Dresser-Rand (DRC) 10-Q 4 Aug 14 2014 Q2 Quarterly report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jul. 28, 2014
Document Documentand Entity Information [Abstract]	'	'
Document Type	'10-Q	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Document Period End Date	30-Jun-14	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'Q2	'
Trading Symbol	'drc	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Dresser-Rand Group Inc.	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001316656	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--12-31	'
Entity Filer Category	'Large Accelerated Filer	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	76,616,271

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Inco

Consolidated Statement Of Income (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, except Share data in Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Net sales of products	$448.80	$590.20	$990.60	$1,162.20
Net sales of services	179.6	215.1	336.9	409.5
Total revenues	628.4	805.3	1,327.50	1,571.70
Cost of products sold	326.9	460.1	756.6	918.3
Cost of services sold	123	147	245	283.2
Total cost of sales	449.9	607.1	1,001.60	1,201.50
Gross profit	178.5	198.2	325.9	370.2
Selling and administrative expenses	105.1	98.4	204.9	194.6
Research and development expenses	7.1	12.6	14.5	22.9
Income from operations	66.3	87.2	106.5	152.7
Interest expense, net	-12.6	-13.4	-25.6	-27.7
Other (expense) income, net	-3.8	2	-0.5	1
Income before income taxes	49.9	75.8	80.4	126
Provision for income taxes	21.1	21.4	35	37.2
Net income	28.8	54.4	45.4	88.8
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest	0.3	-1.1	0.3	-2.6
Net income attributable to Dresser-Rand	$29.10	$53.30	$45.70	$86.20
Net income attributable to Dresser-Rand per share	'	'	'	'
Basic	$0.38	$0.70	$0.60	$1.13
Diluted	$0.38	$0.69	$0.59	$1.12
Weighted-average shares outstanding-(in thousands )	'	'	'	'
Basic	76,525	76,210	76,448	76,005
Diluted	77,084	76,739	77,017	76,742

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Comp

Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Statement Of Income And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Net income	$28.80	$54.40	$45.40	$88.80
Other comprehensive income (loss)	'	'	'	'
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-2.6	-15.6	1.5	-40.6
Unrealized gain on derivatives - net of tax of $0.1 and $0.1 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $0.1 and $0.1 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	'	0.1	0.1	0.2
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:	'	'	'	'
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss included in net periodic costs - net of tax of $0.5 and $0.8 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $0.8 and $1.6 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	0.5	1.3	1	2.7
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	-2.1	-14.2	2.6	-37.7
Total comprehensive income	26.7	40.2	48	51.1
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest	0.3	-1.2	0.3	-1.7
Comprehensive income attributable to Dresser-Rand	$27	$39	$48.30	$49.40

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Comp1

Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Statement Of Income And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Unrealized gain on derivatives, tax	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Pensions and other postretirement benefit plans, tax	$0.50	$0.80	$0.80	$1.60

Consolidated_Balance_Sheet

Consolidated Balance Sheet (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Current assets	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$138.70	$190.40
Restricted cash	6.6	8.1
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $8.1 at 2014 and $9.1 at 2013	563.6	727.4
Inventories, net	741.7	716
Prepaid expenses and other	70.4	68.8
Deferred income taxes	22.8	25.2
Total current assets	1,543.80	1,735.90
Property, plant and equipment, net	481.9	472.3
Goodwill	926.4	927.6
Intangible assets, net	462.5	479
Deferred income taxes	12.2	11.8
Other assets	138.2	111.2
Total assets	3,565	3,737.80
Current liabilities	'	'
Accounts payable and accruals	591.6	729.1
Customer advance payments	173	164.5
Accrued income taxes payable	35.2	36.1
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	33.9	40.1
Total current liabilities	833.7	969.8
Deferred income taxes	55.1	55.4
Postemployment and other employee benefit liabilities	64.6	74
Long-term debt	1,154.30	1,246.90
Other noncurrent liabilities	94.6	90.3
Total liabilities	2,202.30	2,436.40
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)	'	'
Stockholders' equity	'	'
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; and 76,616,271 and 76,293,924 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	0.8	0.8
Additional paid-in capital	175.7	162.4
Retained earnings	1,298.70	1,253
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	-116.2	-118.8
Total Dresser-Rand stockholders' equity	1,359	1,297.40
Noncontrolling interest	3.7	4
Total stockholders' equity	1,362.70	1,301.40
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$3,565	$3,737.80

Consolidated_Balance_Sheet_Par

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified
Statement Of Financial Position [Abstract]	'	'
Accounts receivable, allowance for losses	$8.10	$9.10
Common stock, par value	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	76,616,271	76,293,924
Common stock, shares outstanding	76,616,271	76,293,924

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Cash

Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities	'	'
Net income	$45.40	$88.80
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:	'	'
Depreciation and amortization	47.6	45.9
Deferred income taxes	-3	4
Stock-based compensation	13.1	17.9
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	-2.1	-6.6
Amortization of debt financing costs	1.1	2
Provision for losses on inventory	2.4	0.6
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	2.2	1
Loss (gain) from equity investments	3	-1.3
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	2.8	'
Changes in working capital and other	'	'
Accounts receivable	165.9	-85.2
Inventories	-29.2	-21.9
Prepaid expenses and other	-0.8	-12.3
Accounts payable and accruals	-139.7	57.2
Customer advances	8.6	-108.4
Taxes payable	1.2	-11.9
Pension and other post-retirement benefits	-8.5	-4.8
Other	-15.4	0.6
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	94.6	-34.4
Cash flows from investing activities	'	'
Capital expenditures	-31.7	-39.7
Loans made to investees and others	-20.7	'
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment	0.6	'
Other investments	-2.5	-10.5
Decrease in restricted cash balances	1.6	5.9
Net cash used in investing activities	-52.7	-44.3
Cash flows from financing activities	'	'
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	3.3	3.5
Proceeds from borrowings	530.4	850.8
Repayments of borrowings	-628.5	-730.5
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	2.1	6.6
Repurchase of common stock	-5.2	-1.5
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	-97.9	128.9
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	4.3	-10.7
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	-51.7	39.5
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	190.4	122.8
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$138.70	$162.30

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Chan

Consolidated Statement Of Changes In Stockholders' Equity (USD $)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income [Member]	Non-Controlling Interest [Member]	Total
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	$0.80	$140.50	$1,084.60	($134.70)	$3.70	$1,094.90
Stock-based compensation	'	11.7	'	'	'	11.7
Stock repurchases	'	-1.5	'	'	'	-1.5
Net income (loss)	'	'	86.2	'	2.6	88.8
Other comprehensive income (loss)	'	'	'	'	'	'
Foreign currency translation adjustments	'	'	'	-39.7	-0.9	-40.6
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax	'	'	'	0.2	'	0.2
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:	'	'	'	'	'	'
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss included in net periodic costs-net of tax	'	'	'	2.7	'	2.7
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	0.8	150.7	1,170.80	-171.5	5.4	1,156.20
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	0.8	162.4	1,253	-118.8	4	1,301.40
Stock-based compensation	'	13.3	'	'	'	13.3
Net income (loss)	'	'	45.7	'	-0.3	45.4
Other comprehensive income (loss)	'	'	'	'	'	'
Foreign currency translation adjustments	'	'	'	1.5	'	1.5
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax	'	'	'	0.1	'	0.1
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:	'	'	'	'	'	'
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss included in net periodic costs-net of tax	'	'	'	1	'	1
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2014	$0.80	$175.70	$1,298.70	($116.20)	$3.70	$1,362.70

Consolidated_Statement_Of_Chan1

Consolidated Statement Of Changes In Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Statement Of Stockholders Equity [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Unrealized gain on derivatives, tax	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Pensions and other postretirement benefit plans, tax	$0.50	$0.80	$0.80	$1.60

