UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________ to __________
Commission file number: 000-51553
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 14-1928384 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
11490 Westheimer Road, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) | | 77077 (Zip Code) |
(281) 649-4500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicated by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of June 30, 2008, 24,068,675 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Platinum Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company” or “Platinum”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 15, 2008 (“the Original Report”) to restate our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods then ended under Item 1 and to amend Items 2 and 4 of Part I of the Original Report. This Amendment does not affect any other items or sections in the Original Filing, and no attempt has been made in this Form 10-Q/A to update other disclosures presented in the Original Filing, except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement. In addition, Exhibits 31 and 32.1 of the Original Filing have been re-filed to contain currently dated certifications from our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. We are republishing the entire Original Filing, as amended by this Amendment, so that all of our information regarding the quarter ended June 30, 2008 is in one report.
Management determined certain commodity hedges that were entered into in April 2008 were inadvertently omitted from the reported second quarter 2008 financial results and the schedule of contracts at June 30, 2008. The accounting error resulted in an understatement of net loss by $5.8 million. In addition the tax provision was restated to reflect the tax impact of the hedging loss and to adjust the purchase accounting for the Tandem acquisition. The purchase price and deferred tax liability were modified for the deferred tax effect caused by timing differences in the tax basis and financial basis of oil and gas properties and recognition of the tax benefit of net operating losses. The latter determination was made upon filing of the consolidated tax return. There was no impact on cash flows from operating activities. The tables below present the effect of the financial statement adjustments related to the restatement of our previously reported financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives | | $ | (9,756,171 | ) | $ | (13,337,159 | ) | $ | (23,093,330 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (7,312,207 | ) | | (13,337,159 | ) | | (20,649,366 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | - | | | (7,577,740 | ) | | (7,577,740 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (7,312,207 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (13,071,626 | ) |
Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | (0.33 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.59 | ) |
Diluted | | | (0.33 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.59 | ) |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives | | $ | (11,792,094 | ) | $ | (13,337,159 | ) | $ | (25,129,253 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (8,366,724 | ) | | (13,337,159 | ) | | (21,703,883 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | (54,000 | ) | | (7,577,740 | ) | | (7,631,740 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (8,312,724 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (14,072,143 | ) |
Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | (0.38 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.63 | ) |
Diluted | | | (0.38 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.63 | ) |
As of June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Oil and gas properties, full cost method | | $ | 188,943,166 | | $ | 4,640,000 | | $ | 193,583,166 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 101,960 | | | (19,468 | ) | | 82,474 | |
Fair value of commodity derivatives | | | 2,478,871 | | | 13,337,159 | | | 15,816,030 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 48,085,215 | | | (2,918,254 | ) | | 45,166,961 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | (6,750,349 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (12,509,768 | ) |
As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2008, after discussions between management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Company concluded that the previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing should no longer be relied upon because of an error in reporting commodity hedges that were entered into in April 2008 but inadvertently omitted from the reported second quarter 2008 financial results in the Original Filing. The effects of the restatement on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period presented herein are described in Note 12 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/A and are also reflected in Items 2 and 4 of Part I of this Form 10-Q/A.
As a result of the restatement of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, our management, including the principal executive and financial officer, have re-evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008, and have found our disclosure controls and procedures to have been ineffective. Management has initiated corrective measures that will continue through 2008. See Item 4 of Part I of this Form 10-Q/A for a further discussion.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Table of Contents
| Page |
PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 30 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 40 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 41 |
| |
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 42 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 42 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 43 |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 43 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 43 |
Item 5. | Other Information | 43 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 43 |
Signatures | 44 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | * | |
ASSETS | | (As Restated) | | | |
| | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 7,014,718 | | $ | 16,429,619 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | | | | |
Oil and gas sales | | | 4,870,304 | | | 2,619,363 | |
Service | | | 4,743,507 | | | — | |
Affililiates and other | | | 991,494 | | | 668,216 | |
Inventory | | | 542,035 | | | 88,556 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 584,082 | | | 299,445 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total Current Assets | | | 18,746,140 | | | 20,105,199 | |
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, at cost | | | | | | | |
Oil and gas properties, full cost method | | | 193,583,166 | | | 170,571,663 | |
Other | | | 5,243,876 | | | 3,293,108 | |
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | (5,605,817 | ) | | (1,253,026 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | | 193,221,225 | | | 172,611,745 | |
| | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 5,718,963 | | | 376,164 | |
Goodwill | | | 5,912,611 | | | — | |
Fair value of commodity derivatives | | | — | | | 73,446 | |
Advance payment and costs, acquisition transactions | | | — | | | 2,522,639 | |
Real estate held for development | | | 2,700,000 | | | 2,700,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 226,298,939 | | $ | 198,389,193 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | | | | | |
Trade | | $ | 3,175,560 | | $ | 1,132,725 | |
Oil and gas sales | | | 2,687,580 | | | 1,074,222 | |
Fair value of commodity derivatives | | | 8,098,471 | | | 3,116,542 | |
Asset retirement obligation - current | | | — | | | 186,545 | |
Accrued liabilities and other | | | 2,318,979 | | | 181,430 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 82,474 | | | 254,960 | |
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | | | 876,961 | | | — | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 17,240,025 | | | 5,946,424 | |
| | | | | | | |
Revolving lines of credit | | | 10,757,922 | | | — | |
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion | | | 2,360,709 | | | — | |
Notes payable - Maverick acquisition | | | 3,070,772 | | | — | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 996,673 | | | — | |
Fair value of commodity derivatives | | | 15,816,030 | | | — | |
Asset retirement obligation | | | 3,994,530 | | | 3,390,094 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 45,166,961 | | | 48,085,215 | |
| | | 82,163,597 | | | 51,475,309 | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 1,000,000 authorized, 0 issued | | | — | | | — | |
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 24,068,675 issued and outstanding in each period, respectively | | | 2,407 | | | 2,407 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 155,064,142 | | | 155,064,142 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | (12,509,768 | ) | | 1,562,375 | |
Treasury stock - 1,997,913 shares | | | (15,661,464 | ) | | (15,661,464 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total Stockholders' Equity | | | 126,895,317 | | | 140,967,460 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | $ | 226,298,939 | | $ | 198,389,193 | |
* Condensed from audited consolidated financial statements
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | (As Restated) | | | | (As Restated) | | | |
| | | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | |
Oil and gas Sales | | $ | 10,694,071 | | $ | — | | $ | 17,828,875 | | $ | — | |
Service revenues | | | 5,056,682 | | | — | | | 5,056,682 | | | — | |
| | | 15,750,753 | | | — | | | 22,885,557 | | | | |
Costs and expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease and other operating expense | | | 2,864,605 | | | — | | | 5,320,911 | | | — | |
Cost of sevice revenues | | | 3,959,110 | | | | | | 3,959,110 | | | — | |
Marketing, general and administrative expense | | | 3,768,613 | | | 144,214 | | | 5,500,440 | | | 299,205 | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense | | | 2,577,874 | | | — | | | 4,641,163 | | | — | |
Accretion of abandonment obligations | | | 49,319 | | | — | | | 110,988 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | | | 13,219,521 | | | 144,214 | | | 19,532,612 | | | 299,205 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 2,531,232 | | | (144,214 | ) | | 3,352,945 | | | (299,205 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income, net of interest allocated to common stock subject to possible redemption of $0, $188,991, $0 and $366,111, respectively | | | 35,796 | | | 756,437 | | | 140,183 | | | 1,465,362 | |
Interest expense | | | (230,880 | ) | | (5,380 | ) | | (244,685 | ) | | (23,449 | ) |
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives | | | (23,093,171 | ) | | — | | | (25,129,253 | ) | | — | |
Other | | | 107,816 | | | — | | | 176,927 | | | — | |
Total other income (expense) | | | (23,180,598 | ) | | 751,057 | | | (25,056,828 | ) | | 1,441,913 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | | | (20,649,366 | ) | | 606,843 | | | (21,703,883 | ) | | 1,142,708 | |
Provision (Benefit) For Income Taxes | | | (7,577,740 | ) | | 28,000 | | | (7,631,740 | ) | | 66,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | (13,071,626 | ) | $ | 578,843 | | $ | (14,072,143 | ) | $ | 1,076,708 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 22,070,762 | | | 15,121,440 | | | 22,070,762 | | | 15,121,440 | |
Diluted | | | 22,070,762 | | | 18,220,150 | | | 22,070,762 | | | 17,882,548 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.04 | | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.03 | | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
| �� | Common stock | | Additional paid- | | Retained earnings | | Treasury Stock | | Total stockholders' | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | in capital | | (deficit) | | Shares | | Amount | | equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2008 | | | 24,068,675 | | $ | 2,407 | | $ | 155,064,142 | | $ | 1,562,375 | | | (1,997,913 | ) | $ | (15,661,464 | ) | $ | 140,967,460 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (14,072,143 | ) | | — | | | — | | | | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2008 | | | 24,068,675 | | $ | 2,407 | | $ | 155,064,142 | | $ | (12,509,768 | ) | | (1,997,913 | ) | $ | (15,661,464 | ) | $ | 126,895,317 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | (As Restated) | | | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (14,072,143 | ) | $ | 1,076,708 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 4,603,546 | | | — | |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation and debt discount | | | 147,760 | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (7,558,254 | ) | | — | |
Amortization/write-off of bank loan fees | | | 37,617 | | | — | |
Stock based compensation | | | 848,215 | | | — | |
Unrealized change in fair value of derivatives | | | 21,879,970 | | | — | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (3,021,693 | ) | | — | |
Inventory | | | (453,479 | ) | | — | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (127,334 | ) | | 48,634 | |
Accounts payable | | | 3,021,210 | | | (88,188 | ) |
Accrued liabilities and other | | | (77,956 | ) | | — | |
Due to related party | | | — | | | 45,000 | |
Income taxes payable - State | | | (172,486 | ) | | 66,000 | |
Commodity derivatives | | | (1,008,566 | ) | | — | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 4,046,407 | | | 1,148,154 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment | | | (10,325,098 | ) | | — | |
Acquisition of other businesses - oil and gas properties | | | (7,739,139 | ) | | — | |
Acquisition of Maverick, net of cash of $ 621,518 | | | (5,640,601 | ) | | — | |
Advance payment and costs, Pleasanton transaction | | | 2,522,639 | | | — | |
Deposits to cash and cash equivalents held in trust fund | | | — | | | (1,831,474 | ) |
Payment of deferred acquisition costs | | | — | | | (22,791 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (21,182,199 | ) | | (1,854,265 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | | | | | | |
Proceeds of revolving credit facility | | | 7,797,767 | | | — | |
Accretion of discount on cash flow notes - Maverick acquisition | | | (42,454 | ) | | — | |
Payments, long-term debt and capital leases | | | (34,422 | ) | | — | |
Interest on cash held in trust allocated to common stock subject to possible redemption | | | — | | | 366,111 | |
Proceeds from notes payable-stockholder | | | — | | | 340,000 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 7,720,891 | | | 706,111 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net Increase (Decrease)in Cash | | | (9,414,901 | ) | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash - Beginning of the Period | | | 16,429,619 | | | — | |
Cash - End of Period | | $ | 7,014,718 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 194,108 | | $ | 16,639 | |
Income taxes - State | | $ | 99,000 | | $ | - | |
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | | | | | | | |
Issuance of notes payable - Pleasanton acquisition | | $ | 550,000 | | $ | - | |
Acquisition of oil and gas property - Pleasanton | | $ | 550,000 | | $ | - | |
Issuance of Cash Flow Notes, net- Maverick transaction | | $ | 3,034,000 | | $ | - | |
Acquisition of Maverick | | $ | 3,034,000 | | $ | - | |
Adjustment of purchase price of oil and gas properties | | $ | 4,640,000 | | $ | — | |
Deferred acquisition costs accrued and deferred | | $ | - | | $ | 252,852 | |
| | | | | | | |
Acquisition of Maverick: | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 621,518 | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 4,296,033 | | | | |
Other current assets | | | 157,303 | | | | |
Property and equipment | | | 1,510,052 | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 5,912,611 | | | | |
Intangible assets | | | 5,522,250 | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | (634,984 | ) | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | (1,765,404 | ) | | | |
Accrued payroll | | | (576,165 | ) | | | |
Term notes and revolving line of credit | | | (5,223,086 | ) | | | |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | (524,010 | ) | | | |
Total purchase price | | | 9,296,118 | | | | |
Less: cash consideration paid to sellers | | | (6,000,000 | ) | | | |
Less: transaction costs | | | (262,118 | ) | | | |
Non-cash consideration issued to sellers - Cash Flow Notes, net | | $ | 3,034,000 | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 1 — Organization, Business and Operations and Basis of Presentation
Subsequent to the Maverick acquisition, the Company considers itself to be in two lines of business as follows:
(i) The oil and gas division operations have approximately 37,000 acres under lease in relatively long-lived fields with well-established production histories, 21,000 of which were acquired as part of the Tandem acquisition. The Company’s properties are concentrated primarily in the Gulf Coast region in Texas, the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico and the Fort Worth Basin in Texas; and
(ii) Maverick provides engineering and construction services primarily for three types of clients: (1) upstream oil and gas, domestic oil and gas producers and pipeline companies; (2) industrial, petrochemical and refining plants; and (3) infrastructure, private and public sectors, including state municipalities, cities, and port authorities. Maverick operates out of facilities headquartered in Victoria, Texas and operates primarily in Texas.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 and notes thereto of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc (the “Company” or “Platinum”) included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2008. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accounting policy most affected by management’s estimates and assumptions is the reliance on
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Estimates and Assumptions, continued
estimates of proved reserves to compute the provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”), and the determination of any impairment of long-lived assets.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development activities as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and natural gas attributable to a country. The Company has defined a cost center by country. Currently, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties are located within the continental United States.
Properties and equipment may include costs that are excluded from costs being depreciated or amortized. Oil and gas costs excluded represent investments in unproved properties and major development projects in which the Company owns a direct interest. These unproved property costs include nonproducing leasehold, geological and geophysical costs associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration drilling costs. All costs excluded are reviewed at least quarterly to determine if impairment has occurred. The amount of any impairment is transferred to the capitalized costs being amortized in the DD&A pool.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
The depreciable base for oil and gas properties includes the sum of capitalized costs net of accumulated DD&A, estimated future development costs and asset retirement costs not accrued in oil and gas properties, less costs excluded from amortization and salvage. The depreciable base of oil and gas properties and mineral investments are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on total proved oil and gas reserves. Properties and equipment carrying values do not purport to represent replacement or market values.
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
In accordance with Rule 4-10(a) of SEC Regulation S-X, proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – continued
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves, continued
conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalation based upon future conditions.
| (i) | Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is supported by either actual production or conclusive formation tests. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes (A) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and (B) the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of available geological and engineering data. In the absence of information on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir. |
| (ii) | Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in the “proved” classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based. |
| (iii) | Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following: |
| (A) | oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is classified separately as “indicated additional reserves”; |
| (B) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors; |
| (C) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and |
| (D) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids that may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such sources. |
Ceiling Test
Under the full cost method of accounting, a ceiling test is performed each quarter. The full cost ceiling test is an impairment test prescribed by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10. The ceiling test determines a limit, on a country-by-country basis, on the book value of oil and gas properties. Currently, all of the Company’s operations are located in the United States. The capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties, net of accumulated DD&A and the related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, excluding future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, generally using prices in effect at the end of the period held flat for the life of production and including the effect of derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, discounted at 10%, net of related tax effects, plus the cost of unevaluated properties and major development projects excluded from the costs being amortized. If capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as additional accumulated DD&A.
Asset Retirement Obligation
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to recognize a liability for the present value of all legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible, long-lived assets and capitalize an equal amount as a cost of the asset. The cost of the abandonment obligations, less estimated salvage values, is included in the computation of depreciation, depletion and amortization.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – continued
Income Taxes
The Company follows the asset and liability method prescribed by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”). Under this method of accounting for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in enacted tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
Management has evaluated and concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements as of January 1, 2008. The evaluation was performed for the tax period April 25 (inception) to December 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the tax years which remain subject to examination for federal and New Jersey State purposes as of June 30, 2008.
The Company’s policy is to classify assessments, if any, for tax related interest as interest expenses and penalties as marketing, general and administrative expenses.
Property
Property is recorded at cost. Improvements or betterments of a permanent nature are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost of assets retired or otherwise disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts in the year of disposal. Gains or losses resulting from property disposals are credited or charged to operations currently.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:
| | | 3 - 15 years | |
Vehicles | | | 5 years | |
Drilling Rigs | | | 10 years | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 5 years | |
| | | 5 - 7 years | |
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired through acquisitions. The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill recorded by the Company has not been amortized and will be evaluated on an annual basis, or sooner if deemed necessary, in connection with other long-lived assets, for potential impairment. Management performed an impairment assessment on goodwill as of June 30, 2008, which resulted in no impairment of goodwill. An annual assessment of goodwill will be assessed in the fourth quarter of each year.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Non-Employee Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” (“EITF 96-18”) which requires that such equity instruments be recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instrument vests. No such instruments were issued in 2007 and 2008. In October 2007, the Company issued 178,572 shares of its common stock in connection with a consulting agreement as described in Note 5(d).
Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS No. 128”). In accordance with SFAS No. 128, earnings (loss) per common share amounts (“basic EPS”) were computed by dividing earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Earnings per common share amounts, assuming dilution (“diluted EPS”), were computed by reflecting the potential dilution from the exercise of dilutive common stock purchase warrants. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both basic EPS and diluted EPS on the face of the consolidated statements of operations.
Reconciliations between the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations for each period where there was a dilutive effect are as follows:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Net Income (Numerator) | | Shares (Denominator) | | Per Share Amounts | |
Basic EPS | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 578,843 | | | 15,121,440 | | $ | 0.04 | |
Effect of Dilutive Securities | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | $ | — | | | 3,098,710 | | $ | (0.01 | ) |
Net income attributable to common stock and assumed exercise of warrants | | $ | 578,843 | | | 18,220,150 | | $ | 0.03 | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Net Income (Numerator) | | Shares (Denominator) | | Per Share Amounts | |
Basic EPS | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 1,076,708 | | | 15,121,440 | | $ | 0.07 | |
Effect of Dilutive Securities | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | $ | — | | | 2,761,108 | | $ | (0.01 | ) |
Net income attributable to common stock and assumed exercise of warrants | | $ | 1,076,708 | | | 17,882,548 | | $ | 0.06 | |
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Income (Loss) Per Share, continued
In 2007, for the periods prior to the October 26, 2007 Tandem acquisition, common shares subject to possible conversion of 2,878,560 were excluded from the calculation of basic EPS since such shares if redeemed, would only participate in their pro-rata share of the trust asset earnings. In this acquisition, 1,802,205 shares were actually converted and redeemed. Subsequent to the date of the Tandem acquisition, the remainder of 1,076,355 common shares subject to conversion but which were not redeemed, were included in the determination of weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company has determined that the warrants contained in the units sold in its initial public offering are dilutive for the 2007 periods, and accordingly included the effects of these warrants in diluted EPS using the treasury stock method in these periods. The Company has determined that their inclusion in 2008 would be antidilutive and thus excluded the effects of the warrants in these periods. An option to purchase 720,000 units was excluded in the computation of diluted EPS because the option exercise price exceeded the average market price for the units in all periods.
Environmental Expenditures
The Company is subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require the Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites. Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the timing of cash payments for the liability or component is fixed or reliably determinable.
Hedging Activities
From time to time, the Company may utilize derivative instruments, consisting of swaps, floors and collars, to attempt to reduce its exposure to changes in commodity prices and interest rates. The Company accounts for its derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recognized as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on both the intended purpose and the formal designation of the derivative. Designation is established at the inception of a derivative, but subsequent changes to the designation are permitted. The Company has elected not to designate any of its derivative financial contracts as accounting hedges and, accordingly, has accounted for these derivative financial contracts using mark-to-market accounting. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments which are not designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other income (expense) as changes in fair value of derivatives.
Real Estate Held for Development
The Company’s real estate held for development was recorded at fair market value when the Company completed its purchase of the assets of Tandem Energy Corporation on October 26, 2007 and relates to approximately 41 acres of undeveloped land located near Tomball, Texas.
Revenue Recognition and Gas Balancing
The Company utilizes the sales method of accounting for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues whereby revenues, net of royalties, are recognized as the production is sold to purchasers. The amount of gas sold
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Revenue Recognition and Gas Balancing, continued
may differ from the amount to which the Company is entitled based on its revenue interests in the properties. The Company did not have any significant gas imbalance positions at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, established standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components (revenue, expenses, gains and losses) in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. There were no differences between net income and comprehensive income.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Oil and gas operations
The Company’s trade receivables consist primarily of receivables from non-operators who own an interest in properties which the Company operates, and trade receivables associated with the operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Red Iron Tool, Inc. Insofar as the receivables relate to oil and gas trade receivables, the Company has the ability and the right to withhold oil and gas revenues from any owner who is delinquent in their payments.
Services
Revenues are billed and accounts receivable recorded as services are performed. Most services revenues are derived from time and material projects. Management periodically reviews all accounts receivable to determine if any are considered delinquent based upon the age of the receivable and the credit worthiness of the parties involved. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for the amount management estimates as uncollectible. An allowance of $63,182 was considered necessary by management at June 30, 2008 with respect to services accounts receivable. Unbilled receivables represent costs and estimated fees on work for which billings have not been presented to customers. When billed, these amounts are included in accounts receivable - trade. Unbilled accounts receivable include management’s best estimates of the amounts expected to be realized on the work that has been performed to date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurements, and requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Positions (FSPs) No. 157-1 and No. 157-2, which, respectively, remove leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS No. 157 and defer its effective date for one year relative to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. As a result, the application of the definition of fair value and related disclosures of SFAS No. 157 (as impacted by these two FSPs) was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008 on a prospective basis with respect to fair value measurements of (a) nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 for which the effective date was deferred under FSP No. 157-2 are currently being evaluated by the Company. Areas
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued
impacted by the deferral relate to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. This deferral applies to such items as nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination (but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods) or nonfinancial long-lived asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment. The effects of these remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied to fair value measurements prospectively beginning January 1, 2009.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which will become effective on January 1, 2008. FAS 159 permits entities to measure eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and firm commitments at fair value. on an instrument-by-instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value measurement election is irrevocable and subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in earnings.
In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39. FSP FIN 39-1 clarifies that a reporting entity that is party to a master netting arrangement can offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments that have been offset under the same master netting arrangement. FSP FIN 39-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141(R)”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non- controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for acquisitions that occur in an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of SFAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements has not yet been determined.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - continued
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of FSP No. 142-3 on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 07-05, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”. EITF Issue No. 07-05 clarifies the determination of whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock, which would qualify as a scope exception under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. EITF Issue No. 07-05 is effective for financial statement issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption for an existing instrument is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of EITF Issue No. 07-05 on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 — Initial Public Offering
On October 28, 2005, the Company sold to the public 14,400,000 units at an offering price of $8.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, and one redeemable common stock purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 commencing on the later of the completion of a business combination with a target business or one year from the effective date of the offering and expiring four years from the effective date of the offering. The warrants will be redeemable, in whole or in part, upon written consent of the representative of the underwriters, at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon thirty days notice after the warrants become exercisable, only in the event that the last sale price of the common stock is at least $11.50 per share for any twenty trading days within a thirty trading day period ending on the third day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given. Separate trading of the common stock and warrants comprising the units commenced on or about December 9, 2005.
In connection with the offering, the Company issued an option (the “Units Purchase Option” or “UPO”), for $100.00, to the representative of the underwriters to purchase up to 720,000 units at an exercise price of $10.00 per unit. The units issuable upon exercise of this option are identical to those described in the preceding paragraph, except that the warrants underlying the units will be exercisable at $7.50 per share. This option is exercisable at $10.00 per unit commencing on the later of the consummation of a business combination or one year from the date of the prospectus relating to the offering (October 24, 2005) and expiring five years from such date. The option may be exercised for cash or on a “cashless” basis, at the holder’s option, such that the holder may use the appreciated value of the option (the difference between the exercise prices of the option and the underlying warrants and the market price of the units and underlying securities) to exercise the option without the payment of any cash. The option and the 720,000 units, the 720,000 shares of common stock and the 720,000 warrants included in such units, and the 720,000 shares of common stock underlying such warrants, were deemed compensation by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”). The option grants to holders demand and “piggy back” rights for periods of five and seven years, respectively, from the date of the offering with respect to the registration under the Securities Act of the securities directly and indirectly issuable upon exercise of the option. The Company would be obligated to bear all fees and expenses attendant to registering the securities.
The exercise price and number of units issuable upon exercise of the option may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or a recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the option will not be adjusted for issuances of common stock at a price below its exercise price.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 3 — Initial Public Offering - continued
Should the Company be unable to deliver shares of its common stock underlying the exercise of the warrants included in the units and shares of its common stock underlying the exercise of the underwriters’ unit purchase option as a result of the absence of an effective registration statement with respect to these securities, then these warrants and the UPO would not be exercisable and the Company will have no obligation to pay holders of the warrants and UPO any cash or otherwise “net cash settle” these warrants or the UPO. In this event, the warrants and UPO may expire worthless.
Note 4 — Business Combinations
On October 26, 2007, Platinum consummated the Tandem acquisition pursuant to the related acquisition agreement. Among other terms and conditions, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the approximately 7.7 million Platinum common shares issued in connection with the acquisition. This registration statement became effective on August 7, 2008. In connection with the asset acquisition agreement, the Company entered into a finder’s agreement and a consulting agreement with Mr. Lance Duncan, an individual with prior affiliations with Tandem, who had been given limited authority by Tandem management to act on its behalf.
In December 2007, Platinum, through a wholly owned subsidiary acquired a 50% working interest in the La Rosa field for approximately $5.3 million. Although the La Rosa field is a producing field of approximately 3,800 acres in Refugio County, Texas, actual production was minimal. The primary focus of the acquisition is related to its recompletion and re-entry potential. The entire purchase price was allocated to oil and gas properties. In March 2008 an additional related working interest was acquired for $461,500.
In January 2008, the Company acquired a 70% working interest in the Pleasanton field for approximately $6.1 million. $2.5 million of the purchase price was paid in December 2007 and recorded as a deposit on the December 31, 2007 balance sheet. The remainder of the purchase price was paid in January 2008, including direct transaction costs. See Note 6 for a further description of consideration paid. The Pleasanton Field is a non-producing field of approximately 4,200 acres in Atascosa County, Texas. The field contains previously drilled and abandoned wells. The entire purchase price was allocated to the fair value of oil and gas properties.
In April, 2008 the Company purchased a 100% working interest in producing leases (Quantum prospect) in Atascosa County, Texas for $750,000. The leases consist of 12 producing wells, 2 shut in wells, 2 injection wells and 1 salt water disposal well. The Company will operate this lease.
In May, 2008 the Company purchased a 70% working interest in an acreage position (Lieke prospect) in Atascosa County, Texas for $600,000, with the initial goal of re-entering an abandoned well bore and attempting a completion in the Edwards formation. The Company will operate this lease.
In June, 2008 the Company purchased a 25% non-operated working interest in an acreage position (Lacy prospect) in Nueces County, Texas for $400,000. The agreement contains a requirement for the drilling of the initial test well to a depth of 9,500 feet.
On April 29, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Maverick pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger entered into on March 18, 2008 among the Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, Maverick, and Robert L. Kovar Services, LLC, as the stockholder representative. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger was $6 million in cash and $5 million to be paid over the next 6 years pursuant to non-interest bearing cash flow notes, subject to certain escrows, holdbacks and post-closing adjustments. The cash flow notes are payable quarterly at the rate of 50% of pre-tax net income, as it is defined in the merger agreement, generated by the Maverick business on a stand-alone basis in the preceding quarter. Payment can be accelerated by certain events, including change in control of the Company. The purchase price was subject to adjustment for any change in working capital as defined in the agreement, between October 31, 2007 and the closing date, as well as other adjustments associated with changes in indebtedness. The balance of the cash flow notes remaining unpaid upon maturity, if any, will be converted into a 12 month self-amortizing note bearing interest at the annual rate of 2% over the bank's prime rate at the time. The cash flow notes were reduced by the amount of the working capital post closing adjustment which was determined by the Company to be $645,596. This amount may be subject to modification as may be agreed between the parties. In addition, a discount to present value in the amount of $1,320,404 has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements and deducted from the cash flow notes as these notes are non-interest bearing for the initial 5 years of their term. As a result, the net book value of the notes on April 29, 2008 was $3,034,000.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 4 — Business Combinations - continued
In addition, the sellers agreed to satisfy and assume Maverick's bank indebtedness in the aggregate amount of $4,889,538 consisting of a $2,960,155 revolving line of credit maturing April 2008, a $1,584,375 term note due April 2011, and $345,008 oil and gas note due May 2009, using a portion of the cash received by them at closing. Following the closing, the Company was indebted to the sellers for these amounts under the identical terms of the bank loan agreements. On April 30, 2008, Maverick entered into extension and modification agreements with the sellers pursuant to which sellers agreed to defer principal payments of the $1.6 million term loan for six months and extend the maturity date to April 2013. The sellers also agreed to extend the maturity dates of the revolving line of credit and oil and gas note to 2010 and 2013, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2008, Maverick was not in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio contained in the loan agreements. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, the sellers waived the Company's obligation to maintain this ratio through September 30, 2009.
Maverick is a provider of project management, engineering, procurement, and construction management services to both the public and private sectors, including the oil and gas business in which the Company is engaged. Maverick is based in south Texas with offices in Corpus Christi, Victoria, Harlingen and Houston. It is anticipated
that Maverick will provide complimentary services to the Company which would otherwise be procured from third parties, as well as strengthen the overall management of the Company.
The aggregate purchase price for Maverick reflected in the financials, including legal and other items, was $9,296,118. The results of operations of Maverick are included for the period from April 29, 2008 (the date of acquisition) to June 30, 2008.
The following table details the allocation of the purchase price of the Maverick acquisition.
Consideration: | | | |
Cash, including costs | | $ | 6,262,118 | |
Cash Flow Notes – net of discount | | | 3,034,000 | |
| | $ | 9,296,118 | |
| | | | |
Recognized amount of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: | | | | |
Assets Acquired: | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 621,518 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 4,296,033 | |
Other current assets | | | 157,303 | |
Property and equipment | | | 1,510,052 | |
Goodwill | | | 5,912,611 | |
Intangible assets | | | 5,522,250 | |
| | | 18,019,767 | |
Liabilities Assumed: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | (634,984 | ) |
Accrued expenses | | | (1,765,404 | ) |
Accrued payroll | | | (576,165 | ) |
Term notes and revolving line of credit | | | (5,223,086 | ) |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | (524,010 | ) |
| | | (8,723,649 | ) |
Total net assets acquired | | $ | 9,296,118 | |
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Unaudited Pro-Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the Maverick acquisition was completed as of January 1, 2008 for each of the periods shown below:
| | Pro Forma Consolidated Results of Operations | |
| | Revenue | | (Loss) Before Income Taxes | | Net (Loss) | | (Loss) Per Share | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma 2008 | | $ | 33,819,000 | | $ | (22,366,000 | ) | $ | (14,598,000 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma 2008 | | $ | 18,463,000 | | $ | (20,916,000 | ) | $ | (13,596,000 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) |
The pro forma combined results are not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the Maverick acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of 2008, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results. The impact on pro forma results of other transactions entered into by the Company other than Maverick was immaterial.
The assets and liabilities related to the foregoing acquisitions were recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and may be adjusted based upon third party fair value studies within one year of the date of acquisition.
a. The Company has engaged Casimir Capital LP (“CCLP”), the representative of the underwriters, on a non-exclusive basis, as its agent for the solicitation of the exercise of the warrants included in the units sold to the public. To the extent not inconsistent with the guidelines of the NASD and the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Company has agreed to pay CCLP for bona fide services rendered, a commission equal to 5% of the exercise price for each warrant exercised more than one year after the date of an effective prospectus if the exercise was solicited by the underwriters. In addition to soliciting, either orally or in writing, the exercise of the warrants, the representative’s services may also include disseminating information, either orally or in writing, to warrant holders about the Company or the market for its securities, and assisting in the processing of the exercise of the warrants. No compensation will be paid to the representative upon the exercise of the warrants if:
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 5 — Commitments – continued
| · | the market price of the underlying shares of common stock is lower than the exercise price; |
| · | the holder of the warrants has not confirmed in writing that the underwriters solicited the exercise; |
| · | the warrants are held in a discretionary account; |
| · | the warrants are exercised in an unsolicited transaction; or |
| · | the arrangement to pay the commission is not disclosed in the prospectus provided to warrant holders at the time of exercise. |
b. On March 20, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved its 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Pursuant to the plan, the Company may grant incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, restricted stock awards and performance bonuses, or collectively, awards, to officers and key employees. In addition, the plan authorizes the grant of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to directors and to any independent contractors and consultants. Generally, all classes of employees are eligible to participate in the plan.
The Company has reserved a maximum of 4 million shares of its authorized common stock for issuance upon the exercise of awards to be granted pursuant to the plan.
Other than stock options and restricted stock issued and issuable in connection with the Maverick acquisition described in Note 4 and the related employment agreement in Note 5e, the employment agreement entered into with the new chief financial officer on August 11, 2008 as described in Note 12 and an aggregate of 10,000 options issued to directors on July 16, 2008, no options, restricted stock or other awards under the plan have been made or committed to be made as of the date hereof.
c. Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2006, the Company’s board approved a share repurchase program to repurchase shares of Company common stock in open market transactions in an amount up to $80 million, following the consummation of a the Tandem acquisition. On November 1, 2007, the board of directors instituted the initial open market stage of this share repurchase program and established a plan in conformity with the provisions of Rule 10b5-1 to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of Platinum common stock in open market transactions during the month of November 2007, subject to the broker, volume, price and timing restrictions of Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to the plan, in November 2007 the Company purchased 1,997,913 of its common shares for an aggregate of $15,661,464 under the repurchase program. On October 26, 2007, the Company redeemed 1,802,205 shares of its common stock for a total purchase price of $14,057,199. The initial stage of the repurchase plan expired November 30, 2007. The Company may resume repurchases in the future, pursuant to the share repurchase program, for up to the remaining amount of $50.3 million.
d. Consulting Agreement
Effective with the Tandem acquisition on October 26, 2007, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Lance Duncan, for consulting services, including investigation and evaluation of possible future acquisitions for the Company. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, the Company valued such services at $5 million and agreed to issue to Mr. Duncan a total of 714,286 shares (based upon a $7 per share valuation at that date) of the Company’s restricted common stock as consideration over the period of service. These shares are fixed in number (except for stock splits or other recapitalizations). These shares are to be issued in semi-annual installments over the eighteen month term of the agreement beginning with the closing of the Tandem acquisition.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 5 — Commitments - continued
d. Consulting Agreement, continued
On October 26, 2007, the first installment of 178,572 of irrevocable shares was issued to Mr. Duncan. The Company was required to issue the second installment of 178,572 shares of its common stock on April 26, 2008. The Company has not issued these shares due to a dispute between the Company and Duncan with respect to other claims that Duncan has raised. In a letter addressed to the Company dated October 10, 2008, Duncan demanded payment of $7.7 million relating to all such claims, including payment in cash for shares for which he is not yet entitled at a valuation not provided for in the consulting agreement and significantly above current market price. The Company believes that these claims have no merit and will vigorously defend its position. Stock compensation expense in the amount of $848,215, based upon a closing price of $4.75 per share of the Company’s common stock on April 26, 2008 as quoted on the Electronic Bulletin Board, is included in marketing, general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2008.
e. Employment Agreement
In connection with completion by the Company of its acquisition of Maverick on April 29, 2008, as discussed in Note 4, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Robert Kovar pursuant to which Mr. Kovar was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company and President of Maverick, a wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Kovar was Maverick’s founder and its president and chief executive officer prior to the acquisition.
The employment agreement provides for an initial term of five years. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Kovar will be paid a $200,000 base annual salary and will be eligible for annual performance bonuses in such amount and at such times as determined by the Board or the compensation committee, in their sole discretion. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Kovar was granted 50,000 options to purchase shares of Platinum’s common stock with an exercise price of $5.15 per share, the closing price on the date of grant, and will be granted an additional 50,000 stock options on each of the four succeeding anniversaries of the effective date of the employment agreement at the closing price on each anniversary date. The stock compensation expense of these options, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine their fair market value, was not material for the period from April 29, 2008 to June 30, 2008. All options will be issued pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan and will be subject to a 5 year vesting schedule, with one-fifth of such options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning April 29, 2009. Upon a change in control of the Company, the employment agreement provides that all options granted to Mr. Kovar will immediately vest.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, if Mr. Kovar’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or Mr. Kovar terminates his employment for good reason, he will receive an 18 month severance package and his cash flow note (as defined in Note 4) will become immediately due and payable. If, however, Mr. Kovar’s employment is terminated for cause or Mr. Kovar terminates his employment without good reason, he will receive no severance package and his cash flow note will be cancelled.
Mr. Kovar has also agreed that during the term of his employment with the Company and for an 18 month period thereafter, he will not compete with nor solicit employees of the Company. If Mr. Kovar breaches any of these obligations, he would forfeit his right to any severance payments and benefits to which he otherwise would be entitled.
f. Operating leases
The Company leases its general office space and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases that expire through August 2012. The obligations presented below include the operating leases associated with the Maverick acquisition:
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 5 — Commitments - continued
For the Year Ending June 30: | | | |
2009 | | $ | 1,261,064 | |
2010 | | | 1,276,994 | |
2011 | | | 1,243,025 | |
2012 | | | 884,657 | |
| | $ | 4,665,740 | |
Rent expense amounted to approximately $221,000 for the period ending June 30, 2008.
g. Capitalized leases
Maverick leases office equipment and vehicles under capital lease agreements. Depreciation expense for capital leases is included with depreciation on property.
The cost and accumulated depreciation of capital leases, included in property and equipment at June 30, 2008, is as follows:
For the Year Ending June 30, 2008: | | | |
Office equipment and furniture | | $ | 885,010 | |
Vehicles | | | 371,598 | |
| | | 1,256,608 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | 672,189 | |
| | $ | 584,419 | |
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capitalized leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments at June 30, 2008:
For the Year Ending June 30: | | | |
2009 | | $ | 318,255 | |
2010 | | | 201,761 | |
2011 | | | 130,945 | |
2012 | | | 74,003 | |
2013 | | | 24,859 | |
Total minimum lease payments | | | 749,823 | |
Less: Amount representing interest | | | 197,726 | |
Current value of minimum lease payments | | | 552,097 | |
Less: Current maturities | | | 253,252 | |
| | $ | 298,845 | |
The effective interest rate on capitalized leases ranges from 5% - 27%.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 6 — Long-Term Debt
On March 14, 2008, two operating subsidiaries of the Company entered into a new credit facility with a bank, establishing a revolving line of credit with an initial borrowing base of $35 million. The revolving line of credit is secured by the co-borrowers’ oil and gas properties and will be used to facilitate the execution of the two entities’ drilling and acquisition programs. The line bears interest at the bank’s base rate or LIBOR, plus a margin which varies with the ratio of the co-borrowers’ outstanding borrowings against the defined borrowing base, ranging from 1.5% to 2.25 %. The co-borrowers’ can choose periodically to change the interest rate base which applies to outstanding borrowings. Under the terms of revolving line of credit agreement, the co-borrowers must maintain certain financial ratios, must repay any amounts due in excess of the borrowing base, and may not declare any dividends or enter into any transactions resulting in a change in control, without the bank’s consent. The Company, as the parent company, is not a co-borrower or guarantor of the line, and transfers from the co-borrowers to the parent company are limited to (i) $1 million per fiscal year to the parent for management fees, and (ii) the repayment of up to $2 million per fiscal year in subordinate indebtedness owed to the parent. As of June 30, 2008 there was approximately $7.5 million outstanding under the revolving line of credit, bearing interest at the bank’s base rate, which was 5.00%. The entire $7.5 million outstanding balance is classified as long term debt in the accompanying financial statements. The facility expires in March, 2012. In conjunction with the execution of the new line of credit and as required under the terms of the new credit facility, the Company novated its existing hedge positions from its existing counterparty over to the bank under terms satisfactory to the Company. In connection with establishing the line of credit, the bank received a commitment fee of $87,500 and a fee of $60,229 for its expenses in connection with the aforementioned novation. In addition, the co-borrowers are obligated to the bank for a monthly fee of any unused portion of the line of credit at the rate of 0.25% per annum.
In conjunction with and simultaneous to the establishment of the new bank credit facility, the previously existing $5 million line of credit with another bank was terminated. No outstanding borrowings existed at the time of the termination of this previous arrangement.
In connection with the Pleasanton acquisition as more fully described in Note 4, the Company entered into a settlement agreement for $1,000,000 in order to secure clear title to the properties acquired, of which it paid $450,000 cash and issued its note for the balance in the amount of $550,000. The Company was given a credit against the purchase price in the amount of the cash payment pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the acquisition agreement. The note bears interest at 12% per annum, and is subject to monthly payments beginning June 1, 2008 of an amount equal to ½ of the net proceeds from production attributable to the Company’s interest in the purchased leasehold or $30,000, whichever is greater, until the note is paid in full. The long term portion of the note at June 30, 2008 was $147,546.
The following table sets forth the Company’s long-term debt position as of June 30, 2008:
Oil and gas revolving line of credit | | | | | $ | 7,508,767 | |
Notes payable, Pleasanton agreement | | | | | | 507,546 | |
Revolving line of credit to former shareholders - Maverick | | | (a) | | | 3,249,155 | |
Term note to former shareholders - Maverick | | | (b) | | | 329,277 | |
Second term note to former shareholders - Maverick | | | (c) | | | 1,543,750 | |
Notes payable to third party – Maverick | | | (d) | | | 305,000 | |
| | | | | $ | 13,443,595 | |
| | | | | | 623,709 | |
Long-term debt | | | | | $ | 12,819,786 | |
(a) $3,250,000 revolving line of credit, payable to the Maverick former shareholders in monthly interest payments at prime plus .25%, principal and unpaid interest due at maturity in September 2010.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 6 — Long-Term Debt, continued
(b) Term note, payable to the Maverick former shareholders in monthly principal and interest payments of $10,280 with interest at prime plus .75%, unpaid principal and interest due at maturity in April 2011.
(c) Second term note, payable to the Maverick former shareholders in monthly interest payments at prime plus .50% beginning in April 2008 and beginning in October 2008, principal payments of $23,390 plus interest until maturity in April 2013.
(d) Note payable to a third party in monthly installments, with interest paid at 12%, principal due at maturity in September 2009, collateralized by the guaranty of the Maverick former majority stockholder and substantially all assets. These notes are collateralized by accounts receivable, a $4,000,000 life insurance policy on the former majority stockholder, and general and limited oil and gas partnership interests owned by the Maverick former majority stockholder.
Annual maturities of indebtedness included in this Footnote 6 at June 30, 2008 are as follows:
For the Year Ending June 30, | | | |
2009 | | $ | 623,709 | |
2010 | | | 890,172 | |
2011 | | | 3,648,967 | |
2012 | | | 7,789,447 | |
2013 | | | 491,200 | |
| | $ | 13,443,495 | |
Note 7 — Marketing Arrangements and Segment Information
With the consummation of the Maverick acquisition , in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company considers itself to be in two lines of business - (i) as an independent oil and gas exploration and production company and (ii) as an engineering services company.
(i) The Company sells substantially all of its crude oil production under short-term contracts based on prices quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) for spot West Texas Intermediate contracts, adjusted by agreed-upon increases or decreases which vary by grade of crude oil. The majority of the Company’s natural gas production is sold under short-term contracts based on pricing formulas which are generally market responsive. From time to time, the Company may also sell a portion of the gas production under short-term contracts at fixed prices. The Company believes that the loss of any of its oil and gas purchasers would not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations due to the availability of other purchasers.
(ii) Maverick provides engineering and construction services primarily for three types of clients: (1) upstream oil & gas, domestic oil and gas producers and pipeline companies; (2) industrial, petrochemical and refining plants; and (3) infrastructure, private and public sectors, including state municipalities, cities, and port authorities. Maverick operates out of facilities headquartered in Victoria, Texas and operates primarily in Texas. The types of services provided include project management, engineering, procurement, and construction management services to both the public and private sectors, including the oil and gas business in which the Company is engaged. Maverick is based in south Texas with offices in Corpus Christi, Victoria, Harlingen and Houston.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 7 — Marketing Arrangements and Segment Information - continued
The following table presents selected financial information for the Company’s operating segments.
.
| | Exploration | | | | Parent | | Intercompany | | Consolidated | |
| | and Production | | Engineering | | and Other | | Eliminations | | Total | |
For the Three Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 10,694,071 | | $ | 5,344,546 | | $ | - | | $ | (287,864 | ) | $ | 15,750,753 | |
Intersegment revenues | | | - | | | (287,864 | ) | | - | | | 287,864 | | | - | |
Total revenues | | $ | 10,694,071 | | $ | 5,056,682 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 15,750,753 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | (17,192,607 | ) | $ | (241,500 | ) | $ | (2,966,275 | ) | $ | (248,984 | ) | $ | (20,649,366 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 17,828,875 | | $ | 5,344,546 | | $ | - | | $ | (287,864 | ) | $ | 22,885,557 | |
Intersegment revenues | | | - | | | (287,864 | ) | | - | | | 287,864 | | | - | |
Total revenues | | $ | 17,828,875 | | $ | 5,056,682 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 22,885,557 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | (17,515,358 | ) | $ | (241,500 | ) | $ | (3,582,421 | ) | $ | (364,604 | ) | $ | (21,703,883 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 202,654,223 | | $ | 18,371,322 | | $ | 144,831,055 | | $ | (139,557,661 | ) | $ | 226,298,939 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2007: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 180,686,645 | | $ | - | | $ | 144,674,091 | | $ | (126,971,543 | ) | $ | 198,389,193 | |
The Company reported no oil and gas or service operations in 2007 interim periods.
