UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 |
or |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission filenumber: 0-51547
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 20-2783228 |
(State of incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
111 Eighth Avenue | | 10011 |
New York, New York | | (Zip code) |
(Address of principal executive office) | | |
(212) 624-3700
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filero | | Accelerated filerþ | | Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
As of May 4, 2009, the Registrant had 10,227,000 shares of Class A Common Stock (including unvested shares of restricted WebMD Class A Common Stock) and 48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
QUARTERLY REPORT ONFORM 10-Q
For the period ended March 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WebMD®, WebMD Health®, Medscape®, CME Circle®, eMedicine®, MedicineNet®, theheart.org®, RxList®, The Little Blue Booktm, Subimo®, Summex® and Medsite® are among the trademarks of WebMD Health Corp. or its subsidiaries.
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be, forward-looking statements. For example, statements concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts and statements that describe our objectives, future performance, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations concerning future results and events and can generally be identified by the use of expressions such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “future,” “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” and other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the future tense.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements. The following important risks and uncertainties could affect our future results, causing those results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements:
| | |
| • | failure to achieve sufficient levels of usage of our public portals; |
|
| • | failure to achieve sufficient levels of utilization and market acceptance of new and updated products and services; |
|
| • | difficulties in forming and maintaining relationships with customers and strategic partners; |
|
| • | the inability to successfully deploy new or updated applications or services; |
|
| • | the anticipated benefits from acquisitions not being fully realized or not being realized within the expected time frames; |
|
| • | the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
| • | adverse economic conditions and disruptions in the capital markets; |
|
| • | general economic, business or regulatory conditions affecting the healthcare, information technology, and Internet industries being less favorable than expected; and |
|
| • | the other risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of Operations.” |
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our future results.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Except as required by law or regulation, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
3
| |
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements |
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 204,803 | | | $ | 191,659 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,694 at March 31, 2009 and $1,301 at December 31, 2008 | | | 90,835 | | | | 93,082 | |
Current portion of prepaid advertising | | | — | | | | 1,753 | |
Other current assets | | | 11,319 | | | | 11,358 | |
Assets of discontinued operations | | | 11,839 | | | | 12,575 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 318,796 | | | | 310,427 | |
Investments | | | 127,033 | | | | 133,563 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 54,132 | | | | 54,165 | |
Goodwill | | | 208,967 | | | | 208,967 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 24,520 | | | | 26,237 | |
Other assets | | | 21,269 | | | | 22,573 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 754,717 | | | $ | 755,932 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | $ | 20,355 | | | $ | 31,241 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 84,574 | | | | 79,613 | |
Due to HLTH | | | 199 | | | | 427 | |
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | | 3,256 | | | | 2,599 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 108,384 | | | | 113,880 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 8,081 | | | | 8,334 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 10,051,556 shares issued at March 31, 2009 and 10,044,372 shares issued at December 31, 2008 | | | 101 | | | | 100 | |
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, 150,000,000 shares authorized; 48,100,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | | | 481 | | | | 481 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 553,519 | | | | 548,069 | |
Class A Treasury Stock, at cost; 515,024 shares at March 31, 2009 and 624,871 shares at December 31, 2008 | | | (10,300 | ) | | | (12,497 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (10,207 | ) | | | (4,277 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 104,658 | | | | 101,842 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 638,252 | | | | 633,718 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 754,717 | | | $ | 755,932 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
4
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Revenue | | $ | 90,264 | | | $ | 80,650 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations | | | 36,565 | | | | 30,927 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 27,561 | | | | 25,149 | |
General and administrative | | | 14,726 | | | | 13,480 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 6,937 | | | | 6,672 | |
Interest income | | | 975 | | | | 3,453 | |
Impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | 27,406 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision | | | 5,450 | | | | (19,531 | ) |
Income tax provision | | | 2,211 | | | | 3,432 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 3,239 | | | | (22,963 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | (423 | ) | | | (372 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,816 | | | $ | (23,335 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 57,575 | | | | 57,636 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 58,109 | | | | 57,636 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
5
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,816 | | | $ | (23,335 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 423 | | | | 372 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 6,937 | | | | 6,672 | |
Non-cash advertising | | | 1,753 | | | | 1,558 | |
Non-cash stock-based compensation | | | 5,523 | | | | 3,680 | |
Deferred and other income taxes | | | 2,097 | | | | 2,372 | |
Impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | 27,406 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2,247 | | | | 10,449 | |
Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities | | | (11,140 | ) | | | (8,791 | ) |
Due to HLTH | | | (228 | ) | | | 1,329 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 4,961 | | | | 11,231 | |
Other | | | (689 | ) | | | (164 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by continuing operations | | | 14,700 | | | | 32,779 | |
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | | | 1,062 | | | | 1,912 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 15,762 | | | | 34,691 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from maturities and sales ofavailable-for-sale securities | | | 600 | | | | 40,350 | |
Purchases ofavailable-for-sale securities | | | — | | | | (127,900 | ) |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (5,290 | ) | | | (2,626 | ) |
Cash received from sale of business, net of fees | | | 250 | | | | 985 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in continuing operations | | | (4,440 | ) | | | (89,191 | ) |
Net cash used in discontinued operations | | | (5 | ) | | | (11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (4,445 | ) | | | (89,202 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 1,827 | | | | 589 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by continuing operations | | | 1,827 | | | | 589 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 13,144 | | | | (53,922 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 191,659 | | | | 213,753 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 204,803 | | | $ | 159,831 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
6
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
| |
1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Background and Basis of Presentation
WebMD Health Corp. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated on May 3, 2005. The Company completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of Class A Common Stock on September 28, 2005. The Company’s Class A Common Stock trades under the symbol “WBMD” on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Prior to the date of the IPO, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of HLTH Corporation (“HLTH”) and its consolidated financial statements had been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of HLTH, principally representing the WebMD segment, using the historical results of operations, and historical basis of assets and liabilities of the WebMD related businesses. Since the completion of the IPO, the Company is a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH, which owned 83.5% of the equity of the Company, as of March 31, 2009, through its ownership of all 48,100,000 outstanding shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock. The Company’s Class A Common Stock has one vote per share, while the Company’s Class B Common Stock has five votes per share. As a result, the Company’s Class B Common Stock owned by HLTH represented, as of March 31, 2009, 95.9% of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock.
The Company provides health information services to consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans through its public and private online portals and health-focused publications. The Company’s public portals for consumers enable them to obtain health and wellness information (including information on specific diseases or conditions), check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual healthcare information, receive periodice-newsletters on topics of individual interest and participate in online communities with peers and experts. The Company’s public portals for physicians and healthcare professionals make it easier for them to access clinical reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical information, learn about new treatment options, earn continuing medical education (“CME”) credit and communicate with peers. The Company’s public portals generate revenue primarily through the sale of advertising and sponsorship products, including CME services. The sponsors and advertisers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consumer products companies. The Company’s private portals enable employers and health plans to provide their employees and plan members with access to personalized health and benefit information and decision-support technology that helps them make more informed benefit, provider and treatment choices. The Company provides related services for use by such employees and members, including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health coaching. The Company generates revenue from its private portals through the licensing of these portals to employers and health plans either directly or through distributors. The Company also providese-detailing promotion and physician recruitment services for use by pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies. The Company also publishesWebMD the Magazine,a consumer magazine distributed to physician office waiting rooms.
Transactions between the Company and HLTH have been identified in these notes to the consolidated financial statements as Transactions with HLTH (see Note 3).
Interim Financial Statements
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by management and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for any subsequent period or for the entire year ending December 31, 2009. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations.
7
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Board of Directors of the Company decided to divest the Company’s Little Blue Book print directory business (“LBB”) as it is not strategic to the overall business. As a result of the Company’s intention to divest LBB and the expectation that this divesture will be completed within one year, the Company has reflected LBB as discontinued operations. See Note 2 below for additional information. The revenue and operating results of LBB had previously been reflected within an operating segment titled publishing and other services. As a result of the decision to divest LBB, the Company eliminated the separate segment presentation for publishing and other services.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2008, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Seasonality
The timing of the Company’s revenue is affected by seasonal factors. Advertising and sponsorship revenue is seasonal, primarily as a result of the annual budget approval process of the advertising and sponsorship clients of the public portals. This portion of the Company’s revenue is usually the lowest in the first quarter of each calendar year, and increases during each consecutive quarter throughout the year. The Company’s private portal licensing revenue is historically highest in the second half of the year as new customers are typically added during this period in conjunction with their annual open enrollment periods for employee benefits.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current business factors, and various other assumptions that the Company believes are necessary to consider to form a basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company is subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic and political factors and changes in the Company’s business environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Company’s operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and assumptions by management affect: revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the carrying value of long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible assets), the amortization period of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill), the carrying value, capitalization and amortization of software and Web site development costs, the carrying value of investments in auction rate securities, the provision for income taxes and related deferred tax accounts, certain accrued expenses and contingencies, share-based compensation to employees and transactions with HLTH.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share are presented in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”). In accordance with SFAS 128, basic income (loss) per common share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted income (loss) per common share
8
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods, increased to give effect to potentially dilutive securities.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | �� |
|
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 3,239 | | | $ | (22,963 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | $ | (423 | ) | | $ | (372 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Denominator: (shares in thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average shares — Basic | | | 57,575 | | | | 57,636 | |
Employee stock options and restricted stock | | | 534 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed conversions — Diluted | | | 58,109 | | | | 57,636 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The impact of certain shares issued to the former owners of Subimo, LLC pursuant to the purchase agreement (as amended, the “Subimo Purchase Agreement”) for the Company’s acquisition of Subimo, LLC were considered in the calculation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Under the terms of the Subimo Purchase Agreement, the Company had deferred the issuance of 640,930 shares of Class A Common Stock (“Deferred Shares”) until December 2008. Prior to December 2008, up to 246,508 of the Deferred Shares were available to be used to settle any outstanding claims or warranties the Company may have had against the sellers. For purposes of calculating net loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008, the impact of 394,422 of the Deferred Shares (representing the non-contingent portion of the Deferred Shares) was included in the calculation of basic weighted average shares outstanding. The additional 246,508 Deferred Shares were considered if their effect was dilutive.
The Company has excluded certain outstanding stock options, restricted stock and Deferred Shares from the calculation of diluted income (loss) per common share during the periods in which such securities were anti-dilutive. The total number of shares that could potentially dilute income per common share in the future that were not included in the calculation of diluted income (loss) per common share was 7,833,044 and 5,736,129 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)No. FAS 107-1 and APB28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSPFAS 107-1”). FSPFAS 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods. Such disclosures were previously required only in annual financial statements.FSP FAS 107-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSPFAS 107-1 is only expected to apply to financial statement disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-4. “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
9
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Are Not Orderly” (“FSPFAS 157-4”).FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased, as well as guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSPFAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and has not determined the impact, if any, that the adoption will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 115-2 andFAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation ofOther-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSPFAS 115-2”). FSPFAS 115-2 provides additional guidance to makeother-than-temporary impairments more operational and to improve the financial statement presentation of such impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and has not determined the impact, if any, that the adoption will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
| |
2. | Discontinued Operations |
During March 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company decided to divest LBB as it is not strategic to the rest of the overall business, and initiated the process of seeking a buyer for LBB. Accordingly, the financial information for LBB has been reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Summarized operating results for the discontinued operations of LBB are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Revenue | | $ | 572 | | | $ | 1,032 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Losses before taxes | | $ | 715 | | | $ | 700 | |
Tax benefit | | | 292 | | | | 328 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | $ | 423 | | | $ | 372 | |
| | | | | | | | |
10
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The major classes of assets and liabilities of LBB are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Assets of discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 1,058 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 89 | | | | 98 | |
Goodwill | | | 11,044 | | | | 11,044 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 298 | | | | 362 | |
Other assets | | | 13 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 11,839 | | | $ | 12,575 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities of discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 113 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 1,577 | | | | 876 | |
Deferred tax liability | | | 1,610 | | | | 1,610 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 3,256 | | | $ | 2,599 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
3. | Transactions with HLTH |
Agreements with HLTH
In connection with the IPO in September 2005, the Company entered into a number of agreements with HLTH governing the future relationship of the companies, including a Services Agreement, a Tax Sharing Agreement and an Indemnity Agreement. These agreements cover a variety of matters, including responsibility for certain liabilities, including tax liabilities, as well as matters related to HLTH providing the Company with administrative services, such as payroll, accounting, tax, employee benefit plan, employee insurance, intellectual property, legal and information processing services.
Charges from HLTH to the Company:
Corporate Services: The Company is charged a services fee (the “Services Fee”) for costs related to corporate services provided by HLTH. The services that HLTH provides include certain administrative services, including payroll, accounting, tax planning and compliance, employee benefit plans, legal matters and information processing. In addition, the Company reimburses HLTH for an allocated portion of certain expenses that HLTH incurs for outside services and similar items, including insurance fees, outside personnel, facilities costs, professional fees, software maintenance fees and telecommunications costs. HLTH has agreed to make the services available to the Company for up to five years following the IPO. These expense allocations were determined on a basis that HLTH and the Company consider to be a reasonable assessment of the costs of providing these services, exclusive of any profit margin. The basis the Company and HLTH used to determine these expense allocations required management to make certain judgments and assumptions. The Services Fee is reflected in general and administrative expense within the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Healthcare Expense: The Company is charged for its employees’ participation in HLTH’s healthcare plans. Healthcare expense is charged based on the number of total employees of the Company and reflects HLTH’s average cost of these benefits per employee. Healthcare expense is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the same expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees.
11
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: Stock-based compensation expense is related to stock option issuances and restricted stock awards of HLTH Common Stock that have been granted to certain employees of the Company. Stock-based compensation expense is allocated on a specific employee identification basis. The expense is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the same expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees. The allocation of stock-based compensation expense related to HLTH Common Stock is recorded as a capital contribution in additional paid-in capital.
The following table summarizes the allocations reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Charges from HLTH to the Company: | | | | | | | | |
Corporate services | | $ | 1,035 | | | $ | 873 | |
Healthcare expense | | | 2,114 | | | | 1,955 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 32 | | | | 244 | |
| |
4. | Related Party Transaction |
Fidelity Human Resources Services Company LLC
In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Fidelity Human Resources Services Company LLC (“FHRS”) to integrate the Company’s private portals product into the services FHRS provides to its clients. FHRS provides human resources administration and benefits administration services to employers. The Company recorded revenue of $2,388 and $2,438 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in accounts receivable as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $2,476 and $2,070, respectively, related to the FHRS agreement.
| |
5. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Non-Recourse Credit Facility |
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing GAAP that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
| | |
| Level 1: | Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
| Level 2: | Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. |
|
| Level 3: | Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions. |
12
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company did not have any Level 1 or Level 2 assets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The following table sets forth the Company’s Level 3 financial assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 and the respective fair values at December 31, 2008:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Financial assets carried at fair value: | | | | | | | | |
Auction rate securities | | $ | 127,033 | | | $ | 133,563 | |
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 assets, which consist of the Company’s auction rate securities for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | | | |
Fair value as of the beginning of the period | | $ | 133,563 | |
Redemptions | | | (600 | ) |
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive loss | | | (5,930 | ) |
| | | | |
Fair value as of the end of the period | | $ | 127,033 | |
| | | | |
The Company holds investments in auction rate securities (“ARS”) which have been classified as Level 3 assets as described above. The types of ARS holdings the Company owns are backed by student loans, 97% guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. Historically, the fair value of the Company’s ARS holdings approximated par value due to the frequent auction periods, generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided liquidity to these investments. However, since February 2008, all auctions involving these securities have failed. The result of a failed auction is that these ARS holdings will continue to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each respective auction date; however liquidity of the securities will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time as other markets for these ARS holdings develop. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company concluded that the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximated the face value due to the lack of liquidity. The securities have been classified within Level 3 as their valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the securities.
The Company estimated the fair value of its ARS holdings using an income approach valuation technique. Using this approach, expected future cash flows were calculated over the expected life of each security and were discounted to a single present value using a market required rate of return. Some of the more significant assumptions made in the present value calculations were (i) the estimated weighted average lives for the loan portfolios underlying each individual ARS, which ranged from 4 to 14 years as of March 31, 2008 and (ii) the required rates of return used to discount the estimated future cash flows over the estimated life of each security, which considered both the credit quality for each individual ARS and the market liquidity for these investments. As of March 31, 2008, the Company concluded the fair value of its ARS holdings was $141,044 compared to a face value of $168,450. The impairment in value, or $27,406, was considered to beother-than-temporary, and accordingly, was recorded as an impairment charge within the statement of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In making the determination that the impairment wasother-than-temporary the Company considered (i) the current market liquidity for ARS, particularly student loan backed ARS, (ii) the long-term maturities of the loan portfolios underlying each ARS owned by the Company and (iii) the ability and intent of the Company to hold its ARS investments until sufficient liquidity returns to the auction rate market to enable the sale of these securities or until the investments mature.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company received $600 associated with the partial redemption of certain of its ARS holdings, which represented 100% of their face value. As a result, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the total face value of the Company’s ARS holdings was $164,200
13
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
and $164,800, compared to a fair value of $127,033 and $133,563, respectively. In addition to the impairment charge discussed above, during the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company reduced the carrying value of its ARS holdings by $5,930. The Company assessed this reduction to be temporary in nature, as this reduction in value resulted from fluctuations in interest rate and discount rate assumptions, and accordingly, this amount has been recorded as an unrealized loss in other comprehensive income in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company continues to monitor the market for ARS as well as the individual ARS investments it owns. The Company may be required to record additional losses in future periods if the fair value of its ARS holdings deteriorates further.
Non-Recourse Credit Facility
On May 6, 2008, the Company entered into a non-recourse credit facility (the “2008 Credit Facility”) with an affiliate of Citigroup, secured by its ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings), that would allow the Company to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of the ARS holdings pledged as collateral under the 2008 Credit Facility. No borrowings were made under the 2008 Credit Facility.
On April 28, 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated facility with an affiliate of Citigroup (the “2009 Credit Facility”), replacing the 2008 Credit Facility. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, no borrowings have been made under the 2009 Credit Facility. The 2009 Credit Facility is secured by the Company’s ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings). The Company can make borrowings under the 2009 Credit Facility until April 27, 2010. Any borrowings outstanding under the 2009 Credit Facility after February 26, 2010 become demand loans, subject to 60 days notice, with recourse only to the pledged collateral. Loan proceeds may be used for general working capital purposes or other lawful business purposes of the Company (including repurchases of its own securities), but not for purposes of buying, trading or carrying other securities. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the 2009 Credit Facility will be the Open Federal Funds Rate plus 3.95%. The maximum that can be borrowed under the 2009 Credit Facility is 75% of the face amount of the pledged ARS holdings. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the maximum the Company would be able to borrow is $123,075. Removals of ARS from the pledged collateral (including upon their redemption or sale) will reduce the amount available for borrowing under the 2009 Credit Facility.
The 2009 Credit Facility is governed by an amended and restated loan agreement, which contains customary representations and warranties of the Company and certain affirmative covenants and negative covenants relating to the pledged collateral. Under the loan agreement, the Company and the lender may, in certain circumstances, cause the pledged collateral to be sold, with the proceeds of any such sale required to be applied in full immediately to repayment of amounts borrowed.
Comprehensive loss is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net income (loss), such as changes in unrealized losses on securities. The following table presents the components of comprehensive loss:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Unrealized losses on securities | | $ | (5,930 | ) | | $ | — | |
Net income (loss) | | | 2,816 | | | | (23,335 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (3,114 | ) | | $ | (23,335 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
14
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Weighted
| | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted
| |
| | Gross
| | | | | | | | | Average
| | | Gross
| | | | | | | | | Average
| |
| | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | | | | Remaining
| | | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | | | | Remaining
| |
| | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Net | | | Useful Life(a) | | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Net | | | Useful Life(a) | |
|
Content | | $ | 15,954 | | | $ | (14,790 | ) | | $ | 1,164 | | | | 1.5 | | | $ | 15,954 | | | $ | (14,541 | ) | | $ | 1,413 | | | | 1.7 | |
Customer relationships | | | 32,430 | | | | (13,707 | ) | | | 18,723 | | | | 8.5 | | | | 32,430 | | | | (12,872 | ) | | | 19,558 | | | | 8.7 | |
Technology and patents | | | 14,700 | | | | (13,870 | ) | | | 830 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 14,700 | | | | (13,370 | ) | | | 1,330 | | | | 0.8 | |
Trade names | | | 6,030 | | | | (2,227 | ) | | | 3,803 | | | | 7.2 | | | | 6,030 | | | | (2,094 | ) | | | 3,936 | | | | 7.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 69,114 | | | $ | (44,594 | ) | | $ | 24,520 | | | | | | | $ | 69,114 | | | $ | (42,877 | ) | | $ | 26,237 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | The calculation of the weighted average remaining useful life is based on the net book value and the remaining amortization period of each respective intangible asset. |
Amortization expense was $1,717 and $2,446 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:
| | | | |
Year ending December 31: | | | | |
2009 (April 1st to December 31st) | | $ | 4,428 | |
2010 | | | 3,231 | |
2011 | | | 2,465 | |
2012 | | | 2,465 | |
2013 | | | 2,464 | |
Thereafter | | | 9,467 | |
As a result of the completion of the integration of previously acquired businesses and efficiencies that the Company continues to realize from infrastructure investments, the Company recorded a restructuring charge during the three months ended December 31, 2008 of $2,460 for the severance expenses related to the reduction of approximately 5% of its work force and $450 of costs to consolidate facilities and other exit costs. The remaining accrual related to this charge was $1,230 and $2,530 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and is reflected in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
| |
9. | Commitments and Contingencies |
In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and legal proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters, including those discussed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report onForm 10-K has yet to be determined, the Company does not believe that their outcomes will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
| |
10. | Stock-Based Compensation |
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123, “(Revised 2004): Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaced SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) and superseded APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized
15
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition method and, as a result, prior period results were not restated. Under the modified prospective transition method, awards that were granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006 are measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R. Unvested stock options and restricted stock awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123, using the same grant date fair value and same expense attribution method used under SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the results of operations over the remaining vesting periods. The impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount recognized for all stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2006.
The Company has various stock compensation plans under which directors, officers and other eligible employees receive awards of options to purchase the Company’s Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock and restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock. The following sections of this note summarize the activity for each of these plans.
HLTH Plans
Certain WebMD employees participate in the stock-based compensation plans of HLTH (collectively, the “HLTH Plans”). Under the HLTH Plans, certain of the Company’s employees have received grants of options to purchase HLTH common stock and restricted shares of HLTH Common Stock. Additionally, all eligible WebMD employees were provided the opportunity to participate in HLTH’s employee stock purchase plan until HLTH terminated the stock purchase plan on April 30, 2008. All unvested options to purchase HLTH Common Stock and restricted shares of HLTH Common Stock held by the Company’s employees as of the effective date of the IPO continue to vest under the original terms of those awards. An aggregate of 2,745,547 shares of HLTH Common Stock remained available for grant under the HLTH Plans at March 31, 2009.
Stock Options
Generally, options under the HLTH Plans vest and become exercisable ratably over periods ranging from three to five years based on their individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. The majority of options granted under the HLTH Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant. Options are granted at prices not less than the fair market value of HLTH’s Common Stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes activity for the HLTH Plans relating to the Company’s employees during the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Weighted
| | | | |
| | | | | Weighted
| | | Average
| | | | |
| | | | | Average
| | | Remaining
| | | Aggregate
| |
| | | | | Exercise Price
| | | Contractual Life
| | | Intrinsic
| |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | (In Years) | | | Value(1) | |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 | | | 7,685,557 | | | $ | 13.80 | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (531,693 | ) | | | 8.61 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (18,233 | ) | | | 25.57 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 | | | 7,135,631 | | | $ | 14.15 | | | | 2.5 | | | $ | 4,562 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period | | | 6,908,432 | | | $ | 14.31 | | | | 2.3 | | | $ | 4,356 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the market price of HLTH’s Common Stock on March 31, 2009, which was $10.35, less the applicable exercise price of the underlying option. This aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount that would have been realized if all the option holders had exercised their options on March 31, 2009. |
16
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Proceeds received by HLTH from the exercise of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock were $4,579 and $712 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The intrinsic value related to the exercise of these stock options was $1,195 and $252 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
WebMD Plans
During September 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2005 Plan”). In connection with the acquisition of Subimo, LLC in December 2006, the Company adopted the WebMD Health Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan for Employees of Subimo, LLC (as amended, the “Subimo Plan”). The terms of the Subimo Plan are similar to the terms of the 2005 Plan but it has not been approved by the Company’s stockholders. Awards under the Subimo Plan were made on the date of the Company’s acquisition of Subimo, LLC in reliance on the NASDAQ Global Select Market exception to shareholder approval for equity grants to new hires. No additional grants will be made under the Subimo Plan. The 2005 Plan and the Subimo Plan are referred to below as the “WebMD Plans.” The maximum number of shares of the Company Class A Common Stock that may be subject to options or restricted stock awards under the WebMD Plans was 14,980,574, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the WebMD Plans. The Company had an aggregate of 2,068,457 shares of Class A Common Stock available for future grants under the WebMD Plans at March 31, 2009.
Stock Options
Generally, options under the WebMD Plans vest and become exercisable ratably over periods ranging from four to five years based on their individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. The options granted under the WebMD Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant. Options are granted at prices not less than the fair market value of the Company Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes activity for the WebMD Plans during the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Weighted
| | | | |
| | | | | Weighted
| | | Average
| | | | |
| | | | | Average
| | | Remaining
| | | Aggregate
| |
| | | | | Exercise Price
| | | Contractual Life
| | | Intrinsic
| |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | (In Years) | | | Value(1) | |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 | | | 10,284,236 | | | $ | 25.46 | | | | | | | | | |
Granted | | | 226,000 | | | | 22.53 | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (109,847 | ) | | | 17.50 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (278,275 | ) | | | 29.03 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 | | | 10,122,114 | | | $ | 25.39 | | | | 8.6 | | | $ | 11,804 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period | | | 2,374,252 | | | $ | 24.35 | | | | 6.9 | | | $ | 7,711 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on March 31, 2009, which was $22.30 less the applicable exercise price of the underlying option. This aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount that would have been realized if all the option holders had exercised their options on March 31, 2009. |
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model considering the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on implied volatility from traded options of the Company’s Class A Common Stock combined with historical volatility of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The expected term represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding following their grant date, and was determined using historical exercise
17
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
data. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options on the grant date.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
Expected volatility | | | 0.57 | | | | 0.43 | |
Risk free interest rate | | | 1.33 | % | | | 2.31 | % |
Expected term (years) | | | 3.40 | | | | 3.29 | |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period | | $ | 9.31 | | | $ | 11.51 | |
Restricted Stock Awards
The Company Restricted Stock consists of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock which have been awarded to employees with restrictions that cause them to be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture and restrict their sale or other transfer by the employee until they vest. Generally, the Company’s Restricted Stock awards vest ratably over periods ranging from four to five years from their individual award dates subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. The following table summarizes the activity of non-vested Company Restricted Stock during the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted-
| |
| | | | | Average
| |
| | | | | Grant Date
| |
| | Shares | | | Fair Value | |
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2009 | | | 706,009 | | | $ | 25.22 | |
Granted | | | 5,000 | | | | 21.82 | |
Vested | | | (11,463 | ) | | | 42.99 | |
Forfeited | | | (21,283 | ) | | | 31.82 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Ending balance at March 31, 2009 | | | 678,263 | | | $ | 24.69 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase the Company’s Class A Common Stock were $1,922 and $589 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The intrinsic value related to the exercise of these stock options, as well as the fair value of shares of the Company Restricted Stock that vested, was $790 and $971 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
HLTH’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) allowed eligible employees of the Company the opportunity to purchase shares of HLTH Common Stock through payroll deductions, up to 15% of a participant’s annual compensation with a maximum of 5,000 shares available per participant during each purchase period. The purchase price of the stock was 85% of the fair market value on the last day of each purchase period. No HLTH Common Stock was issued to the Company’s employees under HLTH’s ESPP during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The ESPP was terminated effective April 30, 2008.
Other
At the time of the IPO and each year on the anniversary of the IPO, the Company issued shares of its Class A Common Stock to each non-employee director with a value equal to the director’s annual board and committee retainers. The Company recorded $85 of stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 in connection with these issuances.
18
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Additionally, the Company recorded $279 of stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008 in connection with a stock transferability right for shares that were issued in connection with the acquisition of Subimo, LLC by the Company.
Summary of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the components and classification of stock-based compensation expense:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
HLTH Plans: | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 204 | |
Restricted stock | | | — | | | | 9 | |
WebMD Plans: | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 4,669 | | | | 2,840 | |
Restricted stock | | | 865 | | | | 278 | |
ESPP | | | — | | | | 31 | |
Other | | | 88 | | | | 350 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 5,654 | | | $ | 3,712 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Included in: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations | | $ | 1,623 | | | $ | 1,116 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 1,550 | | | | 1,126 | |
General and administrative | | | 2,350 | | | | 1,438 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | | | 5,523 | | | | 3,680 | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 131 | | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 5,654 | | | $ | 3,712 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2009, approximately $470 and $72,895 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.0 years and 3.4 years related to the HLTH Plans and the WebMD Plans, respectively.
19
| |
ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This Item 2 contains forward-looking statements with respect to possible events, outcomes or results that are, and are expected to continue to be, subject to risks, uncertainties and contingencies, including those identified in this Item. See “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 3.
Overview
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, is provided as a supplement to our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and is intended to provide an understanding of our results of operations, financial condition and changes in financial condition. Our MD&A is organized as follows:
| | |
| • | Introduction. This section provides a general description of our company, a description of recent transactions and other significant developments and trends, and a discussion of how seasonal factors may impact the timing of our revenue. |
|
| • | Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. This section discusses those accounting policies that are considered important to the evaluation and reporting of our financial condition and results of operations, and whose application requires us to exercise subjective and often complex judgments in making estimates and assumptions. In addition, all of our significant accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies, are summarized in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the SEC). |
|
| • | Transactions with HLTH. This section describes the services that we receive from HLTH Corporation (which we refer to as HLTH) and the costs of these services, as well as the fees we charge HLTH for our services and our tax sharing agreement with HLTH. |
|
| • | Recent Accounting Pronouncements. This section provides a summary of the most recent authoritative accounting standards and guidance that have either been recently adopted by our company or may be adopted in the future. |
|
| • | Results of Operations and Supplemental Financial and Operating Information. These sections provide our analysis and outlook for the significant line items on our statements of operations, as well as other information that we deem meaningful to understand our results of operations on a consolidated basis. |
|
| • | Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flows, as well as a discussion of our commitments that existed as of March 31, 2009. |
|
| • | Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of Operations. This section describes circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on our financial condition or results of operations, or that could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of our businesses. The factors discussed in this section are in addition to factors that may be described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. |
In this MD&A, dollar amounts are in thousands, unless otherwise noted.
Introduction
Our Company
We are a leading provider of health information services to consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans through our public and private online portals and health-focused publications. Our public portals for consumers enable them to obtain health and wellness information (including information on specific diseases or conditions), check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual healthcare information, receive periodice-newsletters on topics of individual interest and participate in online communities with peers and experts. Our public portals for physicians and healthcare professionals make it easier for them to access clinical reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical information, learn about new treatment
20
options, earn continuing medical education (“CME”) credit and communicate with peers. Our sponsors and advertisers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consumer products companies. Our private portals enable employers and health plans to provide their employees and members with access to personalized health and benefit information and decision-support technology that helps them to make more informed benefit, treatment and provider decisions. We also provide related services for use by such employees and members, including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health coaching. We generate revenue from our private portals through the licensing of these portals to employers and health plans either directly or through distributors. We also distribute our online content and services to other entities and generate revenue from these arrangements through the sale of advertising and sponsorship products and content syndication fees. We also providee-detailing promotion and physician recruitment services for use by pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies. We also publish,WebMD the Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed to physician office waiting rooms.
Background Information on Certain Trends and Developments
Trends Influencing the Use of Our Services. Several key trends in the healthcare and Internet industries are influencing the use of healthcare information services of the types we provide or are developing. Those trends are described briefly below:
| | |
| • | Use of the Internet by Consumers and Physicians. The Internet has emerged as a major communications medium and has already fundamentally changed many sectors of the economy, including the marketing and sales of financial services, travel, and entertainment, among others. The Internet is also changing the healthcare industry and has transformed how consumers and physicians find and utilize healthcare information. |
| | |
| — | Healthcare consumers increasingly seek to educate themselves online about their healthcare related issues, motivated in part by the continued availability of new treatment options and in part by the larger share of healthcare costs they are being asked to bear due to changes in the benefit designs being offered by health plans and employers. The Internet has fundamentally changed the way consumers obtain health and wellness information, enabling them to have immediate access to searchable information and dynamic interactive content to check symptoms, assess risks, understand diseases, find providers and evaluate treatment options. The Internet is the consumers’ fastest growing health information resource, according to a national study released in August 2008 by the Center for Studying Health System Change. Researchers found that 32 percent of American consumers (approximately 70 million adults) conducted online health searches in 2007, compared with 16 percent in 2001. More than half of those surveyed said the information changed their overall approach to maintaining their health. Four in five said the information helped them better understand how to treat an illness or condition. |
|
| — | The Internet has also become a primary source of information for physicians seeking to improve clinical practice and is growing relative to traditional information sources, such as conferences, meetings and offline journals. |
| | |
| • | Increased Online Marketing and Education Spending for Healthcare Products. Pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies spend large amounts each year marketing their products and educating consumers and physicians about them; however, only a small portion of this amount is currently spent on online services. We believe that these companies, which comprise the majority of the advertisers and sponsors of our public portals, are becoming increasingly aware of the effectiveness of the Internet relative to traditional media in providing health, clinical and product-related information to consumers and physicians, and this increasing awareness will result in increasing demand for our services. However, notwithstanding our general expectation for increased demand, our advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not in our control, and some of which may be difficult to forecast accurately, including general economic conditions and the following: |
| | |
| — | The majority of our advertising and sponsorship contracts are for terms of approximately four to twelve months. We have relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship contracts. |
21
| | |
| — | The time between the date of initial contact with a potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that program may be subject to delays over which we have little or no control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals. |
Other factors that may affect the timing of contracting for specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of revenue under such contracts, include: the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved uses for existing products; the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with existing brand name products; the timing of withdrawals of products from the market; the timing of roll-outs of new or enhanced services on our public portals; seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing of promotional campaigns for specific products; and the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other healthcare professionals.
| | |
| • | Changes in Health Plan Design; Health Management Initiatives. In a healthcare market where the responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information technology (including personal health records) to assist consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also increased. We believe that through our WebMD Health and Benefits Manager tools, including our personal health record application, we are well positioned to play a role in this environment, and these services will be a significant driver for the growth of our private portals during the next several years. However, our growth strategy depends, in part, on increasing usage of our private portal services by our employer and health plan clients’ employees and members, respectively. Increasing usage of our services requires us to continue to deliver and improve the underlying technology and develop new and updated applications, features and services. In addition, we face competition in the area of healthcare decision-support tools and online health management applications and health information services. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than we do, and may be better known than we are. We also expect that, for clients and potential clients in the industries most seriously affected by recent adverse changes in general economic conditions (including those in the financial services and automotive industries), we may experience some reductions in initial contracts, contract expansions and contract renewals for our private portal services, as well as reductions in the size of existing contracts. |
The healthcare industry in the United States and relationships among healthcare payers, providers and consumers are very complicated. In addition, the Internet and the market for online services are relatively new and still evolving. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the trends identified above will continue or that the expected benefits to our businesses from our responses to those trends will be achieved. In addition, the market for healthcare information services is highly competitive and not only are our existing competitors seeking to benefit from these same trends, but the trends may also attract additional competitors.
Proposed Divestiture of the Little Blue Book Print Directory Business. In March 2009, our Board of Directors decided to divest our Little Blue Book print directory business (which we refer to as LBB) as it is not strategic to our overall business. As a result of our intention to divest LBB and our expectation that this divesture will be completed within one year, we reflected LBB as discontinued operations within the consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The revenue and operating results of LBB had previously been reflected within an operating segment titled publishing and other services. As a result of the decision to divest LBB, we eliminated the separate segment presentation for publishing and other services and began reporting revenue in the following three categories: advertising and sponsorship, licensing and print.
Non-Recourse Credit Facility. On May 6, 2008, we entered into a non-recourse credit facility (which we refer to as the 2008 Credit Facility) with an affiliate of Citigroup, secured by our auction rate securities (including, in some circumstances, interest payable on the auction rate securities), that would allow us to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of the auction rate securities pledged as collateral under the 2008 Credit Facility. No borrowings were made under the 2008 Credit Facility. A description of our auction rate securities
22
(which we refer to as ARS) is included under “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Fair Value of Investments” below.
On April 28, 2009, we entered into an amended and restated facility with an affiliate of Citigroup (which we refer to as the 2009 Credit Facility), replacing the 2008 Credit Facility. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, no borrowings have been made under the 2009 Credit Facility. The 2009 Credit Facility is secured by our ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings). We can make borrowings under the 2009 Credit Facility until April 27, 2010. Any borrowings outstanding under the 2009 Credit Facility after February 26, 2010 become demand loans, subject to 60 days notice, with recourse only to the pledged collateral. Loan proceeds may be used for general working capital purposes or other lawful business purposes (including repurchases of its own securities), but not for purposes of buying, trading or carrying other securities. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the 2009 Credit Facility will be the Open Federal Funds Rate plus 3.95%. The maximum that can be borrowed under the 2009 Credit Facility is 75% of the face amount of the pledged ARS holdings. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the maximum we are able to borrow is $123,075. Removals of ARS from the pledged collateral (including upon their redemption or sale) will reduce the amount available for borrowing under the 2009 Credit Facility. The 2009 Credit Facility is governed by an amended and restated loan agreement, which contains customary representations and warranties of WebMD, as borrower, the borrower and certain affirmative covenants and negative covenants relating to the pledged collateral. Under the loan agreement, WebMD and the lender may, in certain circumstances, cause the pledged collateral to be sold, with the proceeds of any such sale required to be applied in full immediately to repayment of amounts borrowed.
