Consolidated Communications (CNSL) 10-Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

[     ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-51446

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	02-0636095
(State or other jurisdiction	(IRS Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
121 South 17th Street, Mattoon, Illinois	61938-3987
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

   (217) 235-3311   

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    X            No       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes    X             No       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer           Accelerated filer   X  

Non-accelerated filer      (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes                 No   X

On July 26, 2013, the registrant had 40,111,518 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	44
Item 6.	Exhibits	46
SIGNATURES		47

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited; Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

	Quarter Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Net revenues	$	151,320	$	86,557	$	302,848	$	173,008
Operating expense:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	55,942		32,019		110,994		63,073
Selling, general and administrative expenses	33,544		19,121		66,670		37,804
Financing and other transaction costs	178		562		357		5,384
Depreciation and amortization	34,709		21,708		69,550		43,682
Income from operations	26,947		13,147		55,277		23,065
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net of interest income	(20,697)		(16,893)		(45,297)		(31,493		)
Investment income	8,693		6,762		17,477		13,228
Other, net	82		185		(25)		199
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	15,025		3,201		27,432		4,999
Income tax expense	5,465		880		11,014		1,501
Income from continuing operations	9,560		2,321		16,418		3,498
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax	(272)		585		(248)		1,292
Net income	9,288		2,906		16,170		4,790
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	94		120		193		245
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	9,194	$	2,786	$	15,977	$	4,545
Net income per common share - basic and diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	0.23	$	0.07	$	0.40	$	0.11
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax	(0.01)		0.02		(0.01)		0.04
Net income per basic and diluted common share attributable to common shareholders	$	0.22	$	0.09	$	0.39	$	0.15
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.38	$	0.38	$	0.77	$	0.77

See accompanying notes.

1

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited; Amounts in thousands)

	Quarter Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Net income	$	9,288	$	2,906	$	16,170	$	4,790
Pension and post-retirement obligations:
Amortization of actuarial losses and prior service cost to earnings, net of tax	474		448		948		897
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax	719		589		1,138		1,584
Reclassification of realized (gain) loss to earnings, net of tax	-		(8)		1,839		-
Comprehensive income	10,481		3,935		20,095		7,271
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	94		120		193		245
Total comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders	$	10,387	$	3,815	$	19,902	$	7,026

See accompanying notes.

2

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited; Amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,520	$	17,854
Accounts receivable, net	56,527		57,957
Income tax receivable	1,954		12,020
Deferred income taxes	8,984		8,984
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	13,761		11,269
Assets of discontinued operations	714		1,772
Total current assets	85,460		109,856
Property, plant and equipment, net	895,597		907,672
Investments	111,800		109,750
Goodwill	603,446		603,446
Other intangible assets	44,994		49,530
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets	15,992		13,800
Total assets	$	1,757,289	$	1,794,054
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	7,630	$	14,954
Advance billings and customer deposits	26,485		27,654
Dividends payable	15,538		15,463
Accrued compensation	19,445		21,912
Accrued expense	33,755		47,225
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	9,849		9,596
Current portion of derivative liability	371		3,164
Liabilities of discontinued operations	254		4,209
Total current liabilities	113,327		144,177
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	1,214,404		1,208,248
Deferred income taxes	140,320		138,068
Pension and other postretirement obligations	149,672		156,710
Other long-term liabilities	12,989		10,746
Total liabilities	1,630,712		1,657,949
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 40,111,518 and 39,877,998, shares outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	401		399
Additional paid-in capital	163,668		177,315
Retained earnings	-		-
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net	(41,859)		(45,784		)
Noncontrolling interest	4,367		4,175
Total shareholders’ equity	126,577		136,105
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,757,289	$	1,794,054

See accompanying notes.

3

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited; amounts in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Net cash provided by continuing operations	$	67,346	$	49,228
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations	(3,097)		912
Net cash provided by operating activities	64,249		50,140
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net	(52,623)		(20,715		)
Restricted cash for acquisition of SureWest	-		(298,035		)
Other	(81)		(286		)
Net cash used in continuing operations	(52,704)		(319,036		)
Net cash used in discontinued operations	(48)		(97		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(52,752)		(319,133		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds on bond offering	-		298,055
Restricted cash on bond offering	-		(17,047		)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	49,000		-
Payment of capital lease obligation	(224)		(92		)
Payment on long-term debt	(43,620)		(4,400		)
Payment of financing costs	-		(5,070		)
Dividends on common stock	(30,987)		(23,173		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(25,831)		248,273
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(14,334)		(20,720		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	17,854		105,704
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,520	$	84,984

See accompanying notes.

4

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business and Basis of Accounting

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, “we” or “our”) is a holding company with operating subsidiaries (collectively “Consolidated”) that provide communications services to residential and business customers in Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Kansas and Missouri.

We offer a wide range of telecommunications services to residential and business customers in the areas we serve. Our telecommunications services include local and long-distance service, high-speed broadband Internet access, video services, digital telephone service (“VOIP”), custom calling features, private line services, carrier grade access services, network capacity services over our regional fiber optic networks, directory publishing, Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) services and equipment sales.  As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately 263 thousand access lines, 126 thousand voice connections, 251 thousand data and Internet connections and 109 thousand video connections.

We historically operated our business as two separate reportable segments: Telephone Operations and Other Operations.  Based on recent changes in our business structure, as of the quarter ended June 30, 2013 we concluded that we operate our business as one reportable segment. See the Recent Business Developments section below for a more detailed discussion regarding the circumstances that resulted in the change to our segment reporting.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP” or “GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations and accounting principles applicable for interim periods. Events subsequent to the balance sheet date have been evaluated for inclusion in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements through the date of issuance.  Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.  The information presented in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements (“Notes”) thereto included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Recent Business Developments

SureWest Merger

We completed the acquisition of SureWest Communications on July 2, 2012.  SureWest Communications results of operations are included within our results following the acquisition date.  For a more complete discussion of the transaction, refer to Note 2.

Segment Reporting

Historically, we have classified our operations into two separate reportable business segments: Telephone Operations and Other Operations.  Our Telephone Operations consisted of a wide range of telecommunications services to residential and business customers, including local and long-distance service, high-speed broadband Internet access, video services, VOIP services, custom calling features, private line services, carrier access services, network capacity services over a regional fiber optic network, mobile services and directory publishing.  Our Other Operations segment operated two complementary non-core businesses including telephone services to state and county correctional facilities (“Prison Services”) and equipment sales.  As discussed below, our contract to provide telephone services to correctional facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections was not renewed and the process of transitioning these services to another service provider was completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, upon establishing a plan to sell certain assets related to the Prison Services business, we classified the assets

5

and operations as a discontinued operation.  Prison Services comprised nearly all of the Other Operations segment revenue and results of operations.  Consequently, with the cessation of our Prison Services business and based on the segment accounting guidance, the Company has concluded that it operates as one segment as of the quarter ended June 30, 2013. As required by the authoritative guidance for segment presentation, segment results of operations have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this change for all periods presented.

Prison Services Contract

We previously provided telephone service to inmates incarcerated at facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections and to certain county jails.  On June 27, 2012, the Illinois Department of Central Management Services announced its intent to replace us as the provider of those services with a competitor. Although we challenged our competitor’s bid and the State’s decision to accept that bid in a variety of different forums, during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the process of transitioning these services to another service provider was completed. All related assets have been assessed for recoverability in light of this change and we determined that no impairment was necessary. During 2012, the prison services contract comprised 5% of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 2% of consolidated operating income, excluding financing and other transaction fees.

Discontinued Operations

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company established a plan to sell certain assets related to the Prison Services business.  We expect the plan to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2013.  In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20, “Discontinued Operations”, the financial results of these prison services operations have been classified as discontinued operations and are presented in a separate line on the condensed consolidated statements of income for all periods presented.  The related prison services assets have been classified on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as assets of discontinued operations for all periods presented.  For a more complete discussion of the transaction, refer to Note 2.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in our 2012 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of our 2013 condensed consolidated financial statements, which consists primarily of the effects of reclassifications from the presentation of prison services as a discontinued operation and the finalization of purchase accounting for the SureWest acquisition.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 (“ASU 2012-02”), Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to perform an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that a non-goodwill indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired and thus whether it is necessary to calculate the asset’s fair value for the purpose of comparing it with the asset’s carrying amount. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which establishes new requirements for disclosing reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”). ASU 2013-2 requires disclosures for the (i) changes in components of accumulated OCI, (ii) effects on individual line items in net income for each item of accumulated OCI that is reclassified in its entirety to net income, and (iii) cross references to other disclosures that provide additional details for OCI items that are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For public companies, amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. In accordance with the provisions of this guidance, disclosures related to accumulated OCI can be found in Note 8.

6

2.     ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITIONS

Merger With SureWest Communications

On July 2, 2012, we completed the merger with SureWest Communications (“SureWest”), which resulted in the acquisition of 100% of all the outstanding shares of SureWest for $23.00 per share in a cash and stock transaction.  SureWest provides telecommunications services in Northern California, primarily in the greater Sacramento region, and in the greater Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri areas. The total purchase price of $550.8 million consisted of cash and assumed debt of $402.4 million and 9,965,983 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at the Company’s opening stock price on July 2, 2012 of $14.89, which totaled $148.4 million. We acquired SureWest to provide additional diversification of our revenues and cash flows.

Subsequent to the merger, the financial results of SureWest operations have been included in our condensed consolidated statement of income.  During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, we paid change-in-control obligations to former members of the SureWest management team of $0.8 million and $7.9 million, respectively, that were previously accrued.  At June 30, 2013, unpaid obligations under the change-in-control agreements were $0.3 million, which are expected to be paid during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The acquisition of SureWest has been accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with the FASB’s ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations.  Accordingly, the net assets acquired were recorded at their estimated fair values at July 2, 2012.  These values were derived from a purchase price allocation, which was finalized during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 with the completion of various tax analysis and adjustments.

The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation:

	(In thousands)
Current assets	$	47,073
Property, plant and equipment	591,818
Goodwill	84,016
Other intangible assets	3,600
Other long-term assets	4,861
Total assets acquired	731,368
Current liabilities	53,566
Pension and other post-retirement obligations	55,916
Deferred income taxes	66,976
Other long-term liabilities	4,114
Total liabilities assumed	180,572
Net assets acquired	$	550,796

As noted above, during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded tax related adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation which decreased deferred income taxes by $1.3 million, increased current assets by $0.2 million and decreased goodwill by $1.5 million.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company has completed its accounting for the acquisition of SureWest.  These adjustments were retrospectively applied on the balance sheet to reflect the appropriate balances as of July 2, 2012.  There was no impact to the income statement for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.

Unaudited Pro Forma Results

The following unaudited pro forma information presents our results of operations as if the acquisition of SureWest occurred on January 1, 2011.  The adjustments to arrive at the pro forma information below include additional depreciation and amortization expense for the fair value increases to property plant and equipment, software and customer relationships.  Interest expense was increased to reflect the additional debt acquired to finance a portion of the acquisition price.  Shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share were adjusted to reflect the additional shares of common stock issued to fund a portion of the acquisition price. The pro forma information below does not purport to present the actual results that would have resulted if the acquisition had in fact occurred at the beginning of the fiscal periods presented, nor does the information project results for any future period.

7

	Quarter Ended		Six Months Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2012
Operating revenues	$	151,563	$	300,910
Income from operations	$	12,037	$	26,113
Loss from continuing operations	$	(1,659)	$	(761	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	$	585	$	1,292
Net (loss) income	$	(1,074)	$	531
Less: income attributable to noncontrolling interest	120		245
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders	$	(1,194)	$	286
Net income per common share - basic and diluted
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.04)	$	(0.02	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	0.01		0.03
Net (loss) income per basic and diluted common share attributable to common shareholders	$	(0.03)	$	0.01

Discontinued Operations

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company established a plan to sell certain assets related to the Prison Services business.  We expect the plan to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2013. The financial results of the operations for prison services, which were previously reported in the Other Operations segment, have been reported as a discontinued operation in our condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the major classes of the prison services assets and liabilities included in discontinued operations were as follows:

(In thousands)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Accounts receivable, net	$	60	$	625
Deferred income taxes	583		583
Property, plant and equipment, net	71		564
Total assets	$	714	$	1,772
Accounts payable	$	-	$	13
Advance billings and customer deposits	165		938
Accrued expense	89		3,258
Total liabilities	$	254	$	4,209

The following table summarizes the financial information for the prison services operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Quarter Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Operating revenues	$	482	$	6,448	$	5,249	$	13,361
Operating expenses including depreciation and amortization	878		5,543		5,577		11,361
(Loss) income from operations	(396)		905		(328)		2,000
Income tax (benefit) expense	(124)		320		(80)		708
(Loss) income from discontinued operations	$	(272)	$	585	$	(248)	$	1,292

8

3.  EARNINGS PER SHARE

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders computed using the two-class method is as follows:

	Quarter Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Income from continuing operations	$	9,560	$	2,321	$	16,418	$	3,498
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	94		120		193		245
Income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities	9,466		2,201		16,225		3,253
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities	131		95		263		160
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders	9,335		2,106		15,962		3,093
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	(272)		585		(248)		1,292
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	9,063	$	2,691	$	15,714	$	4,385
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding	39,755		29,689		39,755		29,689
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.23	$	0.07	$	0.40	$	0.11
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	(0.01)		0.02		(0.01)		0.04
Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders	$	0.22	$	0.09	$	0.39	$	0.15

Diluted earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 excludes 0.4 million shares and 0.2 million shares, respectively, of potential common securities related to our share-based compensation plan, because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have had an antidilutive effect.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, diluted earnings per share excluded 0.3 million potential common shares.

