LHC (LHCG) 10-Q 2012 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to            

Commission file number: 001-33989

LHC GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	71-0918189
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

420 West Pinhook Rd, Suite A

Lafayette, LA 70503

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(337) 233-1307

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of August 2, 2012: 18,264,503 shares.

LHC GROUP, INC.

INDEX

	Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income — Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity — Six months ended June 30, 2012		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		31
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		31
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		32
Item 1A. Risk Factors		32
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		32
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		32
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		32
Item 5. Other Information		32
Item 6. Exhibits		33
Signatures		34

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	385		$	256
Receivables:
Patient accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $10,909 and $10,692, respectively		90,506			91,183
Other receivables		1,218			1,636
Amounts due from governmental entities		190			315
Total receivables, net		91,914			93,134
Deferred income taxes		7,506			7,269
Prepaid income taxes		15,551			26,667
Prepaid expenses		6,550			6,576
Other current assets		2,905			4,363
Total current assets		124,811			138,265
Property, building and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $30,895 and $28,073, respectively		27,909			28,182
Goodwill		164,731			164,731
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $2,712 and $2,325, respectively		60,702			59,389
Other assets		5,203			5,809
Total assets	$	383,356		$	396,376
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	20,569		$	23,119
Salaries, wages, and benefits payable		29,261			25,571
Self insurance payable		4,888			5,612
Amounts due to governmental entities		3,241			3,234
Total current liabilities		57,959			57,536
Deferred income taxes		24,563			22,523
Income tax payable		3,415			3,415
Revolving credit facility		8,309			34,820
Total liabilities		94,246			118,294
Noncontrolling interest — redeemable		11,033			11,348
Stockholders’ equity:
LHC Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Common stock — $0.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 21,534,814 and 21,374,264 shares issued and 18,191,813 and 18,298,659 shares outstanding, respectively		184			183
Treasury stock — 3,343,001 and 3,075,605 shares at cost, respectively		(10,779	)		(6,216	)
Additional paid-in capital		98,483			95,964
Retained earnings		187,456			173,752
Total LHC Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity		275,344			263,683
Noncontrolling interest — non-redeemable		2,733			3,051
Total equity		278,077			266,734
Total liabilities and equity	$	383,356		$	396,376

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net service revenue	$	158,055		$	161,015		$	316,816		$	322,798
Cost of service revenue		92,218			86,216			182,077			175,172
Gross margin		65,837			74,799			134,739			147,626
Provision for bad debts		2,647			3,143			5,408			5,704
General and administrative expenses		50,967			52,154			101,849			107,195
Operating income		12,223			19,502			27,482			34,727
Interest expense		(208	)		(195	)		(567	)		(290	)
Non-operating income (loss)		(51	)		4			14			177
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		11,964			19,311			26,929			34,614
Income tax expense		4,092			6,549			9,318			11,710
Net income		7,872			12,762			17,611			22,904
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		1,909			2,974			3,907			5,422
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	5,963		$	9,788		$	13,704		$	17,482
Earnings per share — basic:
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	0.32		$	0.54		$	0.75		$	0.96
Earnings per share — diluted:
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	0.32		$	0.53		$	0.74		$	0.95
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		18,385,783			18,278,479			18,357,362			18,247,238
Diluted		18,423,258			18,346,441			18,396,453			18,338,605

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands except share data)

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock										Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings		Non-controlling Interest Non Redeemable			Total Equity
	Issued				Treasury
	Amount		Shares		Amount			Shares
Balances at December 31, 2011	$	183		21,374,264	$	(6,216	)		(3,075,605	)	$	95,964		$	173,752	$	3,051		$	266,734
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			13,704		296			14, 000	(1)
Sale of noncontrolling interest		—		—		—			—			80			—		—			80
Purchase of additional controlling interest		—		—		—			—			(38	)		—		—			(38	)
Noncontrolling interest distributions		—		—		—			—			—			—		(614	)		(614	)
Nonvested stock compensation		—		—		—			—			2,387			—		—			2,387
Issuance of vested stock		—		132,676		—			—			—			—		—			—
Treasury shares redeemed to pay income tax		—		—		(562	)		(30,435	)		—			—		—			(562	)
Repurchase of common stock		—		—		(4,001	)		(236,961	)		—			—		—			(4,001	)
Excess tax benefits — vesting nonvested stock		—		—		—			—			(316	)		—		—			(316	)
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan		1		27,874		—			—			406			—		—			407
Balances at June 30, 2012	$	184		21,534,814	$	(10,779	)		(3,343,001	)	$	98,483		$	187,456	$	2,733		$	278,077

(1) Net income excludes net income attributable to noncontrolling interest-redeemable of $3.6 million during the six months ending June 30, 2012. Noncontrolling interest-redeemable is reflected outside of permanent equity on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities
Net income	$	17,611		$	22,904
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,836			3,939
Provision for bad debts		5,408			5,704
Stock-based compensation expense		2,387			1,960
Deferred income taxes		1,803			3,375
Loss on sale of assets		113			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Receivables		(4,875	)		(4,254	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,090			5,984
Prepaid income taxes		10,802			(3,899	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		416			(1,950	)
Net amounts due to/from governmental entities		132			—
Net cash provided by operating activities		39,723			33,763
Investing activities
Purchases of property, building and equipment		(3,314	)		(5,761	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		23			—
Cash paid for acquisitions, primarily goodwill, intangible assets and advance payments on acquisition		(1,700	)		(11,770	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,991	)		(17,531	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from line of credit		66,446			49,187
Payments on line of credit		(92,957	)		(49,187	)
Payments on capital leases		—			(14	)
Excess tax benefits from vesting of restricted stock		—			318
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		407			426
Noncontrolling interest distributions		(4,452	)		(6,645	)
Payments on repurchase of common stock		(4,001	)		(577	)
Purchase of additional controlling interest		(126	)		(816	)
Sale of noncontrolling interest		80			—
Net cash used in financing activities		(34,603	)		(7,308	)
Change in cash		129			8,924
Cash at beginning of period		256			288
Cash at end of period	$	385		$	9,212
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Interest paid	$	567		$	290
Income taxes paid	$	8,203		$	11,956

Note: Supplemental cash flow information is provided in Note 12 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Organization

LHC Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is a health care provider specializing in the post-acute continuum of care primarily for Medicare beneficiaries. The Company provides home-based services, primarily through home nursing agencies and hospices, and facility-based services, primarily through long-term acute care hospitals (“LTACHs”). As of June 30, 2012, the Company, through its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries, equity joint ventures and controlled affiliates, operated in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012, condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and related notes (collectively, these statements are referred to herein as the “interim financial information”) have been prepared by the Company. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial information presented. This report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 15, 2012, which includes information and disclosures not included herein.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s most critical accounting policies relate to the principles of consolidation, revenue recognition and accounts receivable and allowances for uncollectible accounts.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries and entities controlled by the Company. Control is defined by the Company as ownership of a majority of the voting interest of an entity. The condensed consolidated financial statements include entities in which the Company receives a majority of the entities’ expected residual returns, absorbs a majority of the entities’ expected losses, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the entity. Third party equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the percentage of net service revenue earned by type of ownership or relationship the Company had with the operating entity:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Equity joint ventures		48.2	%		49.8	%		48.5	%		50.3	%
Wholly-owned subsidiaries		49.0	%		47.4	%		48.4	%		46.5	%
License leasing arrangements		1.9	%		2.3	%		2.2	%		2.3	%
Management services		0 .9	%		0.5	%		0.9	%		0.9	%
		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

7

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Business combinations accounted for under the acquisition method have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.

The following describes the Company’s consolidation policy with respect to its various ventures excluding wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Equity Joint Ventures

The Company’s joint ventures are structured as limited liability companies in which the Company typically owns a majority equity interest ranging from 51% to 90%. The members of the Company’s equity joint ventures participate in profits and losses in proportion to their equity interests. The Company consolidates these entities as the Company has voting control over the entities.

License Leasing Arrangements

The Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, leases home health licenses necessary to operate certain of its home nursing agencies. As with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Company owns 100% of the equity of these entities and consolidates them based on such ownership.

Management Services

The Company has various management services agreements under which the Company manages certain operations of agencies and facilities. The Company does not consolidate these agencies or facilities because the Company does not have an ownership interest and does not have an obligation to absorb losses of the entities or the right to receive the benefits from the entities.

Revenue Recognition

The Company reports net service revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, managed care payors, patients and others for services rendered. All payors contribute to both the home-based services and facility-based services.

The following table sets forth the percentage of net service revenue earned by category of payor for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Payor:
Medicare		77.8	%		79.8	%		78.1	%		79.7	%
Medicaid		1.9	%		2.4	%		2.0	%		2.4	%
Other		20.3	%		17.8	%		19.9	%		17.9	%
		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

The percentage of net service revenue contributed from each reporting segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Home-based services		88.6	%		88.2	%		88.3	%		87.9	%
Facility-based services		11.4	%		11.8	%		11.7	%		12.1	%
		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

8

Medicare

Home-Based Services

Home Nursing Services. The Company’s home nursing Medicare patients are classified into one of 153 home health resource groups prior to receiving services. Based on this home health resource group, the Company is entitled to receive a standard prospective Medicare payment for delivering care over a 60-day period referred to as an episode. The Company recognizes revenue based on the number of days elapsed during an episode of care within the reporting period.

Final payments from Medicare may reflect one of four retroactive adjustments to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the total reimbursement: (a) an outlier payment if the patient’s care was unusually costly; (b) a low utilization adjustment if the number of visits was fewer than five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another provider before completing the episode; or (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy services required in the population base. Management estimates the impact of these payment adjustments based on historical experience and records this estimate during the period the services are rendered. The Company’s payment is also adjusted for differences in local prices using the hospital wage index. In calculating the Company’s reported net service revenue from home nursing services, the Company adjusts the prospective Medicare payments by an estimate of the adjustments. The adjustments are calculated using the expected level of services that will be provided and the schedule of those services or a historical average of prior adjustments.

Hospice Services. The Company is paid by Medicare under a per diem payment system. The Company receives one of four predetermined daily or hourly rates based upon the level of care the Company furnished. The Company records net service revenue from hospice services based on the daily or hourly rate and recognizes revenue as hospice services are provided.

Hospice payments are also subject to an inpatient cap and an overall payment cap. Inpatient cap relates to individual programs receiving more than 20% of its total Medicare reimbursement from inpatient care services and the overall payment cap relates to individual programs receiving reimbursements in excess of a “cap amount,” calculated by multiplying the number of beneficiaries during the period by a statutory amount that is indexed for inflation. The determination for each cap is made annually based on the 12-month period ending on October 31 of each year. The Company monitors our limits on a program-by-program basis. The Company has not received notification that any of our hospices have exceeded the cap on inpatient care services or overall payments during 2011 or 2012 to date.

Facility-Based Services

Long-Term Acute Care Services. The Company is reimbursed by Medicare for services provided under the LTACH prospective payment system. Each patient is assigned a long-term care diagnosis-related group. The Company is paid a predetermined fixed amount intended to reflect the average cost of treating a Medicare patient classified in that particular long-term care diagnosis-related group. For selected patients, the amount may be further adjusted based on length of stay and facility-specific costs, as well as in instances where a patient is discharged and subsequently re-admitted, among other factors. The Company calculates the adjustment based on a historical average of these types of adjustments for claims paid. Similar to other Medicare prospective payment systems, the rate is also adjusted for geographic wage differences. Revenue is recognized for the Company’s LTACHs as services are provided.

Medicaid, managed care and other payors

The Company’s Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each service provided. Therefore, revenue is recognized for Medicaid services as services are provided based on this fee schedule. The Company’s managed care and other payors reimburse the Company in a manner similar to either Medicare or Medicaid. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue from managed care and other payors in the same manner as the Company recognizes revenue from Medicare or Medicaid.

Management Services

The Company records management services revenue as services are provided in accordance with the various management services agreements to which the Company is a party. As described in the agreements, the Company provides billing, management and other consulting services suited to and designed for the efficient operation of the applicable home nursing agency. The Company is responsible for the costs associated with the locations and personnel required for the provision of services. The Company is compensated based on a percentage of cash collections, a flat fee or is reimbursed for operating expenses and compensated based on a percentage of operating net income.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Uncollectible Accounts

The Company reports accounts receivable net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts and adjustments. Accounts receivable are uncollateralized and primarily consist of amounts due from Medicare, other third-party payors, and patients. To provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Company establishes an allowance for uncollectible accounts to reduce the carrying amount of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The credit risk for other concentrations of

9

receivables is limited due to the significance of Medicare as the primary payor. We believe the credit risk associated with our Medicare accounts, which represent 63.5% and 65.6% of our patient accounts receivable at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, is limited due to (i) the historical collection rate from Medicare and (ii) the fact that Medicare is a U.S. government payor. The Company does not believe that there are any other concentrations of receivables from any particular payor that would subject it to any significant credit risk in the collection of accounts receivable.

The amount of the provision for bad debts is based upon the Company’s assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic conditions and trends in government reimbursement. Uncollectible accounts are written off when the Company has determined the account will not be collected.

A portion of the estimated Medicare prospective payment system reimbursement from each submitted home nursing episode is received in the form of a request for anticipated payment (“RAP”). The Company submits a RAP for 60% of the estimated reimbursement for the initial episode at the start of care. The full amount of the episode is billed after the episode has been completed. The RAP received for that particular episode is deducted from the final payment. If a final bill is not submitted within the greater of 120 days from the start of the episode, or 60 days from the date the RAP was paid, any RAP received for that episode will be recouped by Medicare from any other Medicare claims in process for that particular provider. The RAP and final claim must then be resubmitted. For subsequent episodes of care contiguous with the first episode for a particular patient, the Company submits a RAP for 50% instead of 60% of the estimated reimbursement.

Our Medicare population is paid at a prospectively set amount that can be determined at the time services are rendered. Our Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each individual service we provide. Our managed care contracts and contracts with other payors are structured similar to either the Medicare or Medicaid payment methodologies. Because of our payor mix, we are able to calculate our actual amount due at the patient level and adjust the gross charges down to the actual amount at the time of billing. This negates the need to record an estimated contractual allowance when reporting net service revenue for each reporting period.

Other Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Share

Basic per share information is computed by dividing the relevant amounts from the condensed consolidated statements of income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period, under the treasury stock method. Diluted per share information is also computed using the treasury stock method, by dividing the relevant amounts from the condensed consolidated statements of income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding plus dilutive potential shares.

The following table sets forth shares used in the computation of basic and diluted per share information:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for basic per share calculation		18,385,783		18,278,479		18,357,362		18,247,238
Effect of dilutive potential shares:
Options		1,867		4,960		1,781		5,097
Nonvested stock		35,608		63,002		37,310		86,270
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted per share calculation		18,423,258		18,346,441		18,396,453		18,338,605
Anti-dilutive shares		342,949		229,190		373,288		147,355

10

3. Goodwill and Intangibles

The following table summarizes the changes in intangible assets during the six months ended June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

	Trade Names		Certificate of Need/ License		Other Intangibles			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	49,840	$	8,502	$	1,047		$	59,389
Additions		—		1,616		84			1,700
Amortization		—		—		(387	)		(387	)
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	49,840	$	10,118	$	744		$	60,702

Other intangible assets of $59.2 million, net of accumulated amortization, related to the home-based services segment and $1.5 million related to the facility-based services segment as of June 30, 2012.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company entered into an asset acquisition for $1.7 million, primarily paid in cash. This asset acquisition was allocated among certificate of need and noncompete agreement in the home-based services segment. The certificate of need has an indefinite useful live and will not be subject to amortization. The noncompete agreement will be amortized over the life of the agreement, which is three years. The fair value of the acquired intangible assets is preliminary pending the final valuations of those assets.

4. Credit Facility

As of June 30, 2012 the Company had $8.3 million drawn and a letter of credit totaling $5.7 million outstanding under the Credit Facility. The interest rate for borrowings under the Credit Facility is a function of the prime rate (base rate) or Eurodollar rate, as elected by the Company, plus the applicable margin based on the Leverage Ratio, as defined in the agreement. The interest rate at June 30, 2012 was 4.25%.

5. Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2012, $3.4 million was recorded in income tax payable as an unrecognized tax benefit which if recognized would decrease our effective tax rate. All of our unrecognized tax benefit is due to the settlement with the United States of America, which was announced September 30, 2011.

6. Stockholder’s Equity

Equity Based Awards

At the 2010 Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”). The 2010 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. A total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock is reserved and available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan. A variety of discretionary awards for employees, officers, directors and consultants are authorized under the 2010 Incentive Plan, including incentive or non-qualified statutory stock options and nonvested stock. All awards must be evidenced by a written award certificate which will include the provisions specified by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors. The Compensation Committee will determine the exercise price for non-statutory stock options. The exercise price for any option cannot be less than the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of grant.

Share Based Compensation

Nonvested Stock

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, our independent directors were granted 26,100 nonvested shares of stock under the 2005 Director Compensation Plan. The shares were drawn from the 1,500,000 shares reserved and available for issuance under our 2010 Incentive Plan. The shares vest 100% on the one year anniversary date. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, employees were granted 174,640 nonvested shares pursuant to the 2010 Incentive Plan. The shares generally vest over a five year period, conditioned on continued employment for the full incentive period. The fair value of nonvested shares is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s shares on the grant date. The weighted average grant date fair value of nonvested shares granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $19.11.

11

The following table represents the nonvested stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Number of Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value
Nonvested shares outstanding at December 31, 2011		494,995		$	24.17
Granted		200,740		$	19.11
Vested		(132,676	)	$	24.61
Forfeited		(53,690	)	$	24.27
Nonvested shares outstanding at June 30, 2012		509,369		$	22.57

As of June 30, 2012, there was $9.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 3.3 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $3.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively. The Company records compensation expense related to nonvested share awards at the grant date for shares that are awarded fully vested, and over the vesting term on a straight line basis for shares that vest over time. The Company recorded $2.4 million and $2.0 million of compensation expense related to nonvested stock grants in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2006, the Company adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan whereby eligible employees may purchase the Company’s common stock at 95% of the market price on the last day of the calendar quarter. There were 250,000 shares initially reserved for the plan. The table below details the shares issued during 2012.

	Number of Shares		Per share price
Shares available as of December 31, 2011		111,432
Shares issued during three months ended March 31, 2012		15,556	$	12.19
Shares issued during three months ended June 30, 2012		12,318	$	17.60
Shares available as of June 30, 2012		83,558

Stock Options

As of June 30, 2012, 15,000 options were issued and exercisable. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, no options were exercised or forfeited and no options were granted.

Treasury Stock

In conjunction with the vesting of the non-vested shares of stock, recipients incur personal income tax obligations. The Company allows the recipients to turn in shares of common stock to satisfy minimum tax obligations. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company redeemed 30,435 shares of common stock valued at $562,000, related to these tax obligations.

Stock Repurchase Program

In October 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, from time to time, in an amount not to exceed $50.0 million (“Stock Repurchase Program”). The Company anticipates that it will finance the Stock Repurchase Program with cash from general corporate funds, or draws under the Company’s Credit Facility. The Company may repurchase shares of common stock in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable securities laws, rules and regulations. The timing and extent to which the Company repurchases its shares will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations.

The Company uses the cost method to account for the repurchase of common stock and the average cost method to account for reissuance of treasury shares. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 236,961 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $4.0 million, or an average cost per share of $16.88, excluding commissions. The remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased under the share repurchase program is $45.4 million at June 30, 2012.

12

Sale of Membership Interest in Company’s Subsidiary

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company sold membership interests in one of its wholly owned subsidiaries. The total sales price was $80,000 for the sale of 40% membership interests and was accounted for as an equity transaction, resulting in the Company increasing additional paid in capital by $80,000.

Purchase of Membership Interest in Company’s Subsidiary

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased membership interests in two of its joint ventures. The total purchase price for the additional ownership from these equity transactions was $126,000, resulting in the Company reducing noncontrolling interest-redeemable by $88,000 and additional paid in capital by $38,000.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect, after considering the effect of the Company’s insurance coverage, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On May 12, 2010, the Company received a letter from the United States Senate Finance Committee in response to an April 26, 2010 article inThe Wall Street Journal entitled “Home Care Yields Medicare Bounty.” The letter from the Senate Finance Committee asked the Company to provide documents and data related to the issues referenced inThe Wall Street Journalarticle. On June 25, 2010, the Company completed its response to the Senate Finance Committee’s letter. On October 3, 2011, the Senate Finance Committee issued a report with its findings. At this time, the Company is unable to predict whether any further actions will result from this matter.

On July 16, 2010, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that included a request for documents related to the Company’s participation in the Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System, as well as the documents and information produced in response to the Senate Finance Committee’s investigation set forth above. The Company produced the documents requested by the initial subpoena, produced additional documents requested by the SEC as part of its review, and continues to cooperate with the SEC’s review. The Company cannot predict the outcome or effect of this investigation, if any, on the Company’s business.

On October 17, 2011, the Company received a subpoena from the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (the “OIG”). The subpoena requests documents related to our agencies in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. The Company will produce the requested documents and will cooperate with the OIG’s review in this matter. The Company cannot predict the outcome or effect of this review, if any, on the Company’s business.

On June 13, 2012, a putative shareholder securities class action was filed against the Company and its Chairman/CEO in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, styledCity of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System v.LHC Group, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:12-cv-01609-RFD-CMH. The action was filed on behalf of LHC shareholders who purchased shares between July 30, 2008 and October 26, 2011. Plaintiff generally alleges that the defendants caused false and misleading statements to be issued in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and that the Company’s Chairman/CEO is a control person under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend this lawsuit vigorously. The Company cannot predict the outcome or effect of this lawsuit, if any, on the Company’s business.

Except as discussed above, the Company is not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of potential wrongdoing.

Joint Venture Buy/Sell Provisions

Several of the Company’s joint ventures include a buy/sell option that grants to the Company and its joint venture partners the right to require the other joint venture party to either purchase all of the exercising member’s membership interests or sell to the exercising member all of the non-exercising member’s membership interest, at the non-exercising member’s option, within 30 days of the receipt of notice of the exercise of the buy/sell option. In some instances, the purchase price is based on a multiple of the historical or future earnings before income taxes and depreciation and amortization of the equity joint venture at the time the buy/sell option is exercised. In other instances, the buy/sell purchase price will be negotiated by the partners and subject to a fair market valuation process. The Company has not received notice from any joint venture partners of their intent to exercise the terms of the buy/sell agreement nor has the Company notified any joint venture partners of its intent to exercise the terms of the buy/sell agreement.

13

Compliance

The laws and regulations governing the Company’s operations, along with the terms of participation in various government programs, regulate how the Company does business, the services offered and its interactions with patients and the public. These laws and regulations and their interpretations, are subject to frequent change. Changes in existing laws or regulations, or their interpretations, or the enactment of new laws or regulations could materially and adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial condition.

The Company is subject to various routine and non-routine governmental reviews, audits and investigations. In recent years, federal and state civil and criminal enforcement agencies have heightened and coordinated their oversight efforts related to the health care industry, including referral practices, cost reporting, billing practices, joint ventures and other financial relationships among health care providers. Violation of the laws governing the Company’s operations, or changes in the interpretation of those laws, could result in the imposition of fines, civil or criminal penalties, and/or termination of the Company’s rights to participate in federal and state-sponsored programs and suspension or revocation of the Company’s licenses. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

8. Noncontrolling interest

Noncontrolling Interest-Redeemable

A majority of the Company’s joint venture agreements include a provision that requires the Company to purchase the noncontrolling partner’s interest upon the occurrence of certain triggering events, such as death or bankruptcy of the partner or the partner’s exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs. These triggering events and the related repurchase provisions are specific to each individual joint venture; if the repurchase provision is triggered in any one joint venture, the remaining joint ventures would not be impacted. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the Company would be required to purchase the noncontrolling partner’s interest at either the fair value or the book value at the time of purchase as stated in the agreement. Historically, no triggering event has occurred, and the Company believes the likelihood of a triggering event occurring is remote. The Company has never been required to purchase the noncontrolling interest of any of its joint venture partners. According to authoritative guidance, redeemable noncontrolling interests must be reported outside of permanent equity on the consolidated balance sheet in instances where there is a repurchase provision with a triggering event that is outside the control of the Company.

The following table summarizes the activity of noncontrolling interest-redeemable for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	11,348
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest-redeemable		3,611
Noncontrolling interest-redeemable distributions		(3,838	)
Purchase of additional controlling interest		(88	)
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	11,033

9. Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

The following table summarizes the activity and ending balances in the allowance for uncollectible accounts (amounts in thousands):

	Beginning of Year Balance		Additions and Expenses		Deductions			End of Period Balance
At June 30, 2012	$	10,692	$	5,408	$	(5,191	)	$	10,909

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values. For the period ended June 30, 2012, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value as the interest rates approximate current rates.

14

11. Segment Information

The Company’s segments consist of home-based services and facility-based services. Home-based services include home nursing services and hospice services. Facility-based services include long-term acute care services. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The following tables summarize our segment information for the three and six months ending June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Home- Based Services			Facility- Based Services			Total
Net service revenue	$	139,996		$	18,059		$	158,055
Cost of service revenue		80,707			11,511			92,218
Provision for bad debts		2,334			313			2,647
General and administrative expenses		45,566			5,401			50,967
Operating income		11,389			834			12,223
Interest expense		(187	)		(21	)		(208	)
Non-operating income (loss)		(50	)		(1	)		(51	)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		11,152			812			11,964
Income tax expense		3,697			395			4,092
Net income		7,455			417			7,872
Noncontrolling interest		1,826			83			1,909
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	5,629		$	334		$	5,963
Total assets	$	348,788		$	34,568		$	383,356

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Home- Based Services			Facility- Based Services			Total
Net service revenue	$	141,984		$	19,031		$	161,015
Cost of service revenue		74,733			11,483			86,216
Provision for bad debts		2,998			145			3,143
General and administrative expenses		47,456			4,698			52,154
Operating income		16,797			2,705			19,502
Interest expense		(175	)		(20	)		(195	)
Non-operating income (loss)		(9	)		13			4
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		16,613			2,698			19,311
Income tax expense		5,917			632			6,549
Net income		10,696			2,066			12,762
Noncontrolling interest		2,687			287			2,974
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	8,009		$	1,779		$	9,788
Total assets	$	342,608		$	35,118		$	377,726

15

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Home- Based Services			Facility- Based Services			Total
Net service revenue	$	279,591		$	37,225		$	316,816
Cost of service revenue		159,768			22,309			182,077
Provision for bad debts		4,957			451			5,408
General and administrative expenses		90,792			11,057			101,849
Operating income		24,074			3,408			27,482
Interest expense		(510	)		(57	)		(567	)
Non-operating income		3			11			14
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		23,567			3,362			26,929
Income tax expense		8,428			890			9,318
Net income		15,139			2,472			17,611
Noncontrolling interest		3,518			389			3,907
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	11,621		$	2,083		$	13,704
Total assets	$	348,788		$	34,568		$	383,356

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Home- Based Services			Facility- Based Services			Total
Net service revenue	$	283,785		$	39,013		$	322,798
Cost of service revenue		151,823			23,349			175,172
Provision for bad debts		5,406			298			5,704
General and administrative expenses		97,520			9,675			107,195
Operating income		29,036			5,691			34,727
Interest expense		(261	)		(29	)		(290	)
Non-operating income		142			35			177
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		28,917			5,697			34,614
Income tax expense		10,594			1,116			11,710
Net income		18,323			4,581			22,904
Noncontrolling interest		4,782			640			5,422
Net Income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	13,541		$	3,941		$	17,482
Total assets	$	342,608		$	35,118		$	377,726

12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental disclosures of the company’s non-cash transactions are as follows:

In conjunction with the vesting of the non-vested shares of stock, recipients incur personal income tax obligations. The Company allows the recipients to turn in shares of common stock to satisfy minimum tax obligations. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company redeemed $562,000 of treasury shares for tax payments on stock vestings.

16

ITEM  2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains certain statements and information that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements relate to future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, future financial performance and expectations and beliefs concerning matters that are not historical facts or that necessarily depend upon future events. The words “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Specifically, this report contains, among others, forward-looking statements about:

• our expectations regarding financial condition or results of operations for periods after June 30, 2012;

• our critical accounting policies;

• our participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

• the impact of healthcare reform;

• the reimbursement levels of Medicare and other third-party payors;

• the prompt receipt of payments from Medicare and other third-party payors;

• the outcomes of various routine and non-routine governmental reviews, audits and investigations;

• the impact of legal proceedings;

• our compliance with health care laws and regulations;

• our compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission laws and regulations and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements;

• the impact of federal and state government regulation on our business; and

• the impact of changes in our future interpretations of fraud, anti-kickback or other laws.

The forward-looking statements contained in this report reflect our current views about future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Many important factors could cause actual results or achievements to differ materially from any future results or achievements expressed in or implied by our forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine future events or achievements are beyond our ability to control or predict. Important factors that could cause actual results or achievements to differ materially from the results or achievements reflected in our forward-looking statements include, among other things, the factors discussed in the Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” included in this report and in other of our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. This report should be read in conjunction with that annual report on Form 10-K, and all our other filings, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K made with the SEC through the date of this report.

You should read this report, the information incorporated by reference into this report and the documents filed as exhibits to this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results or achievements may be materially different from what we expect or anticipate.

The forward-looking statements contained in this report reflect our views and assumptions only as of the date this report is signed. Except as required by law, we assume no responsibility for updating any forward-looking statements.

We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. In addition, with respect to all of our forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to LHC Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

OVERVIEW

We provide post-acute health care services by providing quality cost-effective health care services to our patients. As of June 30, 2012, we had 296 service providers in 19 states: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. Our services are classified into two segments: (1) home-based services offered through our home nursing agencies and hospices; and (2) facility-based services offered through our long-term acute care hospitals (“LTACHs”).

17

Through our home-based services segment we offer a wide range of services, including skilled nursing, private duty nursing, medically-oriented social services, hospice care and physical, occupational and speech therapy. As of June 30, 2012, the home-based services segment was comprised of the following:

Type of Service	Locations
Home Health		244
Hospice		32
Private Duty		4
Specialty Services		3
Management Companies		2
		285

Of our 285 home-based services locations, 153 are wholly-owned by us, 123 are majority-owned by us through joint ventures, 7 are license lease arrangements and we manage the operations of the remaining two locations. We intend to increase the number of home nursing agencies and hospice locations that we operate through continued acquisitions and development.

We provide facility-based services through our LTACHs. As of June 30, 2012, we owned and operated nine LTACH locations, of which all but one are located within host hospitals. We also owned and operated a health club and a pharmacy. Of these 11 facility-based services locations, six are wholly-owned by us and five are majority-owned through joint ventures.

The percentage of net service revenue contributed from each reporting segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Home-based services		88.6	%		88.2	%		88.3	%		87.9	%
Facility-based services		11.4	%		11.8	%		11.7	%		12.1	%
		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Recent Developments

Home-based services

Home Nursing. The base payment rate for Medicare home nursing in 2012 is $2,138.52 per 60-day episode.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted and was amended shortly afterwards by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the “Affordable Care Act”). The Affordable Care Act makes a number of changes to Medicare payment rates, including the reinstatement of the 3% home health rural add-on, which began on April 1, 2010 (expiring January 1, 2016). Other changes from the Affordable Care Act that began on or after January 1, 2011 are:

• a reduction in the market basket adjustment to be determined by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) for the calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013 by 1%;

• a full productivity adjustment beginning in 2015; and

• rebasing of the base payment rate for Medicare beginning in 2014 and phasing in over a four year period — the amount of the rebasing is uncertain at this time.

On October 31, 2011, CMS issued the final rule covering payment rates for home health services in CY 2012. CMS set the base payment rate for Medicare home nursing at $2,138.52 per 60-day episode for CY 2012, a decrease of 2.4% from the CY 2011 base payment rate of $2,192.07. The decrease for CY 2012 includes the following adjustments to the base rate, as compared to the CY 2011 base rate, in accordance with the Affordable Care Act: a reduction of 1% to the 2.4% inflation update increase to the market basket; and a 3.79% case-mix weight adjustment decrease. These changes are effective for all episodes completed during 2012.

The case-mix coding adjustment reduced HH PPS rates 3.79 percent for CY 2012 and an additional 1.32 percent reduction for CY 2013.

18

This rule also finalizes structural changes to the HH PPS by removing two hypertension codes from the case-mix system, lowering payments for high therapy episodes, and recalibrating the HH PPS case-mix weights to ensure that these changes result in the same amount of total aggregate payments.

Under current Medicare policy, a certifying physician or an allowed non-physician practitioner must see a patient prior to certifying a patient as eligible for the home health benefit. The rule also finalizes added flexibility to allow physicians who cared for the patient in an acute or post-acute facility to inform the certifying physician of their encounters with the patient in order to satisfy the requirement.

On July 6, 2012, CMS issued the proposed rule regarding payment rates for home health services in CY 2013. In the CY 2013 issue, CMS is proposing:

* Increasing the base payment rate by 0.2% to $2,141.95 in 2013 as compared to $2,138.52 in 2012. The increase is made up of a market basket increase of 2.5% less a reduction of 1% to the market basket as defined by the Affordable Care Act and less a 1.3% case mix adjustment carried over from 2012.

* Rebasing of the wage index and increasing the labor related portion of the base payment rate from 77.082% to 78.535% which decreases payments to the home health industry an aggregate of 0.3%.

*The 0.1% reduction to home health payments does not include any projection of the potential deficit reduction sequester approved earlier by Congress as it is unclear whether or not that reduction will take effect. If the sequester is imposed, it would become effective in January 2013 and would reduce payments by an additional 2%.

* Face to Face – CMS proposes to allow non-physician practitioners in an inpatient setting to perform the encounter and inform the certifying physician.

* Therapy—CMS also proposes to revise the regulation to state that in cases where multiple therapy disciplines are involved, if the required reassessment visit was missed for any one of the therapy disciplines for which therapy services were being provided, therapy coverage would cease only for that particular therapy discipline. Therefore, as long as the required therapy reassessments were completed timely for the remaining therapy disciplines, therapy services would continue to be covered for those therapy disciplines.

Finally, with respect to the therapy assessments timing, CMS proposes to revise the regulations to clarify that in cases where the patient is receiving more than one type of therapy, qualified therapists could complete their reassessment visits during the 11th, 12th, or 13th visit for the required 13th visit reassessment and the 17th, 18th, or 19th visit for the required 19th visit reassessment.

*Sanctions—CMS is proposing additional sanctions for enforcement of survey deficiencies that will include the following (these are not mutually exclusive, CMS can impose any or all of the following including termination)—each of these require a prior 15 day notice:

(a) Civil money penalties

(b) Suspension of payment for all new admissions and new payment episodes

(c) Temporary management of the HHA

(d) Directed plan of correction

(e) Directed in-service training

The proposed rule is subject to the standard 60-day open comment period.

Hospice. The following table shows the hospice Medicare payment rates for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2012, which began on October 1, 2011 and ends September 30, 2012:

Description	Rate per patient day
Routine Home Care	$	151.03
Continuous Home Care	$	881.46
Full Rate = 24 hours of care $36.73 = hourly rate
Inpatient Respite Care	$	156.22
General Inpatient Care	$	671.84

19

On July 29, 2011, CMS issued its final rule for hospice for FY 2012 which increases Medicare reimbursement payments by 2.5%. The 2.5% increase consists of a 3.0% inflationary market basket update offset by a 0.5% reduction for the third year of CMS’ seven-year phase-out of its wage index budget neutrality adjustment factor. The final rule also will:

• Change the way CMS counts hospice patients for the 2012 cap accounting year and beyond. The final policy for counting the number of Medicare hospice beneficiaries in care for a given cap year calculates the cap based on the number of days of care the patient received in that cap year for each hospice. This rule also finalized that the new counting method be applied to past cap years in certain instances.

• Allow hospice providers who do not want a change in their patient counting method to elect to continue using the current method.

• Allow any hospice physician to perform the face-to-face encounter regardless of whether that same physician recertifies the patient’s terminal illness and composes the recertification narrative.

• Implement a hospice quality reporting program, which includes a timeframe for reporting, as required by section 3004 of the Affordable Care Act. The measures that are being adopted in this final rule for the FY 2014 program are one measure endorsed by the National Quality Forum related to pain management and one structural measure that assesses whether a hospice administers a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that contains at least three indicators related to patient care.

On July 24, 2012, CMS issued its final rule for hospice for FY 2013 which increases Medicare reimbursement payments by 0.9% over FY 2012 rates. The 0.9% increase consists of a 2.6% inflationary market basket update offset by a 0.6% reduction for the fourth year of CMS’ seven-year phase-out of its wage index budget neutrality adjustment factor, a 0.7% reduction for the productivity adjustment, a 0.3% reduction to the market basket as defined by the Affordable Care Act, and a 0.1% reduction related to the wage index changes. The 0.9% does not include any projection of the potential deficit reduction sequester approved earlier by Congress as it is unclear whether or not that reduction will take effect. If the sequester is imposed, it would become effective in January 2013 and would reduce payments by an additional 2%.

The final rule will also provide:

• Clarification regarding diagnosis reporting on hospice claims:

CMS is concerned that hospices reporting a single diagnosis on claims are not providing an accurate description of the patients’ conditions, and believes that providers should code and report coexisting or additional diagnoses in order to more fully describe the Medicare patients they are treating.

• Hospice payment reform update:

CMS indicates that it is moving forward with hospice payment reform efforts and will continue to investigate Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Office of the Inspector General, and Government Accountability Office recommendations, as well as other payment options, as part of this comprehensive effort. CMS does not, however, provide an anticipated timeline for public release of information about proposals to alter the current hospice payment system.

The following table shows the hospice Medicare payment rates for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2013, which will begin on October 1, 2012 and end September 30, 2013:

Description	Rate per patient day
Routine Home Care	$	153.45
Continuous Home Care	$	895.56
Full Rate = 24 hours of care $37.32 = hourly rate
Inpatient Respite Care	$	158.72
General Inpatient Care	$	682.59

20

Facility-based services.

LTACHs.On August 1, 2011, CMS released its rule for LTACH Medicare reimbursement for FY 2012, which spans from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. In aggregate, payments for FY 2012 will increase 2.5% from FY 2011. Included in the final regulations is (1) a 2.9% market basket increase to the standard payment rate; (2) an aggregate reduction in the standard payment rate of 1.1% mandated by the Affordable Care Act; and (3) a reduction in the high cost outlier threshold per discharge from $18,785 in FY 2011 to $17,931 in FY 2012. The final rule would result in a 1.8% increase in average Medicare payments to LTACHs. Some of the other changes in the final rule include:

• Three quality measures to begin reporting October 1, 2012 and will affect payment in FY 2014.

• Clarification that the 25-day Average Length of Stay calculation includes both traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service and Medicare Advantage stays but this calculation will begin January 1, 2012.

On August 1, 2012 CMS released its final rule for LTACH Medicare reimbursement for FY 2013 which spans from October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013. In aggregate, payments for FY 2013 will increase by 1.8 percent over FY 2012 rates. The 1.8% increase consists of a 2.6% inflationary market basket update offset by a 0.7% reduction for the productivity adjustment, a 0.1% reduction to the market basket as defined by the Affordable Care Act. LTACH payment rates will also be reduced by approximately 1.3 percent to 0.5 percent for the “one-time” budget neutrality adjustment for discharges on or after December 29, 2012. The 0.5% does not include any projection of the potential deficit reduction sequester approved earlier by Congress as it is unclear whether or not that reduction will take effect. If the sequester is imposed, it would become effective in January 2013 and would reduce payments by an additional 2%.

The FY 2013 rule also includes:

* A one-year extension of the existing moratorium on the “25 percent threshold” policy, pending results of an on-going research initiative to re-define the role of LTACHs in the Medicare program.

* A reduction to Medicare payments for very short stay cases in LTACHs to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System comparable per diem amount payment option for discharges occurring on or after December 29, 2012 and an increase to the high cost outlier payment.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended June 30, 2012

Consolidated financial statements

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of consolidated net service revenue unless indicated otherwise):

	2012					2011					Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	158,055				$	161,015					(2,960	)		(1.8	%)
Cost of service revenue		92,218		58.3	%		86,216		53.5	%		6,002			7.0	%
General and administrative expenses		50,967		32.2	%		52,154		32.4	%		(1,187	)		(2.3	%)
Provision for bad debt		2,647		1.7	%		3,143		2.0	%		(496	)		(15.8	%)
Income tax expense		4,092		40.7	%(1)		6,549		40.1	%(1)		(2,457	)		(37.5	%)
Noncontrolling interest		1,909					2,974					(1,065	)		—
Total non-operating income (loss)		(259	)				(191	)				(68	)		—
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.	$	5,963				$	9,788					(3,825	)

(1) Percentage of income from continuing operations attributable to LHC Group, Inc.

21

Home-based services segment operating results

The following table summarizes our home-based results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of home-based net service revenue):

	2012				2011				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	139,996			$	141,984				(1,988	)		(1.4	%)
Cost of service revenue		80,707	57.6	%		74,733	52.6	%		5,974			8.0	%
General and administrative expenses		45,566	32.5	%		47,456	33.4	%		(1,890	)		(4.0	%)
Provision for bad debt		2,334	1.7	%		2,998	2.1	%		(664	)		(22.1	%)
Operating income	$	11,389			$	16,797

Net service revenue

The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2012 home-based services revenue growth, admissions, census and episodes and the related change from the same period in 2011 (in thousands except census and episode data).

	2012		2011		Total Growth (Decrease) %
Revenue	$	139,996	$	141,984		(1.4	)%
Medicare Revenue	$	109,220	$	114,758		(4.8	)%
New Admissions		27,570		25,980		6.1	%
New Medicare Admissions		18,807		18,437		2.0	%
Average Census		33,983		34,867		(2.5	)%
Average Medicare Census		25,759		27,046		(4.8	)%
Episodes		42,480		44,541		(4.6	)%

As of April 1, 2012, all agencies had been in service with the Company for greater than 12 months, therefore, meeting the qualifications of same store locations. As a result, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company does not have any de novo or acquired revenue.

Total home-based revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 1.4% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, while Medicare revenue decreased 4.8%. The primary cause for the decrease in revenue in the home-based segment was the decrease in census offset by a slight increase in revenue per episode.

Average patient census for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 2.5% lower than the June quarter last year. Although new admissions and new Medicare admissions increased in the second quarter of 2012 compared to last year, average daily census did not increase in the current quarter because of the timing of these new admissions.

22

Cost of service revenue

The following table summarizes home-based services cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012				2011
Salaries, wages and benefits	$	69,666	49.8	%(1)	$	64,395	45.4	%(1)
Transportation		6,343	4.5	%		6,013	4.2	%
Supplies and services		4,698	3.3	%		4,325	3.0	%
	$	80,707	57.6	%	$	74,733	52.6	%

(1) Percentage of home-based net service revenue

Salaries, wages and benefits increased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in employee positions. Additionally, employee health insurance expense was higher due to increased claim expenditures.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year due to cost reduction initiatives that began last year reducing personnel costs. Additionally, travel and related lodging costs were lower than last year as a result of the transition support costs of our conversion to point of care technology. Litigation support costs were higher last year during discussions with the United States government prior to our settlement on September 30, 2011.

Provision for bad debt

Provision for bad debt decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. Beginning January 1, 2011, the period allowed to file Medicare claims was reduced to twelve months from the end of episode date. This change resulted in a greater number of claims being denied for timely filing requirements last year.

Facility-based services segment operating results

The following table summarizes our facility-based results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of facility-based net service revenue):

	2012				2011				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	18,059			$	19,031				(972	)		(5.1	%)
Cost of service revenue		11,511	63.7	%		11,483	60.3	%		28			0.2	%
General and administrative expenses		5,401	29.9	%		4,698	24.7	%		703			15.0	%
Provision for bad debt		313	1.7	%		145	0.8	%		168			115.9	%
Operating income	$	834			$	2,705

Facility-based services net service revenue decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in revenue per patient day caused by a decrease in case mix and a higher number of patient days provided in excess of a patient’s maximum benefit.

Cost of service revenue

The following table summarizes facility-based services cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012				2011
Salaries, wages and benefits	$	7,067	39.1	%(1)	$	6,572	34.5	%(1)
Transportation		60	0.3	%		53	0.3	%
Supplies and services		4,384	24.3	%		4,858	25.5	%
	$	11,511	63.7	%	$	11,483	60.3	%

(1) Percentage of facility-based net service revenue

23

Salaries, wages and benefits increased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to an increase in staffing related to an increase in patient days including an increase in personnel related costs. Cost of service revenue as a percentage of net service revenue increased because net service revenue was reduced by the combination of a decrease in case mix and a higher number of patient days provided in excess of a patient’s maximum benefit.

Supplies and services decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in pharmaceutical supplies related to patient care.

Six months ended June 30, 2012

Consolidated financial statements

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of consolidated net service revenue unless indicated otherwise):

	2012					2011					Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	316,816				$	322,798					(5,982	)		(1.9	%)
Cost of service revenue		182,077		57.5	%		175,172		54.3	%		6,905			3.9	%
General and administrative expenses		101,849		32.1	%		107,195		33.2	%		(5,346	)		(5.0	%)
Provision for bad debt		5,408		1.7	%		5,704		1.8	%		(296	)		(5.2	%)
Income tax expense		9,318		40.5	%(1)		11,710		40.1	%(1)		(2,392	)		(20.4	%)
Noncontrolling interest		3,907					5,422					(1,515	)		—
Total non-operating income (loss)		(553	)				(113	)				(440	)		—
Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.	$	13,704				$	17,482					(3,778	)

(1) Percentage of income from continuing operations attributable to LHC Group, Inc.

Home-based services segment operating results

The following table summarizes our home-based results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of home-based net service revenue):

	2012				2011				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	279,591			$	283,785				(4,194	)		(1.5	%)
Cost of service revenue		159,768	57.1	%		151,823	53.5	%		7,945			5.2	%
General and administrative expenses		90,792	32.5	%		97,520	34.4	%		(6,728	)		(6.9	%)
Provision for bad debt		4,957	1.8	%		5,406	1.9	%		(449	)		(8.3	%)
Operating income	$	24,074			$	29,036

24

Net service revenue

The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2012 home-based services revenue growth, admissions, census and episodes and the related change from the same period in 2011 (in thousands except census and episode data).

	2012		2011		Total Growth (Decrease) %
Revenue	$	279,591	$	283,785		(1.5	)%
Medicare Revenue	$	218,783	$	229,016		(4.5	)%
New Admissions		56,375		53,093		6.2	%
New Medicare Admissions		38,848		37,868		2.6	%
Average Census		33,687		35,002		(3.8	)%
Average Medicare Census		25,589		27,129		(5.7	)%
Episodes		83,767		86,607		(3.3	)%

As of April 1, 2012, all agencies had been in service with the Company for greater than 12 months, therefore, meeting the qualifications of same store locations. As a result, the Company does not have any de novo or acquired revenue.

Total home-based revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 1.5% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, while Medicare revenue decreased 4.5%. The primary cause for the decrease in revenue in the home-based segment was the decrease in census.

Average patient census for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 3.8% lower than the same period last year. Although new admissions and new Medicare admissions increased in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to last year, average daily census did not increase in the current quarter because of the timing of those new admissions.

Cost of service revenue

The following table summarizes home-based services cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012				2011
Salaries, wages and benefits	$	138,326	49.4	%(1)	$	131,425	46.3	%(1)
Transportation		12,252	4.4	%		11,493	4.1	%
Supplies and services		9,190	3.3	%		8,905	3.1	%
	$	159,768	57.1	%	$	151,823	53.5	%

(1) Percentage of home-based net service revenue

Salaries, wages and benefits increased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in employee positions. Additionally, employee health insurance expense was higher due to increased claim expenditures in the current period.

Transportation increased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year due to the increase in mileage reimbursement rates, which are adjusted to reflect changing gasoline prices per gallon.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to elimination of salaries and benefits, consulting, travel and hotel costs incurred last year related to the conversion of our point of care platform. We accelerated this transition in order to replace the legacy billing systems which remained from previous acquisitions. The accelerated transition was completed in the first quarter last year. In addition, there were fewer acquisitions and lower acquisition related costs than in the same period last year. Also, litigation support costs were higher last year during discussions with the United States government prior to our settlement on September 30, 2011. Finally, cost reduction initiatives begun last year reduced personnel costs and other corporate costs in the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.

25

Provision for bad debt

Provision for bad debt decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. Beginning January 1, 2011, the period allowed to file Medicare claims was reduced to twelve months from the end of episode date. This change resulted in a greater number of claims being denied for timely filing requirements last year.

Facility-based services segment operating results

The following table summarizes our facility-based results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except percentages which are percentages of facility-based net service revenue):

	2012				2011				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Net service revenue	$	37,225			$	39,013				(1,788	)		(4.6	%)
Cost of service revenue		22,309	59.9	%		23,349	59.8	%		(1,040	)		(4.5	%)
General and administrative expenses		11,057	29.7	%		9,675	24.8	%		1,382			14.3	%
Provision for bad debt		451	1.2	%		298	0.8	%		153			51.3	%
Operating income	$	3,408			$	5,691

Facility-based services net service revenue decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in pharmacy revenue related to the loss of a third party contract as well as a decrease in revenue per patient day caused by a decrease in case mix and a higher number of patient days provided in excess of a patient’s maximum benefit.

Cost of service revenue

The following table summarizes facility-based services cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012				2011
Salaries, wages and benefits	$	13,946	37.4	%(1)	$	13,354	34.2	%(1)
Transportation		115	0.3	%		90	0.2	%
Supplies and services		8,248	22.2	%		9,905	25.4	%
	$	22,309	59.9	%	$	23,349	59.8	%

(1) Percentage of facility-based net service revenue

Salaries, wages and benefits increased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to an increase in contract labor, and an increase in staffing related to an increase in patient days including an increase in personnel related costs.

Supplies and services decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in pharmaceutical supplies related to patient care.

26

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our principal source of liquidity for operating activities is the collection of patient accounts receivable, most of which are collected from governmental and third party commercial payors. We also have the ability to obtain additional liquidity, if necessary, through our revolving credit facility, which provides for aggregate borrowings up to $75.0 million.

Our reported cash flows from operating activities are affected by various external and internal factors, including the following:

• Operating Results — Our net income has a significant effect on our operating cash flows. Any significant increase or decrease in our net income could have a material effect on our operating cash flows.

• Timing of Acquisitions —We use our operating cash flows for acquisitions. When the acquisitions occur at or near the end of a period, our cash outflows significantly increase.

• Timing of Payroll — Our employees are paid bi-weekly on Fridays; therefore, operating cash flows decline in reporting periods that end on a Friday.

• Medical Insurance Plan Funding — We are self-funded for medical insurance purposes. Any significant changes in the amount of insurance claims submitted could have a direct effect on our operating cash flows.

• Medical Supplies — A significant expense associated with our business is the cost of medical supplies. Any increase in the cost of medical supplies, or in the use of medical supplies by our patients, could have a material effect on our operating cash flows.

The following table summarizes changes in cash (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Cash provided by operating activities	$	39,723		$	33,763
Cash (used in) investing activities		(4,991	)		(17,531	)
Cash (used in) financing activities		(34,603	)		(7,308	)
Change in cash		129			8,924
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		256			288
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	385		$	9,212

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recovered income tax overpayments to provide $13.2 million cash from operations. This was offset in part by changes in other current assets and liabilities.

Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was lower than last year due to lower acquisition activity. Additionally, in the first quarter last year we paid approximately $3.0 million related to software conversion and point of care initiatives.

Cash used in financing activities was primarily the net repayment of our line of credit and payments made under our Stock Repurchase Program, as more fully discussed in Item 1, “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 6 – Stockholder’s Equity” of this Form 10-Q.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

At June 30, 2012, our allowance for uncollectible accounts, as a percentage of patient accounts receivable, was approximately 10.8%, or $10.9 million, compared to 10.5% or $10.7 million at December 31, 2011. Days sales outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 52 days and 53 days, respectively. Our calculation of days sales outstanding is derived by dividing our ending net patient accounts receivable (i.e., net of estimated revenue adjustments and allowance for doubtful accounts) at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by our average daily net patient revenues for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

27

The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2012, the aging of accounts receivable (based on the end of episode date) and the total allowance for uncollectible accounts expressed as a percentage of the related aged accounts receivable (amounts in thousands):

Payor	0-90			91-180			181-365			Over 365			Total
Medicare	$	46,695		$	10,394		$	6,282		$	1,011		$	64,382
Medicaid		2,346			944			686			271			4,247
Other		19,708			6,414			5,694			970			32,786
Total	$	68,749		$	17,752		$	12,662		$	2,252		$	101,415
Allowance as a percentage of receivables		3.5	%		9.8	%		20.5	%		100.0	%		10.8	%

For home-based services, we calculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts as a percentage of total patient receivables. The percentage changes depending on the payor and increases as the patient receivables age. For facility-based services, we calculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts based on a claim by claim review. As a result, the allowance percentages presented in the table above vary between the aging categories because of the mix of claims in each category.

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2011, the aging of accounts receivable (based on the end of episode date) and the total allowance for uncollectible accounts expressed as a percentage of the related aged accounts receivable (amounts in thousands):

Payor	0-90			91-180			181-365			Over 365			Total
Medicare	$	48,656		$	10,358		$	6,732		$	1,110		$	66,856
Medicaid		2,609			770			642			160			4,181
Other		18,346			5,425			5,860			1,240			30,871
Total	$	69,611		$	16,553		$	13,234		$	2,510		$	101,908
Allowance as a percentage of receivables		3.7	%		9.9	%		30.0	%		98.8	%		10.5	%

Indebtedness

As of June 30, 2012 we had $8.3 million drawn and a letter of credit totaling $5.7 million outstanding and $61.0 million available under our line of credit. At December 31, 2011, $34.8 million was drawn and a letter of credit totaling $3.8 million was outstanding on the line of credit.

Our Credit Facility with Capital One, National Association provides for a maximum aggregate principal borrowing of $75 million. The Credit Facility, which is scheduled to expire on October 12, 2013, is unsecured and has a letter of credit sublimit of $7.5 million. The commitment fee is 0.50% of the total availability. An additional fee of 0.375% is charged for any unused amounts. The interest rate for the borrowings under the Credit Facility, at our election, shall be either at the Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Facility) as a function of the prime rate or the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Borrowings accruing interest under the Credit Facility at either the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate are subject to the applicable margins set forth below:

Leverage Ratio	Eurodollar Margin			Base Rate Margin
<1.00:1.00		2.25	%		1.00	%
>1.00:1.00<1.50:1.00		2.50	%		1.25	%
>1.50:1.00<2.00:1.00		2.75	%		1.50	%

Our Credit Facility contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. For example, we are restricted in incurring additional debt, disposing of assets, making investments, allowing fundamental changes to our business or organization, and making certain payments in respect of stock or other ownership interests, such as dividends and stock repurchases, up to 2.0 million shares. Under the Credit Facility, we are also required to meet certain financial covenants with respect to minimum fixed charge coverage, consolidated net worth and leverage ratios.

Our Credit Facility also contains customary events of default. These include bankruptcy and other insolvency events, cross-defaults to other debt agreements, a change in control involving us or any subsidiary guarantor, and the failure to comply with certain covenants.

At June 30, 2012, we believe the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

Contingencies

For a discussion of contingencies, see Item 1, “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies” of this Form 10-Q.

28

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

Critical Accounting Policies

For a discussion of critical accounting policies, see Item 1, “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies” of this Form 10-Q.

Revenue Recognition

We report net service revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, managed care payors, patients and others for services rendered.

Medicare

Home-Based Services

Home Nursing Services. We are reimbursed by Medicare for delivering care over a 60-day period referred to as an episode. We recognize revenue based on the number of days elapsed during an episode of care within the appropriate reporting period.

A portion of the estimated Medicare prospective payment system reimbursement from each submitted home nursing episode is received in the form of a request for anticipated payment (“RAP”). We submit a RAP for 60% of the estimated reimbursement for the initial episode at the start of care. The full amount of the episode is billed after the episode has been completed. Final payments from Medicare may reflect one of four retroactive adjustments to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the total reimbursement: (a) an outlier payment if the patient’s care was unusually costly; (b) a low utilization adjustment if the number of visits was fewer than five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another provider before completing the episode; or (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy services required in the population base. We estimate all potential adjustments to an episode based on the best information available as the services are provided and prior to recognizing revenue or presenting the final bill. Therefore, historically, we have recorded little or no adjustments at the time payment is received. Although our estimates are based on historical experience using the best information available at the time we provide service, final payments could differ from our estimates.

29

Hospice Services. We are paid by Medicare under a per diem payment system. We receive one of four predetermined daily or hourly rates based upon the level of care we furnished. We record net service revenue less provision for bad debts from hospice services based on the daily or hourly rate and recognize revenue as these hospice services are provided.

Hospice payments are also subject to an inpatient cap and an overall payment cap. The inpatient cap relates to individual programs receiving more than 20% of its total Medicare reimbursement from inpatient care services. The overall payment cap relates to individual programs receiving reimbursements in excess of a “cap amount,” which is calculated by multiplying the number of beneficiaries receiving services during the period by a statutory amount that is indexed for inflation. The determination for each cap is made annually based on the 12-month period ending on October 31 of each year. We monitor our limits on a provider-by-provider basis. While historically we have not exceeded these caps, our revenue could be affected if we exceed the cap limits in the future.

Facility-Based Services

Long-Term Acute Care Services. We are reimbursed by Medicare for services provided at our LTACHs based on a predetermined fixed amount intended to reflect the average cost of treating a Medicare patient. The actual amount reimbursed can be adjusted based on length of stay and facility-specific costs, as well as in instances where a patient is discharged and subsequently re-admitted. Similar to the home health Medicare reimbursement, we estimate the adjustment based on a historical average and record revenue considering such adjustment. Similar to other Medicare prospective payment systems, the rate is also adjusted for geographic wage differences. Revenue is recognized for our LTACHs as services are provided. Although our estimates are based on historical experience using the best information available at the time we provide service, final payments could differ from our estimates.

Medicaid, managed care and other payors

Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each service provided. Therefore, revenue is recognized for Medicaid services as the services are provided based on this fee schedule. Managed care and other payors reimburse us in a manner similar to either Medicare or Medicaid. Accordingly, we recognize revenue from managed care and other payors in the same manner as we recognize revenue from Medicare or Medicaid.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Uncollectible Accounts

We report accounts receivable net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts and adjustments. Accounts receivable are uncollateralized and primarily consist of amounts due from Medicare, other third-party payors, and patients. To provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, we establish an allowance for uncollectible accounts to reduce the carrying amount of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value.

The collection of outstanding receivables is our primary source of cash collections and is critical to our operating performance. Because Medicare is our primary payor, the credit risk associated with receivables from other payors is limited. We believe the credit risk associated with our Medicare accounts, which represent 63.5% and 65.6% of our patient accounts receivable at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, is limited due to (i) the historical collections from Medicare and (ii) the fact that Medicare is a U.S. government payor. We do not believe that there are any other significant concentrations of receivables from any particular payor that would subject it to any significant credit risk in the collection of accounts receivable.

The amount of the provision for bad debts is based upon our assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic conditions and trends in government reimbursement. Quarterly, we perform a detailed review of historical writeoffs and recoveries as well as recent collection trends. Uncollectible accounts are written off when we have exhausted collection efforts and concluded the account will not be collected.

Although our estimated reserves for uncollectible accounts are based on historical experience and the most current collection trends, this process requires significant judgment and interpretation of the observed trends and the actual collections could differ from our estimates.

Insurance

We retain significant exposure for our employee health insurance, workers compensation, employment practices and professional liability insurance programs. Our insurance programs require us to estimate potential payments on filed claims and/or claims incurred but not reported. Our estimates are based on information provided by the third-party plan administrators, historical claim experience, expected costs of claims incurred but not paid and expected costs associated with settling claims. Each month we review the insurance-related recoveries and liabilities to determine if any adjustments are required.

Our employee health insurance program is self funded, with stop-loss coverage on claims that exceed $150,000 for any individual covered employee or employee family member. We are responsible for workers’ compensation claims up to $350,000 per individual incident.

30

Malpractice, employment practices and general patient liability claims for incidents which may give rise to litigation have been asserted against us by various claimants. The claims are in various stages of processing and some may ultimately be brought to trial. We are aware of incidents that have occurred through June 30, 2012 that may result in the assertion of additional claims. We currently carry professional, general liability and employment practices insurance coverage (on a claims made basis) for this exposure. We also carry D&O coverage (also on a claims made basis) for potential claims against our directors and officers, including securities actions, with a deductible of $500,000 per claim.

We estimate our liabilities related to these programs using the most current information available. As claims develop, we may need to change the recorded liabilities and change our estimates. These changes and adjustments could be material to our financial statements, results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As of June 30, 2012, we had cash of $385,000. The FDIC reinstated coverage on all non interest bearing checking accounts through December 31, 2012. All non interest bearing accounts are fully insured, regardless of the balance of the account.

Our exposure to market risk relates to changes in interest rates for borrowings under our Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is a revolving credit facility and, as such, we borrow, repay and re-borrow amounts as needed, changing the average daily balance outstanding under the facility. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the average daily amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility would have increased interest expense $43,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Such information is also accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2012.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the period ending June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

31

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Item 1, “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies” of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

None

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

In October 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, from time to time, in an amount not to exceed $50.0 million (“Stock Repurchase Program”). The Company anticipates that it will finance the Stock Repurchase Program with cash from general corporate funds, or draws under the Company’s Credit Facility. The Company may repurchase shares of common stock in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable securities laws, rules and regulations. The timing and extent to which the Company repurchases its shares will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations.

The Company uses the cost method to account for the repurchase of common stock and the average cost method to account for reissuance of treasury shares. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 236,961 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $4.0 million, or an average cost per share of $16.88, excluding commissions. The remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased under the share repurchase program is $45.4 million at June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes the Company’s repurchase activity during the three months ended June 30, 2012:

Period	(a) Total number of shares (or Units Purchased)		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1 — April 30		—		—		—	$	49,423,000
May 1 — May 31		—		—		—	$	49,423,000
June 1 — June 30		236,961	$	16.88		236,961	$	45,420,000
Total second quarter		236,961	$	16.88		236,961	$	45,420,000

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None

32

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of LHC Group, Inc. (previously filed as an exhibit to the Form S-1/A (File No. 333-120792) on February 14, 2005).
3.2	Bylaws of LHC Group, Inc. as amended on December 31, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-Q on May 9, 2008).
4.1	Specimen Stock Certificate of LHC’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (previously filed as an exhibit to the Form S-1/ A (File No. 333-120792) on February 14, 2005).
31.1	Certification of Keith G. Myers, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Peter J. Roman, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of LHC Group, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” and “unreviewed.”

* This exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, and the document will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

33

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	LHC GROUP, INC.
Date: August 9, 2012	/s/ Peter J. Roman
	Peter J. Roman
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer)

34