DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
We are a global supplier of rotating equipment solutions to the worldwide oil, gas, petrochemical and industrial process industries. Our segments are new units and aftermarket parts and services. Our services and products are used for a range of applications, including oil and gas production, refinery processes, natural gas processing, pipelines, petrochemical production, high-pressure field injection and enhanced oil recovery. We also serve general industrial markets including paper, steel, sugar, distributed power and government markets.
We operate globally with manufacturing facilities in the United States, France, Germany, Norway, India and Brazil, and have 24 service and support centers worldwide. We have sales and services locations in all of the major international energy markets and established coverage of 105 countries.
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
There were significant differences in the basis of financial reporting between the Successor and Predecessor periods as a result of the Acquisition on October 29, 2004, and the resultant application of purchase accounting to the assets and liabilities acquired.
Sales. The worldwide market demand for oil and gas products continues to increase in 2005 which has increased the demand for our products and services. Total sales increased by $92.5 million, or 42.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. Our backlog increased 48.9% at September 30, 2005, compared to September 30, 2004.
Cost of goods sold. As a percentage of sales, cost of goods sold increased slightly to 75.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from 73.7% for the same period in 2004. Cost of goods sold increased due to volume and mix by $8.1 million from costs related to purchase accounting which were recognized during the third quarter of 2005, reflecting additional depreciation and amortization.
Selling and administrative expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $6.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from the same period in 2004, but decreased as a percentage of sales. Establishing corporate functions for the stand alone company was the principal cause of a $5.7 million direct increase in expenses during the third quarter of 2005 compared to $2.2 million of administrative expenses allocated to us from Ingersoll-Rand during the third quarter of 2004. An additional $1.7 million of increases were the result of the consolidation of TES and expenses related to the acquisition.
Research and development. Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2005, and 2004 were $1.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
Operating income. Improved volume along with productivity improvements were the principal causes of the increase in operating income of $13.3 million to $35.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from $22.5 million for the same period in 2004.
Interest (expense) income, net. Interest expense was $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to interest income of $1.2 million for the same period in 2004. The difference was primarily from interest on the outstanding principal of the senior secured credit facility and the senior subordinated notes issued in connection with the Acquisition. The 2005 period also included $2.8 million additional amortization of deferred financing fees related to the accelerated payment of long-term debt during the period. We were obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to register the notes under the Securities Act and consummate an exchange offer no later than August 25, 2005. We were unable to register the notes by that date. Accordingly, the annual interest on the notes increased by (1) .25% for the first 90 days following August 25, 2005, increasing our interest expense by about $90,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2005, and (2) will increase by .25% at the beginning of each subsequent 90-day period, up to a maximum of 1% until all such registration defaults are cured. We will now be required to incorporate financial information through September 30, 2005, into any registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Early redemption premium on debt. We used a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering to prepay $50 million of our notes incurring a premium payment of $3.7 million.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2005, resulted from the difference between the provision for income tax required for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and that recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The provision results in an effective tax rate that differs from the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% principally because of current and forecasted net operating losses in certain tax jurisdictions. As a result, we have provided a valuation allowance for that deferred tax asset on the basis that it is more likely than not that we will not realize that asset. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2004, differs from the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% primarily because the Predecessor period reflected the non-taxable partnership structure in existence for most of the domestic operations.
Bookings and backlog. Bookings represent the value of firm orders placed during the three months ended September 30, 2005, whether or not filled. Backlog as of any date represents the firm orders left unfilled as of that date. Bookings during this third quarter of 2005 were $288.9 million, slightly lower than the $289.0 million in bookings for the period in 2004. The backlog at September 30, 2005, was $872.8 million compared to $586.2 million at September 30, 2004, a 48.9% increase. This increase is attributable to increased demand in the new units segment.
Page 16 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Segment Analysis - three months ended September 30, 2005—Successor compared to three months ended September 30, 2004—Predecessor
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor | | Period to Period Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
(In thousands) | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 | | 2004 to 2005 | | Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
Sales, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 162.6 | | | 52.5 | % | | | $ | 85.9 | | | 39.5 | % | $ | 76.7 | | | 89.2 | % |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 147.2 | | | 47.5 | % | | | | 131.4 | | | 60.5 | % | | 15.8 | | | 12.0 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| | $ | 309.8 | | | 100.0 | % | | | $ | 217.3 | | | 100.0 | % | $ | 92.5 | | | 42.6 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Gross Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 21.5 | | | | | | | $ | 10.5 | | | | | $ | 11.0 | | | 103.8 | % |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 55.4 | | | | | | | | 46.6 | | | | | | 8.8 | | | 19.1 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total gross profit | | $ | 76.9 | | | | | | | $ | 57.1 | | | | | $ | 19.8 | | | 34.8 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 8.3 | | | | | | | $ | 0.3 | | | | | $ | 8.0 | | | N/M | |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 38.4 | | | | | | | | 29.8 | | | | | | 8.6 | | | 29.0 | % |
Unallocated corporate expense | | | (10.9 | ) | | | | | | | (7.6 | ) | | | | | (3.3 | ) | | 42.6 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total operating income | | $ | 35.8 | | | | | | | $ | 22.5 | | | | | $ | 13.3 | | | 59.4 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
New Units
Sales. Sales in the segment increased $76.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to higher backlog coming into the period, as orders typically have lead times from as little as three months to over twelve months depending on the complexity of the configuration.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. As a percentage of segment revenues, gross profit increased slightly to 13.2% for the period in 2005 from 12.3% for the same period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to margins on buyouts and a reduction in costs primarily due to improved direct labor and engineering absorption, no severance costs in 2005 and a reduction in the provisions for obsolete and slow moving inventory. Gross profit increases were offset by additional depreciation and amortization from purchase accounting recognized in the third quarter of 2005.
Operating income. Operating income increased by $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase is attributable to the $ 11.0 million change in gross profit mentioned above reduced by a $3.0 million increase in the allocation of selling and administrative expenses due to the increase in sales.
Bookings and backlog. Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2005, were $121.3 million, 16.0% below the bookings for the same period in 2004. The decline is attributable to a very large order booked in 2004. The backlog at September 30, 2005, was $687.3 million, or 64.5% above the $417.8 million backlog at September 30, 2004. This increase is attributable to increased worldwide demand.
Aftermarket Parts and Services
Sales. Sales increased by $15.8 million, or 12.0%, for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 primarily from higher parts sales.
Page 17 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 as a result of the increases in sales. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased to 37.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from 35.4% for the same period in 2004, as a result of reduced allocations of costs and expenses due to the stronger growth in new unit sales.
Operating income. Operating income increased by $8.6 million, or 29.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase is mainly attributable to the change in gross profit mentioned above.
Bookings and backlog. Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2005, were $167.6 million, 16.0% above bookings for the same period in 2004. Backlog at September 30, 2005, was $185.5 million, or 10.2% above the $168.4 million backlog at September 30, 2004.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005—Successor compared to nine months ended September 30, 2004—Predecessor
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor | | Period to Period Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
(In thousands) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | | 2004 to 2005 | | Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales, net | | $ | 846.2 | | | 100.0 | % | | | $ | 657.5 | | | 100.0 | % | $ | 188.7 | | | 28.7 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | | 657.8 | | | 77.7 | % | | | | 499.2 | | | 75.9 | % | | 158.6 | | | 31.8 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Gross profit | | | 188.4 | | | 22.3 | % | | | | 158.3 | | | 24.1 | % | | 30.1 | | | 19.0 | % |
Selling and administrative expenses | | | 118.3 | | | 14.0 | % | | | | 110.5 | | | 16.8 | % | | 7.8 | | | 7.1 | % |
Research and development expenses | | | 4.7 | | | 0.6 | % | | | | 4.7 | | | 0.7 | % | | 0.0 | | | 1.1 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Operating income | | | 65.3 | | | 7.7 | % | | | | 43.1 | | | 6.6 | % | | 22.2 | | | 51.6 | % |
Interest (expense) income, net | | | (44.6 | ) | | (5.3 | )% | | | | 2.4 | | | 0.3 | % | | (47.0 | ) | | N/M | |
Other income (expense), net | | | (5.2 | ) | | (0.6 | )% | | | | (2.8 | ) | | (0.4 | )% | | (2.4 | ) | | 90.5 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 15.5 | | | 1.8 | % | | | | 42.7 | | | 6.5 | % | | (27.2 | ) | | (63.8 | )% |
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes | | | 10.6 | | | 1.2 | % | | | | 5.0 | | | 0.8 | % | | 5.6 | | | 114.7 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Net income | | $ | 4.9 | | | 0.6 | % | | | $ | 37.7 | | | 5.7 | % | $ | (32.8 | ) | | (87.0 | )% |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Sales. The demand for oil and gas products continues to increase in 2005 driving strong demand for our products and services. Total sales increased by $188.7 million, or 28.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. Our backlog at December 31, 2004, increased 51.8% compared to December 31, 2003, which contributed to increased sales during this 2005 period.
Cost of goods sold. As a percentage of sales, cost of goods sold increased to 77.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from 75.9% for the same period in 2004. Cost of goods sold increased by $34.4 million for adjustments related to purchase accounting which were recognized during 2005, reflecting additional depreciation and amortization and the purchase accounting value of inventory sold.
Selling and administrative expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from the same period in 2004, but decreased as a percentage of sales. Establishing corporate functions for the stand-alone company was the principal cause of a $14.8 million direct increase in expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to $14.6 million of administrative expenses allocated to us from Ingersoll-Rand during the period 2004. Third party commissions increased $1.2 million over 2004 due to the increase in sales. An additional $1.7 million of increases were the result of the consolidation of TES and expenses related to the acquisition. Other costs increased to support current and future growth.
Research and development. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and 2004 were $4.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Page 18 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Operating income. Operating income increased by $22.2 million to $65.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from $43.1 million for the same period in 2004 primarily attributable to the factors discussed above regarding increased sales and gross profit partially offset by high selling and administrative expenses.
Interest (expense) income, net. Interest expense was $44.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to interest income of $2.4 million for the same period in 2004. The difference was primarily from interest on the outstanding principal of the senior secured credit facility and senior subordinated notes issued in connection with the Acquisition. Additionally, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to register the notes under the Securities Act and consummate an exchange offer no later than August 25, 2005. We were not able to register the notes by that date. Accordingly, the annual interest on the notes increased by (1) .25% for the first 90 days following August 25, 2005, increasing our interest expense by about $90 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and (2) will increase by .25% at the beginning of each subsequent 90-day period, up to a maximum of 1% until all such registration defaults are cured. We will now be required to incorporate financial information through September 30, 2005, into any registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Early redemption premium on debt. We used a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering to prepay $50 million of our notes incurring a premium payment of $3.7 million.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was $10.6 million and results in an effective tax rate that differs from the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% principally because of current and forecasted net operating losses in certain tax jurisdictions. As a result, we have provided a valuation allowance for that deferred tax asset on the basis that it is more likely than not that we will not realize that asset. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, differs from the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% primarily because the Predecessor period reflected the non-taxable partnership structure in existence for most of the domestic operations.
Bookings and backlog. Bookings during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, were $1,036.0 million, 26.6% higher than the $818.2 million in bookings for the period in 2004. The backlog at September 30, 2005, was $872.8 million, or 48.9% above the $586.2 million backlog at September 30, 2004. The increase is attributable to increased worldwide demand in the new units segment.
