UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-32582
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 20-3112047 |
(State of incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
100 Pike Way, PO Box 868, Mount Airy, NC 27030
(Address of principal executive office)
(336) 789-2171
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filero | | Accelerated filerþ | | Non-accelerated filero | | Smaller reporting companyo |
| | | | (Do not check if smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
As of May 1, 2009, there were 33,433,713 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
INDEX
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 25,572 | | | $ | 11,357 | |
Accounts receivable from customers, net | | | 70,531 | | | | 62,224 | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | | | 47,854 | | | | 40,410 | |
Inventories | | | 9,014 | | | | 8,343 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 6,083 | | | | 5,123 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 14,521 | | | | 15,376 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 173,575 | | | | 142,833 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 225,004 | | | | 229,119 | |
Goodwill | | | 105,019 | | | | 94,402 | |
Other intangibles, net | | | 41,426 | | | | 40,065 | |
Deferred loan costs, net | | | 2,175 | | | | 2,778 | |
Other assets | | | 1,464 | | | | 1,463 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 548,663 | | | $ | 510,660 | |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 10,778 | | | $ | 10,867 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 21,716 | | | | 22,157 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | 5,255 | | | | 397 | |
Accrued expenses and other | | | 9,713 | | | | 5,018 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 3,051 | | | | 442 | |
Current portion of deferred compensation | | | 1,383 | | | | 3,666 | |
Current portion of insurance and claim accruals | | | 30,636 | | | | 28,873 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 82,532 | | | | 71,420 | |
Long-term debt | | | 140,500 | | | | 140,500 | |
Insurance and claim accruals, net of current portion | | | 6,817 | | | | 7,989 | |
Deferred compensation, net of current portion | | | 5,369 | | | | 6,283 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 56,510 | | | | 62,416 | |
Other liabilities | | | 3,983 | | | | 1,100 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 100,000 authorized shares; no shares issued and outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 100,000 authorized shares; 33,419 and 33,183 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively | | | 6,427 | | | | 6,427 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 151,931 | | | | 148,288 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes | | | (1,559 | ) | | | (806 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 96,153 | | | | 67,043 | |
| | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 252,952 | | | | 220,952 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 548,663 | | | $ | 510,660 | |
| | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 154,921 | | | $ | 131,362 | | | $ | 485,014 | | | $ | 414,213 | |
Cost of operations | | | 126,792 | | | | 110,607 | | | | 393,488 | | | | 345,717 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 28,129 | | | | 20,755 | | | | 91,526 | | | | 68,496 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 12,137 | | | | 10,377 | | | | 36,607 | | | | 31,253 | |
Loss on sale and impairment of property and equipment | | | 1,096 | | | | 93 | | | | 1,949 | | | | 2,076 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 14,896 | | | | 10,285 | | | | 52,970 | | | | 35,167 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | 2,162 | | | | 3,327 | | | | 7,228 | | | | 11,473 | |
Other, net | | | (238 | ) | | | (43 | ) | | | (746 | ) | | | (168 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other expense | | | 1,924 | | | | 3,284 | | | | 6,482 | | | | 11,305 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 12,972 | | | | 7,001 | | | | 46,488 | | | | 23,862 | |
Income tax expense | | | 4,702 | | | | 2,718 | | | | 17,378 | | | | 9,217 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,270 | | | $ | 4,283 | | | $ | 29,110 | | | $ | 14,645 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.88 | | | $ | 0.45 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.86 | | | $ | 0.44 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares used in computing earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 33,036 | | | | 32,844 | | | | 33,011 | | | | 32,791 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 33,703 | | | | 33,605 | | | | 33,733 | | | | 33,655 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 29,110 | | | $ | 14,645 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 27,823 | | | | 27,408 | |
Non-cash interest expense | | | 1,116 | | | | 2,560 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (2,845 | ) | | | (5,621 | ) |
Loss on sale and impairment of property and equipment | | | 1,949 | | | | 2,076 | |
Equity compensation expense | | | 2,520 | | | | 2,085 | |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | | | (198 | ) | | | (977 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | | | 2,961 | | | | 14,062 | |
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other | | | (1,717 | ) | | | 770 | |
Insurance and claim accruals | | | 591 | | | | (226 | ) |
Accounts payable and other | | | (5,603 | ) | | | (5,840 | ) |
Deferred compensation | | | (3,710 | ) | | | (3,034 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 51,997 | | | | 47,908 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (21,270 | ) | | | (6,353 | ) |
Business acquisitions, net | | | (22,632 | ) | | | — | |
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | 5,247 | | | | 10,182 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | | (38,655 | ) | | | 3,829 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Principal payments on long-term debt | | | — | | | | (51,000 | ) |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | | | 84,705 | | | | 17,775 | |
Repayments under revolving credit facility | | | (84,705 | ) | | | (17,775 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases | | | 675 | | | | 1,285 | |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | | | 198 | | | | 977 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 873 | | | | (48,738 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 14,215 | | | | 2,999 | |
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year | | | 11,357 | | | | 1,467 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents end of period | | $ | 25,572 | | | $ | 4,466 | |
| | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Pike Electric Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Pike,” “Pike Electric,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year or future interim periods. The balance sheet at June 30, 2008 has been derived from our audited financial statements but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Certain amounts reported previously have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.
2. Business
Pike Electric is headquartered in Mount Airy, North Carolina and is one of the largest providers of energy solutions in the United States. Our core services are transmission and distribution powerline construction, engineering, substation construction, EPC, and renewable energy. We are also a recognized leader in storm restoration services. We operate in one reportable segment. We do not have operations or assets outside the United States.
