Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Celator Pharmaceutical Corp. (“CPC”) and Celator UK Ltd. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Significant areas requiring management estimates in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements include, amongst other things, assessment of other receivables, accrued liabilities, impairment and amortization of property and equipment, valuation allowance for deferred income taxes, valuation of stock-based compensation, warrants and contingencies. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign currency translation and transactions: The functional currency of the Company and its foreign subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. As such, monetary assets and liabilities of the Company’s operation denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing as at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates prevailing at each transaction date. Expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the year, with the exception of amortization which is translated at historical cash and cash equivalents exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses on translation are included in operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and cash equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates its fair value due to its short-term nature. The Company had $29,500,819 in short-term money market accounts as of December 31, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line depreciation method as follows: |
|
Computer equipment | | 4 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and office equipment | | 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Laboratory equipment | | 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital lease equipment and Leasehold improvements | | Lesser of useful life or term of lease | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. The Company reviews property and equipment to assess recoverability from future operations whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are recognized in operating results when expected undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets used or disposed of by sale. If impairment is indicated, the asset value is written down to its fair value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Research and development: Research and development expenses include costs directly attributable to the conduct of research and development programs, including the cost of salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, materials, supplies, maintenance of research equipment, costs related to research collaboration and licensing agreements, the cost of services provided by outside contractors, including services related to the Company’s clinical trials, clinical trial expenses, the full cost of manufacturing drug for use in research, preclinical development, and clinical trials. All costs associated with research and development are expensed as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collaborative Arrangement, Accounting Policy [Policy Text Block] | Research collaboration funding: The Company has research and development agreements where the Company receives funding when it achieves certain agreed upon milestones such as meeting clinical trial objectives or patient enrollment. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605-28-25-2, Milestone Method-Recognition milestones considered substantive and that related solely to past Company performance and do not have any remaining deliverables associated with them are recognized as revenue when earned. Income derived from these arrangements is shown gross of research and development expenses on the consolidated statement of loss. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-based compensation: Stock based compensation transactions are recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated statement of loss based on their fair values on the date of the grant, with the compensation expense recognized over the period in which a grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This estimate uses assumptions regarding a number of inputs that required the Company to make significant estimates and judgments. Because the Company is a relatively new publicly traded common stock the expected volatility assumption was based on industry peer information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Warrants: The estimated fair value of warrants is determined by using the Black-Scholes pricing model with assumptions for risk free interest rates, dividend yields, volatility factors and the contractual life of the warrants. Based on ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, the Company has determined that its outstanding warrants meet the criteria for equity classification. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Loss per share: Income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share would be calculated, if the Company had positive net earnings, to give effect to the potential dilution that if secured or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted to common stock using the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and warrants are used to repurchase common stock at the prevailing market rate. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes using ASC 740 Income Taxes. ASC 740 Income Taxes is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, ASC 740 generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of and changes in the tax law or rates. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. Valuation allowances are provided if, considering available evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. ASC 740 clarifies the criteria that must be met prior to recognition of the financial statement benefit of a position taken in a tax return. ASC 740 provides a benefit recognition model with a two-step approach consisting of “more-likely-than-not” recognition criteria, and a measurement attribute that measures a given tax position as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 also requires the recognition of liabilities created by differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements. |
|
Investment tax credits relating to scientific research and experimental development are accounted for in operations. To the extent there is reasonable assurance the credits will be realized, they are recorded in the period the related expenditure is made as a reduction of current operating expenses (tax recovery). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair value of financial instruments: The carrying values of certain Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, restricted cash, other receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of those investments. The Company believes that the current carrying amount of its long-term debt approximates fair value because interest rate on this instrument is similar to rates that the Company would be able to receive for similar instruments of comparable maturity. |
|
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. |
|
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: |
|
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, such as: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. |
|
Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements requires disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. |
|
The Company recognizes transfers between input levels as of the actual date of event. There were no transfers between levels and the following table provides the assets carried at fair value: |
|
| | Fair Value | | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) | |
31-Dec-14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund | | $ | 29,500,819 | | $ | 29,500,819 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Certificates of Deposit | | $ | 15,003,472 | | $ | 15,003,472 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Money Market Fund | | | 7,597,730 | | | 7,597,730 | | | — | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 22,601,202 | | $ | 22,601,202 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Segment reporting: The Company operates within one reportable segment and presents geographic results of its United States and Canadian operations. Intersegment transactions and balances have been eliminated in the preparation of the segmental analysis note. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | New Accounting Pronouncement: In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-10, Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation, which eliminates all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities by removing ASC Topic 915, Development Stage Entities, from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in this Update remove the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. ASC Topic 915 is removed effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the ASU effective with the issuance of its June 30, 2014 financial statements. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The ASU provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. |
|
In March 2013, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on foreign currency matters in order to clarify the guidance for the release of cumulative translation adjustments. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this amended accounting guidance did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |