As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2007
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21725
Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222, Overland Park, KS 66210
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
David J. Schulte
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222, Overland Park, KS 66210
(Name and address of agent for service)
913-981-1020
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2006
Item 1. Report to Stockholders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31b6b/31b6b9d57ef4cbae6d3d6d7a3d323ca1fe973304" alt="Cover Page"
Company at a Glance
Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. is a pioneering closed-end investment company investing primarily in equity securities of Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) operating energy infrastructure assets.
Investment Objectives: Yield, Growth and Quality
Our goal is to provide our stockholders with a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions.
In seeking to achieve yield, we target distributions to our stockholders that are roughly equal to the underlying yield on a direct investment in MLPs. We accomplish this by maintaining our strategy of investing primarily in energy infrastructure companies with attractive current yields and growth potential.
Tortoise Capital achieves dividend growth as revenues of our underlying companies grow with the economy, with the population and through rate increases. This revenue growth leads to increased operating profits, and when combined with internal expansion projects and acquisitions, is expected to provide attractive growth in distributions to Tortoise Capital. We also seek dividend growth through capital market strategies involving timely debt and equity offerings by Tortoise Capital that are primarily invested in MLP issuer direct placements.
We seek to achieve quality by investing in companies operating infrastructure assets that are critical to the U.S. economy. Often these assets would be difficult to replicate. We also back experienced management teams with successful track records. By investing in Tortoise Capital, our stockholders have access to a portfolio that is diversified through geographic regions and across product lines, including natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil and refined products.
About Master Limited Partnerships
MLPs are limited partnerships whose units trade on public exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and NASDAQ. Buying MLP units makes an investor a limited partner in the MLP. There are currently more than 50 MLPs in the market, mostly in industries related to energy, natural resources and real estate.
Tortoise Capital invests primarily in MLPs in the energy infrastructure sector. Energy infrastructure MLPs are engaged in the transportation, storage and processing of crude oil, natural gas and refined products from production points to the end users. Our investments are primarily in mid-stream (mostly pipeline) operations, which typically produce steady cash flows with less exposure to commodity prices than many alternative investments in the broader energy industry. With the growth potential of this sector along with our disciplined investment approach, we endeavor to generate a predictable and increasing dividend stream for our investors.
A Tortoise Capital Investment Versus a Direct Investment in MLPs
Tortoise Capital seeks to provide its stockholders with an efficient alternative to investing directly in MLPs. A direct investment in a MLP potentially offers the opportunity to receive an attractive distribution that is approximately 80 percent tax deferred, with a historically low correlation to returns on stocks and bonds. However, the tax characteristics of a direct MLP investment are generally undesirable for tax-exempt investors such as retirement plans. Tortoise Capital is structured as a C Corporation — accruing federal and state income taxes, based on taxable earnings and profits. Because of this innovative structure, pioneered by Tortoise Capital Advisors, institutions and retirement accounts are able to join individual stockholders as investors in MLPs.
Additional features of Tortoise Capital include:
• | One Form 1099 per stockholder at the end of the year, thus avoiding multiple K-1s and multiple state filings for individual partnership investments; |
• | A professional management team, with nearly 100 years combined investment experience, to select and manage the portfolio on your behalf; |
• | The ability to access investment grade credit markets to enhance the dividend rate; and |
• | Access to direct placements and other investments not available through the public markets. |
Summary Financial Information (Unaudited)
Year Ended November 30 | | | | 2006 | |
|
Market value per share | | | $ | 26.50 | |
Net asset value per share | | | | 26.79 | |
Total net assets | | | | 429,009,899 | |
Unrealized appreciation of investments (excluding interest rate swap contracts) | | |
before deferred taxes | | | | 146,369,894 | |
Unrealized appreciation of investments and interest rate swap contracts | | |
after deferred taxes | | | | 87,973,824 | |
Net investment loss | | | | (5,736,773 | ) |
Total realized gain after deferred taxes | | | | 2,637,597 | |
Total investment return based on market value(1) | | | | 27.67 | % |
Net operating expenses before leverage costs and taxes as a percent | | |
of average total assets | | | | 1.10 | % |
Distributable cash flow as a percent of average net assets(2) | | | | 6.24 | % |
|
(1) | See footnote 4 to the Financial Highlights on page 22 for further disclosure. |
(2) | See Key Financial Data which illustrates the calculation of distributable cash flow. |
Allocation of Portfolio Assets
November 30, 2006 (Unaudited)
(Percentages based on total investment portfolio)
January 22, 2007
Fellow Stockholders,
Tortoise Energy Capital Corp.’s (Tortoise Capital) fiscal 2006 results reflect our commitment to yield, growth and quality.
Our portfolio companies exceeded performance expectations as a result of growing energy demand, internal growth projects and acquisitions. This performance, coupled with a strong equity market, low interest rates and strengthening investor confidence in the sector, led to an outstanding year for Tortoise Capital.
Performance Review and Outlook
Tortoise Capital’s total return for fiscal year 2006 was 27.7 percent, based on market value, including the reinvestment of quarterly dividends. Our most recent dividend of $0.39 per common share was paid on November 30, 2006, reflecting a $1.56 annualized dividend rate. This represents a 4.0 percent increase over the full investment period dividend of $0.375 paid in the second quarter of 2006 and a 14.7 percent increase over the 2005 fourth quarter annualized dividend rate of $1.36.
The average annual percentage increase of distributions of our portfolio companies was 15 percent as compared to their distributions for the prior year. The strength of our portfolio is evidenced by our selection of quality companies, led by excellent management teams who focus on what we believe are low-risk infrastructure assets and stable recurring revenue streams.
We maintain our expectation that our long-term dividend growth will be approximately 4 percent on an annual basis.
2 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Investment Review
In January 2006, we completed a $70 million Money Market Cumulative Preferred (MMP) offering, achieving our initial leverage target. The proceeds from the MMP shares offering were used primarily to repay outstanding debt under a revolving credit facility and make direct placements and open market purchases. We also entered into additional interest rate swap agreements, effectively fixing the borrowing costs of all our long-term leverage. We use interest rate swaps to fix our leverage costs in order to eliminate the potential adverse impact rising interest rates would otherwise have on our dividend.
Since its inception in May 2005 through the date of this letter, Tortoise Capital has helped finance growth in the energy infrastructure MLP sector through the completion of 13 direct purchases from MLP issuers or their affiliates totaling nearly $323 million.
Master Limited Partnership Investment Overview and Outlook
In 2006, the MLP market continued to play a vital role in the expansion of U.S. energy infrastructure. Lehman Brothers estimated that approximately $4 billion was spent on internal growth projects in the 2006 calendar year compared to approximately $3 billion in 2005. Expected internal growth project costs for the next few years exceed $17 billion. In addition, acquisition activity through December 31, 2006 remained strong with more than $11 billion of mainly natural gas assets entering the MLP sector. We anticipate acquisitions in 2007 will also drive distribution growth, since MLPs currently own less than 50 percent of the refined product, crude oil, and natural gas midstream assets in the United States.
These organic growth projects and acquisitions will require equity and debt financing that could provide direct placement opportunities for Tortoise Capital.
Conclusion
Population and economic growth trends should continue to increase U.S. energy demand. We believe energy infrastructure will directly benefit, providing investors an attractive return with minimal exposure to risks associated with volatile energy commodity prices. We hope that investors seeking expertise in RIT and MLP portfolio management will find Tortoise Capital a compelling option.
Thank you to our stockholders for your continued support. As always, we will strive to deliver a rewarding return and we will remain steadfast to our objective of providing you with an attractive yield, dividend growth and a portfolio of quality companies. We look forward to seeing you at the annual stockholders’ meeting on April 13, 2007. For those unable to attend, please access our webcast of the meeting at www.tortoiseadvisors.com.
Sincerely,
The Managing Directors
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d964/2d9640de54e00517835201bb9fb2a8ef30abd636" alt="Birzer signature" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6ec/0f6ec9c3d2db330a9fca580185e6b6af389381e2" alt="Hamel signature" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0fae/e0fae06a2070a3567b30791a7549d11729c82eca" alt="Malvey signature" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0597/e0597a430123960e61fe7d5b859436f3c2e7c507" alt="Matlack signature" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f33/27f33c8fb7a1eda6c14741668088e1da860088a6" alt="Schulte signature" |
H. Kevin Birzer | Zachary A. Hamel | Kenneth P. Malvey | Terry Matlack | David J. Schulte |
4 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Table of Contents
6 | | Key Financial Data |
8 | | Management’s Discussion |
12 | | Business Description |
15 | | Schedule of Investments |
17 | | Statement of Assets & Liabilities |
18 | | Statement of Operations |
19 | | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
20 | | Statement of Cash Flows |
21 | | Financial Highlights |
23 | | Notes to Financial Statements |
30 | | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
31 | | Company Officers and Directors |
33 | | Additional Information |
Key Financial Data (Unaudited)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
| Year Ended November 30, 2006
| |
---|
Total Distributions Received from Investments | | | | | |
Distributions received from master limited partnerships | | | $ | 34,071 | |
Dividends paid in stock | | | | 5,946 | |
Short-term interest and dividend income | | | | 790 | |
|
| |
Total from investments | | | | 40,807 | |
Operating Expenses Before Leverage Costs and Current Taxes | | |
Advisory fees | | | | 5,510 | |
Other operating expenses | | | | 1,109 | |
|
| |
| | | | 6,619 | |
|
| |
Distributable cash flow before leverage costs and current taxes | | | | 34,188 | |
Leverage costs(2) | | | | 9,807 | |
Current income tax expense | | | | 28 | |
|
| |
Distributable Cash Flow(3) | | | $ | 24,353 | |
|
| |
Dividends paid on common stock | | | $ | 24,029 | |
Dividends paid on common stock per share | | | | 1.505 | |
Payout percentage for period(4) | | | | 98.7 | % |
Total assets, end of period | | | | 706,624 | |
Average total assets during period(5) | | | | 602,940 | |
Leverage (Tortoise Notes, Preferred Stock and short-term credit facility)(6) | | | | 218,000 | |
Leverage as a percent of total assets | | | | 30.9 | % |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) net of deferred taxes, end of period | | | | 87,161 | |
Net assets, end of period | | | | 429,010 | |
Average net assets during period(7) | | | | 390,212 | |
Net asset value per common share | | | | 26.79 | |
Market value per share | | | | 26.50 | |
Shares outstanding | | | | 16,014 | |
Selected Operating Ratios(8) | | |
|
As a Percent of Average Total Assets | | |
Total distributions received from investments | | | | 6.77 | % |
Net operating expenses before leverage costs and current taxes | | | | 1.10 | % |
Distributable cash flow before leverage costs and current taxes | | | | 5.67 | % |
As a Percent of Average Net Assets | | |
Distributable cash flow(3) | | | | 6.24 | % |
(1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through November. |
(2) | Leverage costs include interest expense, auction agent fees, interest rate swap expenses and preferred dividends. |
(3) | “Net investment income (loss), before income taxes” on the Statement of Operations is adjusted as follows to reconcile to Distributable Cash Flow (DCF): increased by the return of capital on MLP distributions and the value of paid-in-kind distributions; and decreased by dividends to preferred stockholders, current taxes, and realized and short-term unrealized losses (gains) on interest rate swap settlements. |
(4) | Dividends paid as a percentage of Distributable Cash Flow. |
(5) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(6) | The balance on the short-term credit facility was $28,000,000 as of November 30, 2006. |
(7) | Computed by averaging daily values within each period. |
(8) | Annualized for periods less than one full year. |
| |
6 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
| 2006
| |
---|
2005 Q4(1) | | Q1(1) | | Q2(1) | | Q3(1) | | Q4(1) | |
---|
| |
| |
---|
$ | 5,058 | | $ | 7,537 | | $ | 8,436 | | $ | 8,878 | | $ | 9,220 | |
| 1,549 | | | 1,580 | | | 1,454 | | | 1,442 | | | 1,470 | |
| 494 | | | 311 | | | 182 | | | 156 | | | 141 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 7,101 | | | 9,428 | | | 10,072 | | | 10,476 | | | 10,831 | |
| 939 | | | 1,193 | | | 1,318 | | | 1,467 | | | 1,532 | |
| 211 | | | 287 | | | 281 | | | 285 | | | 256 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1,150 | | | 1,480 | | | 1,599 | | | 1,752 | | | 1,788 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 5,951 | | | 7,948 | | | 8,473 | | | 8,724 | | | 9,043 | |
| 372 | | | 1,935 | | | 2,530 | | | 2,634 | | | 2,708 | |
| — | | | 17 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 2 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
$ | 5,579 | | $ | 5,996 | | $ | 5,939 | | $ | 6,085 | | $ | 6,333 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
$ | 5,423 | | $ | 5,742 | | $ | 5,989 | | $ | 6,069 | | $ | 6,229 | |
| 0.340 | | | 0.360 | | | 0.375 | | | 0.380 | | | 0.390 | |
| 97.2 | % | | 95.8 | % | | 100.8 | % | | 99.7 | % | | 98.4 | % |
| 494,402 | | | 580,569 | | | 607,064 | | | 644,119 | | | 706,624 | |
| 425,085 | | | 545,374 | | | 591,705 | | | 619,080 | | | 661,332 | |
| 120,000 | | | 190,000 | | | 190,000 | | | 201,600 | | | 218,000 | |
| 24.3 | % | | 32.7 | % | | 31.3 | % | | 31.3 | % | | 30.9 | % |
| (813 | ) | | 8,716 | | | 33,657 | | | 53,482 | | | 87,161 | |
| 370,455 | | | 372,568 | | | 389,305 | | | 401,887 | | | 429,010 | |
| 381,915 | | | 373,251 | | | 380,117 | | | 395,781 | | | 411,564 | |
| 23.23 | | | 23.36 | | | 24.38 | | | 25.16 | | | 26.79 | |
| 22.09 | | | 22.90 | | | 22.40 | | | 23.60 | | | 26.50 | |
| 15,951 | | | 15,951 | | | 15,971 | | | 15,971 | | | 16,014 | |
| |
| 6.70 | % | | 7.01 | % | | 6.75 | % | | 6.71 | % | | 6.57 | % |
| 1.09 | % | | 1.10 | % | | 1.07 | % | | 1.12 | % | | 1.08 | % |
| 5.61 | % | | 5.91 | % | | 5.68 | % | | 5.59 | % | | 5.49 | % |
| 5.86 | % | | 6.51 | % | | 6.20 | % | | 6.10 | % | | 6.17 | % |
Management’s Discussion
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and the Notes thereto. In addition, this report contains certain forward-looking statements. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for future operations and financial objectives and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Certain factors that could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of our public filings with the SEC.
Overview
Tortoise Capital seeks to provide a growing dividend stream to our investors, and when combined with MLP growth prospects, the investment offers the opportunity for an attractive total return. We seek to provide our stockholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in the energy infrastructure sector. While we are a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), we are not a “regulated investment company” for federal tax purposes. Our dividends do not generate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) and our stock may therefore be suitable for holding by pension funds, IRAs and mutual funds as well as taxable accounts.
We invest primarily in MLPs through private and public market purchases. MLPs are publicly traded partnerships whose equity interests are traded in the form of units on public exchanges, such as the NYSE. Our private purchases principally involve providing financing directly to an MLP through equity investments, which we refer to as direct placements. MLPs typically use this financing to fund growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations, debt repayments and bridge financings. We generally invest in companies that are publicly reporting, but for which private financing offers advantages. These direct placement opportunities generally arise from our long-term relationships with energy infrastructure MLPs and our unique expertise in origination, structuring, diligence and investment oversight.
Critical Accounting Policies
The financial statements are based on the selection and application of critical accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, complex, or subjective judgments. Our critical accounting policies are those applicable to the valuation of investments and certain revenue recognition matters as discussed in Note 2 in the Notes to Financial Statements.
Determining Dividends Distributed to Stockholders
Our portfolio generates cash flow from which we pay dividends to stockholders. We pay dividends out of our distributable cash flow (“DCF”). Our Board of Directors reviews the dividend rate quarterly, and may adjust the quarterly dividend throughout the year. Our goal is to declare what we believe to be sustainable increases in our regular quarterly dividends. We intend to reinvest the after-tax proceeds of sales of investments in order to maintain and grow our dividend rate. We have targeted to pay at least 95 percent of DCF on an annualized basis.
Determining DCF
DCF is simply distributions received from investments less our total expenses. The total distributions received from our investments includes the amount received by us as cash distributions from MLPs, paid-in-kind distributions, and dividend and interest payments. The total expenses include current or anticipated operating expenses, total leverage costs and current income taxes on our operating income. Each are summarized for you in the table on pages 6 and 7 and are discussed in more detail below.
8 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Management’s Discussion
(Continued)
The key financial data table discloses the calculation of DCF. The difference between distributions received from investments in the DCF calculation and net investment income (loss) before taxes as reported in the Statement of Operations, is reconciled as follows: (1) the Statement of Operations, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), recognizes distribution income from MLPs and common stock on their ex-dates, whereas the DCF calculation reflects distribution income on their pay dates; (2) GAAP recognizes that a significant portion of the cash distributions received from MLPs are treated as a return of capital and therefore excluded from investment income, whereas the DCF calculation includes the return of capital; and (3) distributions received from investments in the DCF calculation include the value of dividends paid-in-kind (additional stock), whereas such amounts are not included as income for GAAP purposes. The treatment of expenses in the DCF calculation also differs from what is reported in the Statement of Operations. In addition to the expenses that are included in net investment income (loss) before taxes in the Statement of Operations, the DCF calculation reflects dividends to preferred stockholders and realized and short-term unrealized losses (gains) on interest swap settlements as additional leverage costs, as well as current tax expense.
Distributions Received from Investments
Our ability to generate cash is dependent on the ability of our portfolio of investments to generate cash flow from their operations. In order to maintain and grow our dividend to our stockholders, we evaluate each holding based upon its contribution to our investment income, our expectation for its growth rate, and its risk relative to other potential investments.
We concentrate on MLPs we believe can expect an increasing demand for services from economic and population growth. Our disciplined investment process seeks to select well-managed businesses with real, hard assets and stable recurring revenue streams.
Our focus remains primarily on investing in fee-based service providers that operate long-haul, interstate pipelines. We further diversify among issuers, geographies and energy commodities, while seeking to achieve a dividend yield equivalent to a direct investment in energy infrastructure MLPs. In addition, most energy infrastructure companies are regulated and utilize an inflation escalator index that factors in inflation as a cost pass-through. So, over the long-term, we believe MLPs will outpace interest rate increases and produce positive returns.
Total distributions received from our investments relating to DCF for 4th quarter 2006 was approximately $10.8 million representing a 53 percent increase as compared to 4th quarter 2005 and a 3 percent increase as compared to 3rd quarter 2006. These changes reflect earnings from investment of $70 million in leverage issued in 1st quarter 2006, earnings from investment of $28 million of our credit facility and continuing distribution increases from a majority of our MLP investments. The average annual percentage increase of distributions of our MLPs, as compared to the distributions of the prior year was 15 percent. In addition, total distributions received from investments represented 6.57 percent of average total assets for the 4th quarter 2006, as compared to 6.70 percent for 4th quarter 2005 and 6.71 percent for 3rd quarter 2006. These changes reflect the increase in distributions in the numerator of this calculation, as well as an increase in our average total assets in the denominator, which resulted from issuing additional leverage and the increased market value of our investments.
Expenses
We incur two types of expenses: (1) operating expenses, consisting primarily of the advisory fee; and (2) leverage costs. Net operating expenses before leverage costs and current taxes were approximately $1.8 million in 4th quarter 2006, an increase of 55 percent as compared to 4th quarter 2005 and 2 percent as compared to 3rd quarter 2006. These changes are mainly the result of increased advisory fees. Advisory fees increased as a result of growth in total assets and from the impact of the contractual change in advisory fees from 0.90 percent of average managed assets to 0.95 percent which took effect June 1, 2006. Other operating expenses decreased 10 percent as compared to 3rd quarter 2006, reflecting lower non-asset based costs and general operating efficiencies realized during the quarter.
Management’s Discussion
(Continued)
Leverage costs consist of four major components: (1) the direct interest expense, which will vary from period to period, as all of our Tortoise Notes and revolving credit line have variable rates of interest; (2) the auction agent fees, which are the marketing costs for the variable rate leverage; (3) the realized gain or loss on our swap arrangements; and (4) our preferred dividends, which also carry a variable rate dividend. We have locked-in our long-term leverage costs through interest rate swap agreements, converting our variable rate obligations to fixed rate obligations for the term of the swap agreements. With very little short-term interest rate risk in Tortoise Capital, we now have an all-in weighted average cost of leverage of 5.31 percent with a remaining weighted average maturity of approximately 9 years. Details of the swaps are disclosed in Note 11 of our Notes to Financial Statements.
As indicated in Note 11, Tortoise Capital has agreed to pay U.S. Bank a fixed rate while receiving a floating rate based upon the one-month U.S. Dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). LIBOR is the primary global benchmark or reference rate for short-term interest rates, and is intended to approximate our variable rate payment obligation. The spread between the fixed rate and floating LIBOR rate is reflected in our Statement of Operations as a realized or unrealized gain when the LIBOR rate exceeds the fixed rate (U.S. Bank pays Tortoise Capital the net difference) or a realized or unrealized loss when the fixed rate exceeds the LIBOR rate (Tortoise Capital pays U.S. Bank the net difference). We realized approximately $101,000 in gains on interest rate swap settlements for the fiscal year ended 2006.
Leverage costs were $2.7 million in 4th quarter 2006, as compared to $2.6 million in 3rd quarter 2006, primarily due to interest expense associated with the increased utilization of our credit facility during the quarter.
Distributable Cash Flow
Our 4th quarter 2006 DCF was $6.3 million, an increase of $248,000 or 4 percent as compared to 3rd quarter 2006. This increase is the net result of growth in distributions and expenses as outlined above. From this, we paid a dividend of $6.2 million, or 98.4 percent of DCF. On a per share basis, we paid a $0.39 dividend on November 30, 2006, a 2.6 percent increase over 3rd quarter 2006. The annualized run-rate of $1.56 per share equates to a 6.2 percent yield on our IPO price of $25.00. With the growth in distributions from the MLPs in which we invest, we expect the dividend to grow at least 4 percent annually.
Taxation of our Distributions
We invest in partnerships which generally have larger distributions of cash than the accounting income which they generate. Accordingly, the distributions include a return of capital component for accounting and tax purposes on our books. Dividends declared and paid by Tortoise Capital in a year generally differ from taxable income for that year, as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income or return of capital.
The taxability of the dividend you receive depends on whether Tortoise Capital has annual earnings and profits. If so, those earnings and profits are first allocated to the preferred shares, and then to the common shares. Because most of the distributions we have received from MLPs are not income for tax purposes, we currently have very little taxable income to offset against our expenses.
In the future, however, Tortoise Capital could have earnings and profits. That would make our dividend like any other corporate dividend and taxable at the 15 percent qualified dividend rate. Our dividend would include a taxable component for either of two reasons: first, the tax characterization of the distributions we receive from MLPs could change and become less return of capital and more in the form of income. Second, we could sell an MLP investment in which Tortoise Capital has an unrealized gain. The unrealized gain we have in the portfolio is reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Tortoise Capital’s investments at value are $703 million, with an adjusted cost of $556.5 million. The $146.5 million difference reflects gain that would be realized if those investments were sold at those values. A sale could give rise to earnings and profits in that period and make the distributions taxable qualified dividends. Note, however, that the Statement of Assets and Liabilities reflects as a deferred tax liability the possible future tax liability we would pay if all investments were liquidated at their indicated value. It is for these two reasons that we inform you of the tax treatment after the close of each year because both of these items are unpredictable until the year is over. For book and tax purposes, dividends for the fiscal year ended 2006, were comprised entirely of return of capital.
10 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Management’s Discussion
(Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Tortoise Capital had total assets of $707 million at fiscal year end 2006. Our total assets reflect the value of our investments, which are itemized in the Schedule of Investments. It also reflects cash, interest and other receivables and any expenses that may have been prepaid. During the year, total assets grew from $494 million to $707 million, an increase of $213 million or 43 percent. This change was primarily the result of an increase in unrealized appreciation of investments of approximately $113 million and an increase in leverage of $98 million. The Statement of Operations reflects unrealized appreciation before deferred tax expense of approximately $144 million, which includes approximately $31 million in MLP distributions treated as return of capital.
On December 13, 2006, the Company increased to $60 million from $40 million the credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A. maturing July 25, 2007. The credit facility has a variable annual interest rate equal to the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.75 percent. Proceeds from the credit facility are primarily used to facilitate direct placement equity investments. At November 30, 2006, the outstanding borrowing under the credit facility was $28 million.
Total leverage outstanding of $218 million is comprised of $120 million in auction rate senior notes rated ‘Aaa’ and ‘AAA’ by Moody’s Investors Services Inc. and Fitch Ratings, respectively, $70 million in money market preferred shares rated ‘Aa2’ and ‘AA’ by Moody’s Investors Services Inc. and Fitch Ratings, respectively, and $28 million outstanding under the credit facility. Total leverage represented 30.9 percent of total assets at November 30, 2006 as compared to 24.3 at November 30, 2005. Our long-term target for leverage remains approximately 33 percent of total assets. We expect to use our line of credit to make desirable investments as they become available and to reach our targeted leverage amounts. As the line of credit increases in size, we would issue additional Tortoise Notes or Preferred Stock to repay the line and provide longer-term capital for our Company.
Our Board of Directors recently approved a policy permitting temporary increases in the amount of leverage from 33 percent to 38 percent of total assets at the time of incurrence, to allow participation in investment opportunities. The policy requires leverage to be within the limits set forth in the 1940 Act (300 percent and 200 percent asset coverage for debt and preferred shares, respectively) and indicates that leverage will be reduced to our long-term target of 33 percent over time in an orderly fashion from portfolio sales and/or an equity offering.
Business Description
November 30, 2006
Tortoise Capital
Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. (Tortoise Capital) commenced operations in May 2005. Tortoise Capital’s investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to stockholders and dividend growth. For purposes of Tortoise Capital’s investment objective, total return includes capital appreciation of, and all distributions received from, securities in which Tortoise Capital will invest regardless of the tax character of the distributions.
Tortoise Capital seeks to provide its stockholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in a portfolio of publicly traded master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the energy infrastructure sector. Similar to the tax characterization of distributions made by MLPs to its unitholders, Tortoise Capital believes a significant portion of its distributions to stockholders will be treated as a return of capital.
Tortoise Capital is regulated as a non-diversified investment management company, for which Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. (the Adviser) serves as Tortoise Capital’s investment adviser.
Energy Infrastructure Industry
Energy infrastructure companies engage in the business of transporting, processing, storing, distributing or marketing natural gas, natural gas liquids (primarily propane), coal, crude oil or refined petroleum products, or exploring, developing, managing or producing such commodities. Tortoise Capital invests solely in energy infrastructure companies operating in the United States.
Energy infrastructure companies (other than most pipeline MLPs) do not operate as “public utilities” or “local distribution companies,” and are therefore not subject to rate regulation by state or federal utility commissions. However, energy infrastructure companies may be subject to greater competitive factors than utility companies, including competitive pricing in the absence of regulated tariff rates, which could cause a reduction in revenue and which could adversely affect profitability. Most pipeline MLPs are subject to government regulation concerning the construction, pricing and operation of pipelines.
Regulated pipeline MLPs are able to set prices (rates or tariffs) to cover operating costs, depreciation and taxes, and provide a return on investment. These rates are monitored by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which seeks to ensure that consumers receive adequate and reliable supplies of energy at the lowest possible price while providing energy suppliers and transporters a just and reasonable return on capital investment and the opportunity to adjust to changing market conditions.
Master Limited Partnerships
Under normal circumstances, Tortoise Capital invests at least 80 percent of its total assets in equity securities of MLPs and affiliates in the energy infrastructure sector and are organized as partnerships, thereby eliminating income tax at the entity level.
A MLP has two classes of partners—the general partner and limited partners. The general partner is usually a major energy company, utility, investment fund or the direct management of the MLP. The general partner normally controls the MLP through a two percent equity interest plus units that are subordinated to the common (publicly traded) units for at least the first five years of the partnership’s existence and then only converting to common if certain financial tests are met.
As a motivation for the general partner to successfully manage the MLP and increase cash flows, the terms of most MLPs typically provide that the general partner receives a larger portion of the net income as distributions reach higher target levels. As cash flow grows, the general partner receives a greater interest in the incremental income compared to the interest of limited partners. The general partner’s incentive compensation typically increases up to 50 percent of incremental income.
Nevertheless, the aggregate amount distributed to limited partners will increase as MLP distributions reach higher target levels. Given this incentive structure, the general partner has an incentive to streamline operations and undertake acquisitions and growth projects in order to increase distributions to all partners.
12 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Business Description
(Continued)
Energy infrastructure MLPs in which Tortoise Capital invests can generally be classified in the following categories:
• | Pipeline MLPs are common carrier transporters of natural gas, natural gas liquids (primarily propane, ethane, butane and natural gasoline), crude oil or refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel). Pipeline MLPs also may operate ancillary businesses such as storage and marketing of such products. Revenue is derived from capacity and transportation fees. Historically, pipeline output has been less exposed to cyclical economic forces due to its low cost structure and government-regulated nature. In addition, pipeline MLPs do not have direct commodity price exposure because they do not own the product being shipped. |
• | Processing MLPs are gatherers and processors of natural gas as well as providers of transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids (NGLs). Revenue is derived from providing services to natural gas producers, which require treatment or processing before their natural gas commodity can be marketed to utilities and other end user markets. Revenue for the processor is fee-based, although it is not uncommon to have some participation in the prices of the natural gas and NGL commodities for a portion of revenue. |
• | Propane MLPs are distributors of propane to homeowners for space and water heating. Revenue is derived from the resale of the commodity on a margin over wholesale cost. The ability to maintain margin is a key to profitability. Propane serves approximately three percent of the household energy needs in the U.S., largely for homes beyond the geographic reach of natural gas distribution pipelines. Approximately 70 percent of annual cash flow is earned during the winter heating season (October through March). Accordingly, volumes are weather dependent, but have utility type functions similar to electricity and natural gas. |
• | Coal MLPs own, lease and manage coal reserves. Revenue is derived from production and sale of coal, or from royalty payments related to leases to coal producers. Electricity generation is the primary use of coal in the United States. Demand for electricity and supply of alternative fuels to generators are the primary drivers of coal demand. Coal MLPs are subject to operating and production risks, such as: the MLP or a lessee meeting necessary production volumes; federal, state and local laws and regulations which may limit the ability to produce coal; the MLPs’ ability to manage production costs and pay mining reclamation costs; and the effect on demand that the Clean Air Act standards have on coal end-users. |
Tortoise Capital invests primarily in equity securities of MLPs, which currently consist of the following instruments: common units, convertible subordinated units and I-Shares. Almost all MLP common units and I-Shares in which Tortoise Capital invests are listed and traded on the NYSE, AMEX or NASDAQ. Tortoise Capital also may purchase MLP common units through direct placements that are not initially readily tradable. MLP convertible subordinated units are not listed or publicly traded and are typically purchased in direct transactions with MLP affiliates or institutional holders of such shares.
MLP common unitholders have typical limited partner rights, including limited management and voting rights. MLP common units have priority over convertible subordinated units upon liquidation. Common unitholders are entitled to minimum quarterly distributions (MQD), including arrearage rights, prior to any distribution payments to convertible subordinated unit holders or incentive distribution payments to the general partner. MLP convertible subordinated units are convertible into common units on a one-to-one basis after the passage of time and/or achievement of specified financial goals. MLP convertible subordinated units are entitled to MQD after the payments to holders of common units and before incentive distributions to the general partner. MLP convertible subordinated units do not have arrearage rights. I-Shares have similar features to common units except that distributions are payable in additional I-Shares rather than cash. Tortoise Capital invests in I-Shares only if it has adequate cash to satisfy its distribution targets.
Although Tortoise Capital also may invest in equity and debt securities of energy infrastructure companies that are organized and/or taxed as corporations, it is likely that any such investments will be in debt securities because the dividends from equity securities of such corporations typically do not meet Tortoise Capital’s investment objective. Tortoise Capital also may invest in securities of general partners or other affiliates of MLPs and private companies operating energy infrastructure assets.
Summary of Investment Policies
Under normal circumstances, Tortoise Capital will invest at least 80 percent of its total assets (including assets obtained through leverage) in equity securities of energy infrastructure MLPs and their affiliates.
Business Description
(Continued)
Tortoise Capital has adopted the following additional nonfundamental investment policies:
• | Tortoise Capital may invest up to 50 percent of its total assets in restricted securities. Subject to this policy, Tortoise Capital may invest without limitation in illiquid securities. |
• | Tortoise Capital may invest up to 20 percent of total assets in debt securities of energy infrastructure companies, including securities rated below noninvestment grade (commonly referred to as junk bonds). |
• | Tortoise Capital will not invest more than 15 percent of total assets in any single issuer. |
• | Tortoise Capital will not engage in short sales. |
Tax Status of Company
Unlike most investment companies, Tortoise Capital is not treated as a regulated investment company under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Internal Revenue Code”). Therefore, Tortoise Capital is obligated to pay federal and applicable state corporate taxes on its taxable income. Unlike regulated investment companies, Tortoise Capital is not required to distribute substantially all of its income and capital gains. Tortoise Capital invests a substantial portion of its assets in MLPs.
Although the MLPs generate income taxable to Tortoise Capital, the Company expects the MLPs to pay cash distributions in excess of the taxable income reportable by Tortoise Capital. Similarly, Tortoise Capital expects to distribute cash in excess of its taxable income to its stockholders and intends to distribute substantially all of its distributable cash flow (generally, cash from operations less certain operating expenses and reserves).
Summary of Tax Features for U.S. Stockholders
Stockholders of Tortoise Capital hold stock of a corporation. Shares of stock differ substantially from partnership interests for federal income tax purposes. Unlike holders of MLP common units, stockholders of Tortoise Capital will not recognize an allocable share of Tortoise Capital income, gains, losses and deductions. Stockholders recognize income only if Tortoise Capital pays distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to the particular shares held by a stockholder. Such distributions will be taxable to a stockholder in the current period as dividend income. Dividend income will be treated as “qualified dividends” for federal income tax purposes, currently subject to favorable capital gains rates. If distributions exceed Tortoise Capital’s allocated current or accumulated earnings and profits, such excess distributions will constitute a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a stockholder’s basis in its stock. To the extent excess distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the amount in excess of basis will be taxed as capital gain.
Based on the historical performance of MLPs, Tortoise Capital expects that a significant portion of distributions to holders of stock will constitute a tax-free return of capital. In addition, earnings and profits are treated generally, for federal income tax purposes, as first being used to pay distributions on the preferred stock, if any, and then to the extent remaining, if any, to pay distributions on common stock. There is no assurance that Tortoise Capital will make regular distributions or that Tortoise Capital’s expectation regarding the tax character of its distributions will be realized. The special tax treatment for qualified dividends is scheduled to expire as of December 31, 2010.
Upon the sale of stock, a stockholder generally will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale proceeds received by the stockholder and the stockholder’s federal income tax basis in its stock sold, as adjusted to reflect return(s) of capital. Generally, such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the stock were held as a capital asset for more than one year.
Distributions
Tortoise Capital intends to pay out substantially all of its Distributable Cash Flow (DCF) to holders of stock through quarterly distributions. DCF is the amount received by Tortoise Capital as cash or paid-in-kind distributions from MLPs or their affiliates, and interest payments received on debt securities owned by Tortoise Capital, less current or anticipated operating expenses, dividends on preferred stock, taxes on Company taxable income, and other leverage costs paid by Tortoise Capital. Tortoise Capital’s Board of Directors adopted a policy to target distributions to stockholders in an amount of at least 95 percent of DCF on an annual basis. Distributions will be paid each fiscal quarter out of DCF, if any. There is no assurance that Tortoise Capital will continue to make regular distributions.
