Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies (Policies): | ' |
Interim Financial Reporting | ' |
Interim Financial Reporting |
|
While the information presented in the accompanying interim financial statements is unaudited, it includes all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"). These interim financial statements have adjustments related to the accounting for a reverse acquisition completed on February 3, 2014. The acquired company did not exist at the end of this three and nine month period in 2013 and therefore, no comparative data is reflected for the period ending September 30, 2013 or at the audit period ending December 31, 2013. For the Company, Frontier Beverage Company, Inc. (the “Company”), all adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Interim financial statements and the notes thereto do not contain all of the disclosures normally found in year-end audited financial statements and these Notes to Financial Statements are abbreviated and contain only certain disclosures related to the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2014. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on April 16, 2014. Operating results for the period from January 13, 2014 (date of inception) through ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the period from January 13, 2014 (date of inception) through December 31, 2014 |
Basis of presentation and going concern uncertainty | ' |
Basis of presentation and going concern uncertainty |
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern, which is dependent upon the Company's ability to establish itself as a profitable business. At September 30, 2014, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $2,160,967 and has incurred net loss of $879,240 from continuing operations for the period from January 13, 2014 (date of inception) through September 30, 2014. The Company’s ability to continue in business is dependent upon obtaining sufficient financing or attaining profitable operations. However, there can be no assurance that management will be successful in obtaining additional funding or in attaining profitable operations, and therefore, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties, nor do they include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in operation |
Change of Control | ' |
Change of Control |
|
On July 1, 2013, an unrelated third party acquired an aggregate of 15,978,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company constituting approximately 85% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock. |
|
On October 9, 2013, the Company entered into share exchange agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital with Gallant Acquisition Corp. (GAC) the 100% owner of all of the issued and outstanding share capital of 22 Social Club Productions (22 SCP) and its subsidiaries, Blue 22 Entertainment and Appquest, Inc. for 140,000,000 common shares of the Company and 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Appquest, Inc. Effectively, GAC held 89% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company and the transaction has been accounted for as a reverse merger, where 22 SCP is deemed to be the acquirer and the surviving entity for accounting purposes |
|
On December 31, 2013, the Company sold 30% shares of 22 Social Club Productions, Inc. to GAC, a related party in return of 100,000,000 restricted common shares from the share exchange agreement entered into on October 9, 2013. GAC held 30% of the outstanding common shares after this transaction. |
|
On February 3, 2014, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement receiving 90% of Dance Broadcast Systems, Inc. from Vinyl Groove Productions, Inc., and issuing 10,000 Series A Preferred shares with a voting privilege of 66.67% of all outstanding shares regardless of the number of common shares outstanding, to Vinyl Groove Productions, Inc. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse merger where Dance Broadcast Systems, Inc. is deemed to be the acquirer and the surviving entity for accounting purposes. |
|
The transaction is accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As a result of the recapitalization and change in control, Dance Broadcast Systems, Inc. is the acquiring entity in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the historical financial statements are those of Dance Broadcast Systems, Inc., the accounting acquirer, immediately following the consummation of the reverse merger. Dance Broadcast Systems, Inc. was incorporated on January 13, 2014. The entertainment subsidiaries have been sold (Refer to Note 6). |
|
Derivative Liabilities, Policy | ' |
Derivative Liabilities |
|
The Company assessed the classification of its derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2014, which consist of convertible instruments and rights to shares of the Company’s common stock, and determined that such derivatives meet the criteria for liability classification under ASC 815. |
|
ASC 815 generally provides three criteria that, if met, require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments. These three criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument subject to the requirements of ASC 815. ASC 815 also provides an exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as described. |
Financial Instruments | ' |
Financial Instruments |
|
The Company’s balance sheet includes certain financial instruments. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. |
|
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below: |
|
| • | | Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
|
|
| • | | Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
| • | | Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
|
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2014. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has determined that the only asset or liability measured at fair value is the derivative instrument related to an anti-dilution provision contained in Convertible Notes and valued using level 3 inputs. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies, Policy | ' |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
The Company follows ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. There were no commitments or contingencies as of September 30, 2014. |
|
Convertible Instruments | ' |
Convertible Instruments |
|
The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in its convertible instruments in accordance with professional standards for “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. |
|
Professional standards generally provides three criteria that, if met, require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments. These three criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. Professional standards also provide an exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional as defined under professional standards as “The Meaning of “Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument.” |
|
The Company accounts for convertible instruments (when it has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) in accordance with professional standards when “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features,” as those professional standards pertain to “Certain Convertible Instruments.” Accordingly, the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their earliest date of redemption. The Company also records when necessary deemed dividends for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in preferred shares based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. |
|
|
|
ASC 815-40 provides that, among other things, generally, if an event is not within the entity’s control could or require net cash settlement, then the contract shall be classified as an asset or a liability. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect of the adoption of this standard and it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations. |
|
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605 - Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective on January 1, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has not yet determined the effect of the adoption of this standard and it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for each annual and interim reporting period. If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosure is required. This new standard will be effective for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt this new standard for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 and the Company will continue to assess the impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flow. |