Basis_Of_Presentation

Basis Of Presentation	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]	'
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]	'
	1.Basis of Presentation
	Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” and similar terms refer to Dresser-Rand Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
	The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information.  The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013; the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013; and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.  The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.
	In preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.  Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, including those related to fair values, allowance for losses on receivables, depreciation and amortization, inventory adjustments related to lower of cost or market, the carrying value and estimated useful lives of long-lived assets, valuation of assets including goodwill and other intangible assets, product warranties, sales allowances, taxes, pensions, postemployment benefits, stock-based compensation, stage of completion and ultimate profitability for certain long-term revenue contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method, contract losses, penalties, environmental contingencies, product liability, self-insurance programs and other contingencies (including purchase price contingencies).  Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates.
	These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, are not indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.  Certain amounts in the prior periods consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.
	Revenue Recognition
	We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Generally, we consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when we have persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the product or service has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery does not occur until products have been shipped or services have been provided to the client, risk of loss has transferred to the client, and either any required client acceptance has been obtained (or such provisions have lapsed) or we have objective evidence that the criteria specified in the client acceptance provisions have been satisfied. The amount of revenue related to any contingency is not recognized until the contingency is resolved.
	Multiple-element arrangements
	A substantial portion of our arrangements are multiple-element revenue arrangements or contracts, where multiple products and/or services are involved. Products involved in multiple-element arrangements may include centrifugal compressors, gas turbines, power turbines, power recovery expanders, reciprocating compressors, steam turbines and engines. Our typical arrangement includes one of our classes of compressors and a driver (e.g., a motor, turbine or an engine).  In addition to our products, we perform installation and commissioning, training, and other services, and we purchase any number of standard or engineered items from third parties (“buyouts”) that support the application in which our equipment is being used.  Generally, buyouts, installation and commissioning, training and each of our products listed above are considered separate deliverables for a number of reasons, including the following:
		·		Clients would purchase each of those products or services apart from other products or services;
		·		The products and services being provided are at the request of the client and for the client’s sole benefit, apart from any other product or service in the transaction;
		·		The other deliverables can be performed without the service or product in question being performed or delivered;
		·		Contractual payments are typically tied to the delivery or performance of the specific product or service;
		·		The skills or equipment required to perform the services are readily available in the marketplace; and
		·		Clients attribute significant value to each product or service.
	These contracts generally can take fifteen months or more to complete and in one case we have a contract which may take sixty months to complete, or longer.  The timing between the first deliverable and the last deliverable is generally three to twelve months, and services are typically delivered last.
	Because the aforementioned separate deliverables have value to the client on a stand-alone basis, they are typically considered separate units of accounting.  The entire contract value is allocated to each unit of accounting. Revenue allocated to products is recognized upon delivery, while revenue allocated to services is recognized when the service is performed.  We use the selling price hierarchy described below to determine how to separate multiple-element revenue arrangements into separate units of accounting and how to allocate the arrangement consideration among those separate units of accounting:
		·		Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”).
		·		Third-party evidence (“TPE”), if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available.
		·		Estimated selling price (“ESP”), determined in the same manner as that used to determine the price at which we sell the deliverables on a stand-alone basis, if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available.
	In substantially all of our multi-element arrangements, we use ESP to allocate arrangement consideration. We determine ESP based on our normal pricing and discounting practices. In determining ESP, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors, based on the facts of the arrangement. We typically arrive at an ESP by considering client and entity-specific factors such as existing pricing, price discounts, geographies, competition, internal costs and profitability objectives.
	Our sales arrangements do not include a general right of return of the delivered unit(s). In certain cases, the cancellation terms of a contract provide us with the opportunity to bill for certain incurred costs and penalties.
	If it is determined that the separate deliverables do not have value on a stand-alone basis, the entire arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting, which results in revenue being recognized when the last unit is delivered based on the revenue recognition policy described above.
	It is uncommon for the Company to have contract scope adjustments that impact the selling price for specific units of accounting resulting in changes in the allocation of the selling price.  In the event of such an adjustment, we apply the change in the allocation of the selling price to the units of accounting that are not yet delivered.  As our business and offerings evolve over time, our pricing practices may be required to be modified accordingly, which could result in changes in selling prices in subsequent periods.  Historically, there have been no material impacts, nor do we currently expect material impacts in the next twelve months, on our revenue recognition due to changes in our VSOE, TPE or ESP.
	Percentage of completion
	We also enter into certain large contracts with expanded construction-type scope and risk.  These contractual arrangements have a scope of activity that differs in substance from the scope of deliverables found in our traditional sales agreements.  For these types of contracts, we apply the guidelines of ASC 605-35 – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts and utilize the percentage of completion method of revenue recognition. Non-traditional scope arrangements include activities typically performed by engineering, procurement and construction contractors. Our clients on these projects typically require us to act as a general construction contractor for all or a portion of these projects. These arrangements are often executed in the form of turnkey contracts, where the Company designs, engineers, manufactures, constructs, transports, erects and hands over to the client at the designated destination point the fully commissioned and tested module or facility, which is ready for operation.  Percentage of completion revenue represents approximately 4.8% and 7.3% of consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Under the percentage of completion method, revenue is recognized as work on a contract progresses.  For each contractual arrangement that qualifies for the percentage of completion method of accounting, the Company recognizes revenue, cost of sales and gross profit in the amounts that are equivalent to a percentage of the total estimated contract sales value, estimated cost of sales and estimated gross profit to be achieved upon completion of the project.  This percentage is generally determined by dividing the cumulative amount of labor costs and labor converted material costs incurred to date by the sum of the cumulative costs incurred to date plus the estimated remaining costs to be incurred in order to complete the contract.  Preparing these estimates is a process requiring judgment.  Factors influencing these estimates include, but are not limited to, historical performance trends, inflationary trends, productivity and labor disruptions, availability of materials, claims, change orders and other factors as set forth in the Risk Factors included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.  In the event that the Company experiences changes in estimated revenues, cost of sales and gross profit, they would be recognized using a cumulative catch-up adjustment that recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a contract’s updated percentage of completion.
	We apply the percentage of completion method of accounting to agreements when the following conditions exist:
		·		The costs are reasonably estimable;
		·		The contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding products and services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement;
		·		The customer can be expected to satisfy all obligations under the contract; and
		·		We expect to perform all of our contractual obligations.
	Cost of revenue for our construction-type contracts includes contract costs, such as materials and labor, and indirect costs that are attributable to contract activity.  Generally, we bill our customers based on advance billing terms or completion of certain contract milestones.  Cumulative costs and estimated earnings recognized to date in excess of cumulative billings are included in accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet.  Cumulative billings in excess of cumulative costs and estimated earnings recognized to date are included in accounts payable and accruals on the consolidated balance sheet.
	We estimate the future costs and estimated gross profit that will be incurred related to sales arrangements to determine whether any arrangement will result in a loss. These costs include material, labor and overhead. Factors influencing these future costs include the availability of materials and skilled laborers. We record provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the period in which such losses are identified.
	Fair Value Measurements
	Fair value, as defined in U.S. GAAP, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). U.S. GAAP classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
		Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
		Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
		Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
	Recurring Fair Value Measurements —  Fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, accounts payable and customer advance payments approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
	Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements — Fair value measurements were applied with respect to the Company’s nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, which consists primarily of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including contingent consideration, related to purchased businesses in business combinations and impairments.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments — Recurring fair value measurement of financial instruments consist principally of foreign currency derivatives, interest rate swaps and fixed rate long-term debt.
	Input levels used for fair value measurements are as follows:
					Input
		Description	Disclosure		Level	Level 2 Inputs	Level 3 Inputs
		Impairment of long-lived assets	Note 7		Level 3	Not applicable	Level 3 inputs are more fully described in Note 7.
		Financial derivatives	Note 8		Level 2	Quoted prices of similar assets or liabilities in active markets	Not applicable
		Long-term debt (disclosure only)	Note 10		Level 2	Quoted prices in markets that are not active	Not applicable

New_Accounting_Standards

New Accounting Standards	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]	'
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Text Block]	'
	2.New Accounting Standards
	Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date (“ASU 2013-04”). The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. In accordance with the amendments, an entity will measure the obligation as the sum of (1) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangements among its co-obligors, and (2) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 also require an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The adoption of ASU 2013-04 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (“ASU 2013-05”). The amendments in ASU 2013-05 resolve the diversity in practice in applying Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation, and Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters, when a reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary within a foreign entity. The amendments in ASU 2013-05 require the reporting entity to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary resided.  For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such an equity method investment, if significant influence is retained.  Additionally, the amendments clarify that the sale of an investment in a foreign entity includes both (1) events that result in the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity; and (2) events that result in an acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately before the acquisition date (step acquisition). The adoption of ASU 2013-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). The amendments in ASU 2013-11 clarify that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward if the settlement of the deferred tax asset is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed.  In situations where a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require, and the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”). The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. The amendments in ASU 2014-08 are effective prospectively for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity, and for all businesses that, on acquisition, are classified as held for sale that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to its consolidated financial statements.
	In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). This ASU is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early application not permitted.  Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU and the Company is currently evaluating which transition approach to use.  The Company is currently evaluating the new pronouncement to determine the impact it may have to its consolidated financial statements.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASU 2014-10”). The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. The revised consolidation standards are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early application permitted.  The Company is evaluating the new pronouncement to determine the impact it may have to its consolidated financial statements.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). The amendments in ASU 2014-12 require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early application permitted.  Companies may use either a prospective or a retrospective approach to adopt this ASU and the Company is currently evaluating which transition approach to use.  The Company is evaluating the new pronouncement to determine the impact it may have to its consolidated financial statements.

Other_Investments

Other Investments	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Other Investments [Abstract]	'
Other Investments	'
	3. Other Investments
	On June 28, 2013, the Company and Apex Compressed Air Energy Storage, LLC (“APEX”) formed Bethel Holdco, LLC (“Bethel”) to develop a 317 megawatt compressed air energy storage (“CAES”) facility to be constructed in the north zone of Texas.  The Company expects to manufacture and supply the compression trains, expansion trains, balance of plant process equipment and installation, commissioning, start-up and on-site testing services to a subsidiary of Bethel, subject to the project reaching full financing.   Although the project is not yet fully financed, management believes that the ability to finance the project will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.  As of June 30, 2014, the Company had invested a total of $5.0 for a 5.7% ownership interest in Bethel.  The remaining 94.3% interest is held by APEX.  The Company has certain rights, but no obligations, to make additional capital contributions to Bethel.    In connection with its investment in Bethel, the Company received an option to sell all of its initial ownership interests in Bethel to APEX at such time on or after the second anniversary of the CAES facility achieving commercial operation that Bethel has a net positive amount of available cash to distribute to its members for a trailing twelve-month period.  The sale price under the option is the Company’s purchase price for the Bethel interests.    On February 14, 2014, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with Bethel to help fund the construction of the CAES facility.  The Company may loan Bethel an aggregate principal amount of up to $25.0, with interest rates ranging from 8.0% to 16.0% per annum.  Loans made under the arrangement mature no later than eight years from the date of issuance.  As of June 30, 2014, Bethel has borrowed $18.6 from the Company.  The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on its investment in Bethel is limited to amounts invested plus any amounts the Company may choose to invest in the future. In determining whether the Company should consolidate Bethel, the Company considered that its board participation, ownership interest and loan would not give the Company the power to direct the activities of Bethel and, consequently, would not result in the Company being the primary beneficiary.  The investment in Bethel is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and the amount of the investment recorded in other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet is $4.9 at June 30, 2014.  The Company recognized revenues from APEX of $11.6 and $22.4 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
	In February 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a noncontrolling interest in Echogen Power Systems, LLC (“Echogen”), a privately-held technology company that is developing and commercializing power generation systems that harness waste heat for power and cooling applications using a proprietary supercritical carbon dioxide process technology. The Company will pay Echogen a royalty based on future equipment sales in these markets. Aggregate minimum royalties of $6.0 must be paid in the first five years of commercialization, which has not begun, regardless of the amount of revenues generated, or the license will become non-exclusive.  On March 26, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement for exclusive license rights to certain of Echogen’s intellectual property in exchange for $2.5 of cash and the relief of the Company’s obligation to provide certain equipment which was required under the original agreement. These exclusive license rights are represented by the remaining shares of Echogen held by the Company, which will be exchanged for an exclusive license when Echogen’s intellectual property is proven. Additionally, the Company is obligated to match other funding of up to $1.0, which we expect to pay during the three months ended September 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had invested a total of $25.5 for a 33.4% noncontrolling interest in Echogen. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on its investment in Echogen is limited to amounts invested plus any amounts the Company may choose to invest in the future. In determining whether the Company should consolidate Echogen, the Company considered that its board participation and ownership interest would not give the Company the power to direct the activities of Echogen and, consequently, would not result in the Company being the primary beneficiary.  The investment in Echogen is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and the amount of the investment recorded in other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet is $18.2 at June 30, 2014.
	In April 2009, the Company and Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company (“ARPIC”) executed a Business Venture Agreement to form a joint venture, Dresser-Rand Arabia LLC (“D-R Arabia”). D-R Arabia was formed to execute manufacturing, repair, and other services, and to provide technical expertise and training in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Company and ARPIC each own approximately 50% of D-R Arabia. In determining whether the Company should consolidate D-R Arabia, the Company determined that its ownership, board participation and other related contractual rights would give the Company the ability to direct the activities of D-R Arabia, which would result in the Company being the primary beneficiary. Consequently, D-R Arabia is consolidated in the financial results of the Company.
	D-R Arabia has total assets of approximately $50.0, consisting principally of property, plant and equipment, and total liabilities of approximately $78.6, consisting principally of intercompany loans. The assets have been classified accordingly in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, and the loans have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has no contractual responsibility to provide additional funding to D-R Arabia. The creditors of D-R Arabia have no recourse to any of the Company’s assets outside of D-R Arabia.
	The Company and ARPIC, as shareholders of D-R Arabia, and their respective director nominees provided approvals to enable D-R Arabia to satisfy two issues raised by the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (“SAGIA”), concerning adding licensing to provide additional services and repairs and increasing its capitalization.  The necessary filings have been made and further requirements are pending SAGIA’s processing of the filings.
	In 2008, the Company entered into an agreement by which it acquired a noncontrolling interest in Ramgen Power Systems, LLC (“Ramgen”), a privately-held company that is developing compressor technology that applies proven supersonic aircraft technology to ground-based air and gas compressors.  In addition to receiving a noncontrolling interest, the Company received an option to acquire the business of Ramgen at a price of $25.0 and a royalty commitment. On April 4, 2014, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) to acquire substantially all of the assets of Ramgen, with an expected closing date no later than August 15, 2014. Under the terms of the APA, the Company will exchange its existing equity ownership in Ramgen, cash of approximately $1.0 and the rights to royalty payments from certain future sales made by the Company for substantially all of the assets of Ramgen. This agreement supersedes all prior agreements between the Company and Ramgen, including the option to acquire and the original royalty arrangement. The Company has made investments totaling $34.4, which have resulted in an aggregate noncontrolling interest of 42.2% at June 30, 2014. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on its investment in Ramgen is limited to amounts invested plus any amounts the Company may choose to invest in the future. In determining whether the Company should consolidate Ramgen at June 30, 2014, the Company considered that its board participation, ownership interest, the option to acquire and the APA would not give the Company the power to direct the activities of Ramgen and, consequently, would not result in the Company being the primary beneficiary. The investment in Ramgen is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and the amount of the investment recorded in other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet is $28.5 at June 30, 2014.

Costs_And_Estimated_Earnings_O

Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts [Abstract]	'
Costs And Estimated Earnings In Excess Of Billings On Uncompleted Contracts	'
	4.Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
	Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts were as follows:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$	244.4	$	195.5
	Estimated earnings		66.8		52.4
			311.2		247.9
	Less: billings to date		-336.2		-162.7
		$	-25	$	85.2
	Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings	$	7.4	$	98.1
	Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings		-32.4		-12.9
		$	-25	$	85.2

Intangible_Assets_And_Goodwill

Intangible Assets And Goodwill	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets And Goodwill [Abstract]	'
Intangible Assets And Goodwill	'
	5.Intangible Assets and Goodwill
	The following table sets forth the weighted-average useful life, gross amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets:
		30-Jun-14						31-Dec-13
		Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Weighted-Average Useful Lives		Cost		Accumulated Amortization
	Trade names	$	119.7	$	25.9	36 years		$	120.0	$	24.2
	Customer relationships		333.6		87.9	32 years			333.2		79.4
	Non-compete agreements		5.5		5.4	3 years			5.5		5.0
	Existing technology		160.8		58.9	23 years			160.6		55.3
	Contracts and purchase agreements		10.7		1.6	11 years			10.2		1.4
	Software		28.7		27.8	10 years			28.7		26.3
	In-process research and development		12.6		1.6	10 years			12.7		0.3
	Total amortizable intangible assets	$	671.6	$	209.1			$	670.9	$	191.9
	Intangible asset amortization expense was $8.5 and $16.8 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and $7.3 and $14.6 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and is estimated to be $16.9 for the remainder of fiscal year 2014.  Estimated amortization expense for each of the subsequent five fiscal years is expected to be as follows: $30.6 in 2015,  $30.0 in 2016,  $29.8 in 2017,  $29.4 in 2018 and $29.1 in 2019.
	The following table represents the changes in goodwill in total and by segment (see Note 15 for additional segment information):
				Aftermarket
		New Units		Parts and Services		Total
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	488.4	$	439.2	$	927.6
	Foreign currency adjustments		-0.6		-0.6		-1.2
	Balance, June 30, 2014	$	487.8	$	438.6	$	926.4

Inventories_Net

Inventories, Net	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Inventory, Net [Abstract]	'
Inventories, net	'
	6. Inventories, net
	Inventories were as follows:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Raw materials	$	141.6	$	71.0
	Finished parts		281.2		262.4
	Work-in-process		774.9		845.9
			1,197.7		1,179.3
	Less: progress payments from clients		-456		-463.3
	Inventories, net	$	741.7	$	716.0
	Finished parts may be used in production or sold to customers.  Progress payments represent payments from clients based on milestone completion schedules.  Any payments received in excess of inventory investment are classified as “Customer Advance Payments” in the current liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheet.  Progress payments to suppliers are included in work-in-process and were $116.8 and $129.0  at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.  The total allowance for obsolescence for slow-moving inventory for all categories of inventory was $34.6 and $30.7 at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Property_Plant_And_Equipment

Property, Plant And Equipment	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]	'
Property, Plant And Equipment	'
	7. Property, plant and equipment
	Property, plant and equipment were as follows:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Cost:
	Land	$	32.6	$	33.1
	Buildings and improvements		276.7		261.4
	Machinery and equipment		502.7		479.0
			812.0		773.5
	Less: accumulated depreciation		-330.1		-301.2
	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	481.9	$	472.3
	Depreciation expense was $15.5 and $30.8 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and $14.3 and $31.3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
	Impairment of Spanish Cogeneration Facilities
	The Company has a wholly-owned or majority ownership in six cogeneration facilities in Spain. The Spanish government published a ministerial order on June 20, 2014, that reflected a reduction in the tariffs of approximately 38%, which was retroactive to July 2013.
	The enacted order was issued in draft form in February 2014 and is an implementation of a law that was passed in 2013.  The 2013 law did not have sufficient specificity to reasonably estimate the change in the tariff without the further order, but did provide that the existing tariffs would be paid on a provisional basis until the order was issued.  Before the initial draft was issued, the Company believed there would not be a material change in the tariff, and therefore did not believe that assets would be impaired. Once the initial draft was issued, the Company determined that operating the cogeneration facilities would not be economical under the proposed reduced tariff level and decided to suspend operations at the facilities.  Because the initial draft related to the 2013 law, the Company recorded the resulting impairment charge of $40.0 in the three months ended December 31, 2013.  The impairment charge solely impacted the aftermarket parts and services segment.
	The impaired assets included land, power generation equipment, cogeneration plant equipment and structures. The land was valued using the market approach and the machinery and equipment was valued using the cost approach. The income approach was considered and applied to the total operations, but the income approach was not applied to the individual assets because these assets contribute to earnings jointly with many other economic factors.  No value was placed on the structures because it was determined that buildings would not be necessary for the highest and best use of the land.
	The market approach was applied to the land based on discussions with local brokers considering the land’s size, shape, zoning, location, and other similar factors. This methodology was used because comparable land transactions and comparable current listings could not be located.
	The current replacement cost of a typical similar cogeneration facility was the basis used to estimate the replacement cost of the machinery and equipment.  Recoverability adjustments were applied to the current replacement cost based upon production hours since the last overhaul to reduce the estimated fair value accordingly.
	Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations
	Any legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may not be within our control is recognized as a liability at the fair value of the conditional asset retirement obligation, if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. U.S. GAAP acknowledges that, in some cases, sufficient information may not be available to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation.
	We are legally obligated to decommission our cogeneration sites in Brazil and Spain upon site exit.  The Company has not recorded any conditional asset retirement obligations on its cogeneration facilities in Brazil because there is no current active market in which the obligations could be transferred and we do not have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the range of settlement dates and their related probabilities. The decommissioning activities in Brazil are less significant than those in Spain, and the Company believes any obligations arising from such activities are immaterial to the financial statements.  As a result of the suspension of its cogeneration facilities in Spain, the Company recorded a  conditional asset retirement obligation related to its Spanish cogeneration facilities in 2014.  The changes in the Company’s asset retirement obligations were as follows:
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013
	Beginning balance	$	-	$	-
	Provisions		4.5		-
	Effects of exchange rate changes		-		-
	Ending balance	$	4.5	$	-

Financial_Instruments

Financial Instruments	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Financial Instruments [Abstract]	'
Financial Instruments	'
	8. Financial Instruments (€ in millions)
	The Company manages exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates through its normal operating and financing activities as well as through the use of financial instruments.
	The purpose of the Company’s hedging activities is to mitigate the economic impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  The Company attempts to hedge transaction exposures through natural offsets.  To the extent that this is not practicable, the Company may enter into forward exchange contracts or interest rate swaps.  Major exposure areas considered for hedging include foreign currency denominated receivables and payables, firm committed transactions, forecast sales and purchases and variable interest rates.
	The Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement to minimize the economic impact of unexpected fluctuations in interest rates on the lease of its compressor testing facility in France. The interest rate swap has a notional amount of €18.0 (approximately $24.6) and effectively converts substantially the entire interest component of the lease from a variable rate of interest to a fixed rate of interest of approximately 3.87% per annum. The interest rate swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes, and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income.  The fair value of the interest rate swap at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 was $0.6 and $0.7, respectively, and the related unrealized gain for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, was $0.0 and $0.1, respectively, and $0.1 and $0.2 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
	None of the Company’s other derivative financial instruments are designated as hedges for accounting purposes.  Changes in the fair values of derivatives that are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes are immediately recognized in the consolidated statement of income in other income (expense), net.
	All of the Company’s foreign currency derivative contracts are subject to master netting arrangements.  These arrangements provide for the option to settle contracts with a given counterparty on a net basis when they settle on the same day and the same currency.  In addition, these arrangements provide for a net settlement of all contracts with a given counterparty in the event that the arrangement is terminated due to the occurrence of default or a termination event.  The Company has elected to present the derivative contracts on a gross basis in the consolidated balance sheet.  The Company recognizes derivatives in prepaid expenses and other, or accounts payable and accruals, as appropriate, on the consolidated balance sheet and measures them at fair value each reporting period.  Had the Company presented its derivative contracts on a net basis, the amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheet would not be materially different from the presentation in the table below.  In addition, the arrangements do not require the Company to post any cash collateral.
	The following table sets forth the Company’s foreign currency exchange contracts that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Foreign currency exchange contracts assets	$	3.1	$	5.4
	Foreign currency exchange contracts liabilities	$	9.6	$	16.3
	The notional amount for the forward exchange contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, was $471.3 and $546.6, respectively.  The net foreign currency gains (losses) recognized for forward currency contracts were $1.6 and $4.4 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, compared to $(5.0) and ($9.3) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

