Connexus (CNXS) 10-Q/A 2 Jun 14 2014 Q2 Quarterly report (amended) Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 03, 2014
Document and Entity Information:	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'BRAZIL GOLD CORP.	'
Document Type	'10-Q	'
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-13	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001301075	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--06-30	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	44,362,668
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'No	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'Yes	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'Yes	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'Q2	'

Balance_Sheets_Unaudited

Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Current Assets	'	'
Cash	$659	$5,552
Prepaid expenses	0	0
Other current assets	0	0
Total current assets	659	5,552
NON-CURRENT ASSETS	'	'
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary- at cost	45,000	0
Property and equipment	1,524	1,524
Accumulated depreciation	-1,524	-1,332
Property and Equipment, net	0	192
Total Non-current assets	45,000	192
Total Assets	45,659	5,744
Current Liabilities	'	'
Accounts payable	115,828	115,828
Accrued expenses	16,234	19,007
Advances payable	42,940	42,940
Derivative liability	497,577	565,007
Convertible debentures, net	479,934	278,961
Total Current Liabilities	1,152,513	1,021,743
Note payable - related party	210,043	185,116
Total Long-Term Liabilities	210,043	185,116
Total Liabilities	1,362,556	1,206,859
Stockholders' Deficit	'	'
Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; None issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock $0.001 par value, 10,000,000,000 shares authorized; 663,523 and 128,790 shares issued and outstanding respectively.	664	129
Additional paid-in capital	6,446,161	5,867,002
Accumulated deficit	-7,763,772	-7,068,246
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):	'	'
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	0	0
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-1,316,898	-1,201,115
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$45,658	$5,744

Balance_Sheets_Parentheticals_

Balance Sheets Parentheticals (Unaudited) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Balance Sheets Parentheticals	'	'
Preferred stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, shares authorized	10,000,000,000	10,000,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	663,523	128,790
Common stock, shares outstanding	663,523	128,790

Statements_of_Operations_Unaud

Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Income Statement	'	'	'	'
NET REVENUES	$0	$0	$0	$0
OPERATING EXPENSES:	'	'	'	'
Consulting fees	60,000	60,000	120,000	60,000
Rent Expense	2,279	0	18,304	0
Professional fees	8,825	40,000	26,355	122,277
Compensation	7,500	0	22,500	0
General and administrative expenses	85,167	111	94,096	9,722
Total operating expenses	163,771	100,111	281,255	191,999
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS	-163,771	-100,111	-281,255	-191,999
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:	'	'	'	'
Derivative expense	0	82,167	142,137	124,469
Interest expense	194,218	82,794	306,059	118,820
Loss on settlement of debt	260,405	7,722	303,162	0
Other (income) expense	0	0	0	0
Other (income) expense, net	171,951	-223,833	414,221	251,011
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION	-335,722	123,722	-695,476	-443,010
INCOME TAX PROVISION	0	0	0	0
NET LOSS	-335,722	123,722	-695,476	-443,010
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	($335,722)	$123,722	($695,476)	($443,010)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	($0.67)	$1.91	($2.09)	($7.25)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted	503,085	64,773	333,153	61,137

Statement_of_Stockholders_Equi

Statement of Stockholders' Equity Deficit (USD $) (USD $)	Common Stock, number of shares	Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Amount	Additional Paid-in Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss)	Total
			USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2010	36,000	36	759,063	-2,448,263	5,531	-1,683,633
Common stock issued in settlement of Coach convertible debt.	10,000	10	2,299,990	'	'	2,300,000
Common stock issued for consulting services and cash.	1,000	1	19,799	'	'	19,800
Common stock issued for services.	155	'	17,067	'	'	17,067
Settlement of related party debt and common stock compensation.	675	1	141,749	'	'	141,750
Common stock issued for compensation.	6,370	6	2,184,474	'	'	2,184,480
Beneficial conversion feature.	'	'	59,702	'	'	59,702
Net loss	'	'	'	($3,304,621)	'	($3,304,621)
Foreign currency translation loss.	'	'	'	'	-114	-114
Total Comprehensive income (loss).	'	'	'	'	'	-3,304,735
Balance.	54,200	54	5,481,844	-5,752,884	5,417	-265,569
Balance, at Jun. 30, 2011	54,200	54	5,481,844	-5,752,884	5,417	-265,569
Balance.	54,650	'	5,573,077	-6,209,236	'	-636,104
Common stock issued for services,	'	'	49,817	'	'	49,817
Common stock issued with convertible debentures,	450	'	36,000	'	'	36,000
Write off of foreign currency translation gain (loss),	'	'	5,417	'	-5,417	'
Net loss	'	'	'	-456,352	'	-456,352
Balance, at Jun. 30, 2012	54,650	55	5,573,077	-6,209,236	'	-636,104
Balance.	128,790	129	5,867,002	-7,068,246	'	-1,201,115
Common stock issued upon conversion of convertible debentures,	74,140	74	293,925	'	'	293,999
Net loss	'	'	'	-859,010	'	-859,010
Balance, at Jun. 30, 2013	128,790	129	5,867,002	-7,068,246	'	-1,201,115
Balance.	663,523	664	6,446,161	-7,763,722	'	-1,316,898
Common stock issued upon conversion of convertible debentures,	534,733	535	579,159	'	'	579,694
Net loss	'	'	'	($695,476)	'	($695,476)
Balance, at Dec. 31, 2013	663,523	664	6,446,161	-7,763,722	'	-1,316,898

Statements_of_Cash_Flows_Unaud

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	'	'
Net loss	($695,476)	($443,010)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities	'	'
Depreciation expense	192	222
Convertible Notes issued for services	170,000	120,000
Amortization of discount on convertible debt	291,709	113,536
Accretion of original issue discount	5,952	0
Loss on settlement of debt	303,162	0
Stock based compensation	0	0
Derivative expense	142,137	124,469
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	-337,137	7,722
Common stock issued for interest	0	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'
Prepaid expenses	0	167
Other current assets	0	0
Accounts payable	0	738
Accrued expenses	-2,773	6,546
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	-122,234	-69,610
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES	'	'
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary	-45,000	0
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES	-45,000	0
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES	'	'
Amounts from (repayments to) related parties	0	0
Accrued interest on Notes payable converted	2,564	0
Interest expense to related party	927	0
Proceeds from convertible debentures	158,850	69,610
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	162,341	69,610
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	0	0
NET CHANGE IN CASH	-4,894	0
Cash at beginning of period	5,552	0
Cash at end of period	659	0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION	'	'
Interest paid	0	0
Income tax paid	$0	$0