Page 19 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Segment Analysis - nine months ended September 30, 2005—Successor compared to nine months ended September 30, 2004—Predecessor
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor | | Period to Period Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
(In thousands) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | | 2004 to 2005 | | Change | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
Sales, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 399.0 | | | 47.2 | % | | | $ | 256.6 | | | 39.0 | % | $ | 142.4 | | | 55.5 | % |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 447.2 | | | 52.8 | % | | | | 400.9 | | | 61.0 | % | | 46.3 | | | 11.5 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| | $ | 846.2 | | | 100.0 | % | | | $ | 657.5 | | | 100.0 | % | $ | 188.7 | | | 28.7 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Gross Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 40.4 | | | | | | | $ | 31.7 | | | | | $ | 8.7 | | | 27.4 | % |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 148.0 | | | | | | | | 126.6 | | | | | | 21.4 | | | 16.9 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total gross profit | | $ | 188.4 | | | | | | | $ | 158.3 | | | | | $ | 30.1 | | | 19.0 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New units | | $ | 4.7 | | | | | | | $ | 2.0 | | | | | $ | 2.7 | | | 134.8 | % |
Aftermarket parts and services | | | 93.2 | | | | | | | | 72.9 | | | | | | 20.3 | | | 27.9 | % |
Unallocated corporate expense | | | (32.6 | ) | | | | | | | (31.8 | ) | | | | | (0.8 | ) | | 2.6 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total operating income | | $ | 65.3 | | | | | | | $ | 43.1 | | | | | $ | 22.2 | | | 51.6 | % |
| |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
New Units
Sales. Sales in the new units segment increased $142.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to higher backlog coming into the period, as orders typically have lead times from as little as three months to over twelve months depending on the complexity of the configuration. Improved new order rates also contributed. Our operations in North America, France and Norway accounted for most of this increase.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $8.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. As a percentage of segment revenues, gross profit decreased to 10.1% for the period in 2005 from 12.4% for the same period in 2004. The decrease was due to higher allocations including the additional costs related to purchase accounting recognized in the period for higher depreciation and amortization and the purchase accounting value of inventory sold.
Operating income. Operating income increased by $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase is attributable to the $8.7 million increase in gross profit mentioned above, less a $6.0 million increase in the allocation of costs and expenses due to the increase in sales.
Bookings. Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, were $558.3 million, 45.2% higher than the $384.5 million in bookings for the same period in 2004.
Aftermarket Parts and Services
Sales. Sales increased by $46.3 million, or 11.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 primarily from higher parts sales.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $21.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 as a result of the increases in volume. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased to 33.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from 31.6% for the same period in 2004, due to a more favorable product mix from increased parts revenue and lower allocations from stronger growth in new units.
Page 20 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Operating income. Operating income increased by $20.3 million, or 27.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase is mainly attributable to the change in gross profit mentioned above.
Bookings. Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, were $477.7 million, 10.2% above bookings for the same period in 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our primary source of cash has been from operations. Prior to the Acquisition, our Predecessor participated in Ingersoll-Rand’s centralized treasury management system whereby, in certain countries, our Predecessor’s cash receipts were remitted to I-R and I-R funded our Predecessor’s cash disbursements. Our Predecessor’s primary cash disbursements were for capital expenditures and working capital. Following the consummation of the Acquisition, we initially relied upon a transition services agreement with I-R to provide these services until we could establish our own cash management system. As of April 2, 2005, we were no longer reliant upon I-R for any cash management services.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was $222.4 million, compared to $64.5 million for the same period in 2004. The increase of $157.8 million in net cash provided by operating activities was mainly from a reduction in inventories and an increase in customer advance payments. Inventories-net declined $13.0 million and customer advance payments increased $75.8 million from December 31, 2004, a result of our increased efforts to collect customer payments in line with or ahead of the costs of inventory work-in-process. In addition, other current and noncurrent liabilities increased $26.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to a decrease of $18.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This change over the periods is primarily attributable to accrued interest on new debt and other accruals related to being a stand-alone company compared to being a division of I-R.
Net cash used by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was $57.7 million, compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2004. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, were $10.7 million. We sold our investment in a partially owned entity in the first quarter of 2005 for $10 million.
On September 8, 2005, we acquired from Tuthill Corporation certain assets of its Tuthill Energy Systems Division (“TES”). TES is an international manufacturer of single and multi-stage steam turbines and portable ventilators under the Coppus, Murray and Nadrowski brands which complement our steam turbine business. The current estimated cost of TES is approximately $57.0 million, net of $4.0 million cash acquired, subject to future adjustments for agreement on the final working capital at the closing date and other related matters. We have preliminarily allocated the cost based on current estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):
Accounts receivable | | $ | 13,458 | |
Inventory – net | | | 7,690 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 208 | |
| |
|
| |
Total current assets | | | 21,356 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 20,319 | |
Intangible assets and goodwill | | | 28,414 | |
| |
|
| |
Total assets acquired | | | 70,089 | |
| |
|
| |
| | | | |
Accounts payable and accruals | | | 10,570 | |
Other liabilities | | | 2,501 | |
| |
|
| |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 13,071 | |
| |
|
| |
Cash paid – net | | $ | 57,018 | |
| |
|
| |
Page 21 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
The above amounts are estimates as final appraisals and other required information to determine final cost and assign fair values have not been received. Also, certain restructuring of operations will be necessary to obtain appropriate synergies in the combined steam turbine business. Accordingly, the above amounts may be revised when all required information is obtained and the restructuring plan is finalized which is expected to be accomplished during the fourth quarter of 2005. Pro forma financial information, assuming that TES had been acquired at the beginning of each period for which an income statement is presented, has not been presented because the effect on our results for these periods was not considered material. TES results have been included in our financial results since September 8, 2005, and were not material to the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005.
During the third quarter of 2005, we purchased the other 50% of our Multiphase Power and Processing Technologies (MppT) joint venture for a payment of $200,000 and an agreement to pay $300,000 on April 1, 2006, and $425,000 on April 1, 2007. The net present value of the total consideration is $876,000, bringing our total investment in MppT to $2.9 million at the date of the purchase. MppT owns patents and technology for inline, compact, gas-liquid scrubbers.
Net cash used in financing activities was $161.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, related primarily to our initial public offering and payments on long-term debt, compared to $50.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, related primarily to the impact of the net change in intercompany accounts with I-R.
On August 10, 2005, we completed our initial public offering of 31,050,000 shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $608.9 million. On September 12, 2005, we used approximately $55.0 million of the net proceeds to redeem $50.0 million face value amount of our 7-3/8% senior subordinated notes due 2014, including the payment of $3.7 million applicable redemption premium and $1.3 million accrued interest to the redemption date. Our Board of Directors approved the payment of a dividend on August 11, 2005, of the remaining net proceeds, excluding certain costs, of approximately $557.7 million (10.26 per share) to our stockholders existing immediately prior to the offering, consisting of affiliates of First Reserve Corporation and certain members of senior management. In addition, we have paid $161.2 million in long-term debt and $2.6 million in short-term debt for a total debt reduction during 2005 of $213.8 million.
On August 26, 2005, we increased the availability under the revolving credit portion of our senior credit facility from $300 million to $350 million. As of September 30, 2005, we had a cash balance of $109.5 million and the ability to borrow $178.7 million under our $350 million senior secured revolving credit facility, as $171.3 million was used for outstanding letters of credit. Although there can be no assurances, based on our current and anticipated levels of operations and conditions in our markets and industry, we believe that our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility will be adequate to meet our working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and other funding requirements for the next twelve months and our long-term future contractual obligations.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Risk Factors
Statements included or incorporated by reference in the report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements may relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies. These forward-looking statements relate to analyses and other information that are based upon forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not determinable which involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in other documents we file with the SEC from time-to-time, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. These risks, uncertainties and factors include, without limitation:
• | material weaknesses in our internal controls; |
| |
• | economic or industry downturns; |
| |
• | our inability to implement our business strategy to increase our aftermarket parts and services revenue; |
Page 22 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
• | competition in our markets; |
| |
• | failure to complete or achieve the expected benefits from any future acquisitions; |
| |
• | economic, political, currency and other risks associated with our international sales and operations; |
| |
• | loss of our senior management; |
| |
• | our brand name may be confused with others; |
| |
• | environment compliance costs and liabilities; |
| |
• | failure to maintain safety performance acceptable to our clients; |
| |
• | failure to negotiate new collective bargaining agreements; |
| |
• | our ability to operate as a standalone company; |
| |
• | unexpected product claims or regulations; |
| |
• | infringement on our intellectual property or our infringement on others’ intellectual property; and |
| |
• | other factors described in this report. |
Page 23 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our results of operations are affected by fluctuations in the value of local currencies in which we transact business. We record the effect of translating our non-U.S. subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as they exist at the end of each month. The effect on our results of operations of fluctuations in currency exchange rates depends on various currency exchange rates and the magnitude of the transactions completed in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The net foreign currency loss was $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to a net currency loss $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
We enter into financial instruments to mitigate the impact of changes in currency exchange rates that may result from long-term customer contracts where we deem appropriate.
We have interest rate risk related to the term loan portion of senior secured credit facility as the interest rate on the principal outstanding on the loans is variable. A 1% increase in the interest rate would have the affect of increasing interest expense by $2.3 million annually, based on the outstanding principal balance at September 30, 2005.
Page 24 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2005.
In June 2004, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) adopted rules for purposes of implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which included revised definitions of material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. The PCAOB defines a material weakness as “a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.” The new rules describe certain circumstances as being both significant deficiencies and strong indicators that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting exists.
During the transition from a subsidiary of a multinational company to a stand-alone entity, we identified a number of factors leading us to conclude that we have material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting including the following:
| • | identification by our auditors of misstatements in internal drafts of our financial statements that were not initially identified by our internal control process, indicating a weakness with respect to our ability to properly monitor and account for non-routine transactions, and to apply GAAP in transactions subject to new or complex accounting pronouncements; |
| | |
| • | the need for a Chief Financial Officer with SEC reporting experience, a Director of Financial Reporting with strong accounting and SEC reporting experience and additional skilled accounting and SEC experienced personnel to enhance the accounting department to remedy insufficient experience in public company accounting and periodic reporting matters among our existing staff; |
| | |
| • | the need to develop a tax department; |
| | |
| • | the need to develop a risk management department; |
| | |
| • | the need to establish an internal audit department; and |
| | |
| • | the need to enhance our documentation of our systems and controls. |
We have already taken a number of actions to begin to address the items identified including:
| • | hiring, in the third quarter of 2005, an Assistant Controller-Director Tax Worldwide |
| | |
| • | hiring an experienced Chief Financial Officer with broad finance and SEC reporting experience, a Chief Accounting Officer with significant accounting experience and SEC reporting experience, a Director of Risk Management, a Director of Internal Audit and a General Counsel; |
| | |
| • | changing the organizational relationship of the worldwide accounting organization so that the Controllers of the operating units report directly to our Vice-President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. |
| | |
| • | engaging additional outside consultants to assist our personnel with internal audit work; |
| | |
| • | outsourcing a substantial portion of our tax functions to a professional service firm; and |
| | |
| • | engaging external resources to supplement our Section 404 evaluation efforts. |
Page 25 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES - Continued
While we have taken actions to address the items identified, additional measures will be necessary and these measures, along with other measures we expect to take to improve our internal control over financial reporting, may not be sufficient to address the issues identified by our independent auditors or ensure that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. In addition, we may in the future identify further material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting.
Beginning with the year ending December 31, 2006, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management will be required to deliver a report that assesses the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and our auditors will be required to deliver an attestation report on management’s assessment of and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have substantial effort ahead of us to complete the documentation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting and remediate any additional internal control over financial reporting deficiencies identified in these efforts. We may not be able to complete the required management assessment by our reporting deadline. An inability to complete this assessment would result in receiving something other than an unqualified report from our auditors with respect to our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if material weaknesses are not remediated, we would not be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, which would result in the inability of our external auditors to deliver an unqualified report, or any report, on our internal control over financial reporting.