Income_Taxes

Income Taxes	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Income Taxes [Abstract]	'
Income Taxes	'
	9.Income taxes
	We operate in numerous countries and tax jurisdictions around the world and there is no assurance that future tax audits will not result in significant tax adjustments. Management believes that it has provided adequate estimated liabilities for taxes based on its understanding of the tax laws and regulations in those countries.
	Our estimated income tax provisions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, result in effective rates that differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally because of different tax rates in foreign tax jurisdictions and certain deductions and credits allowable for income tax purposes, offset by state and local income taxes and valuation allowances on net operating loss carryforwards that more-likely-than-not will not be realized.  We will adjust the valuation allowances in the future if it becomes more-likely-than-not that the benefits of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
	The increase in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, is principally due to an increased amount of net operating losses in certain foreign countries for which we could not record benefits under U.S. GAAP, thus increasing the effective tax rate by approximately 13.9 and 14.0 percentage points, respectively.
	On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act (“ATRA”) of 2012 was signed into law. Some of the provisions were retroactive to January 1, 2012, including the exclusion from U.S. federal taxable income of certain interest, dividends, rents, and royalty income of foreign affiliates, as well as the tax benefits of the credits associated with that income and an extension of the research and experimentation credit. Therefore, as required by U.S. GAAP, a $4.4 benefit was reflected in the three months ended March 31, 2013 as a discrete event. The “look-through” exemption for foreign earnings provision and the research and experimentation credit has not yet been extended for 2014, causing an increase in the effective tax rate of approximately 2.4 percentage points for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, was not significant.
	As a result of the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar on February 8, 2013, the Company recorded a nondeductible foreign exchange loss in its Consolidated Statement of Income of approximately $3.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.  Had this amount been deductible, our effective tax rate would have been 1.0 percentage point lower for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
	Certain foreign subsidiaries are operating under tax holiday arrangements that will expire during 2014 and 2015, subject to potential extensions.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the impact of these tax holiday arrangements lowered income tax expense by $1.7 ($0.02 per diluted share) and $2.9  ($0.04 per diluted share), respectively, and by $2.3  ($0.03  per diluted share) and $3.3  ($0.04 per diluted share) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
	Except for earnings in India, management has decided to indefinitely reinvest the unremitted earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and, therefore, no provision for U.S. federal or state income taxes has been provided on those foreign earnings. If any indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings are distributed, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company could be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to adjustment for foreign tax credits), as well as withholding taxes imposed by certain foreign jurisdictions.

LongTerm_Debt

Long-Term Debt	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Long-Term Debt [Abstract]	'
Long-Term Debt	'
	10.Long-Term Debt
	Long-term debt consists of the following:
		June 30,			December 31,
		2014			2013
	Amended Credit Facility	$	793.5			$              884.5
	6½% Senior Subordinated Notes due May 2021		375.0			375.0
	Bank overdraft facility		-			4.6
	Other indebtedness		19.7			22.9
	Total debt		1,188.2			1,287.0
	Less:  current portion		-33.9			-40.1
	Total long-term debt	$	1,154.3			1,246.9
	On June 27, 2014, we entered into an amendment (the “First Amendment”) to our committed credit agreement (as amended by the First Amendment, the “Amended Credit Facility”).  The First Amendment amends certain terms and provisions of our committed credit agreement to incorporate recent changes to the ownership structure of certain legal entities completed by the Company in order to facilitate the Company’s cash management activities.
	At June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.
	Senior Subordinated Notes
	The carrying and fair values of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes were as follows:
			30-Jun-14					31-Dec-13
			Carrying Value			Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	6½% senior subordinated notes due May 2021		$	375.0		$	403.4	$	375.0	$	400.5
	Due to the variable rate nature of all of the Company’s other long-term debt, the carrying values materially approximate their fair values as the rates are comparable to current market rates at which debt with similar terms could be obtained.

Pension_Plans

Pension Plans	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Pension Plans [Abstract]	'
Pension Plans	'
	11. Pension Plans
	The components of net pension expense were as follows:
		U.S. Plans								Non-U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	Service cost	$	0.9	$	1.0	$	1.8	$	2.0	$	0.6	$	1.4	$	1.2	$	2.8
	Interest cost		3.3		2.9		6.6		5.8		1.3		1.5		2.7		3.1
	Expected return on plan assets		-4.6		-4.1		-9.2		-8.1		-1.7		-1.6		-3.3		-3.3
	Amortization of net actuarial
	loss		0.7		1.9		1.4		3.9		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.3
	Amortization of prior service
	cost		-		-		0.1		-		0.1		-		0.1		-
	Net pension expense	$	0.3	$	1.7	$	0.7	$	3.6	$	0.5	$	1.5	$	0.9	$	2.9
	The fair value measurement of certain plan assets (approximately 3.5% of total plan assets) is derived using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  Level 3 assets consist of annuities held as investments within the plan that cover a set amount of liabilities and the effects of changes in the values of the related assets and liabilities are generally offsetting.  Level 3 assets also consist of annuities that require contribution premiums to fund ongoing liabilities as required by foreign governmental regulations.  Annuities are valued using standard actuarial calculations such as discount rates, mortality rates and participant population.
	The Company made pension contributions of $3.5 and $9.0, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, and $4.6 and $10.1, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

PostRetirement_Benefits_Other_

Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Post-Retiements Benefits Other Than Pensions [Abstract]	'
Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions	'
	12.Post-Retirement Benefits Other than Pensions
	The components of the net post-retirement benefit expense were as follows:
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013		2014		2013
	Interest cost	$	0.2	$	0.2	$	0.3	$	0.4
	Amortization of net actuarial loss		-		0.1		-		0.2
	Net post-retirement benefits expense	$	0.2	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	0.6

Commitments_And_Contingencies

Commitments And Contingencies	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]	'
Commitments And Contingencies	'
	13.Commitments and Contingencies (£, € and R$ in millions)
	Legal Proceedings
	We are involved in various litigation, claims and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Amounts recorded for identified contingent liabilities are estimates, which are regularly reviewed and adjusted to reflect additional information when it becomes available. We are indemnified by our former owner, Ingersoll Rand Company Limited (“Ingersoll Rand”), for certain of these matters as part of Ingersoll Rand’s sale of the Company and by the sellers of Grupo Guascor for certain of these matters in connection with our acquisition of Grupo Guascor, S.L. (“Guascor”) in May 2011.  While adverse decisions in certain of these litigation matters, claims and administrative proceedings could have a material effect on a particular period’s results of operations, subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs for contingent liabilities and the benefit of the indemnities from Ingersoll Rand and the sellers of Guascor, management believes that any future accruals with respect to these currently known contingencies would not have a material effect on the financial condition, liquidity or cash flows of the Company.
	Guascor Purchase Price Dispute
	On May 4, 2011, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Guascor pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) for approximately $543.2.  The purchase price was subject to a further adjustment to the extent that net debt (debt minus cash) at the end of business on May 4, 2011, was different from €124.5. Pursuant to the SPA, this adjustment is to be computed on the basis of Spanish generally accepted accounting principles (“SGAAP”).
	The Company and the sellers of Guascor (“Sellers”) are in dispute about the amount of the purchase price adjustment set out in the SPA. In some cases, the Sellers and the Company have opposing views as to the amount that should be included in the price adjustment.  In other cases, the Sellers and the Company are in dispute as to whether certain items should be included in the net debt computation.  In accordance with the provisions of the SPA, the parties are resolving this dispute under an arbitration in the International Court of Commerce (“ICC”) and before a French court-appointed expert.  Based upon its interpretation of Spanish GAAP, the Company has unresolved disputes totaling approximately $42.4 with the Sellers.
	The Company has recorded a receivable from the Sellers for the purchase price adjustment, net of an allowance for the Company’s best estimate of amounts collectible.  This allowance was established by considering, for each disputed item, the Company’s view of its position under SGAAP, uncertainties around the expert’s interpretation of SGAAP, and the collectability of the amounts. As additional information becomes known and disputed items are resolved, changes to the allowance will be recorded directly to net income.  The final resolution of these amounts could take several months and potentially years if appeals are pursued.  The final amount could be materially different than the net receivable recorded by the Company.  The Company, however, does not believe that the difference could have a material adverse effect on its operating results, financial condition, liquidity or cash flows.
	Painted Post Labor Litigation
	In November 2007, Local 313 of IUE-CWA, the union that represents certain employees at the Company’s Painted Post, New York, facility (the “IUE”) made an offer to have its striking members return to work under the terms of the previously expired union agreement.  The Company rejected that offer and locked out these represented employees.  Approximately one week later, after reaching an impasse in negotiations, the Company exercised its right to implement the terms of its last contract offer, ended the lockout, and the employees represented by the IUE agreed to return to work under the implemented terms.  Subsequently, the IUE filed several unfair labor practice (“ULP”) charges against the Company with Region 3 of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), asserting multiple allegations arising from the protracted labor dispute, its termination, contract negotiations and related matters.
	Region 3 of the NLRB decided to proceed to complaint on only one-third of the ULP allegations asserted by the IUE, while the remaining claims were dismissed.  Notably, the NLRB found that many of the critical aspects of the Company’s negotiations with the IUE were handled appropriately, including the NLRB’s findings that the union’s strike was not an unfair labor practice strike and the Company’s declaration of impasse and its unilateral implementation of its last offer were lawful. The Company, therefore, continued to operate under a more contemporary and competitive implemented contract offer while contract negotiations with the IUE continued in 2008 and 2009.  In November 2009, a collective bargaining agreement between the IUE and the Company was ratified, which agreement was renegotiated in 2013 and extended to March 2016.
	The claims that proceeded to complaint before the NLRB included the Company’s handling of the one week lockout, the negotiation of the recall process used to return employees to the facility after reaching impasse and lifting the lockout, and the termination of two employees who engaged in misconduct on the picket line during the strike.  The trial of this matter took place before a NLRB Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) in Elmira and Painted Post, New York, during the summer of 2009.  On January 29, 2010, the ALJ issued his decision in which he found in favor of the union on some issues and upheld the Company’s position on others.  The Company timely appealed the ALJ’s rulings against the Company to the NLRB in Washington, D.C.  On August 6, 2012, the NLRB affirmed the ALJ’s rulings.  The Company timely appealed the matter to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which stayed the proceedings in July 2013 pending a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on a constitutional issue, in an unrelated case, that is also in controversy in the Company’s appeal.  The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on the constitutional matter was decided in June 2014. That decision held that the NLRB that ruled on this and other cases was invalidly appointed by the President and the matters decided by that NLRB were also set aside as invalid. As a result, this matter has been returned to the current and validly appointed NLRB to be reheard in its entirety. The Company continues to believe it complied with the law and that it will ultimately prevail with respect to these ULP allegations.  The litigation process, including further appeals, could reasonably take one to two years to resolve with finality.  Given the broad scope of possible remedies that may apply pursuant to conflicting case law, the Company cannot estimate the range of loss, if any, at this time.  Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained at this time, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.
	Banco Santos Litigation
	In July 2004, Guascor SA and Jaguari Energetica SA, subsidiaries of Guascor (collectively, the “GG Entities”), entered into an agreement (the “BNDES Agreement”) with the Bank of National Economic and Social Development (“BNDES”) for the construction of a hydroelectric dam in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (the “Project”).  Pursuant to the terms of the BNDES Agreement, in August 2004, the GG Entities entered into a separate agreement (the “Banco Santos Agreement”) with Banco Santos, a Brazilian bank previously based in Sao Paulo, Brazil.  Per the terms of the Banco Santos Agreement, Banco Santos and the GG Entities agreed that: (i) in exchange for a fee paid by the GG Entities, Banco Santos would establish a reserve in favor of the GG Entities in the amount of R$3.6 (approximately $1.6) (the “Reserve”) to ensure that funds for a twelve month term would be available (if needed) by the GG Entities to fund their performance obligations under the BNDES Agreement; (ii) the GG Entities would issue twelve banking credit notes (the “Notes”) to Banco Santos (one for each of the twelve months), under which Notes the GG Entities would be obligated to make a payment to Banco Santos if the GG Entities used the applicable portion of the Reserve associated with a Note; and (iii) no portion of the Reserve would be invested by Banco Santos in any high risk investments.  The GG Entities completed the Project in December 2006 and fulfilled their obligations under the BNDES Agreement, without using any portion of the Reserve.  Accordingly, the Company believes that, pursuant to the terms of the Banco Santos Agreement, none of the Notes securing the Reserve became due or payable by the GG Entities to Banco Santos.
	In September 2004, Banco Santos, without the knowledge or consent of the GG Entities, transferred the Reserve to its affiliates, Santos Credit Yield (“SCY”) and Santos Credit Master (“SCM,” and together with SCY, the “BS Affiliates”).  Upon the receipt of the Reserve, the BS Affiliates invested the funds in a high risk investment, resulting in the loss of the entire Reserve.  In addition, concurrently with the transfer of the Reserve, Banco Santos assigned its rights in the Notes to the BS Affiliates.  Shortly after the assignment of the Notes, Banco Santos declared bankruptcy.
	The GG Entities commenced an action (the “Declaratory Action”) in the Civil Courts in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in April 2005 seeking a declaratory judgment that the BS Affiliates were barred from recovering any amounts with regard to the Notes because such Notes were null and void pursuant to the terms of the Banco Santos Agreement.  In December 2010, while the Declaratory Action was still pending, the BS Affiliates filed a separate action (the “BS Action”) in the Sao Paulo Civil Court seeking to recover from the GG Entities the amount of the Reserve.  The Court stayed the BS Action in September 2011 pending a final ruling in the Declaratory Action.  The GG Entities appealed the Court’s denial of their request for declaratory relief, and the Appellate Court ruled in favor of the GG Entities, which were not ordered to pay any amounts.  Banco Santos may appeal the Appellate Court’s decision.
	Although the Company believes, based on the factual circumstances and the applicable law, that Banco Santos and the BS Affiliates violated the terms of the Banco Santos Agreement and the payment terms of the Notes, and that the GG Entities should prevail in the Declaratory Action and a similar case filed by the BS Affiliates, the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be ascertained at this time.  The Company estimates that the total aggregate exposure for damages, interest and attorneys’ fees could be up to R$46.4 (approximately $21.0).  Moreover, the Company has an indemnification claim against the sellers of Guascor with regard to this matter.
	Italian Value-Added Tax Claim
	The Company is in litigation with the Italian tax authorities regarding value-added taxes for tax years 2005-2008 and the application of Italian and European Union laws.  The Company received an adverse judgment from the Italian Tax Court (i.e., the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale Di Genova) in February 2012 for tax years 2005-2006 for approximately €4.2 ($5.8).  On March 6, 2014, as requested by the Italian Tax Court with regard to tax years 2007 and 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued an advisory, preliminary ruling, which ruling supported the Company’s position with regard to the value-added tax regulations that no such taxes are owed.  The Company then requested that the Italian Tax Court issue its judgment with regard to tax years 2007 and 2008, which judgment the Company intends to present to the appeals court in connection with its appeal of the Italian Tax Court’s adverse judgment with respect to tax years 2005 and 2006.  The Company estimates the total aggregate exposure for taxes, interest and penalties could be up to €10.1 ($13.8).

Warranties

Warranties	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Warranties [Abstract]	'
Warranties	'
	14.   Warranties
	We maintain a product warranty liability that represents estimated future claims for equipment, parts and services covered during a warranty period.  A warranty liability is provided at the time of revenue recognition based on historical experience and is adjusted as required.
	The following table represents the changes in the product warranty liability:
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013
	Beginning balance	$	21.4	$	20.1
	Provision for warranties issued during period		7.5		6.8
	Adjustments to warranties issued in prior periods		0.7		0.9
	Payments during the period		-9.3		-8.8
	Foreign currency adjustments		0.2		-0.3
	Ending balance	$	20.5	$	18.7

Segment_Information

Segment Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Segment Information [Abstract]	'
Segment Information	'
	15.Segment Information
	The Company has two reportable segments based on the engineering and production processes, and the products and services provided by each segment, as follows:
		1)		New units are predominately highly engineered solutions to new requests from clients. New units also include standardized equipment such as engines and single stage steam turbines. The segment includes engineering, manufacturing, project management, packaging, testing, sales and administrative support.
		2)		Aftermarket parts and services consist of support solutions for the existing population of installed equipment and the operation and maintenance of several types of energy plants. The segment includes engineering, manufacturing, project management, installation, commissioning, start-up and other field services, repairs, overhauls, refurbishment, sales and administrative support.
	These functions have been defined as the operating segments of the Company because they are the segments (1) that engage in business activities from which revenues are earned and expenses are incurred; (2) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance; and (3) for which discrete financial information is available.
	Unallocated amounts represent expenses and assets that cannot be assigned directly to either reportable segment because of their nature.  Unallocated net expenses include certain corporate expenses and research and development expenses.  Assets that are directly assigned to the two reportable segments are trade accounts receivable, net inventories and goodwill.  Unallocated assets include cash, prepaid expenses and other, deferred taxes, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. There are no significant intercompany transactions between our reportable segments.
	Segment results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
			Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
			2014		2013		2014		2013
	Revenues
	New units		$	302.7	$	420.2	$	694.0	$	863.4
	Aftermarket parts and services			325.7		385.1		633.5		708.3
	Total revenues		$	628.4	$	805.3	$	1,327.5	$	1,571.7
	Income from operations
	New units		$	27.1	$	25.8	$	42.8	$	54.4
	Aftermarket parts and services			70.5		92.8		120.3		159.2
	Unallocable			-31.3		-31.4		-56.6		-60.9
	Total income from operations		$	66.3	$	87.2	$	106.5	$	152.7
	Depreciation and amortization
	New units		$	11.3	$	11.2	$	24.0	$	25.3
	Aftermarket parts and services			12.7		10.4		23.6		20.6
	Total depreciation and amortization		$	24.0	$	21.6	$	47.6	$	45.9
	Total assets by segment were as follows:
			June 30,		December 31,
			2014		2013
	Total assets (including goodwill)
	New units		$	1,067.6	$	1,113.8
	Aftermarket parts and services			1,351.1		1,305.0
	Unallocable			1,146.3		1,319.0
	Total assets		$	3,565.0	$	3,737.8

Incentive_StockBased_Compensat

Incentive Stock-Based Compensation Plans	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Incentive Stock-Based Compensation Plans [Abstract]	'
Incentive Stock-Based Compensation Plans	'
	16.Incentive Stock-Based Compensation Plans
	During the six months ended June 30,  2014, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, and with respect to the President and Chief Executive Officer, the independent members of the Board of Directors, approved grants of options and stock appreciation rights for 294,749 shares of common stock and grants of 321,121 shares of time-vested restricted stock units to employees under the Dresser-Rand Group Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan and approved the issuance of Performance Restricted Stock Units with a target grant amount of 69,499 restricted stock units.
	The Company also granted 15,736 shares of stock to non-employee Directors in February 2014.
	The difference between basic weighted-average shares outstanding and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding in the computation of earnings per share presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income is comprised entirely of the dilutive effect of the stock-based compensation awards described above for all periods presented.

Accumulated_Other_Comprehensiv

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI")	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Share Repurchases [Abstract]	'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI")	'
	17.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”)
	AOCI and the changes in AOCI by component were as follows:
		Foreign				Pension and
		Currency		Unrealized		Other
		Translation		(Loss) Gain on		Postretirement
		Adjustments		Derivatives		Benefit Plans		Total
	At December 31, 2013	$	-69.5	$	-0.4	$	-48.9	$	-118.8
	Other comprehensive gain before reclassifications		1.5		-		-		1.5
	Amounts reclassified from AOCI		-		0.1		1.0		1.1
	Net current period other comprehensive income		1.5		0.1		1.0		2.6
	At June 30, 2014	$	-68	$	-0.3	$	-47.9	$	-116.2
		Foreign				Pension and
		Currency		Unrealized		Other
		Translation		(Loss) Gain on		Postretirement
		Adjustments		Derivatives		Benefit Plans		Total
	At December 31, 2012	$	-51.3	$	-0.7	$	-82.7	$	-134.7
	Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		-39.7		-		-		-39.7
	Amounts reclassified from AOCI		-		0.2		2.7		2.9
	Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income		-39.7		0.2		2.7		-36.8
	At June 30, 2013	$	-91	$	-0.5	$	-80	$	-171.5
	Items reclassified out of AOCI into net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
		Amount Reclassified From AOCI into Net Income								Affected Line Item in the
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Consolidated Statement
	Details About AOCI Components	2014		2013		2014		2013		of Income
	Unrealized gain on derivatives	$	-0.1	$	-0.2	$	-0.2	$	-0.3	Interest expense, net
			0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1	Provision for income taxes
		$	-	$	-0.1	$	-0.1	$	-0.2	Net of tax
	Pension and other postretirement benefit plans
	Amortization of net actuarial loss	$	-1	$	-2.1	$	-1.8	$	-4.3	(a)
			0.5		0.8		0.8		1.6	Provision for income taxes
		$	-0.5	$	-1.3	$	-1	$	-2.7	Net of tax
	Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	-0.5	$	-1.4	$	-1.1	$	-2.9	Net of tax
	(a)These items are included in the computation of net pension expense and net post-retirement benefits expense. See Note 11, Pension Plans and Note 12, Post-Retirement Benefits Other than Pensions for additional information.

Significant_Concentration_Of_C

Significant Concentration Of Credit Risk	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Significant Concentration Of Credit Risk [Abstract]	'
Significant Concentration Of Credit Risk	'
	18.  Significant Concentration of Credit Risk
	At June 30, 2014, approximately 15.2% of the Company’s net accounts receivable was from Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (“PDVSA”).  Historically, the Company has collected its outstanding receivables from PDVSA. Payments of approximately $35.8 were received during the six months ended June 30, 2014, and additional payments of $13.8 were received subsequent to June 30, 2014.  The Company believes that, based on this historical experience and discussions with PDVSA, the outstanding balance is ultimately collectible.  Consequently, a provision for bad debts has not been recorded for these accounts receivable.