14 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Schedule of Investments
| November 30, 2006
| |
---|
| Shares
|
| Value
| |
---|
Master Limited Partnerships and Related Companies — 162.5%(1) | | | | | | | | |
Crude/Refined Products Pipelines — 89.2%(1) | | |
Buckeye Partners, L.P. | | | | 207,191 | | $ | 9,507,995 | |
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 860,700 | | | 43,086,642 | |
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 49,215 | | | 1,977,951 | |
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(2) | | | | 1,848,889 | | | 85,048,894 | |
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. | | | | 952,429 | | | 36,868,527 | |
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.(3) | | | | 1,923,497 | | | 97,136,599 | |
Sunoco Logistics Partners, L.P. | | | | 848,860 | | | 41,203,664 | |
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. | | | | 755,898 | | | 29,759,704 | |
Valero, L.P. | | | | 690,309 | | | 37,884,158 | |
|
| |
| | | | | | | 382,474,134 | |
|
| |
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquid Pipelines — 23.7%(1) | | |
DCP Midstream Partners, L.P. | | | | 323,250 | | | 10,748,062 | |
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. | | | | 2,597,696 | | | 73,462,843 | |
ONEOK Partners, L.P. | | | | 289,050 | | | 17,470,182 | |
|
| |
| | | | | | | 101,681,087 | |
|
| |
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 44.7%(1) | | |
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, L.P. | | | | 611,060 | | | 18,240,141 | |
Copano Energy, LLC | | | | 529,737 | | | 31,312,754 | |
Crosstex Energy, L.P.(4) | | | | 1,269,913 | | | 47,685,233 | |
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 10,250 | | | 193,622 | |
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.(5) | | | | 547,246 | | | 15,257,218 | |
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. | | | | 771,260 | | | 42,110,796 | |
Hiland Partners, L.P. | | | | 2,200 | | | 116,006 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 337,933 | | | 19,127,008 | |
Regency Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 471,720 | | | 12,703,420 | |
Universal Compression Partners, L.P. | | | | 66,000 | | | 1,644,060 | |
Williams Partners, L.P. | | | | 83,735 | | | 3,238,870 | |
|
| |
| | | | | | | 191,629,128 | |
|
| |
Shipping — 2.3%(1) | | |
K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P. | | | | 280,910 | | | 10,056,578 | |
|
| |
Propane Distribution — 2.6%(1) | | |
Inergy, L.P. | | | | 378,879 | | | 11,218,607 | |
|
| |
Total Master Limited Partnerships and Related Companies (Cost $550,588,463) | | | | | | | 697,059,534 | |
|
| |
| Principal Amount
| |
---|
Promissory Note — 1.3%(1) | | |
Shipping — 1.3%(1) | | |
E.W. Transportation, LLC — Unregistered, 9.12%, Due 3/31/2009 | | |
(Cost $5,565,484)(5)(6) | | | $ | 5,593,999 | | | 5,565,484 | |
|
| |
Schedule of Investments
(Continued)
| November 30, 2006
| |
---|
| Shares
|
| Value
| |
---|
Short-Term Investments — 0.1%(1) | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies — 0.1%(1) | | |
First American Prime Obligations Money Market Fund — Class Y, 5.02%(7) | | | | 173,606 | | $ | 173,606 | |
First American Treasury Obligations Money Market Fund — Class Y, 5.00%(7) | | | | 173,606 | | | 173,606 | |
|
| |
Total Short-Term Investments (Cost $347,212) | | | | | | | 347,212 | |
|
| |
Total Investments — 163.9%(1) (Cost $556,501,159) | | | | | | | 702,972,230 | |
Auction Rate Senior Notes — (28.0%)(1) | | | | | | | (120,000,000 | ) |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts — (0.9%)(1) | | |
$190,000,000 notional — Unrealized Depreciation(8) | | | | | | | (3,624,505 | ) |
Liabilities in Excess of Cash and Other Assets — (18.7%)(1) | | | | | | | (80,337,826 | ) |
Preferred Shares at Redemption Value — (16.3%)(1) | | | | | | | (70,000,000 | ) |
|
| |
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) | | | | | | $ | 429,009,899 | |
|
| |
(1) | Calculated as a percentage of net assets applicable to common stockholders. |
(2) | Non-income producing; security distributions are paid in kind. Related company of master limited partnership. |
(3) | All or a portion of the security is segregated as collateral for the unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts. |
(4) | Due to the Company’s ownership percentage, this investment is deemed an affiliated company. See Note 7 to the financial statements for further disclosure. |
(5) | Fair valued securities represent a total market value of $20,822,702 which represents 4.9% of net assets. These securities are deemed to be restricted; see Note 6 to the financial statements for further disclosure. |
(6) | Security is a variable rate instrument. Interest rate is as of November 30, 2006. |
(7) | Rate indicated is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2006. |
(8) | See Note 11 to the financial statements for further disclosure. |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
16 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
| November 30, 2006
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | |
Investments at value, non-affiliated (cost $512,979,321) | | | $ | 655,286,997 | |
Investments at value, affiliated (cost $43,521,838) | | | | 47,685,233 | |
|
| |
Total investments (cost $556,501,159) | | | | 702,972,230 | |
Cash | | | | 1,145,252 | |
Interest and dividend receivable | | | | 16,603 | |
Distribution receivable from master limited partnerships | | | | 899,374 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | 1,590,949 | |
|
| |
Total assets | | | | 706,624,408 | |
|
| |
Liabilities | | |
Payable to Adviser | | | | 1,045,944 | |
Dividend payable on preferred shares | | | | 237,912 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | | 28,000,000 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | | 606,496 | |
Unrealized depreciation of interest rate swap contracts | | | | 3,624,505 | |
Current tax liability | | | | 27,973 | |
Deferred tax liability | | | | 54,071,679 | |
Auction rate senior notes payable: | | |
Series A, due November 14, 2045 | | | | 60,000,000 | |
Series B, due November 14, 2045 | | | | 60,000,000 | |
|
| |
Total liabilities | | | | 207,614,509 | |
|
| |
Preferred Shares | | |
$25,000 liquidation value per share applicable to 2,800 outstanding shares | | |
(7,500 shares authorized) | | | | 70,000,000 | |
|
| |
Net assets applicable to common stockholders | | | $ | 429,009,899 | |
|
| |
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders Consist of | | |
Capital stock, $0.001 par value; 16,013,802 shares issued and outstanding | | |
(100,000,000 shares authorized) | | | $ | 16,014 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | 344,932,828 | |
Accumulated net investment loss, net of deferred tax benefit | | | | (5,736,773 | ) |
Accumulated realized gain, net of deferred tax expense | | | | 2,637,281 | |
Net unrealized gain on investments and interest rate swap contracts, | | |
net of deferred tax expense | | | | 87,160,549 | |
|
| |
Net assets applicable to common stockholders | | | $ | 429,009,899 | |
|
| |
Net Asset Value per common share outstanding (net assets applicable to common shares, | | |
divided by common shares outstanding) | | | $ | 26.79 | |
|
| |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Statement of Operations
| Year Ended November 30, 2006
| |
---|
Investment Income | | |
Distributions received from master limited partnerships (including $6,182,907 from affiliates) | | | $ | 34,070,980 | |
Less return of capital on distributions (including $5,216,617 from affiliates) | | | | (30,695,532 | ) |
|
| |
Distribution income from master limited partnerships | | | | 3,375,448 | |
Dividends from money market mutual funds | | | | 96,184 | |
Interest | | | | 694,251 | |
|
| |
Total Investment Income | | | | 4,165,883 | |
|
| |
Expenses | | |
Advisory fees | | | | 5,510,366 | |
Administrator fees | | | | 384,837 | |
Professional fees | | | | 215,111 | |
Directors’ fees | | | | 121,401 | |
Reports to stockholders | | | | 118,933 | |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | | 73,257 | |
Fund accounting fees | | | | 62,294 | |
Registration fees | | | | 47,241 | |
Stock transfer agent fees | | | | 14,268 | |
Other expenses | | | | 71,229 | |
|
| |
Total Expenses before Interest Expense and Auction Agent Fees | | | | 6,618,937 | |
|
| |
Interest expense | | | | 6,464,774 | |
Auction agent fees | | | | 458,745 | |
|
| |
Total Interest Expense and Auction Agent Fees | | | | 6,923,519 | |
|
| |
Total Expenses | | | | 13,542,456 | |
|
| |
Net Investment Loss, before Income Taxes | | | | (9,376,573 | ) |
Current tax expense | | | | (27,973 | ) |
Deferred tax benefit | | | | 3,667,773 | |
|
| |
Income tax benefit, net | | | | 3,639,800 | |
|
| |
Net Investment Loss | | | | (5,736,773 | ) |
|
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Interest Rate Swaps | | |
Net realized gain on investments (including $6,026 from affiliates) | | | | 4,223,176 | |
Net realized gain on interest rate swap settlements | | | | 100,754 | |
|
| |
Net realized gain, before deferred tax expense | | | | 4,323,930 | |
Deferred tax expense | | | | (1,686,333 | ) |
|
| |
Net realized gain on investments and interest rate swap settlements | | | | 2,637,597 | |
|
| |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | | | | 146,369,894 | |
Net unrealized depreciation of interest rate swap contracts | | | | (2,150,489 | ) |
|
| |
Net unrealized appreciation, before deferred tax expense | | | | 144,219,405 | |
Deferred tax expense | | | | (56,245,581 | ) |
|
| |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and interest rate swap contracts | | | | 87,973,824 | |
|
| |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Interest Rate Swaps | | | | 90,611,421 | |
|
| |
Dividends to Preferred Stockholders | | | | (3,009,156 | ) |
|
| |
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders | | |
Resulting from Operations | | | $ | 81,865,492 | |
|
| |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
18 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Year Ended November 30, 2006 | | Period from May 31, 2005(1) through November 30, 2005 | |
---|
|
| |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (5,736,773 | ) | $ | 574,502 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | 2,637,597 | | | (316 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | | |
interest rate swap contracts | | | | 87,973,824 | | | (813,275 | ) |
Dividends to preferred stockholders | | | | (3,009,156 | ) | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common stockholders | | |
resulting from operations | | | | 81,865,492 | | | (239,089 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Dividends and Distributions to Common Stockholders | | |
Net investment income | | | | — | | | (512,594 | ) |
Return of capital | | | | (24,029,094 | ) | | (8,649,370 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total dividends to common stockholders | | | | (24,029,094 | ) | | (9,161,964 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Capital Share Transactions | | |
Proceeds from initial public offering of 14,000,000 common shares | | | | — | | | 350,000,000 | |
Proceeds from issuance of 1,887,000 common shares in connection | | |
with exercising an overallotment option granted to underwriters | | |
of the initial public offering | | | | — | | | 47,175,000 | |
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with the | | |
issuance of common shares | | | | — | | | (18,780,799 | ) |
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with the | | |
issuance of preferred shares | | | | (903,565 | ) | | — | |
Issuance of 63,141 and 41,131 common shares from reinvestment | | |
of dividend distributions to stockholders, respectively | | | | 1,621,624 | | | 986,298 | |
|
| |
| |
Net increase in net assets, applicable to common stockholders, | | |
from capital share transactions | | | | 718,059 | | | 379,380,499 | |
|
| |
| |
Total increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders | | | | 58,554,457 | | | 369,979,446 | |
Net Assets | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 370,455,442 | | | 475,996 | |
|
| |
| |
End of period | | | $ | 429,009,899 | | $ | 370,455,442 | |
|
| |
| |
Accumulated net investment loss at the end of the period | | | $ | (5,736,773 | ) | $ | — | |
|
| |
| |
(1) | Commencement of Operations. |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Statement of Cash Flows
| Year Ended November 30, 2006
| |
---|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | | | |
Distributions received from master limited partnerships | | | $ | 33,171,606 | |
Interest and dividend income received | | | | 845,731 | |
Purchases of long-term investments | | | | (130,831,061 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments | | | | 32,931,315 | |
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments, net | | | | 7,360,616 | |
Proceeds from interest rate swap contracts, net | | | | 100,754 | |
Interest expense paid | | | | (6,782,749 | ) |
Operating expenses paid | | | | (6,117,945 | ) |
|
| |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | | (69,321,734 | ) |
|
| |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | |
Issuance of preferred stock | | | | 70,000,000 | |
Advances from revolving line of credit | | | | 101,200,000 | |
Repayments on revolving line of credit | | | | (73,200,000 | ) |
Preferred stock issuance costs | | | | (903,565 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | | | (360,966 | ) |
Dividends paid to common stockholders | | | | (23,598,733 | ) |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | | | | (2,771,244 | ) |
|
| |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | | 70,365,492 | |
|
| |
Net increase in cash | | | | 1,043,758 | |
Cash — beginning of year | | | | 101,494 | |
|
| |
Cash — end of year | | | $ | 1,145,252 | |
|
| |
Reconciliation of net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders | | |
resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities | | |
Net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders resulting from operations | | | | 81,865,492 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders | | |
resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities | | |
Purchases of long-term investments | | | | (130,831,061 | ) |
Return of capital on distributions received | | | | 30,695,532 | |
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments | | | | 32,931,315 | |
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments, net | | | | 7,360,616 | |
Deferred income tax expense | | | | 54,264,141 | |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and interest rate swap contracts | | | | (144,219,405 | ) |
Realized gain on investments | | | | (4,223,176 | ) |
Accretion of discount on long-term investments | | | | (11,933 | ) |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | | | 40,572 | |
Dividends to preferred stockholders | | | | 3,009,156 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | |
Increase in interest receivable | | | | (832,144 | ) |
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | 44,213 | |
Increase in current tax liability | | | | 27,973 | |
Increase in payable to Adviser | | | | 395,088 | |
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | | 161,887 | |
|
| |
Total adjustments | | | | (151,187,226 | ) |
|
| |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | $ | (69,321,734 | ) |
|
| |
Non-Cash Financing Activities | | |
Reinvestment of distributions by common stockholders in additional common shares | | | $ | 1,621,624 | |
|
| |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
20 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Financial Highlights
| Year Ended November 30, 2006 | | Period from May 31, 2005(1)through November 30, 2005 | |
---|
|
| |
Per Common Share Data(2) | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, beginning of period | | | $ | 23.23 | | $ | — | |
Public offering price | | | | — | | | 25.00 | |
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on issuance of common shares | | | | — | | | (1.18 | ) |
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on issuance of preferred shares | | | | (0.06 | ) | | — | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | |
Net investment income (loss)(3) | | | | (0.36 | ) | | 0.04 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments(3) | | | | 5.68 | | | (0.05 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total increase (decrease) from investment operations | | | | 5.32 | | | (0.01 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Less Dividends to Preferred Stockholders: | | |
Net investment income | | | | — | | | — | |
Return of capital | | | | (0.19 | ) | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Total dividends to preferred stockholders | | | | (0.19 | ) | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Less Dividends to Common Stockholders: | | |
Net investment income | | | | — | | | (0.03 | ) |
Return of capital | | | | (1.51 | ) | | (0.55 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total dividends to common stockholders | | | | (1.51 | ) | | (0.58 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net Asset Value, end of period | | | $ | 26.79 | | $ | 23.23 | |
|
| |
| |
Per common share market value, end of period | | | $ | 26.50 | | $ | 22.09 | |
Total Investment Return Based on Market Value(4) | | | | 27.67 | % | | (8.33 | )% |
Financial Highlights
(Continued)
| Year Ended November 30, 2006 | | Period from May 31, 2005(1) through November 30, 2005 | |
---|
|
| |
Supplemental Data and Ratios | | | | | | | | |
Net assets applicable to common stockholders, end of period (000’s) | | | $ | 429,010 | | $ | 370,455 | |
Ratio of expenses (including current and deferred income | | |
tax expense) to average net assets:(5)(6)(7) | | | | 17.38 | % | | 1.29 | % |
Ratio of expenses (excluding current and deferred income | | |
tax expense) to average net assets:(5)(6)(7)(8) | | | | 3.47 | % | | 1.39 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | |
(including current and deferred income tax expense):(5)(6)(7) | | | | (16.31 | )% | | 0.60 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | |
(excluding current and deferred income tax expense):(5)(6)(7)(8) | | | | (2.40 | )% | | 0.50 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate(5) | | | | 5.56 | % | | 0.08 | % |
Tortoise Auction Rate Senior Notes, end of period (000’s) | | | $ | 120,000 | | $ | 120,000 | |
Tortoise Preferred Shares, end of period (000’s) | | | $ | 70,000 | | | — | |
Per common share amount of auction rate senior notes | | |
outstanding at end of period | | | $ | 7.49 | | $ | 7.52 | |
Per common share amount of net assets, excluding auction | | |
rate senior notes, at end of period | | | $ | 34.28 | | $ | 30.75 | |
Asset coverage, per $1,000 of principal amount of auction | | |
rate senior notes and short-term borrowings(9) | | | $ | 4,372 | | $ | 4,087 | |
Asset coverage ratio of auction rate senior notes and short-term borrowings(9) | | | | 437 | % | | 409 | % |
Asset coverage, per $25,000 liquidation value per share of preferred shares(10) | | | $ | 178,218 | | | — | |
Asset coverage ratio of preferred shares(11) | | | | 297 | % | | — | |
(1) | Commencement of Operations. |
(2) | Information presented relates to a share of common stock outstanding for the entire period. |
(3) | The per common share data for the period ended November 30, 2005, do not reflect the change in estimate of investment income and return of capital. See Note 2C to the financial statements for further disclosure. |
(4) | Not Annualized. Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at the beginning of period (or initial public offering price) and a sale at the closing price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of dividends at actual prices pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. |
(5) | Annualized for periods less than one full year. |
(6) | For the year ended November 30, 2006, the Company accrued $54,292,114 in current and deferred income tax expense. For the period from May 31, 2005 through November 30, 2005, the Company accrued $192,462 in net deferred income tax benefit. |
(7) | The expense ratios and net investment loss ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred stockholders. |
(8) | This ratio excludes current and deferred income taxes on net investment income (loss). |
(9) | Represents value of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by auction rate senior notes, short-term borrowings and preferred shares at the end of the period divided by auction rate senior notes and short-term borrowings outstanding at the end of the period. |
(10) | Represents value of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by preferred shares at the end of the period divided by preferred shares outstanding at the end of the period, assuming the retirement of all auction rate senior notes and short-term borrowings. |
(11) | Represents value of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by auction rate senior notes, short-term borrowings and preferred shares at the end of the period divided by the sum of auction rate senior notes, short-term borrowings and preferred shares outstanding at the end of the period. |
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
22 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Notes to Financial Statements
November 30, 2006
1. Organization
Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation (the “Company”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on March 4, 2005, and is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Company’s investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on current cash distributions paid to stockholders. The Company seeks to provide its stockholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in the energy infrastructure sector. The Company received the proceeds of its initial public offering and commenced operations on May 31, 2005. The Company’s shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TYY.”
2. Significant Accounting Policies
A. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, recognition of distribution income, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
B. Investment Valuation
The Company owns securities that are listed on a securities exchange. The Company values those securities at their last sale price on that exchange on the valuation date. If the security is listed on more than one exchange, the Company uses the price of that exchange that it generally considers to be the principal exchange on which the stock is traded. Securities listed on the NASDAQ will be valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price, which may not necessarily represent the last sale price. If there has been no sale on such exchange or NASDAQ on such day, the security will be valued at the mean between bid and asked price on such day.
The Company may invest up to 50 percent of its total assets in restricted securities. Restricted securities are subject to statutory or contractual restrictions on their public resale, which may make it more difficult to obtain a valuation and may limit the Company’s ability to dispose of them. Investments in restricted securities and other securities for which market quotations are not readily available will be valued in good faith by using fair value procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Such fair value procedures consider factors such as discounts to publicly traded issues, securities with similar yields, quality, type of issue, coupon, duration and rating.
The Company generally values short-term debt securities at prices based on market quotations for such securities, except those securities purchased with 60 days or less to maturity are valued on the basis of amortized cost, which approximates market value.
The Company generally values its interest rate swap contracts using industry-accepted models which discount the estimated future cash flows based on the stated terms of the interest rate swap agreement by using interest rates currently available in the market, or based on dealer quotations, if available.
If events occur that affect the value of the Company’s portfolio securities before the net asset value has been calculated (a “significant event”), the portfolio securities so affected will generally be priced using a fair value procedure.
C. Security Transactions and Investment Income
Security transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains and losses are reported on an identified cost basis. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Dividend and distribution income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from the Company’s investments in master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) generally are comprised of ordinary income, capital gains and return of capital from the MLP. The Company records investment income and return of capital based on estimates made at the time such distributions are received. Such estimates are based on historical information available from each MLP and other industry sources. These estimates may subsequently be revised based on information received from MLPs after their tax reporting periods are concluded, as the actual character of these distributions is not known until after the fiscal year-end of the Company.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
For the period from May 31, 2005 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2005, the Company estimated the allocation of investment income and return of capital for the distributions received from MLPs within the Statement of Operations. For this period, the Company had estimated approximately 21 percent as investment income and approximately 79 percent as return of capital.
Subsequent to November 30, 2005, the Company reclassified the amount of investment income and return of capital it recognized based on the 2005 tax reporting information received from the individual MLPs. This reclassification amounted to a decrease in pre-tax net investment income of approximately $1.3 million or $0.08 per share ($0.8 million or $0.05 per share, net of deferred tax benefit), and a corresponding increase in unrealized appreciation of investments, net of deferred tax expense, for the year ended November 30, 2006. The reclassification is reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
D. Dividends to Stockholders
Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The character of dividends to common stockholders made during the year may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. For the year ended November 30, 2006, the Company’s dividends, for book and tax purposes, were comprised entirely of return of capital as a result of the net investment loss incurred by the Company in the reporting period. For the period from May 31, 2005 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2005, the Company’s dividends, for book purposes, were comprised of approximately 5 percent investment income and 95 percent return of capital and 100 percent return of capital for tax purposes.
Dividends to preferred stockholders are based on variable rates set at auctions, normally held every 28 days. Dividends on preferred shares are accrued on a daily basis for the subsequent 28 day period at a rate as determined on the auction date. Dividends on preferred shares are payable every 28 days, on the first day following the end of the dividend period. The character of dividends to preferred stockholders made during the year may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. For the years ended November 30, 2006 and the period from May 31, 2005 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2005, for tax purposes, the Company determined the dividends to preferred stockholders were comprised entirely of return of capital.
E. Federal Income Taxation
The Company, as a corporation, is obligated to pay federal and state income tax on its taxable income. The Company invests its assets primarily in MLPs, which generally are treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As a partner in the MLPs, the Company reports its allocable share of the MLP’s taxable income in computing its own taxable income. The Company’s tax expense or benefit is included in the Statement of Operations based on the component of income or gains (losses) to which such expense or benefit relates. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized.
F. Organization Expenses, Offering and Debt Issuance Costs
The Company is responsible for paying all organizational expenses, which are expensed as incurred. Offering costs related to the issuance of common and preferred stock is charged to additional paid-in capital when the shares are issued. Offering costs (excluding underwriter commissions) of $203,565 were charged to additional paid-in capital for the issuance of preferred stock in January 2006. Debt issuance costs related to the auction rate senior notes are capitalized and amortized over the period the notes are outstanding.
G. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk. The Company has established policies and procedures for risk assessment and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in value during the reporting period, and amounts accrued under the derivative instruments, included as unrealized gains or losses in the Statement of Operations. Monthly cash settlements under the terms of the derivative instruments are recorded as realized gains or losses in the Statement of Operations.
24 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
H. Indemnifications
Under the Company’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred, and may not occur. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
I. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, but not before the Company’s last NAV calculation in the first required financial statement reporting period for its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. At this time, the Company is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and whether it will have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement on Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This standard establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company beginning December 1, 2007. The changes to current generally accepted accounting principles from the application of this statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company has recently begun to evaluate the application of the statement, and is not in a position at this time to evaluate the significance of its impact, if any, on the Company’s financial statements.
3. Concentration of Risk
The Company’s investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to its stockholders. Under normal circumstances, and once fully invested in accordance with its investment objective, the Company will have at least 80 percent of its total assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, invested in equity securities of entities in the energy sector within the United States and at least 80 percent of its total assets in equity securities of MLPs and their affiliates in the energy infrastructure sector. The Company will not invest more than 15 percent of its total assets in any single issuer as of the time of purchase. The Company may invest up to 20 percent of its total assets in debt securities, including securities rated below investment grade. In determining application of these policies, the term “total assets” includes assets to be obtained through anticipated leverage.
4. Agreements
The Company has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with Tortoise Capital Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company pays the Adviser a fee equal to an annual rate of 0.95 percent of the Company’s average monthly total assets (including any assets attributable to leverage) minus accrued liabilities (other than deferred income taxes, debt entered into for purposes of leverage and the aggregate liquidation preference of outstanding preferred shares) (“Managed Assets”), in exchange for the investment advisory services provided. Prior to May 31, 2006, the Company paid the Adviser a fee equal to an annual rate of 0.90 percent of the Company’s Managed Assets.
The Company has engaged U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC to serve as the Company’s administrator. The Company pays the administrator a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.07 percent of the first $300 million of the Company’s Managed Assets, 0.06 percent on the next $500 million of Managed Assets and 0.04 percent on the balance of the Company’s Managed Assets.
Notes to Financial Statements
November 30, 2006
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. serves as the Company’s transfer agent, dividend paying agent, and agent for the automatic dividend reinvestment plan.
U.S. Bank, N.A. serves as the Company’s custodian. The Company pays the custodian a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.015 percent on the first $100 million of the Company’s Managed Assets and 0.01 percent on the balance of the Company’s Managed Assets.
5. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of November 30, 2006 are as follows:
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | | | $ | 7,509,385 | |
Organization costs | | | | 21,596 | |
|
| |
| | | | 7,530,981 | |
|
| |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | |
Net unrealized gains on investment securities and interest rate swap contracts | | | | 55,710,174 | |
Basis reduction of investment in MLPs | | | | 5,892,486 | |
|
| |
| | | | 61,602,660 | |
|
| |
Total net deferred tax liability | | | $ | 54,071,679 | |
|
| |
For the year ended November 30, 2006, the components of income tax expense include current foreign taxes of $27,973 and deferred federal and state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit) of $48,697,471 and $5,566,670, respectively. As of November 30, 2006, the Company had a net operating loss for federal income tax purposes of approximately $19,231,000. This net operating loss may be carried forward for 20 years. If not utilized this net operating loss will expire as follows: $555,000 and $18,676,000 in the years ending November 30, 2025 and 2026, respectively.
Total income taxes differ from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent to net investment loss and realized and unrealized gains (loss) on investments and interest rate swaps before taxes, as follows:
Application of statutory income tax rate | | | $ | 48,708,367 | |
State income taxes, net of federal taxes | | | | 5,566,670 | |
Other, net | | | | 17,077 | |
|
| |
Total | | | $ | 54,292,114 | |
|
| |
At November 30, 2006, a valuation allowance was not recorded because the Company believes it is more likely than not, that there is an ability to utilize its deferred tax asset.
As of November 30, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for Federal income tax purposes was $541,392,222. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost was $161,580,008 and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value was $0.
26 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
6. Restricted Securities
Certain of the Company’s investments are restricted and are valued as determined in accordance with procedures established by the Board of Directors and more fully described in Note 2. The table below shows the number of units held or principal amount, the acquisition date, acquisition cost, value per unit and percent of net assets which the securities comprise.
Investment Security | Number of Units or Principal Amount | Acquisition Date | Acquisition Cost | Value Per Unit | Percent of Net Assets |
---|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. | | | | Common Units | | | 547,246 | | | 11/27/06 | | | $15,000,013 | | | $27.88 | | | 3.6 | % |
E.W. Transportation, LLC | | | | Promissory Note | | | $5,593,999 | | | 9/08/05 | | | 5,552,044 | | | N/A | | | 1.3 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | $20,552,057 | | | | | | 4.9 | % |
|
| |
| |
7. Investments in Affiliates
Investments representing 5 percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of a portfolio company result in that company being considered an affiliated company, as defined in the 1940 Act. The aggregate market value of all securities of affiliates held by the Company as of November 30, 2006 amounted to $47,685,233, representing 11.1 percent of net assets applicable to common stockholders. A summary of affiliated transactions for each company which is or was an affiliate at or during the year ended November 30, 2006 is as follows:
| November 30, 2006 | |
---|
| Share Balance 11/30/05 | Gross Additions | | Gross Deductions | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | Distribution Income | | Share Balance | | Market Value | |
---|
|
Crosstex Energy Partners, L.P. | | | | 1,269,913 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,557,721 | | | 1,269,913 | | $ | 47,685,233 | |
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. * | | | | 1,617,500 | | | 105,669 | | | 243,887 | | | 6,026 | | | 3,625,186 | | | — | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | $ | 105,669 | | $ | 243,887 | | $ | 6,026 | | $ | 6,182,907 | | | | | $ | 47,685,233 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
* This security merged with Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. on November 16, 2006 and was not an affiliate at November 30, 2006.
8. Investment Transactions
For the year ended November 30, 2006, the Company purchased (at cost) and sold securities (at proceeds) in the amount of $130,831,061 and $32,931,315 (excluding short-term debt securities and interest rate swaps), respectively.
9. Auction Rate Senior Notes
The Company has issued two $60,000,000 aggregate principal amounts of auction rate senior notes Series A and Series B, respectively (collectively, the “Notes”). The Notes were issued in denominations of $25,000. The principal amount of the Notes will be due and payable on November 14, 2045. Fair value of the Notes approximates carrying amount because the interest rate fluctuates with changes in interest rates available in the current market.
Holders of the Notes are entitled to receive cash interest payments at an annual rate that may vary for each rate period. Interest rates for Series A and Series B as of November 30, 2006, were 5.44 percent and 5.50 percent, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for Series A and Series B for the year ended November 30, 2006, were 5.09 percent and 5.13 percent, respectively. These rates include the applicable rate based on the latest results of the auction, plus commissions paid to the auction agent in the amount of 0.25 percent which is included in the auction agent fees in the accompanying Statement of Operations. For each subsequent rate period, the interest rate will be determined by an auction conducted in accordance with the procedures described in the Notes’ prospectus. Generally, the rate period will be 28 days for Series A and Series B. The Notes will not be listed on any exchange or automated quotation system.
The Notes are redeemable in certain circumstances at the option of the Company. The Notes are also subject to a mandatory redemption if the Company fails to meet an asset coverage ratio required by law, or fails to cure in a timely manner a deficiency as stated in the rating agency guidelines applicable to the Notes.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and, upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, will rank: (1) senior to all the Company’s outstanding preferred shares; (2) senior to all of the Company’s outstanding common shares; (3) on a parity with any unsecured creditors of the Company and any unsecured senior securities representing indebtedness of the Company; and (4) junior to any secured creditors of the Company.
10. Preferred Shares
The Company has 7,500 authorized Money Market Preferred (“MMP”) Shares, of which 2,800 shares are currently outstanding. The MMP Shares have rights determined by the Board of Directors. The MMP Shares have a liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus any accumulated, but unpaid dividends, whether or not declared. Fair value of the MMP Shares approximates carrying amount because the interest rate fluctuates with changes in interest rates available in the current market.
Holders of the MMP Shares are entitled to receive cash dividend payments at an annual rate that may vary for each rate period. The dividend rate for the MMP Shares as of November 30, 2006, was 5.57 percent. The weighted average dividend rate for the MMP Shares for year ended November 30, 2006, was 5.34 percent. This rate includes the applicable rate based on the latest results of the auction, plus commissions paid to the auction agent in the amount of 0.25 percent which is included in the auction agent fees in the accompanying Statement of Operations. Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Company may not declare dividends or make other distributions on shares of common stock or purchases of such shares if, at the time of the declaration, distribution or purchase, asset coverage with respect to the outstanding MMP Shares would be less than 200 percent.
The MMP Shares are redeemable in certain circumstances at the option of the Company. The MMP Shares are also subject to a mandatory redemption if the Company fails to meet an asset coverage ratio required by law, or fails to cure a deficiency in a timely manner as stated in the rating agency guidelines.
The holders of MMP Shares have voting rights equal to the holders of common stock (one vote per share) and will vote together with the holders of shares of common stock as a single class except on matters affecting only the holders of preferred stock or the holders of common stock.
11. Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The Company has entered into interest rate swap contracts to protect itself from increasing interest expense on its leverage resulting from increasing short-term interest rates. A decline in interest rates may result in a decline in the value of the swap contracts, which may result in a decline in the net assets of the Company. In addition, if the counterparty to the interest rate swap contracts defaults, the Company would not be able to use the anticipated receipts under the swap contracts to offset the interest payments on the Company’s leverage. At the time the interest rate swap contracts reach their scheduled termination, there is a risk that the Company would not be able to obtain a replacement transaction, or that the terms of the replacement would not be as favorable as on the expiring transaction. In addition, if the Company is required to terminate any swap contract early due to the Company failing to maintain a required 300 percent and 200 percent asset coverage of the liquidation value of the outstanding auction rate senior notes and MMP shares, respectively, or if the Company loses its credit rating on its auction rate senior notes or MMP Shares, then the Company could be required to make a termination payment, in addition to redeeming all or some of the auction rate senior notes and MMP Shares. Details of the interest rate swap contracts outstanding as of November 30, 2006, were as follows:
Counterparty | Maturity Date | Notional Amount | Fixed Rate Paid by the Company | Floating Rate Received by the Company | Unrealized Depreciation |
---|
|
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 11/25/2015 | | | $ 60,000,000 | | | 5.11 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | $ (1,327,881 | ) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 12/02/2015 | | | 60,000,000 | | | 5.11 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | (1,330,089 | ) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 2/15/2013 | | | 20,000,000 | | | 4.95 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | (206,089 | ) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 3/01/2018 | | | 20,000,000 | | | 4.99 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | (256,990 | ) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 2/28/2017 | | | 15,000,000 | | | 5.05 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | (276,853 | ) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. | | | | 2/28/2015 | | | 15,000,000 | | | 5.01 | % | | 1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR | | | (226,603 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | | $190,000,000 | | | | | | | | | $ (3,624,505 | ) |
|
| |
| |
28 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Company is exposed to credit risk on the interest rate swap contracts if the counterparty should fail to perform under the terms of the interest rate swap contracts. The amount of credit risk is limited to the net appreciation of the interest rate swap contract, as no collateral is pledged by the counterparty.
12. Common Stock
The Company has 100,000,000 shares of beneficial interest authorized and 16,013,802 shares outstanding at November 30, 2006. Transactions in common shares for the period May 31, 2005 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2005, and the year ended November 30, 2006, were as follows:
Shares at May 31, 2005 | | | 22,530 | |
Shares sold through initial public offering and exercise of overallotment options | | | 15,887,000 | |
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends | | | 41,131 | |
|
| |
Shares at November 30, 2005 | | | 15,950,661 | |
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends | | | 63,141 | |
|
| |
Shares at November 30, 2006 | | | 16,013,802 | |
|
| |
13. Credit Facilities
On December 5, 2005, the Company entered into a $50 million unsecured committed credit facility maturing February 10, 2006, with U.S. Bank, N.A. The credit facility had a variable annual interest rate equal to the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.75 percent. Proceeds from the credit facility were used to execute the Company’s investment objective. The credit facility was retired on January 31, 2006, with the proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares described in Note 10. The average outstanding borrowing and interest rate for the period during which the credit facility was utilized was approximately $33.6 million and 5.28 percent, respectively.
On July 25, 2006, the Company entered into a $20 million unsecured committed credit facility, maturing July 25, 2007, with U.S. Bank, N.A. On November 22, 2006, the principal amount of the credit facility was increased to $40 million. The credit facility has a variable annual interest rate equal to the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.75 percent. The average principal balance and interest rate for the period during which the credit facility was utilized was approximately $10.7 million and 6.10 percent, respectively. At November 30, 2006, the principal balance outstanding was $28 million.
14. Subsequent Events
On December 13, 2006, the Company increased the principal amount of the credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A. to $60 million.
On January 12, 2007, the Company filed an initial shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. When effective, the shelf will allow the Company to issue, in multiple offerings, common stock, preferred stock and debt securities.
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation (the Company), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2006, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the periods indicated therein. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation at November 30, 2006, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended and the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for the periods indicated therein, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Kansas City, Missouri
January 16, 2007
30 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Company Officers and Directors (Unaudited)
November 30, 2006
Name and Age* | | Position(s) Held with Company and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation During past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director2 | | Other Public Company Directorships Held by Director |
|
Independent Directors |
Conrad S. Ciccotello (Born 1960) | | Director since 2005 | | Tenured Associate Professor of Risk Management and Insurance, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University (faculty member since 1999); Director of Graduate Personal Financial Planning (PFP) Programs, Editor, “Financial Services Review,” (an academic journal dedicated to the study of individual financial management); formerly, faculty member, Pennsylvania State University (1997-1999). | | 3 | | None |
|
John R. Graham, (Born 1945) | | Director since 2005 | | Executive-in-Residence and Professor of Finance, College of Business Administration, Kansas State University (has served as a professor or adjunct professor since 1970); Chairman of the Board, President and CEO, Graham Capital Management, Inc., primarily a real estate development and investment company and a venture capital company; and Owner of Graham Ventures, a business services and venture capital firm; formerly, CEO, Kansas Farm Bureau Financial Services, including seven affiliated insurance or financial service companies (1979-2000). | | 3 | | Erie Indemnity Company; Kansas State Bank |
|
Charles E. Heath, (Born 1942) | | Director since 2005 | | Retired in 1999. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, GE Capital’s Employers Reinsurance Corporation (1989-1999). Chartered Financial Analyst (“CFA”) since 1974. | | 3 | | None |
|
(1) | As a result of their respective positions held with the Adviser or its affiliates, these individuals are considered “interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. |
(2) | This number includes Tortoise North American Energy Corporation (“TYN”) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation (“TYG”). The Adviser also serves as investment adviser to TYN, TYG and Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation (“TTO”), a fund that intends to elect to become a business development company in the first half of 2007. Each independent director is also an independent director of TTO. |
* | The address of each director and officer is 10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 222, Overland Park, Kansas 66210. |
Company Officers and Directors (Unaudited)
November 30, 2006 (Continued)
Name and Age* | | Position(s) Held with Company and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation During past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director2 | | Other Public Company Directorships Held by Director |
|
Interested Directors and Officers1 |
H. Kevin Birzer, (Born 1959) | | Class II Director and Chairman of the Board since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital Management (1990-present); formerly, Vice President, Corporate Finance Department, Drexel Burnham Lambert (1986-1989); Vice President, F. Martin Koenig & Co., an investment management firm (1983-1986). | | 3 | | None |
|
Terry C. Matlack, (Born 1956) | | Class I Director and Chief Financial Officer since 2005; Assistant Treasurer since November 2005; Chief Compliance Officer from 2005 to June 2006; Treasurer from inception to November 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Managing Director, KCEP (2001-present); formerly, President, GreenStreet Capital, a private investment firm (1998-2001). | | 3 | | None |
|
David J. Schulte, (Born 1961) | | President and Chief Executive Officer since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Managing Director, KCEP (1993-present); CFA since 1992. | | | | None |
|
Zachary A. Hamel, (Born 1965) | | Senior Vice President and Secretary since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital Management (1997-present). | | | | None |
|
Kenneth P. Malvey, (Born 1965) | | Senior Vice President since inception; Treasurer since November 2005; Assistant Treasurer from inception to November 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital Management (2002-present); formerly, Investment Risk Manager and member of the Global Office of Investments, GE Capital’s Employers Reinsurance Corporation (1996-2002). | | | | None |
|
(1) | As a result of their respective positions held with the Adviser or its affiliates, these individuals are considered “interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. |
(2) | This number includes Tortoise North American Energy Corporation (“TYN”) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation (“TYG”). The Adviser also serves as investment adviser to TYN, TYG and to TTO. Mr. Bizer is also a director and Chairman of the Board of TTO. Mr. Matlack is also a director of TTO and is the Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer of each of TYG, TYN and TTO. Mr. Schulte is the President and Chief Executive Officer of each of TYG, TYN and TTO. Mr. Hamel is the Secretary of each of TYG, TYN and TTO. Mr. Malvey is the Treasurer of each of TYG, TYN and TTO. |
* | The address of each director and officer is 10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 222, Overland Park, Kansas 66210. |
32 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)
Director and Officer Compensation
The Company does not compensate any of its directors who are interested persons nor any of its officers. The following table sets forth information with respect to the aggregate compensation paid by the Company to each independent director during fiscal 2006 for their services as a director. The Company did not pay any special compensation to any of its directors or officers.
