Held-to-Maturity Securities Disclosure [Text Block] | Held-to-Maturity Securities Major Security Types. Held-to-maturity securities as of June 30, 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Amortized Cost OTTI Recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Carrying Value Gross Unrecognized Holding Gains Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses Estimated Fair Value Debentures U.S. government-guaranteed obligations $ 24,333 $ — $ 24,333 $ 34 $ 87 $ 24,280 State housing agency obligation 35,000 — 35,000 — — 35,000 59,333 — 59,333 34 87 59,280 Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-guaranteed residential MBS 5,765 — 5,765 27 — 5,792 GSE residential MBS 3,450,129 — 3,450,129 31,636 784 3,480,981 Non-agency residential MBS 157,013 24,123 132,890 18,565 3,524 147,931 GSE commercial MBS 61,817 — 61,817 — 165 61,652 3,674,724 24,123 3,650,601 50,228 4,473 3,696,356 Total $ 3,734,057 $ 24,123 $ 3,709,934 $ 50,262 $ 4,560 $ 3,755,636 Held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Amortized Cost OTTI Recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Carrying Value Gross Unrecognized Holding Gains Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses Estimated Fair Value Debentures U.S. government-guaranteed obligations $ 27,119 $ — $ 27,119 $ 143 $ — $ 27,262 Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-guaranteed residential MBS 6,642 — 6,642 34 — 6,676 GSE residential MBS 4,424,542 — 4,424,542 46,767 398 4,470,911 Non-agency residential MBS 169,240 27,349 141,891 21,982 3,469 160,404 GSE commercial MBS 61,819 — 61,819 58 — 61,877 4,662,243 27,349 4,634,894 68,841 3,867 4,699,868 Total $ 4,689,362 $ 27,349 $ 4,662,013 $ 68,984 $ 3,867 $ 4,727,130 The following table summarizes (in thousands, except number of positions) the held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015 . The unrealized losses include other-than-temporary impairments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized holding losses (or, in the case of the Bank's holdings of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, gross unrecognized holding gains) and are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position. Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Debentures U.S. government-guaranteed obligations 2 $ 13,618 $ 87 — $ — $ — 2 $ 13,618 $ 87 Mortgage-backed securities GSE residential MBS 4 160,107 86 11 366,324 698 15 526,431 784 Non-agency residential MBS 1 6,433 139 24 121,103 9,821 25 127,536 9,960 GSE commercial MBS 3 61,652 165 — — — 3 61,652 165 Total 10 $ 241,810 $ 477 35 $ 487,427 $ 10,519 45 $ 729,237 $ 10,996 The following table summarizes (in thousands, except number of positions) the held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2014 . The unrealized losses include other-than-temporary impairments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized holding losses (or, in the case of the Bank's holdings of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, gross unrecognized holding gains) and are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position. Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Number of Positions Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Mortgage-backed securities GSE residential MBS 1 $ 10,798 $ 5 17 $ 485,626 $ 393 18 $ 496,424 $ 398 Non-agency residential MBS 1 6,874 223 24 131,265 9,917 25 138,139 10,140 Total 2 $ 17,672 $ 228 41 $ 616,891 $ 10,310 43 $ 634,563 $ 10,538 At June 30, 2015 , the gross unrealized losses on the Bank’s held-to-maturity securities were $10,996,000 , of which $9,960,000 were attributable to its holdings of non-agency (i.e., private-label) residential MBS and $1,036,000 were attributable to securities that are either guaranteed by the U.S. government or issued and guaranteed by GSEs. As of June 30, 2015 , the U.S. government and the issuers of the Bank’s holdings of GSE MBS were rated triple-A by Moody’s and Fitch and AA+ by S&P. Based upon the credit ratings assigned by the NRSROs and the Bank's assessment of the strength of the GSEs’ guarantees of the Bank’s holdings of GSE MBS, the Bank expects that its holdings of U.S. government-guaranteed debentures and GSE MBS that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2015 would not be settled at an amount less than the Bank’s amortized cost bases in these investments. Because the current market value deficits associated with these securities are not attributable to credit quality, and because the Bank does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, the Bank does not consider any of these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 . The deterioration in the U.S. housing markets that occurred primarily during the period from 2007 through 2011, as reflected during that period by declines in the values of residential real estate and higher levels of delinquencies, defaults and losses on residential mortgages, including the mortgages underlying the Bank’s non-agency residential MBS (“RMBS”), generally increased the risk that the Bank may not ultimately recover the entire cost bases of some of its non-agency RMBS. However, based on its analysis of the securities in this portfolio, the Bank believes that the unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015 were principally the result of liquidity risk related discounts in the non-agency RMBS market and do not accurately reflect the currently likely future credit performance of the securities. Because the ultimate receipt of contractual payments on the Bank’s non-agency RMBS will depend upon the credit and prepayment performance of the underlying loans and the credit enhancements for the senior securities owned by the Bank, the Bank closely monitors these investments in an effort to determine whether the credit enhancement associated with each security is sufficient to protect against potential losses of principal and interest on the underlying mortgage loans. The credit enhancement for each of the Bank’s non-agency RMBS is provided by a senior/subordinate structure, and none of the securities owned by the Bank are insured by third-party bond insurers. More specifically, each of the Bank’s non-agency RMBS represents a single security class within a securitization that has multiple classes of securities. Each security class has a distinct claim on the cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans, with the subordinate securities having a junior claim relative to the more senior securities. The Bank’s non-agency RMBS have a senior claim on the cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans. To assess whether the entire amortized cost bases of its 27 non-agency RMBS holdings are likely to be recovered, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for each security as of June 30, 2015 using two third-party models. The first model considers borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the loans underlying the Bank’s securities, in conjunction with assumptions about future changes in home prices and interest rates, to project prepayments, defaults and loss severities. A significant input to the first model is the forecast of future housing price changes for the relevant states and core based statistical areas (“CBSAs”), which are based upon an assessment of the individual housing markets. (The term “CBSA” refers collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget; as currently defined, a CBSA must contain at least one urban area of 10,000 or more people.) The Bank’s housing price forecast as of June 30, 2015 assumed changes in home prices ranging from declines of 2 percent to increases of 8 percent over the 12 -month period beginning April 1, 2015 . For the vast majority of markets, the changes were projected to range from increases of 2 percent to 5 percent . Thereafter, home price changes for each market were projected to return (at varying rates and over varying transition periods based on historical housing price patterns) to their long-term historical equilibrium levels. Following these transition periods, the constant long-term annual rates of appreciation for the vast majority of markets were projected to range between 2 percent and 5 percent . The month-by-month projections of future loan performance derived from the first model, which reflect projected prepayments, defaults and loss severities, are then input into a second model that allocates the projected loan level cash flows and losses to the various security classes in the securitization structure in accordance with its prescribed cash flow and loss allocation rules. In a securitization in which the credit enhancement for the senior securities is derived from the presence of subordinate securities, losses are generally allocated first to the subordinate securities until their principal balance is reduced to zero. Based on the results of its cash flow analyses, the Bank determined it was not likely that it would fully recover the remaining amortized cost basis of one of its previously other-than-temporarily impaired non-agency RMBS and, accordingly, this security was deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2015 . The difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from this security and its amortized cost basis (i.e., the credit loss) totaled $19,000 at June 30, 2015 . Because the Bank does not intend to sell the investment and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis, only the amount related to the credit loss was recognized in earnings. None of the Bank's other non-agency RMBS were deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 . For the security for which an other-than-temporary impairment was determined to have occurred as of June 30, 2015 , the following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used to measure the amount of the credit loss recognized in earnings (dollars in thousands): Significant Inputs (2) Year of Securitization Collateral Type (1) Unpaid Principal Balance as of June 30, 2015 Projected Prepayment Rate Projected Default Rate Projected Loss Severity Current Credit Enhancement as of June 30, 2015 (3) 2005 Alt-A/Option ARM $ 11,716 7.3 % 22.0 % 34.9 % 32.7 % ________________________________________ (1) Although the other-than-temporarily impaired security was not labeled as Alt-A at the time of issuance, based upon its current collateral and performance characteristics, it was analyzed using Alt-A assumptions. (2) The prepayment rate reflects the weighted average of projected future voluntary prepayments. The default rate reflects the total balance of loans projected to default as a percentage of the current unpaid principal balance of the underlying loan pool. The loss severity reflects the total projected loan losses as a percentage of the total balance of loans that are projected to default. (3) The current credit enhancement percentage reflects the ability of subordinated classes of securities to absorb principal losses and interest shortfalls before the senior class held by the Bank is impacted (i.e., the losses, expressed as a percentage of the outstanding principal balances, that could be incurred in the underlying loan pool before the security held by the Bank would be impacted, assuming that all of those losses occurred on the measurement date). Depending upon the timing and amount of losses in the underlying loan pool, it is possible that the senior class held by the Bank could bear losses in scenarios where the cumulative loan losses do not exceed the current credit enhancement percentage. In addition to the security that was determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 , 14 of the Bank's holdings of non-agency RMBS were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired in periods prior to 2013. The following table presents a rollforward for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 of the amount related to credit losses on the Bank’s non-agency RMBS holdings for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands). Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2015 2014 2015 2014 Balance of credit losses, beginning of period $ 12,301 $ 12,836 $ 12,512 $ 12,901 Credit losses on securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized 19 — 25 — Increases in cash flows expected to be collected (accreted as interest income over the remaining lives of the applicable securities) (220 ) (66 ) (437 ) (131 ) Balance of credit losses, end of period 12,100 12,770 12,100 12,770 Cumulative principal shortfalls on securities held at end of period (1,469 ) (1,061 ) (1,469 ) (1,061 ) Cumulative amortization of the time value of credit losses at end of period 321 264 321 264 Credit losses included in the amortized cost bases of other-than-temporarily impaired securities at end of period $ 10,952 $ 11,973 $ 10,952 $ 11,973 Redemption Terms. The amortized cost, carrying value and estimated fair value of held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are presented below (in thousands). The expected maturities of some debentures could differ from the contractual maturities presented because issuers may have the right to call such debentures prior to their final stated maturities. June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Maturity Amortized Cost Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Debentures Due after one year through five years $ 10,628 $ 10,628 $ 10,662 $ 12,544 $ 12,544 $ 12,649 Due after five years through ten years 13,705 13,705 13,618 14,575 14,575 14,613 Due after ten years 35,000 35,000 35,000 — — — 59,333 59,333 59,280 27,119 27,119 27,262 Mortgage-backed securities 3,674,724 3,650,601 3,696,356 4,662,243 4,634,894 4,699,868 Total $ 3,734,057 $ 3,709,934 $ 3,755,636 $ 4,689,362 $ 4,662,013 $ 4,727,130 The amortized cost of the Bank’s mortgage-backed securities classified as held-to-maturity includes net purchase discounts of $17,672,000 and $26,510,000 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively. Interest Rate Payment Terms. The following table provides interest rate payment terms for investment securities classified as held-to-maturity at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands): June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Amortized cost of variable-rate held-to-maturity securities other than mortgage-backed securities $ 59,333 $ 27,119 Amortized cost of held-to-maturity mortgage-backed securities Fixed-rate pass-through securities 251 276 Collateralized mortgage obligations Fixed-rate 545 624 Variable-rate 3,612,111 4,599,524 Variable-rate multi-family MBS 61,817 61,819 3,674,724 4,662,243 Total $ 3,734,057 $ 4,689,362 All of the Bank’s variable-rate collateralized mortgage obligations classified as held-to-maturity securities have coupon rates that are subject to interest rate caps, none of which were reached during 2014 or the six months ended June 30, 2015 . Sales of Securities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Bank sold held-to-maturity securities with an amortized cost (determined by the specific identification method) of $244,190,000 and $588,438,000 , respectively. Proceeds from the sales totaled $248,077,000 and $598,551,000 , respectively, resulting in realized gains of $3,887,000 and $10,113,000 , respectively. For each of these securities, the Bank had previously collected at least 85 percent of the principal outstanding at the time of acquisition. As such, the sales were considered maturities for purposes of security classification. There were no sales of held-to-maturity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 . |