Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The unaudited interim financial statements as of September 30, 2018 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. These financial statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the balance sheets, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the SEC’s rules and regulations for interim reporting. The Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows are presented in U.S. Dollars. The accompanying unaudited financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, which are included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-225960). The Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”) on January 1, 2018. There have been no other material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, as compared to the significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 2 of the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Reverse Stock Split On July 12, 2018 and July 19, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders, respectively, approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation effecting a 1-for-16.8273325471348 reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock and convertible preferred stock. The reverse stock split was effective on July 19, 2018. The par value of the common and redeemable convertible preferred stock was not adjusted as a result of the reverse stock split. All issued and outstanding share and per share amounts included in the accompanying financial statements have been adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split for all periods presented. Variable Interest Entities The Company identifies entities (i) that do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) in which the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial interest as variable interest entities (“VIE” or “VIEs”). The Company performs an initial and ongoing evaluation of the entities with which the Company has variable interests to determine if any of these entities are VIEs. If an entity is identified as a VIE, the Company performs an assessment to determine whether the Company has both (i) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses from or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If both of these criteria are satisfied, the Company is identified as the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the entity must be consolidated. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company determined that Envisia Therapeutics Inc. (“Envisia”) was a variable interest entity (“VIE”), although the Company does not consolidate it as the Company is not the primary beneficiary for Envisia. Envisia is accounted for under the equity method. There have been no activities between Envisia and the Company in 2018. Going Concern The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company closed its initial public offering (“IPO”) in July and August 2018 resulting in total net proceeds of $49.4 million, after underwriting discounts but prior to payment of other offering expenses. The Company's operations have consisted primarily of developing its technology, developing products, prosecuting its intellectual property and securing financing. The Company has incurred recurring losses and cash outflows from operations, has an accumulated deficit, and has debt maturing within twelve months. The Company expects to continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future and will require additional financial resources to continue to advance its products and intellectual property, in addition to repaying its maturing debt and other obligations. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to this matter include continuing attempts to obtain additional financing to sustain its operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining sufficient financing on terms acceptable to the Company, and the failure of the Company to obtain sufficient funds on acceptable terms, when needed, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. If sufficient financings are not obtained, this may necessitate other actions by the Company. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to credit risk, subject to federal deposit insurance, in the event of default by the financial institutions holding its cash to the extent of amounts recorded on the Balance Sheet. With regards to cash, 100% of the Company’s cash is held on deposit with Pacific Western Bank. With regards to revenues and accounts receivable, GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK” and “GSK Inhaled”) accounted for 0% and 84% of the Company’s revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, 20% and 81% of the Company’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $0 or 0% and $1.1 million or 69% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”). The FASB issued Topic 606 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance. Topic 606 also includes Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers , which requires the deferral of incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and certain contract fulfillment costs. The Company adopted this standard and all the related amendments (“new revenue standard”) on January 1, 2018, applying the modified retrospective method. The modified retrospective transition method is applied on a prospective basis from the adoption date and does not recast historical financial statement periods. Any contracts with customers that were not complete as of the adoption date are reviewed and the Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018. Financial information in comparative periods have not been restated and continue to be reported under the accounting methods in effect for that period. This adoption primarily affected the recognition of non-refundable up-front fees and milestone payments. The Company previously recognized non-refundable up-front fees as deferred revenue which was recognized into revenue on a straight-line basis over the estimated period of the Company’s substantive performance obligations, as a component of a multiple element arrangement. Milestone payments were previously accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-28-50-2(e), which had required recognition of a milestone payment when the applicable event was considered to be both substantive and achieved. The adoption of the new revenue standard generally requires licenses that are not considered distinct performance obligations from other goods or services within a contract to be bundled with those goods or services as a combined performance obligation. Revenue associated with the combined performance obligation is recognized over time as those goods or services are delivered. The adoption of the new revenue standard also impacted the deferral of sublicense payments related to the milestone payments, which were previously expensed when the milestone payments were recognized, and the timing of recognition of deferred sublicense payments related to up-front license payments. Under the new revenue standard, the incremental sublicense payments related to milestone payments will be deferred as contract fulfillment costs and amortized over time, consistent with the method of recognition for the related revenues. The cumulative effect of the changes made to the January 1, 2018 balance of accumulated deficit on the Balance Sheet for the adoption of Topic 606 was $0.5 million as follows: Balance at Adjustments Balance at December 31, Due to January 1, 2017 Topic 606 2018 Balance Sheet: Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 443,460 $ 10,551 $ 454,011 Prepaid expenses and other assets 1,115,972 45,529 1,161,501 Liabilities Current portion of deferred revenue 3,605,199 105,512 3,710,711 Long-term deferred revenue 5,527,296 455,295 5,982,591 Stockholders’ equity (deficit) Accumulated deficit (113,413,311) (504,727) (113,918,038) In accordance with the new revenue standard requirements, the impact of adoption on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and Balance Sheet was as follows: For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Balances Without Adoption of Effect of Change As Reported Topic 606 Higher/(Lower) Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss: Revenues $ 169,730 $ 919,730 $ (750,000) Costs and expenses Cost of sales — 75,000 (75,000) Net loss (9,673,012) (8,998,012) 675,000 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Balances Without Adoption of Effect of Change As Reported Topic 606 Higher/(Lower) Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss: Revenues $ 2,138,579 $ 4,118,228 $ (1,979,649) Costs and expenses Cost of sales 121,391 319,356 (197,965) Net loss (43,450,124) (41,668,440) 1,781,684 September 30, 2018 Balances Without Adoption of Effect of Change As Reported Topic 606 Higher/(Lower) Balance Sheet: Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 240,883 $ 540,883 $ (300,000) Prepaid expenses and other assets 1,160,839 631,980 528,859 Liabilities Current portion of deferred revenue 326,700 3,326,700 (3,000,000) Long-term deferred revenue 8,071,921 2,783,334 5,288,587 Stockholders’ equity (deficit) Accumulated deficit (157,368,161) (155,308,433) 2,059,728 Segment Data The Company manages, reports and evaluates its business in the following two segments: Pharmaceutical Products and Partnering and Licensing. The Company’s reportable operating segments have been determined in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on operating activities, the manner in which the Company organizes segments for making operating decisions and assessing performance and the availability of separate financial results. Unallocated operations and corporate expenses, such as depreciation, facilities costs, corporate management costs and interest expense, are represented within Corporate / Operations. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company determined that it will change the way it manages and operates the reporting entity and is in the process of modifying the Company’s information system to produce financial information to support the new structure. The changes will require the Company to revise its segment reporting. It is anticipated that the modification to the system will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018, at which point management will reorganize its operations and reporting structure and begin to manage its operations under its new segment structure. The segment data is reflected below for three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, as follows: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Revenues: Pharmaceutical Products $ — $ — $ — $ — Partnering and Licensing 169,730 1,820,848 2,138,579 5,442,020 Total 169,730 1,820,848 2,138,579 5,442,020 Operating (loss) income: Pharmaceutical Products (5,481,289) (3,832,268) (14,427,982) (10,058,345) Partnering and Licensing 57,399 564,841 1,342,359 1,637,588 Corporate / Operations (3,846,934) (4,529,217) (12,023,103) (12,422,590) Total (9,270,824) (7,796,644) (25,108,726) (20,843,347) Interest income 128,120 — 139,965 268 Interest expense (636,573) (4,155,714) (18,759,078) (8,323,924) Derivative and warrant fair value adjustments 106,265 (7,284,256) 277,715 (8,197,356) Net loss $ (9,673,012) $ (19,236,614) $ (43,450,124) $ (37,364,359) Segment information by asset is not disclosed as it is not reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker or used to allocate resources or to assess the Company’s operating results and financial performance. All long‑lived assets are domiciled within the United States and all revenues were earned within the United States. Net Loss Per Share Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents consist of preferred stock, stock options and stock warrants. Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated using the two‑class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines net loss per share for the holders of the Company’s common shares and participating securities. The Company’s convertible preferred stock contains participating rights in any dividend paid by the Company and are deemed to be participating securities. Net loss attributable to common stockholders and participating preferred shares are allocated to each share on an as‑converted basis as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed. The participating securities do not include a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company and are not included in the calculation of net loss per share in the periods that have a net loss. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti‑dilutive effect on net loss per share. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the more dilutive of (a) the two‑class method or (b) the if‑converted method. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss attributable to common stockholders, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders since dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti‑dilutive. Diluted net loss per share is equivalent to basic net loss per share for all years presented herein because common stock equivalent shares from unexercised stock options, outstanding warrants, preferred stock and common shares expected to be issued under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan were anti‑dilutive. Due to their dilutive effect, the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 does not include the following common stock equivalent shares: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Preferred Stock — 4,172,437 — 4,172,437 Stock Options 1,642,004 673,684 1,642,004 673,684 Warrants 198,870 235,805 198,870 235,805 Total 1,840,874 5,081,926 1,840,874 5,081,926 For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 the only reconciling item between basic and diluted net loss per share is the impact of the common stock warrants that are included in the calculation of basic net loss per share since their exercise price is de minimis, but excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share since the impact of such warrants is antidilutive. For all other periods presented, there were no reconciling items between basic and diluted net loss per share. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 approximated fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s valuation of financial instruments is based on a three‑tiered approach, which requires that fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of three tiers. The fair value hierarchy defines a three‑level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows: Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 — Other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset and liability used to measure fair value, to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables present the placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017: Significant Quoted Prices Other in Active Observable Significant Markets Inputs Unobservable Carrying September 30, 2018 (Level 1) (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3) Value Pacific Western Bank Tranche I note $ — $ 2,136,320 $ — $ 2,126,422 Pacific Western Bank Tranche II note — 2,536,270 — 2,538,047 Pacific Western Bank Tranche III note — 3,381,693 — 3,384,063 CSC build-to-suit equipment financing — 1,406,093 — 1,206,932 UNC Promissory Note — 1,764,243 — 1,764,243 Total $ — $ 11,224,619 $ — $ 11,019,707 Significant Quoted Prices Other in Active Observable Significant Markets Inputs Unobservable Carrying December 31, 2017 (Level 1) (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3) Value Pacific Western Bank Tranche I note $ — $ 2,512,301 $ — $ 2,488,572 Pacific Western Bank Tranche II note — 2,845,194 — 2,820,382 Pacific Western Bank Tranche III note — 3,793,644 — 3,760,509 UNC Promissory Note — 2,257,684 — 2,257,684 Convertible notes — — 9,837,984 Warrant liabilities — — 2,462,859 2,462,859 Total $ — $ $ $ The fair value of debt was measured as the present value of the respective future cash outflows discounted at a current interest rate as of the year‑end date, taking into account the remaining term of liabilities. Warrant Liabilities The Company has classified warrants to purchase shares of preferred stock as a liability on its Balance Sheets as these warrants were free-standing financial instruments that will require the Company to issue convertible securities upon exercise. The warrants were initially recorded at fair value on date of grant, and were subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting period. Changes in fair value of the warrants are recognized as a component of other income (expense) in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. In conjunction with the Company’s IPO, the warrants were converted to warrants for common stock. Following that conversion, these warrants no longer meet the criteria to be presented as a liability and have been reclassified to additional paid-in capital. The Company will no longer include the warrants as liabilities or recognize changes in their fair value on the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company used the Black Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates assumptions and estimates, to value the preferred stock warrants. The Company assessed these assumptions and estimates on a quarterly basis as additional information impacting the assumptions was obtained. Estimates and assumptions impacting the fair value measurement included the fair value per share of the underlying preferred stock, the remaining contractual term of the warrant, the risk-free interest rate, the expected dividend yield and the expected volatility of the price of the underlying preferred stock. The Company determined the fair value per share of the underlying preferred stock by taking into consideration the most recent sales of its convertible preferred stock, results obtained from third party valuations and additional factors that were deemed relevant. The Company estimated its expected stock volatility based on the historical volatility of publicly traded peer companies for a term equal to the remaining contractual term of the warrant. The risk-free interest rate was determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve for time periods approximately equal to the remaining contractual term of the warrant. Expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Embedded Derivatives Embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from the underlying instrument are accounted for and valued as a separate financial instrument. In conjunction with the Company’s convertible notes (see Note 10), embedded derivatives exist associated with the future consummation of a qualified financing event, as defined in the notes, and a subsequent discounted conversion of the instrument to capital stock. The embedded derivatives were bifurcated and classified as derivative liabilities on the Balance Sheets and separately adjusted to their fair values at the end of each reporting period. Changes in fair values of the derivative liabilities are recognized as a component of other income (expense) in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. These embedded derivatives were eliminated upon conversion of the underlying convertible notes into Series D preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Series D”) (see Note 3). Deferred Offering Costs The Company capitalizes certain legal, professional accounting and other third-party fees that are directly associated with in-process equity financings as deferred offering costs until such equity financings are consummated. After consummation of the equity financing, these costs were recorded in stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a reduction of proceeds generated as a result of the offering. As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded deferred offering costs relating to its IPO of $125,000, which is included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets in the accompanying Balance Sheets. Income Taxes The Company did not record a federal or state income tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, as a result of the establishment of a full valuation allowance being required against the Company’s net deferred tax assets. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) was enacted into law. This new law includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system, including a permanent reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation and the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system. The TCJA also limits interest expense deductions to 30% of taxable income before interest, depreciation and amortization from 2018 to 2021 and then taxable income before interest thereafter. The TCJA permits disallowed interest expense to be carried forward for five years. The Company has calculated its best estimate of the impact of the TCJA in its income tax provision in accordance with its understanding of the TCJA and guidance available. Using the guidance issued by the SEC staff in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, the Company completed the accounting for the TCJA with the filing of the 2017 U.S. federal income tax return, which had no material impact. The legislative changes effective for the tax year 2018 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825‑10) — Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016‑01”). The provisions of ASU 2016‑01 make targeted improvements to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more useful information, including certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The guidance was effective for public companies with annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016‑02”). The provisions of ASU 2016‑02 set out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight‑line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right‑of‑use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for in a similar manner as under existing guidance for operating leases. ASU 2016‑02 supersedes the previous lease standard, Topic 840, Leases . The guidance is effective for public companies with annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the implementation of this standard will have on the Company’s financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) — Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016‑15”). The provisions of ASU 2016‑15 address eight specific cash flow issues and how those certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows , and other Topics. The guidance is effective for public companies with annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017‑09, Compensation‑Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share‑based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017‑11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with “down round” features. Down round features are features of certain equity‑linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity , because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2017‑11 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2018‑13”). The provisions of ASU 2018‑13 set out modifications to the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The modifications removed certain disclosure requirements regarding transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy and valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, the modifications added requirements to disclose changes in unrealized gains and losses for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for public companies with annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the implementation of this standard will have on the Company’s financial statements. |