- TRUE Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
DEF 14A Filing
TrueCar (TRUE) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy
Filed: 8 Apr 20, 4:10pm
Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrantý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
TrueCar, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý | No fee required. | |||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
DATE
Thursday, May 21, 2020
TIME
8:30 a.m. Pacific Time
PLACE
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/True2020
RECORD DATE
March 26, 2020
YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF THREE WAYS | ||||
| | | | |
INTERNET Visit the website noted on your proxycard to vote online. | ![]() | |||
| | | | |
TELEPHONE Use the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card to vote by telephone. | ![]() | |||
| | | | |
Sign, date, and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope to vote by mail. | ![]() | |||
We are pleased to invite you to attend our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 26, 2020 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of March 26, 2020 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.
Sincerely,
Michael Darrow
President and Chief Executive Officer
Santa Monica, California
April 8, 2020
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting by live webcast, we urge you to submit your vote on the Internet or by telephone or mail to ensure your shares are represented. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled "General Information" and the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability. For additional instructions on voting by telephone or the Internet, please refer to your proxy card. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the virtual meeting and to vote your shares at the virtual meeting. Please vote as soon as possible.
The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting by live webcast.You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. As described in more detail in the accompanying proxy statement, our board of directors believes that holding a virtual stockholder meeting facilitates attendance, increases participation and communication and offers significant time and cost savings to us and our stockholders and therefore has chosen this over an in-person meeting. To participate, vote or submit questions during the Annual Meeting by live webcast, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/True2020.
In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we are once again pleased to provide our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet at http://materials.proxyvote.com/89785L rather than in paper form. The Notice of Internet Availability, which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials and our 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders, is first being given or sent on or about April 8, 2020 to our stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Our stockholders will also have the ability to request that a printed set of the proxy materials be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2020: This proxy statement, along with the 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders, is available at the following website: http://materials.proxyvote.com/89785L.
By furnishing a Notice of Internet Availability and access to our proxy materials by the Internet, we are lowering the costs and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
The Notice of Internet Availability will also provide instructions on how you may request electronic or paper delivery of future proxy materials. If you choose to receive electronic delivery of future proxy materials, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by electronic or paper delivery will remain in effect until you terminate it. We encourage you to choose to receive future proxy materials by electronic delivery, which will (i) allow us to provide you with the information you need in a more timely manner, (ii) reduce printing and mailing documents to you and (iii) conserve natural resources.
Table of Contents |
Proxy Statement Summary | 1 | |
| | |
Executive Officers, Directors and Corporate Governance | 4 | |
| | |
Executive Officers and Directors | 4 | |
Board Composition | 10 | |
Board Meetings and Director Communications | 10 | |
Policy Regarding Nominations | 10 | |
Director Independence | 11 | |
Board Committees | 11 | |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | 15 | |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | 15 | |
Board Leadership Structure | 16 | |
Board's Role in Risk Oversight | 16 | |
Information on Compensation Risk Assessment | 16 | |
Non-Employee Director Compensation | 17 | |
Outside Director Compensation Policy | 17 | |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 19 | |
| | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 23 | |
| | |
Summary Compensation Table | 42 | |
Grants of Plan Based Awards | 44 | |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End | 46 | |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested | 49 | |
Executive Employment Arrangements | 49 | |
Potential Payments Upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events | 51 | |
Equity Compensation Plan Information | 60 | |
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure | 61 | |
Certain Relationships and Related Party and Other Transactions | 63 | |
| | |
Audit Committee Report | 65 | |
| | |
Proposal One: Election of Directors | 66 | |
| | |
Proposal Two: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants | 67 | |
| | |
Proposal Three: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | 69 | |
| | |
General Information | 71 | |
| | |
ANNEX A — Reconciliation of Adjusted EBIDTA to GAAP Net Loss | 78 | |
| | |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Proxy Statement Summary |
This summary highlights selected information in this Proxy Statement. Please review the entire document before voting.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
| | | | | | | | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||
| DATE | TIME | PLACE | RECORD DATE | ||||
| May 21, 2020 | 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time | www.virtualshareholder meeting.com/True2020 | March 26, 2020 | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
PROPOSALS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposals | Board Recommendation | Page Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Election of Directors | FOR | 66 | |||
2 | Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm | FOR | 67 | |||
3 | Advisory vote on executive compensation | FOR | 69 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
INTERNET Visit the website noted on your proxycard to vote online. | ![]() | Sign, date, and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope to vote by mail. | ![]() | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
TELEPHONE Use the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card to vote by telephone. | ![]() | IN PERSON You will not be able attend the Annual Meeting in Person. | ![]() | |||||||
| | |
![]() | | 1 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Proxy Summary |
SNAPSHOT OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TrueCar Committees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Age | Director Since | Independent | Audit Committee | Compensation & Workforce Committee | Executive Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael D. Darrow Director and President & CEO | 62 | 2020 | NO | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Robert E. Buce Director | 71 | 2005 | YES | o | | | | · | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher W. Claus* Director and Chairman of the Board | 59 | 2014 | YES | · | | · | | o | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John Krafcik(1) Director | 58 | 2014 | YES | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Erin N. Lantz Director | 40 | 2016 | YES | · | | | | | | · | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Philip G.J. McKoy Director | 47 | 2018 | YES | | | | | | | · | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John W. Mendel Director | 65 | 2017 | YES | | | · | | · | | o | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wesley A. Nichols Director | 55 | 2016 | YES | | | o | | · | | · | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ion A. Yadigaroglu Director | 50 | 2007 | YES | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
o Chairperson · Member * Chairman of the Board |
| | |
2 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Proxy Summary |
Below are the primary components of our 2019 executive compensation program:
| | |
![]() | | 3 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Executive Officers, Directors and Corporate Governance |
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers and directors as of March 31, 2020:
Name | Age | Position | ||
Executive Officers | ||||
Michael D. Darrow | 62 | President and Chief Executive Officer, and a Director | ||
Noel B. Watson | 44 | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Simon E. Smith | 50 | Executive Vice President of Dealer Sales & Service | ||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 52 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||
Non-Employee Directors | ||||
Robert E. Buce | 71 | Director | ||
Christopher W. Claus | 59 | Director and Chairman of the Board | ||
John Krafcik(1) | 58 | Director | ||
Erin N. Lantz | 40 | Director | ||
Philip G.J. McKoy | 47 | Director | ||
John W. Mendel | 65 | Director | ||
Wesley A. Nichols | 55 | Director | ||
Ion A. Yadigaroglu | 50 | Director | ||
| | | | |
Executive Officers
Michael D. Darrow has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since March 2020. From November 2017 until March 2020, he served as our Executive Vice President of Partner and OEM Development and served as our Executive Vice President of OEM Development from March 2017 to November 2017. Mr. Darrow has also served as the President of our subsidiary, ALG, Inc., since January 2018. From June 2016 until he joined us, Mr. Darrow was an Automotive Industry Consultant for Inventory Command Center LLC, before which Mr. Darrow served in numerous roles at Edmunds.com Inc. from July 2000 to August 2014, including as Chief Executive Officer of Edmunds Data Services, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Sales Officer. Mr. Darrow holds a B.S. in Economics from Allegheny University.
| | |
4 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
We believe that Mr. Darrow is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his substantial industry, operational and business strategy expertise, developed over more than 20 years of service in the online automotive industry, and his working relationships with many key customers, partners and industry participants.
Noel B. Watson has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer since June 2019. From February 2016 until he joined us, Mr. Watson was the Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance and Accounting of TripAdvisor, Inc., an online travel company that assists travelers by providing user-generated content, price comparison tools and online reservation and related services for accommodations, travel activities and restaurants around the world, and from February 2013 to February 2016, he served as TripAdvisor's Vice President of Accounting and Controller. Before that, Mr. Watson worked in various other accounting roles for TripAdvisor and Expedia, Inc., a travel booking website. Mr. Watson holds a B.A. in Accounting from Bryant University.
Simon E. Smith has served as our Executive Vice President of Dealer Sales & Service since June 2019. From July 2015 until June 2019, he served as our Senior Vice President of Dealer Development, and as our Vice President of Trade Operations from July 2012 until July 2015. Before joining us, Mr. Smith was the National Sales Director for AutoNation, Inc., the largest automotive retailer in the United States, and before that he spent eight years at CarsDirect.com, Inc. (now known as Internet Brands, Inc.), an online automotive research portal and car-buying service as Vice President of Sales and Operations, after beginning his career at Mercedes-Benz UK Ltd., the UK subsidiary of Daimler AG, a German multinational automobile manufacturer. Mr. Smith attended the University of Canterbury in New Zealand.
Jeffrey J. Swart has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since July 2017. From January 2016 to July 2017, Mr. Swart served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and he served as our Senior Vice President & Deputy General Counsel from April 2014 until December 2015. From May 1998 until he joined us, Mr. Swart practiced law at the law firm of Alston & Bird LLP, where he was a litigation partner. Before joining Alston & Bird, Mr. Swart served for two years as a law clerk to Judge Edward Carnes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Mr. Swart has substantial experience in complex commercial litigation. Mr. Swart holds a J.D. from the Emory University School of Law and a B.B.A. from the Goizueta Business School at Emory University.
| | |
![]() | | 5 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Board of Directors
Age: 71 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Audit Committee • Executive Committee | ROBERT E. BUCE Recent Business Experience: Robert E. Buce has served as a member of our Board since April 2005. Mr. Buce served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2005 to September 2008. Before joining us, Mr. Buce founded and served as Chief Financial Officer and a senior member of the management team of Build-To-Order, Inc., an automotive company focused on modularized outsourced manufacturing of vehicles. Before Build-To-Order, Mr. Buce held a variety of senior management positions, including Managing Partner, at KPMG LLP, an accounting and advisory firm, and served as Managing Director at BearingPoint, Inc., a related consulting firm. Mr. Buce also served on the board of directors of KPMG LLP from March 1991 to November 1995. Since July 2000, Mr. Buce has served as Chairman of PalisadesHoldings, a sole proprietorship providing independent advisory assistance to a variety of technology services and consumer products and services commercial enterprises. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Buce served on the board of directors of Intersection Technologies, Inc., the parent company of F&I Express, a provider of software and services to the automotive industry. Mr. Buce is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) in the State of California and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Buce holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University and an M.B.A. from the Anderson School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. Buce is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of the experience he gained from serving as our Chief Financial Officer, the substantial corporate governance, operational and financial expertise he gained from serving as Managing Partner at KPMG LLP, as Managing Director at BearingPoint and on the boards of directors and boards of advisors of several private companies. As the longest-serving member of our Board, we also value his deep understanding of our business as it has evolved over time. | |||
| | | | |
| | |
6 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Board Chair Since: 2016 Age: 59 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Compensation and Workforce Committee • Executive Committee • Audit Committee | CHRISTOPHER W. CLAUS Recent Business Experience: Christopher Claus has served as a member of our Board since April 2014 and as Chairman of the Board since February 2016. From December 1994 to March 2014, Mr. Claus served in various senior executive roles at the United Services Automobile Association, or USAA, a Fortune 150 diversified financial services company, most recently as Executive Vice President of USAA Enterprise Advice Group and President of USAA Financial Services Group. Previously, he served as the Senior Vice President and then President of USAA Investment Management Company. Mr. Claus also served as USAA's Vice President of Investment Sales and Service. Before USAA, Mr. Claus was Vice President of Equity Trading and Retirement Plans at Norwest Investment Services, Inc, a venture and growth equity investment firm. In June 2017, Mr. Claus joined the board of directors of Citizens, Inc., a provider of insurance and reinsurance services. Mr. Claus holds a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Minnesota Duluth and an M.B.A. from the University of St. Thomas. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. Claus is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his substantial business strategy and corporate development and governance expertise gained as an executive and counselor at several companies in the finance industry. | |||
| | | | |
Age: 40 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Audit Committee • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ERIN N. LANTZ Recent Business Experience: Erin N. Lantz has served as a member of our Board since November 2016. Ms. Lantz is a technology executive and strategic general manager. Most recently she was the Vice President and General Manager of Mortgages at Zillow Group, Inc., an online real estate database company, where she worked from 2010 through October 2019. Just before joining Zillow, Ms. Lantz was Senior Vice President at Bank of America Corporation, a U.S. multinational investment bank and financial services company, where she led the Direct-to-Consumer purchase home loan business. Before entering the mortgage industry, Ms. Lantz worked at the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm, as an Associate. From September 2016 until August 2018, Ms. Lantz served on the board of directors of Washington Federal, Inc., a bank holding company. Ms. Lantz holds a B.A. in Political Science, Philosophy and Economics from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Ms. Lantz is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of her extensive knowledge in finance, consumer behavior, online marketplaces and financial consumer technology. | |||
| | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 7 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Age: 47 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | PHILIP G.J. MCKOY Recent Business Experience: Philip G.J. McKoy has served as a member of our Board since October 2018. Since July 2016, Mr. McKoy has served as the Chief Information Officer of United Healthcare Services, Inc., a business of UnitedHealth Group, a diversified health and well-being company. From January 2016 to June 2016, Mr. McKoy served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Global Loyalty Solutions at Aimia Inc., a data-driven marketing and loyalty analytics company, and from July 2014 to December 2015, Mr. McKoy served as Aimia's Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the U.S. Region. Before joining Aimia, Mr. McKoy served in various roles at Target Corporation, a U.S. department store retailer, including as Vice President of Target.com from November 2011 through January 2014, where he was responsible for leading the customer-facing digital experience. Mr. McKoy has a B.A. in Political Science from Washington and Lee University and an M.A. in International Affairs from the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. McKoy is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his extensive knowledge in information security, technology strategy and digital business operations. | |||
| | | | |
Age: 65 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Compensation and Workforce Committee • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee • Executive Committee | JOHN W. MENDEL Recent Business Experience: John W. Mendel has served as a member of our Board since May 2017. Mr. Mendel served as the Executive Vice President, Automobile Division, of American Honda Motor Company, the U.S. subsidiary of Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese multinational automaker, from November 2004 until April 2017. Before Honda, Mr. Mendel worked for Ford Motor Company, a U.S. multinational automaker, from July 1976 until November 2004 in various roles, serving most recently as Chief Operating Officer of Mazda Motor of America, Inc., the U.S. subsidiary of Mazda Motor Corporation, a Japanese multinational automaker and, at the time, a business partner of Ford. Since August 2018, Mr. Mendel has served on the board of directors of LKQ Corporation, a global distributor of vehicle products. Mr. Mendel has a B.A. in Business and Economics from Austin College and an M.B.A. from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. Mendel is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his substantial corporate development, business strategy and automotive expertise gained as an executive in the automotive industry. | |||
| | | | |
| | |
8 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Age: 55 Independent Current Committee Memberships: • Compensation and Workforce Committee • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee • Executive Committee | WESLEY A. NICHOLS Recent Business Experience: Wesley A. Nichols has served as a member of our Board since November 2016. Since April 2018, Mr. Nichols has served as a strategic adviser to Snap Inc., a camera application company, and since January 2017, Mr. Nichols has been advising select portfolio companies of Upfront Ventures as a Board Partner and select multinational companies as a strategic adviser through Incrementum LLC, a strategic advisory and investment firm he co-founded in 2017. Mr. Nichols was the Chief Strategy Officer of Neustar, Inc., a global provider of real-time information services and analytics, from December 2015 until February 2017. Mr. Nichols co-founded MarketShare, LLC, a provider of advanced analytic solutions and software, in 2005 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from January 2005 until its acquisition by Neustar in December 2015. Mr. Nichols served on the board of directors of BJ's Restaurants, Inc. from December 2013 until June 2018, and on the board of directors of comScore, Inc. from October 2017 until October 2018. Mr. Nichols holds a B.A. in Psychology from Randolph-Macon College and an M.A. in Business Management from Johns Hopkins University. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. Nichols is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his extensive knowledge in analytics, marketing optimization and digital technology. | |||
| | | | |
Age: 50 Independent Current Committee Memberships: | ION A. YADIGAROGLU Recent Business Experience: Ion A. Yadigaroglu has served as a member of our Board since August 2007. Since July 2004, Mr. Yadigaroglu has served as a Managing Principal at Capricorn Investment Group LLC, an investment firm. Mr. Yadigaroglu holds a Masters in Physics from Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich in Switzerland and a Ph.D. in Astrophysics from Stanford University. Reasons for Nomination: We believe that Mr. Yadigaroglu is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his substantial corporate finance, business strategy and corporate development expertise gained from his holding various executive positions and from his significant experience in the capital industry, analyzing, investing in and serving on the boards of directors of various private technology companies. We also value his perspective as a representative of one of our significant stockholders. | |||
| | | | |
Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
| | |
![]() | | 9 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Board Composition
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. The number of directors is fixed by our Board, subject to the terms of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, or Charter, and our Amended and Restated Bylaws, or Bylaws, that became effective at the completion of our initial public offering. As of April 1, 2020, our Board consists of eight directors, seven of whom qualify as "independent" under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, which we refer to as Nasdaq.
In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. Only one class of directors is elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:
Messrs. Claus, McKoy and Mendel are standing for election at the Annual Meeting.
The division of our Board into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control. Under Delaware law, our directors may only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Our directors may not be removed by our stockholders without cause.
Any increase or decrease in the number of directors must be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors.
Board Meetings and Director Communications
During 2019, the Board held nine meetings. With the exception of Mr. Yadigaroglu, who attended 27% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served in 2019. Directors are also encouraged to attend our annual stockholder meetings absent an unavoidable and irreconcilable conflict. Each member of our Board attended our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the non-management members of the Board by mail to our principal executive offices addressed to the intended recipient and care of our Corporate Secretary. Our Corporate Secretary will review all incoming stockholder communications (except for mass mailings, product complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, business solicitations and patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material) and route such communications as appropriate to the Board or an individual director.
Policy Regarding Nominations
Our Board is responsible for identifying and nominating candidates for election to the Board. The Board considers recommendations from directors, stockholders and others, as it deems appropriate. In evaluating director candidates, our Board considers factors such as character, integrity, judgment, diversity, including diversity in terms of gender, race, ethnicity and experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest and other commitments. Our Board evaluates these factors, among others,
| | |
10 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
and does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of these factors. Our Board considers these factors in light of the specific needs of the Board at that time and also considers advice and recommendations from our President and Chief Executive Officer.
We have paid fees to a third party search firm to assist the Board in identifying and evaluating potential candidates for nomination. Search firms retained to assist our Board in seeking candidates for the Board are instructed to seek to include diverse candidates in terms of race and gender.
Director Independence
Our Board reviewed the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our Board determined that none of Ms. Lantz or Messrs. Buce, Claus, Krafcik, McKoy, Mendel, Nichols or Yadigaroglu has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is "independent" as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq's listing standards. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director. The Board also determined that each of Messrs. Claus, Mendel and Nichols is a non-employee director, as defined by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Board Committees
Our Board has an audit committee, a compensation and workforce committee, an executive committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The Company also has a standing disclosure committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board. Each of these committees operates under a written charter adopted by our Board that is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at http://ir.truecar.com/corporate-governance.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee is comprised of Messrs. Buce and Claus and Ms. Lantz. Mr. Buce serves as the chairperson of the audit committee. Each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence of audit committee members under current Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our audit committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the current Nasdaq listing standards. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Buce qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. During 2019, the audit committee held eight meetings. The responsibilities of our audit committee include, among other things:
| | |
![]() | | 11 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and Nasdaq's listing standards.
Compensation and Workforce Committee
We refer to our compensation and workforce committee as the compensation committee. Our compensation committee is comprised of Messrs. Nichols, Claus and Mendel. Mr. Nichols serves as the chairperson of the compensation committee. The composition of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under current Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of the compensation committee is also a non-employee director, as defined by Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The purpose of our compensation committee is to oversee our compensation policies, plans and benefit programs, significant matters related to our workforce and to discharge the responsibilities of our Board relating to the compensation of our executive officers. During 2019, the compensation committee held six meetings. The responsibilities of our compensation committee include, among other things:
Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and Nasdaq's listing standards.
| | |
12 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Executive Committee
Our executive committee is comprised of the chairperson of the Board and the chairpersons of each of the committees of the Board. Mr. Claus serves as the chairperson of the executive committee. The executive committee was established in February 2020, and so did not hold any meetings during 2019. The purpose of the executive committee is to assist with coordinating the Board's activities and to be in a position to act expeditiously with the full authority of the Board in the intervals between meetings of the Board, but the executive committee may not:
The executive committee operates under a written charter.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We refer to our nominating and corporate governance committee as our nominating committee. From January 1, 2019 until March 20, 2019, the nominating committee was comprised of Messrs. Mendel, McKoy, Nichols and Yadigaroglu and Ms. Lantz. On March 20, 2019, Mr. Yadigaroglu was removed from the nominating committee. Mr. Mendel served as the chairperson of the nominating committee throughout 2019. The composition of our nominating committee meets the requirements for independence under current Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. During 2019, the nominating and corporate governance committee held two meetings. The responsibilities of our nominating committee include, among other things:
| | |
![]() | | 13 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Our nominating committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is posted in the corporate governance section of our investor relations website at www.ir.truecar.com. Candidates should have broad experience and demonstrated excellence in their fields. In addition, candidates for director should have:
Each director must represent the interests of all stockholders. Their service on the boards of directors of other public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform responsibly all director duties. The nominating committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time.
The nominating committee reviews candidates for director in the context of the current composition of our Board, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the nominating committee considers the appropriate skills, experience and characteristics for members of the Board, including the appropriate role of diversity and such other factors as it deems appropriate given our current needs and those of our Board, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability. In the case of incumbent directors, the nominating committee reviews a director's overall service during his or her term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair his or her independence. The nominating committee also determines whether the Board can determine that the nominee is independent under Nasdaq's listing standards.
The nominating committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The committee periodically assesses the appropriate size of our Board and whether any vacancies on our Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. Candidates may come to the attention of the nominating committee through current members of our Board, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. The nominating committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of our Board. The nominating committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates' qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to our Board by majority vote. The nominating committee evaluates these candidates at its meetings, which may take place at any point during the year.
The nominating committee will consider candidates for our Board who meet the minimum qualifications as described above if properly recommended by stockholders holding at least one percent of the fully-diluted capitalization of the Company continuously for at least 12 months before the proposal. Proper recommendations will include the nominee's name, contact information, biography and qualifications as well as a consent signed by the nominee and a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the nominee and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.
Our nominating committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and Nasdaq's listing standards.
Disclosure Committee
Our disclosure committee is comprised of Mr. Watson, our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer; Mr. Darrow, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Swart, our General Counsel and Secretary, and other members of our management team. Messrs. Watson and Swart co-chair our disclosure committee. During 2019,
| | |
14 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
the disclosure committee held four meetings, one before the filing of each quarterly and annual report filed in 2019. The responsibilities of our disclosure committee include, among other things:
Our disclosure committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of our compensation committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of ours. Messrs. Nichols, Claus and Mendel served on our compensation committee throughout 2019. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or compensation committee.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://ir.truecar.com/corporate-governance. We intend to disclose on our website any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements.
| | |
![]() | | 15 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board currently believes that we are best served by separating the roles of a Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Darrow, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the director with the most in-depth understanding of and experience in our industry. Consequently, Mr. Darrow is most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy. Christopher Claus serves as the Chairman of the Board. Independent directors and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from both within and outside the automotive industry, while our President and Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific perspective and industry expertise. Our Board believes that separating the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is the best leadership structure for us at the current time because it promotes the efficient and effective development and execution of our strategy and facilitates information flow between management and our Board, which are essential to effective governance. Additionally, we established an executive committee of the Board in February 2020 to allow the independent Board leadership a forum to meet, communicate and act more expeditiously.
Board's Role in Risk Oversight
Management, which is responsible for day-to-day risk management, continually monitors the material enterprise risks we face, including strategic risks, operational risks, financial risks, credit risks, liquidity risks and legal and compliance risks.
The Board is responsible for overseeing our identification and management of, as well as planning for, those risks. The Board has delegated to certain committees oversight responsibility for those risks that are directly related to their area of focus (see descriptions of our Board committees' areas of responsibilities above) to identify, assess and mitigate risks facing the Company. The Board and its committees exercise their risk oversight function by receiving and evaluating reports from management and by making inquiries of management, as appropriate. In addition, the Board and its committees receive reports from our auditors and other consultants, and meet in executive sessions with these outside consultants. Each of our committees provides reports to the full Board, which enhances the Board's oversight of risk.
Information on Compensation Risk Assessment
Management periodically reviews our incentive compensation programs at all levels within the organization. Employee cash bonuses are based on company-wide and individual performance, and management (with respect to our non-executive employees) and our compensation committee (with respect to our executive officers) have discretion to adjust bonus payouts. Equity awards for new hires are based on the employee's position, prior experience, qualifications and the market for particular types of talent; and any additional grants are based on employee performance and retention objectives. Equity awards generally have long-term vesting requirements to ensure that recipients' focus is on our long-term success. The compensation committee reviewed our incentive compensation structure during 2019. Based on this review, the compensation committee does not believe that our compensation policies and practices, taken as a whole, create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on us.
| | |
16 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
2019 Non-Employee Director Compensation
The following table presents compensation information for our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2019. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for service as a director. Compensation paid to Mr. Darrow is discussed in "Executive Compensation."
Name | Fees Earned ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | |||
Robert E. Buce | 75,000 | 149,995 | 224,995 | |||
Christopher W. Claus | 97,500 | 149,995 | 247,495 | |||
John Krafcik | 55,000 | 149,995 | 204,995 | |||
Erin N. Lantz | 70,000 | 149,995 | 219,995 | |||
Philip G.J. McKoy | 60,000 | 149,995 | 209,995 | |||
John W. Mendel | 72,500 | 149,995 | 222,495 | |||
Wesley A. Nichols | 75,000 | 149,995 | 224,995 | |||
Ion A. Yadigaroglu | — | 149,995 | 149,995 | |||
| | | | | | |
The following table presents the aggregate number of stock awards and the aggregate number of option awards outstanding for each non-employee director as of December 31, 2019:
Name | Outstanding Stock Awards at December 31, 2019(1) | Outstanding Options at December 31, 2019(2) | ||
Robert E. Buce | 23,219 | 155,865 | ||
Christopher W. Claus | 23,219 | 97,976 | ||
John Krafcik | 23,219 | 662,124 | ||
Erin N. Lantz | 23,219 | 62,885 | ||
Philip G.J. McKoy | 32,147 | 28,753 | ||
John W. Mendel | 26,069 | 37,601 | ||
Wesley A. Nichols | 23,219 | 62,885 | ||
Ion A. Yadigaroglu | 23,219 | 83,812 | ||
| | | | |
Outside Director Compensation Policy
Our Board has adopted a policy for the compensation of non-employee directors, or Outside Directors, which we refer to as our Outside Director Compensation Policy. Under the Outside Director Compensation Policy, our Outside Directors receive compensation in the form of equity under the terms of our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2014 Plan, as described below, and Outside Directors who are not affiliated with a
| | |
![]() | | 17 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
venture capital investor in the Company, or Non-Affiliated Directors, also receive cash compensation for their service.
Our compensation committee regularly reviews and evaluates the Outside Director Compensation Policy in consultation with Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC, or Semler Brossy, an independent compensation consulting firm it has retained as described elsewhere in this proxy statement. Semler Brossy provides the compensation committee with competitive data and analysis regarding non-employee director compensation that the compensation committee considers in reviewing our Outside Director Compensation Policy. The compensation committee endeavors to update the Outside Director Compensation Policy such that it provides reasonable compensation to our Outside Directors that is appropriately aligned with our peers and is commensurate with the services and contributions of our Outside Directors.
Initial Award. Under the Outside Director Compensation Policy, each person who first becomes an Outside Director is granted an award of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $300,000, which we refer to as an Initial Award. Each Initial Award is automatically granted on the date the recipient first becomes an Outside Director. If a director's status changes from an employee director to an Outside Director, he or she will not receive an Initial Award.
Except as set forth below, an Initial Award vests in three approximately equal annual installments over three years from the 15th day of the month during which the individual commenced service as an Outside Director, subject to continued service as a director through the applicable vesting dates.
Any RSUs under an Initial Award that are scheduled to vest on or after the date of the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which the Initial Award is granted, in the case of an Initial Award granted at an annual meeting, or the date of the fourth annual meeting following the grant of the Initial Award, in the case of other Initial Awards, will instead vest on the day before that date.
Annual Award. On the date of each annual meeting, each Outside Director who has served on our Board for at least the preceding six months will be automatically granted an award of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $150,000, which we refer to as an Annual Award. Except as set forth below, the RSUs under an Annual Award will vest on the last day of the month that includes the 12-month anniversary of the date of grant of the Annual Award, subject to continued service as a director through the vesting date.
Any RSUs under an Annual Award that are scheduled to vest on or after the date of the following year's annual meeting will instead vest on the day before the following year's annual meeting.
Under the terms of the 2014 Plan, if the service of an Outside Director is terminated on or after a change in control, other than by a voluntary resignation, his or her restricted stock units will vest fully. Awards granted under our Outside Director Compensation Policy are granted under, and subject to the other terms and conditions of, our 2014 Plan. Our 2014 Plan provides that no Outside Director may be granted, in any fiscal year, stock-settled equity awards with a grant date fair value (determined in accordance with GAAP) of more than $750,000, with this limit increased to $1,500,000 in connection with grants awarded upon his or her initial appointment or election, or cash-settled awards with a grant date fair value of more than $750,000, increased to $1,500,000 in connection with grants awarded upon his or her initial appointment or election.
Cash Compensation. Each Non-Affiliated Director receives an annual retainer of $55,000 in cash for serving on our Board, or the Annual Fee. In addition to the Annual Fee, a Non-Affiliated Director who serves as chairman of the Board or lead independent director, as applicable, will be entitled to an additional annual retainer of $25,000 in cash.
| | |
18 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
Non-Affiliated Directors serving as chairperson and members of the committees of our Board are entitled to the annual cash retainers set forth below.
Board Committee | Chairperson Fee ($) | Member Fee ($) | ||
Audit Committee | 20,000 | 10,000 | ||
Compensation and Workforce Committee | 15,000 | 7,500 | ||
Executive Committee | — | — | ||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | 10,000 | 5,000 | ||
| | | | |
All cash retainers under the Outside Director Compensation Policy will be paid in quarterly installments to each Non-Affiliated Director that served in the relevant capacity at any point during the immediately preceding fiscal quarter no later than 30 days following the end of such preceding fiscal quarter.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT |
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 29, 2020 by:
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. In computing the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of our common stock subject to options or RSUs held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2020. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. We have based percentage ownership of our common stock on 107,083,724 shares of our common stock outstanding as
| | |
![]() | | 19 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
of February 29, 2020. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed on the table below is c/o TrueCar, Inc., 120 Broadway, Suite 200, Santa Monica, California 90401.
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Shares Outstanding | ||
5% Stockholders: | ||||
Caledonia (Private) Investments Pty Limited(1) | 18,626,859 | 17.4 | ||
PAR Capital(2) | 10,299,504 | 9.6 | ||
United Services Automobile Association(3) | 9,042,992 | 8.4 | ||
Vanguard Group(4) | 8,984,300 | 8.4 | ||
BlackRock, Inc.(5) | 8,125,927 | 7.6 | ||
Pacific Sequoia Holdings LLC(6) | 6,363,569 | 5.9 | ||
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||
Michael D. Darrow(7) | 338,245 | * | ||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry(8) | 3,164,908 | 2.9 | ||
Noel B. Watson(9) | 56,510 | * | ||
Charles C. Thomas(10) | 52,645 | * | ||
John E. Pierantoni(11) | 289,527 | * | ||
Simon E. Smith(12) | 212,767 | * | ||
Jeffrey J. Swart(13) | 704,550 | * | ||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung | — | — | ||
Neeraj Gunsagar(14) | 50,000 | * | ||
Robert E. Buce(15) | 466,506 | * | ||
Christopher W. Claus(16) | 204,123 | * | ||
John Krafcik(17) | 711,851 | * | ||
Erin N. Lantz(18) | 91,213 | * | ||
Philip G.J. McKoy(19) | 18,842 | * | ||
John W. Mendel(20) | 51,923 | * | ||
Wesley A. Nichols(21) | 91,213 | * | ||
Ion A. Yadigaroglu(22) | 1,606,876 | 1.5 | ||
All current executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(23) | 4,554,619 | 4.2 | ||
| | | | |
| | |
20 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
| | |
![]() | | 21 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Executive Officers, Directors andCorporate Governance |
| | |
22 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
| Table of Contents | Page | | |||
| Introduction | 23 | | |||
| Named Executive Officers (NEOs) | 23 | | |||
| Executive Summary | 24 | | |||
| Compensation Philosophy and Design Strategies | 27 | | |||
| Establishing Compensation Levels | 27 | | |||
| Role of the Compensation Committee | 27 | | |||
| Role of Management | 28 | | |||
| Role of the Compensation Consultant | 28 | | |||
| Use of Competitive Market Data | 28 | | |||
| Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions | 30 | | |||
| Base Salary | 30 | | |||
| Annual Cash Incentive Program | 31 | | |||
| Long-Term Incentive Opportunities | 35 | | |||
| Coronavirus Response Preview | 37 | | |||
| Other Governance Items | 38 | | |||
| Employment Agreements and Severance and Changes in Control Protections | 38 | | |||
| Separation and Consulting Agreements | 38 | | |||
| Hedging Policies | 39 | | |||
| Stock Ownership Guidelines | 39 | | |||
| Recoupment of Incentive Compensation, or | 39 | | |||
| Accounting Treatment and Deductibility of | 39 | | |||
| Equity Grant Timing and Equity Plan | 40 | | |||
| Taxation of "Parachute" Payments | 40 | | |||
| | | | | | |
Our named executive officers, or NEOs, for 2019 consist of our current and former principal officers, our current and former principal financial officers, our next two most highly compensated executive officers and two former executive officers who would have been among our three most highly compensated executive officers had they remained executive officers as of December 31, 2019.
The NEOs among our currently serving executives are:
The NEOs among our former executives are:
We experienced considerable change in our leadership during 2019. In May 2019, Mr. Perry, then our President and CEO, retired from his positions with us, and Mr. Darrow, who was then serving as our EVP of Partner and OEM Development, became our Interim President and CEO. In March 2020, the Board appointed Mr. Darrow as
| | |
![]() | | 23 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
our permanent President and CEO and a member of the Board. References in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis to our CEO refer to Mr. Perry before May 31, 2019 and to Mr. Darrow on and after May 31, 2019.
Mr. Pierantoni, our Interim CFO and CAO, resigned from his positions with us in April 2019 and Mr. Thomas, our Vice President and Controller, served as principal financial officer and principal accounting officer following Mr. Pierantoni's departure until Mr. Watson joined us in June 2019. Mr. Thomas continues to serve in a non-executive officer capacity as our Vice President and Controller. Also in June 2019, Mr. Smith was promoted from SVP of Dealer Development to our EVP of Dealer Sales & Service, and each of Mr. Gunsagar and Mr. McClung ceased service with us.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Our full-year financial and market performance outcomes were below expectations; however, after a mid-year leadership transition, we executed several key strategic initiatives in the second half of the year and in early 2020.
Additionally, although USAA's sudden and unexpected decision in February 2020 to terminate our partnership substantially complicates our efforts to return us to growth, we were able to negotiate a transition services agreement with USAA that gives us time to capitalize on these successful initiatives and chart a course of financial independence from USAA. Nevertheless, despite these achievements, a variety of operational challenges prevented us from achieving the external financial guidance we provided at the beginning of 2019, and USAA's decision to terminate our partnership is likely to weigh on our performance in 2020 and beyond. Below is a summary of our key results in 2019:
| | |
24 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Annual target compensation decisions made in early 2019 align with our pay for performance philosophy after mixed company performance in 2018 and reflect feedback from our stockholder outreach efforts in late 2018 and early 2019.
In mid-2019, we underwent a substantial leadership transition and the compensation committee took the following actions relating to the second half of the year that we believe were in the best interests of us and our stockholders:
| | |
![]() | | 25 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
We are committed to responsible executive compensation and governance practices.
The following table summarizes what we do and what we don't do in our executive compensation practices to highlight both the responsible practices we have implemented and the practices we have avoided to best serve our stockholders' long-term interests:
What We Do | ||||||
![]() | Pay-for-performance (75% of former CEO target pay was tied to performance through equity and cash incentives) | |||||
![]() | Include multi-year performance-vesting equity awards | |||||
![]() | Maintain robust stock ownership guidelines and a clawback policy for performance-based compensation | |||||
![]() | Retain an independent compensation consultant who reports directly to the compensation committee | |||||
![]() | Solicit advisory votes on our executive compensation program annually and engage in stockholder outreach | |||||
| | | | | | |
What We Don't Do | ||||||
![]() | No automatic "single trigger" cash or vesting acceleration upon a change in control | |||||
![]() | No option repricings or exchanges without stockholder approval | |||||
![]() | No hedging or pledging by executive officers or directors | |||||
![]() | No tax gross ups on severance or change in control benefits | |||||
![]() | No excessive executive perquisites | |||||
| | | | | | |
Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement
In late 2018 and early 2019, we reached out to more than 20 of our largest stockholders who collectively owned more than 93% of our outstanding shares as of year-end 2018 and met with each stockholder that expressed an interest in speaking with us. We made several changes to our compensation program in response to stockholder feedback on the design of our compensation program, including introducing performance-vesting equity awards, eliminating aspirational companies from our peer group and expanding our peer group disclosure, implementing a clawback policy and adopting stock ownership guidelines, revising our cash incentive program and providing more transparency in our disclosure of our performance goals.
In 2019, our say-on-pay proposal was supported by approximately 99% of the total votes cast, an approximate 47% increase over our 2018 say-on-pay vote. We believe this increase in support was, in part, the result of the stockholder outreach and changes we made to our executive compensation program and related disclosures. We value the views of our stockholders and have continued our stockholder outreach. Our compensation committee will monitor and continue to evaluate our executive compensation program going forward in light of our stockholders' views and our transforming business needs. Our compensation committee expects to continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay votes and our stockholders' views when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers.
| | |
26 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND DESIGN STRATEGIES
The compensation committee works to design a compensation program for our NEOs to facilitate the attraction and retention of key executive talent in a highly competitive technology job market, align employees' interests with those of stockholders and motivate the creation of sustainable growth in enterprise value. We recognize that our employees are our greatest asset and drive our operational results and the creation of sustainable growth. As such, we strive to provide NEO total pay packages that:
In designing our NEO compensation packages, the compensation committee reviews the competitive market data, without targeting any specific market percentile, and also takes into consideration the factors described above, as well as retention concerns with respect to key talent, the motivational impact of pay levels and mix in driving toward company goals and the creation of stockholder value, the input of our CEO (as to NEOs other than himself) and the overall cost of the compensation package.
ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION LEVELS
Role of the Compensation Committee
The compensation committee oversees our executive compensation and other compensation and benefit programs, serves as the administrator of our equity compensation plans and reviews, formulates and determines the design and amount of compensation for our executive officers, including the NEOs. Compensation decisions for our CEO are made by the compensation committee in executive session without our CEO present.
At the beginning of each year, the compensation committee reviews our executive compensation program, including incentive compensation plans and arrangements, assesses the quality, appropriateness and effectiveness of the program for its intended purposes and makes modifications to existing plans and arrangements or adopts new plans or arrangements as it deems necessary. The compensation committee also annually reviews our executive compensation strategy to ensure it is appropriately aligned with our business strategy and achieving our desired objectives. Further, the compensation committee reviews market trends and changes in competitive compensation practices, as further described below. Based on its review and assessment, the compensation committee, from time to time, makes changes in our executive compensation program and also recommends changes to the remuneration of members of our Board.
During 2019, as detailed above, we underwent numerous changes in our executive team, with the separation of four executive officers, including our former President and CEO and our former Interim CFO, the hiring of our current CFO and the promotion of two additional executives, including our current President and CEO. In each of
| | |
![]() | | 27 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
these cases, the compensation committee reviewed and reassessed elements of our executive compensation program and took actions designed to fit the needs of our business.
Role of Management
Our CEO works closely with the compensation committee in determining the compensation of our NEOs, and makes recommendations to the compensation committee as described below.
At the beginning of each year, our CEO reviews the performance of our other NEOs for the previous year and then shares these evaluations with, and makes recommendations to, the compensation committee for each element of compensation. These recommendations concern the base salary, performance-based cash incentives and long-term incentive compensation for each of our NEOs, other than himself, based on our results, the individual's contribution to these results and his individual performance. The compensation committee then reviews these recommendations and considers the other factors described in this proxy statement and makes decisions as to the target total direct compensation of each NEO, as well as the mixture of elements that will comprise each NEO's compensation.
While the compensation committee considers our CEO's recommendations, it only uses these recommendations as one of several factors in making its decisions on the compensation of our NEOs. In all cases, the final decisions on NEO compensation matters are made by the compensation committee. Moreover, no NEO participates in the determination of the amounts or elements of his own compensation.
At the request of the compensation committee, our CEO typically attends a portion of each compensation committee meeting in which executive compensation is discussed, including meetings at which the compensation committee's compensation consultant is present.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
Under its charter, the compensation committee has the authority to retain the services of one or more executive compensation advisers, including compensation consultants, legal counsel, accounting and other advisers, to assist in the creation of our compensation plans and arrangements and related policies and practices, as it determines necessary in its sole discretion. The compensation committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees and services of these external advisers, and any external adviser reports directly to the compensation committee.
The compensation committee continued to engage Semler Brossy in 2019 to assess the competitiveness of executive compensation programs and practices to assist the compensation committee in making 2019 executive compensation decisions. During 2019, Semler Brossy also assisted in the stockholder outreach efforts, the design of the annual incentive and long-term incentive programs for 2020 and the structuring of our new-hire and promotion compensation decisions associated with our executive transition in mid-2019. The compensation committee assessed the independence of Semler Brossy, most recently in March 2020, and concluded that it was independent of management and that its work had not raised any conflict of interest.
Use of Competitive Market Data
As part of its deliberations, the compensation committee considers competitive market data and related analysis on executive compensation levels and practices that is provided by Semler Brossy. Our compensation committee reviews and considers this market data, but did not engage in any benchmarking or targeting of any specific levels of pay for 2019 compensation decisions.
In late 2018, Semler Brossy worked with the compensation committee to develop a comparator group of "peer" companies for a competitive assessment of the pay programs. The companies included in the peer group were selected based on a set of financial and industry/business parameters to best reflect a group of companies most similar to us.
| | |
28 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
We used initial quantitative screens primarily as guides to inform our decision-making process in reviewing current or potential peers. The screening process for 2019 used the same parameters as 2018, focusing specifically on companies within defined ranges for revenue and market capitalization, the technology industry and additional qualitative parameters (see more below).
Specifically, the criteria the compensation committee used to assess our 2019 peer group are summarized below.
In late 2018, in preparation for 2019 pay decisions, we removed two companies from our 2018 peer group whose revenue and market capitalization had grown to be much larger than ours by October 2018 (Zillow had approximately $1.2 billion in revenues and $8.1 billion market capitalization and CoStar Group had approximately $1.2 billion in revenues and $13.2 billion market capitalization at the time of our assessment) and removed another company which had been acquired and therefore was no longer public (Bazaarvoice). We added three companies to our peer group (Eventbrite, eHealth and EverQuote) that had under $300 million in revenues, less than $2.5 billion in market value and also met the additional industry and qualitative criteria above at the time of our assessment. The compensation committee made these changes to reduce the overall size of our peer group by revenue and market value to bring it more in line with TrueCar. The resulting peer group for 2019 consisted of the following 17 companies:
| | |
GrubHub | CarGurus | |
Yelp | Quotient Technology | |
LendingTree | Eventbrite | |
Cars.com | Care.com | |
Shutterstock | eHealth | |
Etsy | XO Group | |
Redfin | EverQuote | |
QuinStreet | ||
| | |
The compensation committee also reviewed market data from the Radford Technology survey for companies that met the same size and scale parameters described above for our peer group, were in Radford's "Software Products/Services" and "Internet/E-Commerce/Online Community" industries, had similar market valuation multiples (e.g., market cap-to-revenue multiples within one-third to three times ours) and excluded companies with materially different business models (e.g., semi-conductors, IT services, communications equipment, telecommunication services). The compensation committee used the survey data to complement the available information from the peer companies described above. Our compensation committee primarily used data from our peer group and used the data from the Radford survey only when there was a lack of sufficient comparative data available from our peer group. The data from our peer group and the data from the refined Radford Technology survey are collectively referred to in this proxy statement as market data.
In late 2019, the compensation committee again reviewed our peer group for purposes of assisting with pay decisions for 2020, taking into consideration our revised growth trajectory compared to the overall size and growth rates among our peers. After that review, the compensation committee again removed three larger peers by revenue or market value (ANGI Homeservices, GrubHub, and Trade Desk), removed one acquired peer (XO Group) and added five smaller peers (The RealReal, Cardlytics, The Rubicon Project, Leaf Group, and TechTarget). The resulting changes positioned TrueCar at median on company revenues for the new peer group going forward.
| | |
![]() | | 29 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND 2019 PAY DECISIONS
Our 2019 NEO compensation program was comprised primarily of a base salary, a cash incentive opportunity, and long-term incentives. This program emphasized "at-risk" pay (both cash incentives and equity incentives) while providing competitive packages to retain and motivate our key talent.
Base Salary
A base salary is a critical part of our NEO compensation program and establishes financial security for each NEO. We provide base salaries that are market-calibrated, equitable and a relatively small portion of our total compensation opportunities. Generally, we establish base salaries after taking into account an NEO's position, qualifications, experience, market practice and the base salaries of our other executives. Internal base salary parity is an important consideration for NEOs other than our CEO, as it creates a team-first culture. This philosophy promotes a team approach in problem solving and encourages focus on driving stockholder value in ways that will be rewarded through "at risk" pay. Thereafter, the compensation committee reviews the base salaries of our NEOs from time to time, as well as at the time of a promotion or other significant change in responsibility, and makes adjustments to base salaries as determined necessary or appropriate.
In February 2019, the compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of our then-serving NEOs, taking into account the considerations described above and market data. As a result, the compensation committee elected not to make any increases to base salaries at that time, determining that the base salaries continued to be market competitive and appropriately reflect our NEOs' past and expected future contribution levels. In late 2018, effective on January 1, 2019, the compensation committee increased the base salary of Mr. Swart, who at that time was not an NEO, from $375,000 to $400,000 to reflect his contributions during the year and the further the compensation committee's goal of internal pay equity. Additionally, the compensation committee approved an increase in Mr. Smith's pay from $355,000 to $400,000 in connection with his promotion to EVP of Dealer Sales & Service.
In May 2019, we hired Mr. Watson as our new CFO and CAO and the compensation committee approved a base salary of $450,000. Also in May 2019, following our former CEO's retirement, Mr. Darrow was promoted to Interim President and CEO. His annual base salary remained unchanged at $400,000, but the compensation committee approved a monthly stipend of $20,000 in addition to his base salary to recognize the fact that he assumed additional responsibilities while still maintaining his original responsibilities as EVP of OEM and Partner Development for TrueCar and President of ALG. Mr. Darrow's aggregate salary and stipend resulted in annualized non-bonus cash compensation of $640,000, representing a 20% decrease from Mr. Perry's base salary. The compensation committee, after consulting Semler Brossy and market data, determined that these amounts were appropriate compensation for Messrs. Darrow and Watson for their positions.
| | |
30 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
The table below illustrates the annual base salaries of our executives as of year end 2018 and 2019. In several cases, the executive did not receive the full amount due to termination of his employment, promotion or new hire. (See the "2019 Summary Compensation Table" for the actual salary paid to each NEO in 2019.)
Executive | 2018 Base Salary | 2019 Base Salary | % Change | |||
Michael D. Darrow(1) | $400,000 | $400,000 | —% | |||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry(2) | $800,000 | $800,000 | —% | |||
Noel B. Watson(3) | N/A | $450,000 | N/A | |||
Charles C. Thomas(4) | $237,500 | $237,500 | —% | |||
John E. Pierantoni(5) | $360,500 | $360,500 | —% | |||
Simon E. Smith(6) | $355,000 | $400,000 | 13% | |||
Jeffrey J. Swart(7) | $375,000 | $400,000 | 7% | |||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung(8) | $400,000 | $400,000 | —% | |||
Neeraj Gunsagar(8) | $400,000 | $400,000 | —% | |||
| | | | | | |
Annual Cash Incentive Program
The objective of our annual cash incentive program is to reward executives for achievement against pre-determined short-term financial and operational objectives established at the beginning of the year. Based on stockholder feedback, the compensation committee moved to a formula-based, annual incentive program for the senior executive team in 2019; below the senior executive team, we maintained a broad-based quarterly incentive program consistent with historical practice, in which some of the NEOs reported in this proxy statement participated at some point during the year based on their role at the time. Messrs. Perry, Darrow, Pierantoni, Watson, Swart, Gunsagar and McClung all participated in the annual incentive program for the senior executive team during the portion of 2019 that they were employed by us. Mr. Smith participated in the quarterly incentive program until his promotion from SVP to EVP in June 2019, at which point he transitioned to the annual incentive program for the senior executive team on a pro-rata basis for the remainder of the year. Mr. Thomas participated in the quarterly incentive program for the entirety of 2019.
| | |
![]() | | 31 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
For 2019, the compensation committee approved an annual cash incentive opportunity for the NEOs in which 70% of the payout was tied to financial performance and 30% was tied to the achievement of objective strategic goals established at the beginning of the year.
Executive | 2018 Target Incentive as % of Base Salary | 2019 Target Incentive as % of Base Salary | % Change | |||
Michael D. Darrow(1) | 50% | 50% | —% | |||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry(2) | 100% | 100% | —% | |||
Noel B. Watson(3) | N/A | 50% | N/A | |||
Charles C. Thomas(4) | 26% | 26% | —% | |||
John E. Pierantoni(2) | 40% | 40% | —% | |||
Simon E. Smith(5) | 40% | 50% | 25% | |||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 50% | 50% | —% | |||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung(2) | 50% | 50% | —% | |||
Neeraj Gunsagar(2) | 50% | 50% | —% | |||
| | | | | | |
For the annual incentive program for the senior executive team, at the beginning of 2019, the compensation committee selected the performance metrics, which were generally consistent with the metrics used in prior years. The financial component, weighted at 70% of the total opportunity, measured performance against Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, as defined below, and provided the opportunity to earn between 0% and 180% of target payout. The financial component would be set at 100% if the Revenue target of $389 million and the Adjusted EBITDA target of $39.3 million were achieved. The strategic component, weighted at 30% of the total opportunity, included goals relating to the achievement of a variety of critical strategic objectives, and provided the opportunity to earn between 0% and 150% of target payout. The design of the program included a feature where no payout would be delivered on the strategic component if the financial results did not meet the threshold requirements. The illustration below summarizes the framework used to determine the final payouts as a percent of each individual's target incentive.
The compensation committee developed a matrix reflected below to determine the payout mechanism for the financial component. The matrix design was selected to ensure that a cash incentive payout would only be earned
| | |
32 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
if both the threshold Revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA were achieved. The payout in the event of results falling between associated cells in the matrix would be determined by interpolation between the end point when determining the final payout.
| | 2019 Revenue Growth | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Below Threshold | | Threshold | | Between Target and Threshold | | Target | | Between Target and Maximum | | Maximum | | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2019 Adjusted EBITDA | | <+4% | | +6% | | +8% | | +10% | | +12% | | +14% | | |||||||||||||||||||
Below | $36.8M | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | | 0% | 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Threshold | $37.5M | 0% | 35% | 40% | | 45% | | 50% | 55% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Between | $38.2M | 0% | 40% | 70% | | 75% | | 80% | 85% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Target | | $39.3M | | 0% | | 45% | | 75% | | 100% | | 105% | | 110% | | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Between | $41.0M | 0% | 50% | 80% | | 105% | | 135% | 140% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Max | $43.3M | 0% | 55% | 85% | | 110% | | 140% | 180% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
After the end of 2019, the compensation committee reviewed financial performance against the pre-determined goals and determined that neither our 2019 Revenue nor our 2019 Adjusted EBITDA met the threshold requirements and thus no cash incentive would be delivered to the participants under the annual incentive program for the senior executive team (including Messrs. Darrow, Watson, Smith and Swart).
As noted earlier, Mr. Smith participated in our non-executive bonus program for the first two quarters of 2019, for which he was paid $73,785 under the program, and Mr. Thomas participated in that program for all of 2019, for which he was paid $57,218 under the program. In the aggregate, these bonus payments to Messrs. Smith and Thomas were nearly 100% of their target incentive for the time during which they participated in the non-executive bonus program. Their quarterly payments under that program were discretionary and were based on (x) our overall non-executive bonus pool, which was determined by management in consultation with the compensation committee, and (y) management's assessments of each participant's individual contributions. Mr. Thomas also received a discretionary "spot" bonus of $17,500 for critical assistance with an important transaction outside the scope of his traditional role. Neither Mr. Smith nor Mr. Thomas was an executive officer within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act at the time of earning a payout under the non-executive bonus program.
Although our financial performance in 2019 did not result in any cash bonuses being payable to our NEOs under the annual incentive program for the senior executive team, the compensation committee in January 2020 determined to recognize strong second half financial performance and several strategic accomplishments by providing a discretionary cash bonus to our leadership team at the end of the year. The amount of these discretionary bonuses was as follows:
Executive | | 2019 Cash Bonus | ||
Michael D. Darrow(1) | $ | 300,000 | ||
Noel B. Watson(2) | $ | 112,500 | ||
Simon E. Smith(2) | $ | 100,000 | ||
Jeffrey J. Swart(2) | $ | 100,000 | ||
| | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 33 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
The decision to grant these cash bonuses despite our not having achieved the formula-based metrics underlying the annual executive plan was made in the exercise of the compensation committee's discretion, taking into account a number of relevant considerations, including the following:
Given the new management team's accomplishments in the second half of the year following a significant leadership transition, the compensation committee believed that a below target cash bonus was appropriate and in the best interests of stockholders by stabilizing the business and our leadership team. Additionally, the compensation committee's decision was made at a time that USAA had given us a strong basis for believing that its partnership with USAA would be renewed. The compensation committee will consider the effect of USAA's change in position in its 2020 compensation decisions.
"Adjusted EBITDA" is a financial measure not prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, was calculated based on earnings as reflected in our audited consolidated financial statements, adjusted to exclude interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, income (loss) from equity method investment, certain restructuring costs, certain executive departure costs, certain transaction expenses, certain litigation costs changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and income taxes. Refer to Annex A for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss. We use Adjusted EBITDA as an operating performance measure because it is (i) an integral part of our reporting and planning processes; (ii) used by our management and Board to assess our operational performance, and together with operational objectives, as a measure in evaluating employee compensation and bonuses; and (iii) used by our management to make financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments. We believe that using Adjusted EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons on a period-to-period basis because it excludes variations primarily caused by changes in the excluded items noted above. In addition, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors, securities analysts, rating agencies and other parties in evaluating companies as measures of financial performance and debt service capabilities.
"Revenue" is prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and is comprised of dealer revenue, consisting of fees paid by our dealer customers participating in our network of TrueCar Certified Dealers either on a per-vehicle basis for sales to our users or in the form of a subscription arrangement or purchasing our other products and services, such as TrueCar Trade or our DealerScience products; OEM incentives revenue, consisting of fees paid by OEMs to promote the sale of their vehicles through the offering of consumer incentives to members of our affinity group marketing partners; and forecasts, consulting and other revenue, primarily from the provision of services to the automotive and financial services industries by our ALG subsidiary.
| | |
34 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
Long-Term Incentive Opportunities
We use long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards to align the interests of our executive officers, including our NEOs, with the interests of our stockholders. We believe that our executive officers will be strongly incentivized to act in a manner that cultivates opportunities for maximizing long-term value creation if they own significant amounts of our common stock. Since our initial public offering and before 2019, we relied on a combination of time-based stock options and RSUs as vehicles for delivering long-term incentive compensation opportunities to our executive officers. We believe that stock options, which are granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, provide an appropriate long-term incentive for our executive officers, as the options provide value to the holder only to the extent that our stock price appreciates on a sustained basis following the date of grant. We believe that RSUs, which deliver increasing value with the appreciation of our stock price, serve as a valuable retention tool for our executive officers. In 2019, based on feedback from stockholders and an ongoing review of competitive market practices, we introduced performance units, which we refer to as PUs, to the senior executive team, and in 2020, following our experience in 2019, we extended PUs to our senior vice presidents as well. We believe that PUs strengthen alignment with stockholders, complement the options and RSUs by diversifying our management's equity portfolio and promote a longer-term view of performance by measuring performance over a three-year period.
In determining the size of the equity awards to grant to our executive officers, the compensation committee takes into consideration individual and overall company performance, market data, internal pay equity, the timing of the last equity grant, unvested equity values, compensation expense to us and stockholder dilution, as well as our CEO's recommendations (except as to his own equity awards). The compensation committee uses its subjective judgment considering all of the factors described above to arrive at the amounts it determines are appropriate for each individual NEO.
For Mr. Perry, who was CEO at the time of the annual equity grant in March 2019, the equity mix consisted of 50% PUs, 25% options and 25% RSUs. For the other members of the leadership team in March 2019, including several NEOs, the equity mix consisted of 20% PUs, 40% options and 40% RSUs. For Messrs. Smith and Thomas, the equity mix for the annual grant received in March 2019 was 70% RSUs and 30% options. In establishing these equity mixes, the compensation committee considered the various long-term incentive vehicles used by our peers and determined that the performance-weighting of the awards should be progressively higher as an individual's potential impact increases, with the CEO having the highest performance weighting and the other members of the senior executive team having lesser (though still considerable) performance weighting.
Equity awards were granted in March 2019 and the stock options granted to the NEOs have an exercise price of $6.93 per share and vest monthly over a four-year period. As of December 31, 2019, all of the options granted in the 2019 annual equity grant were "underwater" (that is, had exercise prices higher than the fair market value of our common stock) and provided no direct value to our executives. The RSUs granted in 2019 generally are scheduled to vest over a four-year period with quarterly vesting (see the "Outstanding Equity" table for vesting details), subject to the acceleration provisions of each NEO's employment agreement and our 2014 Plan.
For the PUs granted in 2019, executives have the opportunity to earn between 0% and 150% of the target number of shares based on our annualized total stockholder return determined by reference to our compound annual growth in stock price, or CAGR, compared to that of the Russell 2000 index, or the Index, over a three-year period. The PUs will generally be eligible to vest in early 2022, following the end of the three-year performance period, based on our relative CAGR compared to the Index. If our CAGR is equal to that of the Index, the target number of shares will vest. For every percentage point that our CAGR exceeds the Index, the payout is increased by two percentage points, and for every percentage point that our CAGR is below the Index, the payout is decreased by two percentage points.
In developing the performance goals and vesting structure of the PUs, the compensation committee sought to be rigorous and to align the interests of management and our stockholders. Moreover, it chose a three-year measurement period to accentuate the long-term nature of the award and further align management with the
| | |
![]() | | 35 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
interests of our long-term stockholders. The compensation committee chose relative CAGR as the performance goal to provide a relative performance metric against an appropriate comparator group of companies to incentivize and reward not only returns to our stockholders, but also returns in excess of those generally available. At the end of the three-year performance period, the compensation committee will determine the level of achievement of our relative CAGR for the three-year performance period and then apply the resulting vesting to the grant amount to determine the total amount that will vest.
The table below reflects the annual equity grants awarded to our NEOs in March 2019:
Executive(1) | Options Granted | RSUs Granted | PUs Granted | |||
Michael D. Darrow | 68,598 | 32,927 | 14,952 | |||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry(2) | 113,444 | 54,453 | 99,006 | |||
Charles C. Thomas | 12,096 | 13,548 | — | |||
Simon E. Smith | 27,216 | 30,482 | — | |||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 54,432 | 26,127 | 11,864 | |||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung(3) | 68,598 | 32,927 | 14,952 | |||
Neeraj Gunsagar(3) | 54,432 | 26,127 | 11,864 | |||
| | | | | | |
On June 17, 2019, Mr. Watson joined us as our CFO and CAO. In connection with his hiring, the Committee granted him an equity award with a grant-date fair value of approximately $2.5 million, comprising approximately $500,000 in options and approximately $2 million in RSUs. The compensation committee crafted this grant after consultation with Semler Brossy and consideration of competitive annualized opportunities for peer CFOs, as well as the need to compensate Mr. Watson for his outstanding and forfeited equity from his prior employer and to ensure that he is meaningfully and immediately aligned with stockholders. The compensation committee considered the size of the grant to be within the typical market practice for new-hire awards and also within the historical range used in the past for other non-CEO executives when joining us. Further, the grant included a mix of RSUs and options, with a heavier mix of RSUs to provide meaningful retention and immediate ownership with options providing stronger alignment with stockholders. The options were granted with a $5.34 exercise price and were "underwater" as of December 31, 2019.
In addition to the annual grants identified above, the compensation committee also made grants in connection with the leadership transition that occurred in June 2019. Mr. Darrow received an award of RSUs worth approximately $515,000 to recognize his additional responsibilities while serving as Interim President and CEO. The compensation committee, in consultation with Semler Brossy, determined this award amount by reviewing the competitive market range for annualized total pay opportunities for full-time CEO positions among our peers and seeking to position 2019 annualized total pay for Mr. Darrow toward the lower end of that range, given the circumstances and context for the Interim President and CEO role for the second half of the year. These RSUs follow the same quarterly vesting schedule as the annual grants but will vest in full after a two-year period, which the compensation committee established to more closely align with the interim nature of the role and to provide a meaningful retention incentive during a period of uncertainty.
At the same time, Mr. Smith was promoted to EVP of Dealer Sales & Service and received a promotional grant of RSUs and options with a grant-date fair value of approximately $770,000. The compensation committee, in
| | |
36 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
consultation with Semler Brossy, determined the amount of these awards by reviewing external market data for similar positions and considering Mr. Smith's internal equity positioning against our other executives and the prior incumbent. The compensation committee believed that this promotional grant was appropriate to recognize Mr. Smith's increased responsibilities, strengthen his retention incentives and include a mix of options and RSUs that is generally more consistent with the annual grant structure, with the same four-year vesting schedule as the annual grants.
Finally, in September 2019, the compensation committee, after reviewing information provided by Semler Brossy, granted Mr. Swart an award of RSUs with a grant-date fair value of approximately $450,000 to further its goal of internal pay equity, strengthen his retention incentives and recognize the critical importance of his role, and continuity in that role, during the period of uncertainty facing us.
Preview of 2020 Compensation Decisions Occasioned by the Coronavirus Outbreak
The recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus and the measures taken by governments and societies in response thereto have precipitated a period of substantial uncertainty that poses unprecedented challenges to us. Shortly after the scale of the economic impact of the coronavirus outbreak became apparent, we temporarily reduced our executive officers' base salaries and our directors' cash retainers, as described in a contemporaneous Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on March 26, 2020. Responding effectively to this crisis will require that we be as nimble and flexible as possible, and may require us to make additional adjustments to executive compensation to maintain the financial health of our business while simultaneously ensuring that we retain our key executives and provide them with appropriate incentives.
These adjustments could include further changes in executives' base salary or ad hoc cash bonuses or equity awards to executives, in each case in the discretion of the compensation committee, as well as further adjustments to directors' compensation in the Board's discretion. Although the compensation committee expects to adopt an annual cash incentive program for the senior executive team for 2020 similar to the program that was in place for 2019, it expects to do so only after the coronavirus-related uncertainty has abated sufficiently to permit it to make an informed judgment as to the appropriate contours of the program, and it cannot rule out the need to make discretionary, ad hoc cash bonuses in lieu of or in addition to any bonuses payable under such an annual program in light of the ongoing uncertainty.
401(k) Plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. All participants' interests in their salary deferrals are 100% vested when contributed. In 2019, we made discretionary matching contributions into the 401(k) plan of 100% of the first 3% of compensation contributed by the participant. Our matching contributions are fully vested after four years with 25% vesting annually. Employee and employer contributions are allocated to each participant's individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participants' directions. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, employer contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) plan, and all employer contributions are deductible by us when made.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
We provide perquisites to our NEOs only to the extent that we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his duties, to increase his effectiveness or for recruitment and retention purposes. For 2019, these perquisites included medical expense reimbursements to assist our NEOs with their health and well-being. In addition, due to the increased time commitment required of Mr. Pierantoni during the time he served as Interim CFO in addition to his continuing responsibilities as CAO, he was reimbursed for in-town lodging and was paid a related tax gross up of approximately $4,000. Further, under his employment agreement we reimbursed Mr. Watson for approximately $80,000 of his expenses incurred in connection with his relocation to the Santa
| | |
![]() | | 37 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
Monica area and provided him a $15,000 monthly housing allowance for the first six months of his employment. We did not pay Mr. Watson a tax gross up in connection with either of these perquisites.
In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits not offered to our broader employee population to our executive officers. However, we do not anticipate that perquisites or other personal benefits will be a significant aspect of our executive compensation program. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the compensation committee.
Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Protections
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our NEOs, excluding Mr. Thomas, that provide certain severance benefits if a termination of employment occurs under specified circumstances and certain change in control benefits, which are described in "Executive Employment Agreements" below. Severance benefits under these agreements are conditioned on the executive's signing a release of claims in favor of us. We have provided our executives with severance in the event of certain qualifying terminations, and certain change in control benefits, because we understand that anxieties about future employment or transactions involving a change in control can result in the early departure or distraction of our executives to our detriment. We believe that providing these benefits helps to alleviate these uncertainties, and therefore provides our NEOs with incentives to forgo other employment opportunities to remain with us, and allows our executives to focus more fully on making decisions that are in the best interests of our stockholders. We believe that these arrangements serve as an important recruiting and retention tool to ensure that personal uncertainties do not dilute our executives' complete focus on building stockholder value and driving our success.
The compensation committee determined the terms of these agreements. The employment agreements for the other NEOs are generally similar, as in determining the appropriate severance and change in control benefit levels for executives in general, the compensation committee considered internal parity and length of service and reviewed relevant market data provided by our outside compensation consultant for other companies with which we compete for executive talent.
Separation and Consulting Agreements
In 2019, we entered into a separation agreement and release with Messrs. Perry, Pierantoni, Gunsagar and McClung. Under those agreements, Messrs. Perry, Gunsagar and McClung received the benefits to which they were entitled under their employment agreements in the case of a termination without cause, except that the compensation committee determined that it was appropriate to provide an additional cash payment not to exceed $25,000 in the case of Messrs. Gunsagar and McClung to expedite the completion of discussions and mitigate associated transaction costs for us. The separation agreement and release that we entered into with Mr. Pierantoni did not provide any benefits, as it was entered into in circumstances representing a resignation without good reason.
Concurrently with their terminations, we also entered into consulting agreements with Messrs. Perry and Pierantoni to secure their post-termination assistance with the associated management transitions. The consulting agreement with Mr. Pierantoni, which had a one-year term, did not provide him with any consideration other than his continued status as a "service provider" under our 2014 Plan, which resulted in his equity awards continuing to vest, and his stock options remaining exercisable, during that term. The consulting agreement with Mr. Perry, which has a two-year term, similarly does not provide him with any consideration other than his continued status as a "service provider" under the 2014 Plan; because his stock options and RSUs were accelerated and his PUs were forfeited in connection with his termination, the sole compensatory effect of his consulting agreement is to extend the expiration date of his stock options. The compensation committee considered these arrangements and determined that they were appropriate in light of the consulting services that Messrs. Perry and Pierantoni would be providing following their termination.
| | |
38 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
Hedging Policies
We have an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits insiders from engaging in short sales of our common stock, hedging of stock ownership positions and transactions in publicly-traded options (such as puts and calls) and other derivative securities relating to our common stock.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In 2018, we adopted formal stock ownership guidelines for certain executives, including our NEOs. Under our stock ownership guidelines, our CEO is expected to accumulate and hold a number of shares of our common stock with a value equal to six times his annual base salary, and each of our other NEOs is expected to accumulate and hold a number of shares of our common stock with a value equal to two times his annual base salary. The NEOs are expected to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines within five years from the adoption of the guidelines (or the individual's date of hire for individuals hired after the effective date). As of March 31, 2020, due to the recent downturn in the price of our stock, none of our NEOs, except for Mr. Watson, would have been in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines were it not for the phase-in period required for such compliance.
Recoupment of Incentive Compensation, or Clawback, Policy
In 2018, we adopted a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. If our compensation committee determines that an officer's misconduct caused us to materially restate all or a portion of our financial results, under certain circumstances our compensation committee has the authority and discretion to, within a period of time following the material restatement, require the officer to repay incentive compensation that would not have been payable absent the material restatement. Incentive compensation for purposes of this policy means an officer's cash bonus and long-term equity-based compensation where the award size or vesting was contingent on our performance. Our compensation committee intends to revisit our clawback policy after the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Accounting Treatment and Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The fair value of equity awards is established in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and the related compensation expense is one of the factors taken into consideration by the compensation committee in determining NEO equity awards.
Under Section 162(m) of the Code, or Section 162(m), compensation paid to any publicly held corporation's "covered employees" that exceeds $1 million per taxable year for any covered employee is generally non-deductible. Before the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Section 162(m) provided a performance-based compensation exception, pursuant to which the deduction limit under Section 162(m) did not apply to any compensation that qualified as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m). Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) was repealed with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, except that certain transition relief is provided for compensation paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which is not modified in any material respect on or after that date.
Compensation paid to each of our "covered employees" in excess of $1 million per taxable year generally will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) pursuant to the transition relief described above. Because of certain ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m), as well as other factors beyond the control of the compensation committee, no assurance can be given that any compensation paid by us will be eligible for such transition relief and be deductible by us in the future. Although the compensation committee will continue to consider tax implications as one factor in determining executive compensation, the compensation committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions and retains the flexibility to provide compensation for our NEOs in a manner
| | |
![]() | | 39 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation Elements and 2019 Pay Decisions |
consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program and the best interests of us and our stockholders, which may include providing for compensation that is not deductible by us due to the deduction limit under Section 162(m). The compensation committee also retains the flexibility to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with our business needs.
Equity Grant Timing and Equity Plan Information
We do not have a formal policy for the timing of equity award grants. Before 2018, we granted equity awards when our compensation committee determined appropriate to serve the incentive and retention purposes of the awards. Beginning in 2018, our compensation committee determined to initiate a practice of granting equity awards to our executive officers annually in the first half of the year, although grants may occur at other times during the year, including for new hires, for promotees, to address special retention needs or otherwise as determined appropriate by the compensation committee. We currently grant equity awards to the NEOs under the 2014 Plan, which was adopted in connection with our initial public offering in 2014.
Taxation of "Parachute" Payments
Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers, directors who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers may be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change of control that exceed certain prescribed limits, and that we (or our successor) may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. We did not provide any executive, including any NEO, with a gross up or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the executive might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 of the Code during 2019 and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any executive with such a gross up or other reimbursement.
| | |
40 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Compensation Committee Report |
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on that review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the Board that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
Wesley Nichols (Chair)
Christopher Claus
John Mendel
| | |
![]() | | 41 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
2019 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows compensation awarded to, paid to or earned by the persons named below for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, except for Messrs. McClung and Pierantoni, for whom compensation is shown for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 only (reflecting that they were named executive officers only during those years); and for Messrs. Watson Thomas, Smith and Swart, for whom compensation is shown for the year ended December 31, 2019 only (reflecting that they were named executive officers only during that year).
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Stock Awards ($)(1) | | Option Awards ($)(1) | | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) | ||||||||
Michael D. Darrow | 2019 | 400,000 | 300,000(2) | 882,413 | 272,123 | 158,101(3) | 2,012,637 | |||||||||||||||
President and CEO | 2018 | 400,000 | 70,868(2) | 331,178 | 407,713 | 9,479(4) | 1,219,238 | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 333,333 | 101,922(2) | 1,656,702 | 2,948,302 | 9,247(4) | 5,049,506 | ||||||||||||||||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | | 2019 | | 333,333 | | — | | 2,799,290(5) | | 3,944,739(5) | | 3,214,750(6) | | 10,292,112 | ||||||||
Former President and CEO | | 2018 | | 800,000 | | 238,848(2) | | 784,635 | | 1,181,778 | | 14,878(4) | | 3,020,139 | ||||||||
| | 2017 | | 800,000 | | 195,488(2) | | 789,615 | | 2,818,285 | | 482,876(7) | | 5,086,264 | ||||||||
Noel B. Watson | 2019 | 243,750 | 112,500(2) | 1,975,752 | 455,750 | 376,820(8) | 3,164,572 | |||||||||||||||
CFO and CAO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles C. Thomas | | 2019 | | 237,500 | | 74,718(2) | | 100,215 | | 47,984 | | 8,757(9) | | 469,174 | ||||||||
VP, Controller | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
John E. Pierantoni | 2019 | 90,125 | — | 14,782 | — | 20,099(10) | 125,006 | |||||||||||||||
Interim CFO; SVP and CAO | 2018 | 356,841 | 77,318(2) | 457,019 | 105,048 | 62,770(11) | 1,058,996 | |||||||||||||||
Simon E. Smith | | 2019 | | 380,313 | | 173,785(2) | | 614,591 | | 622,332 | | 24,266(12) | | 1,815,287 | ||||||||
EVP, Dealer Sales & Service | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 2019 | 400,000 | 100,000(2) | 744,496 | 215,928 | 14,880(12) | 1,475,304 | |||||||||||||||
EVP, General Counsel and Secretary | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung | | 2019 | | 191,667 | | — | | 369,230 | | 272,123 | | 434,168(13) | | 1,267,188 | ||||||||
Former EVP and Chief | | 2018 | | 400,000 | | 70,868(2) | | 409,212 | | 525,234 | | 9,207(4) | | 1,414,521 | ||||||||
Technology Officer | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Neeraj Gunsagar | 2019 | 191,667 | — | 298,452 | 215,928 | 450,352(14) | 1,156,399 | |||||||||||||||
Former EVP and Chief | 2018 | 400,000 | 70,868(2) | 295,868 | 354,535 | 13,674(15) | 1,134,945 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing Officer | 2017 | 400,000 | 134,699(2) | 699,876 | 1,735,936 | 23,803(16) | 2,994,314 | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maximum Achievement Payout | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Michael D. Darrow | $ | 171,798 | ||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | $ | 1,137,579 | ||
Jeffrey J. Swart | $ | 136,317 | ||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung | $ | 171,798 | ||
Neeraj Gunsagar | $ | 136,317 |
| | |
42 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
| | |
![]() | | 43 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
2019 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
| Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | | All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or | | All other option awards: Number of securities underlying | | Exercise or base price of option | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | | Threshold ($) | | Target (#) | | Maximum ($) | | Threshold (#) | | Target (#) | | Maximum (#) | | units (#) | | options (#) | | awards ($/sh) | | Awards ($)(3) | ||||||||||||
Michael D. Darrow | 3/15/2019 | 299 | 14,952 | 22,428 | — | — | — | 114,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019 | — | — | — | 36,753(4) | 68,598(5) | 6.93 | 526,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/2019 | — | — | — | 94,162(6) | — | — | 513,183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30,000 | 200,000 | 342,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | 1,980 | | 99,006 | | 148,509 | | — | | — | | — | | 758,386 | ||||||||||||
| 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 54,453(7) | | 113,444(5) | | 6.93 | | 827,383 | ||||||||||||
| | | 60,000 | | 400,000 | | 684,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
Noel B. Watson | 6/17/2019 | — | — | — | 369,991(8) | 148,991(9) | 5.34 | 2,431,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18,308 | 122,055 | 208,714 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles C. Thomas | 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 14,461(10) | | 12,096(5) | | 6.93 | | 148,199 | ||||||||||||
John E. Pierantoni | 3/15/2019 | — | — | — | 2,133(11) | — | — | 14,782 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21,630 | 144,200 | 246,582 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simon E. Smith | 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 32,583(12) | | 27,216(5) | | 6.93 | | 333,764 | ||||||||||||
| 4/8/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 20,000(13) | | — | | — | | 132,200 | ||||||||||||
| 6/8/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 47,081(14) | | 165,910(15) | | 5.45 | | 770,959 | ||||||||||||
| | | 15,000 | | 100,000 | | 171,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 3/15/2019 | 237 | 11,864 | 17,796 | — | — | — | 90,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019 | — | — | — | 29,714(16) | 54,432(5) | 6.93 | 421,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/16/2019 | — | — | — | 110,000(8) | — | — | 447,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30,000 | 200,000 | 342,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert T. "Tommy" | 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | 299 | | 14,952 | | 22,428 | | — | | — | | — | | 114,532 | ||||||||||||
McClung | 3/15/2019 | | | | | | | | — | | — | | — | | 36,753(4) | | 68,598(5) | | 6.93 | | 526,821 | ||||||||||||
| | | 30,000 | | 200,000 | | 342,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
Neeraj Gunsagar | 3/15/2019 | 237 | 11,864 | 17,796 | — | — | — | 90,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019 | — | — | — | 29,953(17) | 54,432(5) | 6.93 | 423,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30,000 | 200,000 | 342,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
44 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
| | |
![]() | | 45 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table provides information regarding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2019.
| Option Awards | | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options | | Option Exercise Price Per | | Option Expiration | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have Not | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have Not | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have Not | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have Not | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Share | | Date | | Vested (#) | | Vested ($) | | Vested (#) | | Vested ($) | ||||||||||
Michael D. Darrow | 3/1/2017(1) | 129,166 | 70,834 | $ | 14.61 | 3/1/2027 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017(2) | 37,500 | 178,125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/10/2017(3) | 27,000 | 63,000 | $ | 18.91 | 6/10/2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8/16/2017(3) | 27,000 | 63,000 | $ | 16.62 | 8/16/2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8/16/2017(4) | 3,319 | 15,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(5) | 37,536 | 52,551 | $ | 9.59 | 5/12/2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(6) | 17,642 | 83,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(7) | 12,862 | 55,736 | $ | 6.93 | 3/15/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(8) | 27,711 | 131,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(9) | 299 | 1,420 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/2019(4) | 70,622 | 335,455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | 12/14/2015(10) | | 1,840,000 | | — | $ | 8.02 | | 8/31/2021 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/10/2017(10) | | 312,000 | | — | $ | 18.91 | | 8/31/2021 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/12/2018(10) | | 261,122 | | — | $ | 9.59 | | 8/31/2021 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/15/2019(10) | | 113,444 | | — | $ | 6.93 | | 8/31/2021 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Noel B. Watson | 6/17/2019(11) | 9,311 | 139,680 | $ | 5.34 | 6/17/2029 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6/17/2019(12) | 346,867 | 1,647,618 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles C. Thomas | 5/15/2014(10) | | 4,061 | | — | $ | 12.81 | | 5/15/2024 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 10/6/2014(10) | | 2,000 | | — | $ | 20.85 | | 10/6/2024 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 2/3/2015(10) | | 1,030 | | — | $ | 19.29 | | 2/3/2025 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/14/2016(13) | | | | | | | | | | 250 | | 1,188 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 7/1/2016(14) | | | | | | | | | | 458 | | 2,176 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 8/11/2016(15) | | 7,297 | | 1,043 | $ | 10.85 | | 8/11/2026 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/10/2017(16) | | 10,530 | | 18,018 | $ | 18.91 | | 6/10/2027 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/10/2017(4) | | | | | | | | | | 1,116 | | 5,301 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/12/2018(6) | | | | | | | | | | 8,313 | | 39,487 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 9/18/2018(17) | | 3,547 | | 7,092 | $ | 13.49 | | 9/18/2028 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/15/2019(7) | | 2,268 | | 9,828 | $ | 6.93 | | 3/15/2029 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/15/2019(18) | | | | | | | | | �� | 11,237 | | 53,376 | | | | |
| | |
46 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
| Option Awards | | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options | | Option Exercise Price Per | | Option Expiration | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have Not | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have Not | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have Not | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have Not | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Share | | Date | | Vested (#) | | Vested ($) | | Vested (#) | | Vested ($) | ||||||||||
John E. Pierantoni | 2/7/2014(10) | 68,448 | — | $ | 9.26 | 6/30/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2014(10) | 66,374 | — | $ | 12.81 | 6/30/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7/1/2016(14) | 3,965 | 18,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/11/2016(15) | 63,244 | 9,036 | $ | 10.85 | 6/30/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6/10/2017(19) | 32,130 | 44,238 | $ | 18.91 | 6/30/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6/10/2017(4) | 1,770 | 8,408 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(5) | 9,671 | 13,540 | $ | 9.59 | 6/30/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(6) | 15,910 | 75,573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(20) | 534 | 2,537 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simon E. Smith | 2/22/2013(10) | | 3,206 | | — | $ | 7.92 | | 2/22/2023 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/2/2013(10) | | 1,069 | | — | $ | 7.92 | | 5/2/2023 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2013(10) | | 5,342 | | — | $ | 8.88 | | 10/22/2023 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 2/28/2014(10) | | 3,549 | | — | $ | 9.26 | | 2/28/2024 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/15/2014(10) | | 11,480 | | — | $ | 12.81 | | 5/15/2024 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/14/2016(21) | | 6,927 | | 1,094 | $ | 6.03 | | 3/14/2026 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/14/2016(13) | | | | | | | | | | 782 | | 3,715 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 7/1/2016(14) | | | | | | | | | | 3,438 | | 16,331 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 8/11/2016(15) | | 54,836 | | 7,834 | $ | 10.85 | | 8/11/2026 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/10/2017(22) | | 31,438 | | 42,626 | $ | 18.91 | | 6/10/2027 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/10/2017(4) | | | | | | | | | | 1,770 | | 8,408 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/12/2018(5) | | 11,636 | | 16,291 | $ | 9.59 | | 5/12/2028 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 5/12/2018(6) | | | | | | | | | | 19,142 | | 90,925 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/15/2019(7) | | 5,103 | | 22,113 | $ | 6.93 | | 3/15/2029 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 3/15/2019(23) | | | | | | | | | | 25,293 | | 120,142 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 4/8/2019(24) | | | | | | | | | | 17,500 | | 83,125 | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/8/2019(25) | | 20,738 | | 145,172 | $ | 5.45 | | 6/8/2029 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
| 6/8/2019(26) | | | | | | | | | | 41,196 | | 195,681 | | | | | ||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Swart | 5/2/2014(10) | 300,000 | — | $ | 12.81 | 5/2/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2014(10) | 11,227 | — | $ | 12.81 | 5/15/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7/1/2016(14) | 6,250 | 29,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/11/2016(15) | 174,999 | 25,001 | $ | 10.85 | 8/11/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6/10/2017(27) | 62,460 | 84,276 | $ | 18.91 | 6/10/2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6/10/2017(4) | 3,540 | 16,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(5) | 32,640 | 45,697 | $ | 9.59 | 5/12/2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/12/2018(6) | 15,341 | 72,870 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(7) | 10,206 | 44,226 | $ | 6.93 | 3/15/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(28) | 22,126 | 105,099 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/15/2019(9) | 237 | 1,127 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/16/2019(12) | 103,125 | 489,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert T. "Tommy" | 3/15/2019(9) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 26 | | 126 | ||||||||||
Neeraj Gunsagar | 3/15/2019(9) | 21 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 47 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
| | |
48 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
2019 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE
The following table provides information, on an aggregate basis, regarding (i) stock options exercised during 2019, including the total number of shares acquired upon exercise and the aggregate value realized before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker commissions, and (ii) RSUs that vested during 2019.
| Option Awards | | Stock Awards | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1) | |||||
Michael D. Darrow | — | — | 73,532 | 409,247 | |||||||||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | | — | | — | | 314,548 | | 1,813,465 | |||||
Noel B. Watson | — | — | 23,124 | 116,776 | |||||||||
Charles C. Thomas | | — | | — | | 10,322 | | 57,053 | |||||
John E. Pierantoni | — | — | 44,432 | 248,429 | |||||||||
Simon E. Smith | | — | | — | | 37,570 | | 199,344 | |||||
Jeffrey J. Swart | — | — | 55,571 | 305,369 | |||||||||
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung | | — | | — | | 103,263 | | 596,458 | |||||
Neeraj Gunsagar | — | — | 134,212 | 641,619 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
We have employment agreements with Messrs. Darrow, Watson, Smith and Swart, and we previously had employment agreements with Messrs. Perry, Pierantoni, Gunsagar and McClung before they left the Company. These agreements provide for at-will employment and generally include the NEO's base salary, an indication of eligibility for an annual performance-based bonus opportunity, equity awards and certain severance and change in control benefits. These employment arrangements are described below and in "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below.
Michael Darrow
For 2019, Mr. Darrow, then our EVP of Partner & OEM Development, the President of our ALG, Inc. subsidiary and, beginning May 31, 2019, our Interim President and CEO, had an annual base salary of $400,000 and was eligible for a performance-based bonus. In connection with his appointment as our Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Darrow was granted 94,162 RSUs, and he was entitled to a monthly stipend of $20,000 during his service as our Interim President and CEO.
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Darrow as of February 28, 2017 (the "Prior Darrow Employment Agreement"). Pursuant to the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement, Mr. Darrow was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus, to receive awards of stock options, restricted stock or other equity awards pursuant to any plans or arrangements we may have in effect from time to time and to participate in our executive benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated employees. In connection with his appointment on March 9, 2020 as our permanent President and CEO, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Darrow as of March 9, 2020 (the "New Darrow Employment Agreement"), which superseded the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement. Pursuant to the New Darrow Employment Agreement, Mr. Darrow was granted an option to purchase 323,000 shares of our common stock, 488,000 RSUs and 326,000 PUs. The
| | |
![]() | | 49 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
terms of the New Darrow Employment Agreement are described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2020 and will be further described in our proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting.
Please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below for additional information on the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement.
Chip Perry
For 2019, Mr. Perry, our President and CEO until his retirement on May 31, 2019, had an annual salary of $800,000 and an annual performance-based bonus opportunity targeted at 100% of his base salary.
We entered into an employment agreement (the "Perry Employment Agreement") on November 16, 2015 with Mr. Perry. Pursuant to the Perry Employment Agreement, Mr. Perry was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus opportunity of 100% of his base salary, a minimum annual bonus opportunity of 50% of his base salary for achievement of minimum performance levels and a maximum annual bonus opportunity of 200% of his base salary for achievement of maximum performance levels. During the first two years of his employment (Mr. Perry's two-year anniversary with us occurred in December 2017), Mr. Perry was entitled to receive monthly payments of $20,000 as an allowance for personal housing and travel costs and gross-up payments to cover the related taxes on such amounts. Mr. Perry was also eligible to participate in our executive benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated employees.
Please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below for additional information on the Perry Employment Agreement.
Noel Watson
For 2019, Mr. Watson, our CFO and CAO from June 17, 2019, had an annual base salary of $450,000 and was eligible for a performance-based bonus.
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Watson as of May 24, 2019 (the "Watson Employment Agreement"). Pursuant to the Watson Employment Agreement, Mr. Watson was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus, to receive awards of stock options, restricted stock or other equity awards pursuant to any plans or arrangements we may have in effect from time to time and to participate in our executive benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated employees. Mr. Watson also received a $400,000 signing bonus, with $200,000 paid on June 28, 2019 and $200,000 payable on December 31, 2020, provided that Mr. Watson remains employed with us on such date (except in the case of a change of control), and if he does not, he will be required to repay a prorated portion of the first installment of the signing bonus. Under the Watson Employment Agreement, Mr. Watson was entitled to up to $100,000 of relocation assistance benefits and a monthly housing allowance of $15,000 for the first six months of his employment, neither of which were subject to a tax gross up.
Pursuant to the Watson Employment Agreement, Mr. Watson was granted a stock option to purchase 148,991 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and 369,991 RSUs. Please see "Equity Grants to our Named Executive Officers" below for additional information on these grants.
Please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below for additional information on the Watson Employment Agreement.
Charlie Thomas
For 2019, Mr. Thomas, our Vice President and Controller and, from April 1, 2019 until June 17, 2019, our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, had an annual base salary of $237,500 and was eligible for a performance-based bonus. We do not, and did not in 2019, have an employment agreement with Mr. Thomas.
| | |
50 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
John Pierantoni
For 2019, Mr. Pierantoni, our CAO from 2013 until his resignation on April 1, 2019, and our Interim CFO from February 1, 2018 until his resignation, had an annual base salary of $360,500, and was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus.
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Pierantoni as of August 18, 2015 (the "Pierantoni Employment Agreement"). Pursuant to the Pierantoni Employment Agreement, Mr. Pierantoni was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus, to receive awards of stock options, restricted stock or other equity awards pursuant to any plans or arrangements we may have in effect from time to time and to participate in our executive benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated employees.
Please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below for additional information on the Pierantoni Employment Agreement.
Simon Smith, Jeffrey Swart, Neeraj Gunsagar and Tommy McClung
For 2019, Mr. Smith, our Senior Vice President of Dealer Development from July 2015 until his promotion to EVP of Dealer Sales & Services on June 20, 2019, had an annual base salary of $355,000 before his promotion and $400,000 after the promotion; Mr. Swart, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, had an annual base salary of $400,000; Mr. Gunsagar, our Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer from April 2016 until his termination on June 20, 2019, had an annual base salary of $400,000; and Mr. McClung, our Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from July 2017 until his termination on June 20, 2019, had an annual base salary of $400,000.
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Smith as of July 15, 2019 (the "Smith Employment Agreement"), with Mr. Swart as of January 26, 2017 (the "Swart Employment Agreement"), with Mr. Gunsagar as of June 29, 2015 (the "Gunsagar Employment Agreement") and with Mr. McClung as of January 12, 2017 (the "McClung Employment Agreement"). Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Smith, Swart, Gunsagar and McClung was eligible for an annual performance-based bonus, to receive awards of stock options, restricted stock or other equity awards pursuant to any plans or arrangements we may have in effect from time to time and to participate in our executive benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated employees.
Please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change in Control or Certain Other Events" below for additional information on the Smith Employment Agreement, the Swart Employment Agreement, the Gunsagar Employment Agreement and the McClung Employment Agreement.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL OR CERTAIN OTHER EVENTS
Chip Perry
Effective May 31, 2019, Mr. Perry retired from his positions as our President and CEO and Mr. Darrow was appointed as our Interim President and CEO. Mr. Perry agreed to provide consulting services to us for a two-year period following his departure in support of the management transition, during which consulting arrangement his stock options remain exercisable. On May 31, 2019, we agreed with Mr. Perry to treat his retirement as a termination without cause or resignation for good reason pursuant to the terms of the Perry Employment Agreement and, accordingly, Mr. Perry was paid benefits thereunder. The description below describes the terms of the Perry Employment Agreement as it was in effect on the last day of Mr. Perry's employment.
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Perry Employment Agreement, and references to "equity awards" do not, for purposes of this summary, include PUs, whose treatment is discussed later in this section. The Perry Employment Agreement provided that, if we terminated Mr. Perry's employment for a reason other than cause (as defined in the Perry Employment Agreement and summarized below), or he resigned from his
| | |
![]() | | 51 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
employment for good reason (as defined in the Perry Employment Agreement and summarized below), then, in addition to earned but unpaid amounts, and subject to Mr. Perry's signing a release of claims agreement with us and his continued compliance with a confidential information agreement entered into with the Company, he would have received (i) a lump sum payment equal to 200% of the sum of his then-current base salary and target annual bonus opportunity; (ii) if the termination occurred before a change in control, immediate vesting of 100% of each of his then-outstanding equity awards; and (iii) if the termination occurred upon or after a change in control, immediate vesting of 100% of each of his then-outstanding equity awards.
If Mr. Perry's employment with us had terminated due to his death or disability (as defined in the Perry Employment Agreement and summarized below), regardless of whether before, on or after a change in control, then, in addition to earned but unpaid amounts, and subject to Mr. Perry's (or his estate's) signing a release of claims agreement with us and his continued compliance with a confidential information agreement entered into with us, he would have received immediate vesting of each of his then-outstanding equity awards.
If a change in control had occurred while Mr. Perry was employed by us, and if he had remained employed with us (or our successor) as of the first day immediately following the 12-month anniversary of the closing of the change in control, then 100% of any of Mr. Perry's equity awards that both are outstanding as of such date and were granted to him at least 90 days before the change in control would have vested and, if applicable, become fully exercisable.
The Perry Employment Agreement provided that any severance payments and benefits payable to Mr. Perry would be subject to a delay in payment if and to the extent required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). If the severance payments and other benefits payable to Mr. Perry constituted "parachute payments" under Section 280G of the Code and would have been subject to the applicable excise tax, then Mr. Perry's severance and other benefits would have been either delivered in full or delivered to such lesser extent as would result in no portion of such benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever resulted in the receipt by Mr. Perry on an after-tax basis of the greatest amount of benefits.
John Pierantoni, Noel Watson, Michael Darrow, Simon Smith, Jeff Swart, Neeraj Gunsagar and Tommy McClung
The severance and change in control-related terms of the Pierantoni Employment Agreement, the Watson Employment Agreement, the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement, the Smith Employment Agreement, the Swart Employment Agreement, the Gunsagar Employment Agreement and the McClung Employment Agreement (collectively, the "Executive Employment Agreements") related to potential payments upon termination, change in control and certain other events are generally the same, except as noted below. Except as noted, the description below applies to each Executive Employment Agreement, and refers to Messrs. Pierantoni, Watson, Darrow (in relation to the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement), Smith, Swart, Gunsagar and McClung, as applicable, as the "Executive."
Effective March 9, 2020, Mr. Darrow was appointed as our permanent President and CEO, in connection with which the Company entered into the New Darrow Employment Agreement. The description below relates to the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement as it was in effect during 2019. The terms of the New Darrow Employment Agreement are described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2020 and will be further described in our proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting.
Effective April 1, 2019, Mr. Pierantoni resigned from his positions as our Interim CFO and CAO and Charles Thomas was appointed as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. We do not, and did not in 2019, have an employment agreement with Mr. Thomas. Mr. Pierantoni agreed to provide consulting services to us for a one-year period following his departure in support of the management transition, during which consulting arrangement he continued to vest in his equity awards, but he did not otherwise receive any severance benefits in connection with his resignation. The description below relates to the Pierantoni Employment Agreement as it was in effect on the last day of Mr. Pierantoni's employment.
| | |
52 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
Effective June 20, 2019, Messrs. Gunsagar and McClung were terminated from their respective positions as our Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, and each of them received the benefits to which they were entitled in connection with a termination without cause under their respective employment agreements. The description below relates to the Gunsagar Employment Agreement and the McClung Employment Agreement as they were in effect on the last day of Messrs. Gunsagar's and McClung's employment.
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Executive Employment Agreements, and references to "equity awards" do not, for purposes of this summary, include PUs, whose treatment is discussed later in this section.
Under the Executive Employment Agreements, if we terminate the Executive's employment with us for a reason other than cause (as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement and summarized below), or the Executive resigns from his employment for good reason (as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement and summarized below), and in each case, the termination occurs before a change in control (as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement and summarized below), then, subject to the Executive signing a release of claims agreement with us and his continued compliance with a confidential information agreement entered into with us, and for Mr. Darrow only, continued compliance with the non-solicitation provisions in his Executive Employment Agreement, he will receive: (i) continuing payments of his base salary for a period of time beginning immediately after his separation of service through the date that is six months after the separation date, plus an additional two months for every fully completed year of service with us (measured from his original start date with us or any predecessor to us), but not to exceed a total of 12 months (the "Executive Severance Period"), except in the case of Mr. Watson, in which case these payments will continue for 18 months after his separation date, if that date is before June 17, 2020, and for 12 months after his separation date otherwise, and the "Executive Severance Period" with respect to Mr. Watson will refer to this alternative period; (ii) the immediate vesting of each of his then-outstanding equity awards as to the number of shares that otherwise would have vested had he remained our employee through the 12-month anniversary of the termination date; and (iii) reimbursement (the "COBRA Reimbursement") for the payments the Executive makes for medical, vision and dental coverage under Title X of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended ("COBRA"), or, in the case of Messrs. Watson, Darrow and Smith, at our election, direct payment of the COBRA premiums to the insurance provider, up to the full Executive Severance Period (the "Direct COBRA Benefits" and, collectively with the COBRA Reimbursements, the "COBRA Coverage"), except in the case of Mr. Watson, where the period in question is 12 months from his separation date. If we cannot provide the COBRA Coverage to which the Executive becomes entitled without a violation of applicable laws, we may instead provide a monthly cash payment, plus a gross-up amount to cover the taxes on the payment, during the Executive Severance Period (which the Executive may, but does not have to, use toward his health care continuation costs). If we cannot provide these cash payments in lieu of COBRA Coverage without violating applicable law, then we will not provide the Executive with the COBRA Coverage or these cash payments.
If the Executive's employment terminates due to his death or disability (as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement and summarized below), regardless of whether before, on or after a change in control, then, subject to the Executive (or his estate) signing a release of claims agreement with us and his continued compliance with a confidential information agreement entered into with us, and for Mr. Darrow only, his continued compliance with the non-solicitation provisions in his Executive Employment Agreement, the Executive will receive: (i) immediate vesting as to 100% of his then-outstanding equity awards; and (ii) the COBRA Reimbursement (or, for Mr. Watson, at our election, the Direct COBRA Benefits) up to the full Executive Severance Period (but if the applicable COBRA Coverage is in violation of applicable laws, the Executive will not receive the COBRA Coverage or any cash payments in lieu thereof).
Under the terms of each Executive Employment Agreement, if we terminate the Executive's employment for a reason other than cause, or the Executive resigns from his employment for good reason, and in each case, the termination occurs upon the closing of a change in control or later, then, subject to the Executive signing a release of claims agreement with us and his continued compliance with a confidential information agreement entered into with us, and for Mr. Darrow only, his continued compliance with the non-solicitation provisions in his
| | |
![]() | | 53 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
Executive Employment Agreement, he will receive: (i) continuing payments of his base salary during the Executive Severance Period; (ii) immediate vesting as to 100% of his then-outstanding equity awards were granted to him at least 90 days before the change in control; (iii) the COBRA Reimbursement or, for Mr. Watson, at our election, the Direct COBRA Benefits (or the cash payments in lieu thereof, as described above, unless doing so would violate applicable laws) up to the full Executive Severance Period, except in the case of Mr. Watson, where the period in question is 12 months from his separation date; and (iv) with respect to Mr. Watson, he will receive any unpaid portion of his signing bonus and will be relieved of any obligation to repay any portion of the signing bonus and his relocation benefits.
If a change in control occurs while the Executive remains employed with us and he remains employed with us (or our successor) as of the first day immediately following the 12-month anniversary of the closing of the change in control, then 100% of any of the Executive's then-outstanding equity awards that were granted to him at least 90 days before the change in control will vest and, if applicable, become fully exercisable.
The Executive Employment Agreements each provide that any severance payments and benefits to the Executive will be subject to a delay in payment if and to the extent required by Section 409A of the Code. If the severance payments and other benefits payable to an Executive constitute "parachute payments" under Section 280G of the Code and would be subject to the applicable excise tax, then the Executive's severance and other benefits will be either delivered in full or delivered to such lesser extent as would result in no portion of such benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the receipt by the Executive on an after-tax basis of the greatest amount of benefits.
Treatment of Performance Units
After the execution of the employment agreements described above, we established PUs, whose terms supersede any contrary terms of an Executive's employment agreement. The following summary of the treatment of PUs in connection with certain triggering events applies to each of our NEOs, regardless of the provisions of his individual employment agreement, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of PU award agreement that we have previously filed.
If a triggering event does not occur, the PUs will vest at the end of a three-year "performance period" beginning on March 15, 2019 and ending on March 14, 2022, with a number of shares of our common stock being issued in settlement of each PU between 0 and 1.5 shares. The number of shares issued in settlement is determined by comparing our compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, during the performance period to that of the Russell 2000 Total Return Index. The shares will be issued within 90 days of the end of the performance period, on a date referred to as the "determination date."
If the Executive experiences a qualifying termination before a change in control, then a pro-rata portion of his PUs (determined by dividing the total number of days between the beginning of the performance period and his termination date by the total number of days in the performance period) will immediately vest but will not be settled until the determination date, at which time those vested PUs will be settled for common stock based on our comparative CAGR performance during the performance period.
If a change of control occurs after the qualifying termination but before the last day of the performance period, then the pro-rata portion of the Executive's PUs that vested on his termination date will be settled based on our comparative CAGR performance during the portion of the performance period before and including the date of the change in control, with our ending stock price being the price of our stock in the change in control. We refer to this settlement exchange ratio as the CIC Achievement Level. If the acquiring entity assumes the PUs, they will be settled on the last day of the performance period; otherwise, they will be settled immediately before the change in control.
If the Executive dies or becomes disabled, the PUs will immediately vest and each PU will be settled for one share of our common stock.
| | |
54 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
If a change in control occurs while the Executive remains employed with us, his PUs will settle at the CIC Achievement Level, subject to his continued employment through the end of the performance period, unless the acquiring entity does not assume the PUs, in which case they vest immediately before the change in control. If the Executive is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason after a change in control but before the end of the performance period, the PUs will vest immediately but will not be settled until the end of the performance period, at which time they will be settled at the CIC Achievement Level. If the Executive retires after a change in control but before the end of the performance period, a pro-rata portion of his PUs (determined by dividing the total number of days between the beginning of the performance period and his termination date by the total number of days in the performance period) will vest and be settled at the CIC Achievement Level. If the Executive dies or becomes disabled after a change in control but before the end of the performance period, his PUs will immediately vest and will be settled at the CIC Achievement Level.
Definitions
Except as noted, the definitions below apply to the Perry Employment Agreement, each Executive Employment Agreement and the PU award agreement, and each agreement refers to Messrs. Perry, Watson, Pierantoni, Darrow (in relation to the Prior Darrow Employment Agreement), Smith, Swart, Gunsagar and McClung, as applicable, as the "Executive." The following are summaries of the definitions included in the Perry Employment Agreement, the Executive Employment Agreements and the PU award agreement, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Perry Employment Agreement, the Executive Employment Agreements and the PU award agreement, as applicable.
As used in this section, "cause" means: (i) the Executive's failure (continued failure, with respect to Mr. Perry) to perform his assigned duties or responsibilities as an employee (as President and CEO, with respect to Mr. Perry) (other than a failure resulting from the Executive's disability) after written notice thereof from us describing (with specificity, with respect to Mr. Perry) his failure to perform such duties or responsibilities, which notice has actually been received by the Executive, with respect to Mr. Perry; (ii) the Executive engaging in any act of dishonesty, fraud or misrepresentation with respect to us; (iii) the Executive's violation of any federal or state law or regulation applicable to our business or our affiliates; (iv) the Executive's breach (material breach, with respect to Mr. Perry) of any confidentiality agreement or invention assignment agreement; or (v) the Executive being convicted of, or entering a plea of nolo contendere to, any crime (with respect to Mr. Perry, the Executive being convicted of, or entering a plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude). The Perry Employment Agreement and each Executive Employment Agreement note, for purposes of clarity, that the Executive's termination of employment due to death or disability is not, by itself, deemed to be a termination by us other than for cause or a resignation for good reason.
As used in this section, "change in control" means: (i) a change in our ownership that occurs on the date that any person, or persons acting as a group, acquires ownership of our stock that, together with the stock held by such person, constitutes more than 50% of the total voting power of our stock; provided, that for purposes of this subsection (i), the acquisition of additional stock by any one person who is considered to own more than 50% of the total voting power of our stock will not be considered a change in control; provided, further, in the case of the Perry Employment Agreement and each Executive Employment Agreement, that our Board may, in its reasonable judgment, determine that any such change in the ownership of our stock as a result of a financing or otherwise for fundraising purposes, and in each case that is approved by the Board before the change in ownership, also will not be considered a change in control; (ii) in the case of the PU award agreement only, a change in our effective control which occurs on the date that a majority of the members of the Board is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election (but if any person is considered to be in effective control of us, the acquisition of additional control by the same person will not be a change in control); or (iii) subject to certain exclusions specified in the Perry Employment Agreement, the Executive Employment Agreements and the PU award agreement, a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of our assets that occurs on the date that any person, or persons acting as a group, acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by the person or persons) assets from us that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all of our assets immediately before the
| | |
![]() | | 55 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
acquisition or acquisitions; provided, that our Board may determine in its reasonable judgment that certain asset transfers that should not be considered to be a change in control due to extenuating factors. However, a transaction will not constitute a change in control if (x) its sole purpose is to change the state of our incorporation or (y) its sole purpose is to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held our securities immediately before the transaction. In addition, a transaction will not be deemed a change in control unless it qualifies as a change in control event within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.
As used in this section, "disability" means the Executive (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health plan covering our employees.
As used in this section, "good reason" means the Executive's resignation within 30 days following the expiration of a cure period (discussed below) following the occurrence of one or more of the following, without the Executive's consent: (i) with respect to the Executive Employment Agreements only, a material reduction in the Executive's base salary, which reduction is not applicable to a majority of our senior management, excluding the substitution of substantially equivalent compensation and benefits; with respect to the Perry Employment Agreement only, a reduction in the Executive's base salary, excluding the substitution of substantially equivalent compensation and benefits, which reduction, as a percentage of base salary, is of a greater percentage than the percentage of base salary reduction applicable to a majority of our senior management; (ii) with respect to the Executive Employment Agreements only, a material reduction of the Executive's authority, duties or responsibilities, unless the Executive is provided with a comparable position; provided, that a reduction in authority, duties or responsibilities primarily by virtue of our being acquired and made part of a larger entity, whether as a subsidiary, business unit or otherwise (as, for example, when our CEO remains as such following an acquisition where we become a wholly owned subsidiary of an acquirer, but is not made the CEO of the acquiring company), will not constitute "good reason"; with respect to the Perry Employment Agreement only, a material reduction of the Executive's title, positions, authority, duties or responsibilities, or the assignment to the Executive of titles, positions, authority, duties or responsibilities that are inconsistent with his position as our President and CEO, in each case, that results in a material diminution of his authority, duties or responsibilities; provided, that a reduction in title, position, authority, duties or responsibilities by virtue of our being acquired and made part of a larger entity, whether as a subsidiary, business unit or otherwise (as, for example, when our CEO remains as such following an acquisition where we become a wholly owned subsidiary of an acquirer, but is not made the CEO of the acquiring company), will not constitute "good reason"; (iii) a material change (with respect to Mr. Perry only, any actual change) in the geographic location of the Executive's primary work facility or location; provided, that a relocation of 50 miles or less from the Executive's then-present location or to the Executive's home as his primary work location will not be considered a material change in geographic location; or, with respect to the Perry Employment Agreement only, the following clauses (iv) through (vi): (iv) the Executive being required to report to any person other than the Board or, if we are acquired, either the Board or the board of directors of the acquiring company; (v) the failure by a successor entity of us to assume the Perry Employment Agreement; or (vi) any other material breach of the Perry Employment Agreement. For an event to qualify as good reason, the Executive must not terminate employment with us without first providing us with written notice of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for "good reason" within 90 days of the initial existence of the grounds for "good reason" and a reasonable cure period of not less than 30 days following the date of such notice, and such grounds must not have been cured during such time and for Messrs. Watson, Darrow and Smith only, any resignation for "good reason" must occur within two years of the initial existence of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for "good reason."
As used in this section, "qualifying termination" means (i) the Executive's termination on or after May 15, 2021 due to retirement, (ii) the Executive's termination without cause or (iii) the Executive's resignation for good reason.
As used in this section, "retirement" means the Executive's ceasing to be a service provider for any reason other than his disability, death or termination by us for cause if (i) he is then at least age 65, (ii) he has previously
| | |
56 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
served as a service provider for not less than five years and (iii) he has provided at least six months' advance written notice to us of his intention to terminate due to retirement.
Estimated Payments Upon Termination of Employment and/or a Change in Control
The following table provides information concerning the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided in the circumstances described above for each of the NEOs serving as of the end of 2019 pursuant to the employment agreements in effect at that time. Payments and benefits are estimated assuming that the triggering event took place on the last business day of 2019 (December 31, 2019), and the price per share of our common stock is the closing price of our common stock on that date of $4.75. There can be no assurances that a triggering event would produce the same or similar results as those estimated below if it occurs on any other date or at any other price, or if any other assumption used to estimate potential payments and benefits is not correct. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any potential payments of benefits, any actual payments and benefits may be different.
| Potential Payments Upon | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Termination other than for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Benefit | | Prior to Change in Control ($) | | Upon or Following Change in Control ($) | | Change in Control ($)(1) | | Death or Disability ($) | ||||||
Michael D. Darrow | Cash Severance(2) | 333,333 | 333,333 | — | — | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration of | |||||||||||||||
Equity Awards(3) | 448,977(4) | 744,772(5) | 314,716 | 815,794(6) | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of | |||||||||||||||
Employee Benefits(7) | 23,515 | 23,515 | — | 23,515 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Benefits | 805,825 | 1,101,620 | 314,716 | 839,309 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noel B. Watson | Cash Severance(2) | | 675,000 | | 875,000(8) | | — | | — | ||||||
| Vesting Acceleration of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Equity Awards(3) | | 439,366(4) | | 1,647,618(5) | | 1,208,253 | | 1,647,618(6) | ||||||
| Continued Coverage of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Employee Benefits | | 28,218(9) | | 28,218(9) | | — | | 42,327(7) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Benefits | | 1,142,584 | | 2,550,836 | | 1,208,253 | | 1,689,945 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Simon E. Smith | Cash Severance(2) | 400,000 | 400,000 | — | — | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration of | |||||||||||||||
Equity Awards(3) | 180,372(4) | 518,325(5) | 337,953 | 518,325(6) | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of | |||||||||||||||
Employee Benefits(7) | 28,218 | 28,218 | — | 28,218 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Benefits | 608,590 | 946,543 | 337,953 | 546,543 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey J. Swart | Cash Severance(2) | | 400,000 | | 400,000 | | — | | — | ||||||
| Vesting Acceleration of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Equity Awards(3) | | 250,970(4) | | 714,315(5) | | 478,358 | | 770,669(6) | ||||||
| Continued Coverage of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Employee Benefits(7) | | 19,728 | | 19,728 | | — | | 19,728 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Benefits | | 670,698 | | 1,134,043 | | 478,358 | | 790,397 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 57 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
connection with the change of control will be determined based upon the Company's CAGR performance measured against the Index companies' CAGR performance during the portion of the performance period the precedes the effective date of the change of control, but if the acquiring or surviving company assumes or substitutes the PUs with substantially similar equity awards, then the PUs will not vest until the last day of the performance period (but with the number of PUs vesting having been determined as of the closing of the change in control as described earlier).
| | |
58 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
The table below reflects the actual severance payments made to each of the NEOs who was not serving as of the end of 2019 pursuant to their employment and separation agreements as a result of the applicable triggering event.
| Payments Upon | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Termination other than for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason | | | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Benefit | | Prior to Change in Control ($) | | Upon or Following Change in Control ($) | | Change in Control ($) | | Death or Disability ($) | ||||||
Victor A. "Chip" Perry | Cash Severance | 3,200,000(1) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration of | |||||||||||||||
Equity Awards | 1,376,286(2) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of | |||||||||||||||
Employee Benefits | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Benefits | 4,576,286 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Robert T. "Tommy" McClung | Cash Severance | | 425,000(3) | | — | | — | | — | ||||||
| Vesting Acceleration of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Equity Awards | | 332,526(4) | | — | | — | | — | ||||||
| Continued Coverage of | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Employee Benefits | | 28,218(5) | | — | | — | | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Benefits | | 785,744 | | — | | — | | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Neeraj Gunsagar | Cash Severance | 423,346(6) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration of | |||||||||||||||
Equity Awards | 281,232(4) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of | |||||||||||||||
Employee Benefits | 28,218(5) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Benefits | 732,796 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 59 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
2015 Inducement Equity Incentive Plan
The 2015 Inducement Equity Incentive Plan, or the Inducement Plan, was adopted in 2015 without stockholder approval pursuant to Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 5635(c)(4). No shares remain available for grant under the Inducement Plan, and no grants were made under the Inducement Plan in 2019. The Inducement Plan provided for the grant of equity-based awards in the form of nonstatutory stock options and its terms are substantially similar to the 2014 Plan, including with respect to treatment of equity awards in the event of a "merger" or "change in control" as defined under the Inducement Plan.
2014 Equity Incentive Plan
The 2014 Plan provides that in the event of a "merger" or "change in control" as defined under the 2014 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, except that if a successor company or its parent or subsidiary does not assume or substitute an equivalent award for any outstanding award, then the award will fully vest, all restrictions on the award will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria applicable to the award will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and the award will become fully exercisable, if applicable, for a specified period prior to the transaction. The award will then terminate upon the expiration of the specified period of time. If the service of an outside director is terminated on or following a change in control, other than pursuant to a voluntary resignation, his or her options, RSUs and stock appreciation rights, if any, will vest fully and become immediately exercisable, all restrictions on his or her restricted stock will lapse and all performance goals or other vesting requirements for his or her PUs will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and all other terms and conditions met.
Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Plan and 2008 Stock Plan
Our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Plan, or the 2005 Plan, and our 2008 Plan, or the 2008 Plan, provide that in the event of a "merger" or "change in control," as defined therein, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, and unless determined otherwise by the administrator, will be assumed or an equivalent award substituted by the successor company or a parent or subsidiary of the successor company. If the successor corporation in a merger or change in control refuses to assume or substitute for the award, then the participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise the award that is not assumed or substituted as to all of the award (including shares as to which it would not otherwise be vested or exercisable). If an award is not assumed or substituted for in connection with a merger or change in control, the administrator will notify the participant in writing that the award will be fully exercisable for a period of time as determined by the administrator in its sole discretion and the award will terminate upon the expiration of that period for no consideration, unless otherwise determined by the administrator. No shares remain available for grant under the 2005 Plan or the 2008 Plan, and no grants were made under those plans in 2019.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019:
Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | | Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | ||||
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1) | 14,676,972(2) | $ | 11.89(3) | 10,521,842(4) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholder(5) | | 3,298,979 | $ | 10.27 | | — | ||||
Total | 17,975,951 | $ | 11.45(3) | 10,521,842(4) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
60 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
Set forth below is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees for 2019.
During 2019, we had two principal executive officers, Messrs. Perry and Darrow. Pursuant to Instruction 10 to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, we calculated the annual total compensation for our principal executive officer by annualizing the compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement for Mr. Darrow, our principal executive officer as of December 31, 2019, as follows:
Compensation Component | | Value from Summary Compensation Table | | Annualized Value | Explanation | |||
Salary | $ | 400,000 | $ | 400,000 | Not annualized. Mr. Darrow's salary was paid throughout 2019 without change. | |||
Bonus | $ | 300,000 | $ | 300,000 | Not annualized, as this represents the discretionary bonus received for performance in 2019. | |||
Stock Awards | $ | 882,413 | $ | 882,413 | Not annualized. In addition to his regular, annual equity award as EVP, Mr. Darrow received a supplemental RSU grant upon his appointment as Interim President and CEO. | |||
Option Awards | $ | 272,123 | $ | 272,123 | Not annualized, as this option represents an annual equity award as EVP. | |||
All Other Compensation | $ | 158,101 | $ | 258,101 | Annualized the $20,000 monthly stipend for service as Interim President and CEO; the remaining amounts were not annualized in light of Mr. Darrow's full-year 2019 service. | |||
Total | $ | 2,012,637 | $ | 2,112,637 | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Based on these calculations, the 2019 annual total compensation of our principal executive officer was $2,112,637. The 2019 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee other than Mr. Darrow was $130,939. Based on this information, for 2019, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Darrow to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was16 to 1.
| | |
![]() | | 61 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Compensation of Executive Officers |
To find the median compensated employee, we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2019 as our consistently-applied compensation measure and selected the median employee from that list (after excluding Mr. Darrow). As of December 31, 2019, we had 709 employees globally, including 708 employees based in the United States and one employee based outside of the United States, in Canada. In determining the identity of our median employee, as permitted by SEC rules, we chose to exclude from this population the one employee in Canada, representing approximately one-tenth of one percent of our total employees. As a result, our employee population used for determining the median employee consisted of 708 full-time, part-time and temporary employees based only in the United States as of December 31, 2019. Since all of these employees are located in the United States, as is Mr. Darrow, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments or foreign currency conversions. After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for the median employee according to the methodology used to report the annual compensation of our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table.
The pay ratio disclosed above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee's annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their pay ratios.
| | |
62 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Certain Relationships and Related Party and other Transactions |
In addition to the director and executive officer compensation arrangements and indemnification arrangements discussed above under "Executive Officers, Directors and Corporate Governance" and "Executive Compensation," the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2019 and each currently proposed transaction in which:
Transactions with Directors and Their Affiliates
USAA
USAA, a large stockholder and most significant affinity group marketing partner, beneficially owned approximately 8.4% of our common stock at December 31, 2019. In February 2020, days before the expiration of our then-current partnership agreement, which we refer to as the Former USAA Agreement, USAA informed us that it did not wish to extend our partnership, and we accordingly entered into a Transition Services Agreement and an associated Order Addendum No. 1 (Transition of Auto-Buying Program Platform) with USAA Federal Savings Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of USAA to which we refer as USAA FSB, as of February 14, 2020. We refer to this Transition Services Agreement and the associated Order Addendum collectively as the TSA.
