Shamika 2 Gold 10Q 2010 Q1 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

		(Mark One)
	[X ]	Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

[ ]

Transition Report Under Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the transition period ________to ________

Commission File Number: 333-126748

AULTRA GOLD, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada	98-0448154
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
organization)

1980, Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 1100

Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1E8

(Address of principal executive offices)

(514) 931-9990

Issuer's telephone number

120 North 5th Street, Jacksonville, Oregon 97530

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerate filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerate filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-3 of the Exchange Act. (Check One).

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of May 24, 2010, the Issuer had 50,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

AULTRA GOLD, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
		Page
ITEM 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009	F-3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	F-4
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	F-5
	Notes to Financial Statements	F-7-F-14

ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operation	3

ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4

ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures	4

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1	Legal Proceedings	6

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	6

ITEM 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	6

ITEM 5.	Other Information	6

ITEM 6	Exhibits	6

	Signatures	27

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B, and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders' equity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”), the terms "we", "us", "our", the “Company” and mean Aultra Gold, Inc., unless otherwise indicated. All dollar amounts in this Quarterly Report are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.

F-1

AULTRA GOLD, INC.

An Exploration Stage Company

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three month Ended March 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009	Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, and 12 months ended December 31, 2009	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and twelve months ended December 31, 2009	F-5

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the period ended March 31, 2010	F-6

Notes to Financial Statements	F-7

F-2

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of March 31, 2010 and twelve months ending December 31, 2009

(Stated in United States Dollars)

	March 31			December 31
	2010			2009
	$			$
A S S E T S
Current Assets
Cash		-0-			-0-
Accounts receivable and accrued receivables		-0-			-0-
Total Current Assets		-0-			-0-
Long term Assets
Long term investment		-0-			6,232
Long term receivables		-0-			65,485
Fixed Assets		-0-			100,000
Total Assets		-0-			171,717


L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S T O C K H O L D E R S’ E Q U I T Y

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, notes payable and other accrued liabilities		22,516			946,243
Total current liabilities		22,516			946,243

Total Liabilities		22,516			946,243

S TOCK H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 50,000,000 shares issued and outstanding (note 7)		50,000			96,147
Accumulated deficit		(421,225	)		(1,230,048	)
Additional paid-in capital		348,709			348,709

Total stockholders’ equity		(22,516	)		(774,526	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		0			171,717

See notes to financial statements

F-3

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Consolidated Statement of Operations

For the three months ending March 31, 2010 and twelve months ending December 31, 2009

(Stated in United States Dollars)

See notes to financial statements

	For the Period Ended March 31, 2010		For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
		$		$

R E V E N U E		0		0

Expenses
Filing fees		0		4,311
Consultants and contractors		22,516		243,564
Travel		0		0
Mineral property expenditures		0		187,302
Office and sundry		0		4,225
Professional fees		0		6,000
Shares for interest expense		0		0
Transfer agent		0		6,200

Loss for the Period		22,516		451,602

Other Revenues and Expenses
Gain on Sale to Dutch Gold		1,267,841		0
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		0		0
Bad debt		0		0
Loss on investment		0		6,232
Total gain (loss) for period		1,245,325		(457,834)
Deficit - beginning of the period		(1,666,550)		(1,230,048)

Deficit - end of period		(421,225)		(1,687,822)

Gain (Loss) per shares - basic and diluted		0.02		(0.01	)

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding		73,073,334		96,146,668

See notes to financial statements

F-4

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the three months ending March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009

(Stated in United States Dollars)

	For the Period Ended March 31, 2010			For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
		$			$

Cash flows from operating activities
Gain (Loss) for the period		1,245,325			(457,835	)

Changes in:

Accounts receivables and accrued receivables		22,516

Non cash impact of sale of Dutch		(1,222,809	)		451,602
Net cash used in operating activities		0			6,233

Cash flows from investing activities
Mineral property		-			0	)
Investments		0			(6,232	)
Cash used in investing activities					(6,233)	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Share capital issued		-			0
Loans		-			-
Cumulative translation adjustment		-			0
Net cash received from financing activities		-			0

Net increase in cash		0			0
Cash - beginning of period		0-			0
Cash - end of period		0-			0

See notes to financial statements

F-5

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

From inception on January 26, 2005 to March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

See notes to financial statements

	Common Stock
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit During Exploration Stage		Total Equity (Deficit)
			$		$		$		$
Balance, December 31, 2009		96,146,668		96,147		348,709		(1,666,550)		(1,221,694)
Cancellation of Shares		(46,146,668)		(46,147)						(46,147)
Sale of Mining Business to Dutch Gold								1,267,841		1,267,841
Loss for the Period								(22,516)		(22,516)
Balance March 31, 2010		50,000,000		50,000		348,709		(421,225)		(22,516)

F-6

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

1. Nature of Operations

Aultra Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 26, 2005 as Katie Gold Corp. and it was primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties until April 2006. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

On March 21, 2006, a Certificate of Amendment was filed with the Secretary of State in Nevada to change the name of the Company from Katie Gold Corp. to Morningstar Industrial Holdings Corp. At this time, the Company was still engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties.

On April 26, 2006, the Company filed Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State in Nevada to merge with New World Entertainment Corp., a private company incorporated in Nevada. As a result of the merger, the Company changed its business and its name from Morningstar Industrial Holdings Corp. to New World Entertainment Corp.

On December 7, 2006, a Certificate of Amendment was filed with the Secretary of State in Nevada to change the name of the Company from New World Entertainment Corp. to Aultra Gold, Inc. The Nevada Secretary of Stated declared the amendment effective on January 18, 2007.

On January 22, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Strategic Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation, Aultra Gold, Inc. (fka Dutch Mining (Canada) Ltd.) (“AGI”), a company formed under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, and certain other shareholders of AGI. Pursuant to the Agreement, which is subject to certain regulatory approval, the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity of AGI from the stockholders of AGI (the “AGI Shareholders”) in exchange for the issuance by the Company to the AGI Shareholders of one share of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Common Stock”), of the Company for each issued common share of AGI (the “Acquisition”). Therefore, subject to certain regulator y approval, the Company shall be required to issue 24,496,668 shares of Common Stock to the AGI Shareholders (the “Consideration Shares”) and there will be approximately a total of 95,896,668 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding subsequent to the Acquisition. AGI was incorporated on January 20, 2006 in Canada under the Business Corporations Act of British Columbia. AGI’s main business is acquiring and exploring gold and mineral properties with proven and probable reserves principally located in Nevada and Montana, USA, with the objective of identifying gold and mineralized deposits economically worthy of continued production and/or subsequent development, mining or sale.

On April 26, 2006, the Company filed Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State in Nevada to change its name from Morningstar Industrial Holdings Corp. and underwent a change in management and direction and was involved in the acquisition and licensing of online gaming technologies.

On May 12, 2006 the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Liverpoole Inc., a privately-owned corporation organized under the laws of Antigua, for the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Liverpoole in exchange for 25,000,000 shares of the Company, upon completion of the agreement. In connection therewith, in order to secure the right to enter into such agreement with Liverpoole, the Company entered into an agreement with World Mobile Network Corp., a publicly-held corporation, pursuant to which, upon the completion of the agreement, World Mobile Network Corp.

F-7

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

agreed to assign its exclusive right to acquire Liverpoole to the Company in exchange for 20,000,000 shares of the Company. As of December 31, 2006, these agreements were not been finalized.

On March 26, 2010, Aultra Gold, Inc. (the “Company” or the “Registrant”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (the “Agreement”) with Shamika Gold Inc., a Canadian Corporation (“Shamika”), and certain shareholders of Shamika (the “Shamika Holders”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Shamika Gold Inc. (the “Shamika Shares”) from the Shamika Holders in exchange for an aggregate of 25,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Common Stock”) (the “Exchange”). As a result of the Exchange, Shamika and its 99.9% subsidiary Shamika Gold Mining Sprl., a Congolese limited partnership became subsidiaries of the Company. Sha mika Gold Mining Sprl. owns an option to acquire a mining exploration concession located on lands in Poko, Province Orientale in the Democratic Republic of Congo and, at the time of the exchange, an option to acquire two mining exploitation permits in Lubutu in the Congo. The Company shares were issued to the Shamika Holders on a pro rata basis, on the basis of the shares held by such Shamika Holders at the time of the Exchange.

On March 26, 2010 the former holders of the Shamika Shares acquired 51% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Accordingly, the Exchange represents a change in control. Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. retained 4,950,000 shares of Shamika Gold, Inc. For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by Shamika, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with the Shamika as the acquirer. Upon consummation of the Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of Shamika.

At the effective time of the Acquisition, our board of directors and officers was reconstituted by the resignation of: Rauno Perttu from his role as President, Secretary and director, Daniel Hollis from his role as Chief Financial Officer and director, Lance Rosmarin from his role as director, and the appointment of Robert Vivian as President and Chief Executive Officer and Terence Orstlan as Secretary and Director.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

a) Basis of Accounting

These financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in United States. The Company has elected a December 31 year-end. Summarized below are those policies considered particularly significant to the Company.

a) Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

b) Use of Estimates

F-8

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

2.	Significant Accounting Policies-continued

assets and liabilities and the disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities as at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues earned and expenses incurred during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

c) Financial Instruments and Financial Risk

The Company’s financial instruments consists of cash, prepaid expenses, investments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the fair values of which approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

d) Cash

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the company considers all funds held in its bank accounts and funds held in trust by third parties as cash.

e) Investment in mining properties

Land and Mining Claims – Land and mining claims are recorded at the lower of cost, less accumulated depletion, or fair value. Costs of developing mining properties (after completion of exploration) are capitalized. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred until the establishment of a commercially minable deposit or reserve which can be economically and legally produced. When a mining property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs are amortized using the units of production method on the basis of proven and probable ore reserves. The Company’s mining properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment.

f) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for long-lived assets pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. The Company evaluates its land and mineral properties, buildings, machinery and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment at least annually and when indications of possible impairment exist and assesses their recoverability based upon anticipated future cash flows from the asset’s or group of assets’ use or sale. If changes in circumstances lead Company management to believe that any of its long-lived assets may be impaired, the carrying value of long-lived assets are reduced by the estimated excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the as sets. Fair value is determined by the discounted future cash flows from the asset or group of assets. No impairment was recognized during the reporting periods.

g) Gain or Loss per Share

Basic gain or loss per share is computed by dividing loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

h) Management’s Estimates

F-9

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

2.	Significant Accounting Policies-continued

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

i) Share Capital

Share capital issued for non-monetary consideration is recorded at an amount based upon fair market value as estimated by management.

j) Comprehensive Income

The Company applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS No. 130). Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non owner sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except from those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.

k) Income taxes

Deferred Income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax laws and rates for the years when the differences are expected to reverse.

l) Stock based compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 for “Accounting for stock-based compensation” and related interpretations.

m) Asset retirement obligations

Asset retirement obligations requires recognition of a legal liability for obligations relating to retirement of property, plant and equipment, and arising from the acquisition, construction, development, or normal operation of those assets. Such asset retirement cost, must be recognized at fair value, when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be estimated, in the period in which it is incurred, added to the carrying value of the asset, and amortized into income on a systematic basis over its useful life.

As at the reporting date, the Company does not have any asset retirement obligations.

F-10

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

3.	Acquisition of Subsidiary

4.	Related Party Balances and Transactions

None.

F-11

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

5.	Share Capital

a)	Details of share capital are as follows:

Authorized: 500,000,000 common shares with a par value of $.001

	Number of
	Shares			Amount
				$
Issued:
Balance – inception January 26, 2005		-			-
Common Shares issued		71,400,000			71,400
Shares issued in lieu of promissory note		10,833,333			10,833
Balance-December 31, 2006		82,233,333			82,233
Restricted common shares issued		24,496,668			24,497
Restricted Common Shares issued for Jungo		50,000			50
Common Shares issued		200,000			200
Shares cancelled		(40,833,333	)		(40,833	)
Balance – December 31, 2007 (d)		66,146,668			66,147
Restricted Common Shares issued for Services		30,000,000			30,000
Balance – December 31, 2008		96,146,668			96,147
Balance, December 31, 2009		96,146,668			96,147
Cancellation of Shares		(46,146,668)			(46,147)
Balance March 31, 2010		50,000,000			50,000

6. Income Taxes

A reconciliation of income taxes at statutory rates is as follows:

	March 31, 2010

Net gain for the period	$	1,245,325
Total income taxes		-0-

Management believes that there may be a Canadian tax charge in relation to the merger transaction, but that this amount will not be material and management has deemed it appropriate not to accrue for this amount at this time.

7. Commitments and Claims

In the course of normal business, we may be subject to the threat of litigation, claims and assessments. Our management believes that unfavorable decisions in any pending procedures or threat of procedures or any amount it might be required to pay will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.

On or about April 17, 2007, a lawsuit was filed by 761273 B.C. Ltd., Calderan Ventures Ltd., Scott Kostiuk, William Parkin, Ronald Oliver, Lubomir Palecek and Krista Dayton under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada in the British Columbia Supreme Court for a total amount of $ 203,311.88. Aultra has no assets in Canada and intends to vigorously defend itself should this action be pursued in the United States. As part of the the transaction with Dutch Gold, Dutch Gold indemnified the Company against any claims arising from this claim.

F-12

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

From time to time we may be a defendant and plaintiff in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We are currently not a party to any material pending legal proceedings or government actions, including any bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings. In addition, management is not aware of any known litigation or liabilities involving the operators of our properties that could affect our operations. Should any liabilities incurred in the future, they will be accrued based on management’s best estimate of the potential loss. As such, there is no adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow at this time. Furthermore, our management does not believe that there are any proceedings to which any of our directors, officers, or affiliates, any owner of record o f the beneficially or more than five percent of our common stock, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate, or security holder is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to us.

8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows the company to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 159 and the potential impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more single-employer defined benefit plans to (a) recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position, (b) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, or SFAS 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”, (c) m easure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end, and (d) disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. SFAS 158 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements-continued

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurement" ("SFAS 157"). The Statement provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The Statement also expands disclosures about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurement on earnings. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This Statement does not expand the use of fair value measurements in any new circumstances. Under this Statement, fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market part icipants in the market in which the entity transacts. SFAS 157 is effective for the Company for fair value measurements and disclosures made by the Company in its fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2008.

F-13

Aultra Gold, Inc.

An Exploration Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

(Stated in United States Dollars)

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “ Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments ”, which amends SFAS No. 133, “ Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ” and SFAS No. 140. SFAS No. 155 permits fair value measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or hybrid financial instruments containing embedded derivatives. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

10. Subsequent events

Shamika Gold Inc. through its 99.9% subsidiary, Shamika Gold Mining Sprl., exercised its option to acquire two gold exploitation permits located on land in the territory of Lubutu in the Congo. The cost of acquisition was $500,000 of which $41,000 has been paid, $59,000 is due in 90 days and the terms of the balance are to be negotiated. Other costs of this transaction were $17782. By agreement Shamika Gold, is obliged to pay Shamika Congo Kalehe Sprl. (a related party) certain amounts in the event that this option to acquire the Lubutu permits is exercised. Specifically Shamika Gold has agreed to pay an amount of $100,000 in cash within six months from the date of public listing and a deferred consideration of $2,000,000 of which $1,000,000 is to be paid in cash and $1,000,000 is to be paid in shares. There is no specified date of paymen t for this deferred consideration. The agreement also provides for a net smelter return of 2.5% to be paid to Shamika Congo Kalehe Sprl. Shamika Congo Kalehe Sprl. is a related party to Shamika Gold Inc.

F-14

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited Financial Statements and Notes thereto included herein beginning on page F-1.

Certain statements in this Report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby.

References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Annual Report”) to “we”, “us,” “our,” “the Company,” “Aultra Gold” and “AGI” mean Aultra Gold, Inc. and our subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

Overview

The Company is a development stage company in the business of acquiring natural resources properties in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Company owns gold mining concessions in that country, which it intends to further explore, develop and ultimately put into production. The Company intends to raise an initial financing of $1,500,000 with which it will obtain 43-101 reports on each property, establish an operations camp in the region and initiate further exploration.

Applications have been made to FINRA to change the name of Aultra Gold Inc to Shamika 2 Gold Inc. Upon approval from FINRA, the name change will be announced.

There is limited historical information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are at an exploration stage operation and have had limited revenues. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise.

We have not earned any revenues from our incorporation on January 26, 2005. We do not anticipate earning revenues for the foreseeable future. We have not commenced the exploration stage of our business and can provide no assurance that we will discover economic mineralization on the property, or if such minerals are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

Net income for the period ended to March 31, 2010 was $1,245,325, as compared to a net loss of ($457,834) for the period ended December 31, 2009. This result are a result of the restructured business and disposition of mining properties to Dutch Gold.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expense consisted of accounting and professional fees and other general expenses. General and administrative expenses for the for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 were $22,516, as compared to $451,602 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The changes are a result of the restructured business and disposition of mining properties to Dutch Gold.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2010, our cash was $0. Since our inception on January 20, 2005, to the end of the period ended March 31, 2010, we have incurred losses of ($421,225). We attribute our net loss to having no revenues to offset our operating expenses.

We have no cash flow from operations and do not have cash and or equivalents to meet our core operational requirements for the next 12 months, but we will also be required to raise additional working capital to fund our Plan of Mining Operations in order to carry-out the Plan of Operations as discussed further above.

We have no assurance that future financings will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms, we may be unable to continue our operations. Should our costs and expenses prove to be greater than we currently anticipate, or should we change our current Plan of Mining Operations in a manner that will increase or accelerate our anticipated costs and expenses, such as through the acquisition of new properties, the depletion of our working capital would be accelerated. To the extent that it becomes necessary to raise additional cash in the future as our current cash and working capital resources are depleted, we will seek to raise it through the public or private sale of debt or equity securities, the procurement of advances on contracts or funding from joint-venture or strategic partners, debt financing or term loans, or a combination of the foregoing. We also may seek to satisfy indebtedness without any cash outlay through the private issuance of debt or equity securities.

We have no assurance that future financings will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms, we may be unable to continue our operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company also has not entered into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, although we may enter into such transactions in the future.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This rule defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of Company management to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and principal accounting officer concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal period ending March 31, 2010 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in reports we submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that such information was accumulated and communicated to our chief executive officer and principal accounting officer in a manner that allowed for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, cont rols can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's CEO and CFO and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that: pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of t he company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitatio ns are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of March 31, 2010 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

Identified Weaknesses

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board was the lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.

-We omitted to disclose of our “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” in our initial Annual Report filed on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007;

- During 2007, we did not timely file our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30, 2007 and our Annual Report for year ending December 31, 2007;

-We lack sufficient trained personnel with experience in accounting and financial reporting functions due to the size of our Company and our lack of financial resources to pay such personnel; and

-We do not have a sufficient number of employees to adequately segregate accounting duties to provide for sufficient internal controls.

These material weaknesses were first identified by management in connection with the preparation and review of our unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 2008 in or about November 2008.

Management also believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated a plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board. While we are actively seeking outside members, including candidates with accounting experience, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful. Given the size of our company, lack of revenues and current lack of financing to continue with our business, it is unlikely that anyone will agree to join our Board until general economic conditions and our own business prospects improve significantly.

(b)	Changes in Internal Controls

During the most recent quarter ended March 31, 2010, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. However, as discussed above, changes have been implemented subsequent to the period covered by this Form 10-K to add additional controls to correct the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On or about April 17, 2007, a lawsuit was filed by 761273 B.C. Ltd., Calderan Ventures Ltd., Scott Kostiuk, William Parkin, Ronald Oliver, Lubomir Palecek and Krista Dayton under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada in the British Columbia Supreme Court for a total amount of $ 203,311.88. Aultra has no assets in Canada and intends to vigorously defend itself should this action be pursued in the United States. As part of the transaction with Dutch Gold, Dutch Gold indemnified the Company against any claims arising from this claim.

From time to time we may be a defendant and plaintiff in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We are currently not a party to any material pending legal proceedings or government actions, including any bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings. In addition, management is not aware of any known litigation or liabilities involving the operators of our properties that could affect our operations. Should any liabilities incurred in the future, they will be accrued based on management’s best estimate of the potential loss. As such, there is no adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow at this time. Furthermore, our management does not believe that there are any proceedings to which any of our directors, officers, or affiliates, any owner of recor d of the beneficially or more than five percent of our common stock, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate, or security holder is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to us.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.


Exhibit Number			Description of Exhibits
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

May 24, 2010	/s/ Robert Vivian
	Name: Robert Vivian
	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer
	(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. freshman Avg

Shamika 2 Gold (SHMX) Inactive 10-Q2010 Q1 Quarterly report

Content analysis