UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011. |
| |
or |
| |
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 333-88829
| PENINSULA GAMING, LLC | | PENINSULA GAMING CORP. |
| (Exact name of registrants as specified in their charter) | | (Exact name of registrants as specified in their charter) |
| | | |
| DELAWARE | | DELAWARE |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| | | |
| 20-0800583 | | 25-1902805 |
| (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
301 Bell Street
Dubuque, Iowa 52001
(563) 690-4975
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer x Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
All of the common equity interests of Peninsula Gaming, LLC (the “Company”) are held by Peninsula Gaming Partners, LLC. All of the common equity interests of Diamond Jo, LLC, The Old Evangeline Downs, L.L.C., Diamond Jo Worth, LLC, Belle of Orleans, L.L.C., Kansas Star Casino, LLC and Peninsula Gaming Corp. are held by the Company.
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
| PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (in thousands)
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash—purse settlements | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Receivables from affiliates | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization of $7,150 and $6,342, respectively | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Licenses and other intangibles | | | | | | | | |
Deposits and other assets | | | | | | | | |
Investment available for sale | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S DEFICIT | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt and leases | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
8 3/8% senior secured notes, net of discount | | | | | | | | |
10 3/4% senior notes, net of discount | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured credit facilities | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes and leases payable, net of discount | | | | | | | | |
Obligation under Minimum Assessment Agreement | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) (in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | |
REVENUES: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Less promotional allowances | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Affiliate management fees | | | | | | | | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | | | | | | |
Loss from equity affiliate | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN MEMBER’S DEFICIT AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
| | COMMON MEMBER'S INTEREST | | | ACCUMU-LATED DEFICIT | | | ACCUMU-LATED OTHER COMPRE-HENSIVE INCOME | | | TOTAL MEMBER'S DEFICIT | | | COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2010 | | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | (84,254 | ) | | $ | 3,385 | | | $ | (71,869 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | (128 | ) | | | | | | | (128 | ) | | $ | (128 | ) |
Unrealized loss on available for sale security | | | | | | | | | | | (45 | ) | | | (45 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
| | | | | | | 4,291 | | | | | | | | 4,291 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | (3,125 | ) | | | | | | | (3,125 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (173 | ) |
| | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | (83,216 | ) | | $ | 3,340 | | | $ | (70,876 | ) | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) (in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from equity affiliate | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | | | | | | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash — purse settlements | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Receivables from affiliates | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Increase in cash value of life insurance for premiums paid | | | | | | | | |
Business acquisition and licensing costs | | | | | | | | |
Construction project development costs | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Principal payments on debt | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from senior notes | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from senior secured credit facilities | | | | | | | | |
Payments on senior secured credit facilities | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment acquired, but not paid | | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment acquired in exchange for obligation under Minimum Assessment Agreement | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized (loss) gain on investment available for sale | | | | | | | | |
Property contributions from parent | | | | | | | | |
Gaming license contribution from parent | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expense contribution from parent | | | | | | | | |
Deferred financing costs incurred, but not paid | | | | | | | | |
Gaming license acquired, but not paid | | | | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
PENINSULA GAMING, LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Peninsula Gaming, LLC (“PGL” or the “Company”), a Delaware limited liability company, is a casino entertainment holding company with gaming operations in local markets in Iowa and Louisiana. PGL’s wholly owned subsidiaries consist of: (i) Diamond Jo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“DJL”), that owns and operates the Diamond Jo casino in Dubuque, Iowa; (ii) Diamond Jo Worth, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“DJW”), that owns and operates the Diamond Jo casino in Worth County, Iowa; (iii) The Old Evangeline Downs, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company (“EVD”), that owns and operates the Evangeline Downs Racetrack and Casino, or racino, in St. Landry Parish, Louisiana and five off-track betting (“OTB”) parlors in Louisiana; (iv) Belle of Orleans, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company (“ABC”), that owns and operates the Amelia Belle Casino in Amelia, Louisiana; and (v) Kansas Star Casino, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company (“KSC”), formed to own and operate the Kansas Star Casino, Hotel and Event Center (“Kansas Star”) which is currently under development; and (vi) Peninsula Gaming Corp. (“PGC”), a Delaware corporation with no assets or operations. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Peninsula Gaming Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PGP”).
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring entries unless otherwise disclosed, necessary to present fairly the financial information of the Company for the interim periods presented and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The interim results reflected in the financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year or other periods.
The financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Accordingly, footnote disclosure which would substantially duplicate the disclosure in the audited financial statements has been omitted in the accompanying unaudited financial statements.
Kansas Star Developments
On January 14, 2011, PGP’s Contract to Serve as Lottery Gaming Facility Manager for the South Central Gaming Zone on behalf of the Kansas Lottery (“Kansas Management Contract”) was approved by the Kansas Racing and Gaming Commission (“KRGC”) and upon such approval, became effective and was then assigned to KSC. In March 2011, KSC purchased two parcels of land in Mulvane, Kansas totaling approximately 202 acres on which the Kansas Star will be developed. This land effectively gives the Company all the land needed to develop the Kansas Star facility in compliance with the terms of the Kansas Management Contract. In March 2011, KSC broke ground on the Kansas Star development.
We plan on completing construction of the Kansas Star in two phases. The first phase of the project is expected to include 1,500 slot machines, 42 table games, 10 poker tables, 150 hotel rooms in a third party operated hotel, approximately 2,700 parking spaces, a 250-seat buffet, a 140-seat steakhouse, a sports bar, a two outlet food court, and a 177,000 square foot indoor event center. While the first phase of the project is not expected to be completed until January 2013, KSC plans to begin operating 1,310 slots machines and 32 table games within the event center by January 2012 pending completion of the first phase of the project. The second phase of the project is expected to include an additional 500 slot machines (thus expanding the total to 2,000 slot machines), an additional 8 table games (bringing the total to 50 table games), the development of an equine complex that includes multiple arenas and barn facilities, parking for 80 recreational vehicles, and 150 additional hotel rooms (bringing the total to 300 rooms). The second phase is scheduled for completion by January 2015.