Pursuant to the TSA, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, among other things, we will, during a transitional period ending on September 30, 2020, continue to operate the white-labeled website through which USAA FSB makes available to USAA members a new and used automobile buying program, which we refer to as the Auto-Buying Program. Beginning on October 1, 2020, the TSA provides for a 120-day wind-down period during which the Auto-Buying Program will no longer be made available to USAA members, and the parties will cooperate to wind down the Auto-Buying Program and provide services to USAA members who had submitted leads through the Auto-Buying Program before that date. The entry into the TSA did not change the revenue sharing amounts payable by us in connection with transactions by USAA members through the Auto-Buying Program, and USAA FSB will pay us a $20 million transition services fee over the term of the TSA, which we refer to as the Transition Services Fee. The TSA requires USAA FSB, subject to wind-down negotiations and certain regulatory carveouts, to use commercially reasonable efforts to support the Auto-Buying Program in a manner materially consistent with the manner in which it operated the Auto-Buying Program on February 14, 2020.
From time to time under the Former USAA Agreement and the TSA, we have provided marketing services to promote USAA membership, certain dealer incentive programs and loan subvention programs and have subsidized loan rate discount programs for USAA members who meet certain conditions. Under the Former USAA
| | |
![]() | | 63 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Certain Relationships and Related Party and other Transactions |
Agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2019, we made cash payments to USAA of $22.3 million and received cash payments from USAA of $1.4 million. Under the Former USAA Agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2019, 293,142 units, or approximately 29% of all units purchased from TrueCar Certified Dealers by TrueCar users, were matched to users of the Auto-Buying Program. We believe that the Former USAA Agreement was, and the TSA is, on terms no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties. As a result of the wind-down of our partnership with USAA FSB under the TSA, we expect the Auto-Buying Program to represent a smaller share of our total units in 2020 than it did in 2019. We further expect to receive a net payment from USAA FSB during 2020 as a result of the Transition Services Fee being offset against the revenue share payments to USAA FSB.
In connection with the Former USAA Agreement, we issued to USAA warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. In May 2014, we issued to USAA a warrant to purchase up to 1,458,979 shares of our common stock consisting of 392,313 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $7.95 per share and 1,066,666 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $15.00 per share. The shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants are subject to certain performance-based vesting conditions. The vesting conditions are based on the number of cars sold by TrueCar Certified Dealers to our users originating from the USAA Auto Program. The warrant includes a multiplier provision whereby the vesting accelerates faster based on achievement of higher sales milestones within a given month. At December 31, 2019, there were 509,642 warrants that were earned and outstanding with an additional 949,337 warrants that are available for issuance upon achievement of minimum performance milestones. As a result of the wind-down of the Auto-Buying Program, we expect the warrants to expire on October 1, 2021.
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our Charter and Bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers, and may indemnify our employees and other agents, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law prohibits our Charter from limiting the liability of our directors for the following:
In addition to the indemnification required in our Charter and Bylaws, we have entered into an indemnification agreement with each member of our Board. These agreements provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers and some employees for certain expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with any action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute resolution mechanism, or hearing, inquiry or investigation that may lead to the foregoing, to which they are a party, or are threatened to be made a party, by reason of the fact that they are or were a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of our company, or any of our subsidiaries, by reason of any action or inaction by them while serving as an officer, director, agent or fiduciary, or by reason of the fact that they were serving at our request as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of another entity. In the case of an action or proceeding by or in the right of our company or any of our subsidiaries, no indemnification will be provided for any claim where a court determines that the indemnified party is prohibited from receiving indemnification. We believe that these Charter and Bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.
Policies and Procedures for Related-Party Transactions
Our audit committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing and approving or disapproving "related-party transactions," which are transactions between us and related persons in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of this policy, a related person is defined as a director, executive officer, nominee for director or greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, in each case since the beginning of the most recently completed year, and their immediate family members. Our audit committee charter provides that the audit committee shall review, approve or disapprove and oversee any related-party transactions.
| | |
64 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Audit Committee Report |
This Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other TrueCar filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference therein.
The following is the report of the audit committee of our Board of Directors. The audit committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 with our management. In addition, the audit committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent accountants, the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB") and the SEC. The audit committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant's communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the audit committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Based on the audit committee's review of the matters noted above and its discussions with our independent accountants and our management, the audit committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
Respectfully submitted by:
Robert Buce (Chair)
Christopher Claus
Erin Lantz
| | |
![]() | | 65 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Proposal 1: Election of Directors |
| RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD | | ||
| | | | |
| ![]() | | The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders voteFOR the election of each of Christopher Claus, Philip McKoy and John Mendel as Class III directors to serve until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. | |
| | | | |
Our Board consists of eight members. In accordance with our Charter, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At the Annual Meeting, three directors will be elected for three-year terms.
Our nominating committee recommended, and our Board approved, Christopher Claus, Philip McKoy and John Mendel as nominees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company. If elected, the nominees will serve as directors until our annual meeting in 2023, and until a successor is qualified and elected or until his earlier resignation or removal. Please see "Executive Officers, Directors and Corporate Governance" in this proxy statement for information concerning the nominees.
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR each of Christopher Claus, Philip McKoy and John Mendel. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for another nominee designated by the Board. We are not aware of any reason that a nominee would be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.
Each director is elected by a plurality of the voting power of the shares present virtually or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
| | |
66 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants |
| RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD | | ||
| | | | |
| ![]() | | The Board, at the audit committee's recommendation, recommends that stockholders voteFOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. | |
| | | | |
The audit committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of that appointment. The audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint new independent registered public accountants at any time during the year, notwithstanding the results of any vote and despite the fact it has already appointed PwC, if the audit committee believes that a change in our independent registered public accountant would be in our best interests and those of our stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the audit committee may consider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm.
PwC served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 and 2019 fiscal years. We expect that representatives of PwC will be present at the virtual Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table sets forth all fees accrued or paid to PwC for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019:
| Fiscal Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2019 | |||||
Audit Fees | $ | 2,327,000 | $ | 2,356,309 | |||
Audit-Related Fees | 53,000 | 338,000 | |||||
Tax Fees | 42,303 | 173,547 | |||||
All Other Fees | 6,300 | 6,300 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 2,428,603 | $ | 2,874,156 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 67 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants |
Audit fees cover professional services provided by PwC in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and an audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, quarterly reviews of financial statements included in our annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and professional services rendered in connection with comfort letters, consents and reviews of other documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-related fees are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including due diligence activities relating to mergers and acquisitions and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax fees cover tax services provided by PwC including detailed tax studies (Section 382 studies), tax planning projects, consultation, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, and tax compliance services.
All other fees cover license fees for accounting research and disclosure software.
Pre-approval Policy. Under our audit committee's charter, the audit committee is required to pre-approve all audit services and to pre-approve (or approve subsequently, where permitted by law) all non-audit and tax services performed by our independent registered public accountants in order to ensure that the provision of those services does not impair the public accountants' independence. In fiscal years 2018 and 2019, all fees identified above under the captions "Audit Fees," "Audit-Related Fees," "Tax Fees" and "All Other Fees" that PwC billed were approved by the audit committee in accordance with the audit committee's charter and other applicable legal requirements.
The audit committee has determined that PwC's rendering of other professional services for tax compliance and tax advice is compatible with maintaining PwC's independence.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is necessary to ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020. A share that abstains on this proposal is treated as a share present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote and, therefore, will have the effect of a vote "against" ratifying PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
| | |
68 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation |
| RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD | | ||
| | | | |
| ![]() | | The Board recommends a voteFOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of our executive compensation, as discussed in this proxy statement. | |
| | | | |
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to approve, by advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement.
This proposal, commonly referred to as a "say-on-pay" vote, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our named executive officers and our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and program, as described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the section entitled "Executive Compensation" of this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure, by casting a non-binding advisory vote "FOR" the following resolution:
"RESOLVED, that the stockholders of TrueCar, Inc. approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion."
As an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on the Board or the compensation committee. The say-on-pay vote will, however, provide us with important feedback from our stockholders about our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and program. The Board and the compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions and when evaluating our executive compensation program.
| | |
![]() | | 69 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any additional matters are properly presented or otherwise allowed to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will have discretion to vote shares they represent in accordance with their own judgment on such matters.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to submit your proxy or voting instructions at your earliest convenience.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||
Santa Monica, California April 8, 2020 |
| | |
70 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
General Information |
Q: Why am I receiving these materials?
Q: What is included in these materials?
Q: What matters will stockholders vote on at the Annual Meeting?
Q: How does the Board recommend that I vote on these proposals?
Q: Who is making this solicitation?
| | |
![]() | | 71 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
Q: Who pays for the proxy solicitation process?
Q: Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?
Q: Why is TrueCar conducting the Annual Meeting as an exclusively virtual, online meeting?
Q: What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?
Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are the "beneficial owner" of shares held in "street name," and that organization forwarded these proxy materials to you. The organization holding your account is the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account.
Q: If I am a stockholder of record of TrueCar shares, how do I vote?
| | |
72 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 20, 2020.
Q: If I am a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, how do I vote?
Q: If I submit a proxy, how will it be voted?
Q: What should I do if I get more than one proxy or voting instruction card?
Q: Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by (1) granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy) using any of the methods described above (and until the applicable deadline for each method), (2) providing a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at TrueCar, Inc., 120 Broadway, Suite 200, Santa Monica, California 90401 before your shares are voted or (3) attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting by live webcast. Attending the Annual Meeting by live webcast will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request or vote by live webcast during the Annual Meeting.
| | |
![]() | | 73 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may generally change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or nominee following the instructions they provided.
Q: Can I attend the meeting in person?
Q: How do I participate in the Annual Meeting on the Internet?
Q: How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?
Q: What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?
For Proposal Two, the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, and Proposal Three, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to approve the proposal. Abstentions are treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of such proposals and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Q: What are broker non-votes?
| | |
74 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
Q: Who will tabulate the votes?
Q: What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year's annual meeting or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:
TrueCar, Inc.
Attn: Corporate Secretary
120 Broadway, Suite 200
Santa Monica, California 90401
Our amended and restated bylaws, which we refer to as our Bylaws, also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our Bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (1) described in our proxy materials for the meeting, (2) brought by or at the direction of our Board or (3) brought by a stockholder of record (both when the stockholder provides proper written notice of the proposal and on the record date for the annual meeting) who has timely complied with the notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws. In addition, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, it must be a proper matter for stockholder action under our Bylaws and applicable law. To be timely for our 2021 annual meeting, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:
If we hold our 2021 annual meeting more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 21, 2021 (the one-year anniversary date of the Annual Meeting), then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices:
To be in proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Corporate Secretary must set forth as to each matter of business the stockholder intends to bring before the annual meeting (1) a brief description of the business and the reasons for conducting the business at the annual meeting, (2) the name and address of the stockholder and any associated person proposing the business, (3) the class and number of shares of our common stock held of record or beneficially owned by the stockholder and any associated person,
| | |
![]() | | 75 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
(4) whether and the extent to which the stockholder and any associated persons have entered into any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions or any person has done so on their behalf with respect to any of our securities, and a description of any other similar agreement, arrangement or understanding, (5) any material interest of the stockholder and any associated person in the business and (6) a statement whether the stockholder or any associated person will deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to stockholders. In addition, to be in proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Corporate Secretary must be supplemented not later than five days after the record date to disclose the information contained in clauses (3) and (4) in this paragraph as of the record date. A stockholder's "associated person" is (A) any person controlling, directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with, the stockholder, (B) any beneficial owner of shares of our stock the stockholder owns of record or beneficially and on whose behalf the proposal or nomination, as the case may be, is being made or (C) any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with any person referred to in the preceding clauses (A) and (B).
Nomination of Director Candidates: In addition, our Bylaws permit certain stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting. To be eligible, a stockholder must be a stockholder of record as of the date notice of the annual meeting is given and as of the record date for the annual meeting.
To be in proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Company's Corporate Secretary must set forth, as to each nominee whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director: (1) the name, age, business address and residence address of the nominee, (2) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, (3) the class and number of shares of the Company the nominee holds of record or owns beneficially and any derivative positions he or she holds of record or beneficially, (4) whether and the extent to which the nominee has entered into any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions with respect to any of our securities or any person has done so on his or her behalf, and a description of any other similar agreement, arrangement or understanding, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, or to manage the risk or benefit of share price changes for, or to increase or decrease the voting power of, the nominee, (5) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons pursuant to which the nominations were made, (6) a written statement executed by the nominee acknowledging that as a director of the Company, the nominee will owe a fiduciary duty under Delaware law to the Company and its stockholders and (7) any other information relating to the nominee that would be required to be disclosed about the nominee if proxies were being solicited for the election of the nominee as a director, or that is otherwise required (including without limitation the nominee's written consent to being named in the proxy statement, if any, as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected). As to the stockholder giving notice of the director nomination, the notice must also include the information about the stockholder and any associated person described above in clauses (2) through (6) of the last paragraph under "Stockholder Proposals" above, and supplemented following the record date in the manner referred to in that paragraph. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary under our Bylaws, which, in general, require that our Corporate Secretary receive the notice within the time period described above under "Stockholder Proposals" for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in our proxy statement. The charter of the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board requires the committee to consider nominations of director candidates validly made by our stockholders in accordance with the provisions of our Bylaws.
Additionally, as described in more detail under "Executive Officers, Directors and Corporate Governance—Board Committees—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee," our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider certain nominations made by stockholders holding at least one percent of the fully diluted capitalization of TrueCar continuously for at least 12 months.
Q: I share an address with another stockholder and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?
| | |
76 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | General Information |
by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process is commonly referred to as "householding."
Brokers with account holders who are TrueCar stockholders may be householding our proxy materials. A single set of proxy materials may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or you notify your broker or TrueCar that you no longer wish to participate in householding.
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, you may (1) notify your broker, (2) direct your written request to: Investor Relations, TrueCar, Inc., 120 Broadway, Suite 200, Santa Monica, California 90401 or (3) contact our Investor Relations department by email at investors@truecar.com or by phone at (800) 200-2000, extension 8771. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker. In addition, we will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request to the address or telephone number above, a separate copy of the annual report and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered.
Q: What if I have questions about lost stock certificates or need to change my mailing address?
| | |
![]() | | 77 |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | |
Annex A — Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP Net Loss |
This Proxy Statement contains information regarding Adjusted EBITDA, which is a financial measure that is not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss adjusted to exclude interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, income (loss) from equity method investment, certain restructuring costs, certain executive departure costs, certain transaction expenses, certain litigation costs, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and income taxes.
We have provided below a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net loss or any other measure of financial performance calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our Adjusted EBITDA measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other organizations as they may not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as we do.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as an operating performance measure as it is (i) an integral part of our reporting and planning processes; (ii) used by our management and Board to assess our operational performance, and together with operational objectives, as a measure in evaluating employee compensation and bonuses; and (iii) used by our management to make financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments. We believe that using Adjusted EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons on a period-to-period basis because it excludes variations primarily caused by changes in the excluded items noted above. In addition, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors, securities analysts, rating agencies and other parties in evaluating companies as measures of financial performance and debt-service capabilities.
| | |
78 | | ![]() |
| | |
2020 ANNUALPROXY STATEMENT | | Annex A — Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP Net Loss |
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||
Reconciliation of Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (54,890 | ) | $ | (28,321 | ) | |
Non-GAAP adjustments: | |||||||
Interest income | (3,495 | ) | (3,314 | ) | |||
Interest expense | — | 2,649 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 25,591 | 22,677 | |||||
Stock-based compensation(1) | 37,974 | 37,219 | |||||
Share of net loss of equity method investment | 1,280 | — | |||||
Certain litigation costs(2) | 1,575 | 2,157 | |||||
Executive departure costs(3) | 5,089 | — | |||||
Restructuring charges(4) | 3,280 | — | |||||
Transaction costs(5) | 1,926 | 620 | |||||
Change in fair value of contingent consideration | 300 | — | |||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 289 | (177 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 18,919 | $ | 33,510 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |
![]() | | 79 |
VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRUE2020 You may attend the Meeting via the Internet and vote during the Meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. TRUECAR, INC. 120 BROADWAY SUITE 200 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E92451-P33046 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. TRUECAR, INC. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends you vote FOR the following: 1.Election of Directors Nominees: For Withhold For All AllAllExcept To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. ! ! ! 01) 02) 03) Christopher Claus Philip McKoy John Mendel The Board of Directors unanimously recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: For Against Abstain 2.To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. 3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. ! ! ! ! ! ! NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business that may properly come before the meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. E92452-P33046 TRUECAR, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 21, 2020 8:30 AM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Noel Watson and Jeffrey Swart, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of TRUECAR, INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 8:30 AM, PDT on May 21, 2020, live via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRUE2020 and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side