4.  INVESTMENTS

Our investments are as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2013		2012
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies	$	2,115	$	2,045
Cost method investments:
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (2.34% interest)	21,450		21,450
Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (3.60% interest)	22,950		22,950
CoBank, ACB Stock	5,028		5,023
Other	430		430
Equity method investments:
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (20.51% interest)	26,543		25,695
Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (16.6725% interest)	7,434		7,286
Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (23.67% interest)	24,186		23,338
CVIN, LLC (13.43% interest)	1,664		1,533
Totals	$	111,800	$	109,750

Cost Method

We own 2.34% of GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (the “Mobilnet South Partnership”).  The principal activity of the Mobilnet South Partnership is providing cellular service in the Houston, Galveston, and Beaumont, Texas metropolitan areas.  We also own 3.60% of Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (“Pittsburgh SMSA”), which provides cellular service in and around the Pittsburgh metropolitan area.  Because of our limited influence over these partnerships, we use the cost method to account for both of these investments.  It is not practicable to estimate fair value of these investments.  We did not evaluate any of the investments for impairment

9

during the quarters or six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012 as no factors indicating impairment existed.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $3.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $7.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively.

CoBank, ACB (“CoBank”) is a cooperative bank owned by its customers.  On an annual basis, CoBank distributes patronage in the form of cash and stock in the cooperative based on the Company’s outstanding loan balance with CoBank, which has traditionally been a significant lender in the Company’s credit facility.  The investment in CoBank represents the accumulation of the equity patronage paid by CoBank to the Company.

Equity Method

We own 20.51% of GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (“RSA #17”), 16.6725% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(I)”) and 23.67% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(II)”).  RSA #17 provides cellular service to a limited rural area in Texas.  RSA 6 (I) and RSA 6 (II) provide cellular service in and around our Pennsylvania service territory.  Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these three entities, we account for the investments using the equity method.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $3.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $8.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

We have a 13.43% interest in Central Valley Independent Network, LLC (“CVIN”), a joint enterprise comprised of affiliates of several independent telephone companies located in central and northern California. CVIN provides network services and oversees a broadband infrastructure project designed to expand and improve the availability of network services to counties in central California.  Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of this entity, we account for this investment using the equity method.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we made additional capital investments of $0.1 million in this partnership.  We did not receive any distributions from this partnership during the quarters or six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

The combined unaudited results of operations and financial position of our three equity investments in the cellular limited partnerships are summarized below:

	Quarter Ended				Six Months
	June 30,				Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Total revenues	$	79,342	$	73,555	$	156,061	$	145,890
Income from operations	24,914		22,235		48,888		41,927
Net income before taxes	24,926		22,247		48,911		41,956
Net income	24,926		22,143		48,911		41,748

	June 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2013		2012
Current assets	$	58,650	$	49,982
Non-current assets	81,826		79,529
Current liabilities	15,798		15,417
Non-current liabilities	1,492		1,351
Partnership equity	123,186		112,734

5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Our derivative instruments related to interest rate swap agreements are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  The fair values of the interest rate swaps are determined using valuation models which rely on the expected London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based yield curve and estimates of counterparty and Consolidated’s non-performance risk as the most significant inputs.  Because each of these inputs are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized these interest rate swaps as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7 for further discussion regarding our interest rate swap agreements.

10

Our interest rate swap liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to disclosure requirements at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

			As of June 30, 2013
			Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(In thousands)	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Current interest rate swap liabilities	$	(371)	$	–	$	(371)	$	–
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities	(2,779)		–		(2,779)		–
Totals	$	(3,150)	$	–	$	(3,150)	$	–

			As of December 31, 2012
			Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(In thousands)	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Current interest rate swap liabilities	$	(3,164)	$	–	$	(3,164)	$	–
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities	(3,919)		–		(3,919)		–
Totals	$	(7,083)	$	–	$	(7,083)	$	–

The change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily a result of a change in market expectations for future interest rates and the expiration of certain instruments during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.  The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities or variable-rate nature of the respective balances.  The following table presents the other financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

	As of June 30, 2013				As of December 31, 2012
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Investments, equity basis	$	59,827	n/a		$	57,852	n/a
Investments, at cost	$	49,858	n/a		$	49,853	n/a
Long-term debt	$	1,218,839	$	1,268,870	$	1,213,000	$	1,231,355

Cost & Equity Method Investments

Our investments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 accounted for under both the equity and cost methods consists primarily of minority positions in various cellular telephone limited partnerships and our investment in CoBank.  These investments are recorded using either the equity or cost methods. It is impracticable to determine fair value of these investments.

Long-term Debt

The fair value of our long-term debt was estimated using a discounted cash flow analyses based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.  We have categorized the long-term debt as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

11

6.     LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt, presented net of unamortized discounts, consisted of the following:

	June 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2013		2012
Senior secured credit facility:
Term Loan 2	$	402,916	$	404,961
Term Loan 3, net of discount of $4,714 and $5,088 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	507,711		509,912
Revolving loan	10,000		-
Senior notes, net of discount of $1,788 and $1,873 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	298,212		298,127
Capital leases	5,414		4,844
	1,224,253		1,217,844
Less: current portion of long-term debt and capital leases	(9,849)		(9,596)
Total long-term debt	$	1,214,404	$	1,208,248

Credit Agreement

The Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has an outstanding credit agreement with several financial institutions, which consists of a $50.0 million revolving credit facility and outstanding term loans of $910.6 million at June 30, 2013.  The credit facility also includes an incremental term loan facility which provides the ability to borrow up to $300.0 million of incremental term loans.  As of June 30, 2013, $10.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  No amounts were outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and our majority-owned subsidiary, East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated.

Our term loans under the credit facility, as amended, were issued in separate tranches, resulting in different maturity dates and interest rate margins for each term loan.  The second term loan (“Term 2”) consists of an original aggregate principal amount of $409.1 million, matures on December 31, 2017 and currently has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 4.00% for a LIBOR-based term loan or 3.00% for an alternative base rate term loan.  The Term 2 loan requires $1.0 million in quarterly principal payments, which began on March 31, 2012.  The third term loan (“Term 3”) consists of an original aggregate principal amount of $515.0 million, with a maturity date of December 31, 2018.  The Term 3 loan requires quarterly principal payments of $1.3 million which commenced March 31, 2013 and has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 4.00% for a LIBOR-based term loan or 3.00% for an alternative base rate term loan subject to a 1.25% LIBOR floor. The Term 3 loan contains an original issuance discount of $5.2 million, which is being amortized over the term of the loan.

Our revolving credit facility has a maturity date of June 8, 2016 and an applicable margin (at our election) of between 2.75% and 3.50% for LIBOR-based borrowings and between 1.75% and 2.50% for alternative base rate borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio.  Based on our leverage ratio at June 30, 2013, the borrowing margin for the next three month period ending September 30, 2013 will be at a weighted-average margin of 3.25% for a LIBOR-based loan or 2.25% for an alternative base rate loan.  The applicable borrowing margin for the revolving credit facility is adjusted quarterly to reflect the leverage ratio from the prior quarter-end. As of June 30, 2013, $10.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. There were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012.

The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our credit agreement was 4.77% and 4.79% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  Interest is payable at least quarterly.

Net proceeds from asset sales exceeding certain thresholds, to the extent not reinvested, are required to be used to repay loans outstanding under the credit agreement.

12

Credit Agreement Covenant Compliance

The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants, including, among other items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, and issue capital stock.  We have agreed to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage and total net leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement.  As of June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with the credit agreement covenants.

Effective February 17, 2012, we amended our credit facility to provide us with the ability to incur indebtedness necessary to finance the acquisition of SureWest, which enabled us to issue the unsecured Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”), as described below.  In connection with the amendment, fees of $3.5 million were recognized as financing and other transaction costs during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

In general, our credit agreement restricts our ability to pay dividends to the amount of our Available Cash as defined in our credit agreement. As of June 30, 2013, and including the $15.5 million dividend declared in May 2013 and paid on August 1, 2013, we had $194.2 million in dividend availability under the credit facility covenant.

Under our credit agreement, if our total net leverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement), as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 5.10:1.00, we will be required to suspend dividends on our common stock unless otherwise permitted by an exception for dividends that may be paid from the portion of proceeds of any sale of equity not used to fund acquisitions, or make other investments.  During any dividend suspension period, we will be required to repay debt in an amount equal to 50.0% of any increase in Available Cash, among other things.  In addition, we will not be permitted to pay dividends if an event of default under the credit agreement has occurred and is continuing.  Among other things, it will be an event of default if our total net leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is greater than 5.25:1.00 and less than 2.25:1.00, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013, our total net leverage ratio under the credit agreement was 4.26:1.00, and our interest coverage ratio was 3.32:1.00.

Senior Notes

On May 30, 2012, we completed an offering of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.875% unsecured Senior Notes, due 2020 through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Consolidated Communications Finance Co. (“Finance Co.”) for the acquisition of SureWest.  The Senior Notes will mature on June 1, 2020 and earn interest at a rate of 10.875% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2012.  The Senior Notes were sold in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act.  In addition, some of the Senior Notes were sold to certain “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act).  The Senior Notes were sold to investors at a price equal to 99.345% of the principal amount thereof, for a yield to maturity of 11.00%.  This discount is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes.  The proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes were held in an escrow account prior to the closing of the SureWest transaction.  Upon closing of the SureWest acquisition on July 2, 2012, Finance Co. merged with and into our wholly-owned subsidiary Consolidated Communications, Inc., which assumed the Senior Notes, and we and certain of our subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Senior Notes.  On August 3, 2012, SureWest and its subsidiaries guaranteed the Senior Notes.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we completed an exchange offer to issue registered notes (“Exchange Notes”) for $287.3 million of the original Senior Notes.  The terms of the Exchange Notes are substantially identical to the Senior Notes, except that the Exchange Notes are registered under the Securities Act and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Senior Notes do not apply to the Exchange Notes.  The exchange offer did not impact the aggregate principal amount or the remaining terms of the Senior Notes outstanding.

Senior Notes Covenant Compliance

The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains customary covenants for high yield notes, which limits Consolidated Communications, Inc.’s and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to: incur debt or issue certain preferred stock; pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or prepay subordinated indebtedness; purchase or redeem any equity interests; make investments; create liens; sell assets; enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments by restricted subsidiaries; consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets; engage in transactions with its affiliates; or enter into any sale and leaseback transactions.

13

Among other matters, the Senior Notes indenture provides that Consolidated Communications, Inc. may not pay dividends or make other “restricted payments” to the Company if its total net leverage ratio is 4.25:1.00 or greater.  At June 30, 2013, this ratio, which is calculated differently than the comparable ratio under the credit agreement, was 4.00:1.00.  If this ratio is met, dividends and other restricted payments may be made from cumulative consolidated cash flow since the date the Senior Notes were issued, less 1.75 times fixed charges, less dividends and other restricted payments made since the date the Senior Notes were issued.  Dividends may be paid and other restricted payments may also be made from a “basket” of $50.0 million, none of which has been used to date, and pursuant to other exceptions identified in the Senior Notes indenture. Since dividends of $77.5 million have been paid since May 30, 2012, at June 30, 2013 there was $115.2 million of the $192.7 million of cumulative consolidated cash flow since May 30, 2012 available to pay dividends.

Bridge Loan Facility

In connection with the acquisition of SureWest, in February 2012 the Company received committed financing for a total of $350.0 million to fund the cash portion of the anticipated transaction, to refinance SureWest’s debt and to pay for certain transaction costs. The financing package included a $350.0 million Senior Unsecured Bridge Loan Facility (“Bridge Facility”). As anticipated, permanent financing for the SureWest acquisition was funded by our Senior Note offering, as described above.  As a result, the $4.2 million commitment fee incurred for the Bridge Facility was capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs in February 2012 and was amortized over the expected life of the Bridge Facility, which was four months.

Capital Leases

As of June 30, 2013, we had seven capital leases which expire between 2015 and 2021.  As of June 30, 2013, the present value of the minimum remaining lease commitments was approximately $5.4 million, of which $0.6 million was due and payable within the next twelve months.  The leases require total remaining rental payments of $8.5 million as of June 30, 2013, of which $6.1 million will be paid to LATEL LLC, a related party entity.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we acquired equipment of $0.8 million through capital lease agreements, which represents a noncash investing activity.

7.     DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to the risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments.  Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.  Certain of our interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of our expected future interest payments.  For derivative instruments designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value is recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and is recognized as an adjustment to earnings over the period in which the hedged item impacts earnings. When an interest rate swap agreement terminates, any resulting gain or loss is recognized over the shorter of the remaining original term of the hedging instrument or the remaining life of the underlying debt obligation.  If a derivative instrument is de-designated, the remaining gain or loss in AOCI on the date of de-designation is amortized to earnings over the remaining term of the hedging instrument. For derivative financial instruments that are not designated as a hedge, changes in fair value are recognized on a current basis in earnings.  The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of any hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.  Cash flows from hedging activities are classified under the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items in our consolidated statement of cash flows.

The following interest rate swaps were outstanding at June 30, 2013:

(In thousands)	Notional Amount		2013 Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Cash Flow Hedges:
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR	$	275,000	Other long-term liabilities	$	(2,779)
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR	100,000		Current portion of derivative liability	(371)
Total Fair Values				$	(3,150)

14

The following interest rate swaps were outstanding at December 31, 2012:

(In thousands)	Notional Amount		2012 Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Cash Flow Hedges:
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR	$	200,000	Other long-term liabilities	$	(2,758)
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR	100,000		Current portion of derivative liability	(1,069)
Forward starting fixed to
1-month floating LIBOR	75,000		Other long-term liabilities	(1,161)
De-designated Hedges:
Fixed to 3-month floating LIBOR	130,000		Current portion of derivative liability	(1,300)
3-month floating LIBOR minus spread to 1-month floating LIBOR	130,000		Current portion of derivative liability	(16)
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR	200,000		Current portion of derivative liability	(779)
Total Fair Values				$	(7,083)

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the interest rate on approximately 41% and 69%, respectively, of our outstanding debt under the term loan credit facility was fixed through the use of interest rate swaps.