Basis_Of_Presentation_Policies

Basis Of Presentation (Policies)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]	'
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Generally, we consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when we have persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the product or service has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery does not occur until products have been shipped or services have been provided to the client, risk of loss has transferred to the client, and either any required client acceptance has been obtained (or such provisions have lapsed) or we have objective evidence that the criteria specified in the client acceptance provisions have been satisfied. The amount of revenue related to any contingency is not recognized until the contingency is resolved.
	Multiple-element arrangements
	A substantial portion of our arrangements are multiple-element revenue arrangements or contracts, where multiple products and/or services are involved. Products involved in multiple-element arrangements may include centrifugal compressors, gas turbines, power turbines, power recovery expanders, reciprocating compressors, steam turbines and engines. Our typical arrangement includes one of our classes of compressors and a driver (e.g., a motor, turbine or an engine).  In addition to our products, we perform installation and commissioning, training, and other services, and we purchase any number of standard or engineered items from third parties (“buyouts”) that support the application in which our equipment is being used.  Generally, buyouts, installation and commissioning, training and each of our products listed above are considered separate deliverables for a number of reasons, including the following:
		·		Clients would purchase each of those products or services apart from other products or services;
		·		The products and services being provided are at the request of the client and for the client’s sole benefit, apart from any other product or service in the transaction;
		·		The other deliverables can be performed without the service or product in question being performed or delivered;
		·		Contractual payments are typically tied to the delivery or performance of the specific product or service;
		·		The skills or equipment required to perform the services are readily available in the marketplace; and
		·		Clients attribute significant value to each product or service.
	These contracts generally can take fifteen months or more to complete and in one case we have a contract which may take sixty months to complete, or longer.  The timing between the first deliverable and the last deliverable is generally three to twelve months, and services are typically delivered last.
	Because the aforementioned separate deliverables have value to the client on a stand-alone basis, they are typically considered separate units of accounting.  The entire contract value is allocated to each unit of accounting. Revenue allocated to products is recognized upon delivery, while revenue allocated to services is recognized when the service is performed.  We use the selling price hierarchy described below to determine how to separate multiple-element revenue arrangements into separate units of accounting and how to allocate the arrangement consideration among those separate units of accounting:
		·		Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”).
		·		Third-party evidence (“TPE”), if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available.
		·		Estimated selling price (“ESP”), determined in the same manner as that used to determine the price at which we sell the deliverables on a stand-alone basis, if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available.
	In substantially all of our multi-element arrangements, we use ESP to allocate arrangement consideration. We determine ESP based on our normal pricing and discounting practices. In determining ESP, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors, based on the facts of the arrangement. We typically arrive at an ESP by considering client and entity-specific factors such as existing pricing, price discounts, geographies, competition, internal costs and profitability objectives.
	Our sales arrangements do not include a general right of return of the delivered unit(s). In certain cases, the cancellation terms of a contract provide us with the opportunity to bill for certain incurred costs and penalties.
	If it is determined that the separate deliverables do not have value on a stand-alone basis, the entire arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting, which results in revenue being recognized when the last unit is delivered based on the revenue recognition policy described above.
	It is uncommon for the Company to have contract scope adjustments that impact the selling price for specific units of accounting resulting in changes in the allocation of the selling price.  In the event of such an adjustment, we apply the change in the allocation of the selling price to the units of accounting that are not yet delivered.  As our business and offerings evolve over time, our pricing practices may be required to be modified accordingly, which could result in changes in selling prices in subsequent periods.  Historically, there have been no material impacts, nor do we currently expect material impacts in the next twelve months, on our revenue recognition due to changes in our VSOE, TPE or ESP.
	Percentage of completion
	We also enter into certain large contracts with expanded construction-type scope and risk.  These contractual arrangements have a scope of activity that differs in substance from the scope of deliverables found in our traditional sales agreements.  For these types of contracts, we apply the guidelines of ASC 605-35 – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts and utilize the percentage of completion method of revenue recognition. Non-traditional scope arrangements include activities typically performed by engineering, procurement and construction contractors. Our clients on these projects typically require us to act as a general construction contractor for all or a portion of these projects. These arrangements are often executed in the form of turnkey contracts, where the Company designs, engineers, manufactures, constructs, transports, erects and hands over to the client at the designated destination point the fully commissioned and tested module or facility, which is ready for operation.  Percentage of completion revenue represents approximately 4.8% and 7.3% of consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Under the percentage of completion method, revenue is recognized as work on a contract progresses.  For each contractual arrangement that qualifies for the percentage of completion method of accounting, the Company recognizes revenue, cost of sales and gross profit in the amounts that are equivalent to a percentage of the total estimated contract sales value, estimated cost of sales and estimated gross profit to be achieved upon completion of the project.  This percentage is generally determined by dividing the cumulative amount of labor costs and labor converted material costs incurred to date by the sum of the cumulative costs incurred to date plus the estimated remaining costs to be incurred in order to complete the contract.  Preparing these estimates is a process requiring judgment.  Factors influencing these estimates include, but are not limited to, historical performance trends, inflationary trends, productivity and labor disruptions, availability of materials, claims, change orders and other factors as set forth in the Risk Factors included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.  In the event that the Company experiences changes in estimated revenues, cost of sales and gross profit, they would be recognized using a cumulative catch-up adjustment that recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a contract’s updated percentage of completion.
	We apply the percentage of completion method of accounting to agreements when the following conditions exist:
		·		The costs are reasonably estimable;
		·		The contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding products and services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement;
		·		The customer can be expected to satisfy all obligations under the contract; and
		·		We expect to perform all of our contractual obligations.
	Cost of revenue for our construction-type contracts includes contract costs, such as materials and labor, and indirect costs that are attributable to contract activity.  Generally, we bill our customers based on advance billing terms or completion of certain contract milestones.  Cumulative costs and estimated earnings recognized to date in excess of cumulative billings are included in accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet.  Cumulative billings in excess of cumulative costs and estimated earnings recognized to date are included in accounts payable and accruals on the consolidated balance sheet.
	We estimate the future costs and estimated gross profit that will be incurred related to sales arrangements to determine whether any arrangement will result in a loss. These costs include material, labor and overhead. Factors influencing these future costs include the availability of materials and skilled laborers. We record provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the period in which such losses are identified.
Fair Value Measurements	'
	Fair Value Measurements
	Fair value, as defined in U.S. GAAP, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). U.S. GAAP classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
		Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
		Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
		Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
	Recurring Fair Value Measurements —  Fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, accounts payable and customer advance payments approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
	Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements — Fair value measurements were applied with respect to the Company’s nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, which consists primarily of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including contingent consideration, related to purchased businesses in business combinations and impairments.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments — Recurring fair value measurement of financial instruments consist principally of foreign currency derivatives, interest rate swaps and fixed rate long-term debt.
	Input levels used for fair value measurements are as follows:
					Input
		Description	Disclosure		Level	Level 2 Inputs	Level 3 Inputs
		Impairment of long-lived assets	Note 7		Level 3	Not applicable	Level 3 inputs are more fully described in Note 7.
		Financial derivatives	Note 8		Level 2	Quoted prices of similar assets or liabilities in active markets	Not applicable
		Long-term debt (disclosure only)	Note 10		Level 2	Quoted prices in markets that are not active	Not applicable

Costs_And_Estimated_Earnings_O1

Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts [Abstract]	'
Schedule Of Costs And Estimated Earnings In Excess Of Billings On Uncompleted Contracts	'
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$	244.4	$	195.5
	Estimated earnings		66.8		52.4
			311.2		247.9
	Less: billings to date		-336.2		-162.7
		$	-25	$	85.2
	Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings	$	7.4	$	98.1
	Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings		-32.4		-12.9
		$	-25	$	85.2

Intangible_Assets_And_Goodwill1

Intangible Assets And Goodwill (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets And Goodwill [Abstract]	'
Weighted Average Useful Life, Gross Amount And Accumulated Amortization Of Intangible Assets	'
		30-Jun-14						31-Dec-13
		Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Weighted-Average Useful Lives		Cost		Accumulated Amortization
	Trade names	$	119.7	$	25.9	36 years		$	120.0	$	24.2
	Customer relationships		333.6		87.9	32 years			333.2		79.4
	Non-compete agreements		5.5		5.4	3 years			5.5		5.0
	Existing technology		160.8		58.9	23 years			160.6		55.3
	Contracts and purchase agreements		10.7		1.6	11 years			10.2		1.4
	Software		28.7		27.8	10 years			28.7		26.3
	In-process research and development		12.6		1.6	10 years			12.7		0.3
	Total amortizable intangible assets	$	671.6	$	209.1			$	670.9	$	191.9
Changes In Goodwill, In Total And By Segment	'
				Aftermarket
		New Units		Parts and Services		Total
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	488.4	$	439.2	$	927.6
	Foreign currency adjustments		-0.6		-0.6		-1.2
	Balance, June 30, 2014	$	487.8	$	438.6	$	926.4

Inventories_Net_Tables

Inventories, Net (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Inventory, Net [Abstract]	'
Inventories	'
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Raw materials	$	141.6	$	71.0
	Finished parts		281.2		262.4
	Work-in-process		774.9		845.9
			1,197.7		1,179.3
	Less: progress payments from clients		-456		-463.3
	Inventories, net	$	741.7	$	716.0

Property_Plant_And_Equipment_T

Property, Plant And Equipment (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]	'
Property, Plant And Equipment	'
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Cost:
	Land	$	32.6	$	33.1
	Buildings and improvements		276.7		261.4
	Machinery and equipment		502.7		479.0
			812.0		773.5
	Less: accumulated depreciation		-330.1		-301.2
	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	481.9	$	472.3
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations	'
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013
	Beginning balance	$	-	$	-
	Provisions		4.5		-
	Effects of exchange rate changes		-		-
	Ending balance	$	4.5	$	-

Financial_Instruments_Tables

Financial Instruments (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Financial Instruments [Abstract]	'
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts Accounted For At Fair Value On Recurring Basis	'
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Foreign currency exchange contracts assets	$	3.1	$	5.4
	Foreign currency exchange contracts liabilities	$	9.6	$	16.3

LongTerm_Debt_Tables

Long-Term Debt (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Long-Term Debt [Abstract]	'
Long-Term Debt	'
		June 30,			December 31,
		2014			2013
	Amended Credit Facility	$	793.5			$              884.5
	6½% Senior Subordinated Notes due May 2021		375.0			375.0
	Bank overdraft facility		-			4.6
	Other indebtedness		19.7			22.9
	Total debt		1,188.2			1,287.0
	Less:  current portion		-33.9			-40.1
	Total long-term debt	$	1,154.3			1,246.9
Carrying And Fair Values Of Senior Subordinated Notes	'
			30-Jun-14					31-Dec-13
			Carrying Value			Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	6½% senior subordinated notes due May 2021		$	375.0		$	403.4	$	375.0	$	400.5