Seasonality
The timing of our revenue is affected by seasonal factors. Advertising and sponsorship revenue is seasonal, primarily due to the annual budget approval process of the advertising and sponsorship clients of our public portals. This portion of our revenue is usually the lowest in the first quarter of each calendar year, and increases during each consecutive quarter throughout the year. Our private portal licensing revenue is historically higher in the second half of the year as new customers are typically added during this period in conjunction with their annual open enrollment periods for employee benefits. The timing of revenue in relation to our expenses, much of which do not vary directly with revenue, has an impact on cost of operations, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue in each calendar quarter.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our MD&A is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, which were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience, current business factors, and various other assumptions that we believe are necessary to consider to form a basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic and political factors, and changes in our business environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in preparation of our financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the carrying value of long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible assets), the carrying value of marketable securities, the amortization period of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill), the carrying value, capitalization and amortization of software and Web site development costs, the
23
provision for income taxes and related deferred tax accounts, certain accrued expenses and contingencies, share-based compensation to employees and transactions with HLTH.
We believe the following reflects our critical accounting policies and our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
| | |
| • | Revenue Recognition. Revenue from advertising is recognized as advertisements are delivered or as publications are distributed. Revenue from sponsorship arrangements, content syndication and distribution arrangements, and licenses of healthcare management tools and private portals as well as related health coaching services are recognized ratably over the term of the applicable agreement. Revenue from the sponsorship of CME is recognized over the period we substantially complete our contractual deliverables as determined by the applicable agreements. When contractual arrangements contain multiple elements, revenue is allocated to each element based on its relative fair value determined using prices charged when elements are sold separately. In certain instances where fair value does not exist for all the elements, the amount of revenue allocated to the delivered elements equals the total consideration less the fair value of the undelivered elements. In instances where fair value does not exist for the undelivered elements, revenue is recognized when the last element is delivered. |
|
| • | Long-Lived Assets. Our long-lived assets consist of property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets arise from the acquisitions we have made. The amount assigned to intangible assets is subjective and based on our estimates of the future benefit of the intangible assets using accepted valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow and replacement cost models. Our long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which we determined based on the consideration of several factors including the period of time the asset is expected to remain in service. We evaluate the carrying value and remaining useful lives of long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, whenever indicators of impairment are present. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually, and whenever indicators of impairment are present. We use a discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of goodwill. There was no impairment of goodwill noted as a result of our impairment testing in 2008. |
|
| • | Fair Value of Investments. We hold investments in ARS which are backed by student loans, which are 97% guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and which had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. Historically, the fair value of our ARS investments approximated face value due to the frequent auction periods, generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided liquidity to these investments. However, since February 2008, all auctions involving these securities have failed. The result of a failed auction is that these ARS will continue to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each respective auction date; however, liquidity of the securities will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time as other markets for these ARS investments develop. We cannot be certain regarding the amount of time it will take for an auction market or other markets to develop. Accordingly, during the three months ended March 31, 2008, we concluded that the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximates the face value due to the lack of liquidity and therefore recorded another-than-temporary impairment. |
As of and subsequent to March 31, 2008, we estimate the fair value of our ARS investments using an income approach valuation technique. Using this approach, expected future cash flows are calculated over the expected life of each security and are discounted to a single present value using a market required rate of return. Some of the more significant assumptions made in the present value calculations include (i) the estimated weighted average lives for the loan portfolios underlying each individual ARS and (ii) the required rates of return used to discount the estimated future cash flows over the estimated life of each security, which considered both the credit quality for each individual ARS and the market liquidity for these investments.
Our ARS investments have been classified as Level 3 assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (which we refer to as SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” as their valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable in
24
the market due to the lack of trading in the securities. If different assumptions were used for the various inputs to the valuation approach including, but not limited to, assumptions involving the estimated lives of the ARS investments, the estimated cash flows over those estimated lives, and the estimated discount rates applied to those cash flows, the estimated fair value of these investments could be significantly higher or lower than the fair value we determined. We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities as well as the individual ARS investments we own. We may be required to record additional losses in future periods if the fair value of our ARS deteriorates further.
| | |
| • | Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (which we refer to as FASB) issued SFAS No. 123, “(Revised 2004): Share-Based Payment” (which we refer to as SFAS 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (which we refer to as SFAS 123) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on their fair values. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in this model are expected dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term. We elected to use the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method, awards that were granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006 are measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R. Unvested stock options and restricted stock awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123, using the same grant date fair value and same expense attribution method used under SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the results of operations over the remaining vesting periods. The impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount recognized for all stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2006. As of March 31, 2009, approximately $470 and $72,895 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.0 years and 3.4 years, related to the HLTH and WebMD stock-based compensation plans, respectively. |
|
| • | Deferred Tax Assets. Our deferred tax assets are comprised primarily of net operating loss (which we refer to as NOL) carryforwards on a separate return basis. Subject to certain limitations, these loss carryforwards may be used to offset taxable income in future periods, reducing the amount of taxes we might otherwise be required to pay. A significant portion of our deferred tax assets are reserved for through a valuation allowance. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income. Management will continue to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance, and in the future, should management determine that realization of the net deferred tax asset is more likely than not, some or all of the remaining valuation allowance will be reversed, and our effective tax rate may be reduced by such reversal. |
|
| • | Transactions with HLTH. As discussed further below, our expenses reflect a services fee for an allocation of costs for corporate services provided by HLTH. Our expenses also reflect the allocation of a portion of the cost of HLTH’s healthcare plans and the allocation of stock-based compensation expense related to HLTH restricted stock awards and HLTH stock options held by our employees. Additionally, our revenue includes revenue from HLTH for services we provide. |
Transactions with HLTH
Agreements with HLTH
In connection with our IPO in September 2005, we entered into a number of agreements with HLTH governing the future relationship of the companies, including a Services Agreement, a Tax Sharing Agreement and an Indemnity Agreement. These agreements cover a variety of matters, including responsibility for certain
25
liabilities, including tax liabilities, as well as matters related to HLTH providing us with administrative services, such as payroll, tax, employee benefit plan, employee insurance, intellectual property, legal and information processing services.
Charges from HLTH to WebMD:
Corporate Services: We are charged a services fee (which we refer to as the Services Fee) for costs related to corporate services provided to us by HLTH. The services that HLTH provides include certain administrative services, including payroll, accounting, tax planning and compliance, employee benefit plans, legal matters and information processing. In addition, we reimburse HLTH for an allocated portion of certain expenses that HLTH incurs for outside services and similar items, including insurance fees, outside personnel, facilities costs, professional fees, software maintenance fees and telecommunications costs. HLTH has agreed to make the services available to us for up to five years following the IPO. These expense allocations were determined on a basis that we and HLTH consider to be a reasonable assessment of the cost of providing these services, exclusive of any profit margin. The basis we and HLTH used to determine these expense allocations required management to make certain judgments and assumptions. The Services Fee is reflected in general and administrative expense within our consolidated statements of operations.
Healthcare Expense: We are charged for our employees’ participation in HLTH’s healthcare plans. Healthcare expense is charged based on the number of our total employees and reflects HLTH’s average cost of these benefits per employee. Healthcare expense is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the same expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: Stock-based compensation expense is related to stock option issuances and restricted stock awards of HLTH Common Stock that have been granted to certain of our employees. Stock-based compensation expense is allocated on a specific employee identification basis. The expense is reflected in our consolidated statements of operations in the same expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees. The allocation of stock-based compensation expense related to HLTH Common Stock is recorded as a capital contribution in additional paid-in capital.
The following table summarizes the allocations reflected in our consolidated financial statements:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Charges from HLTH to the Company: | | | | | | | | |
Corporate services | | $ | 1,035 | | | $ | 873 | |
Healthcare expense | | | 2,114 | | | | 1,955 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 32 | | | | 244 | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position (which we refer to as FSP)No. FAS 107-1 and APB28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (which we refer to as FSPFAS 107-1). FSPFAS 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods. Such disclosures were previously required only in annual financial statements. FSPFAS 107-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSPFAS 107-1 is only expected to apply to financial statement disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-4. “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (which we refer to as FSPFAS 157-4).FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased, as well as guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSPFAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. We are currently
26
evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and have not determined the impact, if any, that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 115-2 andFAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation ofOther-Than-Temporary Impairments” (which we refer to FSPFAS 115-2). FSPFAS 115-2 provides additional guidance to makeother-than-temporary impairments more operational and to improve the financial statement presentation of such impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and have not determined the impact, if any, that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data and expresses that data as a percentage of revenue for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | $ | | | % | | | $ | | | % | |
|
Revenue | | $ | 90,264 | | | | 100.0 | | | $ | 80,650 | | | | 100.0 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations | | | 36,565 | | | | 40.5 | | | | 30,927 | | | | 38.3 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 27,561 | | | | 30.5 | | | | 25,149 | | | | 31.2 | |
General and administrative | | | 14,726 | | | | 16.3 | | | | 13,480 | | | | 16.7 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 6,937 | | | | 7.7 | | | | 6,672 | | | | 8.3 | |
Interest income | | | 975 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 3,453 | | | | 4.3 | |
Impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27,406 | | | | 34.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision | | | 5,450 | | | | 6.0 | | | | (19,531 | ) | | | (24.2 | ) |
Income tax provision | | | 2,211 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 3,432 | | | | 4.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 3,239 | | | | 3.6 | | | | (22,963 | ) | | | (28.5 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | (423 | ) | | | (0.5 | ) | | | (372 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,816 | | | | 3.1 | | | $ | (23,335 | ) | | | (28.9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue is derived from advertising, sponsorship (including online CME services),e-detailing promotion and physician recruitment services, content syndication and distribution, and licenses of private online portals to employers, healthcare payers and others, along with related services including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic coaching. We also derive revenue from advertisements inWebMD the Magazine.Our customers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consumer products companies, as well as employers and health plans.
Cost of operations consists of costs related to services and products we provide to customers and costs associated with the operation and maintenance of our public and private portals. These costs relate to editorial and production, Web site operations, non-capitalized Web site development costs, and costs related to the production and distribution of our publications. These costs consist of expenses related to salaries and related expenses, non-cash stock-based compensation, creating and licensing content, telecommunications, leased properties and printing and distribution.
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising, product and brand promotion, salaries and related expenses, and non-cash stock-based compensation. These expenses include items related to salaries and related expenses of account executives, account management and marketing personnel, costs and expenses for marketing programs, and fees for professional marketing and advertising services. Also included in sales and marketing expense are the non-cash advertising expenses discussed below.
27
General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, non-cash stock-based compensation and other salary-related expenses of administrative, finance, legal, information technology, human resources and executive personnel. These expenses include costs of general insurance and costs of accounting and internal control systems to support our operations and a services fee for certain services performed for us by HLTH.
Our discussions throughout this MD&A reference certain non-cash expenses. The following is a summary of our principal non-cash expenses:
| | |
| • | Non-cash advertising expense. Expense related to the use of our prepaid advertising inventory that we received from News Corporation in exchange for equity instruments that HLTH issued in connection with an agreement it entered into with News Corporation in 1999 and subsequently amended in 2000. This non-cash advertising expense is included in sales and marketing expense when we use the asset for promotion of our brand. |
|
| • | Non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Expense related to awards of our restricted Class A Common Stock and awards of employee stock options, as well as awards of restricted HLTH Common Stock and awards of HLTH stock options that have been granted to certain of our employees. Expense also related to shares issued to our non-employee directors. Non-cash stock-based compensation expense is reflected in the same expense captions as the related salary costs of the respective employees. |
The following table is a summary of our non-cash expenses included in the respective statements of operations captions.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended
| |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Advertising expense: | | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | | $ | 1,753 | | | $ | 1,558 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations | | $ | 1,623 | | | $ | 1,116 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 1,550 | | | | 1,126 | |
General and administrative | | | 2,350 | | | | 1,438 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 5,523 | | | | 3,680 | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 131 | | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 5,654 | | | $ | 3,712 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
The following discussion is a comparison of our results of operations on a consolidated basis for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Revenue
Our total revenue increased 11.9% to $90,264 from $80,650 in the prior year period. This increase is primarily due to higher revenue from our public portals. A more detailed discussion regarding changes in revenue is included below under “— Supplemental Financial and Operating Information.”
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Operations. Cost of operations increased to $36,565 from $30,927 in the prior year period. As a percentage of revenue, cost of operations was 40.5% in 2009, compared to 38.3% in 2008. Included in cost of operations in 2009 was non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation of $1,623 compared to $1,116 in 2008. The increase in non-cash expenses during the three month period compared to last year were primarily related to stock options and restricted stock awards granted to our employees in December 2008.
28
Cost of operations excluding such non-cash expense was $34,942 or 38.7% of revenue, compared to $29,811 or 37.0% of revenue last year. The increase in absolute dollars, as well as the increase as a percentage of revenue, was primarily attributable to $2,800 of higher staffing costs and $1,300 of licensing expense associated with creating and licensing content for our sponsorship arrangements and our Web sites. Additionally, the increase is related to approximately $600 in costs related to our personalized telephonic coaching services primarily due to higher staffing levels to support that part of our business.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense increased to $27,561 from $25,149 in the prior year period. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense was 30.5% in 2009, compared to 31.2% in 2008. Included in sales and marketing expense in 2009 and 2008 was non-cash expense related to advertising of $1,753 and $1,558, respectively, and stock-based compensation of $1,550 and $1,126, respectively. The increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense was primarily related to stock options and restricted stock awards granted to our employees in December 2008. Sales and marketing expense, excluding such non-cash expenses, was $24,258 or 26.9% of revenue, compared to $22,465 or 27.9% of revenue last year. The increase in absolute dollars was primarily attributable to an increase in compensation related costs due to increased staffing and sales commissions related to higher revenue.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased to $14,726, from $13,480 in the prior year period. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense was 16.3% in 2009, compared to 16.7% in 2008. Included in general and administrative expense in 2009 and 2008 was non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2,350 and $1,438, respectively. The increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense was primarily due to stock options and restricted stock awards granted our employees in December 2008. General and administrative expense, excluding non-cash expenses, was $12,376 or 13.7% of revenue, compared to $12,042 or 14.9% of revenue last year. The decrease as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to our ability to achieve an increase in revenue without incurring a proportional increase in general and administrative expense.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $6,937 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $6,672 in the same period last year. The increase over the prior year period was primarily due to the $994 increase in depreciation expense relating to capital expenditures in 2008 and 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in amortization expense of $729 resulting from certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to $975 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $3,453 in the same period last year. The decrease resulted from a decrease in the average interest rate of our investments.
Impairment of Auction Rate Securities. Impairment of auction rate securities represents a charge of $27,406 related to an other-than temporary reduction of the fair value of the Company’s auction rate securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. For additional information, see ‘‘— Background Information on Certain Trends and Developments — Impairment of Auction Rate Securities; Non-Recourse Credit Facility” above.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision of $2,211 and $3,432 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, represents taxes related to federal, state and other jurisdictions. The income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2008 excludes a benefit for the impairment of ARS, as it is currently not deductible for tax purposes.
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, represents the Little Blue Book print directory business. For additional information, see “Introduction — Background Information on Certain Trends and Developments — Proposed Divestiture of the Little Blue Book Print Directory Business” above.
Net Income (Loss). Net income was $2,816 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to a net loss of $23,335 in the prior year period. Net income (loss) was significantly lower in the prior year period, due to the impairment charge of $27,406 related to our ARS.
29
Supplemental Financial and Operating Information
The following table and the discussion that follows presents information for groups of revenue based on similar services we provide, as well as information related to a non-GAAP performance measure that we use to monitor the performance of our business which we refer to as “Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items” or “Adjusted EBITDA.” Due to the fact that Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure, we have also included a reconciliation from Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss).
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | |
Advertising and sponsorship | | $ | 65,428 | | | $ | 56,482 | |
Licensing | | | 22,975 | | | | 21,923 | |
Print | | | 1,861 | | | | 2,245 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 90,264 | | | $ | 80,650 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items (Adjusted EBITDA) | | $ | 18,688 | | | $ | 16,332 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest, taxes, non-cash and other items | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 975 | | | | 3,453 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (6,937 | ) | | | (6,672 | ) |
Non-cash advertising | | | (1,753 | ) | | | (1,558 | ) |
Non-cash stock-based compensation | | | (5,523 | ) | | | (3,680 | ) |
Impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | (27,406 | ) |
Income tax provision | | | (2,211 | ) | | | (3,432 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 3,239 | | | | (22,963 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | (423 | ) | | | (372 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,816 | | | $ | (23,335 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The following discussion is a comparison of the results of operations for our three groups of revenue and our Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Advertising and Sponsorship. Advertising and sponsorship revenue increased $8,946 or 15.8% compared to the prior year period. The increase in advertising and sponsorship revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of brands and sponsored programs promoted on our sites. The number of such programs grew to 751 compared to 628 in the prior year period. In general, pricing remained relatively stable for our online advertising programs and was not a significant source of the revenue increase. Substantially all of our advertising and sponsorship revenue is generated through our public portals.
Licensing. Licensing revenue increased $1,052 or 4.8% compared to the prior year period. This increase was due to an increase in the number of companies using our private portal platform to 134 from 122 in the prior year period. In general, pricing remained relatively stable for our private portal licenses and was not a significant source of the revenue increase. We also have approximately 140 additional customers who purchase stand-alone decision support services from us. Substantially all of our licensing revenue is generated through our private portals.
Print. Print revenue was $1,861 compared to $2,245 in the prior year period, a decrease of $384.WebMD the Magazineand other print products are reflected in print revenue.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA was $18,688 or 20.7% of revenue, compared to $16,332 or 20.3% of revenue in the prior year period. This increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to higher revenue from the increase in number of brands and sponsored programs in our public portals, as well as the
30
increase in companies using our private online portal, without incurring a proportionate increase in overall expenses.
Explanatory Note Regarding Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should be viewed as supplemental to, and not as an alternative for, “income (loss) from continuing operations” or “net income (loss)” calculated in accordance with GAAP. Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA as an additional measure of performance for purposes of business decision-making, including developing budgets, managing expenditures, and evaluating potential acquisitions or divestitures. Period-to-period comparisons of Adjusted EBITDA help our management identify additional trends in financial results that may not be shown solely by period-to-period comparisons of income (loss) from continuing operations or net income (loss). In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA in the incentive compensation programs applicable to many of our employees in order to evaluate our performance. Our management recognizes that Adjusted EBITDA has inherent limitations because of the excluded items, particularly those items that are recurring in nature. In order to compensate for those limitations, management also reviews the specific items that are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, but included in income (loss) from continuing operations or net income (loss), as well as trends in those items. The amounts of those items are set forth, for the applicable periods, in the reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA to income (loss) from continuing operations or to net income (loss) above. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in their analysis of our results for reasons similar to the reasons why our management finds it useful and because it helps facilitate investor understanding of decisions made by our management in light of the performance metrics used in making those decisions. In addition, we believe that providing Adjusted EBITDA, together with a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to income (loss) from continuing operations or to net income (loss), helps investors make comparisons between us and other companies that may have different capital structures, different effective income tax rates and tax attributes, different capitalized asset valuesand/or different forms of employee compensation. However, Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide a supplemental way of comparing us with other public companies and is not intended as a substitute for comparisons based on “income (loss) from continuing operations” or “net income (loss)” calculated in accordance with GAAP. In making any comparisons to other companies, investors need to be aware that companies use different non-GAAP measures to evaluate their financial performance. Please see the “Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Information” filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report for additional background information regarding our use of Adjusted EBITDA. Exhibit 99.1 is incorporated in this MD&A by this reference.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2009, we had $204,803 of cash and cash equivalents and we owned investments in auction rate securities with a face value of $164,200 and a fair value of $127,033. While liquidity for our ARS investments is currently limited, we recently entered into an amended non-recourse credit facility with Citigroup in April 2009 that will allow us to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of our ARS holdings through April 2010. See “— Introduction — Background Information on Certain Trends and Developments — Non-Recourse Credit Facility” and “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Fair Value of Investments” above. Our working capital excluding the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of March 31, 2009 was $210,412. Our working capital is affected by the timing of each period end in relation to items such as payments received from customers, payments made to vendors, and internal payroll and billing cycles, as well as the seasonality within our business. Accordingly, our working capital, and its impact on cash flow from operations, can fluctuate materially from period to period.
Cash provided by operating activities from our continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $14,700, primarily as a result of net income of $2,816, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $16,733, which included loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, depreciation and amortization, non-cash advertising expense, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and deferred income taxes. Changes in working capital used cash flow of $4,849, primarily due to a decrease in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of $11,140, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $2,247 and an increase in deferred revenue of $4,961. Cash provided by operating activities from our continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $32,779, primarily as a result of net loss of $23,335, adjusted for
31
non-cash expenses of $42,060, which included loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, depreciation and amortization, non-cash advertising expense, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, deferred income taxes and an impairment of auction rate securities. Additionally, changes in working capital provided cash flow of $14,054, primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable of $10,449 and an increase in deferred revenue of $11,231, partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of $8,791.
Cash used in investing activities from our continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $4,440, which primarily related to investments in property and equipment of $5,290 primarily to enhance our technology platform offset by proceeds from the redemption of auction rate securities of $600 and cash received from the sale of the ACS/ACP Business of $250. Cash used in investing activities from our continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $89,191, which primarily related to net purchases of available-for-sale securities of $87,550, investments in property and equipment of $2,626 primarily to enhance our technology platform and cash received from the sale of the ACS/ACP Business of $985.
Cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 related to proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $1,827 and $589, respectively.
Potential future cash commitments include our anticipated 2009 capital expenditure requirements for the full year which we currently estimate to be up to $25,000. Our anticipated capital expenditures relate to improvements that will be deployed across our public and private portal web sites in order to enable us to service future growth in unique users, page views and private portal customers, as well as to create new sponsorship areas for our customers.
Based on our plans and expectations as of the date of this Quarterly Report and taking into consideration issues relating to the liquidity of our ARS investments, we believe that our available cash resources and future cash flow from operations will provide sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments described above and to fund our currently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for up to twenty-four months. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including retention of customers at current volume and revenue levels, our existing and new application and service offerings, competing technological and market developments, and potential future acquisitions. In addition, our ability to generate cash flow is subject to numerous factors beyond our control, including general economic, regulatory and other matters affecting us and our customers. We plan to continue to enhance the relevance of our online services to our audience and sponsors and will continue to invest in acquisitions, strategic relationships, facilities and technological infrastructure and product development. We intend to grow each of our existing businesses and enter into complementary ones through both internal investments and acquisitions. We may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities. If required, we may raise such additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders. Future indebtedness may impose various restrictions and covenants on us that could limit our ability to respond to market conditions, to provide for unanticipated capital investments or to take advantage of business opportunities.
Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of Operations
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on our financial results or operations or that could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of our businesses. The occurrence of one or more of the circumstances or events described below could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or on the trading prices of the common stock and convertible notes that we have issued or securities we may issue in the future. The risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that are
32
not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also adversely affect our business and operations.
Risks Related to Our Operations and the Healthcare Content We Provide
If we are unable to provide content and services that attract and retain users to The WebMD Health Network on a consistent basis, our advertising and sponsorship revenue could be reduced
Users ofThe WebMD Health Networkhave numerous other online and offline sources of healthcare information services. Our ability to compete for user traffic on our public portals depends upon our ability to make available a variety of health and medical content, decision-support applications and other services that meet the needs of a variety of types of users, including consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking information. Our ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
| | |
| • | our ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists and independent writers; |
|
| • | our ability to license quality content from third parties; and |
|
| • | our ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in user interest in specific topics. |
We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to develop or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of our public portals may be attracted toThe WebMD Health Networkas a result of a specific condition or for a specific purpose, it is difficult for us to predict the rate at which they will return to the public portals. Because we generate revenue by, among other things, selling sponsorships of specific pages, sections or events onThe WebMD Health Network, a decline in user traffic levels or a reduction in the number of pages viewed by users could cause our revenue to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Developing and implementing new and updated applications, features and services for our public and private portals may be more difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue to justify the costs
Attracting and retaining users of our public portals and clients for our private portals requires us to continue to improve the technology underlying those portals and to continue to develop new and updated applications, features and services for those portals. If we are unable to do so on a timely basis or if we are unable to implement new applications, features and services without disruption to our existing ones, we may lose potential users and clients.
We rely on a combination of internal development, strategic relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop our portals and related applications, features and services. Our developmentand/or implementation of new technologies, applications, features and services may cost more than expected, may take longer than originally expected, may require more testing than originally anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies, applications, features or services will justify the amounts spent.
We face significant competition for our healthcare information products and services
The markets for healthcare information products and services are intensely competitive, continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change.
| | |
| • | Our public portals face competition from numerous other companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue from advertisers and sponsors. We compete for users with online services and Web sites that provide health-related information, including both commercial sites and not-for-profit sites. We compete for advertisers and sponsors with: health-related Web sites; general purpose consumer Web sites that offer specialized health sub-channels; other high-traffic Web sites that include both healthcare-related and non-healthcare-related content and services; search engines that provide specialized |
33
| | |
| | health search; and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple sites. Our public portals also face competition from offline publications and information services. |
| | |
| • | Our private portals compete with: providers of healthcare decision-support tools and online health management applications, including personal health records; wellness and disease management vendors; and health information services and health management offerings of healthcare benefits companies and their affiliates. |
Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than we do. These organizations may be better known than we are and have more customers or users than we do. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against these organizations or any alliances they have formed or may form. Since there are no substantial barriers to entry into the markets in which our public portals participate, we expect that competitors will continue to enter these markets.
Failure to maintain and enhance the “WebMD” brand could have a material adverse effect on our business
We believe that the “WebMD” brand identity that we have developed has contributed to the success of our business and has helped us achieve recognition as a trusted source of health and wellness information. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing that brand is important to expanding the user base for our public portals, to our relationships with sponsors and advertisers and to our ability to gain additional employer and healthcare payer clients for our private portals. We have expended considerable resources on establishing and enhancing the “WebMD” brand and our other brands, and we have developed policies and procedures designed to preserve and enhance our brands, including editorial procedures designed to provide quality control of the information we publish. We expect to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain and enhance our brands. However, we may not be able to successfully maintain or enhance awareness of our brands, and events outside of our control may have a negative effect on our brands. If we are unable to maintain or enhance awareness of our brand, and do so in a cost-effective manner, our business could be adversely affected.
Our online businesses have a limited operating history
Our online businesses have a limited operating history and participate in relatively new markets. These markets, and our online businesses, have undergone significant changes during their short history and can be expected to continue to change. Many companies with business plans based on providing healthcare information and related services through the Internet have failed to be profitable and some have filed for bankruptcyand/or ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot assure you that our businesses will continue to be profitable.
Our failure to attract and retain qualified executives and employees may have a material adverse effect on our business
Our business depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of key members of our management team. We also depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified writers and editors, software developers and other technical personnel and sales and marketing personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the healthcare information services and Internet industries is intense. We cannot assure you that we will be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel to meet our requirements, or that we will be able to do so at salary and benefit costs that are acceptable to us. Failure to do so may have an adverse effect on our business.
34
The timing of our advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and is subject to factors beyond our control, including regulatory changes affecting advertising and promotion of drugs and medical devices and general economic conditions
Our advertising and sponsorship revenue, which accounted for approximately 75% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008, may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not in our control, and some of which may be difficult to forecast accurately, including potential effects on demand for our services as a result of regulatory changes affecting advertising and promotion of drugs and medical devices and general economic conditions. The majority of our advertising and sponsorship programs are for terms of approximately four to twelve months. We have relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship programs. We cannot assure you that our current advertisers and sponsors will continue to use our services beyond the terms of their existing contracts or that they will enter into any additional contracts.
The time between the date of initial contact with a potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts, and may be subject to delays over which we have little or no control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals. Other factors that could affect the timing of contracting for specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of revenue under such contracts, include:
| | |
| • | the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved uses for existing products; |
|
| • | the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with existing brand name products; |
|
| • | the timing of withdrawals of products from the market; |
|
| • | the timing of roll-outs of new or enhanced services on our public portals; |
|
| • | seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing of promotional campaigns for specific products; and |
|
| • | the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other healthcare professionals. |
We may be unsuccessful in our efforts to increase advertising and sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies
Most of our advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in the past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies. We have been focusing on increasing sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies that are interested in communicating health-related or safety-related information about their products to our audience. However, many consumer products companies have increased the portion of their promotional spending used on the Internet, we cannot assure you that these advertisers and sponsors will find our consumer Web sites to be as effective as other Web sites or traditional media for promoting their products and services. If we encounter difficulties in competing with the other alternatives available to consumer products companies, this portion of our business may develop more slowly than we expect or may fail to develop. In addition, revenues from consumer products companies are more likely to reflect general economic conditions, and to be reduced to a greater extent during economic downturns or recessions, than revenues from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies.
Lengthy sales and implementation cycles for our private online portals make it difficult to forecast our revenues from these applications and may have an adverse impact on our business
The period from our initial contact with a potential client for a private online portal and the first purchase of our solution by the client is difficult to predict. In the past, this period has generally ranged from six to twelve months, but in some cases has been longer. Potential sales may be subject to delays or cancellations due to a client’s internal procedures for approving large expenditures and other factors beyond our control, including the effect of general economic conditions on the willingness of potential clients to commit to licensing our private portals. The time it takes to implement a private online portal is also difficult to predict
35
and has lasted as long as six months from contract execution to the commencement of live operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the availability of the internal resources of the client that are needed and other factors outside of our control. As a result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing of revenue from new clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult to predict our financial performance from quarter to quarter.
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, we may expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private online portal without receiving any related revenue. In addition, many of the expenses related to providing private online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if our private portal revenue is lower than expected, we may not be able to reduce related short-term spending in response. Any shortfall in such revenue would have a direct impact on our results of operations.
Our ability to provide comparative information on hospital cost and quality depends on our ability to obtain the required data on a timely basis and, if we are unable to do so, our private portal services would be less attractive to clients
We provide, in connection with our private portal services, comparative information about hospital cost and quality. Our ability to provide this information depends on our ability to obtain comprehensive, reliable data. We currently obtain this data from a number of public and private sources, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), many individual states and the Leapfrog Group. We cannot provide assurance that we would be able to find alternative sources for this data on acceptable terms and conditions. Accordingly, our business could be negatively impacted if CMS or our other data sources cease to make such information available or impose terms and conditions for making it available that are not consistent with our planned usage. In addition, the quality of the comparative information services we provide depends on the reliability of the information that we are able to obtain. If the information we use to provide these services contains errors or is otherwise unreliable, we could lose clients and our reputation could be damaged.
Our ability to renew existing licenses with employers and health plans will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to increase usage of our private portal services by their employees and plan members
In a healthcare market where a greater share of the responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information technology (including personal health records) to assist consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also increased. We believe that through our WebMD Health and Benefits Manager platform, including our personal health record application, we are well positioned to play a role in this consumer-directed healthcare environment, and these services will be a significant driver for the growth of our private portals during the next several years. However, our growth strategy depends, in part, on increasing usage of our private portal services by our employer and health plan clients’ employees and members, respectively. Increasing usage of our services requires us to continue to deliver and improve the underlying technology and develop new and updated applications, features and services. In addition, we face competition in the area of healthcare decision-support tools and online health management applications and health information services. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than we do, and may be better known than we are. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to meet our development and implementation goals, nor that we will be able to compete successfully against other vendors offering competitive services and, as a result, may experience static or diminished usage for our private portal services and possible non-renewals of our license agreements.
We may be subject to claims brought against us as a result of content we provide
Consumers access health-related information through our online services, including information regarding particular medical conditions and possible adverse reactions or side effects from medications. If our content, or content we obtain from third parties, contains inaccuracies, it is possible that consumers, employees, health plan members or others may sue us for various causes of action. Although our Web sites contain terms and conditions, including disclaimers of liability, that are intended to reduce or eliminate our liability, the law
36
governing the validity and enforceability of online agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. We could be subject to claims by third parties that our online agreements with consumers and physicians that provide the terms and conditions for use of our public or private portals are unenforceable. A finding by a court that these agreements are invalid and that we are subject to liability could harm our business and require costly changes to our business.
We have editorial procedures in place to provide quality control of the information that we publish or provide. However, we cannot assure you that our editorial and other quality control procedures will be sufficient to ensure that there are no errors or omissions in particular content. Even if potential claims do not result in liability to us, investigating and defending against these claims could be expensive and time consuming and could divert management’s attention away from our operations. In addition, our business is based on establishing the reputation of our portals as trustworthy and dependable sources of healthcare information. Allegations of impropriety or inaccuracy, even if unfounded, could harm our reputation and business.
Expansion to markets outside the United States will subject us to additional risks
One element of our growth strategy is to seek to expand our online services to markets outside the United States. Generally, we expect that we would accomplish this through partnerships or joint ventures with other companies having expertise in the specific country or region. However, our participation in international markets will still be subject to certain risks beyond those applicable to our operations in the United States, such as:
| | |
| • | difficulties in staffing and managing operations outside of the United States; |
|
| • | fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
| • | burdens of complying with a wide variety of legal, regulatory and market requirements; |
|
| • | variability of economic and political conditions, including the extent of the impact of recent adverse economic conditions in markets outside the United States; |
|
| • | tariffs or other trade barriers; |
|
| • | costs of providing and marketing products and services in different markets; |
|
| • | potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on repatriation of earnings; and |
|
| • | difficulties in protecting intellectual property. |
Risks Related to the Internet and Our Technological Infrastructure
Any service interruption or failure in the systems that we use to provide online services could harm our business
Our online services are designed to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without interruption. However, we have experienced and expect that we will in the future experience interruptions and delays in services and availability from time to time. We rely on internal systems as well as third-party vendors, including data center providers and bandwidth providers, to provide our online services. We may not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of these services. In the event of a catastrophic event with respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, we may experience an extended period of system unavailability, which could negatively impact our relationship with users. In addition, system failures may result in loss of data, including user registration data, content, and other data critical to the operation of our online services, which could cause significant harm to our business and our reputation.
To operate without interruption or loss of data, both we and our service providers must guard against:
| | |
| • | damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters; |
37
| | |
| • | communications failures; |
|
| • | software and hardware errors, failures and crashes; |
|
| • | security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems; and |
|
| • | other potential service interruptions. |
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services provided by third-party providers to us or any failure by these third-party providers or our own systems to handle current or higher volume of use could significantly harm our business. We exercise little control over these third-party vendors, which increases our vulnerability to problems with services they provide.
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with these third-party technologies and information services or our own systems could negatively impact our relationships with users and adversely affect our brand and our business and could expose us to liabilities to third parties. Although we maintain insurance for our business, the coverage under our policies may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
Implementation of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms used to deliver our online services may result in performance problems and may not provide the additional functionality that was expected
From time to time, we implement additions to or changes in the hardware and software platforms we use for providing our online services. During and after the implementation of additions or changes, a platform may not perform as expected, which could result in interruptions in operations, an increase in response time or an inability to track performance metrics. In addition, in connection with integrating acquired businesses, we may move their operations to our hardware and software platforms or make other changes, any of which could result in interruptions in those operations. Any significant interruption in our ability to operate any of our online services could have an adverse effect on our relationships with users and clients and, as a result, on our financial results. We rely on a combination of purchasing, licensing, internal development, and acquisitions to develop our hardware and software platforms. Our implementation of additions to or changes in these platforms may cost more than originally expected, may take longer than originally expected, and may require more testing than originally anticipated. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that additions to or changes in these platforms will provide the additional functionality and other benefits that were originally expected.
If the systems we use to provide online portals experience security breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, our business could suffer
We retain and transmit confidential information, including personal health records, in the processing centers and other facilities we use to provide online services. It is critical that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach could damage our reputation or result in liability. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate problems caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of security measures, this infrastructure or other systems that we interface with, including the Internet and related systems, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors, denial-of-service attacks or other attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of our security, whether as a result of our own systems or the systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for our services and could subject us to legal claims from our clients and users, including for breach of contract or breach of warranty.
Our online services are dependent on the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure
Our ability to deliver our online services is dependent on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and delays in the
38
future. The Internet has also experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet continues to experience increased usage, the Internet infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet may be harmed by increased usage or by denial-of-service attacks. Any resulting interruptions in our services or increases in response time could, if significant, result in a loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and sponsors on our Web sites and, if sustained or repeated, could reduce the attractiveness of our services.
Customers who utilize our online services depend on Internet service providers and other Web site operators for access to our Web sites. All of these providers have experienced significant outages in the past and could experience outages, delays and other difficulties in the future due to system failures unrelated to our systems. Any such outages or other failures on their part could reduce traffic to our Web sites.
Third parties may challenge the enforceability of our online agreements
The law governing the validity and enforceability of online agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. We could be subject to claims by third parties that the online terms and conditions for use of our Web sites, including disclaimers or limitations of liability, are unenforceable. A finding by a court that these terms and conditions or other online agreements are invalid could harm our business.
We could be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by clients of our online portals if the software and systems we use to provide them contain errors or experience failures
Errors in the software and systems we use could cause serious problems for clients of our online portals. We may fail to meet contractual performance standards or client expectations. Clients of our online portals may seek compensation from us or may seek to terminate their agreements with us, withhold payments due to us, seek refunds from us of part or all of the fees charged under those agreements or initiate litigation or other dispute resolution procedures. In addition, we could face breach of warranty or other claims by clients or additional development costs. Our software and systems are inherently complex and, despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain that they will perform as planned.
We attempt to limit, by contract, our liability to our clients for damages arising from our negligence, errors or mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not provide sufficient protection to us from liability for damages. We maintain liability insurance coverage, including coverage for errors and omissions. However, it is possible that claims could exceed the amount of our applicable insurance coverage, if any, or that this coverage may not continue to be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts. Even if these claims do not result in liability to us, investigating and defending against them would be expensive and time consuming and could divert management’s attention away from our operations. In addition, negative publicity caused by these events may delay or hinder market acceptance of our services, including unrelated services.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry, Healthcare Regulation and Internet Regulation
Developments in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business
Most of our revenue is derived from the healthcare industry and could be affected by changes affecting healthcare spending. We are particularly dependent on pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies for our advertising and sponsorship revenue. General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry participants could result from, among other things:
| | |
| • | government regulation or private initiatives that affect the manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients, payers or other healthcare industry participants, including changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products and services; |
|
| • | consolidation of healthcare industry participants; |
39
| | |
| • | reductions in governmental funding for healthcare; and |
|
| • | adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical, biotechnology or medical device companies or other healthcare industry participants. |
Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may result in reduced spending in some or all of the specific market segments that we serve or are planning to serve. For example, use of our products and services could be affected by:
| | |
| • | changes in the design of health insurance plans; |
|
| • | a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming to market; and |
|
| • | decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical or medical device companies, including as a result of governmental regulation or private initiatives that discourage or prohibit advertising or sponsorship activities by pharmaceutical or medical device companies. |
In addition, our customers’ expectations regarding pending or potential industry developments may also affect their budgeting processes and spending plans with respect to products and services of the types we provide.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent years and we expect that significant changes will continue to occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure you that the markets for our products and services will continue to exist at current levels or that we will have adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react to changes in those markets.
Government regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with respect to our compliance efforts and our business strategies
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, legislative, regulatory and other influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry could create unexpected liabilities for us, could cause us to incur additional costs and could restrict our operations. Many healthcare laws are complex, and their application to specific products and services may not be clear. In particular, many existing healthcare laws and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate the healthcare information services that we provide. However, these laws and regulations may nonetheless be applied to our products and services. Our failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations, or other failure to comply, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses. Some of the risks we face from healthcare regulation are as follows:
| | |
| • | Regulation of Drug and Medical Device Advertising and Promotion. The WebMD Health Networkprovides services involving advertising and promotion of prescription and over-the-counter drugs and medical devices. If the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finds that any information onThe WebMD Health Networkor inWebMD the Magazineviolates FDA or FTC regulations, they may take regulatory or judicial action against usand/or the advertiser or sponsor of that information. State attorneys general may also take similar action based on their state’s consumer protection statutes. Any increase or change in regulation of drug or medical device advertising and promotion could make it more difficult for us to contract for sponsorships and advertising. Members of Congress, physician groups and others have criticized the FDA’s current policies, and have called for restrictions on advertising of prescription drugs to consumers and increased FDA enforcement. We cannot predict what actions the FDA or industry participants may take in response to these criticisms. It is also possible that new laws would be enacted that impose restrictions on such advertising. In addition, recent private industry initiatives have resulted in voluntary restrictions, which advertisers and sponsors have agreed to follow. Our advertising and sponsorship revenue could be materially reduced by additional restrictions on the advertising of prescription drugs and medical devices to consumers, whether imposed by law or regulation or required under policies adopted by industry members. |
40
| | |
| • | Anti-kickback Laws. There are federal and state laws that govern patient referrals, physician financial relationships and inducements to healthcare providers and patients. The federal healthcare programs’ anti-kickback law prohibits any person or entity from offering, paying, soliciting or receiving anything of value, directly or indirectly, for the referral of patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs or the leasing, purchasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the lease, purchase or order of any item, good, facility or service covered by these programs. Many states also have similar anti-kickback laws that are not necessarily limited to items or services for which payment is made by a federal healthcare program. These laws are applicable to manufacturers and distributors and, therefore, may restrict how we and some of our customers market products to healthcare providers, includinge-details. Any determination by a state or federal regulatory agency that any of our practices violate any of these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties and require us to change or terminate some portions of our business and could have an adverse effect on our business. Even an unsuccessful challenge by regulatory authorities of our practices could result in adverse publicity and be costly for us to respond to. |
|
| • | Medical Professional Regulation. The practice of most healthcare professions requires licensing under applicable state law. In addition, the laws in some states prohibit business entities from practicing medicine. If a state determines that some portion of our business violates these laws, it may seek to have us discontinue those portions or subject us to penalties or licensure requirements. Any determination that we are a healthcare provider and have acted improperly as a healthcare provider may result in liability to us. |
Government regulation of the Internet could adversely affect our business
The Internet and its associated technologies are subject to government regulation. However, whether and how existing laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, including privacy and consumer protection laws, apply to the Internet is still uncertain. Our failure, or the failure of our business partners or third-party service providers, to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations to our products and services and the manner in which we deliver them, or any other failure to comply with such laws and regulations, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our business. In addition, new laws and regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, may be adopted with respect to the Internet and online services, including in areas such as: user privacy, confidentiality, consumer protection, pricing, content, copyrights and patents, and characteristics and quality of products and services. We cannot predict how these laws or regulations will affect our business.
Internet user privacy and the use of consumer information to track online activities are major issues both in the United States and abroad. For example, in February 2009, the FTC published Self-Regulatory Principles to govern the tracking of consumers’ activities online in order to deliver advertising targeted to the interests of individual consumers (sometimes referred to as behavioral advertising). These principles serve as guidelines to industry. In addition, there is the possibility of proposed legislation and enforcement activities relating to behavioral advertising. We have privacy policies posted on our Web sites that we believe comply with applicable laws requiring notice to users about our information collection, use and disclosure practices. We also notify users about our information collection, use and disclosure practices relating to data we receive through offline means such as paper health risk assessments. We cannot assure you that the privacy policies and other statements we provide to users of our products and services, or our practices will be found sufficient to protect us from liability or adverse publicity in this area. A determination by a state or federal agency or court that any of our practices do not meet applicable standards, or the implementation of new standards or requirements, could adversely affect our business.
We face potential liability related to the privacy and security of personal health information we collect from or on behalf of users of our services
Privacy and security of personal health information, particularly personal health information stored or transmitted electronically, is a major issue in the United States. The Privacy Standards and Security Standards
41
under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (or HIPAA) establish a set of national privacy and security standards for the protection of individually identifiable health information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers (referred to as covered entities) and their business associates. Currently, only covered entities are directly subject to potential civil and criminal liability under these Standards. However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) amends the HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards and makes certain provisions applicable to those portions of our business, such as those managing employee or plan member health information for employers or health plans, that are business associates of covered entities. Currently, we are bound by certain contracts and agreements to use and disclose protected health information in a manner consistent with the Privacy Standards and Security Standards. Beginning on February 17, 2010, some provisions of the HIPAA Privacy and Security rules will apply directly to us. Currently, depending on the facts and circumstances, we could potentially be subject to criminal liability for aiding and abetting or conspiring with a covered entity to violate the Privacy Standards or Security Standards. As of February 17, 2010, we will be directly subject to HIPAA’s criminal and civil penalties. We cannot assure you that we will adequately address the risks created by these Standards.
We are unable to predict what changes to these Standards might be made in the future or how those changes, or other changes in applicable laws and regulations, could affect our business. Any new legislation or regulation in the area of privacy of personal information, including personal health information, could affect the way we operate our business and could harm our business.
Failure to maintain CME accreditation could adversely affect Medscape, LLC’s ability to provide online CME offerings
Medscape, LLC’s continuing medical education (or CME) activities are planned and implemented in accordance with the current Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, or ACCME, which oversees providers of CME credit, and other applicable accreditation standards. ACCME’s standards for commercial support of CME are intended to ensure, among other things, that CME activities of ACCME-accredited providers, such as Medscape, LLC, are independent of “commercial interests,” which are defined as entities that produce, market, re-sell or distribute healthcare goods and services, excluding certain organizations. “Commercial interests,” and entities owned or controlled by “commercial interests,” are ineligible for accreditation by the ACCME. The standards also provide that accredited CME providers may not place their CME content on Web sites owned or controlled by a “commercial interest.” In addition, accredited CME providers may not ask “commercial interests” for speaker or topic suggestions, and are also prohibited from asking “commercial interests” to review CME content prior to delivery.
From time to time, ACCME revises its standards for commercial support of CME. As a result of certain past ACCME revisions, we adjusted our corporate structure and made changes to our management and operations intended to allow Medscape, LLC to provide CME activities that are developed independently from programs developed by its sister companies, which may not be independent of “commercial interests.” We believe that these changes allow Medscape, LLC to satisfy the applicable standards.
In June 2008, the ACCME published for comment several proposals, including the following:
| | |
| • | The ACCME stated that due consideration should be given to eliminating commercial support of CME. |
|
| • | The ACCME proposed that: (a) accredited providers must not receive communications from commercial interests announcing or prescribing any specific content that would be a preferred, or sought-after, topic for commercially supported CME (e.g., therapeutic area, product-line, patho-physiology); and (b) receiving communications from commercial interests regarding a commercial interest’s internal criteria for providing commercial support would also not be permissible. |
42
The comment period for these proposals ended on September 12, 2008, and the ACCME has determined not to take any action as to these proposals at this point. However, in April 2009, the ACCME published for comment several other proposals, including the following:
| | |
| • | “Commercial Support-Free” Designation. In order to clarify the distinction between CME that does include relationships with industry from CME that does not include relationships with industry, the ACCME is considering creating a new designation and review process for CME providers that wish to identify their program of CME as one that does not utilize funds donated by commercial interests. The designation would be termed: “Commercial Support-Free.” The ACCME has indicated that a range of standards for “Commercial Support-Free” CME are possible, including for example: (1) the CME provider not accepting any commercial support for any CME activity, or any part of its CME program; and (2) the CME provider not using funds from advertising or promotion, paid by commercial interests, to underwrite the costs of CME. |
|
| • | Independent CME Funding Entity. The ACCME is considering creating a granting entity that would accept unrestricted donations for the purpose of funding CME. The funds would be distributed to ACCME recognized and accredited organizations for development and presentation of ACCME-compliant CME. The ACCME is proposing for comment that the entity would: (1) be independent of the ACCME; (2) not provide funds to the ACCME; (3) be managed by its own governance structure; (4) establish its own granting criteria reflecting practice gaps established through methods consistent with ACCME’s content validation policies; and (5) fund CME done for U.S. learners. |
The comment period for these proposals ends on May 21, 2009. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the process, including what other alternatives may be considered by ACCME as a result of comments it has received. The elimination of, or restrictions on, commercial support for CME could adversely affect the volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through our Web sites.
Medscape, LLC’s current ACCME accreditation expires at the end of July 2010. In order for Medscape, LLC to renew its accreditation, it will be required to demonstrate to the ACCME that it continues to meet ACCME requirements. If Medscape, LLC fails to maintain its status as an accredited ACCME provider (whether at the time of such renewal or at an earlier time as a result of a failure to comply with existing or additional ACCME standards), it would not be permitted to accredit CME activities for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Instead, Medscape, LLC would be required to use third parties to provide such CME-related services. That, in turn, could discourage potential supporters from engaging Medscape, LLC to develop CME or education-related activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Government regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through our Web sites or require changes to how Medscape, LLC offers CME
CME activities may be subject to government oversight or regulation by Congress, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services, the federal agency responsible for interpreting certain federal laws relating to healthcare, and by state regulatory agencies. Medscape, LLCand/or the sponsors of the CME activities that Medscape, LLC accredits may be subject to enforcement actions if any of these CME activities are deemed improperly promotional, potentially leading to the termination of sponsorships.
During the past several years, educational activities, including CME, directed at physicians have been subject to increased governmental scrutiny to ensure that sponsors do not influence or control the content of the activities. For example, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee conducted an investigation of the sponsorship of CME activities, including an examination of the ACCME’s role in ensuring that CME activities are independent from the influence of their supporters. In response, pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have developed and implemented internal controls and procedures that promote adherence to applicable regulations and requirements. In implementing these controls and procedures, supporters of CME
43
may interpret the regulations and requirements differently and may implement varying procedures or requirements. These controls and procedures:
| | |
| • | may discourage pharmaceutical companies from providing grants for independent educational activities; |
|
| • | may slow their internal approval for such grants; |
|
| • | may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs that Medscape, LLC produces to levels that are lower than in the past, thereby reducing revenue; and |
|
| • | may require Medscape, LLC to make changes to how it offers or provides educational programs, including CME. |
In addition, future changes to laws, regulations or accreditation standards, or to the internal compliance programs of supporters or potential supporters, may further discourage, significantly limit, or prohibit supporters or potential supporters from engaging in educational activities with Medscape, LLC, or may require Medscape, LLC to make further changes in the way it offers or provides educational activities.
Risks Related to the Relationship between WebMD and HLTH
The concentrated ownership of our common stock by HLTH and certain corporate governance arrangements prevent our other stockholders from influencing significant corporate decisions
We have two classes of common stock:
| | |
| • | Class A Common Stock, which entitles the holder to one vote per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders; and |
|
| • | Class B Common Stock, which entitles the holder to five votes per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders. |
HLTH owns 100% of our Class B Common Stock, which represents approximately 83.5% of our outstanding common stock, as of March 31, 2009. These Class B shares collectively represent approximately 96% of the combined voting power of our outstanding common stock. Given its ownership interest, HLTH is able to control the outcome of all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election of directors. Accordingly, either in its capacity as a stockholder or through its control of our Board of Directors, HLTH is able to control all key decisions regarding our company, including mergers or other business combinations and acquisitions, dispositions of assets, future issuances of our common stock or other securities, the incurrence of debt by us, the payment of dividends on our common stock (including the frequency and the amount of dividends that would be payable on our common stock, a substantial majority of which HLTH owns) and amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Further, as long as HLTH and its subsidiaries (excluding our company and our subsidiaries) continue to beneficially own shares representing at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of our outstanding voting stock, it may take actions required to be taken at a meeting of stockholders without a meeting or a vote and without prior notice to holders of our Class A Common Stock. In addition, HLTH’s controlling interest may discourage a change of control that the holders of our Class A Common Stock may favor. Any of these provisions could be used by HLTH for its own advantage to the detriment of our other stockholders and our company. This in turn may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
The interests of HLTH may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders
We cannot assure you that the interests of HLTH will coincide with the interests of the other holders of our Common Stock. For example, HLTH could cause us to make acquisitions that increase the amount of our indebtedness or outstanding shares of common stock or sell revenue-generating assets. Also, HLTH or its
44
directors and officers may allocate to HLTH or its other affiliates corporate opportunities that could have been directed to us. So long as HLTH continues to own shares of our Common Stock with significant voting power, HLTH will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions.