As of June 30, 2013, the counterparties to our various swaps are four major U.S. and European banks.  None of the swap agreements provide for either us or the counterparties to post collateral nor do the agreements include any covenants related to the financial condition of Consolidated or the counterparties.  The swaps of any counterparty that is a “Lender” as defined in our credit facility are secured along with the other creditors under the credit facility.  Each of the swap agreements provides that in the event of a bankruptcy filing by either Consolidated or the counterparty, any amounts owed between the two parties would be offset in order to determine the net amount due between parties.  This provision allows us to partially mitigate the risk of non-performance by a counterparty.

On December 4, 2012, $660.0 million notional interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges were de-designated in connection with an amendment to our credit agreement.  Prior to the de-designation, the effective portion of the change in fair value of these interest rate swaps were recognized in AOCI.  The balance of the unrealized loss included in AOCI as of the date the swaps were de-designated was amortized to earnings over the remaining term of the swap agreements.  On December 31, 2012, $200.0 million notional interest rate swap agreements expired and the remainder expired on March 31, 2013.  Subsequent to December 4, 2012, changes in fair value of the de-designated swaps were recognized in earnings.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, a gain of $2.1 million was recognized as a reduction to interest expense for the change in fair value of the de-designated swaps.

Information regarding our cash flow hedge transactions is as follows:

	Quarter Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Gain recognized in AOCI, pretax	$	1,161	$	932	$	1,838	$	2,508
Deferred losses reclassed from AOCI to interest expense	$	-	$	13	$	(2,912)	$	1
Gain arising from ineffectiveness reducing interest expense	$	-	$	15	$	-	$	31

	June 30,		December 31,
(In thousands, except months)	2013		2012
Aggregate notional value of current derivatives outstanding	$	375,000	$	630,000
Aggregate notional value of forward derivatives outstanding	$	-	$	75,000
Period through which derivative positions currently exist	March 2016		March 2016
Fair value of derivatives	$	(3,150)	$	(7,083)
Deferred losses included in AOCI (pretax)	$	3,149	$	7,899
Losses included in AOCI to be recognized in the next 12 months	$	-	$	2,912
Number of months over which loss in AOCI is to be recognized	N/A		3

15

8.     EQUITY

Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes total compensation costs recognized for share-based payments during the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Quarter Ended				Six Months
	June 30,				Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Restricted stock	$	461	$	325	$	917	$	650
Performance shares	323		264		523		440
Total	$	784	$	589	$	1,440	$	1,090

Stock-based compensation expense is included in “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the accompanying statements of income.

As of June 30, 2013, total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested Restricted Stock Awards (“RSAs”) and Performance Share Awards (“PSAs”) was $5.1 million and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.3 years.

The following table summarizes the RSA and PSA activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

	RSAs				PSAs
		Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested shares outstanding - January 1, 2013		64,318	$	18.33	58,221	$	18.85
Shares granted		168,516	17.13		66,504	19.30
Shares cancelled		(1,500)	17.13		-	-
Shares vested		-	-		-	-
Non-vested shares outstanding - June 30, 2013		231,334			124,725

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

	Pension and
	Post-Retirement		Derivative
(In thousands)	Obligations		Instruments		Total
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(40,581)	$	(5,203)	$	(45,784)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	-		1,138		1,138
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	948		1,839		2,787
Net current period other comprehensive income	948		2,977		3,925
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	(39,633)	$	(2,226)	$	(41,859)

16

The following table summarizes reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013:

	Amount Reclassified from AOCI
	Quarter		Six Months
	Ended		Ended		Affected Line Item in the
(In thousands)	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2013		Statement of Income
Amortization of pension and post-retirement items:
Prior service credit	$	115	$	231	(a)
Actuarial loss	(891)		(1,782)		(a)
	(776)		(1,551)		Total before tax
	302		603		Tax benefit
	$	(474)	$	(948)	Net of tax
Loss on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate derivatives	$	-	$	(2,912)	Interest expense
	-		1,073		Tax benefit
	$	-	$	(1,839)	Net of tax

(a)These items are included in the components of net periodic benefit cost for our pension and post-retirement benefit plans.  See Note 9 for additional details.

9.PENSION PLAN AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Defined Benefit Plans

We sponsor a qualified defined benefit pension plan (“Retirement Plan”) that is non-contributory covering certain of our hourly employees who fulfill minimum age and service requirements.  Certain salaried employees are also covered by the Retirement Plan, although these benefits have previously been frozen.  In April 2013, the Retirement Plan was amended to among other things: (i) change the benefit formula to a cash balance account as of May 1, 2013 and (ii) freeze entrance into the Retirement Plan so that no person is eligible to become a participant on or following May 1, 2013.

In connection with the acquisition of SureWest, we assumed sponsorship in 2012 of a frozen non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (the “SureWest Plan”).  The SureWest Plan covers certain eligible employees and benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s average compensation during the five highest consecutive years of the last ten years of credited service.  This plan has previously been frozen so that no person is eligible to become a new participant and all future benefit accruals for existing participants have ceased.

We also have two non-qualified supplemental retirement plans (“Supplemental Plans”): the Restoration Plan, which we acquired as part of our North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (“North Pittsburgh”) and TXU Communications Venture Company (“TXUCV”) acquisitions, and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which we acquired as part of our acquisition of SureWest.  The Supplemental Plans provide supplemental retirement benefits to certain former employees by providing for incremental pension payments to partially offset the reduction that would have been payable under the qualified defined benefit pension plans if it were not for limitations imposed by federal income tax regulations. Both plans have previously been frozen so that no person is eligible to become a new participant in the Supplemental Plans.  These plans are unfunded and have no assets.  The benefits paid under the Supplemental Plans are paid from the general operating funds of the Company.

17

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for our defined benefit plans for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Quarter Ended				Six Months
	June 30,				Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Service cost	$	304	$	357	$	608	$	713
Interest cost	3,860		2,641		7,722		5,283
Expected return on plan assets	(5,151)		(2,611)		(10,302)		(5,222)
Net amortization loss	891		809		1,782		1,618
Prior service credit amortization	(70)		(41)		(141)		(83)
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost	$	(166)	$	1,155	$	(331)	$	2,309

Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Agreements

We also are liable for deferred compensation agreements with former members of the board of directors and certain other former employees of a subsidiary of TXUCV, which was acquired in 2004.  The benefits are payable for up to the life of the participant and may begin as early as age 65 or upon the death of the participant.  Participants accrue no new benefits as these plans had previously been frozen by TXUCV’s predecessor company prior to our acquisition of TXUCV.  Payments related to the deferred compensation agreements totaled approximately $0.1 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $0.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The net present value of the remaining obligations was approximately $1.9 million and $2.2 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and is included in pension and post-retirement benefit obligations in the accompanying balance sheets.

We also maintain 37 life insurance policies on certain of the participating former directors and employees.  The excess of the cash surrender value of the remaining life insurance policies over the notes payable balances related to these policies is determined by an independent consultant, and totaled $2.1 million at June 30, 2013 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2012. These amounts are included in investments in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Cash principal payments for the policies and any proceeds from the policies are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Post-retirement Benefit Obligations

We sponsor a healthcare and life insurance plan (“Post-retirement Plan”) that provides post-retirement medical benefits and life insurance to certain groups of retired employees.  Retirees share in the cost of healthcare benefits, making contributions that are adjusted periodically—either based upon collective bargaining agreements or because total costs of the program have changed.  Covered expenses for retiree health benefits are paid as they are incurred.  Post-retirement life insurance benefits are fully insured.  The Post-retirement Plan is unfunded and has no assets, and benefits are paid from the general operating funds of the Company.

In connection with the acquisition of SureWest, we acquired its post-retirement benefit plan which provides life insurance benefits and a stated reimbursement for Medicare supplemental insurance to certain eligible retired participants.  This plan has previously been frozen so that no person is eligible to become a new participant.  Employer contributions for retiree medical benefits are separately designated within the SureWest Plan pension trust for the sole purpose of providing payments of retiree medical benefits.  The nature of the assets used to provide payment of retiree medical benefits is the same as that of the SureWest Plan.

	Quarter Ended				Six Months
	June 30,				Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Service cost	$	231	$	213	$	463	$	427
Interest cost	392		414		783		828
Expected return on plan assets	(58)		-		(116)		-
Net prior service credit amortization	(45)		(47)		(90)		(95)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	520	$	580	$	1,040	$	1,160

18

Contributions

We expect to contribute approximately $11.5 million to our pension plans and $2.5 million to our other post-retirement plans in 2013.  As of June 30, 2013, we have contributed $4.6 million and $1.4 million of the annual contribution to the pension plans and other post-retirement plans, respectively.

10.  INCOME TAXES

There have been no changes to the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2012.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $1.2 million.  The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $0.8 million.  A decrease of the full amount of unrecognized tax benefits and $0.2 million of related accrued interest is expected in the third quarter of 2013 due to the expiration of federal and state statute of limitations.  The tax benefit attributable to the decrease in unrecognized tax benefits will not have a significant effect on the Company’s effective tax rate.

Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively.  At June 30, 2013, we had no material liability for interest or penalties and had no material interest or penalty expense.

The periods subject to examination for our federal return are years 2009 through 2012.  The periods subject to examination for our state returns are years 2005 through 2011.  We are currently under examination by federal and state taxing authorities.  We do not expect any settlement or payment that may result from the audit to have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

Our effective tax rate was 36.4% and 27.5% for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 40.2% and 30.0% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, the effective tax rate differed from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to non-deductible compensation in relation to the acquisition of SureWest.  Exclusive of this adjustment, our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 would have been approximately 36.7%.

11.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Prior to the completion of the SureWest Merger on July 2, 2012, six putative class action lawsuits were filed by alleged SureWest shareholders challenging the Company’s proposed merger with SureWest in which the Company, WH Acquisition Corp. and WH Acquisition II Corp., SureWest and members of the SureWest board of directors have been named as defendants.  Five shareholder actions were filed in the Superior Court of California, Placer County, and one shareholder action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.  The actions are called Needles v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed February 17, 2012, Errecart v. Oldham, et al., filed February 24, 2012, Springer v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 9, 2012, Aievoli v. Oldham, et al., filed March 15, 2012, and Waterbury v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 26, 2012, and the federal action is called Broering v. Oldham, et al., filed April 18, 2012.  The actions generally allege, among other things, that each member of the SureWest board of directors breached fiduciary duties to SureWest and its shareholders by authorizing the sale of SureWest to the Company for consideration that allegedly was unfair to the SureWest shareholders and agreed to terms that allegedly unduly restrict other bidders from making a competing offer.  The complaints also allege that the Company and SureWest aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duties allegedly committed by the members of the SureWest board of directors.  The Broering complaint also alleges, among other things, that the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012 did not make sufficient disclosures regarding the merger, that SureWest’s board should have appointed an independent committee to negotiate the transaction and that SureWest should have gone back to another bidder to create a competitive bid process.  The lawsuits seek equitable relief, including an order to prevent the defendants from consummating the merger on the agreed-upon terms and/or an award of unspecified monetary damages.  On March 14, 2012, the Placer County Superior Court entered an order consolidating the Needles, Errecart and Springer actions into a single action under the caption In re SureWest Communications Shareholder Litigation.  Under the terms of this order, all cases subsequently filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Placer, that relate to the same subject matter and involve similar questions of law or fact were to be consolidated with these cases as well.  This included the Aievoli and Waterbury cases.  On April 10, 2012, the plaintiff in Waterbury filed a request for voluntary dismissal of her complaint without prejudice.  On May 18, 2012, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the federal Court entered an order staying the Broering action for 90 days.  The federal Court subsequently extended the stay of the Broering action until June 1, 2013.  On June 1, 2012, the parties entered into a proposed settlement of all of the shareholder actions without any admission of

19

liability by the Company or the other defendants.  Pursuant to the proposed settlement, SureWest agreed to make, and subsequently made, certain additional disclosures in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC in advance of the special meeting of SureWest shareholders held on June 12, 2012.  The proposed settlement also provided that plaintiffs’ counsel collectively are to receive attorneys’ fees of $0.525 million, to be paid by the Company and SureWest and its insurer.  On December 20, 2012, the court issued a ruling preliminarily approving the proposed settlement.  Notice of the proposed settlement was thereafter given to the SureWest shareholders.  Eight shareholders representing approximately 4,500 shares of SureWest stock opted-out of the settlement class.  A final hearing on the proposed settlement was held before the court on March 28, 2013.  On April 5, 2013, the court issued a final judgment for $0.525 million, of which the Company was to pay approximately $0.2 million, with the balance to be paid by SureWest and its insurer.  In accordance with the terms of the final judgment, on April 17, 2013 the Company disbursed its portion of the settlement. Pursuant to the settlement and the terms of the final judgment, the consolidated state court actions are now concluded, and the claims of all shareholders who did not opt-out of the settlement have been released and discharged.  In accordance with the settlement, the Broering action pending in federal court was voluntarily dismissed on April 16, 2013.

On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles.  Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs.  Salsgiver originally claimed to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million and did not request a specific dollar amount in damages.  We believe that these claims are without merit and that the alleged damages are completely unfounded.  We intend to defend against these claims vigorously. Discovery concluded and Consolidated filed a motion for summary judgment on June 18, 2012 and the court heard oral arguments on August 30, 2012.  On February 12, 2013, the court granted, in part, Consolidated’s motion.  The court ruled that Salsgiver could not recover prejudgment interest and could not use as a basis of liability any actions prior to April 14, 2006. The court has set a tentative trial date for early November 2013.  Additional discovery will be taken prior to that time.

In addition, we have asked the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgiver’s unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments.  We believe that these are violations of an FCC order regarding Salsgiver’s complaint against us.  We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Two of our subsidiaries, Consolidated Communications of Pennsylvania Company LLC (“CCPA”) and Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services Inc. (“CCES”), received assessment notices from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue increasing the amounts owed for Pennsylvania Gross Receipt Taxes for the tax period ending December 31, 2009.  These two assessments adjusted the subsidiaries’ combined total outstanding taxable gross receipts liability (with interest) to approximately $2.3 million.  In addition, based upon recently completed audits of CCES for 2008, 2009 and 2010, we believe the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may issue additional assessments totaling approximately $1.7 million for Gross Receipt Taxes allegedly owed.  Our CCPA subsidiary has also been notified by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that they will conduct a gross receipts audit for the calendar year 2008.  An appeal challenging the 2009 CCPA assessment was filed with the Department of Revenue’s Board of Appeals on September 15, 2011, and we filed a similar appeal for CCES with the Board of Appeals on November 11, 2011 challenging the 2009 CCES assessment.  The Board of Appeals denied CCPA and CCES’s appeals.  On November 13, 2012, CCPA and CCES filed appeals with the Commonwealth’s Board of Finance and Revenue.  These have been stayed pending the outcome of present litigation in the Commonwealth Court between Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Docket No. 266 F.R. 2008).  The Gross Receipts Tax issues in the Verizon Pennsylvania case are substantially the same as those presently facing CCPA and CCES.  In addition, there are numerous telecommunications carriers with Gross Receipts Tax matters dealing with the same issues that are in various stages of appeal before the Board of Finance and Revenue and the Commonwealth Court.  Those appeals by other similarly situated telecommunications carriers have been continued until resolution of the Verizon Pennsylvania case.  We believe that these assessments and the positions taken by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are without substantial merit.  We do not believe that the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results or cash flows.

20

We previously provided telephone service to inmates incarcerated at facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections.  On June 27, 2012, the Illinois Department of Central Management Services announced its intent to replace the Company as the provider of those services with a competitor, Securus Technologies, Inc.  Since that decision, Securus has replaced the Company as the provider of telephone service at the Illinois Department of Corrections facilities.  We challenged Securus’ bid, and the State’s decision to accept that bid, in a variety of different forums including: (i) protests with the Chief Procurement Officer of the Illinois Executive Ethics Commission, which were denied, (ii) a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois that was dismissed, but is now under appeal in the Illinois Appellate Court Fourth District, (iii) a declaratory ruling request filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission, which was granted on April 9, 2013 and (iv) a complaint filed with the Illinois Procurement Policy Board.  In each of those challenges, we claimed either that Securus was not a responsible vendor, as defined by the State’s bid solicitation document, and/or that rates for the services Securus proposes to provide are subject to regulatory limits below those Securus has proposed to charge. Our efforts to challenge our competitors bid and the States decision to accept the bid have not been successful.  As of June 30, 2013 the process to transition these services to our competitor was complete.

On January 18, 2012, we filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review the FCC’s Order issued November 18, 2011 that reformed intercarrier compensation and core parts of the Universal Service Fund.  We are appealing five core issues in the November 18, 2011 FCC order. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the tenth circuit will hear oral arguments on November 19, 2013.

We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations.  We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.

21

12.  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Communications, Inc. is the primary obligor under the unsecured Senior Notes it issued on May 30, 2012. We and the following of our subsidiaries: Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services, Inc., Consolidated Communications Services Company, Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company, Consolidated Communications of Texas Company, Consolidated Communications of Pennsylvania Company, LLC, SureWest Communications, Inc., SureWest Broadband, SureWest Communications, SureWest Long Distance, SureWest Telephone, SureWest TeleVideo, SureWest Kansas, Inc., SureWest Kansas Holdings, Inc., SureWest Fiber Ventures, LLC, SureWest Kansas Connections, LLC, SureWest Kansas Licenses, LLC, SureWest Kansas Operations, LLC and SureWest Kansas Purchasing, LLC, have jointly and severally guaranteed the Senior Notes.  All of the subsidiary guarantors are 100% direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of the parent, and all guarantees are full, unconditional and joint and several with respect to principal, interest and liquidated damages, if any.  As such, we present condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 for each of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (Parent), Consolidated Communications, Inc. (Subsidiary Issuer), guarantor subsidiaries and other non-guarantor subsidiaries with any consolidating adjustments.  See Note 6 for more information regarding our Senior Notes.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

(amounts in thousands)

	June 30, 2013
	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	-		$	2,166		$	1,354		$	-		$	3,520
Accounts receivable, net	-			251			48,397			7,879			-			56,527
Income taxes receivable	23,665			(6,087		)	(10,631		)	(4,993		)	-			1,954
Deferred income taxes	(51		)	(310		)	8,969			376			-			8,984
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-			-			13,410			351			-			13,761
Assets of discontinued operations	-			-			714			-			-			714
Total current assets	23,614			(6,146		)	63,025			4,967			-			85,460
Property, plant and equipment, net	-			-			843,732			51,865			-			895,597
Intangibles and other assets:
Investments	-			3,645			108,140			15			-			111,800
Investments in subsidiaries	1,010,284			258,563			11,755			-			(1,280,602		)	-
Goodwill	-			-			537,265			66,181			-			603,446
Other intangible assets	-			-			35,907			9,087			-			44,994
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets	-			10,975			5,017			-			-			15,992
Total assets	$	1,033,898		$	267,037		$	1,604,841		$	132,115		$	(1,280,602	)	$	1,757,289
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	-		$	169		$	7,461		$	-		$	-		$	7,630
Advance billings and customer deposits	-			-			24,085			2,400			-			26,485
Dividends payable	15,538			-			-			-			-			15,538
Accrued compensation	36			-			17,652			1,757			-			19,445
Accrued expense	2			3,169			28,760			1,824			-			33,755
Current portion of long term debt and capital lease obligations	-			9,240			550			59			-			9,849
Current portion of derivative liability	-			371			-			-			-			371
Liabilities of discontinued operations	-			-			254			-			-			254
Total current liabilities	15,576			12,949			78,762			6,040			-			113,327
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	-			1,209,599			3,959			846			-			1,214,404
Advances due to/from affiliates, net	898,338			(1,966,776		)	1,098,173			(29,735		)	-			-
Deferred income taxes	(2,358		)	(1,799		)	135,406			9,071			-			140,320
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations	-			-			122,091			27,581			-			149,672
Other long-term liabilities	131			2,779			9,794			285			-			12,989
Total liabilities	911,687			(743,248		)	1,448,185			14,088			-			1,630,712
Shareholders’ equity:
Common Stock	401			-			17,411			30,000			(47,411		)	401
Other shareholders’ equity	121,810			1,010,285			134,878			88,027			(1,233,191		)	121,809
Total Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. shareholders’ equity	122,211			1,010,285			152,289			118,027			(1,280,602		)	122,210
Noncontrolling interest	-			-			4,367			-			-			4,367
Total shareholders’ equity	122,211			1,010,285			156,656			118,027			(1,280,602		)	126,577
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,033,898		$	267,037		$	1,604,841		$	132,115		$	(1,280,602	)	$	1,757,289

22

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

(amounts in thousands)

	December 31, 2012
	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantors		Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	6,577		$	8,530	$	2,747		$	-		$	17,854
Accounts receivable, net	19			457			49,483		7,998			-			57,957
Income taxes receivable	4,258			-			7,886		(124		)	-			12,020
Deferred income taxes	(51		)	(310		)	8,969		376			-			8,984
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-			-			10,855		414			-			11,269
Assets of discontinued operations	-			-			1,772		-			-			1,772
Total current assets	4,226			6,724			87,495		11,411			-			109,856
Property, plant and equipment, net	-			-			855,158		52,514			-			907,672
Intangibles and other assets:
Investments	-			3,641			106,094		15			-			109,750
Investments in subsidiaries	958,199			219,955			11,234		-			(1,189,388		)	-
Goodwill	-			-			537,265		66,181			-			603,446
Other intangible assets	-			-			40,443		9,087			-			49,530
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets	-			12,788			1,012		-			-			13,800
Total assets	$	962,425		$	243,108		$	1,638,701	$	139,208		$	(1,189,388	)	$	1,794,054
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	-		$	-		$	14,954	$	-		$	-		$	14,954
Advance billings and customer deposits	-			-			25,131		2,523			-			27,654
Dividends payable	15,463			-			-		-			-			15,463
Accrued compensation	36			-			19,863		2,013			-			21,912
Accrued expense	235			3,373			39,673		3,944			-			47,225
Current portion of long term debt and capital lease obligations	-			9,242			300		54			-			9,596
Current portion of derivative liability	-			3,164			-		-			-			3,164
Liabilities of discontinued operations	-			-			4,209		-			-			4,209
Total current liabilities	15,734			15,779			104,130		8,534			-			144,177
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	-			1,203,760			3,611		877			-			1,208,248
Advances due to/from affiliates, net	817,119			(1,934,977		)	1,137,157		(19,299		)	-			-
Deferred income taxes	(2,357		)	(3,571		)	135,117		8,879			-			138,068
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations	-			-			125,706		31,004			-			156,710
Other long-term liabilities	-			3,919			6,587		240			-			10,746
Total liabilities	830,496			(715,090		)	1,512,308		30,235			-			1,657,949
Shareholders’ equity:
Common Stock	399			-			17,411		30,000			(47,411		)	399
Other shareholders’ equity	131,530			958,198			104,807		78,973			(1,141,977		)	131,531
Total Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. shareholders’ equity	131,929			958,198			122,218		108,973			(1,189,388		)	131,930
Noncontrolling interest	-			-			4,175		-			-			4,175
Total shareholders’ equity	131,929			958,198			126,393		108,973			(1,189,388		)	136,105
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	962,425		$	243,108		$	1,638,701	$	139,208		$	(1,189,388	)	$	1,794,054

23

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands)

	Quarter Ended June 30, 2013
	Parent				Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantors				Non-Guarantors				Eliminations				Consolidated
Net revenues	$		-		$	(19	)	$		137,547		$	17,360			$		(3,568	)	$	151,320
Operating expenses:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	-				-			55,481				3,733				(3,272			)	55,942
Selling, general and administrative expenses	741				62			28,371				4,666				(296			)	33,544
Financing and other transaction costs	178				-			-				-				-				178
Depreciation and amortization	-				-			32,487				2,222				-				34,709
Operating income (loss)	(919			)	(81		)	21,208				6,739				-				26,947
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net of interest income	(13			)	(20,672		)	(19			)	7				-				(20,697		)
Intercompany interest income (expense)	(28,334			)	34,262			(6,250			)	322				-				-
Investment income	-				42			8,651				-				-				8,693
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net	27,859				19,266			245				-				(47,370			)	-
Other, net	(18			)	-			100				-				-				82
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(1,425			)	32,817			23,935				7,068				(47,370			)	15,025
Income tax expense (benefit)	(10,619			)	4,958			8,572				2,554				-				5,465
Income (loss) from continuing operations	9,194				27,859			15,363				4,514				(47,370			)	9,560
Discontinued operations, net of tax	-				-			(272			)	-				-				(272		)
Net income (loss)	9,194				27,859			15,091				4,514				(47,370			)	9,288
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	-				-			94				-				-				94
Net income (loss) attributable to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.	$		9,194		$	27,859		$		14,997		$	4,514			$		(47,370	)	$	9,194
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$		9,194		$	28,578		$		15,315		$	4,670			$		(47,370	)	$	10,387
	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
	Parent				Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantors				Non-Guarantors				Eliminations				Consolidated
Net revenues	$	-			$	16		$	72,954			$		17,121		$	(3,534		)	$	86,557
Operating expenses:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	-				-			31,627				3,926				(3,534			)	32,019
Selling, general and administrative expenses	636				26			14,364				4,095				-				19,121
Financing and other transaction costs	139				423			-				-				-				562
Depreciation and amortization	-				-			18,164				3,544				-				21,708
Operating income (loss)	(775			)	(433		)	8,799				5,556				-				13,147
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net of interest income	(20			)	(16,563		)	(288			)	(22			)	-				(16,893		)
Intercompany interest income (expense)	(11,357			)	20,249			(9,021			)	129				-				-
Investment income	-				62			6,700				-				-				6,762
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net	10,647				8,621			326				-				(19,594			)	-
Other, net	-				-			195				(10			)	-				185
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(1,505			)	11,936			6,711				5,653				(19,594			)	3,201
Income tax expense (benefit)	(4,291			)	1,289			1,878				2,004				-				880
Income (loss) from continuing operations	2,786				10,647			4,833				3,649				(19,594			)	2,321
Discontinued operations, net of tax	-				-			585				-				-				585
Net income (loss)	2,786				10,647			5,418				3,649				(19,594			)	2,906
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	-				-			120				-				-				120
Net income (loss) attributable to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.	$	2,786			$	10,647		$	5,298			$		3,649		$	(19,594		)	$	2,786
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	2,786			$	11,228		$	5,595			$		3,800		$	(19,594		)	$	3,815

24

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer				Guarantors				Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	-		$		(26	)	$		275,602		$	34,388		$	(7,116	)	$		302,848
Operating expenses:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	-			-				110,342				7,177			(6,525		)	110,994
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,689			93				56,084				9,395			(591		)	66,670
Financing and other transaction costs	357			-				-				-			-			357
Depreciation and amortization	-			-				65,069				4,481			-			69,550
Operating income (loss)	(2,046		)	(119			)	44,107				13,335			-			55,277
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net of interest income	(7		)	(45,169			)	(129			)	8			-			(45,297			)
Intercompany interest income (expense)	(48,767		)	61,870				(13,579			)	476			-			-
Investment income	-			5				17,472				-			-			17,477
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net	48,159			37,659				521				-			(86,339		)	-
Other, net	(18		)	-				2				(9		)	-			(25			)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(2,679		)	54,246				48,394				13,810			(86,339		)	27,432
Income tax expense (benefit)	(18,656		)	6,087				18,515				5,068			-			11,014
Income (loss) from continuing operations	15,977			48,159				29,879				8,742			(86,339		)	16,418
Discontinued operations, net of tax	-			-				(248			)	-			-			(248			)
Net income (loss)	15,977			48,159				29,631				8,742			(86,339		)	16,170
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	-			-				193				-			-			193
Net income (loss) attributable to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.	$	15,977		$		48,159		$		29,438		$	8,742		$	(86,339	)	$		15,977
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	15,977		$		51,136		$		30,074		$	9,054		$	(86,339	)	$		19,902
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer				Guarantors				Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	-		$	23			$	145,799			$	34,230		$	(7,044	)	$	173,008
Operating expenses:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	-			-				62,625				7,492			(7,044		)	63,073
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,170			56				28,466				8,112			-			37,804
Financing and other transaction costs	818			4,566				-				-			-			5,384
Depreciation and amortization	-			-				36,457				7,225			-			43,682
Operating income (loss)	(1,988		)	(4,599			)	18,251				11,401			-			23,065
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net of interest income	(20		)	(30,865			)	(567			)	(41		)	-			(31,493			)
Intercompany interest income (expense)	(22,249		)	40,330				(18,273			)	192			-			-
Investment income	-			124				13,099				5			-			13,228
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net	19,883			16,987				663				-			(37,533		)	-
Other, net	-			1				208				(10		)	-			199
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(4,374		)	21,978				13,381				11,547			(37,533		)	4,999
Income tax expense (benefit)	(8,919		)	2,095				4,161				4,164			-			1,501
Income (loss) from continuing operations	4,545			19,883				9,220				7,383			(37,533		)	3,498
Discontinued operations, net of tax	-			-				1,292				-			-			1,292
Net income (loss)	4,545			19,883				10,512				7,383			(37,533		)	4,790
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	-			-				245				-			-			245
Net income (loss) attributable to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.	$	4,545		$	19,883			$	10,267			$	7,383		$	(37,533	)	$	4,545
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	4,545		$	21,467			$	10,862			$	7,685		$	(37,533	)	$	7,026

25

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Parent				Subsidiary Issuer				Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations	$		(50,234	)	$		19,842		$	84,919		$	12,819		$		67,346
Net cash used in discontinued operations	-				-				(3,097		)	-			(3,097			)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(50,234			)	19,842				81,822			12,819			64,249
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	-				-				(48,856		)	(3,767		)	(52,623			)
Other	-				-				(98		)	17			(81			)
Net cash used in continuing operations	-				-				(48,954		)	(3,750		)	(52,704			)
Net cash used in discontinued operations									(48		)	-			(48			)
Net cash used in investing activities	-				-				(49,002		)	(3,750		)	(52,752			)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	-				49,000				-			-			49,000
Payment of capital lease obligation	-				-				(198		)	(26		)	(224			)
Payment on long-term debt	-				(43,620			)	-			-			(43,620			)
Dividends on common stock	(30,987			)	-				-			-			(30,987			)
Transactions with affiliates, net	81,221				(31,799			)	(38,986		)	(10,436		)	-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	50,234				(26,419			)	(39,184		)	(10,462		)	(25,831			)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	-				(6,577			)	(6,364		)	(1,393		)	(14,334			)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	-				6,577				8,530			2,747			17,854
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$		-		$		-		$	2,166		$	1,354		$		3,520
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Parent				Subsidiary Issuer				Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations	$	(23,796		)	$	15,344			$	42,710		$	14,970		$	49,228
Net cash provided by discontinued operations	-				-				912			-			912
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(23,796			)	15,344				43,622			14,970			50,140
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	-				-				(17,186		)	(3,529		)	(20,715			)
Restricted cash for acquisition of SureWest	-				(298,035			)	-			-			(298,035			)
Other	(314			)	-				12			16			(286			)
Net cash used in continuing operations	(314			)	(298,035			)	(17,174		)	(3,513		)	(319,036			)
Net cash used in discontinued operations	-				-				(97		)	-			(97			)
Net cash used in investing activities	(314			)	(298,035			)	(17,271		)	(3,513		)	(319,133			)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds on bond offering	-				298,055				-			-			298,055
Restriced cash on bond offering	-				(17,047			)	-			-			(17,047			)
Payment of capital lease obligation	-				-				(70		)	(22		)	(92			)
Payment on long-term debt	-				(4,400			)	-			-			(4,400			)
Payment of financing costs	-				(5,070			)	-			-			(5,070			)
Dividends on common stock	(23,173			)	-				-			-			(23,173			)
Transactions with affiliates, net	47,283				(9,367			)	(26,258		)	(11,658		)	-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	24,110				262,171				(26,328		)	(11,680		)	248,273
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	-				(20,520			)	23			(223		)	(20,720			)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	-				103,369				80			2,255			105,704
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	-			$	82,849			$	103		$	2,032		$	84,984

26

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Certain statements included in this report, including that which relates to the impact on future revenue sources, pending and future regulatory orders, continued expansion of the telecommunications network and expected changes in the sources of our revenue and cost structure resulting from our entrance into new communications markets, are forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements reflect, among other things, our expectations, plans, strategies, and anticipated financial results. There are a number of risks, uncertainties, and conditions that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements.  Many of these circumstances are beyond our ability to control or predict.  Moreover, forward looking statements necessarily involve assumptions on our part.  These forward looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “should”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “will be”, “will continue” or similar expressions. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, the impact of current economic conditions, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Consolidated”, the “Company”, “we” or “our”) to be different from those expressed or implied in the forward looking statements. All forward looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements that appear throughout this report. A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward looking statements is included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements (“Notes”) as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Throughout MD&A, we refer to measures that are not a measure of financial performance in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP” or “GAAP”).  We believe the use of these non-GAAP measures on a consolidated and segment basis provides the reader with additional information that is useful in understanding our operating results and trends. These measures should be viewed in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, those measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. See the Non-GAAP Measures section below for a more detailed discussion on the use and calculation of these measures.

Overview

We are an established telecommunications services company providing a wide range of telecommunications services to residential and business customers in Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Kansas and Missouri.  We offer a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, high-speed broadband Internet access, video services, digital telephone service (“VOIP”), custom calling features, private line services, carrier grade access services, network capacity services over our regional fiber optic networks, directory publishing, Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) services and equipment sales.

We generate the majority of our consolidated operating revenues primarily from subscriptions to our voice, video and data services (“broadband services”) to residential and business customers. Revenues increased $64.8 million and $129.8 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, primarily from the SureWest acquisition and growth in data, video and Internet connections. We expect our broadband service revenues to continue to grow as consumer and business demands for data based services increase.

We market our services to residential and business customers, either individually or as a bundled package.  Our “triple play” bundle includes our voice, video and data services. As of June 30, 2013, our video service was available to approximately 526,000 homes in Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Kansas and Missouri markets. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 21% of the homes in the areas we serve subscribe to our video service. Data and Internet connections continue to increase as a result of enhanced product and service offerings, such as our consumer VOIP service and data speeds of up to 50 megabits per second, depending on the geographic market availability. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 30% of the homes in the areas we serve subscribe to our data service.

27

The increase in our operating revenues during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 was offset in part by an anticipated industry wide trend of a decline in access lines and related use of services.  Many consumers are choosing to subscribe to alternative communications services and competition for these subscribers continues to increase. Progressively, consumers are utilizing over-the-top services to download and watch television shows of interest to them on their computers. Competition from wireless providers, competitive local exchange carriers and in some cases cable television providers has increased in recent years in the markets we serve.  We have been able to mitigate some of the access line losses through marketing initiatives and product offerings, such as our VOIP service.

As discussed in the “Regulatory Matters” section below, our operating revenues are also impacted by legislative or regulatory changes at the federal and state levels, which could reduce or eliminate the current subsidies revenue we receive.  A number of proceedings and recent orders relate to universal service reform, intercarrier compensation and network access charges.  There are various ongoing legal challenges to the orders that have been issued.  As a result, it is not yet possible to determine fully the impact of the regulatory changes on our operations.

Significant Recent Developments

Merger With SureWest Communications

On July 2, 2012, we completed the merger with SureWest Communications (“SureWest”), which resulted in the acquisition of 100% of all the outstanding shares of SureWest for $23.00 per share in a cash and stock transaction.  The acquisition of SureWest provides additional diversification of the Company’s revenues and cash flows both geographically and by service type, which offers a platform for future growth and is expected to generate operational and capital cost synergies. SureWest provides a wide range of telecommunications, digital video, Internet, data and other facilities-based communications services in Northern California, primarily in the greater Sacramento region, and in the greater Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri areas.  For the year ended December 31, 2011, SureWest reported $248.1 million in total operating revenues.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, SureWest generated $127.9 million in operating revenues.  The total purchase price of $550.8 million, consisted of cash and assumed debt of $402.4 million and 9,965,983 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at the Company’s opening stock price on July 2, 2012 of $14.89, which totaled $148.4 million. The cash portion of the merger consideration and the funds required to repay SureWest outstanding debt was financed with the sale of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.875% Senior Notes due 2020 (“Senior Notes”).  The Company also used cash on hand and approximately $35.0 million in borrowings from its revolving credit facility.  Because the acquisition closed on July 2, 2012, the Company’s financial information does not include any of the results of operations from SureWest prior to the acquisition date.

Segment Reporting

Historically, we have classified our operations into two separate reportable business segments: Telephone Operations and Other Operations.  Our Telephone Operations consisted of a wide range of telecommunications services to residential and business customers, including local and long-distance service, high-speed broadband Internet access, video services, VOIP services, custom calling features, private line services, carrier access services, network capacity services over a regional fiber optic network, mobile services and directory publishing.  Our Other Operations segment operated two complementary non-core businesses including telephone services to state and county correctional facilities (“Prison Services”) and equipment sales.  As discussed below, our contract to provide telephone services to correctional facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections was not renewed and the process of transitioning these services to another service provider was completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, upon establishing a plan to sell certain assets related to the Prison Services business, we classified the assets and operations as a discontinued operation.  Prison Services comprised nearly all of the Other Operations segment revenue and results of operations.  Consequently, with the cessation of our Prison Services business and based on the segment accounting guidance, the Company has concluded that it operates as one segment as of the quarter ended June 30, 2013. As required by the authoritative guidance for segment presentation, segment results of operations have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this change for all periods presented.

28

Prison Services Contract

We previously provided telephone service to inmates incarcerated at facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections and to certain county jails.  On June 27, 2012, the Illinois Department of Central Management Services announced its intent to replace us as the provider of those services with a competitor. Although we challenged our competitor’s bid and the State’s decision to accept that bid in a variety of different forums, during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the process of transitioning these services to another service provider was completed. All related assets have been assessed for recoverability in light of this change and we determined that no impairment was necessary. During 2012, the prison services contract comprised 5% of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 2% of consolidated operating income, excluding financing and other transaction fees.

Discontinued Operations

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company established a plan to sell certain assets related to the Prison Services business.  We expect the plan to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2013. The financial results of the operations for prison services have been reported as a discontinued operation in our condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

Results of Operations

The following tables reflect our financial results on a consolidated basis and key operating metrics as of and for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Financial Data

	Quarter Ended June 30,											Six Months Ended June 30,
							$			%								$			%
(In millions, except for percentages)	2013			2012			Change			Change		2013			2012			Change			Change
Operating Revenues
Local calling services	$	26.1		$	19.7		$	6.4		32	%	$	52.4		$	39.6		$	12.8		32	%
Network access services	28.8			19.6			9.2			47		58.5			39.4			19.1			48
Video, Data and Internet services	68.2			22.7			45.5			200		135.1			44.7			90.4			202
Subsidies	13.5			11.2			2.3			21		26.9			22.7			4.2			19
Long-distance services	4.5			3.5			1.0			29		9.1			7.0			2.1			30
Other services	10.2			9.8			0.4			4		20.8			19.6			1.2			6
Total operating revenue	151.3			86.5			64.8			75		302.8			173.0			129.8			75
Expenses
Cost of services and products	56.0			32.0			24.0			75		111.0			63.1			47.9			76
Selling, general and administrative costs	33.5			19.0			14.5			76		66.7			37.8			28.9			76
Financing and other transaction costs	0.2			0.6			(0.4		)	(67	)	0.4			5.4			(5.0		)	(93	)
Depreciation and amortization	34.7			21.7			13.0			60		69.5			43.6			25.9			59
Total operating expenses	124.4			73.3			51.1			70		247.6			149.9			97.7			65
Income from operations	26.9			13.2			13.7			104		55.2			23.1			32.1			139
Interest expense, net	(20.7		)	(16.9		)	(3.8		)	(22	)	(45.3		)	(31.5		)	(13.8		)	(44	)
Other income	8.8			6.9			1.9			28		17.5			13.4			4.1			31
Income tax expense	5.5			0.9			4.6			511		11.0			1.5			9.5			633
Income from continuing operations	9.5			2.3			7.2			313		16.4			3.5			12.9			369
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(0.2		)	0.6			(0.8		)	(133	)	(0.2		)	1.3			(1.5		)	(115	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	0.1			0.1			-			0		0.2			0.3			(0.1		)	(33	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	9.2		$	2.8		$	6.4		229		$	16.0		$	4.5		$	11.5		256
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	71.8		$	43.7		$	28.1		64	%	$	145.3		$	88.8		$	56.5		64	%

(1)A non-GAAP measure.  See the Non-GAAP Measures section below for additional information and reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

29

Key Operating Statistics

	As of June 30,
	2013	2012	Change	% Change
ILEC access lines
Residential	150,711	136,047	14,664	11	%
Business	111,870	88,978	22,892	26
Total	262,581	225,025	37,556	17
Voice connections (1)
Residential	76,101	2,158	73,943	3,426
Business	50,013	51,852	(1,839)	(4	)
Total	126,114	54,010	72,104	134
Data and internet connections (2)	251,306	140,048	111,258	79
Video connections (2)	109,083	35,834	73,249	204
Total connections	749,084	454,917	294,167	65

(1)Voice connections include voice lines outside the Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier (“ILEC”) service areas and Voice-over-IP inside the ILEC service areas.

(2)These connections include both residential and business (excluding SureWest business metrics) for services both inside and outside the ILEC service areas.

The comparability of our consolidated results of operations and key operating statistics was impacted by the SureWest acquisition, which closed on July 2, 2012, as described above.  SureWest’s results are included in our consolidated financial statements as of the date of the acquisition.  The acquisition of SureWest provides additional diversification of the Company’s revenues and cash flows both geographically and by service type.

Operating Revenues

Local Calling Services

We offer several different basic local phone service packages for residential and business customers.  The plans include options for voicemail and other custom calling features such as caller ID, call forwarding and call waiting.  Local calling services revenue increased $6.4 million and $12.8 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to the acquisition of SureWest. Excluding the addition of SureWest revenues, local calling services decreased $2.2 million and $4.5 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012, primarily due to a 3% decline in local access lines.  The number of local access lines in service directly affects the recurring revenue we generate from end users and continues to be impacted by the industry-wide decline in access lines.  We expect to continue to experience modest erosion in access lines due to market forces and through our own competing VOIP product.

Network Access Services

Network access service revenues include interstate and intrastate switched access revenue, network special access services and wireless backhaul services.  Network access services revenue increased $9.2 million and $19.1 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily as a result of the acquisition of SureWest, which accounted for $10.5 million and $21.2 million of the current quarter and year-to-date increase, respectively.  Excluding the addition of the SureWest revenues, network access services decreased $1.3 million and $2.1 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to a decline in switched and special access revenue.  As described in the “Regulatory Matters” section below, network access revenues were impacted by a decline in intrastate rates as a result of the intercarrier compensation (“ICC”) reform which became effective in July 2012.

30

Video, Data and Internet Services

Video, data and Internet services include revenue from residential and business customers for subscriptions to our voice, video and data products.  We offer high speed Internet access at speeds for residential consumers of up to 50 Mbps, depending on the nature of the network facilities that are available, the level of service selected and the location.  We also offer a variety of data connectivity services in select markets, including Ethernet services over our copper and fiber-based networks, virtual hosting services and collocation services.  Our VOIP digital phone service is also available in certain markets as an alternative to the traditional telephone line.  Depending on geographic market availability, our video services range from limited basic service to advanced digital television, which includes several plans each with hundreds of local, national and music channels including premium and pay-per-view channels as well as video on demand service.  Certain subscribers may also subscribe to our advanced video services, which consist of high-definition television, digital video recorders (“DVR”) and/or a whole home DVR.

Video, data and Internet revenue increased $45.5 million and $90.4 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily as a result of the acquisition of SureWest, which accounted for $43.2 million and $86.4 million of the quarter and year-to-date increase, respectively.  The remaining increase in revenue was due to the continued growth in data and Internet connections and video connections, which increased 5% and 10% as of June 30, 2013, respectively.  Video, data and Internet revenue comprised 45% of our quarterly consolidated revenues at June 30, 2013, compared to 26% at June 30, 2012.  We expect video, data and Internet service revenue to continue to grow and comprise a greater percentage of consolidated operating revenues as a result of growth opportunities from the acquisition of SureWest and as a result of the rising consumer and business demand for data based services.

Subsidies

Subsidies consist of federal and state subsidies designed to promote widely available, quality telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas.  Subsidy revenues increased $2.3 million and $4.2 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily as a result of the addition of revenue from the acquisition of SureWest and the addition of revenues from the Connect America Fund (“CAF”), which was implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) in July 2012.  See the “Regulatory Matters” section below for a further discussion of the subsidies we receive.

Long-Distance Services

We offer a variety of long-distance calling plans, including unlimited flat-rate calling plans, to residential and business customers. Long-distance services revenue increased $1.0 million and $2.1 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to the acquisition of SureWest.  Excluding the addition of SureWest revenues, long distance services decreased $0.4 million and $0.9 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  The decrease in long distance revenue was primarily due to the decline in access lines as described above and the shift in customers moving to unlimited long-distance plans.

Other Services

Other services include revenues from telephone directory publishing, wholesale transport services, billing and collection services, inside wiring service and maintenance and equipment sales.  Other services revenue increased $0.4 million and $1.2 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  The increase in other services revenue was primarily due to the acquisition of SureWest and an increase in transport services, which were offset in part by a decline in directory publishing revenues and equipment sales.

Operating Expenses

Cost of Services and Products

Cost of services and products increased $24.0 million and $47.9 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  The addition of the operations for SureWest accounted for $25.1 million and $50.0 million of the quarter and year-to-date increase, respectively.  In addition, video programming costs continued to increase due to the growth in video connections and an increase in costs per program channel.  However, the increase in video programming costs was partially offset by a reduction in access costs due to the decline in access lines and usage.

31

Selling, General and Administrative Costs

Selling, general and administrative costs increased $14.5 million and $28.9 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to the addition of the operations for SureWest which accounted for $14.0 million and $27.0 million of the current and year-to-date increase, respectively.  The remaining increase in selling, general and administrative costs was due primarily to an increase in professional fees for audit and legal services.

Transaction/Debt Refinancing Costs

In connection with the acquisition of SureWest, we incurred $0.6 million and $5.4 million of transaction related fees which were recognized as financing and other transaction costs during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $13.0 million and $25.9 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to the addition of the operations for SureWest which accounted for $19.5 million and $38.5 million of the current and year-to-date increase, respectively.  Excluding the addition of the operations for SureWest, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $6.5 million and $12.6 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 as a result of certain intangible assets and network and outside plant equipment becoming fully amortized or depreciated during 2012.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in our 2012 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of our 2013 condensed consolidated financial statements, which consists primarily of the effects of reclassifications from the presentation of prison services as a discontinued operation, the retrospective adjustments to report operating results as a single segment and the finalization of purchase accounting for the SureWest acquisition.

In addition, the calculation of certain key operating statistics was revised during the third quarter of 2012 to reflect a new methodology for the Company following the acquisition of SureWest.  Accordingly, prior period operating statistics have been revised to conform to the current practice.

Regulatory Matters

Our revenues are subject to broad Federal and/or state regulation, which include such telecommunications services as local telephone service, network access service and toll service and are derived from various sources, including:

·business and residential subscribers of basic exchange services;

·surcharges mandated by state commissions;

·long distance carriers, for network access service;

·competitive access providers and commercial enterprises for network access service;

·interstate pool settlements from the National Exchange Carrier Association (“NECA”); and

·support payments from federal or state programs.

The telecommunications industry is subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation.  Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Telecommunications Act”), federal and state regulators share responsibility for implementing and enforcing statutes and regulations designed to encourage competition and to preserve and advance widely available, quality telephone service at affordable prices.

At the federal level, the FCC generally exercises jurisdiction over facilities and services of local exchange carriers, such as our rural telephone companies, to the extent they are used to provide, originate, or terminate interstate or international communications.  The FCC has the authority to condition, modify, cancel, terminate, or revoke our operating authority for failure to comply with applicable federal laws or FCC rules, regulations and policies.  Fines or penalties also may be imposed for any of these violations.

State regulatory commissions generally exercise jurisdiction over carriers’ facilities and services to the extent they are used to provide, originate, or terminate intrastate communications.  In particular, state regulatory agencies have substantial oversight over interconnection and network access by competitors of our rural telephone companies.  In addition, municipalities and other local government agencies regulate the public rights-of-way necessary to install and operate networks.  State regulators can sanction our rural telephone companies or revoke our certifications if we violate relevant laws or regulations.

32

FCC Matters

In general, telecommunications service in rural areas is more costly to provide than service in urban areas.  The lower customer density means that switching and other facilities serve fewer customers and loops are typically longer, requiring greater expenditures per customer to build and maintain.  By supporting the high cost of operations in rural markets, Federal Universal Service Fund subsidies promote widely available, quality telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas.  We received $26.9 million and $22.7 million, in the aggregate, from the Federal Universal Service Fund, the Pennsylvania Universal Service Fund, and the Texas Universal Service Fund during the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in the Universal Service subsidies received during the current year was primarily due to the acquisition of SureWest and the new subsidies received from the CAF, as described below.

Historically, under FCC rules governing rate making, our California ILEC was required to establish rates for its interstate telecommunications services based on projected demand usage for the various services.  We projected our earnings through the use of annual cost separation studies, which utilized estimated total cost information and projected demand usage. Carriers were required to follow FCC rules in the preparation of these annual studies.  We determined actual earnings from our interstate rates as actual volumes and costs became known.  In March 2013, we filed a waiver with the FCC to convert our California ILEC from a rate of return to a price cap company.  The FCC granted the waiver with an effective date of our annual interstate access tariff filing of July 2, 2013.  We expect certain adjustments to take place over the next twenty-four months as a result of exiting the NECA pool, however we do not anticipate that they will be material to our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

An order adopted by the FCC in 2011 (the “Order”) may significantly impact the amount of support revenue we receive from Universal Service Fund (“USF”)/CAF and ICC. The Order reformed core parts of the USF, broadly recast the existing ICC scheme and established the CAF to replace support revenues provided by the current USF and redirects support from voice services to broadband services.  In 2012, the first phase of the CAF was implemented freezing USF support to a price cap holding company until the FCC implements a broadband cost model to shift support from voice service to broadband.  Initially, the second phase was anticipated to be implemented July 1, 2013.  It is now anticipated that implementation will likely occur no sooner than January 2014. We anticipate that our revenues will be significantly impacted when the broadband cost model is implemented.  The order also modifies the methodology used for ICC traffic exchanged between carriers.  The initial phase of ICC reform was effective on July 1, 2012, beginning the transition of our terminating switched access rates to bill-and-keep over a seven year period.  As a result of implementing the provisions of the Order, during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 our network access revenues decreased approximately $475 thousand and $950 thousand, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  There was no impact to network access revenues for the quarter or six month period ended June 30, 2012 as provisions of the Order were not in effect during those periods.

State Matters

California

In an ongoing proceeding relating to the New Regulatory Framework, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) adopted Decision 06-08-030 in 2006, which grants carriers broader pricing freedom in the provision of telecommunications services, bundling of services, promotions and customer contracts.  This decision adopted a new regulatory framework, the Uniform Regulatory Framework (“URF”), which among other things (i) eliminates price regulation and allows full pricing flexibility for all new and retail services, (ii) allows new forms of bundles and promotional packages of telecommunication services, (iii) allocates all gains and losses from the sale of assets to shareholders and (iv) eliminates almost all elements of rate of return regulation, including the calculation of shareable earnings.  On December 31, 2010, the CPUC issued a ruling to initiate a new proceeding to assess whether, or to what extent, the level of competition in the telecommunications industry is sufficient to control prices for the four largest ILECs in the state.  Subsequently, the CPUC issued a ruling temporarily deferring the proceeding.  The status on when the CPUC may open this proceeding is unclear and on hold at this time. The CPUC’s actions in this and future proceedings could lead to new rules and an increase in government regulation.  The Company will continue to monitor this matter.

33

Pennsylvania

In 2011, the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission (“PAPUC”) issued an intrastate access reform order reducing intrastate access rates to interstate levels in a three-step process, beginning in March 2012.  With the release of the FCC order in November 2011, the PAPUC temporarily issued a stay.  A final stay was issued in 2012 to implement the FCC ordered intrastate access rate changes.  The PAPUC has indicated that it will address state universal funding in 2013 pending any state legislative activity that may occur in the 2013 legislative session.  The Company will continue to monitor this matter.

Texas

The Texas Public Utilities Regulatory Act (“PURA”) directs the Public Utilities Commission of Texas (“PUCT”) to adopt and enforce rules requiring local exchange carriers to contribute to a state universal service fund that helps telecommunications providers offer basic local telecommunications service at reasonable rates in high cost rural areas.  The Texas Universal Service Fund is also used to reimburse telecommunications providers for revenues lost by providing lifeline service.  Our Texas rural telephone companies receive disbursements from this fund.

Our Texas ILECs receive two state funds, the small and rural incumbent local exchange company plan (“HCF”) and the high cost assistance fund (“HCAF”).  The HCF is a line-based fund used to keep local rates low.  The rate is applied on all residential lines and up to five single business lines.  The amount we receive from the HCAF is a frozen monthly amount that was originally developed to offset high intrastate toll rates.

In September 2011, the Texas state legislature passed Senate Bill No. 980/House Bill No. 2603 which, among other things, mandated the PUCT to review the Universal Service Fund and issue recommendations by January 1, 2013 with the intent to effectively eliminate the HCF.  This would be accomplished by implementing an urban floor to offset state funding reductions with a phase-in period of four years.  The PUCT recommended that (i) frozen line counts be lifted effective September 1, 2013; and (ii) rural and urban local rate benchmarks be developed.  The large company fund was completed in September 2012 and the PUCT currently has a docketed proceeding to address the small company fund participants.  The proceeding is anticipated to be completed by December 2013.  The elimination of the frozen line counts is not expected to impact funding until the fourth quarter of 2013.  The potential impact on funding related to the urban benchmark is pending the docketed proceeding as well as potential legislative action.  The Company will continue to monitor this matter.

In June 2013, the Texas state legislature passed Senate Bill No. 583 (“SB 583”).  The provisions of SB 583 are effective September 1, 2013 and will freeze HCF and HCAF support for the remainder of 2013 and eliminates our annual $1.4 million HCAF support, effective January 1, 2014.  In July 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the PUCT on Docket No. 41097, Rate Rebalancing (“Docket 41097”), which is expected to be approved by the PUCT during the third quarter of 2013.  Through the terms of the settlement agreement, we will reduce our HCF by approximately $4.8 million over a 4 year period beginning January 1, 2014 through 2017.  However, we have the ability to offset this reduction with increases to residential rates, where market conditions will allow.

Other Regulatory Matters

We are also subject to a number of regulatory proceedings occurring at the federal and state levels that may have a material impact on our operations. The FCC and state commissions have authority to issue rules and regulations related to our business.  A number of proceedings are pending or anticipated that are related to such telecommunications issues as competition, interconnection, access charges, intercarrier compensation, broadband deployment, consumer protection and universal service reform.  Some proceedings may authorize new services to compete with our existing services.  Proceedings that relate to our cable television operations include rulemakings on set top boxes, carriage of programming, industry consolidation and ways to promote additional competition.  There are various on-going legal challenges to the scope or validity of FCC orders that have been issued.  As a result, it is not yet possible to determine fully the impact of the related FCC rules and regulations on our operations.