The current budget for the Kansas Star project is approximately $314.1 million (excluding capitalized interest which is estimated to be approximately $8 million) compared to our preliminary estimate of $295.5 million (excluding capitalized interest) as of December 31, 2010. We expect such increase to be offset by approximately $12 to $14 million from the City of Mulvane, Kansas (“Mulvane”) issuance of general obligation bonds as described below related to offsite utilities. Total cost to open the interim casino is expected to be approximately $184.2 million compared to the preliminary estimate of $153.7 million as of December 31, 2010. This increase in cost is primarily due to enhancements to the gaming floor layout and amenities and the addition of a concourse level to the event center, which were added to provide a better entertainment experience for our guests during the initial phase of the project, as well as an increase in off-site improvements which are expected to be financed by Mulvane as discussed further below. The remaining budget for the first phase of the project is approximately $82.2 million, including approximately $20.0 million to complete the initial 150 hotel rooms of the third party developed hotel, compared to the preliminary estimate of $76.6 million as of December 31, 2010. The increase in cost related to the completion of the first phase is primarily due to the decision to construct the shell of the building that will house the phase two casino floor expansion during the first phase, which is expected to reduce the overall cost of the project. The second phase of the Kansas Star project is budgeted at $47.7 million, including an approximate $19.1 million expansion to the third party developed hotel to increase the number of rooms from 150 to 300, compared to our preliminary estimate of $65.2 million as of December 31, 2010.
The Company plans to finance the remaining costs of the project with (i) cash on hand (which includes proceeds from the senior notes offerings completed during the quarter as discussed in Note 4), (ii) anticipated slot vendor and equipment financing of approximately $41.4 million (which are permitted borrowings under the Company’s existing debt agreements), (iii) cash flow from operations and (iv) if necessary, availability under the PGL Credit Facility (as defined below). Further, the Company has executed a term sheet and expects to enter into an agreement with a third party hotel developer/operator to separately build, finance, and operate a hotel, although no assurances can be given that the Company will obtain such slot vendor and equipment financing or enter into a separate hotel agreement to provide for the construction, financing, development and operation of a hotel.
KSC has entered into a Development Agreement with Mulvane related to the provision of water, sewer, and electrical utilities to the Kansas Star site. This agreement sets forth certain parameters governing the use of public financing for the provision of such utilities, through the issuance of general obligation bonds by Mulvane, paid for through the imposition of a special tax assessment on the Kansas Star site payable over 15 years in an amount equal to Mulvane’s obligations under the general obligation bonds. To date, KSC is utilizing public financing for approximately $4.1 million of sewer and water utilities improvements, and anticipates that it may utilize public financing for an additional $8 million to $10 million worth of utility improvements.
On March 23, 2011, KSC and Conlon Construction Co. (“Conlon”) executed an AIA A133-2009 Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Constructor (the “GMP Contract”). The GMP Contract provides that Conlon will act as Construction Manager for the construction of the Kansas Star project, and that the project will be completed on a “cost of work plus a fee” basis, with a guaranteed maximum price (the “GMP Amount”), and on a designated construction completion schedule.
The GMP Contract effectively limits the total cost of the project to the designated GMP Amount, and imposes financial penalties, including liquidated damages for failing to complete construction by the dates set forth in the Kansas Management Contract. The GMP Contract provides that Conlon will prepare a preliminary GMP Amount based on Conlon’s estimate of the cost of work, including contingencies, and Conlon’s management fee for each phase of the project. The final GMP Amount for Phase 1A of the project is expected to be agreed to between KSC and Conlon by the end of the third quarter of 2011. The GMP Amount for future phases of the project will be established by the parties as the development of the project proceeds. If the total cost of the project falls below the GMP Amount, certain of the cost savings will be shared 60%/40% between KSC and Conlon, respectively. The GMP Amount is subject to amendment by change orders approved by KSC and the dates for completion of construction may be adjusted as a result of the occurrence of certain events, including force majeure.
The GMP Contract also contains other customary provisions, including provisions relating to the scope of work and responsibilities of the parties, termination, compensation and payment calculations and schedules, indemnification, insurance and bond requirements, dispute resolution and assignment of contract.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Capitalized Interest— The Company capitalizes interest costs associated with significant construction projects. The Company capitalizes interest on amounts expended on significant construction projects at the average cost of borrowed money. The Company capitalized $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to the development project at KSC. There was no interest capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Deferred Financing Costs— Costs associated with the issuance of financing agreements have been deferred and are being amortized over the life of the related instrument/agreement using the effective interest method. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company deferred additional costs of $5.5 million related to the $80.0 million tack on offering to its 8 3/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the “PGL Secured Notes”) consummated on February 9, 2011 and $50.0 million tack on offering to its 10 3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2017 (the “PGL Unsecured Notes” and, together with the PGL Secured Notes, the “PGL Notes”) consummated on February 1, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company also deferred additional costs of $1.5 million under the amended and restated loan and security agreement entered into by PGL, DJL, EVD, ABC, DJW and KSC (collectively, the “Borrowers”) with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”) as the arranger and agent on October 22, 2009 (“PGL Credit Facility”) due to the Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement executed on February 2, 2011 (the “Second Amendment”).