We monitor revenue by two categories of services: core and storm restoration. We use this breakdown because core services represent ongoing service revenues, most of which are generated by our customers’ recurring maintenance needs, and storm restoration revenues represent additional revenue opportunities that depend on weather conditions.
The following table sets forth our revenue by category of service for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Core services | | $ | 100,681 | | | | 65.0 | % | | $ | 120,305 | | | | 91.6 | % | | $ | 342,212 | | | | 70.6 | % | | $ | 378,705 | | | | 91.4 | % |
Storm restoration services | | | 54,240 | | | | 35.0 | % | | | 11,057 | | | | 8.4 | % | | | 142,802 | | | | 29.4 | % | | | 35,508 | | | | 8.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 154,921 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 131,362 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 485,014 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 414,213 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. Energy Delivery Services Acquisition
On September 1, 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Shaw Energy Delivery Services, Inc. (“EDS”) for $22,632 in cash, including transaction costs, plus the assumption of certain operating liabilities, primarily accounts payable and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. EDS provided engineering, design, procurement and construction management services on transmission and distribution powerlines and substations, and also performed maintenance and construction services on transmission and distribution powerlines and substations. The transmission and distribution business of EDS has been fully integrated into the Pike workforce. Among other benefits, the acquisition provided us an opportunity to expand our operations to the West Coast, Southwest, Pacific Northwest, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic markets.
4
The purchase price to acquire EDS, including transaction costs, has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the effective date of the acquisition based on estimated fair values, as summarized in the table below. The fair values are based on preliminary valuations and are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained.
| | | | |
Current assets | | $ | 19,225 | |
Property and equipment | | | 6,297 | |
Customer relationships | | | 3,400 | |
Non-compete agreements | | | 700 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 1,723 | |
Goodwill | | | 10,617 | |
| | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 41,962 | |
Current liabilities | | | (16,359 | ) |
Non-current liabilities | | | (2,971 | ) |
| | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | (19,330 | ) |
| | | |
Net assets | | $ | 22,632 | |
| | | |
The intangible asset related to customer relationships is being amortized over eight years. Intangible assets related to non-compete agreements with the seller and certain employees are being amortized over a weighted-average useful life of two years. Approximately 75% of the goodwill is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes.
The financial results of the operations of EDS have been included in our consolidated financial statements since the date of the acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma statement of income data gives effect to the acquisition of EDS as if it had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred had the acquisition been in effect for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | | Nine months ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Revenues | | $ | 154,921 | | | $ | 154,732 | | | $ | 503,061 | | | $ | 481,143 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,270 | | | $ | 1,996 | | | $ | 28,621 | | | $ | 8,284 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.87 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.85 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
4. Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation expense related to stock-based compensation plans was $1,024 and $773 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and $2,520 and $2,085 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation arrangements was $400 and $302 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and $984 and $815 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
5
5. Property and Equipment
Amounts reported as loss on sale and impairment of property and equipment relate primarily to aging, damaged or excess fleet equipment. The carrying value of assets held for sale was $1,744 and $633 at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and is included in prepaid expenses and other in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Substantially all of the assets held for sale at March 31, 2009 are expected to be sold in the next six months.
6. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,270 | | | $ | 4,283 | | | $ | 29,110 | | | $ | 14,645 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares | | | 33,036 | | | | 32,844 | | | | 33,011 | | | | 32,791 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.88 | | | $ | 0.45 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,270 | | | $ | 4,283 | | | $ | 29,110 | | | $ | 14,645 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares | | | 33,036 | | | | 32,844 | | | | 33,011 | | | | 32,791 | |
Potential common stock arising from stock options and restricted stock | | | 667 | | | | 761 | | | | 722 | | | | 864 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares — diluted | | | 33,703 | | | | 33,605 | | | | 33,733 | | | | 33,655 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.86 | | | $ | 0.44 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding options and restricted stock awards equivalent to 1,715 and 1,243 shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Outstanding options and restricted stock awards equivalent to 1,448 and 427 shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We have adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of July 1, 2008, for financial instruments. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not materially impact our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which defers the application date of the provisions of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 currently applies to all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:
| • | | Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that we are able to access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment. |
6
| • | | Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for instruments that are similar, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar instruments, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. |
| • | | Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
As of March 31, 2009, we held certain items that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included interest rate derivative instruments and diesel fuel derivative instruments. Derivative instruments are used to hedge a portion of our diesel fuel costs and our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments currently consist of swaps only. See Note 9 for further information on our derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Our interest rate derivative instruments and diesel fuel derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter contracts, which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values for our interest rate swaps and diesel fuel swaps are based on current settlement values and represent the estimated amount we would have received upon termination of these agreements. The fair values are derived using pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves and commodity forward prices, and therefore are classified as Level 2. We also consider counterparty credit risk in our determination of all estimated fair values. We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented.
At March 31, 2009, both the carrying amounts and fair values for our interest rate swaps and diesel fuel swaps were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 2009 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Interest rate swap agreements | | $ | (2,558 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,558 | ) | | $ | — | |
Diesel fuel swap agreements | | | (1,190 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,190 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (3,748 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,748 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
8. Income Taxes
Effective income tax rates of 36.2% and 38.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and 37.4% and 38.6% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, varied from the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of the effect of state income taxes.
9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 provides companies with requirements for enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities to enable investors to better understand their effects on a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. In accordance with the effective date of SFAS 161, we adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 161 during the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
All derivative instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at their respective fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities(“SFAS 133”). Changes in fair value are recognized either in income or other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”), depending on whether the transaction qualifies for hedge accounting and, if so, the nature of the underlying exposure being hedged and how effective the derivatives are at offsetting price movements in the underlying exposure. The effective portions recorded in OCI are recognized in the statement of income when the hedged item affects earnings.
7
We have used certain derivative instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk relating to diesel fuel and interest rate exposure. Derivative instruments are not entered into for trading or speculative purposes. We document all relationships between derivative instruments and related items, as well as our risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking various derivative transactions.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates on borrowings under our senior credit facility, which bears interest based on LIBOR, plus an applicable margin dependent upon our total leverage ratio. We use derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our senior credit facility.
Effective December 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $100,000 to help manage a portion of our interest risk related to our floating-rate debt interest risk. Under both swap agreements, we pay a fixed rate of 3.99% and receive a rate equivalent to the thirty-day LIBOR, adjusted monthly. Based on our current leverage ratio, these swap agreements effectively fix the interest rate at 5.49% for $100,000 of our term debt. The interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting and were designated as cash flow hedges. As determined in accordance with SFAS 133, there was no hedge ineffectiveness for the interest rate swaps for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009. The interest rate swaps expire in December 2009.
The net derivative income (loss) recorded in OCI will be reclassified into earnings over the term of the underlying cash flow hedge. The amount that will be reclassified into earnings will vary depending upon the movement of the underlying interest rates. As interest rates decrease, the charge to earnings will increase. Conversely, as interest rates increase, the charge to earnings will decrease.
Diesel Fuel Risk
We have a large fleet of vehicles and equipment that primarily uses diesel fuel. As a result, we have market risk for changes in diesel fuel prices. If diesel prices rise, our gross profit and operating income would be negatively affected due to additional costs that may not be fully recovered through increases in prices to customers.
We periodically enter into diesel fuel swaps to decrease our price volatility. We currently hedge approximately 35% of our diesel usage with prices ranging from $2.40 to $4.25 per gallon. In prior periods, we designated one diesel fuel swap as a cash flow hedge qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. We have not elected to apply hedge accounting for the swaps we entered into during fiscal 2009 and are currently not utilizing hedge accounting for any active diesel fuel derivatives.
Balance Sheet and Statement of Income Information
The fair value of derivatives at March 31, 2009 is summarized in the following table:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Liability Derivatives | |
| | March 31, 2009 | |
| | Balance Sheet Location | | | Fair Value | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133: | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | Accrued expenses and other | | $ | 2,558 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 | | | | | | $ | 2,558 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133: | | | | | | | | |
Diesel fuel swaps | | Accrued expenses and other | | $ | 1,190 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 | | | | | | $ | 1,190 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | | | | | $ | 3,748 | |
| | | | | | | |
8
The effects of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized in the following tables:
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Location of Gain (Loss) | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |
| | Amount of Gain (Loss) | | | Reclassified from | | | Reclassified from | |
| | Recognized in OCI | | | Accumulated OCI into | | | Accumulated OCI into | |
| | (Effective Portion) | | | Income | | | Income | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | | | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | 388 | | | $ | (1,487 | ) | | Interest expense | | $ | (529 | ) | | $ | (33 | ) |
Diesel fuel swap | | | — | | | | (102 | ) | | Cost of operations | | | — | | | | 52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | $ | 388 | | | $ | (1,589 | ) | | | | | | $ | (529 | ) | | $ | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | | | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | (753 | ) | | $ | (1,849 | ) | | Interest expense | | $ | (976 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Diesel fuel swap | | | — | | | | 8 | | | Cost of operations | | | — | | | | 114 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | $ | (753 | ) | | $ | (1,841 | ) | | | | | | $ | (976 | ) | | $ | 111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |
| | (Ineffective Portion) | | | (Ineffective Portion) | |
| | and Excluded from | | | and Excluded from | |
| | Effectiveness Testing | | | Effectiveness Testing | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | | | | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Interest rate swaps | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Diesel fuel swap | | Cost of operations | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, | | | | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Diesel fuel swap | | Cost of operations | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | |
| | | | | | Income | |
| | Location of Gain | | | For the Three | | | For the Nine | |
| | (Loss) Recognized | | | Months Ended | | | Months Ended | |
| | in Income | | | March 31, 2009 | |
Diesel fuel swaps | | Cost of operations | | $ | 406 | | | $ | (1,190 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | (1,190 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
9
Accumulated OCI
For the interest rate swaps and diesel fuel swap, the following table summarizes the net derivative gains or losses, net of taxes, deferred into accumulated OCI and reclassified to earnings for the periods indicated below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months | | | For the Nine Months | |
| | Ended March 31, | | | Ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Net accumulated derivative loss deferred at beginning of period | | $ | (1,947 | ) | | $ | (260 | ) | | $ | (806 | ) | | $ | (8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferral of net derivative loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (141 | ) | | | (1,570 | ) | | | (1,729 | ) | | | (1,730 | ) |
Reclassification of net derivative income (loss) to income | | | 529 | | | | (19 | ) | | | 976 | | | | (111 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net accumulated derivative loss deferred at end of period | | $ | (1,559 | ) | | $ | (1,849 | ) | | $ | (1,559 | ) | | $ | (1,849 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
At March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, accumulated OCI associated with interest rate swaps qualifying for hedge accounting treatment was ($1,559) and ($806), respectively, net of income tax effects. At March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, there was no accumulated OCI associated with diesel fuel swaps as we were not utilizing hedge accounting for any such swaps.
The estimated net amount of the existing losses in OCI at March 31, 2009 expected to be reclassified into net earnings with the next twelve months is $1,559. This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at March 31, 2009 and will differ from actual reclassifications from OCI to net income during the next twelve months.
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no reclassifications to earnings due to hedged firm commitments no longer deemed probable or due to hedged forecasted transactions that had not occurred by the end of the originally specified time period.
10. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income were as follows for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months | | | For the Nine Months | |
| | Ended March 31, | | | Ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Net income | | $ | 8,270 | | | $ | 4,283 | | | $ | 29,110 | | | $ | 14,645 | |
Change in fair value of diesel fuel cash flow hedge, net of income taxes | | | — | | | | (102 | ) | | | — | | | | 8 | |
Change in fair value of interest rate cash flow hedges, net of income taxes | | | 388 | | | | (1,487 | ) | | | (753 | ) | | | (1,849 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 8,658 | | | $ | 2,694 | | | $ | 28,357 | | | $ | 12,804 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),Business Combinations(“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS 141R, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is not permitted. SFAS 141R will impact our consolidated financial statements if we are party to a business combination that closes after our fiscal year that ends June 30, 2009.
10
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51(“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method will significantly change the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We currently have no minority interest; therefore we do not expect the standard to have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. These actions typically seek, among other things: (a) compensation for alleged personal injury, workers’ compensation, employment discrimination, breach of contract, property damage, (b) punitive damages, civil penalties or other damages, or (c) injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we accrue reserves when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Performance Bonds and Parent Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, we are required by certain customers to post surety or performance bonds in connection with services that we provide to them. These bonds provide a guarantee to the customer that we will perform under the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs. As of March 31, 2009, we had $86,870 in surety bonds outstanding, and we also had provided collateral in the form of letters of credit to sureties in the amount of $4,000. To date, we have not been required to make any reimbursements to our sureties for bond-related costs. We believe that it is unlikely that we will have to fund significant claims under our surety arrangements in the foreseeable future. Pike Electric Corporation, from time to time, guarantees the obligations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain contracts with customers.
Operating Leases
In connection with our acquisition of EDS (Note 3), we assumed certain operating lease obligations. Commitments for minimum payments under these leases total $1,478 for the remainder of fiscal 2009. For fiscal 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and thereafter, the commitments for minimum payments total $5,610, $4,793, $2,212, $495 and $575, respectively.
Indemnities
We have indemnified various parties against specified liabilities that those parties might incur in the future in connection with our previous acquisitions of certain companies. We also generally indemnify our customers for the services we provide under our contracts, as well as other specified liabilities, which may subject us to indemnity claims and liabilities and related litigation. As of March 31, 2009, we were not aware of circumstances that would lead to future indemnity claims against us for material amounts in connection with these indemnity obligations.
11
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on September 5, 2008 and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are based upon our current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to inaccurate assumptions and known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including those identified in “Uncertainty of Forward-Looking Statements and Information” below in this Item 2 and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report.
Introduction
Pike Electric is headquartered in Mount Airy, North Carolina and is one of the largest providers of energy solutions in the United States. Our core services are transmission and distribution powerline construction, engineering, substation construction, EPC, and renewable energy. We are also a recognized leader in storm restoration services. We operate in one reportable segment. We do not have operations or assets outside the United States.
We monitor our revenues by the two categories of services we provide: core and storm restoration. We use this breakdown because core services represent our ongoing service revenues, most of which are generated by our customers’ recurring maintenance needs and new construction projects, and storm restoration revenues represent additional revenue opportunities that depend on weather conditions. Although storm restoration services can generate significant revenues, their unpredictability is demonstrated by comparing our revenues from those services in the last five fiscal years which have ranged from 2.6% to 25.5% of total revenues. During periods with significant storm restoration work, we generally see man-hours diverted from core work, which decreases core services revenues.
The following table sets forth our revenues by category of service for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Core services | | $ | 100.7 | | | | 65.0 | % | | $ | 120.3 | | | | 91.6 | % | | $ | 342.2 | | | | 70.6 | % | | $ | 378.7 | | | | 91.4 | % |
Storm restoration services | | | 54.2 | | | | 35.0 | % | | | 11.1 | | | | 8.4 | % | | | 142.8 | | | | 29.4 | % | | | 35.5 | | | | 8.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 154.9 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 131.4 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 485.0 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 414.2 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions for interim financial information that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition for work in progress, allowance for doubtful accounts, self-insured claims liability, valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, asset lives and salvage values used in computing depreciation and amortization, including amortization of intangibles, and accounting for income taxes, contingencies, litigation and stock-based compensation. Application of these estimates and assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 for further information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates.
12
Operational and Other Factors
We are subject to various operational and other factors that can affect our business and results of operations. To mitigate the effects of these factors, we focus on elements of our business we can control, including excellent customer service, safety, employee development and cost control. The statements in this section are based on our current expectations. See “Uncertainty of Forward-Looking Statements and Information.” Certain of these operational and other factors that affect our business include the following:
| • | | General economic conditions may impact utility maintenance expenditures, and certain of our customers’ powerline maintenance projects may be temporarily deferred. We continue to work closely with all customers to provide a skilled, flexible work force. |
| • | | When we add new customers and arrangements, we generally experience an increase in costs, including the costs of training and outfitting our crews and spending on equipment and specialized tools and supplies. Once the crews and equipment are fully utilized, our margins generally increase over the life of the arrangement. |
| • | | Industry-wide costs for worker’s compensation, medical and general liability insurance could rise at a rate faster than our revenues. We have implemented several safety initiatives designed to reduce incident rates and corresponding insurance costs. |
| • | | There are a limited number of skilled workers who can perform our work. When we experience increased demand in a particular market, labor costs tend to increase. We historically have been able to obtain price increases when we renegotiate rates with our customers to offset these cost increases. |
| • | | We own the vast majority of our equipment and vehicles. Due to decreased demand for our core services in recent periods, we maintain certain underutilized equipment and vehicles for future growth. As utility maintenance is deferred our fixed fleet costs will cause a decline in our gross profit percentage. |
| • | | We have a large fleet of vehicles and equipment that primarily use diesel fuel. Fuel costs have been extremely volatile in recent years. We have implemented bulk purchasing in certain areas to lower our fuel costs. We utilize diesel fuel swaps and fixed-price arrangements and may enter into additional diesel fuel derivative instruments and fixed-price arrangements in the future, depending on market conditions. |
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected statements of income data as approximate percentages of revenues for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core services | | | 65.0 | % | | | 91.6 | % | | | 70.6 | % | | | 91.4 | % |
Storm restoration services | | | 35.0 | % | | | 8.4 | % | | | 29.4 | % | | | 86.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of operations | | | 81.8 | % | | | 84.2 | % | | | 81.1 | % | | | 83.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 18.2 | % | | | 15.8 | % | | | 18.9 | % | | | 16.5 | % |
General and administrative expenses | | | 7.8 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 7.5 | % |
Loss on sale of property and equipment | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | 0.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 9.6 | % | | | 7.8 | % | | | 11.0 | % | | | 8.5 | % |
Interest expense and other, net | | | 1.2 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 1.4 | % | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 8.4 | % | | | 5.3 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 5.8 | % |
Income tax expense | | | 3.0 | % | | | 2.0 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | 2.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 5.4 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 6.0 | % | | | 3.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Revenues.Revenues increased 17.9%, or $23.5 million, to $154.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $131.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase was attributable to a $43.1 million increase in storm restoration revenues, partially offset by a $19.6 million decrease in core revenues compared to the prior fiscal year.
Storm restoration revenue increased 390.5% to $54.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $11.1 million for the same period in the prior year. Storm restoration work during both periods included various winter storm events, including the significant February 2009 Midwest winter storms. Our storm restoration revenues are highly volatile and unpredictable.
Our core revenue decreased 16.3% to $100.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $120.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The large amount of storm restoration work during the three months ended March 31, 2009 diverted significant man-hours from core work. We also experienced a reduction in distribution service revenues as customers reduced their distribution maintenance spending across our operating territory. Partially offsetting these decreases were the $23.7 million in core revenues for the quarter related to the September 1, 2008 acquisition of EDS. Also, our transmission services grew by $5.6 million, or 67.0%, compared to the same period in the prior year.
The majority of our distribution services are provided to utilities, co-operatives and municipalities under master service agreements (“MSAs”). Services provided under these MSAs include both overhead and underground powerline distribution services. Our MSAs do not guarantee a minimum volume of work. The MSAs provide a framework for core and storm restoration pricing and provides an outline of the service territory in which we will work or the percentage of overall outsourced distribution work we will provide for the customer. Our MSAs also provide a platform for multi-year relationships with our customers. We can easily ramp up staffing for a customer without exhaustive contract negotiations and the MSAs also allow our customers to reduce staffing needs.
Our underground distribution services continue to be impacted by the decrease in new residential housing developments. We began experiencing a decline in underground distribution service revenue in our first fiscal quarter of 2008. Many residential developments utilize underground power distribution powerlines for aesthetic reasons and the underground powerlines can be put in place with required cable, phone or gas lines. Recent economic conditions and tight credit markets have also caused our customers to reduce overhead distribution maintenance spending. Our customers face difficulty in obtaining capital for capital projects and are faced with declining power usage from residential and commercial customers. Reducing maintenance expenditures is an action taken by our customers to improve short-term cash flow and operating results. We believe that a significant amount of pent-up demand is building and power system reliability is being challenged. We remain well positioned to benefit from a reacceleration in maintenance spending, which will remain dependent to a large extent on the health of the economy. Where customers have reduced our crews, in many cases we have extended the terms and conditions of our MSAs to allow us to return to historical staffing levels as the economy improves. In addition to our traditional transmission and distribution services, we believe smart-grid technology implementation, the demand for renewable energy solutions, and the anticipated energy infrastructure stimulus plan will continue to highlight the needs for our services.
