Black Creek Diversified Property Fund 10-Q 2011 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

Or

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission File No. 000-52596

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	30-0309068
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
518 Seventeenth Street, 17th Floor Denver, CO	80202
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 228-2200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 5, 2011, 184,267,108 shares of common stock of Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc., par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.

Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc.

Form 10-Q

June 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		37
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		38
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		38
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		39
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		39
Item 4.	Removed and Reserved		39
Item 5.	Other Information		39
Item 6.	Exhibits		40

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share information)

	As of
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Investments in real property:
Land	$	555,236		$	539,844
Building and improvements		1,759,205			1,740,144
Intangible lease assets		582,613			578,319
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(316,020	)		(247,608	)
Total net investments in real property*		2,581,034			2,610,699
Debt related investments, net		149,781			217,492
Total net investments		2,730,815			2,828,191
Cash and cash equivalents		62,853			83,559
Restricted cash		26,998			31,019
Other assets, net		54,249			56,438
Total Assets	$	2,874,915		$	2,999,207
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	18,475		$	16,307
Distributions and redemptions payable		30,228			43,732
Mortgage notes**		1,461,200			1,465,955
Other secured borrowings		97,029			126,825
Financing obligations		40,191			49,799
Intangible lease liabilities, net		99,414			99,973
Other liabilities		37,095			39,642
Total Liabilities		1,783,632			1,842,233
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 182,925,351 and 182,716,712 shares issued and outstanding, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		1,829			1,827
Additional paid-in capital		1,646,604			1,644,249
Distributions in excess of earnings		(654,143	)		(580,981	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(18,728	)		(22,352	)
Total stockholders’ equity		975,562			1,042,743
Noncontrolling interests		115,721			114,231
Total Equity		1,091,283			1,156,974
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	2,874,915		$	2,999,207

* Includes approximately $658.3 million and $667.2 million, after accumulated depreciation and amortization, in consolidated real property variable interest entity investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

** Includes approximately $483.4 and $484.4 million in consolidated mortgage notes in variable interest entity investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share information)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
REVENUE:
Rental revenue	$	66,046		$	40,145		$	131,679		$	78,714
Debt related income		2,931			3,698			7,416			7,139
Total Revenue		68,977			43,843			139,095			85,853
EXPENSES:
Rental expense		13,936			10,089			28,366			21,120
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense		32,069			15,236			64,216			30,988
General and administrative expenses		2,051			1,726			3,808			3,090
Asset management fees, related party		5,348			4,338			10,601			7,957
Acquisition-related expenses net of other gains/losses*		59			19,080			482			19,084
Total Operating Expenses		53,463			50,469			107,473			82,239
Operating Income (Loss)		15,514			(6,626	)		31,622			3,614
Other Income (Expenses):
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture		—			396			—			941
Interest and other income		390			833			773			2,473
Interest expense		(23,152	)		(15,554	)		(46,251	)		(30,310	)
Gain on disposition of securities		—			32,272			—			32,272
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities		(3,089	)		(3,695	)		(3,089	)		(5,387	)
Provision for loss on debt related investments		—			—			(2,500	)		(2,984	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(10,337	)		7,626			(19,445	)		619
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			149			—			322
Net (loss) income		(10,337	)		7,775			(19,445	)		941
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		749			(267	)		1,421			53
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(9,588	)	$	7,508		$	(18,024	)	$	994
Net (loss) income per basic and diluted common share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.01
Discontinued operations		—			0.00			—			0.00
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON SHARE	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.01
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic		183,945			184,321			183,790			184,301
Diluted		197,591			191,997			197,325			191,644

* Includes approximately $218,000 and $14.0 million paid to our Advisor during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $14.0 million paid to our advisor during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Stockholders’ Equity
													Accumulated
							Additional Paid-in Capital			Distributions in Excess of Earnings			Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Equity
	Common Stock
	Shares			Amount
Balances, December 31, 2010		182,717		$	1,827		$	1,644,249		$	(580,981	)	$	(22,352	)	$	114,231					$	1,156,974
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—			—			—			(18,024	)		—			(1,421	)		(19,445	)		(19,445	)
Net unrealized change from available-for-sale securities		—			—			—			—			2,642			195			2,837			2,837
Cash flow hedging derivatives		—			—			—			—			982			72			1,054			1,054
Comprehensive loss																				(15,554	)		(15,554	)
Common stock:
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs		2,615			26			23,346			—			—			—						23,372
Conversion of OP Units to common stock		98			1			938			—			—			(939	)					—
Redemptions of common stock		(2,505	)		(25	)		(21,944	)		—			—			—						(21,969	)
Amortization of stock based compensation		—			—			15			—			—			—						15
Distributions on common stock		—			—			—			(55,138	)		—			—						(55,138	)
Noncontrolling interests:																							—
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			8,692						8,692
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(5,109	)					(5,109	)
Balances, June 30, 2011		182,925		$	1,829		$	1,646,604		$	(654,143	)	$	(18,728	)	$	115,721					$	1,091,283

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income	$	(19,445	)	$	941
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense		64,216			31,081
Gain on disposition of securities		—			(32,272	)
Net other-than-temporary impairment on securities		3,089			5,387
Provision for loss on debt related investments		2,500			2,984
Loss on disposition of real property		—			107
Other adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities		3,345			2,840
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in restricted cash		(918	)		(414	)
(Increase) in other assets		(305	)		(49	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		2,078			1,282
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(4,525	)		2,617
Net cash provided by operating activities		50,035			14,504
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of real property		(21,325	)		(1,338,097	)
Capital expenditures in real property		(6,825	)		(1,359	)
Proceeds from unconsolidated joint venture		—			17,000
Disposition of real estate securities		—			58,371
Investment in debt related investments		—			(13,265	)
Principal collections on debt related investments		16,309			44
Other investing activities		787			(1,947	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,054	)		(1,279,253	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Mortgage note proceeds		—			943,325
Mortgage note principal repayments		(5,328	)		(2,704	)
Proceeds from other secured borrowings		19,162			61,478
Repayment of other secured borrowings		(208	)		(13,352	)
Redemption of common shares		(35,766	)		(28,446	)
Distributions to common stockholders		(31,727	)		(28,111	)
Other financing activities		(5,820	)		(19,655	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(59,687	)		912,535
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(20,706	)		(352,214	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		83,559			514,786
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	62,853		$	162,572
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Amount issued pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan	$	23,421		$	27,153
Cash paid for interest	$	40,334		$	27,897
Issuances of OP Units for beneficial interests	$	8,699		$	47,307
Non-cash principal collection on debt related investment	$	48,750		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

(Unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION

Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed on April 11, 2005 to invest in a diverse portfolio of real property and real estate related investments. As used herein, “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships except where the context otherwise requires.

We operate in a manner intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2006, when we first elected REIT status. We utilize an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust (“UPREIT”) organizational structure to hold all or substantially all of our assets through our operating partnership, Dividend Capital Total Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”). Furthermore, our Operating Partnership wholly owns a taxable REIT subsidiary, DCTRT Leasing Corp. (the “TRS”), through which we execute certain business transactions that might otherwise have an adverse impact on our status as a REIT if such business transactions were to occur directly or indirectly through our Operating Partnership.

Our day-to-day activities are managed by Dividend Capital Total Advisors LLC (our “Advisor”), an affiliate, under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement (as amended from time to time the “Advisory Agreement”). Our Advisor and its affiliates receive various forms of compensation, reimbursements and fees for services relating to the investment and management of our real estate assets.

We are currently invested in a diverse portfolio of real properties and debt related investments. Our investment in real property consists of office, industrial, and retail properties located in North America. Additionally, we are invested in certain debt related investments, including originating and participating in mortgage loans secured by real estate, junior portions of first mortgages on commercial properties (“B-notes”), and mezzanine debt.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements (herein referred to as “financial statements,” “balance sheets,” or “statements of operations”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements. Accordingly, these statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring items necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with GAAP. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for a full year. The unaudited information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts included in the accompanying financial statements for 2010 have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 financial statements presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the periods during which such revisions are determined to be necessary.

Investment in Real Estate Securities

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we held investments in real estate securities of approximately $3.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively. Real estate securities are included in other assets, net, in the accompanying balance sheets.

7

During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded a net loss of approximately $3.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively, related to other-than-temporary impairment of our real estate securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded a net loss of approximately $3.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to other-than-temporary impairment of our real estate securities.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) recently issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02,A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“ASU 11-02”), which provides additional guidance clarifying when the restructuring of a receivable should be considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Specifically, ASU 11-02 provides additional guidance for determining whether the creditor has granted a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. This may significantly change how some creditors evaluate whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR, which may impact specific impairment-measurement methods and disclosures for receivables restructured in a TDR. ASU 11-02 generally will result in creditors identifying more TDRs and ends the deferral of activity-based disclosures about TDRs that are part of the new credit-quality disclosure requirements. We are required to adopt ASU 11-02 for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 11-02 will have on our financial statements upon adoption.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).” This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a significant impact to the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. As ASU 2011-05 concerns presentation and disclosure only, its adoption will not have an impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

8

3. INVESTMENTS IN REAL PROPERTY

Our consolidated investments in real property consist of investments in office, industrial and retail properties. The following tables summarize our consolidated investments in real property as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands).

Real Property	Land		Building and Improvements			Intangible Lease Assets			Total Investment Amount			Intangible Lease Liabilities			Net Investment Amount
As of June 30, 2011:
Office	$	266,122	$	969,531		$	434,329		$	1,669,982		$	(63,393	)	$	1,606,589
Industrial		58,820		369,537			68,861			497,218			(8,952	)		488,266
Retail		230,294		420,137			79,423			729,854			(51,337	)		678,517
Total gross book value		555,236		1,759,205			582,613			2,897,054			(123,682	)		2,773,372
Accumulated depreciation/amortization		—		(132,830	)		(183,190	)		(316,020	)		24,268			(291,752	)
Total net book value	$	555,236	$	1,626,375		$	399,423		$	2,581,034		$	(99,414	)	$	2,481,620
As of December 31, 2010:
Office	$	266,122	$	966,750		$	434,497		$	1,667,369		$	(63,393	)	$	1,603,976
Industrial		58,820		359,755			68,861			487,436			(8,952	)		478,484
Retail		214,902		413,639			74,961			703,502			(47,076	)		656,426
Total gross book value		539,844		1,740,144			578,319			2,858,307			(119,421	)		2,738,886
Accumulated depreciation/amortization		—		(108,145	)		(139,463	)		(247,608	)		19,448			(228,160	)
Total net book value	$	539,844	$	1,631,999		$	438,856		$	2,610,699		$	(99,973	)	$	2,510,726

Acquisitions

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we acquired two retail properties in the New England market aggregating approximately 147,000 square feet with a combined purchase price of approximately $21.8 million. We did not acquire any real property during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Rental Revenue

The following table summarizes the adjustments to rental revenue related to the amortization of above-market lease assets, below-market lease liabilities, and for straight-line rental adjustments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Straight-line rent adjustments	$	2,618		$	1,073		$	5,411		$	2,055
Above-market lease assets		(2,129	)		(724	)		(4,390	)		(1,462	)
Below-market lease liabilities		2,382			1,323			4,819			2,642
Total increase to rental revenue	$	2,871		$	1,672		$	5,840		$	3,235

Tenant recovery income includes payments from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and is recognized as rental revenue. Tenant recovery income recognized as rental revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $8.9 million and $17.5 million, respectively. For the same periods in 2010, tenant recovery income recognized was approximately $7.4 million and $14.6 million, respectively.

9

4. DEBT RELATED INVESTMENTS

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had invested in 10 and 11 debt investments, respectively, with net investment amounts of approximately $149.8 million and $217.5 million, respectively. The weighted average maturity of our debt investments as of June 30, 2011 was 2.9 years, based on our recorded net investment. The following table describes our debt related income, including equity in earnings of an unconsolidated joint venture, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollar amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,				Weighted Average Yield as of
Investment Type	2011		2010		2011		2010		June 30, 2011 (1)
Mortgage notes (2)	$	1,503	$	2,111	$	4,573	$	4,002		7.0	%
B-notes		895		970		1,783		1,927		6.8	%
Mezzanine debt		533		617		1,060		1,210		10.5	%
Subtotal		2,931		3,698		7,416		7,139		7.3	%
Unconsolidated joint venture		—		396		—		941		N/A
Total	$	2,931	$	4,094	$	7,416	$	8,080		7.3	%

(1) Weighted average yield is calculated on an unlevered basis using the amount invested, current interest rates and accretion of premiums or discounts realized upon the initial investment for each investment type as of June 30, 2011. Yields for LIBOR-based, floating-rate investments have been calculated using the one-month LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2011 for purposes of this table. We have assumed a yield of zero on the debt related investment for which we have recognized a full allowance for loss as of June 30, 2011.

(2) During the six months ended June 30, 2011 we received full and complete repayment of one of our mortgage note investments. This includes an early prepayment fee received of approximately $813,000, accelerated amortization of origination fees of approximately $488,000, offset by accelerated amortization of deferred due diligence costs of approximately $163,000 related to this repayment. None of our debt related investments were repaid during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Repayment of Westin-Galleria Loan

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we received full and complete repayment of a debt investment structured as a mortgage note that was collateralized by two hotel properties located in the Houston, Texas market (the “Westin Galleria Loan”). Our investment in the Westin Galleria Loan was approximately $65.0 million as of December 31, 2010. Upon repayment of this loan to us, the borrower paid us a prepayment fee of approximately $813,000, which has been included in debt related income in the statement of operations. The Westin Galleria Loan effectively secured approximately $48.8 million in other secured borrowings that we repaid upon the repayment of this debt investment. We realized net proceeds upon repayment of approximately $17.6 million, including the receipt of accrued interest payable to us. The prepayment of this debt investment caused us to accelerate net unamortized origination fee and deferred due diligence costs that were included in the carrying value of the investment of approximately $325,000, which was recorded as an increase to debt related income. None of our debt related investments were repaid during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Impairment

We review each of our debt related investments individually on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when such an evaluation is warranted, to determine if impairment exists. Accordingly, we do not group our debt related investments into classes by credit quality indicator. A debt related investment is impaired when, based on current information and events (including economic, industry and geographical factors), it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the agreement. When our investment is deemed impaired, the impairment is measured based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the investment’s effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, we may measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral of an impaired collateral-dependent investment based on an observable market price for the impaired investment. Regardless of the measurement method, we measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when it is determined that foreclosure is probable. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized approximately $2.5 million in provision losses in the accompanying statements of operations. For the same period in 2010, we recognized approximately $3.0 million in provision losses. We did not recognize any provision losses during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The table below presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, between December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, of our allowance for loan loss (amounts in thousands).

10

	Allowance for Loan Loss
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2010:	$	14,984
Provision for loss on debt related investments		2,500
Ending balance as of June 30, 2011:	$	17,484

As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had one B-note debt investment on non-accrual status, related to which we had recorded a complete allowance for loan loss. When we determine that a debt investment is impaired, we record income on the investment using the cash basis of accounting. As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the unpaid principal balance of the impaired debt investments was approximately $38.0 million. The following table describes our recorded investment in debt related investments before allowance for loan loss, and the related allowance for loan loss (amounts in thousands).

	Debt Investments Individually Evaluated for Impairment as of
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Debt investments	$	167,265		$	232,476
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(17,484	)		(14,984	)
Total	$	149,781		$	217,492

All impaired debt investments are subordinate debt investments. The following table describes our recorded investment in impaired debt related investments before allowance for loan loss, and the related allowance for loan loss (amounts in thousands).

As of June 30, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
Recorded Investment		Related Allowance			Recorded Investment		Related Allowance
$	37,944	$	(17,484	)	$	17,987	$	(14,984	)

The following table describes our average recorded investment in the impaired debt related investments and the related interest income recorded (amounts in thousands).

For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2011				2010				2011				2010
Average  Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average  Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average  Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
$	20,459	$	937	$	34,951	$	1,006	$	21,708	$	1,863	$	36,443	$	2,004

11

5. DEBT OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our borrowings as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollar amounts in thousands).

	Weighted Average  Stated Interest Rate as of						Outstanding Balance as of (1)				Gross Investment Amount Securing Borrowings as of (2)
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Fixed rate mortgages		5.8	%		5.8	%	$	1,082,702	$	1,087,377	$	2,016,218	$	2,006,437
Floating rate mortgages (3)		4.1	%		4.0	%		378,498		378,578		785,813		783,157
Total mortgage notes		5.4	%		5.3	%		1,461,200		1,465,955		2,802,031		2,789,594
Repurchase facility		3.1	%		3.5	%		70,344		99,990		95,374		144,101
Mezzanine loan (4)		5.5	%		5.5	%		26,685		26,835		N/A		N/A
Total other secured borrowings		3.7	%		4.0	%		97,029		126,825		95,374		144,101
Total		5.3	%		5.2	%	$	1,558,229	$	1,592,780	$	2,897,405	$	2,933,695

(1) Amounts presented are net of unamortized discounts to the face value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgages of $4.6 million and $5.2 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

(2) “Gross Investment Amount” as used here and throughout this document represents the allocated gross basis of real property and debt related investments, after certain adjustments. Gross Investment Amount for real property (i) includes the effect of intangible lease liabilities of approximately $123.7 million and $119.4 million, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, (ii) excludes accumulated depreciation and amortization on assets of approximately $316.0 million and $247.6 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and (iii) includes the impact of impairments of approximately $3.9 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Amounts reported for debt related investments represent our net accounting basis of the debt investments, which includes (i) unpaid principal balances, (ii) unamortized discounts, premiums, and deferred charges, and (iii) allowances for loan loss of approximately $17.5 million and $15.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

(3) As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, floating-rate mortgage notes were subject to interest rates at spreads ranging from 1.40% to 3.50% over one-month LIBOR, certain of which are subject to a 1.0% LIBOR floor.

(4) Consists of mezzanine loan financing obtained from the seller of a portfolio of 32 office and industrial properties that we purchased on June 25, 2010 (the “NOIP Portfolio”).

As of June 30, 2011, 18 mortgage notes were interest only and 25 mortgage notes were fully amortizing with outstanding balances of approximately $828.5 million and $632.7 million, respectively. We were in compliance with all financial debt covenants as of June 30, 2011.

As of June 30, 2011, certain consolidated subsidiaries were in default on three mortgage note borrowings totaling $27.7 million, all of which were collateralized by office properties with gross investment amounts totaling $38.8 million that we hold in joint ventures in which we are not the managing partner. Our ownership of these joint ventures ranges from 80.0% to 97.5% and our defaults occurred either due to us not repaying the outstanding loan balance upon the contractual maturity date of the mortgage loan or as a result of us not making monthly debt service payments as required by the respective loan agreements. We are in various stages of communication with the respective lenders in an effort to restructure the loan terms so that they would be mutually agreeable to both parties. However, there are no assurances that we will be successful in our negotiations with the lenders. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the respective loan agreements, should the respective lenders enforce their rights, we may be subject to interest rates increasing to a higher default rate and/or the lenders foreclosing on the underlying real property collateral. With the exception of customary “carve-outs” (none of which we believe apply to these loans), these loans are not recourse to us, therefore only our equity investments in such properties are at risk of loss. These defaults do not impact our remaining debt covenants.

Subsequent to June 30, 2011, one of the three assets in default was sold through foreclosure to the beneficiary (the lender) at an amount that approximated the loan balance. The carrying amount of this asset as of June 30, 2011 was approximately $1.3 million, and the related loan balance was approximately $3.3 million. We will recognize the sale and any resulting gain during the three months ending September 30, 2011.

12

6. HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate risk attributable to both our outstanding and forecasted debt obligations. We generally seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows by selectively utilizing derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. While this hedging strategy is designed to minimize the impact on our net income (loss) and cash provided by operating activities from changes in interest rates, the overall returns on our investments may be reduced. Our board of directors has established policies and procedures regarding our use of derivative instruments for hedging or other purposes to achieve these risk management objectives.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium payment. In connection with the borrowing activity noted in Note 5 to these financial statements, above, we have entered into and plan to enter into certain interest rate derivatives with the goal of mitigating our exposure to adverse fluctuations in the interest payments on our one-month LIBOR-indexed debt.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the next 12 months, we estimate that approximately $2.5 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense related to effective hedges of fixed rate debt where the hedging instrument has been terminated, and we estimate that approximately $363,000 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense related to active effective hedges of floating rate debt issuances. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. The table below presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, between December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, of our accumulated other comprehensive loss (“OCI”), net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests related to the effective portion of our cash flow hedges as presented on our financial statements (amounts in thousands).

	Accumulated  Other Comprehensive Loss
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2010:	$	(21,007	)
Amortization of interest expense		1,433
Change in fair value		(379	)
Attribution of OCI to noncontrolling interests		(72	)
Ending balance as of June 30, 2011	$	(20,025	)

13

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

The table below presents the gross fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on our accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	Asset Derivatives							Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location			As of June 30, 2011 Fair Value		As of December 31, 2010 Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location			As of June 30, 2011 Fair Value			As of December 31, 2010 Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815
Interest rate contracts		Other assets, net	(1)	$	9	$	54		Other liabilities	(1)	$	(230	)	$	(45	)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815					9		54					(230	)		(45	)
Derivativesnot designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815
Interest rate contracts		Other assets, net	(1)		6		76		Other liabilities			—			—
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815					6		76					—			—
Total derivatives				$	15	$	130				$	(230	)	$	(45	)

(1) The fair values of our derivative assets and liabilities are presented at their gross values in the accompanying financial statements.

Designated Hedges

As of June 30, 2011, we had four outstanding interest rate caps and three outstanding interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, with a total notional amount of $157.1 million. As of December 31, 2010, we had three outstanding interest rate caps and three outstanding interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, with a total notional amount of $154.0 million.

Undesignated Hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to hedge our exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in a loss of approximately $22,000 and $79,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $112,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 we had two outstanding interest rate caps that were not designated as hedges with a total notional amount of approximately $327.3 million. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, these interest rate caps were recorded as other assets on our financial statements with a fair value of approximately $6,000 and $76,000, respectively.

14

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations

The table below presents the effect of our derivative financial instruments on our accompanying financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Derivative type		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts
Amount of loss recognized in OCI (effective portion)	$	(391)	$	(115)	$	(379)	$	(115)
Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)		Interest expense		Interest expense		Interest expense		Interest expense
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)	$	(724)	$	(695)	$	(1,433)	$	(1,377)
Location of gain or (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)
Amount of loss recognized in income due to missed forecast (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Derivative type		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts		Interest rate contracts
Location of gain or (loss) recognized in income		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)		Interest and other income (loss)
Amount of loss recognized in income	$	(22)	$	(112)	$	(79)	$	(112)

7. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The table below presents certain of our significant assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy set forth by ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” within which those measurements fall (amounts in thousands).

	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
As of June 30, 2011:
Assets
Real estate securities	$	—	$	—		$	3,744	$	3,744
Derivative instruments		—		15			—		15
Total assets	$	—	$	15		$	3,744	$	3,759
Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	(230	)	$	—	$	(230	)
As of December 31, 2010:
Assets
Real estate securities	$	—	$	—		$	3,981	$	3,981
Derivative instruments		—		130			—		130
Total assets	$	—	$	130		$	3,981	$	4,111
Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	(45	)	$	—	$	(45	)

15

With regards to our assets carried at fair value, we did not have any transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three or six months ended June 30, 2011. The table below presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, between December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, of certain of our significant assets having fair value measurements (amounts in thousands).

	Real  Estate Securities			Derivative Instruments
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2010	$	3,981		$	85
Included in net loss		(3,089	)		(105	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		2,852			(235	)
Purchases		—			40
Total change in fair value		(237	)		(300	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—
Ending balance as of June 30, 2011	$	3,744		$	(215	)

Fair Value of Investments in Real Estate Securities

Our real estate securities comprise commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and commercial real estate collateralized debt obligation (“CRE-CDO”) securities. Our pricing procedures for each of the two categories are applied to each specific investment within their respective categories. We estimate the fair value of our CMBS and CRE-CDO securities using a combination of observable market information and unobservable market assumptions. Observable market information considered in these fair market valuations include benchmark interest rates, interest rate curves, credit market indexes and swap curves. Unobservable market assumptions considered in the determination of the fair market valuations of our CMBS and CRE-CDO investments include market assumptions related to discount rates, default rates, prepayment rates, reviews of trustee or investor reports and nonbinding broker quotes and pricing services in what is currently an inactive secondary market. Additionally, we consider security-specific characteristics in determining the fair values of our CMBS and CRE-CDO investments, which include consideration of credit enhancements, the underlying collateral’s average default rates, the average delinquency rate and loan-to-value and several other characteristics. As a result, both Level 2 and Level 3 inputs are used in arriving at the valuation of our investments in CMBS and CRE-CDOs. We determined the Level 3 inputs used in determining the fair value of our investments in CMBS and CRE-CDO securities to be significant. As such, all investments in CMBS and CRE-CDO securities fall under the Level 3 category of the fair value hierarchy.

8. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We are required to disclose the fair value of our financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which such financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. For certain of our financial instruments, fair values are not readily available since there are no active trading markets as characterized by current exchanges between willing parties. Accordingly, we derive our estimated fair value using various valuation techniques, such as computing the present value of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. However, the determination of estimated cash flows may be subjective and imprecise and changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In that regard, the fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets, and in many cases, may not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair values estimated below are indicative of certain interest rate and other assumptions as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and may not take into consideration the effects of subsequent interest rate or other assumption fluctuations, or changes in the values of underlying collateral. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. In addition, we determined that the fair values of our other secured borrowings approximate their carrying values as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, since the floating rates on the balances approximate market rates.

16

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our other financial instruments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (amounts in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2011				As of December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Investments in real estate securities	$	3,744	$	3,744	$	3,981	$	3,981
Fixed-rate debt related investments, net		71,442		75,298		138,975		139,634
Floating-rate debt related investments, net		78,339		73,816		78,517		72,854
Derivative instruments		15		15		130		130
Liabilities:
Fixed-rate mortgage notes	$	1,082,702	$	1,113,930	$	1,087,377	$	1,147,001
Floating-rate mortgage notes		378,498		380,914		378,578		378,578
Fixed-rate other secured borrowings		26,685		26,685		26,835		26,835
Floating-rate other secured borrowings		70,344		70,344		99,990		99,990
Derivative liabilities		230		230		45		45

See Note 7 to these financial statements above for details regarding methodologies and key assumptions applied to determining the fair value of our investments in real estate securities and derivative instruments. The methodologies used and key assumptions made to estimate fair values of the other financial instruments described in the above table are as follows:

Debt Related Investments — The fair value of our debt investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that utilized estimates of scheduled cash flows and discount rates estimated to approximate those that a willing buyer and seller might use.

Mortgage Notes — The fair value of our fixed-rate mortgage notes as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on our estimate of market interest rates. Credit spreads relating to the underlying instruments are based on unobservable Level 3 inputs, which we have determined to be our best estimate of current market spreads of similar instruments.

9. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Our noncontrolling interests consist of three components: (i) joint venture partnership interests held by our partners, (ii) non-voting units of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) held by third parties and (iii) OP Units held by the parent of our Advisor that constitute a separate series of partnership interests with special distribution rights (“Special Units”). The following table summarizes noncontrolling interest balances as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 in terms of cumulative contributions, distributions and cumulative allocations of net loss and comprehensive loss (amounts in thousands).

17

		As of December 31,			As of December 31,
	As of June 30, 2011			As of December 31, 2010
OP Units:
Contributions	$	124,386		$	116,897
Distributions		(16,710	)		(12,646	)
Share of net loss		(10,719	)		(9,390	)
Share of comprehensive loss		2,585			2,318
Subtotal		99,542			97,179
Joint Venture Partner Interests:
Contributions		35,881			35,617
Distributions		(16,721	)		(15,676	)
Share of net loss		(2,982	)		(2,890	)
Subtotal		16,178			17,051
Special Units:
Contributions		1			1
Distributions		—			—
Share of net loss		—			—
Subtotal		1			1
Total	$	115,721		$	114,231

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned approximately 93.1% and 93.4% of our Operating Partnership, respectively, and the remaining interests in our Operating Partnership were owned by third-party investors and our Advisor. After a period of one year from the date of issuance, holders of OP Units may request the Operating Partnership to redeem their OP Units. We have the option of redeeming the OP Units with cash, shares of our common stock, or with a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued approximately 98,000 shares of our common stock in redemption of approximately 99,000 OP Units in accordance with this option. We did not issue any common stock in redemption of OP units during the three months ended June 30, 2011. In May 2005, our Operating Partnership issued 20,000 OP Units to our Advisor for gross proceeds of $200,000, which represented less than a 0.1% ownership interest in our Operating Partnership as of June 30, 2011. In addition, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our Operating Partnership had issued approximately 13.6 million and 12.8 million OP Units, respectively, to third-party investors in connection with its private placement offerings, and such units had a maximum approximate redemption value of $115.3 million and $128.1 million, respectively, based on our most recently announced estimated value per share of common stock (discussed in Note 10 in more detail) as of June 30, 2011, and based on the most recent selling price of our common stock pursuant to a primary offering for the OP Units outstanding as of December 31, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our Operating Partnership issued approximately 961,000 OP Units pursuant to our Operating Partnership’s private placements. Our Operating Partnership did not issue any OP Units during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

On May 27, 2005, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Commission in connection with an initial public offering of our common stock, which was declared effective on January 27, 2006. As of the close of business on September 30, 2009, we terminated the primary portion of our public offering of shares of our common stock and ceased accepting new subscriptions to purchase shares of our common stock. However, we have offered and will continue to offer shares of common stock through the Distribution Reinvestment Plan (the “DRIP Plan”). Effective March 11, 2011, we amended the DRIP Plan to offer shares of our common stock at the estimated per share value of $8.45, which we announced on March 11, 2011 in order to assist broker dealers with certain obligations under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) regulations.

18

The following table summarizes shares sold, gross proceeds received and the commissions and fees paid in connection with our offerings as of June 30, 2011 (amounts in thousands).

		$1,136,968			$1,136,968			$1,136,968			$1,136,968
	Shares			Gross Proceeds			Commissions and Fees			Net Proceeds
Shares sold in the initial offering		114,742		$	1,136,968		$	(104,295	)	$	1,032,673
Shares sold in the follow-on offering		67,140			659,831			(55,332	)		604,499
Shares sold pursuant to our DRIP Plan in the initial offering		3,455			32,825			(309	)		32,516
Shares sold pursuant to our DRIP Plan in the follow-on offering		17,450			164,325			(495	)		163,830
Shares issued in connection with OP Unit redemption program		98			965			—			965
Shares repurchased pursuant to our share redemption program		(19,960	)		(185,644	)		(406	)		(186,050	)
Total		182,925		$	1,809,270		$	(160,837	)	$	1,648,433

Distributions

We accrue and pay distributions on a quarterly basis. Each quarter, our board of directors declares and authorizes the following quarter’s distribution. We calculate individual payments of distributions to each stockholder or OP Unit holder based upon daily record dates during each quarter, so that investors are eligible to earn distributions immediately upon purchasing shares of our common stock or upon purchasing OP Units. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we declared distributions to our common stockholders of approximately $27.6 million and $55.1 million, respectively. Of these amounts, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately $16.3 million and $32.2 million, respectively, were paid or payable in cash and approximately $11.3 million and $22.9 million, respectively, were reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP Plan. For the same periods in 2010, we declared distributions to our common stockholders of approximately $27.6 million and $55.2 million, respectively. Of these amounts, approximately $14.6 million and $28.9 million, respectively, were paid or payable in cash and approximately $13.0 million and $26.3 million, respectively, were reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Plan.

Redemptions

During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we redeemed approximately 2.5 million and 2.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, pursuant to our share redemption program for approximately $21.8 million and $26.9 million, respectively.

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our day-to-day activities are managed by our Advisor, an affiliate, under the terms and conditions of the Advisory Agreement. Our Advisor is considered to be a related party as certain indirect owners and employees of our Advisor serve as our executive officers. The responsibilities of our Advisor include the selection and underwriting of our real property and debt related investments, the negotiations for these investments, the asset management and financing of these investments and the selection of prospective joint venture partners. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owed approximately $45,000 and $77,000, respectively, to our Advisor and affiliates of our Advisor for such services and reimbursement of certain expenses.

The following table summarizes fees and other amounts earned by our Advisor in connection with services performed for us during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

		$13,953		$13,953		$13,953		$13,953
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Acquisition fees	$	—	$	13,953	$	218	$	13,953
Asset management fees		5,348		4,338		10,601		7,957
Other reimbursements		409		385		781		641
Total	$	5,757	$	18,676	$	11,600	$	22,551

19

12. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator used to calculate basic net loss per common share to the numerator and denominator used to calculate diluted net loss per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are described in the following table (amounts in thousands, except per share information).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Numerator
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(10,337	)	$	7,626		$	(19,445	)	$	619
Loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests		749			(259	)		1,421			84
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders		(9,588	)		7,367			(18,024	)		703
Dilutive noncontrolling interests share of (loss) income from continuing operations		(711	)		307			(1,329	)		54
Numerator for diluted earnings per share – adjusted (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(10,299	)	$	7,674		$	(19,353	)	$	757
Income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	149		$	—		$	322
Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			(8	)		—			(31	)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders		—			141			—			291
Dilutive noncontrolling interests share of discontinued operations		—			6			—			12
Numerator for diluted earnings per share – adjusted income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	147		$	—		$	303
Denominator
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		183,945			184,321			183,790			184,301
Incremental weighted average shares effect of conversion of OP Units		13,646			7,676			13,535			7,343
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		197,591			191,997			197,325			191,644
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC
Net (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.00
Net income from discontinued operations, net of noncontrolling interest		—			0.00			—			0.00
Net (loss) income	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.01
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-DILUTED
Net (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.00
Net income from discontinued operations, net of noncontrolling interest		—			0.00			—			0.00
Net (loss) income	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04		$	(0.10	)	$	0.01

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have two reportable operating segments: investments in real property and debt related investments. We organize and analyze the operations and results of each of these segments independently, due to inherently different considerations for each segment. Such considerations include, but are not limited to, the nature and characteristics of the investment, investment strategies and objectives and distinct management of each segment. The following table sets forth revenue and the components of net operating income (“NOI”) of our segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

20

	For the Three Months ended June 30,
	Revenues				NOI
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Real property (1)	$	66,046	$	40,145	$	52,110	$	30,056
Debt related investments (2)		2,931		4,094		2,931		4,094
Total	$	68,977	$	44,239	$	55,041	$	34,150
	For the Six Months ended June 30,
	Revenues				NOI
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Real property (1)	$	131,679	$	78,714	$	103,313	$	57,594
Debt related investments (2)		7,416		8,080		7,416		8,080
Total	$	139,095	$	86,794	$	110,729	$	65,674

(1) Does not include results of operations of real property assets categorized as discontinued operations.

(2) Includes operating results from our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

21

We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental financial performance measure because NOI reflects the specific operating performance of our real properties and debt related investments, and excludes certain items that are not considered to be controllable in connection with the management of each property, such as interest income, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, interest expense and noncontrolling interests. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance as a whole, since it does exclude such items that could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. Therefore, we believe net income, as defined by GAAP, to be the most appropriate measure to evaluate our overall financial performance.

The following table is a reconciliation of our NOI to our reported net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net operating income	$	55,041		$	34,150		$	110,729		$	65,674
Interest and other income		390			833			773			2,473
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense		(32,069	)		(15,236	)		(64,216	)		(30,988	)
General and administrative expenses		(2,051	)		(1,726	)		(3,808	)		(3,090	)
Asset management fees, related party		(5,348	)		(4,338	)		(10,601	)		(7,957	)
Acquisition-related expenses net of other gains (losses)*		(59	)		(19,080	)		(482	)		(19,084	)
Interest expense		(23,152	)		(15,554	)		(46,251	)		(30,310	)
Gain on disposition of securities		—			32,272			—			32,272
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities		(3,089	)		(3,695	)		(3,089	)		(5,387	)
Provision for loss on debt related investments		—			—			(2,500	)		(2,984	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			149			—			322
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		749			(267	)		1,421			53
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(9,588	)	$	7,508		$	(18,024	)	$	994

The following table reflects our total assets by business segment as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	As of June  30, 2011		As of December  31, 2010
Segment assets:
Net investments in real property	$	2,581,034	$	2,610,699
Debt related investments, net		149,781		217,492
Total segment assets, net		2,730,815		2,828,191
Non-segment assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		62,853		83,559
Other non-segment assets (1)		81,247		87,457
Total assets	$	2,874,915	$	2,999,207

(1) Other non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets including restricted cash, investments in real estate securities, and certain loan costs, including loan costs associated with our financing obligations.

22

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

On July 14, 2010, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia against iStar NG, LP, TRT Acquisitions, LLC, TRT NOIP Colshire—McLean LLC, and Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. (together, the “Dividend Capital Defendants”) and iStar Financial Inc. (“iStar Financial” and, together with Dividend Capital Defendants, the “Defendants”). Northrop’s Complaint pertains to a real estate project containing two commercial office buildings and a parking garage located at 7555-7575 Colshire Drive in McLean, Virginia (the “Project”). TRT NOIP Colshire—McLean LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc., acquired iStar NG LP as part of the acquisition of the National Office and Industrial Portfolio from several subsidiaries of iStar Financial on June 25, 2010. Northrop, a holder of a leasehold interest in the Project, alleges that iStar Financial and the Dividend Capital Defendants knowingly completed the sale of the Project (rather than a sale of the owner of the Project, iStar NG LP). Northrop’s Complaint claims that the alleged sale of the Project violated Northrop’s right of first offer (“ROFO”) contained in the relevant deed of lease. Northrop’s Complaint seeks specific performance of the ROFO, other injunctive relief, compensatory damages in the amount of $250 million, $350,000 in punitive damages, treble damages under the Virginia Business Conspiracy Statute, costs, and attorneys’ fees.

On August 10, 2010, Defendants filed demurrers with the Fairfax County Circuit Court seeking dismissal of Northrop’s Complaint as a matter of law. On January 7, 2011, the court sustained the Dividend Capital Defendants’ demurrers and dismissed Northrop’s claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, violation of the Virginia Business Conspiracy Act and conversion, without prejudice. On January 28, 2011, Northrop filed an amended complaint, reasserting the dismissed counts. On February 18, 2011, the Defendants filed renewed demurrers and a plea in bar seeking dismissal of the claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, violation of the Virginia Business Conspiracy Act and conversion. On May 13, 2011, the court sustained the Defendants’ demurrers on the conversion and unjust enrichment claims. In addition to defending Northrop’s amended complaint generally and asserting counterclaims, the Dividend Capital Defendants have obtained indemnities from iStar Financial and insurance coverage that are subject to certain terms, conditions, and limitations.

On September 15, 2010, the Dividend Capital Defendants asserted counterclaims against Northrop based in part on Northrop’s intentional interference with the sale of the Project, its interference with contracts and prospective contracts, and its breach of the contract between iStar NG and Northrop. The Dividend Capital Defendants seek specific performance, damages in excess of $21.0 million, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Northrop filed demurrers seeking dismissal of the Dividend Capital Defendants’ counterclaims, which the court overruled on May 13, 2011.

On June 28, 2011, Northrop filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking judgment on its claim that its ROFO rights had been triggered. Briefing on the motion is ongoing, and a hearing on the motion was held on August 5, 2011, and the motion was denied. In addition to opposing Northrop’s motion, the Dividend Capital Defendants also plan to file their own motion for partial summary judgment on Northrop’s claim for specific performance.

Discovery between the parties is ongoing, and, under the current scheduling order, set to be completed by August 15, 2011. A bench trial has been set to commence on September 12, 2011.

Due to uncertainty regarding the outcome of these proceedings, we cannot estimate the effect that any reasonably possible settlement would have on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

We have evaluated subsequent events for the period from June 30, 2011, the date of these financial statements, through the date these financial statements are issued, and determined that there have been no significant subsequent events.

23

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Such forward-looking statements relate to, without limitation, our future capital expenditures, distributions and acquisitions (including the amount and nature thereof), other development trends of the real estate industry, business strategies, and the growth of our operations. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “project,” “continue,” or the negative of these words, or other similar words or terms. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Among the factors that may cause our results to vary are general economic and business (particularly real estate and capital market) conditions being less favorable than expected, the business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by us, changes in laws or regulations (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs), risk of acquisitions, availability and creditworthiness of prospective tenants, availability of capital (debt and equity), interest rate fluctuations, competition, supply and demand for properties in our current and any proposed market areas, tenants’ ability to pay rent at current or increased levels, accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to REITs, environmental, regulatory and/or safety requirements, tenant bankruptcies and defaults, the availability and cost of comprehensive insurance, including coverage for terrorist acts, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For a further discussion of these factors and other risk factors that could lead to actual results materially different from those described in the forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

This section of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q provides an overview of what management believes to be the key elements for understanding (i) our company and how we manage our business, (ii) how we measure our performance and our operating results, (iii) our liquidity and capital resources, and (iv) the financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed on April 11, 2005 to invest in a diverse portfolio of real property and real estate related investments.

We believe we have operated in such a manner to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2006, when we first elected REIT status. We utilize an UPREIT organizational structure to hold all or substantially all of our assets through our Operating Partnership. Furthermore, our Operating Partnership wholly owns a taxable REIT subsidiary, DCTRT Leasing Corp., through which we execute certain business transactions that might otherwise have an adverse impact on our status as a REIT if such business transactions were to occur directly or indirectly through our Operating Partnership. We are an externally managed REIT and have no employees. Our day-to-day activities are managed by our Advisor, an affiliate, under the terms and conditions of the Advisory Agreement.

The primary source of our revenue and earnings is comprised of rent received under long-term operating leases of our properties, including reimbursements from customers for certain operating costs, and interest payments received from our debt related investments. Our primary expenses include rental expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, general and administrative expenses, asset management fees and interest expense.

The cornerstone of our investment strategy is to provide investors seeking a general real estate allocation with a broadly diversified portfolio of assets. Our current investments include:

(1) direct investments in real properties, consisting of office, industrial, and retail properties, located in North America; and

(2) certain debt related investments, including originating and participating in whole mortgage loans secured by commercial real estate, B-notes and mezzanine debt.

24

As of June 30, 2011, we had total gross investments of approximately $3.0 billion (before accumulated depreciation of approximately $316.0 million), comprised of:

(1) 101 operating properties located in 31 geographic markets in the United States, aggregating approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet. As of June 30, 2011, our real property portfolio was approximately 94.4% leased. Our operating real property portfolio includes an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $2.9 billion and consists of:

• 37 office properties located in 16 geographic markets, aggregating approximately 7.1 million net rentable square feet, with an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $1.7 billion;

• 33 retail properties located in seven geographic markets, aggregating approximately 3.1 million net rentable square feet, with an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $729.9 million; and

• 31 industrial properties located in 17 geographic markets, aggregating approximately 9.0 million net rentable square feet, with an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $497.2 million.

(2) Approximately $149.8 million in net debt related investments, including (i) investments in mortgage notes of approximately $95.4 million, (ii) investments in B-notes of approximately $36.9 million, and (iii) investments in mezzanine debt of approximately $17.5 million.

Consistent with our investment strategy, we have two business segments: (i) investments in real property and (ii) debt related investments. For a discussion of our business segments and the associated revenue and net operating income by segment, see Note 13 to our financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Any future and near-term investment activity is expected to be funded primarily through the use of cash on hand, cash generated from operations, proceeds from the DRIP Plan, proceeds from other public offerings of equity securities, proceeds from the sale of existing investments, and the issuance and assumption of debt obligations.

• Cash on hand — As of June 30, 2011, we had approximately $62.9 million of cash and cash equivalents.

• Cash generated from operations — During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we generated approximately $50.0 million from operations of our real properties and income from debt related investments.

• Proceeds from the DRIP Plan — During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we received approximately $23.4 million in proceeds from the DRIP Plan.

• Proceeds from other public offerings of equity securities — During the year ended December 31, 2010 and during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we did not conduct a public offering of equity securities outside of the DRIP Plan. We have recently filed a registration statement to offer equity securities outside of the DRIP Plan, perhaps as early as the first quarter of 2012. However, such offering is subject to regulatory and other conditions and may not occur.

• Proceeds from sales of existing investments —We did not sell any properties during the six months ended June 30, 2011. However, one of our debt related investments matured, upon which we received net proceeds of approximately $17.6 million. Subsequent to June 30, 2011, the borrower on one of our debt related investments fully repaid the outstanding balance and unpaid interest on the loan, as well as an amount related to a profit participation agreement related to the sale of the property securing the investment. After our repayment of borrowings secured by this investment, we realized net proceeds of approximately $7.3 million on this repayment.

• The issuance and assumption of debt obligations —During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred approximately $19.2 million in additional borrowings under our repurchase facility, of which we subsequently repaid approximately $12.4 million after June 30, 2011, upon the repayment of the investment securing the borrowing.

We believe that our existing cash balance, cash generated from operations, proceeds from our DRIP Plan and our ability to sell investments and to issue debt obligations, remains adequate to meet our expected capital obligations for the next twelve months. Maintaining a strong balance sheet remains critical in the current market to position us well to preserve the value of our portfolio and to selectively take advantage of investment opportunities. Historically, we have been prudent in the deployment of our capital, resulting in a slower pace of investments.

Significant Transactions During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Real Property Acquisitions

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we acquired two retail properties in the New England market aggregating 147,000 square feet with a combined purchase price of $21.8 million.

25

Westin Loan Repayment

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we received full and complete repayment of a debt investment structured as a mortgage note that was collateralized by two hotel properties located in the Houston, Texas market (the “Westin Galleria Loan”). Our investment in the Westin Galleria Loan was approximately $65.0 million as of December 31, 2010. Upon repayment of this loan to us, the borrower paid us a prepayment fee of approximately $813,000, which has been included in debt related income in the statement of operations. The Westin Galleria Loan effectively secured approximately $48.8 million in other secured borrowings that we repaid upon the repayment of this debt investment. We realized net proceeds upon repayment of approximately $17.6 million, including the receipt of accrued interest payable to us.

How We Measure Our Performance

Funds From Operations

NAREIT-defined FFO (“FFO”)

We believe that FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization expense. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that consists of net income (loss), calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes (amounts in thousands, except per share information).

	For the Three Months Ended, June 30,						For the Six Months Ended, June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Reconciliation of net earnings to FFO:
Net income (loss)	$	(10,337	)	$	7,775		$	(19,445	)	$	941
Add (deduct) NAREIT-defined adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization expense		32,069			15,236			64,216			30,988
Depreciation attributable to discontinued operations		—			47			—			93
Loss on disposition of real property		—			137			—			137
Noncontrolling interests’ share of FFO		(2,038	)		(1,528	)		(4,146	)		(2,430	)
FFO attributable to common shares-basic		19,694			21,667			40,625			29,729
FFO attributable to dilutive OP Units		1,461			902			2,993			1,209
FFO attributable to common shares-diluted	$	21,155		$	22,569		$	43,618		$	30,938
FFO per share-basic and diluted	$	0.11		$	0.12		$	0.22		$	0.16
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
Basic		183,945			184,321			183,790			184,301
Diluted		197,591			191,997			197,325			191,644

Company-Defined FFO

As part of its guidance concerning FFO, NAREIT has stated that the “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” As a result, modifications to FFO are common among REITs as companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect the specific characteristics of their businesses. We believe that investors and other stakeholders who review our operating results are best served by providing them with the same performance metrics used by management to gauge operating performance. Therefore, we provide a Company-Defined FFO measure in addition to the NAREIT definition of FFO and other GAAP measures.However, no single measure can provide users of financial information with sufficient information and only our disclosures read as a whole can be relied upon to adequately portray our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.

Certain GAAP measures, as well as FFO, include items that may affect comparability from period to period. Our primary objective for Company-Defined FFO is to provide investors with a supplemental earnings metric that indicates the performance of our operations before certain non-cash charges, non-operating or other items that management believes affects the comparability of our operating results from period to period. Our Company-Defined FFO is derived by adjusting FFO for the following items: gains or loss associated with provisions for loss on debt related investments, acquisition related expenses, and gains and losses on derivatives.

26

Gains and loss associated with provision for loss on debt related investments — Currently, our investment strategy does not include purchasing and selling debt related investments for the purpose of generating short-term gains. Rather, our investment strategy is to hold our investments for the long term for the purpose of earning current income. As a result, management believes that any gains or losses generated from the sale or impairment of such debt related investments are non-routine and intermittent and result in a disproportionate impact to our earnings in the period in which such gains or losses are recorded compared to prior or future periods.

Gains and losses on real estate securities - Currently, our investment strategy does not include purchasing and selling real estate securities for the purpose of generating short-term gains. Rather, we are focused on longer-term investments for the purposes of realizing current income from such investments. As such, management believes any gains or losses generated from the sale or impairment of our investments in real estate securities are non-routine and intermittent and may result in a significant impact to our earnings in the period in which such gains or losses are recorded compared to prior or future periods. Period-to-period fluctuations in gains and losses on real estate securities, including other-than-temporary impairments, can be caused by the accounting treatment for factors affecting our investments in real estate securities that may not translate into our longer-term investment strategy and therefore may not be indicative of the long-term performance of such investments. Such gains and losses, including other-than-temporary impairments, have a disproportionate impact to our earnings in the period when such gains and losses are realized through our earnings, affecting comparability from period to period.

Acquisition related expenses — For GAAP purposes, expenses associated with the acquisition of real property, including acquisition fees paid to our Advisor and gains or losses related to the change in fair value of contingent consideration related to the acquisition of real property are recorded to earnings. Management does not include acquisition-related expenses in its evaluation of operating performance because our level of acquisition activity varies from period to period and such expenses do not recur subsequent to acquisition. As a result, our operating performance may not be comparable period to period without adjusting for such acquisition-related expenses.

Gains and losses on derivatives — Gains and losses on derivatives represent the gains or losses on the fair value of derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges of the underlying financing transactions. Such gains and losses may be due to the nonoccurrence of forecasted financings or ineffectiveness due to changes in the expected terms of financing transactions. These types of charges are not unusual or infrequent but management believes that any gains or losses on derivatives are not reflective of our operating performance and can have an inconsistent impact to our operating results derived from our core business operations (amounts in thousands, except per share information).

	For the Three Months Ended, June 30,						For the Six Months Ended, June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Reconciliation of FFO to Company-Defined FFO:
FFO attributable to common shares-basic	$	19,694		$	21,667		$	40,625		$	29,729
Add (deduct) our adjustments:
Provision for loss on debt related investments		—			—			2,500			2,984
Gain on disposition of securities		—			(32,272	)		—			(32,272	)
Other-than-temporary impairment and related amortization on securities		3,089			4,249			3,215			7,185
Acquisition-related expenses (gains)		59			19,080			482			19,084
(Gain) loss on derivatives		22			112			79			112
Noncontrolling interests’ share of NAREIT-defined FFO		2,038			1,528			4,146			2,430
Noncontrolling interests’ share of Company-Defined FFO		(2,257	)		(1,175	)		(4,579	)		(2,294	)
Company-Defined FFO attributable to common shares-basic		22,645			13,189			46,468			26,958
Company-Defined FFO attributable to dilutive OP Units		1,680			549			3,424			1,073
Company-Defined FFO attributable to common shares-diluted	$	24,325		$	13,738		$	49,892		$	28,031
Company-Defined FFO per share-basic and diluted	$	0.12		$	0.07		$	0.25		$	0.15
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
Basic		183,945			184,321			183,790			184,301
Diluted		197,591			191,997			197,325			191,644

Limitations of FFO and Company-Defined FFO

FFO (as discussed above, “FFO” includes NAREIT-defined FFO and Company-Defined FFO) is presented herein as a supplemental financial measure and has inherent limitations. We do not use FFO as, nor should it be considered to be, an alternative to net income (loss) computed under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance, or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP, or as an indicator of our ability to fund our short or long-term cash requirements. Management uses FFO as an indication of our operating performance and as a guide to making decisions about future investments. Our FFO calculations do not present, nor do we intend them to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and operating performance. In addition, other REITs may define FFO differently and choose to treat impairment charges, acquisition related expenses and potentially other accounting line items in a manner different from us due to specific differences in investment strategy or for other reasons. Our

27

Company-Defined FFO calculation is limited by its exclusion of certain items previously discussed, but we continuously evaluate our investment portfolio and the usefulness of our Company-Defined FFO measure in relation thereto. We believe that net income (loss) computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net income (loss) computed under GAAP. Further, we believe that our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition and operating performance.

Net Operating Income (“NOI”)

We also use NOI as a supplemental financial performance measure because NOI reflects the specific operating performance of our real properties and debt related investments and excludes certain items that are not considered to be controllable in connection with the management of each property, such as gains on the disposition of securities, other-than-temporary impairment, gains and losses related to provisions for losses on debt related investments, gains or losses on derivatives, acquisition related expenses, losses on financing commitments, interest income, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, interest expense and noncontrolling interests. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance as a whole, since it does exclude such items that could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. Therefore, we believe net income, as defined by GAAP, to be the most appropriate measure to evaluate our overall financial performance.

Public Conference Call

We will be hosting a public conference call on Tuesday, August 23, 2011, to review our quarterly financial and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Guy Arnold, our President, and Kirk Scott, our Chief Financial Officer, will present performance data and provide management commentary. The conference call will take place at 4:15 p.m. EDT and can be accessed by dialing 888.481.7939 and referencing “Dividend Capital Passcode 97239366.”

28

Our Operating Results

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

The following unaudited table illustrates the changes in rental revenues, rental expenses and net operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our same store portfolio includes all operating properties that we owned for the entirety of both the current and prior year reporting periods. The same store portfolio includes 75 properties acquired prior to January 1, 2010 and owned through June 30, 2011, comprising approximately 12.9 million square feet. A discussion of these changes follows the table (dollar amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
Revenues
Base rental revenue-same store (1)	$	28,404	$	29,321	$	(917	)		-3	%
Other rental revenue- same store		8,755		9,120		(365	)		-4	%
Total rental revenue-same store		37,159		38,441		(1,282	)		-3	%
Rental revenue-2010/2011 acquisitions		28,887		1,704		27,183			100	%
Total rental revenue		66,046		40,145		25,901			65	%
Debt related income (2)		2,931		4,094		(1,163	)		-28	%
Total revenues		68,977		44,239		24,738			56	%
Rental Expenses
Same store		10,506		9,946		560			6	%
2010 acquisitions		3,430		143		3,287			100	%
Total rental expenses		13,936		10,089		3,847			38	%
Net Operating Income (3)
Real property - same store		26,653		28,495		(1,842	)		-6	%
Real property - 2010/2011 acquisitions		25,457		1,561		23,896			100	%
Debt related income		2,931		4,094		(1,163	)		-28	%
Total net operating income	$	55,041	$	34,150	$	20,891			61	%

(1) Base rental revenue represents contractual base rental revenue earned by us from our tenants and does not include the impact of certain GAAP adjustments to rental revenue, such as straight-line rent adjustments, amortization of above-market intangible lease assets or the amortization of below-market lease intangible liabilities. Such GAAP adjustments and other rental revenue such as expense recovery revenue are included in the line item, referred to as “other rental revenue.”

(2) Includes equity-in-earnings from an unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $396,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

(3) For a discussion as to why we view net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure, refer to “—How We Measure Our Performance—Net Operating Income” above. See also Note 13 to our financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Rental Revenue

The increase in rental revenue is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to March 31, 2010. Our operating portfolio was approximately 94.4% leased as of June 30, 2011.

Same store base rental revenues decreased slightly for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in our annualized base rent per square foot within the same store portfolio. As of June 30, 2011 our same store portfolio was approximately 91.6% leased.

Same store other rental revenue decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was attributable to lower tenant recovery income, which was the result of lower leased square footage.

29

Debt Related Income

Debt related income decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to the repayment of an approximately $65.0 million debt investment subsequent to January 1, 2011.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to March 31, 2010.

Same store rental expenses increased slightly for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was due to increases in certain non-recoverable expenses such as legal and taxes, offset by decreases in certain recoverable expenses such as maintenance and snow removal, year over year.

Other Operating Expenses

Depreciation and Amortization Expense:Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $16.8 million, or 110%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to March 31, 2010.

General and Administrative Expenses:General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $325,000, or 19%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in accounting and legal fees and other general overhead expenses, primarily related to the growth of the portfolio.

Asset Management Fees, Related Party:Asset management fees paid to our Advisor increased by approximately $1.0 million, or 23%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase resulted from our investment activity subsequent to March 31, 2010, including our acquisition of a portfolio of 32 office and industrial properties (the “NOIP Portfolio”) in June 2010.

Acquisition Related Expenses, Net of Other Losses (Gains):Acquisition related expenses, net of other losses (gains), including fees paid to our Advisor, decreased to approximately $59,000, from approximately $19.1 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, nearly entirely due to the acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio on June 25, 2010.

30

Other Income (Expenses)

Interest and Other Income:Interest and other income decreased by approximately $443,000, or 53%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease is primarily attributable to the sale of a portion of our preferred equity securities portfolio and continued deterioration in the performance of our CMBS and CRE-CDO securities portfolio, our significantly reduced average cash balance during the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to the acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio on June 25, 2010, and lower average yields on our floating-rate interest-bearing bank accounts and money market mutual fund investments.

Interest Expense:Interest expense increased by approximately $7.6 million, or 49%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase resulted primarily from additional mortgage note and other financings we assumed or incurred subsequent to March 31, 2010, partially offset by the effects of repayments of certain of these obligations. Our total borrowings, including financing obligations, increased by 70% to approximately $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2011 from approximately $941.1 million as of March 31, 2010, principally due to financing incurred in connection with our investment activities. The following table further describes our interest expense by debt obligation, including amortization of loan cost, amortization related to our derivatives, and amortization of discounts and premiums, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
Debt Obligation	2011		2010
Mortgage notes	$	21,620	$	13,682
Other secured borrowings		976		200
Financing obligations		556		1,672
Total Interest Expense	$	23,152	$	15,554

Other-than-Temporary Impairment on Securities and Gain on Disposition of Securities:During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we recorded net other-than-temporary impairment charges of approximately $3.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively, related to our CMBS and CRE-CDO securities. Additionally, we recognized a gain on the sale of a portion of our preferred equity securities portfolio during the three months ended June 30, 2010, of approximately $32.3 million. We did not recognize any gain on the sale of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

31

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

The following unaudited table illustrates the changes in rental revenues, rental expenses and net operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our same store portfolio includes all operating properties that we owned for the entirety of both the current and prior year reporting periods. The same store portfolio includes 75 properties acquired prior to January 1, 2010 and owned through June 30, 2011, comprising approximately 12.9 million square feet. A discussion of these changes follows the table (dollar amounts in thousands).

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
Revenues
Base rental revenue-same store (1)	$	56,974	$	58,924	$	(1,950	)		-3	%
Other rental revenue-same store		17,565		18,086		(521	)		-3	%
Total rental revenue-same store		74,539		77,010		(2,471	)		-3	%
Rental revenue-2010/2011 acquisitions		57,140		1,704		55,436			100	%
Total rental revenue		131,679		78,714		52,965			67	%
Debt related income (2)		7,416		8,080		(664	)		-8	%
Total revenues		139,095		86,794		52,301			60	%
Rental Expenses
Same store		21,584		21,067		517			2	%
2010/2011 acquisitions		6,782		53		6,729			100	%
Total rental expenses		28,366		21,120		7,246			34	%
Net Operating Income (3)
Real property - same store		52,955		55,943		(2,988	)		-5	%
Real property - 2010/2011 acquisitions		50,358		1,651		48,707			100	%
Debt related income		7,416		8,080		(664	)		-8	%
Total net operating income	$	110,729	$	65,674	$	45,055			69	%

(1) Base rental revenue represents contractual base rental revenue earned by us from our tenants and does not include the impact of certain GAAP adjustments to rental revenue, such as straight-line rent adjustments, amortization of above-market intangible lease assets or the amortization of below-market lease intangible liabilities. Such GAAP adjustments and other rental revenue such as expense recovery revenue are included in the line item, referred to as “other rental revenue.”

(2) Includes equity-in-earnings from an unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $941,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

(3) For a discussion as to why we view net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure, refer to “—How We Measure Our Performance—Net Operating Income” above. See also Note 13 to our financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Rental Revenue

The increase in rental revenue is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to December 31, 2009. Our operating portfolio was approximately 94.4% leased as of June 30, 2011.

Same store base rental revenues decreased slightly for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in our annualized base rent per square foot within the same store portfolio. As of June 30, 2011 our same store portfolio was approximately 91.6% leased.

Same store other rental revenue decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was attributable to lower tenant recovery income, which was the result of lower leased square footage.

32

Debt Related Income

Debt related income decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to (i) the repayment of a debt related investment, structured as a redeemable preferred equity security and recorded as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $17.4 million, (ii) our foreclosure on and subsequent sale of a property that we had previously held as a debt related investment of approximately $17.3 million, and (iii) the full and complete repayment of an approximately $65.0 million investment, that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2009, offset by our incremental investment of $90.2 million in debt related investments subsequent to December 31, 2009.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses increased for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to December 31, 2009.

Same store rental expenses increased very slightly for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is due primarily to severe winter weather in the New England and Chicago markets in the current year causing an increase in snow removal costs over the same period in 2010, offset by generally lower expenses due primarily to lower leased square footage rates, cost reduction measures, a larger property portfolio (which reduces insurance premiums for each property) and lower property tax expense (which resulted from lower assessed valuations applied by local taxing authorities in determining our property tax liabilities).

Other Operating Expenses

Depreciation and Amortization Expense:Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $33.2 million, or 107%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition and continued ownership of 26 additional operating real properties subsequent to December 31, 2009.

General and Administrative Expenses:General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $718,000, or 23%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in accounting and legal fees and other general overhead expenses, primarily related to the growth of the portfolio.

Asset Management Fees, Related Party:Asset management fees paid to our Advisor increased by approximately $2.6 million, or 33%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase resulted from our investment activity subsequent to December 31, 2009, including our acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio, offset by the disposition of our preferred equity securities portfolio and the repayment of certain of our debt related investments.

Acquisition Related Expenses:Acquisition related expenses, including fees paid to our Advisor, decreased by approximately $18.6 million, from approximately $19.1, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio on June 25, 2010.

33

Other Income (Expenses)

Interest and Other Income:Interest and other income decreased by approximately $1.7 million, or 69%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease is primarily attributable to the sale of a portion of our preferred equity securities portfolio and continued deterioration in the performance of our CMBS and CRE-CDO securities portfolio, our significantly reduced average cash balance during the year due to the acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio, and lower average yields on our floating-rate interest-bearing bank accounts and money market mutual fund investments.

Interest Expense:Interest expense increased by approximately $15.9 million, or 53%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. This increase resulted primarily from additional mortgage note and other financings we assumed or incurred subsequent to December 31, 2009, partially offset by the effects of repayments of certain of these obligations. Our total borrowings, including financing obligations, increased by 68% to approximately $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2011 from approximately $950.1 million as of December 31, 2009, principally due to financing incurred in connection with our investment activities. The following table further describes our interest expense by debt obligation, including amortization of loan cost, amortization related to our derivatives, and amortization of discounts and premiums, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Debt Obligation	2011		2010
Mortgage notes	$	43,016	$	26,624
Other secured borrowings		1,983		232
Financing obligations		1,252		3,454
Total Interest Expense	$	46,251	$	30,310

Other-than-Temporary Impairment on Securities and Gain on Disposition of Securities:During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we recorded net other-than-temporary impairment charges of approximately $3.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to our CMBS and CRE-CDO securities. Additionally, we recognized a gain on the sale of a portion of our preferred equity securities portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2010, of approximately $32.3 million. We did not recognize any gain on the sale of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Provision for Loss on Debt Related Investments:During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized provisions for loan loss of approximately $2.5 million and 3.0 million, respectively, related to two of our debt related investments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Outlook

We believe our existing cash balance, cash from operations, additional proceeds from the DRIP Plan, proceeds from the sale of existing investments and prospective debt or equity issuances will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital needs for the foreseeable future, including the next 12 months. Our capital requirements over the next 12 months are anticipated to include, but are not limited to, operating expenses, distribution payments, debt service payments, including debt maturities with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $74.2 million before June 30, 2012, redemption payments, acquisitions of real property and debt related investments. Further, our capital requirements during 2012 are expected to include additional debt maturities with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $311 million, all of which have extension options beyond December 31, 2012. We currently believe that we will qualify for and expect to exercise our extension options. However, we cannot guarantee that we will meet the requirements to extend the notes upon initial maturity. In the event that we do not qualify to extend the notes, we expect to repay them with proceeds from new borrowings. The following discussion summarizes the sources and uses of our cash during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $50.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $14.5 million for the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily due acquisition costs paid related to the acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2010, and increased income due to additional real property and debt investments made subsequent to December 31, 2009.

34

Lease Expirations

Our primary source of funding for our property-level operating expenses and debt service payments is rent collected pursuant to our tenant leases. Our properties are generally leased to tenants for terms ranging from three to ten years. As of June 30, 2011, the weighted average remaining term of our leases was approximately 8.3 years, based on contractual remaining base rent, and 5.5 years, based on square footage. The following is a schedule of expiring leases for our consolidated operating properties by annualized base rent and square footage as of June 30, 2011 and assuming no exercise of lease renewal options (dollar amounts and square footage in thousands).

Year	Lease Expirations
	Number of Leases Expiring		Annualized Base Rent (1)		%			Square Feet		%
2011		49	$	5,727		2.7	%		908		5.0	%
2012		90		16,046		7.5	%		1,552		8.6	%
2013		71		16,452		7.7	%		1,512		8.4	%
2014		82		19,811		9.3	%		2,518		13.9	%
2015		82		16,857		7.9	%		1,610		8.9	%
2016		46		26,830		12.6	%		1,999		11.1	%
2017		20		47,977		22.6	%		2,862		15.8	%
2018		20		5,691		2.7	%		1,239		6.8	%
2019		21		13,196		6.2	%		654		3.6	%
2020		21		6,954		3.3	%		375		2.1	%
Thereafter		29		37,124		17.5	%		2,860		15.8	%
Total		531	$	212,665		100.0	%		18,089		100.0	%

(1) Annualized base rent represents the annualized monthly base rent of leases in place as of June 30, 2011, based on their respective non-cancellable terms.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $11.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to approximately $1.3 billion for the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to our acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our acquisition activity during the same period in 2011 was significantly less.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $59.7 million and primarily comprised the redemption of common shares, distributions to common stockholders and noncontrolling interest holders, and scheduled repayment of our mortgage notes and other secured borrowings, partially offset by proceeds from the other secured borrowings. Net cash provided by financing activities during the same period in 2010 was approximately $912.5 million primarily comprising proceeds received from mortgage borrowings and other secured borrowings, including mortgage note borrowings issued in connection with our acquisition of the NOIP Portfolio, partially offset by amounts related to distributions to common stockholders and the redemption of common shares.

35

Debt Maturities

The following table reflects our contractual debt maturities as of June 30, 2011, specifically our obligations under mortgage note agreements and other secured borrowings (dollar amounts in thousands).

		Balance (2) (3) (4)		Balance (2) (3) (4)
	As of June 30, 2011
Year Ending December 31,	Number of Borrowings Maturing (2)		Outstanding Balance (3) (4) (5)
2011(1)		2	$	12,388
2012		4		391,468
2013		3		104,390
2014		2		92,092
2015		7		164,770
2016		14		310,349
2017		8		308,371
2018		0		4,999
2019		0		5,292
2020		1		157,944
Thereafter		3		10,772
Total		44	$	1,562,835

(1) Represents amounts due for the remainder of 2011.

(2) Borrowings presented include other secured borrowings of approximately $70.3 million related to our master repurchase facility account, which matures in June 2013 and is subject to two one-year extensions and mezzanine borrowings of approximately $26.7 million, which mature in June, 2015.

(3) Eight of our mortgage notes with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of June 30, 2011 of approximately $406.2 million have initial maturities before January 1, 2014. Three of these notes with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of June 30, 2011 of approximately $322.4 million have extension options beyond December 31, 2013. These extension options are subject to certain lender covenants and restrictions that we must meet to extend the respective maturity dates. We currently believe that we will qualify for and expect to exercise our extension options. However, we cannot guarantee that we will meet the requirements to extend the notes upon initial maturity. In the event that we do not qualify to extend the notes, we expect to repay them with proceeds from new borrowings.

(4) Outstanding balance represents expected cash outflows for contractual amortization and scheduled balloon payment maturities, and does not include our mark-to-market adjustment on assumed debt of approximately $4.6 million as of June 30, 2011.

(5) As of June 30, 2011, our mortgage notes and secured borrowings are secured by real properties and debt investments totaling approximately $2.9 billion.

Distributions

To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. The payment of distributions is determined by our board of directors and may be adjusted at its discretion at any time. Distribution levels are set by our board of directors at a level it believes to be appropriate and sustainable based upon a review of a variety of factors including, but not limited to, REIT requirements, the evaluation of existing assets within our portfolio, anticipated acquisitions, projected levels of additional capital to be raised, debt to be incurred in the future and the anticipated results of operations.

Distributions declared payable to common stockholders totaled approximately $55.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to approximately $55.2 million for the same period in 2010. Such distributions were paid following the respective quarters for which they were declared and approximately $32.2 million and $28.9 million, respectively, were paid in cash and approximately $22.9 million and $26.3 million, respectively, were reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP Plan.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we reported $50.0 million and $14.5 million, respectively, of cash provided by our operating activities. In accordance with ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations” (“ASC Topic 805”),which became effective for the year ended December 31, 2009, these amounts were reduced by approximately $482,000 and $19.1 million, respectively, of acquisition related expenses, which were funded from the net proceeds received from our public offerings. As a result, the distributions declared payable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, as described above, were funded with approximately $50.5 million and $33.6 million, respectively (excluding the impact of ASC Topic 805 as described above), from our operating activities, and the remaining amounts of approximately $4.6 million and $21.6 million, respectively, were funded from our borrowings. Our long-term strategy is to fund the payment of quarterly distributions to investors entirely from our operations. There can be no assurance that we will achieve this strategy.

36

Redemptions

During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we redeemed approximately 2.5 million and 2.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, pursuant to our share redemption program, for approximately $21.8 million and $26.9 million, respectively. In addition to the above-mentioned redemptions, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we redeemed approximately 28,000 OP Units from our OP Unit holders for approximately $267,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we redeemed approximately 99,000 OP Units from our OP Unit holders for approximately 98,000 shares of our common stock. We did not redeem any OP Units during the six months ended June 30, 2010. See “Part II, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information regarding redemptions of shares during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Subsequent Events

For information regarding subsequent events, see Note 15 to our financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

New Accounting Pronouncements and Significant Accounting Policies

For information regarding new accounting pronouncements and significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of assets and liabilities that results from a change in the applicable market resulting from a variety of factors such as perceived risk, interest rate changes, inflation and overall general economic changes. Accordingly, we manage our market risk by matching projected cash inflows from operating, investing and financing activities with projected cash outflows for debt service, acquisitions, capital expenditures, distributions to stockholders and unit holders, and other cash requirements. Our investments in real estate securities and debt related investments are our financial instruments that are most significantly and directly impacted by changes in their respective market conditions. In addition, our outstanding borrowings are also directly impacted by changes in market conditions. This impact is largely mitigated by the fact that the majority of our outstanding borrowings have fixed interest rates, which minimize our exposure to the risk that fluctuating interest rates may pose to our operating results and liquidity.

As of June 30, 2011, we had approximately $448.8 million of variable rate borrowings outstanding indexed to LIBOR rates. If the LIBOR rates relevant to our remaining variable rate borrowings were to increase 10%, we estimate that our quarterly interest expense would increase by approximately $6,000 based on our outstanding floating-rate debt as of June 30, 2011.

We may seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs by selectively utilizing derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both our outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. While this hedging strategy is designed to minimize the impact on our net income (loss) and funds from operations from changes in interest rates, the overall returns on our investments may be reduced. Our board of directors has established policies and procedures regarding our use of derivative instruments for hedging or other purposes.

In addition to the above described risks, we are subject to additional credit risk. Credit risk refers to the ability of each individual borrower under our debt related investments or issuer of our real estate securities to make required interest and principal payments on the scheduled due dates. We seek to reduce credit risk by actively monitoring our debt related investments and real estate securities portfolio and the underlying credit quality of our holdings. In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, loan and collateral defaults may continue to increase and result in further credit losses that would continue to, or more severely, adversely affect our liquidity and operating results.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011. There were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

37

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On July 14, 2010, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia against iStar NG, LP, TRT Acquisitions, LLC, TRT NOIP Colshire—McLean LLC, and Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. (together, the “Dividend Capital Defendants”) and iStar Financial Inc. (“iStar Financial” and, together with Dividend Capital Defendants, the “Defendants”). Northrop’s Complaint pertains to a real estate project containing two commercial office buildings and a parking garage located at 7555-7575 Colshire Drive in McLean, Virginia (the “Project”). TRT NOIP Colshire—McLean LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc., acquired iStar NG LP as part of the acquisition of the National Office and Industrial Portfolio from several subsidiaries of iStar Financial on June 25, 2010. Northrop, a holder of a leasehold interest in the Project, alleges that iStar Financial and the Dividend Capital Defendants knowingly completed the sale of the Project (rather than a sale of the owner of the Project, iStar NG LP). Northrop’s Complaint claims that the alleged sale of the Project violated Northrop’s right of first offer (“ROFO”) contained in the relevant deed of lease. Northrop’s Complaint seeks specific performance of the ROFO, other injunctive relief, compensatory damages in the amount of $250 million, $350,000 in punitive damages, treble damages under the Virginia Business Conspiracy Statute, costs, and attorneys’ fees.

On August 10, 2010, Defendants filed demurrers with the Fairfax County Circuit Court seeking dismissal of Northrop’s Complaint as a matter of law. On January 7, 2011, the court sustained the Dividend Capital Defendants’ demurrers and dismissed Northrop’s claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, violation of the Virginia Business Conspiracy Act and conversion, without prejudice. On January 28, 2011, Northrop filed an amended complaint, reasserting the dismissed counts. On February 18, 2011, the Defendants filed renewed demurrers and a plea in bar seeking dismissal of the claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, violation of the Virginia Business Conspiracy Act and conversion. On May 13, 2011, the court sustained the Defendants’ demurrers on the conversion and unjust enrichment claims. In addition to defending Northrop’s amended complaint generally and asserting counterclaims, the Dividend Capital Defendants have obtained indemnities from iStar Financial and insurance coverage that are subject to certain terms, conditions, and limitations.

On September 15, 2010, the Dividend Capital Defendants asserted counterclaims against Northrop based in part on Northrop’s intentional interference with the sale of the Project, its interference with contracts and prospective contracts, and its breach of the contract between iStar NG and Northrop. The Dividend Capital Defendants seek specific performance, damages in an amount in excess of $21.0 million, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Northrop filed demurrers seeking dismissal of the Dividend Capital Defendants’ counterclaims, which the court overruled on May 13, 2011.

On June 28, 2011, Northrop filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking judgment on its claim that its ROFO rights had been triggered. Briefing on the motion is ongoing, and a hearing on the motion was held on August 5, 2011, and the motion was denied. In addition to opposing Northrop’s motion, the Dividend Capital Defendants also plan to file their own motion for partial summary judgment on Northrop’s claim for specific performance.

Discovery between the parties is ongoing, and, under the current scheduling order, set to be completed by August 15, 2011. A bench trial has been set to commence on September 12, 2011.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As of June 30, 2011, no material changes had occurred in our risk factors as discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011.

38

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Share Redemption Program

As of June 30, 2011, no material changes had occurred to our share redemption program (the “Program”) as discussed in Item 2 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011. In aggregate, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, we redeemed approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock pursuant to the Program for approximately $10.4 million, as described further in the table below.

Period	Total Number of Shares Redeemed		Average Price Paid per Share		Pro-rata Percentage  of Redemption Requests Redeemed by Us			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Pursuant to the Program (1)
April 1 - April 30, 2011		—	$	—		—			—		—
May 1 - May 31, 2011		—		—		—			—		—
June 1 - June 30, 2011		1,228,787		8.45		9	%		1,228,787		—
Total		1,228,787	$	8.45		9	%		1,228,787		1,012,497

(1) This represents the number of shares that could be redeemed for the three months ended June 30, 2011 without exceeding our limitations discussed above.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

39

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

3.1	Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. Fifth Articles of Amendment and Restatement.†
3.2	Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. Articles of Amendment ††
3.3	Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc. Second Amended and Restated Bylaws. †
4.2	Sixth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program†
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer*
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer*
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101	The following information from Dividend Capital Total Realty Trust Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity; and (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.*

† Previously filed.

†† Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-175989). Such Registration Statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2011.

* Filed herewith.

40

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DIVIDEND CAPITAL TOTAL REALTY TRUST INC.
Date: August 12, 2011	/S/ GUY M. ARNOLD
	Guy M. Arnold President
Date: August 12, 2011	/S/ M. KIRK SCOTT
	M. Kirk Scott Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

41