Investments in Real Property | 3. INVESTMENTS IN REAL PROPERTY Currently, our consolidated investments in real property consist of investments in office, industrial and retail properties. The following tables summarize our consolidated investments in real property as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (amounts in thousands): Real Property Land Building and Improvements Intangible Lease Assets Total Investment Amount Intangible Lease Liabilities Net Investment Amount As of March 31, 2016: Office $ 173,876 $ 705,603 $ 249,218 $ 1,128,697 $ (18,577) $ 1,110,120 Industrial 9,572 68,051 16,436 94,059 (344) 93,715 Retail 260,761 571,638 109,135 941,534 (74,282) 867,252 Total gross book value 444,209 1,345,292 374,789 2,164,290 (93,203) 2,071,087 Accumulated depreciation/amortization — (187,132) (261,862) (448,994) 30,864 (418,130) Total net book value $ 444,209 $ 1,158,160 $ 112,927 $ 1,715,296 $ (62,339) $ 1,652,957 As of December 31, 2015: Office $ 203,889 $ 833,655 $ 310,629 $ 1,348,173 $ (18,923) $ 1,329,250 Industrial 9,572 65,307 16,436 91,315 (344) 90,971 Retail 260,761 570,700 109,225 940,686 (74,282) 866,404 Total gross book value 474,222 1,469,662 436,290 2,380,174 (93,549) 2,286,625 Accumulated depreciation/amortization — (208,281) (297,676) (505,957) 29,675 (476,282) Total net book value $ 474,222 $ 1,261,381 $ 138,614 $ 1,874,217 $ (63,874) $ 1,810,343 ] ] ] ] Dispositions During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, we disposed of the following properties (dollar amounts and square footage in thousands): Property Type Market Ownership Net Rentable Square Feet Percentage Leased Disposition Date Contract Sales Price Gain on Sale During the three months ended March 31, 2016: Office Washington, DC 100% 574 100% 2/18/1 6 $ 158,400 $ 41,241 Office Chicago, IL 80% 107 66% 3/1 /16 9,850 — Office Chicago, IL 80% 199 81% 3/1/ 16 18,000 159 Total/ Weighted Average 880 92% $ 186,250 $ 41,400 During the three months ended March 31, 2015: Office and Industrial Portfolio (1) Various (1) 100% 2,669 100% 3/11/ 15 $ 398,635 $ 105,542 Office Dallas, TX 100% 177 88% 1/1 6/15 46,600 23,125 Total/ Weighted Average 2,846 99% $ 445,235 $ 128,667 __________________ (1) The office and industrial portfolio includes (i) six office properties comprising 1.1 million net rentable square feet located in the following markets: Los Angeles, CA (three properties, of which one disposed property was a single building from a two-building office property), Northern New Jersey, Miami, FL, and Dallas, TX, and (ii) six industrial properties comprising 1.6 million net rentable square feet located in the following markets: Los Angeles, CA, Dallas, TX, Cleveland, OH, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, and Denver, CO. Real Property Impairment During three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a $587,000 impairment charge related to a consolidated office property located in the Chicago, IL market, which we acquired in January 2007 and we held through a joint venture in which we were not the managing partner. We held an 80% ownership interest in the office property. We sold this property in March 2016. Prior to the disposition, the net book value of the property exceeded the contract sales price less the cost to sell by approximately $587,000. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge to reduce the net book value of the property to our estimate of its fair value less the cost to sell. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recorded approximately $1.4 million of impairment charges related to a wholly owned retail property that we acquired in May 2007 in the Pittsburgh, PA market, which was classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2015 and disposed of in May 2015. As of March 31, 2015, the net book value of this retail property exceeded our estimate of the fair value of the property less the cost to sell by $1.4 million. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment to reduce the net book value of the property to our estimate of its fair value less the cost to sell. In the calculation of our daily NAV, our real estate assets are carried at fair value using valuation methodologies consistent with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). As a result, the timing of valuation changes recorded in our NAV will not necessarily be the same as for impairment charges recorded to our consolidated financial statements prepared pursuant to GAAP. Since we determine our NAV daily, impairment charges pursuant to GAAP will likely always be delayed and potentially significantly delayed compared to the change in fair value of our properties included in the calculation of our daily NAV. Discontinued Operations We present the results of operations and the respective aggregate net gains (losses) of any property or group of properties, the disposal of which would represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results, when such property (or group of properties) have been disposed of or classified as held for sale, as discontinued operations in our accompanying statements of income. We did no t have any discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Rental Revenue The following table summarizes the adjustments to rental revenue related to the amortization of above-market lease assets, below-market lease liabilities, and straight-line rental adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. In addition, the following table summarizes tenant recovery income received from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and recognized as rental revenue (amounts in thousands): For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Straight-line rent adjustments $ (240) $ (356) Above-market lease assets (1,267) (1,360) Below-market lease liabilities 1,535 1,713 Total increase (decrease) to rental revenue $ 28 $ (3) Tenant recovery income (1) $ 10,564 $ 10,165 __________________ (1) Tenant recovery income presented in this table excludes real estate taxes that were paid directly by our tenants that are subject to triple net lease contracts. Such payments totaled approximately $1.4 million and $2.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively . Concentration of Credit Risk Concentration of credit risk with respect to our sources of revenue currently exists due to a small number of tenants whose rental payments to us make up a relatively high percentage of our rental revenue. Rental revenue from our lease with Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., as master tenant of one of our office properties, represented approximately $6.1 million, or 11.0% , of our total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The following is a summary of amounts related to the top five tenants based on annualized base rent, as of March 31, 2016 (dollar amounts and square feet in thousands): Tenant Locations Industry Annualized Base Rent (1) % of Total Annualized Base Rent Square Feet % of Total Portfolio Square Feet Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. 2 Securities, Commodities, Fin. Inv./Rel. Activities $ 23,408 14.2% 602 7.3% Sybase 1 Publishing Information (except Internet) 18,692 11.4% 405 4.9% Stop & Shop 15 Food and Beverage Stores 14,168 8.6% 882 10.6% Novo Nordisk 1 Chemical Manufacturing 4,535 2.8% 167 2.0% Seton Health Care 1 Hospitals 4,339 2.6% 156 1.9% 20 $ 65,142 39.6% 2,212 26.7% __________________ (1) Annualized base rent represents the annualized monthly base rent of executed leases as of March 31, 2016. Our properties in Massachusetts, New Jersey, California, and Texas accounted for approximately 20% , 20% , 14% , and 12% respectively, of our total gross investment in real property portfolio as of March 31, 2016. A deterioration of general economic or other relevant conditions, changes in governmental laws and regulations, acts of nature, demographics or other factors in any of those states or the geographical region in which they are located could result in the loss of tenants, a decrease in the demand for our properties and a decrease in our revenues from those markets, which in turn may have a disproportionate and material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. |