Pension_Plans_Tables

Pension Plans (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Pension Plans [Abstract]	'
Components Of Net Pension Expense Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income	'
		U.S. Plans								Non-U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	Service cost	$	0.9	$	1.0	$	1.8	$	2.0	$	0.6	$	1.4	$	1.2	$	2.8
	Interest cost		3.3		2.9		6.6		5.8		1.3		1.5		2.7		3.1
	Expected return on plan assets		-4.6		-4.1		-9.2		-8.1		-1.7		-1.6		-3.3		-3.3
	Amortization of net actuarial
	loss		0.7		1.9		1.4		3.9		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.3
	Amortization of prior service
	cost		-		-		0.1		-		0.1		-		0.1		-
	Net pension expense	$	0.3	$	1.7	$	0.7	$	3.6	$	0.5	$	1.5	$	0.9	$	2.9

PostRetirement_Benefits_Other_1

Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Post-Retiements Benefits Other Than Pensions [Abstract]	'
Components Of Net Post-Retirement Benefit Expense (Income) and Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss (Income)	'
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013		2014		2013
	Interest cost	$	0.2	$	0.2	$	0.3	$	0.4
	Amortization of net actuarial loss		-		0.1		-		0.2
	Net post-retirement benefits expense	$	0.2	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	0.6

Warranties_Tables

Warranties (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Warranties [Abstract]	'
Changes In Product Warranty Liability	'
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013
	Beginning balance	$	21.4	$	20.1
	Provision for warranties issued during period		7.5		6.8
	Adjustments to warranties issued in prior periods		0.7		0.9
	Payments during the period		-9.3		-8.8
	Foreign currency adjustments		0.2		-0.3
	Ending balance	$	20.5	$	18.7

Segment_Information_Tables

Segment Information (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Segment Information [Abstract]	'
Segment Results	'
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2014		2013		2014		2013
	Revenues
	New units	$	302.7	$	420.2	$	694.0	$	863.4
	Aftermarket parts and services		325.7		385.1		633.5		708.3
	Total revenues	$	628.4	$	805.3	$	1,327.5	$	1,571.7
	Income from operations
	New units	$	27.1	$	25.8	$	42.8	$	54.4
	Aftermarket parts and services		70.5		92.8		120.3		159.2
	Unallocable		-31.3		-31.4		-56.6		-60.9
	Total income from operations	$	66.3	$	87.2	$	106.5	$	152.7
	Depreciation and amortization
	New units	$	11.3	$	11.2	$	24.0	$	25.3
	Aftermarket parts and services		12.7		10.4		23.6		20.6
	Total depreciation and amortization	$	24.0	$	21.6	$	47.6	$	45.9
	Total assets by segment were as follows:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2014		2013
	Total assets (including goodwill)
	New units	$	1,067.6	$	1,113.8
	Aftermarket parts and services		1,351.1		1,305.0
	Unallocable		1,146.3		1,319.0
	Total assets	$	3,565.0	$	3,737.8

Accumulated_Other_Comprehensiv1

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI") (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Share Repurchases [Abstract]	'
Changes In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) By Component	'
		Foreign				Pension and
		Currency		Unrealized		Other
		Translation		(Loss) Gain on		Postretirement
		Adjustments		Derivatives		Benefit Plans		Total
	At December 31, 2013	$	-69.5	$	-0.4	$	-48.9	$	-118.8
	Other comprehensive gain before reclassifications		1.5		-		-		1.5
	Amounts reclassified from AOCI		-		0.1		1.0		1.1
	Net current period other comprehensive income		1.5		0.1		1.0		2.6
	At June 30, 2014	$	-68	$	-0.3	$	-47.9	$	-116.2
		Foreign				Pension and
		Currency		Unrealized		Other
		Translation		(Loss) Gain on		Postretirement
		Adjustments		Derivatives		Benefit Plans		Total
	At December 31, 2012	$	-51.3	$	-0.7	$	-82.7	$	-134.7
	Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		-39.7		-		-		-39.7
	Amounts reclassified from AOCI		-		0.2		2.7		2.9
	Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income		-39.7		0.2		2.7		-36.8
	At June 30, 2013	$	-91	$	-0.5	$	-80	$	-171.5
Schedule Of Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	'
		Amount Reclassified From AOCI into Net Income								Affected Line Item in the
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Consolidated Statement
	Details About AOCI Components	2014		2013		2014		2013		of Income
	Unrealized gain on derivatives	$	-0.1	$	-0.2	$	-0.2	$	-0.3	Interest expense, net
			0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1	Provision for income taxes
		$	-	$	-0.1	$	-0.1	$	-0.2	Net of tax
	Pension and other postretirement benefit plans
	Amortization of net actuarial loss	$	-1	$	-2.1	$	-1.8	$	-4.3	(a)
			0.5		0.8		0.8		1.6	Provision for income taxes
		$	-0.5	$	-1.3	$	-1	$	-2.7	Net of tax
	Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	-0.5	$	-1.4	$	-1.1	$	-2.9	Net of tax
	(a)These items are included in the computation of net pension expense and net post-retirement benefits expense. See Note 11, Pension Plans and Note 12, Post-Retirement Benefits Other than Pensions for additional information.

Basis_of_Presentation_Details

Basis of Presentation (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Percentage of completion, consolidated revenues percentage	4.80%	7.30%
Minimum [Member]	'	'
Period to complete multiple-element revenue arrangements	'15 months	'
Period to deliver items for multiple-element revenue arrangements	'3 months	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'
Period to complete multiple-element revenue arrangements	'60 months	'
Period to deliver items for multiple-element revenue arrangements	'12 months	'

Other_Investments_Narrative_De

Other Investments - (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)

6 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

In Millions, unless otherwise specified

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Apr. 30, 2009

Mar. 26, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Feb. 28, 2011

Apr. 04, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2008

Bethel Holdco, LLC [Member]

Bethel Holdco, LLC [Member]

Dresser-Rand Arabia LLC [Member]

Dresser-Rand Arabia LLC [Member]

Echogen Power Systems, LLC [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Echogen Power Systems, LLC [Member]

Echogen Power Systems, LLC [Member]

Ramgen Power Systems LLC. [Member]

Ramgen Power Systems LLC. [Member]

Ramgen Power Systems LLC. [Member]

MW

Bethel Holdco, LLC [Member]

Bethel Holdco, LLC [Member]

Business Acquisition [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Energy storage facility, power level

'

'

'

317

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Cash paid for acquisition

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$1

'

'

Equity investment, cost

'

'

'

5

'

'

2.5

'

'

'

'

'

34.4

'

Percentage of aggregate non-controlling interest acquired

'

'

5.70%

5.70%

'

'

'

'

'

33.40%

'

'

42.20%

'

Equity method investment, un-owned percentage

'

'

'

94.30%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Loan receivable, maximum commitment

'

'

25

25

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Loans receivable, interest rate

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

16.00%

8.00%

'

'

'

'

'

Years until maturity of loan receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'8 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

Loans receivable

'

'

18.6

18.6

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Equity method Investments

'

'

4.9

4.9

'

'

'

'

'

18.2

'

'

28.5

'

Revenue from equity investment

'

'

11.6

22.4

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Minimum royalties that should be paid in first five years of commercialization

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

6

'

'

'

Royalty guarantee term

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'5 years

'

'

'

'

Equity method investment, pledged funding

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Investment to acquire noncontrolling interest

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

25.5

'

'

'

'

Ownership percentage in joint venture

'

'

'

'

'

50.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Assets

3,565

3,737.80

'

'

50

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Liabilities

2,202.30

2,436.40

'

'

78.6

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Option to acquire business

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$25

Costs_And_Estimated_Earnings_O2

Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Costs And Estimated Earnings On Uncompleted Contracts [Abstract]	'	'
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$244.40	$195.50
Estimated earnings	66.8	52.4
Costs incurred and estimated billings on uncompleted contracts	311.2	247.9
Less: billings to date	-336.2	-162.7
Net estimate billings on uncompleted contracts	-25	85.2
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts	7.4	98.1
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings	($32.40)	($12.90)

Recovered_Sheet1

Intangible Assets and Goodwill (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Intangible Assets And Goodwill [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Intangible asset amortization expense	$8.50	$7.30	$16.80	$14.60
Remainder of fiscal year 2014	16.9	'	16.9	'
2015	30.6	'	30.6	'
2016	30	'	30	'
2017	29.8	'	29.8	'
2018	29.4	'	29.4	'
2019	$29.10	'	$29.10	'

Intangible_Assets_And_Goodwill2

Intangible Assets And Goodwill (Weighted Average Useful Life, Gross Amount And Accumulated Amortization Of Intangible Assets) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	$671.60	$670.90
Accumulated Amortization	209.1	191.9
Trade Names [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	119.7	120
Accumulated Amortization	25.9	24.2
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'36 years	'
Customer Relationships [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	333.6	333.2
Accumulated Amortization	87.9	79.4
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'32 years	'
Non-Compete Agreements [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	5.5	5.5
Accumulated Amortization	5.4	5
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'3 years	'
Existing Technology [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	160.8	160.6
Accumulated Amortization	58.9	55.3
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'23 years	'
Contracts And Purchase Agreements [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	10.7	10.2
Accumulated Amortization	1.6	1.4
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'11 years	'
Software [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	28.7	28.7
Accumulated Amortization	27.8	26.3
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'10 years	'
In-process Research And Development [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Cost	12.6	12.7
Accumulated Amortization	$1.60	$0.30
Weighted-Average Useful Lives	'10 years	'

Intangible_Assets_And_Goodwill3

Intangible Assets And Goodwill (Changes In Goodwill In Total And By Segment) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014
Goodwill [Line Items]	'
Beginning Balance	$927.60
Foreign currency adjustments	-1.2
Ending Balance	926.4
New Units [Member]	'
Goodwill [Line Items]	'
Beginning Balance	488.4
Foreign currency adjustments	-0.6
Ending Balance	487.8
Aftermarket Parts And Services [Member]	'
Goodwill [Line Items]	'
Beginning Balance	439.2
Foreign currency adjustments	-0.6
Ending Balance	$438.60

Inventories_Net_Narrative_Deta

Inventories, Net (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Inventory, Net [Abstract]	'	'
Progress payments to suppliers included in work-in-process	$116.80	$129
Allowance for obsolescence for slow-moving inventory	$34.60	$30.70

Inventories_Net_Inventories_De

Inventories, Net (Inventories) (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Inventory, Net [Abstract]	'	'
Raw materials	$141.60	$71
Finished parts	281.2	262.4
Work-in-process	774.9	845.9
Inventories, gross	1,197.70	1,179.30
Less: progress payments from clients	-456	-463.3
Inventories, net	$741.70	$716

Property_Plant_And_Equipment_N

Property, Plant And Equipment (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
				property
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]	'	'	'	'	'
Depreciation expense	$15.50	'	$14.30	$30.80	$31.30
Number of pig manure treatment facilities	'	'	'	6	'
Power generation, percentage reduction in tariff	'	'	'	38.00%	'
Asset impairment charge	'	$40	'	'	'

