Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation |
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Financial Statements”) of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. have been prepared on a consistent basis with the December 31, 2013 audited Consolidated Financial Statements and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. Certain prior year amounts in the Financial Statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, as permitted by such rules and regulations, omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire 2014 fiscal year or any future periods. |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Our estimates include, but are not limited to, the valuation of inventory, the valuation of our financing derivative and the valuation of our long-term notes, the assumptions used to determine stock-based compensation, and estimates used to allocate proceeds received in revenue. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
The following table sets forth the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | 30-Sep-14 | | 31-Dec-13 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and money market funds | $ | 16,513 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 16,513 | | $ | 12,963 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 12,963 |
Commercial paper | | — | | | 18,898 | | | — | | | 18,898 | | | — | | | 13,399 | | | — | | | 13,399 |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | 16,513 | | | 18,898 | | | — | | | 35,411 | | | 12,963 | | | 13,399 | | | — | | | 26,362 |
Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial paper | | — | | | 37,812 | | | — | | | 37,812 | | | — | | | 61,264 | | | — | | | 61,264 |
Corporate debt securities | | — | | | 8,215 | | | — | | | 8,215 | | | — | | | 8,629 | | | — | | | 8,629 |
Asset backed securities | | — | | | 17,874 | | | — | | | 17,874 | | | — | | | 16,273 | | | — | | | 16,273 |
Total investments | | — | | | 63,901 | | | — | | | 63,901 | | | — | | | 86,166 | | | — | | | 86,166 |
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 16,513 | | $ | 82,799 | | $ | — | | $ | 99,312 | | $ | 12,963 | | $ | 99,565 | | $ | — | | $ | 112,528 |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financing derivative | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 699 | | $ | 699 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 549 | | $ | 549 |
Total liabilities measured at fair value | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 699 | | $ | 699 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 549 | | $ | 549 |
|
Our cash deposits and money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using bank balances or quoted market prices. Our investments are classified as Level 2 instruments based on market pricing and other observable inputs. None of our investments are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. |
During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no impairments of our investments. |
The estimated fair value of the Financing Derivative liability (as defined in Note 6. Debt) was determined using Level 3 inputs, or significant unobservable inputs. Changes to the estimated fair value of the Financing Derivative are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The following table provides the changes in the estimated fair value of the Financial Derivative during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Derivative | Amount | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 549 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss on change in estimated fair value | | 150 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of September 30, 2014 | $ | 699 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 assets or liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques did not change compared to established practice. |
Financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
The carrying amount of our accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, current, approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying value of our other liabilities, non-current approximates fair value due to the time to maturity and prevailing market rates. |
We determined the estimated fair value of the Notes (as defined in Note 6. Debt) from the debt facility using Level 3 inputs, or significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of the Notes was determined by comparing the difference between the estimated fair value of the Notes with and without the Financing Derivative by calculating the respective present values from future cash flows using an 18.8% and 20.4% weighted average market yield at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The estimated fair value and carrying value of the Notes are as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 30-Sep-14 | | 31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term notes payable | $ | 15,129 | | $ | 13,914 | | $ | 14,551 | | $ | 13,347 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Loss per Share |
The following table presents the computation of our basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share amounts): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three-Month Periods Ended | | Nine-Month Periods Ended | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | -9,163 | | $ | -20,487 | | $ | -47,185 | | $ | -62,062 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share | | | 70,740 | | | 65,523 | | | 69,716 | | | 61,636 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per share | | $ | -0.13 | | $ | -0.31 | | $ | -0.68 | | $ | -1.01 | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following were excluded from the computation of our diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of September 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding | 16,651 | | 13,351 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants to purchase common stock | 5,500 | | 5,504 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring entities to recognize revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and early adoption is not permitted. We are evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on our financial statements and related disclosures. |
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This ASU introduces an explicit requirement for management to assess if there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. Disclosures are required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt. This ASU is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. We are currently assessing the potential effects of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements. |
|