The Merger Agreement provides Parent and the Company with certain termination rights and, under certain circumstances, may require Parent or the Company to pay a termination fee. The Merger Agreement provides that the Company will be required to pay to Parent a termination fee of $16.45 million if, among other things, the Merger Agreement is terminated (x) by Parent or the Company (i) because (A) the Company failed to obtain the necessary stockholder vote to approve the Merger or (B) the Merger has not been consummated at or prior to 11:59 p.m. (California time) on November 6, 2019 (or, if so extended by either party in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, February 6, 2020 or May 6, 2020) (the “End Date”) and (ii)(A) at or prior to termination, a third-party offer or proposal to acquire the Company has been made and (B) within 12 months after the date of such termination, the Company has consummated a transaction with a third party or has entered into a definitive agreement with a third party contemplating a transaction, in each case relating to an acquisition of the Company, (y) by Parent or the Company (other than (i) for an inaccuracy of Parent’s representations and warranties or a breach of Parent’s covenants, (ii) by mutual agreement of Parent and the Company or (iii) a termination under circumstances where Parent is required to pay a termination fee to the Company) at any time during the period commencing on the occurrence of a Triggering Event (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and ending on the twentieth business day after the final vote by the Company’s stockholders on a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement or (z) by the Company in order to accept a Superior Offer (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and enter into a definitive agreement providing for consummation of the transaction contemplated by such Superior Offer.
The Merger Agreement also provides that Parent will be required to pay to the Company a termination fee of $25.7 million (the “Reverse Termination Fee”) if (i) the Merger Agreement is terminated by Parent or the Company (A) because the Merger has not been consummated at or prior to 11:59 p.m. (California time) on the End Date, (B) as a result of a suit or legal proceeding brought by a governmental entity under a U.S. federal antitrust law or the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the “DPA”), a court of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and nonappealable order prohibiting the Merger or (C) due to a Final CFIUS Turndown (as defined in the Merger Agreement), (ii)(A) the HSR Condition or the CFIUS Condition is not satisfied and has not been waived by Parent or (B) as a result of a suit or legal proceeding brought by a governmental entity under a U.S. federal antitrust law or the DPA, the Restraints Condition or the Litigation Condition is not satisfied and has not been waived by Parent (a “Designated Circumstance”), and (iii)(A) the Restraints Condition and the Governmental Litigation Condition are satisfied, other than with respect to the Designated Circumstance, and (B) all of Parent’s other closing conditions (other than the closing condition requiring the Company to deliver a closing certificate, the HSR Condition and the CFIUS Condition) have been satisfied as of the time of termination. The Merger Agreement further clarifies that, for the avoidance of doubt, the Company will be entitled to receive the Reverse Termination Fee if: (i) the HSR Condition or CFIUS Condition is not satisfied as a result of a governmental body conditioning its approval on, seeking to impose, or imposing a Burdensome Condition (as defined in the Merger Agreement); (ii) Parent declines to accept or agree to the imposition of such Burdensome Condition and declines to waive such unsatisfied condition; (iii) the Merger Agreement is terminated because (A) the Merger has not been consummated at or prior to 11:59 p.m. (California time) on the End Date, (B) as a result of a suit or legal proceeding brought by a governmental entity under a U.S. federal antitrust law or the DPA, a court of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and nonappealable order prohibiting the Merger or (C) due to a Final CFIUS Turndown (as defined in the Merger Agreement); (iv) as of the time of such termination, a Designated Circumstance exists and (A) the Restraints Condition and the Governmental Litigation Condition are satisfied, other than with respect to the Designated Circumstance, and (B) all of Parent’s other closing conditions (other than the closing condition requiring the Company to deliver a closing certificate, the HSR Condition and the CFIUS Condition) have been satisfied.
The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
The Merger Agreement has been included to provide investors and stockholders with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about the Company. The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties that the parties to the Merger Agreement made to and solely for the benefit of each other. The assertions embodied in such representations and warranties are qualified by information contained in the confidential disclosure schedules that the Company delivered to Parent in connection with signing the Merger Agreement. Accordingly, investors and stockholders should not rely on such representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts or circumstances, since they were only made as of the date of the Merger Agreement and are modified in important part by the underlying disclosure schedules. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of such representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company’s public disclosures.
Voting Agreements
Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, WRV II, L.P., Walden Riverwood Venture, L.P., Joint Stock Company “RUSNANO” (‘Rusnano”), Faraj Aalaei,Lip-Bu Tan and certain of their trusts and affiliated investment vehicles (the “Supporting Stockholders”) entered into voting and support agreements with Parent (the “Voting Agreements”) with respect to all Company Shares beneficially owned by such Supporting Stockholders, and any additional Company Shares and any other equity securities of the Company of which such Supporting Stockholders acquire record and/or beneficial ownership after the date of the Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement Shares”). On May 10, 2019, Parent and certain Supporting Stockholders entered into the First Amendment to the Voting and Support Agreement (the “Voting Agreement Amendment”) solely to correct errors in the number of Voting Agreement Shares reported as being beneficially owned by such Supporting Stockholders on the date of the Voting Agreement. As corrected by the Voting Agreement Amendment, as of the date of the Voting Agreement, the Supporting Stockholders beneficially owned approximately 4.7 million Company Shares (excluding Company Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise or vesting of equity awards), which represent approximately 13.4% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares.
Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, the Supporting Stockholders have agreed, unless otherwise directed in writing by Parent, to vote all of the Voting Agreement Shares (i) in favor of (A) the Merger, and the adoption of the Merger Agreement; (B) each of the other actions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (C) any action in furtherance of any of the foregoing, (ii) against any action or agreement that would result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or obligation of the Company in the Merger Agreement and (iii) against each of the following actions (other than the Merger and the other Contemplated Transactions (as defined in the Merger Agreement)): (A) any extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, consolidation, amalgamation, plan or scheme of arrangement, share exchange or other business combination involving any Acquired Company (as defined in the Merger Agreement); (B) any sale, lease, sublease, license, sublicense or transfer of a material portion of the assets of any Acquired Company; (C) any reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution or liquidation of any Acquired Company; (D) any amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws that may have the effect of (1) frustrating the purpose of, or breaching or nullifying any provision of the Merger Agreement; (2) impeding, interfering with, preventing, delaying or adversely affecting the Merger or (3) changing the voting rights of any shares of capital stock of the Company; (E) any material change in the capitalization of the Company or the Company’s corporate structure; and (F) any other action which is intended, or would reasonably be expected, to impede, interfere with, delay, postpone, discourage or adversely affect the Merger or any of the other Contemplated Transactions. Under each Voting Agreement, the applicable Supporting Stockholder has granted to Parent (and its designee) an irrevocable proxy to vote the Voting Agreement Shares as provided above.
Other than the Voting Agreement with Rusnano, the Voting Agreements, including the irrevocable proxy granted thereunder, will terminate upon the earliest of: (i) the date upon which the Merger Agreement is validly terminated in accordance with its terms; (ii) the date upon which the Merger becomes effective and (iii) the date upon which Parent and the applicable Supporting Stockholders agree to terminate the Voting Agreement in writing. The Voting Agreement with Rusnano, including the irrevocable proxy granted thereunder, will terminate upon the earliest of: (i) the date upon which the Merger Agreement is validly terminated in accordance with its terms; (ii) the date upon which the Merger becomes effective; (iii) the date upon which Parent and the applicable Supporting Stockholders agree to terminate the Voting Agreement in writing and (iv) the six month anniversary of the date of the Voting Agreement.
The foregoing description of the Voting Agreements and the Voting Agreement Amendment does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Voting Agreement and the Voting Agreement Amendment, attached as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to this Current Report onForm 8-K, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws with respect to the proposed transaction between Marvell and Aquantia, including statements regarding the benefits of the transaction and the anticipated timing of the transaction and the products and markets of each company. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking