Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation In the opinion of management, our accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Financial Statements”) have been prepared on a consistent basis with our December 31, 2015 audited Consolidated Financial Statements and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. Certain prior year amounts in the Financial Statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, as permitted by such rules and regulations, omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year or any future periods. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Our estimates include, but are not limited to, the valuation of inventory, revenue valuation, the valuation of a financing derivative and long-term notes, the valuation and recognition of share-based compensation, the delivery period for collaboration agreements, the useful lives assigned to long-lived assets, and the computation provisions for income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates . Fair Value of Financial Instruments Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis The following table sets forth the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively: (in thousands) March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and money market funds $ 12,031 $ — $ — $ 12,031 $ 22,034 $ — $ — $ 22,034 Commercial paper — 8,049 — 8,049 — 8,595 — 8,595 US government & agency securities — — — — — 3,000 — 3,000 Total cash and cash equivalents 12,031 8,049 — 20,080 22,034 11,595 — 33,629 Investments: Commercial paper — 22,232 — 22,232 — 15,903 — 15,903 Corporate debt securities — 6,838 — 6,838 — 1,265 — 1,265 US government & agency securities — 41,084 — 41,084 — 28,136 — 28,136 Asset backed securities — 1,297 — 1,297 — 3,337 — 3,337 Total investments — 71,451 — 71,451 — 48,641 — 48,641 Long-term restricted cash: Cash 4,500 — — 4,500 4,500 — — 4,500 Total assets measured at fair value $ 16,531 $ 79,500 $ — $ 96,031 $ 26,534 $ 60,236 $ — $ 86,770 Liabilities Financing derivative $ — $ — $ 551 $ 551 $ — $ — $ 600 $ 600 Total liabilities measured at fair value $ — $ — $ 551 $ 551 $ — $ — $ 600 $ 600 We classify our cash deposits and money market funds within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using bank balances or quoted market prices. We classify our investments as Level 2 instruments based on market pricing and other observable inputs. We did not classify any of our investments within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no impairments of our investments. The estimated fair value of the Financing Derivative liability (as defined in Note 6. Notes Payable) was determined using Level 3 inputs, or significant unobservable inputs. Changes to the estimated fair value of the Financing Derivative are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The following table provides the changes in the estimated fair value of the Financi ng Derivative during the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 (in thousands): Financing Derivative Amount Balance as of December 31, 2015 $ 600 Gain on change in estimated fair value (49) Balance as of March 31, 2016 $ 551 During the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 assets or liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis and the valuation techniques used did not change compared to our established practice. Financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis The carrying amount of our accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, current, approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying value of our other liabilities, non-current, approximates fair value due to the time to maturity and prevailing market rates. We determined the estimated fair value of the Notes (as defined in Note 6. Notes Payable) using Level 3 inputs, or significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of the Notes was determined by comparing the difference between the estimated fair value of the Notes with and without the Financing Derivative by calculating the respective present values from future cash flows using a weighted average market yield of 13.3% and 13.5% at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The estimated fair value and carrying value of the Notes are as follows (in thousands): March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Notes payable $ 18,278 $ 15,216 $ 18,037 $ 14,948 Net Loss per Share The following outstanding common stock options and warrants to purchase common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect: Three Months Ended March 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Options outstanding 22,542 18,796 Warrants to purchase common stock 1,682 5,500 Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU’) No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory , which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by replacing today’s lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The guidance applies only to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in first-out (LIFO) and the retail inventory method (RIM). Entities that use LIFO or RIM will continue to use existing impairment models (e.g., entities using LIFO would apply the lower of cost or market test). ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual report periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is effective for us in the first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The new guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. We have elected to early adopt ASU 2015-11 effective for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016, as permitted by the standard. The early adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends the current stock compensation guidance. The amendments simplify the accounting for the taxes related to stock based compensation, including adjustments to how excess tax benefits and a company's payments for tax withholdings should be classified. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or the cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date , which deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard for periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted but not earlier than the original effective date. Accordingly, the updated standard is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our condensed consolidated financial statements. |