Property_Plant_And_Equipment_P

Property, Plant And Equipment (Property, Plant And Equipment) (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]	'	'
Property, plant and equipment, gross	$812	$773.50
Less: accumulated depreciation	-330.1	-301.2
Property, plant and equipment, net	481.9	472.3
Land [Member]	'	'
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]	'	'
Property, plant and equipment, gross	32.6	33.1
Building And Improvements [Member]	'	'
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]	'	'
Property, plant and equipment, gross	276.7	261.4
Machinery And Equipment [Member]	'	'
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]	'	'
Property, plant and equipment, gross	$502.70	$479

Property_Plant_And_Equipment_C

Property, Plant And Equipment (Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Asset Retirement Obligation [Abstract]	'	'
Beginning Balance	'	'
Provisions	4.5	'
Effects of exchange rate changes	'	'
Ending Balance	$4.50	'

Financial_Instruments_Narrativ

Financial Instruments (Narrative) (Details)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	Interest Rate Swap [Member]	Interest Rate Swap [Member]	Foreign Exchange Contract [Member]	Foreign Exchange Contract [Member]
						USD ($)	EUR (€)	USD ($)	USD ($)
Financial Instruments [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Notional amount of derivatives	'	'	'	'	'	$24.60	€ 18	$471.30	$546.60
Interest rate swap, fixed rate of interest rate	3.87%	'	3.87%	'	'	'	'	'	'
Fair value of the interest rate swap	0.6	'	0.6	'	0.7	'	'	'	'
Fair value of the interest rate swap related unrealized gain	0	0.1	0.1	0.2	'	'	'	'	'
Gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts	$1.60	($5)	$4.40	($9.30)	'	'	'	'	'

Financial_Instruments_Foreign_

Financial Instruments (Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts Accounted For At Fair Value On Recurring Basis) (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Financial Instruments [Abstract]	'	'
Foreign currency exchange contracts assets	$3.10	$5.40
Foreign currency exchange contracts liabilities	$9.60	$16.30

Income_Taxes_Narrative_Details

Income Taxes (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Income Taxes [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate	'	'	'	35.00%	'
Tax benefit associated with discrete event	'	'	$4.40	'	'
Percentage point change in effective tax rate	13.90%	'	'	14.00%	'
Research and experimentation impact on effective rate	'	'	'	2.40%	'
Impact of tax holiday arrangements on income tax expense	1.7	2.3	'	2.9	3.3
Impact of tax holiday arrangements per diluted share	$0.02	$0.03	'	$0.04	$0.04
Devaluation Of Venezuelan Bolivar [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Income Taxes [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Foreign exchange loss	'	'	$3.10	'	'
Percentage point change in effective tax rate	'	'	'	'	-1.00%

LongTerm_Debt_LongTerm_Debt_De

Long-Term Debt (Long-Term Debt) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'
Total debt	$1,188.20	$1,287
Less: current portion	-33.9	-40.1
Total long-term debt	1,154.30	1,246.90
Amended Credit Facility [Member]	'	'
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'
Total debt	793.5	884.5
6 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes Due May 2021 [Member]	'	'
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'
Total debt	375	375
Long-term debt, maturity date	'2021-05	'
Long-term debt, interest rate	6.50%	'
Bank Overdraft Facility [Member]	'	'
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'
Total debt	'	4.6
Other Indebtedness [Member]	'	'
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'
Total debt	$19.70	$22.90

LongTerm_Debt_Carrying_And_Fai

Long-Term Debt (Carrying And Fair Values Of Senior Subordinated Notes) (Details) (6 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes Due May 2021 [Member], USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
6 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes Due May 2021 [Member]	'	'
Carrying Amounts and Fair Values of Financial Instruments [Line Items]	'	'
Long term debt, carrying value	$375	$375
Long term debt, fair value	$403.40	$400.50
Long-term debt, maturity date	'2021-05	'
Long-term debt, interest rate	6.50%	'

Pension_Plans_Narrative_Detail

Pension Plans (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Pension Plans [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Fair value of plan assets, percentage	3.50%	'	3.50%	'
Contribution by employer	$3.50	$4.60	$9	$10.10

Pension_Plans_Components_Of_Ne

Pension Plans (Components Of Net Pension Expense) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Interest cost	$0.20	$0.20	$0.30	$0.40
Amortization of net actuarial loss	'	0.1	'	0.2
Net plan expense	0.2	0.3	0.3	0.6
U.S. Plans [Member]	'	'	'	'
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Service cost	0.9	1	1.8	2
Interest cost	3.3	2.9	6.6	5.8
Expected return on plan assets	-4.6	-4.1	-9.2	-8.1
Amortization of net actuarial loss	0.7	1.9	1.4	3.9
Amortization of prior service cost	'	'	0.1	'
Net plan expense	0.3	1.7	0.7	3.6
Non-U.S. Plans [Member]	'	'	'	'
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Service cost	0.6	1.4	1.2	2.8
Interest cost	1.3	1.5	2.7	3.1
Expected return on plan assets	-1.7	-1.6	-3.3	-3.3
Amortization of net actuarial loss	0.2	0.2	0.2	0.3
Amortization of prior service cost	0.1	'	0.1	'
Net plan expense	$0.50	$1.50	$0.90	$2.90

PostRetirement_Benefits_Other_2

Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (Components Of Net Post-Retirement Benefits Expense) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Post-Retiements Benefits Other Than Pensions [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Interest cost	$0.20	$0.20	$0.30	$0.40
Amortization of net actuarial loss	'	0.1	'	0.2
Net plan expense	$0.20	$0.30	$0.30	$0.60

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Details)

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

In Millions, unless otherwise specified

4-May-11

Feb. 29, 2012

Feb. 29, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

4-May-11

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

USD ($)

USD ($)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

BRL

EUR (€)

Italian Tax Authorities [Member]

Italian Tax Authorities [Member]

Banco Santos [Member]

Banco Santos [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

item

item

USD ($)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

BRL

loan

loan

employee

employee

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Purchase agreement price

$543.20

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential purchase price adjustments

'

'

'

'

'

124.5

'

'

'

'

'

'

Additional consideration sought

42.4

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Bargaining agreement between IUE and the Company expiration date

'

'

'

'2016-03

'2016-03

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of employees engaged in misconduct during strike and involuntary terminated

'

'

'

2

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated appeal processing period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'2 years

'1 year

Damage sought

'

5.8

4.2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated aggregate exposure

'

'

'

'

'

'

13.8

10.1

21

46.4

'

'

Period of available funds

'

'

'

'12 months

'12 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of banking credit notes

'

'

'

12

12

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of banking credit notes each month

'

'

'

1

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Other Restricted Assets, Current

'

'

'

$1.60

3.6

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Warranties_Changes_In_Product_

Warranties (Changes In Product Warranty Liability) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]	'	'
Beginning balance	$21.40	$20.10
Provision for warranties issued during period	7.5	6.8
Adjustments to warranties issued in prior periods	0.7	0.9
Payments during the period	-9.3	-8.8
Foreign currency adjustments	0.2	-0.3
Ending balance	$20.50	$18.70

Segment_Information_Narrative_

Segment Information (Narrative) (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
	segment
Segment Information [Abstract]	'
Number of reportable segments	2

Segment_Information_Segment_Re

Segment Information (Segment Results) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Revenues	$628.40	$805.30	$1,327.50	$1,571.70	'
Income from operations	66.3	87.2	106.5	152.7	'
Depreciation and amortization	24	21.6	47.6	45.9	'
Assets	3,565	'	3,565	'	3,737.80
New Units [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Revenues	302.7	420.2	694	863.4	'
Income from operations	27.1	25.8	42.8	54.4	'
Depreciation and amortization	11.3	11.2	24	25.3	'
Assets	1,067.60	'	1,067.60	'	1,113.80
Aftermarket Parts And Services [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Revenues	325.7	385.1	633.5	708.3	'
Income from operations	70.5	92.8	120.3	159.2	'
Depreciation and amortization	12.7	10.4	23.6	20.6	'
Assets	1,351.10	'	1,351.10	'	1,305
Unallocable [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Income from operations	-31.3	-31.4	-56.6	-60.9	'
Assets	$1,146.30	'	$1,146.30	'	$1,319

Incentive_StockBased_Compensat1

Incentive Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Narrative) (Details)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Feb. 28, 2014
	Options And Stock Appreciation Rights [Member]	Time-Vested Restricted Stock Units [Member]	Performance Restricted Stock Units [Member]	Non-Employee Directors [Member]
Schedule of Share based Compensation Arrangements by Share based Payment Award, Performance Options [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Maximum number of shares to be issued	294,749	321,121	69,499	'
Number of shares granted, Directors	'	'	'	15,736

Accumulated_Other_Comprehensiv2

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component) (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]	'	'
Beginning balance	($118.80)	($134.70)
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications	1.5	-39.7
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	1.1	2.9
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	2.6	-36.8
Ending balance	-116.2	-171.5
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments [Member]	'	'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]	'	'
Beginning balance	-69.5	-51.3
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications	1.5	-39.7
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	1.5	-39.7
Ending balance	-68	-91
Unrealized (Loss) Gain On Derivatives [Member]	'	'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]	'	'
Beginning balance	-0.4	-0.7
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	0.1	0.2
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	0.1	0.2
Ending balance	-0.3	-0.5
Pension And Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	'	'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]	'	'
Beginning balance	-48.9	-82.7
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	1	2.7
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	1	2.7
Ending balance	($47.90)	($80)

Accumulated_Other_Comprehensiv3

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Schedule of Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014		Jun. 30, 2013		Jun. 30, 2014		Jun. 30, 2013
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]	'		'		'		'
Interest expense, net	($12.60)		($13.40)		($25.60)		($27.70)
Provision for income taxes	21.1		21.4		35		37.2
Net income	28.8		54.4		45.4		88.8
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	'		'		'		'
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]	'		'		'		'
Net income	-0.5		-1.4		-1.1		-2.9
Unrealized (Loss) Gain On Derivatives [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	'		'		'		'
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]	'		'		'		'
Interest expense, net	-0.1		-0.2		-0.2		-0.3
Provision for income taxes	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Net income	'		-0.1		-0.1		-0.2
Pension And Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	'		'		'		'
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]	'		'		'		'
Amortization of net actuarial loss	-1	[1]	-2.1	[1]	-1.8	[1]	-4.3	[1]
Provision for income taxes	0.5		0.8		0.8		1.6
Net income	($0.50)		($1.30)		($1)		($2.70)
[1]	These items are included in the computation of net pension expense and net post-retirement benefits expense. See Note 11, Pension Plans and Note 12, Post-Retirement Benefits Other than Pensions for additional information.

Significant_Concentration_Of_C1

Significant Concentration Of Credit Risk (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Concentration Risk [Line Items]	'	'
Proceeds from Customers	$13.80	$35.80
Accounts Receivable [Member]	'	'
Concentration Risk [Line Items]	'	'
Concentration percentage	'	15.20%