Some of our directors, officers and employees may have potential conflicts of interest as a result of having positions with or owning equity interests in HLTH
Martin J. Wygod, in addition to being Chairman of the Board of our company, is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH. Some of our other directors, officers and employees also serve as directors, officers or employees of HLTH. In addition, some of our directors, officers and employees own shares of HLTH’s Common Stock. Furthermore, because our officers and employees have participated in HLTH’s equity compensation plans and because service at our company will, so long as we are a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH, qualify those persons for continued participation and continued vesting of equity awards under HLTH’s equity plans, many of our officers and employees and some of our directors hold, and may continue to hold, options to purchase HLTH’s Common Stock and shares of HLTH’s Restricted Stock.
These arrangements and ownership interests or cash- or equity-based awards could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when directors or officers who own HLTH’s stock or stock options or who participate in HLTH’s benefit plans are faced with decisions that could have different implications for HLTH than they do for us. We cannot assure you that the provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation will adequately address potential conflicts of interest or that potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in our favor.
Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover, which could adversely affect the value of our Class A Common Stock
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, as well as Delaware corporate law, contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control or changes in our management and Board of Directors that holders of our Class A Common Stock might consider favorable and may prevent them from receiving a takeover premium for their shares. These provisions include, for example, our classified board structure, the disproportionate voting rights of the Class B Common Stock (relative to the Class A Common Stock) and the authorization of our Board of Directors to issue up to 50 million shares of preferred stock without a stockholder vote. In addition, our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that after the time HLTH and its affiliates cease to own, in the aggregate, a majority of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock, stockholders may not act by written consent and may not call special meetings. These provisions apply even if an offer may be considered beneficial by some of our stockholders. If a change of control or change in management is delayed or prevented, the market price of our Class A Common Stock could decline.
We may be prevented from issuing stock to raise capital, as acquisition consideration or to provide equity incentives to members of our management and Board of Directors
Beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power and value of our capital stock is required in order for HLTH to continue to include us in its consolidated group for federal income tax purposes, and beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power of our capital stock and 80% of each class of any non-voting capital stock that we may issue is required in order for HLTH to effect a tax-free split-off, spin-off or other similar transaction. Under the terms of the Tax Sharing Agreement that we have entered into with HLTH, we have agreed that we will not knowingly take or fail to take any action that could reasonably be expected to preclude HLTH’s ability to undertake a tax-free split-off or spin-off. This may prevent us from issuing additional equity securities to raise capital, as acquisition consideration or to provide management or director equity incentives.
45
We are included in HLTH’s consolidated tax return and, as a result, both we and HLTH may use each other’s net operating loss carryforwards
Due to provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to the manner and order in which net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards are utilized when filing consolidated tax returns, a portion of our NOL carryforwards may be required to be utilized by HLTH before HLTH would be permitted to utilize its own NOL carryforwards. Correspondingly, in some situations, such as where HLTH’s NOL carryforwards were generated first, we may be required to utilize a portion of HLTH’s NOL carryforwards before we would have to utilize our own NOL carryforwards. On October 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a Termination Agreement, HLTH and WebMD mutually agreed, in light of recent turmoil in financial markets, to terminate the Agreement and Plan of Merger between HLTH and WebMD. Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, HLTH and WebMD amended the Tax Sharing Agreement between them so that, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2007, HLTH is no longer required to reimburse WebMD for use of NOL carryforwards attributable to WebMD that may result from certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH. The Tax Sharing Agreement had not, other than with respect to certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH, required either HLTH or WebMD to reimburse the other party for any net tax savings realized by the consolidated group as a result of the group’s utilization of WebMD’s or HLTH’s NOL carryforwards during the period of consolidation, and that will continue following the amendment.
If certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock or HLTH’s capital stock, we may be unable to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to reduce our income taxes
As of December 31, 2008, we had NOL carryforwards of approximately $141 million for federal income tax purposes and federal tax credits of approximately $3.6 million, which excludes the impact of any unrecognized tax benefits, residing within the WebMD legal entities. If certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock or HLTH’s capital stock, including issuances, redemptions, recapitalizations, exercises of options, conversions of convertible debt, purchases or sales by 5%-or-greater shareholders and similar transactions, that result in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of capital stock, over a three-year period, as determined under rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations, an annual limitation would be imposed with respect to the ability to utilize our NOL carryforwards and federal tax credits. On November 25, 2008, HLTH repurchased 83,699,922 shares of its common stock in a tender offer. The tender offer resulted in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of HLTH’s capital, as determined under rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations. As a result of this ownership change, there will be an annual limitation imposed on the ability to utilize our NOL carryforwards and federal tax credits. Because substantially all of our NOL carryforwards are reserved for by a valuation allowance, we would not expect an annual limitation on the utilization of our NOL carryforwards to significantly reduce our net deferred tax asset, although the timing of our cash flows may be impacted to the extent any such annual limitation deferred the utilization of our NOL carryforwards to future tax years.
We are included in HLTH’s consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and, as a result, may be liable for any shortfall in HLTH’s federal income tax payments
We will be included in the HLTH consolidated group for federal income tax purposes as long as HLTH continues to own 80% of the total value of our capital stock. By virtue of its controlling ownership and our Tax Sharing Agreement with HLTH, HLTH effectively controls all our tax decisions. Moreover, notwithstanding the Tax Sharing Agreement, federal tax law provides that each member of a consolidated group is jointly and severally liable for the group’s entire federal income tax obligation. Thus, to the extent HLTH or other members of the group fail to make any federal income tax payments required of them by law, we would be liable for the shortfall. Similar principles generally apply for income tax purposes in some state, local and foreign jurisdictions.
46
Other Risks Applicable to Our Company and to Ownership of Our Securities
Negative conditions in the market for certain auction rate securities may result in WebMD incurring a loss on such investments
As of March 31, 2009, WebMD had a total of approximately $164.2 million (face value) of investments in certain auction rate securities (ARS). Those ARS had a book value of $127.0 million. The types of ARS investments that WebMD owns are backed by student loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. WebMD does not own any other type of ARS investments.
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In the event WebMD needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments, it may not be able to do so until a future auction on these types of investments is successful or until a buyer is found outside the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling to purchase the investments at their carrying amount, WebMD would incur a loss on any such sales. In addition, the credit ratings on some of the ARS investments in our portfolio have been downgraded, and there may be additional such rating downgrades in the future. If uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or ARS investments in our portfolio experience additional credit rating downgrades, there could be further fair value adjustments or other-than-temporary impairments in the carrying value of our ARS investments.
We may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights
Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to our businesses. The steps that we take to protect our intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not adequate, may be expensive. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent and other intellectual property laws and confidentiality procedures and non-disclosure contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be able to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property, proprietary information or trade secrets. Even if we detect misappropriation or infringement by a third party, we cannot assure you that we will be able to enforce our rights at a reasonable cost, or at all. In addition, our rights to intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party development and commercialization of competing products or services.
Third parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain services, which may harm our business
We could be subject to claims that we are misappropriating or infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and divert management’s attention from our operations. If we become liable to third parties for infringing these rights, we could be required to pay a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or services that use or contain the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing products or services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We may also be required to indemnify our customers if they become subject to third-party claims relating to intellectual property that we license or otherwise provide to them, which could be costly.
Acquisitions, business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for our business and our security holders
WebMD has been built, in part, through acquisitions. We intend to continue to seek to acquire or to engage in business combinations with companies engaged in complementary businesses. In addition, we may
47
enter into joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar arrangements with third parties. These transactions may result in changes in the nature and scope of our operations and changes in our financial condition. Our success in completing these types of transactions will depend on, among other things, our ability to locate suitable candidates and negotiate mutually acceptable terms with them, and to obtain adequate financing. Significant competition for these opportunities exists, which may increase the cost of and decrease the opportunities for these types of transactions. Financing for these transactions may come from several sources, including:
| | |
| • | cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities; |
|
| • | proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and |
|
| • | proceeds from the issuance of additional Class A Common Stock, of preferred stock, of convertible debt or of other securities. |
The issuance of additional equity or debt securities could:
| | |
| • | cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders at the time of the issuance; |
|
| • | cause substantial dilution of our earnings per share; |
|
| • | subject us to the risks associated with increased leverage, including a reduction in our ability to obtain financing or an increase in the cost of any financing we obtain; |
|
| • | subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our flexibility in conducting future business activities; and |
|
| • | adversely affect the prevailing market price for our outstanding securities. |
We do not intend to seek security holder approval for any such acquisition or security issuance unless required by applicable law, regulation or the terms of then existing securities.
Our business will suffer if we fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in particular transactions
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire, businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses and assets into our operations, on a cost-effective basis, can be critical to our future performance. The amount and timing of the expected benefits of any acquisition, including potential synergies between our company and the acquired business, are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
| | |
| • | our ability to maintain relationships with the customers of the acquired business; |
|
| • | our ability to retain or replace key personnel; |
|
| • | potential conflicts in sponsor or advertising relationships; |
|
| • | our ability to coordinate organizations that are geographically diverse and may have different business cultures; and |
|
| • | compliance with regulatory requirements. |
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be successfully integrated with our operations in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although our management attempts to evaluate the risks inherent in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates appropriately, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets will perform as we expect or enhance the value of our company as a whole. In
48
addition, acquired companies or businesses may have larger than expected liabilities that are not covered by the indemnification, if any, that we are able to obtain from the sellers.
We may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our business or to exploit opportunities
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our service offerings, market developments, and repurchases of our common stock. We may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities. If required, we may raise such additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
As widely reported, financial markets have been experiencing extreme disruption recently, including volatility in the prices of securities and severely diminished liquidity and availability of credit. Until this disruption in the financial markets is resolved, financing will be even more difficult to obtain on acceptable terms and we could be forced to cancel or delay investments or transactions that we would otherwise have made.
49
| |
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity, while at the same time maximizing the yield we receive from our investment portfolio.
Changes in prevailing interest rates will cause the fair value of certain of our investments to fluctuate such as our investments in auction rate securities that generally bear interest at rates indexed to LIBOR. As of March 31, 2009, the fair market value of our auction rate securities was $127 million. However, the fair values of our cash and money market investments, which approximate $205 million at March 31, 2009 are not subject to changes in interest rates.
WebMD has entered into a non-recourse credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with an affiliate of Citigroup that is secured by its ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings), that will allow WebMD to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of the ARS holdings pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. The interest rate applicable to such borrowings will be the Open Federal Funds Rate plus 3.95%. No borrowings have been made under the Credit Facility to date.
| |
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As required by Exchange ActRule 13a-15(b), WebMD management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of WebMD’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-15(e), as of March 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that WebMD’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange ActRule 13a-15(d), WebMD management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in WebMD’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the first quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, WebMD’s internal control over financial reporting.
50
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(c) The following table provides information about purchases by WebMD during the three months ended March 31, 2009 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number
| | | | | | Total Number of Shares
| | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares
| |
| | of Shares
| | | Average Price
| | | Purchased as Part of Publicly
| | | that May Yet Be Purchased Under
| |
Period | | Purchased(1) | | | Paid per Share | | | Announced Plans or Programs(2) | | | the Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
1/01/09 - 1/31/09 | | | 2,344 | | | $ | 21.59 | | | | — | | | $ | 30,000,000 | |
2/01/09 - 2/28/09 | | | 200 | | | $ | 22.71 | | | | — | | | $ | 30,000,000 | |
3/01/09 - 3/31/09 | | | 1,735 | | | $ | 23.18 | | | | — | | | $ | 30,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 4,279 | | | $ | 22.29 | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents shares withheld from WebMD Restricted Class A Common Stock that vested during the respective periods in order to satisfy withholding tax requirements related to the vesting of the awards. The value of these shares was determined based on the closing price of WebMD Class A Common Stock on the date of vesting. |
|
(2) | | Relates to the repurchase program that WebMD announced in December 2008, at which time WebMD was authorized to use up to $30 million to purchase shares of its Class A Common Stock from time to time. As of March 31, 2009, no shares had been purchased under this repurchase program. For additional information, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index onpage E-1 are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WebMD Health Corp.
Mark D. Funston
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 11, 2009
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
|
| 3 | .1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed by the Registrant on September 29, 2005 (the “Form 8-A”)) |
| 3 | .2 | | By-laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 17, 2007) |
| 10 | .1 | | Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2009, between Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and WebMD Health Corp. |
| 10 | .2 | | Loan Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2009, between Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and HLTH Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of HLTH Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009) |
| 10 | .3* | | Letter Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2009, between the Registrant and Anthony Vuolo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008) |
| 10 | .4* | | Amendment No. 1 to WebMD Supplemental Bonus Program Trust Agreement (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 10.58 to Amendment No. 1, filed on April 30, 2009, to WebMD Health Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008) |
| 31 | .1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
| 31 | .2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
| 32 | .1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
| 32 | .2 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
| 99 | .1 | | Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
| | |
* | | Agreement relates to executive compensation. |
E-1