Organization_and_Operations

Organization and Operations	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Organization and Operations	'
Organization and Operations	'
	Note 1 - Organization and Operations
	Brazil Gold Corp. (Formerly " Dynamic Alert Limited")
	Dynamic Alert Limited (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada, on June 17, 2004.  On December 22, 2009, as amended February 25, 2010, pursuant to the provisions of Articles of Merger, Dynamic Alert Limited, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Brazil Gold Corp., a Nevada Corporation which was incorporated on November 3, 2009, were merged, with Dynamic Alert Limited being the surviving entity. In connection with such merger, on March 15, 2010, the Company’s name was changed from Dynamic Alert Limited to Brazil Gold Corp.
	Since inception up until November, 2009 the Company engaged in the business of providing its customers with security professionals, who in turn would provide personal protection as needed, as well as selling a selection of personal security products. The Company changed its status from a development stage company to an operating company on June 30, 2008. Management realized that the results of operations from security products and services were lack-luster, and it was decided to change the Company’s business focus and plan for other strategic opportunities and discontinue the security operations with effect from January 1, 2010. Effective January 1, 2010, the Company started reviewing mineral exploration and other opportunities with the objective of generating revenue for the Company.
	The Company is currently inactive and is evaluating possible new ventures and acquisitions.

Summary_of_Significant_Account

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
	Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 31, 2013.
	Fiscal Year End
	The Company elected June 30th as its fiscal year end date upon its formation.
	Reclassification
	Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
	The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.  Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses and advances payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liability of the Company’s secured convertible promissory notes issued to institutional investors, and the derivative warrants issued in connection with these convertible promissory notes. There is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.  The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation specialist, for which management understands the methodologies.  These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Warrant Liabilities
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative warrant liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  At the balance sheet date, the Company has an immaterial amount of these assets.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
	Investments
	All investments are measured at fair value in the balance sheets. Unrealized gains or losses, if any, are included in the statements of operations.
	The Company has no investment income.
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of three (3) to five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of furniture and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
	Derivative Instruments
	The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
	The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm.  The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument.  Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models.  In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and
	terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives).  The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.).  Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios.  Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections.  This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow.  A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivatives.
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. adescription of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the  financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
	Commitment and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the  financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
	The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The fair value of options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	·
	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the   simplified method  ,   i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2)  , if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	·
	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	·
	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company ’ s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	·
	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties other than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Subtopic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Subtopic 505-50”).
Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of
equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The fair value of option or warrant award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
·
Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
·
Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
·
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company ’ s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
·
Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached.  A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments).  Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions.  Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Income Tax Provision
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Tax Returns Remaining subject to IRS Audits
It is not practicable to determine amounts of interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters that will be due as of December 31, 2013 as a result of non-filing of federal and state income tax returns and examination that may be conducted by federal and state tax authorities in the future. Accordingly, the Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2013, and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. However, management believes that the Company will not have a significant impact on its financial position and results of its operations and cash flows as a result of this uncertainty.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.
The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:
	Potentially Outstanding
	Dilutive Common Shares
	For the Interim Period Ended		For the Interim Period Ended
	31-Dec-13		31-Dec-12
Convertible debentures	9,989,125		482,002
Stock options	2,308		2,308
Warrants issued with convertible debentures	-		6,500
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	9,991,433		490,810
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities ". This ASU clarifies that the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, " Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. " applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other  Comprehensive  Income. " The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint  and  Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date ."  This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity ." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.”  The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Going_Concern

Going Concern	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Going Concern:	'
Going Concern	'
	Note 3 – Going Concern
	The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2013, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the fiscal year then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.
	The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Investment

Investment	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Investment	'
Investment	'
	Note 4 – Investment
	Effective July 22, 2013 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with FAL Minerals LLC (“FAL”).  Pursuant to the Agreement the Company agreed to purchase from FAL, newly issued membership interests of FAL, representing twenty percent (20%) of the issued and outstanding membership interests of FAL (post issuance) (the “Interests”).  The purchase price for the Interests is One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) Dollars, payable in twelve equal installments of $8,333 commencing August 1, 2013.  The Interests will be issued pro rata (1/12 each month) by FAL to the Company upon each month closing.  Pursuant to the Agreement the Company will receive fifteen (15%) percent of the gross proceeds from all royalty payments made to FAL.  Such royalty payments are payable quarterly.
	The Company accounts for its investment in FAL under the cost method and values its investment at the lower of cost or market. Upon investing $100,000, the Company will account for its investment under the equity method and will record its proportionate share of net income as gain or loss.
	As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a total of $45,000 investment in FAL.

Property_and_Equipment

Property and Equipment	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Property and Equipment	'
Property and Equipment	'
	Note 5 – Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment was fully depreciated as of the end of the calendar quarter.
	Depreciation expense was $87 and $111 for the three month interim period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Depreciation expense was $192 and $222 for the six month interim period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

Advances_Payable

Advances Payable	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Advances Payable:	'
Advances Payable	'
	Note 6 – Advances Payable
	As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a total of $42,940, in advances payable to unrelated third parties for expenses paid on behalf of the Company in conjunction with the rescinded acquisition agreement.  These balances are non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Convertible_Debentures_Related

Convertible Debentures - Related Parties	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Convertible Debentures - Related Parties:	'
Convertible Debentures - Related Parties	'
	Note 7 – Convertible Debentures – Related Parties
	Converted debentures to related parties consisted of the following:
			Balance at December 31, 2013		Balance at June 30, 2013
	Note issued June 20, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  past due at June 30, 2013	$	-	$	25,000
	Note issued July 23, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  past due at June 30, 2013		62,500		62,500
	Note issued August 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		5,000		5,000
	Note issued August 21, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		2,110		2,110
	Note issued September 26, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		17,575		40,000
	Note issued October 18, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued November 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued November 8, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued December 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued January 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued January 25, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		5,000		5,000
	Note issued February 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on January 31, 2014		10,000		20,000
	Note issued February 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		-		4,000
	Note issued February 20, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  due on November 30, 2013		535		8,000
	Note issued February 20, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  due on November 30, 2013		7,464		11,941
	Note issued March 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  past due		13,500		20,000
	Note issued March 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is due on January 31, 2014		-		4,000
	Note issued March 8, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is payable on December 31, 2013		-		10,000
	Note issued April 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	Note issued April 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is payable on February 28, 2014		-		4,000
	Note issued April 9, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31, 2014		-		10,000
	Note issued May 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on October 31, 2013		20,000		20,000
	Note issued May 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		-		4,000
	Note issued June 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on November 30, 2013		20,000		20,000
	Note issued June 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		-		4,000
	Note issued June 13, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		25,000		25,000
	Note issued July 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on December 31, 2013		20,000		-
	Note issued July 2, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on December 31, 2013		20,000		-
	Note issued July 24, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		33,000		-
	Note issued August 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on January 31, 2014		20,000		-
	Note issued August 15, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31, 2014		20,000		-
	Note issued September 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on February 28, 2014		20,000		-
	Note issued September 17, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on September 30, 2014		25,000		-
	Note issued October 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31,  2014		20,000		-
	Note issued October 16, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on April 17,  2014		50,000		-
	Note issued October 23, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on April 30,  2014		45,000		-
	Note issued November 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on April 30,  2014		20,000		-
	Note issued November 5, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on November 30, 2014		18,000		-
	Note issued December 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31,  2014		20,000		-
	Note issued December 6, 2013 with 8% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on November 30, 2014		5,000		-
	Note issued December 19, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31,2014		7,500		-
			652,184		424,551
	Less unamortized discount		-172,250		-145,990
	Convertible debentures-net	$	479,934	$	278,561
	The June 20, 2012, July 23, 2012, August 1, 2012, August 21, 2012 September 26, 2012, October 18, 2012, November 1, 2012, November 18, 2012 and December 1, 2012 notes are convertible into common stock of the Company at sixty percent (60%) of the average of two (2) low closing bid prices for the five (5) trading days prior to conversion of the Notes.
	The January 1, 2013, January 25, 2013, February 1, 2013 $20,000, February 20, 2013, March 1, 2013 $20,000, March 8, 2013, April 1, 2013 $20,000, April 9, 2013, May 1, 2013 $20,000, June 1, 2013 $20,000, June 13, 2013, July 1, 2013, July 2, 2013, July 24, 2013, August 1, 2013, August 15, 2013, September 1, 2013, September 17, 2013, October 1, 2013, October 6, 2013, October 23, 2013, November 1, 2013, November 5, 2013, December 1, 2013, December 6, 2013 and December 19, 2013 notes are convertible into common stock of the Company at fifty percent (50%) of the average of the low closing bid prices for the twenty (20) trading days prior to conversion of the Notes.

Derivative_Financial_Instrumen

Derivative Financial Instruments	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments	'
Derivative Financial Instruments	'
	Note 8 – Derivative Financial Instruments
	The Company’s derivative financial instruments are embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s convertible debentures. The Company’s convertible debentures issued to institutional investors are hybrid instruments which contain an embedded derivative feature which would individually warrant separate accounting as a derivative instrument under Paragraph 815-10-05-4.  The embedded derivative feature includes the conversion feature and the warrants attached to certain Notes. Pursuant to Paragraph 815-10-05-4, the value of the embedded derivative liability have been bifurcated from the debt host contract and recorded as a derivative liability resulting in a reduction of the initial carrying amount (as unamortized discount) of the notes, which are amortized as debt discount to be presented in other (income) expenses in the statements of operations using the effective interest method over the life of the notes.
	The compound embedded derivatives within the notes have been valued using a layered discounted probability-weighted cash flow approach, recorded at fair value at the date of issuance; and marked-to-market at each reporting period end date with changes in fair value recorded in the Company’s statements of operations as “change in the fair value of derivative instrument”.
	Summary of Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheets:
		Carrying Value		Fair Value Measurement Using
				Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	$	382,274	$	-	$	-	$	382,274	$	382,274
	Derivative liabilities on warrants		115,303		-		-		115,303		115,303
	Total derivative liabilities	$	497,577	$	-	$	-	$	497,577	$	497,577
	Summary of the Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Financial Liabilities
	The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:
		Fair Value Measurement Using
		Level 3 Inputs
		Derivative liability		Total
	Balance, June 30, 2013	$	565,007	$	565,007
	Purchases, issuances and settlements		269,707		269,707
	Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
	Included in net (income) loss		-337,137		-337,137
	Included in other comprehensive income		-		-
	Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-		-
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	497,577	$	497,577

Notes_Payable_Related_Party

Notes Payable - Related Party	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes Payable - Related Party	'
Notes Payable - Related Party	'
	Note 9 – Notes Payable - Related Party
	Between April 1, 2011 and June 24, 2011, The President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Phillip Jennings, advanced the Company $77,884 in eight installments in the form of a promissory note (“Jennings Note”).  The Jennings Note was due on demand and had borne interest at 8% per annum.  On November 8, 2012, the Company issued promissory notes with its then Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Legal Counsel and Accountant totaling $105,380, which were originally recorded as accounts payable. In addition, the Jennings Note was converted into these notes. With accrued interest included, the notes total $186,043 at December 31, 2013. The notes mature on December 31, 2014 and bear interest at 1% per annum.
	On July 1, 2013 the Company issued to its Chief Executive Officer a Promissory Note in the principal amount of Twenty Four Thousand Dollars ($24,000), with no interest. Principal is payable on demand.
	The Notes total $210,043.

Equity_Purchase_Agreement

Equity Purchase Agreement	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Equity Purchase Agreement:	'
Equity Purchase Agreement	'
	Note 10 – Equity Purchase Agreement
	Southridge Partners II, LP Agreement
	The Company entered into an equity purchase agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”) with Southridge Partners II, LP (“Southridge”) on July 6, 2011.  Pursuant to the Equity Purchase Agreement, Southridge committed to purchase up to $10,000,000 of the Company’s common stock, over a period of time terminating on the earlier of: (i) 24 months from the effective date of a registration statement to be filed in connection therewith or (ii) the date on which Southridge has purchased shares of common stock pursuant to this agreement for an aggregate maximum purchase price of $10,000,000; such commitment is subject to certain conditions. The purchase price to be paid by Southridge will be 92% of the price of the common stock on the date the purchase price is calculated under the Equity Purchase Agreement.
	The maximum amount that the Company is entitled to put in any one notice is such number of shares of common stock as equals the lesser of $500,000 or 250% of the average of the dollar volume of Company common stock for the 20 trading days preceding the put, provided that the number of put shares to be purchased by Southridge shall not exceed the number of such shares that, when aggregated with all other shares and securities of the Company then owned by Southridge beneficially or deemed beneficially owned by Southridge, would result in Southridge owning more than 9.99% of all of the Company’s common stock as would be outstanding on such closing date.
	The Company will not be entitled to put shares to Southridge:
	·
	unless there is an effective registration statement under the Securities Act to cover the resale of the shares by Southridge;
	·
	unless the common stock continues to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and has not been suspended from trading;
	·
	if an injunction shall have been issued and remain in force, or action commenced by a governmental authority which has not been stayed or abandoned, prohibiting the purchase or the issuance of the shares to Southridge;
	·
	if the Company has not complied with their obligations and are otherwise in breach of or in default under, the Equity Purchase Agreement, our registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with Southridge or any other agreement executed in connection therewith with Southridge;
	·
	since the date of the filing of the Company’s most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission no event that had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Equity Purchase Agreement) has occurred; and
	·
	to the extent that such shares would cause Southridge’s beneficial ownership to exceed 9.99% of our outstanding shares.
	The Equity Purchase Agreement further provides that Southridge is entitled to customary indemnification from the Company for any losses or liabilities it suffers as a result of any breach of any provisions of the Equity Purchase Agreement or the Registration Rights Agreement, or as a result of any lawsuit brought by a third-party arising out of or resulting from Southridge's execution, delivery, performance or enforcement of the Equity Purchase Agreement or the Registration Rights Agreement or from material misstatements or omissions in the prospectus accompanying the registration statement for the resale of the shares issued to Southridge.
	As a condition for the execution of the Equity Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to Southridge, 450,000 shares of its restricted common stock pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not filed a Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission

Stockholders_Deficit

Stockholders' Deficit.	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Stockholders' Deficit.	'
Stockholders' Deficit.	'
	Note 11 – Stockholders’ Deficit
	Shares Authorized
	Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Two Hundred and Sixty Million (260,000,000) shares of which Ten Million (1,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and Two Hundred and Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.
	On or about August 12, 2013, the Stockholders holding a majority voting rights of the Company’s Common Stock approved by written consent in lieu of a meeting of Stockholders: to amend and Restate the Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation to specifically, amend ARTICLE FOUR of the Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation in order to increase the number of shares of authorized capital stock to 960,000,000 shares, of which 950,000,000 shall be common stock and 10,000,000 shall be preferred stock of the Corporation, by filing with the Secretary of State of Nevada the Restated Articles of Incorporation.
	Common Stock
	The following stock issuances are listed taking into account the 1:1,000 reverse split.
	In connection with the issuance of the convertible debentures during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued 450 shares of its common stock valued at $0.08 per share, the price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance or $36,000, which was recorded as interest expense.
	On August 2, 2012, the Company issued 4,372 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $26,300 of convertible debt and $4,307 of accrued interest.
	On November 1, 2012, the Company issued 4,373 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $7,880 of convertible debt and $997 of accrued interest.
	On November 21, 2012, the Company issued 4,371 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $3.300 of convertible debt and $219 of accrued interest.
	On December 12, 2012, the Company issued 4,373 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,525 of convertible debt and $230 of accrued interest.
	On January 3, 2013, the Company issued 4,371 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $1,912 of convertible debt and $230 of accrued interest.
	On January 14, 2013, the Company issued 4,350 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,000 of convertible debt and $132 of accrued interest.
	On January 29, 2013, the Company issued 6,582 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,600 of convertible debt and $164 of accrued interest.
	On February 13, 2013, the Company issued 7,655 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,515 of convertible debt and $164 of accrued interest.
	On February 26, 2013, the Company issued 792 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $968 of convertible debt and $3 of accrued interest.
	On February 26, 2013, the Company issued 6,871 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $5,250 of convertible debt and $3,167 of accrued interest.
	On March 7, 2013, the Company issued 7,439 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $19,750 of convertible debt and $39 of accrued interest.
	On March 25, 2013, the Company issued 9,918 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $15,925 of convertible debt and $3,167 of accrued interest.
	On April 8, 2013, the Company issued 8,669 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $9,075 of convertible debt and $27.85 of accrued interest.
	On July 11, 2013, the Company issued 11,756 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $7,055 of convertible debt and $2,115 of accrued interest.
	On July 18, 2013, the Company issued 11,851 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $9,200 of convertible debt and $44 of accrued interest.
	On July 26, 2013, the Company issued 13,308 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $8,745 of convertible debt and $38 of accrued interest.
	On August 27, 2013, the Company issued 6,293 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $1,875 of convertible debt and $328 of accrued interest.
	On September 16, 2013, the Company issued 17,581 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $6,125 of convertible debt and $28 of accrued interest.
	On October 2, 2013, the Company issued 32,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $8,000 of convertible debt.
	On October 7, 2013, the Company issued 19,092 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $4,477 of convertible debt, $11 of accrued interest and $275 in legal fees.
	On October 7, 2013, the Company issued 14,600 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $3,275 of convertible debt and $275 in legal fees.
	On October 8, 2013, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $5,000 of convertible debt.
	On October 16, 2013, the Company issued 25,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,500 of convertible debt.
	On October 16, 2013, the Company issued 15,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $1,500 of convertible debt.
	On October 16, 2013, the Company issued 23,950 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,120 of convertible debt and $275 in legal fees.
	On October 22, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $5,000 of convertible debt.
	On October 24, 2013, the Company issued 48,800 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $4,605 of convertible debt and $275 in legal fees.
	On October 28, 2013, the Company issued 25,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $2,500 of convertible debt.
	On November 1, 2013, the Company issued 48,800 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $5,275 of convertible debt and $375 in legal fees.
	On November 13, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $4,725 of convertible debt and $275 in legal fees.
	On December 6, 2013, the Company issued 94,000 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $4,700 of convertible debt.
	2010 Stock Incentive and Compensation Plan as Amended
	Adoption of 2010 Stock Incentive and Compensation Plan
	On January 7, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive and Compensation Plan, whereby the Board of Directors authorized 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be reserved for issuance (the “2010 Stock Incentive Plan”). The purpose of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan is to advance the interests of the Company by providing an incentive to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and competent persons who are important to the Company and upon whose efforts and judgment the success of the Company is largely dependent. Grants to be made under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan are limited to the Company’s employees, including employees of the Company’s subsidiaries, the Company’s directors and consultants to the Company. The recipient of any grant under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, and the amount and terms of a specific grant, is, determined by the board of directors.  Should any option granted or stock awarded under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan expire or become un-exercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full or fail to vest, the shares subject to the portion of the option not so exercised or lapsed will become available for subsequent stock or option grants.
	January 7, 2010 Issuance
	On January 7, 2010, the board approved and granted options for employees to purchase 2,750,00 shares of the Company's common stock with exercise price at $0.56 per share expiring two (2) years from the date of grant exercisable, in whole or in part, according to the following vesting schedule:
	·
	Twenty five percent (25%) of the total number of shares granted under the option scheme vested immediately as January 7, 2010, the date they were approved at the board meeting; a further twenty-five percent (25%) were vested on July 6, 2010.
	·
	The remaining Fifty percent (50%) of the shares granted under the option scheme shall vest pro rata every six (6) months, on the same date of the month as the date of grant of the option, over the following twelve (12) months of continuous service as a director, employee or consultant.
	The Company estimated the fair value of option granted, estimated on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
			7-Jan-10
	Expected life (year)		2
	Expected volatility (*)		110
	Risk-free rate(s)		0.5
	Expected dividends		0
	*As a newly formed entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price.  The Company selected five (5) comparable public companies listed on NYSE MKT and NASDAQ Capital Market within gold mining industry which the Company plans to engage in to calculate the expected volatility.  The Company calculated those five (5) comparable companies’ historical volatility over the expected life and averaged them as its expected volatility.
	April 19, 2010 Issuance
	On April 19, 2010, the board approved and granted an additional 50 common shares with an exercise price of $1.00 per share expiring two (2) years from the date of grant exercisable, in whole or in part, to the internal general counsel.
	The April 2010 options shall be exercisable, in whole or in part, according to the following vesting schedule:
	·
	Twenty five percent (25%) of the total number of shares granted under the option plan on July 7, 2010, the date they were approved at the board meeting; a further twenty-five percent (25%) on October 19, 2011 and
	·
	The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the shares granted under the option plan shall vest pro rata every six (6) months, on the same date of the month as the date of grant of the option, over the following twelve (12) months of continuous service as a director.
	July 1, 2010 Issuance
	On July 1, 2010, the board approved and granted options for a director to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock with exercise price at $0.56 per share expiring two (2) years from the date of grant exercisable, in whole or in part, according to the following vesting schedule:
·
Twenty five percent (25%) of the total number of shares granted under the option scheme vested immediately as July 1, 2010, the date they were approved at the board meeting; a further twenty-five percent (25%) on January 1, 2011.
·
The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the shares granted under the option scheme shall vest pro rata every six (6) months, on the same date of the month as the date of grant of the option, over the following twelve (12) months of continuous service as a director.
The Company estimated the fair value of option granted, estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
	1-Jul-10
Expected life (year)	1.99
Expected volatility (*)	110
Risk-free rate(s)	0.5
Expected dividends
	0
* As a newly formed entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public companies listed on NYSE MKT and NASDAQ Capital Market within gold mining industry which the Company plans to engage in to calculate the expected volatility.  The Company calculated those five (5) comparable companies’ historical volatility over the expected life and averaged them as its expected volatility.
Summary of the Company’s Stock Option Activities
The table below summarizes the Company’s stock option activities:
		Number of	Exercise Price Range Per Share		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Fair Value		Aggregate
		Option					at Date of Grant		Intrinsic
		Shares							Value
Balance, June 30, 2012		500,000	$	0.56	$	0.56	$	-	$	-
Granted		-		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-		-
Expired		(500,00)		0.56		0.56		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2013		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
And December 31, 2013		-		-		-		-		-
Granted		-		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-		-
Expired		-		-		-		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2013		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2013		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Unvested, December 31, 2013		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Subsequent Events	'
Subsequent Events	'
	Note 12 – Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:
	Issuance of Note and Common Stock to Chief Executive Officer
	On January 28, 2014, Brazil Gold Corp. entered into a promissory note in the principal amount of $36,000 payable to Conrad Huss (the “Note”), Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.  The Note supersedes and replaces all prior notes between the Company and Mr. Huss and was issued in lieu of cash compensation for fiscal 2013.
	The Note is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of Common Stock of the Company (an aggregate of 36,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, which would equal approximately 97% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), at the rate of $.001 per share of Common Stock of the Company.
	See our Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2014 for further detail.
	On January 28, 2014, Mr. Huss converted the Note into 36,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company.  Please see the Form 3 filed on February 19, 2014 for the share issuance.
	Reverse Split
	During the most recent quarter, the Company effectuated a 1:1,000 reverse split.  All information has been restated to reflect this reverse split.
	Issuance of Convertible Debt
	On January 1, 2014 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000), without interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2014. The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at fifty percent (50%) of the lowest closing bid prices for the twenty (20) trading days prior to conversion of the Note.
	On February 1, 2014 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000), with ten percent, 10%, interest and a maturity date of April 1, 2014. The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at sixty percent (60%) of the two low closing bid prices for the five (5) trading days prior to conversion of the Note.
	On February 3, 2014 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,500), with ten percent, 10%, interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2014. The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at fifty percent (50%) of the lowest closing bid prices for the thirty (30) trading days prior to conversion of the Note.
	On February 10, 2014 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of Forty Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000), with ten percent, 10%, interest and a maturity date of February 28, 2015. The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at fifty percent (50%) of the lowest closing bid prices for the thirty (30) trading days prior to conversion of the Note.
	Conversion of Debt
	Between the balance sheet date and the date of this report, the Company issued the following shares for the conversion of debt:
	On February 18, 2014, the Company issued 3,242,857 shares for the conversion of $5,400 and $275 for legal fees.
	On February 21, 2014, the Company issued 4,171,429 shares for the conversion of $7,025 and $275 for legal fees.

Accounting_Policies_POLICIES

Accounting Policies (POLICIES)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies (POLICIES):	'
Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information	'
	Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 31, 2013.
Fiscal Year End	'
	Fiscal Year End
	The Company elected June 30th as its fiscal year end date upon its formation.
Reclassification	'
	Reclassification
	Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions	'
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
	The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.  Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses and advances payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liability of the Company’s secured convertible promissory notes issued to institutional investors, and the derivative warrants issued in connection with these convertible promissory notes. There is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.  The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation specialist, for which management understands the methodologies.  These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis	'
	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Warrant Liabilities
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative warrant liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  At the balance sheet date, the Company has an immaterial amount of these assets.
Cash Equivalents, Policy	'
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investments	'
	Investments
	All investments are measured at fair value in the balance sheets. Unrealized gains or losses, if any, are included in the statements of operations.
	The Company has no investment income
Property and Equipment, Policy	'
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of three (3) to five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of furniture and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
Derivative Instruments	'
	Derivative Instruments
	The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
	The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm.  The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument.  Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models.  In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and
	terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives).  The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.).  Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios.  Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections.  This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow.  A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivatives.
Related Parties	'
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. adescription of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the  financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies	'
	Commitment and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the  financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services	'
	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
	The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The fair value of options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	·
	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the   simplified method  ,   i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2)  , if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	·
	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	·
	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company ’ s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	·
	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties other than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services	'
	Equity Instruments Issued to Parties other than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
	The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Subtopic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Subtopic 505-50”).
	Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of
	equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The fair value of option or warrant award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	·
	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	·
	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	·
	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company ’ s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	·
	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option and similar instruments.
	Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached.  A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments).  Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
	Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions.  Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Income Tax Provision , Policy	'
	Income Tax Provision
	The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
	The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions , Policy	'
	Uncertain Tax Positions
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Tax Returns Remaining subject to IRS Audits	'
	Tax Returns Remaining subject to IRS Audits
	It is not practicable to determine amounts of interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters that will be due as of December 31, 2013 as a result of non-filing of federal and state income tax returns and examination that may be conducted by federal and state tax authorities in the future. Accordingly, the Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2013, and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. However, management believes that the Company will not have a significant impact on its financial position and results of its operations and cash flows as a result of this uncertainty.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share	'
	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.
	The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:
		Potentially Outstanding
		Dilutive Common Shares
		For the Interim Period Ended		For the Interim Period Ended
		31-Dec-13		31-Dec-12
	Convertible debentures	9,989,125		482,002
	Stock options	2,308		2,308
	Warrants issued with convertible debentures	-		6,500
	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	9,991,433		490,810
Cash Flows Reporting	'
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events , Policy	'
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	'
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities ". This ASU clarifies that the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, " Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. " applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other  Comprehensive  Income. " The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint  and  Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date ."  This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity ." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.”  The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

POTENTIALLY_OUTSTANDING_DILUTI

POTENTIALLY OUTSTANDING DILUTIVE COMMON SHARES(TABLE)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
POTENTIALLY OUTSTANDING DILUTIVE COMMON SHARES(TABLE)	'
POTENTIALLY OUTSTANDING DILUTIVE COMMON SHARES(TABLE)	'
	The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:
		Potentially Outstanding
		Dilutive Common Shares
		For the Interim Period Ended	For the Interim Period Ended
		31-Dec-13	31-Dec-12
	Convertible debentures	9,989,125	482,002
	Stock options	2,308	2,308
	Warrants issued with convertible debentures	-	6,500
	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	9,991,433	490,810

Converted_debentures_to_relate

Converted debentures to related parties (TABLE)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Converted debentures to related parties (TABLE):	'
Converted debentures to related parties (TABLE)	'
	Converted debentures to related parties consisted of the following:
			Balance at December 31, 2013		Balance at June 30, 2013
	NNote issued June 20, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  past due at June 30, 2013	$	-	$	25,000
	NNote issued July 23, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  past due at June 30, 2013		62,500		62,500
	NNote issued August 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		5,000		5,000
	NNote issued August 21, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		2,110		2,110
	NNote issued September 26, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		17,575		40,000
	NNote issued October 18, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued November 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued November 8, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued December 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued January 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued January 25, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		5,000		5,000
	NNote issued February 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on January 31, 2014		10,000		20,000
	NNote issued February 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		-		4,000
	NNote issued February 20, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  due on November 30, 2013		535		8,000
	NNote issued February 20, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  due on November 30, 2013		7,464		11,941
	NNote issued March 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  past due		13,500		20,000
	NNote issued March 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is due on January 31, 2014		-		4,000
	NNote issued March 8, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is payable on December 31, 2013		-		10,000
	NNote issued April 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  currently past due		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued April 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is payable on February 28, 2014		-		4,000
	NNote issued April 9, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31, 2014		-		10,000
	NNote issued May 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on October 31, 2013		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued May 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		-		4,000
	NNote issued June 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on November 30, 2013		20,000		20,000
	NNote issued June 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		-		4,000
	NNote issued June 13, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		25,000		25,000
	NNote issued July 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on December 31, 2013		20,000		-
	NNote issued July 2, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on December 31, 2013		20,000		-
	NNote issued July 24, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31, 2014		33,000		-
	NNote issued August 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on January 31, 2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued August 15, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31, 2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued September 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on February 28, 2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued September 17, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on September 30, 2014		25,000		-
	NNote issued October 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on March 31,  2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued October 16, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on April 17,  2014		50,000		-
	NNote issued October 23, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on April 30,  2014		45,000		-
	NNote issued November 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on April 30,  2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued November 5, 2013 with 10% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on November 30, 2014		18,000		-
	NNote issued December 1, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31,  2014		20,000		-
	NNote issued December 6, 2013 with 8% interest.  Principal and interest are  payable on November 30, 2014		5,000		-
	NNote issued December 19, 2013 with no interest.  Principal is  payable on May 31,2014		7,500		-
			652,184		424,551
	LLess unamortized discount		-172,250		-145,990
	CConvertible debentures-net	$	479,934	$	278,561

Financial_assets_and_liabiliti

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (TABLE)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (TABLE):	'
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (TABLE)	'
	Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheets:
		Carrying Value		Fair Value Measurement Using
				Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	$	382,274	$	-	$	-	$	382,274	$	382,274
	Derivative liabilities on warrants		115,303		-		-		115,303		115,303
	Total derivative liabilities	$	497,577	$	-	$	-	$	497,577	$	497,577
Fair Value Measurement Using Level 3 Inputs	'
		Fair Value Measurement Using
		Level 3 Inputs
		Derivative liability		Total
	Balance, June 30, 2013	$	565,007	$	565,007
	Purchases, issuances and settlements		269,707		269,707
	Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
	Included in net (income) loss		-337,137		-337,137
	Included in other comprehensive income		-		-
	Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-		-
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	497,577	$	497,577

BlackScholes_optionpricing_mod

Black-Scholes option-pricing model (TABLE)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Black-Scholes option-pricing model (TABLE):	'
Black-Scholes option-pricing model - JANUARY2010	'
			7-Jan-10
	Expected life (year)		2
	Expected volatility (*)		110
	Risk-free rate(s)		0.5
	Expected dividends		0
Black-Scholes option-pricing model - JULY2010	'
		1-Jul-10
	Expected life (year)	1.99
	Expected volatility (*)	110
	Risk-free rate(s)	0.5
	Expected dividends
		0

Summary_of_the_Companys_Stock_

Summary of the Company's Stock Option Activities(TABLE)	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Summary of the Company's Stock Option Activities	'
Summary of the Company's Stock Option Activities	'
	The table below summarizes the Company’s stock option activities:
		Number of	Exercise Price Range Per Share		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Fair Value		Aggregate
		Option					at Date of Grant		Intrinsic
		Shares							Value
	Balance, June 30, 2012	500,000	$	0.56	$	0.56	$	-	$	-
	Granted	-		-		-		-		-
	Exercised	-		-		-		-		-
	Expired	(500,00)		0.56		0.56		-		-
	Balance, June 30, 2013	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	And December 31, 2013	-		-		-		-		-
	Granted	-		-		-		-		-
	Exercised	-		-		-		-		-
	Expired	-		-		-		-		-
	Balance, December 31, 2013	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2013	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Unvested, December 31, 2013	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recovered_Sheet1

Potentially outstanding dilutive common shares (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares	'	'
Convertible debentures	$9,989,125	$482,002
Stock options	$2,308	$2,308
Warrants issued with convertible debentures	'	6,500
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	9,991,433	490,810

INVESTMENT_TEXTUALS_DETAILS

INVESTMENT TEXTUALS (DETAILS) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Aug. 01, 2013
INVESTMENT TEXTUALS	'	'
Pursuant to agreement company agreed to purchase from Fal newly issued membership intrests of FAL representing (%)	'	20.00%
Purchase price for the interests (Investment)	'	$100,000
Payable in twelve equal installments commencing Aug. 1, 2013	'	8,333
Pursuant to the Agreement the Company will receive percent of the gross proceeds from all royalty payments made to FAL,royalty payments are payable quarterly.	'	15.00%
Company had a total investment in FAL.	$45,000	'

Property_and_Equipment_Text_De

Property and Equipment Text (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property and Equipment Text	'	'	'	'
Depreciation expense	$87	$111	$192	$222

Advances_Payable_Details

Advances Payable (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013
Advances Payable {1}	'
Advances payable to unrelated third parties for expenses paid on behalf of the Company in conjunction with the rescinded acquisition agreement.	$42,940

Converted_debentures_to_relate1

Converted debentures to related parties consisted of the following: (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Converted debentures to related parties consisted of the following:	'	'
Note issued June 20, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are past due at June 30, 2013	'	$25,000
Note issued July 23, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are past due at June 30, 2013	62,500	62,500
Note issued August 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	5,000	5,000
Note issued August 21, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	2,110	2,110
Note issued September 26, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	17,575	40,000
Note issued October 18, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued November 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued November 8, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued December 1, 2012 with interest at 8% per annum. Principal and interest are currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued January 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued January 25, 2013 with no interest. Principal is currently past due	5,000	5,000
Note issued February 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on January 31, 2014	10,000	20,000
Note issued February 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is currently past due	'	4,000
Note issued February 20, 2013 with no interest. Principal is due on November 30, 2013	535	8,000
Note issued February 20, 2013 with no interest. Principal is due on November 30, 2013	7,464	11,941
Note issued March 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is past due	13,500	20,000
Note issued March 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is due on January 31, 2014	'	4,000
Note issued March 8, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on December 31, 2013	'	10,000
Note issued April 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is currently past due	20,000	20,000
Note issued April 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on February 28, 2014	'	4,000
Note issued April 9, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on March 31, 2014	'	10,000
Note issued May 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on October 31, 2013	20,000	20,000
Note issued May 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31, 2014	'	4,000
Note issued June 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on November 30, 2013	20,000	20,000
Note issued June 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31, 2014	'	4,000
Note issued June 13, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31, 2014	25,000	25,000
Note issued July 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on December 31, 2013	20,000	'
Note issued July 2, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on December 31, 2013	20,000	'
Note issued July 24, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31, 2014	33,000	'
Note issued August 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on January 31, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued August 15, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on March 31, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued September 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on February 28, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued September 17, 2013 with 10% interest. Principal and interest are payable on September 30, 2014	25,000	'
Note issued October 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on March 31, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued October 16, 2013 with 10% interest. Principal and interest are payable on April 17, 2014	50,000	'
Note issued October 23, 2013 with 10% interest. Principal and interest are payable on April 30, 2014	45,000	'
Note issued November 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on April 30, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued November 5, 2013 with 10% interest. Principal and interest are payable on November 30, 2014	18,000	'
Note issued December 1, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31, 2014	20,000	'
Note issued December 6, 2013 with 8% interest. Principal and interest are payable on November 30, 2014	5,000	'
Note issued December 19, 2013 with no interest. Principal is payable on May 31,2014	7,500	'
Total Convertible Debentures	652,184	424,551
Less unamortized discount	-172,250	-145,990
Convertible debentures-net	$479,934	$278,561

Financial_assets_and_liabiliti1

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013
Carrying Value	'
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	$382,274
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	382,274
Derivative liabilities on warrants	115,303
Total derivative liabilities	497,577
Fair Value Measurement Using Level 1	'
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	0
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	0
Derivative liabilities on warrants	0
Total derivative liabilities	0
Fair Value Measurement Using Level 2	'
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	0
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	0
Derivative liabilities on warrants	0
Total derivative liabilities	0
Fair Value Measurement UsingLevel 3	'
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	382,274
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	382,274
Derivative liabilities on warrants	115,303
Total derivative liabilities	497,577
Fair Value Measurement Using Total	'
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	382,274
Derivative liabilities on conversion feature	382,274
Derivative liabilities on warrants	115,303
Total derivative liabilities	$497,577

Summary_of_the_Changes_in_Fair

Summary of the Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Financial Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	Derivative liability.	Total
Balance derivative liability. at Jun. 30, 2013	$565,007	$565,007
Purchases, issuances and settlements	269,707	269,707
Included in net (income) loss	-337,137	-337,137
Included in other comprehensive income	0	'
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3	0	'
Balance derivative liability, at Dec. 31, 2013	$497,577	$497,577

Note_Payable_Related_Party_Tex

Note Payable - Related Party Text (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Jul. 31, 2013	Nov. 08, 2012	Jun. 24, 2011
Note Payable - Related Party Text	'	'	'	'
The President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Phillip Jennings, advanced the Company in eight installments in the form of a promissory note	'	'	'	$77,884
Interest rate on note,	'	'	'	8.00%
Balance of note including accrued interest	186,043	'	'	'
Company issued promissory notes with its then CEO, CFO, Legal Counsel and Accountant totaling to , which were originally recorded as accounts payable	'	'	105,380	'
The notes mature on December 31, 2014 and bear interest at % per annum.	100.00%	'	'	'
Company issued to its CEO a Promissory Note in the principal amount of , with no interest	'	24,000	'	'
The Notes total	$210,043	'	'	'

Southridge_Partners_II_LP_Agre

Southridge Partners II, LP Agreement (Details) (USD $)	Jul. 06, 2011
Southridge Partners II, LP Agreement	'
Southridge committed to purchase company's common stock upto	1,000,000
Period in months for termination	24
Southridge has purchased shares of common stock pursuant to this agreement for an aggregate maximum purchase price of	$1,000,000
The purchase price to be paid by Southridge will be % of the price of the common stock on the date the purchase price is calculated under the Equity Purchase Agreement.	92.00%
The maximum amount that the Company is entitled to put in any one notice is such number of shares of common stock as equals the lesser of	$500,000
% of the average of the dollar volume of Company common stock for the 20 trading days preceding the put	25000.00%
Southridge owning more than % of all of the Company's common stock as would be outstanding on such closing date.	999.00%
As per Equity Purchase Agreement, Company issued to Southridge, shares of its restricted common stock pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933	450,000

Shareholders_Equeety_Textuals_

Shareholders Equeety Textuals (Details) (USD $)

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 06, 2013

Nov. 13, 2013

Nov. 01, 2013

Oct. 28, 2013

Oct. 24, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 16, 2013

Oct. 08, 2013

Oct. 07, 2013

Oct. 02, 2013

Sep. 16, 2013

Aug. 27, 2013

Jun. 26, 2013

Jun. 18, 2013

Jun. 11, 2013

Apr. 12, 2013

Apr. 08, 2013

Mar. 25, 2013

Mar. 07, 2013

Feb. 26, 2013

Feb. 13, 2013

Jan. 29, 2013

Jan. 14, 2013

Jan. 03, 2013

Dec. 12, 2012

Nov. 21, 2012

Nov. 01, 2012

Aug. 02, 2012

Jun. 30, 2012

Share holders' Deficit Textuals

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total number of shares authorized

260,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Preferred stock authorized

10,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock authorized

250,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Preferred stock par value

$0.00

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock par value

$0.00

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation in order to increase the number of shares of authorized capital stock to

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

960,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Amended Preferred stock authorized

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

950,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Amended Common stock authorized

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

10,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock issued for convertible debentures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

450

common stock valued at

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$36,000

Conversion price of stock

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.08

Common stock issued with convertible debentures (in shares)

'

94,000

50,000

48,800

25,000

48,800

50,000

43,950

20,000

33,692

32,000

17,581

6,293

13,308

11,851

11,756

'

8,669

9,918

7,349

7,663

7,655

6,582

4,350

4,371

4,373

4,371

4,373

4,372

'

Common stock issued for value of convertible debt

'

4,700

4,725

5,275

2,500

4,605

5,000

6,120

5,000

7,752

8,000

6,125

1,875

8,745

9,200

7,055

'

9,075

15,925

19,750

6,218

2,515

2,600

2,000

1,912

2,525

3,300

7,880

26,300

'

Common stock issued for value of accrued interest

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

11

0

28

328

38

44

2,115

'

27.85

3,167

39

3,200

164

164

132

230

230

219

997

4,307

'

Common stock issued for value of Legal fees

'

'

$275

$375

'

$275

'

$275

'

$550

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Board of Directors authorized shares of the Company's common stock to be reserved for issuance (the "2010 Stock Incentive Plan Jan.10, 2010)

8,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Exercise Price Per Share: Granted options

$0.56

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Duration until expiration of options from date of grant exercisable in whole or in part

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Assumptions_using_the_BlackSch

Assumptions using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model : (Details)	Jul. 07, 2010	Jan. 07, 2010
Assumptions using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:	'	'
Expected life (year)	1.99	2
Expected volatility (*)As a newly formed entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price.	11000.00%	11000.00%
Risk-free rate(s)	50.00%	50.00%
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%

Options_granted_Details

Options granted (Details) (USD $)	Jul. 07, 2010	Jan. 07, 2010
Options granted	'	'
Number of Option Shares: Granted	500,000	275,000
Exercise Price Range Per Share: Granted	$0.56	$0.56
Weighted Average Exercise Price: Granted	$0.56	$0.56
Percent of the total number of shares granted under the option scheme vested immediately	25.00%	25.00%
Further percent of options vested on July 6, 2010.	25.00%	25.00%
The % of the shares granted under the option scheme to vest pro rata every six (6) months, on the same date of the month as the date of grant of the option, over the following twelve (12) months of continuous service as a director, employee or consultant.	50.00%	50.00%

The_table_below_summarizes_the

The table below summarizes the Company's stock option activities: (Details)	Number of Option shares	Exercise Price Range Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Fair Value at the date of grants	Aggregate Instrinsic value
Balance at Jun. 30, 2012	500,000	0.56	0.56	0	0
Granted options	0	'	'	'	'
Exercised options	0	'	'	'	'
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	0	'	'	'	'
Expired options at Jun. 30, 2013	-50,000	0.56	0.56	'	'
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	'	'	'	'	'
Granted options.	0	'	'	'	'
Exercised options.	0	'	'	'	'
Expired options.	0	'	'	'	'
Vested and exercisable, options at Dec. 31, 2013	0	'	'	'	'
Unvested, options at Dec. 31, 2013	0	'	'	'	'
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	0	'	'	'	'
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	0	'	'	'	'

Subsequent_Events_Textuals_Det

Subsequent Events Textuals (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 21, 2014	Feb. 18, 2014	Feb. 10, 2014	Feb. 03, 2014	Feb. 01, 2014	Jan. 28, 2014	Jan. 02, 2014
Subsequent Events Textuals	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Principal amount of payable to Conrad Huss (the "Note"), Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation	'	'	'	'	'	$36,000	'
Value per share	'	'	'	'	'	$1	'
The Note is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of Common Stock of the Company (an aggregate of	'	'	'	'	'	36,000	'
% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock)	'	'	'	'	'	9700.00%	'
Mr. Huss converted the Note into shares of Common Stock of the Company	'	'	'	'	'	36,000,000	'
Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of	'	'	$45,000	$7,500	$20,000	'	$20,000
The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at	'	'	'	50.00%	50.00%	'	50.00%
Interest on promissory note issued	'	'	'	10.00%	10.00%	'	10.00%
The Principal plus any interest shall be convertible into common stock of the Company at	'	'	'	'	60.00%	'	'
Company issued shares for the conversion of $5,400 and $275 for legal fees.	'	3,242,857	'	'	'	'	'
Company issued shares for the conversion of $7,025 and $275 for legal fees.	4,171,429	'	'	'	'	'	'