | 5,729 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 36,164 | 36,212 | ||||||
Other assets | 2,402 | 2,514 | ||||||
Total Other Assets | 44,001 | 44,455 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 583,469 | $ | 575,826 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 6,749 | 6,708 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 32,214 | 33,168 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and related expenses | 11,149 | 14,391 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations | 502 | 496 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 50,614 | 54,763 | ||||||
Long-Term Liabilities: | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 255,000 | 255,000 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, less current portion | 2,202 | 2,329 | ||||||
Other | 6,144 | 5,993 | ||||||
Total Long-Term Liabilities | 263,346 | 263,322 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 313,960 | 318,085 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||||
Member’s Equity: | ||||||||
Member’s equity | 269,509 | 257,741 | ||||||
Total Member’s Equity | 269,509 | 257,741 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity | $ | 583,469 | $ | 575,826 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
AMERICAN CASINO & ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES LLC
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Casino | $ | 67,370 | $ | 48,022 | ||||
Hotel | 22,616 | 17,433 | ||||||
Food and beverage | 23,109 | 18,070 | ||||||
Tower, retail and other | 9,311 | 8,219 | ||||||
Gross Revenues | 122,406 | 91,744 | ||||||
Less promotional allowances | 9,518 | 5,799 | ||||||
Net Revenues | 112,888 | 85,945 | ||||||
Costs and Expenses: | ||||||||
Casino | 22,566 | 16,488 | ||||||
Hotel | 9,063 | 6,843 | ||||||
Food and beverage | 15,975 | 13,201 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,236 | 3,730 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 29,472 | 20,786 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,591 | 6,010 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets | 8 | (2 | ) | |||||
Total Costs and Expenses | 89,911 | 67,056 | ||||||
Income From Operations | 22,977 | 18,889 | ||||||
Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||
Interest income | 419 | 850 | ||||||
Interest expense | (5,436 | ) | (4,682 | ) | ||||
Total Other Expense, net | (5,017 | ) | (3,832 | ) | ||||
Income Before Income Taxes | 17,960 | 15,057 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 6,192 | 5,210 | ||||||
Net Income | $ | 11,768 | $ | 9,847 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
AMERICAN CASINO & ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES LLC
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 11,768 | $ | 9,847 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,591 | 6,010 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets | 8 | (2 | ) | |||||
Provision for deferred income taxes | 48 | (172 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Restricted cash | (2 | ) | 239 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | 404 | 21 | ||||||
Other assets | 1,719 | 1,184 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (4,155 | ) | (1,825 | ) | ||||
Other | 151 | 132 | ||||||
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities | 18,532 | 15,434 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in investments — restricted | 298 | (24 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of property and equipment | (3,821 | ) | (2,152 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in related party receivables | 375 | (2,911 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 353 | 5 | ||||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (2,795 | ) | (5,082 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligation | (121 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities | (121 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 15,616 | 10,236 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period | 54,912 | 108,316 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents — end of period | $ | 70,528 | $ | 118,552 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 9,229 | $ | 8,513 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | — | $ | 650 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
AMERICAN CASINO & ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. | The Company |
American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC, or ACEP or the Company, was formed in Delaware on December 29, 2003. We are a holding company that was formed for the purpose of acquiring the entities that own and operate the Stratosphere Casino Hotel & Tower, or Stratosphere, Arizona Charlie’s Decatur and Arizona Charlie’s Boulder in Las Vegas, Nevada. Stratosphere had been owned by a subsidiary of our indirect parent, American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership, or AREH. Prior to our acquisition of Arizona Charlie’s Decatur and Arizona Charlie’s Boulder, these properties were owned by Carl C. Icahn and one of his affiliated entities. Our senior management team has been responsible for the management of all three properties since 2002.