Taking into consideration the previously mentioned material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There have been no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Page 26 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
OTHER INFORMATION – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As a result of the enhanced compliance processes implemented by us shortly prior to and following the Acquisition of the Company from Ingersoll-Rand in October, 2004, we have recently discovered that our Brazilian subsidiary engaged in a number of transactions that resulted in steam turbine parts and services being provided to Moa Nickel S.A., a Cuban mining company jointly owned by the Government of Cuba and Sherritt International Corp., a Canadian company. Our revenues from these transactions were approximately $4.0 million in the aggregate since December, 1999, when we acquired a controlling interest in the Brazilian subsidiary. This amount represents approximately 0.08% of our consolidated revenues from 2000 through September 30, 2005. Of the $4.0 million, approximately $2.5 million in revenues were in connection with the sale of a spare part ordered in October, 2003, which was delivered and installed in Cuba, with the assistance of non-U.S. employees of our Brazilian subsidiary, in May, 2005. When these transactions came to our attention, we instructed our Brazilian subsidiary in July, 2005, to cease dealings with Cuba. These transactions were apparently in violation of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s regulations with respect to Cuba. We have informed the U.S. Treasury Department of these matters and are currently engaged in preliminary discussions with the Department. Our inquiry into these transactions is continuing and the Department’s review of this matter is in a very preliminary stage. Cuba is subject to economic sanctions administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, and is identified by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist-sponsoring state. To the extent we violated any regulations with respect to Cuba or the Department determines that other violations have occurred, we will be subject to fines or other sanctions, including possible criminal penalties, with related business consequences. We do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial results, cash flow or liquidity. In addition, the Department’s investigation into our activities with respect to Cuba may result in additional scrutiny of our activities with respect to other countries that are the subject of sanctions.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On August 26, 2005, we increased the availability under the revolving credit portion of our senior credit facility from $300 million to $350 million. In connection with that increase, we entered into agreements in the forms attached as Exhibit 10.2 which Exhibit is incorporated into this Item 5 by reference.
On November 10, the Company issued a press release announcing its 2005 third quarter results and conducted a webcast that included a powerpoint slide presentation. The press release, transcript of the webcast and powerpoint slide presentation are attached as Exhibit 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, all of which are incorporated into this Item 5 by reference.
These exhibits are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the registrant specifically incorporated it by reference.
Page 27 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
OTHER INFORMATION – EXHIBITS
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed with this report:
Exhibit 3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-124963) filed with the SEC on August 2, 2005 (the “Form S-1”)). |
| |
Exhibit 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form S-1). |
| |
Exhibit 10.1 | Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Dresser-Rand Holdings, LLC effective as of June 24, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Form S-1). |
| |
Exhibit 10.2 | Commitment Increase Supplement dated as of August 26, 2005, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 29, 2004, among Dresser-Rand Group Inc., the Foreign Borrowers party thereto from time to time, the lenders party thereto, Citicorp North America, Inc. as administrative agent and collateral agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, each as co-syndication agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Fundings, Inc.and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, and Natexis Banques Populaires and Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc., as co-documentation agents. |
| |
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.) |
| |
Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.) |
| |
Exhibit 99.1 | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Press Release, dated November 10, 2005. |
| |
Exhibit 99.2 | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Transcript of Webcast, November 10, 2005. |
| |
Exhibit 99.3 | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Powerpoint Slide Presentation, November 10, 2005. |
Page 28 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
OTHER INFORMATION – SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC. |
| | |
| | |
November 14, 2005 | | /s/ Lonnie A. Arnett |
| |
|
| | Lonnie A. Arnett |
| | Vice President, Controller and |
| | Chief Accounting Officer |
Page 29 of 30
DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
OTHER INFORMATION – EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | | Description |
| |
|
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-124963) filed with the SEC on August 2, 2005 (the “Form S-1”)). |
| | |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form S-1). |
| | |
10.1 | | Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Dresser-Rand Holdings, LLC effective as of June 24, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Form S-1). |
| | |
10.2 | | Commitment Increase Supplement dated as of August 26, 2005, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 29, 2004, among Dresser-Rand Group Inc., the Foreign Borrowers party thereto from time to time, the lenders party thereto, Citicorp North America, Inc. as administrative agent and collateral agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, each as co-syndication agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Fundings, Inc.and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, and Natexis Banques Populaires and Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc., as co-documentation agents. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.) |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.) |
| | |
99.1 | | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Press Release, dated November 10, 2005. |
| | |
99.2 | | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Transcript of Webcast, November 10, 2005. |
| | |
99.3 | | Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Powerpoint Slide Presentation, November 10, 2005. |
Page 30 of 30