Leasing | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2019 |
Leases [Abstract] | |
Leasing | Leasing Adoption of ASC Topic 842, Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 842, Leases . The new guidance replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases . ASC 842 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee accounts for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases result in the lessee recognizing a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability. For finance leases the lessee recognizes interest expense and amortization of the ROU asset, and for operating leases the lessee will recognize a straight-line total lease expense. In addition, ASC 842 changes the definition of a lease, which resulted in changes to the classification of certain service contracts with customers to lease arrangements. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements , which provided entities the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition to the new guidance. The Company elected this transition method, and as a result, the Company did not adjust comparative information for prior periods. The Company elected certain additional practical expedients permitted by the new guidance allowing the Company to carry forward historical accounting related to lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. The Company elected, for its equipment asset classes, the practical expedient that allows lessees to treat the lease and non-lease components of leases as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. As part of the transition, the Company completed a comprehensive review of its lease portfolio, including significant leases by geography and by asset type that were impacted by the new guidance, and enhanced its controls around leasing. The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in an increase to total assets and liabilities due to the recording of operating lease ROU assets of approximately $46.9 million and operating lease liabilities of approximately $53.7 million , as of January 1, 2019. Finance leases were not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets were already recorded in the balance sheet under the previous guidance, ASC 840. The adoption did not materially impact the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows. Lessee Accounting The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. The Company's material lease contracts are generally for real estate or print equipment, and the determination of whether such contracts contain leases generally does not require significant estimates or judgments. The Company’s leases that are classified as operating leases primarily consist of real estate leases. The Company’s real estate leases contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. The Company’s leases that are classified as finance leases primarily consist of print equipment. Certain print equipment leases have lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for as a single lease component as discussed above. Other than the election to treat the Company's fixed lease payment as a single lease component, the accounting for finance leases will remain unchanged under ASC 842. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and are reduced by any lease incentives received. The lease terms primarily range from one to ten years , with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 5 years . A portion of the Company’s real estate leases are generally subject to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which are treated as variable lease payments and recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments was incurred. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The tables below present financial information associated with the Company's leases. This information is only presented as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2019 because, as noted above, the Company adopted ASC 842 using a transition method that does not require application to periods prior to adoption. Classification September 30, 2019 Assets Operating lease assets Right-of-use assets from operating leases $ 40,753 Finance lease assets Property and equipment 85,943 Less accumulated depreciation (41,662 ) Property and equipment, net 44,281 Total lease assets $ 85,034 Liabilities Current Operating Current operating lease liabilities $ 10,899 Finance Current portion of long-term debt and finance leases 16,967 Long-term Operating Long-term operating lease liabilities 37,008 Finance Long-term debt and finance leases 29,854 Total lease liabilities $ 94,728 Classification Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Operating lease cost Cost of sales $ 3,718 $ 12,503 Selling, general and administrative expenses 837 2,578 Total operating lease cost (1) $ 4,555 $ 15,081 Finance lease cost Amortization of leased assets Cost of sales $ 3,897 $ 13,197 Selling, general and administrative expenses 45 172 Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense, net 650 1,767 Total finance lease cost 4,592 15,136 Total lease cost $ 9,147 $ 30,217 (1) Includes variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $653 and $60 , respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $2,140 and $364 , respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . Maturity of lease liabilities (as of September 30, 2019) Operating leases (1) Finance leases (2) 2019 $ 4,065 $ 5,007 2020 13,995 18,151 2021 11,332 14,084 2022 9,502 8,689 2023 7,923 4,212 2024 5,338 1,172 Thereafter 11,915 10 Total 64,070 51,325 Less amount representing interest 16,163 4,504 Present value of lease liability $ 47,907 $ 46,821 (1) Reflects payments for non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of September 30, 2019 . The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. (2) The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. As previously disclosed in the Company's 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments for operating leases and capital lease obligation as of December 31, 2018 were as follows: Maturity of lease liabilities (as of December 31, 2018) Operating leases Capital leases 2019 $ 16,355 $ 16,872 2020 12,956 13,817 2021 10,130 10,141 2022 8,510 5,274 2023 7,054 1,633 Thereafter 16,650 — Total $ 71,655 $ 47,737 September 30, 2019 Weighted average remaining lease term (years) Operating leases 5.6 Finance leases 3.1 Weighted average discount rate Operating leases 5.9 % Finance leases 4.9 % Other information Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 8,888 Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 1,766 Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 13,801 Lessor Accounting The Company concluded that certain of its contracts with customers contain leases under the new leasing standard and accordingly should be accounted for as operating leases upon adoption of ASC 842. Specifically, certain of the Company's MPS arrangements, which had previously been accounted for as service revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are now accounted for as operating leases under ASC 842. The Company's MPS arrangements consists of the placement, management, and optimization of print and imaging equipment in customers' offices, job sites, and other facilities under which the Company is paid a fixed rate per unit for each print produced (per-use), often referred to as a “click charge.” Accordingly, the fixed rate per unit charged to the customer covers the use of the equipment (i.e., the lease component), as well as the additional services performed by the Company as described above (i.e., the non-lease component). Certain of the Company's MPS contracts provide the customer the option to renew or terminate the agreement, which are considered when assessing the lease term. The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate certain lease and non-lease components related to its MPS arrangements, and accounts for the combined component under ASC 842. The pattern of revenue recognition for the Company's MPS revenue has remained substantially unchanged following the adoption of ASC 842. MPS revenue includes $28.5 million of rental income and $2.1 million of service income for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and $86.5 million of rental income and $6.6 million of service income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . The Company's property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, includes approximately $40 million of equipment subject to leases with customers under the Company's MPS arrangements. Following termination of an MPS arrangement, the Company will place existing equipment at an alternate customer site pursuant to an MPS arrangement, at one of the Company's service centers, or dispose of the equipment. |
Leasing | Leasing Adoption of ASC Topic 842, Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 842, Leases . The new guidance replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases . ASC 842 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee accounts for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases result in the lessee recognizing a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability. For finance leases the lessee recognizes interest expense and amortization of the ROU asset, and for operating leases the lessee will recognize a straight-line total lease expense. In addition, ASC 842 changes the definition of a lease, which resulted in changes to the classification of certain service contracts with customers to lease arrangements. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements , which provided entities the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition to the new guidance. The Company elected this transition method, and as a result, the Company did not adjust comparative information for prior periods. The Company elected certain additional practical expedients permitted by the new guidance allowing the Company to carry forward historical accounting related to lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. The Company elected, for its equipment asset classes, the practical expedient that allows lessees to treat the lease and non-lease components of leases as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. As part of the transition, the Company completed a comprehensive review of its lease portfolio, including significant leases by geography and by asset type that were impacted by the new guidance, and enhanced its controls around leasing. The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in an increase to total assets and liabilities due to the recording of operating lease ROU assets of approximately $46.9 million and operating lease liabilities of approximately $53.7 million , as of January 1, 2019. Finance leases were not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets were already recorded in the balance sheet under the previous guidance, ASC 840. The adoption did not materially impact the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows. Lessee Accounting The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. The Company's material lease contracts are generally for real estate or print equipment, and the determination of whether such contracts contain leases generally does not require significant estimates or judgments. The Company’s leases that are classified as operating leases primarily consist of real estate leases. The Company’s real estate leases contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. The Company’s leases that are classified as finance leases primarily consist of print equipment. Certain print equipment leases have lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for as a single lease component as discussed above. Other than the election to treat the Company's fixed lease payment as a single lease component, the accounting for finance leases will remain unchanged under ASC 842. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and are reduced by any lease incentives received. The lease terms primarily range from one to ten years , with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 5 years . A portion of the Company’s real estate leases are generally subject to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which are treated as variable lease payments and recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments was incurred. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The tables below present financial information associated with the Company's leases. This information is only presented as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2019 because, as noted above, the Company adopted ASC 842 using a transition method that does not require application to periods prior to adoption. Classification September 30, 2019 Assets Operating lease assets Right-of-use assets from operating leases $ 40,753 Finance lease assets Property and equipment 85,943 Less accumulated depreciation (41,662 ) Property and equipment, net 44,281 Total lease assets $ 85,034 Liabilities Current Operating Current operating lease liabilities $ 10,899 Finance Current portion of long-term debt and finance leases 16,967 Long-term Operating Long-term operating lease liabilities 37,008 Finance Long-term debt and finance leases 29,854 Total lease liabilities $ 94,728 Classification Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Operating lease cost Cost of sales $ 3,718 $ 12,503 Selling, general and administrative expenses 837 2,578 Total operating lease cost (1) $ 4,555 $ 15,081 Finance lease cost Amortization of leased assets Cost of sales $ 3,897 $ 13,197 Selling, general and administrative expenses 45 172 Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense, net 650 1,767 Total finance lease cost 4,592 15,136 Total lease cost $ 9,147 $ 30,217 (1) Includes variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $653 and $60 , respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $2,140 and $364 , respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . Maturity of lease liabilities (as of September 30, 2019) Operating leases (1) Finance leases (2) 2019 $ 4,065 $ 5,007 2020 13,995 18,151 2021 11,332 14,084 2022 9,502 8,689 2023 7,923 4,212 2024 5,338 1,172 Thereafter 11,915 10 Total 64,070 51,325 Less amount representing interest 16,163 4,504 Present value of lease liability $ 47,907 $ 46,821 (1) Reflects payments for non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of September 30, 2019 . The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. (2) The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. As previously disclosed in the Company's 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments for operating leases and capital lease obligation as of December 31, 2018 were as follows: Maturity of lease liabilities (as of December 31, 2018) Operating leases Capital leases 2019 $ 16,355 $ 16,872 2020 12,956 13,817 2021 10,130 10,141 2022 8,510 5,274 2023 7,054 1,633 Thereafter 16,650 — Total $ 71,655 $ 47,737 September 30, 2019 Weighted average remaining lease term (years) Operating leases 5.6 Finance leases 3.1 Weighted average discount rate Operating leases 5.9 % Finance leases 4.9 % Other information Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 8,888 Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 1,766 Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 13,801 Lessor Accounting The Company concluded that certain of its contracts with customers contain leases under the new leasing standard and accordingly should be accounted for as operating leases upon adoption of ASC 842. Specifically, certain of the Company's MPS arrangements, which had previously been accounted for as service revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are now accounted for as operating leases under ASC 842. The Company's MPS arrangements consists of the placement, management, and optimization of print and imaging equipment in customers' offices, job sites, and other facilities under which the Company is paid a fixed rate per unit for each print produced (per-use), often referred to as a “click charge.” Accordingly, the fixed rate per unit charged to the customer covers the use of the equipment (i.e., the lease component), as well as the additional services performed by the Company as described above (i.e., the non-lease component). Certain of the Company's MPS contracts provide the customer the option to renew or terminate the agreement, which are considered when assessing the lease term. The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate certain lease and non-lease components related to its MPS arrangements, and accounts for the combined component under ASC 842. The pattern of revenue recognition for the Company's MPS revenue has remained substantially unchanged following the adoption of ASC 842. MPS revenue includes $28.5 million of rental income and $2.1 million of service income for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and $86.5 million of rental income and $6.6 million of service income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . The Company's property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, includes approximately $40 million of equipment subject to leases with customers under the Company's MPS arrangements. Following termination of an MPS arrangement, the Company will place existing equipment at an alternate customer site pursuant to an MPS arrangement, at one of the Company's service centers, or dispose of the equipment. |
Leasing | Leasing Adoption of ASC Topic 842, Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 842, Leases . The new guidance replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases . ASC 842 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee accounts for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases result in the lessee recognizing a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability. For finance leases the lessee recognizes interest expense and amortization of the ROU asset, and for operating leases the lessee will recognize a straight-line total lease expense. In addition, ASC 842 changes the definition of a lease, which resulted in changes to the classification of certain service contracts with customers to lease arrangements. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements , which provided entities the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition to the new guidance. The Company elected this transition method, and as a result, the Company did not adjust comparative information for prior periods. The Company elected certain additional practical expedients permitted by the new guidance allowing the Company to carry forward historical accounting related to lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. The Company elected, for its equipment asset classes, the practical expedient that allows lessees to treat the lease and non-lease components of leases as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. As part of the transition, the Company completed a comprehensive review of its lease portfolio, including significant leases by geography and by asset type that were impacted by the new guidance, and enhanced its controls around leasing. The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in an increase to total assets and liabilities due to the recording of operating lease ROU assets of approximately $46.9 million and operating lease liabilities of approximately $53.7 million , as of January 1, 2019. Finance leases were not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets were already recorded in the balance sheet under the previous guidance, ASC 840. The adoption did not materially impact the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows. Lessee Accounting The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. The Company's material lease contracts are generally for real estate or print equipment, and the determination of whether such contracts contain leases generally does not require significant estimates or judgments. The Company’s leases that are classified as operating leases primarily consist of real estate leases. The Company’s real estate leases contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. The Company’s leases that are classified as finance leases primarily consist of print equipment. Certain print equipment leases have lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for as a single lease component as discussed above. Other than the election to treat the Company's fixed lease payment as a single lease component, the accounting for finance leases will remain unchanged under ASC 842. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and are reduced by any lease incentives received. The lease terms primarily range from one to ten years , with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 5 years . A portion of the Company’s real estate leases are generally subject to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which are treated as variable lease payments and recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments was incurred. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The tables below present financial information associated with the Company's leases. This information is only presented as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2019 because, as noted above, the Company adopted ASC 842 using a transition method that does not require application to periods prior to adoption. Classification September 30, 2019 Assets Operating lease assets Right-of-use assets from operating leases $ 40,753 Finance lease assets Property and equipment 85,943 Less accumulated depreciation (41,662 ) Property and equipment, net 44,281 Total lease assets $ 85,034 Liabilities Current Operating Current operating lease liabilities $ 10,899 Finance Current portion of long-term debt and finance leases 16,967 Long-term Operating Long-term operating lease liabilities 37,008 Finance Long-term debt and finance leases 29,854 Total lease liabilities $ 94,728 Classification Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Operating lease cost Cost of sales $ 3,718 $ 12,503 Selling, general and administrative expenses 837 2,578 Total operating lease cost (1) $ 4,555 $ 15,081 Finance lease cost Amortization of leased assets Cost of sales $ 3,897 $ 13,197 Selling, general and administrative expenses 45 172 Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense, net 650 1,767 Total finance lease cost 4,592 15,136 Total lease cost $ 9,147 $ 30,217 (1) Includes variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $653 and $60 , respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $2,140 and $364 , respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . Maturity of lease liabilities (as of September 30, 2019) Operating leases (1) Finance leases (2) 2019 $ 4,065 $ 5,007 2020 13,995 18,151 2021 11,332 14,084 2022 9,502 8,689 2023 7,923 4,212 2024 5,338 1,172 Thereafter 11,915 10 Total 64,070 51,325 Less amount representing interest 16,163 4,504 Present value of lease liability $ 47,907 $ 46,821 (1) Reflects payments for non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of September 30, 2019 . The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. (2) The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. As previously disclosed in the Company's 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments for operating leases and capital lease obligation as of December 31, 2018 were as follows: Maturity of lease liabilities (as of December 31, 2018) Operating leases Capital leases 2019 $ 16,355 $ 16,872 2020 12,956 13,817 2021 10,130 10,141 2022 8,510 5,274 2023 7,054 1,633 Thereafter 16,650 — Total $ 71,655 $ 47,737 September 30, 2019 Weighted average remaining lease term (years) Operating leases 5.6 Finance leases 3.1 Weighted average discount rate Operating leases 5.9 % Finance leases 4.9 % Other information Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 8,888 Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 1,766 Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 13,801 Lessor Accounting The Company concluded that certain of its contracts with customers contain leases under the new leasing standard and accordingly should be accounted for as operating leases upon adoption of ASC 842. Specifically, certain of the Company's MPS arrangements, which had previously been accounted for as service revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are now accounted for as operating leases under ASC 842. The Company's MPS arrangements consists of the placement, management, and optimization of print and imaging equipment in customers' offices, job sites, and other facilities under which the Company is paid a fixed rate per unit for each print produced (per-use), often referred to as a “click charge.” Accordingly, the fixed rate per unit charged to the customer covers the use of the equipment (i.e., the lease component), as well as the additional services performed by the Company as described above (i.e., the non-lease component). Certain of the Company's MPS contracts provide the customer the option to renew or terminate the agreement, which are considered when assessing the lease term. The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate certain lease and non-lease components related to its MPS arrangements, and accounts for the combined component under ASC 842. The pattern of revenue recognition for the Company's MPS revenue has remained substantially unchanged following the adoption of ASC 842. MPS revenue includes $28.5 million of rental income and $2.1 million of service income for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and $86.5 million of rental income and $6.6 million of service income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . The Company's property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, includes approximately $40 million of equipment subject to leases with customers under the Company's MPS arrangements. Following termination of an MPS arrangement, the Company will place existing equipment at an alternate customer site pursuant to an MPS arrangement, at one of the Company's service centers, or dispose of the equipment. |
Leasing | Leasing Adoption of ASC Topic 842, Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 842, Leases . The new guidance replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases . ASC 842 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee accounts for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases result in the lessee recognizing a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability. For finance leases the lessee recognizes interest expense and amortization of the ROU asset, and for operating leases the lessee will recognize a straight-line total lease expense. In addition, ASC 842 changes the definition of a lease, which resulted in changes to the classification of certain service contracts with customers to lease arrangements. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements , which provided entities the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition to the new guidance. The Company elected this transition method, and as a result, the Company did not adjust comparative information for prior periods. The Company elected certain additional practical expedients permitted by the new guidance allowing the Company to carry forward historical accounting related to lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. The Company elected, for its equipment asset classes, the practical expedient that allows lessees to treat the lease and non-lease components of leases as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. As part of the transition, the Company completed a comprehensive review of its lease portfolio, including significant leases by geography and by asset type that were impacted by the new guidance, and enhanced its controls around leasing. The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in an increase to total assets and liabilities due to the recording of operating lease ROU assets of approximately $46.9 million and operating lease liabilities of approximately $53.7 million , as of January 1, 2019. Finance leases were not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets were already recorded in the balance sheet under the previous guidance, ASC 840. The adoption did not materially impact the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows. Lessee Accounting The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. The Company's material lease contracts are generally for real estate or print equipment, and the determination of whether such contracts contain leases generally does not require significant estimates or judgments. The Company’s leases that are classified as operating leases primarily consist of real estate leases. The Company’s real estate leases contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. The Company’s leases that are classified as finance leases primarily consist of print equipment. Certain print equipment leases have lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for as a single lease component as discussed above. Other than the election to treat the Company's fixed lease payment as a single lease component, the accounting for finance leases will remain unchanged under ASC 842. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and are reduced by any lease incentives received. The lease terms primarily range from one to ten years , with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 5 years . A portion of the Company’s real estate leases are generally subject to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which are treated as variable lease payments and recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments was incurred. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The tables below present financial information associated with the Company's leases. This information is only presented as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2019 because, as noted above, the Company adopted ASC 842 using a transition method that does not require application to periods prior to adoption. Classification September 30, 2019 Assets Operating lease assets Right-of-use assets from operating leases $ 40,753 Finance lease assets Property and equipment 85,943 Less accumulated depreciation (41,662 ) Property and equipment, net 44,281 Total lease assets $ 85,034 Liabilities Current Operating Current operating lease liabilities $ 10,899 Finance Current portion of long-term debt and finance leases 16,967 Long-term Operating Long-term operating lease liabilities 37,008 Finance Long-term debt and finance leases 29,854 Total lease liabilities $ 94,728 Classification Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Operating lease cost Cost of sales $ 3,718 $ 12,503 Selling, general and administrative expenses 837 2,578 Total operating lease cost (1) $ 4,555 $ 15,081 Finance lease cost Amortization of leased assets Cost of sales $ 3,897 $ 13,197 Selling, general and administrative expenses 45 172 Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense, net 650 1,767 Total finance lease cost 4,592 15,136 Total lease cost $ 9,147 $ 30,217 (1) Includes variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $653 and $60 , respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $2,140 and $364 , respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . Maturity of lease liabilities (as of September 30, 2019) Operating leases (1) Finance leases (2) 2019 $ 4,065 $ 5,007 2020 13,995 18,151 2021 11,332 14,084 2022 9,502 8,689 2023 7,923 4,212 2024 5,338 1,172 Thereafter 11,915 10 Total 64,070 51,325 Less amount representing interest 16,163 4,504 Present value of lease liability $ 47,907 $ 46,821 (1) Reflects payments for non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of September 30, 2019 . The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. (2) The table above does not include any legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced, and such leases are not material in the aggregate. As previously disclosed in the Company's 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments for operating leases and capital lease obligation as of December 31, 2018 were as follows: Maturity of lease liabilities (as of December 31, 2018) Operating leases Capital leases 2019 $ 16,355 $ 16,872 2020 12,956 13,817 2021 10,130 10,141 2022 8,510 5,274 2023 7,054 1,633 Thereafter 16,650 — Total $ 71,655 $ 47,737 September 30, 2019 Weighted average remaining lease term (years) Operating leases 5.6 Finance leases 3.1 Weighted average discount rate Operating leases 5.9 % Finance leases 4.9 % Other information Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 8,888 Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 1,766 Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 13,801 Lessor Accounting The Company concluded that certain of its contracts with customers contain leases under the new leasing standard and accordingly should be accounted for as operating leases upon adoption of ASC 842. Specifically, certain of the Company's MPS arrangements, which had previously been accounted for as service revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are now accounted for as operating leases under ASC 842. The Company's MPS arrangements consists of the placement, management, and optimization of print and imaging equipment in customers' offices, job sites, and other facilities under which the Company is paid a fixed rate per unit for each print produced (per-use), often referred to as a “click charge.” Accordingly, the fixed rate per unit charged to the customer covers the use of the equipment (i.e., the lease component), as well as the additional services performed by the Company as described above (i.e., the non-lease component). Certain of the Company's MPS contracts provide the customer the option to renew or terminate the agreement, which are considered when assessing the lease term. The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate certain lease and non-lease components related to its MPS arrangements, and accounts for the combined component under ASC 842. The pattern of revenue recognition for the Company's MPS revenue has remained substantially unchanged following the adoption of ASC 842. MPS revenue includes $28.5 million of rental income and $2.1 million of service income for the three months ended September 30, 2019 , and $86.5 million of rental income and $6.6 million of service income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 . The Company's property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, includes approximately $40 million of equipment subject to leases with customers under the Company's MPS arrangements. Following termination of an MPS arrangement, the Company will place existing equipment at an alternate customer site pursuant to an MPS arrangement, at one of the Company's service centers, or dispose of the equipment. |