Goodwill and Licenses and Other Intangible Assets— There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Licenses and other intangibles are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2011 | |
| | Gross Carrying Value | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Book Value | |
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas Management Contract | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets with finite lives: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Customer relationships and customer list | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2010 | |
| | Gross Carrying Value | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Book Value | |
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets with finite lives: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Customer relationships and customer list | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.1 million. Annual amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be $0.3 million for 2011 and $0.2 million per year for 2012 through 2015.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, KSC recorded $28.1 million as an indefinite life intangible asset which includes (i) the $25.0 million privilege fee paid to the State of Kansas and (ii) $3.1 million of additional fees owed to KRGC upon approval of the Kansas Management Contract.
Deposits— At December 31, 2010, included in Deposits and other assets was a $25.0 million deposit related to the refundable privilege fee paid to the State of Kansas. Upon approval of the Kansas Management Contract the $25.0 million privilege fee was no longer refundable. As such, the $25.0 million has been included as a cost of the gaming license at KSC and is included in Licenses and other intangibles as of March 31, 2011.
Pre-opening Expense—Costs associated with start-up activities for new or expanded operations are expensed as incurred.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company incurred $1.1 million of start-up costs related to the development project at KSC.
Use of Estimates— The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates involve the fair value of DJW’s investment in $23.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.5% Urban Renewal Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Taxable Series 2007 (“City Bonds”), the periodic review of the carrying value of assets for impairment, the estimated useful lives for depreciable assets, and the estimated liabilities for slot club awards.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards— In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance regarding the accounting for casino base jackpot liabilities. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2011 with no impact to the Company’s financial statements.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
Land and land improvements | | | | | | | | |
Buildings, riverboat and improvements | | | | | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $7.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively.
4. Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
8 3/8% senior secured notes due August 15, 2015, net of discount of $392 and $4,465, respectively, secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and the equity of the Company | | | | | | | | |
10 3/4% senior unsecured notes due August 15, 2017, net of discount of $2,896 and $7,003, respectively | | | | | | | | |
$50,000 revolving line of credit under a loan and security agreement of PGL, DJL, EVD, ABC, DJW and KSC with Wells Fargo, interest rate at prime plus a margin of 2.5% with a floor of 6.0% (rate of 6.0% at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010), maturing January 15, 2015, secured by substantially all assets of PGL, DJL, EVD, ABC, DJW and KSC and is guaranteed up to $5.0 million by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | |
Term loan under a loan and security agreement of PGL, DJL and EVD with American Trust & Savings Bank, interest rate at 6.5%, due in installments through December 1, 2013, secured by certain assets of DJL | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable and capital lease obligations, interest rates at 6.4% - 14.4%, due 2011 – 2015 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Principal maturities of debt (excluding discount and debt repaid during the period January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011) for the Company, for each of the years ending December 31 listed below have been updated to include: (1) the $50.0 million PGL Unsecured Notes tack-on issuance; (2) the $80.0 million PGL Secured Notes tack-on issuance; and (3) the Second Amendment under the PGL Credit Facility as discussed below. Such maturities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
PGL Notes
On January 27, 2011, the Company commenced a consent solicitation seeking to amend the indenture governing the PGL Secured Notes to allow for the issuance of additional secured notes under that indenture. On February 2, 2011, the Company consummated the consent solicitation and adopted the amendments to the indenture governing the PGL Secured Notes.
On February 1, 2011, the Company issued an additional $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Unsecured Notes at an issue price of 108%, plus accrued interest from August 15, 2010.
On February 9, 2011, the Company issued an additional $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Secured Notes at an issue price of 105%, plus accrued interest from August 15, 2010.
The PGL Secured Notes and the PGL Unsecured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis and senior unsecured basis, respectively, by DJL, EVD, DJW, ABC and KSC (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). The PGL Secured Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a security interest in the Company’s and the Subsidiary Guarantors’ respective existing and future assets (other than certain excluded assets) and by a limited recourse pledge of 100% of the equity interests of PGL by PGP. The security interest on the collateral that secures the PGL Secured Notes and the related guarantees are subject to the prior liens of the PGL Credit Facility. The PGL Unsecured Notes are effectively subordinated to the PGL Credit Facility, the PGL Secured Notes and other secured indebtedness of the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The guarantees of the Subsidiary Guarantors are full and unconditional and joint and several.
PGL Credit Facility
On January 31, 2011, the Borrowers under the PGL Credit Facility and Wells Fargo executed a Consent agreement that permitted KSC to join the PGL Credit Facility as a Borrower.
On February 2, 2011, the Borrowers under the PGL Credit Facility and Wells Fargo executed the Second Amendment which, among other things, (i) permits the issuance of up to $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of additional PGL Secured Notes, (ii) provides for a reduction in the maximum revolver amount under the facility from $58.5 million to $50.0 million, (iii) extends the maturity date of the facility from January 15, 2014 to January 15, 2015, and (iv) permits certain capital expenditures in connection with the development of the Kansas Star.
On May 11, 2011, the Borrowers under the PGL Credit Facility and Wells Fargo executed the Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement which increased the limit on issued and outstanding letters of credit allowed under the PGL Credit Facility from $10.0 million to $25.0 million.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding advances under the PGL Credit Facility. In addition, as of March 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under the PGL Credit Facility of $1.7 million resulting in available borrowings thereunder of $48.3 million.
Compliance
As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the terms of the agreements governing its outstanding indebtedness.
5. Fair Value Measurements
Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The Company had one financial instrument that must be measured at fair value in the financial statements, an investment available for sale. The Company currently does not have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
GAAP establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes these inputs into three broad levels. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date;
Level 2-Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs); and
Level 3-Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s estimate about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
The Company had no Level 1 or Level 2 financial instruments at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company had one Level 3 financial instrument at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
DJW holds an investment in a single municipal bond issuance that is classified as available for sale and is recorded at fair value. DJW is the only holder of this instrument and there is no quoted market price for this instrument. The estimate of the fair value of such investment was determined using a combination of current market rates and estimates of market conditions for instruments with similar terms, maturities, and degrees of risk and an estimate from an independent source of what market participants would use in pricing the bonds. Unrealized gains and losses on this instrument resulting from changes in the fair value of the instrument are not charged to earnings, but rather are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) in the member’s deficit section of the Company’s balance sheets. The discount associated with this investment is netted with the investment on the balance sheets and is being accreted over the life of the investment using the effective interest method. The accretion of such discount is included in interest income on the statements of operations.
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial asset that is required to be measured at fair value as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is classified as “Investment available for sale” in the balance sheets ($0.3 million is classified in Prepaid and other assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010) (in thousands):
| | Total Carrying Value at March 31, 2011 | | | Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2011 | | | Total Carrying Value at December 31, 2010 | | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 |
Investment available for sale | | | | | | | | | $ | | | | |
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | |
| | Investment available for sale | | | Investment available for sale | |
Balance at beginning of the year | | $ | 18,592 | | | $ | 14,741 | |
Total gains (losses) (realized or unrealized): | | | | | | | | |
| | | 53 | | | | 47 | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (45) | | | | 3,775 | |
Transfers in or out of Level 3 | | | - | | | | - | |
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements | | | - | | | | - | |
Ending balance at March 31, 2011 and 2010 | | $ | 18,600 | | | $ | 18,563 | |
| Included in interest income | | Included in interest income | |
Gains included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains relating to assets still held at the reporting date | | | | | | | | |
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Under the Company’s and PGP’s operating agreements, the Company and PGP have agreed, subject to a few exceptions, to indemnify and hold harmless PGP and PGP’s members from liabilities incurred as a result of their positions as sole manager of the Company and as members of PGP, respectively.
On May 13, 2011, the State of Iowa moved "in the interest of justice" to dismiss misdemeanor charges filed against PGP, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer for alleged violations of State of Iowa campaign contribution laws. The Court approved the motion and ordered the complete dismissal of all charges.
Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are parties to any pending or probable legal proceedings other than litigation arising in the normal course of business. Management does not believe that adverse determinations in any or all such litigation would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The Kansas Management Contract contractually obligates KSC to open certain phases of the project by certain specified dates. With certain exceptions, the interim gaming facility must open for business no later than February 14, 2012, while the permanent gaming facility must be completed by January 14, 2013, and the entire construction project (as set forth in the contract) must be completed no later than January 14, 2015. In addition, as of January 14, 2015, KSC is obligated to have made a minimum investment in infrastructure related to the Kansas Star development of $225.0 million, inclusive of any third party investments but exclusive of the $25.0 million privilege fee as discussed in Note 2. See additional discussion of the Kansas Star development in Note 1.
7. Related Party Transactions
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company distributed $3.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, to PGP primarily for (i) certain consulting and financial advisory services related to PGP development expenses, (ii) board fees and actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by members of the board of managers of PGP in their capacity as board members and (iii) tax, accounting, licensure, legal and administrative costs and expenses related to PGP. These amounts were recorded as member distributions. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company received contributions of $4.1 million from PGP primarily for land and capitalized costs related to the Kansas Star development project that were paid by PGP.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, as affiliate management fees, related to other compensation and board fees payable to board members of PGP representing services provided to PGL.
In accordance with a management services agreement between OED Acquisition LLC (“OEDA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PGP, and EVD, under which EVD pays to OEDA (an affiliate) a base management fee of 0.44% of net revenue (less net food and beverage revenue) plus an incentive fee ranging from 0.75% to 1.25% based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-recurring charges, EVD expensed $0.2 million in affiliate management fees payable to OEDA during each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
In accordance with a management services agreement between DJW and PGP under which DJW pays to PGP a base management fee of 1.75% of net revenue (less net food and beverage revenue) plus an incentive fee ranging from 3% to 5% based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-recurring charges, DJW expensed management fees of $0.6 million during each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
EVD and PGP are parties to a consulting agreement with a board member of PGP. Under the consulting agreement, EVD, DJW and ABC must each pay the board member a fee equal to 2.5% of EVD’s, DJW’s and ABC’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and charges associated with the impairment of assets, development expenses, pre-opening expenses, management and consulting fees, corporate allocations, gains or losses on the disposal of assets and extraordinary gains or losses, in each case, applicable to such period. EVD expensed $0.2 million of affiliate management fees during each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to this agreement. DJW expensed $0.2 million of affiliate management fees during each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to this agreement. ABC expensed $0.1 million of affiliate management fees during each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to this agreement.
8. Segment Information
The Company is organized around geographical areas and has five reportable segments: (1) Diamond Jo Dubuque operations, which comprise the Diamond Jo casino in Dubuque, Iowa, (2) Diamond Jo Worth operations, which comprise the Diamond Jo Worth casino operations in Northwood, Iowa, (3) Evangeline Downs operations, which comprise the casino, racetrack and OTBs operated by EVD in Opelousas, Louisiana and the surrounding area, (4) Amelia Belle operations, which comprise the Amelia Belle casino in Amelia, Louisiana, and (5) Kansas Star, which will operate the Kansas Star Casino, Hotel and Event Center in Mulvane, Kansas and is currently under development.
The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in Note 2 above and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon, among other considerations, segment operating earnings (as defined below).
The tables below present information about reported segments as of and for the years ended (in thousands):
| | Net Revenues From External Customers Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Segment Operating Earnings (1) Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total property segment operating earnings (1) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total Segment operating earnings (1) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Affiliate management fees | | | | | | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | | | | |
Loss from equity affiliate | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
_______________
(1) | Segment operating earnings is defined as net (loss) income plus depreciation and amortization, pre-opening expense, development expense, affiliate management fees, loss on disposal of assets, loss from equity affiliate and interest expense, net of amounts capitalized less interest income and gain on settlement. |
(2) | “Gain on settlement” relates to a one time gain on a financial settlement with the predecessor owner of ABC during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and is included in Other revenue. |
| | Interest Expense, net Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Depreciation and Amortization Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | (16,017) | | | $ | (14,223) | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 22 | |
| | | (561) | | | | (578) | | | | 2,290 | | | | 2,243 | |
| | | 486 | | | | 480 | | | | 1,464 | | | | 1,728 | |
| | | 88 | | | | 3 | | | | 1,823 | | | | 1,886 | |
| | | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | 1,588 | | | | 1,488 | |
| | | 22 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | (15,981) | | | $ | (14,316) | | | $ | 7,222 | | | $ | 7,367 | |
| | Total Assets | |
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments consisting of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, and payables approximate their recorded amounts due to the short term nature of the instruments. The fair value and recorded amounts for the Company’s investment available for sale, note receivable and debt instruments at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
| | Fair Value | | | Recorded Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Recorded Amount | |
Investment available for sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8 3/8% senior secured notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10 3/4% senior unsecured notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured credit facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable, capital lease obligations and other financial instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligation under Minimum Assessment Agreement | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value information is based on current market interest rates and estimates of market conditions for instruments with similar terms, maturities, and degrees of risk.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
| Forward Looking Statements |
We make forward-looking statements in this report. These forward-looking statements relate to our outlook or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses, asset quality or other future financial or business performance, strategies or expectations, or the impact of legal, regulatory or supervisory matters on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include:
| · | statements relating to our plans, intentions, expectations, objectives or goals; |
| · | statements relating to our future economic performance, business prospects, revenue, income and financial condition, and any underlying assumptions relating to those statements; and |
| · | statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “target” or similar expressions. |
These statements reflect our management’s judgment based on currently available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. With respect to these forward-looking statements, our management has made assumptions regarding, among other things, economic trends, customer behaviors, the availability of financing and overall liquidity.
Future performance cannot be ensured. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause our actual results to differ include, but are not limited to:
| · | the availability and adequacy of our cash flows to satisfy our obligations, including payment obligations under the PGL Notes and the PGL Credit Facility and additional funds required to support capital improvements, complete the Kansas Star development and pursue future development; |
| · | economic, competitive, demographic, business, regulatory, political and other conditions in our local and regional markets; |
| · | changes or developments in the laws, regulations or taxes in the gaming and horse racing industry; |
| · | actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties, including customers, suppliers, competitors, members and shareholders, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities; |
| · | changes in business strategy, capital improvements, development plans, including those due to environmental remediation concerns, or changes in personnel or their compensation, including federal, state and local minimum wage requirements; |
| · | the loss of any license or permit, including the failure to obtain an unconditional renewal of a required gaming license on a timely basis; |
| · | the termination of our operating agreement with our “qualified sponsoring organizations,” the Dubuque Racing Association (“DRA”) and/or the Worth County Development Authority (“WCDA”), or the failure of the DRA and/or the WCDA to continue as our “qualified sponsoring organization;” |
| · | the loss of our facilities due to casualty, weather, mechanical failure or any extended or extraordinary maintenance or inspection that may be required; |
| · | changes in federal or state tax obligations; |
| · | potential exposure to environmental liabilities, changes or developments in the laws, regulations or taxes in the gaming or horse racing industry or a decline in the public acceptance of gaming or horse racing and other unforeseen difficulties associated with our operations; |
| · | failure to meet the contractually-obligated construction dates, or delays or cost overruns related to the construction of the Kansas Star or delays in obtaining requisite governmental approvals related to the operation of the Kansas Star; |
| · | adverse outcomes of any legal proceedings in which we may become involved from time to time; |
| · | adverse circumstances, changes, developments or events relating to or resulting from our ownership and control of DJL, DJW, EVD, ABC and KSC; and |
| · | other factors discussed in our other filings with the SEC. |
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Executive Summary
We own and operate four casinos located in Iowa and Louisiana. In addition, we are currently developing the Kansas Star in Mulvane, Kansas. See Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on the Kansas Star development project. Our corporate offices are located in Dubuque, Iowa. Our current operating properties consist of:
1. | Diamond Jo Dubuque operations, which comprise the Diamond Jo casino operations in Dubuque, Iowa and serving the eastern Iowa, northwest Illinois and southwest Wisconsin gaming markets; |
2. | Diamond Jo Worth operations, which comprise the Diamond Jo casino operations in Northwood, Iowa serving north central Iowa and south central Minnesota; |
3. | EVD operations, which comprise the casino, racetrack and OTB’s operated by EVD in Louisiana, serving the greater Lafayette, Louisiana area; and |
4. | Amelia Belle operations, which comprise the Amelia Belle Casino in Amelia, Louisiana serving the southern Louisiana markets. |
Our properties offer a variety of amenities including various food and beverage outlets and entertainment venues.
While we are very excited about the current development project in Kansas, we continue to maintain our focus on our four existing operations and are pleased with the operating results of the first quarter of 2011, especially in Louisiana where we saw positive quarter over quarter growth at both of our Louisiana properties. At ABC we experienced a 4% increase in casino revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. In addition, through a continued focus on staffing efficiencies and cost control, segment operating earnings increased by $0.5 million, or 14%. This increase is despite a $0.3 million increase in insurance premiums during the first quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 related to hurricane insurance. EVD also reported period over period growth with a 4% increase in casino revenues in the first quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 due primarily to the positive effects of the hotel at the casino which opened at the end of 2010 as well as the effects of a modestly improving regional economy. Similar to ABC, a continued focus on cost controls and staffing efficiencies resulted in an increase in segment operating earnings of $0.7 million, or 8%, in the first quarter of 2011 compared to 2010. In Iowa, DJW reported a 2% increase in casino revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. However, segment operating earnings declined just under 2% due primarily to increases in direct mail and utility costs. During the first quarter of 2011, DJL reported a 2% decline in gaming revenue. We attribute this decline to the adverse weather that impacted far Eastern Iowa during the month of February 2011. The positive operating results for the 1st quarter of 2011 were driven by our continuing focus on our strategy of providing a great experience for our customers at each of our facilities and pursuing capital projects with attractive returns. The Company’s increased depth of management over the past year also allows for the placement of the appropriate management team to ensure a successful development in Kansas.
Recent Developments
In January 2011, PGP’s Kansas Management Contract was approved by the KRGC and upon such approval, became effective. The Kansas Management Contract was subsequently assigned to KSC and allows KSC to design, develop and operate the Kansas Star Casino, Hotel and Event Center in Mulvane, Kansas.
In March 2011, KSC purchased two parcels of land totaling approximately 202 acres on which the Kansas Star will be developed. This land effectively gives the Company all the land needed to develop the Kansas Star facility in compliance with the terms of the Kansas Management Contract. In March 2011, KSC broke ground on the Kansas Star development project. See Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statement for additional information on the Kansas Star project.
Also in March 2011, a third party developer and operator opened a new 60-room hotel in close proximity to our DJW casino.
On May 13, 2011, the State of Iowa moved "in the interest of justice" to dismiss misdemeanor charges filed against PGP, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer for alleged violations of Iowa State campaign contribution laws. The Court approved the motion and ordered the complete dismissal of all charges.
On May 14, 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers opened the Morganza Spillway, located North of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. For risks to our business and operations regarding the opening of the Morganza Spillway see Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors”.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Statement of Operations Data
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Net Revenues: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net revenues | | | | | | | | |
Segment Operating Earnings: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property segment operating earnings | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating earnings | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Affiliate management fees | | | | | | | | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | | | | | | |
Loss from equity affiliate | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Segment Operating Earnings Margins: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Consolidated segment operating earnings margin | | | | | | | | |
_______________________________
(1) | “Gain on settlement” relates to a one time gain on a financial settlement with the predecessor owner of ABC during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and is included in Other revenue. |
| Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three months ended March 31, 2010 |
Consolidated net revenues increased $2.4 million, or 3%, to $80.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $78.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. DJW, EVD, and ABC reported net revenue growth of 2%, 5%, and 10%, respectively, during the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 primarily due to 2%, 4%, and 4% increases in casino revenues, respectively, while DJL reported a 3% decrease in net revenues quarter over quarter due primarily to a decline in DJL’s casino revenues of 2%. In addition, ABC recorded $0.7 million of other revenue resulting from a gain on a financial settlement with the predecessor owner of ABC which is included in Other revenue.
Casino revenues increased $1.7 million, or 2%, to $75.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $73.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.In Iowa, casino revenues were essentially flat quarter over quarter as DJW’s casino revenues increased by $0.4 million, or 2%, to $20.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $20.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 while DJL’s casino revenues decreased by $0.3 million, or 2%, to $16.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $16.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. DJL’s casino revenue decline is primarily attributable to adverse weather during the month of February 2011 as discussed above. In Louisiana, both properties experienced quarter over quarter growth as EVD’s casino revenues increased by $1.0 million, or 4%, to $25.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $24.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and ABC’s casino revenues increased by $0.6 million, or 5%, to $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $13.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. ABC had the impact of disruptions on the casino floor at ABC during January 2010 and February 2010 as a result of ABC’s $7.5 million casino renovation while EVD had the benefit for the first full quarter of the hotel at the casino that opened November 2010 in addition to a small recovery in the oil and gas industry in southern Louisiana.
Casino operating expenses increased 1% to $30.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $30.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to an increase in gaming taxes as a result of an increase in casino revenues.
Promotional allowances as a percentage of casino revenues were essentially flat quarter over quarter at approximately 12% for each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Racing revenues at EVD were essentially flat quarter over quarter at $2.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Consistent with racing revenues, racing expenses were also flat quarter over quarter at $2.4 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Video poker revenues at EVD increased 25% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $1.5 million compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 which is due primarily to $0.4 million in video poker revenues at our St. Martinville OTB where we began operating video poker machines in September 2010. Consistent with this increase in revenues, EVD experienced an increase of $0.2 million in video poker expenses to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to its video poker operations at our St. Martinville OTB.
Food and beverage revenues were essentially flat quarter over quarter at $6.5 million and $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Consistent with flat revenues, food and beverage expenses were also flat quarter over quarter at $4.1 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Other revenues increased $0.9 million to $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to a $0.7 million increase at ABC resulting from a gain on a financial settlement with the predecessor owner as discussed above and a $0.2 million increase in convenience store revenues at DJW resulting from an increase in fuel prices over the first quarter of 2010. Consistent with this increase in gasoline sales, DJW realized an increase in other expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 5% to $14.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to a $0.7 million increase at PGL in payroll and related expenses as a result of corporate staffing changes made to support the continued growth of the Company with the acquisition of ABC in the fourth quarter 2009 and the current development of the Kansas Star.
Depreciation and amortization expense was relatively consistent quarter over quarter at $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Affiliate management fees were $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and relate to management fees paid or accrued to related parties under various management services and consulting agreements at EVD, DJW and ABC.
Pre-opening expenses of $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 relate to start-up costs for the development project at KSC and consist primarily of pre-opening professional services fees, regulatory costs and payroll.
Operating income margins at DJW, EVD, and ABC increased quarter over quarter while operating income margins declined at DJL due primarily to the casino revenue growth at DJW, EVD, and ABC and the casino revenue decline at DJL as discussed above. ABC’s operating income margin was also positively impacted by the $0.7 million gain on a financial settlement with the predecessor owner as discussed above.
Other expense, net of interest income, increased $1.7 million to $16.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $14.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to the Company’s additional financing activities in February 2011 to support the Kansas Star development project including the $80.0 million PGL Secured Notes tack-on issuance and the $50.0 million PGL Unsecured Notes tack-on issuance.
Our operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our Iowa operations are typically weaker from November through February as a result of adverse weather conditions, and are typically stronger from March through October. Our Louisiana horse racing operations are also subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our horse racing operations are usually stronger during live racing season, which generally runs from April through December. In general, our payroll and general and administrative expenses are affected by inflation. Although inflation has not had a material effect on our business to date, we could experience more significant effects of inflation in future periods.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
| Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities |
Our cash balance increased $96.3 million to $116.0 million at March 31, 2011 from $19.7 million at December 31, 2010.
Cash flows from operating activities were a negative $3.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011, which is consistent with a negative $3.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The negative cash flows from operations for both periods is primarily due to the timing of our semi-annual interest payments on our senior notes for which the Company made a $26.8 million payment (net of accrued interest received upon the issuance of the tack-on notes) and $27.8 million payment in February 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cash flows used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $24.6 million consisting primarily of (i) payments of $17.5 million related to the Kansas Star development project, (ii) payments of $2.5 million related to the Kansas Management Contract and (iii) outflows of $4.3 million primarily related to the acquisition of slot machines and slot machine conversions and general maintenance capital expenditures. General maintenance capital expenditures are capital expenditures that relate to the replacement of or major renewals and improvements to our existing fixed assets. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Examples of general maintenance capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2011, excluding slot machines and slot machine conversions, include improvements to our existing owned and leased buildings and improvements and the replacement of computer equipment.
Cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $124.3 million reflects $138.0 million in gross proceeds from the issuance of $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Secured Notes at an issue price of 105% and the issuance of $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Unsecured Notes at an issue price of 108% offset by (i) repayment of the $3.5 million outstanding balance on the senior credit facility as of December 31, 2010, (ii) principal payments on debt of $0.4 million, (iii) payments of deferred financing costs of $6.7 million related to the $80.0 million PGL Secured Notes tack-on issuance, the $50.0 million PGL Unsecured Notes tack-on issuance and the Second Amendment to the PGL Credit Facility and (iv) member distributions of $3.1 million. The increase in member distributions during the three months ended March 31, 2011 over 2010 relates primarily to distributions for costs associated with the Kansas project that were incurred by PGP prior to the assigning of the Kansas Management Contract to KSC and legal fees related to the campaign contribution matter discussed in Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding advances under the PGL Credit Facility. In addition, as of March 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under the PGL Credit Facility of approximately $1.7 million resulting in available borrowings thereunder of $48.3 million.
Financing Activities
Our financing activities may have several important effects on our future operations and are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant changes to our financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 other than that as previously disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 including (i) the issuance of $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Secured Notes and $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of PGL Unsecured Notes in February 2011 and (ii) the entering into of the Second Amendment to the PGL Credit Facility in February 2011.
In addition to our cash on hand, we currently have the following sources of funds for our business: (i) cash flows from operations and (ii) available borrowings under the PGL Credit Facility. Contractual restrictions and other provisions contained in the agreements governing our consolidated indebtedness, including the PGL Credit Facility and the indentures governing the PGL Notes, limit or restrict our ability to use the funds available to us through, among other things, limitations on capital expenditures, investments, and distributions.
As of March 31, 2011, capital expenditures for the next 12 months, exclusive of the Kansas Star development project are expected to be approximately $9.0 million. Capital expenditures and pre-opening costs related to the Kansas Star development for the next twelve months are expected to be $104.7 million (excluding any capitalized interest, capital expenditures to be financed with anticipated slot and equipment financing by the Company and anticipated financing of the hotel and certain off-site utilities by third parties), including approximately $82.7 million for the completion of the interim facility which is expected to open in January 2012.
The Company’s debt maturities for the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $1.7 million. The Company’s member distributions to PGP for the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $3.1 million.
We plan to finance the foregoing expected cash requirements with: (i) a portion of the available cash on hand (excluding amounts needed for normal operations and including the gross proceeds from the $80.0 million and $50.0 million PGL Secured Notes and PGL Unsecured Notes issuances, respectively); (ii) cash generated from operations; (iii) anticipated slot vendor and equipment financing for the Kansas Star development of $41.4 million (as allowed under our existing borrowing agreements); and (iv) if necessary, available borrowings under the PGL Credit Facility. There can be no assurances that such projects will be completed in the estimated time frames or at the estimated costs. Further, the Company has executed a term sheet and expects to enter into an agreement with a third party hotel developer/operator to separately build, finance, and operate the $20.0 million hotel at KSC, although no assurances can be given that the Company will obtain the slot vendor and equipment financing or enter into a separate hotel agreement.
Based on our cash on hand, expected cash flows from operations and our available sources of financing, we believe we will have adequate liquidity to (i) satisfy our current operating needs at each of our gaming properties, (ii) pay all development costs associated with the Kansas Star development as they become due and (iii) to service our outstanding indebtedness for the next 12 months.
Our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations including, but not limited to, the following: (i) a significant portion of our cash flow from operations will be required to pay interest on our indebtedness and the indebtedness of our subsidiaries; (ii) the financial covenants contained in the agreements governing such indebtedness will require us to meet certain financial tests and may limit our respective abilities to borrow additional funds or to transfer funds to PGP or dispose of assets; (iii) our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes may be impaired; and (iv) our ability to adapt to changes in the gaming or horse racing industries that affect the markets in which we operate could be limited.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
A table of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 was included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2011, except under the Kansas Management Contract we are obligated to have made a minimum investment in infrastructure related to the Kansas Star development of $225.0 million by January 14, 2015, inclusive of any third party investments but exclusive of the $25.0 million privilege fee which was paid in 2010. Phase 1A of the project is budgeted at $184.2 million and is expected to be completed by January 2012, Phase 1B is budgeted at $82.2 million and is expected to be completed by January 2013 and Phase 2 is budgeted at $47.7 million and is expected to be completed by January 2015. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has incurred $54.1 million in capitalized and start-up costs related to that project.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
Other than as described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we do not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, cash flows, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We periodically evaluate our policies and the estimates and assumptions related to these policies.
Understanding our critical accounting policies and related risks is important in evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. The critical accounting policies used in preparation of the Company’s financial statements involve a significant use of management judgment on matters that are inherently uncertain and are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates, there could be a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Management regularly discusses the identification and development of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Managers. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks inherent in our financial instruments that arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business. Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We do not currently utilize derivative financial instruments to hedge market risk. We also do not hold market risk sensitive financial instruments for trading purposes.
We are exposed to interest rate risk due to changes in interest rates with respect to our long-term variable interest rate debt borrowings under the PGL Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the PGL Credit Facility. We have estimated our market risk exposure using sensitivity analysis and have defined our market risk exposure as the potential loss in future earnings and cash flows with respect to interest rate exposure of our market risk sensitive instruments assuming a hypothetical increase in market rates of interest of 100 basis points. Assuming we borrow the maximum amount allowed under the PGL Credit Facility (currently an aggregate amount of $50.0 million at March 31, 2011) and if market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 100 basis points, the estimated additional annual interest expense would be approximately $0.5 million.
We are also exposed to fair value risk due to changes in interest rates with respect to our long-term fixed interest rate investment available for sale, note receivable and debt borrowings. Our fixed rate investment available for sale is recorded at fair value, and therefore, is directly impacted by changes in interest rates and market risks. Our fixed rate note receivable and fixed rate debt instruments are not generally affected by a change in the market rates of interest, and therefore, such changes generally do not have an impact on future earnings. However, future earnings and cash flows may be impacted by changes in interest rates related to a refinancing of our note receivable and future indebtedness incurred to fund repayments as such fixed rate debt matures. The following table contains information relating to our fixed rate investment available for sale, note receivable, and debt borrowings as of March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Description | | Maturity | | Interest Rate | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
Investment available for sale | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
8 ⅜% senior secured notes | | | | | | | | | |
10 ¾% senior unsecured notes | | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured credit facility | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable, capital lease obligations and other financial instruments | | | | | | | | | |
Obligation under Minimum Assessment Agreement | | | | | | | | | |
___________________
(1) Our investment available for sale is not traded. The estimate of the fair value of such investment was determined using a combination of current market rates and estimates of market conditions for instruments with similar terms, maturities, and degrees of risk and an estimate from an independent source of what market participants would use in pricing the bonds. Due to the illiquid nature of the investment, changes in market risks could have a significant impact on the fair value.
(2) Represents fair value as of March 31, 2011 based on current market interest rates and estimates of market conditions for instruments with similar terms, maturities, and degrees of risk.
(3) Such borrowings are made under variable interest rates. The interest rate listed is as of March 31, 2011.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act, and in connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011, in providing assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and in providing reasonable assurance that the information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Security and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there have been no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On May 13, 2011, the State of Iowa moved "in the interest of justice" to dismiss misdemeanor charges filed against PGP, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer for alleged violations of State of Iowa campaign contribution laws. The Court approved the motion and ordered the complete dismissal of all charges.
Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are parties to any pending legal proceedings other than litigation arising in the normal course of business. Management does not believe that adverse determinations in any or all such litigation would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Rising water levels on the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers may have a material adverse effect on ABC's business and operations.
Due to the possibility of significant flooding from rising water levels on the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers opened the Morganza Spillway, located North of Baton Rouge, Louisiana on May 14, 2011.
With the opening of the spillway, Amelia, Louisiana, the location of ABC’s riverboat casino, and the surrounding areas, are likely to be materially impacted, resulting in a serious disruption of ABC’s business, up to and potentially including, closure of the casino and significant property damage.
While ABC carries insurance for property damage and business interruption due to flooding, in the event of significant flooding, we cannot be sure that the proceeds from such insurance will be sufficient to offset the lost income at ABC or the costs of rebuilding or repairing our property.
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
10.1 | | Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Constructor dated March 23, 2011 between Kansas Star Casino, LLC and Conlon Construction Co. |
| | |
10.2 | | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated May 11, 2011 by and among Peninsula Gaming, LLC, Diamond Jo, LLC, The Old Evangeline Downs, L.L.C., Belle of Orleans, L.L.C., Diamond Jo Worth, LLC, and Kansas Star Casino, LLC as borrowers, the lenders that are signatories thereto and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc., as the arranger and agent for the lenders. |
| | |
10.3 | | Mortgage, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement from Kansas Star Casino, LLC to Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc. dated May 9, 2011. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of M. Brent Stevens, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 15d-l4 of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Natalie A. Schramm, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Dubuque, State of Iowa on May 16, 2011.
| PENINSULA GAMING, LLC | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |
| PENINSULA GAMING CORP. | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |
| DIAMOND JO, LLC | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |
| DIAMOND JO WORTH , LLC | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |
| THE OLD EVANGELINE DOWNS, L.L.C. | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |
| BELLE OF ORLEANS, L.L.C. | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ M. Brent Stevens | |
| | M. Brent Stevens |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Natalie A. Schramm | |
| | Natalie A. Schramm |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and principal accounting officer) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Swain | |
| | Jonathan Swain |
| | Chief Operating Officer |
| | |