Independent Directors | Aggregate Compensation from Company |
---|
|
Conrad S. Ciccotello | | | | $28,880 | |
John R. Graham | | | | $26,880 | |
Charles E. Heath | | | | $25,880 | |
Aggregate Compensation Paid by Company to Independent Directors | | | | $81,640 | |
Stockholder Proxy Voting Results
The annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 12, 2006. The matters considered at the meeting, together with the actual vote tabulations relating to such matters are as follows:
1. | To elect Charles E. Heath and Terry C. Matlack as Directors of the Company, each to hold office for a term of three years and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. |
| No. of Shares |
---|
(i) Charles E. Heath | | | | | |
Affirmative | | | | 14,953,790 | |
Withheld | | | | 221,024 | |
|
| |
TOTAL | | | | 15,174,814 | |
(ii) Terry C. Matlack | | |
Affirmative | | | | 14,938,765 | |
Withheld | | | | 236,049 | |
|
| |
TOTAL | | | | 15,174,814 | |
John R. Graham and H. Kevin Birzer continued as directors and their terms expire on the date of the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, and Conrad S. Ciccotello continued as a director and his term expires on the date of the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
2. | To grant the Company the authority to sell common shares for less than net asset value, subject to certain conditions. |
Vote of Common Stockholders of Record (47 Stockholders of Record as of Record Date) | | No. of Record Holders Voting |
---|
Affirmative | | | | 25 | |
Against | | | | 3 | |
Abstain | | | | 3 | |
Broker Non-votes | | | | 0 | |
|
| |
TOTAL | | | | 31 | |
Vote of Common Stockholders | | | No. of Shares |
Affirmative | | | | 5,299,455 | |
Against | | | | 724,263 | |
Abstain | | | | 305,176 | |
Broker Non-votes | | | | 8,845,920 | |
|
| |
TOTAL | | | | 15,174,814 | |
Additional Information (Unaudited)
(Continued)
3. | To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for its fiscal year ending November 30, 2006. |
| No. of Shares |
---|
Affirmative | | | | 15,022,302 | |
Against | | | | 60,329 | |
Abstain | | | | 92,183 | |
|
| |
TOTAL | | | | 15,174,814 | |
Based upon votes required for approval, each of these matters passed.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933. By their nature, all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Several factors that could materially affect Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation’s (the Company) actual results are the performance of the portfolio of investments held by it, the conditions in the U.S. and international financial, petroleum and other markets, and the price at which shares of the Company will trade in the public markets. These factors and additional factors are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s public filings with the SEC.
Proxy Voting Policies
A description of the policies and procedures that the Company uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities owned by the Company and information regarding how the Company voted proxies relating to the portfolio of securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006 are available to stockholders (i) without charge, upon request by calling the Company at (913) 981-1020 or toll-free at (866) 362-9331 and on the Company’s Web site at www.tortoiseadvisors.com; and (ii) on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
The Company files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year with the SEC on Form N-Q. The Company’s Form N-Qs and statement of additional information are available without charge upon request by calling the Company toll-free at (866) 362-9331 or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may review and copy the Company’s Form N-Qs at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling (800) SEC-0330.
The Company’s Form N-Qs are also available on the company’s Web site at www.tortoiseadvisors.com.
Statement of Additional Information
The Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) includes additional information about the fund directors and is available upon request without charge by calling the Company toll-free at (866) 362-9331.
Annual Certification
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
The Company has filed with the SEC the certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Privacy Policy
In order to conduct its business, the Company collects and maintains certain nonpublic personal information about its stockholders of record with respect to their transactions in shares of the Company’s securities. This information includes the stockholder’s address, tax identification or Social Security number, share balances, and dividend elections. We do not collect or maintain personal information about stockholders whose share balances of the Company’s securities are held in “street name” by a financial institution such as a bank or broker.
34 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)
(Continued)
We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about you, the Company’s other stockholders or its former stockholders to third parties unless necessary to process a transaction, service an account, or as otherwise permitted by law.
To protect your personal information internally, we restrict access to nonpublic personal information about the Company’s stockholders to those employees who need to know that information to provide services to our stockholders. We also maintain certain other safeguards to protect you nonpublic personal information.
Important Notice About Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Board of Directors of the Company has approved amendments to the Company’s Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”) as described below. The Amended Plan becomes effective on April 1, 2007.
If a stockholder’s shares are registered directly with the Company or with a brokerage firm that participates in the Company’s Plan (and upon effectiveness, the Amended Plan), all distributions are automatically reinvested for stockholders by the Agent in additional shares of common stock of the Company (unless a stockholder is ineligible or elects otherwise). Stockholders holding shares that participate in the Plan in a brokerage account may not be able to transfer the shares to another broker and continue to participate in the Plan. Stockholders who elect not to participate in the Plan (or the Amended Plan) will receive all distributions payable in cash paid by check mailed directly to the stockholder of record (or, if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to such nominee) by Computershare, as dividend paying agent. Distributions subject to tax (if any) are taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
If, on the distribution payment date, the net asset value per share of the common stock is equal to or less than the market price per share of common stock plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Company will issue additional shares of common stock to participants. The number of shares will be determined by the greater of the net asset value per share or 95 percent of the market price. Otherwise, shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the Agent as soon as possible following the payment date or purchase date, but in no event later than 30 days after such date except as necessary to comply with applicable law. The plan previously provided that purchases would be made prior to the succeeding ex-dividend date. The amendments to the plan also eliminate provisions which gave the plan agent the discretion to cease open market purchases upon a subsequent change in the market discount. There are no brokerage charges with respect to shares issued directly by the Company as a result of distributions payable either in shares or in cash. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Agent’s open-market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of distributions. If a participant elects to have the Agent sell part or all of his or her common stock and remit the proceeds, such participant will be charged a transaction fee of $15.00 plus his or her pro rata share of brokerage commissions on the shares sold.
Stockholders may elect not to participate in the Plan (or the Amended Plan) by sending written instructions to Computershare, as dividend paying agent, at the address set forth below. Participation is completely voluntary and may be terminated or resumed at any time without penalty by giving notice in writing to the Agent; such termination will be effective with respect to a particular distribution if notice is received prior to such record date.
Additional information about the Plan (and the Amended Plan) may be obtained by writing to Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, R.I. 02940-3078. You may also contact Computershare by phone at (312) 588-4990 or visit their Web site at www.computershare.com.
Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
In approving the renewal of the Investment Advisory Agreement in November 2006, the independent directors (“Directors”) of Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation (the “Company”) requested and received extensive data and information from the Adviser concerning the Company and the services provided to it by the Adviser under the Investment Advisory Agreement. In addition, the Directors requested and received data and information from independent, third-party sources regarding the factors considered in their evaluation.
Factors Considered
The Directors considered and evaluated all the information provided by the Adviser. The Directors did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Director may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to renew the agreement, the Directors’ decision was based on the following factors.
Additional Information (Unaudited)
(Continued)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided. The Directors considered information regarding the history, qualification and background of the Adviser and the individuals responsible for the Adviser’s investment program, the adequacy of the number of Adviser personnel and other Adviser resources and plans for growth, use of affiliates of the Adviser, and the particular expertise with respect to energy infrastructure companies, MLP markets and financing (including private financing). The Directors concluded that the unique nature of the Company and the specialized expertise of the Adviser in the niche market of MLPs made it uniquely qualified to serve as the advisor. Further, the Directors recognized that the Adviser’s commitment to a long-term investment horizon correlated well to the investment strategy of the Company.
Investment Performance of the Company and the Adviser, Costs of the Services To Be Provided and Profits To Be Realized by the Adviser and its Affiliates from the Relationship, and Fee Comparisons. The Directors reviewed and evaluated information regarding the Company’s performance (including quarterly, last twelve months, and from inception) and the performance of the other Adviser accounts (including other investment companies), and information regarding the nature of the markets during the performance period, with a particular focus on the MLP sector. The Directors also considered the Company’s performance as compared to comparable closed-end funds for the relevant periods.
The Adviser provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing services to the Company, its profitability in managing the Company, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Directors have reviewed with the Adviser the methodology used to prepare this financial information. This financial information regarding the Adviser is considered in order to evaluate the Adviser’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and the reasonableness of the current management fee, and was, to the extent possible, evaluated in comparison to other closed-end funds with similar investment objectives and strategies.
The Directors considered and evaluated information regarding fees charged to, and services provided to, other investment companies advised by the Adviser (including the impact of any fee reimbursement arrangements), fees charged to separate institutional accounts by the Adviser, and comparisons of fees of closed-end funds with similar investment objectives and strategies, including other MLP investment companies, to the Company. The Directors noted that the fee charged to the Company (0.95% of the company’s average monthly Managed Assets) is below the average of the fees charged to comparable closed-end MLP funds. The Directors concluded that the fees and expenses that the Company is paying under the Advisory Agreement are reasonable given the quality of services provided under the Advisory Agreement and that such fees and expenses are comparable to, and in many cases lower than, the fees charged by advisors to comparable funds.
Economies of Scale. The Directors considered information from the Adviser concerning whether economies of scale would be realized as the Company grows, and whether fee levels reflect any economies of scale for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders. The Directors concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict overall. Accordingly, the Directors reviewed other information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Adviser generally, the profitability of its management of the Company specifically, and the fees of competitive funds not managed by the Adviser over a range of asset sizes. The Directors concluded the Adviser is appropriately sharing any economies of scale through its competitive fee structure and through reinvestment in its business to provide stockholders additional content and services.
Collateral Benefits Derived by the Adviser. The Directors reviewed information from the Adviser concerning collateral benefits it receives as a result of its relationship with the Company. They concluded that the Adviser generally does not use the Company’s or stockholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them.
The Directors did not, with respect to their deliberations concerning their approval of the continuation of the Investment Advisory Agreement, consider the benefits the Adviser may derive for relationships the Adviser may have with brokers through soft dollar arrangements because the Adviser does not employ any such arrangements in rendering its advisory services to the Company.
Conclusions of the Directors
As a result of this process, the independent directors, assisted by the advice of legal counsel that is independent of the Adviser, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Adviser, unanimously concluded that the Investment Advisory Agreement between the Company and the Adviser is fair and reasonable in light of the services provided and should be renewed.
36 | Tortoise Energy Capital Corp. |
|
Office of the Company and of the Investment Adviser Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. 10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 222 Overland Park, Kan. 66210 (913) 981-1020 (913) 981-1021 (fax) www.tortoiseadvisors.com
Managing Directors of Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. H. Kevin Birzer Zachary A. Hamel Kenneth P. Malvey Terry Matlack David J. Schulte
Board of Directors of Tortoise Energy Capital Corp.
H. Kevin Birzer, Chairman Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Terry Matlack Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Conrad S. Ciccotello Independent
John R. Graham Independent
Charles E. Heath Independent | ADMINISTRATOR U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, L.L.C. 615 East Michigan St. Milwaukee, Wis. 53202
CUSTODIAN U.S. Bank, N.A. 1555 North Rivercenter Drive, Suite 302 Milwaukee, Wis. 53212
TRANSFER, DIVIDEND DISBURSING AND REINVESTMENT AGENT Computershare Trust Company, N.A. P.O. Box 43078 Providence, R.I. 02940-3078 (312) 588-4990 www.computershare.com
LEGAL COUNSEL Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP 4801 Main St. Kansas City, Mo. 64112
INVESTOR RELATIONS (866) 362-9331 info@tortoiseadvisors.com
STOCK SYMBOL Listed NYSE Symbol: TYY
This report is for stockholder information. This is not a prospectus intended for use in the purchase or sale of fund shares. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and your investment may be worth more or less at the time you sell. |
Tortoise Capital Advisor’s Family of Funds
|
Name | | Ticker/ Inception Date | | Targeted Investments | | Investor Suitability | | Investment Restrictions | | Total Assets as of 11/30/06 ($ in millions) |
|
Tortoise Capital | | TYY May 2005 | | U.S. Energy Infrastructure | | Retirement Accounts Pension Plans Taxable Accounts | | 50% Restricted Securities 15% Issuer-Limited | | $707 |
Tortoise Energy | | TYG Feb. 2004 | | U.S. Energy Infrastructure | | Retirement Accounts Pension Plans Taxable Accounts | | 30% Restricted Securities 10% Issuer-Limited | | $928 |
Tortoise North America | | TYN Oct. 2005 | | Canadian and U.S. Energy Infrastructure | | Taxable Accounts | | 50% Restricted Securities Diversified to Meet RIC Requirements | | $173 |
“...Steady Wins™"
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Investment Adviser to
Tortoise Energy Capital Corp.
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222 • Overland Park, Kan. 66210 • (913) 981-1020 • (913) 981-1021 (fax) • www.tortoiseadvisors.com |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Registrant has not made any amendments to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report. The Registrant has not granted any waivers from any provisions of this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant’s Board of Directors has determined that there is at least one “audit committee financial expert” serving on its audit committee. Mr. Conrad Ciccotello is the “audit committee financial expert” and is considered to be “independent” as each term is defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. In addition to his experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements, Mr. Ciccotello has a Ph.D. in Finance.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The Registrant has engaged its principal accountant to perform audit services, audit-related services and tax services during the past two fiscal years. “Audit services” refer to performing an audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. “Audit-related services” refer to the assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit. “Tax services” refer to professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. The following table details the approximate amounts of aggregate fees billed to the Registrant for the last two fiscal years for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees by the principal accountant.
|
| FYE 11/30/2006 | FYE 11/30/20051 |
---|
|
Audit Fees | | | | $144,000 | | | $102,000 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | | | $36,000 | | | $8,000 | |
Tax Fees | | | | $42,000 | | | $8,000 | |
All Other Fees | | | | — | | | — | |
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees | | | | $78,000 | | | $16,000 | |
|
1 | Period from March 4, 2005 to November 30, 2005. Registrant was formed on March 4, 2005, and thus did not pay the principal accountant any fees prior to that date. |
The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve (i) the selection of the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to provide any non-audit services to the Registrant, (iii) the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to provide any non-audit services to the Adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant, and (iv) the fees and other compensation to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm. The Chairman of the audit committee may grant the pre-approval of any engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services of less than $5,000, and such delegated pre-approvals will be presented to the full audit committee at its next meeting for ratification. Under certain limited circumstances, pre-approvals are not required under securities law regulations for certain non-audit services below certain de minimus thresholds. Since the adoption of these policies and procedures, the audit committee has pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided to the Registrant by the principal accountant, and all non-audit services provided by the principal accountant for the Adviser. None of these services provided by the principal accountant were approved by the audit committee pursuant to the de minimus exception under Rule 2.01(c)(7)(i)(C) or Rule 2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X. All of the principal accountant’s hours spent on auditing the registrant’s financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal accountant.
In addition, in the registrant’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, the principal accountant billed the Adviser fees in the amount of $20,500 in connection with determining the Adviser’s compliance with AIMR-PPS® standards in 2005 and 2004, but did not bill the Adviser for any fees for non-audit services for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005. In addition, in January 2007, the Adviser paid the principal accountant fees in the amount of $10,000 for general tax consultation in the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006. No entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, has paid to, or been billed for fees by, the principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the Adviser or such entity during the Registrant’s last two fiscal years. The audit committee has considered whether the principal accountant’s provision of services (other than audit services) to the Registrant, the Adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides services to the Registrant is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence in performing audit services.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The Registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is comprised of Mr. Conrad Ciccotello, Mr. John Graham and Mr. Charles Heath.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Copies of the proxy voting policies and procedures of the Registrant and the Adviser are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.VOTEREG and Exhibit 99.VOTEADV, respectively.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Unless otherwise indicated, information is presented as of November 30, 2006.
Portfolio Managers
Management of the registrant’s portfolio is the responsibility of a team of portfolio managers consisting of H. Kevin Birzer, Zachary A. Hamel, Kenneth P. Malvey, Terry C. Matlack and David J. Schulte, all of whom are Managers of the Adviser, comprise the investment committee of the Adviser and share responsibility for such investment management. All decisions to invest in a portfolio company must be approved by the unanimous decision of the Adviser’s investment committee and any one member of the Adviser’s investment committee can require the Advisor to sell a security or can veto the investment committee’s decision to invest in a security. Biographical information about each member of the Adviser’s investment committee as of the date of this filing is set forth below.
Name | | Positions(s) Held With Registrant and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation During Past Five Years |
H. Kevin Birzer | | Director and Chairman of the Board of registrant since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital Management, L.L.C. (“Fountain Capital”), a registered investment advisor (1990-present). Formerly, Vice President, Corporate Finance Department, Drexel Burnham Lambert (1986-1989); and Vice President, F. Martin Koenig & Co. (1983- 1986). |
Zachary A. Hamel | | Secretary of registrant since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital (1997-present). |
Kenneth P. Malvey | | Treasurer of registrant since November 2005; Assistant Treasurer of registrant from its inception in 2005 to November 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Partner, Fountain Capital (2002-present). Formerly, Investment Risk Manager and member of the Global Office of Investments, GE Capital’s Employers Reinsurance Corporation (1996 - 2002). |
Terry C. Matlack | | Director and Chief Financial Officer of registrant since 2005; Assistant Treasurer of registrant since November 2005; Treasurer of registrant from its inception to November 2005; Chief Compliance Officer of registrant from its inception through May 2006 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Managing Director, Kansas City Equity Partners LC (“KCEP”), a private equity firm (2001- present). Formerly, President, GreenStreet Capital (1995 - 2001). |
David J. Schulte | | President and Chief Executive Officer of registrant since 2005 | | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2002; Managing Director, KCEP (1993-present). |
Messrs. Birzer and Matlack also serve as directors of Tortoise North American Energy Corporation (“TYN”) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation (“TYG”), registered closed-end management investment companies, as well as Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation (“TTO”), a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company. Messrs. Matlack, Schulte, Hamel and Malvey also serve as officers of TYN, TYG and TTO. The Adviser also serves as the investment adviser to TYN, TYG and TTO.
The following table provides information about the other accounts managed on a day-to-day basis by each of the portfolio managers as of November 30, 2006:
Name of Manager | Number of Accounts | Total Assets of Accounts | | Number of Accounts Paying a Performance Fee | | Total Assets of Accounts Paying a Performance Fee | |
---|
H. Kevin Birzer | | | | | | | | | |
Registered investment companies | | 2 | | $1,101,619,143 | | 0 | | — | |
Other pooled investment vehicles | | 5 | | $1,928,523,567 | | 1 | | $42,933,012 | |
Other accounts | | 182 | | $1,965,319,994 | | 0 | | — | |
Zachary A. Hamel | |
Registered investment companies | | 2 | | $1,101,619,143 | | 0 | | — | |
Other pooled investment vehicles | | 5 | | $1,928,523,567 | | 1 | | $42,933,012 | |
Other accounts | | 182 | | $1,965,319,994 | | 0 | | — | |
Kenneth P. Malvey | |
Registered investment companies | | 2 | | $1,101,619,143 | | 0 | | — | |
Other pooled investment vehicles | | 5 | | $1,928,523,567 | | 1 | | $42,933,012 | |
Other accounts | | 182 | | $1,965,319,994 | | 0 | | — | |
Terry C. Matlack | |
Registered investment companies | | 2 | | $1,101,619,143 | | 0 | | — | |
Other pooled investment vehicles | | 2 | | $69,933,012 | | 2 | | $69,933,012 | |
Other accounts | | 160 | | $185,779,727 | | 0 | | — | |
David J. Schulte | |
Registered investment companies | | 2 | | $1,101,619,143 | | 0 | | — | |
Other pooled investment vehicles | | 2 | | $69,933,012 | | 2 | | $69,933,012 | |
Other accounts | | 160 | | $185,779,727 | | 0 | | — | |
Material Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest may arise from the fact that the Adviser and its affiliates carry on substantial investment activities for other clients, in which the registrant has no interest. The Adviser or its affiliates may have financial incentives to favor certain of these accounts over the registrant. Any of their proprietary accounts or other customer accounts may compete with the registrant for specific trades. The Adviser or its affiliates may give advice and recommend securities to, or buy or sell securities for, other accounts and customers, which advice or securities recommended may differ from advice given to, or securities recommended or bought or sold for, the registrant, even though their investment objectives may be the same as, or similar to, the registrant’s objectives. When two or more clients advised by the Adviser or its affiliates seek to purchase or sell the same publicly traded securities, the securities actually purchased or sold will be allocated among the clients on a good faith equitable basis by the Adviser in its discretion and in accordance with the client’s various investment objectives and the Adviser’s procedures. In some cases, this system may adversely affect the price or size of the position the registrant may obtain or sell. In other cases, the registrant’s ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better execution for it.
The registrant, TYG, TYN and TTO have the same investment adviser, rely on some of the same personnel and will use the same portfolio managers. To the extent certain energy infrastructure company securities meet the registrant’s investment objective and the objectives of other investment companies or accounts managed by the Adviser, the registrant may compete with such companies or accounts for the same investment opportunities.
Situations may occur when the registrant could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities conducted by the Adviser and its affiliates for their other accounts. Such situations may be based on, among other things, the following: (1) legal or internal restrictions on the combined size of positions that may be taken for the registrant or the other accounts, thereby limiting the size of the registrant’s position; (2) the difficulty of liquidating an investment for the registrant or the other accounts where the market cannot absorb the sale of the combined position; or (3) limits on co-investing in private placement securities under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The registrant’s investment opportunities may be limited by affiliations of the Adviser or its affiliates with energy infrastructure companies.
In addition, three of the five portfolio managers are affiliates of, but not employees of, the Adviser, and each has other significant responsibilities with Fountain Capital, which conducts businesses and activities of its own in which the Adviser has no economic interest. If these separate activities become significantly greater or have greater profit potential than the Adviser’s activities, there could be material competition for the efforts of these portfolio managers.
Compensation
None of Messrs. Birzer, Hamel, Malvey, Matlack or Schulte receives any direct compensation from the registrant or any other of the managed accounts reflected in the table above. All such accounts are managed by the Adviser, Fountain Capital or KCEP. Messrs. Schulte and Matlack are full-time employees of the Adviser and receive a fixed salary for the services they provide. Messrs. Birzer, Hamel and Malvey are employees of Fountain Capital and receive a fixed salary for the services they provide. Fountain Capital is paid a fixed monthly fee, subject to adjustment, for the services of Messrs. Birzer, Hamel or Malvey. Each of Messrs. Birzer, Hamel, Malvey, Matlack and Schulte own an equity interest in either KCEP or Fountain Capital, the two entities that control the Adviser, and each thus benefits from increases in the net income of the Adviser, KCEP or Fountain Capital.
Securities Owned in the Registrant by Portfolio Managers
The following table provides information about the dollar range of equity securities in the registrant beneficially owned by each of the portfolio managers as of November 30, 2006:
Portfolio Manager | Aggregate Dollar Range of Holdings in the Registrant | |
---|
H. Kevin Birzer | Over $100,000 | |
Zachary A. Hamel | $50,001-$100,000 | |
Kenneth P. Malvey | $10,001-$50,000 | |
Terry C. Matlack | Over $100,000 | |
David J. Schulte | $10,001-$50,000 | |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
|
Period | | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
---|
|
Month #1 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
6/1/06-6/30/06 | |
|
Month #2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
7/1/06-7/31/06 | |
|
Month #3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
8/1/06-8/31/06 | |
|
Month #4 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
9/1-06-9/30/06 | |
|
Month #5 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
10/1/06-10/31/06 | |
|
Month #6 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
11/1/06-11/30/06 | |
|
Total | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant’s President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(b) There were no significant changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the Registrant's second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a) (1) Any code of ethics or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the Registrant intends to satisfy Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. Filed herewith.
(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons. None.
(b) Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | Tortoise Energy Capital Corporation |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ David Schulte |
| David J. Schulte, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date February 2, 2007 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ David Schulte |
| David J. Schulte, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date February 2, 2007 |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Terry Matlack |
| Terry C. Matlack, Chief Financial Officer |
Date February 2, 2007 |