ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
June 30, 2005
(In thousands, except percentages and share data)
Significant components of income tax expense from continuing operations were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Current tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | 6,639 | | | $ | 1,461 | | | $ | 8,684 | | | $ | 1,629 | |
State | | | 935 | | | | 43 | | | | 1,315 | | | | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 7,574 | | | | 1,504 | | | | 9,999 | | | | 1,676 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | 1,218 | | | | 1,191 | | | | 1,287 | | | | 1,324 | |
State | | | 297 | | | | 424 | | | | 313 | | | | 473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,515 | | | | 1,615 | | | | 1,600 | | | | 1,797 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | 7,857 | | | | 2,652 | | | | 9,971 | | | | 2,953 | |
State | | | 1,232 | | | | 467 | | | | 1,628 | | | | 520 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,089 | | | $ | 3,119 | | | $ | 11,599 | | | $ | 3,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax expense at 35% to income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest, and the actual income tax expense is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Federal statutory income tax expense | | $ | 12,325 | | | $ | 9,961 | | | $ | 5,362 | | | $ | 11,092 | |
Increases (reductions) in taxes due to: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage depletion allowance | | | (4,895 | ) | | | (1,979 | ) | | | (6,563 | ) | | | (2,205 | ) |
Extraterritorial income exclusion | | | (521 | ) | | | — | | | | (705 | ) | | | — | |
Deduction for domestic production activities | | | (202 | ) | | | — | | | | (279 | ) | | | — | |
State taxes, net of federal tax impact | | | 757 | | | | 304 | | | | 1,056 | | | | 338 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 1,300 | | | | | | | | 13,354 | | | | — | |
Change in valuation allowance | | | 268 | | | | (134 | ) | | | 397 | | | | (149 | ) |
Taxes not provided for minority interest | | | — | | | | (4,644 | ) | | | (1,001 | ) | | | (5,171 | ) |
Taxes not provided for pass-through entity | | | — | | | | (469 | ) | | | (133 | ) | | | (522 | ) |
Other, net | | | 57 | | | | 80 | | | | 111 | | | | 90 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual income tax expense | | $ | 9,089 | | | $ | 3,119 | | | $ | 11,599 | | | $ | 3,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the reporting of amounts for financial statement purposes and income tax purposes. The net deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the condensed consolidated financial statements include the following amounts:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Investment in limited liability company subsidiary | | $ | 124,701 | | | $ | — | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | | | 3,238 | | | | 5,598 | |
Charitable contribution carryforwards | | | 136 | | | | 207 | |
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward | | | 4,364 | | | | 1,249 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross deferred tax assets | | | 132,439 | | | | 7,054 | |
Less valuation allowance | | | (108,677 | ) | | | (1,374 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total net deferred tax assets | | | 23,762 | | | | 5,680 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Investment in limited liability company subsidiary | | | — | | | | (6,869 | ) |
Virginia tax credit | | | (2,665 | ) | | | (1,855 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | (2,665 | ) | | | (8,724 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset(liability) | | $ | 21,097 | | | $ | (3,044 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
June 30, 2005
(In thousands, except percentages and share data)
Changes in the net deferred tax asset (liability) balance during the six months ended June 30, 2005 are as follows:
| | | | |
ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. and Alpha NR Holding, Inc. and Subsidiaries: | | | | |
Deferred tax liability balance at December 31, 2004 | | $ | (3,044 | ) |
Deferred tax benefit recorded in period from January 1, 2005 to February 11, 2005 for continuing and discontinued operations | | | 192 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred tax liability balance at February 11, 2005 | | $ | (2,852 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.: | | | | |
Deferred tax liability balance on February 12, 2005 | | $ | (2,852 | ) |
| | | | |
Estimated deferred tax asset generated from the Internal Restructuring | | | 132,637 | |
Valuation allowance established at the time of the Internal Restructuring | | | (106,908 | ) |
| | | | |
Net deferred taxes recorded as part of Internal Restructuring, with offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital | | | 25,729 | |
Deferred tax expense recorded in period from February 12, 2005 to June 30, 2005 for continuing and discontinued operations | | | (1,780 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2005 | | $ | 21,097 | |
| | | | |
The Internal Restructuring resulted in an increase in the basis of assets for income tax purposes, currently estimated at $346,000, which resulted in a gross deferred tax asset of $132,637. This amount was offset by an increase to the valuation allowance of $106,908 as of the date of the Internal Restructuring. The resulting net increase in deferred income taxes of $25,729 was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital, as the underlying change in the tax basis of assets of the Company was caused by the Internal Restructuring transactions between the Company and its stockholders.
Since the Company has not been in business long enough to develop a strong earnings history (objective evidence as required by generally accepted accounting principles), and due to the likelihood that the alternative minimum tax will exceed the regular tax in the future, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $108,677 as of June 30, 2005. The Company monitors the valuation allowance each quarter and makes adjustments to the allowance through the tax provision as appropriate based primarily upon continued development of an earnings history and projected future earnings based on future sales commitments, which impacts the utilization of deferred tax assets.
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
June 30, 2005
(In thousands, except percentages and share data)
The breakdown of the net deferred tax asset (liability), net of valuation allowance, recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
Current asset | | $ | 605 | | | $ | 4,674 | |
Current liability | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net current asset | | | 605 | | | | 4,674 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent asset | | | 23,157 | | | | 1,006 | |
Noncurrent liability | | | (2,665 | ) | | | (8,724 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net noncurrent asset (liability) | | | 20,492 | | | | (7,718 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total net deferred tax asset (liability) | | $ | 21,097 | | | $ | (3,044 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
(13) New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment,which requires companies to expense the fair value of equity awards over the required service period. This Statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,which uses the intrinsic value method to value stock-based compensation. On April 14, 2005, the SEC adopted a new rule that amends the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) to allow SEC registrants to implement SFAS No. 123(R) as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006.
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. The combined historical financial information discussed below for all periods prior to the completion of our Internal Restructuring on February 11, 2005, is for ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. and Alpha NR Holding, Inc. and subsidiaries, which prior to the completion of our Internal Restructuring were the owners of a majority of the membership interests of ANR Holdings, and for all periods after our Internal Restructuring is for Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., the owner of 100% of the membership interests of ANR Holdings after our Internal Restructuring.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This report includes statements of our expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These statements, which involve risks and uncertainties, relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable and may also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies. We have used the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “should” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, in this report to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements.
The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:
| • | | market demand for coal, electricity and steel; |
|
| • | | future economic or capital market conditions; |
|
| • | | weather conditions or catastrophic weather-related damage; |
|
| • | | our production capabilities; |
|
| • | | the consummation of financing, acquisition or disposition transactions and the effect thereof on our business; |
|
| • | | our plans and objectives for future operations and expansion or consolidation; |
|
| • | | our relationships with, and other conditions affecting, our customers; |
|
| • | | timing of reductions in customer coal inventories; |
|
| • | | long-term coal supply arrangements; |
|
| • | | inherent risks of coal mining beyond our control; |
|
| • | | environmental laws, including those directly affecting our coal mining and production, and those affecting our customers’ coal usage; |
|
| • | | competition in coal markets; |
|
| • | | railroad and other transportation performance and costs; |
|
| • | | availability of mining and processing equipment and parts; |
|
| • | | our assumptions concerning economically recoverable coal reserve estimates; |
|
| • | | availability of skilled employees and other employee workforce factors; |
| • | | regulatory and court decisions; |
|
| • | | future legislation and changes in regulations, governmental policies or taxes; |
|
| • | | changes in postretirement benefit obligations; |
|
| • | | our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition; and |
|
| • | | other factors, including the other factors discussed in “Overview – Coal Pricing Trends and Uncertainties” and “Outlook” below, and the “Risks Related to our Company” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this report and the documents incorporated by reference. We do not undertake any responsibility to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report. Additionally, we do not undertake any responsibility to update you on the occurrence of any unanticipated events which may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.
Overview
We produce, process and sell steam and metallurgical coal from seven regional business units, which, as of June 30, 2005, are supported by 45 active underground mines, 22 active surface mines and 11 preparation plants located throughout Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania. We also sell coal produced by others, the majority of which we process and/or blend with coal produced from our mines prior to resale, providing us with a higher overall margin for the blended product than if we had sold the coals separately. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, sales of steam coal were 3.9 and 7.1 million tons, respectively, which accounted for approximately 58% of our coal sales volume during each of these periods. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, sales of metallurgical coal, which generally sells at a premium over steam coal, were 2.8 and 5.1 million tons, respectively, which accounted for approximately 42% of our coal sales volume during each of these periods. Our primary focus in producing, processing and selling coal is on maximizing coal margins. Our sales of steam coal during the first half of 2005 were made primarily to large utilities and industrial customers in the Eastern region of the United States, and our sales of metallurgical coal during the period were made primarily to steel companies in the Northeastern and Midwestern regions of the United States and in several countries in Europe, Asia and South America. Approximately 47% of our sales revenue in the first six months of 2005 was derived from sales made outside the United States, primarily in Japan, Canada, Brazil, Korea and several European countries.
In addition, we generate other revenues from equipment and parts sales, equipment repair income, rentals, royalties, commissions, coal handling, terminal and processing fees, and coal and environmental analysis fees. We also record revenue for freight and handling charges incurred in delivering coal to our customers, which we treat as being reimbursed by our customers. However, these freight and handling revenues are offset by equivalent freight and handling costs and do not contribute to our profitability.
Our business is seasonal, with operating results varying from quarter to quarter. We generally experience lower sales and hence build coal inventory during the winter months primarily due to the freezing of lakes that we use to transport coal to some of our customers.
Our primary expenses are for wages and benefits, supply costs, repair and maintenance expenditures, cost of purchased coal, royalties, freight and handling costs, and taxes incurred in selling our coal. Historically, our cost of coal sales per ton is lower for sales of our produced and processed coal than for sales of purchased coal that we do not process prior to resale.
We have one reportable segment, Coal Operations, which includes all of our revenues and costs from coal production and sales, freight and handling, rentals, commissions and coal handling and processing operations. We report the revenues and costs from rentals, commissions and coal handling and processing operations in our other revenues and cost of other revenues, respectively.
NKC Disposition.On April 14, 2005, we sold the assets of our Colorado mining subsidiary National King Coal, LLC and related trucking subsidiary Gallup Transportation and Transloading Company, LLC (collectively, “NKC”) to an unrelated third party for cash in the amount of $4.4 million, plus an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of NKC’s coal inventory, and the assumption by the buyer of certain liabilities of NKC. We recorded a gain on this sale of $0.7 million and are reporting NKC as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. The components of the operating results included in discontinued operations are shown in the footnote 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Coal Pricing Trends and Uncertainties.During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the corresponding periods in 2004, prices for our coal increased significantly due to a combination of conditions in the United States and internationally, including an improving U.S. economy and robust economic growth in Asia, relatively low customer stockpiles, limited availability of high-quality coal from competing producers in Central Appalachia, capacity constraints of U.S. nuclear-powered electricity generators, high current and forward prices for natural gas and oil, and increased international demand for U.S. coal. This strong coal pricing environment has contributed to our growth in revenues during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005. While our outlook on coal pricing remains positive as noted below under “—Outlook,” future coal prices are subject to factors beyond our control and we cannot predict whether and for how long this strong coal pricing environment will continue. As of July 25, 2005, approximately 31% of our planned 2006 production and 60% of our planned 2007 production was uncommitted and was not yet priced. For the tons for which we have firm commitments in 2006, the average price for steam coal is $45.34 per ton and the average price for metallurgical coal is $74.28 per ton.
During the first half of 2005 when compared to the first half of 2004, we experienced increased costs for purchased coal which have risen with coal prices generally, and increased operating costs for steel manufactured equipment and supplies, employee wages and salaries, and contract mining and trucking. We also experienced disruptions in railroad service during the first six months of 2005, which caused delays in delivering products to customers and increased our internal coal handling costs at our operations. We currently expect disruptions in railroad service to continue through the second half of 2005. Conditions affecting railroad service are subject to factors beyond our control and we cannot predict whether and for how long these railroad-related costs will continue to increase in the future.
We continued to experience a tight market for supplies of mining and processing equipment and parts during this quarter, due to increased demand by coal producers attempting to increase production in response to the strong market demand for coal. Although we are attempting to obtain adequate supplies of mining and processing equipment and parts to meet our production forecasts, continued limited availability of equipment and parts could prevent us from meeting those forecasts. The supply of mining and processing equipment and parts is subject to factors beyond our control and we cannot predict whether and for how long this supply market will remain limited.
We are also experiencing a tight market for skilled mining employees, due to increased demand by coal producers attempting to increase production in response to the strong market demand for coal, and demographic changes as existing miners in Appalachia retire at a faster rate than new miners are added to the Appalachian mining workforce. Although we have initiated training programs to create new skilled miners and raise the skill levels of existing miners, continued limited availability of skilled miners could prevent us from being able to meet our production and sales forecasts. The supply of skilled mining employees is subject to factors beyond our control and we cannot predict whether and for how long this employee market will remain limited.