On November 28, 2005, AREP Laughlin Corporation entered into an agreement to purchase the Flamingo Laughlin Hotel and Casino, now known as the Aquarius Casino Resort, or the Aquarius, in Laughlin, Nevada from Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc. AREP Laughlin Corporation was formed by our indirect parent, AREH, to acquire, own and operate the Aquarius, and AREH contributed 100% of the stock of AREP Laughlin to ACEP on April 4, 2006. The transaction was approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission upon recommendation of the Nevada Gaming Control Board and closed on May 19, 2006. The purchase price was $114.0 million, including working capital amounts. Accordingly, our financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Aquarius from May 19, 2006 forward.
On April 22, 2007, American Entertainment Properties Corp., or AEP, our direct parent, entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the Agreement, withW2007/ACEP Holdings, LLC, or Whitehall, an affiliate of Whitehall Street Real Estate Funds, a series of real estate investment funds affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co., to sell all of our issued and outstanding membership interests for $1.3 billion plus or minus certain adjustments such as working capital, more fully described in the Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, prior to the closing, AEP is required to cause us to repay, from funds provided by AEP, the principal, interest, any prepayment penalty or premium and any other obligation owing under the terms of our 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 and our senior secured credit facility.
We also adopted a Key Employee Plan, or the Plan, in conjunction with the transaction, which allows for certain key employees to be paid one year’s salary upon meeting certain conditions. The employee must be employed in good standing on the closing date and must complete the transition period, defined as up to 60 days after closing, if requested by Whitehall. The obligation to make such payments will remain with AEP.
The transaction is also subject to approvals from the Nevada State Gaming Commission and the Nevada State Gaming Control Board. We expect the transaction to close in approximately eight months.
We are a subsidiary of AEP, and its ultimate parent is American Real Estate Partners, L.P., or AREP, a Delaware master limited partnership whose units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. As of March 31, 2007, affiliates of Mr. Icahn owned 10,304,013 preferred units and 55,655,382 depositary units, which represent approximately 86.5% of the outstanding preferred units and approximately 90.0% of the outstanding depositary units of AREP. Mr. Icahn is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and owns all of the capital stock of American Property Investors, Inc., AREP’s general partner.
Note 2. | Basis of Presentation |
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in our 2006 audited consolidated financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the 2006 consolidated audited financial statements presented in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 6, 2007 (SEC FileNo. 333-118149). Our reports are available electronically by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of those of a normal recurring nature), which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future interim period or for the entire fiscal year.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ACEP and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” to clarify diversity in practice on the presentation of different types of taxes in the financial statements. The EITF concluded that, for taxes within the scope of the issue, a company may adopt a policy of presenting taxes either gross within revenue or net. That is, it may include charges to customers for taxes within revenues and the charge for the taxes from the taxing authority within cost of sales, or, alternatively, it may net the charge to the customer and the charge from the taxing authority. If taxes are reported on a gross basis, and are significant, an entity should disclose the amounts of those taxes subject to EITF06-3. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We present sales tax on a net basis in our consolidated financial statements, and do not expect the adoption of EITF06-3 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. Interpretation No. 48, which clarifies Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes the criterion that an individual tax position has to meet for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in our financial statements. On initial application, Interpretation No. 48 will be applied to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remains open. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the adoption date will be recognized or continue to be recognized.
Interpretation No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. The adoption of Interpretation No. 48 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, where fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The standard does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159. SFAS No. 159, which amends SFAS No. 115, allows certain financial assets and liabilities to be recognized, at the Company’s election, at fair market value, with any
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
gains or losses for the period recorded in the statement of income. SFAS No. 159 includedavailable-for-sales securities in the assets eligible for this treatment. Currently, the Company records the gains or losses for the period in the statement of comprehensive income and in the equity section of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods in those fiscal years. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. | Related Party Transactions |
We have an intercompany services arrangement with Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc., or Atlantic Holdings, the former owner of The Sands Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey, to provide management and consulting services. AREP owns the majority of Atlantic Holdings’ shares. We are compensated based upon an allocation of salaries plus an overhead charge of 15% of the salary allocation plus reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, we billed Atlantic Holdings and its affiliates approximately $31,000 and $81,000, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we made payments to XO Communications, Inc., which is controlled by affiliates of Mr. Icahn, for certain telecommunications services provided to us. The payments totaled approximately $70,000 and $53,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we were owed approximately $97,000 and $472,000, respectively, from related parties.
Note 4. | Long-term Debt |
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had outstanding borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility of $40.0 million and $40.0 million, respectively. The outstanding principal balance accrues interest at a fixed rate which is equal to one month LIBOR plus 1.5% per annum, which totaled 6.82% at March 31, 2007.
Note 5. | Non-guarantor Subsidiaries |
Our 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 are guaranteed by our operating subsidiaries. In accordance with SEC rules and regulations, separate information with respect to the parent, co-issuer, guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries is not required as the parent and co-issuer have no independent assets or operations, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and the total assets, member’s equity, revenues, income from operations before income taxes and cash flows from operating activities of the non-guarantor subsidiaries are less than 3% of our consolidated amounts.
Note 6. | Legal Proceedings |
We are, from time to time, a party to various legal proceedings arising out of our businesses. We believe, however, there are no proceedings pending or threatened against us, which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect upon our business financial conditions, results of operations or liquidity.
Note 7. | Income Taxes |
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. There was no increase or decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the implementation of FIN 48. As of the date of adoption, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $4.9 million, all of which, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, there have been no changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits. We believe it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax
7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
(Unaudited) — (Continued)
benefits could materially change as a result of settlements due to audits and the expiration of statutes of limitations prior to March 31, 2008; however, quantification of an estimated amount cannot be made at this time.
We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. Penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. The amount of accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits was $1.1 million and $1.2 million as of January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
We file income tax returns in the United States Federal jurisdiction and has no income tax filing requirement in any state or foreign jurisdiction. We are no longer subject to US Federal income tax examinations for years prior to 2003.
8
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion contains management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements.
Overview
We own and operate four gaming and entertainment properties in Clark County, Nevada. The four properties are the Stratosphere Casino Hotel & Tower, or the Stratosphere, which is located on the Las Vegas Strip and caters to visitors to Las Vegas, two off-Strip casinos, Arizona Charlie’s Decatur and Arizona Charlie’s Boulder, which cater primarily to residents of Las Vegas and the surrounding communities, and the Aquarius Casino Resort, formerly known as the Flamingo Laughlin Hotel and Casino, in Laughlin, Nevada, or the Aquarius, which caters to visitors to Laughlin. The Stratosphere is one of the most recognized landmarks in Las Vegas, our two Arizona Charlie’s properties are well known casinos in their respective marketplaces and the Aquarius has the largest hotel in Laughlin. Each of our properties offers customers a value-oriented experience by providing competitive odds in our casinos, quality rooms in our hotels, award-winning dining facilities and, at the Stratosphere and Aquarius, an offering of competitive value-oriented entertainment attractions. We believe the value we offer our patrons, together with a strong focus on customer service, will enable us to continue to attract customers to our properties.
On November 28, 2005, AREP Laughlin Corporation entered into an agreement to purchase the Aquarius, in Laughlin, Nevada from Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc. AREP Laughlin Corporation was formed by our indirect parent, AREH, to acquire, own and operate the Aquarius, and AREH contributed 100% of the stock of AREP Laughlin to ACEP on April 4, 2006. The transaction was approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission upon recommendation of the Nevada Gaming Control Board and closed on May 19, 2006. The purchase price was $114.0 million, including working capital amounts. Accordingly, our financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Aquarius from May 19, 2006 forward.
On April 22, 2007, American Entertainment Properties Corp., or AEP, our direct parent, entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the Agreement, withW2007/ACEP Holdings, LLC, or Whitehall, an affiliate of Whitehall Street Real Estate Funds, a series of real estate investment funds affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. to sell all of our issued and outstanding membership interests for $1.3 billion plus or minus certain adjustments such as working capital, more fully described in the Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, prior to the closing, AEP is required to cause us to repay, from funds provided by AEP, the principal, interest, any prepayment penalty or premium and any other obligation owing under the terms of our 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 and our senior secured credit facility.
We also adopted a Key Employee Plan, or the Plan, in conjunction with the transaction, which allows for certain key employees to be paid one year’s salary upon meeting certain conditions. The employee must be employed in good standing on the closing date and must complete the transition period, defined as up to 60 days after closing, if requested by Whitehall. The obligation to make such payments will remain with AEP.
The transaction is also subject to approvals from the Nevada State Gaming Commission and the Nevada State Gaming Control Board. We expect the transaction to close in approximately eight months.
9
Table of Contents
We currently offer gaming, hotel, dining, entertainment, tower attractions, retail and other amenities at our properties. The following table provides certain summary information for each of our properties at March 31, 2007:
Casino | Number of | Number | Number | |||||||||||||
Square | Hotel | of | of | |||||||||||||
Footage | Rooms | Slots | Table Games | |||||||||||||
Stratosphere | 80,000 | 2,444 | 1,303 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Arizona Charlie’s Decatur | 52,000 | 258 | 1,363 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Arizona Charlie’s Boulder | 47,000 | 303 | 1,056 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Aquarius | 57,000 | 1,907 | 1,139 | 42 |
We use certain key measurements to evaluate operating revenue. Casino revenue measurements include “table games drop” and “slot coin-in,” which are measures of the total amounts wagered by patrons. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of table games drop or slot coin-in that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Hotel revenue measurements include hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of available hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average price of occupied rooms per day. Food and beverage revenue measurements include number of covers, which is the number of guest checks, and the average check amount.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Including | |||||||||||||||||
Aquarius | Excluding Aquarius | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2007 | 2006 | % Change | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
Casino | $ | 67.4 | $ | 46.1 | $ | 48.0 | (4.0 | )% | |||||||||
Hotel | 22.6 | 18.1 | 17.4 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Food and beverage | 23.1 | 18.3 | 18.1 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Tower, retail and other | 9.3 | 8.0 | 8.2 | (2.4 | )% | ||||||||||||
Gross revenues | 122.4 | 90.5 | 91.7 | (1.3 | )% | ||||||||||||
Less promotional allowances | 9.5 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Net revenues | 112.9 | 84.1 | 85.9 | (2.1 | )% | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||||||
Casino | 22.6 | 16.2 | 16.5 | (1.8 | )% | ||||||||||||
Hotel | 9.1 | 6.7 | 6.8 | (1.5 | )% | ||||||||||||
Food and beverage | 16.0 | 13.3 | 13.2 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | (2.7 | )% | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 29.5 | 20.2 | 20.8 | (2.9 | )% | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8.6 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 90.0 | 66.5 | 67.0 | (0.7 | )% | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 22.9 | $ | 17.6 | $ | 18.9 | (6.9 | )% | |||||||||
As disclosed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report, we acquired the Aquarius on May 19, 2006. The Aquarius’ net revenues and operating income for the three months ended
10
Table of Contents
March 31, 2007, were $28.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The following discussion of the results of operations at our gaming properties excludes the results of Aquarius.
Gross Revenues
Gross revenues decreased 1.3% to $90.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $91.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in casino revenues as discussed below.
Casino Revenues
Casino revenues decreased 4.0% to $46.1 million, or 50.9% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $48.0 million, or 52.3% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in slot and table game revenue, due to a decrease in slot coin-in and table games drop. Management believes that these decreases are the result of increases in the price of gas, which adversely affects automobile traffic to Las Vegas and the entrance of a new competitor in the market served by Arizona Charlie’s Decatur. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, slot machine revenues were $37.8 million, or 82.0% of casino revenues, and table game revenues were $6.6 million, or 14.3% of casino revenues, compared to $38.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Other casino revenues, consisting of race and sports book, poker, bingo and keno, were $1.7 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Non-Casino Revenues
Hotel revenues increased 4.0% to $18.1 million, or 20.0% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $17.4 million, or 19.0% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to a 5.6% increase in the average room rate, partially offset by a 1.9% decrease in the hotel occupancy rate.
Food and beverage revenues increased 1.1% to $18.3 million, or 20.2% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $18.1 million, or 19.7% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to an 8.9% increase in the average check amount partially offset by a 7.2% decrease in the number of covers.
Tower, retail and other revenues decreased 2.4% to $8.0 million, or 8.8% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $8.2 million, or 8.9% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to increased inclement weather that caused an increase in closure of the tower rides.
Promotional Allowances
Promotional allowances are comprised of the retail value of goods and services provided to casino patrons under various marketing programs. As a percentage of casino revenues, promotional allowances increased to 13.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from 12.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to increased marketing promotions, especially at the Stratosphere.
Operating Expenses
Casino operating expenses decreased 1.8% to $16.2 million, or 35.1% of casino revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $16.5 million, or 34.4% of casino revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to decreased participation expense.
Hotel operating expenses decreased 1.5% to $6.7 million, or 37.0% of hotel revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $6.8 million or 39.1% of hotel revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in hotel occupancy.
11
Table of Contents
Food and beverage operating expenses increased 0.8% to $13.3 million, or 72.7% of food and beverage revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $13.2 million, or 72.9% of food and beverage revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to increased supplies cost.
Other operating expenses decreased 2.7% to $3.6 million, or 45.0% of tower, retail and other revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $3.7 million or 45.1% of tower, retail and other revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to decreased entertainer fees due to the cancellation of the afternoon show at the Stratosphere, Viva Las Vegas.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were primarily comprised of payroll, supplies, marketing, advertising, utilities and other administrative expenses. These expenses decreased 2.9% to $20.2 million, or 22.3% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $20.8 million, or 22.7% of gross revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in legal fees and supplies.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased 14.9% to $5.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase of $0.7 million was due to the borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility which was used to fund the acquisition of the Aquarius.
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of cash is from the operation of our properties. At March 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $70.5 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities (including the operations of the Aquarius) totaled approximately $18.5 million compared to approximately $15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The change in cash provided by operating activities was attributable to the increase in net income from $9.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, reflecting factors discussed above. In addition to cash from operations, cash is available to us, if necessary, under our senior secured revolving credit facility entered into by us, as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors. In May 2006, we entered into an amendment to the senior secured revolving credit facility, increasing the amount of borrowings allowed by it to $60.0 million, subject to us complying with financial and other covenants (discussed below), until May 12, 2010. We borrowed the maximum amount available under the facility, $60.0 million, in order to fund our acquisition of the Aquarius. At March 31, 2007, we had outstanding borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility of $40.0 million and availability of $20.0 million.
Our primary use of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2007 was for operating expenses, to pay interest on our 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 and interest under our senior secured revolving credit facility. Our capital spending was approximately $3.8 million, and $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For 2007, capital spending to date includes $0.9 million for improvements to the Aquarius. We have estimated our 2007 capital spending for our existing facilities at approximately $31.1 million, which we anticipate to include approximately $14.9 million to purchase new and convert existing slot machines and approximately $8.5 million for remaining Aquarius hotel renovations. The remainder of our capital spending estimate for 2007 will be for upgrades or maintenance to our existing assets.
We believe operating cash flows will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, capital spending and scheduled interest payments on the notes and under the senior secured revolving credit facility, lease payments and other indebtedness at least through the next twelve months. However, additional financing, if needed, may not be available to us, or if available, the financing may not be on terms favorable to us. Our estimates of our reasonably anticipated liquidity needs may not be accurate and new business opportunities or other unforeseen events could occur, resulting in the need to raise additional funds from outside sources.