Note 8 — Price, Interest Rate and Credit Risk Management Activities
The Company engages in price risk management activities from time to time. These activities are intended to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices for natural gas and crude oil. The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, primarily price collars, puts and calls, as the means to manage this price risk. In addition to these financial transactions, the Company is a party to various physical commodity contracts for the sale of hydrocarbons that cover varying periods of time and have varying pricing provisions. Under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS Nos. 137, 138, 149 and 157, these various physical commodity contracts qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales exception and therefore, are not subject to hedge accounting or mark-to-market accounting. The financial impact of these various physical commodity contracts is included in revenues at the time of settlement, which in turn affects average realized hydrocarbon prices. The Company has elected not to designate any of its derivative financial contracts as accounting hedges and, accordingly, has accounted for these derivative financial contracts using mark-to-market accounting.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 8 — Price, Interest Rate and Credit Risk Management Activities - continued
In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the Company has categorized its derivative financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1); the next highest priority inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (Level 2); and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Company uses Level 1 valuation techniques to value its derivatives.
Presented below is a summary of the Company’s crude oil and natural gas derivative financial contracts at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, with crude oil prices expressed in dollars per barrel of crude oil and notional crude oil volumes in barrels of crude oil per year; and natural gas prices expressed in dollars per million British thermal units ($/MMBtu) and notional natural gas volumes in million British thermal units per year (MMBtuy). As indicated, The Company does not have any financial derivative contracts that extend beyond December 2012.
The total fair value of the crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts at June 30, 2008, was a liability of approximately $23.9 million as follows:
Period Ended June 30, | | Instrument Type | | Total Volumes (MMBTU/BBL) | | Weighted Average (Floor/Ceiling) | | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) (stated in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 | | | Gas Collar | | | 25,846 | | | 5.00/11.02 | | | (255 | ) |
| | | Gas Call Option Sold | | | 25,846 | | | 9.10 | | | (698 | ) |
| | | Gas Call Option Purchased | | | 25,846 | | | 12.00 | | | 255 | |
| | | Gas Put Option Sold | | | 25,846 | | | 5.00 | | | 0 | |
| | | Gas Put Option Purchased | | | 25,846 | | | 6.00 | | | 0 | |
| | | Oil Collar | | | 99,000 | | | 40.00/72.10 | | | (3,073 | ) |
| | | Oil Call Option Sold | | | 50,000 | | | 67.00 | | | (3,662 | ) |
| | | Oil Call Option Purchased | | | 50,000 | | | 72.10 | | | 3,414 | |
| | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 71.00 | | | (4,080 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2010 | | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 71.00 | | | (3,915 | ) |
| | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 95.50 | | | (2,441 | ) |
| | | Oil Put Option Purchased | | | 120,000 | | | 75.00 | | | 283 | |
| | | Oil Put Option Purchased | | | 170,000 | | | 80.00/85.00 | | | 669 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 95.50 | | | (2,332 | ) |
| | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 95.25 | | | (2,244 | ) |
| | | Oil Put Option Purchased | | | 120,000 | | | 80.00 | | | 485 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 95.25 | | | (2,163 | ) |
| | | | | | 60,000 | | | 95.00 | | | (2,108 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Oil Swaps | | | 60,000 | | | 95.00 | | | (2,050 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Total fair value liability | | | | | | | | | (23,915 | ) |
The fair value of the Company’s financial derivative contracts at June 30, 2008 are shown in the accompanying financial statements as follows (in thousands):
Fair value of commodity derivative: | | | | |
Current portion | | $ | (8,098 | ) |
Long-term portion | | | (15,816 | ) |
Total fair value liability | | $ | (23,915 | ) |
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 8 — Price, Interest Rate and Credit Risk Management Activities - continued
The total fair value of the crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts at December 31, 2007, was a liability of approximately $3.0 million as follows:
Period | | Instrument Type | | Total Volumes (MMBTU/BBL) | | Weighted Average (Floor/Ceiling) | | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) (stated in thousands) | |
2008 | | Gas Collar | | | 64,615 | | | 5.00/11.02 | | | (25 | ) |
| | Gas Call Option Sold | | | 64,615 | | | 9.10 | | | (128 | ) |
| | Gas Call Option Purchased | | | 64,615 | | | 12.00 | | | 36 | |
| | Gas Put Option Sold | | | 64,615 | | | 5.00 | | | (11 | ) |
| | Gas Put Option Purchased | | | 64,615 | | | 6.00 | | | 46 | |
| | Oil Collar | | | 113,502 | | | 40.00/72.10 | | | (2,455 | ) |
| | Oil Call Option Sold | | | 125,000 | | | 67.00 | | | (3,282 | ) |
| | Oil Call Option Purchased | | | 125,000 | | | 72.10 | | | 2,703 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 | | Oil Swaps | | | 120,000 | | | 71.00 | | | (1,928 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2010 | | Oil Put Option Purchased | | | 120,000 | | | 75.00 | | | 1,015 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | Oil Put Option Purchased | | | 120,000 | | | 80.00 | | | 986 | |
| | Total fair value liability | | | | | | | | $ | (3,043 | ) |
The fair value of the Company’s financial derivative contracts at December 31, 2007 are shown in the accompanying financial statements as follows (in thousands):
Fair value of commodity derivative: | | | | |
Current portion | | $ | (3,116 | ) |
Long-term portion | | | 73 | |
Total fair value liability | | $ | (3,043 | ) |
The natural gas and crude oil prices shown in the above table are based on the corresponding NYMEX index and have been valued using actively quoted prices and quotes obtained from the counterparties to the derivative agreements. The above prices represent a weighted average of several contracts entered into and are on a per MMBtu or per barrel basis for gas and oil derivatives, respectively. Total volumes shown for the crude oil collar reflect net volumetric positions with a single counterparty under which contracts provide for netting of all settlement amounts.
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 8 — Price, Interest Rate and Credit Risk Management Activities - continued
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of financial instruments and related transactions at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in millions): (The carrying amount and the fair value (1) are the same for each period reported.)
| | June 30, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 | |
NYMEX-Related Commodity Derivative | | | | | | | |
Market Positions (1) | | $ | 23.9 | | $ | 3.0 | |
(1) | Estimated fair values have been determined by using available market data and valuation methodologies. Judgment is required in interpreting market data and the use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may affect the estimated fair value amounts. |
Note 9 — Oil and Gas Properties
The following table sets forth the Company’s costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities for the period from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008:
Balance at January 1, 2008: | | $ | 170,571,663 | |
| | | | |
Purchase accounting adjustment | | | 4,640,000 | |
| | | | |
Acquisition of properties | | | | |
Proved | | | 7,289,139 | |
Unproved | | | 1,000,000 | |
| | | | |
Exploration Costs | | | 986,586 | |
| | | | |
Development Costs | | | 9,095,778 | |
| | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2008: | | $ | 193,583,166 | |
The following table sets forth the Company’s capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities at June 30, 2008:
Proved oil and gas properties | | $ | 192,583,166 | |
Unproved oil and gas properties | | | 1,000,000 | |
| | | 193,583,166 | |
| | | | |
Accumulated depletion | | | (5,396,000 | ) |
| | | | |
Net capitalized costs at June 30, 2008 | | $ | 188,187,166 | |
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 10 — Litigation
On January 16, 2008, Exxon Mobil Corporation filed a petition in the 270th District Court of Harris County, Texas, naming Tandem and a third party, Merenco Realty, Inc., demanding environmental remediation of certain properties in Tomball, Texas. In 1996, pursuant to an assignment agreement, Exxon Mobil sold certain oil and gas leasehold interests and real estate interests in Tomball, Texas to the Company’s predecessor in interest, Merit Energy Corporation. In 1999, the Company assigned its 50% undivided interest in one of the tracts in the acquired property to Merenco, an affiliate of the Company, owned 50% by the chairman of the board of the Company, Tim Culp. In October 2007, the Texas Railroad Commission notified Exxon Mobil of an environmental site assessment alleging soil and groundwater contamination for a site in the area of Tomball, Texas. Exxon Mobil believes that the site is one which was sold to the Company and claims that the Company is obligated to remediate the site under the assignment agreement. Exxon Mobil has requested that the court declare the defendants obligated to restore and remediate the properties and has requested any actual damages arising from breach and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes that Exxon Mobil’s claim that the Company is responsible for any remediation of such site is without merit and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself against this claim. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will prevail in this matter. The Company acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities of Tandem in the Tandem acquisition. Merenco was not acquired by the Company in the Tandem acquisition and the Company’s chairman, Tim Culp, continues to have a 50% ownership interest in Merenco.
Note 11 — Benefit Plan
Prior to its acquisition by the Company, Maverick adopted a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the benefit of all employees who have met certain length-of-service requirements. Under this plan, Maverick employees may elect to make contributions pursuant to a salary reduction agreement. Each year, Maverick may make a matching contribution to the plan on behalf of the participating employees. Employer contributions to the plan are discretionary. For the period from April 29, 2008 to June 30, 2008, employer contributions charged to operations totaled approximately $113,000.
Note 12 — Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements
Management determined certain commodity hedges that were entered into in April 2008 were inadvertently omitted from the reported second quarter 2008 financial results and the schedule of contracts at June 30, 2008. The accounting error resulted in an understatement of net loss by $5.8 million. In addition the tax provision was restated to reflect the tax impact of the hedging loss and to adjust the purchase accounting for the Tandem Energy Holdings, Inc. acquisition. The purchase price and deferred tax liability were modified for the deferred tax effect caused by timing differences in the tax basis and financial basis of oil and gas properties and recognition of the tax benefit of net operating losses. The latter determination was made upon filing of the consolidated tax return. There was no impact on cash flows from operating activities. The tables below present the effect of the financial statement adjustments related to the restatement of our previously reported financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives | | $ | (9,756,171 | ) | $ | (13,337,159 | ) | $ | (23,093,330 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (7,312,207 | ) | | (13,337,159 | ) | | (20,649,366 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | - | | | (7,577,740 | ) | | (7,577,740 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (7,312,207 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (13,071,626 | ) |
Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | (0.33 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.59 | ) |
Diluted | | | (0.33 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.59 | ) |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives | | $ | (11,792,094 | ) | $ | (13,337,159 | ) | $ | (25,129,253 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (8,366,724 | ) | | (13,337,159 | ) | | (21,703,883 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | (54,000 | ) | | (7,577,740 | ) | | (7,631,740 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (8,312,724 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (14,072,143 | ) |
Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | (0.38 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.63 | ) |
Diluted | | | (0.38 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.63 | ) |
As of June 30, 2008 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Restated | |
| | | | | | | |
Oil and gas properties, full cost method | | $ | 188,943,166 | | $ | 4,640,000 | | $ | 193,583,166 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 101,960 | | | (19,468 | ) | | 82,474 | |
Fair value of commodity derivatives | | | 2,478,871 | | | 13,337,159 | | | 15,816,030 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 48,085,215 | | | (2,918,254 | ) | | 45,166,961 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | (6,750,349 | ) | | (5,759,419 | ) | | (12,509,768 | ) |
PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Restated)
Note 13 — Subsequent Events
Employment Agreement
On August 11, 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Lisa Meier pursuant to which Ms. Meier was appointed as chief financial officer and treasurer of the Company. Ms. Meier is a certified public accountant Ms. Meier earned a Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) from the University of Texas at Austin and a Master of Professional Accountancy (MPA) from the University of Texas at Austin in 1996. The employment agreement provides for an initial five year term. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Ms. Meier will be paid a $250,000 base annual salary, increasing by 5% annually. Ms. Meier will be eligible for an annual bonus as determined by the Board or a compensation committee of the Board which, in the event the Company has positive cash flow, will be at least $50,000. In addition, Ms. Meier will be eligible for a performance bonus based on certain predetermined budgeted goals. The target bonus for this purpose will be 50% of base salary.
In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Ms. Meier was granted 50,000 incentive stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price equal to the closing price on August 11, 2008, the date of grant, and will be granted an additional 50,000 stock options each year thereafter during the term of her employment. All options will be issued pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan and will be subject to a four year vesting schedule, with one-quarter of such options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning August 11, 2009. Upon a change in control of the Company, the employment agreement provides that all options granted to Ms. Meier will immediately vest.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, if Ms. Meier’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or Ms. Meier terminates her employment for good reason, she will receive an 18 month severance package. If, however, Ms. Meier’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause or Ms. Meier terminates her employment without good reason, she will receive no severance package.
Ms. Meier has also agreed that during the term of her employment with the Company and for an 18 month period thereafter, she will not compete with the Company nor solicit employees of the Company. If Ms. Meier breaches any of these obligations, she would forfeit her right to any severance payments and benefits to which she otherwise would be entitled.
Platenergy Services and Infrastructure
Platenergy Services and Infrastructure (“PSI”) is a proposed new business that Ms. Meier will help develop in the oilfield services industry. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Ms. Meier will also be appointed President of PSI. PSI’s business plan is to develop products, services and solutions to optimize customer performance in a safe and environmentally sound manner. PSI has entered into a restricted stock agreement with Ms Meier pursuant to which Ms. Meier will be issued 50 restricted shares of PSI’s common stock, representing 5% of the outstanding shares of PSI common stock. Under the agreement, the shares will be subject to a four year vesting schedule, with one-quarter of such shares to be released on each anniversary of the date of issue. All shares will be released from restriction upon a sale of the PSI business.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
On October 26, 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Tandem. Prior to that time, we were a blank check company with no operations and no net revenues. On April 29, 2008 we acquired the 100% of the stock of Maverick Engineering, Inc. (Maverick), a full-service engineering service company.
Set forth below are:
(B) A comparison of certain summarized historical information of our oil and gas subsidiaries for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 with the quarter ended March 31, 2008, in order to provide the reader with certain meaningful analytical data.
(C) A discussion of the engineering services company (Maverick) for the period from the date of acquisition (April 29, 2008) through June 30, 2008.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
With the consummation of the Maverick acquisition, we consider ourselves to be in two lines of business - (i) as an independent oil and gas exploration and production company and (ii) as an engineering services company.
| i) | In our oil and gas operations, we conduct oil and natural gas exploration, development, acquisition, and production. Our basic business model is to find and develop oil and gas reserves through development activities, and sell the production from those reserves at a profit. To be successful, we must, over time, be able to find oil and gas reserves and then sell the resulting production at a price that is sufficient to cover our finding costs, operating expenses, administrative costs and interest expense, plus offer an acceptable rate of return on our capital investment. We sell substantially all of our crude oil production under short-term contracts based on prices quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) for spot West Texas Intermediate contracts, less agreed-upon deductions which vary by grade of crude oil. The majority of our natural gas production is sold under short-term contracts based on pricing formulas which are generally market responsive. From time to time, we may also sell a portion of the gas production under short-term contracts at fixed prices. |
| (ii) | Through our wholly-owned Maverick operation, we provide engineering and construction services primarily for three types of clients: (1) upstream oil and gas, domestic oil and gas producers and pipeline companies; (2) industrial, petrochemical and refining plants; and (3) infrastructure, private and public sectors, including state municipalities, cities, and port authorities. Maverick operates out of facilities headquartered in Victoria, Texas and operates primarily in Texas. The types of services provided include project management, engineering, procurement, and construction management services to both the public and private sectors, including the oil and gas business in which we are engaged as described above. Maverick is based in south Texas with offices in Corpus Christi, Victoria, Harlingen and Houston. |
From time to time, we may make strategic acquisitions in our oil and natural gas business if we believe the acquired assets offer us the potential for reserve growth through additional developmental drilling activities. However, the successful acquisition of oil and natural gas properties requires assessment of many factors, which are inherently inexact and may be inaccurate, including future oil and natural gas prices, the amount of recoverable reserves, future operating costs, future development costs, failure of titles to properties, costs and timing of plugging and abandoning wells and potential environmental and other liabilities.
We believe that the economic climate in the domestic oil and gas industry continues to be suitable for our business model. Oil prices are currently at or near-record levels, and gas prices are well above historic averages. Although oil and gas prices are typically volatile and are subject to market fluctuations, we believe that supply and demand fundamentals in the energy marketplace continue to provide us with the economic incentives necessary for us to assume the risks we face in our search for oil and gas reserves. While profit margins remain currently favorable, we cannot guarantee that rising finding costs, production costs, and depletion expense will not affect our future success. Specifically, our revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend substantially on many factors, including those beyond our control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments and competition from other sources of energy. Because of these factors, we continuously seeks ways to reduce exposure to the volatility in oil and natural gas prices. Our strategy is to hedge a portion of our expected future oil and natural gas production, using a mixture of calls, puts, forward contracts and other derivative instruments, to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in commodity price.
Furthermore, like all businesses engaged in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas, we face the challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted, oil and natural gas production from a given well decreases. Thus, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company depletes part of its asset base with each unit of oil or natural gas it produces. Consequently, key to our success is not only finding reserves through developmental drilling and strategic acquisitions, but also by exploiting opportunities related to our existing production. For example, we have two fields, the Ira Unit located in Scurry County, Texas, and the Ballard Unit located in Eddy County, New Mexico which we believe contain substantial opportunities to expand and enhance their existing waterflood capabilities. These projects will require capital in the form of money and expertise.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007
We were a blank check company for the periods ended in 2007 and consequently had no operations and no net operating results. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 , our results of operations included those of the oil and gas entities acquired on and subsequent to October 26, 2007 for the 2008 periods and those of our engineering services business, Maverick, from its date of acquisition April 29, 2008 through June 30, 2008. See “Business - Growth Strategy” beginning on page 5 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page F1-14 in our Form 10K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on April 15, 2008 and Note 4 included elsewhere herein. For a comparison of results of operations relating to our oil and natural gas assets, see “Results of Operations - Oil and Gas” below.
With respect to our results of operations excluding our oil and natural gas assets and the engineering services business (Maverick), we had no net operating revenues during the 2008 or 2007 periods. Our general and administrative expenses other than those attributable to our oil and natural gas assets and our engineering services business for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $1,543,000 and $2,233,000 (of the $3.8 million and $5.5 million of general and administrative expenses included in our condensed consolidated results for the corresponding periods) as compared to approximately $144,000 and $299,000 in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007. The increase of $ 1,399,000 and $1,934,000 in such expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is attributable to (i) $848,000 in stock compensation expense incurred in the 2008 periods related to a consulting arrangement and an employment agreement (See Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) as compared to $0 in the 2007 periods and (ii) to our status as a parent company of operating businesses in 2008, comprised principally of officer salaries’ ($232,000 as compared to $0 for six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 2007), legal and accounting relating to normal corporate and regulatory compliance matters ($919,000 as compared to $168,000 for six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 2007), investor relations and other administrative costs. Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 included interest income of $1,465,000 (substantially all of which was earned on funds held trust for the benefit of public shareholders prior to the closing of the Tandem acquisition) as compared to interest income earned of $117,000 for six months ended June 30, 2008 on substantially lower cash balances.
We also incurred unrealized losses of $1,573,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $0 in 2007 on the decrease in the value of certain put options on crude oil we purchased in December 2007 and January 2008 for an aggregate of $3,035,000. In the period from June 30, 2008 through August 11, 2008, as a result of a decrease in the price of crude oil, these put options experienced an unrealized increase in value of $1,050,000.
(B) – Results of Operations - Oil and Gas
The following summary of oil and gas revenues and lease and other operating expenses for the periods indicated is provided for comparative purposes. These comparative results are for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. As indicated in the preceding paragraph, since our results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 are not in any way comparable to the three months ended June 30, 2008, we believe that the comparison of our current operating data to the immediately preceding period would provide more relevant information to assist in evaluating our Company.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Any reference in this comparison to the second quarter relates to the three months ended June 30, 2008, and any reference to the first quarter relates to the three months ended March 31, 2008, unless otherwise indicated.
Our revenues from oil and natural gas sales for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $10.7 million. Oil and gas sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $7.1 million. The 50% increase in oil and gas revenues was due to an increase in commodity prices as well as to an increase in production on a Boe basis during the second quarter. The average oil price for the second quarter was $122.22 compared to $96.83 for the first quarter. The average gas price for the second quarter was $11.11 per Mcf compared to $8.19 for the first quarter. Production on a Boe basis increased 14% from 88,239 Boe’s during the first quarter to 100,831 Boe’s during the second quarter.
Oil and gas production costs in the form of lease operating expense on a Boe basis increased 4.2% from $27.53 per Boe during the first quarter to $28.68 per Boe during the second quarter. The slight increase was due partially to an increased emphasis on environmental clean-up efforts across our oil and gas assets on a field by field basis. The increase was partially offset by higher production due to increased drilling and workover activities. Other factors outside management control, such as third party service availability and the availability of adequate technical and field staff, could have an adverse effect on lease operating costs in the future
Depletion expense for oil and gas properties increased approximately $250,000, or 14%, during the second quarter compared to the first quarter. The increase was attributable primarily to property additions during the second quarter and a significant increase in the future development costs related to our proved undeveloped locations.
General and administrative costs for the oil and gas entities decreased approximately $50,000, or 5%, during the second quarter compared to the first quarter. The decrease was related to a general decline in engineering and professional fees (excluding fees incurred with our engineering services group).
We also incurred unrealized losses of approximately $21.5 million for the second quarter 2008 as compared to approximately a $2.0 million during the first quarter 2008 on the decrease in the value of certain hedge contracts on crude oil and natural gas.
(C) – Results of Operations – Engineering Services (Maverick)
Revenues for the period since the acquisition (April 29, 2008 – June 30, 2008) were $5.1 million. Gross margin performance for the same period was 21.7%. Performance for the second quarter was hampered by an unusual convergence of contemporaneous weakness in all of our business segments for unrelated reasons. The oil and gas business was impacted by project deferrals and slowdowns in work from some our traditional clients. The industrial division was adversely impacted by capital budget cuts in the refining market plus the decision by Valero to seek strategic alternatives for its Aruba refinery, with a resulting deferral of some project work there. The infrastructure business was adversely impacted by a four-month delay in commencement of a major road project, and elimination of all of our TxDOT survey business due to state government fiscal concerns. These operations reported a pretax loss of $241,500 in the period April 29, 2008 to June 30, 2008, including amortization expense of $142,000 associated with the intangible assets acquired.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In connection with our initial public offering consummated on October 28, 2005, we sold (i) 14,400,000 units to the public, with each unit consisting of one share of our common stock, $0.0001 per share, and one warrant expiring October 28, 2009 to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share and (ii) to the representatives of the underwriters a five year option to purchase up to a total of 720,000 units in the aggregate at a per unit price of $10.00. The units issuable upon exercise of this option are identical to those offered in the public offering except that the warrants included in the option have an exercise price of $7.50. The underwriters’ unit purchase option may be exercised for cash or on a “cashless” basis, at the holder’s option, such that the holder may use the appreciated value of the option (the difference between the exercise prices of the option and the underlying warrants and the market price of the units and underlying securities) to exercise the option without the payment of any cash. If circumstances warrant and in the event that any holders of the unit purchase option choose to exercise all or a portion of the unit purchase option on a cashless basis, we will receive no cash proceeds but would be required to issue additional units. In addition we can give no assurance that any of the warrants included in the units sold to the public will be exercised and result in any proceeds to us.
The following additional events occurred or had an impact during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or may have an impact on our liquidity in future periods:
a. In November 2006, the Company’s board approved a share repurchase program to repurchase shares of Company common stock in an amount up to $80 million (including shares that may be redeemed in connection with stockholders conversion rights upon consummation of the Tandem acquisition). On October 26, 2007, we redeemed 1,802,205 shares of our common stock for a total cash purchase price of $14,057,199 pursuant to such conversion rights.
b. On November 1, 2007, the Company announced the initial stage of the share repurchase program and adopted a share repurchase plan for the month of November 2007. In the period from November 1 through November 30, 2007, we purchased 1,997,913 shares for an aggregate of $15,661,464. We financed these purchases with available cash. The initial share repurchase plan expired November 30, 2007, but the Company may resume repurchases in the future, pursuant to our current share repurchase program, under which approximately $50 million may be used to acquire additional shares.
c. As part of our overall business strategy (See Note 4, Business Combinations to the condensed consolidated financial statements), we continued our program of strategic acquisitions and investment opportunities that complement our existing business. We made various acquisitions of oil and gas properties and businesses in the six month period ended June 30, 2008, summarized as follows:
| · | In December 2007, Platinum, through a wholly owned subsidiary acquired a 50% working interest in the La Rosa field for approximately $5.3 million. Although the La Rosa field is a producing field of approximately 3,800 acres in Refugio County, Texas, actual production was minimal. The primary focus of the acquisition is related to its recompletion and re-entry potential. The entire purchase price was allocated to oil and gas properties. In March 2008 an additional related working interest to our December 2007 La Rosa field acquisition was acquired for $461,500; |
| · | In January 2008, the Company acquired a 70% working interest in the Pleasanton field for approximately $6.1 million. $2.5 million of the purchase price was paid in December 2007 and recorded as a deposit on the December 31, 2007 balance sheet. The remainder of the purchase price was paid in January 2008, including direct transaction costs. See Note 6 for a further description of consideration paid. The Pleasanton Field is a non-producing field of approximately 4,200 acres in Atascosa County, Texas. The field contains previously drilled and abandoned wells. In connection with the Pleasanton acquisition, in April 2008 we entered into a settlement agreement for $1,000,000 in order to secure clear title to the properties acquired, of which we paid $450,000 cash and issued our note for the balance in the amount of $550,000. We received a credit against the purchase price in the amount of the cash payment pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the acquisition agreement. The note bears interest at 12% per annum, and is subject to monthly payments beginning June 1, 2008 of an amount equal to ½ of the net proceeds from production attributable to our interest in the purchased leasehold or $30,000, whichever is greater, until the note is paid in full; |
| · | In April, 2008 we purchased a 100% working interest in producing leases (Quantum prospect) in Atascosa County, Texas for $750,000. The leases consist of twelve producing wells, two shut in wells, two injection wells and one salt water disposal well. We will operate this lease; |
| · | In May, 2008 we purchased a 70% working interest in an acreage position (Lieke prospect) in Atascosa County, Texas for $600,000, with the initial goal of re-entering an abandoned well bore and attempting a completion in the Edwards formation. We will operate this lease; |
In June, 2008 the Company purchased a 25% non-operated working interest in an acreage position (Lacy prospect) in Nueces County, Texas for $400,000. The agreement contains a requirement for the drilling of the initial test well to a depth of 9,500.
d. On March 14, 2008, two of our oil and natural gas operating subsidiaries, Tandem Energy Corporation and PER Gulf Coast, Inc. entered into a new credit facility with the Bank of Texas, establishing a revolving line of credit with an initial borrowing base of $35 million. The revolving line of credit is secured by the oil and gas properties and will be used to facilitate the execution of our drilling and acquisition programs. The line bears interest at the bank’s base rate or LIBOR, plus a margin which varies with the ratio of the outstanding borrowings against the defined borrowing base, ranging from 1.50% to 2.25%. These oil and gas subsidiaries can choose periodically to change the interest rate base which applies to outstanding borrowings. Under the terms of revolving line of credit agreement, they must maintain certain financial ratios, must repay any amounts due in excess of the borrowing base, and may not declare any dividends or enter into any transactions resulting in a change in control, without the bank’s consent. As the parent company, we are not a co-borrower or guarantor of the line, and transfers from the oil and gas operations to us are limited to (i) $1 million per fiscal year for management fees, and (ii) the repayment of up to $2 million per fiscal year in subordinate indebtedness owed to us. As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $7.5 million outstanding under the revolving line of credit. In conjunction with the execution of the new line of credit, and as required under the terms of the new credit facility, we novated our existing hedge positions from our existing counterparty over to the Bank of Texas under terms satisfactory to us. In addition, there is an obligation to the bank for a monthly fee for any unused portion of the line of credit at the rate of 0.25% per annum. The unused portion of this revolving line of credit of approximately $27.5 million remains available.
e. On April 29, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Maverick. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger was $6 million in cash and $5 million to be paid over the next 6 years pursuant to non-interest bearing cash flow notes, subject to certain escrows, holdbacks and post-closing adjustments. Provisions of the cash flow notes require quarterly payments commencing in June 2008 to the noteholders pro rata equal to 50% of the pre-tax net income, as defined, generated by the Maverick business on a stand alone basis in the prior quarter. Payment of the cash flow notes can be accelerated by certain events, including a change in control. The balance of the cash flow notes remaining unpaid upon maturity, if any, will be converted into a 12 month self amortizing note bearing interest at the annual rate of 2% over the bank’s prime rate. In addition, we will assume Maverick’s indebtedness under certain bank and loan arrangements, which aggregate balances approximated $4.5 million at January 31, 2008. In addition, the sellers agreed to satisfy and assume Maverick's bank indebtedness in the aggregate amount of $4.9 million consisting of a $3 million revolving line of credit maturing April 2008, a $1.6 million term note due April 2011, and $.3 million oil and gas note due May 2009, using a portion of the cash received by them at closing. Following the closing, the Company was indebted to the sellers for these amounts under the identical terms of the bank loan agreements. On April 30, 2008, Maverick entered into extension and modification agreements with the sellers pursuant to which sellers agreed to defer principal payments of the $1.6 million term loan for six months and extend the maturity date to April 2013. The sellers also agreed to extend the maturity dates of the revolving line of credit and oil and gas note to 2010 and 2013, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2008, Maverick was not in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio contained in the loan agreements. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, the sellers waived the Company's obligation to maintain this ratio through September 30, 2009. The cash flow notes will be payable quarterly at the rate of 50% of pre-tax net income, as defined, generated by the Maverick business on a stand-alone basis in the preceding quarter. Payment can be accelerated by certain events, including change in control of the Company. The purchase price is also subject to adjustment for any change in working capital as defined in the agreement, between October 31, 2007 and the closing date, as well as other adjustments associated with changes in indebtedness. Any adjustment will be treated as a modification of the amount of the cash flow notes and is to be determined within 45 days of closing.
In connection with the acquisition of Maverick, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kovar to serve as chief operating officer of Platinum. The employment agreement provides for an initial term of five years. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Kovar will be paid a $200,000 base annual salary and will be eligible for annual performance bonuses in such amount and at such times as determined by the Board or the compensation committee, in their sole discretion. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Kovar was granted 50,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $5.15 per share, the closing price on the date of grant, and will be granted an additional 50,000 stock options on each of the four succeeding anniversaries of the effective date of the employment agreement. All options will be issued pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan and will be subject to a 5 year vesting schedule, with one-fifth of such options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning April 29, 2009. In the event of a change in control of the Company, the employment agreement provides that all options granted to Mr. Kovar will immediately vest.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, if Mr. Kovar’s employment is terminated by us without cause or Mr. Kovar terminates his employment for good reason, he will receive an 18 month severance package and his cash flow note will become immediately due and payable. If, however, Mr. Kovar’s employment is terminated by us for cause or Mr. Kovar terminates his employment without good reason, he will receive no severance package and his cash flow note will be cancelled.
f. On August 11, 2008, we entered into an employment agreement with Lisa Meier pursuant to which Ms. Meier was appointed as chief financial officer and treasurer of the Company. Ms. Meier is a certified public accountant. Ms. Meier earned a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin and a Master of Professional Accountancy from the University of Texas at Austin in 1996. The employment agreement provides for an initial five year term. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Ms. Meier will be paid a $250,000 base annual salary, increasing by 5% annually. Ms. Meier will be eligible for an annual bonus as determined by the Board or a compensation committee of the Board which, in the event the Company has positive cash flow, will be at least $50,000. In addition, Ms. Meier will be eligible for a performance bonus based on certain predetermined budgeted goals. The target bonus for this purpose will be 50% of base salary.
In addition, under terms of the employment agreement, Ms. Meier was granted 50,000 incentive stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price equal to the closing price on August 11, 2008, the date of grant, and will be granted an additional 50,000 stock options each year thereafter during the term of her employment. All options will be issued pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan and will be subject to a four year vesting schedule, with one-quarter of such options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning August 11, 2009. Upon a change in control of the Company, the employment agreement provides that all options granted to Ms. Meier will immediately vest.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, if Ms. Meier’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or Ms. Meier terminates her employment for good reason, she will receive an 18 month severance package. If, however, Ms. Meier’s employment is terminated by us for cause or Ms. Meier terminates her employment without good reason, she will receive no severance package.
Ms. Meier has also agreed that during the term of her employment with us and for an 18 month period thereafter, she will not compete with the Company nor solicit our employees. If Ms. Meier breaches any of these obligations, she would forfeit her right to any severance payments and benefits to which she otherwise would be entitled.
Platenergy Services and Infrastructure
Platenergy Services and Infrastructure (“PSI”) is a proposed new business that Ms. Meier will help develop in the oilfield services industry. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Ms. Meier will also be appointed President of PSI. PSI’s business plan is to develop products, services and solutions to optimize customer performance in a safe and environmentally sound manner. PSI has entered into a restricted stock agreement with Ms Meier pursuant to which Ms. Meier will be issued 50 restricted shares of PSI’s common stock, representing 5% of the outstanding shares of PSI common stock. Under the agreement, the shares will be subject to a four year vesting schedule, with one-quarter of such shares to be released on each anniversary of the date of issue. All shares will be released from restriction upon a sale of the PSI business.
Supplemental Oil and Gas Information
The following information is intended to supplement the consolidated financial statements included in this report with data that is not readily available from those statements.
| | Three Months Ended | | Year to Date | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | June 30, 2008 | | June 30, 2008 | |
Production | | | | | | | | | | |
Oil (Bls) | | | 58,707 | | | 71,508 | | | 130,215 | |
Gas (Mcf) | | | 177,189 | | | 175,936 | | | 353,125 | |
Boe (Bls) | | | 88,239 | | | 100,831 | | | 189,070 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Average Prices | | | | | | | | | | |
Oil ($/Bbl) | | $ | 96.83 | | $ | 122.22 | | $ | 110.77 | |
Gas ($/Mcf) | | $ | 8.19 | | $ | 11.11 | | $ | 9.64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Average Lifting Cost | | | | | | | | | | |
Per Boe | | $ | 27.53 | | $ | 28.68 | | $ | 28.14 | |
The reserve report prepared as of December 31, 2007 assumes that we will expend approximately $19.4 million in expenditures in 2008 to drill a number of existing proved undeveloped locations, with the intent of converting them into proved developed producing locations, thereby generating new cash flows. The execution of the drilling program is dependent on rig availability, the availability of technical and field staff, and product pricing. Through June 30, 2008 we have incurred approximately $10.4 million of these expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Contractual Obligations
In connection with the October 26, 2007 Tandem acquisition, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Lance Duncan, for consulting services, including investigation and evaluation of possible future acquisitions. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Duncan’s services were valued at $5 million. We agreed to issue to Mr. Duncan a total of 714,286 shares (based upon a $7 per share valuation at that date) of our restricted common stock, 25% to be issued upon commencement of services and the remainder in semi-annual installments of 25% each over the eighteen month term of the agreement. Each installment will be paid with 178,572 shares of our common stock, based on payments of $1,250,000 valued at a fixed price of $7.00 per share.
On October 26, 2007, the first installment of 178,572 of irrevocable restricted shares was issued to Mr. Duncan. We were required to issue the second installment of 178,572 shares of our common stock on April 26, 2008. The Company has not issued these shares due to a dispute between the Company and Duncan with respect to other claims that Duncan has raised. In a letter addressed to the Company dated October 10, 2008, Duncan demanded payment of $7.7 million relating to all such claims, including payment in cash for shares for which he is not yet entitled at a valuation not provided for in the consulting agreement and significantly above current market price. The Company believes that these claims have no merit and will vigorously defend its position. Stock compensation expense in the amount of $848,215, based upon a closing price of $4.75 per share on April 26, 2008 as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, is reflected in our financial statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies:
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Full Cost and Impairment of Assets
We account for our oil and natural gas exploration and development activities using the full cost method of accounting. Under this method, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties are capitalized. Costs of non-producing properties, wells in the process of being drilled and significant development projects are excluded from depletion until such time as the related project is developed and proved reserves are established or impairment is determined. At the end of each quarter, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, as adjusted for asset retirement obligations, is limited to the lower of unamortized cost or a ceiling, based on the present value of estimated future net revenues, net of income tax effects, discounted at 10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of our unproved properties. Revenues are measured at unescalated oil and natural gas prices at the end of each quarter, with effect given to cash flow hedge positions. If the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties exceed the ceiling, we are subject to a ceiling test write-down to the extent of the excess. A ceiling test write-down is a non-cash charge to earnings. It reduces earnings and impacts stockholders’ equity in the period of occurrence and results in lower DD&A expense in future periods.
There is a risk that we will be required to write down the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties when oil and natural gas prices decline. If commodity prices deteriorate, it is possible that we could incur impairment in future periods.
Depletion
Provision for depletion of oil and natural gas properties under the full cost method is calculated using the unit of production method based upon estimates of proved developed oil and natural gas reserves with oil and natural gas production being converted to a common unit of measure based upon their relative energy content. Investments in unproved properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. The cost of any impaired property is transferred to the balance of oil and natural gas properties being depleted.
Significant Estimates and Assumptions
Oil and Gas Reserves
(1) Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of a reserve estimate depends on the quality of available geological and engineering data, the precision of the interpretation of that data, and judgment based on experience and training. We have historically engaged an independent petroleum engineering firm to evaluate our oil and gas reserves. As a part of this process, our internal reservoir engineer and the independent engineers exchange information and attempt to reconcile any material differences in estimates and assumptions.
(2) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
(3) Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following: (A) oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is classified separately as indicated additional reserves; (B) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and (D) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such sources.
Valuation of proved undeveloped properties
Placing a fair market value on proved undeveloped properties, commonly referred to as “PUDs” is very subjective since there is no quoted market for them. The negotiated price of any PUD between a willing seller and willing buyer depends on the specific facts regarding the PUD, including:
· | the location of the PUD in relation to known fields and reservoirs, available markets and transportation systems for oil and gas production in the vicinity, and other critical services; |
· | the nature and extent of geological and geophysical data on the PUD; |
· | the terms of the leases holding the acreage in the area, such as ownership interests, expiration terms, delay rental obligations, depth limitations, drilling and marketing restrictions, and similar terms; |
· | the PUDs risk-adjusted potential for return on investment, giving effect to suchfactors as potential reserves to be discovered, drilling and completion costs, prevailing commodity prices, and other economic factors; and |
· | the results of drilling activity in close proximity to the PUD that could either enhance or condemn the prospect’s chances of success. |
Provision for DD&A
We have computed our provision for DD&A on a unit-of-production method. Each quarter, we use the following formulas to compute the provision for DD&A.
· | DD&A Rate = Current period production, divided by beginning proved reserves |
· | Provision for DD&A = DD&A Rate, times the un-depleted full cost pool of oil and gas properties |
Reserve estimates have a significant impact on the DD&A rate. If reserve estimates for our properties are revised downward in future periods, the DD&A rate will increase as a result of the revision. Alternatively, if reserve estimates are revised upward, the DD&A rate will decrease.
Hedging Activities
From time to time, we utilize derivative instruments, consisting of swaps, floors and collars, to attempt to reduce our exposure to changes in commodity prices and interest rates. We account for our derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recognized as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on both the intended purpose and the formal designation of the derivative. Designation is established at the inception of a derivative, but subsequent changes to the designation are permitted. We have elected not to designate any of our derivative financial contracts as accounting hedges and, accordingly, account for these derivative financial contracts using mark-to-market accounting. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments which are not designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other income (expense) as changes in fair value of derivatives. Hedging is a strategy that can help a company to mitigate the volatility of oil and gas prices by limiting its losses if oil and gas prices decline; however, this strategy may also limit the potential gains that a company could realize if oil and gas prices increase. Historically, certain “costless collars” executed in June 2005 and swaps executed in mid 2006 by our predecessor in interest were employed to protect such predecessor and its creditors from exposure to lower oil and gas prices. However, as a result of those positions, we have and may continue to periodically incur settlement losses associated with the ceiling component of such hedges as oil prices have increased during 2007 and in 2008. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we reported derivative losses of $23.1 and $25.1 million, respectively.
Asset Retirement Obligation
We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires us to recognize a liability for the present value of all legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible, long-lived assets and capitalize an equal amount as a cost of the asset. The cost of the abandonment obligations, less estimated salvage values, is included in the computation of depreciation, depletion and amortization.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 2 within the financial statements in Item 1 for a description of Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risks. Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates, foreign exchanges, commodity prices, equity prices, and other market-driven rates or prices. The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses, but rather indicators of reasonably possible losses. This forward-looking information provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market risk exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
At June 30,2008 our oil and gas subsidiaries had approximately $7.5 million in outstanding borrowings associated with their credit facility with a major bank and our engineering services company had $4.9 million in outstanding borrowings under a revolving credit facility and term notes with the selling shareholders in the acquisition of that business. To the extent we have debt outstanding, we will be subject to risk of interest rate changes that would impact our future results of operations and cash flows.
Price Risks
See Note 8 within the financial statements in Item 1 for a description of our price risks and price risk management activities.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Original Filing”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, filed on August 15, 2008 management of the Company, including our principal executive and financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by the Original Filing. Based on that evaluation, management initially concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be included in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act as of such time was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) rules and forms and such information was accumulated and communicated as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the restatement discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Form 10-Q/A and in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements, management of the Company, including our principal executive and financial officer, reevaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008 pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. As a result of such reevaluation, management has determined that we had a material weakness in our system of internal control over financial reporting as of such date. This weakness related to the monitoring and timely recording of oil and gas derivative hedging transactions in our financial statements.
As a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described above, management, including our principal executive and financial officer, has revised its earlier assessment and has now concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2008.
Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Commission’s rules and forms. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures that, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives. Management does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, irrespective of how well it is designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance, and cannot guarantee that it will succeed in its stated objectives.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, our internal control over financial reporting. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter and as a result of the restatement, we have made the following improvements and implemented the following policies and procedures:
· | While all transactions we undertook were properly authorized by the Board of Directors, we have instituted a formal policy to require any person entering into a derivative transaction to notify the CFO in writing immediately; |
· | Responsible accounting personnel will maintain and update daily the inventory of hedging derivative transactions in which we engaged; |
· | We will obtain at least on a monthly basis confirmation from our counterparties of our positions and their estimated fair market value; |
· | Reconciliations with counterparties will be performed on at least a monthly basis; |
· | Establishment of a formal disclosure committee. |
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
There have been no material changes to the legal proceedings previously disclosed in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The following is an update of the risk factors set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-K/A”). There have otherwise been no material changes in our risk factors from the information provided in Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in the Form 10-K/A.
Our operations entail inherent casualty risks which may not be covered by adequate insurance.
We must continually acquire, explore and develop new oil and natural gas reserves to replace those produced and sold. Our hydrocarbon reserves and revenues will decline if we are not successful in our drilling, acquisition or exploration activities. We hope to maintain our reserve base primarily through successful exploration and production operations, but we may not be successful in this regard. Casualty risks and other operating risks could cause reserves and revenues to decline.
Our operations are subject to inherent casualty risks such as fires, blowouts, cratering and explosions. Other risks include pollution, the uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas, brine or well fluids. These risks may result in injury or loss of life, suspension of operations, environmental damage or property and equipment damage, all of which would cause us to experience substantial financial loss. Our drilling operations involve risks from high pressures and from mechanical difficulties such as stuck pipes, collapsed casings and separated cables.
Although many of our properties are located across Texas and southeast New Mexico and are not confined to one geographic area, our Tomball field, the largest producer in our current portfolio, and much of our Maverick business are located in the Gulf Coast region of Texas, an area that may be subject to catastrophic weather and natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes and hurricanes. If such disaster were to occur, it could severely disrupt our operations in that area and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In accordance with customary industry practice, we maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks. There can be no assurance that any insurance will be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities. We cannot predict the continued availability of insurance, or its availability at premium levels that justify its purchase. In addition, we may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of properties that we purchased, which liabilities would not be covered by our insurance. We are currently unaware of any material liability we may have for environmental damages caused by previous owners of properties purchased by us.
Maverick Engineering, our wholly owned subsidiary, is dependent upon a small number of customers for a large portion of its net revenues, and a decline in sales to its major customers could harm Maverick's results of operations.
A small number of customers are responsible for a significant portion of Maverick's net revenues. During 2007, Maverick's 5 largest customers accounted for approximately $22 million out of its $33.8 million of net revenues. Maverick's customer concentration could increase or decrease depending on future customer requirements, which will depend in large part on business conditions in the market sectors in which Maverick's customers participate. The loss of one or more major customers or a decline in sales to Maverick’s major customers could significantly harm Maverick's business and results of operations. If Maverick is not able to expand its customer base, it will continue to depend upon a small number of customers for a significant percentage of its sales. There can be no assurance that its current customers will not reduce the amount of services for which they are retained or otherwise terminate their relationship.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
On April 29, 2008, the Company acquired Maverick Engineering, Inc. In connection with the acquisition, the sellers agreed to satisfy and assume Maverick’s bank indebtedness in the aggregate amount of $4.9 million consisting of $3.0 million revolving line of credit maturing April 2008, $1.6 million term note due April 2011, and $0.3 million oil and gas note due May 2009, using a portion of the cash received by them at closing. Following the closing, the Company was indebted to the sellers for these amounts under the identical terms of the bank loan agreements. On April 30, 2008, Maverick entered into extension and modification agreements with the sellers pursuant to which sellers agreed to defer principal payments of the $1.6 million term loan for six months and extend the maturity date to April 2013. The sellers also agreed to extend the maturity dates of the revolving line of credit and oil and gas note to 2010 and 2013, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2008, Maverick was not in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio contained in the loan agreements. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, the sellers waived the Company's obligation to maintain this ratio through September 30, 2009.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits, which are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are filed herewith or, as noted, incorporated by reference herein:
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description |
10.1 | | Employment Agreement by and between Platinum Energy Resources, Inc. and Robert L. Kovar entered into as of April 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Platinum’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2008) |
| | |
10.2 | | Form of Notice of Stock Option Award and Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to Platinum’s Form S-1/A (File No. 333-149258) filed on July 18, 2008) |
| | |
31 | | Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer |
| | |
32.1 | | Section 906 Certification |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. |
| | |
Date: November 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Barry Kostiner |
| Barry Kostiner Chief Executive Officer |