The U.S. dollar weakened during 2003 and 2004, which made U.S. coal relatively less expensive and, therefore, more competitive in foreign markets. We believe that the weakening of the U.S. dollar over this period enabled us to export more metallurgical coal at higher prices than would otherwise have been the case during 2003 and 2004, and that this trend contributed to our growth in revenues and income during those periods. The U.S. dollar has strengthened against most major currencies since the beginning of 2005, and we believe that a sustained strengthening of the U.S. dollar would adversely affect our exports. Changes in currency conversion rates are subject to factors beyond our control and we cannot predict whether the dollar will weaken or strengthen against foreign currencies during any particular period.
A negotiated wage agreement between one of our subsidiaries and the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) covering approximately 86 employees as of June 30, 2005 at our Cherokee mine expired on March 23, 2005. Our subsidiary is currently in negotiations with the UMWA for a successor agreement to cover union workers at this mine.
For additional information regarding some of the risks and uncertainties that affect our business, see the “Risks Related to our Company” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
The following unaudited table reconciles EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, to net income, the mostly directly comparable GAAP measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Six months ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
| | (in thousands) |
Net income | | $ | 26,393 | | | $ | 12,243 | | | $ | 592 | | | $ | 13,480 | |
Interest expense | | | 6,647 | | | | 6,780 | | | | 12,764 | | | | 8,831 | |
Interest income | | | (191 | ) | | | (80 | ) | | | (478 | ) | | | (101 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | 9,182 | | | | 3,067 | | | | 11,506 | | | | 3,377 | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 15,048 | | | | 13,111 | | | | 29,528 | | | | 25,040 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA (1) | | | 57,079 | | | | 35,121 | | | | 53,912 | | | | 50,627 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority interest | | | — | | | | 12,678 | | | | 2,846 | | | | 13,961 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA, as adjusted (1) | | $ | 57,079 | | | $ | 47,799 | | | $ | 56,758 | | | $ | 64,588 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation, depletion, and amortization, less interest income. EBITDA, as adjusted, includes EBITDA plus minority interest. EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, are used by management to measure operating performance, and management also believes they are useful indicators of our ability to meet debt service and capital expenditure requirements. Because EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, are not calculated identically by all companies, our calculation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. In addition, the amounts presented for EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, differ from the amounts calculated under the definition of EBITDA used in our debt covenants. The definition of EBITDA used in our debt covenants is further adjusted for certain cash and non-cash charges and is used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities such as incurring debt and making certain payments. Adjusted EBITDA as it is used and defined in our debt covenants is described and reconciled to net income (loss) in “— Analysis of Material Debt Covenants” below.
Results of Operations
The discussions that follow exclude the discontinued operating results of NKC for all periods.
Three months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to the Three months Ended June 30, 2004
Summary
For the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we recorded revenues of $417.6 million compared to $339.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Net income increased from $12.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 to $26.4 million for the second quarter of 2005. Included in our current period results were a stock-based compensation charge in the amount of $3.4 million ($2.5 million after-tax) and the gain on the sale of NKC of $0.7 million ($0.5 million after-tax). EBITDA, as adjusted and as reconciled to our net income in the table above, was $57.1 million in the second quarter 2005, including the non-cash portion of the stock-based compensation charge in the amount of $3.4 million, and was $9.3 million more than the same period in 2004. Our earnings per diluted share were $0.43 for the second quarter of 2005, a $0.10 per share increase over the pro forma earnings per share for the 2004 period. Our pro forma net income and earnings per share are calculated in footnote 2 of our financial statements included in this report. The combination of the stock-based compensation charge and the NKC gain discussed above had a negative $0.03 effect on our per share earnings in this year’s second quarter.
We sold 6.7 million tons of coal during the current quarter, 0.1 million more than the comparable period in 2004. Coal margin (or coal margin per ton) which we define as coal revenues (or coal revenues per ton) less cost of coal sales (or cost of coal sales per ton), which excludes depreciation, amortization and depletion (DD&A) and selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A), divided by coal revenues (or coal revenues per ton), decreased from 20.5% in 2004 to 19.4% in 2005. Coal margin per ton was $10.55 in the second quarter 2005, a 16% increase from the second quarter 2004.
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months Ended | | Increase |
| | June 30, | | (Decrease) |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | $ or Tons | | % |
| | (in thousands, except per ton data) |
Coal revenues | | $ | 364,070 | | | $ | 293,798 | | | $ | 70,272 | | | | 24 | % |
Freight and handling revenues | | | 48,239 | | | | 39,671 | | | | 8,568 | | | | 22 | % |
Other revenues | | | 5,327 | | | | 6,406 | | | | (1,079 | ) | | | (17 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 417,636 | | | $ | 339,875 | | | $ | 77,761 | | | | 23 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tons Sold: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Steam | | | 3,906 | | | | 4,037 | | | | (131 | ) | | | (3 | %) |
Metallurgical | | | 2,784 | | | | 2,593 | | | | 191 | | | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 6,690 | | | | 6,630 | | | | 60 | | | | 1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Coal sales realization per ton: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Steam | | $ | 40.97 | | | $ | 31.58 | | | $ | 9.39 | | | | 30 | % |
Metallurgical | | | 73.29 | | | | 64.13 | | | | 9.16 | | | | 14 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 54.42 | | | $ | 44.31 | | | $ | 10.11 | | | | 23 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Coal Revenues.Coal revenues increased by $70.3 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 over the comparable period of 2004, or 24%, mainly driven by a 23% increase in coal sales realization per ton from $44.31 per ton in the second quarter of 2004 to $54.42 per ton in the second quarter of 2005. Our metallurgical coal (met coal) realization per ton increased from $64.13 per ton in the second quarter of 2004 to $73.29 per ton in the second quarter of 2005, or 14%, and steam coal realization per ton increased from $31.58 to $40.97 for the reasons discussed in the section titled “Coal Pricing Trends and Uncertainties” above. Met coal sales accounted for 42% of our coal sales volume in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 39% in the year ago period. Total tons sold during the second quarter of 2005 were 6.7 million, including 2.8 million tons of met coal and 3.9 million of steam coal. Sales volume for the comparable period last year were 6.6 million tons of which 2.6 million were met coal and 4.0 million were steam coal. This change in the mix of met and steam coal tons sold reflects our ability to interchange certain coals as part of our effort to maximize realizations and coal margins.
Freight and Handling Revenues.Freight and handling revenues increased by $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 over the year ago period due to higher freight rates partially offset by a decrease of 0.1 million export tons. However, these revenues are offset by equivalent costs and do not contribute to our profitability.
Other Revenues.Other revenues decreased by $1.1 million during the second quarter this year from the second quarter last year. This decrease was mainly due to lower revenues from our equipment and parts sales and equipment repairs of our subsidiary, Maxxim Rebuild Company, offset in part by higher revenues from third party coal processing fees.
Costs and Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Increase |
| | June 30. | | (Decrease) |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | $ | | % |
| | (in thousands, except per ton data) |
Cost of coal sales (exclusive of items shown separately below) | | $ | 293,493 | | | $ | 233,490 | | | $ | 60,003 | | | | 26 | % |
Freight and handling costs | | | 48,239 | | | | 39,671 | | | | 8,568 | | | | 22 | % |
Cost of other revenues | | | 4,319 | | | | 4,928 | | | | (609 | ) | | | (12 | %) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 15,075 | | | | 12,916 | | | | 2,159 | | | | 17 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately above and including stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $3,381 in 2005) | | | 14,870 | | | | 13,861 | | | | 1,009 | | | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | | $ | 375,996 | | | $ | 304,866 | | | $ | 71,130 | | | | 23 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Increase |
| | June 30. | | (Decrease) |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | $ | | % |
| | (in thousands, except per ton data) |
Cost of coal sales per ton: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company mines | | $ | 36.65 | | | $ | 30.51 | | | $ | 6.14 | | | | 20 | % |
Contract mines (including purchased and processed) | | | 53.12 | | | | 41.39 | | | | 11.73 | | | | 28 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total produced and processed | | | 40.40 | | | | 32.97 | | | | 7.43 | | | | 23 | % |
Purchased and sold without processing | | | 56.46 | | | | 41.80 | | | | 14.66 | | | | 35 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of coal sales per ton | | $ | 43.87 | | | $ | 35.22 | | | $ | 8.65 | | | | 25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Coal Sales:Our cost of coal sales increased by $60.0 million, or $8.65 per ton, from $233.5 million, or $35.22 per ton, in the second quarter 2004 to $293.5 million, or $43.87 per ton, in the second quarter of 2005. Our cost of sales per ton of our produced and processed coal was $40.40 per ton in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $32.97 per ton in the comparable period in 2004. This increase is attributable to increased costs for mine supplies, added preparation costs and lower yields involved in increasing the proportion of our sales made to the metallurgical markets, higher trucking costs, and increased variable sales-related costs, such as royalties and severance taxes. Also, our cost for contract miner services and coal purchased and processed at our facilities increased 28% in the current quarter as compared to the first quarter 2004. So far this year we have elected to take over three failing contract mines, and we have incurred extra costs to bring them up to our standards. The cost of sales per ton of our purchased coal was $56.46 per ton in the second quarter 2005, and $41.80 per ton for the corresponding period of 2004. This $14.66 per ton increase in costs is due to the general increase in coal prices since last year and the change in the mix of coal qualities purchased. Of these purchased tons, approximately 68% was blended with our produced and processed tons prior to resale.
Freight and Handling Costs.Freight and handling costs increased by $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 over the year ago period mainly due to higher freight rates. We paid these freight and handling costs which we treat as being reimbursed by our customers. These costs are offset by an equivalent amount of freight and handling revenues.
Cost of Other Revenues. Our cost of other revenues decreased by 12% or $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2005 when compared to the similar period in 2004 due to lower expenses at our subsidiary, Maxxim Rebuild Company, partially offset by higher coal processing costs due to increased volumes. The margin (other revenues less cost of other revenues) on other revenues decreased by $0.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2004 due to a decrease in sales commission margin.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization.DD&A increased $2.2 million or 17%, to $15.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 due mainly to capital additions. DD&A per ton of produced and processed coal sold increased from $2.62 per ton for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $2.88 per ton in the same period of 2005.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Our SG&A expenses increased by $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2005 over the corresponding quarter last year. Excluding our stock-based compensation charge of $3.4 million incurred in the second quarter of 2005, these costs decreased in the three months ended June 30, 2005 by $2.4 million from the second quarter of last year. Included in the second quarter of 2004 expenses were incentive bonuses in the total amount of $4.4 million. Included in this year’s second quarter are higher professional fees related to a strategic sourcing initiative, our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance project and other expenses related to being a public company.
Interest Expense.Interest expense decreased marginally from $6.8 million to $6.6 million during the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as a charge related to the write-off of $2.8 million of the unamortized portion of deferred loan costs associated with our prior credit facility in the 2004 period was almost offset by the additional interest expense we incurred on our 10% senior notes in the 2005 period.
Interest Income.Interest income increased by $0.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 from the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was attributable to our $10.0 million loan to a coal supplier which we made in June 2004.
Income Tax Expense:Our provision for income taxes related to continuing operations increased by $6.0 million from $3.1 million in the prior year’s second quarter to $9.1 million in this year’s second quarter. The effective tax rate of 25.8% for the second quarter of 2005 is higher than the 11.0% effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2004 primarily due to a portion of pre-tax income related to the minority interest and pass-through entity owners not being tax affected in the 2004 period. Subsequent to the Internal Restructuring and IPO in 2005, all of the income of ANR Holdings is taxed to Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
Six months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to the Six months Ended June 30, 2004
Summary
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, our total revenues were $729.8 million compared to $582.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $147.2 million. Net income decreased from $13.5 million in the 2004 period to $0.6 million for the 2005 period. Included in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was a stock-based compensation charge in the amount of $39.8 million ($38.0 million after-tax) and gains associated with the settlement of a funded reclamation bonding program in the first quarter of 2005 and the sale of NKC totaling $2.5 million ($1.8 million after-tax). EBITDA, as adjusted and as reconciled to our net income or loss in the table above, was $56.8 million in the first half of 2005, including the non-cash portion of the stock-based compensation charge in the amount of $32.3 million and was $7.8 million less than the same period in 2004. Our pro forma earnings per diluted share were $0.04 for the first half 2005, a $0.28 per share decrease over pro forma earnings per share for the 2004 period (see footnote 2 in our financial statements included herein). The combination of the stock-based compensation charge and the gains discussed above had a negative $0.59 effect on our pro forma earnings per share for the first half of 2005.
We sold 12.2 million tons of coal during the first half of 2005, 0.4 million less than the comparable period in 2004. Coal margin increased from 17.2% in 2004 to 18.4% in 2005. Coal margin per ton was $9.61 in the six months ended June 30, 2005, a 39% increase from the first half of 2004.
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months Ended | | Increase |
| | June 30, | | (Decrease) |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | $ or Tons | | % |
| | (in thousands, except per ton data) |
Coal revenues | | $ | 637,204 | | | $ | 505,813 | | | $ | 131,391 | | | | 26 | % |
Freight and handling revenues | | | 79,991 | | | | 65,275 | | | | 14,716 | | | | 23 | % |
Other revenues | | | 12,596 | | | | 11,509 | | | | 1,087 | | | | 9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 729,791 | | | $ | 582,597 | | | $ | 147,194 | | | | 25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tons Sold: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Steam | | | 7,111 | | | | 7,806 | | | | (695 | ) | | | (9 | %) |
Metallurgical | | | 5,112 | | | | 4,773 | | | | 339 | | | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 12,223 | | | | 12,579 | | | | (356 | ) | | | (3 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Coal sales realization per ton: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Steam | | $ | 39.01 | | | $ | 31.01 | | | $ | 8.00 | | | | 26 | % |
Metallurgical | | | 70.37 | | | | 55.27 | | | | 15.10 | | | | 27 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 52.13 | | | $ | 40.21 | | | $ | 11.92 | | | | 30 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Coal Revenues.Coal revenues increased by $131.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 over the comparable period of 2004, or 26%, mainly driven by a 30% increase in coal sales realization per ton from $40.21 per ton in the first half of 2004 to $52.13 per ton in the comparable 2005 period. Our met coal realization increased from $55.27 per ton in the six months ended June 30, 2004, to $70.37 per ton in the 2005 six month period, or 27%, and steam coal realization per ton increased from $31.01 to $39.01 or 26%. Met coal sales accounted for 42% of our coal sales volume in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 38% in the year ago period. Total tons sold during the first half of 2005 were 12.2 million, including 5.1 million tons of met coal and 7.1 million of steam coal. Sales for the comparable period last year were 12.6 million tons of which 4.8 million were met coal and 7.8 million were steam coal. This change in the mix of met and steam coal tons sold reflects our ability to interchange certain coals as part of our effort to maximize realizations and coal margins.
Freight and Handling Revenues.Freight and handling revenues increased by $14.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 over the year ago period mainly due to higher freight rates. However, these revenues are offset by equivalent costs and do not contribute to our profitability.
Other Revenues.Other revenues increased by $1.1 million during the first half of this year from the corresponding period last year mainly due to higher revenues from third party coal processing fees that were partially offset by a decrease in revenues associated with coal sales commissions.
Costs and Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended | | Increase |
| | June 30. | | (Decrease) |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | $ | | % |
| | (in thousands, except per ton data) |
Cost of coal sales (exclusive of items shown separately below) | | $ | 519,777 | | | $ | 418,572 | | | $ | 101,205 | | | | 24 | % |
Freight and handling costs | | | 79,991 | | | | 65,275 | | | | 14,716 | | | | 23 | % |
Cost of other revenues | | | 10,384 | | | | 8,338 | | | | 2,046 | | | | 25 | % |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 29,245 | | | | 24,690 | | | | 4,555 | | | | 18 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately above and including stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $39,788 in 2005) | | | 62,776 | | | | 25,666 | | | | 37,110 | | | | 145 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | | $ | 702,173 | | | $ | 542,541 | | | $ | 159,632 | | | | 29 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of coal sales per ton: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company mines | | $ | 35.65 | | | $ | 28.99 | | | $ | 6.66 | | | | 23 | % |
Contract mines (including purchased and processed) | | | 50.14 | | | | 38.32 | | | | 11.82 | | | | 31 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total produced and processed | | | 38.78 | | | | 31.12 | | | | 7.66 | | | | 25 | % |
Purchased and sold without processing | | | 58.09 | | | | 40.43 | | | | 17.66 | | | | 44 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of coal sales per ton | | $ | 42.52 | | | $ | 33.28 | | | $ | 9.24 | | | | 28 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Coal Sales:Our cost of coal sales increased by $101.2 million, or $9.24 per ton, from $418.6 million, or $33.28 per ton, in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $519.8 million, or $42.52 per ton, in the 2005 comparable period. Our cost of sales per ton of our produced and processed coal was $38.78 per ton in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $31.12 per ton in the comparable period in 2004. This increase is attributable to increased costs for steel-related mine supplies, added preparation costs and lower yields involved in increasing the proportion of our sales made to the metallurgical markets, higher trucking costs, and increased variable sales-related costs, such as royalties and severance taxes. Also, our cost for contract miner services and coal purchased and processed at our facilities increased 31% in the current period as compared to the prior year period. The cost of sales per ton of our purchased coal was $58.09 per ton in the first half of 2005, and $40.43 per ton for the corresponding period of 2004. This $17.66 per ton increase in costs is due to the general increase in coal prices since last year and the change in the mix of coal qualities purchased. Of these purchased tons approximately 65% was blended with our produced and processed tons prior to resale.
Freight and Handling Costs.Freight and handling costs increased by $14.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 over the year ago period due to higher freight rates. We paid these freight and handling costs which we treat as being reimbursed by our customers. These costs are offset by an equivalent amount of freight and handling revenues. .
Cost of Other Revenues. Our cost of other revenues increased by 25% or $2.0 million in the first half of 2005 when compared to the similar period in 2004 due to higher coal processing costs due to increased volumes. The margin (other revenues less cost of other revenues) on other revenues decreased by $1.0 million in the first half of 2005 when compared to the first six months of 2004 due mainly to the decrease in sales commission revenues discussed above.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization.DD&A increased $4.6 million, or 18%, to $29.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 due mainly to capital additions. DD&A per ton of produced and processed coal sold increased from $2.56 per ton for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $2.97 per ton in the same period of 2005.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Our SG&A expenses increased by $37.1 million during the first six months of 2005 over the corresponding period last year. Excluding our stock-based compensation charge of $39.8 million incurred in the first half of 2005, these costs decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2005 by $2.7 million from the comparable period last year. Included in the first six months of 2004 expenses were incentive bonuses in the total amount of $4.4 million and a $3.1 million payment related to partial termination of a coal supply agreement. Included in this year’s first six months are higher professional fees related to a strategic sourcing initiative, our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance project and other expenses related to being a public company.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased from $8.8 million to $12.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. A charge related to the write-off of $2.8 million of the unamortized portion of deferred loan costs associated with our prior credit facility in the 2004 period was more than offset by the additional interest expense we incurred on our 10% senior notes in the 2005 period.
Interest Income.Interest income increased by $0.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 over the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was attributable to our $10.0 million loan to a coal supplier which we made in June 2004.
Income Tax Expense:Our provision for income taxes related to continuing operations increased by $8.1 million from $3.5 million in the prior year’s first half to $11.6 million in this year’s first six months. Because the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 include activity both prior to and after the Internal Restructuring and IPO, the total income tax provision is the sum of the provisions for the pre- and post-restructuring periods.
Prior to February 12, 2005, the minority interest owners and ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. owned interests in ANR Holdings, a limited liability company and pass-through entity for income tax purposes. As a pass-through entity, ANR Holdings provides information returns reflecting the allocated income (loss) to the minority interest owners and ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P based upon their respective ownership percentage and certain special allocations as provided by the limited liability company agreement and the Internal Revenue Code. The income tax consequences of the income (loss) allocated to these owners for the period from January 1, 2005 to February 11, 2005 and from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2004 is not reflected in the financial statements. For these periods, only the income tax expense associated with Alpha NR Holding, Inc., a taxable entity, is included. The primary source of the income tax impact is derived from the allocated income (loss) from ANR Holdings, Alpha Natural Resources, LLC and its operating subsidiaries, all of which are pass-through entities for tax purposes. Subsequent to the Internal Restructuring and IPO, all of the income of ANR Holdings is taxed to Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
The effective tax rate of 75.7% for the first half of 2005 is greater than the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the majority of the stock-based compensation charge associated with the issuance of common stock to management in connection with the Internal Restructuring and IPO not being deductible for tax purposes. The increase in expected income tax expense related to the stock-based compensation charge is offset in part by the tax benefits associated with percentage depletion, the extraterritorial income exclusion, and taxes not being provided for on the minority interest and pass-through entity owners’ respective shares for the period prior to the Internal Restructuring. As $33.0 million of the stock-based compensation charge was identified as a significant unusual item in the first quarter of 2005, the tax effect of the $33.0 million expense (no tax benefit) was accounted for in that period and excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate of approximately 26%. The Company’s effective tax rate for the interim periods is applied to pre-tax income exclusive of the $33.0 million stock-based compensation charge. Because the majority of the 2005 stock-based compensation was recorded in the first quarter, the first half of 2005 effective tax rate is not indicative of the effective tax rate for the remainder of 2005. We estimate that exclusive of the stock-based compensation charge (both the $33.0 million significant unusual portion and the recurring portion for the full year of 2005), our 2005 effective tax rate would be approximately 23.5%, which is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to the benefits of percentage depletion and a combination of the extraterritorial income exclusion and deduction for domestic production activities enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, partially offset by state income taxes and valuation allowances. Actual pre-tax income for the year will have an impact on the effective tax rates just noted and therefore our estimate of the rates may change in subsequent quarters.
Our effective tax rate of 75.7% for the first half of 2005 is much higher compared to the first half of 2004 rate of 11% primarily due to the significant stock-based compensation charge for 2005 that did not exist in 2004. In addition, the portion of pre-tax income related to the minority interest and pass-through entity owners not tax affected is greater in the first half of 2004, thereby reducing the effective rate more in that period of 2004 compared to the same period in 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity and capital resource requirements are to finance the cost of our coal production and purchases, to make capital expenditures, pay income taxes, and to service our debt and reclamation obligations. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from sales of our produced and purchased coal, other income and borrowings under our senior credit facility.
At June 30, 2005, our available liquidity was $53.7 million, including cash of $10.1 million and $43.6 million available under our credit facility. Our total indebtedness was $262.6 million at June 30, 2005 an increase of $60.9 million from the year ended December 31, 2004.
We currently project cash capital spending for the full year of 2005 of $110 million to $120 million. These forecasted expenditures will be used to develop new mines and replace or add equipment. We believe that cash generated from our operations and borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Cash Flows
Net cash used by operations in the first six months of 2005 was $1.4 million, a decrease of $48.5 million from the $47.1 million of net cash provided by operations during the first six months of 2004. This $48.5 million decrease in cash provided by operations is mainly attributed to an increase in the cash used by operating assets and liabilities. The combination of our net income and non-cash charges included in net income for the first six months of 2005 increased by $10.6 million over the comparable period in 2004. Improved operating results in the first six months of 2005 over the prior year period were more than offset by our stock-based compensation charges in the amount of $39.8 million, the majority of which were non-cash. This $10.6 million increase was more than offset by an increase in the cash required to support our operating assets and liabilities in the amount of $59.1 million. The additional cash required for operating assets and liabilities in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the first six months of 2004 was principally caused by the following three factors:
| | § Our trade accounts receivable used $19.4 million more cash in the first six months of 2005 than in the comparable period last year, due to the 25% increase in our total revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the prior year period. There has been no change in our credit terms and over 93% of our receivables were current in both periods. |
| | § The cash required to carry inventories increased by $20.1 million in the current six month period over the corresponding period last year mainly due to an increase in tons in inventory and an increase in the associated cost per ton.
|
|
| | § Accounts payable and other current accrued liabilities provided cash in the six months ended June 30, 2005 in the amount of $14.9 million while these liabilities provided cash in the amount of $36.2 million in the year ago period, an additional $21.3 million use of cash in the current period. |
Net cash used in investing activities consumed $18.7 million more cash in the first half of 2005 over the year ago period mainly due to increased capital expenditures for new mines and equipment in the amount of $32.7 million. The 2004 period included a loan to a coal supplier for $10.0 million and the purchase of the net assets of two companies for the total amount of $2.9 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $66.8 million to $69.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 over the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the six month period ended June 30, 2004 we recapitalized our company by issuing $175.0 million of 10% senior notes and entered into a new credit facility. We used the proceeds to repay our then existing credit facility and to pay distributions to the members of ANR Holdings, LLC. Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.1 million during the year ago period. In the six months ended June 30, 2005, we completed our previously discussed Internal Restructuring and IPO. The proceeds from the IPO were used to repay shareholders’ notes issued as part of the Internal Restructuring. Our long-term debt increase of approximately $70.0 million has been used to fund our cash needs for working capital and to purchase capital equipment.
Credit Facility and Long-term Debt
As of June 30, 2005 our total long-term indebtedness, including capital lease obligations, consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | |
| | June 30, |
| | 2005 |
10% Senior notes due 2012 | | $ | 175,000 | |
Revolving credit facility | | | 78,000 | |
Variable rate term notes | | | 879 | |
Capital lease obligation | | | 1,709 | |
| | | | |
Total long-term debt | | | 255,588 | |
Less current portion | | | (1,349 | ) |
| | | | |
Long-term debt, net of current portion | | $ | 254,239 | |
| | | | |
The credit facility and the indenture governing the senior notes each impose certain restrictions on our subsidiaries, including restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to: incur debt; grant liens; enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses; provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other person; pay dividends and make other distributions; make loans, investments, advances and acquisitions; sell assets; make redemptions and repurchases of capital stock; make capital expenditures; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; liquidate or dissolve; engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in affiliate transactions; change businesses; change our fiscal year; amend certain debt and other material agreements; issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries; engage in sale and leaseback transactions; and restrict distributions from subsidiaries. In addition, the credit facility provides that we must meet or exceed certain interest coverage ratios and must not exceed certain leverage ratios.
Borrowings under our credit facility will be subject to mandatory prepayment (1) with 100% of the net cash proceeds received from asset sales or other dispositions of property by ANR Holdings and its subsidiaries (including insurance and other condemnation proceedings), subject to certain exceptions and reinvestment provisions, (2) with 100% of the net cash proceeds received by ANR Holdings and its subsidiaries from the issuance of debt securities or other incurrence of debt, excluding certain indebtedness, and (3) 50% (or 25%, if our leverage ratio is less than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 but greater than 1.00, or 0% if our leverage ratio is less than or equal to 1.00) of the net cash proceeds of equity issuances of ANR Holdings and its subsidiaries.
Other
As a regular part of our business, we review opportunities for, and engage in discussions and negotiations concerning, the acquisition of coal mining assets and interests in coal mining companies, and acquisitions of, or combinations with, coal mining companies. When we believe that these opportunities are consistent with our growth plans and our acquisition criteria, we will make bids or proposals and/or enter into letters of intent and other similar agreements, which may be binding or nonbinding, that are customarily subject to a variety of conditions and usually permit us to terminate the discussions and any related agreement if, among other things, we are not satisfied with the results of our due diligence investigation. Any acquisition opportunities we pursue could materially affect our liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur indebtedness, seek equity capital or both. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Analysis of Material Debt Covenants
We were in compliance with all covenants under our credit facility and the indenture governing our senior notes as of June 30, 2005.
The financial covenants in our credit facility require, among other things, that:
| • | | Alpha Natural Resources, LLC must maintain a leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement), of less than 3.75 at December 31, 2004, 3.50 at March 31 and June 30, 2005, 3.25 at September 30 and December 31, 2005, 3.15 at March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2006 and 3.00 at March 31, 2007 (and thereafter), respectively, with Adjusted EBITDA being computed using the most recent four quarters; and |
|
| • | | Alpha Natural Resources, LLC must maintain an interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement), to cash interest expense (defined as the sum of cash interest expense plus cash letter of credit fees and commissions), of greater than 2.50 at September 30, 2004 and at each quarter end thereafter. |
Based upon Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement), Alpha Natural Resources, LLC’s leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio for the twelve months ended June 30, 2005 were 1.67 (maximum of 3.50) and 7.44 (minimum of 2.50), respectively. Alpha Natural Resources, LLC maintained the leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in, and were in compliance with, the credit facility as of June 30, 2005.
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, is used to determine compliance with many of the covenants under the credit facility. The breach of covenants in the credit facility that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA could result in a default under the credit facility and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture.
Because the covenants in our credit facility relate to Alpha Natural Resources, LLC, EBITDA as presented in the table below reflects adjustments for minority interest necessary to reconcile our net income to Alpha Natural Resources, LLC’s EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude non-recurring items, non-cash items and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under our credit facility, as shown in the table below. We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with our financial covenants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | Three Months | | Three Months | | Three Months | | Twelve Months |
| | Ended | | Ended | | Ended | | Ended | | Ended |
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | March 31, | | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2004 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2005 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 5,342 | | | $ | 1,115 | | | $ | (25,801 | ) | | $ | 26,393 | | | $ | 7,049 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 5,449 | | | | 5,344 | | | | 5,830 | | | | 6,456 | | | | 23,079 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 1,335 | | | | (772 | ) | | | 2,324 | | | | 9,182 | | | | 12,069 | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses | | | 14,312 | | | | 16,660 | | | | 14,480 | | | | 15,048 | | | | 60,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | | 26,438 | | | | 22,347 | | | | (3,167 | ) | | | 57,079 | | | | 102,697 | |
Minority interest(1) | | | 5,688 | | | | 268 | | | | 2,846 | | | | — | | | | 8,802 | |
Stock-based compensation charge(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,407 | | | | 3,381 | | | | 39,788 | |
|
Asset impairment charge and write-offs (2) | | | 5,100 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 683 | | | | 5,783 | |
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (income) expense (2) | — | | | | — | | | | 209 | | | | (505 | ) | | | (296 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 37,226 | | | $ | 22,615 | | | $ | 36,295 | | | $ | 60,638 | | | $ | 156,774 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leverage ratio(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.67 | | |
Interest coverage ratio(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7.44 | |
| | |
(1) | | Because our credit facility and our senior notes are issued by our subsidiaries, we are required to adjust our EBITDA for our minority interest which does not exist at the subsidiary level. |
|
(2) | | Adjusted EBITDA as defined in our credit facility is adjusted to add back for the non-cash portion of the stock-based compensation charge related to our Internal Restructuring and initial public offering as recorded by Alpha Natural Resources, LLC, for the asset impairment charge related to our NKC operations, for other asset write-offs and amounts of income or expense related to the parent of Alpha Natural Resources, LLC. Income or expenses related solely to Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. are excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA under our credit agreement. |
|
(3) | | Leverage ratio is defined in our credit facility as total debt divided by Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
(4) | | Interest coverage ratio is defined in our credit facility as Adjusted EBITDA divided by cash interest expense. |
Outlook
While our business is subject the general risks of the coal industry and specific individual risks, we believe that the outlook for coal markets remains positive worldwide, assuming continued growth in the U.S., China, Pacific Rim, Europe and other industrialized economies that are increasing coal demand for electricity generation and steelmaking. Published indices show improved year-over-year coal prices in most U.S. and global coal markets, and worldwide coal supply/demand fundamentals remain tight due to high market demand, transportation constraints and production difficulties in most countries. Metallurgical coal is generally selling at a significant premium to steam coal, and we expect that pricing relationship to continue based on the same assumptions made above.
For 2005, we are targeting annual production of 20 million to 22 million tons and total sales volume of 25 million to 26 million tons. Approximately 69% and 40% of our planned production in 2006 and 2007, respectively, has been priced as of July 25, 2005.
We have sales commitments with utilities for approximately 5.0 million tons of coal that we believe are priced well below market and are expected to be re-priced this year and next. We are currently engaged in negotiations with these utilities and we currently expect to have about 2.5 million tons that will be re-priced in 2006 at current market prices. However, the utilities are not required to renew their contracts with us at higher prices or at all, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to renew these contracts at higher prices, or at all, within the time period specified above.
We anticipate continued challenges with railroad service throughout the remainder of this year. We are working with our customers and the railroads in an effort to address these issues in a timely manner.
Based on current market conditions in the steam and metallurgical coal markets, we anticipate increasing the proportion of our metallurgical coal sales that are committed under long-term contracts as compared to prior years and continuing to market portions of our high quality steam coal production as metallurgical coal. We plan to focus on organic growth by continuing to develop our existing reserves. In addition, we also plan to evaluate attractively priced acquisitions that create potential synergies with our existing operations.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. The results of operations for the quarter and year-to-date periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the full year. Please refer to the section entitled “Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a discussion of our critical accounting estimates and assumptions.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In addition to risks inherent in operations, we are exposed to market risks. The following discussion provides additional detail regarding our exposure to the risks of changing coal prices, interest rates and customer credit.
We are exposed to market price risk in the normal course of selling coal. As of July 25, 2005, approximately 31% and 60% of our estimated 2006 and 2007 planned production, respectively, was uncommitted. As compared to prior years, we have increased the proportion of our planned future production in 2006 and 2007 for which we have contracts to sell coal, which has the effect of lessening our market price risk.
All of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility are at a variable rate, so we are exposed to rising interest rates in the United States. A one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an annualized increase to interest expense of approximately $0.8 million based on our variable rate borrowings as of June 30, 2005.
Our concentration of credit risk is substantially with electric utilities, producers of steel and foreign customers. We have in place a credit committee consisting of Alpha’s senior mangers whose policy is to independently evaluate a customer’s creditworthiness prior to entering into transactions and to periodically monitor the credit extended.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.Beginning with the year ending December 31, 2006, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require us to include management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The internal control report must contain (1) a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, (2) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, (3) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective, and (4) a statement that our registered independent public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.
In order to achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, management has commenced a Section 404 compliance project under which management has engaged outside consultants and adopted a detailed project work plan to assess the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, remediate any control weaknesses that may be identified, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal
control over financial reporting. In connection with our Section 404 compliance project, during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 we continued the process of implementing measures designed to improve our internal control over financial reporting in the following areas: documentation of controls and procedures; segregation of duties; timely reconciliation of accounts; methods of reconciling fixed asset accounts; the structure of our general ledger; security systems and testing of our disaster recovery plan for our information technology systems; and the level of experience in public company accounting and periodic reporting matters among our financial and accounting staff. We expect to continue to make changes in our internal control over financial reporting from time to time during the period prior to December 31, 2006 in connection with our Section 404 compliance project. Except as described above, during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of the effectiveness of internal control.A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected. Notwithstanding these limitations, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at the “reasonable assurance” level as of the end of the period covered by this report.
PART II
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. was held on April 27, 2005 at the Marriott MeadowView Conference Resort & Convention Center located at 1901 MeadowView Parkway, Kingsport, Tennessee.
At the Annual Meeting, the holders of the registrant’s common stock elected the following nominees for director for a one-year term expiring at the annual meeting in 2006 and until their respective successors are elected and qualified:
| | | | | | | | |
Nominee | | Total Votes For | | Total Votes Withheld |
E. Linn Draper, Jr. | | | 58,614,273 | | | | 1,500,695 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Glenn A. Eisenberg | | | 58,615,673 | | | | 1,499,295 | |
| | | | | | | | |
John W. Fox, Jr. | | | 58,614,173 | | | | 1,500,795 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Alex T. Krueger | | | 51,638,124 | | | | 8,476,844 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fritz R. Kundrun | | | 51,667,586 | | | | 8,447,382 | |
| | | | | | | | |
William E. Macaulay | | | 52,061,951 | | | | 8,053,017 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Hans J. Mende | | | 52,078,586 | | | | 8,036,382 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Michael J. Quillen | | | 52,322,904 | | | | 7,792,064 | |
In addition, the holders of the registrant’s common stock ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP to be our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005:
| | | | |
Vote totals: |
For: | | | 59,902,994 | |
Against: | | | 182,031 | |
Abstained: | | | 29,943 | |
Item 5.Other Information
The Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is maintained by the Board of Directors of the registrant and certain of its subsidiaries and is administered by a committee (the “Committee”) of at least three persons appointed by the registrant’s Board of Directors, for the purpose of providing deferred compensation to key employees of the registrant and its subsidiaries who are designated by management, from time to time, and approved by the Committee. The Plan was amended and restated as of May 1, 2005, to be effective as of December 31, 2004 (i) to include a supplemental retirement plan (“SRP”) feature to provide benefits that would otherwise be denied participants by reason of certain limitations in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (ii) to reflect recent changes made to certain provision of the Code that apply to non-qualified deferred compensation plans and (iii) to effect necessary administrative changes. A copy of the Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by this reference.
On August 12, 2005, the Committee approved the contribution of amounts to the SRP accounts maintained for certain Plan participants with respect to amounts that would have been contributed in 2003 and 2004 had the Plan, including the SRP feature, been in effect during those years. The contribution amounts for the executive officers of the Company who were listed in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2005 annual general meeting of stockholders were as follows: (1) Michael J. Quillen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company: $42,824; (2) Kevin S. Crutchfield, Executive Vice President of the Company: $31,597; (3) D. Scott Kroh, Executive Vice President of the Company: $20,817; (4) David C. Stuebe, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company: $8,551; and (5) Michael D. Brown, Vice President of the Company: $12,685.
The Stockholder Agreement dated as of February 11, 2005 by and among Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and certain of its stockholders was amended by the “FRC Parties” named therein and the “AMCI Parties” named therein, pursuant to a letter agreement
(the “First Amendment to Stockholder Agreement”) dated August 12, 2005 regarding Section 3.1 of the Stockholder Agreement. A copy of the First Amendment to Stockholder Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.2 to this report and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Item 6.Exhibits
| | |
Exhibit No | | Description of Exhibit |
10.1*‡ | | Amended and Restated Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan |
| | |
10.2* | | First Amendment to Stockholder Agreement |
| | |
10.3‡ | | Form of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. Restricted Stock Agreement for Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (File No. 333-127528) filed on August 15, 2005.) |
| | |
| | |
31(a)* | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
31(b)* | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32(a)* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32(b)* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
* | | Filed herewith. |
|
‡ | | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. | |
| By: | /s/ David C. Stuebe | |
| | Name: | David C. Stuebe | |
| | Title: | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
|
Date: August 15, 2005
10-Q EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
Exhibit No | | Description of Exhibit |
10.1*‡ | | Amended and Restated Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan |
| | |
10.2* | | First Amendment to Stockholder Agreement |
| | |
10.3‡ | | Form of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. Restricted Stock Agreement for Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (File No. 333-127528) filed on August 15, 2005.) |
| | |
31(a)* | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
31(b)* | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32(a)* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32(b)* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
* | | Filed herewith. |
|
‡ | | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |