Fair Value of Financial Instruments | 3. Investments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments Marketable Investments The Company’s marketable investments have been classified and accounted for as available-for-sale. The following table presents the Company’s marketable investments as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands): March 31, 2019 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Commercial paper $ 1,500 $ — $ — $ 1,500 U.S. treasury 2,400 — (9 ) 2,391 U.S. agency and government sponsored securities 7,708 21 (14 ) 7,715 U.S. states and municipalities 3,631 1 — 3,632 Corporate bonds 84,039 94 (130 ) 84,003 Total $ 99,278 $ 116 $ (153 ) $ 99,241 December 31, 2018 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Commercial paper $ 13,701 $ — $ (3 ) $ 13,698 U.S. treasury 6,400 — (22 ) 6,378 U.S. agency and government sponsored securities 7,699 18 (27 ) 7,690 U.S. states and municipalities 5,134 — (12 ) 5,122 Corporate bonds 100,606 14 (469 ) 100,151 Total $ 133,540 $ 32 $ (533 ) $ 133,039 The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those marketable investments that were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months or for twelve months or more as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands): March 31, 2019 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses U.S. treasury $ — $ — $ 2,391 $ (9 ) $ 2,391 $ (9 ) U.S. agency and government sponsored securities — — 4,211 (14 ) 4,211 (14 ) Corporate bonds 8,307 (6 ) 31,435 (124 ) 39,742 (130 ) Total $ 8,307 $ (6 ) $ 38,037 $ (147 ) $ 46,344 $ (153 ) December 31, 2018 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Commercial paper $ 12,208 $ (3 ) $ — $ — $ 12,208 $ (3 ) U.S. treasury — — 6,378 (22 ) 6,378 (22 ) U.S. agency and government sponsored securities 1,436 (5 ) 2,759 (22 ) 4,195 (27 ) U.S. states and municipalities 1,529 (5 ) 3,593 (7 ) 5,122 (12 ) Corporate bonds 58,961 (176 ) 33,215 (293 ) 92,176 (469 ) Total $ 74,134 $ (189 ) $ 45,945 $ (344 ) $ 120,079 $ (533 ) The following table presents the contractual maturities of the Company’s marketable investments as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands): March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Fair Value Fair Value Due in less than one year $ 53,205 $ 83,391 Due in one to five years 46,036 49,648 Total $ 99,241 $ 133,039 Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company classifies its cash equivalents and marketable investments within Level 1 and Level 2, as it uses quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs. The Company determined the fair value of its Level 1 financial instruments, which are traded in active markets, using quoted market prices for identical instruments. Financial instruments classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued based on other observable inputs, including broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources. When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are not available, the Company relies on non-binding quotes from its investment managers, which are based on proprietary valuation models of independent pricing services. These models generally use inputs such as observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or historical pricing trends of a security relative to its peers. To validate the fair value determination provided by its investment managers, the Company reviews the pricing movement in the context of overall market trends and trading information from its investment managers. In addition, the Company assesses the inputs and methods used in determining the fair value in order to determine the classification of securities in the fair value hierarchy. The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands): As of March 31, 2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value Financial Assets Cash equivalents: Money market funds $ 44,331 $ — $ — $ 44,331 Marketable investments: Commercial paper — 1,500 — 1,500 U.S. treasury 2,391 — — 2,391 U.S. agency and government sponsored securities — 7,715 — 7,715 U.S. states and municipalities — 3,632 — 3,632 Corporate bonds — 84,003 — 84,003 Total $ 46,722 $ 96,850 $ — $ 143,572 Financial Liabilities: Contingent consideration obligations (1) $ — $ — $ 1,248 $ 1,248 Total $ — $ — $ 1,248 $ 1,248 (1) More information on the contingent consideration obligations and the changes in fair value are presented below. As of December 31, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value Financial Assets Cash equivalents: Commercial paper $ — $ 10,967 $ — $ 10,967 Money market funds 12,087 — — 12,087 Marketable investments: Commercial paper — 13,698 — 13,698 U.S. treasury 6,378 — — 6,378 U.S. agency and government sponsored securities — 7,690 — 7,690 U.S. states and municipalities — 5,122 — 5,122 Corporate bonds — 100,151 — 100,151 Total $ 18,465 $ 137,628 $ — $ 156,093 Financial Liabilities: Contingent consideration obligations (1) $ — $ — $ 2,571 $ 2,571 Total $ — $ — $ 2,571 $ 2,571 (1) More information on the contingent consideration obligations and the changes in fair value are presented below. Contingent Consideration Obligations As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , the Company’s contingent consideration liability relates to milestone payments due in connection with the acquisition of Crossmed and is classified as a Level 3 measurement for which fair value is derived from various inputs, including forecasted revenues during the earn-out milestone periods, revenue volatilities, discount rates, and estimates in the likelihood of achieving revenue-based milestones. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability is remeasured each reporting period. The following table presents quantitative information about certain unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 fair value measurement of the Company’s contingent consideration liability, other than the forecasted revenues during the earn-out milestone period: Fair Value at March 31, 2019 (in thousands) Valuation Method Unobservable Inputs Input (range where applicable) Crossmed: Revenue-based milestones $ 1,248 Monte Carlo Simulation Earn-out period over which revenue-based milestone payments are made 2019 Risk-adjusted discount rate 15% Revenue volatilities for each type of revenue-based milestone 5.1% and 18.4% The following tables summarize the changes in fair value of the contingent consideration obligation for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 (in thousands): Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Balance at December 31, 2018 $ 2,571 Payments of contingent consideration liabilities (1,296 ) Changes in fair value — Foreign currency remeasurement (27 ) Balance at March 31, 2019 $ 1,248 Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 4,675 Payments of contingent consideration liabilities (3,017 ) Changes in fair value 442 Foreign currency remeasurement 133 Balance at March 31, 2018 $ 2,233 During the three months ended March 31, 2019 , the were no changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation. During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation increased by $0.4 million which was recorded in sales, general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration increased as a result of updates to the underlying forecasts based on actual results to date and changes in estimates. For more information related to the payment of the contingent consideration liabilities refer to Note “ 5. Asset Acquisitions and Business Combinations .” During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 , the Company did not record impairment charges related to its marketable investments and the Company did not hold any Level 3 marketable investments as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018 . During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 , the Company did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, the Company did not have any financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018 . |