The factual information provided herein was provided to us by the Company, except that all information regarding David Bergstein and Glendon Group and their respective affiliates herein and in the Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement was provided by Mr. Bergstein and Glendon Group, respectively. Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Special Factors, page 30 Background of the Merger, page 30 1. Please elaborate on your disclosure of the Background of the Merger as to how Glendon Group, in lieu of Cyrano Group, came to be the party that determined to proceed with the merger. Your indication on page 35 that Glendon Group “was subsequently substituted” for Cyrano is unclear, especially considering Glendon Group was formed in anticipation of this transaction. In revising your disclosure, clarify whether it was Kia Jam or some other principal of Glendon Group that negotiated the final terms of the transaction. And please explain what affiliation Mr. Bergstein has with Glendon Group, considering you state that Glendon Group is affiliated with Cyrano Group, Inc. Please see the disclosure on page 36 in the section entitled “SPECIAL FACTORS—Background of the Merger” and on page 25 in the section entitled “IDENTITY AND BACKGROUND OF FILING PERSONS AND OTHERS—Other Persons” in the Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement which has been revised and expanded in response to the Staff’s comment. As noted in the revised disclosure, the Company has been advised by David Bergstein and Kia Jam that David Bergstein, a principal of Cyrano Group, has from time to time engaged in financing and other transactions with Kia Jam, the owner of Glendon Group, but neither David Bergstein nor Cyrano Group has any ownership interest in, or any right to control or manage the affairs of Glendon Group. The Company has been advised that Glendon Group therefore is not “affiliated” with Cyrano Group in the sense of controlling or being controlled by or under common control with Cyrano Group, and therefore the disclosure has been revised to clarify this point. The Company also has been advised by Mr. Bergstein and Glendon Group that Glendon Group has no obligation to issue to Mr. Bergstein, and Mr. Bergstein has no right to acquire from Glendon Group, any equity interest in the Company or Glendon Group. 2. Please also explain what consideration you have given to the inclusion of Mr. Bergstein as a filing person. In this regard, we note that he appears to be an affiliate and/or principal of an identified 13e-3 filing person (the Glendon Group), assisted in negotiating the terms of the transaction and could receive a potential 9% equity interest in Glendon Group, post-merger. The Company has been advised by Mr. Bergstein and by Glendon Group and the other filing persons listed on the Schedule 13D, that Mr. Bergstein has no direct or indirect ownership or any right to control the management or affairs of or to otherwise exercise control over Glendon Group, Merger Subsidiary, Kia Jam, David Zinberg, Marina Zinberg or Albert Hallac. The information regarding Mr. Bergstein is included in the Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement due to his role in introducing Glendon Group to the Company and assisting Glendon Group in negotiating the merger agreement and due to his prior relationships with other participants in the going private transaction. Mr. Bergstein believes he is not required to be a filing person in a Schedule 13D or Schedule 13e-3 relating to the acquisition because (i) he does not beneficially own any securities of the Company that are beneficially owned by any of the filing persons named or listed in such filings, (ii) he is not a purchaser, nor is he a member of the purchaser group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5(b)(1)), and (iii) he has no control relationship with any person or entity that is a member of the purchaser group in the acquisition. As noted above, the Company also has been advised by Mr. Bergstein and Glendon Group that Glendon Group has no obligation to issue to Mr. Bergstein, and Mr. Bergstein has no right to acquire from Glendon Group, any equity interest in either the Company or in Glendon Group. Fairness of the Merger, page 42 3. We note your response to comment 11 in our letter dated July 20, 2012 and your revised disclosure on page 46 of the proxy statement. You indicate on page 46 that the Special Committee “considered the going concern value …” but this discussion does not provide the Special Committee’s assessment as to how going concern value impacted the Committee’s substantive fairness determination. If you believe this factor is immaterial or irrelevant, please disclose why. |