The indenture governing our 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 restrict the payment of cash dividends or distributions, the purchase of equity interests, and the purchase, redemption, defeasance or acquisition of debt
12
Table of Contents
subordinated to the investments as “restricted payments.” The indenture also prohibits the incurrence of debt and the issuance of disqualified or preferred stock, as defined, by us and our restricted subsidiaries, with certain exceptions, provided that we may incur debt or issue disqualified or preferred stock if, immediately after such incurrence or issuance, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to fixed charges (each as defined in the indenture governing the 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012) for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such additional indebtedness is incurred or disqualified or preferred stock is issued would have been at least 2.0 to 1.0, determined on a pro forma basis giving effect to the debt incurrence or issuance. As of March 31, 2007, such ratio was 4.3 to 1.0. The indenture also restricts the creation of liens, the sale of assets, mergers, consolidations or sales of substantially all of our assets, the lease or grant of a license, concession, other agreements to occupy, manage or use our assets, the issuance of capital stock of restricted subsidiaries and certain related party transactions. The indenture governing the notes allows us, and our restricted subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness, among other things, of up to $50.0 million under credit facilities, non-recourse financing of up to $15.0 million to finance the construction, purchase or lease of personal or real property used in our business, permitted affiliate subordinated indebtedness (as defined), additional 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 2.0 times net cash proceeds received from equity offerings and permitted affiliate subordinated debt and additional indebtedness of up to $10 million.
Additionally, as described above, we have a senior secured revolving credit facility that allows for borrowings of up to $60.0 million, including the issuance of letters of credit of up to $10.0 million. Loans made under the senior secured revolving facility will mature and the commitments under them will terminate in May 2010. The facility contains restrictive covenants similar to those contained in the 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012. In addition, the facility requires that, as of the last date of each fiscal quarter, our ratio of consolidated first lien debt to consolidated cash flow be not more than 1.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2007, this ratio was 0.5 to 1.0.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” to clarify diversity in practice on the presentation of different types of taxes in the financial statements. The EITF concluded that, for taxes within the scope of the issue, a company may adopt a policy of presenting taxes either gross within revenue or net. That is, it may include charges to customers for taxes within revenues and the charge for the taxes from the taxing authority within cost of sales, or, alternatively, it may net the charge to the customer and the charge from the taxing authority. If taxes are reported on a gross basis, and are significant, an entity should disclose the amounts of those taxes subject to EITF06-3. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We present sales tax on a net basis in our consolidated financial statements, and do not expect the adoption of EITF06-3 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. Interpretation No. 48, which clarifies Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes the criterion that an individual tax position has to meet for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in our financial statements. On initial application, Interpretation No. 48 will be applied to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remains open. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the adoption date will be recognized or continue to be recognized.
Interpretation No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. The adoption of Interpretation No. 48 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, where fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
13
Table of Contents
The standard does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159. SFAS No. 159, which amends SFAS No. 115, allows certain financial assets and liabilities to be recognized, at the Company’s election, at fair market value, with any gains or losses for the period recorded in the statement of income. SFAS No. 159 includedavailable-for-sales securities in the assets eligible for this treatment. Currently, the Company records the gains or losses for the period in the statement of comprehensive income and in the equity section of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods in those fiscal years. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
With the exception of historical facts, the matters discussed in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, future actions, future performance generally, business development activities, future capital expenditures, strategies, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, future financial results, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and competition. Please see Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. When we use the words “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “could,” “estimate,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions, the statements which include those words are usually forward-looking statements. When we describe strategy that involves risks or uncertainties, we are making forward-looking statements.
We warn you that forward-looking statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ as a result of risks that we face. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made and we undertake no obligation to update them.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We can borrow, from time to time, up to $60.0 million under our senior secured revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2007, there were $40.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the facility.
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities. As such, the estimated fair value of long-term debt outstanding is approximately $224.1 million as of March 31, 2007.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we incurred approximately $5.4 million in interest expense. Certain amounts of our outstanding indebtedness for the year were based upon a variable, LIBOR rate plus a premium. A 1% increase in the LIBOR would have increased our interest cost for 2007 by approximately $100,000. We do not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other investments that alter interest rate exposure.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As of March 31, 2007, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange ActRule 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e). Based upon such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
14
Table of Contents
required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
15
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
The risk factors included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 have not materially changed. The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with such risk factors, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The list of exhibits required by item 601 ofRegulation S-K and filed as part of this report is set forth in the exhibits index.
16
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC
By: | /s/ Denise Barton |
Denise Barton
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: May 9, 2007
17
Table of Contents
Exhibits Index
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description | |||
31 | .1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31 | .2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |