UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32373
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
(Exact name of registration as specified in its charter)
| | |
Nevada | | 27-0099920 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South | | 89109 |
Las Vegas, Nevada | | (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
(702) 414-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filerþ | | Accelerated filero | | Non-accelerated filero | | Smaller reporting companyo |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
| | |
Class | | Outstanding at August 2, 2010 |
Common Stock ($0.001 par value) | | 660,734,408 shares |
1
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
2
ITEM 1 —FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (In thousands, except share | |
| | and per share data) | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
ASSETS | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,518,835 | | | $ | 4,955,416 | |
Restricted cash | | | 91,983 | | | | 118,641 | |
Investments | | | 173,461 | | | | — | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 530,331 | | | | 460,766 | |
Inventories | | | 26,523 | | | | 27,073 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 75,858 | | | | 26,442 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 39,833 | | | | 35,336 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 4,456,824 | | | | 5,623,674 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 14,122,595 | | | | 13,351,271 | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 171,573 | | | | 138,454 | |
Restricted cash | | | 4,591 | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 26,046 | | | | 22,219 | |
Leasehold interests in land, net | | | 1,214,579 | | | | 1,209,820 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 92,010 | | | | 50,129 | |
Other assets, net | | | 178,936 | | | | 176,539 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 20,267,154 | | | $ | 20,572,106 | |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 119,156 | | | $ | 82,695 | |
Construction payables | | | 754,667 | | | | 778,771 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 20,952 | | | | 18,332 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 915,663 | | | | 786,192 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 15,011 | | | | — | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | | 569,196 | | | | 173,315 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 2,394,645 | | | | 1,839,305 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 89,937 | | | | 81,959 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 50,229 | | | | — | |
Deferred proceeds from sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo | | | 243,928 | | | | 243,928 | |
Deferred gain on sale of The Grand Canal Shoppes | | | 52,540 | | | | 54,272 | |
Deferred rent from mall transactions | | | 148,226 | | | | 149,074 | |
Long-term debt | | | 9,826,661 | | | | 10,852,147 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 12,806,166 | | | | 13,220,685 | |
| | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, issued to Principal Stockholder’s family, 5,250,000 shares issued and outstanding, after allocation of fair value of attached warrants, aggregate redemption/liquidation value of $577,500 | | | 457,106 | | | | 410,834 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | | | | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 4,089,999 shares issued and outstanding with warrants to purchase up to 68,166,786 shares of common stock | | | 234,607 | | | | 234,607 | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 660,733,908 and 660,322,749 shares issued and outstanding | | | 661 | | | | 660 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 5,149,854 | | | | 5,114,851 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 26,400 | | | | 26,748 | |
Retained earnings | | | 440,249 | | | | 473,833 | |
| | | | | | |
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders’ equity | | | 5,851,771 | | | | 5,850,699 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | 1,152,111 | | | | 1,089,888 | |
| | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 7,003,882 | | | | 6,940,587 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 20,267,154 | | | $ | 20,572,106 | |
| | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (In thousands, except share and per share data) | |
| | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | 1,294,301 | | | $ | 798,053 | | | $ | 2,356,071 | | | $ | 1,595,978 | |
Rooms | | | 190,767 | | | | 161,969 | | | | 371,549 | | | | 336,357 | |
Food and beverage | | | 105,079 | | | | 87,087 | | | | 197,158 | | | | 174,395 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | 115,266 | | | | 95,885 | | | | 223,481 | | | | 209,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,705,413 | | | | 1,142,994 | | | | 3,148,259 | | | | 2,316,102 | |
Less-promotional allowances | | | (110,937 | ) | | | (84,294 | ) | | | (218,895 | ) | | | (178,340 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | | 1,594,476 | | | | 1,058,700 | | | | 2,929,364 | | | | 2,137,762 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | 790,947 | | | | 532,476 | | | | 1,485,582 | | | | 1,081,373 | |
Rooms | | | 34,073 | | | | 31,524 | | | | 63,727 | | | | 65,291 | |
Food and beverage | | | 47,798 | | | | 44,819 | | | | 92,101 | | | | 87,461 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | 65,326 | | | | 63,234 | | | | 123,730 | | | | 122,477 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 18,711 | | | | 20,707 | | | | 35,153 | | | | 41,717 | |
General and administrative | | | 172,919 | | | | 123,800 | | | | 299,178 | | | | 245,103 | |
Corporate expense | | | 25,954 | | | | 64,307 | | | | 49,430 | | | | 87,731 | |
Rental expense | | | 12,806 | | | | 7,877 | | | | 21,504 | | | | 15,806 | |
Pre-opening expense | | | 50,118 | | | | 41,830 | | | | 87,577 | | | | 86,764 | |
Development expense | | | 676 | | | | 10 | | | | 833 | | | | 264 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 170,694 | | | | 143,633 | | | | 323,783 | | | | 282,882 | |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | 151,175 | | | | — | | | | 151,175 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 37,679 | | | | 4,653 | | | | 38,171 | | | | 4,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,427,701 | | | | 1,230,045 | | | | 2,620,769 | | | | 2,272,828 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 166,775 | | | | (171,345 | ) | | | 308,595 | | | | (135,066 | ) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 2,073 | | | | 2,692 | | | | 3,706 | | | | 8,241 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (76,987 | ) | | | (64,871 | ) | | | (155,152 | ) | | | (135,989 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | | (6,201 | ) | | | 773 | | | | (12,649 | ) | | | (4,970 | ) |
Gain on early retirement of debt | | | 961 | | | | — | | | | 3,137 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 86,621 | | | | (232,751 | ) | | | 147,637 | | | | (267,784 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (8,073 | ) | | | 54,488 | | | | (21,275 | ) | | | 53,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 78,548 | | | | (178,263 | ) | | | 126,362 | | | | (214,109 | ) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (36,741 | ) | | | 2,323 | | | | (66,974 | ) | | | 3,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | 41,807 | | | | (175,940 | ) | | | 59,388 | | | | (210,546 | ) |
Preferred stock dividends | | | (23,350 | ) | | | (23,172 | ) | | | (46,700 | ) | | | (46,326 | ) |
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | (23,136 | ) | | | (23,136 | ) | | | (46,272 | ) | | | (46,272 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (4,679 | ) | | $ | (222,248 | ) | | $ | (33,584 | ) | | $ | (303,144 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | | 660,364,559 | | | | 658,877,256 | | | | 660,322,428 | | | | 653,370,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Las Vegas Sands Corp. Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Capital in | | | Other | | | | | | | Total | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred | | | Common | | | Treasury | | | Excess of | | | Comprehensive | | | Retained | | | Comprehensive | | | Noncontrolling | | | | |
| | Stock | | | Stock | | | Stock | | | Par Value | | | Income | | | Earnings | | | Income (Loss) | | | Interests | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2009 | | $ | 298,066 | | | $ | 642 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,090,292 | | | $ | 17,554 | | | $ | 1,015,554 | | | | | | | $ | 3,073 | | | $ | 4,425,181 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (210,546 | ) | | | (210,546 | ) | | | (3,563 | ) | | | (214,109 | ) |
Currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,756 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,756 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,756 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (213,302 | ) | | | (3,563 | ) | | | (216,865 | ) |
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,284 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | (3,284 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,528 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 22,528 | |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) |
Warrants exercised and settled with preferred stock | | | (63,459 | ) | | | 18 | | | | — | | | | 63,441 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Contribution from noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | 41 | | | | 41 | |
Deemed contribution from Principal Stockholder | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 220 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 220 | |
Dividends declared, net of amounts previously accrued | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (41,143 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (41,143 | ) |
Accumulated but undeclared dividend requirement on preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,854 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (6,854 | ) |
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,272 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (46,272 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2009 | | $ | 234,607 | | | $ | 660 | | | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | 3,173,197 | | | $ | 14,798 | | | $ | 710,739 | | | | | | | $ | (449 | ) | | $ | 4,133,539 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2010 | | $ | 234,607 | | | $ | 660 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,114,851 | | | $ | 26,748 | | | $ | 473,833 | | | | | | | $ | 1,089,888 | | | $ | 6,940,587 | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 59,388 | | | | 59,388 | | | | 66,974 | | | | 126,362 | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (348 | ) | | | — | | | | (348 | ) | | | (4,148 | ) | | | (4,496 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 59,040 | | | | 62,826 | | | | 121,866 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 3,922 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 3,923 | |
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (195 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | (195 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28,718 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1,742 | | | | 30,460 | |
Deemed contribution from Principal Stockholder | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 213 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 213 | |
Acquisition of remaining shares of noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,345 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | (2,345 | ) | | | — | |
Dividends declared, net of amounts previously accrued | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (39,846 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (39,846 | ) |
Accumulated but undeclared dividend requirement on preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,854 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (6,854 | ) |
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,272 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | (46,272 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2010 | | $ | 234,607 | | | $ | 661 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,149,854 | | | $ | 26,400 | | | $ | 440,249 | | | | | | | $ | 1,152,111 | | | $ | 7,003,882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 126,362 | | | $ | (214,109 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash generated from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 323,783 | | | | 282,882 | |
Amortization of leasehold interests in land included in rental expense | | | 21,504 | | | | 14,451 | |
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount | | | 17,530 | | | | 13,248 | |
Amortization of deferred gain and rent | | | (2,580 | ) | | | (2,580 | ) |
Gain on early retirement of debt | | | (3,137 | ) | | | — | |
Impairment and loss on disposal of assets | | | 38,171 | | | | 155,959 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 28,932 | | | | 20,905 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 35,153 | | | | 41,717 | |
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | | | (8,836 | ) | | | 14 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (6,450 | ) | | | (57,942 | ) |
Non-cash contribution from Principal Stockholder included in corporate expense | | | 213 | | | | 220 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (104,581 | ) | | | (24,009 | ) |
Inventories | | | 543 | | | | 1,659 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | (6,561 | ) | | | 43,328 | |
Leasehold interests in land | | | (17,211 | ) | | | (17,671 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 36,285 | | | | 17,100 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 2,464 | | | | (4,498 | ) |
Income taxes payable | | | 15,011 | | | | — | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 141,310 | | | | 37,172 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash generated from operating activities | | | 637,905 | | | | 307,846 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Changes in restricted cash | | | 22,926 | | | | 3,821 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,127,268 | ) | | | (1,022,534 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | | | 5,647 | | | | — | |
Purchases of investments | | | (173,774 | ) | | | — | |
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate | | | (43,305 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (1,315,774 | ) | | | (1,018,713 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 3,923 | | | | — | |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | | | (46,700 | ) | | | (47,997 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | — | | | | (13 | ) |
Proceeds from long-term debt (Note 5) | | | 596,560 | | | | 504,379 | |
Repayments on long-term debt (Note 5) | | | (1,265,218 | ) | | | (194,636 | ) |
Contribution from noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | 41 | |
Payments of deferred financing costs | | | (54,365 | ) | | | (4,431 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities | | | (765,800 | ) | | | 257,343 | |
| | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | | 7,088 | | | | 394 | |
| | | | | | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (1,436,581 | ) | | | (453,130 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 4,955,416 | | | | 3,038,163 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 3,518,835 | | | $ | 2,585,033 | |
| | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 134,979 | | | $ | 127,481 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash payments for taxes, net of refunds | | $ | 150 | | | $ | (70,007 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Changes in construction payables | | $ | (24,104 | ) | | $ | 44,478 | |
| | | | | | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized stock-based compensation costs | | $ | 1,528 | | | $ | 1,623 | |
| | | | | | |
Property and equipment acquired under capital lease | | $ | 2,802 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | |
Accumulated but undeclared dividend requirement on preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | $ | 6,854 | | | $ | 6,854 | |
| | | | | | |
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | $ | 46,272 | | | $ | 46,272 | |
| | | | | | |
Acquisition of remaining shares of noncontrolling interest | | $ | 2,345 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | |
Warrants exercised and settled through tendering of preferred stock | | $ | — | | | $ | 63,459 | |
| | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OF COMPANY
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Las Vegas Sands Corp. (“LVSC”), a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, except as discussed below, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period have been included. The interim results reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of expected results for the full year. The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “LVS.”
In November 2009, the Company’s newly formed subsidiary, Sands China Ltd. (“SCL,” the indirect owner and operator of the majority of the Company’s operations in the Macau Special Administrative Region (“Macau”) of the People’s Republic of China), completed an initial public offering by listing its ordinary shares (the “SCL Offering”) on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. Immediately following the SCL Offering and several transactions consummated in connection with such offering, the Company owned 70.3% of issued and outstanding ordinary shares of SCL. The shares of SCL were not, and will not, be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the U.S. absent a registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an applicable exception from such registration requirements.
Operations
United States
Las Vegas
The Company owns and operates The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian Las Vegas”), a Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (“The Palazzo”), a resort featuring modern European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately 1.2 million square feet (the “Sands Expo Center”). These Las Vegas properties, situated on or near the Las Vegas Strip, form an integrated resort with approximately 7,100 suites; approximately 225,000 square feet of gaming space; a meeting and conference facility of approximately 1.1 million square feet; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex located within The Venetian Las Vegas of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet (“The Grand Canal Shoppes”), which was sold to GGP Limited Partnership (“GGP”) in 2004; and an enclosed retail and dining complex located within The Palazzo of approximately 400,000 net leasable square feet (“The Shoppes at The Palazzo”), which was sold to GGP in February 2008. See “— Note 3 — Property and Equipment, Net” regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Pennsylvania
The Company is in the process of developing Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the “Sands Bethlehem”), a gaming, hotel, retail and dining complex located on the site of the historic Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Sands Bethlehem is also expected to be home to the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and cultural center, and the broadcast home of the local PBS affiliate. The Company owns 86% of the economic interest of the gaming, hotel and entertainment portion of the property through its ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail portion of the property through its ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail, LLC.
7
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
On May 22, 2009, the Company opened the casino component of Sands Bethlehem, which features slot machines and several food and beverage offerings, as well as the parking garage and surface parking. In April 2010, the Company recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel tower, which is expected to open in the second quarter of 2011. In May 2010, the Company paid a $16.5 million table game licensing fee and in July 2010 was issued its table games certificate by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and commenced table games operations. Construction activities on the remaining components, which include an approximate 200,000-square-foot retail facility, a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event center and a variety of additional dining options, have been suspended temporarily and are intended to recommence when capital markets and general economic conditions improve and when the suspended components are able to be financed. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $637.0 million for this project (including $17.7 million in outstanding construction payables). The Company expects to spend approximately $55 million to complete construction of the hotel tower, on furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) and other costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above. The impact of the suspension on the estimated overall cost of the project’s remaining components is currently not determinable with certainty.
Macau
The Company owns 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties, as further discussed below. The Company operates the gaming areas within these properties pursuant to a 20-year gaming subconcession.
The Company owns and operates the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The Sands Macao offers approximately 229,000 square feet of gaming space and a 289-suite hotel tower, as well as several restaurants, VIP facilities, a theater and other high-end services and amenities.
The Company also owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (“The Venetian Macao”), which anchors the Cotai StripTM, the Company’s master-planned development of integrated resort properties in Macau. With a theme similar to that of The Venetian Las Vegas, The Venetian Macao includes a 39-floor luxury hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately 550,000 square feet of gaming space; a 15,000-seat arena; an 1,800-seat theater; retail and dining space of approximately 1.0 million square feet; and a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.2 million square feet.
The Company owns the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai StripTM (the “Four Seasons Hotel Macao”), which features 360 rooms and suites managed and operated by Four Seasons Hotels Inc. and is located adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao. Connected to the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, the Company owns and operates the Plaza Casino (together with the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, the “Four Seasons Macao”), which features approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming space; 19 Paiza mansions; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to the mall at The Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and other facilities. This integrated resort will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao, Cotai StripTM (the “Four Seasons Apartments”), an apart-hotel tower that consists of approximately 1.0 million square feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury apart-hotel units and common areas. The Company has completed the structural work of the tower and expects to subsequently monetize units within the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market conditions and obtaining the necessary government approvals. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $1.06 billion for the entire project (including $27.4 million in outstanding construction payables). The Company expects to spend approximately $145 million primarily on additional costs to complete the Four Seasons Apartments, including FF&E, pre-opening costs and additional land premiums, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above.
Singapore
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd. (“MBS”), entered into a development agreement (the “Development Agreement”) with the Singapore Tourism Board (the “STB”) to build and operate an integrated resort called Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. Marina Bay Sands, portions of which opened on April 27, 2010, is expected to include three 55-story hotel towers (totaling approximately 2,600 rooms and suites), the Sands SkyParkTM (which sits atop the hotel towers and features swimming pools and several dining options), a casino, an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment
8
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable square feet, a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet, theaters and a landmark iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that will contain an art/science museum. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized 6.99 billion Singapore dollars (“SGD,” approximately $5.04 billion at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) in costs for this project, including the land premium and SGD 739.3 million (approximately $532.9 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) in outstanding construction payables. The Company expects to spend approximately SGD 1.7 billion (approximately $1.2 billion at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) through 2011 on additional costs to complete the construction of the integrated resort, FF&E, pre-opening and other costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above, of which approximately SGD 1.0 billion (approximately $750 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) is expected to be spent during 2010. As the Company has obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pays its costs in Singapore dollars, its exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal. Based on its current development plan, the Company expects to progressively open a majority of Marina Bay Sands throughout 2010.
Development Projects
Given the challenging conditions in the capital markets and the global economy and their impact on the Company’s ongoing operations, the Company revised its development plan to suspend portions of its development projects and focus its development efforts on those projects with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should general economic conditions fail to improve, if the Company is unable to obtain sufficient funding such that completion of its suspended projects is not probable, or should management decide to abandon certain projects, all or a portion of the Company’s investment to date on its suspended projects could be lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, the Company may be subject to penalties under the termination clauses in its construction contracts or termination rights under its management contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
The Company was constructing a St. Regis-branded high-rise residential condominium tower, the St. Regis Residences at The Venetian Palazzo (the “St. Regis Residences”), located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. As part of its revised development plan, the Company suspended construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip condominiums and the overall decline in general economic conditions. The Company intends to recommence construction when demand and conditions improve and expects that it will take approximately 18 months thereafter to complete construction of the project. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $175.8 million for this project. The impact of the suspension on the estimated overall cost of the project is currently not determinable with certainty.
Macau
The Company submitted plans to the Macau government for its other Cotai Strip developments, which represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which are referred to as parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, the developments are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas, showrooms, shopping malls, spas, restaurants, entertainment facilities and other amenities. The Company had commenced construction or pre-construction on these developments and plans to operate the related gaming areas under the Company’s Macau gaming subconcession.
As part of its revised development plan, the Company is sequencing the construction of its integrated resort development on parcels 5 and 6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the project, the integrated resort is expected to feature approximately 6,000 hotel rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of gaming space, approximately 1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and dining facilities, exhibition and conference facilities and a multipurpose theater. Phase I of the project is expected to include two hotel towers with approximately 3,700 hotel rooms to be managed by Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited (“Shangri-La”) under its Shangri-La and Traders brands and Sheraton International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas Management Co. (collectively “Starwood”) under its Sheraton brand, as well as completion of the structural work of an adjacent hotel tower with approximately 2,300 rooms to be managed by Starwood under its Sheraton brand. Phase I will also include the gaming space,
9
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
theater and a partial opening of the retail and exhibition and conference facilities. The total cost to complete phase I is expected to be approximately $1.9 billion. Phase II of the project includes completion of the additional Sheraton hotel tower as well as the remaining retail facilities and the total cost is expected to be approximately $235 million. Phase III of the project is expected to include a fourth hotel and mixed-use tower to be managed by Starwood under its St. Regis brand and the total cost is expected to be approximately $450 million. In connection with the Company entering into a $1.75 billion Venetian Orient Limited (“VOL”) credit facility (see “— Note 5 — Long-term Debt — VOL Credit Facility”) to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, the Company is mobilizing to recommence construction of phases I and II. The Company expects that phase I will be completed in the third quarter of 2011 and that it will take an additional six months thereafter to complete the adjacent Sheraton tower in phase II and an additional 24 months thereafter to complete the remaining retail facilities in phase II. The Company intends to commence construction of phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $1.78 billion for the entire project (including $139.6 million in outstanding construction payables). The Company’s management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain construction deadlines and opening obligations on the Company and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as described above, may represent a default under the respective agreements, which would allow Starwood and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. See “— Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies — Other Agreements.”
The Company had commenced pre-construction on parcels 7 and 8 and 3, and has capitalized construction costs of $102.3 million for parcels 7 and 8 and $35.5 million for parcel 3 as of June 30, 2010. The Company intends to commence construction after the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary government approvals are obtained, regional and global economic conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained.
The impact of the delayed construction on the Company’s previously estimated cost to complete its Cotai Strip developments is currently not determinable with certainty. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized an aggregate of $5.88 billion in costs for its Cotai Strip developments, including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as the Company’s investments in transportation infrastructure, including its passenger ferry service operations. In addition to receiving the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility for phases I and II of parcels 5 and 6, the Company will need to arrange additional financing to fund the balance of its Cotai Strip developments and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any of the additional financing required.
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. The Company has received a land concession from the Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2 and 3, including the sites on which The Venetian Macao (parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. In November 2009, the Company made an initial premium payment of 700.0 million patacas (approximately $87.3 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) for the land concession on parcels 5 and 6, which became effective in May 2010 when it was published in Macau’s Official Gazette. The Company does not own these land sites in Macau; however, the land concession grants the Company exclusive use of the land. As specified in the land concession, the Company is required to pay premiums for each parcel, which are either payable in a single lump sum upon acceptance of the land concession by the Macau government or in seven semi-annual installments (provided that the outstanding balance is due upon the completion of the corresponding integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the term of the land concession.
Under the Company’s land concession for parcel 3, the Company was initially required to complete the corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted the Company a two-year extension to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April 2013. The land concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding development be completed by May 2014 (48 months from the date the land concession became effective). The Company believes that if it is not able to complete the developments by the respective deadlines, it will likely be able to obtain extensions from the Macau government; however, no assurances can be given that additional extensions will be granted. If the Company is unable to meet the deadlines and those deadlines are not extended, it could lose its land concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6, which would prohibit the Company from operating any facilities developed under the respective land concessions. As a result, the Company could forfeit all or a substantial portion of its $35.5 million and $1.78 billion in capitalized costs, as of June 30, 2010, related to its developments on parcels 3 and 5 and 6, respectively.
10
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The Company does not yet have all of the necessary Macau government approvals to develop its planned Cotai Strip developments on parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8. The Company has received land concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6. Based on historical experience with the Macau government with respect to the Company’s land concessions for the Sands Macao and parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, management believes that the land concession for parcels 7 and 8 will be granted; however, if the Company does not obtain land concession, the Company could forfeit all or a substantial portion of its $102.3 million in capitalized costs, as of June 30, 2010, related to its development on parcels 7 and 8.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, the Company may continue exploring the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated resorts, in additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
Development Financing Strategy
Through June 30, 2010, the Company has funded its development projects primarily through borrowings under its U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds from its recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility and FF&E facility require the Company’s Las Vegas operations to comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The maximum leverage ratio is 6.0x for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, decreases to 5.5x for quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010, and then decreases to 5.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Macau credit facility, as amended in August 2009, requires the Company’s Macau operations to comply with similar financial covenants, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum leverage ratio is 4.0x for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, decreases to 3.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010, and then decreases to 3.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Company can elect to contribute up to $50 million and $20 million of cash on hand to its Las Vegas and Macau operations, respectively, on a bi-quarterly basis; such contributions having the effect of increasing Adjusted EBITDA by the corresponding amount during the applicable quarter for purposes of calculating compliance with the maximum leverage ratio (the “EBITDA true-up”). If the Company is unable to maintain compliance with the financial covenants under these credit facilities, it would be in default under the respective credit facilities. A default under the U.S. credit facilities would trigger a cross-default under the Company’s airplane financings, which, if the respective lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness outstanding under these agreements, would result in a default under the Company’s senior notes. A default under the Macau credit facility would trigger a cross-default under the Company’s ferry financing. Any defaults or cross-defaults under these agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to exercise their rights and remedies as defined under their respective agreements. If the lenders were to exercise their rights to accelerate the due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and payable under such agreements, which could force the Company to restructure or alter its operations or debt obligations.
In 2008, the Company completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a $2.1 billion common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, the Company completed a $600.0 million exchangeable bond offering and its $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the proceeds from these offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of the U.S. credit facility in March 2010 and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, and was contributed to Las Vegas Sands, LLC (“LVSLLC”) to reduce its net debt in order to maintain compliance with the maximum leverage ratio for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2010.
11
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The Company held unrestricted and restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately $3.69 billion and $96.6 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2010. The Company believes that the cash and investments on hand, cash flow generated from operations and available borrowings under its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund its revised development plan and maintain compliance with the financial covenants of its U.S. and Macau credit facilities. In the normal course of its activities, the Company will continue to evaluate its capital structure and opportunities for enhancements thereof. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, the Company began working on an amendment to its U.S. credit facility, which contemplates a pay down of a portion of the outstanding balances of its term loans and a reduction of its revolving credit facility commitments in exchange for the extension of maturities and other modifications to the credit agreement intended to increase the Company’s financial flexibility. Additionally, in connection with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, the Company is mobilizing to recommence construction of phases I and II of the Company’s Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance for variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which changes the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate VIEs. In December 2009, the FASB supplemented its authoritative guidance for VIE’s, which establishes new criteria for consolidation based on power to direct the activities of a VIE that would significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The new guidance does not allow grandfathering of existing structures and is effective January 1, 2010. The application of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See “— Note 7 — Variable Interest Entities.”
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and gross presentation of activity within the reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance also clarifies existing requirements on the level of disaggregation and required disclosures regarding inputs and valuation techniques for both recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the exception of gross presentation of Level 3 activity, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See “— Note 10 — Fair Value Measurements” for the required disclosure.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for companies that generate revenue from gaming activities that involve base jackpots, which requires companies to accrue for a liability and charge a jackpot (or portion thereof) to revenue at the time the company has the obligation to pay the jackpot. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Base jackpots are currently not accrued for by the Company until it has the obligation to pay such jackpots. As such, the application of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Revision
In connection with the preparation of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company revised its December 31, 2009, condensed consolidated balance sheet and condensed consolidated statements of equity and comprehensive income (loss) to appropriately reflect the impact of the issuance of SCL shares upon its initial public offering. This revision resulted in a $655.7 million increase in the noncontrolling interests balance with a corresponding reduction to capital in excess of par value. The revision, which the Company determined is not material, had no impact on total equity, results of operations or cash flows.
Reclassification
The Company reclassified its intangible assets, net of amortization, as of December 31, 2009, which was previously included in other assets, net, to conform to the current presentation (see “— Note 4 — Intangible Assets, Net”). The reclassification had no effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 2 — INVESTMENTS
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, investments in securities are classified as either held to maturity, trading or available for sale. Management determines the classification of its investments at the time of purchase. The Company’s securities are classified as held to maturity, as the Company has positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity, and are recorded at cost, which is equivalent to their fair value. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has $173.5 million in non-U.S. government fixed maturity investments, of which $109.2 million and $64.3 million will mature in July and August 2010, respectively.
12
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3 — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Land and improvements | | $ | 397,365 | | | $ | 353,791 | |
Building and improvements | | | 10,281,051 | | | | 6,898,071 | |
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements | | | 1,883,724 | | | | 1,703,792 | |
Transportation | | | 403,819 | | | | 403,256 | |
Construction in progress | | | 3,119,397 | | | | 5,647,986 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 16,085,356 | | | | 15,006,896 | |
Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (1,962,761 | ) | | | (1,655,625 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 14,122,595 | | | $ | 13,351,271 | |
| | | | | | |
Construction in progress consists of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Other Macau Development Projects (principally Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6) | | $ | 1,951,975 | | | $ | 1,915,587 | |
Marina Bay Sands | | | 509,289 | | | | 3,119,935 | |
Four Seasons Macao (principally the Four Seasons Apartments) | | | 374,522 | | | | 328,300 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 92,228 | | | | 85,159 | |
Other | | | 191,383 | | | | 199,005 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,119,397 | | | $ | 5,647,986 | |
| | | | | | |
The $191.4 million in other construction in progress consists primarily of construction of the St. Regis Residences, other projects in Las Vegas and at The Venetian Macao and Sands Macao.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company has received proceeds of $295.4 million from the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo; however, the final purchase price will be determined in accordance with the agreement between Venetian Casino Resort, LLC (“VCR”) and GGP based on net operating income (“NOI”) of The Shoppes at The Palazzo calculated 30 months after the closing date of the sale, as defined under the agreement and subject to certain later audit adjustments. In April 2009, GGP and its subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). Additionally, given the economic and market conditions facing retailers on a national and local level, tenants are facing economic challenges that have had an effect, and may have a future effect, on the calculation of NOI. Approximately $284.4 million of property and equipment (net of $27.0 million of accumulated depreciation), which was sold to GGP, is included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010. The Company will continue to review the Chapter 11 Cases and the projected financial performance of the tenants to be included in the NOI calculation, and will adjust the estimates of NOI and capitalization rates as additional information is received. The Company may be required to record further impairment charges in the future depending on changes in the projections. Based on GGP’s current financial condition, there can be no assurance that GGP will make its final payment.
The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment that the Company is leasing to tenants as part of its Macau mall operations was $386.6 million and $60.0 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2010. The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment that the Company is leasing under capital lease arrangements is $28.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2010.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company capitalized interest expense of $22.7 million, $42.3 million, $14.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively.
As described in “— Note 1 — Organization and Business of Company — Development Projects,” the Company revised its development plan to suspend portions of its development projects given the conditions in the capital markets and the global economy and their impact on the Company’s ongoing operations. If circumstances change, the Company may be required to record an impairment charge related to these developments in the future.
13
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4 — INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Gaming licenses and certificate | | $ | 93,529 | | | $ | 50,000 | |
Less — accumulated amortization | | | (1,627 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 91,902 | | | | 50,000 | |
| | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | 265 | | | | 263 | |
Less — accumulated amortization | | | (157 | ) | | | (134 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 108 | | | | 129 | |
| | | | | | |
Intangible assets, net | | $ | 92,010 | | | $ | 50,129 | |
| | | | | | |
In August 2007 and July 2010, the Company was issued a gaming license and certificate from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board for its slots and table games operations at Sands Bethlehem, respectively, which were acquired for $50.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively. The license and certificate were determined to have indefinite lives and therefore, are not subject to amortization. In April 2010, the Company was issued a gaming license from the Singapore Casino Regulatory Authority (the “CRA”) for its gaming operations at Marina Bay Sands, which was acquired for SGD 37.5 million (approximately $27.0 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010). This license is being amortized over its three-year term and is renewable upon submitting a renewal application, paying the applicable license fee and meeting the renewal requirements as determined by the CRA.
NOTE 5 — LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Corporate and U.S. Related: | | | | | | | | |
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Term B | | $ | 2,910,000 | | | $ | 2,925,000 | |
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Delayed Draws I and II | | | 982,000 | | | | 987,000 | |
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Revolving | | | — | | | | 775,860 | |
6.375% Senior Notes (net of original issue discount of $807 and $1,164, respectively) | | | 188,905 | | | | 248,836 | |
FF&E Facility | | | 91,850 | | | | 108,550 | |
Airplane Financings | | | 80,266 | | | | 82,110 | |
HVAC Equipment Lease | | | 23,835 | | | | 24,717 | |
Other | | | 4,323 | | | | 4,778 | |
Macau Related: | | | | | | | | |
Macau Credit Facility — Term B | | | 1,492,789 | | | | 1,501,789 | |
Macau Credit Facility — Term B Delayed | | | 580,529 | | | | 584,029 | |
Macau Credit Facility — Revolving | | | 129,640 | | | | 479,640 | |
Macau Credit Facility — Local Term | | | 54,932 | | | | 67,697 | |
Ferry Financing | | | 192,504 | | | | 210,762 | |
Other | | | 11,350 | | | | 11,016 | |
Singapore Related: | | | | | | | | |
Singapore Credit Facility | | | 3,650,740 | | | | 3,013,678 | |
Other | | | 2,194 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 10,395,857 | | | | 11,025,462 | |
Less — current maturities | | | (569,196 | ) | | | (173,315 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 9,826,661 | | | $ | 10,852,147 | |
| | | | | | |
Senior Secured Credit Facility
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company paid down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of its Senior Secured Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $888.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit and undrawn amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc.
14
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Subsequent to June 30, 2010, the Company began working on an amendment with respect to its Senior Secured Credit Facility. The amendment contemplates a pay down of a portion of the outstanding balances of its term loans and a reduction of its revolving credit facility commitments in exchange for the extension of maturities and other modifications to the credit agreement intended to increase the Company’s financial flexibility.
Senior Notes
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company repurchased $27.6 million and $60.3 million, respectively, of the outstanding principal of its Senior Notes and recorded a gain of $1.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in connection with the repurchase.
Macau Credit Facility
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company paid down $350.0 million under the revolving portion of its Macau Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $467.7 million of available borrowing capacity under the Macau Credit Facility, net of undrawn amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, the Company paid down the remaining $129.6 million outstanding under the revolving portion of its Macau Credit Facility.
VOL Credit Facility
On May 17, 2010, a subsidiary of the Company, Venetian Orient Limited (“VOL,” owner and developer of the integrated resort on Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6), entered into a credit agreement (the “VOL Credit Facility”) providing for up to $1.75 billion (or equivalent in Hong Kong dollars or Macau patacas), which consists of a $750.0 million term loan (the “VOL Term Facility”) that was fully drawn on July 16, 2010, a $750.0 million delayed draw term loan available for 18 months after closing (the “VOL Delayed Draw Facility”) and a $250.0 million revolving facility (the “VOL Revolving Facility”). As of June 30, 2010, the Company had not drawn any amounts under the VOL Revolving Facility.
The indebtedness under the VOL Credit Facility is guaranteed by any future restricted subsidiaries of VOL. The obligations under the VOL Credit Facility are collateralized by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of VOL’s assets, other than (1) capital stock and similar ownership interests, (2) certain furniture, fixtures, fittings and equipment and (3) certain other excluded assets.
The VOL Credit Facility matures on June 17, 2015, with VOL required to repay or prepay the VOL Credit Facility under certain circumstances. Commencing on March 31, 2013, and at the end of each subsequent quarter in 2013, VOL is required to repay the outstanding VOL Term and Delayed Draw Facilities on a pro rata basis in an amount equal to 5% of the aggregate principal amount of term loans outstanding as of November 17, 2011. Commencing on March 31, 2014, and at the end of each subsequent quarter in 2014, VOL is required to repay the outstanding VOL Term and Delayed Draw Facilities on a pro rata bases in an amount equal to 7.5% of the aggregate principal amount of term loans outstanding as of November 17, 2011. In addition, commencing with December 31, 2013, and the end of each fiscal year thereafter, VOL is required to further repay the outstanding VOL Term and Delayed Draw Facilities on a pro rata basis with 50%, subject to downward adjustments if certain conditions are met, of its excess free cash flow (as defined by the VOL Credit Facility).
Borrowings under the VOL Credit Facility bear interest at either the adjusted Eurodollar rate or an alternative base rate (in the case of U.S. dollar denominated loans) or the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (or “HIBOR,” in the case of Hong Kong dollar and Macau pataca denominated loans), as applicable, plus a spread of 4.5% per annum. VOL will pay standby fees of 2.0% per annum on the undrawn amounts under the VOL Term and Delayed Draw Facilities and 1.50% per annum on the undrawn amounts under the VOL Revolving Facility.
15
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The VOL Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to, limitations on liens, annual capital expenditures other than project costs, incurrence of indebtedness, loans and guarantees, investments, acquisitions and asset sales, restricted payments and other distributions, affiliate transactions and use of proceeds from the facility. The VOL Credit Facility also requires VOL to comply with financial covenants as of the first full quarter beginning six months after the commencement of substantial operations of phases I and II of the integrated resort on Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6, including maximum ratios of total indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA and minimum ratios of Adjusted EBITDA to total interest expense. The VOL Credit Facility also contains events of default customer for such financings.
Singapore Credit Facility
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had SGD 116.4 million (approximately $83.9 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) of available borrowing capacity under the Singapore Credit Facility, net of outstanding banker’s guarantees.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities related to long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Proceeds from Singapore Credit Facility | | $ | 596,560 | | | $ | 494,492 | |
Proceeds from Ferry Financing | | | — | | | | 9,887 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 596,560 | | | $ | 504,379 | |
| | | | | | |
Repayments on Senior Secured Credit Facility | | $ | (795,860 | ) | | $ | (20,000 | ) |
Repayments on Macau Credit Facility | | | (375,036 | ) | | | (137,537 | ) |
Repayments on Singapore Credit Facility | | | — | | | | (17,992 | ) |
Repayments on Senior Notes | | | (56,675 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments on Ferry Financing | | | (17,493 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments on Airplane Financings | | | (1,844 | ) | | | (1,844 | ) |
Repayments on HVAC Equipment Lease | | | (882 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments on FF&E Facility and Other Long-Term Debt | | | (17,428 | ) | | | (17,263 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | (1,265,218 | ) | | $ | (194,636 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2010, was approximately $9.32 billion, compared to its carrying value of $10.37 billion. As of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was approximately $9.66 billion, compared to its carrying value of $11.0 billion. The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on quoted market prices, if available, or by pricing models based on the value of related cash flows discounted at current market interest rates.
NOTE 6 — EQUITY AND LOSS PER SHARE
Preferred Stock and Warrants
Preferred stock dividend activity is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Preferred Stock | | | | | | | |
| | | | Dividends Paid to | | | Preferred Stock | | | | |
Board of Directors’ | | | | Principal | | | Dividends Paid to | | | Total Preferred Stock | |
Declaration Date | | Payment Date | | Stockholder’s Family | | | Public Holders | | | Dividends Paid | |
February 5, 2009 | | February 17, 2009 | | $ | 13,125 | | | $ | 11,347 | | | $ | 24,472 | |
April 30, 2009 | | May 15, 2009 | | | 13,125 | | | | 10,400 | | | | 23,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 47,997 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
February 5, 2010 | | February 16, 2010 | | $ | 13,125 | | | $ | 10,225 | | | $ | 23,350 | |
May 4, 2010 | | May 17, 2010 | | | 13,125 | | | | 10,225 | | | | 23,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 46,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 29, 2010 | | August 16, 2010 | | $ | 13,125 | | | $ | 10,225 | | | $ | 23,350 | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, no warrants were exercised. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, holders of the preferred stock exercised 1,106,301 warrants to purchase an aggregate of 18,438,384 shares of the Company’s common stock at $6.00 per share and tendered 1,106,301 shares of preferred stock as settlement of the warrant exercise price.
16
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Loss Per Share
The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the calculation of basic loss per share) | | | 660,364,559 | | | | 658,877,256 | | | | 660,322,428 | | | | 653,370,686 | |
Potential dilution from stock options, restricted stock and warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the calculation of diluted loss per share) | | | 660,364,559 | | | | 658,877,256 | | | | 660,322,428 | | | | 653,370,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Antidilutive stock options, restricted stock and warrants excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share | | | 173,331,327 | | | | 170,644,057 | | | | 173,331,327 | | | | 170,644,057 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accumulated comprehensive income consisted solely of foreign currency translation adjustments.
Total comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 78,548 | | | $ | (178,263 | ) | | $ | 126,362 | | | $ | (214,109 | ) |
Currency translation adjustment | | | (2,172 | ) | | | 18,270 | | | | (4,496 | ) | | | (2,756 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | | 76,376 | | | | (159,993 | ) | | | 121,866 | | | | (216,865 | ) |
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (34,040 | ) | | | 2,323 | | | | (62,826 | ) | | | 3,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | 42,336 | | | $ | (157,670 | ) | | $ | 59,040 | | | $ | (213,302 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 7 — VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company consolidates any VIEs in which it is the primary beneficiary and discloses significant variable interests in VIEs of which it is not the primary beneficiary, if any, which management determines such designation based on accounting standards for VIEs.
The Company has entered into various joint venture agreements with independent third parties. The operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated by the Company due to the Company’s significant investment in these joint ventures, its power to direct the activities of the joint ventures that would significantly impact their economic performance and the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses or the rights to receive potentially significant benefits from these joint ventures. In accordance with revised accounting standards, the Company evaluates its primary beneficiary designation on an ongoing basis and will assess the appropriateness of the VIE’s status when events have occurred that would trigger such an analysis.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s joint ventures had total assets of $97.0 million and $105.6 million, respectively, and total liabilities of $72.6 million and $75.3 million, respectively.
17
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES
The Company’s major tax jurisdictions are the U.S., Macau and Singapore. In the U.S., the Company is currently under examination for years 2005 through 2008 and is subject to examination for years after 2008. In Macau and Singapore, the Company is subject to examination for years after 2005. It is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change within the next 12 months, due to the progression of ongoing examinations. An estimate of the amount of possible changes cannot be made at this time. The Company believes it has adequately reserved for its uncertain tax positions; however, there is no assurance that taxing authorities will not propose adjustments that are different than the Company’s expected outcome and impact the provision for income taxes.
The Company recorded valuation allowances on the net deferred tax assets of the Company’s U.S. operations and certain foreign jurisdictions and does not anticipate recording an income tax benefit related to these deferred tax assets. The Company will reassess the realization of deferred tax assets based on accounting standards for income taxes each reporting period and will be able to reduce the valuation allowance to the extent that the financial results of these operations improve and it becomes more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable.
The Company received a 5-year income tax exemption in Macau that exempts the Company from paying corporate income tax on profits generated by gaming operations. The Company will continue to benefit from this tax exemption through the end of 2013.
NOTE 9 — STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Sands China Ltd. Equity Award Plan
The Company’s subsidiary, SCL, adopted an equity award plan (the “SCL Equity Plan”) for grants of options to purchase ordinary shares of SCL. The purpose of the SCL Equity Plan is to give SCL a competitive edge in attracting, retaining and motivating employees, directors and consultants and to provide SCL with a stock plan providing incentives directly related to increases in its stockholder value. Subject to certain criteria as defined in the SCL Equity Plan, SCL’s subsidiaries’ or affiliates’ employees, directors or officers and many of its consultants are eligible for awards under the SCL Equity Plan. The SCL Equity Plan provides for an aggregate of 804,786,508 shares of SCL’s common stock to be available for awards, representing 10% of the outstanding shares of the SCL Offering. The SCL Equity Plan has a term of ten years and no further awards may be granted after the expiration of the term. SCL’s compensation committee may grant awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards or any combination of the foregoing. As of June 30, 2010, there were 784,410,408 shares available for grant under the SCL Equity Plan.
Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price not less than (i) the closing price of SCL’s stock on the date of grant or (ii) the average closing price of SCL’s stock for the five business days immediately preceding the date of grant. The outstanding stock options generally vest over four years and have ten-year contractual terms. Compensation cost for all stock option grants, which all have graded vesting, is net of estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the awards’ respective requisite service periods. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities from a selection of companies from SCL’s peer group due to SCL’s lack of historical information. The Company used the simplified method for estimating expected option life, as the options qualify as “plain-vanilla” options. The risk-free interest rate for periods equal to the expected term of the stock option is based on the Hong Kong Exchange Fund Note rate in effect at the time of grant.
18
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Stock-Based Compensation Activity
Stock-based compensation activity under the LVSC 2004 and SCL Equity Plans is as follows (in thousands, except weighted average grant date fair values):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Compensation expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | $ | 13,714 | | | $ | 8,973 | | | $ | 28,682 | | | $ | 20,070 | |
Restricted shares | | | 125 | | | | 336 | | | | 250 | | | | 835 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 13,839 | | | $ | 9,309 | | | $ | 28,932 | | | $ | 20,905 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation cost capitalized as part of property and equipment | | $ | 798 | | | $ | 996 | | | $ | 1,528 | | | $ | 1,623 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LVSC 2004 Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options granted | | | 2,043 | | | | 1,449 | | | | 4,089 | | | | 7,048 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | $ | 25.69 | | | $ | 5.16 | | | $ | 20.62 | | | $ | 2.44 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted shares granted | | | 14 | | | | 37 | | | | 14 | | | | 66 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | $ | 24.94 | | | $ | 9.49 | | | $ | 24.94 | | | $ | 7.38 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SCL Equity Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options granted | | | 2,500 | | | | — | | | | 20,376 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | $ | 0.88 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1.03 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
LVSC 2004 Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average volatility | | | 88.1 | % | | | 77.5 | % | | | 92.9 | % | | | 74.7 | % |
Expected term (in years) | | | 6.3 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.0 | |
Risk-free rate | | | 3.0 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 2.6 | % |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
SCL Equity Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average volatility | | | 73.6 | % | | | — | | | | 73.6 | % | | | — | |
Expected term (in years) | | | 5.6 | | | | — | | | | 6.2 | | | | — | |
Risk-free rate | | | 2.0 | % | | | — | | | | 2.0 | % | | | — | |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Under applicable accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance also establishes a valuation hierarchy for inputs in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs (inputs market participants would use based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company) and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs (inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions based upon the best information available in the circumstances) by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Categorization within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets carried at fair value (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Carrying | | | Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2010 Using: | |
| | Value as of | | | Quoted Market | | | Significant Other | | | Significant | |
| | June 30, | | | Prices in Active | | | Observable Inputs | | | Unobservable Inputs | |
| | 2010 | | | Markets (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
Cash equivalents(1) | | $ | 2,328,357 | | | $ | 2,328,357 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Interest rate caps(2) | | $ | 723 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 723 | | | $ | — | |
| | |
(1) | | The Company has short-term investments classified as cash equivalents as the original maturities are less than 90 days. |
|
(2) | | The Company has 31 interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate fair value of approximately $0.7 million, based on quoted market values from the institutions holding the agreements as of June 30, 2010. |
19
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 11 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is involved in other litigation in addition to those noted below, arising in the normal course of business. Management has made certain estimates for potential litigation costs based upon consultation with legal counsel. Actual results could differ from these estimates; however, in the opinion of management, such litigation and claims will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Macau Operations
On October 15, 2004, Richard Suen and Round Square Company Limited filed an action against LVSC, Las Vegas Sands, Inc. (“LVSI”), Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, asserting a breach of an alleged agreement to pay a success fee of $5.0 million and 2.0% of the net profit from the Company’s Macau resort operations to the plaintiffs as well as other related claims. In March 2005, LVSC was dismissed as a party without prejudice based on a stipulation to do so between the parties. Pursuant to an order filed March 16, 2006, plaintiffs’ fraud claims set forth in the first amended complaint were dismissed with prejudice as against all defendants. The order also dismissed with prejudice the first amended complaint against defendants Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner. On May 24, 2008, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $43.8 million. On June 30, 2008, a judgment was entered in this matter in the amount of $58.6 million (including pre-judgment interest). The Company has appealed the verdict to the Nevada Supreme Court and the appeal has been fully briefed by all parties. The Nevada Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument on the appeal for September 2, 2010. The Company believes that it has valid bases in law and fact to overturn or appeal the verdict. As a result, the Company has concluded that it is not probable that it has incurred a loss relating to this matter. The Company believes a range of possible loss, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, is between zero and the amount of the judgment. Because the Company believes that this potential loss is not probable or estimable, it has not recorded any reserves or contingencies related to this legal matter. In the event that the Company’s assumptions used to evaluate this matter as neither probable nor estimable change in future periods, it will be required to record a liability for an adverse outcome, which may include post judgment interest.
On February 5, 2007, Asian American Entertainment Corporation, Limited (“AAEC”) filed an action against LVSI, VCR, Venetian Venture Development, William P. Weidner and David Friedman in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the “District Court”). The plaintiffs assert (i) breach of contract by LVSI, VCR and Venetian Venture Development of an agreement under which AAEC would work to obtain a gaming license in Macau and, if successful, AAEC would jointly operate a casino, hotel and related facilities in Macau with Venetian Venture Development and Venetian Venture Development would receive fees and a minority equity interest in the venture and (ii) breach of fiduciary duties by all of the defendants. The plaintiffs have requested an unspecified amount of actual, compensatory and punitive damages, and disgorgement of profits related to the Company’s Macau gaming license. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on July 11, 2007. On August 1, 2007, the District Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against all defendants without prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed this decision and subsequently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Circuit Court”) decided that AAEC was not barred from asserting claims that the written agreement was breached prior to its expiration on January 15, 2002. The Circuit Court remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings on this issue and discovery has recently begun. The plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representing the plaintiffs on December 15, 2009, and it was granted by the Magistrate on January 12, 2010. On February 11, 2010, the Magistrate filed a recommendation that the case be dismissed in the court docket. The plaintiffs had until February 28, 2010, to file any objections thereto. None were filed and the District Court entered an order on April 16, 2010, dismissing the case. The plaintiff’s did not timely file an appeal of the District Court’s order dismissing the case and this matter has been closed.
On October 16, 2009, the Company received a letter from counsel to Far East Consortium International Ltd. (“FEC”) notifying the Company that it may pursue various claims seeking, among other things, monetary damages and an entitlement to an ownership interest in any development projects on parcel 3 in Macau, which the Company will own and operate. The Company believes such claims are based on a non-legally binding memorandum of agreement that expired by its terms in 2005. The Company intends to vigorously contest any claims or lawsuits that may be brought by FEC.
20
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
China Matters
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China (“SAFE”) regulates foreign currency exchange transactions and other business dealings in China. SAFE has made inquiries and requested and obtained documents relating to certain payments made by the Company’s wholly foreign-owned enterprises (“WFOEs”) to counterparties and other vendors in China. These WFOEs were established to conduct non-gaming marketing activities in China and to create goodwill in China and Macau for the Company’s operations in Macau. SAFE recently preliminarily indicated that its investigation of these matters was nearly complete and that it may impose a fine or penalty against the Company’s WFOEs, although it has not done so to date. The Company believes that the WFOEs complied with then-applicable SAFE regulations in connection with these matters. The Company and the WFOEs will continue to address this matter with SAFE and may contest any fine or penalty that may be imposed. The Company does not believe that any fine or penalty that may be imposed on the WFOEs as a result of these matters would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Securities Litigation
On May 24, 2010, Frank J. Fosbre, Jr. filed a purported class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson, and William P. Weidner. The complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants, disseminated or approved materially false information, or failed to disclose material facts, through press releases, investor conference calls and other means from August 1, 2007 through November 6, 2008. The complaint seeks, among other relief, class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. On June 15, 2010, a stipulated order was entered extending the time for the defendants to respond to the complaint until after a lead plaintiff is appointed by the court and an amended complaint is thereafter filed. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On July 21, 2010, Wendell and Shirley Combs filed a purported class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, against LVSC, Messrs Adelson, and Weidner. The complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants, disseminated or approved materially false information, or failed to disclose material facts, through press releases, investor conference calls and other means from June 13, 2007 through November 11, 2008. The complaint, which is substantially similar to the matter discussed above, seeks, among other relief, class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
Singapore Development Project
In August 2006, the Company entered into the Development Agreement with the STB, which requires the Company to construct and operate the Marina Bay Sands in accordance with the Company’s proposal for the integrated resort and in accordance with the agreement. The Company entered into the SGD 5.44 billion (approximately $3.92 billion at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) Singapore Credit Facility to fund a significant portion of the construction, operating and other development costs of the Marina Bay Sands.
In December 2009, MBS signed a supplement to the Development Agreement with the STB, which permits the Marina Bay Sands to open in stages throughout 2010 in accordance with an agreed upon schedule. There are no financial consequences to MBS if it fails to meet the agreed upon schedule, provided that the entire integrated resort is opened by December 31, 2011. If MBS fails to meet this deadline, the STB will be entitled to draw on the SGD 192.6 million (approximately $138.8 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) security deposit under the Singapore Credit Facility.
21
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Other Agreements
The Company has entered into agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La to manage hotels on the Company’s Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6, and for Starwood to brand the serviced luxury apart-hotel units located thereon. The management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain construction and opening obligations and deadlines on the Company, and certain past and/or anticipated delays may represent a default under the agreements, which would allow Starwood and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. The Company is mobilizing to recommence construction on parcels 5 and 6 and is negotiating (or undertaking to negotiate) amendments to its management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La to provide for new opening timelines. Additionally, although the Company’s agreement with Starwood related to the St. Regis Residences has been terminated in connection with the suspension of the project, as part of the negotiations in Macau, the Company is continuing its discussions with Starwood in relation to the branding of the St. Regis Residences. If negotiations are unsuccessful and Starwood or Shangri-La exercises their rights to terminate their agreements, the Company would have to find new managers and brands for these projects. Such measures could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE 12 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s principal operating and developmental activities occur in three geographic areas: United States, Macau and Singapore. The Company reviews the results of operations for each of its key operating segments: The Venetian Las Vegas, which includes the Sands Expo Center; The Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao; Other Asia (comprised primarily of the Company’s ferry operations and various other operations that are ancillary to the Company’s properties in Macau); and Marina Bay Sands. The Company also reviews construction and development activities for each of its primary projects: The Venetian Las Vegas; The Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao; Other Asia; Marina Bay Sands; Other Development Projects (on Cotai Strip parcels 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8); and Corporate and Other (comprised primarily of airplanes and the St. Regis Residences). The Venetian Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort and have been aggregated as one reportable segment (the “Las Vegas Operating Properties”), considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and products, the regulatory business environment of the operations within each segment and the Company’s organizational and management reporting structure. The information for the three months and six ended June 30, 2009, has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The Company’s segment information as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | $ | 581,032 | | | $ | 443,608 | | | $ | 1,130,727 | | | $ | 927,708 | |
Sands Macao | | | 302,212 | | | | 234,198 | | | | 586,018 | | | | 458,610 | |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 144,096 | | | | 48,700 | | | | 246,440 | | | | 95,691 | |
Other Asia | | | 28,386 | | | | 19,110 | | | | 52,558 | | | | 43,039 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,055,726 | | | | 745,616 | | | | 2,015,743 | | | | 1,525,048 | |
United States: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 276,219 | | | | 291,940 | | | | 601,729 | | | | 610,578 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 68,624 | | | | 32,711 | | | | 135,865 | | | | 32,711 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 344,843 | | | | 324,651 | | | | 737,594 | | | | 643,289 | |
Singapore | | | 216,393 | | | | — | | | | 216,393 | | | | — | |
Intersegment eliminations | | | (22,486 | ) | | | (11,567 | ) | | | (40,366 | ) | | | (30,575 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | $ | 1,594,476 | | | $ | 1,058,700 | | | $ | 2,929,364 | | | $ | 2,137,762 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
22
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Adjusted Property EBITDA(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | $ | 192,829 | | | $ | 109,974 | | | $ | 362,744 | | | $ | 231,460 | |
Sands Macao | | | 81,212 | | | | 61,049 | | | | 150,973 | | | | 111,407 | |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 32,999 | | | | 5,563 | | | | 52,494 | | | | 9,931 | |
Other Asia | | | (6,154 | ) | | | (9,891 | ) | | | (10,586 | ) | | | (15,901 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 300,886 | | | | 166,695 | | | | 555,625 | | | | 336,897 | |
United States: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 65,992 | | | | 78,110 | | | | 171,284 | | | | 167,884 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 12,121 | | | | 2,837 | | | | 23,089 | | | | 2,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 78,113 | | | | 80,947 | | | | 194,373 | | | | 170,721 | |
Singapore | | | 94,466 | | | | — | | | | 94,466 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total adjusted property EBITDA | | | 473,465 | | | | 247,642 | | | | 844,464 | | | | 507,618 | |
Other Operating Costs and Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | (8,763 | ) | | | (5,502 | ) | | | (14,571 | ) | | | (13,278 | ) |
Corporate expense | | | (25,954 | ) | | | (64,307 | ) | | | (49,430 | ) | | | (87,731 | ) |
Rental expense | | | (12,806 | ) | | | (7,877 | ) | | | (21,504 | ) | | | (15,806 | ) |
Pre-opening expense | | | (50,118 | ) | | | (41,830 | ) | | | (87,577 | ) | | | (86,764 | ) |
Development expense | | | (676 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | (833 | ) | | | (264 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (170,694 | ) | | | (143,633 | ) | | | (323,783 | ) | | | (282,882 | ) |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | (151,175 | ) | | | — | | | | (151,175 | ) |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | (37,679 | ) | | | (4,653 | ) | | | (38,171 | ) | | | (4,784 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 166,775 | | | | (171,345 | ) | | | 308,595 | | | | (135,066 | ) |
Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 2,073 | | | | 2,692 | | | | 3,706 | | | | 8,241 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (76,987 | ) | | | (64,871 | ) | | | (155,152 | ) | | | (135,989 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | | (6,201 | ) | | | 773 | | | | (12,649 | ) | | | (4,970 | ) |
Gain on early retirement of debt | | | 961 | | | | — | | | | 3,137 | | | | — | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (8,073 | ) | | | 54,488 | | | | (21,275 | ) | | | 53,675 | |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (36,741 | ) | | | 2,323 | | | | (66,974 | ) | | | 3,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | 41,807 | | | $ | (175,940 | ) | | $ | 59,388 | | | $ | (210,546 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, loss on disposal of assets, interest, other income (expense), gain on early retirement of debt, income tax benefit (expense) and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of operating performance of the Company’s properties and to compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties with that of its competitors. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Intersegment Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | $ | 2,753 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 5,166 | | | $ | 842 | |
Other Asia | | | 16,608 | | | | 10,234 | | | | 30,433 | | | | 27,661 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 19,361 | | | | 10,629 | | | | 35,599 | | | | 28,503 | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 2,721 | | | | 938 | | | | 4,363 | | | | 2,072 | |
Singapore | | | 404 | | | | — | | | | 404 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total intersegment revenues | | $ | 22,486 | | | $ | 11,567 | | | $ | 40,366 | | | $ | 30,575 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
23
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | |
Corporate and Other | | $ | 8,759 | | | $ | 28,331 | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | 18,003 | | | | 12,512 | |
Sands Macao | | | 1,374 | | | | 4,721 | |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 15,624 | | | | 128,081 | |
Other Asia | | | 2,409 | | | | 16,445 | |
Other Development Projects | | | 85,993 | | | | 56,076 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 123,403 | | | | 217,835 | |
United States: | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 9,192 | | | | 54,693 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 22,177 | | | | 174,188 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 31,369 | | | | 228,881 | |
Singapore | | | 963,737 | | | | 547,487 | |
| | | | | | |
Total capital expenditures | | $ | 1,127,268 | | | $ | 1,022,534 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Total Assets | | | | | | | | |
Corporate and Other | | $ | 1,124,394 | | | $ | 1,849,596 | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | 2,777,952 | | | | 2,836,643 | |
Sands Macao | | | 528,685 | | | | 527,737 | |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 1,160,114 | | | | 1,151,028 | |
Other Asia | | | 339,050 | | | | 328,584 | |
Other Development Projects | | | 2,426,431 | | | | 2,085,984 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 7,232,232 | | | | 6,929,976 | |
United States: | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 5,698,335 | | | | 6,893,106 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 747,089 | | | | 737,062 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 6,445,424 | | | | 7,630,168 | |
Singapore | | | 5,465,104 | | | | 4,162,366 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 20,267,154 | | | $ | 20,572,106 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Total Long-Lived Assets | | | | | | | | |
Corporate and Other | | $ | 314,131 | | | $ | 324,268 | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | 2,236,188 | | | | 2,324,882 | |
Sands Macao | | | 330,866 | | | | 355,170 | |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 1,038,162 | | | | 1,047,201 | |
Other Asia | | | 270,854 | | | | 276,559 | |
Other Development Projects | | | 2,060,919 | | | | 2,022,861 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 5,936,989 | | | | 6,026,673 | |
United States: | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 3,528,743 | | | | 3,642,405 | |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 605,303 | | | | 610,846 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 4,134,046 | | | | 4,253,251 | |
Singapore | | | 4,952,008 | | | | 3,956,899 | |
| | | | | | |
Total long-lived assets | | $ | 15,337,174 | | | $ | 14,561,091 | |
| | | | | | |
24
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 13 — CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LVSC is the obligor of the Senior Notes due 2015. LVSLLC, VCR, Mall Intermediate Holding Company, LLC, Venetian Venture Development, Venetian Transport, LLC, Venetian Marketing, Inc., Lido Intermediate Holding Company, LLC and Lido Casino Resort Holding Company, LLC (collectively, the “Original Guarantors”), have jointly and severally guaranteed the Senior Notes on a full and unconditional basis. Effective May 2007, in conjunction with entering into the Senior Secured Credit Facility, LVSC, the Original Guarantors and the trustee entered into a supplemental indenture related to the Senior Notes, whereby the following subsidiaries were added as full and unconditional guarantors on a joint and several basis: Sands Expo & Convention Center, Inc. (formerly Interface Group-Nevada, Inc.), Palazzo Condo Tower, LLC, Sands Pennsylvania, Inc., Phase II Mall Holding, LLC and Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC (collectively with the Original Guarantors, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). LVS (Nevada) International Holdings, Inc. (“LVS Nevada”) and LVS Management Services, LLC, newly formed subsidiaries, were added in September 2009 as full and unconditional guarantors to the Senior Notes on a joint and several basis, and have been included in the group of subsidiaries that is the Guarantor Subsidiaries. In November 2009, Venetian Venture Development was merged with and into LVS Nevada, with LVS Nevada as the surviving entity. The voting stock of all entities included as Guarantor Subsidiaries is 100% owned directly or indirectly by Las Vegas Sands Corp. The noncontrolling interest amount included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries’ condensed consolidating balance sheets is related to non-voting preferred stock of one of the subsidiaries held by third parties.
In February 2008, all of the capital stock of Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC was sold to GGP and in connection therewith, it was released as a guarantor under the Senior Notes. The sale is not complete from an accounting perspective due to the Company’s continuing involvement in the transaction related to the completion of construction on the remainder of The Shoppes at The Palazzo, certain activities to be performed on behalf of GGP and the uncertainty of the final sales price. Certain of the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows related to the ownership and operation of the mall by Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC subsequent to the sale will continue to be accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries until the final sales price has been determined, and therefore are included in the “Guarantor Subsidiaries” columns in the following condensed consolidating financial information. As a result, net assets of $40.3 million (consisting of $284.4 million of property and equipment, offset by $244.1 million of liabilities consisting primarily of deferred proceeds from the sale) and $47.0 million (consisting of $291.1 million of property and equipment, offset by $244.1 million of liabilities consisting primarily of deferred proceeds from the sale) as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and a net loss (consisting primarily of depreciation expense) of $3.7 million and $7.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $3.7 million and $6.2 million for the three and six months ended June, 30 2009, respectively, related to the mall and are being accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries. These balances and amounts are not collateral for the Senior Notes and should not be considered as credit support for the guarantees of the Senior Notes.
25
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The condensed consolidating financial information of LVSC, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, is as follows (in thousands):
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 429,467 | | | $ | 1,991,125 | | | $ | 1,098,243 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,518,835 | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 2,204 | | | | 89,779 | | | | — | | | | 91,983 | |
Investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 173,461 | | | | — | | | | 173,461 | |
Intercompany receivables | | | — | | | | 55,028 | | | | 19,715 | | | | (74,743 | ) | | | — | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 905 | | | | 159,305 | | | | 371,029 | | | | (908 | ) | | | 530,331 | |
Inventories | | | 1,914 | | | | 10,231 | | | | 14,378 | | | | — | | | | 26,523 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | — | | | | 25,739 | | | | 55,301 | | | | (5,182 | ) | | | 75,858 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 3,053 | | | | 7,583 | | | | 29,197 | | | | — | | | | 39,833 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 435,339 | | | | 2,251,215 | | | | 1,851,103 | | | | (80,833 | ) | | | 4,456,824 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 139,894 | | | | 3,666,059 | | | | 10,316,642 | | | | — | | | | 14,122,595 | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | 6,054,456 | | | | 4,200,699 | | | | — | | | | (10,255,155 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 846 | | | | 31,376 | | | | 139,351 | | | | — | | | | 171,573 | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 4,591 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,591 | |
Intercompany receivables | | | 32,465 | | | | 86,353 | | | | — | | | | (118,818 | ) | | | — | |
Intercompany notes receivable | | | — | | | | 573,241 | | | | — | | | | (573,241 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 53,138 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (27,092 | ) | | | 26,046 | |
Leasehold interests in land, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,214,579 | | | | — | | | | 1,214,579 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | 92,010 | | | | — | | | | 92,010 | |
Other assets, net | | | 1,981 | | | | 29,708 | | | | 147,247 | | | | — | | | | 178,936 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,718,119 | | | $ | 10,843,242 | | | $ | 13,760,932 | | | $ | (11,055,139 | ) | | $ | 20,267,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 3,862 | | | $ | 28,117 | | | $ | 88,085 | | | $ | (908 | ) | | $ | 119,156 | |
Construction payables | | | — | | | | 2,204 | | | | 752,463 | | | | — | | | | 754,667 | |
Intercompany payables | | | 25,095 | | | | — | | | | 49,648 | | | | (74,743 | ) | | | — | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 4,640 | | | | 1,077 | | | | 15,235 | | | | — | | | | 20,952 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 8,972 | | | | 144,498 | | | | 762,193 | | | | — | | | | 915,663 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 14,797 | | | | — | | | | 214 | | | | — | | | | 15,011 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 5,182 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,182 | ) | | | — | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | | 3,688 | | | | 133,540 | | | | 431,968 | | | | — | | | | 569,196 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 66,236 | | | | 309,436 | | | | 2,099,806 | | | | (80,833 | ) | | | 2,394,645 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 48,906 | | | | 10,734 | | | | 30,297 | | | | — | | | | 89,937 | |
Intercompany payables | | | 28,616 | | | | — | | | | 90,202 | | | | (118,818 | ) | | | — | |
Intercompany notes payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 573,241 | | | | (573,241 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred amounts related to mall transactions | | | — | | | | 444,694 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 444,694 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | | 27,469 | | | | 49,852 | | | | (27,092 | ) | | | 50,229 | |
Long-term debt | | | 265,484 | | | | 3,874,145 | | | | 5,687,032 | | | | — | | | | 9,826,661 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 409,242 | | | | 4,666,478 | | | | 8,530,430 | | | | (799,984 | ) | | | 12,806,166 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | 457,106 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 457,106 | |
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders’ equity | | | 5,851,771 | | | | 6,176,359 | | | | 4,078,796 | | | | (10,255,155 | ) | | | 5,851,771 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | 405 | | | | 1,151,706 | | | | — | | | | 1,152,111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 5,851,771 | | | | 6,176,764 | | | | 5,230,502 | | | | (10,255,155 | ) | | | 7,003,882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 6,718,119 | | | $ | 10,843,242 | | | $ | 13,760,932 | | | $ | (11,055,139 | ) | | $ | 20,267,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
26
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 254,256 | | | $ | 3,033,625 | | | $ | 1,667,535 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,955,416 | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 6,954 | | | | 111,687 | | | | — | | | | 118,641 | |
Intercompany receivables | | | — | | | | 101,485 | | | | 27,646 | | | | (129,131 | ) | | | — | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 727 | | | | 152,151 | | | | 309,547 | | | | (1,659 | ) | | | 460,766 | |
Inventories | | | 1,906 | | | | 12,332 | | | | 12,835 | | | | — | | | | 27,073 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | — | | | | 29,117 | | | | 1,992 | | | | (4,667 | ) | | | 26,442 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 11,410 | | | | 5,251 | | | | 18,675 | | | | — | | | | 35,336 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 268,299 | | | | 3,340,915 | | | | 2,149,917 | | | | (135,457 | ) | | | 5,623,674 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 140,684 | | | | 3,786,061 | | | | 9,424,526 | | | | — | | | | 13,351,271 | |
Investment in subsidiaries | | | 6,242,214 | | | | 4,117,915 | | | | — | | | | (10,360,129 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 1,095 | | | | 37,850 | | | | 99,509 | | | | — | | | | 138,454 | |
Intercompany receivables | | | 34,029 | | | | 85,725 | | | | — | | | | (119,754 | ) | | | — | |
Intercompany notes receivable | | | — | | | | 500,518 | | | | — | | | | (500,518 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 48,362 | | | | — | | | | 243 | | | | (26,386 | ) | | | 22,219 | |
Leasehold interests in land, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,209,820 | | | | — | | | | 1,209,820 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50,129 | | | | — | | | | 50,129 | |
Other assets, net | | | 2,338 | | | | 27,555 | | | | 146,646 | | | | — | | | | 176,539 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,737,021 | | | $ | 11,896,539 | | | $ | 13,080,790 | | | $ | (11,142,244 | ) | | $ | 20,572,106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 4,229 | | | $ | 21,353 | | | $ | 58,772 | | | $ | (1,659 | ) | | $ | 82,695 | |
Construction payables | | | — | | | | 9,172 | | | | 769,599 | | | | — | | | | 778,771 | |
Intercompany payables | | | 59,029 | | | | — | | | | 70,102 | | | | (129,131 | ) | | | — | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 6,074 | | | | 351 | | | | 11,907 | | | | — | | | | 18,332 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 6,470 | | | | 170,706 | | | | 609,016 | | | | — | | | | 786,192 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 4,667 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,667 | ) | | | — | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | | 3,688 | | | | 81,374 | | | | 88,253 | | | | — | | | | 173,315 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 84,157 | | | | 282,956 | | | | 1,607,649 | | | | (135,457 | ) | | | 1,839,305 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 48,907 | | | | 10,621 | | | | 22,431 | | | | — | | | | 81,959 | |
Intercompany payables | | | 15,166 | | | | — | | | | 104,588 | | | | (119,754 | ) | | | — | |
Intercompany notes payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 500,518 | | | | (500,518 | ) | | | — | |
Deferred amounts related to mall transactions | | | — | | | | 447,274 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 447,274 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | | 26,386 | | | | — | | | | (26,386 | ) | | | — | |
Long-term debt | | | 327,258 | | | | 4,739,753 | | | | 5,785,136 | | | | — | | | | 10,852,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 475,488 | | | | 5,506,990 | | | | 8,020,322 | | | | (782,115 | ) | | | 13,220,685 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholder’s family | | | 410,834 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 410,834 | |
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders’ equity | | | 5,850,699 | | | | 6,389,144 | | | | 3,970,985 | | | | (10,360,129 | ) | | | 5,850,699 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | 405 | | | | 1,089,483 | | | | — | | | | 1,089,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 5,850,699 | | | | 6,389,549 | | | | 5,060,468 | | | | (10,360,129 | ) | | | 6,940,587 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 6,737,021 | | | $ | 11,896,539 | | | $ | 13,080,790 | | | $ | (11,142,244 | ) | | $ | 20,572,106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
27
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | — | | | $ | 102,902 | | | $ | 1,191,399 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,294,301 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 120,169 | | | | 70,598 | | | | — | | | | 190,767 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 41,273 | | | | 63,806 | | | | — | | | | 105,079 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 44,070 | | | | 81,911 | | | | (10,715 | ) | | | 115,266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 308,414 | | | | 1,407,714 | | | | (10,715 | ) | | | 1,705,413 | |
Less-promotional allowances | | | (115 | ) | | | (40,794 | ) | | | (69,389 | ) | | | (639 | ) | | | (110,937 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | | (115 | ) | | | 267,620 | | | | 1,338,325 | | | | (11,354 | ) | | | 1,594,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | — | | | | 68,180 | | | | 723,336 | | | | (569 | ) | | | 790,947 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 25,040 | | | | 9,034 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 34,073 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 18,005 | | | | 31,387 | | | | (1,594 | ) | | | 47,798 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 18,137 | | | | 51,077 | | | | (3,888 | ) | | | 65,326 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | — | | | | 9,355 | | | | 9,356 | | | | — | | | | 18,711 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 63,460 | | | | 109,733 | | | | (274 | ) | | | 172,919 | |
Corporate expense | | | 22,036 | | | | 51 | | | | 8,867 | | | | (5,000 | ) | | | 25,954 | |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,806 | | | | — | | | | 12,806 | |
Pre-opening expense | | | 179 | | | | 1 | | | | 49,966 | | | | (28 | ) | | | 50,118 | |
Development expense | | | 676 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 676 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 3,017 | | | | 57,671 | | | | 110,006 | | | | — | | | | 170,694 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | | 8,704 | | | | 28,975 | | | | — | | | | 37,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 25,908 | | | | 268,604 | | | | 1,144,543 | | | | (11,354 | ) | | | 1,427,701 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (26,023 | ) | | | (984 | ) | | | 193,782 | | | | — | | | | 166,775 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 815 | | | | 21,755 | | | | 846 | | | | (21,343 | ) | | | 2,073 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (3,886 | ) | | | (27,144 | ) | | | (67,300 | ) | | | 21,343 | | | | (76,987 | ) |
Other expense | | | — | | | | (255 | ) | | | (5,946 | ) | | | — | | | | (6,201 | ) |
Gain on early retirement of debt | | | 961 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 961 | |
Income from equity investments in subsidiaries | | | 85,577 | | | | 83,098 | | | | — | | | | (168,675 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 57,444 | | | | 76,470 | | | | 121,382 | | | | (168,675 | ) | | | 86,621 | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (15,637 | ) | | | 7,710 | | | | (146 | ) | | | — | | | | (8,073 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 41,807 | | | | 84,180 | | | | 121,236 | | | | (168,675 | ) | | | 78,548 | |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (36,741 | ) | | | — | | | | (36,741 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | 41,807 | | | $ | 84,180 | | | $ | 84,495 | | | $ | (168,675 | ) | | $ | 41,807 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
28
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | — | | | $ | 119,068 | | | $ | 678,985 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 798,053 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 112,821 | | | | 49,148 | | | | — | | | | 161,969 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 44,188 | | | | 42,899 | | | | — | | | | 87,087 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 41,628 | | | | 55,098 | | | | (841 | ) | | | 95,885 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 317,705 | | | | 826,130 | | | | (841 | ) | | | 1,142,994 | |
Less-promotional allowances | | | (186 | ) | | | (40,471 | ) | | | (43,019 | ) | | | (618 | ) | | | (84,294 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | | (186 | ) | | | 277,234 | | | | 783,111 | | | | (1,459 | ) | | | 1,058,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | — | | | | 67,854 | | | | 465,028 | | | | (406 | ) | | | 532,476 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 24,947 | | | | 6,577 | | | | — | | | | 31,524 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 19,322 | | | | 27,099 | | | | (1,602 | ) | | | 44,819 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 20,078 | | | | 42,357 | | | | 799 | | | | 63,234 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | — | | | | 11,662 | | | | 9,045 | | | | — | | | | 20,707 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 59,493 | | | | 64,557 | | | | (250 | ) | | | 123,800 | |
Corporate expense | | | 61,391 | | | | 64 | | | | 2,852 | | | | — | | | | 64,307 | |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | 1,404 | | | | 6,473 | | | | — | | | | 7,877 | |
Pre-opening expense | | | 364 | | | | 3 | | | | 41,463 | | | | — | | | | 41,830 | |
Development expense | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,693 | | | | 56,576 | | | | 84,364 | | | | — | | | | 143,633 | |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | 151,175 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 151,175 | |
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | | (50 | ) | | | 4,703 | | | | — | | | | 4,653 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 64,458 | | | | 412,528 | | | | 754,518 | | | | (1,459 | ) | | | 1,230,045 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (64,644 | ) | | | (135,294 | ) | | | 28,593 | | | | — | | | | (171,345 | ) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 2,632 | | | | 8,171 | | | | 136 | | | | (8,247 | ) | | | 2,692 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (4,640 | ) | | | (29,592 | ) | | | (38,886 | ) | | | 8,247 | | | | (64,871 | ) |
Other income | | | — | | | | 556 | | | | 217 | | | | — | | | | 773 | |
Loss from equity investments in subsidiaries | | | (103,460 | ) | | | (7,072 | ) | | | — | | | | 110,532 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before income taxes | | | (170,112 | ) | | | (163,231 | ) | | | (9,940 | ) | | | 110,532 | | | | (232,751 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (5,828 | ) | | | 59,771 | | | | 545 | | | | — | | | | 54,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (175,940 | ) | | | (103,460 | ) | | | (9,395 | ) | | | 110,532 | | | | (178,263 | ) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,323 | | | | — | | | | 2,323 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | (175,940 | ) | | $ | (103,460 | ) | | $ | (7,072 | ) | | $ | 110,532 | | | $ | (175,940 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | — | | | $ | 258,247 | | | $ | 2,097,824 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,356,071 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 240,236 | | | | 131,313 | | | | — | | | | 371,549 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 84,795 | | | | 112,363 | | | | — | | | | 197,158 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 95,092 | | | | 148,152 | | | | (19,763 | ) | | | 223,481 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 678,370 | | | | 2,489,652 | | | | (19,763 | ) | | | 3,148,259 | |
Less-promotional allowances | | | (247 | ) | | | (91,444 | ) | | | (125,874 | ) | | | (1,330 | ) | | | (218,895 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | |
Net revenues | | | (247 | ) | | | 586,926 | | | | 2,363,778 | | | | (21,093 | ) | | | 2,929,364 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | — | | | | 154,832 | | | | 1,331,926 | | | | (1,176 | ) | | | 1,485,582 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 48,251 | | | | 15,477 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 63,727 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 36,337 | | | | 58,986 | | | | (3,222 | ) | | | 92,101 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 37,837 | | | | 92,015 | | | | (6,122 | ) | | | 123,730 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | — | | | | 17,695 | | | | 17,458 | | | | — | | | | 35,153 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 120,035 | | | | 179,681 | | | | (538 | ) | | | 299,178 | |
Corporate expense | | | 42,307 | | | | 132 | | | | 16,991 | | | | (10,000 | ) | | | 49,430 | |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,504 | | | | — | | | | 21,504 | |
Pre-opening expense | | | 357 | | | | 3 | | | | 87,251 | | | | (34 | ) | | | 87,577 | |
Development expense | | | 833 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 833 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 6,036 | | | | 116,130 | | | | 201,617 | | | | — | | | | 323,783 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | | 8,704 | | | | 29,467 | | | | — | | | | 38,171 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 49,533 | | | | 539,956 | | | | 2,052,373 | | | | (21,093 | ) | | | 2,620,769 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (49,780 | ) | | | 46,970 | | | | 311,405 | | | | — | | | | 308,595 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 1,319 | | | | 42,033 | | | | 1,356 | | | | (41,002 | ) | | | 3,706 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (8,164 | ) | | | (56,708 | ) | | | (131,282 | ) | | | 41,002 | | | | (155,152 | ) |
Other expense | | | — | | | | (271 | ) | | | (12,378 | ) | | | — | | | | (12,649 | ) |
Gain (loss) on early retirement of debt | | | 3,358 | | | | — | | | | (221 | ) | | | — | | | | 3,137 | |
Income from equity investments in subsidiaries | | | 136,167 | | | | 108,654 | | | | — | | | | (244,821 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 82,900 | | | | 140,678 | | | | 168,880 | | | | (244,821 | ) | | | 147,637 | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (23,512 | ) | | | (730 | ) | | | 2,967 | | | | — | | | | (21,275 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 59,388 | | | | 139,948 | | | | 171,847 | | | | (244,821 | ) | | | 126,362 | |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (66,974 | ) | | | — | | | | (66,974 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | 59,388 | | | $ | 139,948 | | | $ | 104,873 | | | $ | (244,821 | ) | | $ | 59,388 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | — | | | $ | 248,887 | | | $ | 1,347,091 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,595,978 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 235,770 | | | | 100,587 | | | | — | | | | 336,357 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 91,283 | | | | 83,112 | | | | — | | | | 174,395 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 86,495 | | | | 128,508 | | | | (5,631 | ) | | | 209,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 662,435 | | | | 1,659,298 | | | | (5,631 | ) | | | 2,316,102 | |
Less-promotional allowances | | | (344 | ) | | | (83,288 | ) | | | (93,178 | ) | | | (1,530 | ) | | | (178,340 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | | (344 | ) | | | 579,147 | | | | 1,566,120 | | | | (7,161 | ) | | | 2,137,762 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | — | | | | 144,699 | | | | 937,866 | | | | (1,192 | ) | | | 1,081,373 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 51,532 | | | | 13,759 | | | | — | | | | 65,291 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 38,482 | | | | 52,223 | | | | (3,244 | ) | | | 87,461 | |
Convention, retail and other | | | — | | | | 39,602 | | | | 85,000 | | | | (2,125 | ) | | | 122,477 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | — | | | | 24,715 | | | | 17,002 | | | | — | | | | 41,717 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 121,930 | | | | 123,773 | | | | (600 | ) | | | 245,103 | |
Corporate expense | | | 81,012 | | | | 131 | | | | 6,588 | | | | — | | | | 87,731 | |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | 2,821 | | | | 12,985 | | | | — | | | | 15,806 | |
Pre-opening expense | | | 654 | | | | 95 | | | | 86,015 | | | | — | | | | 86,764 | |
Development expense | | | 156 | | | | — | | | | 108 | | | | — | | | | 264 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 5,314 | | | | 113,496 | | | | 164,072 | | | | — | | | | 282,882 | |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | 151,175 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 151,175 | |
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | | (110 | ) | | | 4,894 | | | | — | | | | 4,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 87,136 | | | | 688,568 | | | | 1,504,285 | | | | (7,161 | ) | | | 2,272,828 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (87,480 | ) | | | (109,421 | ) | | | 61,835 | | | | — | | | | (135,066 | ) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 7,171 | | | | 10,791 | | | | 310 | | | | (10,031 | ) | | | 8,241 | |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | | | (9,427 | ) | | | (59,093 | ) | | | (77,500 | ) | | | 10,031 | | | | (135,989 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | | — | | | | 465 | | | | (5,435 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,970 | ) |
Loss from equity investments in subsidiaries | | | (112,188 | ) | | | (17,217 | ) | | | — | | | | 129,405 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before income taxes | | | (201,924 | ) | | | (174,475 | ) | | | (20,790 | ) | | | 129,405 | | | | (267,784 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (8,622 | ) | | | 62,287 | | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | 53,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (210,546 | ) | | | (112,188 | ) | | | (20,780 | ) | | | 129,405 | | | | (214,109 | ) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,563 | | | | — | | | | 3,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | $ | (210,546 | ) | | $ | (112,188 | ) | | $ | (17,217 | ) | | $ | 129,405 | | | $ | (210,546 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities | | $ | (60,730 | ) | | $ | 190,889 | | | $ | 507,746 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 637,905 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in restricted cash | | | — | | | | 159 | | | | 22,767 | | | | — | | | | 22,926 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (5,246 | ) | | | (12,545 | ) | | | (1,109,477 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,127,268 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | | | — | | | | 745 | | | | 4,902 | | | | — | | | | 5,647 | |
Purchases of investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | (173,774 | ) | | | — | | | | (173,774 | ) |
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate | | | — | | | | — | | | | (43,305 | ) | | | — | | | | (43,305 | ) |
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries | | | — | | | | (72,723 | ) | | | — | | | | 72,723 | | | | — | |
Dividends from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | 3,042,483 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,042,483 | ) | | | — | |
Dividends from non-guarantor subsidiaries | | | — | | | | 23,400 | | | | — | | | | (23,400 | ) | | | — | |
Capital contributions to subsidiaries | | | (2,700,000 | ) | | | (16,500 | ) | | | — | | | | 2,716,500 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) investing activities | | | 337,237 | | | | (77,464 | ) | | | (1,298,887 | ) | | | (276,660 | ) | | | (1,315,774 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 3,923 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,923 | |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | | | (46,700 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,700 | ) |
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | — | | | | (3,042,483 | ) | | | — | | | | 3,042,483 | | | | — | |
Dividends paid to Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | (23,400 | ) | | | 23,400 | | | | — | |
Capital contributions received | | | — | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 16,500 | | | | (2,716,500 | ) | | | — | |
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | 72,723 | | | | (72,723 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from Singapore credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | 596,560 | | | | — | | | | 596,560 | |
Repayments on senior secured credit facility | | | — | | | | (795,860 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (795,860 | ) |
Repayments on Macau credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | (375,036 | ) | | | — | | | | (375,036 | ) |
Repayments on senior notes | | | (56,675 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (56,675 | ) |
Repayments on ferry financing | | | — | | | | — | | | | (17,493 | ) | | | — | | | | (17,493 | ) |
Repayments on airplane financings | | | (1,844 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,844 | ) |
Repayments on HVAC equipment lease | | | — | | | | (882 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (882 | ) |
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term debt | | | — | | | | (16,700 | ) | | | (728 | ) | | | — | | | | (17,428 | ) |
Payments of deferred financing costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (54,365 | ) | | | — | | | | (54,365 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities | | | (101,296 | ) | | | (1,155,925 | ) | | | 214,761 | | | | 276,660 | | | | (765,800 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,088 | | | | — | | | | 7,088 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 175,211 | | | | (1,042,500 | ) | | | (569,292 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,436,581 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 254,256 | | | | 3,033,625 | | | | 1,667,535 | | | | — | | | | 4,955,416 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 429,467 | | | $ | 1,991,125 | | | $ | 1,098,243 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,518,835 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
32
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non- | | | Consolidating/ | | | | |
| | Las Vegas | | | Guarantor | | | Guarantor | | | Eliminating | | | | |
| | Sands Corp. | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Entries | | | Total | |
Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities | | $ | 55,499 | | | $ | (26,298 | ) | | $ | 278,645 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 307,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,741 | ) | | | (81,313 | ) | | | (939,480 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,022,534 | ) |
Change in restricted cash | | | — | | | | (49 | ) | | | 3,870 | | | | — | | | | 3,821 | |
Dividends received from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | 3,026,662 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,026,662 | ) | | | — | |
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries | | | (20,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,000 | | | | — | |
Intercompany receivables to non-guarantor subsidiaries | | | (55,000 | ) | | | (128,143 | ) | | | — | | | | 183,143 | | | | — | |
Repayments of receivable from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | 11,151 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (11,151 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments of receivable from non-guarantor subsidiaries | | | — | | | | 23,511 | | | | — | | | | (23,511 | ) | | | — | |
Capital contributions to subsidiaries | | | (3,258,015 | ) | | | (66,166 | ) | | | — | | | | 3,324,181 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (296,943 | ) | | | (252,160 | ) | | | (935,610 | ) | | | 466,000 | | | | (1,018,713 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | | | (47,997 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (47,997 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (13 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) |
Capital contributions received | | | — | | | | 3,258,015 | | | | 66,166 | | | | (3,324,181 | ) | | | — | |
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | — | | | | (3,026,662 | ) | | | — | | | | 3,026,662 | | | | — | |
Borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | — | | | | — | | | | 75,000 | | | | (75,000 | ) | | | — | |
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | 128,143 | | | | (128,143 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments on borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | — | | | | (11,151 | ) | | | — | | | | 11,151 | | | | — | |
Repayments on borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | (23,511 | ) | | | 23,511 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from Singapore permanent facilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 494,492 | | | | — | | | | 494,492 | |
Proceeds from ferry financing | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,887 | | | | — | | | | 9,887 | |
Repayments on Macau credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | (137,537 | ) | | | — | | | | (137,537 | ) |
Repayments on senior secured credit facility | | | — | | | | (20,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (20,000 | ) |
Repayments on Singapore permanent facilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | (17,992 | ) | | | — | | | | (17,992 | ) |
Repayments on airplane financings | | | (1,844 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,844 | ) |
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term debt | | | — | | | | (16,700 | ) | | | (563 | ) | | | — | | | | (17,263 | ) |
Contribution from noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41 | | | | — | | | | 41 | |
Payments of deferred financing costs | | | — | | | | (2,872 | ) | | | (1,559 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,431 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities | | | (49,854 | ) | | | 180,630 | | | | 592,567 | | | | (466,000 | ) | | | 257,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | | — | | | | — | | | | 394 | | | | — | | | | 394 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (291,298 | ) | | | (97,828 | ) | | | (64,004 | ) | | | — | | | | (453,130 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 294,563 | | | | 2,286,825 | | | | 456,775 | | | | — | | | | 3,038,163 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 3,265 | | | $ | 2,188,997 | | | $ | 392,771 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,585,033 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
33
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| | |
ITEM 2 — | | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and other financial information included in this Form 10-Q. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. See “— Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Operations
We view each of our casino properties as an operating segment. Our operating segments in the United States consist of The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian Las Vegas”), The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (“The Palazzo”) and the Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the “Sands Bethlehem”). The Venetian Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort and have been aggregated into one reportable segment (the “Las Vegas Operating Properties”), considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and products, the regulatory business environment of the operations within each segment and our organizational and management reporting structure. Our operating segments in the Macau Special Administrative Region (“Macau”) of the People’s Republic of China consist of the Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (“The Venetian Macao”); the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai StripTM and the Plaza Casino (collectively, the “Four Seasons Macao”); and other ancillary operations in that region (“Other Asia”). Our operating segment in Singapore, Marina Bay Sands, opened on April 27, 2010.
United States
Las Vegas
Our Las Vegas Operating Properties, situated on or near the Las Vegas Strip, consist of The Venetian Las Vegas, a Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo, a resort featuring modern European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately 1.2 million square feet (the “Sands Expo Center”). Our Las Vegas Operating Properties represent an integrated resort with approximately 7,100 suites and approximately 225,000 square feet of gaming space. Our Las Vegas Operating Properties also feature a meeting and conference facility of approximately 1.1 million square feet; Canyon Ranch SpaClub facilities; a Paiza ClubTM offering services and amenities to premium customers, including luxurious VIP suites, spa facilities and private VIP gaming room facilities; entertainment facilities; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex located within The Venetian Las Vegas of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet (“The Grand Canal Shoppes”), which was sold to GGP Limited Partnership (“GGP”) in 2004; and an enclosed retail and dining complex located within The Palazzo of approximately 400,000 net leasable square feet (“The Shoppes at The Palazzo”), which was sold to GGP in February 2008. See “Item 1 — Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 3 — Property and Equipment, Net” regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Approximately 62.9% and 64.3% of gross revenue at our Las Vegas Operating Properties for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from room revenues, food and beverage services, and other non-gaming sources, and 37.1% and 35.7%, respectively, was derived from gaming activities. The percentage of non-gaming revenue reflects the integrated resort’s emphasis on the group convention and trade show business.
Pennsylvania
We are in the process of developing Sands Bethlehem, a gaming, hotel, retail and dining complex located on the site of the historic Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Sands Bethlehem is also expected to be home to the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and cultural center, and the broadcast home of the local PBS affiliate. We own 86% of the economic interest of the gaming, hotel and entertainment portion of the property through our ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail portion of the property through our ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail, LLC.
34
On May 22, 2009, we opened the casino component of Sands Bethlehem, which features slot machines and several food and beverage offerings, as well as the parking garage and surface parking. In April 2010, we recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel tower, which is expected to open in the second quarter of 2011. In May 2010, we paid a $16.5 million table game licensing fee and in July 2010, we were issued a gaming certificate by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and commenced table games operations. Construction activities on the remaining components, which include an approximate 200,000-square-foot retail facility, a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event center and a variety of additional dining options, have been suspended temporarily and are intended to recommence when capital markets and general economic conditions improve, and when the suspended components are able to be financed. Approximately 91.1% and 89.6% of the gross revenue at Sands Bethlehem for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the period ended June 30, 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from food and beverage services and other non-gaming sources.
Macau
Sands China Ltd. (“SCL”) completed an initial public offering by listing its ordinary shares (the “SCL Offering”) on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited in November 2009. We own 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties. We operate the gaming areas within these properties pursuant to a 20-year gaming subconcession.
We own and operate the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The Sands Macao includes approximately 229,000 square feet of gaming space; a 289-suite hotel tower; several restaurants; a spacious Paiza Club; a theater and other high-end services and amenities. Approximately 94.4% and 92.9% of the gross revenue at the Sands Macao for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder primarily derived from room revenues and food and beverage services.
We also own and operate The Venetian Macao, the anchor property of our master-planned development of integrated resort properties that we refer to as the Cotai StripTM in Macau. The Venetian Macao, with a theme similar to that of The Venetian Las Vegas, features a 39-floor luxury hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately 550,000 square feet of gaming space; approximately 1.0 million square feet of retail and dining offerings; a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.2 million square feet; a 15,000-seat arena that has hosted a wide range of entertainment and sporting events; and an 1,800-seat theater that features an original production from Cirque du Soleil. Approximately 82.8% and 81.6% of the gross revenue at The Venetian Macao for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from room revenues and other non-gaming sources.
We own the Four Seasons Macao, which is located adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao. The Four Seasons Macao is an integrated resort that features 360 rooms and suites managed and operated by Four Seasons Hotels Inc.; 19 Paiza mansions; approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming space; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to the mall at The Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and other facilities operated by us. The property will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao, Cotai StripTM (the “Four Seasons Apartments”), an apart-hotel tower that consists of approximately 1.0 million square feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury apart-hotel units and common areas. We have completed the structural work of the tower and expect to monetize the units within the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market conditions and obtaining the necessary government approvals. Approximately 85.5% and 72.0% of the gross revenue at the Four Seasons Macao for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder primarily derived from mall revenues, room revenues and other non-gaming sources.
35
Singapore
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd. (“MBS”), entered into a development agreement (the “Development Agreement”) with the Singapore Tourism Board (the “STB”) to build and operate an integrated resort called Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. Marina Bay Sands, portions of which opened on April 27, 2010, is expected to include three 55-story hotel towers (with over 2,500 rooms and suites), the Sands SkyParkTM (which sits atop the hotel towers and features swimming pools and several dining options), a casino, an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable square feet, a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet, theaters and a landmark iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that will contain an art/science museum. As of June 30, 2010, we have capitalized 6.99 billion Singapore dollars (“SGD,” approximately $5.04 billion at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) in costs for this project, including the land premium and SGD 739.3 million (approximately $532.9 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) in outstanding construction payables. We expect to spend approximately SGD 1.7 billion (approximately $1.2 billion at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) through 2011 on additional costs to complete the construction of the integrated resort, FF&E, pre-opening and other costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above, of which approximately SGD 1.0 billion (approximately $750 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) is expected to be spent during 2010. As we have obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pay our costs in Singapore dollars, our exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal. Based on our current development plan, we expect to progressively open a majority of Marina Bay Sands throughout 2010.
Development Projects
Given the challenging conditions in the capital markets and the global economy and their impact on our ongoing operations, we revised our development plan to suspend portions of our development projects and focus our development efforts on those projects with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should general economic conditions fail to improve, if we are unable to obtain sufficient funding such that completion of our suspended projects is not probable, or should management decide to abandon certain projects, all or a portion of our investment to date on our suspended projects could be lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, we may be subject to penalties under the termination clauses in our construction contracts or termination rights under our management contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
We were constructing a St. Regis-branded high-rise residential condominium tower, the St. Regis Residences at The Venetian Palazzo (the “St. Regis Residences”), located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. As part of our revised development plan, we suspended our construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip condominiums and the overall decline in general economic conditions. We intend to recommence construction when demand and conditions improve and expect that it will take approximately 18 months thereafter to complete construction of the project. As of June 30, 2010, we have capitalized construction costs of $175.8 million for this project. The impact of the suspension on the estimated overall cost of the project is currently not determinable with certainty.
Macau
We submitted plans to the Macau government for our other Cotai Strip developments, which represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which we refer to as parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, the developments are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas, showrooms, spas, dining, retail and entertainment facilities and other amenities. We commenced construction or pre-construction on these developments and plan to operate the related gaming areas under our Macau gaming subconcession. In addition, we are completing the development of some public areas surrounding our Cotai Strip properties on behalf of the Macau government. We currently intend to develop our other Cotai Strip properties as follows:
| • | | Parcels 5 and 6 — Under our revised development plan, we are sequencing the construction of the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the project, the integrated resort will feature approximately 6,000 luxury and mid-scale hotel rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of gaming space, approximately 1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and dining facilities, exhibition and conference facilities and a multipurpose theater. Phase I of the project is expected to include two hotel towers with approximately 3,700 |
36
| | | hotel rooms to be managed by Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited (“Shangri-La”) under its Shangri-La and Traders brands and Sheraton International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas Management Co. (collectively “Starwood”) under its Sheraton brand, as well as completion of the structural work of an adjacent hotel tower with approximately 2,300 rooms to be managed by Starwood under its Sheraton brand. Phase I will also include the gaming space, theater and a partial opening of the retail and exhibition and conference facilities. The total cost to complete phase I is expected to be approximately $1.9 billion. Phase II of the project includes completion of the additional Sheraton hotel tower as well as the remaining retail facilities. The total cost to complete phase II is expected to be approximately $235 million. Phase III of the project is expected to include a fourth hotel and mixed-use tower to be managed by Starwood under its St. Regis brand. The total cost to complete phase III is expected to be approximately $450 million. In connection with entering into a $1.75 billion Venetian Orient Limited (“VOL”) credit facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we are mobilizing to recommence construction of phases I and II. We expect that phase I will be completed in the third quarter of 2011, and that it will take an additional six months thereafter to complete the adjacent Sheraton tower in phase II and an additional 24 months thereafter to complete the remaining retail facilities in phase II. We intend to commence construction of phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it. As of June 30, 2010, we have capitalized construction costs of $1.78 billion for the entire project (including $139.6 million in outstanding construction payables). Our management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain construction deadlines and opening obligations on us and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as described above, may represent a default under the respective agreements, which would allow Starwood and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. We are currently negotiating (or undertaking to negotiate) amendments to the management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La to provide for new opening timelines. |
|
| • | | Parcels 7 and 8 — The integrated resort on parcels 7 and 8 is expected to be similar in size and scope to the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6. We had commenced pre-construction and have capitalized construction costs of $102.3 million as of June 30, 2010. We intend to commence construction after the integrated resorts on parcels 5 and 6 and 3 are complete, necessary government approvals are obtained, regional and global economic conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained. |
|
| • | | Parcel 3 — The integrated resort on parcel 3 will be connected to The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao. The multi-hotel complex is intended to include a gaming area, a shopping mall and serviced luxury apart-hotel units. We had commenced pre-construction and have capitalized construction costs of $35.5 million as of June 30, 2010. We intend to commence construction after the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary government approvals are obtained, regional and global economic conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained. |
The impact of the delayed construction on our previously estimated cost to complete our Cotai Strip developments is currently not determinable with certainty. As of June 30, 2010, we have capitalized an aggregate of $5.88 billion in construction costs for our Cotai Strip developments, including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as our investments in transportation infrastructure, including our passenger ferry service operations. In addition to receiving the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility for phases I and II of parcels 5 and 6, we will need to arrange additional financing to fund the balance of our Cotai Strip developments and there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain any of the additional financing required.
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. We have received a land concession from the Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2 and 3, including the sites on which The Venetian Macao (parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. In November 2009, we made an initial premium payment of 700.0 million patacas (approximately $87.3 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010) for the land concession on parcels 5 and 6, which became effective in May 2010 when it was published in Macau’s Official Gazette. We do not own these land sites in Macau; however, the land concession grants us exclusive use of the land. As specified in the land concession, we are required to pay premiums for each parcel, which are either payable in a single lump sum upon acceptance of the land concession by the Macau government or in seven semi-annual installments (provided that the outstanding balance is due upon the completion of the corresponding integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the term of the land concession.
37
Under our land concession for parcel 3, we were initially required to complete the corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted us a two-year extension to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April 2013. The land concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding development be completed by May 2014 (48 months from the date the land concession became effective). We believe that if we are not able to complete the developments by the respective deadlines, we will likely be able to obtain extensions from the Macau government; however, no assurances can be given that additional extensions will be granted. If we are unable to meet the deadlines and those deadlines are not extended, we could lose our land concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6, which would prohibit us from operating any facilities developed under the respective land concessions. As a result, we could forfeit all or a substantial portion of the $35.5 million and $1.78 billion in capitalized costs, as of June 30, 2010, related to our developments on parcels 3 and 5 and 6, respectively.
We do not yet have all of the necessary Macau government approvals to develop our planned Cotai Strip developments on parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8. We have received land concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6. Based on historical experience with the Macau government with respect to our land concessions for the Sands Macao and parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, management believes that the land concession for parcels 7 and 8 will be granted; however, if we do not obtain the land concession, we could forfeit all or a substantial portion of the $102.3 million in capitalized costs, as of June 30, 2010, related to our development on parcels 7 and 8.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, we may continue exploring the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated resorts, in additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are based on historical information, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from those estimates and we may change our estimates and assumptions in future evaluations. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We believe that these critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of our significant accounting policies and estimates, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” presented in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010.
There were no newly identified significant accounting estimates in the six months ended June 30, 2010, nor were there any material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in our 2009 Annual Report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See related disclosure at “Item 1 — Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 1 — Organization and Business of Company — Recent Accounting Pronouncements.”
Summary Financial Results
The following table summarizes our results of operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | | | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Net revenues | | $ | 1,594,476 | | | $ | 1,058,700 | | | | 50.6 | % | | $ | 2,929,364 | | | $ | 2,137,762 | | | | 37.0 | % |
Operating expenses | | | 1,427,701 | | | | 1,230,045 | | | | 16.1 | % | | | 2,620,769 | | | | 2,272,828 | | | | 15.3 | % |
Operating income (loss) | | | 166,775 | | | | (171,345 | ) | | | 197.3 | % | | | 308,595 | | | | (135,066 | ) | | | 328.5 | % |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 86,621 | | | | (232,751 | ) | | | 137.2 | % | | | 147,637 | | | | (267,784 | ) | | | 155.1 | % |
Net income (loss) | | | 78,548 | | | | (178,263 | ) | | | 144.1 | % | | | 126,362 | | | | (214,109 | ) | | | 159.0 | % |
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | 41,807 | | | | (175,940 | ) | | | 123.8 | % | | | 59,388 | | | | (210,546 | ) | | | 128.2 | % |
38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Percent of Net Revenues | |
| | Three Months | | | Six Months | |
| | Ended June 30, | | | Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Operating expenses | | | 89.5 | % | | | 116.2 | % | | | 89.5 | % | | | 106.3 | % |
Operating income (loss) | | | 10.5 | % | | | (16.2 | )% | | | 10.5 | % | | | (6.3 | )% |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 5.4 | % | | | (22.0 | )% | | | 5.0 | % | | | (12.5 | )% |
Net income (loss) | | | 4.9 | % | | | (16.8 | )% | | | 4.3 | % | | | (10.0 | )% |
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | 2.6 | % | | | (16.6 | )% | | | 2.0 | % | | | (9.8 | )% |
Operating Results
Key Operating Revenue Measurements
Operating revenues at our Las Vegas Operating Properties, The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons Macao and Marina Bay Sands are dependent upon the volume of customers who stay at the hotel, which affects the price that can be charged for hotel rooms and the volume of table games and slot machine play. Operating revenues at Sands Macao and Sands Bethlehem are principally driven by casino customers who visit the properties on a daily basis.
The following are the key measurements we use to evaluate operating revenues:
Casino revenue measurements for the U.S.: Table games drop (“drop”) and slot handle (“handle”) are volume measurements. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of drop or handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Table games drop represents the sum of markers issued (credit instruments) less markers paid at the table, plus cash deposited in the table drop box. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the period cited. We view table games win as a percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Based upon our mix of table games, our table games have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage (calculated before discounts) of 18.3% and slot machines produce a statistical average hold percentage (calculated before slot club cash incentives) generally between 6.0% and 7.0%. Actual win may vary from the statistical average. Generally, slot machine play is conducted on a cash basis, while approximately 62.3% of our table games play, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was conducted on a credit basis.
Casino revenue measurements for Macau and Singapore: Macau and Singapore table games are segregated into two groups, consistent with the Macau and Singapore market’s convention: Rolling Chip play (all VIP players) and Non-Rolling Chip play (mostly non-VIP players). The volume measurement for Rolling Chip play is non-negotiable gaming chips wagered and lost. The volume measurement for Non-Rolling Chip play is table games drop as previously described. Rolling Chip and Non-Rolling Chip volume measurements are not comparable as the amounts wagered and lost are substantially higher than the amounts dropped. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the period cited.
We view Rolling Chip win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip win as a percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games, our Rolling Chip win percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) is expected to be 2.7% to 3.0% and our Non-Rolling Chip table games have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage of 24.4%, 19.8% and 24.3% at The Venetian Macao, Sands Macao and Four Seasons Macao, respectively. Similar to Las Vegas, our Macau slot machines produce a statistical average win percentage generally between 6.0% and 7.0%. Actual win may vary from the statistical average. Generally, gaming is conducted on a cash basis, with only 36.2% of our Macau table games play, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, being conducted on a credit basis. This percentage is expected to increase as we increase the credit extended to our premium players and gaming promoters for table games play. In Singapore, 35.9% of table games play, for the period ended June 30, 2010, was conducted on a credit basis. This percentage is expected to increase as we increase the credit extended to our premium players and as our operations ramp up at Marina Bay Sands.
Hotel revenue measurements: Hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of available hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average price of occupied rooms per day, are used as performance indicators. Revenue per available room represents a summary of hotel average daily room rates and occupancy. Because not all available rooms are occupied, average daily room rates are normally higher than revenue per available room. Reserved rooms where the guests do not show up for their stay and lose their deposit may be re-sold to walk-in guests. These rooms are considered to be occupied twice for statistical purposes due to obtaining the original deposit and the walk-in guest revenue. In cases where a significant number of rooms are resold, occupancy rates may be in excess of 100% and revenue per available room may be higher than the average daily room rate.
39
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Casino | | $ | 1,294,301 | | | $ | 798,053 | | | | 62.2 | % |
Rooms | | | 190,767 | | | | 161,969 | | | | 17.8 | % |
Food and beverage | | | 105,079 | | | | 87,087 | | | | 20.7 | % |
Convention, retail and other | | | 115,266 | | | | 95,885 | | | | 20.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,705,413 | | | | 1,142,994 | | | | 49.2 | % |
Less — promotional allowances | | | (110,937 | ) | | | (84,294 | ) | | | 31.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenues | | $ | 1,594,476 | | | $ | 1,058,700 | | | | 50.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net revenues were $1.59 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $535.8 million as compared to the $1.06 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net revenues was driven by $216.4 million of net revenues at Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, as well as increases across our Macau properties and Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009.
Casino revenues increased $496.2 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $286.6 million was attributable to our Macau operations driven by an increase in Rolling Chip activity and $190.8 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands. The following table summarizes the results of our casino activity:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Macau Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 506,051 | | | $ | 380,024 | | | | 33.2 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 897,672 | | | $ | 768,905 | | | | 16.7 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 24.8 | % | | | 24.8 | % | | | — | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 9,765,626 | | | $ | 9,896,202 | | | | (1.3 | )% |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 3.36 | % | | | 2.28 | % | | | 1.08 | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 701,575 | | | $ | 535,310 | | | | 31.1 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | (0.4 | )pts |
Sands Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 297,069 | | | $ | 229,402 | | | | 29.5 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 603,561 | | | $ | 595,548 | | | | 1.3 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 20.7 | % | | | 19.4 | % | | | 1.3 | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 7,220,885 | | | $ | 4,711,445 | | | | 53.3 | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 3.05 | % | | | 2.90 | % | | | 0.15 | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 406,624 | | | $ | 299,812 | | | | 35.6 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 5.5 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | (1.0 | )pts |
Four Seasons Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 132,543 | | | $ | 39,593 | | | | 234.8 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 95,553 | | | $ | 80,777 | | | | 18.3 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 28.4 | % | | | 27.3 | % | | | 1.1 | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 4,844,991 | | | $ | 566,060 | | | | 755.9 | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 3.07 | % | | | 3.27 | % | | | (0.20 | )pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 107,550 | | | $ | 56,099 | | | | 91.7 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 5.6 | % | | | 6.0 | % | | | (0.4 | )pts |
U.S. Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 102,902 | | | $ | 119,068 | | | | (13.6 | )% |
Table games drop | | $ | 417,127 | | | $ | 386,124 | | | | 8.0 | % |
Table games win percentage | | | 13.8 | % | | | 19.3 | % | | | (5.5 | )pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 670,779 | | | $ | 668,625 | | | | 0.3 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.8 | % | | | 7.2 | % | | | 0.6 | pts |
Sands Bethlehem | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 64,958 | | | $ | 29,966 | | | | 116.8 | % |
Slot handle | | $ | 947,350 | | | $ | 369,594 | | | | 156.3 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 6.9 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | (1.2 | )pts |
Singapore Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marina Bay Sands | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 190,778 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 538,296 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 21.5 | % | | | — | % | | | — | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 3,883,995 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 2.18 | % | | | — | % | | | — | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 482,326 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.5 | % | | | — | % | | | — | pts |
40
In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
Room revenues increased $28.8 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. Room revenues increased at The Venetian Macao driven by increased visitation and at our Las Vegas Operating Properties as room rates were reduced to increase visitation, as well as $9.7 million in revenues attributable to Marina Bay Sands. The suites at Sands Macao are primarily provided to casino patrons on a complimentary basis. The following table summarizes the results of our room activity:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Room revenues in thousands) | |
Macau Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 47,782 | | | $ | 38,460 | | | | 24.2 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 203 | | | $ | 201 | | | | 1.0 | % |
Occupancy rate | | | 91.9 | % | | | 76.2 | % | | | 15.7 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 153 | | | | 22.2 | % |
Sands Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 6,236 | | | $ | 6,444 | | | | (3.2 | )% |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 253 | | | | (3.2 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 97.8 | % | | | 97.8 | % | | | — | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 239 | | | $ | 247 | | | | (3.2 | )% |
Four Seasons Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 6,921 | | | $ | 4,244 | | | | 63.1 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 298 | | | $ | 291 | | | | 2.4 | % |
Occupancy rate | | | 69.1 | % | | | 44.5 | % | | | 24.6 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 206 | | | $ | 130 | | | | 58.5 | % |
U.S. Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 120,169 | | | $ | 112,821 | | | | 6.5 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 196 | | | | (2.0 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 97.8 | % | | | 90.0 | % | | | 7.8 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 176 | | | | 6.3 | % |
Singapore Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marina Bay Sands | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 9,659 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 226 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Occupancy rate | | | 54.9 | % | | | — | % | | | — | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 124 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
41
Food and beverage revenues increased $18.0 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to $13.4 million in revenues at Marina Bay Sands.
Convention, retail and other revenues increased $19.4 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to $12.5 million in revenues at Marina Bay Sands and a $4.6 million increase at The Venetian Macao driven by an increase in mall revenues.
Operating Expenses
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Casino | | $ | 790,947 | | | $ | 532,476 | | | | 48.5 | % |
Rooms | | | 34,073 | | | | 31,524 | | | | 8.1 | % |
Food and beverage | | | 47,798 | | | | 44,819 | | | | 6.6 | % |
Convention, retail and other | | | 65,326 | | | | 63,234 | | | | 3.3 | % |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 18,711 | | | | 20,707 | | | | (9.6 | )% |
General and administrative | | | 172,919 | | | | 123,800 | | | | 39.7 | % |
Corporate expense | | | 25,954 | | | | 64,307 | | | | (59.6 | )% |
Rental expense | | | 12,806 | | | | 7,877 | | | | 62.6 | % |
Pre-opening expense | | | 50,118 | | | | 41,830 | | | | 19.8 | % |
Development expense | | | 676 | | | | 10 | | | | NM | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 170,694 | | | | 143,633 | | | | 18.8 | % |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | 151,175 | | | | (100.0 | )% |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 37,679 | | | | 4,653 | | | | 709.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | $ | 1,427,701 | | | $ | 1,230,045 | | | | 16.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
NM — Percent change not meaningful. | | |
Operating expenses were $1.43 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $197.7 million as compared to $1.23 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the opening of Marina Bay Sands, increased casino activity at our Macau operations and an increase in our depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by decreases due to a $151.2 million impairment charge and a $42.5 million legal settlement included in corporate expense that were recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Casino expenses increased $258.5 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $148.0 million was due to the 39.0% gross win tax on increased casino revenues across all of our Macau operations and $73.0 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands.
Room expenses increased $2.5 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009, with $3.2 million attributable to Marina Bay Sands, offset by decreases across our other properties driven primarily by cost saving initiatives that were implemented during 2009.
42
The provision for doubtful accounts was $18.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $20.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was due to a $5.5 million decrease in the provision for mall and other receivables driven by a higher provision during the three months ended June 30, 2009, due to the economic conditions during 2009, offset by a $3.5 million increase in provisions for gaming receivables driven by the increase in casino activity. The amount of this provision can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific to the customers who owe us money at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General and administrative expenses increased $49.1 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $36.2 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands and $10.8 million was due to payroll-related expenses in Macau and Las Vegas.
Pre-opening expenses were $50.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $41.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Pre-opening expense represents personnel and other costs incurred prior to the opening of new ventures, which are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010, were primarily related to activities at Marina Bay Sands and costs associated with recommencing work on our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $27.1 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the opening of Marina Bay Sands, which contributed $25.5 million.
Loss on disposal of assets was $37.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, which was due to the disposition of construction materials in Macau and Las Vegas.
Adjusted Property EBITDA
Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of the operating performance of our segments. Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, loss on disposal of assets, interest, other income (expense), gain on early retirement of debt, income taxes and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. The following table summarizes information related to our segments (see “Item 1 — Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 12 — Segment Information” for discussion of our operating segments and a reconciliation of adjusted property EBITDA to net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | $ | 192,829 | | | $ | 109,974 | | | | 75.3 | % |
Sands Macao | | | 81,212 | | | | 61,049 | | | | 33.0 | % |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 32,999 | | | | 5,563 | | | | 493.2 | % |
Other Asia | | | (6,154 | ) | | | (9,891 | ) | | | 37.8 | % |
United States: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 65,992 | | | | 78,110 | | | | (15.5 | )% |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 12,121 | | | | 2,837 | | | | 327.2 | % |
Marina Bay Sands | | | 94,466 | | | | — | | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total adjusted property EBITDA | | $ | 473,465 | | | $ | 247,642 | | | | 91.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Macau properties increased $134.2 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009, led by an increase of $82.9 million at The Venetian Macao. As previously described, the increase across the properties was primarily attributable to a combined increase in net revenues of $310.1 million, partially offset by an increase of $148.0 million in gross win tax on increased casino revenues.
43
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Las Vegas Operating Properties decreased $12.1 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. As previously described, the decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in net revenues of $15.7 million, offset by decreases in expenses driven by our cost-cutting measures, which were implemented during 2009.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009, and Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, do not have a comparable prior-year period. Results of the operations of Sands Bethlehem and Marina Bay Sands are as previously described.
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest cost (which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount) | | $ | 99,657 | | | $ | 78,989 | |
Less — capitalized interest | | | (22,670 | ) | | | (14,118 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | $ | 76,987 | | | $ | 64,871 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 85,500 | | | $ | 70,823 | |
Weighted average total debt balance | | $ | 10,679,714 | | | $ | 10,636,528 | |
Weighted average interest rate | | | 3.7 | % | | | 3.0 | % |
Interest cost increased $20.7 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009, resulting primarily from an increase in our weighted average interest rate. The increase in interest cost was partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest primarily due to the recommencement of construction activities on our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Other expense was $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to other income of $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The expense during the three months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to foreign exchange losses in Macau and a decrease in the fair value of our interest rate cap agreements held in Macau and Singapore.
The gain on early retirement of debt of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was related to the repurchase of $27.6 million of the outstanding principal of our senior notes.
Our effective income tax rate was 9.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to a beneficial tax rate of 23.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2010, reflects the commencement of our Singapore operations that are subject to a statutory tax rate of 17% and a zero percent tax rate from our Macau gaming operations due to our income tax exemption in Macau, which is set to expire in 2013. The non-realizable net operating losses in foreign jurisdictions unfavorably impacted our effective income tax rate. A valuation allowance was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009, on the net deferred tax assets of our U.S. operations. Management does not anticipate recording an income tax benefit related to deferred tax assets generated by operations in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions; however, to the extent that the financial results of these operations improve and it becomes more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are realizable, we will be able to reduce the valuation allowances.
The net income attributable to our noncontrolling interests was $36.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The net income during the three months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to the noncontrolling interest of SCL.
44
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Casino | | $ | 2,356,071 | | | $ | 1,595,978 | | | | 47.6 | % |
Rooms | | | 371,549 | | | | 336,357 | | | | 10.5 | % |
Food and beverage | | | 197,158 | | | | 174,395 | | | | 13.1 | % |
Convention, retail and other | | | 223,481 | | | | 209,372 | | | | 6.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,148,259 | | | | 2,316,102 | | | | 35.9 | % |
Less — promotional allowances | | | (218,895 | ) | | | (178,340 | ) | | | 22.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenues | | $ | 2,929,364 | | | $ | 2,137,762 | | | | 37.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net revenues were $2.93 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $791.6 million as compared to the $2.14 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net revenues was driven by $216.4 million of net revenues at Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, $103.2 million of net revenues at Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009, as well as increases across our Macau properties.
Casino revenues increased $760.1 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $461.7 million was attributable to our Macau operations driven by an increase in Rolling Chip activity, as well as $190.8 million and $98.3 million in revenues attributable to Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem, respectively. The following table summarizes the results of our casino activity:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Macau Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 980,806 | | | $ | 793,252 | | | | 23.6 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 1,819,603 | | | $ | 1,623,251 | | | | 12.1 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 25.0 | % | | | 23.2 | % | | 1.8 | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 19,815,304 | | | $ | 18,590,090 | | | | 6.6 | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 3.14 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | 0.45 | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 1,372,324 | | | $ | 1,093,814 | | | | 25.5 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.2 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | (0.3 | )pts |
Sands Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 575,014 | | | $ | 448,876 | | | | 28.1 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 1,193,077 | | | $ | 1,208,412 | | | | (1.3 | )% |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 20.5 | % | | | 19.1 | % | | 1.4 | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 13,627,818 | | | $ | 9,845,293 | | | | 38.4 | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 3.11 | % | | | 2.74 | % | | 0.37 | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 769,128 | | | $ | 577,248 | | | | 33.2 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 5.8 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | (0.9 | )pts |
Four Seasons Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 222,996 | | | $ | 74,997 | | | | 197.3 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 194,564 | | | $ | 167,489 | | | | 16.2 | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 26.8 | % | | | 25.2 | % | | 1.6 | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 8,562,932 | | | $ | 1,125,178 | | | | 661.0 | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 2.81 | % | | | 3.18 | % | | (0.37 | )pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 256,310 | | | $ | 100,022 | | | | 156.3 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 5.6 | % | | | 5.7 | % | | (0.1 | )pts |
U.S. Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 258,248 | | | $ | 248,887 | | | | 3.8 | % |
Table games drop | | $ | 964,172 | | | $ | 830,571 | | | | 16.1 | % |
Table games win percentage | | | 19.2 | % | | | 20.0 | % | | (0.8 | )pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 1,308,574 | | | $ | 1,374,526 | | | | (4.8 | )% |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.8 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | 0.7 | pts |
Sands Bethlehem | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 128,229 | | | $ | 29,966 | | | | 327.9 | % |
Slot handle | | $ | 1,868,981 | | | $ | 369,594 | | | | 405.7 | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 6.9 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | (1.2 | )pts |
Singapore Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marina Bay Sands | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total casino revenues | | $ | 190,778 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Non-Rolling Chip drop | | $ | 538,296 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 21.5 | % | | | — | % | | — | pts |
Rolling Chip volume | | $ | 3,883,995 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Rolling Chip win percentage | | | 2.18 | % | | | — | % | | — | pts |
Slot handle | | $ | 482,326 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Slot hold percentage | | | 7.5 | % | | | — | % | | — | pts |
45
In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
Room revenues increased $35.2 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Room revenues increased at The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao as room rates were reduced to increase visitation, as well as $9.7 million in revenues attributable to Marina Bay Sands. The suites at Sands Macao are primarily provided to casino patrons on a complimentary basis. The following table summarizes the results of our room activity:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Room revenues in thousands) | |
Macau Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 95,339 | | | $ | 79,533 | | | | 19.9 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 203 | | | $ | 209 | | | | (2.9 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 92.4 | % | | | 76.7 | % | | 15.7 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 160 | | | | 16.9 | % |
Sands Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 12,830 | | | $ | 13,119 | | | | (2.2 | )% |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 253 | | | $ | 261 | | | | (3.1 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 97.6 | % | | | 97.3 | % | | 0.3 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 247 | | | $ | 253 | | | | (2.4 | )% |
Four Seasons Macao | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 13,485 | | | $ | 7,935 | | | | 69.9 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 293 | | | | (1.7 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 71.0 | % | | | 41.5 | % | | 29.5 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 204 | | | $ | 122 | | | | 67.2 | % |
U.S. Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 240,236 | | | $ | 235,770 | | | | 1.9 | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 199 | | | $ | 205 | | | | (2.9 | )% |
Occupancy rate | | | 94.5 | % | | | 90.4 | % | | 4.1 | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 188 | | | $ | 185 | | | | 1.6 | % |
Singapore Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marina Bay Sands | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total room revenues | | $ | 9,659 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Average daily room rate | | $ | 226 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Occupancy rate | | | 54.9 | % | | | — | % | | — | pts |
Revenue per available room | | $ | 124 | | | $ | — | | | | — | % |
Food and beverage revenues increased $22.8 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to $13.4 million in revenues at Marina Bay Sands and $6.0 million in revenues at Sands Bethlehem.
46
Convention, retail and other revenues increased $14.1 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to $12.5 million in revenues at Marina Bay Sands.
Operating Expenses
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Casino | | $ | 1,485,582 | | | $ | 1,081,373 | | | | 37.4 | % |
Rooms | | | 63,727 | | | | 65,291 | | | | (2.4 | )% |
Food and beverage | | | 92,101 | | | | 87,461 | | | | 5.3 | % |
Convention, retail and other | | | 123,730 | | | | 122,477 | | | | 1.0 | % |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 35,153 | | | | 41,717 | | | | (15.7 | )% |
General and administrative | | | 299,178 | | | | 245,103 | | | | 22.1 | % |
Corporate expense | | | 49,430 | | | | 87,731 | | | | (43.7 | )% |
Rental expense | | | 21,504 | | | | 15,806 | | | | 36.0 | % |
Pre-opening expense | | | 87,577 | | | | 86,764 | | | | 0.9 | % |
Development expense | | | 833 | | | | 264 | | | | 215.5 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 323,783 | | | | 282,882 | | | | 14.5 | % |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | 151,175 | | | | (100.0 | )% |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 38,171 | | | | 4,784 | | | | 697.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | $ | 2,620,769 | | | $ | 2,272,828 | | | | 15.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses were $2.62 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $347.9 million as compared to $2.27 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to increased casino activity and increases in general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by decreases due to a $151.2 million impairment charge and a $42.5 million legal settlement included in corporate expense that were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Casino expenses increased $404.2 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $239.2 million was due to the 39.0% gross win tax on increased casino revenues across all of our Macau operations, as well as $73.0 million and $70.0 million in expenses attributable to Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem, respectively.
Room expenses decreased $1.6 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Expenses of $3.2 million were attributable to Marina Bay Sands, offset by decreases across our other properties driven primarily by cost saving initiatives that were implemented during 2009.
The provision for doubtful accounts was $35.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $41.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was due primarily to a $6.8 million decrease in the provision for mall and other receivables driven by a higher provision during the six months ended June 30, 2009, due to the economic conditions during 2009. The amount of this provision can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific to the customers who owe us money at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General and administrative expenses increased $54.1 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the increase, $36.2 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands, $10.9 million was attributable to Sands Bethlehem and $19.7 million was due to payroll-related expenses in Macau and Las Vegas, offset by cost saving initiatives that were implemented during 2009.
Pre-opening expenses were $87.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $86.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Pre-opening expense represents personnel and other costs incurred prior to the opening of new ventures, which are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010, were primarily related to activities at Marina Bay Sands and costs associated with recommencing work on our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
47
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $40.9 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the opening of Marina Bay Sands and a full six months of depreciation expense at Sands Bethlehem, which contributed $26.2 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
Loss on disposal of assets was $38.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which was primarily due to the disposition of construction materials in Macau and Las Vegas.
Adjusted Property EBITDA
Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of the operating performance of our segments. Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, loss on disposal of assets, interest, other expense, gain on early retirement of debt, income taxes and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. The following table summarizes information related to our segments (see “Item 1 — Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 12 — Segment Information” for discussion of our operating segments and a reconciliation of adjusted property EBITDA to net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Macau: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Venetian Macao | | $ | 362,744 | | | $ | 231,460 | | | | 56.7 | % |
Sands Macao | | | 150,973 | | | | 111,407 | | | | 35.5 | % |
Four Seasons Macao | | | 52,494 | | | | 9,931 | | | | 428.6 | % |
Other Asia | | | (10,586 | ) | | | (15,901 | ) | | | 33.4 | % |
United States: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Las Vegas Operating Properties | | | 171,284 | | | | 167,884 | | | | 2.0 | % |
Sands Bethlehem | | | 23,089 | | | | 2,837 | | | | 713.9 | % |
Marina Bay Sands | | | 94,466 | | | | — | | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total adjusted property EBITDA | | $ | 844,464 | | | $ | 507,618 | | | | 66.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Macau properties increased $218.7 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009, led by an increase of $131.3 million at The Venetian Macao. As previously described, the increase across the properties was primarily attributable to a combined increase in net revenues of $490.7 million, partially offset by an increase of $239.2 million in gross win tax on increased casino revenues.
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Las Vegas Operating Properties increased $3.4 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to decreases in expenses driven by our cost-cutting measures, which were implemented during 2009, of which $17.1 million were payroll-related expenses, offset by a decrease in net revenues of $8.8 million.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009, and Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, do not have a comparable prior-year period. Results of the operations of Sands Bethlehem and Marina Bay Sands are as previously described.
48
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest cost (which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount) | | $ | 197,475 | | | $ | 164,159 | |
Less — capitalized interest | | | (42,323 | ) | | | (28,170 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | $ | 155,152 | | | $ | 135,989 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 177,302 | | | $ | 155,651 | |
Weighted average total debt balance | | $ | 10,907,822 | | | $ | 10,553,475 | |
Weighted average interest rate | | | 3.6 | % | | | 3.1 | % |
Interest cost increased $33.3 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009, resulting from an increase in our weighted average long-term debt balance and weighted average interest rate. The increase in interest cost was partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest primarily due to Marina Bay Sands.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Other expense was $12.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The expense during the six months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to foreign exchange losses in Macau and a decrease in the fair value of our interest rate cap agreements held in Macau and Singapore.
The gain on early retirement of debt of $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily related to the repurchase of $60.3 million of the outstanding principal of our senior notes.
Our effective income tax rate was 14.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to a beneficial tax rate of 20.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010, reflects the commencement of our Singapore operations that are subject to a statutory tax rate of 17% and a zero percent tax rate from our Macau gaming operations due to our income tax exemption in Macau, which is set to expire in 2013. The non-realizable net operating losses in foreign jurisdictions unfavorably impacted our effective income tax rate. A valuation allowance was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009, on the net deferred tax assets of our U.S. operations. Management does not anticipate recording an income tax benefit related to deferred tax assets generated by operations in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions; however, to the extent that the financial results of these operations improve and it becomes more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are realizable, we will be able to reduce the valuation allowances.
The net income attributable to our noncontrolling interests was $67.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The net income during the six months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to the noncontrolling interest of SCL.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows — Summary
Our cash flows consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Net cash generated from operations | | $ | 637,905 | | | $ | 307,846 | |
| | | | | | |
Investing cash flows: | | | | | | | | |
Change in restricted cash | | | 22,926 | | | | 3,821 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,127,268 | ) | | | (1,022,534 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | | | 5,647 | | | | — | |
Purchases of investments | | | (173,774 | ) | | | — | |
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate | | | (43,305 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (1,315,774 | ) | | | (1,018,713 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Financing cash flows: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 3,923 | | | | — | |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | | | (46,700 | ) | | | (47,997 | ) |
Proceeds from long term-debt | | | 596,560 | | | | 504,379 | |
Repayments of long-term debt | | | (1,265,218 | ) | | | (194,636 | ) |
Other | | | (54,365 | ) | | | (4,403 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities | | | (765,800 | ) | | | 257,343 | |
| | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | | 7,088 | | | | 394 | |
| | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (1,436,581 | ) | | $ | (453,130 | ) |
| | | | | | |
49
Cash Flows — Operating Activities
Table games play at our Las Vegas Operating Properties is conducted on a cash and credit basis while table games play at our Macau and Singapore properties is generally conducted on a cash basis. Slot machine play is primarily conducted on a cash basis. The retail hotel rooms business is generally conducted on a cash basis, the group hotel rooms business is conducted on a cash and credit basis, and banquet business is conducted primarily on a credit basis resulting in operating cash flows being generally affected by changes in operating income and accounts receivable. Net cash generated from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010, increased $330.1 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was attributable primarily to the increase in our operating income and favorable changes in our working capital, primarily to operations at Marina Bay Sands, during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Cash Flows — Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2010, totaled $1.13 billion, including $963.7 million for construction and development activities in Singapore; $123.4 million for construction and development activities in Macau (primarily for our other Cotai Strip developments); $22.2 million for construction activities at Sands Bethlehem; and $18.0 million at our Las Vegas Operating Properties and for corporate and other activities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we purchased $173.8 million of short-term investments, which are classified as held-to-maturity and recorded at cost.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we paid $26.8 million for our Singapore gaming license and $16.5 million for our Pennsylvania table games certificate.
Cash Flows — Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash flows used in financing activities were $765.8 million, which was primarily attributable to the repayments of $795.9 million of borrowings under our U.S. senior secured credit facility and $375.0 million of borrowings under our Macau credit facility, payments of $56.7 million to purchase our senior notes and dividends paid to preferred stockholders of $46.7 million, offset by proceeds of $596.6 million under our Singapore credit facility.
Development Financing Strategy
Through June 30, 2010, we have funded our development projects primarily through borrowings under our U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds from our recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility and FF&E facility require our Las Vegas operations to comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The maximum leverage ratio is 6.0x for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, decreases to 5.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010, and then decreases to 5.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Macau credit facility, as amended in August 2009, requires our Macau operations to comply with similar financial covenants, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum leverage ratio is 4.0x for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, decreases to 3.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010, and then decreases to 3.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. We can elect to contribute up to $50 million and $20 million of cash on hand to our Las Vegas and Macau operations, respectively, on a bi-quarterly basis; such contributions
50
having the effect of increasing Adjusted EBITDA by the corresponding amount during the applicable quarter for purposes of calculating compliance with the maximum leverage ratio (the “EBITDA true-up”). If we are unable to maintain compliance with the financial covenants under these credit facilities, we would be in default under the respective credit facilities. A default under the U.S. credit facilities would trigger a cross-default under our airplane financings, which, if the respective lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness outstanding under these agreements, would result in a default under our senior notes. A default under the Macau credit facility would trigger a cross-default under our ferry financing. Any defaults or cross-defaults under these agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to exercise their rights and remedies as defined under their respective agreements. If the lenders were to exercise their rights to accelerate the due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there can be no assurance that we would be able to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and payable under such agreements, which could force us to restructure or alter our operations or debt obligations.
In 2008, we completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a $2.1 billion common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, we completed a $600.0 million exchangeable bond offering and our $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the proceeds from these offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of the U.S. credit facility in March 2010 and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, and was contributed to Las Vegas Sands, LLC to reduce its net debt in order to maintain compliance with the maximum leverage ratio for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, our U.S. leverage ratio was 5.5x, compared to the maximum leverage ratio allowed of 6.0x, and our Macau leverage ratio was 2.1x, compared to the maximum leverage ratio allowed of 4.0x.
We held unrestricted and restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately $3.69 billion and $96.6 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2010. We believe that the cash and investments on hand, cash flow generated from operations and available borrowings under our credit facilities will be sufficient to fund our revised development plan and maintain compliance with the financial covenants of our U.S. and Macau credit facilities. In the normal course of our activities, we will continue to evaluate our capital structure and opportunities for enhancements thereof. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, we began working on an amendment to our U.S credit facility, which contemplates a pay down of a portion of the outstanding balances of the term loans and a reduction of the revolving credit facility commitments in exchange for the extension of maturities and other modifications to the credit agreement intended to increase our financial flexibility. Additionally, in connection with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we are mobilizing to recommence construction of phases I and II of our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Aggregate Indebtedness and Other Known Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2010, there had been no material changes to our aggregated indebtedness and other known contractual obligations, which are set forth in the table included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, with the exception of borrowings of $637.1 million under our Singapore credit facility (which mature in March 2015 and include quarterly payments commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2011, with the remaining principal due in full upon maturity), a repayment of $775.9 million under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility (which would have matured in May 2012 with no interim amortization), a repayment of $350.0 million under the revolving portion of our Macau credit facility (which would have matured in May 2011 with no interim amortization) and the repurchase of $60.3 million of the outstanding principal of our senior notes (which would have matured in February 2015). Subsequent to June 30, 2010, we drew down $750.0 million under the term loan of our VOL credit facility (which matures in June 2015 and includes quarterly payments commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2013, with the remaining principal due in full upon maturity) and paid down the remaining $129.6 million outstanding under the revolving portion of our Macau Credit Facility.
Restrictions on Distributions
We are a parent company with limited business operations. Our main asset is the stock and membership interests of our subsidiaries. The debt instruments of our U.S., Macau and Singapore subsidiaries contain certain restrictions that, among other things, limit the ability of certain subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock or equity interests, pay dividends or make other distributions, repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness, create certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, enter into certain mergers or consolidations or sell our assets of our company without prior approval of the lenders or noteholders.
51
Inflation
We believe that inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on our sales, revenues or income from continuing operations during the past year.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include the discussions of our business strategies and expectations concerning future operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. In addition, in certain portions included in this report, the words: “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends” and similar expressions, as they relate to our company or management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that any forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. These forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks associated with:
| • | | our substantial leverage, debt service and debt covenant compliance (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates, as a significant portion of our debt is variable-rate debt, and other capital markets trends); |
|
| • | | disruptions in the global financing markets and our ability to obtain sufficient funding for our current and future developments, including our Cotai Strip, Singapore, Pennsylvania and Las Vegas developments; |
|
| • | | general economic and business conditions which may impact levels of disposable income, consumer spending, group meeting business, pricing of hotel rooms and retail and mall sales; |
|
| • | | the impact of the suspensions of certain of our development projects and our ability to meet certain development deadlines; |
|
| • | | the uncertainty of tourist behavior related to spending and vacationing at casino-resorts in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore; |
|
| • | | regulatory policies in mainland China or other countries in which our customers reside, including visa restrictions limiting the number of visits or the length of stay for visitors from mainland China to Macau and restrictions on foreign currency exchange or importation of currency; |
|
| • | | our dependence upon properties primarily in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore for all of our cash flow; |
|
| • | | the expected annualized savings and enhanced operating leverage to be generated from our cost-cutting measures, which were fully implemented during 2009, may not be fully realized; |
|
| • | | our relationship with GGP or any successor owner of The Shoppes at The Palazzo and The Grand Canal Shoppes, and the ability of GGP to perform under the purchase and sale agreement for The Shoppes at The Palazzo, as amended; |
|
| • | | new developments, construction and ventures, including our Cotai Strip developments, Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem; |
|
| • | | the passage of new legislation and receipt of governmental approvals for our proposed developments in Macau and other jurisdictions where we are planning to operate; |
|
| • | | our insurance coverage, including the risk that we have not obtained sufficient coverage or will only be able to obtain additional coverage at significantly increased rates; |
52
| • | | disruptions or reductions in travel due to acts of terrorism; |
|
| • | | disruptions or reductions in travel, as well as disruptions in our operations, due to outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian flu or swine flu; |
|
| • | | government regulation of the casino industry, including gaming license regulation, the legalization of gaming in other jurisdictions and regulation of gaming on the Internet; |
|
| • | | increased competition in Las Vegas and Macau, including recent and upcoming increases in hotel rooms, meeting and convention space, and retail space; |
|
| • | | fluctuations in the demand for all-suites rooms, occupancy rates and average daily room rates in Las Vegas and Macau; |
|
| • | | the popularity of Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore as convention and trade show destinations; |
|
| • | | new taxes, changes to existing tax rates or proposed changes in tax legislation; |
|
| • | | our ability to maintain our gaming licenses, certificates and subconcession; |
|
| • | | the completion of infrastructure projects in Macau and Singapore; |
|
| • | | increased competition for labor and materials due to other planned construction projects in Macau and Singapore; and |
|
| • | | the outcome of any ongoing and future litigation. |
All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report as a result of new information, future events or developments, except as required by federal securities laws.
ITEM 3 —QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our variable rate long-term debt, which we attempt to manage through the use of interest rate cap agreements. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes and do not enter into derivative transactions that would be considered speculative positions. Our derivative financial instruments consist exclusively of interest rate cap agreements, which do not qualify for hedge accounting. Interest differentials resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to interest expense.
To manage exposure to counterparty credit risk in interest rate cap agreements, we enter into agreements with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements. Frequently, these institutions are also members of the bank group providing our credit facilities, which management believes further minimizes the risk of nonperformance.
53
The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average variable rates are based on June 30, 2010, LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR plus the applicable interest rate spread in accordance with the respective debt agreements. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which is the Company’s reporting currency, for the years ending June 30:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fair | |
| | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | | | Value(1) | |
| | (Dollars in millions) | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 189.7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 189.7 | | | $ | 180.2 | |
Average interest rate(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6.4 | % | | | — | | | | 6.4 | % | | | | |
Variable rate | | $ | 566.7 | | | $ | 1,037.0 | | | $ | 2,278.8 | | | $ | 3,790.0 | | | $ | 2,428.7 | | | $ | 79.3 | | | $ | 10,180.5 | | | $ | 9,143.7 | |
Average interest rate(2) | | | 3.5 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.1 | % | | | 2.3 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.2 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cap agreements(3) | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 0.7 | |
| | |
(1) | | The estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available, or by pricing models based on the value of related cash flows discounted at current market interest rates. |
|
(2) | | Based upon contractual interest rates for fixed rate indebtedness or current LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR for variable-rate indebtedness. Based on variable-rate debt levels as of June 30, 2010, an assumed 100 basis point change in LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR would cause our annual interest cost to change approximately $101.5 million. |
|
(3) | | As of June 30, 2010, we have 31 interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate fair value of approximately $0.7 million based on quoted market values from the institutions holding the agreements. |
Borrowings under the U.S. senior secured credit facility bear interest at our election, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate or at an alternative base rate plus a credit spread. The revolving facility and term loans bear interest at the alternative base rate plus 0.5% per annum or 0.75% per annum, respectively, or at the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 1.5% per annum or 1.75% per annum, respectively, subject to downward adjustments based upon our credit rating. Borrowings under the Macau credit facility, as amended, bear interest at our election, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate (or in the case of the local term loan, adjusted HIBOR) plus 4.5% per annum or at an alternative base rate plus 3.5% per annum. Applicable spreads under the Macau revolving facility and the local term loan are subject to a downward adjustment if certain consolidated leverage ratios are satisfied. Borrowings under the Singapore credit facility bear interest at SOR plus a spread of 2.25% per annum. Borrowings under the airplane financings bear interest at LIBOR plus approximately 1.5% per annum. Borrowings under the ferry financing, as amended, bear interest at HIBOR plus 2.5% per annum.
Foreign currency transaction losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010, were $9.9 million primarily due to U.S. denominated debt held in Macau. We may be vulnerable to changes in the U.S. dollar/Macau pataca exchange rate. Based on balances as of June 30, 2010, an assumed 1% change in the U.S. dollar/Macau pataca exchange rate would cause a foreign currency transaction gain/loss of approximately $21.7 million. We do not hedge our exposure to foreign currencies; however, we maintain a significant amount of our operating funds in the same currencies in which we have obligations; thereby, reducing our exposure to currency fluctuations.
See also “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
ITEM 4 —CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) of the Company as of June 30, 2010, and have concluded that they are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
54
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The only change in our Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that had a material effect, or were reasonably likely to have a material effect, on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, was the opening of Marina Bay Sands in April 2010. We have implemented controls and procedures at Marina Bay Sands similar to those in effect at our other properties.
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 —LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is party to litigation matters and claims related to its operations. For more information, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and “Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies — Litigation” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The only change from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is set forth below.
The bankruptcy filings of GGP and its subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo could have an adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows at our Las Vegas Operating Properties.
In April 2009, GGP and its subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo filed the Chapter 11 Cases. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement for the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo, a calculation will be performed during the third quarter of 2010 (on the 30-month anniversary of the closing date) to determine whether additional amounts are owed to the Company. To date, the Company has received sale proceeds of $295.4 million. Should additional amounts be contractually owed to the Company, there can be no assurance that GGP will have the financial ability to make such a payment based on GGP’s current financial condition.
55
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
List of Exhibits
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Document |
| | |
10.1 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2010, by and among Venetian Orient Limited, the financial institutions listed as Lenders on the signature pages thereto, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, BNP Paribas, Hong Kong Branch, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Financial Services Limited and Citibank, N.A., Hong Kong Branch, UBS AG Hong Kong Branch, Barclays Capital, The Investment Banking Division of Barclays PLC, Bank of China Limited, Macau Branch (“BOC”), and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Macau) Limited (“ICBC”), as Global Coordinators and Bookrunners, and, with the exception of BOC and ICBC, as co-syndication agents for the enders, and Banco Nacional Ultramarino, S.A., DBS Bank Ltd. and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited, as Mandated Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners. |
| | |
10.2 | | Sponsor Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2010, by and between Sands China Ltd., The Bank of Nova Scotia, as administrative agent, and Bank of China Limited, Macau Branch, as the collateral agent. |
| | |
10.3 | | Guaranty, dated as of May 17, 2010, is made by Sands China Ltd., and each Subsidiary of Sands China Ltd. required from time to time to become party hereto pursuant to the Credit Agreement, in favor of and for the benefit of The Bank of Nova Scotia, as administrative agent. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document (1) |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1) |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1) |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1) |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1) |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1) |
| | |
(1) | | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
56
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. | |
| By: | /s/ Sheldon G. Adelson | |
| | Sheldon G. Adelson | |
| | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | |
August 6, 2010
| | | | |
| By: | /s/ Kenneth J. Kay | |
| | Kenneth J. Kay | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | |
August 6, 2010