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased 35.5%, or $7.3 million, to $28.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $20.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to 18.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 15.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our gross profit was impacted positively by the following:
| • | | A higher mix of storm revenue.Our storm restoration services typically generate a higher profit margin than core services. During a storm response, our storm-assigned crews and equipment are fully utilized. In addition, the overtime typically worked on storm events lowers the ratio of fixed costs to revenue. Storm gross profit margins can vary greatly depending on the geographic area, customer and amount of overtime worked. |
14
| • | | Lower fuel expense as a percentage of revenue. Fuel expense decreased to 3.7% of total revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 6.4% for the same period in the prior year as fuel costs have moderated significantly since the record highs reached during the spring and summer of 2008. |
Partially offsetting those positive impacts were the following:
| • | | Lower gross profit margin material procurement services. Material procurement services offered in the EDS business generate lower gross profit margins compared to other core services. Our engineering and substation businesses recognized approximately $5.7 million in material procurement revenues in the quarter. |
| • | | Higher fixed equipment costs as a percent of revenue due to decreased utilization.We own much of our equipment, and both underground and overhead distribution equipment utilization decreased as a result of a reduction in overall utility distribution maintenance projects in our territory. This impact was compounded by the excess leased and special rental equipment which we assumed in the EDS transaction. |
General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million to $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $10.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 7.8% from 7.9%. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the approximately $0.9 million of costs incurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that related to the recently acquired EDS business.
Loss on Sale and Impairment of Property and Equipment.Loss on sale and impairment of property and equipment increased $1.0 million to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The level of losses is affected by several factors, including the timing of the continued replenishment of aging, damaged or excess fleet equipment, and conditions in the market for used equipment. We continually evaluate the depreciable lives and salvage values of our equipment.
Interest Expense and Other, Net.Interest expense and other, net decreased $1.4 million to $1.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 from $3.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower average debt balances and lower interest rates.
Income Tax Expense.Income tax expense increased $2.0 million to $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in income before income taxes. The effective tax rate was 36.2% and 38.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Net Income.As a result of the factors discussed above, net income increased $4.0 million to $8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2008
Revenues.Revenues increased 17.1%, or $70.8 million, to $485.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $414.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The revenue increase resulted from: storm restoration revenues; the September 1, 2008 acquisition of EDS, which provided $52.6 million in core revenues in the period; and continued growth in transmission services of $7.1 million, or 25%.
Our storm restoration revenues are highly volatile and unpredictable. In the nine months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to damages caused by Hurricanes Gustav and Ike and significant ice storms in the Midwest, storm restoration revenues totaled $142.8 million. This compares to $35.5 million in storm restoration revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The large amount of storm restoration work in the current fiscal year, however, diverted significant man-hours from core work. Core revenues were also negatively impacted as our customers reduced overhead distribution maintenance projects. As a result, core revenues decreased by 9.6% to $342.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the comparable period of the prior fiscal year.
15
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased $23.0 million to $91.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $68.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to 18.9% from 16.5% during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to the significant increase in higher-margin storm restoration revenues, including those resulting from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike.
General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses increased $5.3 million to $36.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $31.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This increase is primarily related to increased administration costs of approximately $2.2 million related to the EDS acquisition. To a lesser extent, the following also contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses: a $1.0 million increase in depreciation expense related to recent software and office equipment purchases, a $0.6 million prior year credit related to deferred compensation forfeitures, a $0.5 million increase in incentive compensation expense and a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense. General and administrative expenses were 7.5% of revenues for both periods.
Loss on Sale and Impairment of Property and Equipment.Loss on sale and impairment of property and equipment decreased $0.1 million to $2.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $2.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Interest Expense and Other, Net.Interest expense and other, net decreased $4.8 million to $6.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $11.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in average debt balances and lower interest rates.
Income Tax Expense.Income tax expense increased $8.2 million to $17.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $9.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 primarily as a result of the increase in income before income taxes. The effective tax rate was 37.4% and 38.6% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net Income.As a result of the factors discussed above, net income increased $14.5 million to $29.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $14.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary cash needs have been for working capital and capital expenditures. Our primary source of cash for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was cash provided by operations. Our primary sources of cash for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 were cash provided by operations and, to a lesser extent, proceeds from the sale of property and equipment.
We need working capital to support seasonal variations in our business, primarily due to the impact of weather conditions on the electric infrastructure and the corresponding spending by our customers on electric service and repairs. The increased service activity during storm restoration events temporarily causes an excess of customer billings over customer collections, leading to increased accounts receivable during those periods. In the past, we have utilized borrowings under the revolving portion of our senior credit facility to satisfy normal cash needs during these periods.
As of March 31, 2009, our cash totaled $25.6 million and we had $66.4 million available under the $90.0 million revolving portion of our senior credit facility (after giving effect to the outstanding balance of $23.6 million of standby letters of credit).
To date, recent distress in the financial markets has not had a significant impact on our financial position. We consider our cash investment policies to be conservative in that we maintain a diverse portfolio of what we believe to be high-quality cash investments with short-term maturities. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that the current volatility in the capital markets will have a material impact on the principal amounts of our cash investments.
16
We believe that our cash flow from operations, available cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings available under our senior credit facility will be adequate to meet our ordinary course liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. The revolving portion of our senior credit facility expires in July 2010 and we are currently exploring alternatives for a new arrangement. In addition, our ability to satisfy our obligations or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control.
Changes in Cash Flows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | (In millions) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 52.0 | | | $ | 47.9 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | $ | (38.7 | ) | | $ | 3.8 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | 0.9 | | | $ | (48.7 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $4.1 million to $52.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $47.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash flows from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in storm restoration services, partially offset by the $22.8 million increase in our accounts receivable (“AR”) balance at March 31, 2009 compared to March 31, 2008. The AR increase was primarily due to the increased billings as a result of increased storm restoration services. The AR related to storm restoration was approximately $24.0 million as of March 31, 2009. Our customers have historically been financially stable and creditworthy and we believe that we will continue to collect our AR in normal time parameters, which are typically slightly extended for storm restoration services.