34

Non-Operating Items

Other Income and Expense, Net

Interest expense, net of interest income, increased $3.8 million and $13.8 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  The increase in interest expense was due primarily to an increase in total debt outstanding as a result of the acquisition of SureWest in 2012, which included the issuance of incremental term loans under our credit facility in December 2012 and the issuance of a $300.0 million Senior Note offering in May 2012, as described in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.  An increase in interest rates on outstanding borrowings under our credit facility, which was amended in December 2012 to extend the maturity dates, also contributed to the increase in interest expense during the current year periods.  The increase in the current year was offset in part by the inclusion of $1.1 million and $4.2 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 of amortized financing costs for the temporary bridge loan facility obtained to fund the SureWest acquisition.

Investment income increased $1.9 million and $4.1 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012, primarily due to higher earnings from our wireless partnership interests.

Income Taxes

Income taxes increased $4.6 million and $9.5 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.  Our effective rate was 36.4% and 40.2% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to 27.5% and 30.0% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively.  For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, the effective tax rate differed from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to non-deductible compensation in relation to the acquisition of SureWest.  Exclusive of this adjustment, our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 would have been approximately 36.7%.

Non-GAAP Measures

In addition to the results reported in accordance with US GAAP, we also use certain non-GAAP measures such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to evaluate operating performance and to facilitate the comparison of our historical results and trends. These financial measures are not a measure of financial performance under US GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income as a measure of performance and net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity. They are not, on their own, necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. The calculation of these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP are provided below.

EBITDA is defined as net earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization.  Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of EBITDA, adjusted for certain items as permitted or required under our credit facility as described in the reconciliations below.  These measures are a common measure of operating performance in the telecommunications industry and are useful, with other data, as a means to evaluate our ability to fund our estimated uses of cash.

35

The following table is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Quarter Ended						Six Months
	June 30,						Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations	$	29,623		$	27,947		$	67,346		$	49,228
Adjustments:
Compensation from restricted share plan	(784		)	(589		)	(1,440		)	(1,090		)
Other adjustments, net	349			(906		)	(1,820		)	(4,055		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	15,081			(2,423		)	21,882			3,097
Interest expense, net	20,697			16,893			45,297			31,493
Income taxes	5,465			880			11,014			1,501
EBITDA	70,431			41,802			142,279			80,174
Adjustments to EBITDA:
Other, net (1)	(7,066		)	(4,551		)	(14,150		)	(4,599		)
Investment distributions (2)	7,660			5,901			15,761			12,112
Non-cash compensation (3)	784			589			1,440			1,090
Adjusted EBITDA	$	71,809		$	43,741		$	145,330		$	88,777

(1) ��    Other, net includes the equity earnings from our investments, dividend income, income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, transaction related costs including severance and certain other miscellaneous items.

(2)Includes all cash dividends and other cash distributions received from our investments.

(3)Represents compensation expenses in connection with the issuance of stock awards, which because of the non-cash nature of these expenses are excluded from adjusted EBITDA.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Outlook and Overview

Our operating requirements have historically been funded from cash flows generated from our business and borrowings under our credit facilities.  We expect that our future operating requirements will continue to be funded from cash flows from operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents, and, if needed, from borrowings under our revolving credit facility and our ability to obtain future external financing.  We anticipate that we will continue to use a substantial portion of our cash flow to fund capital expenditures, meet scheduled payments of long-term debt, make dividend payments and to invest in future business opportunities.

The following table summarizes our cash flows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013			2012
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities:
Continuing operations	$	67,346		$	49,228
Discontinued operations	(3,097		)	912
Investing activities:
Continuing operations	(52,704		)	(319,036		)
Discontinued operations	(48		)	(97		)
Financing activities:
Continuing operations	(25,831		)	248,273
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(14,334	)	$	(20,720	)

36

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $67.3 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $18.1 million compared to the same period in 2012.  Cash provided by operating activities increased as a result of the additional cash flows provided by the addition of the SureWest operations and a decrease in income taxes receivable.  These increases were offset in part by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses related to the timing in payments to suppliers and the payment of accrued transaction costs during 2013.

Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $52.7 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 and consisted primarily of cash used for capital expenditures.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures continue to be our primary recurring investing activity and were $52.6 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $31.9 million compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase in capital expenditures was due to the addition of the SureWest operations of $26.6 million and growth in residential customer additions.  Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2013 are expected to be $55.0 million to $60.0 million of which approximately 50% is planned for success-based capital projects for residential and commercial initiatives.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities consists primarily of our proceeds and principal payments on long-term borrowings and the payment of dividends.

Long-term Debt

Credit Agreement

The Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has an outstanding credit agreement with several financial institutions, which consists of a $50.0 million revolving credit facility and outstanding term loans of $910.6 million at June 30, 2013.  The credit facility also includes an incremental term loan facility which provides the ability to borrow up to $300.0 million of incremental term loans.  As of June 30, 2013, $10.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  No amounts were outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and our majority-owned subsidiary, East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated.

Our term loans under the credit facility, as amended, were issued in separate tranches, resulting in different maturity dates and interest rate margins for each term loan.  The second term loan (“Term 2”) consists of an original aggregate principal amount of $409.1 million, matures on December 31, 2017 and currently has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 4.00% for a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based term loan or 3.00% for an alternative base rate term loan.  The Term 2 loan requires $1.0 million in quarterly principal payments which began on March 31, 2012.  The third term loan (“Term 3”) consists of an original aggregate principal amount of $515.0 million, with a maturity date of December 31, 2018.  The Term 3 loan requires quarterly principal payments of $1.3 million which commenced March 31, 2013 and has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 4.00% for a LIBOR-based term loan or 3.00% for an alternative base rate term loan subject to a 1.25% LIBOR floor. The Term 3 loan contains an original issuance discount of $5.2 million, which is being amortized over the term of the loan.

Our revolving credit facility has a maturity date of June 8, 2016 and an applicable margin (at our election) of between 2.75% and 3.50% for LIBOR-based borrowings and between 1.75% and 2.50% for alternative base rate borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio.  Based on our leverage ratio at June 30, 2013, the borrowing margin for the next three month period ending June 30, 2013 will be at a weighted-average margin of 3.25% for a LIBOR-based loan or 2.25% for an alternative base rate loan.  The applicable borrowing margin for the revolving credit facility is adjusted quarterly to reflect the leverage ratio from the prior quarter-end. As of June 30, 2013, $10.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. There were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012.

The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our credit agreement was 4.77% and 4.79% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  Interest is payable at least quarterly.

37

Net proceeds from asset sales exceeding certain thresholds, to the extent not reinvested, are required to be used to repay loans outstanding under the credit agreement.

Credit Agreement Covenant Compliance

The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants, including, among other items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, and issue capital stock.  We have agreed to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage, and total net leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement.  As of June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with the credit agreement covenants.

Effective February 17, 2012, we amended our credit facility to provide us with the ability to incur indebtedness necessary to finance the acquisition of SureWest, which enabled us to issue the Senior Notes described below.  In connection with the amendment, fees of $3.5 million were recognized as financing and other transaction costs during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

In general, our credit agreement restricts our ability to pay dividends to the amount of our Available Cash as defined in our credit agreement. As of June 30, 2013 and including the $15.5 million dividend declared in May 2013 and paid on August 1, 2013, we had $194.2 million in dividend availability under the credit facility covenant.

Under our credit agreement, if our total net leverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement), as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 5.10:1.00, we will be required to suspend dividends on our common stock unless otherwise permitted by an exception for dividends that may be paid from the portion of proceeds of any sale of equity not used to fund acquisitions, or make other investments.  During any dividend suspension period, we will be required to repay debt in an amount equal to 50.0% of any increase in Available Cash, among other things.  In addition, we will not be permitted to pay dividends if an event of default under the credit agreement has occurred and is continuing.  Among other things, it will be an event of default if our total net leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is greater than 5.25:1.00 and less than 2.25:1.00, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013, our total net leverage ratio under the credit agreement was 4.26:1.00 and our interest coverage ratio was 3.32:1.00.

Senior Notes

On May 30, 2012, we completed an offering of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.875% unsecured Senior Notes, due 2020 through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Consolidated Communications Finance Co. (“Finance Co.”) for the acquisition of SureWest.  The Senior Notes will mature on June 1, 2020 and earn interest at a rate of 10.875% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2012.  The Senior Notes were sold in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act.  In addition, some of the Senior Notes were sold to certain “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act).  The Senior Notes were sold to investors at a price equal to 99.345% of the principal amount thereof, for a yield to maturity of 11.00%.  This discount is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes.  The proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes were held in an escrow account prior to the closing of the SureWest transaction.  Upon closing of the SureWest acquisition on July 2, 2012, Finance Co. merged with and into our wholly-owned subsidiary Consolidated Communications, Inc., which assumed the Senior Notes, and we and certain of our subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Senior Notes.  On August 3, 2012, SureWest and its subsidiaries guaranteed the Senior Notes.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we completed an exchange offer to issue registered notes (“Exchange Notes”) for $287.3 million of the original Senior Notes.  The terms of the Exchange Notes are substantially identical to the Senior Notes, except that the Exchange Notes are registered under the Securities Act and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Senior Notes do not apply to the Exchange Notes.  The exchange offer did not impact the aggregate principal amount or the remaining terms of the Senior Notes outstanding.

Senior Notes Covenant Compliance

The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains customary covenants for high yield notes, which limits Consolidated Communications, Inc.’s and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to:  incur debt or issue certain preferred stock; pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or prepay subordinated indebtedness; purchase or redeem any equity interests; make investments; create liens; sell assets; enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments by restricted subsidiaries; consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets; engage in transactions with its affiliates; or enter into any sale and leaseback transactions.

38

Among other matters, the Senior Notes indenture provides that Consolidated Communications, Inc. may not pay dividends or make other “restricted payments” to the Company if its total net leverage ratio is 4.25:1.00 or greater.  At June 30, 2013, this ratio, which is calculated differently than the comparable ratio under the credit agreement, was 4.00:1.00.  If this ratio is met, dividends and other restricted payments may be made from cumulative consolidated cash flow since the date the Senior Notes were issued, less 1.75 times fixed charges, less dividends and other restricted payments made since the date the Senior Notes were issued.  Dividends may be paid and other restricted payments may also be made from a “basket” of $50.0 million, none of which has been used to date, and pursuant to other exceptions identified in the Senior Notes indenture. Since dividends of $77.5 million have been paid since May 30, 2012, at June 30, 2013 there was $115.2 million of the $192.7 million of cumulative consolidated cash flow since May 30, 2012 available to pay dividends.

Bridge Loan Facility

In connection with the acquisition of SureWest, in February 2012 the Company received committed financing for a total of $350.0 million to fund the cash portion of the anticipated transaction, to refinance SureWest’s debt and to pay for certain transaction costs. The financing package included a $350.0 million Senior Unsecured Bridge Loan Facility (“Bridge Facility”). As anticipated, permanent financing for the SureWest acquisition was funded by our Senior Note offering, as described above.  As a result, the $4.2 million commitment fee incurred for the Bridge Facility was capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs in February 2012 and was amortized over the expected life of the Bridge Facility, which was four months.

Capital Leases

As of June 30, 2013, we had seven capital leases which expire between 2015 and 2021.  As of June 30, 2013, the present value of the minimum remaining lease commitments was approximately $5.4 million, of which $0.6 million was due and payable within the next twelve months.  The leases require total remaining rental payments of $8.5 million as of June 30, 2013, of which $6.1 million will be paid to LATEL LLC, a related party entity.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we acquired equipment of $0.8 million through capital lease agreements, which represents a noncash investing activity.

Dividends

We paid $15.6 million and $11.6 million in dividend payments to shareholders during the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We paid $31.0 million and $23.2 million in dividend payments to shareholders during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  On May 7, 2013, our board of directors declared our next quarterly dividend of $0.38738 per common share, which is payable on August 1, 2013 to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 15, 2013.  Our current annual dividend rate is approximately $1.55 per share.

The cash required to fund dividend payments is in addition to our other expected cash needs, which we expect to fund with cash flows from our operations.  In addition, we expect we will have sufficient availability under our revolving credit facility to fund dividend payments in addition to any expected fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs, although we do not intend to borrow under this facility to pay dividends.

We believe that our dividend policy will limit, but not preclude, our ability to grow.  If we continue paying dividends at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy, we may not retain a sufficient amount of cash, and may need to seek refinancing, to fund a material expansion of our business, including any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth opportunities requiring capital expenditures significantly beyond our current expectations.  In addition, because we expect a significant portion of cash available will be distributed to holders of common stock under our dividend policy, our ability to pursue any material expansion of our business will depend more than it otherwise would on our ability to obtain third-party financing.

39

Sufficiency of Cash Resources

The following table sets forth selected information regarding our financial condition.

	June 30,			December 31,
(In thousands, except for ratio)	2013			2012
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,520		$	17,854
Working capital (deficit)	(27,867		)	(34,321		)
Total debt and capital leases	1,224,253			1,217,844
Current ratio	0.75			0.76

Our most significant uses of funds in the remainder of 2013 are expected to be for: (i) dividend payments of between $30.0 million and $32.0 million; (ii) interest payments on our indebtedness of between $38.0 million and $43.0 million and principal payments on debt of $4.6 million; (iii) capital expenditures of between $55.0 million and $60.0 million and (iv) pension and other post-retirement obligations of $8.0 million.  However, in the future our ability to use cash may be limited by our other expected uses of cash, including our dividend policy, and our ability to incur additional debt will be limited by our existing and future debt agreements.

With the acquisition of SureWest, we took on additional debt to fund the transaction.  We believe that cash flows from operating activities, together with our existing cash and borrowings available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient for at least the next twelve months to fund our current anticipated uses of cash.  After that, our ability to fund these expected uses of cash and to comply with the financial covenants under our debt agreements will depend on the results of future operations, performance and cash flow.  Our ability to fund these expected uses from the results of future operations will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business, regulatory, legislative and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

We may be unable to access the cash flows of our subsidiaries since certain of our subsidiaries are parties to credit or other borrowing agreements, or subject to statutory or regulatory restrictions, that restrict the payment of dividends or making intercompany loans and investments, and those subsidiaries are likely to continue to be subject to such restrictions and prohibitions for the foreseeable future.  In addition, future agreements that our subsidiaries may enter into governing the terms of indebtedness may restrict our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or advance cash in any other manner to us.

To the extent that our business plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate, we may require additional financing or require financing sooner than we currently anticipate.  Sources of additional financing may include commercial bank borrowings, other strategic debt financing, sales of nonstrategic assets, vendor financing or the private or public sales of equity and debt securities.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations in the future, that anticipated revenue growth will be realized, or that future borrowings or equity issuances will be available in amounts sufficient to provide adequate sources of cash to fund our expected uses of cash.  Failure to obtain adequate financing, if necessary, could require us to significantly reduce our operations or level of capital expenditures which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of operations.

Surety Bonds

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into surety, performance, and similar bonds as required by certain jurisdictions in which we provide services.  As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $3.4 million of these bonds outstanding.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

As required, we contribute to qualified defined pension plans and non-qualified supplemental retirement plans (collectively the “Pension Plans”) and other post-retirement benefit plans, which provide retirement benefits to certain eligible employees. Contributions are intended to provide for benefits attributed to service to date. Our funding policy is to contribute annually an actuarially determined amount consistent with applicable federal income tax regulations.

The cost to maintain our Pension Plans and future funding requirements are affected by several factors including the expected return on investment of the assets held by the Pension Plan, changes in the discount rate used to calculate pension expense and the amortization of unrecognized gains and losses. Returns generated on Plan assets have historically funded a significant portion of the benefits paid under the Pension Plans.  As of January 1, 2013, we estimate the long-term rate of return of Plan assets will be 8.0%. However, the significant decline in the

40

equity markets precipitated by the credit crisis in recent years has negatively affected the value of our Pension Plan assets.  The Pension Plans invest in marketable equity securities which are exposed to changes in the financial markets.  If the financial markets experience a downturn and returns fall below our estimate, as seen in recent years, we could be required to make a material contribution to the Pension Plan, which could adversely affect our cash flows from operations.

In 2013, we expect to make contributions totaling approximately $11.5 million to our pension plans and $2.5 million to our other post-retirement plans.  As of June 30, 2013, we have contributed $4.6 million and $1.4 million to our pension plans and our other post-retirement plans, respectively.  Our contribution amounts meet the minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit and tax laws. See Note 9 for a more detailed discussion regarding our pension and other post-retirement plans.

Income Taxes

The timing of cash payments for income taxes, which is governed by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing jurisdictions, will differ from the timing of recording tax expense and deferred income taxes, which are reported in accordance with GAAP. For example, tax laws in effect regarding accelerated or “bonus” depreciation for tax reporting resulted in less cash payments than the GAAP tax expense. Acceleration of tax deductions could eventually result in situations where cash payments will exceed GAAP tax expense.

It is more likely than not that the benefit from approximately $1.5 million in federal NOL carryforwards that are subject to separate return limitation year restrictions will not be realized.  This loss carryover can only be used against consolidated taxable income to the extent of a single member’s contribution to consolidated taxable income.  The amount considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income for the single member during the carryforward period are increased.

Historically, pre-tax earnings for financial reporting purposes have exceeded the amount of taxable income reported for income tax purposes. This has primarily occurred due to the acceleration of depreciation deductions for income tax reporting purposes.

Regulatory Matters

As discussed in the Regulatory Matters section above, an order adopted by the FCC may significantly impact the amount of support revenue we receive from USF/CAF and ICC.  The Order seeks to reform the current USF system by redirecting support from voice services to broadband services. Although the broadband cost model for this reform is still being developed, we anticipate that our revenues will be significantly impacted when it is implemented.  The initial phase of ICC reform decreased our network access revenues $475 thousand and $950 thousand during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. We anticipate network access revenues will continue to decline as a result of the Order through 2018 and could be as much as $950 thousand in the remainder of 2013 and $1.3 million, $1.0 million, $1.1 million, $2.5 million and $1.8 million in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Our judgments are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making estimates about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. For a full discussion of our accounting estimates and assumptions that we have identified as critical in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements, refer to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

41

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 (“ASU 2012-02”), Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to perform an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that a non-goodwill indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired and thus whether it is necessary to calculate the asset’s fair value for the purpose of comparing it with the asset’s carrying amount. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which establishes new requirements for disclosing reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”). ASU 2013-2 requires disclosures for the (i) changes in components of accumulated OCI, (ii) effects on individual line items in net income for each item of accumulated OCI that is reclassified in its entirety to net income, and (iii) cross references to other disclosures that provide additional details for OCI items that are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For public companies, amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. In accordance with the provisions of this guidance, disclosures related to accumulated OCI can be found in Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is primarily related to the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our debt obligations.  Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market interest rates on our variable rate obligations.  In order to manage the volatility relating to changes in interest rates, we utilize derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps to maintain a mix of fixed and variable rate debt.  We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.  Our interest rate swap agreements effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments.  We calculate the potential change in interest expense caused by changes in market interest rates by determining the effect of the hypothetical rate increase on the portion of our variable rate debt that is not subject to a variable rate floor or hedged through the interest rate swap agreements.

As of June 30, 2013, the interest rate on approximately $37.9 million of our floating rate debt was not fixed through the use of interest rate swaps or subject to a variable rate floor, thereby subjecting this portion of our debt to potential changes in interest rates.  Based on variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2013, if market interest rates changed by 1.0%, annual interest expense would have increased or decreased by approximately $0.1 million.

As of June 30, 2013, the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements amounted to a net liability of $3.2 million.  Pretax deferred losses related to our interest rate swap agreements included in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCI”) was $3.1 million at June 30, 2013.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In connection with the filing of this Form 10-Q, management evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013.  Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2013.

Our assessment of the internal control structure excluded SureWest, which was acquired on July 2, 2012.  SureWest had net revenues of $66.5 million and $133.5 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively or approximately 44% for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 of our consolidated net revenues and total assets of $686.9 million at June 30, 2013, or approximately 39% of our consolidated total assets, which are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Under guidance issued by the SEC, companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company.

42

Change in internal control over financial reporting

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company had the following changes relating to its controls over financial reporting:

·As noted above, our assessment of the internal control structure excluded SureWest which was acquired on July 2, 2012. Under guidance issued by the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company.  Our internal control assessment for the year ended December 31, 2013 will include SureWest.

Limitations on the effectiveness of controls

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management, Board of Directors and Audit Committee regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

43

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Prior to the completion of the SureWest Merger on July 2, 2012, six putative class action lawsuits were filed by alleged SureWest shareholders challenging the Company’s proposed merger with SureWest in which the Company, WH Acquisition Corp. and WH Acquisition II Corp., SureWest and members of the SureWest board of directors have been named as defendants.  Five shareholder actions were filed in the Superior Court of California, Placer County, and one shareholder action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.  The actions are called Needles v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed February 17, 2012, Errecart v. Oldham, et al., filed February 24, 2012, Springer v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 9, 2012, Aievoli v. Oldham, et al., filed March 15, 2012, and Waterbury v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 26, 2012, and the federal action is called Broering v. Oldham, et al., filed April 18, 2012.  The actions generally allege, among other things, that each member of the SureWest board of directors breached fiduciary duties to SureWest and its shareholders by authorizing the sale of SureWest to the Company for consideration that allegedly was unfair to the SureWest shareholders and agreed to terms that allegedly unduly restrict other bidders from making a competing offer.  The complaints also allege that the Company and SureWest aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duties allegedly committed by the members of the SureWest board of directors.  The Broering complaint also alleges, among other things, that the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012 did not make sufficient disclosures regarding the merger, that SureWest’s board should have appointed an independent committee to negotiate the transaction and that SureWest should have gone back to another bidder to create a competitive bid process.  The lawsuits seek equitable relief, including an order to prevent the defendants from consummating the merger on the agreed-upon terms and/or an award of unspecified monetary damages.  On March 14, 2012, the Placer County Superior Court entered an order consolidating the Needles, Errecart and Springer actions into a single action under the caption In re SureWest Communications Shareholder Litigation.  Under the terms of this order, all cases subsequently filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Placer, that relate to the same subject matter and involve similar questions of law or fact were to be consolidated with these cases as well.  This included the Aievoli and Waterbury cases.  On April 10, 2012, the plaintiff in Waterbury filed a request for voluntary dismissal of her complaint without prejudice.  On May 18, 2012, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the federal Court entered an order staying the Broering action for 90 days.  The federal Court subsequently extended the stay of the Broering action until June 1, 2013.  On June 1, 2012, the parties entered into a proposed settlement of all of the shareholder actions without any admission of liability by the Company or the other defendants.  Pursuant to the proposed settlement, SureWest agreed to make, and subsequently made, certain additional disclosures in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC in advance of the special meeting of SureWest shareholders held on June 12, 2012.  The proposed settlement also provided that plaintiffs’ counsel collectively are to receive attorneys’ fees of $0.525 million, to be paid by the Company and SureWest and its insurer.  On December 20, 2012, the court issued a ruling preliminarily approving the proposed settlement.  Notice of the proposed settlement was thereafter given to the SureWest shareholders.  Eight shareholders representing approximately 4,500 shares of SureWest stock opted-out of the settlement class.  A final hearing on the proposed settlement was held before the court on March 28, 2013.  On April 5, 2013, the court issued a final judgment for $0.525 million, of which the Company is to pay approximately $0.2 million, with the balance to be paid by SureWest and its insurer.  In accordance with the terms of the final judgment, on April 17, 2013 the Company disbursed its portion of the settlement. Pursuant to the settlement and the terms of the final judgment, the consolidated state court actions are now concluded, and the claims of all shareholders who did not opt-out of the settlement have been released and discharged.  In accordance with the settlement, the Broering action pending in federal court was voluntarily dismissed on April 16, 2013.

On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles.  Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs.  Salsgiver originally claimed to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million and did not request a specific dollar amount in damages.  We believe that these claims are without merit and that the alleged damages are completely unfounded.  We intend to defend against these claims vigorously. Discovery concluded and Consolidated filed a motion for summary judgment on June 18, 2012 and the court heard oral arguments on August 30, 2012.  On February 12, 2013, the court granted, in part, Consolidated’s motion.  The court ruled that Salsgiver could not recover prejudgment interest and could not use as a basis of liability any actions prior to April 14, 2006. The court has set a tentative trial date for early November 2013.  Additional discovery will be taken prior to that time.

44

In addition, we have asked the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgiver’s unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments.  We believe that these are violations of an FCC order regarding Salsgiver’s complaint against us.  We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Two of our subsidiaries, Consolidated Communications of Pennsylvania Company LLC (“CCPA”) and Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services Inc. (“CCES”), received assessment notices from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue increasing the amounts owed for Pennsylvania Gross Receipt Taxes for the tax period ending December 31, 2009.  These two assessments adjusted the subsidiaries’ combined total outstanding taxable gross receipts liability (with interest) to approximately $2.3 million.  In addition, based upon recently completed audits of CCES for 2008, 2009 and 2010, we believe the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may issue additional assessments totaling approximately $1.7 million for Gross Receipt Taxes allegedly owed.  Our CCPA subsidiary has also been notified by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that they will conduct a gross receipts audit for the calendar year 2008.  An appeal challenging the 2009 CCPA assessment was filed with the Department of Revenue’s Board of Appeals on September 15, 2011, and we filed a similar appeal for CCES with the Board of Appeals on November 11, 2011 challenging the 2009 CCES assessment.  The Board of Appeals denied CCPA and CCES’s appeals.  On November 13, 2012, CCPA and CCES filed appeals with the Commonwealth’s Board of Finance and Revenue.  These have been stayed pending the outcome of present litigation in the Commonwealth Court between Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Docket No. 266 F.R. 2008).  The Gross Receipts Tax issues in the Verizon Pennsylvania case are substantially the same as those presently facing CCPA and CCES.  In addition, there are numerous telecommunications carriers with Gross Receipts Tax matters dealing with the same issues that are in various stages of appeal before the Board of Finance and Revenue and the Commonwealth Court.  Those appeals by other similarly situated telecommunications carriers have been continued until resolution of the Verizon Pennsylvania case.  We believe that these assessments and the positions taken by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are without substantial merit.  We do not believe that the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results or cash flows.

We previously provided telephone service to inmates incarcerated at facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Corrections.  On June 27, 2012, the Illinois Department of Central Management Services announced its intent to replace the Company as the provider of those services with a competitor, Securus Technologies, Inc.  Since that decision, Securus has replaced the Company as the provider of telephone service at the Illinois Department of Corrections facilities.  We challenged Securus’ bid, and the State’s decision to accept that bid, in a variety of different forums including: (i) protests with the Chief Procurement Officer of the Illinois Executive Ethics Commission, which were denied, (ii) a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois that was dismissed, but is now under appeal in the Illinois Appellate Court Fourth District, (iii) a declaratory ruling request filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission, which was granted on April 9, 2013  and (iv) a complaint filed with the Illinois Procurement Policy Board.  In each of those challenges, we claimed either that Securus was not a responsible vendor, as defined by the State’s bid solicitation document, and/or that rates for the services Securus proposes to provide are subject to regulatory limits below those Securus has proposed to charge. Our efforts to challenge our competitors bid and the States decision to accept the bid have not been successful.  As of June 30, 2013 the process to transition these services to our competitor was complete.

On January 18, 2012, we filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review the FCC’s Order issued November 18, 2011 that reformed intercarrier compensation and core parts of the Universal Service Fund.  We are appealing five core issues in the November 18, 2011 FCC order. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the tenth circuit will hear oral arguments on November 19, 2013.

We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations.  We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.

45

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

3.1	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., as amended as of May 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 2013)
10.1	Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 2013)
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*	The following financial information from Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 hereto are not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Registrant)

August 8, 2013	By:	/s/ Robert J. Currey
		Robert J. Currey,
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
August 8, 2013	By:	/s/ Steven L. Childers
		Steven L. Childers,
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

47