Net cash used in investing activities was $38.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $3.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The change in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the purchase of EDS during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and, to a lesser extent, an increase in purchases of transmission equipment, some of which had been on short-term rental and leasing arrangements assumed in connection with the acquisition of EDS, and software. We determined that it was economically advantageous to purchase the transmission equipment because of the high utilization rates. The software purchases have consisted primarily of $1.0 million for the implementation of our human resource and payroll system and $1.8 million related to progress toward implementation of our job cost reporting and billing system. Our access to capital for growth and acquisitions will be impacted by the credit market crisis and volatility in the equity markets.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $48.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 primarily reflected net payments under our senior credit facility.
Senior Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2009, we had $140.5 million of term loan outstanding under our senior credit facility. As of March 31, 2009, our borrowing availability under the $90.0 million revolving portion of our senior credit facility was $66.4 million (after giving effect to the outstanding balance of $23.6 million of outstanding standby letters of credit). The obligations under our senior credit facility are unconditionally guaranteed by us and each of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized subsidiaries (other than Pike Electric, Inc., which is the borrower under the facility) and secured on a first-priority basis by security interests (subject to permitted liens) in substantially all assets owned by us, Pike Electric, Inc. and each of our other domestic subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions.
We continue to monitor the state of the overall credit market. We are currently renegotiating the revolving portion of our credit facility, which matures in July 2010. The economic environment and overall credit market will have an impact on those negotiations including availability, interest rates, fees and restrictive covenants. Our long-term debt matures in 2012.
17
Our credit agreement contains a number of affirmative and restrictive covenants including limitations on mergers, consolidations and dissolutions, sales of assets, investments and acquisitions, indebtedness and liens, and other restricted payments. Among these covenants, our credit agreement includes a requirement that we maintain: (i) a leverage ratio (as defined in the senior credit facility) of no more than 3.75 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, measured on a trailing four-quarter basis and (ii) a cash interest coverage ratio (as defined in the senior credit facility) of at least 3.5 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, measured on a trailing four-quarter basis. As of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with these covenants with a leverage ratio of 1.33 to 1.00 and a cash interest coverage ratio of 12.89 to 1.00. The credit agreement also contains an excess cash provision which requires us to make debt payments based on a defined calculation. As of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants, including those noted above.
Concentration of Credit Risk
We are subject to concentrations of credit risk related primarily to our cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We maintain substantially all of our cash investments with what we believe to be high credit quality financial institutions. We grant credit under normal payment terms, generally without collateral, to our customers, which include electric power companies, governmental entities, general contractors and builders, owners and managers of commercial and industrial properties located in the United States. Consequently, we are subject to potential credit risk related to changes in business and economic factors throughout the United States. However, we generally have certain statutory lien rights with respect to services provided.
Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. These actions typically seek, among other things: (a) compensation for alleged personal injury, workers’ compensation, employment discrimination, breach of contract, or property damage, (b) punitive damages, civil penalties or other damages, or (c) injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we accrue reserves when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As is common in our industry, we have entered into certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business that result in risks not directly reflected in our balance sheets. Our significant off-balance sheet transactions include liabilities associated with non-cancelable operating leases, letter of credit obligations, and surety guarantees entered into in the normal course of business. We have not engaged in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements through special purpose entities.
Operating Leases
In connection with our acquisition of EDS (Note 3, “Energy Delivery Service Acquisition,” of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), we assumed certain operating lease obligations. These commitments total $1.5 million for the remainder of fiscal 2009. For fiscal 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and thereafter, the commitments total $5.6 million, $4.8 million, $2.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Letters of Credit
Certain of our vendors require letters of credit to ensure reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on our behalf. In addition, from time to time some customers require us to post letters of credit to ensure payment to our subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to guarantee performance under our contracts. Such letters of credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the holder claims that we have failed to perform specified actions. If this were to occur, we would be required to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the circumstances of such a reimbursement, we may also have to record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. We do not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be made under a letter of credit in the foreseeable future. As of March 31, 2009, we had $23.6 million of standby letters of credit issued under our senior credit facility primarily for insurance and bonding purposes.
18
Performance Bonds and Parent Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, we are required by certain customers to post surety or performance bonds in connection with services that we provide to them. These bonds provide a guarantee to the customer that we will perform under the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs. As of March 31, 2009, we had $86.9 million in surety bonds outstanding, and we also had provided collateral in the form of a letter of credit to sureties in the amount of $4.0 million, which is included in the total letters of credit outstanding above. To date, we have not been required to make any reimbursements to our sureties for bond-related costs. We believe that it is unlikely that we will have to fund significant claims under our surety arrangements in the foreseeable future.
Pike Electric Corporation, from time to time, guarantees the obligations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain contracts with customers.
Seasonality; Fluctuations of Results
Because our services are performed outdoors, our results of operations can be subject to seasonal variations due to weather conditions. These seasonal variations affect both our core and storm restoration services. Extended periods of rain affect the deployment of our core crews, particularly with respect to underground work. During the winter months, demand for core work is generally lower due to inclement weather. In addition, demand for core work generally increases during the spring months due to improved weather conditions and is typically the highest during the summer due to better weather conditions. Due to the unpredictable nature of storms, the level of our storm restoration revenues fluctuates from period to period.
Inflation
Due to relatively low levels of inflation experienced during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2008, inflation did not have a significant effect on our results.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 11, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” to our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
Uncertainty of Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by Pike Electric Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material, press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain, certain “forward-looking statements” under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such “forward-looking statements” include information relating to, among other matters, our future prospects, developments and business strategies for our operations. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our company and the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “project,” “continue,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements include, among others, statements relating to:
| • | | our belief that a rise in diesel prices would negatively affect our gross profit and operating income to an extent that may not be fully recoverable through price increases to customers; |
| • | | our belief that the lawsuits, claims or other proceedings to which we are subject in the ordinary course of business will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial position; |
19
| • | | our belief that no material claims will be made under a letter of credit issued on our behalf; |
| • | | our belief that it is unlikely that we will have to fund significant claims under our surety arrangements in the foreseeable future; |
| • | | our belief that a significant amount of pent-up demand for our services is building and power system reliability is being challenged; |
| • | | our belief that smart-grid technology implementation, the demand for renewable energy solutions, the anticipated energy infrastructure stimulus plan will continue to highlight the needs for our services; |
| • | | our belief that the current volatility in the capital markets will not have a material impact on the principal amounts of our cash investments; |
| • | | our belief that our cash flow from operations, available cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings available under our senior credit facility will be adequate to meet our ordinary course liquidity needs for the foreseeable future; |
| • | | our belief that we will be able to renegotiate our revolving credit facility before its maturity in July 2010. |
These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances, and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those differences or adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect the expectations of management of Pike Electric only as of the time such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates on borrowings under our senior credit facility, which bears interest based on London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin dependent upon a total leverage ratio. We use derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our senior credit facility. These derivative financial instruments, which are currently all swap agreements, are not entered into for trading or speculative purposes. A swap agreement is a contract to exchange a floating rate for a fixed rate without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Effective December 2007, we entered into two separate interest rate swap agreements. The first agreement had a notional amount of $60.0 million, an effective date of December 13, 2007 and an expiration date of December 13, 2009. The second agreement had a notional amount of $40.0 million, an effective date of December 19, 2007 and an expiration date of December 19, 2009. Under both swap agreements, we pay a fixed rate of 3.99% and receive a rate equivalent to the thirty-day LIBOR, adjusted monthly. Based on our current leverage ratio, these swap agreements effectively fix the interest rate at 5.49% for $100.0 million of our term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps at March 31, 2009 was reflected on the balance sheet in accrued expenses and other for $2.6 million.
20
Diesel Fuel Risk
We have a large fleet of vehicles and equipment that primarily uses diesel fuel. As a result, we have market risk for changes in diesel fuel prices. If diesel prices rise, our gross profit and operating income would be negatively affected due to additional costs that may not be fully recovered through increases in prices to customers.
We periodically enter into diesel fuel swaps to decrease our price volatility. We currently hedge approximately 35% of our diesel usage with prices ranging from $2.40 to $4.25 per gallon. Our goal is to gradually increase our hedged positions to 40% to 60% of our annual volumes by June 30, 2009 and ultimately maintain a program level of hedged positions at 60% to 70% of our annual volumes on a rolling basis.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has established and maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Design and Operation of Control Systems
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
21
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. These actions typically seek, among other things, (a) compensation for alleged personal injury, workers’ compensation, employment discrimination, breach of contract, or property damages, (b) punitive damages, civil penalties or other damages, or (c) injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Except for the risk factor set forth below, there have been no material changes to these matters, disclosed in Part I, Item 1 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
We are unable to predict the impact of the weakening U.S. economy and financial market deterioration on our industry, our customers or our ability to access the capital or credit markets.The demand for our services has been, and will likely continue to be, cyclical in nature and vulnerable to general downturns in the U.S. economy. Given the weakening of the U.S. economy and financial market deterioration, our customers may not have the ability or desire to continue to fund capital expenditures for infrastructure or may have difficulty in obtaining financing, either of which could result in cancellations of projects or deferral of projects to a later date. Such cancellations or deferrals could result in decreased demand for our services and could materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. In addition, it is possible that our ability to access the capital and credit markets may be limited by these or other factors at a time when we would like, or need, such access, which could have an impact on our ability to refinance maturing debt, grow our operations and/or react to changing economic and business conditions.
22
Item 6.Exhibits
| | | | |
Exhibit | | Description |
| | | | |
| 3.1 | | | Certificate of Incorporation of Pike Electric Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed July 11, 2005) |
| | | | |
| 3.2 | | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Pike Electric Corporation, as of April 30, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on our Form 8-K filed May 5, 2009) |
| | | | |
| 10.1 | | | Form of Forfeiture and Termination Agreement between Pike Electric Corporation and certain of its officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on our Form 8-K filed February 3, 2009) |
| | | | |
| 10.2 | | | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Pike Electric Corporation and its directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on our Form 8-K filed May 5, 2009) |
| | | | |
| 10.3 | | | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated April 30, 2009, by and between Pike Electric Corporation and J. Eric Pike (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on our Form 8-K filed May 5, 2009) |
| | | | |
| 31.1 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| 31.2 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| 32.1 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION (Registrant)
| | |
Date: May 11, 2009 | By: | /s/ J. Eric Pike | |
| | J. Eric Pike | |
| | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President | |
| | |
Date: May 11, 2009 | By: | /s/ Anthony K. Slater | |
| | Anthony K. Slater | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | |
24
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit | | |
No. | | Description |
| | | | |
| 31.1 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| 31.2 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| 32.1 | | | Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
25