0001331875fnf:TraditionalLifeInsuranceMember2023-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
| | | | | |
☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024
OR
| | | | | |
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-32630
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | | | | | | |
Delaware | | 16-1725106 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
601 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(904) 854-8100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Title of Each Class | | Trading Symbol | | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
FNF Common Stock, $0.0001 par value | | FNF | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ or No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ or No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | ☒ | Accelerated Filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated Filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting Company | ☐ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the shares of FNF common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2024
was $12,817,158,134 based on the closing price of $49.42 as reported by The New York Stock Exchange.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock as of January 31, 2025 were:
FNF Common Stock 274,989,699
The information in Part III hereof for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, will be filed within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year that is the subject of this Report.
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business
Introductory Note
The following describes the business of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Except where otherwise noted, all references to "we," "us," "our", the "Company" or "FNF" are to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken together.
Overview
We are a leading provider of (i) title insurance, escrow and other title-related services, including trust activities, trustee sales guarantees, recordings and reconveyances and home warranty and (ii) transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. FNF is one of the nation’s largest title insurance companies operating through its title insurance underwriters - Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ("FNTIC"), Chicago Title Insurance Company ("Chicago Title"), Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company ("Commonwealth Land Title"), Alamo Title Insurance ("Alamo Title") and National Title Insurance of New York Inc. ("National Title of New York") - which collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States. Through our subsidiary ServiceLink Holdings, LLC ("ServiceLink"), we provide mortgage transaction services including title-related services and facilitation of production and management of mortgage loans. We are also a leading provider of insurance solutions serving retail annuity and life customers and institutional clients through our majority-owned subsidiary, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. ("F&G").
On December 1, 2022, we completed our previously announced separation and distribution to our shareholders, on a pro rata basis, of approximately 15% of the common stock of F&G (the "F&G Distribution"). Following the F&G Distribution, we retained control of F&G through our approximate 85% ownership stake. The F&G Distribution was accomplished by the distribution of 68 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of F&G for every 1,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, as a dividend to each holder of shares of our common stock as of the close of business on November 22, 2022, the record date for the F&G Distribution.
As a result of the F&G Distribution, F&G is a separate, publicly traded company and its businesses, assets and liabilities consist of those related to F&G’s business as a provider of insurance solutions serving retail annuity and life customers and institutional clients. Through F&G’s insurance subsidiaries, including Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company ("FGL Insurance") and Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company of New York ("FGL NY Insurance"), F&G markets a broad portfolio of deferred annuities, including fixed indexed annuities ("FIA"), registered index-linked annuities ("RILA"), (together referred to as indexed annuities) and fixed rate annuities including multi-year guarantee annuities ("MYGAs"), immediate annuities, indexed universal life insurance ("IUL"), funding agreements (through funding agreement-backed notes issuances ("FABNs") and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB")) and pension risk transfer solutions ("PRTs"). All of FNF’s core title insurance, real estate, technology and mortgage related businesses, assets and liabilities that are not held by F&G remain with FNF.
As of December 31, 2024, we had the following reporting segments:
•Title. This segment consists of the operations of our title insurance underwriters and related businesses, which provide title insurance and escrow and other title-related services including trust activities, trustee sales guarantees, and home warranty products. This segment also includes our transaction services business, which includes other title-related services used in the production and management of mortgage loans, including mortgage loans that experience default.
•F&G. This segment primarily consists of operations of our annuities and life insurance related businesses. This segment issues a broad portfolio of annuity and life insurance products, including deferred annuities, immediate annuities, and IUL insurance, through its retail distribution channels. This segment also provides funding agreements and PRTs through its institutional channels.
•Corporate and Other. This segment consists of the operations of the parent holding company, our real estate technology subsidiaries, other smaller, non-title businesses and certain unallocated corporate overhead expenses and eliminations of revenues and expenses between it and our Title segment.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include the following:
Corporate principles. A cornerstone of our management philosophy and operating success is the six fundamental precepts upon which we were founded, which are:
•Autonomy and entrepreneurship;
•Bias for action;
•Customer-oriented and motivated;
•Minimize bureaucracy;
•Employee ownership; and
•Highest standard of conduct.
These six precepts are emphasized to our employees from the first day of employment and are integral to many of our strategies described below.
Title
Leading residential and commercial title insurance company. We are one of the largest title insurance companies in the United States and a leading provider of title insurance and escrow and other title-related services for real estate transactions. Through the third quarter of 2024, our insurance companies had a 32.0% share of the U.S. title insurance market, according to the American Land Title Association ("ALTA"). While residential title insurance comprises the majority of our business, we are also a significant provider of commercial real estate title insurance in the United States. Our network of independent title agents and employees in our direct operations that service the commercial real estate markets is one of the largest in the industry. Our commercial network combined with our financial strength makes our title insurance operations attractive to large national lenders that require the underwriting and issuing of larger commercial title policies.
Established relationships with our customers. We have strong relationships with the customers who use our title services. Our distribution network, which includes approximately 1,300 direct title offices and approximately 5,100 agents, is among the largest in the United States. We also benefit from strong brand recognition in our multiple title brands that allows us to access a broader client base than if we operated under a single consolidated brand and provides our customers with a choice among brands.
Strong value proposition for our customers as a leading provider of services and technology solutions to the title insurance industry. Through our Title segment, we provide our customers with title insurance and escrow and other title-related services that support their ability to effectively close real estate transactions. We help make the real estate closing process more efficient for our customers by offering a single point of access to a broad platform of title-related products and resources necessary to close real estate transactions.
Industry leading margins and disciplined operating focus. We have been able to maintain competitive operating margins in part by monitoring our businesses in a disciplined manner through continual evaluation of business activity and management of our cost structure. When compared to our industry competitors, we also believe that our structure is more efficiently designed, which allows us to operate with lower overhead costs.
Proven management team. The managers of our operating businesses have successfully built our Title segment over an extended period of time, resulting in our business attaining the size, scope and presence in the industry that it has today. Our managers have demonstrated their leadership ability during numerous acquisitions through which we have grown and throughout a number of business cycles and significant periods of industry change.
We believe that our Title segment's competitive strengths position us well to take advantage of future changes to the real estate market.
F&G
Trusted by distributors. We have long-standing relationships with a broad range of distributors representing nearly 138,000 independent agents and financial advisors, and built on our reputation for transparency and a consistently competitive product portfolio. We offer fixed annuities and life insurance products through a network of approximately 22 leading banks and broker dealers and approximately 300 Independent Marketing Organizations (“IMOs”) that provide back-office support for thousands of independent insurance agents.
Winning in high-growth markets. The U.S. retirement and middle markets are growing, and we are both well-established and well-positioned for continued growth. Our strategic alignment with our distribution partners allows us to reach a diverse, growing and underserved middle market demographic in both our retail and institutional channels.
Durable investment management edge. Our strategic partnership with Blackstone Inc. ("Blackstone") provides a sustained competitive advantage for our business. Our liability profile and risk appetite drive our investment strategy. F&G’s investment and risk offices set strategic asset allocation and risk limits. Blackstone is responsible for idea generation and security selection. Blackstone’s capabilities expand our investment universe to new asset classes and their origination capabilities provide incremental spread. Our high quality, diversified investment portfolio is well positioned to withstand macroeconomic headwinds and continues to perform well. We have enhanced the return while improving the credit quality of our portfolio, and credit related impairments remain low, averaging 7 basis points over the past 3 years, below our pricing assumption.
Clean and profitable in-force book. As a life insurer, we generate spread earnings based on our assets under management and over the lifetime of the liabilities in place. Our disciplined new business underwriting process provides us with stable liabilities, primarily in products that reset annually, which has allowed us to achieve consistently attractive lifetime returns. Approximately 93% of our $35.6 billion FIAs and fixed rate annuities account value are surrender-charge protected and our asset and liability cash flows are well matched. Additionally, our funding agreements, pension risk transfer and immediate annuities are non-surrenderable.
Track record of attracting top talent. F&G’s management team and over 1,300 employees have a record of long-term success and have delivered impressive results in the last few years. Our commitment to our cultural values is the cornerstone of our success, whereby F&G is a company of individuals who believe in the power of partnerships, encourage innovation and creativity, and are transparent about decisions while delivering on their commitments. This is borne out by consistently being recognized as an employer of choice as well as an involuntary turnover rate that is well below that of other financial services companies. We believe our flexible, employee-centric work approach positions us as an employer of choice.
Clear governance structure. We have a disciplined approach for considering new lines of business to enter, the appropriate product/channel mix for achieving our targeted new business profitability, and the management of our capital and in-force liabilities. Further, we target and pursue opportunities that leverage our strengths.
Our business model is strong and positions us to capitalize on the growth prospects in our addressable markets.
Strategy
Title
Our strategy in the Title segment is to maximize operating profits by increasing our market share and managing operating expenses throughout the real estate business cycle. To accomplish our goals, we intend to do the following:
•Continue to operate multiple title brands independently. We believe that in order to maintain and strengthen our title insurance customer base, we must operate our strongest brands in a given marketplace independently of each other. Our national and regional brands include FNTIC, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, Lawyers Title Company, Ticor Title Company, Alamo Title, and National Title of New York. In our largest markets, we operate multiple brands. This approach allows us to continue to attract customers who identify with a particular brand and allows us to utilize a broader base of local agents and local operations than we would have with a single consolidated brand.
•Consistently deliver superior customer service. We believe customer service and consistent product delivery are the most important factors in attracting and retaining customers. Our ability to provide superior customer service and consistent product delivery requires continued focus on providing high quality service and products at competitive prices. Our goal is to continue to improve the experience of our customers, in all aspects of our business.
•Manage our operations successfully through business cycles. Our Title segment operates in a cyclical industry and our ability to diversify our revenue base within our title insurance business and manage the duration of our investments may allow us to better operate in this cyclical business. Maintaining a broad geographic revenue base, utilizing both direct and independent agency operations and pursuing both residential and commercial title insurance business help diversify our title insurance revenues. We continue to monitor, evaluate and execute upon the consolidation of administrative functions, legal entity structure, and office consolidation, as necessary, to respond to the continually changing marketplace. We maintain shorter durations on our investment portfolio to mitigate our interest rate risk. A more detailed discussion of our investment strategies is included in “Investment Policies and Investment Portfolio.”
•Continue to improve our products and technology. As a national provider of real estate transaction products and services, we participate in an industry that is subject to significant change, frequent new product and service introductions, and evolving industry standards. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to anticipate industry changes and offer products and services that meet evolving industry standards. In connection with our service offerings, we are continuing to deploy new information system technologies to our direct and agency operations. We expect to continue to improve the process of ordering title and escrow services and the delivery of our products to our customers.
•Maintain values supporting our strategy. We believe that our continued focus on and support of our long-established corporate culture will reinforce and support our business strategy. Our goal is to foster and support a corporate culture where our employees and agents seek to operate independently and maintain profitability at the local level while forming close customer relationships by meeting customer needs and improving customer service. Utilizing a relatively flat managerial structure and providing our employees with a sense of individual ownership supports this goal.
•Effectively manage costs based on economic factors. We believe that our focus on our operating margins is essential to our continued success in the title insurance business. Regardless of the business cycle in which we may be operating, we seek to continue to evaluate and manage our cost structure and make appropriate adjustments where economic conditions dictate. This continual focus on our cost structure helps us to better maintain our operating margins.
F&G
Through a diversified growth strategy, our F&G segment seeks to deliver consistent and increasing earnings driven by asset growth. We are positioned to accomplish these goals through the following areas of strategic focus:
•Targeting large and growing markets. The opportunity for our core annuity products remains significant, as policyholders seek to add safety and certainty to their retirement plans. Our investments in life insurance products allows us to penetrate the underserved middle market, which addresses the needs of many of our cultural communities. And as corporations continue to de-risk their pension funds, our buyout solutions can guarantee pension-holders the lifetime benefits they need and want. Finally, we continue to attract strong institutional annuity buyers with funding agreements. F&G is a national leader in the markets we play in, and demographic trends provide tailwinds and significant room to continue growing.
•Superior ecosystem. Our business model gives us a sustainable competitive advantage. We have strong and long-standing relationships with a diverse network of distributors, a durable investment edge through our Blackstone partnership, a scalable administrative platform, and a track record of attracting and retaining top talent.
•Consistent track record of success. F&G’s deep and experienced management team has successfully diversified products and channels in recent years and demonstrated our ability to deliver consistent top line growth, increase assets under management and generate steady spreads and return on assets across varying market cycles.
•Driving margin expansion and improved returns. We are pursuing strategies to continue to grow earnings, while generating significant positive net cash flow and diversifying into “capital light” flow reinsurance and accretive owned distribution to generate higher return on equity.
Acquisitions, Dispositions, Minority Owned Operating Subsidiaries and Financings
Acquisitions have been an important part of our growth strategy and dispositions have been an important aspect of our strategy of returning value to shareholders. On an ongoing basis, with assistance from our advisors, we actively evaluate possible transactions, such as acquisitions and dispositions of business units and operating assets and business combination transactions.
In the future, we may seek to sell certain investments or other assets to increase our liquidity. In the past, we have obtained majority and minority investments in entities and securities where we see the potential to achieve above market returns. Fundamentally, our goal is to acquire quality companies that are run by best-in-class management teams and that have attractive organic and acquired growth opportunities. We leverage our operational expertise and track record of growing industry-leading companies along with our active interaction with the acquired company's management directly or through our board of directors, to ultimately provide value for our shareholders.
There can be no assurance that any suitable opportunities will arise or that any particular transaction will be completed. We have made a number of acquisitions and dispositions over the past several years to strengthen and expand our service offerings and customer base in our various businesses, to expand into other businesses or where we otherwise saw value, and to monetize investments in assets and businesses.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of contractual restrictions; internal security practices; and copyright and trade secret law to establish and protect our software, technology, and expertise across our businesses. Further, we have developed a number of brands that have accumulated substantial goodwill in the marketplace, and we rely on trademark law to protect our rights in that area. We intend to continue our policy of taking all measures we deem necessary to protect our copyright, trade secret, and trademark rights. These legal protections and arrangements afford only limited protection of our proprietary rights, and there is no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop or license products, services, or capabilities that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours.
Technology and Research and Development
As a national provider of real estate transaction products and services, we participate in an industry that is subject to significant regulatory requirements, frequent new product and service introductions, and evolving industry standards. We believe that our future success depends in part on our ability to anticipate industry changes and offer products and services that meet evolving industry standards. In connection with our Title segment service offerings, we are continuing to deploy new
information system technologies to our direct and agency operations. We continue to improve the process of ordering title and escrow services and improve the delivery of our products to our customers. In order to meet new regulatory requirements, we also continue to expand our data collection and reporting abilities.
Loss Reserves
For information about our loss reserves, see Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report, under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates.
Title Insurance
Market for title insurance. According to Demotech Performance of Title Insurance Companies 2024 Edition, an annual compilation of financial information from the title insurance industry that is published by Demotech Inc. ("Demotech"), an independent firm, total operating income for the entire U.S. title insurance industry has increased from approximately $16.9 billion in 2019 to $23.3 billion in 2022 prior to decreasing to $16.5 billion in 2023. The size of the industry is closely tied to various macroeconomic factors, including, but not limited to, growth in the gross domestic product, inflation, unemployment, the availability of credit, consumer confidence, interest rates, housing inventory and sales volumes, and prices for new and existing homes, as well as the volume of refinancing of previously issued mortgages.
Most real estate transactions consummated in the U.S. require the use of title insurance by a lending institution before the transaction can be completed. Generally, revenues from title insurance policies are directly correlated with the value of the property underlying the title policy, and appreciation or depreciation in the overall value of the real estate market are major factors in total industry revenues. Industry revenues are also driven by factors affecting the volume of real estate closings, such as the state of the economy, the availability of mortgage funding, and changes in interest rates, which affect demand for new mortgage loans and refinancing transactions.
The U.S. title insurance industry is concentrated among a handful of industry participants. According to Demotech, the top four title insurance groups accounted for 80% of net premiums written in 2023. Approximately 38 independent title insurance companies accounted for the remaining 20% of net premiums written in 2023. Consolidation has created opportunities for increased financial and operating efficiencies for the industry’s largest participants and should continue to drive profitability and market share in the industry.
Our Title segment revenue is closely related to the level of real estate activity that includes sales, mortgage financing and mortgage refinancing. For further discussion of current trends in real estate activity in the U.S., see discussion under Business Trends and Conditions included in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 1 of Part I.
Title Insurance Policies. Title insurance plays a key role in the U.S. economy by insuring the secure transfer of real estate and facilitating the growth of homeownership. The products and services we offer have a positive social impact on families and communities overall. For many families, their home is the single largest investment that they will make in their lifetimes. Generally, real estate buyers and mortgage lenders purchase title insurance to insure good and marketable title to real estate and priority of lien. An owner’s title insurance policy, like those we issue in connection with the closing of a real estate transaction, is the best way for property owners to protect themselves from losing their property due to unforeseen or unexpected title claims. Unlike other types of insurance, title insurance protects against past problems instead of future risk, such as the previous owner’s debt, liens, or other claims of ownership that may have been in place prior to the purchase of the property. Under our policies, we defend insureds when covered claims are filed against their interest in the property. A brief generalized description of the process of issuing a title insurance policy is as follows:
•The customer, typically a real estate salesperson or broker, escrow agent, attorney or lender, places an order for a title policy.
•Company personnel note the specifics of the title policy order and place a request with the title company or its agents for a preliminary report or commitment.
•After the relevant historical data on the property is compiled, the title officer prepares a preliminary report that documents the current status of title to the property, any exclusions, exceptions and/or limitations that the title company might include in the policy, and specific issues that need to be addressed and resolved by the parties to the transaction before the title policy will be issued.
•The preliminary report is circulated to all the parties for satisfaction of any specific issues.
•After the specific issues identified in the preliminary report are satisfied, an escrow agent closes the transaction in accordance with the instructions of the parties and the title company’s conditions.
•Once the transaction is closed and all monies have been released, the title company issues a title insurance policy.
In real estate transactions financed with a mortgage, virtually all real property mortgage lenders require their borrowers to obtain a title insurance policy at the time a mortgage loan is made. This lender’s policy insures the lender against any defect affecting the priority of the mortgage in an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the related mortgage loan. An owner’s
policy is typically also issued, insuring the buyer against defects in title in an amount equal to the purchase price. In a refinancing transaction, only a lender’s policy is generally purchased because ownership of the property has not changed. In the case of an all-cash real estate purchase, no lender’s policy is issued but typically an owner’s title policy is issued.
Title insurance premiums paid in connection with a title insurance policy are based on (and typically are a percentage of) either the amount of the mortgage loan or the purchase price of the property insured. Applicable state insurance regulations or regulatory practices may limit the maximum, or in some cases the minimum, premium that can be charged on a policy. Title insurance premiums are due in full at the closing of the real estate transaction.
The amount of the insured risk or “face amount” of insurance under a title insurance policy is generally equal to either the amount of the loan secured by the property or the purchase price of the property. The title insurer is also responsible for the cost of defending the insured title against covered claims. The insurer’s actual exposure at any given time, however, generally is less than the total face amount of policies outstanding because the coverage of a lender’s policy is reduced and eventually terminated as a result of payments on the mortgage loan. A title insurer also generally does not know when a property has been sold or refinanced except when it issues the replacement coverage. Because of these factors, the total liability of a title underwriter on outstanding policies cannot be precisely determined.
Title insurance companies typically issue title insurance policies directly through branch offices or through affiliated title agencies, or indirectly through independent third-party agencies unaffiliated with the title insurance company. Where the policy is issued through a branch or wholly owned subsidiary agency operation, the title insurance company typically performs or directs the title search, and the premiums collected are retained by the title company. Where the policy is issued through an independent agent, the agent generally performs the title search (in some areas searches are performed by approved attorneys), examines the title, collects the premium and retains a majority of the premium. The remainder of the premium is remitted to the title insurance company as compensation, part of which is for bearing the risk of loss in the event a claim is made under the policy. The percentage of the premium retained by an agent varies from region to region and is sometimes regulated by the states. The title insurance company is obligated to pay title claims in accordance with the terms of its policies, regardless of whether the title insurance company issues policies through its direct operations or through independent agents.
Prior to issuing policies, title insurers and their agents attempt to reduce the risk of future claim losses by accurately performing title searches and examinations. A title insurance company’s predominant expense relates to such searches and examinations, the preparation of preliminary title reports, policies or commitments, facilitation and closing of real estate transactions and the maintenance of title plants. Title plants are indexed compilations of public records, maps and other relevant historical documents, and the facilitation and closing of real estate transactions. Claim losses generally result from errors made in the title search and examination process, from hidden defects such as fraud, forgery, incapacity, missing heirs of the property, closing-related errors, etc.
Residential real estate business results from the construction, sale, resale and refinancing of residential properties, while commercial real estate business results from similar activities with respect to properties with a business or commercial use. Commercial real estate title insurance policies insure title to commercial real property, and generally involve higher coverage amounts and yield higher premiums. Residential real estate transaction volume is primarily affected by macroeconomic and seasonal factors, while commercial real estate transaction volume is affected primarily by fluctuations in local supply and demand conditions for commercial space.
Direct and Agency Operations. We provide title insurance services through our direct operations and independent title insurance agents who issue title policies on behalf of our title insurance companies. Our title insurance companies determine the terms and conditions upon which they will insure title to the real property according to our underwriting standards, policies and procedures.
Direct Operations. Our direct operations include both the operations of our underwriters and those of affiliated agencies. In our direct operations, the title insurer issues the title insurance policy and retains the entire premium paid in connection with the transaction. Our direct operations provide the following benefits:
•higher margins because we retain the entire premium from each transaction instead of paying a commission to an independent agent;
•continuity of service levels to a broad range of customers; and
•additional sources of income through escrow and closing services.
We have approximately 1,300 offices throughout the U.S. primarily providing title insurance. We continuously monitor the number of direct offices to ensure that it remains in line with our strategy and the current economic environment. Our commercial real estate title insurance business is operated primarily through our direct operations. We maintain direct operations for our commercial title insurance business in all the major real estate markets including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Washington D.C.
Agency Operations. In our agency operations, the search and examination function is performed by an independent agent or the agent may purchase the search product from us. In either case, the agent is responsible to ensure that the search and examination is completed. The agent thus retains the majority of the title premium collected, with the balance remitted to the title underwriter as compensation for bearing the risk of loss in the event that a claim is made under the title insurance policy. Independent agents may select among several title underwriters based upon their relationship with the underwriter, the amount of the premium “split” offered by the underwriter, the overall terms and conditions of the agency agreement and the scope of services offered to the agent. Premium splits vary by geographic region, and in some states are fixed by insurance regulatory requirements. Our relationship with each agent is governed by an agency agreement defining how the agent issues a title insurance policy on our behalf. The agency agreement also sets forth the agent’s liability to us for policy losses attributable to the agent’s errors. An agency agreement is usually terminable without cause upon 30 days' notice or immediately for cause. In determining whether to engage or retain an independent agent, we consider the agent’s experience, financial condition and loss history. For each agent with whom we enter into an agency agreement, we maintain financial and loss experience records. We also conduct periodic audits of our agents and strategically manage the number of agents with which we transact business in an effort to reduce future expenses and manage risks. As of December 31, 2024, we transacted business with approximately 5,100 agents.
Fees and Premiums. One method of analyzing our business is to examine the level of premiums generated by direct and agency operations.
The following table presents the percentages of our title insurance premiums generated by direct and agency operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Amount | | % | | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Direct | $ | 2,200 | | | 42.7 | % | | $ | 1,982 | | | 43.2 | % | | $ | 2,858 | | | 41.8 | % |
Agency | 2,953 | | | 57.3 | | | 2,610 | | | 56.8 | | | 3,976 | | | 58.2 | |
Total title insurance premiums | $ | 5,153 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,592 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 6,834 | | | 100.0 | % |
The premium for title insurance is due in full when the real estate transaction is closed. We recognize title insurance premium revenues from direct operations upon the closing of the transaction. Premium revenues from agency operations include an accrual based on estimates of the volume of transactions that have closed in a particular period for which premiums have not yet been reported to us. The accrual for agency premiums is necessary because of the lag between the closing of these transactions and the reporting of these policies to us by the agent and is based on estimates utilizing historical information.
Escrow, Title-Related and Other Fees. In addition to fees for underwriting title insurance policies, we derive a significant amount of our revenues from escrow and other title-related services including closing and trust activities, trustee sales guarantees, recordings and reconveyances, and home warranty products. The escrow and other services provided by us include all of those typically required in connection with residential and commercial real estate purchases and refinance activities. Escrow, title-related and other fees included in our Title segment represented approximately 28.5%, 30.1% and 27.5% of total Title segment revenues in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Sales and Marketing. We market and distribute our title and escrow products and services to customers in the residential and commercial market sectors of the real estate industry through customer solicitation by sales personnel. Although in many instances the individual homeowner is the beneficiary of a title insurance policy, we do not focus our marketing efforts on the homeowner. We actively encourage our sales personnel to develop new business relationships with persons in the real estate community, such as real estate sales agents and brokers, financial institutions, independent escrow companies and title agents, real estate developers, mortgage brokers and attorneys who order title insurance policies for their clients. While our smaller, local clients remain important, large customers, such as national residential mortgage lenders, real estate investment trusts and developers are an important part of our business. The buying criteria of locally based clients differ from those of large, geographically diverse customers in that the former tend to emphasize personal relationships and ease of transaction execution, while the latter generally place more emphasis on consistent product delivery across diverse geographical regions and the ability of service providers to meet their information systems requirements for electronic product delivery.
Claims. An important part of our business is responsible claims management. We employ a large staff of attorneys in our claims department to handle title and escrow claims. Our claims processing centers are located in Omaha, Nebraska and Jacksonville, Florida. In-house claims counsel are also located in other parts of the country.
Claims result from a wide range of causes. These causes generally include, but are not limited to, search and exam errors, forgeries, incorrect legal descriptions, signature and notary errors, unrecorded liens, mechanics’ liens, the failure to pay off existing liens, mortgage lending fraud, mishandling or theft of settlement funds (including independent agency theft), and
mistakes in the escrow process. Under our policies, we are required to defend insureds when covered claims are filed against their interest in the property. Some claimants seek damages in excess of policy limits. Those claims are based on various legal theories, including in some cases allegations of negligence or an intentional tort. We occasionally incur losses in excess of policy limits. Experience shows that most policy claims and claim payments are made in the first five years after the policy has been issued, although claims may also be reported and paid many years later.
Title losses due to independent agency defalcations typically occur when the independent agency misappropriates funds from escrow accounts under its control. Such losses are usually discovered when the independent agency fails to pay off an outstanding mortgage loan at closing (or immediately thereafter) from the proceeds of the new loan. Once the previous lender determines that its loan has not been paid off timely, it will file a claim against the title insurer.
Claims can be complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time claims are processed. In our commercial title business, we may issue polices with face amounts well in excess of $100 million, and from time-to-time claims are submitted with respect to large policies. We believe we are appropriately reserved with respect to all claims (large and small) that we currently face. Occasionally we experience large losses from title policies that have been issued or from our escrow operations, or overall worsening loss payment experience, which require us to increase our title loss reserves. These events are unpredictable and adversely affect our earnings. Claims can result in litigation in which we may represent our insured and/or ourselves. We consider this type of litigation to be an ordinary course aspect of the conduct of our business.
Reinsurance and Coinsurance. Within our Title segment, we limit our maximum loss exposure by reinsuring risks with other insurers under excess of loss and case-by-case (“facultative”) reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance agreements generally provide that the reinsurer is liable for loss and loss adjustment expense payments exceeding the amount retained by the ceding company. However, the ceding company remains primarily liable to the insured whether or not the reinsurer is able to meet its contractual obligations. Facultative reinsurance agreements are entered into with other title insurers when the transaction to be insured exceeds state statutory or self-imposed limits. Excess of loss reinsurance coverage protects us from a large loss from a single loss occurrence. Our excess of loss reinsurance coverage is split into four contracts. The first excess of loss reinsurance contract provides a $75 million limit of coverage from a single loss occurrence for losses in excess of a $25 million retention per single loss occurrence. The second excess of loss reinsurance contract ("Second XOL Contract") provides an additional $300 million limit of coverage from a single loss occurrence, with the Company co-participating at approximately 10%. The third excess of loss reinsurance contract ("Third XOL Contract") provides an additional $80 million limit of coverage from a single loss occurrence, with the Company co-participating at approximately 10%. The fourth excess of loss reinsurance contract ("Fourth XOL Contract") provides an additional $220 million limit of coverage from a single loss occurrence, with the Company co-participating at approximately 10%. Subject to the Company’s retention and co-participation on the Second, Third and Fourth XOL Contracts, the maximum coverage from a single loss occurrence provided under our excess of loss reinsurance coverage is $615 million. Each XOL Contract provides for one reinstatement of its respective limit, so the aggregate limit of coverage is $1.2 billion.
In addition to reinsurance, we carry errors and omissions insurance and fidelity bond coverage, each of which can provide protection to us in the event of certain types of losses that can occur in our businesses.
Our policy is to be selective in choosing our reinsurers, seeking only those companies that we consider to be financially stable and adequately capitalized. In an effort to minimize exposure to the insolvency of a reinsurer, we periodically review the financial condition of our reinsurers.
We also use coinsurance in our commercial title business to provide coverage in amounts greater than we would be willing or able to provide individually. In coinsurance transactions, each individual underwriting company issues a separate policy and assumes a portion of the overall total risk. As a coinsurer we are only liable for the portion of the risk we assume.
We also earn a small amount of additional income, which is reflected in our direct premiums, by assuming reinsurance for certain risks of other title insurers.
Competition. Competition in the title insurance industry is based primarily on service and price. The number and size of competing companies varies in the different geographic areas in which we conduct our business. In our principal markets, competitors include other major title underwriters such as First American Financial Corporation, Old Republic International Corporation, Stewart Information Services Corporation, Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, Title Resources Guaranty Company, and WFG National Title Insurance Company, as well as numerous regional title insurance companies, underwritten title companies and independent agency operations at the regional and local level. The addition or removal of regulatory barriers might result in changes to competition in the title insurance business. New competitors may include diversified financial services companies that have greater financial resources than we do and possess other competitive advantages. Competition among the major title insurance companies, expansion by regional companies and any new entrants with alternative products could affect our business operations and financial condition.
Regulation. Our insurance subsidiaries, including title insurers, underwritten title companies and insurance agencies, are subject to extensive regulation under applicable state laws. Each of the insurers is subject to a holding company act in its state of domicile, which regulates, among other matters, the ability to pay dividends and enter into transactions with affiliates. The laws of most states in which we transact business establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to issuing and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms and accounting and financial practices, establishing reserves and capital and surplus in regard to policyholder requirements defining suitable investments for reserves and capital and surplus, approving rate schedules, etc. The state regulation process for rate changes ranges from states that set rates, to states where individual companies or associations of companies prepare rate filings that are submitted for approval, to a few states in which rate changes do not need to be filed for approval.
Since we are governed by both state and federal governments and the applicable insurance laws and regulations are constantly subject to change, it is not possible to predict the potential effects on our insurance operations of any laws or regulations that may become more restrictive in the future or if new restrictive laws will be enacted.
Pursuant to statutory accounting requirements of the various states in which our title insurers are domiciled, these insurers must defer a portion of premiums as an unearned premium reserve for the protection of policyholders (in addition to their reserves for known claims) and must maintain qualified assets in an amount equal to the statutory requirements. The level of unearned premium reserve required to be maintained at any time is determined by a statutory formula based upon either the age, number of policies, and dollar amount of policy liabilities underwritten, or the age and dollar amount of statutory premiums written. As of December 31, 2024, the combined statutory unearned premium reserve required and reported for our title insurers was $1,608 million. In addition to statutory unearned premium reserves and reserves for known claims, each of our insurers maintains surplus funds for policyholder protection and business operations.
Each of our insurance subsidiaries is regulated by the insurance regulatory authority in its respective state of domicile, as well as that of each state in which it is licensed. The insurance commissioners of their respective states of domicile are the primary regulators of our insurance subsidiaries. Each of the insurers is subject to periodic regulatory financial examination by regulatory authorities.
Under the statutes governing insurance holding companies in most states, insurers may not enter into certain transactions, including sales, reinsurance agreements and service or management contracts, with their affiliates unless the regulatory authority of the insurer’s state of domicile has received notice at least 30 days prior to the intended effective date of such transaction and has not objected to, or has approved, the transaction within the 30-day period.
In addition to state-level regulation, our title insurance and certain other real estate businesses are subject to regulation by federal agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). The CFPB was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank"), which also included regulation over financial services and other lending related businesses. The CFPB has broad authority to regulate, among other areas, the mortgage and real estate markets in matters pertaining to consumers. This authority includes the enforcement of the Truth-in-Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act formerly placed with the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
As a holding company with no significant business operations of our own, we depend on dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries as the principal source of cash to meet our obligations, including the payment of interest on and repayment of principal of any debt obligations and to pay any dividends to our shareholders. The payment of dividends or other distributions to us by our insurers is regulated by the insurance laws and regulations of their respective states of domicile. In general, an insurance company subsidiary may not pay an “extraordinary” dividend or distribution unless the applicable insurance regulator has received notice of the intended payment at least 30 days prior to payment and has not objected to or has approved the payment within the 30-day period. In general, an “extraordinary” dividend or distribution is statutorily defined as a dividend or distribution that, together with other dividends and distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater of:
•10% of the insurer’s statutory surplus as of the immediately prior year end; or
•the statutory net income of the insurer during the prior calendar year.
The laws and regulations of some jurisdictions also prohibit an insurer from declaring or paying a dividend except out of its earned surplus or require the insurer to obtain prior regulatory approval. During 2025, our directly owned title insurers can pay dividends or make distributions to us of approximately $498 million; however, insurance regulators have the authority to prohibit the payment of ordinary dividends or other payments by our title insurers to us (such as a payment under a tax sharing agreement or for other services) if they determine that such payment could be adverse to our policyholders. There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to shareholders.
The combined statutory capital and surplus of our title insurers was approximately $1,223 million and $1,225 million as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The combined statutory earnings of our title insurers were $587 million, $503 million and $778 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
As a condition to continued authority to underwrite policies in the states in which our insurers conduct their business, they are required to pay certain fees and file information regarding their officers, directors and financial condition.
Pursuant to statutory requirements of the various states in which our insurers are domiciled, such insurers must maintain certain levels of minimum capital and surplus. Required levels of minimum capital and surplus are not significant to the insurers individually or in the aggregate. Each of our title insurers has complied with the minimum statutory requirements as of December 31, 2024.
Our underwritten title companies, primarily those domiciled in California, are also subject to certain regulation by insurance regulatory or banking authorities relating to their net worth and working capital. Minimum net worth and working capital requirements for each underwritten title company is less than $1 million. These companies were in compliance with their respective minimum net worth and working capital requirements at December 31, 2024.
From time to time, we receive inquiries and requests for information from state insurance departments, attorneys general and other regulatory agencies about various matters relating to our business. Sometimes these take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. We cooperate with all such inquiries and we have responded to or are currently responding to inquiries from multiple governmental agencies. Various governmental entities are studying the title insurance product, market, pricing, and business practices, and potential regulatory and legislative changes, which may materially affect our business and operations. Occasionally, we are assessed fines for violations of regulations or other matters or enter into settlements with such authorities that may require us to pay fines or claims or take other actions. For further discussion, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Before a person can acquire control of a U.S. insurance company, prior written approval must be obtained from the insurance commissioner of the state in which the insurer is domiciled. Prior to granting approval of an application to acquire control of a domestic insurer, the state insurance commissioner will consider factors such as the financial strength of the applicant; the integrity and management of the applicant’s Board of Directors and executive officers; the acquirer’s plans for the insurer’s Board of Directors and executive officers; the acquirer’s plans for the future operations of the domestic insurer; and any anti-competitive results that may arise from the consummation of the acquisition of control. Generally, state statutes provide that control over a domestic insurer is presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing 10% or more of the voting securities of the domestic insurer. Because a person acquiring 10% or more of our common shares would indirectly control the same percentage of the stock of our insurers, the insurance change of control laws would likely apply to such a transaction.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") has adopted an instruction requiring an annual certification of reserve adequacy by a qualified actuary. Because all the states in which our title insurers are domiciled require adherence to NAIC filing procedures, each such insurer, unless it qualifies for an exemption, must file an actuarial opinion with respect to the adequacy of its reserves.
For further information associated with regulation, refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Title Insurance Ratings. Our title insurance underwriters are regularly assigned ratings by independent agencies designed to indicate their financial condition and/or claims paying ability. The rating agencies determine ratings by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing financial data and other information. Our title subsidiaries include Alamo Title, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, FNTIC and National Title of New York. Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) provide ratings for the FNF family of companies as a whole as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| S&P | | Moody’s |
FNF family of companies | A | | A2 |
The relative position of each of our ratings among the ratings scale assigned by each rating agency is as follows:
•An S&P "A" rating is the third highest rating of eleven ratings for S&P. According to S&P, an insurer rated “A” has strong capacity to meet its financial commitments but is somewhat more susceptible to adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than insurers with "AAA" or "AA" ratings.
•A Moody's "A2" rating is the third highest rating of nine ratings for Moody's. Moody's states that companies rated “A2” are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Demotech provides financial strength/stability ratings for each of our title insurance underwriters individually, as follows:
| | | | | |
Alamo Title | A' |
Chicago Title | A'' |
Commonwealth Land Title | A' |
FNTIC | A' |
National Title of New York | A' |
Demotech states that its ratings of A" and A' reflect its opinion that the insurer possesses unsurpassed ability to maintain liquidity of invested assets, quality reinsurance, acceptable financial leverage and realistic pricing while simultaneously establishing loss and loss adjustment expense reserves at reasonable levels. The A'' and A' ratings are the two highest ratings of Demotech's six ratings.
The ratings of S&P, Moody’s, and Demotech described above are not designed to be, and do not serve as, measures of protection or valuation offered to investors. These financial strength ratings should not be relied on with respect to making an investment in our securities.
For further information associated with ratings, refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investment Policies and Investment Portfolio. Within our Title segment, our investment policy is designed to maximize total return through investment income and capital appreciation consistent with moderate risk of principal, while providing adequate liquidity. Our insurance subsidiaries, including title insurers, underwritten title companies and insurance agencies, are subject to extensive regulation under applicable state laws. The various states in which we operate our underwriters regulate the types of assets that qualify for purposes of capital, surplus, and statutory unearned premium reserves. Our investment policy specifically limits duration and non-investment grade allocations in the FNF fixed-income portfolio. Maintaining shorter durations on the investment portfolio allows for the mitigation of interest rate risk. Equity securities and preferred stock are utilized to take advantage of perceived value or for strategic purposes. Due to the magnitude of the investment portfolio in relation to our claims loss reserves, durations of investments are not specifically matched to the cash outflows required to pay claims.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amount of total investments within our Title segment, which approximates the fair value, excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates, was approximately $3.3 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively.
We purchase investment grade fixed maturity securities, selected non-investment grade fixed maturity securities, preferred stock and equity securities. The securities in our portfolio are subject to economic conditions and normal market risks and uncertainties.
The following table presents certain information regarding the investment ratings of our fixed maturity securities and preferred stock portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
| Amortized | | % of | | Fair | | % of | | Amortized | | % of | | Fair | | % of |
Rating (1) | Cost | | Total | | Value | | Total | | Cost | | Total | | Value | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Aaa/AAA | $ | 727 | | | 33.8 | % | | $ | 706 | | | 33.5 | % | | $ | 687 | | | 32.0 | % | | $ | 672 | | | 31.9 | % |
Aa/AA | 174 | | | 8.1 | | | 170 | | | 8.1 | | | 134 | | | 6.2 | | | 133 | | | 6.3 | |
A | 506 | | | 23.5 | | | 493 | | | 23.4 | | | 508 | | | 23.6 | | | 492 | | | 23.4 | |
Baa/BBB | 548 | | | 25.4 | | | 537 | | | 25.5 | | | 633 | | | 29.5 | | | 618 | | | 29.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lower | 154 | | | 7.1 | | | 156 | | | 7.4 | | | 134 | | | 6.2 | | | 128 | | | 6.1 | |
Other (2) | 45 | | | 2.1 | | | 45 | | | 2.1 | | | 54 | | | 2.5 | | | 63 | | | 3.0 | |
| $ | 2,154 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,107 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,150 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,106 | | | 100.0 | % |
(1)Ratings as assigned by Moody’s, or S&P, if a Moody's rating is unavailable.
(2)This category is composed of unrated securities.
The following table presents certain information regarding contractual maturities of our fixed maturity securities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Amortized | | % of | | Fair | | % of |
Maturity | Cost | | Total | | Value | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
One year or less | $ | 435 | | | 22.3 | % | | $ | 431 | | | 22.7 | % |
After one year through five years | 982 | | | 50.3 | | | 955 | | | 50.2 | |
After five years through ten years | 381 | | | 19.5 | | | 370 | | | 19.5 | |
After ten years | 87 | | | 4.5 | | | 79 | | | 4.1 | |
Mortgage-backed/asset-backed securities | 67 | | | 3.4 | | | 66 | | | 3.5 | |
| $ | 1,952 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,901 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Amortized | | % of | | Fair | | % of |
Maturity | Cost | | Total | | Value | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
One year or less | $ | 320 | | | 16.0 | % | | $ | 313 | | | 16.0 | % |
After one year through five years | 1,113 | | | 55.6 | | | 1,080 | | | 55.3 | |
After five years through ten years | 373 | | | 18.6 | | | 368 | | | 18.8 | |
After ten years | 121 | | | 6.0 | | | 116 | | | 6.0 | |
Mortgage-backed/asset-backed securities | 77 | | | 3.8 | | | 77 | | | 3.9 | |
| $ | 2,004 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,954 | | | 100.0 | % |
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because of the potential for prepayment on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, they are not categorized by contractual maturity.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we held $166 million and $263 million, respectively, in investments that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, other long-term investments $126 million and $95 million, respectively. Other long-term investments include other investments carried at fair value and company-owned life insurance policies carried at cash surrender value.
Short-term investments, which consist primarily of commercial paper and money market instruments that have an original maturity of one year or less, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, short-term investments were approximately $640 million and $667 million, respectively.
Our investment results for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Net investment income (1) | | $ | 405 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 236 | |
Average cash and invested assets (2) | | $ | 8,298 | | | $ | 9,271 | | | $ | 14,184 | |
Effective return on average cash and invested assets | | 4.9 | % | | 4.3 | % | | 1.7 | % |
(1)Net investment income as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings has been adjusted in the presentation above to provide the tax equivalent yield on tax exempt investments. Net investment income includes fees earned by holding customer funds in escrow (off-balance sheet) during facilitation of tax-deferred property exchanges. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, fees earned during facilitation of tax-deferred property exchanges were $180 million, $202 million and $106 million, respectively. See Note E Investments to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a detail of our interest income.
(2)For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, average invested assets include off-balance sheet customer funds used in the facilitation of tax-deferred property exchanges of $3,613 million, $4,436 million and $8,296 million, respectively.
F&G
Through F&G, and its wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries, we market a broad portfolio of annuities, including fixed indexed annuities (“FIAs”), registered index-linked annuities (“RILAs”), (together referred to as “indexed annuities”), multi-year guarantee annuities (“MYGAs”) as well as pension risk transfer (“PRT”) solutions, indexed universal life (“IUL”) insurance and institutional funding agreements.
For more than 60 years, F&G has helped middle-income Americans prepare for retirement and for their loved ones' financial security. We partner with leading IMOs and their agents to serve the needs of the middle-income market and develop competitive products to align with their evolving needs. During 2020, F&G entered the bank and broker dealer distribution channels to connect with even more customers. As of December 31, 2024, F&G has approximately 731,000 policyholders who count on the safety and protection features our fixed annuity and life insurance products provide. We also serve approximately 115,000 plan participants who will receive their pension payments from F&G through our pension risk transfer solutions.
Through the efforts of F&G's approximately 1,300 employees, most of whom are located in Des Moines, Iowa, and through a network of approximately 300 IMOs and 22 leading banks and independent broker dealers, representing approximately 138,000 independent agents and advisers, we offer various types of fixed annuities and life insurance products. Our fixed annuities serve as a retirement and savings tool for which our customers rely on principal protection and predictable income streams. In addition, our IUL insurance products provide our customers with a complementary product that allows them to build on their savings and provide a payment to their designated beneficiaries upon the policyholder’s death. Our most popular products are indexed annuities that tie contractual returns to specific market indices, such as the S&P 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the "S&P 500 Index"). Our customers value our indexed annuities, which provide a portion of the gains of an underlying market index, while also providing principal protection. We believe this mix of “some upside but limited downside” fills the need for middle-income Americans who must save for retirement but who want to limit the risk of decline in their savings.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, FIAs generated approximately 44% of our total gross sales. The remaining 56% of sales were primarily generated from fixed rate annuities, 33%, PRT sales, 15%, funding agreements, 7%, and IUL, 1%. We invest the proceeds primarily in fixed income securities. We also use options and futures that hedge the index credit of our FIA and IUL liabilities by replicating the market index returns to our policyholders. We invest in options on indices such as the S&P 500 Index. Most of our products allow for active management to achieve targeted lifetime returns. In addition, our annuity contracts generally either cannot be surrendered or include surrender charges that discourage early redemptions.
Annuities. Through F&G’s insurance subsidiaries, we issue a broad portfolio of deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), immediate annuities, and PRT solutions. A deferred annuity is a type of contract that accumulates value on a tax deferred basis and typically begins making specified periodic or lump sum payments a certain number of years after the contract has been issued. An immediate annuity is a type of contract that begins making specified payments within one annuity period (e.g., one month or one year) and typically pays principal and earnings in equal payments over some period of time.
Deferred Annuities – FIAs. Our FIAs allow contract owners the possibility of earning returns linked to the performance of a specified market index, such as the S&P 500 Index, while providing principal protection. The contract owners typically make a single deposit into our deferred annuities. The contracts include a provision for a minimum guaranteed surrender value calculated in accordance with applicable law. A market index tracks the performance of a specific group of stocks representing a particular segment of the market, or in some cases an entire market. For example, the S&P 500 Composite Stock Price Index is an index of 500 stocks intended to be representative of a broad segment of the market. All FIA products allow policyholders to allocate funds once a year among several different crediting strategies, including one or more index-based strategies and a traditional fixed rate strategy. Surrender charges apply for early withdrawal, typically for seven to fourteen years after purchase.
We purchase derivatives consisting predominantly of over-the-counter options and, to a lesser degree, futures contracts (specifically for FIA contracts) on the equity indices underlying the applicable policy such as the S&P 500 Index. These derivatives are used to fund the index credits due to policyholders under the FIA and IUL contracts based upon policyholders’ contract elections. The down-side risk to F&G is limited to the cost of the options because if the value of the options decreases there is no index credit. The cost of the hedge is included in the pricing of the product and can be reset on an annual basis for each policy based on market conditions. The majority of all such equity options are one-year options purchased to match the funding requirements underlying the FIA/IUL contracts. On the anniversary dates of the FIA/IUL contracts, the market index used to compute the annual index credit under the contracts is reset. At such time, we purchase new equity options to fund the next index credit. We manage the cost of these purchases through the terms of our FIA/IUL contracts, which permit us to change caps or participation rates, subject to certain guaranteed minimums on each contract’s anniversary date. The change in
the fair value of the options and futures contracts is generally designed to offset the equity market related change in the fair value of the FIA/IUL contract’s related reserve liability. The options and futures contracts are marked to fair value with the change in fair value included as a component of “Recognized gains and losses, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The change in fair value of the options and futures contracts includes the gains and losses recognized at the expiration of the instrument’s term or upon early termination and the changes in fair value of open positions. Generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) accounting of the reserve liability for products with embedded derivatives such as FIA creates additional volatility beyond the accounting for the options and the futures.
The contractholder account value of a FIA contract is equal to the sum of deposits paid, premium bonuses, if any, (described below), and index credits based on the change in the relevant market index (subject to a cap, spread and/or a participation rate) less any fees for riders and any withdrawals taken to-date. Caps (a maximum rate that may be credited) generally range from 1% to 10% when measured annually and 1% to 3% when measured monthly, spreads (a credited rate determined by deducting a specific rate from the index return) generally range from 1% to 3% when measured annually, and participation rates (a credited rate equal to a percentage of index return) generally range from 50% to 250% of the performance of the applicable market index. The cap, spread and participation rate can typically be reset annually and in some instances every two to five years. Certain riders provide a variety of benefits, such as the ability to increase their cap, lifetime income or additional liquidity for a set fee. As this fee is fixed, the contract holder may lose principal if the index credits received do not exceed the amount of such fee.
Approximately 39% of the FIA sales for the year ended December 31, 2024, involved premium bonuses or vesting bonuses. Premium bonuses increase the initial annuity deposit by a specified rate of 2%. The vesting bonuses, which range from 1% to 15%, increase the initial annuity deposit liability but are subject to adjustment for unvested amounts in the event of surrender by the policyholder prior to the end of the vesting period. We made compensating adjustments in the commission paid to the agent or the surrender charges on the policy to offset the premium bonus.
Approximately 48% of our FIA contracts were issued with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) rider for the year ended December 31, 2024. With this rider, a contract owner can elect to receive guaranteed payments for life from the FIA contract without requiring the owner to annuitize the FIA contract value. The amount of the income benefit available is determined by the growth in the policy’s benefit base value as defined in the FIA contract rider. Typically, this accumulates for 10 years based on a guaranteed rate of 3% to 8%. Guaranteed withdrawal payments may be stopped and restarted at the election of the contract owner. Some of the FIA contract riders that we offer include an additional death benefit or an increase in benefit amounts under chronic health conditions. Rider fees range from 0% to 1%. Unlike a variable annuity, policyholder values do not decline with market movements.
Deferred Annuities – Fixed Rate Annuities. Fixed rate annuities are typically single deposit contracts and include annual reset and multi-year rate guaranteed policies. Fixed rate annual reset annuities issued by us have an annual interest rate (the “crediting rate”) that is guaranteed for the first policy year. After the first policy year, we have the discretionary ability to change the crediting rate once annually to any rate at or above a guaranteed minimum rate. MYGAs are similar to fixed rate annual reset annuities except that the initial crediting rate is guaranteed for a specified number of years before it may be changed at our discretion. As of December 31, 2024, crediting rates on outstanding single-year guaranteed annuities generally ranged from 2% to 6% and MYGA ranged from 1% to 6%. The average crediting rate on all outstanding fixed rate annuities at December 31, 2024, was 5%.
Deferred Annuities - Registered Index-Linked Annuities (“RILA”). In early 2024, we entered the RILA markets. RILAs are similar to indexed annuities in offering the policyholder the opportunity for tax-deferred growth based in part on the performance of a market index. Compared to an indexed annuity, RILAs have the potential for higher returns but also have the potential for risk of loss to principal and related earnings. RILAs provide the ability for the policyholder to participate in the positive performance of certain market indices during a term, limited by a cap or adjusted for a participation rate. Negative performance of the market indices during a term can result in negative policyholder returns, with downside protection typically provided in the form of either a “buffer” or a “floor” to limit the policyholder’s exposure to market loss. A "buffer" is protection from negative exposure up to a certain percentage, typically 10% or 20%. A "floor" is protection from negative exposure less than a stated percentage (i.e., the policyholder risks exposure of loss up to the "floor", but is protected against any loss in excess of this amount).
Withdrawal Options for Deferred Annuities. After the first year following the issuance of a deferred annuity policy, holders of deferred annuities are typically permitted penalty-free withdrawals up to a contractually specified amount. The penalty-free withdrawal amount is typically 10% of the prior year account value for indexed annuities and is typically up to accumulated interest for fixed rate annuities, subject to certain restrictions. Withdrawals in excess of allowable penalty-free amounts are assessed a surrender charge if such withdrawals are made during the penalty period of the deferred annuity policy. The penalty period typically ranges from seven to fourteen years for indexed annuities and three to ten years for fixed rate annuities. This
surrender charge initially ranges from 8% to 14% of the contract value for indexed annuities and is 8% of the contract value for fixed rate annuities. The charge generally decreases by approximately one to two percentage points per year during the penalty period. The average surrender charge was 8% for our indexed annuities and 7% for our fixed rate annuities as of December 31, 2024. A market value adjustment (“MVA”) will also apply in most states to any withdrawal that incurs a surrender charge, subject to certain exceptions. The MVA is based on a formula that accounts for changes in interest rates since contract issuance. Generally, if interest rates have risen, the MVA will decrease surrender value, whereas if rates have fallen, it will increase surrender value. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 81% of our business included an MVA feature.
The following table summarizes our deferred annuity account values and surrender charge protection as of December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SURRENDER CHARGE EXPIRATION BY YEAR | | Fixed Rate and Indexed Annuities Account Value | | Percent of Total | | Weighted Average Surrender Charge |
| | (In millions) |
Out of surrender charge | | $ | 2,427 | | | 7 | % | | — | % |
2025 | | 2,225 | | | 6 | % | | 4 | % |
2026-2028 | | 8,332 | | | 23 | % | | 6 | % |
2029-2030 | | 6,347 | | | 18 | % | | 7 | % |
2031-2032 | | 6,213 | | | 17 | % | | 8 | % |
Thereafter | | 10,009 | | | 29 | % | | 11 | % |
Total | | $ | 35,553 | | | 100 | % | | 7 | % |
Subsequent to the penalty period, the policyholder may elect to take the proceeds of the surrender either in a single payment or in a series of payments over the life of the policy or for a fixed number of years (or a combination of these payment options). In addition to the foregoing withdrawal rights, policyholders may also elect to have additional withdrawal benefits by purchasing a GMWB.
Single Premium Immediate Annuities. We have previously sold single premium immediate annuities (“SPIAs”), which provide a series of periodic payments for a fixed period of time or for the life of the contract, according to the policyholder’s choice at the time of issue. The amounts, frequency and length of time of the payments are fixed at the outset of the annuity contract. SPIAs are often purchased by persons at or near retirement age who desire a steady stream of payments over a future period of years. Existing policyholders may elect to surrender their contract and use the proceeds to purchase a supplementary contract, which functions as a SPIA.
Life Insurance. We currently offer IUL insurance policies and have previously sold universal life, term and whole life insurance products. Holders of universal life insurance policies may make periodic payments over the life of the contract and earn returns on their policies, which are credited to the policyholder’s cash value account. The insurer periodically deducts its expenses and the cost of life insurance protection from the cash value account. The balance of the cash value account is credited interest at a fixed rate or returns based on the performance of a market index, or both, at the option of the policyholder, using a method similar to that described above for indexed annuities. In addition to the annual renewal premium, we are diversifying earnings through strong growth in our middle market life insurance business.
Funding Agreements. As defined by the Iowa Insurance Division (the "IID"), a funding agreement is an agreement for an insurer to accept and accumulate funds and to make one or more payments at future dates in amounts that are not based on mortality or morbidity contingencies of the person to whom the funding agreement is issued. In essence, funding agreement providers are agreeing to a defined stream of future payments in exchange for a single upfront premium. This type of business is sometimes referred to as spread lending, as funding agreement providers invest upfront premiums with the intent to earn an investment spread on the funds prior to making agreed upon maturity and interest payments. The structure of the payments can take several forms but are commonly a fixed or variable interest payment with a single maturity principal re-payment.
F&G currently utilizes two forms of funding agreement offerings. The first is through the issuance of collateralized funding agreements with the FHLB. This enables spread-based income without longevity or mortality exposure given the certainty in liability profile. Funding agreements through the FHLB are flexible in their format and the ability to issue during broad windows, as long as sufficient eligible collateral has been deposited with the bank. F&G and its predecessors have been entering into funding agreements with the FHLB since at least 2004.
In June 2021, we established a FABN Program, which is a medium term note program under which funding agreements are issued to a special-purpose trust that issues marketable notes. The notes are underwritten and marketed by major investment banks’ broker-dealer operations and are sold to institutional investors. These FABN offerings are more limited regarding timing of issuance, but do not require collateralization as with the FHLB. The maximum aggregate principal amount permitted to be
outstanding at any one time under the FABN Program is currently $5.0 billion. As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $2.5 billion outstanding under the FABN Program.
Pension Risk Transfer. In July 2021, we entered the PRT market. A PRT occurs when a defined-benefit pension provider seeks to remove some or all of its obligation to pay guaranteed retirement income or post-retirement benefits to plan participants. There are four major types of PRT strategies: longevity reinsurance, buy-in, buy-out, and paying in lump sums. We are currently active in plan buy-outs, where we have a direct, irrevocable commitment to each covered participant to make the specified annuity payments based upon the terms of the pension plan. Plan buy-out transactions fully and permanently transfer all investment, mortality, and administrative risk, associated with covered benefits, from the pension plan sponsor to the insurance provider.
Our PRT products are comparable to income annuities, as we generally receive a single, upfront premium in exchange for paying a guaranteed stream of future income payments, which are typically fixed in nature, but may vary in duration based on participant mortality experience. These products primarily create earnings through spread income. In each transaction FGL Insurance and/or FGL NY Insurance issues a group annuity contract to discharge pension plan liabilities from a pension plan sponsor, either through a separate account or through a general account guarantee. Certificate holders covered under a group annuity contract have a guaranteed benefit from the insurance company.
We entered the PRT solutions business by building a team of experienced professionals, then working with brokers and institutional consultants for distribution. As of December 31, 2024, we had completed PRT transactions that represented pension obligations of $7.0 billion.
Distribution. We distribute our annuity and life insurance products through three main retail channels of distribution: independent agents, banks, and broker dealers.
In our independent agent channel, the sale of our products typically occurs as part of a four-party, three stage sales process between FGL Insurance, an IMO, the agent and the customer. FGL Insurance designs, manufactures, issues, and services the product. The IMOs will typically sign contracts with multiple insurance carriers to provide their agents with a broad and competitive product portfolio. The IMO provides training and discusses product options with agents in preparation for meetings with clients. The IMO staff also provide assistance to the agent during the selling and application process. The agent may get customer leads from the IMOs. The agent conducts a fact finding and presents suitable product choices to the customers. We monitor the business issued by each distribution partner for pricing metrics, mortality, persistency, as well as market conduct and suitability.
We offer our products through a network of approximately 300 IMOs, representing approximately 126,000 agents. We believe that our relationships with these IMOs are strong. We identify Power Partners as those who have demonstrated the ability to generate significant production for our business. We currently have 41 Power Partners, comprised of 19 annuity IMOs and 22 life insurance IMOs. The average tenure of the Power Partners is approximately 21 years.
We took a similar approach in launching products as a new entrant into the bank and broker dealer channels by partnering with one of the largest broker dealers in the industry. In 2020, F&G launched a set of fixed rate annuity and indexed annuity products to banks and broker dealers and gained selling agreements with some of the largest banks and broker dealers in the United States. We offer our products through a network of approximately 22 banks and broker dealers, representing approximately 12,000 financial advisers. The financial advisers at our bank and broker dealer partners can offer their clients guaranteed rates of return, protected growth, and income for life through our secure series of annuity products. We employ a hybrid distribution model in this channel, whereby some financial institutions partner directly with F&G and our sales team, and others work with an intermediary. As such, we partner with a select number of financial institution intermediaries who have expertise in the channel and maintain the appropriate field wholesaling forces to be successful in this channel. In 2024, the top five firms represented 77% of channel sales. Bank and broker dealers represented 42% of annuity sales for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The top 5 states for the distribution of F&G retail products in the year ended December 31, 2024, were Florida, California, Pennsylvania, Texas and Ohio, which together accounted for 38.7% of FGL Insurance’s premiums.
Investments. Within our F&G segment, we embrace a long-term conservative investment philosophy, investing nearly all the insurance premiums we receive in a wide range of high-quality debt securities. Our investment strategy is designed to preserve capital, provide consistent yield and investment income and achieve attractive absolute returns. We base all our decisions on fundamental, bottom-up research, coupled with a top-down view that respects the cyclicality of certain asset classes. The types of assets in which we may invest are influenced by various state laws, which prescribe qualified investment assets applicable to insurance companies.
FGL Insurance and certain other subsidiaries of F&G are party to investment management agreements ("IMAs") with Blackstone ISG-I Advisors LLC (“BIS”) pursuant to which BIS is appointed as investment manager of the F&G Accounts.
Effective October 1, 2024, FGL Insurance amended and restated its IMA with BIS to increase a fee cap from 26 basis points to 30 basis points. This increase did not change the overall economics of the IM as it was not material in nature. There are no specified minimum amounts of assets that we have agreed that BIS will manage; however, BIS has the right to manage (and receive fees based on) all assets in the F&G Accounts with limited exceptions. For certain asset classes, we continue to utilize specialized third-party investment managers. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 81% of our $60 billion investment portfolio was managed by BIS, with 18% managed by other third parties, and the remaining 1% internally managed. BIS, in accordance with our IMAs, has delegated certain investment services to its affiliates, including Blackstone’s Credit, Real Estate Debt and Asset-Based Finance businesses, in each case, pursuant to separate sub-management agreements executed between BIS and each such affiliate.
Effective January 1, 2025, FGL NY Insurance and BIS entered into an IMA pursuant to which BIS is appointed as investment manager of substantially all assets in the general account of FGL NY Insurance. FGL NY Insurance terminated its current IMA with its current investment manager effective December 31, 2024. There are no separate agreements or arrangements between BIS or its affiliates, on the one hand, and FGL NY Insurance or its affiliates, on the other hand, concerning the IMA between BIS and FGL NY Insurance.
Our investment portfolio consists of high-quality fixed maturities, including publicly issued and privately issued corporate bonds, municipal and other government bonds, asset-backed securities ("ABS"), residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"), commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs"), residential mortgage loans ("RMLs"), limited partnership investments and other investments. We also maintain holdings in floating rate, and less rate-sensitive investments, including senior tranches of collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), non-agency RMBS and various types of ABS. It is our expectation that our investment portfolio will broaden in scope and diversity to include other asset classes held by life and annuity insurance writers. We also have a small amount of equity holdings required as part of our funding arrangements with the FHLB.
The portfolio also has exposure to U.S. dollar denominated emerging market bonds, highly rated preferred stocks and hybrids, and structured securities including ABS. We currently maintain a well-matched asset/liability profile (asset duration, including cash and cash equivalents, of 4.9 years vs. liability duration of 5.8 years).
For further discussion of portfolio activity, see Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report, under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Investment Portfolio.
Outsourcing. Our F&G segment outsources the following functions to third-party service providers:
•new business administration (data entry and policy issue only);
•service of existing policies;
•underwriting administration of life insurance applications;
•call centers;
•information technology development and maintenance;
•certain investment accounting and custody; and
•co-located data centers and hosting of financial systems.
We closely manage our outsourcing partners and integrate their services into our operations. We believe that outsourcing such functions allows us to focus capital and our employees on our core business operations and perform differentiating functions, such as finance, actuarial, product development and risk management functions. In addition, we believe an outsourcing model provides predictable pricing, service levels and volume capabilities and allows us to benefit from technological developments that enhance our customer self-service and sales processes. We believe that we have a good relationship with our principal outsource service providers.
Ratings. Within our F&G segment, access to funding and our related cost of borrowing, the attractiveness of certain of our products to customers and requirements for derivatives collateral posting are affected by our credit ratings and insurance financial strength ratings, which are periodically reviewed by the rating agencies. Financial strength ratings and credit ratings are important factors affecting public confidence in an insurer and its competitive position in marketing products.
As of the date of this Annual Report, A.M. Best Company ("A.M. Best"), Fitch Ratings ("Fitch"), Moody's, and S&P had issued credit ratings, financial strength ratings and/or outlook statements regarding us, as listed below. Credit ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an entity’s ability to repay its indebtedness. Financial strength ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding the ability of an insurance company to meet its financial obligations under an insurance policy and generally involve quantitative and qualitative evaluations by rating agencies of a company’s financial condition and operating performance. Generally, rating agencies base their financial strength ratings upon information furnished to them by
the insurer and upon their own investigations, studies and assumptions. Financial strength ratings are based upon factors of concern to policyholders, agents and intermediaries and are not directed toward the protection of investors. Credit and financial strength ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and they may be revised or revoked at any time at the sole discretion of the rating organization.
In addition to the financial strength ratings, rating agencies use an “outlook statement” to indicate a medium or long term trend that, if continued, may lead to a rating change. A positive outlook indicates a rating may be raised and a negative outlook indicates a rating may be lowered. A stable outlook is assigned when ratings are not likely to be changed. A developing outlook is assigned when a rating may be raised, lowered or affirmed. Outlooks should not be confused with expected stability of the issuer’s financial or economic performance. A rating may have a "stable" outlook to indicate that the rating is not expected to change, but a "stable" outlook does not preclude a rating agency from changing a rating at any time without notice.
The rating organizations may take various actions, positive or negative. Such actions are beyond our control, and we cannot predict what these actions may be and the timing thereof.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | A.M. Best | | S&P | | Fitch | | Moody's | | |
Holding Company Ratings | | | | | | | | | | |
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuer Credit / Default Rating | | Not Rated | | BBB- | | BBB | | Baa3 | | |
Outlook | | | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | |
Senior Unsecured Notes | | Not Rated | | BBB- | | BBB- | | Baa3 | | |
Junior Unsecured Notes (a) | | Not Rated | | BB | | BB | | Ba1 | | |
CF Bermuda Holdings Limited | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuer Credit / Default Rating | | Not Rated | | BBB- | | BBB | | Baa3 | | |
Outlook | | | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | |
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. (b) | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuer Credit / Default Rating | | BBB | | BBB- | | BBB | | Not Rated | | |
Outlook | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Subsidiary Ratings | | | | | | | | | | |
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Strength Rating | | A | | A- | | A- | | A3 | | |
Outlook | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | |
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company of New York | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Strength Rating | | A | | A- | | A- | | Not Rated | | |
Outlook | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | | | |
F&G Life Re Ltd | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Strength Rating | | Not Rated | | A- | | A- | | A3 | | |
Outlook | | | | Stable | | Stable | | Stable | | |
F&G Cayman Re Ltd | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Strength Rating | | Not Rated | | Not Rated | | A- | | Not Rated | | |
Outlook | | | | | | Stable | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Reflects rating of $375 million Junior Subordinated Notes due 2065 issued in January 2025 | | | |
(b) Ratings removed for Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025 following full redemption in February 2025 | | |
A.M. Best, S&P, Fitch and Moody’s review their ratings of insurance companies from time to time. There can be no assurance that any particular rating will continue for any given period of time or that it will not be changed or withdrawn entirely if, in their judgment, circumstances so warrant. While the degree to which ratings adjustments will affect sales and persistency is unknown, we believe if our ratings were to be negatively adjusted for any reason, we could experience a material decline in the sales of our products and the persistency of our existing business. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors."
F&G is required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice as part of its over-the-counter derivatives agreements on International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") forms. Under some ISDA agreements, we have agreed to maintain certain financial strength ratings. Please refer to Note F Derivative Financial Instruments to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for disclosure around the Company's requirement to maintain minimum ratings.
If the insurance subsidiaries held net short positions against a counterparty, and the subsidiaries’ financial strength ratings were below the levels required in the ISDA agreement with the counterparty, the counterparty would demand immediate further
collateralization, which could negatively impact overall liquidity. Based on the fair value of our derivatives as of December 31, 2024, we hold no net short positions against a counterparty; therefore, we were not required to post collateral at December 31, 2024.
A downgrade of the financial strength rating of one of our principal insurance subsidiaries could affect our competitive position in the insurance industry and make it more difficult for us to market our products, as potential customers may select companies with higher financial strength ratings. A downgrade of the financial strength rating could also impact our borrowing costs.
Risk Management. Risk management is a critical part of our business. We seek to assess risk to our business through a formalized process involving (i) identifying short-term and long-term strategic and operational objectives, (ii) development of risk appetite statements that establish what the company is willing to accept in terms of risks to achieving its goals and objectives, (iii) identifying the levers that control the risk appetite of the company, (iv) establishing the overall limits of risk acceptable for a given risk driver, (v) establishing operational risk limits that are aligned with the tolerances, (vi) assigning risk limit quantification and mitigation responsibilities to individual team members within functional groups, (vii) analyzing the potential qualitative and quantitative impact of individual risks, including but not limited to stress and scenario testing covering over eight economic and insurance related risks, (viii) mitigating risks by appropriate actions and (ix) identifying, documenting and communicating key business risks in a timely fashion.
The responsibility for monitoring, evaluating and responding to risk is assigned first to our management and employees, second to those occupying specialist functions, such as legal compliance and risk teams, and third to those occupying supervisory functions, such as internal audit and the board of directors.
Reinsurance. Within our F&G segment, we cede insurance to other insurance companies. We use reinsurance to diversify risks and earnings, to manage loss exposures, to enhance our capital position, and to manage new business volume. The effects of certain reinsurance agreements are not accounted for as reinsurance as they do not reinsure insurance contracts or they do not transfer the risks of the reinsured policies.
In instances where we are the ceding company, we pay a premium to a reinsurer in exchange for the reinsurer assuming a portion of our liabilities under the policies we issued and collect expense allowances in return for our administration of the ceded policies. Use of reinsurance does not discharge our liability as the ceding company because we remain directly liable to our policyholders and are required to pay the full amount of our policy obligations in the event that our reinsurers fail to satisfy their obligations. We collect reimbursement from our reinsurers when we pay claims on policies that are reinsured.
We monitor the credit risk related to the ability of our reinsurers to honor their obligations under various agreements. To minimize the risk of credit loss on such contracts, we generally diversify our exposures among many reinsurers and limit the amount of exposure to each based on financial strength ratings, which are reviewed annually. We are able to further manage risk with various forms of collateral or collateral arrangements, including secured trusts, funds withheld arrangements and irrevocable letters of credit.
Please refer to Note O F&G Reinsurance to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion on reinsurance, reinsurance recoverables for our largest reinsurers and credit risk and counterparty risk.
See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for further discussion on credit risk and counterparty risk.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for further discussion of credit risk related to reinsurance agreements. A description of significant ceded reinsurance transactions appears below.
Wilton Reinsurance Transaction. Almost all of the life insurance policies in force issued before March 1, 2010, except for the return of premium benefits on term life insurance products, are subject to a reinsurance arrangement with Wilton Reassurance Company (“Wilton Re”). Pursuant to the agreed upon terms, Wilton Re purchased through a 100% quota share reinsurance agreement certain FGL Insurance life insurance policies that are subject to redundant reserves, reported on a statutory basis, under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX, as well as another block of FGL Insurance’s in-force traditional, universal life and IUL insurance policies. The effects of this agreement are accounted for as reinsurance as the ceded policies qualify as insurance products and because the agreement satisfies the risk transfer requirements for GAAP.
Hannover Reinsurance Transaction. FGL Insurance has a reinsurance agreement with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America (Bermuda) Ltd., an unaffiliated reinsurer, to reinsure an in-force block of its indexed annuity and fixed deferred annuity contracts with GMWB and Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit (“GMDB”) guarantees. In accordance with the terms of this agreement, we cede 70% net retention of secondary guarantee payments in excess of account value for GMWB
and GMDB guarantees. The effects of this agreement are not accounted for as reinsurance as it does not satisfy the risk transfer requirements for GAAP; therefore, deposit accounting is applied.
Kubera Reinsurance Transaction. FGL Insurance has a reinsurance agreement with Kubera Insurance (SAC) Ltd. (“Kubera”), an unaffiliated reinsurer, to cede a quota share of certain indexed annuity statutory reserves on a coinsurance funds withheld basis, net of applicable existing reinsurance. This agreement has been amended several times to include additional FIA policies, with the latest amendment effective December 1, 2024. The effects of this agreement are not accounted for as reinsurance as it does not satisfy the risk transfer requirements for GAAP; therefore, deposit accounting is applied and FGL Insurance applies the right of offset in the reinsurance agreement.
To enhance Kubera's ability to pay its obligations under the amended reinsurance agreement, F&G entered into a Variable Note Purchase Agreement (the “NPA”), whereby F&G agreed to fund a note to Kubera to be used to ultimately settle with F&G, with principal increases up to a maximum amount of $300 million, to the extent a potential funding shortfall (treaty assets are less than the total funding requirement) is projected relative to the business ceded to Kubera from F&G as part of the amended reinsurance agreement. The potential funding shortfall will be determined quarterly and, among other items, is impacted by the market value of the assets in the funds withheld account related to the reinsurance agreement and Kubera's capital as calculated on a Bermuda regulatory basis. The NPA matures on November 30, 2071. Based on the current level of the treaty assets and projections that these policies will be profitable over the lifetime of the agreement, we do not expect significant fundings to occur under the NPA. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the amount funded under the NPA was insignificant.
Kubera & Somerset Reinsurance Transactions. FGL Insurance entered into a reinsurance agreement with Kubera, effective December 31, 2018, to cede certain fixed rate annuity (including MYGA) GAAP and statutory reserves on a coinsurance funds withheld basis, net of applicable existing reinsurance. Effective October 31, 2021, this agreement was novated from Kubera to Somerset Reinsurance Ltd. (“Somerset”), a certified third-party reinsurer. Effective December 1, 2023, FGL Insurance executed an additional coinsurance funds withheld agreement with Somerset to cede certain flow MYGA business written effective on or after December 1, 2023. As the policies ceded to Somerset are investment contracts, there is no significant insurance risk present and the reinsurance agreements are accounted for as separate investment contracts.
Effective July 1, 2024, FGL Insurance amended the existing flow reinsurance agreement with Somerset to additionally cede the base contract benefits and GMWB riders attached under certain FIA policies on a coinsurance funds withheld quota share basis written on or after July 1, 2024. As the base contract benefits and GWMB riders are ceded to Somerset, there is sufficient insurance risk present that results in this portion of the reinsurance agreement being accounted for as reinsurance.
Everlake Reinsurance Transaction. Effective September 1, 2023, FGL Insurance executed a coinsurance agreement with Everlake Life Insurance Company (“Everlake”), an unaffiliated reinsurer to cede, on a quota share basis, certain flow MYGA business written effective on or after September 1, 2023. As the policies ceded to Everlake are investment contracts, there is no significant insurance risk present and the effects of this agreement are accounted for as a separate investment contract.
Effective January 1, 2025, F&G amended the existing flow reinsurance agreement with Everlake Life Insurance Company (“Everlake”) to cede future additional MYGA business for agreed upon periods to Everlake pursuant to an offer and acceptance process, rather than on a flow basis. The amendment included a cession of an inforce block of certain MYGA policies on a coinsurance quota share basis.
Aspida Reinsurance Transaction. FGL Insurance has a reinsurance agreement with ASPIDA Life Re Ltd. (“Aspida Re”), an unaffiliated reinsurer, to cede certain flow MYGA business, on a funds withheld coinsurance basis, net of applicable existing reinsurance, written effective on or after January 15, 2021. As the policies ceded to Aspida Re are investment contracts, there is no significant insurance risk present and therefore the reinsurance agreement is accounted for as a separate investment contract.
New Re Reinsurance Transaction. Effective December 31, 2022, FGL Insurance entered into an indemnity reinsurance agreement with New Reinsurance Company Ltd., an unaffiliated reinsurer and wholly owned subsidiary of Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in München (d/b/a Munich Re), to cede certain indexed annuity policies. Effective July 1, 2023, this agreement was amended to reinsure additional indexed annuity products. The coinsurance quota share is only applicable to the base contract benefits under the indexed annuity policies. The yearly renewable term is applicable to the waiver of surrender charges and return of premium. The effects of this agreement are not accounted for as reinsurance as it does not satisfy the risk transfer requirements for GAAP; therefore, deposit accounting is applied and FGL Insurance applies the right of offset in the reinsurance agreement.
The CARVM Facility. Life insurance companies operating in the United States must calculate required reserves for life and annuity policies based on statutory principles. The insurance divisions have adopted the methodology contained in the NAIC Valuation Manual as the prescribed methodology for the insurance industry. The industry has reduced or eliminated redundancies thereby increasing capital using a variety of techniques including reserve facilities.
FGL Insurance has a reinsurance treaty with Raven Reinsurance Company (“Raven Re”), its wholly owned captive reinsurance company, to cede the Commissioners Annuity Reserve Valuation Method (“CARVM”) liability for annuity benefits where surrender charges are waived related to certain indexed annuities, deferred annuity and MYGA policies. In connection with the CARVM reinsurance agreement, FGL Insurance and Raven Re entered into an agreement with Nomura Bank International plc (“NBI”) to establish a reserve financing facility in the form of a letter of credit issued by NBI. The financing facility has $175 million available to draw on as of December 31, 2024. The amended facility may terminate earlier than the current termination date of October 1, 2027, in accordance with the terms of the reimbursement agreement. Under the terms of the reimbursement agreement, in the event the letter of credit is drawn upon, Raven Re is required to repay the amounts utilized, and FGAL is obligated to repay the amounts utilized if Raven Re fails to make the required reimbursement. Under the terms of the agreement, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (“FGAL”) is also required to make a capital contribution to Raven Re in certain circumstances, including in the event that Raven Re’s statutory capital and surplus falls below defined levels. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, no capital contributions were required to be made due to these conditions. As this letter of credit is provided by an unaffiliated financial institution, Raven Re is permitted to carry the letter of credit as an admitted asset on the Raven Re statutory balance sheet.
GMWB/GWP Reinsurance Transaction. Effective December 31, 2023, FGL Insurance recaptured its reinsurance arrangement with Canada Life Assurance Company (“Canada Life”) United States Branch covering indexed annuity policies with GMWB and guaranteed withdrawal payment (“GWP”) features and entered into a reinsurance treaty with Corbeau Re, Inc. (“Corbeau Re”), its wholly owned captive reinsurance company, to cede certain indexed annuity policies with GMWB and GWP. In connection with the reinsurance agreement between FGL Insurance and Corbeau Re, Corbeau Re entered into an excess of loss reinsurance agreement (“XOL”) with Canada Life Barbados Branch to finance the portion of statutory reserves considered to be non-economic. The XOL matures on December 31, 2043, and provides for coverage on losses up to $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2024. With Corbeau Re, non-economic reserves were financed through the maturity date of the XOL and statutory reserves are recorded for all risks expected to be incurred after the maturity date of the XOL. The XOL is not accounted for as reinsurance as it does not satisfy the risk transfer requirements for GAAP; therefore, deposit accounting is applied. Under the terms of the agreement, FGAL is required to make a capital contribution to Corbeau Re in certain circumstances, including in the event that Corbeau Re’s statutory capital and surplus falls below defined levels. As of December 31, 2024, no capital contributions were required to be made due to these conditions. Corbeau Re is permitted to account for the excess of loss reinsurance agreement from Canada Life as an admitted asset on the Corbeau Re statutory balance sheet.
PRT Reinsurance Transaction. Effective October 1, 2023, FGL Insurance recaptured a reinsurance agreement with its affiliate F&G Life Re Ltd. (“F&G Life Re”), a Bermuda reinsurer, covering a quota share of certain pension risk transfer group annuity contracts and entered into an agreement with its affiliate F&G Cayman Re Ltd. (“F&G Cayman Re”), a Cayman Islands reinsurer, to reinsure a quota share of certain PRT group annuity contracts (previously ceded to F&G Life Re) in addition to flow PRT group annuity contracts. Some of the contracts reinsured are held by FGL Insurance’s general account and others are held by a FGL Insurance separate account (which does not meet the GAAP definition of a separate account). Reinsurance of the general account contracts are maintained on a coinsurance funds withheld basis for the general account statutory reserves. Reinsurance of the separate account contracts are maintained on a modified coinsurance basis for the separate account statutory reserves and coinsurance basis for the general account statutory reserves supporting the separate account. In connection with the agreement, F&G Cayman Re entered into a financing agreement with Deutsche Bank AG (“DB”), operating out of its New York branch, whereby DB issued a letter of credit used to support the coinsured general account statutory reserves (generally considered to be the non-economic reserves).
Regulation - U.S. FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision in their domiciles, Iowa, New York, Vermont and Vermont, respectively, and in each state in which they do business. FGL Insurance does business throughout the United States and Puerto Rico, except for New York. FGL NY Insurance only does business in New York. Raven Re is a special purpose captive reinsurance company that only provides reinsurance to FGL Insurance under the CARVM Treaty. Corbeau Re, a wholly owned captive reinsurance company, reinsures certain of FGL Insurance’s indexed annuity policies with GMWB and GWP. FGL Insurance’s principal insurance regulatory authority is the IID; however, state insurance departments throughout the United States also monitor FGL Insurance’s insurance operations as a licensed insurer. The New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) regulates the operations of FGL NY Insurance. The purpose of these regulations is primarily to protect insurers’ policyholders and beneficiaries and not their general creditors and shareholders of those insurers or of their holding companies. Many of the laws and regulations to which FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance are subject are regularly re-examined and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect their operations.
Generally, insurance products underwritten by, and rates used by FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance must be approved by the insurance regulators in each state or territory in which they are sold. In addition, insurance products may also be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").
State insurance authorities have broad administrative powers over FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance with respect to all aspects of the insurance business including:
•licensing to transact business;
•licensing agents;
•prescribing which assets and liabilities are to be considered in determining statutory surplus;
•regulating premium rates for certain insurance products;
•approving policy forms and certain related materials;
•requiring insurers and agents to act in the best interests of consumers when making recommendations to purchase annuities, or to determine whether a reasonable basis exists as to the suitability of such investments for consumers;
•regulating unfair trade and claims practices;
•establishing reserve requirements and solvency standards;
•regulating the amount of dividends that may be paid in any year by insurance companies;
•regulating the availability of reinsurance or other substitute financing solutions, the terms thereof and the ability of an insurer to take credit on its financial statements for insurance ceded to reinsurers or other substitute financing solutions;
•fixing maximum interest rates on life insurance policy loans and minimum accumulation or surrender values; and
•regulating the type, amounts, and valuations of investments permitted, transactions with affiliates, and other matters.
State insurance laws and regulations require FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re to file reports, including financial statements, with state insurance departments in each state in which they do business, and their operations and accounts are subject to examination by those departments at any time. FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices and procedures prescribed or permitted by these departments.
The NAIC has approved a series of statutory accounting principles and various model regulations that have been adopted, in some cases with certain modifications, by all state insurance departments. These statutory principles are subject to ongoing change and modification. Moreover, compliance with any particular regulator’s interpretation of a legal or accounting issue may not result in compliance with another regulator’s interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. Any particular regulator’s interpretation of a legal or accounting issue may change over time to FGL Insurance’s, FGL NY Insurance’s, Raven Re’s or Corbeau Re’s detriment, or changes to the overall legal or market environment, even absent any change of interpretation by a particular regulator, may cause FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re to change their views regarding the actions they need to take from a legal risk management perspective, which could necessitate changes to FGL Insurance’s, FGL NY Insurance’s, Raven Re’s or Corbeau Re’s practices that may, in some cases, limit their ability to grow and improve profitability.
State insurance departments conduct periodic examinations of the books and records, financial reporting, policy and rate filings, market conduct and business practices of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the NAIC. State insurance departments also have the authority to conduct examinations of non-domiciliary insurers that are licensed in their states.
The Iowa insurance law and the New York insurance law regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid in any year by FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance, respectively.
FGL Insurance dividends are paid as declared by its Board of Directors. Pursuant to Iowa insurance law, any proposed payment of a dividend is classified as an “extraordinary dividend” if it, together with the aggregate fair market value of other dividends or distributions made during the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of capital and surplus as of the preceding December 31 or (ii) net gain from operations before realized capital gains or losses for twelve month period ending December 31 of the preceding year. No extraordinary dividends may be paid without prior approval of the IID. In addition, no ordinary dividends may be paid except from the earned profits arising from FGL Insurance’s business, which does not include contributed capital or contributed surplus.
In 2024, FGL Insurance did not pay dividends to Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. (“FGLH”). Pursuant to the limitations described above, it is estimated that FGL Insurance’s maximum ordinary dividend capacity for 2025 is $0.
Any payment of dividends by FGL Insurance is subject to the regulatory restrictions described above and the approval of such payment by the board of directors of FGL Insurance, which must consider various factors, including general economic and business conditions, tax considerations, FGL Insurance’s strategic plans, financial results and condition, FGL Insurance’s expansion plans, any contractual, legal or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends and its effect on RBC and such other factors the board of directors of FGL Insurance considers relevant. For example, payments of dividends could reduce FGL Insurance’s RBC and financial condition and lead to a reduction in FGL Insurance’s financial strength rating. See section titled "Risks Relating to Our Business- If the rating agencies downgrade our insurance companies, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Each year, FGL NY Insurance may pay a certain limited amount of ordinary dividends or other distributions as calculated under New York insurance laws without being required to obtain the prior consent of the NYDFS. However, to pay any dividends or distributions (including the payment of any dividends or distributions for which prior consent is not required), FGL NY Insurance must provide advance written notice to the NYDFS.
FGL NY Insurance has historically not paid dividends.
FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance are subject to the supervision of the regulators in states where they are licensed to transact business. Regulators have discretionary authority in connection with the continued licensing of these entities to limit or prohibit sales to policyholders if, in their judgment, the regulators determine that such entities have not maintained the minimum surplus or capital or that the further transaction of business would be hazardous to policyholders.
In order to enhance the regulation of insurers’ solvency, the NAIC adopted a model law to implement RBC requirements for life, health and property and casualty insurance companies. All states have adopted the NAIC’s model law or a substantially similar law. RBC is used to evaluate the adequacy of capital and surplus maintained by an insurance company in relation to risks associated with: (i) asset risk, (ii) insurance risk, (iii) interest rate risk and (iv) business risk. In general, RBC is calculated by applying factors to various asset, premium and reserve items, taking into account the risk characteristics of the insurer. Within a given risk category, these factors are higher for those items with greater underlying risk and lower for items with lower underlying risk. The RBC formula is used as an early warning regulatory tool to identify possible inadequately capitalized insurers for purposes of initiating regulatory action, and not as a means to rank insurers generally. Insurers that have less statutory capital than the RBC calculation requires are considered to have inadequate capital and are subject to varying degrees of regulatory action depending upon the level of capital inadequacy. As of the most recent annual statutory financial statements filed with insurance regulators, the RBC ratios for FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance each exceeded the minimum RBC requirements.
It is desirable to maintain an RBC ratio in excess of the minimum requirements in order to maintain or improve financial strength ratings. FGL Insurance’s estimated U.S. RBC ratio was over 410% as of December 31, 2024, above our 400% target. See section titled “Risks Relating to Our Business- If the rating agencies downgrade our insurance companies, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The NAIC has developed a set of financial relationships or tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System ("IRIS") to assist state regulators in monitoring the financial condition of U.S. insurance companies and identifying companies that require special attention or action by insurance regulatory authorities. A ratio falling outside the prescribed “usual range” is not considered a failing result. Rather, unusual values are viewed as part of the regulatory early monitoring system. In many cases, it is not unusual for financially sound companies to have one or more ratios that fall outside the usual range. Insurance companies generally submit data annually to the NAIC, which in turn analyzes the data using prescribed financial data ratios, each with defined “usual ranges”. Generally, regulators will begin to investigate or monitor an insurance company if its ratios fall outside the usual ranges for four or more of the ratios. IRIS consists of a statistical phase and an analytical phase whereby financial examiners review insurers’ annual statements and financial ratios. The statistical phase consists of 12 key financial ratios based on year-end data that are generated from the NAIC database annually; each ratio has a “usual range” of results. As of December 31, 2024, FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re had five, one, two and four ratios outside the usual range, respectively. The IRIS ratios for net and gross change to capital and surplus, total affiliated investments to capital and surplus, surplus relief - over $5 million capital and surplus and change in premium for FGL Insurance were outside the usual range. The IRIS ratio for change in premium ratio for FGL NY Insurance was outside the usual range. The IRIS ratios for adequacy of investment income and change in premium for Raven Re were outside the usual range. The IRIS ratios for net income to total income (including realized capital gains and losses), adequacy of investment income, change in premium and change in asset mix for Corbeau Re were outside the usual range.
In all instances in prior years, regulators have been satisfied upon follow-up that no regulatory action was required. FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re are not currently subject to regulatory restrictions based on these ratios.
State insurance laws require insurers to analyze the adequacy of reserves. Following the implementation of principle-based reserving for life insurance products, the NAIC is now developing a principle-based reserving framework for fixed annuity products. The respective appointed actuaries for FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re must each submit an opinion on an annual basis that their respective reserves, when considered in light of the respective assets FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re hold with respect to those reserves, make adequate provision for the contractual obligations and related expenses of FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re. FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re have filed all of the required opinions with the insurance departments in the states in which they do business.
States regulate the extent to which insurers are permitted to take credit on their financial statements for the financial obligations that the insurers cede to reinsurers. Where an insurer cedes obligations to a reinsurer that is neither licensed nor accredited by the state insurance department, the ceding insurer is not permitted to take such financial statement credit unless the unlicensed or unaccredited reinsurer secures the liabilities it will owe under the reinsurance contract. Under the laws regulating credit for reinsurance issued by such unlicensed or unaccredited reinsurers, the permissible means of securing such liabilities are (i) the establishment of a trust account by the reinsurer to hold certain qualifying assets in a qualified U.S. financial institution, such as a member of the Federal Reserve, with the ceding insurer as the exclusive beneficiary of such trust account with the unconditional right to demand, without notice to the reinsurer, that the trustee pay over to it the assets in the trust account equal to the liabilities owed by the reinsurer; (ii) the posting of an unconditional and irrevocable letter of credit by a qualified U.S. financial institution in favor of the ceding company allowing the ceding company to draw upon the letter of credit up to the amount of the unpaid liabilities of the reinsurer and (iii) a “funds withheld” arrangement by which the ceding company withholds transfer to the reinsurer of the assets, which support the liabilities to be owed by the reinsurer, with the ceding insurer retaining title to and exclusive control over such assets. In addition, all U.S. states, including Iowa and New York, permit an insurer to take credit for reinsurance ceded to a non-U.S. reinsurer that posts collateral in amounts less than 100% of the reinsurer’s obligations if the reinsurer has been designated as a “certified reinsurer” and is domiciled in a country recognized by the state and the NAIC as a “Qualified Jurisdiction.” The reduced percentage of full collateral applied to a certified reinsurer is based upon an assessment of the reinsurer and its financial ratings. Iowa and New York both also recognize certain qualified non-U.S. insurers as reciprocal jurisdiction reinsurers such that ceding domestic insurers may receive credit for reinsurance ceded to such unauthorized reinsurers without the requirement for the reinsurer to provide collateral. FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance are subject to such credit for reinsurance rules in Iowa and New York, respectively, insofar as they enter into any reinsurance contracts with reinsurers that are neither licensed nor accredited in Iowa and New York, respectively, or recognized as a reciprocal reinsurer in such jurisdictions.
F&G, as the indirect parent company of FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance, is subject to the insurance holding company laws in Iowa and New York. These laws generally require each insurance company directly or indirectly owned by the holding company to register with the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile and to furnish annually financial and other information about the operations of companies within the holding company system. Generally, all transactions between insurers and affiliates within the holding company system are subject to regulation and must be fair and reasonable, and may require prior notice and approval or non-disapproval by its domiciliary insurance regulator.
Most states, including Iowa and New York, have insurance laws that require regulatory approval of a direct or indirect change of control of an insurer or an insurer’s holding company. Such laws prevent any person from acquiring control, directly or indirectly, of F&G, FGL US Holdings Inc. (“FGL US Holdings”), CF Bermuda Holdings Limited (“CF Bermuda”), Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. ("FGLH"), FGL Insurance or FGL NY Insurance or certain of their affiliates unless that person has filed a statement with specified information with the insurance regulators and has obtained their prior approval. In addition, investors deemed to have a direct or indirect controlling interest are required to make regulatory filings and respond to regulatory inquiries. Under most states’ statutes, including those of Iowa and New York, acquiring 10% or more of the voting stock of an insurance company or its parent company is presumptively considered a change of control, although such presumption may be rebutted. In addition, the insurance laws of Iowa and New York permit a determination of control in circumstances where the thresholds for the presumption of control have not been crossed. Similar laws apply to a direct or indirect change of ownership of Raven Re and Corbeau Re. Any person who is deemed to acquire control over F&G, FNF, FGL US Holdings, CF Bermuda, FGLH, FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re, Corbeau Re or certain of their affiliates including any person who acquires 10% or more of our or FNF’s voting securities of FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance or certain of their affiliates, without the prior approval of the insurance regulators of Iowa and New York, will be in violation of those states’ laws and may be subject to injunctive action requiring the disposition or seizure of those securities by the relevant
insurance regulator or prohibiting the voting of those securities and to other actions determined by the relevant insurance regulator.
Each state has insurance guaranty association laws under which insurers doing business in the state may be assessed by state insurance guaranty associations for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. Typically, states assess each member insurer in an amount related to the member insurer’s proportionate share of the business written by all member insurers in the state. Although no prediction can be made as to the amount and timing of any future assessments under these laws, FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance have established reserves that they believe are adequate for assessments relating to insurance companies that are currently subject to insolvency proceedings.
State insurance laws and regulations include numerous provisions governing the marketplace activities of insurers, including provisions governing the form and content of disclosure to consumers, illustrations, advertising, sales and complaint process practices. State regulatory authorities generally enforce these provisions through periodic market conduct examinations. In addition, FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance must file, and in many jurisdictions and for some lines of business obtain regulatory approval for, rates and forms relating to the insurance written in the jurisdictions in which they operate. FGL Insurance is currently the subject of two ongoing market conduct examinations in various states. Market conduct examinations can result in monetary fines or remediation and generally require FGL Insurance to devote significant resources to the management of such examinations. FGL Insurance does not believe that any of the current market conduct examinations it is subject to will result in any fines or remediation orders that will be material to its business.
FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re are subject to state laws and regulations that require diversification of their investment portfolios and limit the amount of investments in certain asset categories, such as below investment grade fixed income securities, equity, real estate, other equity investments and derivatives. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding regulatory limitations to be treated as either non-admitted assets for purposes of measuring surplus or as not qualified as an asset held for reserve purposes and, in some instances, would require divestiture or replacement of such non-qualifying investments. We believe that the investment portfolios of FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re as of December 31, 2024, complied in all material respects with such regulations.
Our operations are subject to certain federal and state laws and regulations that require financial institutions and other businesses to protect the security and confidentiality of personal information, including health-related and customer information, and to notify customers and other individuals about their policies and practices relating to their collection and disclosure of health-related and customer information and their practices relating to protecting the security and confidentiality of such information. These laws and regulations require notice to affected individuals, law enforcement agencies, regulators and others if there is a breach of the security of certain personal information, including social security numbers, and require holders of certain personal information to protect the security of the data. Our operations are also subject to certain federal regulations that require financial institutions and creditors to implement effective programs to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft. In addition, our ability to make telemarketing calls and to send unsolicited e-mail or fax messages to consumers and customers and our uses of certain personal information, including consumer report information, are regulated. Federal and state governments and regulatory bodies may be expected to consider additional or more detailed regulation regarding these subjects and the privacy and security of personal information.
The Dodd-Frank Act made sweeping changes to the regulation of financial services entities, products and markets. Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are applicable to us, our competitors or those entities with which we do business. These provisions may impact us in many ways, including, but not limited to, having an effect on the overall business climate, requiring the allocation of certain resources to government affairs, and increasing our legal and compliance related activities and the costs associated therewith.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, annuities that meet specific requirements, including requirements relating to certain state suitability rules, are specifically exempted from being treated as securities by the SEC. We believe that the types of indexed annuities that FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance sell will meet these requirements and, therefore, are exempt from being treated as securities by the SEC and state securities regulators. However, there can be no assurance that federal or state securities laws or state insurance laws and regulations will not be amended or interpreted to impose further requirements on indexed annuities. If indexed annuities were to be treated as securities, federal and state securities laws would require additional registration and licensing of these products and the agents selling them, and FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance would be required to seek additional marketing relationships for these products, any of which could impose significant restrictions on its ability to conduct operations as currently operated. However, our RILA product is not exempted from being treated as a security by the SEC.
Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act established the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which plays a role in shaping the regulatory environment affecting RILAs. The FSOC monitors systemic risks and may designate insurers offering
RILAs as systemically important financial institutions if their activities pose significant risks to the broader economy, subjecting them to enhanced prudential standards and supervision by the Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve. The prudential standards for non-bank Systemically Important Financial Institutions (“SIFIs”) include enhanced RBC requirements, leverage limits, liquidity requirements, single counterparty exposure limits, governance requirements for risk management, stress test requirements, special debt-to-equity limits for certain companies, early remediation procedures, and recovery and resolution planning.
We may offer certain insurance and annuity products to employee benefit plans governed by ERISA and/or the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), including group annuity contracts designated to fund tax-qualified retirement plans. ERISA and the Code provide (among other requirements) standards of conduct for employee benefit plan fiduciaries, including investment managers and investment advisers with respect to the assets of such plans, and holds fiduciaries liable if they fail to satisfy fiduciary standards of conduct.
State and federal regulators have been adopting stronger consumer protection regulations that may materially impact our company, business, distribution and products. The NAIC adopted an amended Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation in February 2020 incorporating a requirement that agents act in the best interest of consumers without putting their own financial interests or insurer’s interests ahead of consumer interests. The best interest requirement is satisfied by complying with four regulatory obligations relating to care, disclosure, conflict of interest and documentation. The amended model regulation also requires agents to provide certain disclosures to consumers, obligates insurers to supervise agent compliance with the new requirements and prohibits sales contests or other incentives based on sales of specific annuities within a limited period of time.
Several states have adopted the revised NAIC model regulation, including FGL Insurance’s domiciliary state of Iowa. Management has instituted business procedures to comply with these revised requirements where required. FGL NY Insurance separately instituted new business procedures in response to the NYDFS best interest rule adopted in August 2019, which survived a legal challenge and deviates from the NAIC model regulation and is considered more onerous in certain respects including its broader application to life insurance sales.
In December 2020 the U. S. Department of Labor (the "DOL") issued its final version of an investment advice rule replacing the previous “Fiduciary Rule” that had been challenged by industry participants and vacated in March 2018 by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The new investment advice rule reinstates the five-part test for determining whether a person is considered a fiduciary for purposes of ERISA and the Code and sets forth a new prohibited transaction class exemption ("PTE") referred to as PTE 2020-02. The rule’s preamble also contains the DOL’s reinterpretation of elements of the five-part test that appears to encompass more insurance agents selling individual retirement account ("IRA") products and withdraws the agency’s longstanding position that rollover recommendations out of employer plans are not subject to ERISA. The new rule took effect on February 16, 2021.
The DOL investment advice rule leaves in place PTE 84-24, which is a longstanding class exemption providing prohibited transaction relief for insurance agents selling annuity products provided certain disclosures are made to the plan fiduciary, which is the policyholder in the case of an IRA, and certain other conditions are met. Among other things, these disclosures include the agent’s relationship to the insurer and commissions received in connection with the annuity sale. FGL Insurance, along with FGL NY Insurance, designed and launched a compliance program in January 2022 requiring all agents selling IRA products to submit an acknowledgment with each IRA application indicating the agent has satisfied PTE 84-24 requirements on a precautionary basis in case the agent acted or is found to have acted as a fiduciary. Meanwhile the DOL has publicly announced its intention to consider future rulemaking that may revoke or modify PTE 84-24.
On April 23, 2024, following previous attempts to expand fiduciary regulation for advisers, the DOL released a new rule, the New Fiduciary Rule, which significantly broadens the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA and Section 4975 when advisers provide investment recommendations to plans subject to ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. Among other requirements, the New Fiduciary Rule provides that any person will be an investment advice fiduciary if such person provides investment advice or makes an investment recommendation to a retirement investor (i.e., a plan, a discretionary plan fiduciary, a plan participant or beneficiary, an IRA, an IRA owner or beneficiary, or an IRA fiduciary) for a fee or other compensation, the person makes professional investment recommendations to investors on a regular basis as part of their business, and the recommendation is provided under circumstances that would indicate to a reasonable investor in like circumstances that the recommendation is based on a review of the particular needs or individual investor circumstances of the retirement investor, reflects the application of professional or expert judgment to the retirement investor’s particular needs or individual circumstances, and may be relied upon by the retirement investor as intended to advance the retirement investor’s best interest. Unlike the current ERISA standard, the New Fiduciary Rule subjects non-discretionary investment advice to retirement plans and accounts under the care and loyalty standards that also apply to investment advisors with discretionary authority or control over such plans and accounts. In addition, on the same date, the DOL issued amended versions of PTE 2020-02 and PTE 84-24,
either or both of which provide prohibited transaction exemptive relief to insurance companies and insurance producers who make insurance product recommendations to retirement investors, subject to certain conditions. The New Fiduciary Rule likely means that certain of the Company’s agents will be considered fiduciaries for purposes of ERISA and the Code, subjecting the Company, and the insurance industry on the whole, to greater regulatory risk.
The DOL’s new Fiduciary Rule, which was scheduled to become effective on September 23, 2024, has been challenged. On July 25, 2024, in the case of Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice, Inc., et al. v. United States Department of Labor, et al., (“Federation of Americans”) the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order staying the effective date of the DOL’s final fiduciary rule (and related amendments to PTE 84-24) that was issued in March 2024. The District Court, in part relying on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, found that the plaintiffs (primarily insurance agents) were likely to succeed on their arguments that the Final Rule improperly expanded the definition of an “investment advice fiduciary” under ERISA. As a result, the Final Rule’s original effective date of September 23, 2024 has been delayed until further notice.
In addition, on July 26, 2024, a companion case to Federation of Americans filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, American Council of Life Insurers, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Labor, et al., held the remaining PTE amendments included in the Final Rule (PTEs 2020-02, 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1 and 86-128) that were not challenged in Federation of Americans were also stayed, noting that the Northern District fully agreed with the Eastern District’s analysis and decision to stay the effective date of the Final Rule.
On September 20, 2024, the DOL appealed both rulings to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On February 11, 2025, the DOL filed an unopposed motion to hold the appeals in abeyance to allow new agency officials time to become familiar with the issues in these cases and determine how they wish to proceed. The motion was granted so the appeals are in abeyance. A Fifth Circuit reversal of the Texas district court rulings could have harmful effects on the insurance industry, creating additional hurdles to operate our business.
Management believes these current and emerging developments relating to market conduct standards for the financial services industry may, over time, materially affect the way in which our agents do business, the role of IMOs, sale of IRA products including IRA-to-IRA and employer plan rollovers, how we supervise our distribution force, compensation practices and liability exposure and costs. In addition to implementing the compliance procedures described above, management is monitoring further developments closely and will be working with IMOs and distributors to adapt to these evolving regulatory requirements and risks. See “Risk Factors - Our F&G segment is highly regulated and subject to numerous legal restrictions and regulations.”
Regulation - Bermuda. F&G Life Re is a Bermuda exempted company incorporated under the Companies Act 1981, as amended (the “Companies Act”) and registered as a Class E insurer under the Insurance Act 1978, as amended, and its related regulations (the “Insurance Act”). F&G Life Re is regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”).
Bermuda has been awarded full equivalence for commercial insurers under Europe’s Solvency II regime applicable to insurance companies, which regime came into effect on January 1, 2016. In addition, the Insurance Act required BMA approval of increases in control or dispositions of control of an insurance company.
The BMA utilizes a risk-based approach when it comes to licensing and supervising insurance and reinsurance companies. As part of the BMA’s risk-based system, an assessment of the inherent risks within each particular class of insurer or reinsurer is used to determine the limitations and specific requirements that may be imposed. Thereafter the BMA keeps its analysis of relative risk within individual institutions under review on an ongoing basis, including through the scrutiny of audited financial statements, and, as appropriate, meeting with senior management during onsite visits.
The Insurance Act imposes on Bermuda insurance companies solvency and liquidity standards, as well as auditing and reporting requirements. Certain significant aspects of the Bermuda insurance regulatory framework are set forth below.
Minimum Solvency Margin. The Insurance Act provides that the value of the assets of an insurer must exceed the value of its liabilities by an amount greater than its prescribed minimum solvency margin.
The minimum solvency margin that must be maintained by a Class E insurer is the greater of: (i) $8,000,000; (ii) 2% of first $500,000,000 of assets plus 1.5% of assets above $500,000,000; and (iii) 25% of that insurer’s enhanced capital requirement (“ECR”). An insurer may file an application under the Insurance Act to waive the aforementioned requirements.
ECR and Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirements (“BSCR”). Class E insurers are required to maintain available capital and surplus at a level equal to or in excess of the applicable ECR, which is established by reference to either the applicable BSCR model or an approved internal capital model. Furthermore, to enable the BMA to better assess the quality of the insurer’s capital resources, a Class E insurer is required to disclose the makeup of its capital in accordance with its 3-tiered capital system. An insurer may file an application under the Insurance Act to have the aforementioned ECR requirements waived.
Restrictions on Dividends and Distributions. In addition to the requirements under the Companies Act (as discussed below), the Insurance Act limits the maximum amount of annual dividends and distributions that may be paid or distributed by F&G Life Re without prior regulatory approval.
F&G Life Re is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin, or ECR, or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such breach. If F&G Life Re were to fail to meet its minimum solvency margin on the last day of any financial year, it would be prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA.
In addition, as a Class E insurer, F&G Life Re must not declare or pay a dividend to any person other than a policyholder unless the value of the assets of such insurer, as certified by the insurer’s approved actuary, exceeds its liabilities (as so certified) by the greater of its margin of solvency or ECR. In the event a dividend complies with the above, F&G Life Re must ensure the amount of any such dividend does not exceed that excess.
Furthermore, as a Class E insurer, F&G Life Re must not declare or pay a dividend in any financial year which would exceed 25% of its total capital and statutory surplus, as set out in its previous year’s Bermuda statutory financial statements, unless at least seven days before payment of such dividend F&G Life Re files with the BMA an affidavit signed by at least two directors of F&G Life Re and its principal representative under the Bermuda Insurance Act stating that, in the opinion of those signing, declaration of such dividend has not caused the insurer to fail to meet its relevant margins.
The Companies Act also limits F&G Life Re’s ability to pay dividends and make distributions to its shareholders. F&G Life Re is not permitted to declare or pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of its contributed surplus, if it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or if the realizable value of its assets would be less than its liabilities.
Reduction of Capital. F&G Life Re may not reduce its total statutory capital by 15% or more, as set out in its previous year’s financial statements, unless it has received the prior approval of the BMA. Total statutory capital consists of the insurer’s paid in share capital, its contributed surplus (sometimes called additional paid in capital) and any other fixed capital designated by the BMA as statutory capital.
Regulation - Cayman. F&G Cayman Re Ltd. ("F&G Cayman Re") is licensed as a class D insurer in the Cayman Islands by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (“CIMA”). As a regulated insurance company, F&G Cayman Re is subject to the supervision of CIMA and CIMA may at any time direct F&G Cayman Re, in relation to a policy, a line of business or the entire business, to cease or refrain from committing an act or pursing a course of conduct and to perform such acts as in the opinion of CIMA are necessary to remedy or ameliorate the situation.
The laws and regulations of the Cayman Islands require that, among other things, F&G Cayman Re maintain minimum levels of statutory capital, surplus and liquidity, meet solvency standards, submit to periodic examinations of its financial condition and restrict payments of dividends and reductions of capital. Statutes, regulations and policies that F&G Cayman Re is subject to may also restrict the ability of F&G Cayman Re to write insurance and reinsurance policies, make certain investments and distribute funds. Any failure to meet the applicable requirements or minimum statutory capital requirements could subject it to further examination or corrective action by CIMA, including restrictions on dividend payments, limitations on our writing of additional business or engaging in finance activities, supervision or liquidation.
Sustainability
FNF is dedicated to addressing those sustainability issues important to our strategic objectives. The Company’s senior management and Board of Directors have committed to understanding sustainability issues to better serve our employees, business partners and communities. To honor this commitment, the management team actively leads such efforts with oversight from the Audit Committee, which reports progress to the Board of Directors.
While climate change does not materially impact FNF’s title insurance products and services, we believe maintaining a sustainable business starts with being transparent about our business practices, corporate governance, environmental impact and commitment to stakeholders. In 2019, we shared our inaugural Sustainability report. Since then, FNF has continuously enhanced our sustainability efforts and published annual progress updates. Additional information about our efforts and commitment to sustainable business practices is available on the Company’s sustainability page at www.fnf.com/sustainability.
FNF’s core sustainability commitments include:
Protecting Property Owners. Our policyholders depend on the strength and security of a reputable title insurance company to protect their property for years to come. As a provider of title insurance, we protect the rights of the insured – both residential and commercial property owners – against fraudulent and unexpected legal and financial claims that may arise after closing.
Consumer Data and Fraud Protection. The safety and security of our policyholders, customers, vendors and employees is a top priority. We maintain rigorous information security, internal auditing protocols, and monitoring to protect funds and private information while in our custody. We continuously work hard to educate and protect our stakeholders from deceitful practices by enhancing fraud prevention programs.
Preserving the Environment. FNF integrates environmental management practices into our operations, including facilities. As part of the Company's commitment to preserving the environment, we understand our duty to protect the local environments where we operate, and that climate change may present risk and opportunities to our business. Annually, we conduct a climate risk assessment to understand climate-related risks that may impact our business and to manage these risks through enterprise risk management systems.
We are actively working to understand and reduce FNF’s environmental footprint across our locations. Efforts include monitoring and mitigating our carbon footprint, eliminating the use of plastic water bottles, and participating in recycling programs. Additionally, we have started to collect scope 1 and 2 emissions data of our real estate footprint in preparation for climate reporting regulations. As part of a traditionally paper-intensive industry, we have implemented customer-focused technology to significantly reduce paper consumption in real estate transactions demonstrating our commitment to moving the title insurance industry in a more sustainable direction.
Supporting Our Employees and Communities. As one of FNF's greatest assets, we are dedicated to providing employees with opportunities to expand their knowledge base and develop skills for career advancement. Additionally, we are committed to building a diverse and inclusive workforce, and we strongly believe the diversity of our clients should be reflected among our employees. With over 1,300 locations throughout the United States and Canada and over 23,000 employees, we are positioned to make a difference within our communities. Through local community involvement, corporate initiatives, philanthropic giving, and an active community volunteer ethos, we work hard each day to support the communities in which we live and operate.
Highest Standard of Conduct: We adhere to all related laws, regulations and principles of conduct to protect the public’s trust, ensure conscientious performance and preserve FNF’s legacy of honesty and strong ethical standards. We firmly commit to upholding the Company’s core precepts, which inspire us to do our best each day. FNF implements robust governance practices, policies, trainings, and reporting avenues designed to encourage all employees to uphold the highest standards for business integrity.
Human Capital Resources
Employees. As of December 27, 2024, we employed 23,533 full-time equivalent employees, including 21,596 in our Title segment, 1,337 in our F&G segment, and 600 in our Corporate and other segment. In our Title segment, we monitor staffing levels based on current economic activity. In our F&G segment, the employee base increased by approximately 13% during 2024 as our F&G business continues to grow. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. We believe relations with employees are good, as evidenced by our strong track record of employee retention.
Diversity. FNF aims to implement diverse and inclusive practices in all aspects of business operations; and the diversity of our employees contributes to our success by offering our clientele meaningful customized products and services. We are committed to being an equal opportunity employer. We foster an inclusive workplace where each employee, regardless of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identification, receives equal access to opportunities throughout the organization.
Our Board of Directors leads by example in its commitment to diversity. In 2018, the board codified into our Corporate Governance Guidelines its commitment to diversity when selecting new director nominees, including candidates with a diversity of viewpoints, background, experience, and other demographics including age, gender, nationality, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation.
FNF’s Code of Business Conduct & Ethics prohibits discrimination and harassment, and we distribute a written nondiscrimination policy to all employees as part of the employee handbook. Employees participate in annual training courses, including the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Training and Reporting Harassment: Everyone’s Responsibility Training, which employees must acknowledge annually. FNF publishes its Diversity and Inclusion policy statement on the sustainability website at www.fnf.com/sustainability.
We have many women in leadership roles throughout our organization. As of January 1, 2025, out of the 18,483 U.S. based employees under FNF, 69% of the total workforce are women and 31% are men. Two out of eleven board members are women, 43% percent of the members of FNF’s Executive Team are women, and 67% of FNF’s Non-Executive Managers are women. Our annual Women in Leadership Program for female executives, managers, and future managers provides mentoring and development opportunities encouraging and promoting women into more active leadership roles within the Company.
Training and Professional Development
We believe our employees are one of the Company’s greatest assets, and we are committed to providing opportunities for them to expand their knowledge base and develop skills for advancement, resulting in improved employee performance and morale.
FNF offers a variety of training and educational opportunities for employees including, but not limited to, training on escrow policies and procedures, advanced escrow processing and practices, title loss reduction, title underwriting, advanced title practices and procedures, fraud prevention, as well as leadership effectiveness, software, soft skills, sales, and time management trainings. Our Commercial Sales University is a course for new commercial sales representatives, and our Leadership Development Program provides employees with mentorship from senior executives.
Leadership Development Program. Our Leadership Development Program helps employees advance their careers through professional development. Candidates are nominated once a year by their manager to participate in an intensive program, where they are asked to prepare and present a manager’s report and to participate in preparing an annual budget. The program includes thought-provoking discussions between candidates and our management team about leadership, business, the economy, and other industry-related topics. This process enables candidates to gain a better understanding of our Company culture and management expectations. Candidates also gain access to mentorship and engagement with senior executives.
Many departments provide Continuing Education and Continuing Legal Education opportunities for state land title and legal associations. Some offices provide financial assistance to join professional organizations and offer education reimbursement.
Financial Information by Operating Segment
For financial information by operating segment, see Note J Segment Information to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The statements contained in this Annual Report or in our other documents or in oral presentations or other statements made by our management that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), including statements regarding our expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These statements relate to, among other things, future financial and operating results of the Company. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these statements as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to the following:
•adverse changes in the level of real estate activity, which may be caused by, among other things, high or increasing interest rates, a limited supply of mortgage funding, increased mortgage defaults, or a weak U.S. economy;
•the severity of our title insurance claims;
•downgrade of our credit rating by rating agencies;
•compliance with extensive government regulation of our operating subsidiaries and adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations or in their application by regulators;
•potential impact of the F&G Distribution on relationships, including employees, suppliers, customers and competitors;
•regulatory investigations of the title insurance industry;
•loss of key personnel that could negatively affect our financial results and impair our operating abilities;
•our business concentration in the States of California and Texas are the source of approximately 12.9% and 13.8%, respectively, of our title insurance premiums;
•our potential inability to find suitable acquisition candidates, as well as the risks associated with acquisitions in lines of business that will not necessarily be limited to our traditional areas of focus, or difficulties integrating acquisitions;
•our dependence on distributions from our title insurance underwriters as our main source of cash flow;
•competition from other title insurance companies;
•changes in general economic, business, and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets related to inflation and geopolitical uncertainties;
•impacts to our business operations caused by the occurrence of a catastrophe or global crisis; and
•other risks detailed in "Risk Factors" below and elsewhere in this Annual Report and in our other filings with the SEC.
We are not under any obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or alter our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements.
Additional Information
Our website address is www.fnf.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. However, the information found on our website is not part of this or any other report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the normal risks of business, we are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those listed below and others described elsewhere in this Annual Report. Any of the risks described herein could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Risk Factors Relating to Market Conditions
If economic and credit market conditions deteriorate, it could have a material adverse impact on our investment portfolio and could also cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly.
Our investment portfolio is exposed to economic and financial market risks, including changes in interest rates, credit markets and prices of marketable equity and fixed-income securities. Our investment policy in our title business is designed to maximize total return through investment income and capital appreciation consistent with moderate risk of principal, while providing adequate liquidity and complying with internal and regulatory guidelines. To achieve this objective, our marketable debt investments are primarily investment grade, liquid, fixed-income securities and money market instruments denominated in U.S. dollars. We make investments in certain equity securities and preferred stock in order to take advantage of perceived value and for strategic purposes. Economic and credit market conditions may adversely affect the ability of some issuers of investment securities to repay their obligations and affect the values of investment securities. If the carrying value of our investments exceeds the fair value, and the decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, we will be required to write down the value of our investments, which could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Fixed maturities, equity securities and derivatives represent the majority of total cash and invested assets reported at fair value on our balance sheets. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). Fair value estimates are made based on available market information and judgments about the financial instrument at a specific point in time. Expectations that our investments will continue to perform in accordance with their contractual terms are based on evidence gathered through our normal credit surveillance process and on assumptions a market participant would use in determining the current fair value.
The value and performance of certain of our assets are dependent upon the performance of collateral underlying these investments. It is possible the collateral will not meet performance expectations leading to adverse changes in the cash flows on our holdings of these types of securities.
In addition, many factors unrelated to our business could cause the market price of our common stock to rise and fall, including the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies, investors’ general perception of our industry and changes in general economic and market conditions. If the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if successfully defended, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.
Equity market volatility could negatively impact our business.
The estimated cost of providing GMWB riders associated with our annuity products incorporates various assumptions about the overall performance of equity markets over certain time periods. Periods of significant and sustained downturns in equity markets or increased equity volatility could result in an increase in the valuation of the Market Risk Benefit ("MRB") or contractholder funds balance liabilities associated with such products, resulting in a reduction in our revenues and net income.
Conditions in the economy generally could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the U.S. economy. Adverse economic conditions may result in a decline in revenues and/or erosion of our profit margins. In addition, in the event of extreme prolonged market events and economic downturns, we could incur significant losses. Even in the absence of a market downturn we are exposed to substantial risk of loss due to market volatility.
Factors such as consumer spending, business investment, government spending, potential government shutdowns, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, investor and consumer confidence, foreign currency exchange rates, geopolitical uncertainties and inflation levels all affect the business and economic environment and, ultimately, the amount and profitability of our business. In an economic downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, negative investor sentiment and lower consumer spending, the demand for our insurance products could be adversely affected. Under such conditions, our F&G segment may also experience an elevated incidence of policy lapses, policy loans, withdrawals and surrenders. In addition, our investments could be adversely affected as a result of deteriorating financial and business conditions affecting the issuers of the securities in our investment portfolio.
Our investments are subject to market and credit risks. These risks could be heightened during periods of extreme volatility or disruption in financial and credit markets.
A worsening business climate or changing trends could cause issuers of the fixed-income securities that we own to default on either principal or interest payments. Additionally, market price valuations may not accurately reflect the underlying expected cash flows of securities within our investment portfolio. If we fail to react appropriately to difficult market or economic conditions, our investment portfolio could incur material losses.
Our invested assets and derivative financial instruments are subject to risks of credit defaults and changes in market values. Periods of extreme volatility or disruption in the financial and credit markets could increase these risks. Changes in interest rates and credit spreads could cause market price and cash flow variability in the fixed income instruments in our investment portfolio. Significant volatility and lack of liquidity in the credit markets could cause the market value of the fixed-income securities we own to decline. Additionally, market price valuations may not accurately reflect the underlying expected cash flows of securities within our investment portfolio. Finally, market volatility could cause investment income fluctuations in regard to our alternative investments that may differ significantly from period to period.
The value of our mortgage-backed securities and our commercial and residential mortgage loan investments depends in part on the financial condition of the borrowers and tenants for the properties underlying those investments, as well as general and specific economic trends affecting the overall default rate. We are also subject to the risk that cash flows resulting from the payments on pools of mortgages that serve as collateral underlying the mortgage-backed securities we own may differ from our expectations in timing or size. Any event reducing the estimated fair value of these securities, other than on a temporary basis, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If adverse changes in the levels of real estate activity occur, our revenues may decline.
Title insurance revenue is closely related to the level of real estate activity that includes sales, mortgage financing and mortgage refinancing. The levels of real estate activity are primarily affected by the average price of real estate sales, the availability of funds to finance purchases and mortgage interest rates.
We have found that residential real estate activity generally decreases in the following situations:
•when mortgage interest rates are high or increasing;
•when the mortgage funding supply is limited;
•when housing inventory is limited or home prices are high or increasing; and
•when the United States economy is weak, including high unemployment levels.
Declines in the level of real estate activity or the average price of real estate sales are likely to adversely affect our title insurance revenues. The Mortgage Bankers Association's ("MBA") Mortgage Finance Forecast as of February 19, 2025, reported an approximate $1.8 trillion mortgage origination market for 2024, which would be a modest increase from 2023 resulting from an increase in refinance activity. The MBA predicts overall mortgage originations in 2025 will increase when compared to 2024 as a result of increases in both purchase and refinance activity. Our revenues in future periods will continue to be subject to these and other factors that are beyond our control and, as a result, are likely to fluctuate. See discussion under "Business Trends and Conditions" within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of current market trends.
Interest rate fluctuations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and cash flows.
Interest rate risk is a significant market risk for us, as our F&G segment involves issuing interest rate sensitive obligations backed primarily by investments in fixed income assets. F&G also maintains a portion of the assets in its investment portfolio in floating rate instruments and has executed variable interest rate credit agreements and floating rate funding agreements, which are subject to an element of market risk from changes in interest rates.
Prior to 2022, interest rates had been at or near historical low levels over the preceding several years. A prolonged period of low rates exposes us to the risk of not achieving returns sufficient to meet our earnings targets and/or our contractual obligations. Furthermore, low or declining interest rates may reduce the rate of policyholder surrenders and withdrawals on our life insurance and annuity products, thus increasing the duration of the liabilities, creating asset and liability duration mismatches and increasing the risk of having to reinvest assets at yields below the amounts required to support our obligations. Lower interest rates may also result in decreased sales of certain insurance products, negatively impacting our profitability from new business.
During periods of increasing interest rates, we may offer higher crediting rates on interest-sensitive products, such as universal life insurance and fixed rate annuities, and we may increase crediting rates on in-force products to keep these products
competitive. We may be required to accept lower spread income (the difference between the returns we earn on our investments and the amounts we credit to contractholders), thus reducing our profitability, as returns on our portfolio of invested assets may not increase as quickly as current interest rates. Rapidly rising interest rates may also expose us to the risk of financial disintermediation, which is an increase in policy surrenders, withdrawals and requests for policy loans as customers seek to achieve higher returns elsewhere, requiring us to liquidate assets in an unrealized loss position. If we experience unexpected withdrawal activity, we could exhaust our liquid assets and be forced to liquidate other less liquid assets such as limited partnership investments. We may have difficulty selling these investments in a timely manner and/or be forced to sell them for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. We have developed and maintain asset liability management programs and procedures that are, we believe, designed to mitigate interest rate risk by matching asset cash flows to expected liability cash flows. In addition, we assess surrender charges on withdrawals in excess of allowable penalty-free amounts that occur during the surrender charge period. There can be no assurance that actual withdrawals, contract benefits and maturities will match our estimates. Despite our efforts to reduce the impact of rising interest rates, we may be required to sell assets to raise the cash necessary to respond to an increase in surrenders, withdrawals and loans, thereby realizing capital losses on the assets sold.
Liabilities that are held on our balance sheet at fair value, including embedded derivatives on our indexed annuities and IUL business and MRBs on our indexed annuity and fixed rate annuity business, are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Decreases in interest rates generally would have the impact of increasing the value of these liabilities, which will result in a reduction in our net income. Liabilities for future policyholder benefits are valued using locked-in discount rates, and any changes in interest rates since the inception of those contracts are reflected in Other comprehensive earnings (loss) ("OCI"). Decreases in interest rates would result in a reduction in our OCI. In addition, certain statutory capital and reserve requirements are based on formulas or models that consider interest rates and a prolonged period of low interest rates may increase the statutory capital we are required to hold as well as the amount of assets we must maintain to support statutory reserves.
Economic conditions, including higher interest rates, could materially adversely affected our business, results of operations and financial condition. However, we cannot predict if it will impact our business, results of operations or financial condition in the future for the forgoing reasons.
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business
We have recorded goodwill as a result of prior acquisitions, and an economic downturn could cause these balances to become impaired, requiring write-downs that would reduce our operating income.
Goodwill aggregated approximately $5,271 million, or 5.5% of our total assets, as of December 31, 2024. Current accounting rules require that goodwill be assessed for impairment at least annually or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstance indicating the carrying value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, a significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization, and negative industry or economic trends. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, no goodwill impairment charge was recorded. However, if economic conditions deteriorate, the carrying amount of our goodwill may no longer be recoverable, and we may be required to record an impairment charge, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. We will continue to monitor our market capitalization and the impact of the economy to determine if there is an impairment of goodwill in future periods.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from meeting our obligations under our indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2024, our outstanding debt was $4,321 million. Our high degree of leverage could have important consequences, including the following: (i) a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations is dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available for operations, future business opportunities and capital expenditures; (ii) our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate purposes in the future may be limited; (iii) we may be unable to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions; (iv) the debt service requirements of our other indebtedness could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations; and (v) we may be vulnerable in a downturn in general economic conditions or in our business and we may be unable to carry out activities that are important to our growth.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, or to pay interest on, or to refinance indebtedness depends on and is subject to our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
or to fund our other liquidity needs, we will need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, which could cause us to default on our obligations and impair our liquidity. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more stringent covenants that could further restrict our business operations. We from time to time may increase the amount of our indebtedness, modify the terms of our financing arrangements, issue dividends, make capital expenditures and take other actions that may substantially increase our leverage.
We may face losses if our actual experience differs significantly from our reserve assumptions.
Our profitability depends significantly upon the extent to which our actual experience is consistent with the assumptions used in setting rates for our products and establishing liabilities for future life insurance, annuity and PRT policy benefits and claims. However, due to the nature of the underlying risks and the high degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the liabilities for unpaid policy benefits and claims, we cannot determine precisely the amounts we will ultimately pay to settle these liabilities. As a result, we may experience volatility in our profitability and our reserves from period to period. To the extent that actual experience is less favorable than our underlying assumptions, we could be required to increase our liabilities, which may reduce our profitability and impact our financial strength.
We have been issuing GMWB products since 2008. In our reserve calculations, we make assumptions for policyholder behavior as it relates to GMWB utilization. If emerging experience deviates from our assumptions on GMWB utilization, it could have a significant effect on our reserve levels and related results of operations. We will continue to monitor the GMWB utilization assumption and update our best estimate as applicable.
See Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report, under. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Our management has historically sought to grow through acquisitions, both in our current lines of business as well as in lines of business outside of our traditional areas of focus or geographic areas. This expansion of our business subjects us to associated risks, such as risks and uncertainties associated with new companies, the diversion of management’s attention and lack of experience in operating unrelated businesses, and may affect our credit and ability to repay our debt.
Our management has historically sought to grow through acquisitions, both in our current lines of business, as well as lines of business that are not directly tied to or synergistic with our current operations. Accordingly, we have in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire, businesses in industries or geographic areas with which management is less familiar than we are with our current businesses. These activities involve risks that could adversely affect our operating results, due to uncertainties involved with new companies, diversion of management’s attention and lack of substantial experience in operating such businesses. There can be no guarantee that we will not enter into transactions or make acquisitions that will cause us to incur additional debt, increase our exposure to market and other risks and cause our credit or financial strength ratings to decline.
We are a holding company and depend on distributions from our subsidiaries for cash.
We are a holding company whose primary assets are the securities of our operating subsidiaries. Our ability to pay interest on our outstanding debt and our other obligations and to pay dividends is dependent on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions or payments to us. If our operating subsidiaries are not able to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to meet our obligations or pay dividends on our common stock.
Our title insurance subsidiaries must comply with state laws, which require them to maintain minimum amounts of working capital, surplus and reserves, and place restrictions on the amount of dividends that they can distribute to us. Compliance with these laws will limit the amounts our regulated subsidiaries can dividend to us. During 2025, our title insurers may pay dividends or make distributions to us of approximately $498 million; however, insurance regulators have the authority to prohibit the payment of ordinary dividends or other payments by our title insurers to us if they determine that such payment could be adverse to our policyholders.
The maximum dividend permitted by law is not necessarily indicative of an insurer’s actual ability to pay dividends, which may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of dividends on surplus, which could affect an insurer’s ratings or competitive position, the amount of premiums that can be written and the ability to pay future dividends. Further, depending on business and regulatory conditions, we may in the future need to retain cash in our underwriters or even contribute cash to one or more of them in order to maintain their ratings or their statutory capital position. Such a requirement could be the result of investment losses, reserve charges, adverse operating conditions in the current economic environment or changes in interpretation of statutory accounting requirements by regulators.
Our business could be interrupted or compromised if we experience difficulties arising from outsourcing relationships.
If we do not maintain an effective outsourcing strategy or third-party providers do not perform as contracted, we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs and a loss of business that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. If there is a delay in our third-party providers’ introduction of our new products or if our third-party providers are
unable to service our customers appropriately, we may experience a loss of business that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have a formal vendor management program that follows a continuous lifecycle for third-party providers. The lifecycle includes an initial risk assessment for new relationships to determine risk tier; vendor due diligence depending on the risk tier; contract management to effectively address all terms, conditions, duties and obligations, risks/issues identified; ongoing monitoring and management to ensure compliance with contract provisions and service level agreements; and termination/offboarding to ensure appropriate communication and any other requirements such as destruction of data.
If our key providers, distributors or other parties terminate important business arrangements with us, reduce their business with us or renew contracts on terms less favorable to us, which occurs from time to time, we may fail to meet our business objectives and targets, and our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, our reliance on third-party service providers that we do not control does not relieve us of our responsibilities and contractual, legal and other requirements. Any failure or negligence by such third-party service providers in carrying out their contractual duties may result in us becoming subjected to liability to parties who are harmed and ensuing litigation. Any litigation relating to such matters could be costly and time-consuming, and the outcome of any such litigation may be uncertain. Moreover, any adverse publicity arising from such litigation, even if the litigation is not successful, could adversely affect our reputation and sales of our products.
If we are unable to attract and retain national marketing organizations and independent agents, sales of our products may be reduced.
Within our F&G segment, we must attract and retain our network of IMOs and independent agents to sell our products. Insurance companies compete vigorously for productive agents. We compete with other life insurance companies for marketers and agents primarily on the basis of our financial position, support services, compensation and product features. Such marketers and agents may promote products offered by other life insurance companies that offer a larger variety of products than we do. If we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of marketers and agents to sell our products, our ability to compete and our revenues would suffer.
Failure of our enterprise-wide risk management processes could result in unexpected monetary losses, damage to our reputation, additional costs or impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively.
As a large insurance entity and a publicly traded company, we have risk management functions, policies and procedures throughout our operations and management. These functions include but are not limited to departments dedicated to enterprise risk management and information technology risk management, information security, business continuity, lender strategy and contracts, and vendor risk management. Our policies and procedures have evolved over the years as we continually reassess our processes both internally and to comply with changes in the regulatory environment. Due to limitations inherent in any internal process, if our risk management processes prove unsuccessful at identifying and responding to risks, we could incur unexpected monetary losses, damage to our reputation, additional costs or impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively.
If we experience changes in the rate or severity of title insurance claims, it may be necessary for us to record additional charges to our claim loss reserve. This may result in lower net earnings and the potential for earnings volatility.
By their nature, claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time of settlement of the claims. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors. From time to time, we experience large losses or an overall worsening of our loss payment experience in regard to the frequency or severity of claims that require us to record additional charges to our claims loss reserve. There are currently pending several large claims, which we believe can be defended successfully without material loss payments. However, if unanticipated material payments are required to settle these claims, it could result in or contribute to additional charges to our claim loss reserves. These loss events are unpredictable and adversely affect our earnings.
At each quarter end, our recorded reserve for claim losses is initially the result of taking the prior recorded reserve for claim losses, adding the current provision to that balance and subtracting actual paid claims from that balance, resulting in an amount that management then compares to our actuary's central estimate provided in the actuarial calculation. Due to the uncertainty and judgment used by both management and our actuary, our ultimate liability may be greater or less than our current reserves and/or our actuary’s calculation. If the recorded amount is within a reasonable range of the actuary’s central estimate, but not at the central estimate, management assesses other factors in order to determine our best estimate. These factors, which are both qualitative and quantitative, can change from period to period and include items such as current trends in the real estate industry (which management can assess, but for which there is a time lag in the development of the data used by our actuary), any adjustments from the actuarial estimates needed for the effects of unusually large or small claims,
improvements in our claims management processes and other cost saving measures. Depending upon our assessment of these factors, we may or may not adjust the recorded reserve. If the recorded amount is not within a reasonable range of the actuary’s central estimate, we would record a charge or credit and reassess the provision rate on a go forward basis.
Changes in the Company’s dealings with large mortgage lenders, servicers or government-sponsored enterprises could adversely affect our title insurance and mortgage servicing subsidiaries.
Large mortgage lenders, servicers and government-sponsored enterprises have significant influence over the products and services provided by our title insurance and mortgage servicing subsidiaries. Changes in our dealings with any of these lenders, servicers or the government-sponsored enterprises, the loss of all or a portion of the business derived from these parties or revisions to the government-sponsored enterprises’ selling or servicing guides related to title insurance or mortgage servicing, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If the rating agencies downgrade our insurance companies, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.
Ratings have always been an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. Our title insurance subsidiaries are rated by S&P, Moody’s and Demotech. Our F&G insurance subsidiaries are rated by A.M. Best, Fitch, Moody's and S&P. Ratings reflect the opinion of a rating agency with regard to an insurance company’s or insurance holding company’s financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and are not evaluations directed to investors. Our ratings are subject to continued periodic review by rating agencies and the continued retention of those ratings cannot be assured. If our ratings are reduced from their current levels by those entities, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
If our claim loss prevention procedures fail, we could incur significant claim losses.
In the ordinary course of our title insurance business, we assume risks related to insuring clear title to residential and commercial properties. We have established procedures to mitigate the risk of loss from title claims, including extensive underwriting and risk assessment procedures. We also mitigate the risk of large claim losses by reinsuring risks with other insurers under excess of loss and case-by-case facultative reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance agreements generally provide that the reinsurer is liable for loss and loss adjustment expense payments exceeding the amount retained by the ceding company. However, the ceding company remains primarily liable to the insured whether or not the reinsurer is able to meet its contractual obligations. If inherent limitations cause our claim loss risk mitigation procedures to fail, we could incur substantial losses having an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our use of independent agents for a significant amount of our title insurance policies could adversely impact the frequency and severity of title claims.
In our agency operations, an independent agent performs the search and examination function or the agent may purchase a search product from us. In either case, the agent is responsible for ensuring that the search and examination is completed. The agent thus retains the majority of the title premium collected, with the balance remitted to the title underwriter for bearing the risk of loss in the event that a claim is made under the title insurance policy. Our relationship with each agent is governed by an agency agreement defining how the agent issues a title insurance policy on our behalf. The agency agreement also sets forth the agent’s liability to us for policy losses attributable to the agent’s errors. For each agent with whom we enter into an agency agreement, financial and loss experience records are maintained. Periodic audits of our agents are also conducted and the number of agents with whom we transact business is strategically managed in an effort to reduce future expenses and manage risks. Despite efforts to monitor the independent agents with which we transact business, there is no guarantee that an agent will comply with their contractual obligations to us. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that, due to changes in the regulatory environment and litigation trends, we will not be held liable for errors and omissions by agents. Accordingly, our use of independent agents could adversely impact the frequency and severity of title claims.
Our business is subject to risk due to our owned distribution strategy and investments in distribution consolidation.
Our owned distribution strategy, including our investments in minority and majority stakes in various Network Marketing Groups and other distribution consolidators, exposes us to operational, financial, and strategic risks. These investments, including stakes in Syncis Holdings, Quility Holdings, DCMT Worldwide, and a majority interest in Roar Joint Venture, LLC, represent a significant component of our distribution strategy. The success of this strategy depends on the continued growth and performance of these businesses, which is subject to challenges such as the retention and performance of agents, market demand in cultural communities, and our ability to integrate these entities effectively into our broader operations. Furthermore, as industry consolidation among independent agent distribution channels accelerates, competition to acquire and partner with high-performing platforms intensifies, limiting our ability to secure attractive investment opportunities. Our ownership stakes also expose us to financial risks, including the potential for impairment of goodwill or intangible assets if these entities underperform, as well as regulatory and compliance risks related to licensing and fiduciary standards. These factors, combined
with the operational challenges of managing both majority and minority investments, create risks that could materially and adversely affect our financial performance, competitive position, and long-term growth prospects.
Risk Factors Related to the F&G Distribution
The F&G Distribution could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
On December 1, 2022, we completed the F&G Distribution. The F&G Distribution is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: diversion of management’s attention; our ability to successfully realize the anticipated benefits of the F&G Distribution; the terms and conditions of agreements and arrangements between FNF and F&G following the distribution, such as the Corporate Services Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2022, between FNF and F&G (the “Corporate Services Agreement”), which provides for, among other things, the provision of certain services by FNF to F&G following the F&G Distribution; and the nature and amount of indebtedness incurred by F&G. In addition, our F&G segment contributes to a significant portion of our earnings and the F&G Distribution could adversely affect our earnings.
Certain F&G directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their FNF equity ownership or their current or former FNF positions.
A number of F&G’s directors have been, and will continue to be, officers, directors or employees of FNF (or officers, directors or employees of affiliates of FNF) and, thus, have professional relationships with FNF’s officers, directors or employees. In addition, certain of F&G’s directors and executive officers own FNF common stock or other equity compensation awards. These relationships may create, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest when these directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for FNF and F&G. For example, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute that may arise between FNF and F&G regarding the terms of the agreements governing F&G’s relationship with FNF, including the Corporate Services Agreement.
Risk Factors Relating to the Geographic Concentrations of our Business Segments
Because we are dependent upon California and Texas for approximately 12.9% and 13.8% of our title insurance premiums, respectively, our Title segment may be adversely affected by regulatory conditions in California and/or Texas.
California and Texas are the two largest sources of revenue for our Title segment. In 2024, California-based premiums accounted for approximately 27.8% of premiums earned by our direct operations and 0.5% of our agency premium revenues, while Texas-based premiums accounted for 19.2% of premiums earned by our direct operations and 9.2% of our agency premium revenues. In the aggregate, California and Texas accounted for approximately 12.9% and 13.8%, respectively, of our total title insurance premiums for 2024. A significant part of our revenues and profitability are therefore subject to our operations in California and Texas and to the prevailing regulatory conditions in these states. Adverse regulatory developments in California and Texas, which could include reductions in the maximum rates permitted to be charged, inadequate rate increases or more fundamental changes in the design or implementation of the California and Texas title insurance regulatory framework, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Concentration in certain states for the distribution of our life insurance and annuity products in our F&G segment may subject us to losses attributable to economic downturns or catastrophes in those states.
Our top five states for the distribution of our life insurance and annuity products in our F&G segment are Florida, California, Pennsylvania, Texas and Ohio. Any adverse economic developments or catastrophes in these states could have an adverse impact on our F&G segment.
Risk Factors Relating to Government Regulation of the Insurance Industry
Our subsidiaries must comply with federal and state statutes and regulations. These statutes and regulations may increase our costs, impede our provision of certain products or services, or impose burdensome conditions on actions that we might seek to take to increase the revenues of those subsidiaries, resulting in decreased demand for the Company's products and services or otherwise adversely affecting the Company.
Changes to federal and state statutes and regulations; statutory or regulatory guidance, policies, or interpretations of existing regulations or statutes; guidelines published by the government-sponsored enterprises; enhanced federal or state governmental oversight or efforts by federal or state governmental agencies that cause customers to refrain from purchasing or using the Company’s products and services, could: (i) prohibit, impact or limit our future operations, (ii) make it more costly or burdensome to conduct such operations or (iii) result in decreased demand for the Company’s products and services. Such changes could impact our competitive position and have a negative impact on our ability to generate revenues, earnings and cash flows.
Additionally, our insurance businesses are subject to extensive regulation by state insurance authorities in each state in which they operate. These agencies have broad administrative and supervisory power relating to the following, among other matters:
•licensing requirements;
•trade and marketing practices;
•accounting and financing practices;
•disclosure requirements on key terms of mortgage loans;
•capital and surplus requirements;
•the amount of dividends and other payments made by insurance subsidiaries;
•investment practices;
•rate schedules;
•deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders;
•establishing reserves; and
•regulation of reinsurance.
Most states also regulate insurance holding companies like us with respect to acquisitions, changes of control and the terms of transactions with our affiliates. State regulations may impede or impose burdensome conditions on our ability to increase or maintain rate levels or on other actions that we may want to take to enhance our operating results. In addition, we may incur significant costs in the course of complying with regulatory requirements. Further, various state legislatures have in the past considered offering a public alternative to the title industry in their states, as a means to increase state government revenues. Although we think this situation is unlikely, if one or more such takeovers were to occur, they could adversely affect our business. We cannot be assured that future legislative or regulatory changes will not adversely affect our business operations. See “Item 1. Business — Regulation” of this Annual Report for further discussion of the current regulatory environment.
Our ServiceLink subsidiary provides mortgage transaction services including title-related services and facilitation of production and management of mortgage loans. Certain of these businesses are subject to federal and state regulatory oversight. For example, ServiceLink’s LoanCare business services and subservices mortgage loans secured primarily by residential real estate throughout the United States. LoanCare is subject to extensive federal, state and local regulatory oversight, including federal and state regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and investigations by governmental and regulatory agencies, including the CFPB. In connection with formal and informal inquiries by those agencies, LoanCare receives numerous requests, subpoenas, and orders for documents, testimony and information in connection with various aspects of its or its clients’ regulated activities.
LoanCare is also required to maintain a variety of licenses, both federal and state. License requirements are in a frequent state of renewal and reexamination as regulations change or are reinterpreted. In addition, federal and state statutes establish specific guidelines and procedures that debt collectors must follow when collecting consumer accounts. LoanCare’s failure to comply with any of these laws, should the states take an opposing interpretation, could have an adverse effect on LoanCare in the event and to the extent that they apply to some or all of its servicing activities.
State regulation of the rates we charge for title insurance could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive rate regulation by the applicable state agencies in the jurisdictions in which they operate. Title insurance rates are regulated differently in various states, with some states requiring the subsidiaries to file and receive approval of rates before such rates become effective and some states promulgating the rates that can be charged. In general, premium rates are determined on the basis of historical data for claim frequency and severity as well as related production costs and other expenses. In all states in which our title subsidiaries operate, our rates must not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. Premium rates are likely to prove insufficient when ultimate claims and expenses exceed historically projected levels. Premium rate inadequacy may not become evident quickly and may take time to correct, and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our F&G segment is highly regulated and subject to numerous legal restrictions and regulations.
State insurance regulators, the NAIC and federal regulators continually reexamine existing laws and regulations and may impose changes in the future. New interpretations of existing laws and the passage of new legislation may harm our ability to sell new policies, increase our claims exposure on policies we issued previously and adversely affect our profitability and financial strength. We are also subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator’s interpretation of a legal or accounting issue may not result in compliance with another regulator’s interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. Regulators and other authorities have the power to bring administrative or judicial proceedings against us, which could result in, among other things, suspension or revocation of our licenses, cease and desist orders, fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary action, which could materially harm our results of operations and financial condition.
We cannot predict what form any future changes in these or other areas of regulation affecting the insurance industry might take or what effect, if any, such proposals might have on us if enacted into law. In addition, because our activities are relatively concentrated in a small number of lines of business, any change in law or regulation affecting one of those lines of business could have a disproportionate impact on us as compared to other more diversified insurance companies. See “Item 1. Business — Regulation” of this Annual Report for further discussion of the impact of regulations on our business.
State Regulation
Our business is subject to government regulation in each of the states in which we conduct business and is concerned primarily with the protection of policyholders and other customers rather than shareholders. Such regulation is vested in state agencies having broad administrative and discretionary authority, which may include, among other things, premium rates and increases thereto, underwriting practices, reserve requirements, marketing practices, advertising, privacy, policy forms, reinsurance reserve requirements, acquisitions, mergers and capital adequacy. At any given time, we and our insurance subsidiaries may be the subject of a number of ongoing financial or market conduct, audits or inquiries. From time to time, regulators raise issues during such examinations or audits that could have a material impact on our business.
Under insurance guaranty fund laws in most states, insurance companies doing business therein can be assessed up to prescribed limits for policyholder losses incurred by insolvent companies. We cannot predict the amount or timing of any such future assessments and therefore the liability we have established for these potential assessments may not be adequate. In addition, regulators may change their interpretation or application of existing laws and regulations such as the case with broadening the scope of carriers that must contribute towards Long Term Care insolvencies.
NAIC
Although our business is subject to regulation in each state in which we conduct business, in many instances the state regulatory models emanate from the NAIC. Some of the NAIC pronouncements, particularly as they affect accounting issues, take effect automatically in the various states without affirmative action by the states. Statutes, regulations and interpretations may be applied with retroactive impact, particularly in areas such as accounting and reserve requirements. The NAIC continues to work to reform state regulation in various areas, including comprehensive reforms relating to cybersecurity regulations, best interest standards, RBC and life insurance reserves.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to minimum capitalization requirements based on RBC formulas for life insurance companies that establish capital requirements relating to insurance, business, asset, interest rate and certain other risks. Changes to statutory reserve or RBC requirements may increase the amount of reserves or capital our insurance companies are required to hold and may impact our ability to pay dividends. In addition, changes in statutory reserve or risk-based capital requirements may adversely impact our financial strength ratings. Changes currently under consideration include adding an operational risk component, factors for asset credit risk and group wide capital calculations.
“Fiduciary” Rule
In December 2020, the DOL issued its final version of an investment advice rule replacing the previous “Fiduciary Rule” that had been challenged by industry participants and vacated in March 2018 by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The new investment advice rule reinstates the five-part test for determining whether a person is considered a fiduciary for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and sets forth a new exemption, referred to as prohibited transaction class exemption (“PTE”) 2020-02. The rule’s preamble also contains the DOL’s reinterpretation of elements of the five-part test that appears to encompass more insurance agents selling IRA products and withdraws the DOL’s longstanding position that rollover recommendations out of employer plans are not subject to ERISA. The new rule took effect on February 16, 2021. The DOL left in place PTE 84-24, which is a longstanding class exemption providing prohibited transaction relief for insurance agents selling annuity products, provided that certain disclosures are made to the plan fiduciary, which is the policyholder in the case of an IRA, and certain other conditions are met. Among other things, these disclosures include the agent’s relationship to the insurer and commissions received in connection with the annuity sale. We, along with FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance, designed and launched a compliance program in January 2022 requiring all agents selling IRA products to submit an acknowledgment with each IRA application indicating the agent has satisfied PTE 84-24 requirements on a precautionary basis in case the agent acted or is found to have acted as a fiduciary. Meanwhile, the DOL has publicly announced its intention to consider future rulemaking that may revoke or modify PTE 84-24.
On April 23, 2024, following previous attempts to expand fiduciary regulation for advisers, the DOL released a new rule, the "New Fiduciary Rule", which significantly broadens the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA and Section 4975 when advisers provide investment recommendations to plans subject to ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. Among other requirements, the New Fiduciary Rule provides that any person will be an investment advice fiduciary if such person provides investment advice or makes an investment recommendation to a retirement investor (i.e., a plan, a discretionary plan fiduciary, a plan participant or beneficiary, an IRA, an IRA owner or beneficiary, or an IRA fiduciary) for a fee or other compensation, the person makes professional investment recommendations to investors on a regular basis as part of their business, and the
recommendation is provided under circumstances that would indicate to a reasonable investor in like circumstances that the recommendation is based on a review of the particular needs or individual investor circumstances of the retirement investor, reflects the application of professional or expert judgment to the retirement investor’s particular needs or individual circumstances, and may be relied upon by the retirement investor as intended to advance the retirement investor’s best interest. Unlike the current ERISA standard, the New Fiduciary Rule subjects non-discretionary investment advice to retirement plans and accounts under the care and loyalty standards that also apply to investment advisors with discretionary authority or control over such plans and accounts. In addition, on the same date, the DOL issued amended versions of PTE 2020-02 and PTE 84-24, either or both of which provide prohibited transaction exemptive relief to insurance companies and insurance producers who make insurance product recommendations to retirement investors, subject to certain conditions. The New Fiduciary Rule likely means that certain of the Company’s agents will be considered fiduciaries for purposes of ERISA and the Code, subjecting the Company, and the insurance industry on the whole, to greater regulatory risk.
The DOL’s New Fiduciary Rule, which was scheduled to become effective on September 23, 2024, has been challenged. On July 25, 2024, in the case of Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice, Inc., et al. v. United States Department of Labor, et al., (“Federation of Americans”) the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order staying the effective date of the DOL’s final fiduciary rule (and related amendments to PTE 84-24) that was issued in March 2024. The District Court, in part relying on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, found that the plaintiffs (primarily insurance agents) were likely to succeed on their arguments that the New Fiduciary Rule improperly expanded the definition of an “investment advice fiduciary” under ERISA. As a result, the New Fiduciary Rule’s original effective date of September 23, 2024 has been delayed until further notice.
In addition, on July 26, 2024, a companion case to Federation of Americans filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, American Council of Life Insurers, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Labor, et al., held the remaining PTE amendments included in the New Fiduciary Rule (PTEs 2020-02, 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1 and 86-128) that were not challenged in Federation of Americans were also stayed, noting that the Northern District fully agreed with the Eastern District’s analysis and decision to stay the effective date of the New Fiduciary Rule.
On September 20, 2024, the DOL appealed both rulings to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. A Fifth Circuit reversal of the Texas district court rulings could have harmful effects on the insurance industry, creating additional hurdles to operate our business. The Fifth Circuit has yet to issue a decision on these appeals. Consequently, the stays on the 2024 fiduciary rule remain in effect.
Management believes these current and emerging developments relating to market conduct standards for the financial services industry may, over time, materially affect the way in which our agents do business, the role of IMOs, sale of IRA products including IRA-to-IRA and employer plan rollovers, how we supervise our distribution force, compensation practices and liability exposure and costs. In addition to implementing the compliance procedures described above, management is monitoring further developments closely and will be working with IMOs and distributors to adapt to these evolving regulatory requirements and risks.
Bermuda and Cayman Islands Regulation
Our business is subject to regulation in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, including the BMA and the CIMA. These regulations may limit or curtail our activities, including activities that might be profitable, and changes to existing regulations may affect our ability to continue to offer our existing products and services, or new products and services we may wish to offer in the future.
Our reinsurance subsidiary, F&G Life Re, is registered in Bermuda under the Bermuda Insurance Act and subject to the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The BMA has sought regulatory equivalency, which enables Bermuda’s commercial insurers to transact business with the European Union on a “level playing field.” In connection with its initial efforts to achieve equivalency under the European Union’s Directive (2009/138/EC) (“Solvency II”), the BMA implemented and imposed additional requirements on the companies it regulates. The European Commission in 2016 granted Bermuda’s commercial insurers full equivalence in all areas of Solvency II for an indefinite period of time.
Our reinsurance subsidiary, F&G Cayman Re, is licensed in the Cayman Islands by the CIMA and is subject to supervision by CIMA and CIMA may at any time direct F&G Cayman Re, in relation to a policy, a line of business or the entire business, to cease or refrain from committing an act or pursing a course of conduct and to perform such acts as in the opinion of CIMA are necessary to remedy or ameliorate the situation.
The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 may impact our business and the markets in which we compete.
The Secure 2.0 Act of 2022, Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (“SECURE Act 2.0”), was signed into law on December 29, 2022, and went into effect as early as January 1, 2023, in certain respects. The SECURE Act 2.0 contains provisions that may impact our F&G insurance subsidiaries, and these changes could affect the desirability of IRAs,
necessitate changes to our administrative system to implement the Secure Act 2.0, and affect, to some extent, the length of time that IRA assets remain in our annuity products. These provisions include, for example, raising the age for required minimum distributions from IRAs from 72 to 73 (age 74 after 2032); additional exceptions to the 10% penalty tax for distributions before age 59-1/2; reduction of the penalty for failures to take a required distribution amount; directions to the SEC for new registration forms for RILAs; and directions to the DOL to revisit fiduciary standards relating to choosing an annuity provider in pension risk transfer transactions. While we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, the SECURE Act 2.0 will ultimately impact us, whether positive or negative, it may have implications for our business operations and the markets in which we compete.
Regulatory investigations of the insurance industry may lead to fines, settlements, new regulation or legal uncertainty, which could negatively affect our results of operations.
From time to time we receive inquiries and requests for information from state insurance departments, attorneys general and other regulatory agencies about various matters relating to our business. Sometimes these take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. We cooperate with all such inquiries and we have responded to or are currently responding to inquiries from multiple governmental agencies. Also, regulators and courts have been dealing with issues arising from foreclosures and related processes and documentation. Various governmental entities are studying the insurance product, market, pricing and business practices, and potential regulatory and legislative changes, which may materially affect our business and operations. From time to time, we are assessed fines for violations of regulations or other matters or enter into settlements with such authorities, which may require us to pay fines or claims or take other actions.
Changing rules, public disclosure regulations and stakeholder expectations on environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) related matters create a variety of risks for our business.
In addition to the changing rules and regulations related to ESG matters imposed by governmental and self-regulatory organizations such as the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, a variety of third-party organizations, institutional investors and customers evaluate the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. These changing rules, regulations and stakeholder expectations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and increased management time and attention spent complying with or meeting such regulations and expectations. Reduced access to or increased cost of capital may occur as financial institutions and investors increase or change expectations related to ESG matters.
Developing and acting on initiatives within the scope of ESG, and collecting, measuring and reporting ESG-related information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming and is subject to evolving reporting standards. We may also communicate certain initiatives and goals, regarding environmental matters, diversity, social investments and other ESG-related matters, in our SEC filings or in other public disclosures. These initiatives and goals within the scope of ESG could be difficult and expensive to implement, the technologies needed to implement them may not be cost effective and may not advance at a sufficient pace, and we could be criticized for the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the disclosure. If our ESG-related data, processes and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to our goals, including our previously announced commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, within the scope of ESG on a timely basis, or at all, our reputation, business, financial performance and growth could be adversely affected.
In addition, in recent years “anti-ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states and Congress having proposed or enacted “anti-ESG” policies, legislation, or initiatives or issued related legal opinions, and the President having recently issued an executive order opposing diversity equity and inclusion (“DEI”) initiatives in the private sector. Such "anti-ESG" and anti-DEI-related policies, legislation, initiatives, litigation, legal opinions, and scrutiny could result in additional compliance obligations, investigations and enforcement actions, or reputational harm.
Risk Factors Relating to the Credit Risk of our Counterparties
We are subject to the credit risk of our counterparties, including companies with whom we have reinsurance agreements or we have purchased equity options.
We cede material amounts of insurance and transfers of related assets and certain liabilities to other insurance companies through reinsurance. Accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. The failure, insolvency, inability or unwillingness of any reinsurer to pay under the terms of reinsurance agreements with us could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. We regularly monitor the credit rating and performance of our reinsurance parties. Aspida Re, Wilton Re, Somerset and Everlake represent our largest third-party reinsurance counterparty exposure. As of December 31, 2024, the net amount recoverable from Aspida Re, Wilton Re, Somerset and Everlake were $7,844 million, $2,822 million, $1,168 million, and $1,066 million, respectively. The risk of non-performance is mitigated with various forms of collateral or collateral arrangements, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit.
We are also exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on options. We seek to reduce the risk associated with such agreements by purchasing such options from large, well-established financial institutions, and by holding collateral. There can be no assurance we will not suffer losses in the event of counterparty non-performance. Several of our derivative counterparty International Swap and Derivative Association (“ISDA”) agreements contain additional termination event triggers based on a downgrade of FGL Insurance. These triggers would give these counterparties the option to terminate our options, which could lead to losses if occurring at an inopportune time.
Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional details on credit risk and counterparty risk.
If financial institutions at which we hold escrow funds fail, it could have a material adverse impact on our company.
We hold customers' assets in escrow at various financial institutions, pending completion of real estate transactions. These assets are maintained in segregated bank accounts and have not been included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances for our customers, which amounted to $14.4 billion at December 31, 2024. Failure of one or more of these financial institutions may lead us to become liable for the funds owed to third parties and there is no guarantee that we would recover the funds deposited, whether through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage or otherwise.
Risk Factors Related to a National or Global Crisis, Climate Change, Computer Cyber-terrorism and Other Catastrophic Events
Our business could be materially and adversely affected by the occurrence of a catastrophe, including natural disasters or those caused by humans.
Any catastrophic event, such as a pandemic, terrorist attacks, floods, severe storms or hurricanes or cyber-attacks, could have a material and adverse effect on our business in several respects:
•the outbreak of a pandemic disease, like COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and the operating results of our insurance business due to its impact on the economy and financial markets;
•the occurrence of any pandemic disease, natural disaster, terrorist attack or any other catastrophic event that results in our workforce being unable to be physically located at one of our facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our service; or
•we could experience long-term interruptions in our service and the services provided by our significant vendors due to the effects of catastrophic events, including but not limited to cyber-attacks. Some of our operational systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery and business continuity planning cannot account for all eventualities. Additionally, unanticipated problems with our disaster recovery systems could further impede our ability to conduct business, particularly if those problems affect our computer-based data processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data;
•we manage our financial exposure for losses in our title insurance business and in our F&G segment with third-party reinsurance. Catastrophic events could adversely affect the cost and availability of that reinsurance;
•the value of our investment portfolio may decrease if the securities in which we invest are negatively impacted by climate change, pandemics, severe weather conditions and other catastrophic events.
Natural catastrophes and pandemics present risks that could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our business operations may be adversely affected by the increased risk of malicious and terrorist acts, as evidenced by recent incidents such as the New Orleans attack and Las Vegas explosion, which could disrupt our operations or the safety of our employees or customers. Claims arising from such events could have an adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition, either directly or as a result of their effect on our reinsurers or other counterparties. Such events could also have an adverse effect on the rate and amount of lapses and surrenders of existing policies, as well as sales of new policies.
While we believe we have taken steps to identify and mitigate these types of risks, such risks cannot be reliably predicted, nor fully protected against even if anticipated. In addition, such events could result in overall macroeconomic volatility or specifically a decrease or halt in economic activity in large geographic areas, adversely affecting the marketing or administration of our business within such geographic areas or the general economic climate, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The possible macroeconomic effects of such events could also adversely affect our asset portfolio.
General Risk Factors
Failure of our information security systems or unauthorized access to such systems could result in a loss or disclosure of confidential information, damage to our reputation, monetary losses, additional costs and impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively.
Our operations are highly dependent upon the effective operation of our computer systems. We use our computer systems to receive, process, store and transmit sensitive personal consumer data (such as names and addresses, social security numbers, driver's license numbers and bank account information) and important business information of our customers. We also electronically manage substantial cash, investment assets and escrow account balances on behalf of ourselves and our customers, as well as financial information about our businesses generally. The integrity of our computer systems and the protection of the information that resides on such systems are important to our successful operation. If we fail to maintain an adequate security infrastructure, adapt to emerging security threats such as ransomware or follow our internal business processes with respect to security, the information or assets we hold could be compromised. Further, even if we, or third parties to which we outsource certain information technology services, maintain a reasonable, industry-standard information security infrastructure to mitigate these risks, the inherent risk that unauthorized access to information or assets remains. This risk is increased by transmittal of information over the internet and the increased threat and sophistication of cyber criminals. While, to date, we believe that we have not experienced a material breach of our computer systems, the occurrence or scope of such events is not always apparent.
Examples of security threats that represent significant inherent risk with little to no warning include the MoveIT security incident affecting F&G, in which F&G activated its crisis management protocols to adequately manage the investigation, impact and response to this incident. In November 2023, we experienced a cybersecurity incident where an unauthorized third-party accessed certain of our systems, deployed a type of malware that is not self-propagating, and exfiltrated certain data. We promptly commenced an investigation, retained leading experts to assist the Company, notified law enforcement authorities, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders and followed our incident response plans. Although we believe we have remediated the significant exposures related to these incidents, there remains potential for future losses associated with litigation and damage to our reputation. If additional information regarding an event previously considered immaterial is discovered, or a new event were to occur, it could potentially have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition. In addition, some laws and certain of our contracts require notification of various parties, including regulators, consumers or customers, in the event that confidential or personal information has or may have been taken or accessed by unauthorized parties. Such notifications can potentially result, among other things, in adverse publicity, diversion of management and other resources, the attention of regulatory authorities, the imposition of fines and disruptions in business operations, the effects of which may be material. Any inability to prevent security or privacy breaches, or the perception that such breaches may occur, could inhibit our ability to retain or attract new clients and/or result in financial losses, litigation, increased costs, negative publicity or other adverse consequences to our business.
While we currently maintain cybersecurity insurance, such insurance may not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to cybersecurity breaches or attacks, failures or other data security-related incidents, and we cannot be certain that cyber insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all, or that an insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductibles, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Further, our financial institution clients have obligations to safeguard their information technology systems and the confidentiality of customer information. In certain of our businesses, we are bound contractually and/or by regulation to comply with the same requirements. If we fail to comply with these regulations and requirements, we could be exposed to lawsuits for breach of contract, governmental proceedings or the imposition of fines. In addition, future adoption of more restrictive privacy laws, rules or industry security requirements by federal or state regulatory bodies or by a specific industry in which we do business could have an adverse impact on us through increased costs or restrictions on business processes.
The new and emerging types of Artificial Intelligence and their uses are very early stage in the industry and may be subject to many uncertain future developments and regulations.
Regulatory agencies are evaluating existing regulatory frameworks for insurance industry wide use of Artificial Intelligence. New artificial intelligence algorithms and predictive models may be used by insurance companies in selling insurance products to consumers. However, the use of new artificial intelligence models may make insurance companies more susceptible to potential bias, discrimination and data breaches. These concerns could lead to development of new, or modifications to, laws and regulations pertaining to the use of Artificial Intelligence by insurance companies or the broader financial services sector, which may prove to be onerous for companies to implement in a timely manner.
The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies, including generative artificial intelligence, has increased rapidly with increasing complexity and changes in the nature of the technology. Our potential uses of generative artificial intelligence may be subject to various risks including flaws or limitations in the large language models or training datasets that may result in biased or inaccurate results, ethical considerations, and the ability to safely deploy and implement governance and controls for such systems. Laws and regulations related to artificial intelligence are evolving, and there is uncertainty as to potential adoption of new laws and regulations and the application of existing laws and regulations to use of artificial intelligence, which may restrict or impose burdensome and costly requirements on our ability to use artificial intelligence. In addition, there has been considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in the artificial intelligence industry, which has resulted in litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We may receive claims from third parties, including our competitors, alleging that our use of artificial intelligence technology infringes on or violates such third party's intellectual property rights. Adverse consequences of these risks related to artificial intelligence could undermine the decisions, predictions or analysis such technologies produce and subject us to competitive harm, legal liability, heightened regulatory scrutiny and brand or reputational harm.
Our ability to adopt new technologies may be inhibited by the emergence of industry-wide standards, a changing legislative and regulatory environment, an inability to develop appropriate governance and controls, a lack of internal product and engineering expertise, resistance to change from consumers, or lack of appropriate change management processes or the complexity of our systems. In addition, our adoption of new technologies and our introduction of new products and services may expose us to new or enhanced risks, particularly in areas where we have less experience or our existing governance and control systems may be insufficient, which could require us to make substantial expenditures or subject us to legal liability, heightened regulatory scrutiny and brand or reputational harm.
Damage to our reputation may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Our reputation is a key asset, and our continued success is dependent upon our ability to earn and maintain the trust and confidence of our broad range of customers. We provide our products and services to a wide range of customers, and our ability to attract and retain customers is highly dependent upon the external perceptions of our level of service, trustworthiness, business practices, financial condition and other subjective qualities. Damage to our reputation may arise from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, litigation or regulatory actions, compliance failures, employee misconduct, cybersecurity incidents, unfavorable press coverage and unfavorable comments on social media. Any damage to our reputation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers and employees, potentially leading to a reduction in our revenues and profitability.
Failure to respond to rapid changes in technology could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Rapidly evolving technologies and innovations in software and financial technology could drive changes in how real estate transactions are recorded and processed throughout the mortgage life cycle. There is no guarantee that we will be able to effectively adapt to and utilize changing technology. Existing or new competitors may be able to utilize or create technology more effectively than us, which could result in the loss of market share.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
We rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property. Although we use a broad range of measures to protect our intellectual property rights, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property. We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability, which represents a diversion of resources that may be significant in amount and may not prove successful. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce the protection of our intellectual property assets could adversely impact our business and our ability to compete effectively.
We may be subject to costly litigation in the event that another party alleges our operations or activities infringe upon that party’s intellectual property rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents or other protections that could be infringed by our products, methods, processes or services or could otherwise limit our ability to offer certain product features. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for breach of copyright, trademark, trade secret or license usage rights. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could result in significant expense and liability for damages or we could be enjoined from providing certain products or services to our customers or utilizing and benefiting from certain methods, processes, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or licenses, or alternatively, we could be required to enter into costly licensing arrangements with third parties, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are the subject of various legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, including in some cases class-action lawsuits and regulatory inquiries, investigations or other proceedings. If we are unsuccessful in our defense of litigation matters or regulatory proceedings, we may be forced to pay damages, fines or penalties and/or change our business practices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Note H Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of pending litigation and regulatory matters and our related accrual.
We operate in a highly competitive industry, which could limit our ability to gain or maintain our position in the industry and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our F&G insurance subsidiaries operate in a highly competitive industry and encounter significant competition in all of our product lines from other insurance companies, many of which have greater financial resources and higher financial strength ratings than us and that may have a greater market share, offer a broader range of products, services or features, assume a greater level of risk, have lower operating or financing costs or have different profitability expectations than us. Competition could result in, among other things, lower sales or higher lapses of existing products.
Our annuity products compete with indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities sold by other insurance companies and also with mutual fund products, traditional bank investments and other retirement funding alternatives offered by asset managers, banks and broker-dealers. The ability of banks and broker dealers to increase their securities-related business or to affiliate with insurance companies may materially and adversely affect sales of all of our products by substantially increasing the number and financial strength of potential competitors. Our insurance products compete with those of other insurance companies, financial intermediaries and other institutions based on a number of factors, including premium rates, policy terms and conditions, service provided to distribution channels and policyholders, ratings by rating agencies, reputation and commission structures.
Our ability to compete is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to develop competitive and profitable products, our ability to maintain low unit costs and our maintenance of adequate financial strength ratings from rating agencies. Our ability to compete is also dependent upon, among other things, our ability to attract and retain distribution channels to market our products, the competition for which is vigorous. We must anticipate and respond effectively to changes in customer preferences, new industry standards, evolving distribution models, disruptive technology developments and alternate business models. The evolving nature of consumer needs and preferences and improvements in technology could result in a reduction in consumer demand and in the prices of the products and services we offer. Our competitive position may be impacted if we are unable to deploy, in a cost effective and competitive manner, technology such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, or if our competitors collect and use data which we do not have the ability to access or use.
There is a risk that purchasers may be able to obtain more favorable terms and offerings from competitors, vendors or other third parties, including pricing and technology. Additionally, customers may turn to our competitors as a result of our or our client’s failure, or perceived failure, to deliver on customer expectations, product or service flaws, technology issues, gaps in operational support or other issues affecting customer experience. As a result, competition may adversely affect the persistency of our policies, our ability to sell products and provide services, maintain client relationships, and our revenues and results of operations.
The loss of key personnel could negatively affect our financial results and impair our operating abilities.
Our success substantially depends on our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team and officers. If we lose one or more of these key employees, our operating results and in turn the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we have employment agreements with many of our officers, there can be no assurance that the entire term of the employment agreement will be served or that the employment agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
We are highly dependent on information technology in the operation of our various businesses. Cybersecurity is an integral part of our operations and is a focus of all employees, including senior management and our board of directors.
Risk Management and Strategy
We assess, identify and manage cybersecurity risks through various processes within our Enterprise Risk Management Program and Information Security Program. We focus on all areas of cybersecurity, including threat and vulnerability management, security monitoring, identity and access management, phishing awareness, risk oversight, third-party risk
management, disaster recovery and continuity management. We have established policies, including those related to privacy, information security and cybersecurity, and we employ a broad and diversified set of cybersecurity risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques. Internal audits, external audits and self-assessments are conducted to assess the effectiveness and maturity of our Enterprise Risk Management Program and Information Security Program.
Our employees are one of our strongest assets in protecting our customers' information and mitigating cybersecurity risk. We maintain comprehensive and tailored training programs that focus on applicable privacy and cybersecurity requirements. Additionally, we make strategic investments in cybersecurity to protect our customers and information systems, including both capital expenditures and operating expenses for hardware, software, personnel and consulting services.
Our processes to assess, identify and manage cybersecurity risks, including cybersecurity risks related to the use of third-party service providers, are fully integrated into our Enterprise Risk Management Program. In some circumstances we use third-party service providers to provide expertise and to monitor utilization of specific cyber tools, and in certain cases, to supplement staffing services. Through our vendor risk management process, these vendors undergo various assessments such as financial, reputational, contractual and informational security. These assessments are performed to ascertain that these vendors meet our policy requirements relative to the services they perform on our behalf.
To further reduce the residual risk associated with cybersecurity, we maintain Miscellaneous Professional Liability Insurance, which provides coverage for cybersecurity incidents. The deductible limits on these policies are determined by a corporate insurance risk management group and executive management at least on an annual basis. This group determines appropriate coverage levels and deductibles for each policy based on tolerance and weighs the coverage against the premium for the policy.
Governance
Management's Role in Assessing and Managing Cybersecurity Risk
Our Corporate Information Security Group is led by our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") who is responsible for our information security strategy. This strategy includes policy management, security engineering, identity and access management, vulnerability management and cyber threat detection and response through our Security Operations Center. Our CISO has extensive information technology and program management experience as do many of our employees in our information security group. Our CISO, as well as others in our information security group, hold certifications such the Certified Information System Security Professional certification. We believe cybersecurity is a shared responsibility throughout the organization and thus we also manage cybersecurity risks, through a cross-functional committee of members of senior management known as the Enterprise Risk Steering Committee, which includes the CISO. The diversity of this group allows for identification of key enterprise risks from strategic, operational, financial, legal, information technology and compliance perspectives. These individuals receive reporting on our cybersecurity programs and also participate in table-top exercises relating to potential security incidents. The CISO is also the primary point of contact for reporting information security incidents and for coordinating information security activities including incident response and digital forensics. Our CISO reports to our Chief Security Officer who also has extensive experience in the information security space.
Board Oversight of Cybersecurity
Our board has a strong focus on cybersecurity. Our approaches to cybersecurity and privacy risk are overseen by the audit committee. At each regular meeting of the audit committee of our Board of Directors, our Chief Risk Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Security Officer, Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Audit Officer provide reports relating to existing and emerging cyber and data security risks, as well as reports on the Company’s risk assessments and security incidents. Our audit committee chairman reports on these discussions to our board of directors on a quarterly basis. See Item 1A Risk Factors for discussion of material risks faced by the Company, including risks related to cybersecurity.
2023 Cybersecurity Incident
On November 19, 2023, we became aware of a cybersecurity incident that impacted certain of our systems. We promptly commenced an investigation, retained leading experts to assist the Company, notified law enforcement authorities, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders and followed our incident response plans. In addition, we took containment measures such as blocking access to certain of our systems resulting in varying levels of disruption to our businesses. The incident was contained on November 26, 2023.
We completed our forensic investigation on December 13, 2023. We determined that an unauthorized third-party accessed certain of our systems, deployed a type of malware that is not self-propagating and exfiltrated certain data. We have no evidence that any customer-owned system was directly impacted in the incident, and no customer has reported that this has occurred. The last confirmed date of unauthorized third-party activity in our network occurred on November 20, 2023.
We have identified and analyzed the nature and scope of the affected systems and data. We have notified our affected customers and applicable state attorneys general and regulators, and approximately 1.3 million potentially impacted consumers; are providing credit monitoring, web monitoring and identity theft restoration services; and are fielding questions from customers. We are continuing to coordinate with law enforcement, our customers, regulators, advisors and other stakeholders. We have been named as a defendant in several lawsuits related to this incident. The Company will vigorously defend itself against any litigation filed related to this incident.
This incident did not have a material impact on the Company.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are in Jacksonville, Florida in owned facilities. F&G's headquarters are in Des Moines, Iowa in leased facilities.
The majority of our branch offices are leased from third parties. See Note Q Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further information on our outstanding leases. Our subsidiaries conduct their business operations primarily in leased office space in 47 states, Washington, DC, Canada, India, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For a description of our legal proceedings see discussion of Legal and Regulatory Contingencies in Note H Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 3 of Part I.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "FNF".
On January 31, 2025, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $58.17. We had approximately 5,461 shareholders of record on January 31, 2025.
Refer to Note U Employee Benefit Plans to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 5 of Part II, for further information on securities issued for employee stock compensation pursuant to our Omnibus Plan.
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be included in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing cumulative total shareholder return on our FNF common stock against the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and against the cumulative total return of a peer group index consisting of certain companies in the primary industry in which we compete (SIC code 6361 — Title Insurance) for the period ending December 31, 2024. This peer group consists of the following companies: First American Financial Corporation and Stewart Information Services Corp. The peer group comparison has been weighted based on their stock market capitalization. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100.00 on December 31, 2019, with dividends reinvested over the periods indicated.
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2021 | 12/31/2022 | 12/31/2023 | 12/31/2024 |
| | | | | | | |
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | | 100.00 | | 89.97 | | 124.34 | | 97.57 | | 138.67 | | 158.17 | |
S&P 500 | | 100.00 | | 118.40 | | 152.39 | | 124.79 | | 157.59 | | 197.02 | |
Peer Group | | 100.00 | | 95.45 | | 151.24 | | 100.69 | | 131.27 | | 136.36 | |
Dividends
On February 20, 2025, our Board of Directors formally declared a $0.50 per FNF share cash dividend that is payable on March 31, 2025, to FNF shareholders of record as of March 17, 2025. During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, we declared dividends on our common stock of $1.94, $1.83, and $1.77, respectively.
Our current dividend policy anticipates the payment of quarterly dividends in the future. The declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our future earnings, financial condition and capital requirements.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On August 3, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a three-year repurchase program (the "2021 Repurchase Program") under which we were authorized to purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2024. Since the commencement of the 2021 Repurchase Program, we repurchased a total of 16,449,565 FNF common shares for approximately $701 million, at an average price of $42.60 per share. On July 31, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a new three-year stock repurchase program effective July 31, 2024 (the "2024 Repurchase Program") under which we are authorized to purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2027. We did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2021 Repurchase Program or the 2024 Repurchase Program during the year ended December 31, 2024. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 and through market close on February 21, 2025, we did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2024 Repurchase Program.
Item 6. Reserved.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and Selected Financial Data included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
For a description of our business, including descriptions of segments, see the discussion under Business in Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Business Trends and Conditions
Title
Our Title segment revenue is closely related to the level of real estate activity that includes sales, mortgage financing and mortgage refinancing. Declines in the level of real estate activity or the average price of real estate sales will adversely affect our title insurance revenues.
We have found that residential real estate activity is generally dependent on the following factors:
•mortgage interest rates;
•mortgage funding supply;
•housing inventory and home prices;
•supply and demand for commercial real estate; and
•the strength of the United States economy, including employment levels.
The most recent forecast of the MBA, as of February 19, 2025, estimated (actual for fiscal years 2023 and 2024) the size of the U.S. residential mortgage originations market as shown in the following table for 2023 - 2027 in its "Mortgage Finance Forecast" (in trillions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 2027 | | 2026 | | 2025 | | 2024 | | 2023 |
Purchase transactions | | | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 1.4 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 1.3 | |
Refinance transactions | | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.2 | |
Total U.S. mortgage originations forecast | | | | $ | 2.5 | | | $ | 2.4 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 1.5 | |
As of February 19, 2025, the MBA expected residential purchase transactions and residential refinance transactions to increase in 2025 through 2027.
Following the Federal Reserve's reduction of its benchmark rate to nearly zero in response to COVID-19, residential purchase and refinance activity were on strong footing resulting in record revenues in 2021. However, residential refinance transactions began to slow in 2021 as the population of eligible refinance candidates declined.
The Federal Reserve raised the benchmark interest rate from near zero as of March 2022 to a range between 5.25% and 5.50% in July 2023 in an effort to combat inflation. Following a decline in inflation in 2024, the Federal Reserve reduced the benchmark rate to a range of 4.25% and 4.50% as of December 31, 2024. Interest rates on a 30-year, fixed rate mortgage averaged 6.7% in 2024, 6.8% and 5.2% in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
A shortage in the supply of homes for sale, increasing home prices, varying mortgage interest rates, inflation, disrupted labor markets and geopolitical uncertainties created some volatility in the residential real estate market in 2022, 2023 and 2024. Existing-home sales decreased 9% in December 2024 as compared to the corresponding month in 2023 while median existing-home sales prices rose to $404,400 in December 2024, a 6% increase over the corresponding month in 2023.
According to the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor, the unemployment rate was near record lows throughout 2022 and 2023. The unemployment rate was 4.1% and 3.7% in December of 2024 and 2023, respectively.
We issue commercial title insurance policies in sectors including office, industrial, energy, hospitality, retail and multi-family, among others. The demand for commercial title insurance varies based on a variety of factors such as investor appetite, financing availability and supply and demand in a particular area. Because commercial real estate transactions tend to be generally driven by supply and demand for commercial space in a particular area rather than by interest rate fluctuations, we believe that our commercial real estate title insurance business is less dependent on the industry cycles discussed above than our residential real estate title business. Factors including U.S. tax reform and a shift in U.S. monetary policy have had, or are expected to have, varying effects on availability of financing in the U.S. Lower corporate and individual tax rates and corporate tax-deductibility of capital expenditures have provided increased capacity and incentive for investments in commercial real estate. In recent years, we experienced fluctuating demand in commercial real estate markets. Commercial volumes and
commercial fee-per-file were stable in the first three quarters of 2022. Commercial volumes and commercial fee-per-file declined in the fourth quarter of 2022 and remained depressed throughout 2023 and 2024 when compared to recent years.
We continually monitor mortgage origination trends and believe that, based on our ability to produce industry leading operating margins through all economic cycles, we are well positioned to adjust our operations for adverse changes in real estate activity and to take advantage of increased volume when demand increases.
Seasonality. Historically, real estate transactions have produced seasonal revenue fluctuations in the real estate industry. The first calendar quarter is typically the weakest quarter in terms of revenue due to the generally low volume of home sales during January and February. The second and third calendar quarters are typically the strongest quarters in terms of revenue, primarily due to a higher volume of residential transactions in the spring and summer months. The fourth quarter is typically strong due to the desire of commercial entities to complete transactions by year-end. We have noted short-term fluctuations through recent years in resale and refinance transactions as a result of changes in interest rates.
Geographic Operations. Our direct title operations are divided into approximately 230 profit centers. Each profit center processes title insurance transactions within its geographical area, which is usually identified by a county, a group of counties forming a region, or a state, depending on the management structure in that part of the country. We also transact title insurance business through a network of approximately 5,100 agents, primarily in those areas in which agents are the more prevalent title insurance provider. Substantially all of our revenues are generated in the United States.
The following table sets forth the approximate dollar and percentage volumes of our title insurance premium revenue by state:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Amount | | % | | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Texas | $ | 710 | | | 13.8 | % | | $ | 657 | | | 14.3 | % | | $ | 1,027 | | | 15.0 | % |
California | 668 | | | 12.9 | | | 597 | | | 13.0 | | | 819 | | | 12.0 | |
Florida | 525 | | | 10.2 | | | 490 | | | 10.7 | | | 722 | | | 10.6 | |
Illinois | 298 | | | 5.8 | | | 275 | | | 6.0 | | | 360 | | | 5.3 | |
Pennsylvania | 269 | | | 5.2 | | | 227 | | | 4.9 | | | 356 | | | 5.2 | |
All others | 2,687 | | | 52.1 | | | 2,351 | | | 51.1 | | | 3,550 | | | 51.9 | |
Totals | $ | 5,157 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,597 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 6,834 | | | 100.0 | % |
F&G
The following factors represent some of the key trends and uncertainties that have influenced the development of our F&G segment and its historical financial performance, and we believe these key trends and uncertainties will continue to influence the business and financial performance of our F&G segment in the future.
Market Conditions. Market volatility has affected, and may continue to affect, our business and financial performance in varying ways. Volatility can pressure sales and reduce demand as consumers hesitate to make financial decisions. To enhance the attractiveness and profitability of our products and services, we continually monitor the behavior of our customers, as evidenced by annuitization rates and lapse rates, which vary in response to changes in market conditions. See Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report for further discussion of risk factors that could affect market conditions.
Interest Rate Environment. Some of our F&G products include guaranteed minimum crediting rates, most notably our fixed rate annuities. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, our reserves, net of reinsurance, and average crediting rate on our fixed rate annuities were $6 billion and 5%, respectively, and $6 billion and 4%, respectively. We are required to pay the guaranteed minimum crediting rates even if earnings on our investment portfolio decline, which would negatively impact earnings. In addition, we expect more policyholders to hold policies with comparatively high guaranteed rates for a longer period in a low interest rate environment. Conversely, a rise in average yield on our investment portfolio would increase earnings if the average interest rate we pay on our products does not rise correspondingly. Similarly, we expect that policyholders would be less likely to hold policies with existing guarantees as interest rates rise and the relative value of other new business offerings are increased, which would negatively impact our earnings and cash flows.
See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk” for a more detailed discussion of interest rate risk.
Aging of the U.S. Population.
We believe that the aging of the U.S. population will increase the demand for our indexed annuity and indexed universal life (“IUL”) products. As the “baby boomer” generation prepares for retirement, we believe that demand for retirement savings, growth, and income products will grow. We serve a growing retirement population, with more than 10,000 Americans turning 65 every day and a projected 23% increase in people age 65 and older over the next 25 years. The impact of this growth may be offset to some extent by asset outflows as an increasing percentage of the population begins withdrawing assets to convert their savings into income.
Industry Factors and Trends Affecting Our Results of Operations. We operate in the sector of the insurance industry that focuses on the needs of middle-income Americans. The underserved middle-income market represents a major growth opportunity for us. As a tool for addressing the unmet need for retirement planning, we believe that many middle-income Americans have grown to appreciate the financial certainty that we believe annuities such as our FIA products afford. For example, the fixed index annuity market grew from nearly $12 billion of sales in 2002 to $97 billion of sales in 2023 and the registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”) market grew from $11 billion of sales in 2018 to $44 billion of sales in 2023. Additionally, this market demand has positively impacted the IUL market as it has expanded from $100 million of annual sales in 2002 to $3 billion of annual sales in 2023.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accounting estimates described below are those we consider critical in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures with respect to contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates. See Note A Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for additional description of the significant accounting policies that have been followed in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reserve for Title Claim Losses
Title companies issue two types of policies, owner's and lender's policies, since both the new owner and the lender in real estate transactions want to know that their interest in the property is insured against certain title defects outlined in the policy. An owner's policy insures the buyer against such defects for as long as he or she owns the property (as well as against warranty claims arising out of the sale of the property by such owner). A lender's policy insures the priority of the lender's security interest over the claims that other parties may have in the property. The maximum amount of liability under a title insurance policy is generally the face amount of the policy plus the cost of defending the insured's title against an adverse claim; however, occasionally we do incur losses in excess of policy limits. While most non-title forms of insurance, including property and casualty, provide for the assumption of risk of loss arising out of unforeseen future events, title insurance serves to protect the policyholder from risk of loss for events that predate the issuance of the policy.
Unlike many other forms of insurance, title insurance requires only a one-time premium for continuous coverage until another policy is warranted due to changes in property circumstances arising from refinance, resale, additional liens, or other events. Unless we issue the subsequent policy, we receive no notice that our exposure under our policy has ended and, as a result, we are unable to track the actual terminations of our exposures.
Our reserve for title claim losses includes reserves for known claims as well as for losses that have been incurred but not yet reported to us (“IBNR”), net of recoupments. We reserve for each known claim based on our review of the estimated amount of the claim and the costs required to settle the claim. Reserves for IBNR claims are estimates that are established at the time the premium revenue is recognized and are based upon historical experience and other factors, including industry trends, claim loss history, legal environment, geographic considerations, and the types of policies written. We also reserve for losses arising from closing and disbursement functions due to fraud or operational error.
The table below summarizes our reserves for known claims and incurred but not reported claims related to title insurance:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | % | | December 31, 2023 | | % |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Known claims | | $ | 209 | | | 12.2 | % | | $ | 217 | | | 12.3 | % |
IBNR | | 1,504 | | | 87.8 | | | 1,553 | | | 87.7 | |
Total Reserve for Title Claim Losses | | $ | 1,713 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,770 | | | 100.0 | % |
Although claims against title insurance policies can be reported relatively soon after the policy has been issued, claims may be reported many years later. Historically, approximately 60% of claims are paid within approximately five years of the policy being written. By their nature, claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions, as well as the legal environment existing at the time of settlement of the claims. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors.
Our process for recording our reserves for title claim losses begins with analysis of our loss provision rate. We forecast ultimate losses for each policy year based upon historical policy year loss emergence and development patterns and adjust these to reflect policy year and policy type differences that affect the timing, frequency and severity of claims. We also use a technique that relies on historical loss emergence and on a premium-based exposure measurement. The latter technique is particularly applicable to the most recent policy years, which have few reported claims relative to an expected ultimate claim volume. After considering historical claim losses, reporting patterns and current market information, and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data provided by our legal, claims and underwriting departments, we determine a loss provision rate, which is recorded as a percentage of current title premiums. This loss provision rate is set to provide for losses on current year policies, but due to development of prior years and our long claim duration, it periodically includes amounts of estimated adverse or positive development on prior years' policies. Any significant adjustments to strengthen or release loss reserves resulting from the comparison with our actuarial analysis are made in addition to this loss provision rate. At each quarter end, our recorded reserve for claim losses is initially the result of taking the prior recorded reserve for claim losses, adding the current provision
and subtracting actual paid claims, resulting in an amount that management then compares to the range of reasonable estimates provided by the actuarial calculation.
We recorded our loss provision rate at 4.5% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 related to policies written in those years. The provision rate in 2024, 2023 and 2022 is supported by stability in payments for prior policy years, and qualitative factors that would indicate consistency, including consistency in lender underwriting standards, extension of credit to quality borrowers, a high proportion of refinance activity, claims expense management, mechanic’s lien underwriting practices, and fraud awareness by lenders, title insurers and settlement agents.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the process and due to the judgment used by both management and our actuary, our ultimate liability may be greater or less than our carried reserves. If the recorded amount is within the actuarial range but not at the central estimate, we assess the position within the actuarial range by analysis of other factors in order to determine that the recorded amount is our best estimate. These factors, which are both qualitative and quantitative, can change from period to period, and include items such as current trends in the real estate industry (which we can assess, but for which there is a time lag in the development of the data), any adjustments from the actuarial estimates needed for the effects of unusually large or small claims, improvements in our claims management processes and other cost saving measures. If the recorded amount is not within a reasonable range of our actuary's central estimate, we may have to record a charge or credit and reassess the loss provision rate on a go forward basis. We will continue to reassess the provision to be recorded in future periods consistent with this methodology.
The table below presents our title insurance loss development experience for the past three years:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Beginning balance | $ | 1,770 | | | $ | 1,810 | | | $ | 1,883 | |
| | | | | |
Change in reinsurance recoverable | (10) | | | 15 | | | (128) | |
Claims loss provision related to: | | | | | |
Current year | 232 | | | 207 | | | 308 | |
Prior years | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total title claim loss provision | 232 | | | 207 | | | 308 | |
Claims paid, net of recoupments related to: | | | | | |
Current year | (25) | | | (22) | | | (21) | |
Prior years | (254) | | | (240) | | | (232) | |
Total title claims paid, net of recoupments | (279) | | | (262) | | | (253) | |
Ending balance of claim loss reserve for title insurance | $ | 1,713 | | | $ | 1,770 | | | $ | 1,810 | |
Title premiums | $ | 5,153 | | | $ | 4,592 | | | $ | 6,834 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Provision for title insurance claim losses as a percentage of title insurance premiums: | | | | | |
Current year | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
Prior years | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total provision | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
Actual claims payments consist of loss payments and claims management expenses offset by recoupments and were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Loss Payments | | Claims Management Expenses | | Recoupments | | Net Loss Payments |
| | (In millions) |
| | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2024 | | $ | 204 | | | $ | 123 | | | $ | (48) | | | $ | 279 | |
Year ended December 31, 2023 | | 169 | | | 128 | | | (35) | | | 262 | |
Year ended December 31, 2022 | | 294 | | | 134 | | | (175) | | | 253 | |
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, our recorded reserves were $1,713 million and $1,770 million, respectively, which we determined were reasonable and represented our best estimate and these recorded amounts were within a reasonable range of the central estimates provided by our actuaries. Our recorded reserves were $61 million above the mid-point of the provided
range of $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion of our actuarial estimates as of December 31, 2024. Our recorded reserves were $70 million above the mid-point of the provided range of our actuarial estimates of $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2023.
During 2024, 2023 and 2022, payment patterns were consistent with our actuaries' and management's expectations. Also, compared to prior years we have seen a leveling off of the ultimate loss ratios in more mature policy years, particularly 2006-2009. While we still see claims opened on these policy years, the proportion of our claims inventory represented by these policy years has continued to decrease. Additionally, we continued to see stable development relating to the 2012 through 2022 policy years, which we believe is indicative of more stringent underwriting standards by us and the lending industry. Our ending open claim inventory decreased from approximately 9,200 claims as of December 31, 2023, to approximately 8,300 claims as of December 31, 2024. If actual claims loss development varies from what is currently expected and is not offset by other factors, it is possible that our recorded reserves may fall outside a reasonable range of our actuaries' central estimate, which may require additional reserve adjustments in future periods.
An approximate $52 million increase (decrease) in our annualized provision for title claim losses would occur if our loss provision rate were 1% higher (lower), based on 2024 title premiums of $5,153 million. A 10% increase (decrease) in our reserve for title claim losses, as of December 31, 2024, would result in an increase (decrease) in our provision for title claim losses of approximately $171 million.
Reserves for Future Policy Benefits and Certain Information on Contractholder Funds
The determination of FPB reserves is dependent on actuarial assumptions. The principal assumptions used to establish liabilities for FPBs are established at issue of the contract and include discount rates, mortality and cash surrender or policy lapse for our traditional life insurance products. The assumptions used require considerable judgment. We review policyholder behavior experience at least annually and update these assumptions when deemed necessary based on additional information that becomes available. Discount rate assumptions are updated at each reporting period and also incorporate changes in risk free rates and option market values. Changes in, or deviations from, the assumptions previously used can significantly affect our reserve levels and related results of operations in a positive or negative direction.
Mortality refers to the incidence of death on covered lives, which triggers contractual death benefit provisions. On our deferred annuities and life insurance products, these provisions may allow for lump sum payments, payments over a period of time, or spousal continuation of the contract. On our life-contingent immediate annuities (which includes life-contingent PRT annuities), the death of a named annuitant or certificate holder may trigger the cessation or reduction of future life-contingent payments due, depending on the presence of a joint annuitant/certificate holder and any remaining guaranteed non-life contingent payment periods. We utilize a combination of internal and industry experience when setting our mortality assumptions.
A surrender rate is the percentage of account value surrendered by the policyholder in exchange for receipt of a cash surrender value. A lapse rate is the percentage of account value canceled by us due to nonpayment of premiums required to maintain coverage on our life insurance products. We make estimates of expected full and partial surrenders of our deferred annuity products based on a combination of internal and industry experience. Management’s best estimate of surrender behavior generally represents a medium-to-long term perspective, as we expect to experience a range of policyholder behavior and market conditions period to period. If actual surrender rates are significantly different from those estimated, such differences could have a significant effect on our reserve levels and related results of operations.
Discount rates refer to the interest rates used to discount future cash flows to the current period to determine a present value. For liability for FPB reserves, the discount rate used is based on the yield curve for A-rated corporate bonds as of the valuation date. Changes in the discount rates from the at-issue or at-purchase discount rates flow through OCI.
Our aggregate reserves for contractholder funds, FPBs and MRBs on a direct and net basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2024 |
| Direct | | Deposit Asset/ Reinsurance Recoverable | | Net |
| (In millions) |
Indexed annuities | $ | 31,002 | | | $ | (861) | | | $ | 30,141 | |
Fixed rate annuities | 17,443 | | | (11,009) | | | 6,434 | |
SPIA and other | 1,673 | | | (109) | | | 1,564 | |
IUL and other life | 4,203 | | | (1,390) | | | 2,813 | |
| | | | | |
Funding agreements | 5,315 | | | — | | | 5,315 | |
PRT | 6,066 | | | — | | | 6,066 | |
Total | $ | 65,702 | | | $ | (13,369) | | | $ | 52,333 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2023 |
| Direct | | Deposit Asset/ Reinsurance Recoverable | | Net |
| (In millions) |
Indexed annuities | $ | 27,809 | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | 27,792 | |
Fixed rate annuities | 13,445 | | | (7,521) | | | 5,924 | |
SPIA and other | 1,814 | | | (115) | | | 1,699 | |
IUL and other life | 3,828 | | | (1,307) | | | 2,521 | |
| | | | | |
Funding agreements | 5,152 | | | — | | | 5,152 | |
PRT | 4,203 | | | — | | | 4,203 | |
Total | $ | 56,251 | | | $ | (8,960) | | | $ | 47,291 | |
Indexed annuities and IUL products contain an embedded derivative; a feature that permits the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity-index linked component, where interest credited to the contract is linked to the performance of various equity indices. The indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives are valued at fair value and included in the liability for Contractholder funds in our Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair value included as a component of Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
For life-contingent immediate annuity policies, gross premiums received in excess of net premiums are deferred at initial recognition as a deferred profit liability (“DPL”). Gross premiums are measured using assumptions consistent with those used in the measurement of the related liability for FPBs.
Valuation of Fixed Maturity, Preferred and Equity Securities and Derivatives
Our investments in fixed maturity securities have been designated as available-for-sale (“AFS”) and are carried at fair value, net of allowance for expected credit losses, with unrealized gains and losses included within accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) (“AOCI”), net of deferred income taxes. Our equity securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of first-in first-out cost basis and are credited or charged to income on a trade date basis.
Management’s assessment of all available data when determining fair value of the AFS securities is necessary to appropriately apply fair value accounting. Management utilizes information from independent pricing services, who take into account perceived market movements and sector news, as well as a security’s terms and conditions, including any features specific to that issue that may influence risk and marketability. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary. We generally obtain one value from our primary external pricing service. In situations where a price is not available from the independent pricing service, we may obtain broker quotes or prices from additional parties recognized to be market participants. We believe the broker quotes are prices at which trades could be executed based on historical trades executed at broker-quoted or slightly higher prices. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flows, matrix pricing or other similar techniques.
We validate external valuations at least quarterly through a combination of procedures that include the evaluation of methodologies used by the pricing services, comparisons to valuations from other independent pricing services, analytical reviews and performance analysis of the prices against trends, and maintenance of a securities watch list. See Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Note E Investments to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities is based upon valuation pricing models or independent broker quotes and represents what we would expect to receive or pay at the balance sheet date if we canceled or exercised the derivative or entered into offsetting positions. Fair values for instruments utilizing valuation pricing models are determined internally using a conventional model and market observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curve volatilities and other factors. Credit risk related to the counterparty is considered when estimating the fair values of these derivatives. However, we are largely protected by collateral arrangements with counterparties when individual counterparty exposures exceed certain thresholds. The fair value of futures contracts (specifically for indexed annuities contracts) at the balance sheet date represents the cumulative unsettled variation margin (open trade equity net of cash settlements). The fair value of an interest rate swap represents the change in projected interest rates between the reporting date and the date the interest rate swap was executed. The fair values of the embedded derivatives in our indexed annuities and IUL contracts are derived using market value of options, use of current and budgeted option cost, swap rates, mortality rates, surrender rates, partial withdrawals and non-performance spread. The discount rate used to determine the fair value of our indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivative liabilities includes an adjustment to reflect the risk that these obligations will not be fulfilled (“non-performance risk”). For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our non-performance risk adjustment was based on the expected loss due to default in debt obligations for similarly rated
financial companies. See Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Note F Derivative Financial Instruments to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
F&G cedes certain business on a coinsurance funds withheld basis. Investment results for the assets that support the coinsurance that are segregated within the funds withheld account are passed directly to the reinsurer pursuant to the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangement, which creates embedded derivatives considered to be total return swaps. These total return swaps are not clearly and closely related to the underlying insurance contract and thus require bifurcation. The fair value of the total return swaps is based on the change in fair value of the underlying assets held in the funds withheld account. For arrangements reinsuring indexed annuities products, the funds withheld account additionally contains an embedded derivative representing the index credit obligation due the reinsurer, resulting in a compound embedded derivative. These compound embedded derivatives are reported in Funds withheld for reinsurance liabilities and for all other arrangements, embedded derivatives are reported in Prepaid expenses and other assets if in a net gain position, or Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, if in a net loss position on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The related gains or losses are reported in Recognized gains and losses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. See Note O F&G Reinsurance to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We categorize our fixed maturity securities, preferred securities, equity securities and derivatives into a three-level hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity securities and equity securities by pricing source, hierarchy level and net asset value (“NAV”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2024 |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | NAV | | Total |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale and equity securities: | | (Dollars in millions) |
Prices via third-party pricing services | | $ | 1,483 | | | $ | 36,650 | | | $ | 856 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 38,989 | |
Priced via independent broker quotations | | — | | | — | | | 10,256 | | | — | | | 10,256 | |
Priced via other methods | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 57 | | | 66 | |
Total | | $ | 1,483 | | | $ | 36,650 | | | $ | 11,121 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 49,311 | |
% of Total | | 3 | % | | 74 | % | | 23 | % | | — | % | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2023 |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | NAV | | Total |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale and equity securities: | | (Dollars in millions) |
Prices via third-party pricing services | | $ | 1,012 | | | $ | 32,714 | | | $ | 895 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 34,621 | |
Priced via independent broker quotations | | — | | | — | | | 8,290 | | | — | | | 8,290 | |
Priced via other methods | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 59 | | | 68 | |
Total | | $ | 1,012 | | | $ | 32,714 | | | $ | 9,194 | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 42,979 | |
% of Total | | 2 | % | | 76 | % | | 22 | % | | — | % | | 100 | % |
Goodwill
We have made acquisitions that have resulted in a significant amount of goodwill. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, goodwill was $5,271 million and $4,830 million, respectively. The majority of our goodwill as of December 31, 2024 relates to goodwill recorded in connection with the Chicago Title merger in 2000, our initial acquisition of an ownership interest in ServiceLink in 2014 and our acquisition of F&G in 2020. Refer to Note N Goodwill to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a summary of recent changes in our Goodwill balance.
In evaluating the recoverability of goodwill, we perform a qualitative analysis at the reporting unit level to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our recorded goodwill exceeds its carrying value. Based on the results of this analysis, an annual goodwill impairment test may be completed based on an analysis of the discounted future cash flows generated by the underlying assets. The process of determining whether or not goodwill is impaired or recoverable relies on
projections of future cash flows, operating results and market conditions. Future cash flow estimates are based partly on projections of market conditions such as the volume and mix of refinance and purchase transactions and interest rates, which are beyond our control and are likely to fluctuate. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, these estimates are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from what is assumed in our impairment tests. Such analyses are particularly sensitive to changes in estimates of future cash flows and discount rates. Changes to these estimates might result in material changes in fair value and determination of the recoverability of goodwill, which may result in charges against earnings and a reduction in the carrying value of our goodwill in the future. We completed annual goodwill impairment analyses in the fourth quarter of each period presented using a September 30 measurement date. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we determined there were no events or circumstances that indicated that the carrying value exceeded the fair value.
Market Risk Benefits
MRBs are contracts or contract features that both provide protection to the contract holder from other-than-nominal capital market risk (equity, interest and foreign exchange risk) and expose the Company to other-than-nominal capital market risk. MRBs include certain contract features primarily on indexed annuities contracts that provide minimum guarantees to policyholders, such as GMDB and GMWB riders. MRBs are measured at fair value using a risk neutral valuation method, which is based on current net amounts at risk, market data, internal and industry experience, and other factors.
The principal policyholder behavior assumptions used to calculate MRBs are established at issue of the contract and include mortality, contract full and partial surrenders, and utilization of the GMWB rider benefits. The assumptions used reflect a combination of internal experience, industry experience and judgment. We review overall policyholder behavior experience at least annually and update these assumptions when deemed necessary based on additional information that becomes available. Changes in, or deviations from, the assumptions previously used can significantly affect our MRBs and related results of operations in a positive or negative direction. See Note X Market Risk Benefits to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Mortality refers to the incidence of death amongst policyholders on covered lives, which triggers contractual death benefit provisions. These provisions may allow for lump sum payments, payments over a period of time or spousal continuation of the contract. We utilize a combination of actual internal and industry experience when setting our mortality assumptions.
A surrender rate is the percentage of account value surrendered by the policyholder in exchange for receipt of a cash surrender value. We make estimates of expected full and partial surrenders of our deferred annuity products based on a combination of internal and industry experience. Management’s best estimate of surrender generally represents a medium-to-long term perspective, as we expect to experience a range of policyholder behavior and market conditions period to period. If actual surrender rates are significantly different from those estimated, such differences could have a significant effect on our MRBs and related results of operations.
We have been issuing GMWB products since 2008. We make assumptions for policyholder behavior as it relates to GMWB utilization using a higher degree of industry experience and judgment than our other behavioral assumptions because internal experience, which we review annually, is still emerging. If emerging experience deviates from our assumptions on GMWB utilization, it could have a significant effect on MRBs and related results of operations.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements, we are required to determine income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing recognition of items for income tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that deferred income tax assets will be realized and, to the extent we believe that realizability is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Determination of income tax expense requires estimates and can involve complex issues that may require an extended period to resolve. Further, the estimated level of annual pre-tax income can cause the overall effective income tax rate to vary from period to period. We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that we adequately provide for any known tax contingencies. We believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our evaluation of tax benefit realization are reasonable. Final determination of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax provisions. The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax provision, net income or cash flows in the period that determination is made.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, changes in market conditions, including changing interest rates, resulted in deferred tax assets related to the net unrealized capital losses in the Company’s investment portfolio. U.S. GAAP requires the evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the establishment of a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. When assessing the need for valuation allowance on
the unrealized capital loss deferred tax assets, we assert a tax planning strategy to hold certain underlying securities to recovery or maturity. Our ability to assert such a tax planning strategy is dependent upon factors such as the Company’s asset/liability matching process, overall investment strategy, projected future annuity product sales, and expected liquidity needs. In the event these estimates differ from our prior estimates due to the receipt of new information, we may be required to significantly change the income tax expense recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. This includes a further significant decline in value of assets incorporated into our tax planning strategies, which could lead to an increase of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets having an adverse effect on current and future results.
Refer to Note T Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for details.
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
Net Earnings. The following table presents certain financial data for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Direct title insurance premiums | | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | 1,982 | | | $ | 2,858 | |
Agency title insurance premiums | | 2,953 | | | 2,610 | | | 3,976 | |
Escrow, title-related and other fees | | 5,321 | | | 4,717 | | | 4,333 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest and investment income | | 3,124 | | | 2,607 | | | 1,891 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | 83 | | | (164) | | | (1,493) | |
Total revenues | | 13,681 | | | 11,752 | | | 11,565 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | | 3,148 | | | 2,908 | | | 3,192 | |
Agent commissions | | 2,287 | | | 2,008 | | | 3,064 | |
| | | | | | |
Other operating expenses | | 1,558 | | | 1,521 | | | 1,721 | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | | 3,791 | | | 3,553 | | | 1,126 | |
Market risk benefit (gains) losses | | (25) | | | 95 | | | (182) | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 739 | | | 593 | | | 491 | |
Provision for title claim losses | | 232 | | | 207 | | | 308 | |
Interest expense | | 209 | | | 174 | | | 115 | |
Total expenses | | 11,939 | | | 11,059 | | | 9,835 | |
Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | 1,742 | | | 693 | | | 1,730 | |
Income tax expense | | 367 | | | 192 | | | 439 | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 15 | |
Net earnings from continuing operations | | $ | 1,391 | | | $ | 518 | | | $ | 1,306 | |
Revenues.
Total revenues increased by $1,929 million in 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase was attributable to increases in direct title insurance premiums, agency title insurance premiums, escrow, title-related and other fees, interest and investment income and net recognized gains in 2024 as compared to net recognized losses in 2023. Total revenues increased by $187 million in 2023 as compared to 2022, primarily attributable to increases in escrow title-related and other fees, increases in interest and investment income and decreases in net recognized losses, partially offset by decreases in both direct and agency title insurance premiums.
See Note L Revenue Recognition to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a breakout of our consolidated revenues.
Total net earnings from continuing operations increased by $873 million in 2024 as compared to 2023, and decreased by $788 million in 2023 as compared to 2022.
The change in revenue and net earnings from our reportable segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Interest and investment income levels are primarily a function of securities markets, interest rates and the amount of cash available for investment. Interest and investment income was $3,124 million, $2,607 million and $1,891 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Recognized gains and losses, net totaled $83 million, $(164) million and $(1,493) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Recognized gains and losses, net for the year ended December 31, 2024 are primarily attributable to gains on sales of equity securities and other assets of $193 million and realized gains on derivatives of $50
million, partially offset by recognized losses on sales of fixed maturity securities of $38 million and non-cash valuation losses on equity and preferred security holdings of $117 million. Recognized gains and losses, net for the year ended December 31, 2023 are primarily attributable to losses on sales of fixed maturity securities of $166 million, losses on sales of equity and preferred securities of $104 million and losses on sales of mortgages and other assets of $75 million, partially offset by non-cash valuation gains on equity and preferred security holdings and other invested assets of $181 million. Recognized gains and losses, net for the year ended December 31, 2022 are primarily attributable to realized losses on derivatives of $515 million, losses on sales of fixed maturity securities of $282 million, losses on sales of mortgages and other assets of $80 million, losses on sales of equity and preferred securities of $31 million and non-cash valuation losses on equity and preferred security holdings of $584 million.
See Note E Investments to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a breakout of our consolidated interest and investment income and realized gains and losses.
Expenses.
Our operating expenses consist primarily of Personnel costs; Other operating expenses, which in our Title segment are incurred as orders are received and processed; Agent commissions, which are incurred as title agency revenue is recognized; and Benefits and other changes in policy reserves, which in our F&G segment are charged to earnings in the period they are earned by the policyholder based on their selected strategy. For traditional life and immediate annuities, policy benefit claims are charged to expense in the period that the claims are incurred, net of reinsurance recoveries. Title insurance premiums, escrow fees and title-related fees are generally recognized as income at the time the underlying transaction closes or other service is provided. Direct title operations revenue often lags approximately 45-60 days behind expenses, therefore; gross margins may fluctuate. The changes in the market environment, mix of business between direct and agency operations and the contributions from our various business units have historically impacted margins and net earnings. We have implemented programs and have taken necessary actions to maintain expense levels consistent with revenue streams. However, a short-term lag exists in reducing controllable fixed costs and certain fixed costs are incurred regardless of revenue levels.
Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses.
Agent commissions represent the portion of premiums retained by our third-party agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency contracts.
Benefit expenses for deferred annuity, indexed annuities and IUL policies include index credits and interest credited to contractholder account balances and benefit claims in excess of contract account balances, net of reinsurance recoveries. Other changes in policy reserves include the change in the fair value of the indexed annuities embedded derivative and the change in the reserve for secondary guarantee benefit payments. Other changes in policy reserves also include the change in reserves for life insurance products.
Other operating expenses consist primarily of facilities expenses, title plant maintenance, premium taxes (which insurance underwriters are required to pay on title premiums in lieu of franchise and other state taxes), appraisal fees and other cost of sales on ServiceLink product offerings and other title-related products, postage and courier services, computer services, professional services, travel expenses, general insurance and bad debt expense on our trade and notes receivable.
The Provision for title claim losses includes an estimate of anticipated title and title-related claims, and escrow losses.
The change in expenses attributable to our reportable segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Income tax expense was $367 million, $192 million and $439 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before income taxes was 21.1%, 27.7% and 25.4% in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively. The decrease in income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before taxes in 2024 as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to favorable movement in the valuation allowance in 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase in income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before taxes in 2023 as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to a non-recurring tax benefit in 2022 of realized capital losses carried back to 2017.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, changes in market conditions, including varying interest rates, resulted in deferred tax assets related to the net unrealized capital losses in the Company’s investment portfolio. U.S. GAAP requires the evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the establishment of a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
When assessing the need for a valuation allowance for the F&G segment on the unrealized capital loss deferred tax assets, F&G asserts a tax planning strategy to hold the vast majority of underlying securities to recovery or maturity. F&G’s ability to
assert such a tax planning strategy is dependent upon factors such as F&G’s asset/liability matching process, overall investment strategy, projected future annuity product sales, and expected liquidity needs.
In the event these estimates differ from our prior estimates due to the receipt of new information, the Company may be required to significantly change the income tax expense recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. This includes a further significant decline in value of assets incorporated into our tax planning strategies, which could lead to an increase of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets having an adverse effect on current and future results.
For further information related to income taxes, refer to Note T Income Taxes in our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Title
The following table presents the results of operations of our Title segment for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Direct title insurance premiums | | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | 1,982 | | | $ | 2,858 | |
Agency title insurance premiums | | 2,953 | | | 2,610 | | | 3,976 | |
Escrow, title-related and other fees | | 2,196 | | | 2,117 | | | 2,502 | |
Interest and investment income | | 359 | | | 338 | | | 213 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | (6) | | | (9) | | | (443) | |
Total revenues | | 7,702 | | | 7,038 | | | 9,106 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | | 2,695 | | | 2,544 | | | 2,987 | |
Agent commissions | | 2,287 | | | 2,008 | | | 3,064 | |
Other operating expenses | | 1,251 | | | 1,242 | | | 1,515 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 141 | | | 154 | | | 142 | |
Provision for title claim losses | | 232 | | | 207 | | | 308 | |
Interest expense | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total expenses | | 6,606 | | | 6,155 | | | 8,016 | |
Earnings from continuing operations, before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | $ | 1,096 | | | $ | 883 | | | $ | 1,090 | |
Orders opened by direct title operations (in thousands) | | 1,310 | | | 1,230 | | | 1,594 | |
Orders closed by direct title operations (in thousands) | | 879 | | | 837 | | | 1,222 | |
Fee per file by direct title operations (in dollars) | | $ | 3,742 | | | $ | 3,617 | | | $ | 3,381 | |
Total revenues for the Title segment increased by $664 million, or 9%, in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023. Total revenues for the Title segment decreased by $2,068 million, or 23%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to increases in both our direct and agency title insurance premiums, increases in escrow, title-related and other fees, increases in interest and investment income and a decrease in non-cash valuation losses on our equity and preferred investment holdings. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to decreases in both our direct and agency title insurance premiums and decreases in escrow, title-related and other fees, partially offset by an increase in interest and investment income and a decrease in non-cash valuation losses on our equity and preferred investment holdings.
The following table presents the percentages of title insurance premiums generated by our direct and agency operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % |
| | | | | | (Dollars in millions) | | | | |
Title premiums from direct operations | | $ | 2,200 | | | 42.7 | % | | $ | 1,982 | | | 43.2 | % | | $ | 2,858 | | | 41.8 | % |
Title premiums from agency operations | | 2,953 | | | 57.3 | | | 2,610 | | | 56.8 | | | 3,976 | | | 58.2 | |
Total title premiums | | $ | 5,153 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,592 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 6,834 | | | 100.0 | % |
Title premiums increased by 12% in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in Title premiums from direct operations of $218 million, or 11%, and a increase in Title premiums from agency operations of $343 million, or 13%. Title premiums decreased by 33% in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in Title premiums from direct operations of $876 million, or 31%, and a decrease in Title premiums from agency operations of $1,366 million, or 34%.
The following table presents the percentages of opened and closed title insurance orders generated by purchase and refinance transactions by our direct operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Opened title insurance orders from purchase transactions (1) | | 76.1 | % | | 78.9 | % | | 71.1 | % |
Opened title insurance orders from refinance transactions (1) | | 23.9 | | | 21.1 | | | 28.9 | |
| | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
Closed title insurance orders from purchase transactions (1) | | 77.5 | % | | 79.8 | % | | 67.9 | % |
Closed title insurance orders from refinance transactions (1) | | 22.5 | | | 20.2 | | | 32.1 | |
| | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
_______________________________________
(1) Percentages exclude consideration of an immaterial number of non-purchase and non-refinance orders.
Title premiums from direct operations increased in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023. Title premiums from direct operations decreased in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in total closed order volume from purchase and refinance transactions, and an increase in fee per file. The decreases in closed our volume are primarily attributable to closed orders from refinance transactions. Title premiums from direct operations decreased in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in total closed order volume, partially offset by an increase in fee-per-file. The decrease in closed order volume is primarily attributable to closed orders from refinance transactions. The residential refinance market has considerably lower fees per closed order than commercial or residential purchase transactions.
We experienced an increase in closed title insurance order volumes from both purchase and refinance transactions in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023. Total closed order volumes were 879,000 in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 837,000 in the year ended December 31, 2023, an overall increase of 5%. Total closed order volumes from refinance transactions, which have a lower fee per file than purchase transactions, were 183,000 in the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 156,000 in the year ended December 31, 2023, an overall increase of 17%. Total closed order volumes were 837,000 in the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 1,222,000 in the year ended December 31, 2022, an overall decrease of 32%. Total closed order volumes from refinance transactions were 156,000 in the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 369,000 in the year ended December 31, 2022, an overall decrease of 57%. The decreases in both purchase and refinance transactions in 2024 and 2023 are primarily attributable to higher average mortgage interest rates in 2024 and 2023 as compared to 2022.
Total opened title insurance order volumes increased in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase was attributable to increases in both opened title orders from purchase transactions and refinance transactions. Total opened title insurance order volumes decreased in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The decrease was attributable to decreases in both opened title orders from purchase transactions and refinance transactions.
The average fee per file in our direct operations was $3,742 in the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $3,617 in the year ended December 31, 2023. The average fee per file in our direct operations was $3,617 in the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $3,381 in the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in average fee per file in 2024 and 2023 as
compared to 2022 reflects an increased proportion of purchase transactions relative to total closed orders and a stable commercial market. The fee per file tends to change as the mix of refinance and purchase transactions changes, because purchase transactions involve the issuance of both a lender’s policy and an owner’s policy, resulting in higher fees, whereas refinance transactions only require a lender’s policy, resulting in lower fees.
Title premiums from agency operations increased $343 million, or 13%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, and decreased $1,366 million, or 34%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The current trends in the agency business reflect a softening residential purchase environment in many markets throughout the country and a dramatic decline in residential refinance transactions, consistent with trends in the direct business.
Escrow, title-related and other fees increased by $79 million, or 4%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, and decreased by $385 million, or 15%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. Escrow fees, which are more closely related to our direct operations, increased by $58 million, or 8%, in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023, and decreased $214 million, or 22%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 were relatively consistent with the increase in direct premiums. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared 2022 was primarily due to the decreases in closed order volume including declines in residential refinance volume. Other fees in the Title segment, excluding escrow fees, increased by $21 million, or 2%, in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023, and decreased $172 million, or 11%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The increase in Other fees in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 was attributable to various immaterial items. The decrease in Other fees in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022 was primarily driven by decreases in revenues related to our ServiceLink and home warranty businesses and various other immaterial items. The change in both escrow fees and other fees is directionally consistent with the change in title premiums from direct operations in 2024 and 2023.
Interest and investment income levels are primarily a function of securities markets, interest rates and the amount of cash available for investment. Interest and investment income increased $21 million, or 6%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, and increased $125 million, or 59%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 was attributable to various immaterial items. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022 was primarily attributable to increased income from our tax-deferred property exchange business and higher yields on fixed maturity securities and short-term investments.
Recognized net losses were $6 million, $9 million and $443 million in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The variability in recognized gains and losses, net is primarily attributable to fluctuations in non-cash valuation changes on our equity and preferred security holdings in addition to various other individually immaterial items.
Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. Personnel costs increased $151 million, or 6%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, and decreased $443 million, or 15% in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to inflationary salary increases and increased variable costs from a modest increase in revenue and earnings. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to the decrease in average headcount in 2023 associated with the decline in closed order volume and decreases in bonuses and commissions associated with the declines in revenue and profitability. Personnel costs as a percentage of total revenues from direct title premiums and escrow, title-related and other fees were 61%, 62% and 56% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Average employee count in the Title segment was 21,206, 21,398 and 25,157 in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Other operating expenses increased by $9 million, or 1%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, and decreased $273 million, or 18%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue excluding agency premiums, interest and investment income and recognized gains and losses were 28%, 30% and 28% in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Agent commissions represent the portion of premiums retained by agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency contracts. Agent commissions and the resulting percentage of agent premiums that we retain vary according to regional differences in real estate closing practices and state regulations.
The following table illustrates the relationship of agent premiums and agent commissions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % | | Amount | | % |
| | | | | | (Dollars in millions) | | | | |
Agent premiums | | $ | 2,953 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,610 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 3,976 | | | 100.0 | % |
Agent commissions | | 2,287 | | | 77.4 | | | 2,008 | | | 76.9 | | | 3,064 | | | 77.1 | |
Net retained agent premiums | | $ | 666 | | | 22.6 | % | | $ | 602 | | | 23.1 | % | | $ | 912 | | | 22.9 | % |
The claim loss provision for title insurance was $232 million, $207 million and $308 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively. The provision reflects a provision rate of 4.5% of title premiums in all periods. We continually monitor and evaluate our loss provision level, actual claims paid, and the loss reserve position each quarter. This loss provision rate is set to provide for losses on current year policies, but due to development of prior years and our long claim duration, it periodically includes amounts of estimated adverse or positive development on prior years' policies.
F&G
Segment Overview
Through our majority owned F&G subsidiary, which we acquired on June 1, 2020, we provide our principal annuity and life insurance products through the insurance subsidiaries composing our F&G segment, FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance. Our customers range across a variety of age groups and are concentrated in the middle-income market. Our indexed annuities products provide for pre-retirement wealth accumulation and post-retirement income management. Our IUL products provide wealth protection and transfer opportunities. Life and annuity products are primarily distributed through IMOs and independent insurance agents, and beginning in 2020, independent broker dealers and banks. Additionally, we provide funding agreements and PRT solutions to various institutions through consultants and brokers.
In setting the features and pricing of our flagship indexed annuity products relative to our targeted net margin, we take into account our expectations regarding (1) the difference between the net investment income we earn and the sum of the interest credited to policyholders and the cost of hedging our risk on the policies; (2) fees, including surrender charges and rider fees, partly offset by vesting bonuses that we pay our policyholders; and (3) a number of related expenses, including benefits and changes in reserves, acquisition costs, and general and administrative expenses.
Key Components of Our Historical Results of Operations
Through our insurance subsidiaries, we issue a broad portfolio of deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), IUL insurance, immediate annuities, funding agreements and PRT solutions. A deferred annuity is a type of contract that accumulates value on a tax deferred basis and typically begins making specified periodic or lump sum payments a certain number of years after the contract has been issued. IUL insurance is a complementary type of contract that accumulates value in a cash value account and provides a payment to designated beneficiaries upon the policyholder’s death. An immediate annuity is a type of contract that begins making specified payments within one annuity period (e.g., one month or one year) and typically makes payments of principal and interest earnings over a period of time. As defined by the Iowa Insurance Division, a funding agreement is an agreement for an insurer to accept and accumulate funds and to make one or more payments at future dates in amounts that are not based on mortality or morbidity contingencies of the person to whom the funding agreement is issued. In essence, funding agreement providers issue fixed maturity contracts with fixed or floating interest rates in exchange for a single upfront premium. Our PRT products are comparable to income annuities, as we generally receive a single, upfront premium in exchange for paying a guaranteed stream of future income payments which are typically fixed in nature but may vary in duration based on participant mortality experience.
Under GAAP, premium collections for deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), immediate annuities and PRT without life contingency, and deposits received for funding agreements are reported in the financial statements as deposit liabilities (i.e., contractholder funds) instead of as sales or revenues. Similarly, cash payments to customers are reported as decreases in the liability for contractholder funds and not as expenses. Sources of revenues for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are net investment income, surrender charges, cost of insurance and other charges deducted from contractholder funds (i.e., amortization of URL), and net realized gains (losses) on investments. Components of expenses for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are interest-sensitive and index product benefits (primarily interest credited to account balances or the hedging cost of providing index credits to the policyholder), amortization of VOBA, DAC and DSI, and other operating costs and expenses.
F&G hedges certain portions of its exposure to product related equity market risk by entering into derivative transactions. We purchase derivatives consisting predominantly of equity options and, to a lesser degree, futures contracts (specifically for indexed annuity contracts) on the equity indices underlying the applicable policy. These derivatives are used to offset the reserve impact of the index credits due to policyholders under the indexed annuity and IUL contracts. The majority of all such equity options are one-year options purchased to match the funding requirements underlying the indexed annuity/IUL contracts. We attempt to manage the cost of these purchases through the terms of our indexed annuity/IUL contracts, which permit us to change caps, spread, or participation rates on each policy's annual anniversary, subject to certain guaranteed minimums that must be maintained. The equity options and futures contracts are marked to fair value with the change in fair value included as a component of net investment gains (losses). The change in fair value of the equity options and futures contracts includes the gains and losses recognized at the expiration of the instruments’ terms or upon early termination and the changes in fair value of open positions. In addition, to reduce market risks from interest rate changes on our earnings associated with our floating rate investments, during 2023 we began to execute pay-float and receive-fixed interest rate swaps.
Market risk benefits (“MRBs”) are contracts or contract features that both provide protection to the contract holder from other-than-nominal capital market risk (equity, interest and foreign exchange risk) and expose the Company to other-than-nominal capital market risk. MRBs (inclusive of reinsured MRBs) are measured at fair value using a risk neutral valuation method, which is based on current net amounts at risk, market data, internal and industry experience, and other factors. The change in fair value of MRBs generally reflects impacts from actual policyholder behavior (including surrenders of the benefit), changes in interest rates, and changes in equity market returns. Generally higher interest rates and equity returns result in gains whereas lower interest rates and equity returns result in losses. Reinsured MRBs are valued using a methodology consistent with direct MRBs, with the exception of the non-performance spread which reflects the credit of the reinsurer.
Earnings from products accounted for as deposit liabilities are primarily generated from the excess of net investment income earned over the sum of interest credited to policyholders and the cost of hedging our risk on indexed annuity/IUL policies, which includes the expenses incurred to fund the index credit with respect to indexed annuities/IULs. Proceeds received upon expiration or early termination of equity options purchased to fund annual index credits are recorded as part of the change in fair value of derivatives and are largely offset by an expense for index credits earned on annuity contractholder fund balances.
F&G Results of Operations
The results of operations of our F&G segment for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Revenues | | (In millions) |
Life insurance premiums and other fees | | $ | 2,860 | | | $ | 2,413 | | | $ | 1,704 | |
Interest and investment income | | 2,719 | | | 2,211 | | | 1,655 | |
Owned distribution revenues | | 81 | | | — | | | — | |
Recognized gains and (losses), net | | 84 | | | (124) | | | (1,010) | |
Total revenues | | 5,744 | | | 4,500 | | | 2,349 | |
Benefits and expenses | | | | | | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | | 3,791 | | | 3,553 | | | 1,126 | |
Market risk benefit (gains) losses | | (25) | | | 95 | | | (182) | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 569 | | | 412 | | | 324 | |
Personnel costs | | 296 | | | 232 | | | 157 | |
Other operating expenses | | 203 | | | 146 | | | 102 | |
Interest expense | | 132 | | | 97 | | | 29 | |
Total benefits and expenses | | 4,966 | | | 4,535 | | | 1,556 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | $ | 778 | | | $ | (35) | | | $ | 793 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Revenues
Life insurance premiums and other fees
Life insurance premiums and other fees primarily reflect premiums on life-contingent PRTs and traditional life insurance products, which are recognized as revenue when due from the policyholder, as well as policy rider fees primarily on indexed annuity policies, the cost of insurance on IUL policies and surrender charges assessed against policy withdrawals in excess of the policyholder's allowable penalty-free amounts (up to 10% of the prior year's value, subject to certain limitations). The following table summarizes the Life insurance premiums and other fees, on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Life-contingent pension risk transfer premiums | $ | 2,217 | | | $ | 1,964 | | | $ | 1,362 | |
Traditional life insurance and life-contingent immediate annuity premiums | 35 | | | 43 | | | 33 | |
| | | | | |
Surrender charges | 268 | | | 103 | | | 58 | |
Policyholder fees and other income | 340 | | | 303 | | | 251 | |
Life insurance premiums and other fees | $ | 2,860 | | | $ | 2,413 | | | $ | 1,704 | |
| | | | | |
•Life-contingent pension risk transfer premiums increased for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, reflecting the timing of PRT transactions. As noted above, PRT premiums are subject to fluctuation period to period.
•Surrender charges increased for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, primarily reflecting increases in withdrawals from policyholders with surrender charges and market value adjustments (“MVAs”), primarily on our indexed annuities policies. The increase in termination activity is primarily due to the higher interest rate environment. See “Item 1. Business – The Products We Offer – Withdrawal Option for Deferred Annuities,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion on surrender charges and MVAs.
•Policyholder fees and other income increased for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, primarily due to increased cost of insurance charges, net of changes in unearned revenue liabilities (“URL”) on IUL policies from growth in business and higher guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) rider fees. GMWB rider fees are based on the policyholder's benefit base and are collected at the end of the policy year.
Interest and investment income
Below is a summary of interest and investment income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale | $ | 2,181 | | | $ | 1,843 | | | $ | 1,431 | |
Equity securities | 21 | | | 20 | | | 17 | |
Preferred securities | 23 | | | 41 | | | 49 | |
Mortgage loans | 273 | | | 229 | | | 186 | |
Invested cash and short-term investments | 161 | | | 76 | | | 33 | |
Limited partnerships | 323 | | | 229 | | | 110 | |
Other investments | 32 | | | 27 | | | 20 | |
Gross investment income | 3,014 | | | 2,465 | | | 1,846 | |
Investment expense | (295) | | | (254) | | | (191) | |
Interest and investment income | $ | 2,719 | | | $ | 2,211 | | | $ | 1,655 | |
Interest and investment income is shown net of amounts attributable to certain funds withheld reinsurance agreements which is passed along to the reinsurer in accordance with the terms of these agreements. Interest and investment income attributable to these agreements, and thus excluded from the totals in the table above, was $636 million, $339 million and $109 million, for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Recognized gains and losses, net
Below is a summary of the major components included in recognized gains and losses, net for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, equity securities and other invested assets | $ | 76 | | | $ | (111) | | | $ | (461) | |
Change in allowance for expected credit losses | (34) | | | (37) | | | (34) | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on certain derivatives instruments | 70 | | | 147 | | | (857) | |
Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivatives | (32) | | | (128) | | | 352 | |
Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives | 4 | | | 5 | | | (10) | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | $ | 84 | | | $ | (124) | | | $ | (1,010) | |
Recognized gains and losses, net is shown net of amounts attributable to certain funds withheld reinsurance agreements which is passed along to the reinsurer in accordance with the terms of these agreements. Recognized gains and (losses) attributable to these agreements, and thus excluded from the totals in the table above, was $(30) million, $(123) million and $381 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
•For the year ended December 31, 2024, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, equity securities and other invested assets is primarily the result of unrealized fair value option gains on owned distribution investments and mark-to-market gains on our preferred and equity securities.
•For the year ended December 31, 2023, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, equity securities and other invested assets is primarily the result of realized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, partially offset by mark-to-market gains on our equity securities and realized gains on other invested assets.
•For the year ended December 31, 2022, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, equity securities and other invested assets is primarily the result of realized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities and mark-to-market losses on our equity securities.
•For all periods, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments primarily relate to the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on equity options and futures used to hedge indexed annuity and IUL products, including gains on option and futures expiration and changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps. See the table below for primary drivers of gains (losses) on certain derivatives.
•The fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative is based on the change in fair value of the underlying assets held in the funds withheld (“FWH”) portfolio.
We utilize a combination of static (equity options) and dynamic (long futures contracts) instruments in our product hedging strategy. Equity options and futures contracts are generally based upon the performance of various equity indices, such as the S&P 500 Index, as well as other bond and gold market indices.
We utilize interest rate swaps to reduce market risks from interest rate changes on our earnings associated with our floating rate investments.
The components of the realized and unrealized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments hedging our indexed annuities, universal life products and floating rate investments are summarized in the table below for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Equity options: | | | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | $ | 220 | | | $ | (216) | | | $ | (170) | |
Change in unrealized (losses) gains | (75) | | | 308 | | | (692) | |
Futures contracts: | | | | | |
Gains (losses) on futures contracts expiration | 24 | | | 7 | | | (6) | |
Change in unrealized (losses) gains | (6) | | | 2 | | | (1) | |
Interest rate swap (losses) gains | (103) | | | 48 | | | — | |
Other derivative investments | | | | | |
Gains (losses) on other derivative investments | 10 | | | (2) | | | 12 | |
Total net change in fair value | $ | 70 | | | $ | 147 | | | $ | (857) | |
| | | | | |
Annual Point-to-Point Change in S&P 500 Index during the periods | 23 | % | | 24 | % | | (19) | % |
Secured Overnight Financing Rates | 4.49 | % | | 5.38 | % | | 4.30 | % |
•Realized gains and (losses) on certain derivative instruments are directly correlated to the performance of the indices upon which the equity options and futures contracts are based and the value of the derivatives at the time of expiration compared to the value at the time of purchase.
•The changes in unrealized gains (losses) due to the net changes in fair value of equity options and futures contracts are driven by the underlying performance of the indices, such as the S&P 500 Index, upon which the equity options and futures contracts are based during each respective period relative to the respective indices on the policyholder buy dates.
•The net change in fair value of the interest rate swaps was primarily driven by fluctuations in the interest rate index underlying the swap contracts.
The average index credits to policyholders are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Average Crediting Rate | 4 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
S&P 500 Index: | | | | | |
Point-to-point strategy | 4 | % | | 2 | % | | 1 | % |
Monthly average strategy | 3 | % | | 1 | % | | 2 | % |
Monthly point-to-point strategy | 5 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
3 year high water mark | 3 | % | | 8 | % | | 13 | % |
•Actual amounts credited to contractholder fund balances may differ from the index appreciation due to contractual features in the indexed annuity contracts and certain IUL contracts (caps, spreads and participation rates), which allow us to manage the cost of the options purchased to fund the annual index credits.
•The credits for the periods presented were based on comparing the S&P 500 Index on each issue date in the period to the same issue date in the respective prior year periods.
Benefits and expenses
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
Below is a summary of the major components included in Benefits and other changes in policy reserves:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
PRT agreements | $ | 2,310 | | | $ | 2,016 | | | $ | 1,399 | |
Indexed annuities/IUL market related liability movements | (221) | | | 588 | | | (1,010) | |
Index credits, interest credited and bonuses | 1,696 | | | 831 | | | 593 | |
Other changes in policy reserves | 6 | | | 118 | | | 144 | |
Total benefits and other changes in policy reserves | $ | 3,791 | | | $ | 3,553 | | | $ | 1,126 | |
•PRT agreements increased for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, reflecting the timing of PRT transactions. PRT transactions are subject to fluctuation period to period.
•The indexed annuities/IUL market related liability movements for all periods presented are mainly driven by changes in the equity markets, non-performance spreads, and risk-free rates during the respective periods. The change in risk free rates and non-performance spreads (decreased) increased the indexed annuities market related liability by approximately $(203) million, $106 million and $(656) million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The remaining changes in market value of the market related liability movements for all periods were primarily driven by equity market impacts. See “Revenues — Recognized gains and losses, net” above for summary and discussion of net unrealized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments.
•Annually, typically in the third quarter, we review assumptions associated with reserves for policy benefits and product guarantees.
•During the third quarter of 2024 and for the year ended December 31, 2024, based on policyholder behavior, experience and interest rate movements, we reflected updates to surrender assumptions for recent and expected near term policyholder behavior, as well as updated certain FIA assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds. These changes resulted in decreases in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $89 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
•During the third quarter and for the year ended December 31, 2023, based on increases in interest rates and pricing changes, we updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds and also aligned reserves to actual policyholder behavior. These changes, taken together, resulted in an increase in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $73 million.
•During the fourth quarter of 2022, based on increases in interest rates and pricing changes during 2022, we updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds and the fair value of market risk benefits. These changes, taken together, resulted in an increase in contractholder funds and market risk benefits of approximately $99 million.
•Index credits, interest credited and bonuses were higher for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, primarily reflecting higher index credits and interest credited on indexed annuities and other policies as a result of market movement during the respective periods and higher interest credited associated with the growth in PRT agreements.
Market risk benefit (gains) losses
Below is a summary of market risk benefit (gains) losses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Market risk benefit (gains) losses | $ | (25) | | | $ | 95 | | | $ | (182) | |
•Market risk benefit (gains) losses is primarily driven by issuances, attributed fees collected, effects of market related movements (including changes in equity markets and risk-free rates), actual policyholder behavior as compared with expected, changes in assumptions during the periods. Market risk benefit (gains) losses are reported net of reinsurance, reflecting an amended reinsurance agreement effective during the year ended December 31, 2024.
•Changes in market risk benefit (gains) losses for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily reflect more favorable market related movements and favorable actual policyholder behavior as compared to expected.
▪Changes in market risk benefit (gains) losses for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily reflect less favorable market related movements, a favorable GMWB utilization assumption change in 2022 (that did not recur in 2023) and higher attributed fees. These changes were partially offset by actual policyholder behavior for the year ended December 31, 2023 being more in line with expected, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, resulting in a favorable change to the market risk benefit (gains) losses.
Depreciation and amortization
Below is a summary of the major components included in depreciation and amortization:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Amortization of DAC, VOBA and DSI | $ | 495 | | | $ | 382 | | | $ | 300 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Amortization of other intangible assets and fixed asset depreciation | 74 | | | 30 | | | 24 | |
Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 569 | | | $ | 412 | | | $ | 324 | |
•DAC, VOBA and DSI are amortized on a constant level basis for the grouped contracts over the expected term of the related contracts to approximate straight-line amortization. Amortization of DAC, VOBA and DSI increased for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, primarily reflecting increased DAC and DSI associated with the growth of the business. In addition, as a result of our annual actuarial assumption update process, amortization rates on some DAC and DSI balances increased primarily for indexed annuities. Amortization of VOBA also increased approximately $15 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting other actuarial model updates and refinements.
•Amortization of other intangible assets and fixed asset depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2024 included amortization of other intangible assets from our majority owned interests in Roar Joint Venture, LLC ("Roar") and PALH, LLC ("PALH").
Personnel costs and other operating expenses
Below is a summary of personnel costs and other operating expenses:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Personnel costs | $ | 296 | | | $ | 232 | | | $ | 157 | |
Other operating expenses | 203 | | | 146 | | | 102 | |
Total personnel costs and other operating expenses | $ | 499 | | | $ | 378 | | | $ | 259 | |
•Personnel costs and other operating expenses increased for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, reflecting costs in line with the growth in sales and assets along with continued investments in our operating platform. In addition, the year ended December 31, 2024 includes $39 million from our majority owned interests in Roar and
PALH, $26 million related to the change in fair value of contingent consideration and $19 million of guaranty fund assessments.
Investment Portfolio
The types of assets in which we may invest are influenced by various state laws, which prescribe qualified investment assets applicable to insurance companies. Within the parameters of these laws, we invest in assets giving consideration to four primary investment objectives: (i) maintain robust absolute returns; (ii) provide reliable yield and investment income; (iii) preserve capital and (iv) provide liquidity to meet policyholder and other corporate obligations.
Our investment portfolio is designed to contribute stable earnings, excluding short-term mark-to-market effects, and balance risk across diverse asset classes and is primarily invested in high quality fixed income securities.
As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, the fair value of our investment portfolio was approximately $60 billion and $52 billion, respectively, and was divided among the following asset classes and sectors:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | |
| Fair Value | | Percent | | Fair Value | | Percent | | | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | | | | |
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States Government full faith and credit | $ | 158 | | | — | % | | $ | 261 | | | 1 | % | | | | |
United States Government sponsored entities | 95 | | | — | % | | 31 | | | — | % | | | | |
United States municipalities, states and territories | 1,346 | | | 2 | % | | 1,567 | | | 3 | % | | | | |
Foreign Governments | 186 | | | — | % | | 226 | | | — | % | | | | |
Corporate securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Finance, insurance and real estate | 8,611 | | | 14 | % | | 6,895 | | | 13 | % | | | | |
Manufacturing, construction and mining | 1,139 | | | 2 | % | | 947 | | | 2 | % | | | | |
Utilities, energy and related sectors | 2,971 | | | 5 | % | | 2,374 | | | 5 | % | | | | |
Wholesale/retail trade | 3,210 | | | 5 | % | | 2,433 | | | 5 | % | | | | |
Services, media and other | 4,547 | | | 8 | % | | 3,930 | | | 8 | % | | | | |
Hybrid securities | 581 | | | 1 | % | | 618 | | | 1 | % | | | | |
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities | 2,693 | | | 5 | % | | 2,393 | | | 5 | % | | | | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 5,131 | | | 9 | % | | 4,410 | | | 9 | % | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | 10,270 | | | 17 | % | | 8,929 | | | 17 | % | | | | |
Collateral loan obligations | 5,379 | | | 9 | % | | 5,405 | | | 10 | % | | | | |
Total fixed maturity available for sale securities | $ | 46,317 | | | 77 | % | | $ | 40,419 | | | 79 | % | | | | |
Equity securities (a) | 415 | | | 1 | % | | 606 | | | 1 | % | | | | |
Limited partnerships: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Private equity | 1,830 | | | 3 | % | | 1,277 | | | 2 | % | | | | |
Real assets | 437 | | | 1 | % | | 463 | | | 1 | % | | | | |
Credit | 1,021 | | | 2 | % | | 1,039 | | | 2 | % | | | | |
Limited partnerships | $ | 3,288 | | | 6 | % | | $ | 2,779 | | | 5 | % | | | | |
Commercial mortgage loans | 2,404 | | | 4 | % | | 2,253 | | | 4 | % | | | | |
Residential mortgage loans | 2,916 | | | 5 | % | | 2,545 | | | 5 | % | | | | |
Other (primarily derivatives, company owned life insurance and unconsolidated owned distribution investments) | 1,753 | | | 3 | % | | 1,697 | | | 3 | % | | | | |
Short term investments | 2,410 | | | 4 | % | | 1,452 | | | 3 | % | | | | |
Total investments | $ | 59,503 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 51,751 | | | 100 | % | | | | |
(a) Includes investment grade non-redeemable preferred stocks ($222 million and $428 million at December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively).
Insurance statutes regulate the type of investments that our life insurance subsidiaries are permitted to make and limit the amount of funds that may be used for any one type of investment. In light of these statutes and regulations, and our business and investment strategy, we generally seek to invest in primarily high-grade fixed-income assets across a wide range of sectors, including Corporate securities, U.S. Government and government-sponsored agency securities, and Structured securities, among others.
The NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office (“SVO”) is responsible for the day-to-day credit quality assessment and valuation of securities owned by state regulated insurance companies. Insurance companies report ownership of securities to the SVO when such securities are eligible for regulatory filings. The SVO conducts credit analysis on these securities for the purpose of assigning an NAIC designation or unit price. Typically, if a security has been rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”), the SVO utilizes that rating and assigns an NAIC designation based upon the NAIC published comparison of NRSRO ratings to NAIC designations.
The NAIC determines ratings for non-agency Residential Mortgage-backed Securities (“RMBS”) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) using modeling that estimates security level expected losses under a variety of economic scenarios. For such assets issued prior to January 1, 2013, an insurer’s amortized cost basis in applicable assets can impact the assigned rating. In the tables below, we present the rating of structured securities based on ratings from the NAIC rating methodologies described above (which in some cases do not correspond to rating agency designations). All NAIC designations (e.g., NAIC 1-6) are based on the NAIC methodologies.
The following table summarizes the credit quality by NRSRO rating, or NAIC designation equivalent, of our fixed income portfolio (dollars in millions) at December 31, 2024, and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | | | |
NRSRO Rating | NAIC Designation | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Fair Value Percent | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Fair Value Percent | | | | | | | | |
AAA/AA/A | 1 | $ | 31,258 | | | $ | 29,174 | | | 63 | % | | $ | 28,052 | | | $ | 26,170 | | | 65 | % | | | | | | | | |
BBB | 2 | 16,254 | | | 15,082 | | | 33 | % | | 13,421 | | | 12,302 | | | 30 | % | | | | | | | | |
BB | 3 | 1,591 | | | 1,538 | | | 3 | % | | 1,633 | | | 1,554 | | | 4 | % | | | | | | | | |
B | 4 | 375 | | | 353 | | | 1 | % | | 268 | | | 215 | | | 1 | % | | | | | | | | |
CCC | 5 | 100 | | | 68 | | | — | % | | 103 | | | 72 | | | — | % | | | | | | | | |
CC and lower | 6 | 151 | | | 102 | | | — | % | | 124 | | | 106 | | | — | % | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 49,729 | | | $ | 46,317 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 43,601 | | | $ | 40,419 | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Concentrations
The tables below present the top ten structured security and industry categories of our fixed maturity and equity securities including the fair value and percent of total fixed maturity and equity securities fair value as of December 31, 2024, and 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 |
Top 10 Concentrations | | Fair Value (In millions) | | Percent of Total Fair Value |
ABS other | | $ | 10,270 | | | 22 | % |
CLO securities | | 5,379 | | | 11 | % |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | 5,131 | | | 11 | % |
Diversified financial services | | 4,271 | | | 9 | % |
Whole loan collateralized mortgage obligation | | 2,635 | | | 6 | % |
Banking | | 1,988 | | | 4 | % |
Insurance | | 1,761 | | | 4 | % |
Municipal | | 1,363 | | | 3 | % |
Electric | | 1,229 | | | 3 | % |
Pharmaceuticals | | 738 | | | 1 | % |
Total | | $ | 34,765 | | | 74 | % |
| | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 |
Top 10 Concentrations | | Fair Value (In millions) | | Percent of Total Fair Value |
ABS other | | $ | 8,929 | | | 22 | % |
CLO securities | | 5,405 | | | 13 | % |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | 4,410 | | | 11 | % |
Diversified financial services | | 3,272 | | | 8 | % |
Banking | | 2,048 | | | 5 | % |
Whole loan collateralized mortgage obligation | | 2,043 | | | 5 | % |
Municipal | | 1,600 | | | 4 | % |
Insurance | | 1,567 | | | 4 | % |
Electric | | 1,086 | | | 3 | % |
Telecommunications | | 696 | | | 2 | % |
Total | | $ | 31,056 | | | 77 | % |
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities by contractual maturities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | | | | | | | |
Corporate, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal, Foreign and U.S. Government securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due in one year or less | $ | 525 | | | $ | 524 | | | $ | 383 | | | $ | 374 | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one year through five years | 3,634 | | | 3,589 | | | 3,207 | | | 3,129 | | | | | | | | | |
Due after five years through ten years | 4,930 | | | 4,756 | | | 2,822 | | | 2,680 | | | | | | | | | |
Due after ten years | 16,675 | | | 13,880 | | | 15,333 | | | 13,068 | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | $ | 25,764 | | | $ | 22,749 | | | $ | 21,745 | | | $ | 19,251 | | | | | | | | | |
Other securities, which provide for periodic payments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 15,777 | | | $ | 15,649 | | | $ | 14,623 | | | $ | 14,334 | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 5,327 | | | 5,131 | | | 4,732 | | | 4,410 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 2,861 | | | 2,788 | | | 2,501 | | | 2,424 | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | $ | 23,965 | | | $ | 23,568 | | | $ | 21,856 | | | $ | 21,168 | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities | $ | 49,729 | | | $ | 46,317 | | | $ | 43,601 | | | $ | 40,419 | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Agency RMBS Exposure
Our investment in non-agency RMBS securities is predicated on the conservative and adequate cushion between purchase price and NAIC 1 rating, general lack of sensitivity to interest rates, positive convexity to prepayment rates and correlation between the price of the securities and the unfolding recovery of the housing market.
The fair value of our investments in subprime securities and Alt-A RMBS securities were $29 million and $44 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively, and $33 million and $49 million as of December 31, 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, approximately 93% and 95%, respectively, of the subprime and Alt-A RMBS exposures were rated NAIC 2 or higher.
ABS and CLO Exposures
Our ABS exposures are largely diversified by underlying collateral and issuer type. Our CLO exposures are generally senior tranches of CLOs which have leveraged loans as their underlying collateral.
As of December 31, 2024, the CLO and ABS positions were trading at a net unrealized gain position of $92 million and a net unrealized loss of $207 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, the CLO and ABS positions were trading at a net unrealized gain position of $65 million and a net unrealized loss position of $344 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the credit quality by NRSRO rating, or NAIC designation equivalent, of our AFS ABS portfolio (dollars in millions) at December 31, 2024, and 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | | December 31, 2023 |
| | Fair Value | | Percent | | | Fair Value | | Percent |
NRSRO Rating | NAIC Designation | | | | | | | | |
AAA/AA/A | 1 | $ | 7,963 | | | 78% | | | $ | 7,023 | | | 79% |
BBB | 2 | 1,633 | | 16% | | | 1,375 | | 15% |
BB | 3 | 445 | | 4% | | | 418 | | 5% |
B | 4 | 183 | | 2% | | | 59 | | 1% |
CCC | 5 | 8 | | —% | | | 13 | | —% |
CC and lower | 6 | 38 | | —% | | | 41 | | —% |
Total | | $ | 10,270 | | | 100% | | | $ | 8,929 | | | 100% |
The following table summarizes the credit quality by NRSRO rating, or NAIC designation equivalent, of our AFS CLO portfolio (dollars in millions) at December 31, 2024, and 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | | December 31, 2023 |
| | Fair Value | | Percent | | | Fair Value | | Percent |
NRSRO Rating | NAIC Designation | | | | | | | | |
AAA/AA/A | 1 | $ | 3,411 | | | 63% | | | $ | 3,288 | | | 61% |
BBB | 2 | 1,396 | | 26% | | | 1,582 | | 29% |
BB | 3 | 524 | | 10% | | | 480 | | 9% |
B | 4 | 10 | | —% | | | 17 | | —% |
CCC | 5 | — | | —% | | | — | | | —% |
CC and lower | 6 | 38 | | 1% | | | 38 | | 1% |
Total | | $ | 5,379 | | | 100% | | | $ | 5,405 | | | 100% |
Municipal Bond Exposure
The following table summarizes our municipal bond exposure as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | | | |
| | | | | |
General obligation bonds | $ | 247 | | | $ | 205 | | | $ | 269 | | | $ | 232 | | | | | |
Special revenue bonds | 1,329 | | | 1,128 | | | 1,507 | | | 1,335 | | | | | |
Certificate participations | 16 | | | 13 | | | — | | | — | | | | | |
Total | $ | 1,592 | | | $ | 1,346 | | | $ | 1,776 | | | $ | 1,567 | | | | | |
Across all municipal bonds, the largest issuer represented 5% of the category and less than 1% of the total portfolio for both December 31, 2024, and 2023, and is rated NAIC 1 as of December 31, 2024. Our focus within municipal bonds is on NAIC 1 rated instruments, with 97% and 98% of our municipal bond exposure rated NAIC 1 as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
Mortgage Loans
Commercial Mortgage Loans
We diversify our CMLs portfolio by geographic region and property type to attempt to reduce concentration risk. We continuously evaluate CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a level to secure the related debt. Loan-to-value ("LTV") and debt-service coverage ("DSC") ratios are utilized to assess the risk and quality of CMLs. As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, our mortgage loans on real estate portfolio had a weighted average DSC ratio of 2.3 times, and a weighted average LTV ratio of 57% and 55%, respectively.
We consider a CML delinquent when a loan payment is greater than 30 days past due. For mortgage loans that are determined to require foreclosure, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of estimated costs to obtain and sell at the point of foreclosure. As of December 31, 2024, we had one CML that was delinquent in principal or interest payments compared to none as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had no CMLs in the process of foreclosure. See Note E Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for additional information on our CMLs, including our distribution by property type, geographic region, LTV and DSC ratios.
Residential Mortgage Loans
Our residential mortgage loans are closed end, amortizing loans and 100% of the properties are in the United States. We diversify our RML portfolio by state to attempt to reduce concentration risk. RMLs have a primary credit quality indicator of either a performing or non-performing loan. We define non-performing RMLs as those that are 90 or more days past due and/or in non-accrual status.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when they are over 90 days delinquent. If a loan becomes over 90 days delinquent, it is our general policy to initiate foreclosure proceedings unless a workout arrangement to bring the loan current can be put in place. See Note E Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report for additional information on our RMLs.
Unrealized Losses
The amortized cost and fair value of the fixed maturity securities and the equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Number of Securities | | Amortized Cost | | Allowance for Expected Credit Losses | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale: | (In millions) |
United States Government full faith and credit | 29 | | | $ | 106 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | 103 | |
United States Government sponsored agencies | 64 | | | 92 | | | — | | | (4) | | | 88 | |
United States municipalities, states and territories | 176 | | | 1,476 | | | — | | | (249) | | | 1,227 | |
Foreign Governments | 43 | | | 224 | | | — | | | (45) | | | 179 | |
Corporate securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Finance, insurance and real estate | 840 | | | 6,596 | | | — | | | (728) | | | 5,868 | |
Manufacturing, construction and mining | 156 | | | 1,173 | | | — | | | (161) | | | 1,012 | |
Utilities, energy and related sectors | 477 | | | 3,000 | | | — | | | (542) | | | 2,458 | |
Wholesale/retail trade | 523 | | | 3,111 | | | — | | | (497) | | | 2,614 | |
Services, media and other | 640 | | | 4,679 | | | — | | | (874) | | | 3,805 | |
Hybrid securities | 31 | | | 515 | | | — | | | (29) | | | 486 | |
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities | 314 | | | 1,370 | | | — | | | (101) | | | 1,269 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 344 | | | 2,552 | | | (41) | | | (200) | | | 2,311 | |
Asset-backed securities | 355 | | | 4,148 | | | (11) | | | (317) | | | 3,820 | |
Total fixed maturity available for sale securities | 3,992 | | | 29,042 | | | (52) | | | (3,750) | | | 25,240 | |
Equity securities | 31 | | | 363 | | | — | | | (87) | | | 276 | |
Total investments | 4,023 | | | $ | 29,405 | | | $ | (52) | | | $ | (3,837) | | | $ | 25,516 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Number of Securities | | Amortized Cost | | Allowance for Expected Credit Losses | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale: | (In millions) |
United States Government full faith and credit | 8 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 14 | |
United States Government sponsored agencies | 56 | | | 30 | | | — | | | (3) | | | 27 | |
United States municipalities, states and territories | 180 | | | 1,498 | | | — | | | (222) | | | 1,276 | |
Foreign Governments | 50 | | | 209 | | | — | | | (39) | | | 170 | |
Corporate securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Finance, insurance and real estate | 637 | | | 5,529 | | | — | | | (690) | | | 4,839 | |
Manufacturing, construction and mining | 117 | | | 965 | | | — | | | (135) | | | 830 | |
Utilities, energy and related sectors | 316 | | | 2,402 | | | — | | | (471) | | | 1,931 | |
Wholesale/retail trade | 332 | | | 2,165 | | | — | | | (397) | | | 1,768 | |
Services, media and other | 401 | | | 3,370 | | | — | | | (686) | | | 2,684 | |
Hybrid securities | 36 | | | 597 | | | — | | | (53) | | | 544 | |
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities | 244 | | | 1,118 | | | (2) | | | (101) | | | 1,015 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 435 | | | 3,198 | | | (22) | | | (323) | | | 2,853 | |
Asset-backed securities | 800 | | | 8,078 | | | (9) | | | (470) | | | 7,599 | |
Total fixed maturity available for sale securities | 3,612 | | | 29,174 | | | (33) | | | (3,591) | | | 25,550 | |
Equity securities | 41 | | | 567 | | | — | | | (100) | | | 467 | |
Total investments | 3,653 | | | $ | 29,741 | | | $ | (33) | | | $ | (3,691) | | | $ | 26,017 | |
The gross unrealized loss position on the fixed maturity available-for-sale fixed and equity portfolio was $3,837 million and $3,691 million as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Most components of the portfolio exhibited price depreciation caused by higher treasury rates as opposed to issuer specific credit concerns. The total amortized cost of all securities in an unrealized loss position was $29,405 million and $29,741 million as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The average market value/book value of the investment category with the largest unrealized loss position was 81% for services, media and other as of December 31, 2024. In the aggregate, services, media and other represented 23% of the total unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024. The average market value/book value of the investment category with the largest unrealized loss position was 88% for finance, insurance and real estate as of December 31, 2023. In aggregate, finance, insurance and real estate represented 19% of the total unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2023.
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity available for sale securities under watch list analysis and the number of months in a loss position with investment grade securities (NRSRO rating of BBB/Baa or higher) as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Number of Securities | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Allowance for Credit Loss | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Investment grade: | (In millions) |
Less than six months | 8 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 52 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | |
Six months or more and less than twelve months | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Twelve months or greater | 107 | | | 1,443 | | | 959 | | | — | | | (484) | |
Total investment grade | 115 | | | 1,497 | | | 1,011 | | | — | | | (486) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Below investment grade: | | | | | | | | | |
Less than six months | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Six months or more and less than twelve months | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Twelve months or greater | 5 | | | 82 | | | 51 | | | — | | | (31) | |
Total below investment grade | 5 | | | 82 | | | 51 | | | — | | | (31) | |
Total | 120 | | | $ | 1,579 | | | $ | 1,062 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (517) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Number of Securities | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Allowance for Credit Loss | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Investment grade: | (In millions) |
Less than six months | 1 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | |
Six months or more and less than twelve months | 1 | | | 54 | | | 44 | | | — | | | (10) | |
Twelve months or greater | 47 | | | 634 | | | 444 | | | — | | | (190) | |
Total investment grade | 49 | | | 703 | | | 502 | | | — | | | (201) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Below investment grade: | | | | | | | | | |
Less than six months | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Six months or more and less than twelve months | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Twelve months or greater | 3 | | | 19 | | | 15 | | | — | | | (4) | |
Total below investment grade | 3 | | | 19 | | | 15 | | | — | | | (4) | |
Total | 52 | | | $ | 722 | | | $ | 517 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (205) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expected Credit Losses and Watch List
F&G prepares a watch list to identify securities to evaluate for expected credit losses. Factors used in preparing the watch list include fair values relative to amortized cost, ratings and negative ratings actions and other factors. Detailed analysis is performed for each security on the watch list to further assess the presence of credit impairment loss indicators and, where present, calculate an allowance for expected credit loss or direct write-down of a security’s amortized cost.
As of December 31, 2024, our watch list included 120 securities in an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of $1,579 million, no allowance for expected credit losses, unrealized losses of $517 million and a fair value of $1,062 million.
As of December 31, 2023, our watch list included 52 securities in an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of $722 million, no allowance for expected credit losses, unrealized losses of $205 million and a fair value of $517 million.
The watch list excludes structured securities as we have separate processes to evaluate the credit quality on the structured securities.
There were 45 and 101 structured securities with a fair value of $146 million and $316 million, respectively, to which we had potential credit exposure as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Our analysis of these structured securities, which included cash flow testing, resulted in allowances for expected credit losses of $62 million and $35 million as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
Exposure to Sovereign Debt and Certain Other Exposures
Our investment portfolio had an immaterial amount of direct exposure to European sovereign debt as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. We have no exposure to investments in Russia or Ukraine and de minimis investments in peripheral countries in the region.
Interest and Investment Income
For discussion regarding our net investment income and net investment gains (losses) refer to Note E Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
AFS Securities
For additional information regarding our AFS securities, including the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses), and fair value as well as the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities by contractual maturities, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, refer to Note E Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Concentrations of Financial Instruments
For detail regarding our concentration of financial instruments refer to Item 7A. of Part II of this Annual Report.
Derivatives
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on derivative instruments. We attempt to reduce this credit risk by purchasing such derivative instruments from large, well-established financial institutions.
We also hold cash and cash equivalents received from counterparties for derivative instrument collateral, as well as U.S. Government securities pledged as derivative instrument collateral, if our counterparty’s net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds.
We are required to pay counterparties the effective federal funds rate each day for cash collateral posted to F&G for daily mark to market margin changes. We reduce the negative interest cost associated with cash collateral posted from counterparties under various ISDA agreements by reinvesting derivative cash collateral. This program permits collateral cash received to be invested in short term Treasury securities, bank deposits and commercial paper rated A1/P1, which are included in Cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
See Note F Derivative Financial Instruments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for additional information regarding our derivatives and our exposure to credit loss on derivatives.
Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of the operations of the parent holding company, our various real estate brokerage businesses and our real estate technology subsidiaries. This segment also includes certain other unallocated corporate overhead expenses and eliminations of revenues and expenses between it and our Title segment.
The following table presents the results of operations of our Corporate and Other segment for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Escrow, title-related and other fees | | $ | 184 | | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 127 | |
Interest and investment income | | 154 | | | 123 | | | 23 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | 5 | | | (31) | | | (40) | |
Total revenues | | 343 | | | 279 | | | 110 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | | 157 | | | 132 | | | 48 | |
| | | | | | |
Other operating expenses | | 104 | | | 133 | | | 104 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 29 | | | 27 | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 77 | | | 77 | | | 86 | |
Total expenses | | 367 | | | 369 | | | 263 | |
Loss from continuing operations, before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | $ | (24) | | | $ | (90) | | | $ | (153) | |
The revenue in the Corporate and Other segment for all years represents revenue generated by our non-title real estate technology and brokerage subsidiaries as well as mark-to-market valuation changes on certain corporate deferred compensation plans.
Total revenues in the Corporate and Other segment increased $64 million, or 23% in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023, and increased $169 million, or 154%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to a $43 million increase in dividends received from F&G and a $33 million impairment of cost method investments in 2023, partially offset by a $12 million decrease in interest and investment income related to short-term investments and various other immaterial items. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to a $71 million increase in valuations associated with our deferred compensation plan assets, which increased both revenue and personnel costs, a $65 million increase in dividends received from F&G, a $35 million increase in interest and investment income related to cash and short-term investments and a $33 million impairment of cost method investments in 2023 as compared to a $41 million impairment of cost method investments in 2022, partially offset by various other immaterial items. The dividends received from F&G are eliminated upon consolidation.
Personnel costs in the Corporate and Other segment increased $25 million, or 19% in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023, and increased $84 million, or 175%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to inflationary pressures on salaries expense and a $13 million increase is stock compensation expense associated with a restricted stock grant to our chairman. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to the aforementioned increase in the valuation of deferred compensation plan assets in 2023.
Other operating expenses in the Corporate and Other segment decreased $29 million, or 22%, in the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 2023, and increased $29 million, or 28% in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to a $10 million reduction in expenses related to the 2023 cybersecurity incident, a $9 million reduction in expenses related to the termination of our pension plan and other various immaterial items. The increase in 2024 as compared to 2023 is attributable to various immaterial items.
Interest expense decreased $9 million, or 10%, in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to decreased average debt outstanding in 2023 associated with repayment of the $400 million in outstanding principal of our 5.50% Senior Notes in September of 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements. Our current cash requirements include personnel costs, operating expenses, claim payments, taxes, payments of interest and principal on our debt, capital expenditures, business acquisitions, stock repurchases and dividends on our common stock. We paid dividends of $1.94 per share in 2024, or approximately $532 million to our common shareholders. On February 20, 2025, our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.50 per share, payable on March 31, 2025, to FNF common shareholders of record as of March 17, 2025. There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, although there are limits on the ability of certain subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, as described below. The declaration of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $3,479 million, short term investments of $3,050 million and available capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility of $800 million and available capacity under the Amended F&G Credit Agreement of $750 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2024, on February 1, 2025, F&G redeemed the outstanding $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.50% senior notes due May 1, 2025. On January 13, 2025, F&G completed its public offering of its 7.300% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2065 with an aggregate principal amount of $375 million.
On October 4, 2024, F&G completed its public offering of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2034 with the aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the "6.25% F&G Notes"). A portion of the net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding balance of $365 million on the Company’s revolving credit facility. On June 4, 2024, F&G completed its public offering of $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.50% Senior Notes due 2029 (the "6.50% F&G Notes"). A portion of the net proceeds were used to finance a cash tender offer by its wholly owned subsidiary Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. ("FGLH") for an aggregate principal amount of $250 million of FGLH’s 5.50% Senior Notes due 2025 (the "5.50% F&G Notes"). On February 16, 2024, we entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for our $800 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and other agents party thereto (the "Sixth Restated Credit Agreement"). Among other changes, the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amends the Revolving Credit Facility to extend the maturity date from October 29, 2025, to February 16, 2029. On February 16, 2024, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement of our $665 million credit agreement, with the guarantors party thereto, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and an issuing bank (the "Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement"). Among other changes, the Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement amends the Amended F&G Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date and increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the revolving credit facility to $750 million. For further information related to the 7.95% F&G Notes and 7.40% F&G Notes, refer to Note G Notes Payable to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
We continually assess our capital allocation strategy, including decisions relating to the amount of our dividend, reducing debt, repurchasing our stock, investing in growth of our subsidiaries, making acquisitions and/or conserving cash. We believe that all anticipated cash requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds, through cash dividends from subsidiaries, cash generated by investment securities, potential sales of non-strategic assets, potential issuances of additional debt or equity securities, and borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility and the F&G Credit Facility. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are monitored regularly to ensure that we can meet our cash requirements. We forecast the needs of all of our subsidiaries and periodically review their short-term and long-term projected sources and uses of funds, as well as the asset, liability, investment and cash flow assumptions underlying such forecasts.
Our title insurance subsidiaries generate cash from premiums earned and their respective investment portfolios, and these funds are adequate to satisfy the payments of claims and other liabilities. Due to the magnitude of our title segment investment portfolio in relation to our title claim loss reserves, we do not specifically match durations of our investments to the cash outflows required to pay claims, but do manage outflows on a shorter time frame.
Our two significant sources of internally generated funds are dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries. As a holding company, we receive cash from our subsidiaries in the form of dividends and as reimbursement for operating and other administrative expenses we incur. The reimbursements are paid within the guidelines of management agreements among us and our subsidiaries. Our insurance subsidiaries are restricted by state regulation in their ability to pay dividends and make distributions. Each applicable state of domicile regulates the extent to which our title underwriters can pay dividends or make other distributions. As of December 31, 2024, $1,141 million of our net assets were restricted from dividend payments without prior approval from the relevant departments of insurance. We anticipate that our title insurance subsidiaries will pay or make dividends to us in 2025 of approximately $498 million. Our underwritten title companies and non-insurance subsidiaries are not regulated to the same extent as our insurance subsidiaries.
The maximum dividend permitted by law is not necessarily indicative of an insurer’s actual ability to pay dividends, which may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of dividends on surplus, which could affect an insurer’s ratings or competitive position, the amount of premiums that can be written and the ability to pay future dividends. Further, depending on business and regulatory conditions, we may in the future need to retain cash in our underwriters or even contribute cash to one or more of them in order to maintain their ratings or their statutory capital position. Such a requirement could be the result of investment losses, reserve charges, adverse operating conditions in the current economic environment or changes in statutory accounting requirements by regulators.
Cash flow from our operations will be used for general corporate purposes including to reinvest in operations, repay debt, pay dividends, repurchase stock, pursue other strategic initiatives and/or conserve cash.
Operating Cash Flow. Our cash flows provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $6,815 million, $6,478 million and $4,355 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating activities of $337 million in 2024 as compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the increase in net earnings of $873 million, increased cash inflows associated with the change in future policy benefits of $528 million, increased cash inflows associated with the change in funds withheld from reinsurers of $409 million and net cash inflows associated with the change in income taxes of $83 million in 2024 as compared to net cash outflows of $50 million in 2023, partially offset by reduced net cash inflows associated with the change in derivative collateral liabilities of $319 million and increased net cash outflows associated with the timing of receipts and payments of prepaid assets, payables, and receivables of $268 million. The increase in cash provided by operating activities of $2,123 million in 2023 as compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to increased cash inflows associated with the change in funds withheld from reinsurers of $1,330 million, increased cash inflows associated with the change in future policy benefits of $254 million, reduced net cash outflows associated with the timing of receipts and payments of prepaid assets, payables, and receivables of $359 million and net cash inflows associated with the change in derivative collateral liabilities of $410 million in 2023 as compared to net cash outflows of $398 million in 2022, partially offset by the decrease in net earnings of $788 million, decreased net cash inflows from the change in reinsurance recoverable of $198 million, decreased net cash inflows from the change in trade receivables of $141 million and net cash outflows associated with the change in income taxes of $50 million in 2023 as compared to net cash inflows of $66 million in 2022.
Investing Cash Flows. Our cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $7,862 million, $9,090 million and $10,524 million, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2024 as compared to 2023 of $1,228 million is primarily associated with increased cash inflows from proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities of $6,399 million, increased cash inflows from distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates of $198 million and decreased investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $165 million, partially offset by increased purchases of investment securities of $3,840 million, increased cash outflows associated with acquisitions of $287 million and net purchases of short-term investment securities of $1,416 in 2024 as compared to net proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investment securities of $340 million in 2023. The decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2023 as compared to 2022 of $1,434 million is primarily associated with increased cash inflows from net proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investment securities of $340 million in 2023 as compared to net purchases of short-term investment securities of $2,571 million in 2022, partially offset by increased cash outflows for additional investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $219 million, increased cash outflows for purchases of investment securities of $837 million, decreased cash inflows from proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities of $465 million and increased cash outflows associated with acquisitions of $119 million.
Capital Expenditures. Total capital expenditures for property and equipment and capitalized software were $146 million, $132 million and $138 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively.
Financing Cash Flows. Our cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $1,759 million, $3,093 million and $4,095 million, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities of $1,334 million in 2024 as compared to 2023 is primarily associated with increased cash outflows from contractholder withdrawals of $3,385 million, cash outflows for the tender offer of $250 million of our 5.50% F&G Notes and increased cash outflows associated with repayments of principal outstanding on our F&G Credit Agreement of $180 million, partially offset by increased cash inflows from contractholder deposits of $2,360 million and increased cash inflows associated with the issuance of our 6.25% F&G Senior Notes of $500 million and the issuance of our 6.50% F&G Senior Notes of $550 million in 2024, as compared to the issuance of our 7.95% F&G Notes of $345 million and the issuance of our 7.40% F&G Notes of $500 million in 2023. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities of $1,002 million in 2023 as compared to 2022 is primarily associated with increased cash outflows from contractholder withdrawals of $1,175 million, decreased cash inflows from contractholder deposits of $743 million and net F&G Credit Agreement repayments of $185 million, partially offset by the issuance of our 7.95% F&G Notes of $345 million in December of 2023 and the issuance of our 7.40% F&G Notes of $500 million in January of 2023 as compared to the issuance of borrowings of $550 million in 2022, decreased purchases of treasury stock of $547 million and the repayment of $400 million for our 5.50% Notes in September 2022.
Financing Arrangements. For a description of our financing arrangements see Note G Notes Payable included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 7 of Part II.
Obligations - Contractual and Other. As of December 31, 2024, our required annual payments relating to contractual and other obligations were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | 2029 | | Thereafter | | Total | |
| (In millions) | |
Notes payable principal repayment | $ | 300 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 950 | | | $ | 550 | | | $ | 2,545 | | | $ | 4,367 | | |
Operating lease payments | 133 | | | 108 | | | 77 | | | 52 | | | 32 | | | 24 | | | 426 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annuity and universal life products | 6,801 | | | 6,340 | | | 7,338 | | | 7,284 | | | 6,881 | | | 45,376 | | | 80,020 | | |
Pension risk transfer annuity payments | 854 | | | 821 | | | 793 | | | 763 | | | 734 | | | 8,922 | | | 12,887 | | |
Funding agreements (FABN/FHLB) | 796 | | | 1,514 | | | 1,690 | | | 1,052 | | | 429 | | | — | | | 5,481 | | |
Title claim loss estimated payments | 285 | | | 285 | | | 187 | | | 153 | | | 110 | | | 693 | | | 1,713 | | |
Interest on fixed rate notes payable | 139 | | | 136 | | | 136 | | | 92 | | | 78 | | | 996 | | | 1,577 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 9,308 | | | $ | 9,226 | | | $ | 10,221 | | | $ | 10,346 | | | $ | 8,814 | | | $ | 58,556 | | | $ | 106,471 | | |
As of December 31, 2024, we had title insurance reserves of $1,713 million. The amounts and timing of these obligations are estimated and are not set contractually. While we believe that historical loss payments are a reasonable source for projecting future claim payments, there is significant inherent uncertainty in this payment pattern estimate because of the potential impact of changes in:
•future mortgage interest rates, which will affect the number of real estate and refinancing transactions and; therefore, the rate at which title insurance claims will emerge;
•the legal environment whereby court decisions and reinterpretations of title insurance policy language to broaden coverage could increase total obligations and influence claim payout patterns;
•events such as fraud, escrow theft, multiple property title defects, foreclosure rates and individual large loss events that can substantially and unexpectedly cause increases in both the amount and timing of estimated title insurance loss payments; and
•loss cost trends whereby increases or decreases in inflationary factors (including the value of real estate) will influence the ultimate amount of title insurance loss payments.
Based on historical title insurance claim experience, we anticipate the above payment patterns. The uncertainty and variation in the timing and amount of claim payments could have a material impact on our cash flows from operations in a particular period.
We sponsor certain frozen pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. See Note U Employee Benefit Plans to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further information.
Capital Stock Transactions. On August 3, 2021, our Board of Directors approved the 2021 Repurchase Program under which we may purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2024. Since the original commencement of the 2021 Repurchase Program, we have repurchased a total of 16,449,565 FNF common shares for an aggregate amount of $701 million, or an average of $42.60 per share. On July 31, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a new three-year stock repurchase program effective July 31, 2024 (the "2024 Repurchase Program") under which we are authorized to purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2027. We did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2021 Repurchase Program or the 2024 Repurchase Program during the year ended December 31, 2024. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 and through market close on February 21, 2025, we did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2024 Repurchase Program.
Equity and Preferred Security Investments. Our equity and preferred security investments may be subject to significant volatility. Currently prevailing accounting standards require us to record the change in fair value of equity and preferred security investments held as of any given period end within earnings. Our results of operations in future periods are anticipated to be subject to such volatility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In conducting our operations, we routinely hold customers’ assets in escrow, pending completion of real estate transactions, and are responsible for the proper disposition of these balances for our customers. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and have not been included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, consistent with GAAP and industry practice. These balances amounted to $14.4 billion and $13.5 billion at
December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. As a result of holding these customers’ assets in escrow, we have ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks.
We have unfunded investment commitments as of December 31, 2024, based upon the timing of when investments are executed compared to when the actual investments are funded, as some investments require that funding occur over a period of months or years. Please refer to Note E Investments and Note H Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for additional details on unfunded investment commitments.
FHLB Collateral. We are currently a member of the FHLB and are required to maintain a collateral deposit that backs any funding agreements issued. We use these funding agreements as part of a spread enhancement strategy. We have the ability to obtain funding from the FHLB based on a percentage of the value of our assets, subject to the availability of eligible collateral. Collateral is pledged based on the outstanding balances of FHLB funding agreements. The amount of funding varies based on the type, rating and maturity of the collateral posted to the FHLB. Generally, U.S. government agency notes, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, and commercial and residential whole loans are pledged to the FHLB as collateral. Market value fluctuations resulting from changes in interest rates, spreads and other risk factors for each type of asset are monitored and additional collateral is either pledged or released as needed.
Our borrowing capacity under these credit facilities does not have an expiration date as long as we maintain a satisfactory level of creditworthiness based on the FHLB’s credit assessment. As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, we had $2,852 million and $2,514 million, respectively, in FHLB non-putable funding agreements included under contractholder funds on our consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, we had assets with a fair value of approximately $4,289 million and $4,345 million, respectively, which collateralized the FHLB funding agreements. Assets pledged to the FHLB are included in fixed maturities, AFS, on our consolidated balance sheets.
Collateral-Derivative Contracts. Under the terms of our ISDA agreements, we may receive from, or deliver to, counterparties collateral to assure that all terms of the ISDA agreements will be met with regard to the Credit Support Annex (“CSA”). The terms of the CSA call for us to pay interest on any cash received equal to the federal funds rate. As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively, $771 million and $775 million of collateral was posted by our counterparties as they did not meet the net exposure thresholds. Collateral requirements are monitored on a daily basis and incorporate changes in market values of both the derivatives contract as well as the collateral pledged. Market value fluctuations are due to changes in interest rates, spreads and other risk factors.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we are routinely subject to a variety of risks, as described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report and in our other filings with the SEC. For example, we are exposed to the risk that decreased real estate activity, which depends in part on the level of interest rates, may reduce our revenues.
The risks related to our business also include certain market risks that may affect our debt and other financial instruments. At present, we face the market risks associated with our marketable equity securities subject to equity price volatility and with interest rate movements on our fixed income investments.
We regularly assess these market risks and have established policies and business practices designed to protect against the adverse effects of these exposures.
At December 31, 2024, we had $4,321 million in long-term debt, none of which bears interest at a floating rate. Accordingly, fluctuations in market interest rates will not have a material impact on our resulting interest expense.
Our fixed maturity investments, certain preferred securities and our floating rate debt are subject to an element of market risk from changes in interest rates. Increases and decreases in prevailing interest rates generally translate into decreases and increases in fair values of those instruments. Additionally, fair values of interest rate sensitive instruments may be affected by the creditworthiness of the issuer, prepayment options, relative values of alternative investments, the liquidity of the instrument and other general market conditions. We manage interest rate risk through a variety of measures. We monitor our interest rate risk and make investment decisions to manage the perceived risk.
Equity price risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in equity prices. In the past, our exposure to changes in equity prices primarily resulted from our holdings of equity securities. As of December 31, 2024, we held $642 million in marketable equity securities (not including our investments in preferred securities of $443 million and our investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $3,731 million). The carrying values of investments subject to equity price risks are based on quoted market prices as of the balance sheet date. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the
relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. Furthermore, amounts realized in the sale of a particular security may be affected by the relative quantity of the security being sold.
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and trade receivables. We require placement of cash in financial institutions evaluated as highly creditworthy.
For purposes of this Annual Report, we perform a sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our debt and other financial instruments.
The financial instruments that are included in the sensitivity analysis with respect to interest rate risk include fixed maturity investments, preferred securities and notes payable. The financial instruments that are included in the sensitivity analysis with respect to equity price risk include marketable equity securities. With the exception of our equity method investments, it is not anticipated that there would be a significant change in the fair value of other long-term investments or short-term investments if there were a change in market conditions, based on the nature and duration of the financial instruments involved.
To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assess the risk of loss in fair values from the effect of hypothetical changes in interest rates and equity prices on market-sensitive instruments. The changes in fair values for interest rate risks are determined by estimating the present value of future cash flows using various models, primarily duration modeling. The changes in fair values for equity price risk are determined by comparing the market price of investments against their reported values as of the balance sheet date.
Information provided by the sensitivity analysis does not necessarily represent the actual changes in fair value that we would incur under normal market conditions because, due to practical limitations, all variables other than the specific market risk factor are held constant. For example, our reserve for title claim losses (representing 2.0% of total liabilities at December 31, 2024) is not included in the hypothetical effects.
Market Risk Factors
Market risk is the risk of the loss of fair value resulting from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Market risk is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying financial instruments are traded. We have significant holdings in financial instruments, which are naturally exposed to a variety of market risks. They are primarily exposed to interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk and have some exposure to counterparty risk, which affect the fair value of financial instruments subject to market risk.
We have no market risk sensitive instruments entered into for trading purposes; therefore, all of our market risk sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading. The results of the sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2024 and 2023, are as follows:
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2024, an increase (decrease) in the levels of interest rates of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant, would result in a (decrease) increase in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities and certain of our investments in preferred securities, which are tied to interest rates of $2.7 billion as compared with a (decrease) increase of $2.5 billion at December 31, 2023.
The actuarial models used to estimate the impact of a one percentage point change in market interest rates incorporate numerous assumptions, require significant estimates and assume an immediate and parallel change in interest rates without any management of the investment portfolio in reaction to such change. Consequently, potential changes in value of financial instruments indicated by these simulations will likely be different from the actual changes experienced under given interest rate scenarios, and the differences may be material. Because we actively manage our investments and liabilities, the net exposure to interest rates can vary over time. However, any such decreases in the fair value of fixed maturity securities, unless related to credit concerns of the issuer requiring allowances for credit losses, would generally be realized only if we were required to sell such securities at losses prior to their maturity to meet liquidity needs. Within our F&G segment, liquidity needs are managed using the surrender and withdrawal provisions of the annuity contracts and through other means.
Equity Price Risk
As of December 31, 2024, a 10% increase (decrease) in market prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our equity securities portfolio of $64 million, as compared with an increase (decrease) of $77 million at December 31, 2023.
Interest Rate Risk Related to our F&G Segment
Interest rate risk is the F&G segment's primary market risk exposure. An increase in the levels of interest rates of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant, would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities and certain investments in preferred securities of approximately $2.6 billion, a net decrease in the fair value of interest rate swaps of approximately $0.1 billion and a net decrease in the combined fair value of embedded derivatives and MRBs of approximately $0.6 billion at December 31, 2024. For comparison, a similar increase in the levels of interest rates of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant, would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities and certain investments in preferred securities of approximately $2.4 billion, a net decrease in the fair value of interest rate swaps of approximately $0.1 billion and a net decrease in the combined fair value of embedded derivatives and MRBs of approximately $0.5 billion at December 31, 2023.
A 100 basis point shift in interest rates for our floating rate debt and funding agreements will increase or decrease floating expense by approximately $17 million and $14 million per year as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As noted above, the impact to net earnings related to the interest rate swaps and floating rate notes payable and funding agreements will be significantly offset by corresponding changes in investment income associated with our floating rate investments.
The actuarial models used to estimate the impact of a one percentage point change in market interest rates incorporate numerous assumptions, require significant estimates and assume an immediate and parallel change in interest rates without any management of the investment portfolio in reaction to such change. Consequently, potential changes in value of financial instruments indicated by these simulations will likely be different from the actual changes experienced under given interest rate scenarios, and the differences may be material. Because we actively manage our investments and liabilities, the net exposure to interest rates can vary over time. However, any such decreases in the fair value of fixed maturity securities, unless related to credit concerns of the issuer requiring allowances for credit losses, would generally be realized only if we were required to sell such securities at losses prior to their maturity to meet liquidity needs. Our liquidity needs are managed using the surrender and withdrawal provisions of the annuity contracts and through other means.
As part of F&G's asset liability management (“ALM”) program, F&G has made a significant effort to identify the assets appropriate to different product lines and ensure investing strategies match the profile of these liabilities. The ALM strategy is designed to align the expected cash flows from the investment portfolio with the expected liability cash flows. As such, a major component of F&G's effort to manage interest rate risk has been to structure the investment portfolio with cash flow characteristics that are consistent with the cash flow characteristics of the insurance liabilities. F&G uses actuarial models to simulate the cash flows expected from the existing business under various interest rate scenarios. These simulations enable F&G to measure the potential gain or loss in the fair value of interest rate-sensitive financial instruments, to evaluate the adequacy of expected cash flows from assets to meet the expected cash requirements of the liabilities and to determine if it is necessary to lengthen or shorten the average life and duration of our investment portfolio. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a security to a small change in interest rates. When the durations of assets and liabilities are similar, exposure to interest rate risk is minimized because a change in the value of assets could be expected to be largely offset by a change in the value of liabilities.
The duration of the investment portfolio, excluding cash and cash equivalents, derivatives, policy loans, and common stocks as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 |
Duration (years) | | Amortized Cost (In millions) | | % of Total |
0-4 | | $ | 29,363 | | | 54 | % |
5-9 | | 12,526 | | | 23 | % |
10-14 | | 10,448 | | | 19 | % |
15-19 | | 1,862 | | | 4 | % |
20-30 | | 33 | | | — | % |
Total | | $ | 54,232 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 |
Duration (years) | | Amortized Cost (In millions) | | % of Total |
0-4 | | $ | 26,146 | | | 54 | % |
5-9 | | 10,455 | | | 21 | % |
10-14 | | 9,943 | | | 20 | % |
15-19 | | 2,650 | | | 5 | % |
20-30 | | 69 | | | — | % |
Total | | $ | 49,263 | | | 100 | % |
Equity Price Risk Related to our F&G Segment
Our F&G segment is exposed to equity price risk through certain insurance products. Equity price risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in equity prices. In the past, our exposure to changes in equity prices primarily resulted from our holdings of equity securities. Refer to Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details on how the carrying values of these investments are determined as of the balance sheet date. Carrying values are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported carrying value. Fluctuation in the carrying value of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. Furthermore, amounts realized in the sale of a particular security may be affected by the relative quantity of the security being sold.
We are also exposed to equity price risk through certain insurance products. We offer a variety of indexed annuities/IUL contracts with crediting strategies linked to the performance of indices such as the S&P 500 Index, Dow Jones Industrials or the NASDAQ 100 Index, and target volatility indices. Additionally, the estimated cost of providing GMWB on indexed annuities products incorporates various assumptions about the overall performance of equity markets over certain time periods. Periods of significant and sustained downturns in equity markets or increased equity volatility could result in an increase in the valuation of the MRB liabilities and decrease in the valuation of contractholder funds liabilities associated with such products.
To economically hedge the equity returns on these products, we purchase derivatives to hedge the indexed annuities and IUL equity exposures. The primary way we hedge indexed annuities/IUL equity exposure is to purchase over the counter equity index equity options from broker-dealer derivative counterparties approved by F&G. The second way to hedge indexed annuities/ IUL equity exposure is by purchasing exchange traded equity index futures contracts. This hedging strategy enables us to reduce the overall hedging costs and achieve a high correlation of returns on the equity options purchased relative to the index credits earned by the indexed annuities/IUL contractholders. The majority of the equity options are one-year options purchased to match the funding requirements underlying the indexed annuities/IUL contracts. These hedge programs are limited to the current policy term of the indexed annuities/IUL contracts. Future returns, which may be reflected in indexed annuities IUL contracts’ credited rates beyond the current policy term, are not hedged. We attempt to manage the costs of these purchases through the terms of the indexed annuities/IUL contracts, which permit us to change cap, spread or participation rates, subject to certain guaranteed minimums that must be maintained.
The derivatives are used to fund the indexed annuities/IUL contract index credits and the cost of the equity options purchased is treated as a component of spread earnings. While the indexed annuities/IUL hedging program does not explicitly hedge GAAP income volatility, the indexed annuities/IUL hedging program tends to mitigate a significant portion of the GAAP reserve changes associated with movements in the equity market. This is due to the fact that a key component in the calculation of GAAP reserves is the market valuation of the current term embedded derivative. Due to the alignment of the embedded derivative reserve component with hedging of this same embedded derivative, there should be a reasonable match between changes in this component of the reserve and changes in the assets backing this component of the reserve. However, there may be an interim mismatch due to the fact that the hedges, which are put in place are only intended to cover exposures expected to remain until the end of an indexing term. To the extent index credits earned by the contractholder exceed the proceeds from option expirations and futures income, we incur a raw hedging loss.
See Note F Derivative Financial Instruments to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details on the derivatives portfolio.
Fair value changes associated with these investments are intended to, but do not always, substantially offset the increase or decrease in the amounts added to contractholder funds for indexed products. When index credits to policyholders exceed option proceeds received at expiration related to such credits, any shortfall is funded by our excess of net investment income earned over the sum of interest credited to policyholders and the cost of hedging our risk on indexed product policies and futures
income. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the annual index credits to policyholders on their anniversaries were $725 million, $203 million and $155 million, respectively. Proceeds received at expiration of options related to such credits were $849 million, $212 million and $158 million, respectively.
Other market exposures are hedged periodically depending on market conditions and our risk tolerance. The indexed annuities/IUL hedging strategy economically hedges the equity returns and exposes us to the risk that unhedged market exposures result in divergence between changes in the fair value of the liabilities and the hedging assets. We use a variety of techniques, including direct estimation of market sensitivities, to monitor this risk daily. We intend to continue to adjust the hedging strategy as market conditions and risk tolerance change.
Credit Risk and Counterparty Risk Related to our F&G Segment
Our F&G segment is exposed to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligation resulting in financial loss. Our major source of credit risk arises predominantly in our insurance operations’ portfolios of debt and similar securities. The fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio totaled $46 billion at December 31, 2024. Our credit risk materializes primarily as impairment losses. We are exposed to occasional cyclical economic downturns, during which impairment losses may be significantly higher than the long-term historical average. This is offset by years where it expects the actual impairment losses to be substantially lower than the long-term average. Credit risk in the portfolio can also materialize as increased capital requirements as assets migrate into lower credit qualities over time. The effect of rating migration on our capital requirements is also dependent on the economic cycle and increased asset impairment levels may go hand in hand with increased asset related capital requirements.
We attempt to manage the risk of default and rating migration by applying disciplined credit evaluation and underwriting standards and limiting allocations to lower quality, higher risk investments. In addition, we diversify exposure by issuer and country, using rating-based issuer and country limits. We also set investment constraints that limit our exposure by industry segment. To limit the impact that credit risk can have on earnings and capital adequacy levels, we have portfolio-level credit risk constraints in place. Limit compliance is monitored on a monthly basis.
In connection with the use of derivative instruments, we are exposed to counterparty credit risk-the risk that a counterparty fails to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We have adopted a policy of only dealing with credit worthy counterparties and obtaining sufficient collateral where appropriate, as a means of attempting to mitigate the financial loss from defaults. The exposure and credit rating of the counterparties are continuously monitored, and the aggregate value of transactions concluded is spread amongst different approved counterparties to limit the concentration in one counterparty. This policy allows for the purchase of derivative instruments from counterparties and/or clearinghouses that meet the required qualifications under the insurance laws of Iowa. We review the ratings of all the counterparties periodically. Collateral support documents are negotiated to further reduce the exposure when deemed necessary. See Note F Derivative Financial Instruments in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our exposure to credit loss.
We also have credit risk related to the ability of reinsurance counterparties to honor their obligations to pay the contract amounts under various agreements. To minimize the risk of credit loss on such contracts, we diversify exposures among many reinsurers and limit the amount of exposure to each based on credit rating. We also generally limit selection of counterparties with which to do new transactions to those with an “A-” credit rating or above from at least one of the major rating agencies and/or that are appropriately collateralized and provide credit for reinsurance.
In the normal course of business, certain reinsurance recoverables are subject to reviews by the reinsurers. We are not aware of any material disputes arising from these reviews or other communications with the counterparties as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, that would require an increase to the allowance for credit losses.
For information on concentrations of reinsurance risk, refer to Note O F&G Reinsurance in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For further information on certain risk associated with our business, refer to Note H Commitments and Contingencies in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions used.
Concentrations of Financial Instruments Related to our F&G Segment
Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Investment Portfolio - Investment Industry Concentrations included in Part II - Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding the top ten investment concentrations of our fixed maturity and equity securities including the fair value and percent of total fixed maturity and equity securities fair value as of December 31, 2024, and 2023.
Concentrations of Financial and Capital Markets Risk Related to our F&G Segment
Our F&G segment is exposed to financial and capital markets risk, including changes in interest rates and credit spreads, which can have an adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Exposure to such financial and capital markets risk relates primarily to the market price and cash flow variability associated with changes in interest rates. A rise in interest rates, in the absence of other countervailing changes, will increase the net unrealized loss position and, if long-term interest rates rise dramatically within a six to twelve-month time period, certain of F&G’s products may be exposed to disintermediation risk. Disintermediation risk refers to the risk that policyholders surrender their contracts in a rising interest rate environment, requiring F&G to liquidate assets in an unrealized loss position. We attempt to mitigate the risk, including changes in interest rates by investing in less rate-sensitive investments, including senior tranches of collateralized loan obligations, non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, and various types of asset backed securities. Management believes this risk is also mitigated to some extent by surrender charge protection provided by F&G’s products. We expect to continue to face these challenges and uncertainties that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) and our report dated February 28, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2025
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 28, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
| | | | | |
| Loss Provision Rate Assumption related to the Reserve for Title Claim Losses |
Description of the Matter | The Company’s reserve for title claim losses totaled $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2024. As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, the reserve for title claim losses includes known claims as well as losses that have been incurred but not yet reported, net of recoupments. The Company establishes reserves for claims which are incurred but not reported at the time premium revenue is recognized based on estimated loss provision rates. There is significant uncertainty inherent in determining the loss provision rates. Auditing the Company’s reserve for title claim losses was complex because of the highly judgmental nature of the determination of the loss provision rates used in the valuation of the reserve for title claim losses. The significant judgment was primarily due to the sensitivity of management’s estimate to claim loss history, industry trends, and current legal environment.
|
| | | | | |
How we Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over management’s process for the development of the loss provision rates and the recorded reserve for title claim losses. These controls included, among others, the review and approval process management has in place for the development of the loss provision rates and the estimation of the reserve for title claim losses. To evaluate the judgment used by management in determining the loss provision rates, among other procedures, we considered claim loss history, industry trends, current legal environment, and how management assessed these factors in the current period as compared to prior periods. We involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and industry knowledge, who assisted in performing an evaluation of the Company’s current year loss provision rates compared with those used in prior periods, as well as a review of loss development experience for prior years. We also independently calculated a range of reasonable reserve estimates which we compared to management’s recorded reserve for title claim losses.
|
| Fixed Indexed Annuity Embedded Derivative Liability, Market Risk Benefits, and Future Policy Benefits Liability |
Description of the Matter | At December 31, 2024, the fair value of the Company’s fixed indexed annuity embedded derivative liability totaled $5.2 billion. Certain of the Company’s fixed indexed annuity (FIA) contracts allow the policyholder to elect an equity index linked feature, where amounts credited to the contract’s account value are linked to the performance of designated equity indices and crediting strategy selected by the policyholder. The equity index crediting feature is accounted for as an embedded derivative liability and reported at fair value as discussed in Notes A (see section on Contractholder Funds), D, F, and Y to the consolidated financial statements. A subset of FIA contracts include certain contract features that provide minimum guarantees to policyholders, such as guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits and guaranteed minimum death benefit features that are market risk benefits (MRB) measured at fair value as discussed in Notes A (see section on MRBs), D, and X to the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s MRB assets and MRB liabilities totaled $189 million and $549 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, future policy benefits (FPB) liabilities related to traditional life and life-contingent immediate annuity policies (which includes life-contingent pension risk transfer annuities) totaled $8.7 billion. The future policy benefits liability related to these products is based on estimates of how much the Company will need to pay for future benefits and related claim expenses and the amount of net premiums to be collected from policyholders as discussed in the Notes A (see section on FPB) and Z to the consolidated financial statements.
Auditing the valuation of the Company’s fixed indexed annuity embedded derivative, MRBs, and FPB liabilities was complex because of the highly judgmental nature of the determination of the assumptions required to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative and MRBs and valuation of FPB liabilities. In particular, the fair value of fixed indexed annuity embedded derivative and MRBs was sensitive to the significant assumptions including surrender rates, GMWB utilization, option cost and non-performance spread. In addition, mortality, partial withdrawals, and capital market performance scenarios were significant assumptions used in the valuation of MRBs. Mortality is a significant assumption used in the valuation of FPB liabilities.
|
| | | | | |
|
|
How we Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over management’s process for the development of the significant assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the embedded derivative for fixed indexed annuities and MRBs and the valuation of FPB liabilities. These controls included, among others, the review and approval process management has in place for the development of the significant assumptions. To evaluate the judgment used by management in determining the assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the fixed indexed annuity embedded derivative and MRBs and the valuation of FPB liabilities, among other procedures, we involved actuarial specialists and evaluated the methodology applied by management in determining the valuation with those used in the prior period and in the industry. To evaluate the significant assumptions used by management in the methodology applied, we compared as applicable, the significant assumptions noted above to historical experience, observable market data, and management’s estimates of prospective changes in these assumptions. We also performed an independent recalculation of the embedded derivative, MRB, and FPB liabilities for a sample of policies or cohorts for comparison with the actuarial models used by management.
|
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2025
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| | | |
ASSETS |
Investments: | | | |
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, at an amortized cost of $51,681 and $45,606, respectively, net of allowance for credit losses of $67 and $42, respectively, and includes pledged fixed maturity securities of $495 and $489, respectively, related to secured trust deposits | $ | 48,218 | | | $ | 42,373 | |
Preferred securities, at fair value | 443 | | | 621 | |
Equity securities, at fair value | 642 | | | 766 | |
Derivative investments | 794 | | | 797 | |
Mortgage loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $70 and $66 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | 5,926 | | | 5,336 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | 3,731 | | | 3,334 | |
Other long-term investments | 811 | | | 703 | |
Short-term investments | 3,050 | | | 2,119 | |
Total investments | 63,615 | | | 56,049 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 includes $69 and $262, respectively, of pledged cash related to secured trust deposits | 3,479 | | | 2,767 | |
Trade and notes receivables, net of allowance of $32 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | 471 | | | 442 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Reinsurance recoverable, net of allowance for credit losses of $20 and $21 at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | 13,380 | | | 8,977 | |
Goodwill | 5,271 | | | 4,830 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 2,047 | | | 1,900 | |
Market risk benefits assets | 189 | | | 88 | |
Lease assets | 351 | | | 348 | |
Other intangible assets, net | 5,976 | | | 4,627 | |
Title plants | 420 | | | 418 | |
Property and equipment, net | 173 | | | 168 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Total assets | $ | 95,372 | | | $ | 80,614 | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
Liabilities: | | | |
Contractholder funds | $ | 56,404 | | | $ | 48,798 | |
Future policy benefits | 8,749 | | | 7,050 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 3,249 | | | 3,009 | |
Market risk benefits liability | 549 | | | 403 | |
Notes payable | 4,321 | | | 3,887 | |
Reserve for title claim losses | 1,713 | | | 1,770 | |
Funds withheld for reinsurance liabilities | 10,867 | | | 7,083 | |
Secured trust deposits | 551 | | | 731 | |
Lease liabilities | 385 | | | 394 | |
Income taxes payable | 52 | | | — | |
Deferred tax liability | — | | | 29 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities | 86,840 | | | 73,154 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Equity: | | | |
| | | |
FNF common stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 600 shares as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively; outstanding of 275 and 273 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and issued of 331 and 329 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | — | | | — | |
| | | |
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 50 shares; issued and outstanding, none | — | | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | 5,976 | | | 5,913 | |
Retained earnings | 5,982 | | | 5,244 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings | (2,052) | | | (2,119) | |
Less: Treasury stock, 56 shares as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, at cost | (2,152) | | | (2,130) | |
Total Fidelity National Financial, Inc. shareholders’ equity | 7,754 | | | 6,908 | |
Non-controlling interests | 778 | | | 552 | |
Total equity | 8,532 | | | 7,460 | |
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 95,372 | | | $ | 80,614 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Direct title insurance premiums | | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | 1,982 | | | $ | 2,858 | |
Agency title insurance premiums | | 2,953 | | | 2,610 | | | 3,976 | |
Escrow, title-related and other fees | | 5,321 | | | 4,717 | | | 4,333 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest and investment income | | 3,124 | | | 2,607 | | | 1,891 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | 83 | | | (164) | | | (1,493) | |
Total revenues | | 13,681 | | | 11,752 | | | 11,565 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Personnel costs | | 3,148 | | | 2,908 | | | 3,192 | |
Agent commissions | | 2,287 | | | 2,008 | | | 3,064 | |
| | | | | | |
Other operating expenses | | 1,558 | | | 1,521 | | | 1,721 | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | | 3,791 | | | 3,553 | | | 1,126 | |
Market risk benefit (gains) losses | | (25) | | | 95 | | | (182) | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 739 | | | 593 | | | 491 | |
Provision for title claim losses | | 232 | | | 207 | | | 308 | |
Interest expense | | 209 | | | 174 | | | 115 | |
Total expenses | | 11,939 | | | 11,059 | | | 9,835 | |
Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | 1,742 | | | 693 | | | 1,730 | |
Income tax expense | | 367 | | | 192 | | | 439 | |
Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | 1,375 | | | 501 | | | 1,291 | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 15 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net earnings | | 1,391 | | | 518 | | | 1,306 | |
Less: Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests | | 121 | | | 1 | | | 12 | |
Net earnings attributable to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. common shareholders | | $ | 1,270 | | | $ | 517 | | | $ | 1,294 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Earnings per share | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net earnings per share attributable to FNF common shareholders, basic | | $ | 4.69 | | | $ | 1.91 | | | $ | 4.71 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net earnings per share attributable to FNF common shareholders, diluted | | $ | 4.65 | | | $ | 1.91 | | | $ | 4.67 | |
| | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding FNF common stock, basic basis | | 271 | | | 270 | | | 275 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding FNF common stock, diluted basis | | 273 | | | 271 | | | 277 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(In millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | |
Net earnings | | $ | 1,391 | | | $ | 518 | | | $ | 1,306 | |
| | | | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings: | | | | | | |
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments and other financial instruments, net of adjustments to intangible assets and unearned revenue (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates) (1) | | (157) | | | 961 | | | (4,783) | |
Unrealized gain on investments in unconsolidated affiliates (2) | | 32 | | | 12 | | | 9 | |
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency translation (3) | | (22) | | | 6 | | | (18) | |
Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings (4) | | (8) | | | 126 | | | 173 | |
Changes in current discount rate - future policy benefits (5) | | 224 | | | (189) | | | 764 | |
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk - market risk benefits (6) | | 5 | | | (34) | | | 67 | |
| | | | | | |
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings attributable to non-controlling interest (7) | | (7) | | | (134) | | | 35 | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment (8) | | — | | | 3 | | | 5 | |
Other comprehensive earnings (loss) | | 67 | | | 751 | | | (3,748) | |
Comprehensive earnings (loss) | | 1,458 | | | 1,269 | | | (2,442) | |
Less: Comprehensive earnings attributable to non-controlling interests | | 121 | | | 1 | | | 12 | |
Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. common shareholders | | $ | 1,337 | | | $ | 1,268 | | | $ | (2,454) | |
(1)Net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(43) million, $238 million, and $(1,246) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(2)Net of income tax expense of $9 million, $3 million, and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(3)Net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(6) million and $2 million, and $(4) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(4)Net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(1) million, $34 million and $45 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(5)Net of income tax expense (benefit) of $59 million, $(50) million and $203 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(6)Net of income tax expense (benefit) of $1 million, $(9) million and $18 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(7)Net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(3) million, $(35) million and $9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(8)Net of income tax expense of $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In millions, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Common Shareholders | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | |
| | | FNF | | | | | | | | Other | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common | | | | Additional | | | | Comprehensive | | Treasury | | Non- | | | | |
| | | Stock | | | | Paid-in | | Retained | | Earnings | | Stock | | controlling | | Total | | |
| | | | | Shares | | $ | | | | | | Capital | | Earnings | | (Loss) | | Shares | | $ | | Interests | | Equity | | |
Balance, January 1, 2022 | | | | | 325 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,810 | | | $ | 4,818 | | | $ | 878 | | | 42 | | | $ | (1,545) | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 10,004 | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | | 2 | | | — | | | | | | | 39 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 39 | | | |
Non-controlling interest associated with current period acquisition | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 46 | | | 46 | | | |
Purchase of incremental share in consolidated subsidiaries | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (3) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11) | | | (14) | | | |
Issuance of restricted stock | | | | | 1 | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Treasury stock repurchased | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13 | | | (549) | | | — | | | (549) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized loss on investments and other financial instruments | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (4,783) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4,783) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized gain on investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized loss on foreign currency translation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (18) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (18) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - minimum pension liability adjustment | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | |
Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 173 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 173 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 35 | | | — | | | — | | | (35) | | | — | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 48 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 49 | | | |
Dividends declared | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | (490) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (490) | | | |
Shares withheld for taxes and in treasury | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (15) | | | — | | | (15) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in current discount rate — liability for future policy benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 764 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 764 | | | |
Change in instrument-specific credit risk - market risk benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 67 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 67 | | | |
Distribution of 15% of the common stock of F&G | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (24) | | | (397) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 421 | | | — | | | |
Subsidiary dividends declared to non-controlling interests | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (24) | | | (24) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | 1,294 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | 1,306 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | | | | | 328 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,870 | | | $ | 5,225 | | | $ | (2,870) | | | 55 | | | $ | (2,109) | | | $ | 453 | | | $ | 6,569 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (CONTINUED) | | |
(In millions, except per share data) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Common Shareholders | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | |
| | | FNF | | | | | | | | Other | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common | | | | Additional | | | | Comprehensive | | Treasury | | Non- | | | | |
| | | Stock | | | | Paid-in | | Retained | | Earnings | | Stock | | controlling | | Total | | |
| | | | | Shares | | $ | | | | | | Capital | | Earnings | | (Loss) | | Shares | | $ | | Interests | | Equity | | |
Balance January 1, 2023 | | | | | 328 | | | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,870 | | | $ | 5,225 | | | $ | (2,870) | | | 55 | | | $ | (2,109) | | | $ | 453 | | | $ | 6,569 | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 15 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock repurchased | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | | (4) | | | |
Issuance of restricted stock | | | | | 1 | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Purchase of incremental share in consolidated subsidiaries | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (11) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | (19) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on investments and other financial instruments | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 961 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 961 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on foreign currency translation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - minimum pension liability adjustment | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | |
Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 126 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 126 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (2) | | | — | | | (134) | | | — | | | — | | | 136 | | | — | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 55 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | 59 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilution from share issuance by consolidated subsidiary | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (13) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13 | | | — | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | (498) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (498) | | | |
Shares withheld for taxes and in treasury | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | (17) | | | — | | | (17) | | | |
Change in current discount rate — liability for future policy benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (189) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (189) | | | |
Change in instrument-specific credit risk - market risk benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (34) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (34) | | | |
F&G purchases of treasury stock | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (18) | | | (19) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subsidiary dividends declared to non-controlling interests | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (29) | | | (29) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | 517 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 518 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | | | | | 329 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,913 | | | $ | 5,244 | | | $ | (2,119) | | | 56 | | | $ | (2,130) | | | $ | 552 | | | $ | 7,460 | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (CONTINUED)
(In millions, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Common Shareholders | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | |
| | | FNF | | | | | | | | Other | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common | | | | Additional | | | | Comprehensive | | Treasury | | Non- | | | | |
| | | Stock | | | | Paid-in | | Retained | | Earnings | | Stock | | controlling | | Total | | |
| | | | | Shares | | $ | | | | | | Capital | | Earnings | | (Loss) | | Shares | | $ | | Interests | | Equity | | |
Balance, January 1, 2024 | | | | | 329 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,913 | | | $ | 5,244 | | | $ | (2,119) | | | 56 | | | $ | (2,130) | | | $ | 552 | | | $ | 7,460 | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | | 1 | | | — | | | | | | | 21 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 21 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-controlling interest associated with current period acquisitions | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 139 | | | 139 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of restricted stock | | | | | 1 | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Purchase of incremental share in consolidated subsidiaries | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (13) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | (21) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized loss on investments and other financial instruments | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (157) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (157) | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized gain on investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 32 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32 | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings - unrealized loss on foreign currency translation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (22) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (22) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 80 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | | | 82 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | (532) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (532) | | | |
Dilution from share issuance by consolidated subsidiary | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (24) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 24 | | | — | | | |
Shares withheld for taxes and in treasury | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (22) | | | (12) | | | (34) | | | |
Change in current discount rate — liability for future policy benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 224 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 224 | | | |
Change in instrument-specific credit risk - market risk benefits | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (1) | | | — | | | (7) | | | — | | | — | | | 8 | | | — | | | |
Subsidiary dividends declared to non-controlling interests | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (48) | | | (48) | | | |
Net earnings | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | 1,270 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 121 | | | 1,391 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2024 | | | | | 331 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 5,976 | | | $ | 5,982 | | | $ | (2,052) | | | 56 | | | $ | (2,152) | | | $ | 778 | | | $ | 8,532 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Net earnings | $ | 1,391 | | | $ | 518 | | | $ | 1,306 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 739 | | | 593 | | | 491 | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (16) | | | (17) | | | (15) | |
(Gain) loss on sales of investments and other assets and asset impairments, net | (339) | | | 542 | | | 533 | |
| | | | | |
Interest credited/index credits to contractholder account balances | 1,327 | | | 1,409 | | | (560) | |
Change in market risk benefits, net | (25) | | | 95 | | | (182) | |
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements | (1,419) | | | (1,084) | | | (814) | |
Charges assessed to contractholders for mortality and administration | (291) | | | (255) | | | (221) | |
Non-cash lease costs | 132 | | | 136 | | | 142 | |
Operating lease payments | (147) | | | (153) | | | (154) | |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates, return on investment | 127 | | | 122 | | | 151 | |
Stock-based compensation cost | 82 | | | 60 | | | 49 | |
Change in NAV of limited partnerships, net | (350) | | | (220) | | | (109) | |
Change in valuation of derivatives, equity and preferred securities, net | 189 | | | (388) | | | 947 | |
Change in derivative collateral liability, net | 91 | | | 410 | | (398) | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Change in reinsurance recoverable | (13) | | | 78 | | | 276 | |
Change in future policy benefits | 1,853 | | | 1,325 | | | 1,071 | |
Change in funds withheld from reinsurers | 3,795 | | | 3,386 | | | 2,056 | |
Net (increase) decrease in trade receivables | (43) | | | 37 | | | 178 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net decrease in reserve for title claim losses | (57) | | | (40) | | | (73) | |
Net change in income taxes | 83 | | | (50) | | | 66 | |
Net change in other assets and other liabilities | (294) | | | (26) | | | (385) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 6,815 | | | 6,478 | | | 4,355 | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities | 12,274 | | | 5,875 | | | 6,340 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Fundings of notes receivable | (21) | | | (19) | | | (99) | |
| | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment and capitalized software | (146) | | | (132) | | | (138) | |
Purchases of investment securities | (17,825) | | | (13,985) | | | (13,148) | |
Net (purchases of) proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investment securities | (1,076) | | | 340 | | | (2,571) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Other acquisitions/disposals, net of cash acquired | (586) | | | (299) | | | (180) | |
Additional investments in unconsolidated affiliates | (1,131) | | | (1,296) | | | (1,077) | |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates, return of investment | 621 | | | 423 | | | 335 | |
Net other investing activities | 28 | | | 3 | | | 14 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (7,862) | | | (9,090) | | | (10,524) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED) | | |
(In millions) | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Borrowings | 18 | | | 6 | | | 550 | |
Debt offering | 1,050 | | | 845 | | | — | |
F&G Credit Agreement repayments, net | (365) | | | (185) | | | — | |
Debt costs/equity issuance additions | (20) | | | (16) | | | (4) | |
Debt service payments | (250) | | | — | | | (400) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Dividends paid | (532) | | | (500) | | | (489) | |
Subsidiary dividends paid to non-controlling interest shareholders | (49) | | | (32) | | | (20) | |
Exercise of stock options | 21 | | | 15 | | | 39 | |
| | | | | |
Net change in secured trust deposits | (179) | | | (132) | | | (72) | |
Purchase of additional share in consolidated subsidiaries | (21) | | | (19) | | | (15) | |
Payment of contingent consideration for prior period acquisitions | (17) | | | (10) | | | (6) | |
Payment for shares withheld for taxes and in treasury | (34) | | | (17) | | | (15) | |
Contractholder account deposits | 10,147 | | | 7,787 | | | 8,530 | |
Contractholder account withdrawals | (8,010) | | | (4,625) | | | (3,450) | |
F&G repurchases of F&G stock | — | | | (18) | | | — | |
Purchases of treasury stock | — | | | (6) | | | (553) | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,759 | | | 3,093 | | | 4,095 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 712 | | | 481 | | | (2,074) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 2,767 | | | 2,286 | | | 4,360 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 3,479 | | | $ | 2,767 | | | $ | 2,286 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note A. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following describes the business and significant accounting policies of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, "we," "us," "our," the "Company" or "FNF"), which have been followed in preparing the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Description of the Business
We are a leading provider of (i) title insurance, escrow and other title-related services, including trust activities, trustee sales guarantees, recordings and reconveyances and home warranty products, (ii) technology and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries and (iii) annuity and life insurance products. FNF is one of the nation’s largest title insurance companies operating through its title insurance underwriters - Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ("FNTIC"), Chicago Title Insurance Company ("Chicago Title"), Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company ("Commonwealth Title"), Alamo Title Insurance and National Title Insurance of New York Inc. - which collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States. Through our subsidiary, ServiceLink Holdings, LLC ("ServiceLink"), we provide mortgage transaction services, including title-related services and facilitation of production and management of mortgage loans. We are also a leading provider of insurance solutions serving retail annuity and life customers and institutional clients through our majority owned subsidiary, F&G Annuities & Life ("F&G").
For information about our reporting segment refer to Note J Segment Information.
Recent Developments
Redemption of 5.50% F&G Senior Notes
On February 1, 2025, F&G redeemed the outstanding $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.50% Senior Notes due May 1, 2025 (the "5.50% F&G Senior Notes"). The notes were redeemed for a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. On and after the redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the notes.
7.30% F&G Junior Notes
On January 13, 2025, F&G completed its public offering of its 7.30% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2065 with an aggregate principal amount of $375 million (the "7.30% F&G Notes"). F&G used a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to redeem the outstanding $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.50% F&G Senior Notes. F&G intends to use the remaining net proceeds of this offering for general corporate purposes. The 7.30% F&G Notes were registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (as amended) (the “Securities Act”).
6.25% F&G Senior Notes
On October 4, 2024, F&G completed its public offering of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2034 with an aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the "6.25% F&G Notes"). The 6.25% F&G Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated basis by each of F&G’s subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G’s obligations under its existing credit agreements. A portion of the net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding balance of $365 million on the Company’s revolving credit facility. The 6.25% F&G Notes were registered under the Securities Act.
Acquisition of PALH
On July 18, 2024, F&G acquired a 100% ownership stake in the equity of PALH, LLC ("PALH"). PALH markets and sells life insurance and annuity products of various insurance carriers to individuals through a network of agents. Prior to the acquisition date, PALH owned a 70% ownership stake in an operating company of which F&G owned 30% equity. Total consideration of approximately $314 million is comprised of cash of $215 million, settlement of a prepaid asset of $8 million, acquisition date fair value of the previously held interests of $92 million, net of $1 million cash acquired.
6.50% F&G Senior Notes
On June 4, 2024, F&G completed its public offering of $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.50% Senior Notes due 2029 (the "6.50% F&G Notes"). The 6.50% F&G Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated basis by each of F&G’s subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G’s obligations under its existing credit agreement. A portion of the net proceeds were used to finance a cash tender offer by its wholly owned subsidiary Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. ("FGLH") for an aggregate principal amount of $250 million of FGLH’s 5.50% Senior Notes due 2025 (the "5.50%" F&G Notes). The 6.50%
F&G Notes were registered under the Securities Act.
For more information related to the F&G Notes refer to Note G Notes Payable.
Amendment to our Revolving Credit Facility
On February 16, 2024, we entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for our $800 million revolving credit facility (the "Amended Revolving Credit Facility") with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and other agents party thereto (the "Sixth Restated Credit Agreement"). For further information related to the Amended Revolving Credit Facility and the Sixth Restated Credit Agreement refer to Note G Notes Payable.
Amendment to the F&G Credit Agreement
On February 16, 2024, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement of our $665 million credit agreement, with the guarantors party thereto, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and an issuing bank (the "Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement"). For more information related to the Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement refer to Note G Notes Payable.
Investment of $250 million in F&G
On January 12, 2024, we completed a $250 million preferred stock investment in F&G. F&G will use the net proceeds from the investment to support growth of its assets under management.
Under the terms of the agreement, we invested $250 million in exchange for 5 million shares of F&G's 6.875% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock"). Each share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $50.00 per share. Unless earlier converted at the option of the holder, each outstanding share of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of common stock of F&G on January 15, 2027 (the "Mandatory Conversion Date"). Upon conversion on the Mandatory Conversion Date, the conversion rate for each share of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will be no more than 1.1111 shares of common stock and no less than 0.9456 shares of common stock per share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, depending on the value of F&G's common stock.
Acquisition of ROAR
On January 2, 2024, F&G acquired a 70% majority ownership stake in the equity of Roar Joint Venture, LLC ("Roar") resulting in the consolidation of Roar in F&G's financial statements. Roar wholesales life insurance and annuity products to banks and broker dealers through a network of agents. Total initial consideration is comprised of cash of approximately $269 million and $48 million of contingent consideration. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company has agreed to make cash payments of up to approximately $90 million over a three year period upon the achievement by Roar of certain earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") milestones.
For more information regarding the Roar and PALH acquisitions, refer to Note B Acquisitions.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") and include our accounts as well as our wholly-owned subsidiaries and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated. Non-controlling interests recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings represent the portion of a majority-owned subsidiary's net earnings or loss that is owned by non-controlling shareholders of the subsidiary. Non-controlling interests recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets represent the portion of equity in a consolidated subsidiary owned by non-controlling shareholders.
We are involved in certain entities that are considered variable interest entities ("VIEs") as defined under GAAP. Our involvement with VIEs is primarily to invest in assets that allow us to gain exposure to a broadly diversified portfolio of asset classes. A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity to finance its own activities without additional financial support, where investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest, or where the entity is structured with non-substantive voting rights. We assess our relationships with VIEs to evaluate if we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If we determine we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE in our Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note E Investments for additional information on our investments in VIEs.
Investments
Fixed Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale
Fixed maturity securities are purchased to support our investment strategies, which are developed based on factors including rate of return, maturity, credit risk, duration, tax considerations and regulatory requirements. Our investments in fixed maturity securities have been designated as available-for-sale ("AFS") and are carried at fair value, net of allowance for
expected credit losses, with unrealized gains and losses included within AOCI, net of deferred income taxes. Fair values for fixed maturity securities are principally a function of current market conditions and are primarily valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable or unobservable. We recognize investment income on fixed maturities based on the effective interest method, which results in the recognition of a constant rate of return on the investment equal to the prevailing rate at the time of purchase or at the time of subsequent adjustments of book value. In our title segment, realized gains and losses on sales of our fixed maturity securities are determined on the basis of the cost of the specific investments sold and are credited or charged to income on a trade date basis. Our F&G segment uses first-in first-out cost basis and generally records security transactions on a trade date basis except for private placements, which are recorded on a settlement date basis. Realized gains and losses on sales of fixed maturity securities are reported within Recognized gains and losses, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Fixed maturity securities AFS are subject to an allowance for credit loss and changes in the allowance are reported in net earnings as a component of Recognized gains and losses, net. For details on our policy around allowance for expected credit losses on AFS securities, refer to Note E Investments.
Preferred and Equity Securities
Preferred and equity securities held are carried at fair value as of the balance sheet dates. Changes in fair value and realized gains and losses on sales of our preferred and equity securities are reported within Recognized gains and losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Realized gains and losses on sales of our preferred and equity securities are determined on the first in first out cost basis and are credited or charged to earnings on a trade date basis unless the security is a private placement in which case settlement date basis is used. Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in Interest and investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Derivative Financial Instruments
In our F&G segment, we hedge certain portions of our exposure to product related equity market risk by entering into derivative transactions (primarily equity options). We utilize interest rate swaps to reduce market risks from interest rate changes on our earnings associated with our floating rate investments. All such derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The changes in fair value are reported within Recognized gains and losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The change in the fair value of derivative instruments is included in (Gain) loss on sales of investments and other assets and asset impairments, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
We purchase financial instruments that may contain embedded derivative instruments. If it is determined that the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract for measurement purposes.
Mortgage Loans
Our investment in mortgage loans consists of commercial and residential mortgage loans on real estate, which are reported at amortized cost, less allowance for expected credit losses. For details on our policy around allowance for expected credit losses on mortgage loans, refer to Note E Investments.
Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") are continuously monitored by reviewing appraisals, operating statements, rent revenues, annual inspection reports, loan specific credit quality, property characteristics, market trends and other factors.
CMLs are rated for the purpose of quantifying the level of risk. Loans are placed on a watch list when the debt service coverage ("DSC") ratio falls below certain thresholds and the loan-to-value ("LTV") ratios exceeds certain thresholds. Loans on the watchlist are closely monitored for collateral deficiency or other credit events that may lead to a potential loss of principal or interest. We define delinquent mortgage loans as 30 days past due, consistent with industry practice.
Residential mortgage loans ("RMLs") have a primary credit quality indicator of either a performing or nonperforming loan. We define nonperforming RMLs as those that are 90 or more days past due and/or in nonaccrual status, which is assessed monthly. Generally, nonperforming RMLs have a higher risk of experiencing a credit loss. We consider residential mortgage loans that are 90 or more days past due and have an LTV greater than 90% to be foreclosure probable.
Interest on loans is recognized on an accrual basis at the applicable interest rate on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and direct costs, as well as premiums and discounts, are amortized as level yield adjustments over the respective loan terms. Unamortized net fees or costs are recognized upon early repayment of the loans. Interest income, amortization of premiums and discounts, prepayment fees, and loan commitment fees are reported in Interest and investment income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Short-term investments
Short-term investments consist of financial instruments with an original maturity of one year or less when purchased and include short-term fixed maturity securities and money market instruments, which are carried at fair value, and short-term loans, which are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
In our F&G segment, we account for our investments in unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method or by electing the fair value option. Initial investments are recorded at cost. For investments subsequently measured using the equity method (primarily limited partnerships), adjustments to the carrying amount reflect our pro rata ownership percentage of the operating results as indicated by net asset value ("NAV") in the unconsolidated affiliates’ financial statements, which we may adjust if we determine NAV is not calculated consistent with investment company fair value principles. Our pro rata share of NAV adjustments are reported in Interest and investment income and realized gains and losses on sales are reported in Recognized gains and (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Distributions received from investments measured using the equity method are recorded as a decrease in the investment balance. Recognition of income and adjustments to the carrying amount can be delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are obtained from the general partner or managing member generally on a one to three-month delay. Management inquires quarterly with the general partner or managing member to determine whether any credit or other market events have occurred since prior quarter financial statements to ensure any material events are properly included in current quarter NAV adjustments and investment income.
For investments subsequently measured using the fair value option, adjustments to the carrying amount reflecting the change in fair value of the investment and realized gains and losses on sales are reported in Recognized gains and (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Distributions received from investments measured using the fair value option are reported within Interest and investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
For descriptions of the fair value methodologies used for our investments, refer to Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
In our title segment, we account for our investments in unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method of accounting and earnings on our investments in unconsolidated affiliates are recorded within Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We classify distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows using the cumulative earnings approach. Under the cumulative earnings approach, distributions are considered returns on investment and classified as cash inflows from operating activities unless the Company’s cumulative distributions from an investee received exceed the cumulative equity in earnings of such investee. When cumulative distributions from an investee exceed cumulative equity in earnings of the investee, such excess is considered a return of investment and is classified as a cash inflow from investing activities.
Interest and investment income
Dividends and interest income are recorded in Interest and investment income and recognized when earned. Income or losses upon call or prepayment of fixed maturity securities are recognized in Interest and investment income. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments in fixed maturity securities are reflected in Interest and investment income over the contractual terms of the investments, and for callable investments at a premium, based on the earliest call date of the investments, in a manner that produces a constant effective yield.
For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, included in the fixed maturity securities portfolios, one of two models may be used to recognize interest income. For higher rated securities, interest income will be estimated based on an effective yield that considers cash flows received to date plus current expectations of future cash flows. For all other securities, interest income will be estimated based upon an effective yield that considers current expectations of future cash flows. For both interest income models, the estimated future cash flows include assumptions regarding the performance of the underlying collateral pool.
Interest and investment income is presented net of investment expenses and the effects of certain reinsurance contracts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Highly liquid instruments purchased as part of cash management with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these instruments approximate fair value.
Trade and Notes Receivables
The carrying values reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for trade and notes receivables approximate their fair value.
Premium revenues from agency title operations are recognized when the underlying title order and transaction closing, if applicable, are complete and reported to us. Premium revenues from agency operations and related commissions include an accrual based on estimated historical transaction volume data for policies that have closed in a particular period in which premiums have not yet been reported to us. Historically, the time lag between the closing of these transactions by our agents and the reporting of these policies, or premiums, to us has been up to 15 months, with 61% - 92% reported within three months following closing, an additional 7% - 29% reported within the next three months and the remainder within seven to fifteen months. In addition to accruing these earned but unreported agency premiums, we also accrue agent commission expense, which was 77.4% of agent premiums earned in 2024, 76.9% of agent premiums earned in 2023 and 77.1% of agent premiums earned in 2022. The amount due from our agents relating to this accrual, i.e., the agent premium less their contractual retained commission, was approximately $40 million and $35 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Due to the offsetting effects of reversing prior period accruals, the impact of this accrual to our recorded Agency title insurance premiums, Agent commissions and net earnings in any given period is not considered material.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements are estimates of the fair values at the balance sheet date using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data. See a description of the fair value methodology used in Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in Business Combinations
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations, requires an acquirer to recognize, separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and to measure these items generally at their acquisition date fair values. If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, we are required to report provisional amounts in the financial statements for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. Adjustments to provisional amounts initially recorded that are identified during the measurement period are recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. This includes any effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. During the measurement period, we are also required to recognize additional assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have resulted in the recognition of those assets and liabilities as of that date. The measurement period ends the sooner of one year from the acquisition date, or when we receive the information we were seeking about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date or learn that more information is not obtainable.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of identifiable net assets acquired and assumed in a business combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reviewed for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount. In evaluating the recoverability of goodwill, we perform a qualitative analysis at the reporting unit level to determine whether there are any events or circumstances that would indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of our recorded goodwill exceeds its carrying value, prior to performing a full fair-value assessment.
We complete annual goodwill impairment analyses in the fourth quarter of each period presented using a September 30 measurement date. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we determined there were no events or circumstances which indicated that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value.
Insurance and Reinsurance Related Intangible Assets
We have insurance and reinsurance related intangible assets, which include the value of insurance and reinsurance contracts acquired (hereafter referred to as “VOBA”), DAC, DSI, and cost of reinsurance (“COR”). VOBA, DAC, and DSI are reported in Other intangible assets, net, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. COR may be reported in Prepaid expenses and other assets or in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as described below under “Reinsurance - Cost of Reinsurance.”
VOBA is an intangible asset that reflects the amount recorded as insurance contract liabilities less the estimated fair value of in-force contracts (“VIF”) in a life insurance company acquisition. It represents the portion of the purchase price that is allocated to the value of the rights to receive future cash flows from the business in force at the acquisition date. VOBA is a function of the VIF, current GAAP reserves, GAAP assets, and deferred tax liability. The VIF is determined by the present value of statutory distributable earnings less opening required capital. DAC consists principally of commissions and other acquisition costs that are related directly to the successful sale of new or renewal insurance contracts that are deferred as they
are incurred. When insurance contracts are reinsured and reinsurance accounting is applied, acquisition cost reimbursements from reinsurers are recorded as a reduction to DAC. Indirect or unsuccessful acquisition costs, maintenance, product development and overhead expenses are charged to expense as incurred and are offset by maintenance expense reimbursements within a reinsurance arrangement, when reinsurance accounting is applied to the respective arrangement DSI represents up front bonus credits and persistency or vesting bonuses credited to contractholder fund balances. COR represents net cash flows on reinsurance coverage to ensure no gain or loss is recognized at inception.
VOBA, DAC, DSI, and COR are amortized on a constant level basis for the grouped contracts over the expected term of the related contracts to approximate straight-line amortization. Contracts are grouped by product type, feature and issue year into cohorts consistent with the grouping used in estimating the associated liability, where applicable. The constant level amortization bases of VOBA, DAC, DSI, and COR varies by product type. For universal life and IUL insurance products, the constant level basis used is face amount in force. For deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), the constant level basis used is initial premium deposit for DAC and DSI and vested account value as of the acquisition date for VOBA and ceded initial premium for COR. For immediate annuity contracts, the VOBA balance is amortized in alignment with the Company’s accounting policy of amortizing the deferred profit liability (“DPL”). All amortization bases are adjusted by full lapses, which includes deaths, full surrenders, annuitizations and maturities, where applicable.
The constant level basis used for amortization are projected using mortality and lapse assumptions that are based on Company’s experience, industry data, and other factors and are consistent with those used for the FPB, where applicable. If those projected assumptions change in future periods, they will be reflected in the cohort level amortization basis at that time. Unexpected contract terminations, due to higher mortality and/or lapse experience than expected, are recognized in the current period as a reduction of the capitalized balances. All balances are reduced for actual experience in excess of expected experience with changes in future estimates recognized prospectively over the remaining expected grouped contract term. The impact of changes in projected assumptions and the impact of actual experience that is different from expectations impact the amortization of these intangible assets, which is reported within Depreciation and amortization for VOBA, DAC DSI and for COR, if the net COR balance is in a deferred gain position is reported within Life insurance premiums and other fees, and if the net COR balance is in a deferred loss position is reported within Other operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Some of our IUL policies require payment of fees or other policyholder assessments in advance for services that will be rendered over the estimated lives of the policies or contracts. These payments are established as URL upon receipt and included in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. URL is amortized like DAC over the estimated lives of these policies.
Other Intangible Assets
We have other intangible assets, not including goodwill, VOBA, DAC or DSI, which consist primarily of customer relationships and contracts, the value of distribution network acquired ("VODA"), trademarks and tradenames, state licenses, and computer software, which are generally recorded in connection with business combinations at their fair value. Intangible assets with estimable lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In general, customer relationships are amortized over their estimated useful lives using an accelerated method, which takes into consideration expected customer attrition rates. VODA is an intangible asset that represents the value of an acquired distribution network and is amortized using the sum of years digits method. Contractual relationships are generally amortized over their contractual life. Trademarks and tradenames are generally amortized over ten years. Capitalized computer software includes the fair value of software acquired in business combinations, purchased software and capitalized software development costs. Purchased software is recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life. Software acquired in business combinations is recorded at its fair value and amortized using straight-line or accelerated methods over its estimated useful life. For internal-use computer software products, internal and external costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as they are incurred. Internal and external costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized on a product-by-product basis commencing on the date the software is ready for its intended use. We do not capitalize any costs once the software is ready for its intended use.
We review VOBA, DSI and other intangible assets for impairment annually or when events or circumstances occur that indicate a potential change in the underlying basis. For further information, refer to Note M Intangibles for details of impairment expense.
Title Plants
Title plants are recorded at the cost incurred to construct or obtain and organize historical title information to the point it can be used to perform title searches. Costs incurred to maintain, update and operate title plants are expensed as incurred. Title plants are not amortized as they are considered to have an indefinite life, if maintained. Sales of title plants are reported at the
amount received net of the adjusted costs of the title plant sold. Sales of title plant copies are reported at the amount received. No cost is allocated to the sale of copies of title plants unless the carrying value of the title plant is diminished or impaired. Title plants are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We reviewed title plants for impairment for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 and did not record any impairment expense in the year ended December 31, 2023. We recorded $2 million and $1 million of impairment expense related to title plants in the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2022, respectively.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets: twenty to thirty years for buildings and three to twenty-five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the applicable lease or the estimated useful lives of such assets. Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recorded $2 million of impairment expense related to property and equipment in our title segment in the year ended December 31, 2022. We did not record any impairment expense related to property and equipment in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Contractholder Funds
Contractholder funds include deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), IULs, funding agreements and non-life contingent ("NLC") immediate annuities (which includes NLC pension risk transfer ("PRT") annuities). The liabilities for contractholder funds for fixed rate annuities, funding agreements and NLC immediate annuities consist of contract account balances that accrue to the benefit of the contractholders. The liabilities for indexed annuities and IUL policies consist of the value of the host contract plus the fair value of the indexed crediting feature of the policy, which is accounted for as an embedded derivative. The embedded derivative liability is carried at fair value in Contractholder funds in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair value reported in Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. See a description of the fair value methodology used in Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Future Policy Benefits
The FPB are determined as the present value of future policy benefits and related claims expenses to be paid to or on behalf of the policyholder less the present value of future net premiums to be collected from policyholders. The FPB for traditional life policies and life-contingent immediate annuity policies (which includes life-contingent PRT annuities) are estimated using current assumptions that include discount rate, mortality and surrender/lapse terminations for traditional life insurance policies only, and expenses. The expense assumption is locked-in at contract issuance and not subsequently reviewed or updated. The initial assumptions are based on generally accepted actuarial methods and a combination of internal and industry experience. Policies are terminated through surrenders, lapses and maturities, where surrenders represent the voluntary terminations of policies by policyholders, lapses represent cancellations by us due to nonpayment of premiums, and maturities are determined by policy contract terms.
For traditional life policies and life-contingent immediate annuity policies, contracts are grouped into cohorts by product type, legal entity, and issue year, or acquisition year for cohorts established as of the F&G acquisition date, June 1, 2020. Life-contingent PRT annuities are grouped into cohorts by deal and legal entity. At contract inception, a net premium ratio ("NPR") is determined, which is calculated based on discounted future cash flows projected using best estimate assumptions and is capped at 100%, as net premiums cannot exceed gross premiums. Cohorts with NPRs less than 100% are not used to offset cohorts with NPRs greater than 100%.
The NPR is adjusted for changes in cash flow assumptions and for differences between actual and expected experience. We assess the appropriateness of all future cash flow assumptions, excluding the expense assumption, on a quarterly basis and perform an in-depth review of future cash flow assumptions in the third quarter of each year. Updates are made when evidence suggests a revision is necessary. Updates for actual experience, which includes actual cash flows and insurance in-force, are performed on a quarterly basis. These updated cash flows are used to calculate a revised NPR, which is used to derive an updated liability as of the beginning of the current reporting period, discounted at the original contract issuance date. The updated liability is compared with the carrying amount of the liability as of that same date before the revised NPR. The difference between these amounts is the remeasurement gain or loss, presented parenthetically within Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. In subsequent periods, the revised NPR is used to measure the FPB, subject to future revisions. If the NPR is greater than 100%, and therefore capped at 100%, the liability is increased and expensed immediately to reflect the amount necessary for net premiums to equal gross premiums. As the liability assumptions are reviewed and updated, if deemed necessary, at least annually, if conditions improve whereby the contracts are no longer expected to have net premiums in excess of gross premiums, the improvements would be captured in the remeasurement process and reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of improvement.
For traditional life policies and life-contingent immediate annuity policies (which includes life-contingent PRT annuities), the discount rate assumption is an equivalent single rate that is derived based on A-credit-rated fixed-income instruments with similar duration to the liability. We selected fixed-income instruments that have been A-rated by Bloomberg. In order to reflect the duration characteristics of the liability, we will use an implied forward yield curve and linear interpolation will be used for durations that have limited or no market observable points on the curve. The discount rate assumption is updated quarterly and used to remeasure the liability at the reporting date, with the resulting change reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings.
Deferred Profit Liability
For life-contingent immediate annuity policies, gross premiums received in excess of net premiums are deferred at initial recognition as a DPL. Premiums are measured using assumptions consistent with those used in the measurement of the related liability for FPBs, including discount rate, mortality, and expenses.
The DPL is amortized and recognized as premium revenue with the amount of expected future benefit payments, discounted using the same discount rate determined and locked-in at contract issuance that is used in the measurement of the related FPB. Interest is accreted on the balance of the DPL using this same discount rate. We periodically review and update our estimates using the actual historical experience and updated cash flows for the DPL at the same time as the estimates of cash flows for the FPB. When cash flows are updated, the updated estimates are used to recalculate the initial DPL at contract issuance. The recalculated DPL as of the beginning of the current reporting period is compared to the carrying amount of the DPL as of the beginning of the current reporting period, with any differences recognized as a remeasurement gain or loss, presented parenthetically within Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The DPL is recorded as a component of the Future policy benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Market Risk Benefits ("MRBs")
MRBs are contracts or contract features that both provide protection to the contract holder from other-than-nominal capital market risk (equity, interest rate and foreign exchange risk) and expose the Company to other-than-nominal capital market risk. MRBs include certain contract features primarily on indexed annuities products that provide minimum guarantees to policyholders, such as guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB"), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit ("GMWB") riders and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit ("GMAB") riders. In certain reinsurance transactions, the underlying risks ceded to a reinsurer contain MRBs.
MRBs (inclusive of reinsured MRBs) are measured at fair value using an attributed fee measurement approach where attributed fees are explicit rider charges collectible from the policyholder (or paid to the reinsurer) used to cover the excess benefits, which represent expected benefits in excess of the policyholder’s account value. At contract inception, an attributed fee ratio is calculated equal to rider charges over benefits paid in excess of the account value attributable to the MRBs. The attributed fee ratio remains static over the life of the MRBs and is capped at 100%. Each period subsequent to contract inception, the attributed fee ratio is used to calculate the fair value of the MRBs using a risk neutral valuation method and is based on current net amounts at risk, market data, internal and industry experience, and other factors. The balances are computed using assumptions including mortality, full and partial surrender, GMWB utilization, risk-free rates including non-performance spread and risk margin, market value of options and economic scenarios. Policyholder behavior assumptions are reviewed at least annually, typically in the third quarter, for any revisions. Reinsured MRBs are valued using a methodology consistent with direct MRBs, with the exception of the non-performance spread which reflects the credit of the reinsurer. MRBs can either be in an asset or liability position and are presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the right of setoff criteria are not met. Changes in fair value, net, are recognized in Market risk benefit (gains) losses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, except for the change in fair value due to a change in the instrument-specific credit risk, which is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings. See a description of the fair value methodology used in Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Note X Market Risk Benefits.
Reserve for Title Claim Losses
Our reserve for title claim losses includes known claims as well as losses we expect to incur, net of recoupments. Each known claim is reserved based on our review as to the estimated amount of the claim and the costs required to settle the claim. Reserves for claims, which are incurred but not reported are established at the time premium revenue is recognized based on historical loss experience and also take into consideration other factors, including industry trends, claim loss history, current legal environment, geographic considerations and the type of policy written.
The reserve for title claim losses also includes reserves for losses arising from closing and disbursement functions due to fraud or operational error.
If a loss is related to a policy issued by an independent agent, we may proceed against the independent agent pursuant to the terms of the agency agreement. In any event, we may proceed against third parties who are responsible for any loss under the title insurance policy under rights of subrogation.
Secured Trust Deposits
In the state of Illinois, a trust company is permitted to commingle and invest customers’ assets with its own assets, pending completion of real estate transactions. Accordingly, our Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect a secured trust deposit liability of $551 million and $731 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, representing customers’ assets held by us and corresponding assets including cash and investments pledged as security for those trust balances.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, is applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.
Reinsurance
Title
In our Title segment, in a limited number of situations, we limit our maximum loss exposure by reinsuring certain risks with other title insurers. We also earn a small amount of additional income, which is reflected in our direct premiums, by assuming reinsurance for certain risks of other title insurers. We cede a portion of certain policy and other liabilities under agent fidelity, excess of loss and case-by-case reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance agreements provide that in the event of a loss (including costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses) exceeding the retained amounts, the reinsurer is liable for the excess amount assumed. However, the ceding company remains primarily liable in the event the reinsurer does not meet its contractual obligations.
F&G
In our F&G segment, our insurance subsidiaries enter into reinsurance agreements with other companies in the normal course of business. In certain arrangements that are not accounted for as reinsurance, the right of offset may be applied resulting in all balances and activity associated with the agreement being presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Earnings, respectively.
When the right of offset is not applied, the arrangement is reflected on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Earnings. This results in the recognition of a Reinsurance recoverable for amounts due from the reinsurer. For arrangements accounted for as reinsurance, the Reinsurance recoverable balance reflects the reserve balance of the policies ceded. For arrangements not accounted for as reinsurance, deposit accounting is applied. As a result, the deposit asset presented as a Reinsurance recoverable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is based on the actual and expected cash flows due from the reinsurer where the interest method is used to accrete the deposit asset using an effective yield based on changes in actual and expected cash flows. For coinsurance of FIA and IUL policies, the Reinsurance recoverable will incorporate the fair value of the indexed crediting feature, which is accounted for as an embedded derivative. Changes in the Reinsurance recoverable balance are reported as Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Cost of Reinsurance
Amounts received from or paid to reinsurers in excess of reimbursements or liabilities ceded, respectively, represents COR. If the net COR balance is in a deferred gain position, it is included within Accounts payable and accrued liabilities with the related amortization reflected within Life insurance premiums and other fees and, if in a deferred loss position, is included within the Prepaid expenses and other assets with the related amortization reflected within Other operating expenses, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Earnings, respectively. Premiums and expenses are recorded net of reinsurance ceded.
Funds Withheld Arrangements
F&G cedes certain business on a coinsurance funds withheld basis. Investment results for the assets that support the coinsurance that are segregated within the funds withheld account are passed directly to the reinsurer pursuant to the contractual terms of the reinsurance agreement, which creates embedded derivatives considered to be total return swaps. These total return swaps are not clearly and closely related to the underlying reinsurance agreement and thus require bifurcation. The fair value of the total return swaps is based on the change in fair value of the underlying assets held in the funds withheld account. These
embedded derivatives are reported in Prepaid expenses and other assets if in a net gain position, or Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, if in a net loss position on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related gains or losses are reported in Recognized gains and (losses), net, on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
See Note O F&G Reinsurance for more details over F&G's reinsurance agreements.
Revenue Recognition
Refer to Note L Revenue Recognition for a description of our accounting for our various revenue streams.
Benefits and Other Changes in Policy Reserves
Benefit expenses for deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), IUL policies and funding agreements include interest credited to contractholder account balances. For indexed annuities and IUL, the benefits expense includes the change in fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with the equity crediting rates. Benefit claims in excess of contract account balances, net of reinsurance recoveries, are charged to expense in the period that they are earned by the policyholder based on their selected strategy or strategies.
All changes in the Reinsurance recoverable balance that need to be reflected in earnings are included within Benefits and other changes in policy reserves on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For reinsurance arrangements that apply reinsurance accounting, this primarily relates to changes in the reserve balance ceded. For reinsurance arrangements that apply deposit accounting, this primarily relates to accretion of the deposit asset balance.
Other changes in policy reserves also include the change in reserves for life insurance products. For traditional life and life-contingent immediate annuities (which includes PRT annuities with life contingencies), policy benefit claims are charged to expense in the period that the claims are incurred, net of reinsurance recoveries. Remeasurement gains or losses on the related FPB and DPL balances are presented parenthetically within Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
We account for stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method. Using the fair value method of accounting, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award at the grant date using quoted market prices, and recognized over the service period.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share, as presented on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings, is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. In periods when earnings are positive, diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the impact of assumed conversions of potentially dilutive securities. For periods when we recognize a net loss, diluted earnings per share is equal to basic earnings per share as the impact of assumed conversions of potentially dilutive securities is considered to be antidilutive. We have granted certain stock options, shares of restricted stock, convertible debt instruments and certain other convertible share-based payments, which have been treated as common share equivalents for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share for periods in which positive earnings have been reported.
The net earnings of F&G in our calculation of diluted earnings per share is adjusted for dilution related to certain F&G restricted stock granted to F&G's employees in accordance with ASC 260-10-55-20. We calculate the ratio of the shares of F&G we own to the total weighted average diluted shares of F&G outstanding and multiply the ratio by F&G's net earnings. The result is used for F&G's net earnings attributable to FNF included in our consolidated net earnings in the numerator for our diluted EPS calculation.
Restricted stock, options or other instruments, which provide the ability to acquire shares of our common stock that are antidilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. There were fewer than 1 million antidilutive instruments outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss)
We report Comprehensive earnings (loss) in accordance with GAAP on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings. Total comprehensive earnings are defined as all changes in shareholders' equity during a period, other than those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. While total comprehensive earnings is the activity in a period and is largely driven by net earnings in that period, accumulated other comprehensive earnings or loss represents the cumulative balance of other comprehensive earnings, net of tax, as of the balance sheet date. Amounts reclassified to net earnings relate to the realized gains (losses) on our investments and other financial instruments, excluding investments in unconsolidated
affiliates, and are included in Recognized gains and losses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The income tax effects are released from AOCI when the related activity is reclassified to net earnings.
Changes in the balance of Other comprehensive earnings (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, by component are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other financial instruments, net (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates) | | Change in current discount rate - future policy benefits | | Change in instrument-specific credit risk - market risk benefits | | Other | | Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) | |
| (In millions) | |
Balance January 1, 2022 | $ | 986 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | (116) | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 878 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustments | 181 | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | 173 | | |
Other comprehensive earnings | (4,783) | | | 764 | | | 67 | | | (4) | | | (3,956) | | |
Non-controlling interest | 33 | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 35 | | |
Balance December 31, 2022 | (3,583) | | | 763 | | | (48) | | | (2) | | | (2,870) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustments | 137 | | | — | | | — | | | (11) | | | 126 | | |
Other comprehensive earnings | 961 | | | (189) | | | (34) | | | 21 | | | 759 | | |
Non-controlling interest | (170) | | | 31 | | | 6 | | | (1) | | | (134) | | |
Balance December 31, 2023 | (2,655) | | | 605 | | | (76) | | | 7 | | | (2,119) | | |
Reclassification adjustments | 3 | | — | | | — | | | (11) | | | (8) | | |
Other comprehensive earnings | (157) | | | 224 | | | 5 | | | 10 | | | 82 | | |
Non-controlling interest | 14 | | | (21) | | | — | | | — | | | (7) | | |
Balance December 31, 2024 | $ | (2,795) | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | (71) | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (2,052) | | |
Management Estimates
The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Periodically, and at least annually, typically in the third quarter, we review the assumptions associated with reserves for policy benefits and product guarantees. During the third quarter of 2024 and for the year ended December 31, 2024, based on policyholder behavior, experience and interest rate movements, we reflected updates to surrender assumptions for recent and expected near term policyholder behavior, as well as updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds. These changes resulted in a decrease in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $89 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
During the third quarter of 2023 and for the year ended December 31, 2023, based on increases in interest rates and pricing changes, we updated certain indexed annuities assumptions to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within the contractholder funds and also aligned reserves to actual policyholder behavior. These changes resulted in an increase in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $73 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, based on increases in interest rates and pricing changes during 2022, we updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds and the fair value of market risk benefits. These changes, taken together, resulted in an increase in contractholder funds and market risk benefits of $99 million.
Owned Distribution Investments
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we expensed approximately $119 million, $154 million and $74 million in commissions on sales through our funded owned distribution investments and their affiliates, respectively, with the acquisition expense deferred and amortized in Depreciation and amortization on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Note B — Acquisitions
Owned Distribution - Acquisition of Roar Joint Venture, LLC
On January 2, 2024, F&G acquired a 70% majority ownership stake in the equity of Roar Joint Venture, LLC (“Roar”). Roar wholesales life insurance and annuity products to banks and broker-dealers through a network of agents. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company has agreed to make cash payments of up to approximately $90 million over a three-year period upon the achievement of certain EBITDA milestones of Roar.
The initial purchase price is as follows (in millions):
| | | | | |
Cash paid for 70% majority interest of Roar shares | $ | 269 | |
Less: Cash acquired net of non-controlling interests | 1 | |
Net cash paid for 70% majority interest of Roar | 268 | |
Initial fair value of contingent consideration | 48 | |
Total initial consideration | $ | 316 | |
The following table summarizes the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
| | | | | |
| Fair value as of January 2, 2024 |
| |
| |
| (In millions) |
Goodwill | $ | 268 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 3 | |
Other intangible assets | 183 | |
Total assets acquired | 454 | |
| |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2 | |
Total liabilities assumed | 2 | |
| |
Non-controlling interests (fair value determined using income approach) | 136 | |
Total liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests | 138 | |
| |
Net assets acquired | $ | 316 | |
The gross carrying value and weighted average estimated useful lives of Other intangible assets acquired in the Roar acquisition consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Carrying Value | | Estimated Useful Life |
Other intangible assets: | (In millions) | | (In years) |
Customer relationships | $ | 179 | | | 12 |
Definite lived trademarks, tradenames, and other | 4 | | | 10 |
Total Other intangible assets | $ | 183 | | | |
| | | |
Goodwill consists primarily of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as the assembled workforce and synergies between the entities. The total amount of goodwill recorded is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Roar’s revenues of $78 million and net earnings attributable to F&G common shareholders of $6 million are included in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Contingent Consideration
Under the terms of the purchase agreement for Roar, we have agreed to make cash payments of up to $90 million over a three-year period upon the achievement by Roar of certain EBITDA milestones. The contingent consideration is recorded at fair value in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Refer to Note A Basis of Financial Statements for more information on the Roar purchase and refer to Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments for more information regarding the fair value of the contingent consideration.
Owned Distribution - Acquisition of PALH, LLC
On July 18, 2024, F&G acquired a 100% ownership stake in the equity of PALH, LLC (“PALH”). PALH markets and sells life insurance and annuity products of various insurance carriers to individuals through a network of agents. Prior to the acquisition date, PALH owned a 70% ownership stake in an operating company of which F&G owned 30% equity. Immediately before the acquisition date, the fair value of F&G’s minority stake in the operating company was approximately $92 million, derived from the transaction value. The transaction value contemplates measures such as EBITDA margin, revenue growth over time periods and growth opportunities. This remeasurement resulted in a realized gain of $2 million recorded in Recognized gains and losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings during the year ended December 31, 2024.
The initial purchase price is as follows:
| | | | | |
| (In millions) |
Cash paid | $ | 215 | |
Less: Cash acquired | 1 | |
Net cash paid | 214 | |
Settlement of prepaid asset | 8 | |
Acquisition date fair value of previously held interests | 92 | |
Total consideration | $ | 314 | |
The following table summarizes the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
| | | | | |
| Fair value as of July 18, 2024 |
| |
| |
| (In millions) |
Goodwill | $ | 162 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 5 | |
Other intangible assets | 149 | |
Total assets acquired | 316 | |
| |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2 | |
Total liabilities assumed | 2 | |
Net assets acquired | $ | 314 | |
The gross carrying value and weighted average estimated useful lives of Other intangible assets acquired in the PALH acquisition consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Carrying Value | | Estimated Useful Life |
Other intangible assets: | (In millions) | | (In years) |
Customer relationships | $ | 131 | | | 20 |
Definite lived trademarks, tradenames, and other | 18 | | | 5 to 10 |
Total Other intangible assets | $ | 149 | | | |
| | | |
Goodwill consists primarily of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as the assembled workforce and synergies between the entities. A portion of the total amount of goodwill recorded is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
PALH’s revenues and net loss attributable to F&G common shareholders of $3 million and $6 million, respectively, are included in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Note C — Summary of Reserve for Title Claim Losses
A summary of the reserve for title claim losses follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2024 | | 2023 | 2022 | |
| (Dollars in millions) | |
Beginning balance | $ | 1,770 | | | $ | 1,810 | | $ | 1,883 | | |
| | | | | |
Change in insurance recoverable | (10) | | | 15 | | (128) | | |
Claim loss provision related to: | | | | | |
Current year | 232 | | | 207 | | 308 | | |
Prior years | — | | | — | | — | | |
Total title claim loss provision | 232 | | | 207 | | 308 | | |
Claims paid, net of recoupments related to: | | | | | |
Current year | (25) | | | (22) | | (21) | | |
Prior years | (254) | | | (240) | | (232) | | |
Total title claims paid, net of recoupments | (279) | | | (262) | | (253) | | |
Ending balance of claim loss reserve for title insurance | $ | 1,713 | | | $ | 1,770 | | $ | 1,810 | | |
Provision for title insurance claim losses as a percentage of title insurance premiums | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | 4.5 | % | |
Several lawsuits were filed by various parties against Chicago Title Company and Chicago Title Insurance Company as its principal (collectively, the “Named Companies”) by plaintiffs claiming they were investors who were solicited by Gina Champion-Cain through her former company, ANI Development LLC (“ANI”), or other affiliates to provide funds placed in an escrow account that purportedly were to be used for high-interest, short-term loans to parties seeking to acquire California alcoholic beverage licenses. Plaintiffs further alleged that employees of Chicago Title Company assisted Ms. Champion-Cain and her entities in diverting the funds placed into an escrow account maintained by Chicago Title Company into which some of the plaintiffs’ funds were deposited.
In connection with the alcoholic beverage license scheme, the SEC filed a civil enforcement proceeding asserting claims for securities fraud against Champion-Cain and ANI in a lawsuit styled, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gina Champion-Cain and ANI Development, LLC, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The receiver, who was appointed by the court to preserve the assets of the defendant affiliated entities, then filed a lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court against the Named Companies seeking damages in a lawsuit styled, Krista Freitag v. Chicago Title Co. and Chicago Title Ins. Co. The Named Companies reached a global settlement with the receiver and several other investor claimants and jointly sought court approval of the global settlement and entry of an order barring any claims against the Named Companies related to the alcoholic beverage license scheme. On November 23, 2022, the federal court overruled any objections by non-joining investors and entered an order approving the global settlement barring further claims against the Named Companies (“Settlement and Bar Order”). After her receipt of the settlement funds, the receiver dismissed the lawsuit against the Named Companies.
Some of the non-joining investor claimants who objected to entry of the Settlement and Bar Order appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by (Cases 22-56206, 22-56208, and 23-55083). On February 20, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's Settlement and Bar Order, barring all ongoing and future litigation against CTC stemming from the scheme operated by Ms. Champion-Cain. If appellants wish to seek further review of the Ninth Circuit's decision, they have a limited time to file a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and/or a petition for review with the U.S. Supreme Court. Once the appellate decision is final, the remaining lawsuits pending in the Superior Court of San Diego County for the State of California involving claimants/investors who objected to CTC's settlement with the receiver are expected to be dismissed as to CTC.
Chicago Title Company has also resolved a number of other pre-suit claims and previously-disclosed lawsuits from both individual and groups of alleged investors under confidential terms. Based on the facts and circumstances of the remaining claims, including the settlements already reached, we have recorded reserves included in our reserve for title claim losses, which we believe are adequate to cover losses related to this matter, and believe that our reserves for title claim losses are adequate.
We continually update loss reserve estimates as new information becomes known, new loss patterns emerge or as other contributing factors are considered and incorporated into the analysis of reserve for claim losses. Estimating future title loss
payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the process and to the judgment used by management, the ultimate liability may be greater or less than our current reserves. If actual claims loss development varies from what is currently expected and is not offset by other factors, it is possible that additional reserve adjustments may be required in future periods in order to maintain our recorded reserve within a reasonable range of our actuary's central estimate.
Note D — Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset, or non-performance risk, which may include our own credit risk. We estimate an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market for that asset or liability in the absence of a principal market as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or assume a liability (“entry price”). We categorize financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique, along with net asset value. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined as follows:
Level 1 - Values are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices from those willing to trade in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by market data for the term of the instrument. Such inputs include market interest rates and volatilities, spreads, and yield curves.
Level 3 - Certain inputs are unobservable (supported by little or no market activity) and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s best estimate of what hypothetical market participants would use to determine a transaction price for the asset or liability at the reporting date based on the best information available in the circumstances.
NAV - Certain equity investments are measured using NAV as a practical expedient in determining fair value. In addition, our unconsolidated affiliates (primarily limited partnerships) are primarily accounted for using the equity method of accounting with fair value determined using NAV as a practical expedient. Our carrying value reflects our pro rata ownership percentage as indicated by NAV in the unconsolidated affiliate’s financial statements, which we may adjust if we determine NAV is not calculated consistent with investment company fair value principles. The underlying investments of the unconsolidated affiliates may have significant unobservable inputs, which may include, but are not limited to, comparable multiples and weighted average cost of capital rates applied in valuation models or a discounted cash flow model. Additionally, management inquires quarterly with the general partner to determine whether any credit or other market events have occurred since prior period financial statements to ensure any material events are properly included in current period valuation and investment income.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.
When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. Because certain securities trade in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information, the determination of fair value for these securities is inherently more difficult. In addition to the unobservable inputs, Level 3 fair value investments may include observable components, which are components that are actively quoted or can be validated to market-based sources.
Our assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis, summarized according to the hierarchy previously described, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Fair Value |
Assets | (In millions) |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,479 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,479 | |
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | — | | | 7,513 | | | 8,143 | | | — | | | 15,656 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — | | | 5,182 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,182 | |
Corporates | 41 | | | 18,698 | | | 2,957 | | | — | | | 21,696 | |
Hybrids | 35 | | | 546 | | | — | | | — | | | 581 | |
Municipals | — | | | 1,386 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,386 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — | | | 2,793 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 2,796 | |
U.S. Government | 631 | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | 637 | |
Foreign Governments | — | | | 280 | | | 4 | | | — | | | 284 | |
Short term investments | 2,995 | | | 18 | | | 37 | | | — | | | 3,050 | |
Preferred securities | 189 | | | 246 | | | 8 | | | — | | | 443 | |
Equity securities | 575 | | | — | | | 10 | | | 57 | | | 642 | |
Derivative investments | — | | | 791 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 794 | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | — | | | — | | | 272 | | | — | | | 272 | |
Loan receivable, included in Prepaid expenses and other assets | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | — | | | 11 | |
Reinsurance related embedded derivative, included in other assets | — | | | 109 | | | — | | | — | | | 109 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Market risk benefits asset | — | | | — | | | 189 | | | — | | | 189 | |
Other assets | — | | | — | | | 65 | | | — | | | 65 | |
Other long-term investments | — | | | — | | | 32 | | | — | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total financial assets at fair value | $ | 7,945 | | | $ | 37,568 | | | $ | 11,734 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 57,304 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities/indexed universal life insurance ("IUL") embedded derivatives, included in Contractholder funds | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,220 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,220 | |
Interest rate swaps | — | | | 10 | | | — | | | — | | | 10 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity options | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
Contingent consideration obligation | — | | | — | | | 74 | | | — | | | 74 | |
Market risk benefits liability | — | | | — | | | 549 | | | — | | | 549 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total financial liabilities at fair value | $ | 1 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 5,843 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,854 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Fair Value |
Assets | (In millions) |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,767 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,767 | |
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | — | | | 7,220 | | | 7,122 | | | — | | | 14,342 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — | | | 4,457 | | | 18 | | | — | | | 4,475 | |
Corporates | 25 | | | 15,892 | | | 1,979 | | | — | | | 17,896 | |
Hybrids | 95 | | | 523 | | | — | | | — | | | 618 | |
Municipals | — | | | 1,562 | | | 49 | | | — | | | 1,611 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — | | | 2,426 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 2,429 | |
U.S. Government | 662 | | | 16 | | | — | | | — | | | 678 | |
Foreign Governments | — | | | 308 | | | 16 | | | — | | | 324 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Preferred securities | 214 | | | 399 | | | 8 | | | — | | | 621 | |
Equity securities | 692 | | | — | | | 15 | | | 59 | | | 766 | |
Derivative investments | — | | | 740 | | | 57 | | | — | | | 797 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | — | | | — | | | 285 | | | — | | | 285 | |
Short-term investments | 2,111 | | | 8 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,119 | |
Reinsurance related embedded derivative, included in other assets | — | | | 152 | | | — | | | — | | | 152 | |
Other long-term investments | — | | | — | | | 37 | | | — | | | 37 | |
Market risk benefits asset | — | | | — | | | 88 | | | — | | | 88 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total financial assets at fair value | $ | 6,566 | | | $ | 33,703 | | | $ | 9,677 | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 50,005 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives, included in Contractholder funds | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,258 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,258 | |
Market risk benefits liability | — | | | — | | | 403 | | | — | | | 403 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity options | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
Total financial liabilities at fair value | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,661 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,662 | |
Valuation Methodologies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these instruments approximate fair value.
Fixed Maturity, Preferred and Equity Securities
We measure the fair value of our securities based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the security. The most appropriate valuation methodology is selected based on the specific characteristics of the fixed maturity, preferred or equity security, and we will then consistently apply the valuation methodology to measure the security’s fair value. Our fair value measurement is based on a market approach, which utilizes prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. Sources of inputs to the market approach include third-party pricing services, independent broker quotations, or pricing matrices. We use observable and unobservable inputs in our valuation methodologies. Observable inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data including market research publications. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored and further market data will be acquired when certain thresholds are met.
For certain security types, additional inputs may be used, or some of the inputs described above may not be applicable. The significant input used in the fair value measurement of equity securities for which the market approach valuation technique is employed is yield for comparable securities. Increases or decreases in the yields would result in lower or higher, respectively, fair value measurements. For broker-quoted only securities, quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized to be market participants. We believe the broker quotes are prices at which trades could be executed based on historical trades executed at broker-quoted or slightly higher prices.
We analyze the third-party valuation methodologies and related inputs to perform assessments to determine the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy. However, we did not adjust prices received from third parties as of December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Certain equity investments are measured using NAV as a practical expedient in determining fair value.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our call options and put options (together referred to as “equity options”), futures contracts, and interest rate swaps can either be exchange traded or over the counter. Exchange traded derivatives typically fall within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy if there is active trading activity. Two methods are used to value over-the-counter derivatives. When required inputs are available, certain derivatives are valued using valuation pricing models, which represent what we would expect to receive or pay at the balance sheet date if we cancelled or exercised the derivative or entered into offsetting positions. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, which include the use of market-observable inputs, including interest rate, yield curve volatilities, and other factors. These over-the-counter derivatives are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the majority trade in liquid markets, we can verify model inputs and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. When inputs aren’t available for valuation models, certain over-the-counter derivatives are valued using independent broker quotes, which are based on unobservable market data and classified within Level 3. Effective September 30, 2024, pricing for certain derivatives was obtained from internal models using substantially all market observable inputs, and those derivatives were transferred out of Level 3 to Level 2.
The fair value of the reinsurance-related embedded derivatives in the funds withheld reinsurance agreements are estimated based upon the fair value of the assets supporting the funds withheld from reinsurance liabilities. The fair value of the assets is based on a quoted market price of similar assets (Level 2), and therefore the fair value of the embedded derivative is based on market-observable inputs and classified as Level 2. See Note O F&G Reinsurance for further discussion on F&G reinsurance agreements.
The fair value measurement of the indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives included in contractholder funds is determined through a combination of market observable information and significant unobservable inputs using the option budget method. The market observable inputs are the market value of option and treasury rates. The significant unobservable inputs are the budgeted option cost (i.e., the expected cost to purchase equity options in future periods to fund the equity indexed linked feature), surrender rates, mortality multiplier and non-performance spread. The mortality multiplier at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was applied to the 2012 Individual Annuity mortality tables. Increases or decreases in the market value of an option in isolation would result in a higher or lower, respectively, fair value measurement. Increases or decreases in treasury rates, mortality multiplier, surrender rates, or non-performance spread in isolation would result in a lower or higher fair value measurement, respectively. Generally, a change in any one unobservable input would not directly result in a change in any other unobservable input.
Investments in Unconsolidated affiliates
We have elected the fair value option for certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates as we believe this better aligns them with other investments in unconsolidated affiliates that are measured using NAV as a practical expedient in determining fair value. Investments measured using the fair value option are included in Level 3 and the fair values of these investments are determined using a multiple of the affiliates’ EBITDA. The EBITDA is based on the affiliates’ financial information. The multiple is derived from market analysis of transactions involving comparable companies. The inputs are considered unobservable, as not all market participants have access to this data.
Short-term Investments
The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these instruments approximate fair value. Certain short-term investments are valued based on third-party pricing services or broker quotes and are classified as Level 2 or 3.
Loan receivable
Concurrent with the Roar purchase agreement, F&G executed a separate loan agreement with the sellers of Roar. The loan is collateralized by the sellers’ minority equity stake in Roar. The loan receivable is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow model applied using a Monte Carlo simulation of estimated cash flows at each measurement period and for each simulated path relative to the estimated collateral value. The Monte Carlo simulation utilizes the outstanding principal balance, a risk-adjusted discount rate, and risk-free rates to discount the expected cash flows and compare to the estimated collateral value for each payment period and simulated path. The discounted cash flow approach applies a company-specific discount rate to future expected interest and payoff payments to calculate the estimated fair value based on the average outcome from the simulation. This loan receivable is included in Level 3 and the inputs are considered unobservable, as not all market participants have access to this data.
Other long-term investments
We hold a fund-linked note, which provides for an additional payment at maturity based on the value of an embedded derivative based on the actual return of a dedicated return fund. Fair value of the embedded derivative is based on an unobservable input, the NAV of the fund at the balance sheet date. The embedded derivative is similar to an equity option on the NAV of the fund with a strike price of zero since F&G will not be required to make any additional payments at maturity of the fund-linked note in order to receive the NAV of the fund on the maturity date. A Black-Scholes model determines the NAV of the fund as the fair value of the equity option regardless of the values used for the other inputs to the option pricing model. The NAV of the fund is provided by the fund manager at the end of each calendar month and represents the value an investor would receive if it withdrew its investment on the balance sheet date. Therefore, the key unobservable input used in the Black-Scholes model is the value of the fund. As the value of the fund increases or decreases, the fair value of the embedded derivative will increase or decrease. See further discussion on the available-for-sale embedded derivative in Note F Derivative Financial Instruments.
The fair value of the credit-linked note is based on a weighted average of a broker quote and a discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow approach is based on the expected portfolio cash flows and amortization schedule reflecting investment expectations, adjusted for assumptions on the portfolio's default and recovery rates, and the note's discount rate. The fair value of the note is provided by the fund manager at the end of each quarter.
Other Assets
Mortgage servicing rights are measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income cash flows. These assumptions include estimates of prepayment rates, discount rates, cost to service (including delinquency and foreclosure costs), escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, and ancillary income.
Contingent Consideration
The contingent consideration is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow model applied using a Monte Carlo simulation of estimated EBITDA at each measurement period and for each simulated path relative to contractual EBITDA milestones. The Monte Carlo simulation utilizes a risk-adjusted discount rate, volatility assumption, and risk-free rates to assess the probability Roar's EBITDA trajectory reaches required milestones for the earn out payments to be made. The discounted cash flow approach applies a company-specific discount rate based on F&G credit profile to future expected earn out payments to calculate the estimated fair value based on the average outcome from the simulation. See further discussion on the contingent consideration in Note H Commitments and Contingencies.
MRBs
MRBs (inclusive of reinsured MRBs) are measured at fair value using an attributed fee measurement approach where attributed fees are explicit rider charges collectible from the policyholder (or paid to the reinsurer) used to cover the excess benefits. The fair value is calculated using a risk neutral valuation method and is based on current net amounts at risk, market data, internal and industry experience, and other factors. The balances are computed using assumptions including mortality, full and partial surrender, rider benefit utilization, risk-free rates including non-performance spread and risk margin, market value of options and economic scenarios. Policyholder behavior assumptions are reviewed at least annually, typically in the third quarter, for any revisions. Reinsured MRBs are valued using a methodology consistent with direct MRBs, with the exception of the non-performance spread which reflects the credit of the reinsurer. See further discussion on MRBs in Note X Market Risk Benefits.
Quantitative information regarding significant unobservable inputs used for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of financial instruments carried at fair value as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, excluding assets and liabilities for which significant quantitative unobservable inputs are not developed internally and not readily available to the Company (primarily those valued using broker quotes and certain third-party pricing services) are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value at | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Input(s) | | Range (Weighted average) |
| December 31, 2024 | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | December 31, 2024 |
Assets | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 95 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 4.83% - 7.15% (6.33%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Corporates | 7 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount Rate | | 13.33% - 100.00% (96.45%) |
Corporates | 750 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 2.00% - 22.53% (6.76%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 3 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 5.89%-5.89% (5.89%) |
Foreign Governments | 4 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 12.14% - 12.14% (12.14%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | 272 | | | Market Comparable Company Analysis | | EBITDA Multiple | | 8.7x - 23.6x (14.6x) |
Preferred securities | 1 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount rate | | 100.00% - 100.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Equity securities | 4 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount rate | | 4.80% - 14.10% (9.40%) |
| | | Market Comparable Company Analysis | | EBITDA multiple | | 5.8x - 7.5x (7.0x) |
Other assets | 65 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount Rate | | 10.60% - 12.00% (11.30%) |
| | | | | Conditional Prepayment Rate | | 6.24% -11.99% (9.12%) |
Other long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale embedded derivative | 32 | | | Black Scholes Model | | Market Value of AnchorPath Fund | | 100.00% |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets: | | | | | | | |
Loan receivable | 11 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate | | 7.22% - 7.22% (7.22%) |
| | | | | Collateral Volatility | | 35.00% - 35.00% (35.00%) |
Market risk benefits asset | 189 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Mortality | | 80.00% - 115.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 30.00% (5.05%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawal Rates | | 2.00% - 24.39% (2.48%) |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.48% - 0.95% (0.75%) |
| | | | | GMWB Utilization | | 50.00% - 75.00% (61.77%) |
Total financial assets at fair value (a) | $ | 1,433 | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Derivatives: | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuity/ IUL embedded derivatives, included in contractholder funds | $ | 5,220 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Market Value of Option | | 0.00% - 20.81% (2.92%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mortality Multiplier | | 80.00% - 115.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 50.00% (6.94%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawals | | 2.00% - 35.71% (2.72%) |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.48% - 0.95% (0.75%) |
| | | | | Option Cost | | 0.07% - 5.70% (2.68%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Contingent consideration | 74 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate | | 13.50% - 13.50% (13.50%) |
| | | | | EBITDA Volatility | | 35% - 35% (35%) |
| | | | | Counterparty Discount Rate | | 6.50% - 6.50% (6.50%) |
Market risk benefits liability | 549 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Mortality | | 80.00% - 115.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 30.00% (5.05%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawal Rates | | 2.00% - 24.39% (2.48%) |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.48% - 0.95% (0.75%) |
| | | | | GMWB Utilization | | 50.00% - 75.00% (61.77%) |
Total financial liabilities at fair value | $ | 5,843 | | | | | | | |
(a) Excludes $10,301 million for which significant quantitative unobservable inputs are not developed internally and not readily available to the Company (primarily those valued using broker quotes and certain third-party pricing services) are excluded from the respective totals in the table above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Fair Value at | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Input(s) | | Range (Weighted average) |
| December 31, 2023 | | | |
| (In millions) | | | | December 31, 2023 |
Assets | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 57 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 5.09% - 6.95% (6.00%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Corporates | 787 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 0.00% - 12.87% (6.91%) |
Corporates | 8 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount Rate | | 44.00% - 100.00% (75.20%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Municipals | 32 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 6.25% - 6.25% (6.25%) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 3 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 5.46% - 5.46% (5.46%) |
Foreign Governments | 16 | | | Third-Party Valuation | | Discount Rate | | 6.94% - 7.68% (7.45%) |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | 285 | | | Market Comparable Company Analysis | | EBITDA Multiple | | 4.4x - 31.8x (23.2x) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Preferred securities | 1 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount rate | | 100.00% |
Equity securities | 7 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Discount rate | | 11.50% - 11.50% (11.50%) |
| | | | | | | |
Other long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale embedded derivative | 28 | | | Black Scholes Model | | Market Value of Fund | | 100% |
Market risk benefits asset | 88 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Mortality | | 100.00% - 100.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 10.00% (5.22%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawal Rates | | 0.00% - 23.26% (2.50%) |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.38% - 1.10% (0.96%) |
| | | | | GMWB Utilization | | 50.00% - 60.00% (50.81%) |
Total financial assets at fair value (a) | $ | 1,312 | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
Derivatives: | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities/ IUL embedded derivatives, included in Contractholder funds | $ | 4,258 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Market Value of Option | | 0.00% - 18.93% (2.63%) |
| | | | | Swap Rates | | 3.84% - 5.26% (4.55%) |
| | | | | Mortality Multiplier | | 100.00% - 100.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 70.00% (6.83%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawals | | 2.00% - 34.48% (2.74%) |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.38% - 1.10% 0.96% |
| | | | | Option Cost | | 0.07% - 5.48% (2.38%) |
Market risk benefits liability | 403 | | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Mortality | | 100.00% - 100.00% (100.00%) |
| | | | | Surrender Rates | | 0.25% - 10.00% (5.22%) |
| | | | | Partial Withdrawal Rates | | 0.00% - 23.26% 2.50% |
| | | | | Non-Performance Spread | | 0.38% - 1.10% (0.96%) |
| | | | | GMWB Utilization | | 50.00% - 60.00% (50.81%) |
Total financial liabilities at fair value | $ | 4,661 | | | | | | | |
(a) Assets of $8,365 million for which significant quantitative unobservable inputs are not developed internally and not readily available to the Company (primarily those valued using broker quotes and certain third-party pricing services) are excluded from the respective totals in the table above.
The following tables summarize changes to the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The gains and losses below may include changes in fair value due in part to observable inputs that are a component of the valuation methodology.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2024 | | |
| (in millions) | | |
| Balance at Beginning of Period | | | | Total Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Net transfer In (Out) of Level 3 (a) | | Balance at End of Period | | Change in Unrealized Incl in OCI |
| | | Included in Earnings | | Included in AOCI | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 7,122 | | | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 5,104 | | | $ | (2,825) | | | $ | (1,210) | | | $ | (195) | | | $ | 8,143 | | | $ | 130 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 18 | | | | | — | | | — | | | 58 | | | — | | | — | | | (76) | | | — | | | — | |
Corporates | 1,979 | | | | | (3) | | | 81 | | | 1,148 | | | (100) | | | (139) | | | (9) | | | 2,957 | | | 80 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipals | 49 | | | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | (50) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 3 | | | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | | | 3 | | | — | |
Foreign Governments | 16 | | | | | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | (11) | | | — | | | 4 | | | (1) | |
Preferred securities | 8 | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8 | | | — | |
Equity securities | 15 | | | | | (5) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10 | | | — | |
Interest rate swaps | 57 | | | | | (50) | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (7) | | | 3 | | | 1 | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates (b) | 285 | | | | | 79 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (92) | | | 272 | | | — | |
Other assets | — | | | | | — | | | — | | | 65 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 65 | | | — | |
Short-term investments | — | | | | | — | | | — | | | 236 | | | (190) | | | (9) | | | — | | | 37 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other long-term assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale embedded derivative | 27 | | | | | — | | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32 | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit linked note | 10 | | | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan receivable (c) | — | | | | | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | — | |
Subtotal Level 3 assets at fair value | $ | 9,589 | | | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 6,623 | | | $ | (3,165) | | | $ | (1,380) | | | $ | (380) | | | $ | 11,545 | | | $ | 216 | |
Market risk benefits asset (d)) | 88 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 189 | | | |
Total Level 3 assets at fair value | $ | 9,677 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 11,734 | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuity/ IUL embedded derivatives, included in contractholder funds | $ | 4,258 | | | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,351 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (434) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,220 | | | $ | — | |
Interest rate swaps | — | | | | | 28 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (28) | | | — | | | — | |
Contingent consideration (e) | — | | | | | 26 | | | — | | | 48 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 74 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Level 3 liabilities at fair value | $ | 4,258 | | | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,399 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (434) | | | $ | (28) | | | $ | 5,294 | | | $ | — | |
Market Risk benefits liability (d) | 403 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 549 | | | |
Total Level 3 liabilities at fair value | $ | 4,661 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,843 | | | |
(a)The net transfers out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2024 were exclusively to Level 2 with the exception of (b) below.
(b)The transfer out of investments in unconsolidated affiliates reflects F&G’s majority acquisition of PALH on July 18, 2024. Refer to Note B Acquisitions for details of the PALH majority acquisition.
(c)Purchases represent advances on the loan commitment to Roar. Refer to Note H - Commitments and Contingencies for further details.
(d)Refer to Note X Market Risk Benefits for roll forward activity of the net Market Risk Benefits Asset and Liability.
(e)The initial contingent consideration recorded in the Roar transaction is included in purchases in the table above. Refer to Note B Acquisitions for more information.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2023 | | |
| Balance at Beginning of Period | | Total Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Net transfer In (Out) of Level 3 (a) | | Balance at End of Period | | Change in Unrealized Incl in OCI |
| | Included in Earnings | | Included in AOCI | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 6,263 | | | $ | (53) | | | $ | 186 | | | $ | 1,830 | | | $ | (125) | | | $ | (738) | | | $ | (241) | | | $ | 7,122 | | | $ | 185 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 37 | | | — | | | 2 | | | 22 | | | — | | | — | | | (43) | | | 18 | | | 2 | |
Corporates | 1,440 | | | (2) | | | (21) | | | 654 | | | (1) | | | (94) | | | 3 | | | 1,979 | | | (20) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipals | 29 | | | — | | | 20 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 49 | | | 20 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 302 | | | 1 | | | 7 | | | 32 | | | — | | | (9) | | | (330) | | | 3 | | | 7 | |
Foreign Governments | 16 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16 | | | — | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | 23 | | | 13 | | | — | | | 249 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 285 | | | — | |
Short-term investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | 204 | | | (19) | | | (185) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Derivative Instruments | — | | | 57 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 57 | | | — | |
Preferred securities | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 1 | |
Equity securities | 10 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | 15 | | | — | |
Other long-term assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale embedded derivative | 23 | | | — | | | 4 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 27 | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit linked note | 15 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5) | | | — | | | 10 | | | — | |
Secured borrowing receivable | 10 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Subtotal Level 3 assets at fair value | $ | 8,169 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 199 | | | $ | 2,991 | | | $ | (145) | | | $ | (1,041) | | | $ | (601) | | | $ | 9,589 | | | $ | 199 | |
Market risk benefits asset (b) | 117 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 88 | | | |
Total Level 3 assets at fair value | $ | 8,286 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 9,677 | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities embedded derivatives, included in contractholder funds | $ | 3,115 | | | $ | 257 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,049 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (163) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,258 | | | $ | — | |
Subtotal Total liabilities at Level 3 fair value | $ | 3,115 | | | $ | 257 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,049 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (163) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,258 | | | $ | — | |
Market risk benefits liability (b) | 282 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 403 | | | |
Total Level 3 liabilities at fair value | $ | 3,397 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 4,661 | | | |
(a) The net transfers out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2023, were to Level 2.
(b) Refer to Note X Market Risk Benefits for roll forward activity of the net Market risk benefits asset and liability.
Valuation Methodologies and Associated Inputs for Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used to determine the fair value of our financial instruments not carried at fair value. Considerable judgment is required to develop these assumptions used to measure fair value. Accordingly, the estimates shown are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a one-time, current market exchange of all of our financial instruments.
Mortgage Loans
The fair value of mortgage loans is established using a discounted cash flow method based on internal credit rating, maturity and future income. This yield-based approach is sourced from our third-party vendor. The internal ratings for mortgages in good standing are based on property type, location, market conditions, occupancy, debt service coverage, loan-to-value, quality of tenancy, borrower, and payment record. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our mortgage loans are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in Unconsolidated affiliates
In our F&G segment, the fair value of Investments in unconsolidated affiliates is determined using NAV as a practical expedient and are included in the NAV column in the table below. In our Title segment, Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In our Title segment, Investments in unconsolidated affiliates were $166 million and $263 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Policy Loans (included within Other long-term investments)
Policy loans are reported at the unpaid principal balance and are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of underlying insurance policies. The carrying value of the policy loans approximates the fair value and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Company Owned Life Insurance (included within Other long-term investments)
Company owned life insurance ("COLI") is a life insurance program used to finance certain employee benefit expenses. The fair value of COLI is based on net realizable value, which is generally cash surrender value. COLI is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Other Invested Assets (included within Other long-term investments)
The fair value of bank loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow method with the discount rate based on weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"). This yield-based approach is sourced from a third-party vendor and the WACC establishes a market participant discount rate by determining the hypothetical capital structure for the asset should it be underwritten as of each period end. Bank loans are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. For cost method investments, our carrying value approximates fair value. Cost method investments are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.
Investment Contracts
Investment contracts include deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities), IUL policies, funding agreements and PRT, and immediate annuity contracts without life contingencies. The indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives, included in contractholder funds, are excluded as they are carried at fair value. The fair value of the deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities) and IUL contracts is based on their cash surrender value (i.e., the cost the Company would incur to extinguish the liability) as these contracts are generally issued without an annuitization date. The fair value of funding agreements and PRT and immediate annuity contracts without life contingencies is derived by calculating a new fair value interest rate using the updated yield curve and treasury spreads as of the respective reporting date. The Company is not required to, and has not, estimated the fair value of the liabilities under contracts that involve significant mortality or morbidity risks, as these liabilities fall within the definition of insurance contracts that are exceptions from financial instruments that require disclosures of fair value.
Other
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") common stock, Accounts receivable and Notes receivable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The carrying amount of FHLB common stock represents the value it can be sold back to the FHLB and is classified as Level 2 within the hierarchy. Accounts receivable and Notes receivable are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Debt
The fair value of debt, with the exception of the F&G Credit Agreement is based on quoted market prices. The carrying value of the F&G Credit Agreement approximates fair value as the rates are comparable to those at which we could currently borrow under similar terms. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our outstanding debt are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the outstanding balance on the F&G Credit Agreement was $0 million and $365 million, respectively.
The following tables provide the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are carried on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at amounts other than fair value, summarized according to the fair value hierarchy previously described.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| (in millions) |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Total Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Amount |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
FHLB common stock | $ | — | | | $ | 153 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 153 | | | $ | 153 | |
Commercial mortgage loans | — | | | — | | | 2,404 | | | — | | | 2,404 | | | 2,705 | |
Residential mortgage loans | — | | | — | | | 2,916 | | | — | | | 2,916 | | | 3,221 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | 3,288 | | | 3,293 | | | 3,293 | |
Policy loans | — | | | — | | | 104 | | | — | | | 104 | | | 104 | |
Other invested assets | 42 | | | — | | | — | | | 48 | | | 90 | | | 90 | |
Company-owned life insurance | — | | | — | | | 431 | | | — | | | 431 | | | 431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade and notes receivables, net of allowance | — | | | — | | | 471 | | | — | | | 471 | | | 471 | |
Total | $ | 42 | | | $ | 153 | | | $ | 6,331 | | | $ | 3,336 | | | $ | 9,862 | | | $ | 10,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment contracts, included in contractholder funds | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 46,339 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 46,339 | | | $ | 51,184 | |
Debt | — | | | 3,781 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,781 | | | 4,321 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | — | | | $ | 3,781 | | | $ | 46,339 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,120 | | | $ | 55,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| (in millions) |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Total Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Amount |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
FHLB common stock | $ | — | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 138 | |
Commercial mortgage loans | — | | | — | | | 2,253 | | | — | | | 2,253 | | | 2,538 | |
Residential mortgage loans | — | | | — | | | 2,545 | | | — | | | 2,545 | | | 2,798 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | — | | | — | | | 7 | | | 2,779 | | | 2,786 | | | 2,786 | |
Policy loans | — | | | — | | | 71 | | | — | | | 71 | | | 71 | |
Other invested assets | 17 | | | — | | | — | | | 42 | | | 59 | | | 59 | |
Company-owned life insurance | — | | | — | | | 397 | | | — | | | 397 | | | 397 | |
Trade and notes receivables, net of allowance | — | | | — | | | 442 | | | — | | | 442 | | | 442 | |
Total | $ | 17 | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 5,715 | | | $ | 2,821 | | | $ | 8,691 | | | $ | 9,229 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment contracts, included in contractholder funds | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 40,229 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 40,229 | | | $ | 44,540 | |
Debt | — | | | 3,568 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,568 | | | 3,887 | |
Total | $ | — | | | $ | 3,568 | | | $ | 40,229 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 43,797 | | | $ | 48,427 | |
For investments for which NAV is used, we do not have any significant restrictions in our ability to liquidate our positions in these investments, other than obtaining general partner approval, nor do we believe it is probable a price less than NAV would be received in the event of a liquidation.
We review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in and out of Level 3, or between other levels, at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. The transfers into and out of Level 3 were related to changes in the primary pricing source and changes in the observability of external information used in determining the fair value.
Note E — Investments
Our investments in fixed maturity securities have been designated as AFS, and are carried at fair value, net of allowance for expected credit losses, with unrealized gains and losses included within AOCI, net of deferred income taxes. Our preferred and equity securities investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings. Our consolidated investments are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Amortized Cost | | Allowance for Expected Credit Losses | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | |
Available-for-sale securities | (In millions) | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 15,784 | | | $ | (13) | | | $ | 202 | | | $ | (317) | | | $ | 15,656 | | | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 5,379 | | | (49) | | | 53 | | | (201) | | | 5,182 | | | |
Corporates | 24,425 | | | (5) | | | 108 | | | (2,832) | | | 21,696 | | | |
Hybrids | 604 | | | — | | | 6 | | | (29) | | | 581 | | | |
Municipals | 1,638 | | | — | | | 3 | | | (255) | | | 1,386 | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 2,869 | | | — | | | 32 | | | (105) | | | 2,796 | | | |
U.S. Government | 645 | | | — | | | 2 | | | (10) | | | 637 | | | |
Foreign Governments | 337 | | | — | | | — | | | (53) | | | 284 | | | |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 51,681 | | | $ | (67) | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | (3,802) | | | $ | 48,218 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Amortized Cost | | Allowance for Expected Credit Losses | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | |
Available-for-sale securities | (In millions) | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 14,631 | | | $ | (11) | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | (469) | | | $ | 14,342 | | | |
Commercial mortgage-backed/asset-backed securities | 4,797 | | | (22) | | | 23 | | | (323) | | | 4,475 | | | |
Corporates | 20,133 | | | (6) | | | 186 | | | (2,417) | | | 17,896 | | | |
Hybrids | 668 | | | — | | | 3 | | | (53) | | | 618 | | | |
Municipals | 1,826 | | | — | | | 14 | | | (229) | | | 1,611 | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 2,507 | | | (3) | | | 29 | | | (104) | | | 2,429 | | | |
U.S. Government | 679 | | | — | | | 8 | | | (9) | | | 678 | | | |
Foreign Governments | 365 | | | — | | | 3 | | | (44) | | | 324 | | | |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 45,606 | | | $ | (42) | | | $ | 457 | | | $ | (3,648) | | | $ | 42,373 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities held on deposit with various state regulatory authorities had a fair value of $997 million and $141 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we held $32 million and $47 million of investments that were non-income producing for a period greater than twelve months, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company's accrued interest receivable balance, excluding accrued interest receivable balances related to mortgage loans discussed below under "Mortgage Loans", was $476 million and $450 million, respectively. Accrued interest receivable is classified within Prepaid expenses and other assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In accordance with our FHLB agreements, the investments supporting the funding agreement liabilities are pledged as collateral to secure the FHLB funding agreement liabilities and are not available to the Company for general purposes. The collateral investments had a fair value of $4,289 million and $4,345 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities by contractual maturities, as applicable, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | | | |
| (in millions) | | (in millions) | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | | | |
Corporates, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal and Government securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due in one year or less | $ | 961 | | | $ | 955 | | | $ | 703 | | | $ | 687 | | | | | |
Due after one year through five years | 4,616 | | | 4,544 | | | 4,320 | | | 4,209 | | | | | |
Due after five years through ten years | 5,311 | | | 5,126 | | | 3,195 | | | 3,048 | | | | | |
Due after ten years | 16,761 | | | 13,959 | | | 15,453 | | | 13,183 | | | | | |
| 27,649 | | | 24,584 | | | 23,671 | | | 21,127 | | | | | |
Other securities, which provide for periodic payments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | 15,784 | | | 15,656 | | | 14,631 | | | 14,342 | | | | | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 5,379 | | | 5,182 | | | 4,797 | | | 4,475 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 2,869 | | | 2,796 | | | 2,507 | | | 2,429 | | | | | |
| 24,032 | | | 23,634 | | | 21,935 | | | 21,246 | | | | | |
Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities | $ | 51,681 | | | $ | 48,218 | | | $ | 45,606 | | | $ | 42,373 | | | | | |
Allowance for Current Expected Credit Loss
We regularly review AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be credit related. For our fixed maturity securities, we generally consider the following in determining whether our unrealized losses are credit related, and if so, the magnitude of the credit loss:
•The extent to which the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis;
•The reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening);
•The financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer (including issuer's current credit rating and the probability of full recovery of principal based upon the issuer's financial strength);
•Current delinquencies and non-performing assets of underlying collateral;
•Expected future default rates;
•Collateral value by vintage, geographic region, industry concentration or property type;
•Subordination levels or other credit enhancements as of the balance sheet date as compared to origination; and
•Contractual and regulatory cash obligations and the issuer's plans to meet such obligations.
We recognize an allowance for current expected credit losses on fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position when it is determined, using the factors discussed above, a component of the unrealized loss is related to credit. We measure the credit loss using a discounted cash flow model that utilizes the single best estimate cash flow and the recognized credit loss is limited to the total unrealized loss on the security (i.e. the fair value floor). Cash flows are discounted using the implicit yield of bonds at their time of purchase and the current book yield for asset and mortgage backed securities as well as variable rate securities. We recognize the expected credit losses in Recognized gains and losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, with an offset for the amount of non-credit impairments recognized in AOCI. We do not measure a credit loss allowance on accrued investment income because we write-off accrued interest through Interest and investment income when collectability concerns arise.
We consider the following in determining whether write-offs of a security’s amortized cost is necessary:
• We believe amounts related to securities have become uncollectible; or
• We intend to sell a security; or
• It is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a security prior to recovery.
If we intend to sell a fixed maturity security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis and the fair value of the security is below amortized cost, we will write down the security to current fair value, with a corresponding charge, net of any amount previously recognized as an allowance for expected credit
loss, to Recognized gains and losses, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. If we do not intend to sell a fixed maturity security or it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell a fixed maturity security before recovery of its amortized cost basis but believe amounts related to a security are uncollectible , an impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amortized cost is written down to the estimated recovery value with a corresponding charge, net of any amount previously recognized as an allowance for expected credit loss, to Recognized gains and losses, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The remainder of unrealized loss is held in AOCI. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, our allowance for expected credit losses for AFS securities was $67 million and $42 million, respectively.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities, excluding securities in an unrealized loss position with an allowance for expected credit loss, aggregated by investment category and duration of fair value below amortized cost were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total |
| Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Available-for-sale securities | (Dollars in millions) |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 1,164 | | | $ | (30) | | | $ | 2,637 | | | $ | (276) | | | $ | 3,801 | | | $ | (306) | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 727 | | | (11) | | | 1,513 | | | (175) | | | 2,240 | | | (186) | |
Corporates | 6,831 | | | (208) | | | 9,866 | | | (2,624) | | | 16,697 | | | (2,832) | |
Hybrids | 105 | | | (4) | | | 380 | | | (25) | | | 485 | | | (29) | |
Municipals | 261 | | | (12) | | | 1,006 | | | (243) | | | 1,267 | | | (255) | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 899 | | | (16) | | | 460 | | | (89) | | | 1,359 | | | (105) | |
U.S. Government | 313 | | | (4) | | | 122 | | | (5) | | | 435 | | | (9) | |
Foreign Government | 120 | | | (5) | | | 157 | | | (48) | | | 277 | | | (53) | |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 10,420 | | | $ | (290) | | | $ | 16,141 | | | $ | (3,485) | | | $ | 26,561 | | | $ | (3,775) | |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months | | | | | | | | | | | 2,005 | |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer | | | | | | | | | | | 2,305 |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position | | | | | | | | | | | 4,310 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total |
| Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | $ | 1,707 | | | $ | (56) | | | $ | 5,835 | | | $ | (404) | | | $ | 7,542 | | | $ | (460) | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 819 | | | (53) | | | 1,922 | | | (235) | | | 2,741 | | | (288) | |
Corporates | 2,387 | | | (134) | | | 10,739 | | | (2,283) | | | 13,126 | | | (2,417) | |
Hybrids | 60 | | | (2) | | | 483 | | | (51) | | | 543 | | | (53) | |
Municipals | 399 | | | (49) | | | 920 | | | (179) | | | 1,319 | | | (228) | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 336 | | | (5) | | | 662 | | | (89) | | | 998 | | | (94) | |
U.S. Government | 84 | | | — | | | 159 | | | (9) | | | 243 | | | (9) | |
Foreign Government | 49 | | | (3) | | | 188 | | | (41) | | | 237 | | | (44) | |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 5,841 | | | $ | (302) | | | $ | 20,908 | | | $ | (3,291) | | | $ | 26,749 | | | $ | (3,593) | |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months | | | | | | | | | | | 1,035 |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer | | | | | | | | | | | 2,846 |
Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position | | | | | | | | | | | 3,881 | |
We determined the unrealized losses were caused by higher treasury rates compared to those at the time of the F&G acquisition or the purchase of the security if later. For securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024, our allowance for expected credit loss was $67 million. We believe the unrealized loss position for which we have not recorded an
allowance for expected credit loss as of December 31, 2024 was primarily attributable to interest rate increases, near-term illiquidity, and other macroeconomic uncertainties as opposed to issuer specific credit concerns.
Mortgage Loans
Our mortgage loans are collateralized by commercial and residential properties.
Commercial Mortgage Loans
CMLs represented approximately 4% of our total investments as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The mortgage loans in our investment portfolio are generally comprised of high quality commercial first lien and mezzanine real estate loans. Mortgage loans are primarily on income producing properties including industrial properties, retail buildings, multifamily properties and office buildings. We diversify our CML portfolio by geographic region and property type to attempt to reduce concentration risk. We continuously evaluate CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of CMLs, gross of valuation allowances, by property type and geographic region is reflected in the following tables:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| Gross Carrying Value | | % of Total | | Gross Carrying Value | | % of Total |
Property Type: | (Dollars in millions) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Hotel | $ | 17 | | | 1 | % | | $ | 18 | | | 1 | % |
Industrial | 657 | | | 24 | | | 616 | | | 24 | |
Mixed Use | 11 | | | — | | | 11 | | | — | |
Multifamily | 1,006 | | | 37 | | | 1,012 | | | 40 | |
Office | 349 | | | 13 | | | 316 | | | 13 | |
Retail | 98 | | | 4 | | | 102 | | | 4 | |
Student Housing | 83 | | | 3 | | | 83 | | | 3 | |
Other | 501 | | | 18 | | | 392 | | | 15 | |
Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance | $ | 2,722 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,550 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for expected credit loss | (17) | | | | | (12) | | | |
Total commercial mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance | $ | 2,705 | | | | | $ | 2,538 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
U.S. Region: | | | | | | | |
East North Central | $ | 98 | | | 4 | % | | $ | 151 | | | 6 | % |
East South Central | 75 | | | 3 | | | 75 | | | 3 | |
Middle Atlantic | 354 | | | 13 | | | 354 | | | 14 | |
Mountain | 409 | | | 15 | | | 352 | | | 14 | |
New England | 164 | | | 6 | | | 168 | | | 6 | |
Pacific | 706 | | | 26 | | | 766 | | | 30 | |
South Atlantic | 683 | | | 25 | | | 563 | | | 22 | |
West North Central | 62 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | — | |
West South Central | 171 | | | 6 | | | 117 | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance | $ | 2,722 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,550 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for expected credit loss | (17) | | | | | (12) | | | |
Total commercial mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance | $ | 2,705 | | | | | $ | 2,538 | | | |
CMLs segregated by aging of the loans and charge offs (by year of origination) were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Prior | | Total |
| (In millions) |
Current (less than 30 days past due) | $ | 273 | | | $ | 227 | | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 469 | | | $ | 201 | | | $ | 2,713 | |
30-89 days past due | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
90 days or more past due | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 9 | |
Total commercial mortgage loans | $ | 273 | | | $ | 227 | | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 469 | | | $ | 210 | | | $ | 2,722 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Charge offs | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
CMLs segregated by aging of loans (by year of origination) were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | Prior | | Total |
| (In millions) |
Current (less than 30 days past due) | $ | 213 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 259 | | | $ | 2,528 | |
30-89 days past due | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
90 days or more past due | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total commercial mortgage loans(a) | $ | 213 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 259 | | | $ | 2,528 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Charge offs | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 3 | |
(a) Excludes loans under development with an amortized cost and estimated fair value of $22 million at December 31, 2023.
LTV and DSC ratios are measures commonly used to assess the risk and quality of mortgage loans. The LTV ratio is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A LTV ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the underlying collateral. The DSC ratio, based upon the most recently received financial statements, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of a property’s net income to its debt service payments. A DSC ratio of less than 1.00 indicates that a property’s operations do not generate sufficient income to cover debt payments. We normalize our DSC ratios to a 25-year amortization period for purposes of our general loan allowance evaluation.
The following tables present the recorded investment in CMLs by LTV and DSC ratio categories and estimated fair value by the indicated loan-to-value ratios, gross of valuation allowances:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Debt-Service Coverage Ratios | | Total Amount | | % of Total | | Estimated Fair Value | | % of Total |
| >1.25 | | 1.00 - 1.25 | | <1.00 | | | | | | |
December 31, 2024 | (Dollars in millions) |
LTV Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less than 50.00% | $ | 490 | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 524 | | | 19 | % | | $ | 501 | | | 21 | % |
50.00% to 59.99% | 803 | | | 112 | | | 12 | | | | | 927 | | | 34 | | | 826 | | | 34 | |
60.00% to 74.99% | 1,238 | | | 16 | | | — | | | | | 1,254 | | | 46 | | | 1,060 | | | 44 | |
75.00% to 84.99% | 4 | | | 4 | | | 9 | | | | | 17 | | | 1 | | | 17 | | | 1 | |
Total Commercial mortgage loans | $ | 2,535 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 21 | | | | | $ | 2,722 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,404 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LTV Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less than 50.00% | $ | 519 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 10 | | | | | $ | 533 | | | 21 | % | | $ | 510 | | | 23 | % |
50.00% to 59.99% | 764 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 764 | | | 30 | | | 679 | | | 30 | |
60.00% to 74.99% | 1,160 | | | 56 | | | — | | | | | 1,216 | | | 48 | | | 1,028 | | | 46 | |
75.00% to 84.99% | — | | | 6 | | | 9 | | | | | 15 | | | 1 | | | 14 | | | 1 | |
Total Commercial mortgage loans (a) | $ | 2,443 | | | $ | 66 | | | $ | 19 | | | | | $ | 2,528 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,231 | | | 100 | % |
(a) Excludes loans under development with an amortized cost and estimated fair value of $22 million at December 31, 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Prior | | Total |
LTV Ratios: | (In millions) |
Less than 50.00% | $ | 66 | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 189 | | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 524 | |
50.00% to 59.99% | 112 | | | 53 | | | 149 | | | 321 | | | 159 | | | 133 | | | 927 | |
60.00% to 74.99% | 91 | | | 71 | | | 113 | | | 858 | | | 121 | | | — | | | 1,254 | |
75.00% to 84.99% | 4 | | | 4 | | | 9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial mortgage loans | $ | 273 | | | $ | 227 | | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 469 | | | $ | 210 | | | 2,722 | |
DSCR | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Greater than 1.25x | $ | 140 | | | $ | 215 | | | $ | 278 | | | $ | 1,241 | | | $ | 469 | | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 2,535 | |
1.00x - 1.25x | 133 | | | 12 | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 18 | | | 166 | |
Less than 1.00x | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 12 | | | — | | | — | | | 21 | |
Total commercial mortgage loans | $ | 273 | | | $ | 227 | | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 469 | | | $ | 210 | | | $ | 2,722 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | Prior | | Total |
LTV Ratios: | (In millions) |
Less than 50.00% | $ | 85 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 232 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 122 | | | $ | 533 | |
50.00% to 59.99% | 53 | | | 149 | | | 267 | | | 158 | | | — | | | 137 | | | 764 | |
60.00% to 74.99% | 69 | | | 113 | | | 912 | | | 122 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,216 | |
75.00% to 84.99% | 6 | | | 9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15 | |
Total commercial mortgage loans (a) | $ | 213 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 259 | | | $ | 2,528 | |
DSCR | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Greater than 1.25x | $ | 154 | | | $ | 276 | | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 2,443 | |
1.00x - 1.25x | 59 | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | 66 | |
Less than 1.00x | — | | | 9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10 | | | 19 | |
Total commercial mortgage loans (a) | $ | 213 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 259 | | | $ | 2,528 | |
(a) Excludes loans under development with an amortized cost and estimated fair value of $22 million at December 31, 2023.
We recognize a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At December 31, 2024, we had one CML that was delinquent in principal or interest payments compared to none at December 31, 2023 as shown in the tables above.
Residential Mortgage Loans
RMLs represented approximately 5% of our total investments as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Our residential mortgage loans are closed end, amortizing loans and 100% of the properties are located in the United States. We diversify our RML portfolio by state to attempt to reduce concentration risk. The distribution of RMLs by state with highest-to-lowest concentration are reflected in the following tables, gross of valuation allowances:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
U.S. States: | Amortized Cost (In millions) | | % of Total |
Florida | $ | 164 | | | 5 | % |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
All Other States (1) | 3,110 | | | 95 | |
Total residential mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance | $ | 3,274 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for expected credit loss | (53) | | | |
Total residential mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance | $ | 3,221 | | | |
(1) The individual concentration of each state is less than 5% as of December 31, 2024.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
U.S. States: | Amortized Cost (In millions) | | % of Total |
Florida | $ | 163 | | | 6 | % |
New York | 129 | | | 5 | |
Texas | 129 | | | 5 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
All other states (1) | 2,431 | | | 84 | |
Total residential mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance | $ | 2,852 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for expected credit loss | (54) | | | |
Total residential mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance | $ | 2,798 | | | |
(1) The individual concentration of each state is less than 5% as of December 31, 2023.
RMLs have a primary credit quality indicator of either a performing or non-performing loan. We define non-performing RMLs as those that are 90 or more days past due or in non-accrual status, which is assessed monthly. The credit quality of RMLs was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
Performance indicators: | Amortized Cost | | % of Total | | Amortized Cost | | % of Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Performing | $ | 3,188 | | | 97 | % | | $ | 2,795 | | | 98 | % |
Non-performing | 86 | | | 3 | | | 57 | | | 2 | |
Total residential mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance | $ | 3,274 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,852 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for expected loan loss | (53) | | | — | | | (54) | | | — | |
Total residential mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance | $ | 3,221 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,798 | | | 100 | % |
There were no charge offs recorded for RMLs during the year ended December 31, 2024. RMLs segregated by aging of the loans (by year of origination) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows, gross of valuation allowances:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | Prior | Total | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgages | (In millions) | | | | | | | | |
Current (less than 30 days past due) | $ | 610 | | $ | 368 | | $ | 911 | | $ | 805 | | $ | 162 | | $ | 312 | | $ | 3,168 | | | | | | | | | |
30-89 days past due | 1 | | 6 | | 4 | | 6 | | 1 | | 3 | | 21 | | | | | | | | | |
90 days or more past due | 3 | | 2 | | 13 | | 29 | | 13 | | 25 | | 85 | | | | | | | | | |
Total residential mortgages | $ | 614 | | $ | 376 | | $ | 928 | | $ | 840 | | $ | 176 | | $ | 340 | | $ | 3,274 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| |
| Amortized Cost by Origination Year |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | Prior | Total |
Residential mortgages | (In millions) |
Current (less than 30 days past due) | $ | 373 | | $ | 985 | | $ | 854 | | $ | 192 | | $ | 183 | | $ | 192 | | $ | 2,779 | |
30-89 days past due | — | | 4 | | 7 | | 3 | | — | | 2 | | 16 | |
90 days or more past due | — | | 6 | | 16 | | 13 | | 21 | | 1 | | 57 | |
Total residential mortgages | $ | 373 | | $ | 995 | | $ | 877 | | $ | 208 | | $ | 204 | | $ | 195 | | $ | 2,852 | |
Non-accrual loans by amortized cost as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Amortized cost of loans on non-accrual | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Residential mortgage | $ | 85 | | $ | 57 | |
Commercial mortgage | 9 | | — | |
Total non-accrual mortgages | $ | 94 | | $ | 57 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Immaterial interest income was recognized on non-accrual financing receivables for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
It is our policy to cease to accrue interest on loans that are delinquent for 90 days or more. For loans less than 90 days delinquent, interest is accrued unless it is determined that the accrued interest is not collectible. If a loan becomes 90 days or more delinquent, it is our general policy to initiate foreclosure proceedings unless a workout arrangement to bring the loan current is in place. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had $94 million and $57 million, respectively, of mortgage loans that were over 90 days past due.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023 we had $81 million and $41 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans that were in the process of foreclosure.
Loan Modifications
Under certain circumstances, modifications are granted to mortgage loans. Generally, the types of concessions may include interest rate reduction, term extension, payment deferrals, principal forgiveness or a combination of these concessions. We had an immaterial amount of mortgage loans modified during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Allowance for Expected Credit Loss
We estimate expected credit losses for our CML and RML portfolios using a probability of default/loss given default model. Significant inputs to this model include, where applicable, the loans' current performance, underlying collateral type, location, contractual life, LTV, DSC and Debt to Income or FICO. The model projects losses using a two year reasonable and supportable forecast and then reverts over a three year period to market-wide historical loss experience. Changes in our allowance for expected credit losses on mortgage loans are recognized in Recognized gains and losses, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The allowances for our mortgage loan portfolio are summarized as follows (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, 2024 | | Year ended December 31, 2023 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Residential Mortgage | | Commercial Mortgage | | Total | | Residential Mortgage | | Commercial Mortgage | | Total |
Beginning Balance | | | | | | | $ | (54) | | | $ | (12) | | | $ | (66) | | | $ | (32) | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | (42) | |
Provision (expense) benefit for loan losses | | | | | | | 1 | | | (5) | | | (4) | | | (22) | | | (5) | | | (27) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans charged-off | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending Balance | | | | | | | $ | (53) | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | (70) | | | $ | (54) | | | $ | (12) | | | $ | (66) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
An allowance for expected credit loss is not measured on accrued interest income for CMLs as we have a process to write-off interest on loans that enter into non-accrual status (90 days or more past due). Allowances for expected credit losses are measured on accrued interest income for RMLs and were immaterial as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
There were no purchases of purchased credit deteriorated mortgage loans during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the accrued interest receivable balance on CMLs totaled $8 million and $7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the accrued interest receivable on RMLs totaled $28 million and $24 million, respectively. Accrued interest receivable is classified within Prepaid expenses and other assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Interest and Investment Income
The major sources of Interest and investment income reported on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended |
| | | | | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| | | | | (In millions) |
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale | | | | | $ | 2,261 | | | $ | 1,911 | | | $ | 1,489 | |
Equity securities | | | | | 33 | | | 33 | | | 31 | |
Preferred securities | | | | | 34 | | | 52 | | | 67 | |
Mortgage loans | | | | | 273 | | | 229 | | | 186 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Invested cash and short-term investments | | | | | 238 | | | 151 | | | 61 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Limited partnerships | | | | | 326 | | | 231 | | | 110 | |
Tax deferred property exchange income | | | | | 133 | | | 166 | | | 103 | |
Other investments | | | | | 125 | | | 91 | | | 41 | |
Gross investment income | | | | | 3,423 | | | 2,864 | | | 2,088 | |
Investment expense | | | | | (299) | | | (257) | | | (197) | |
Interest and investment income | | | | | $ | 3,124 | | | $ | 2,607 | | | $ | 1,891 | |
The Company’s Interest and investment income is shown net of amounts attributable to certain funds withheld reinsurance agreements, which is passed along to the reinsurer in accordance with the terms of these agreements. Interest and investment income attributable to these agreements, and thus excluded from the totals in the table above, was $636 million, $339 million, and $109 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Recognized Gains and Losses, Net
Details underlying Recognized gains and losses, net reported on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended |
| | | | | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| | | | | (In millions) |
Net realized (losses) gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities | | | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | (155) | | | $ | (253) | |
Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities (1) | | | | | 2 | | | 23 | | | (386) | |
Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) on preferred securities (2) | | | | | 12 | | | (1) | | | (230) | |
Realized gains (losses) on other invested assets | | | | | 61 | | | (25) | | | (68) | |
Change in allowance for expected credit losses | | | | | (33) | | | (36) | | | (41) | |
Derivatives and embedded derivatives: | | | | | | | | | |
Realized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments | | | | | 254 | | | (211) | | | (164) | |
Unrealized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments | | | | | (184) | | | 358 | | | (693) | |
Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivatives | | | | | (32) | | | (128) | | | 352 | |
Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives | | | | | 12 | | | 11 | | | (10) | |
Realized gains (losses) on derivatives and embedded derivatives | | | | | 50 | | | 30 | | | (515) | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | (164) | | | $ | (1,493) | |
(1) Includes net valuation (losses) gains of $(131) million, $47 million and $(387) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(2) Includes net valuation gains (losses) of $13 million, $80 million, and $(198) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Recognized gains and losses is shown net of amounts attributable to certain funds withheld reinsurance agreements which are passed along to the reinsurer in accordance with the terms of these agreements. Recognized (losses) gains attributable to these agreements, and thus excluded from the totals in the table above, was $(30) million, $(123) million and $381 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The proceeds from the sale of fixed-maturity securities and the gross gains and losses associated with those transactions were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended |
| | | | | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| | | | | (In millions) |
Proceeds | | | | | $ | 4,414 | | | $ | 2,698 | | | $ | 3,264 | |
Gross gains | | | | | 45 | | | 18 | | | 14 | |
Gross losses | | | | | (80) | | | (145) | | | (252) | |
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within our financial statements. A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity to finance its own activities without additional financial support, where investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest, or where the entity is structured with non-substantive voting rights. VIEs are consolidated by their ‘primary beneficiary’, a designation given to an entity that receives both the benefits from the VIE as well as the substantive power to make its key economic decisions. While the Company participates in the benefits from VIEs in which it invests, but does not consolidate, the substantive power to make the key economic decisions for each respective VIE resides with entities not under common control with the Company. It is for this reason that the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary for the VIE investments that are not consolidated.
We invest in various limited partnerships and limited liability companies primarily as a passive investor. These investments are primarily in credit funds with a bias towards current income, real assets, or private equity. Limited partnership and limited liability company interests are accounted for under the equity method and are included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, we invest in structured investments, which may be VIEs, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. These structured investments typically invest in fixed income investments and are managed by third parties and include asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities included in fixed maturity securities available for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our maximum loss exposure with respect to these VIEs is limited to the investment carrying amounts reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets for limited partnerships and the amortized costs of certain of our fixed maturity securities, in addition to any required unfunded commitments (also refer to Note H Commitments and Contingencies).
The following table summarizes the carrying value and the maximum loss exposure of our unconsolidated VIEs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| Carrying Value | | Maximum Loss Exposure | | Carrying Value | | Maximum Loss Exposure |
| (In millions) |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | $ | 3,565 | | | $ | 4,703 | | | $ | 3,071 | | | $ | 4,806 | |
Fixed maturity securities | 23,242 | | | 24,242 | | | 20,837 | | | 22,346 | |
Total unconsolidated VIE investments | $ | 26,807 | | | $ | 28,945 | | | $ | 23,908 | | | $ | 27,152 | |
Note F — Derivative Financial Instruments
The notional and carrying amounts of derivative instruments, including derivative instruments embedded in indexed annuities and IUL contracts, and reinsurance is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| Notional Amount | | Carrying Amount | | Notional Amount | | Carrying Amount |
Assets: | (In millions) |
Derivative investments: | | | | | | | |
Equity options | $ | 29,594 | | | $ | 773 | | | $ | 27,263 | | | $ | 739 | |
Interest rate swaps | 2,445 | | | 19 | | | 2,705 | | | 57 | |
| | | | | | | |
Other derivative investments | 157 | | | 3 | | | 137 | | | 1 | |
Other long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
Other embedded derivatives | | | 32 | | | | | 28 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets: | | | | | | | |
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives | | | 109 | | | | | 152 | |
Total | | | $ | 936 | | | | | $ | 977 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Contractholder funds: | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives | | | $ | 5,220 | | | | | $ | 4,258 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Equity Options | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Interest rate swaps | $ | 2,700 | | | 10 | | | | | — | |
Total | | | $ | 5,231 | | | | | $ | 4,259 | |
The change in fair value of derivative instruments included within Recognized gains and losses, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Net investment gains (losses): | (In millions) |
Equity options | $ | 153 | | | $ | 98 | | | $ | (862) | |
Interest rate swaps | (103) | | | 48 | | | — | |
Futures contracts | 18 | | | 9 | | | (7) | |
Other derivative investments | 10 | | | (2) | | | 12 | |
Other embedded derivatives | 4 | | | 5 | | | (10) | |
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives | (32) | | | (128) | | | 352 | |
Total net investment gains (losses) | $ | 50 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | (515) | |
| | | | | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves: | | | | | |
Indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives increase (decrease) | $ | 962 | | | $ | 1,143 | | | $ | (768) | |
Additional Disclosures
See descriptions of the fair value methodologies used for derivative financial instruments in Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Indexed Annuities/IUL Embedded Derivative, Equity Options and Futures
We have indexed annuities and IUL contracts that permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity index linked component, where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of various equity indices, such as the S&P 500 Index. This feature represents an embedded derivative under GAAP. The indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives are valued at fair value and included in the liability for contractholder funds in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in
fair value included as a component of Benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
We purchase derivatives consisting of a combination of equity options and futures contracts (specifically for indexed annuity contracts) on the applicable market indices to fund the index credits due to indexed annuity/IUL contractholders. The equity options are one, two, three, five and six year options purchased to match the funding requirements of the underlying policies. On the respective anniversary dates of the indexed policies, the index used to compute the interest credit is reset and we purchase new equity options to fund the next index credit. We manage the cost of these purchases through the terms of our indexed annuities/IUL contracts, which permit us to change caps, spreads or participation rates, subject to guaranteed minimums, on each contract’s anniversary date. The change in the fair value of the equity options and futures contracts is generally designed to offset the portion of the change in the fair value of the indexed annuities/IUL embedded derivatives related to index performance through the current credit period. The equity options and futures contracts are marked to fair value with the change in fair value included as a component of Recognized gains and (losses), net, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The change in fair value of the equity options and futures contracts includes the gains and losses recognized at the expiration of the instrument term or upon early termination and the changes in fair value of open positions.
Other market exposures are hedged periodically depending on market conditions and our risk tolerance. Our indexed annuities/IUL hedging strategy economically hedges the equity returns and exposes us to the risk that unhedged market exposures result in divergence between changes in the fair value of the liabilities and the hedging assets. We use a variety of techniques, including direct estimation of market sensitivities, to monitor this risk daily. We intend to continue to adjust the hedging strategy as market conditions and our risk tolerance changes.
Interest Rate Swaps
We utilize interest rate swaps to reduce market risks from interest rate changes on our earnings associated with our floating rate investments. With an interest rate swap, we agree with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts tied to an agreed upon notional principal. The interest rate swaps are marked to fair value with the change in fair value, including accrued interest and related periodic cash flows received or paid, included as a component of Recognized gains and (losses), net, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Reinsurance Related Embedded Derivatives
F&G cedes certain business on a coinsurance funds withheld basis. Investment results for the assets that support the coinsurances that are segregated within the funds withheld account are passed directly to the reinsurer pursuant to the contractual terms of the reinsurance agreement, which creates embedded derivatives considered to be total return swaps. These total return swaps are not clearly and closely related to the underlying reinsurance contract and thus require bifurcation. The fair value of the total return swaps is based on the change in fair value of the underlying assets held in the funds withheld account. These embedded derivatives are reported in Prepaid expenses and other assets if in a net gain position, or Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, if in a net loss position on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related gains or losses are reported in Recognized gains and (losses), net, on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by our counterparties and reflect assumptions regarding this non-performance risk in the fair value of our derivatives. The non-performance risk is the net counterparty exposure based on the fair value of the open contracts less collateral held. We maintain a policy of requiring all derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement.
We manage credit risk related to non-performance by our counterparties by (i) entering into derivative transactions with creditworthy counterparties; (ii) obtaining collateral, such as cash and securities when appropriate; (iii) establishing counterparty exposure limits, which are subject to periodic management review.
Information regarding our exposure to credit loss on the derivative instruments we hold, excluding futures contracts, is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value | | Collateral | | Net Credit Risk |
| | (In millions) |
December 31, 2024 | | | $ | 782 | | | $ | 771 | | | $ | 34 | |
December 31, 2023 | | | 796 | | | 775 | | | 39 | |
Collateral Agreements
We are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice as part of our over-the-counter derivative agreements on ISDA forms. Under some ISDA agreements, we have agreed to maintain certain financial strength ratings. A downgrade below these levels provides the counterparty under the agreement the right to terminate the open derivative contracts between the parties, at which time any amounts payable by us or the counterparty would be dependent on the market value of the underlying contracts. Our current rating does not allow any counterparty the right to terminate ISDA agreements. In certain transactions, both us and the counterparty have entered into a collateral support agreement requiring either party to post collateral when the net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. For all counterparties, except one, the threshold is set to zero. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, counterparties posted collateral of $771 million and $775 million, respectively, of which $679 million and $588 million, respectively, is included in Cash and cash equivalents with an associated payable for this collateral included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accordingly, the maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that we would incur if parties to the derivatives failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts was $34 million at December 31, 2024, and $39 million at December 31, 2023.
We are required to pay our counterparties the effective federal funds interest rate each day for cash collateral posted to us. Cash collateral is reinvested in overnight investment sweep products, which are included in Cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reduce the interest cost. Changes in cash collateral are included in the Change in derivative collateral liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
We held 527 and 439 futures contracts at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The fair value of the futures contracts represents the cumulative unsettled variation margin (open trade equity, net of cash settlements). We provide cash collateral to the counterparties for the initial and variation margin on the futures contracts, which is included in Cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount of cash collateral held by the counterparties for such contracts was $7 million and $4 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Note G — Notes Payable
Notes payable consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| | (In millions) |
4.50% Notes, net of discount | | $ | 447 | | | $ | 446 | |
| | | | |
3.40% Notes, net of discount | | 646 | | | 644 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
2.45% Notes, net of discount | | 595 | | | 594 | |
3.20% Notes, net of discount | | 444 | | | 444 | |
Revolving Credit Facility | | (4) | | | (2) | |
F&G Credit Agreement | | — | | | 362 | |
5.50% F&G Notes | | 301 | | | 561 | |
| | | | |
7.40% F&G Notes, net of discount | | 497 | | | 495 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
7.95% F&G Notes, net of discount | | 336 | | | 336 | |
6.50% F&G Notes, net of discount | | 545 | | | — | |
6.25% F&G Notes, net of discount | | 492 | | | — | |
Other | | 22 | | | 7 | |
| | $ | 4,321 | | | $ | 3,887 | |
On October 4, 2024, F&G issued $500 million of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2034. The 6.25% F&G Notes were issued at 99.36% of face value, net of deferred issuance costs of approximately $8 million. The 6.25% F&G Notes are senior unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of F&G and are guaranteed by each of F&G's subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G's obligations under its existing credit agreement. The 6.25% F&G Notes mature on October 4, 2034, and become callable on July 4, 2034. Interest is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 6.25%, and if the 6.25% F&G Notes are downgraded, the interest rate
payable is subject to adjustment from time to time per the terms of the indenture. A portion of the net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding balance of $365 million on the F&G Credit Agreement described below. F&G intends to use the remaining net proceeds of this offering for general corporate purposes, including the support of organic growth opportunities.
On June 4, 2024, F&G issued $550 million of its 6.50% Senior Notes due 2029. The 6.50% F&G Notes were issued at 99.74% of face value, net of deferred issuance costs of approximately $6 million. The 6.50% F&G Notes are senior unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of F&G and are guaranteed by each of F&G's subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G's obligations under its existing credit agreement. The 6.50% F&G Notes mature on June 4, 2029, and become callable on May 4, 2029. Interest is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 6.50%, and if the 6.50% F&G Notes are downgraded, the interest rate payable is subject to adjustment from time to time per the terms of the indenture. A portion of the net proceeds were used to finance a cash tender offer by its wholly owned subsidiary Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. (“FGLH”) for an aggregate principal amount of $250 million of FGLH’s 5.50% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “5.50% F&G Notes”). F&G intends to use the remaining net proceeds of this offering for general corporate purposes, which may include the repurchase, redemption or repayment at maturity of outstanding indebtedness.
On December 6, 2023, F&G issued $345 million of its 7.95% Senior Notes due 2053 (the "7.95% F&G Notes"). The 7.95% F&G Notes were issued at par, net of deferred issuance costs of approximately $9 million. The 7.95% F&G Notes are senior unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of F&G and are guaranteed by each of F&G’s subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G’s obligations under its existing credit agreement. The 7.95% F&G Notes mature on December 15, 2053, and become callable on or after December 15, 2028. Interest is payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.95%, and, if the 7.95% F&G Notes are downgraded, the interest rate payable is subject to adjustment from time to time per the terms of the indenture.
On January 13, 2023, F&G issued $500 million of its 7.40% F&G Notes due 2028 (the 7.40% F&G Notes"). The 7.40% F&G Notes were issued at par, net of deferred issuance costs of approximately $6 million. The 7.40% F&G Notes are senior, unsecured unsubordinated obligations of F&G and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated basis by each of F&G’s subsidiaries that are guarantors of F&G’s obligations under its existing credit agreement. The 7.40% F&G Notes mature on January 13, 2028, and become callable on or after December 13, 2027. Interest is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 7.40%, and if, the 7.40% F&G Notes are downgraded, the interest rate payable is subject to adjustment from time to time per the terms of the indenture.
On April 20, 2018, Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. (“FGLH”), F&G's indirect wholly owned subsidiary, completed a debt offering of $550 million of 5.50% F&G Notes due May 1, 2025 at 99.5% of face value for proceeds of $547 million. As a result of our acquisition of F&G in 2020, a premium of $39 million was established for these notes and is being amortized over the remaining life of the debt through 2025. In conjunction with the acquisition, we became a guarantor of FGLH's obligations under the 5.50% F&G Notes and agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the 5.50% F&G Notes, on a joint and several basis. A portion of the net proceeds of the 6.50% F&G Notes were used for a $250 million cash tender offer of the 5.50% F&G Notes in June 2024. Refer to Note A - Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion of the redemption of the 5.50% F&G Notes on February 1, 2025.
On November 22, 2022, F&G entered into the F&G Credit Agreement pursuant to which the Lenders have made available the F&G Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $550 million to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. On February 21, 2023, F&G entered into the Amended F&G Credit Agreement with the Lenders and the Administrative Agent, swing line lender and issuing bank. The Amended F&G Credit Agreement increased the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the F&G Credit Facility by $115 million to $665 million. On February 16, 2024, F&G entered into a Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement. Among other changes, the Second Amended and Restated F&G Credit Agreement amends the Amended F&G Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date to November 22, 2027, and increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the revolving credit facility to $750 million.
Revolving loans under the Credit Agreement generally bear interest at a variable rate based on either (i) the base rate (which is the highest of (a) one-half of one percent in excess of the federal funds rate, (b) the Administrative Agent’s “prime rate”, or (c) the sum of one percent plus Term The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin of between 30.0 and 80.0 basis points depending on the non-credit-enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt ratings of F&G or (ii) Term SOFR plus a margin of between 130.0 and 180.0 basis points depending on the non-credit-enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt ratings of F&G. In addition, F&G pays a facility fee of between 20.0 and 45.0 basis points on the entire facility, also depending on the non-credit-enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt ratings, which is payable quarterly in arrears. The average variable interest rate on the revolving credit facility for the period the debt was outstanding in 2024 was 7.06% compared to 7.11% for the year ended December 31, 2023.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, $0 million and $365 million, respectively, of gross principal balance, was outstanding under the F&G Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2024, we had $750 million of remaining borrowing availability.
On September 17, 2021, we completed our underwritten public offering of $450 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.20% Notes due 2051, pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-3 ASR (File No. 333-239002) and the related prospectus supplement. The net proceeds from the registered offering of the 3.20% Notes were approximately $443 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses. We plan to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes.
On October 29, 2020, we entered into the Fifth Restated Credit Agreement for our Amended Revolving Credit Facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and the other agents party thereto. Among other changes, the Fifth Restated Credit Agreement amends the Fourth Restated Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date from April 27, 2022 to October 29, 2025. The material terms of the Fourth Restated Credit Agreement are set forth in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2024, there was no principal outstanding, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, and $800 million of available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility. On February 16, 2024, we entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Among other changes, the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amends the Fifth Restated Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date from October 29, 2025 to February 16, 2029.
On September 15, 2020, we completed our underwritten public offering of $600 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.45% Notes due March 15, 2031 (the "2.45% Notes") pursuant to an effective registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The net proceeds from the registered offering of the 2.45% Notes were approximately $593 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the offering (i) to repay the remaining $260 million outstanding indebtedness under our prior term loan credit agreement dated April 22, 2020, among us, as borrower, various lenders, and Bank of American N.A., as administrative agent (the "Term Loan"), which provided for an aggregate principal borrowing of $1.0 billion that we entered into to fund a portion of the acquisition of F&G and (ii) for general corporate purposes.
On June 12, 2020, we completed our underwritten public offering of $650 million aggregate principal amount of the 3.40% Notes due 2030 (the “3.40% Notes”) pursuant to an effective registration statement filed with the SEC. The net proceeds from the registered offering of the 3.40% Notes were approximately $642 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, and commissions and offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the offering (i) to repay $640 million of the then outstanding principal amount under the Term Loan, and (ii) for general corporate purposes.
On August 13, 2018, we completed an offering of $450 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.50% notes due August 2028 (the "4.50% Notes"), pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 4.50% Notes were priced at 99.252% of par to yield 4.594% annual interest. We pay interest on the 4.50% Notes semi-annually on the 15th of February and August, beginning February 15, 2019. The 4.50% Notes contain customary covenants and events of default for investment grade public debt, which primarily relate to failure to make principal or interest payments. On May 16, 2019, we completed an offering to exchange the 4.50% Notes for substantially identical notes registered pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "4.50% Notes Exchange"). There were no material changes to the terms of the 4.50% Notes as a result of the 4.50% Notes Exchange and all holders of the 4.50% Notes accepted the offer to exchange.
| | | | | |
Gross principal maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2024, are as follows: | (In millions) |
2025 | $ | 300 | |
2026 | 22 | |
2027 | — | |
2028 | 950 | |
2029 | 550 | |
Thereafter | 2,545 | |
| $ | 4,367 | |
Note H — Commitments and Contingencies
Legal and Regulatory Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. With respect to our title insurance operations, this customary litigation includes but is not limited to a wide variety of cases arising out of or related to title and escrow claims, for which we make provisions through our loss reserves. See Note C Summary of Reserve for Title Claim Losses for further discussion. Additionally, like other companies, our ordinary course litigation includes a number of class action and purported
class action lawsuits, which make allegations related to aspects of our operations. We believe that no actions, other than the matters discussed below, if any, depart from customary litigation incidental to our business.
We review lawsuits and other legal and regulatory matters (collectively “legal proceedings”) on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, management bases its decision on its assessment of the ultimate outcome assuming all appeals have been exhausted. For legal proceedings in which it has been determined that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable, a liability based on known facts and that represents our best estimate has been recorded. Our accrual for legal and regulatory matters was $17 million and $10 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. None of the amounts we have currently recorded are considered to be material to our financial condition individually or in the aggregate. Actual losses may materially differ from the amounts recorded and the ultimate outcome of our pending legal proceedings is generally not yet determinable. While some of these matters could be material to our operating results or cash flows for any particular period if an unfavorable outcome results, at present we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
F&G is a defendant in two putative class action lawsuits related that allege some customers’ personally identifiable information was disclosed due to a vulnerability in the MOVEit file transfer software. F&G’s vendor, Pension Benefit Information, LLC (“PBI”), used the MOVEit software in the course of providing audit and address research services to F&G and many other corporate customers. Miller v. F&G, No. 4:23-cv-00326 ("Miller"), was filed against F&G in the Southern District of Iowa on August 31, 2023. Miller alleges that he is a F&G customer whose personally identifiable information was disclosed in the MOVEit incident and brings common law tort and implied contract claims. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages. Cooper v. Progress Software Corp., No. 1:23-cv-12067 ("Cooper"), was filed against F&G and five other defendants in the District of Massachusetts on September 7, 2023. Cooper also alleges that he is a F&G customer whose personally identifiable information was disclosed and brings similar common law tort claims and alleges claims as a purported third-party beneficiary of an alleged contract. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages.
Well over 150 similar lawsuits have been filed against other entities impacted by the MOVEit incident including a number of such lawsuits related to PBI’s use of MOVEit. On October 4, 2023, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created a multidistrict litigation ("MDL") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to handle all litigation brought by individuals whose information was potentially compromised in connection with the alleged MOVEit vulnerability. Both Miller and Cooper have been transferred to the MDL and are proceeding under MDL Case No. 1:23-md-03083-ADB-PGL. Plaintiffs filed amendments to their complaints, and the Defendants filed their omnibus motion to dismiss for lack of Article III standing on July 23, 2024. The case is proceeding under a modified bellwether structure to decide critical issues and facilitate reciprocal discovery. At this time, we do not believe the incident will have a material impact on our business, operations, or financial results.
In connection with the cybersecurity incident initially reported on November 21, 2023, the Company and/or its subsidiaries is a party to a consolidated putative nationwide class action, In Re: LoanCare Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 3:23cv1508, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and originating from the consolidation of putative class actions filed in the U.S. District Courts for the Middle District of Florida, the Central District of California, and the Western District of Missouri. On March 19, 2024, plaintiffs filed their consolidated class action complaint on behalf of a nationwide class, along with a California subclass and a Florida subclass, alleging common law tort and contract claims and certain state statutory claims. The parties mediated the case on July 25, 2024, and reached an agreement in principle to resolve the case on a class-wide basis. The parties have sought preliminary court approval of the class-wide settlement. If approved, once the settlement administrator disburses all the funds, final court approval of the settlement will be sought, and the case dismissed.
On May 28, 2024, a stockholder derivative lawsuit styled, Roofers Local 149 Pension Fund v. Fidelity National Financial Inc., William P. Foley, F&G Annuities & Life Inc., C.A. No. 2024-0562-LWW, was filed in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware against defendants Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”), in its capacity as F&G Annuities & Life Inc.’s (“F&G”) controlling stockholder, and William P. Foley, Executive Chairman of F&G and Chairman of FNF, alleging breach of fiduciary duty related to F&G’s January 11, 2024 sale of $250 million of 6.875% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock to FNF. Plaintiff alleges that, based upon the unfair process and unfair price, the preferred stock investment was advantageous to FNF and unfair to F&G. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of F&G for the alleged unfair preferred stock investment and the adoption of certain corporate governance measures. On July 24, 2024, F&G filed its answer and the remaining defendants, including FNF, filed their motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. On September 23, 2024, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its action against William P. Foley, leaving FNF’s motion to dismiss fully briefed and a decision pending with the court. On February 4, 2025, FNF argued the motion to dismiss before the court. The remaining defendants will vigorously contest the Plaintiff’s claims in the action.
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company (“FGL Insurance”) is a defendant in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas styled, Insurance Distribution Consulting, LLC v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company, Case No. 3:23-cv-00126. Plaintiff, which provides consulting services to independent marketing organizations (IMOs), alleges FGL Insurance failed to pay commissions owed to Plaintiff and diverted commissions from one of Plaintiff’s IMO customers, Syncis, to another IMO, Freedom Equity Group, LLC (“Freedom Equity”). Further, Plaintiff alleges after FGL Insurance purportedly purchased a partial ownership interest in Syncis and Freedom Equity, Plaintiff offered to sell its interests in its contracts with Syncis but FGL Insurance declined, leading Plaintiff to allege a statutory violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981 for discrimination where Plaintiff’s sole member is a racial minority. Plaintiff claims its damages for breach of contract from FGL Insurance’s purported failure to pay commissions are more than $162 million and its damages from FGL Insurance’s declining to purchase Plaintiff’s interest in its contracts with Syncis are over $11 million. FGL Insurance denies the allegations and denies any contract or agreement existed with Plaintiff to pay commissions. Dispositive motions are due April 21, 2025, and the case is expected to be set for trial in the summer of 2025. FGL Insurance will vigorously contest the Plaintiff’s claims in the action. As this case continues to evolve, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the probability that Plaintiff will ultimately prevail on its claims or that FGL Insurance will be held liable for the dispute. At this time, we do not believe the lawsuit will have a material impact on our business, operations, or financial results.
From time to time, we receive inquiries and requests for information from state insurance departments, attorneys general, and other regulatory agencies about various matters relating to our business. Sometimes these take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. We cooperate with all such inquiries, and we have responded to or are currently responding to inquiries from multiple governmental agencies. Also, regulators and courts have been dealing with issues arising from foreclosures and related processes and documentation. Various governmental entities are studying the title insurance product, market, pricing, and business practices, and potential regulatory and legislative changes, which may materially affect our business and operations. From time to time, we are assessed fines for violations of regulations or other matters or enter into settlements with such authorities, which may require us to pay fines or claims or take other actions. We do not anticipate such fines and settlements, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, or financial results.
Escrow Balances
In conducting our operations, we routinely hold customers’ assets in escrow, pending completion of real estate transactions, and are responsible for the proper disposition of these balances for our customers. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and have not been included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, consistent with GAAP and industry practice. These balances amounted to $14.4 billion and $13.5 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As a result of holding these customers’ assets in escrow, we have ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks. There were no investments or loans outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 related to these arrangements.
F&G Commitments
In our F&G segment, we have unfunded investment commitments as of December 31, 2024 based upon the timing of when investments and agreements are executed or signed compared to when the actual investments and agreements are funded or closed. Some investments require that funding occur over a period of months or years. A summary of unfunded commitments by commitment type is included below:
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | |
Commitment Type | (In millions) |
Unconsolidated VIEs: | | | |
Limited partnerships | $ | 1,138 | | | |
Whole loans | 278 | | | |
Fixed maturity securities, ABS | 338 | | | |
Direct Lending | 1,618 | | | |
Other fixed maturity securities, AFS | 70 | | | |
| | | |
Other assets | 162 | | | |
Commercial mortgage loans | 116 | | | |
Residential mortgage loans | 35 | | | |
Other invested assets | 134 | | | |
| | | |
Total | $ | 3,889 | | | |
Concurrent with the Roar purchase agreement, we executed a separate loan agreement with the sellers of Roar for us to lend up to $40 million. The loan matures on August 5, 2027. The principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2024 was $11 million and is included in Prepaid expenses and other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value are reported within Recognized gains and losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Interest income is recorded in Interest and investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and recognized when earned. The remainder of the unfunded loan commitment is included in the unfunded commitments table above in the “Other assets” line item. Refer to Note B Acquisitions for more information on the Roar acquisition, and refer to Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments for information regarding the fair value calculation of this loan receivable.
Contingent Consideration
Under the terms of the purchase agreement for Roar, we have agreed to make cash payments of up to approximately $90 million over a three-year period upon the achievement by Roar of certain EBITDA milestones. The contingent consideration is recorded at fair value in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note B Acquisitions for more information on the Roar purchase and refer to Note D Fair Value of Financial Instruments for more information regarding the fair value of the contingent consideration.
See Note A Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for discussion of funding agreements that have been issued pursuant to the FABN Program as well as to the FHLB that are included in Contractholder funds.
The Company leases office space under operating leases. The largest leases expire in 2030. Rent expense and minimum rental commitments under all leases are immaterial.
F&G has a reinsurance agreement with Kubera to cede certain FIA statutory reserves on a coinsurance funds withheld basis, net of applicable existing reinsurance. To enhance Kubera's ability to pay its obligations under the amended reinsurance agreement, effective October 31, 2021, F&G entered into a Variable Note Purchase Agreement (the “NPA”), whereby F&G agreed to fund a note to Kubera to be used to ultimately settle with F&G, with principal increases up to a maximum amount of $300 million, to the extent a potential funding shortfall (treaty assets are less than the total funding requirement) is projected relative to the business ceded to Kubera from F&G as part of the amended reinsurance agreement. The potential funding shortfall will be determined quarterly and, among other items, is impacted by the market value of the assets in the funds withheld account related to the reinsurance agreement and Kubera's capital as calculated on a Bermuda regulatory basis. The NPA matures on November 30, 2071. Based on the current level of the treaty assets and projections that these policies will be profitable over the lifetime of the agreement, we do not expect significant fundings to occur under the NPA. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the amount funded under the NPA was insignificant.
Note I — Dividends
On February 20, 2025, our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.50 per share, payable on March 31, 2025, to FNF common shareholders of record as of March 17, 2025.
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we declared dividends on our common stock of $1.94, $1.83 and $1.77, respectively.
Note J — Segment Information
The tables below summarize the result of operations by segment that are provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM"), who is the Company's Chief Executive Officer. The Company's primary methods of measuring profitability and performance on a reportable segment basis are Revenues and Net earnings from continuing operations which are also measures used by the CODM to evaluate segment results and are factors in determining capital allocation among the segments.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Title | | F&G | | Corporate and Other | | Elimination | | Total |
Segment revenues: | (In millions) |
Direct title insurance premiums | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,200 | |
Agency title insurance premiums | 2,953 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,953 | |
Escrow, title related and other fees | 2,196 | | | 2,941 | | | 184 | | | — | | | 5,321 | |
Interest and investment income | 359 | | | 2,719 | | | 154 | | | (108) | | | 3,124 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | (6) | | | 84 | | | 5 | | | — | | | 83 | |
Total segment revenues | 7,702 | | | 5,744 | | | 343 | | | (108) | | | 13,681 | |
Significant segment expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | 2,695 | | | 296 | | | 157 | | | — | | | 3,148 | |
Agent commissions | 2,287 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,287 | |
Other operating expenses | 1,251 | | | 203 | | | 104 | | | — | | | 1,558 | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | — | | | 3,791 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,791 | |
Total significant segment expenses | 6,233 | | | 4,290 | | | 261 | | | — | | | 10,784 | |
Other segment items: | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 141 | | | 569 | | | 29 | | | — | | | 739 | |
Provision for title claim losses | 232 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 232 | |
Market risk benefit gains | — | | | (25) | | | — | | | — | | | (25) | |
Interest expense | — | | | 132 | | | 77 | | | — | | | 209 | |
Total other segment items | 373 | | | 676 | | | 106 | | | — | | | 1,155 | |
Total segment expenses | 6,606 | | | 4,966 | | | 367 | | | — | | | 11,939 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 1,096 | | | 778 | | | (24) | | | (108) | | | 1,742 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | 265 | | | 136 | | | (34) | | | — | | | 367 | |
Earnings (loss) before equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates | 831 | | | 642 | | | 10 | | | (108) | | | 1,375 | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 16 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16 | |
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 847 | | | $ | 642 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | (108) | | | $ | 1,391 | |
Assets | $ | 7,627 | | | $ | 85,047 | | | $ | 2,698 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 95,372 | |
Goodwill | 2,799 | | | 2,179 | | | 293 | | | — | | | 5,271 | |
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Title | | F&G | | Corporate and Other | | Elimination | | Total |
Segment revenues: | (In millions) |
Direct title insurance premiums | $ | 1,982 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,982 | |
Agency title insurance premiums | 2,610 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,610 | |
Escrow, title related and other fees | 2,117 | | | 2,413 | | | 187 | | | — | | | 4,717 | |
Interest and investment income | 338 | | | 2,211 | | | 123 | | | (65) | | | 2,607 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | (9) | | | (124) | | | (31) | | | — | | | (164) | |
Total segment revenues | 7,038 | | | 4,500 | | | 279 | | | (65) | | | 11,752 | |
Significant segment expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | 2,544 | | | 232 | | | 132 | | | — | | | 2,908 | |
Agent commissions | 2,008 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,008 | |
Other operating expenses | 1,242 | | | 146 | | | 133 | | | — | | | 1,521 | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | — | | | 3,553 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,553 | |
Total significant segment expenses | 5,794 | | | 3,931 | | | 265 | | | — | | | 9,990 | |
Other segment items: | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 154 | | | 412 | | | 27 | | | — | | | 593 | |
Provision for title claim losses | 207 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 207 | |
Market risk benefit losses | — | | | 95 | | | — | | | — | | | 95 | |
Interest expense | — | | | 97 | | | 77 | | | — | | | 174 | |
Total other segment items | 361 | | | 604 | | | 104 | | | — | | | 1,069 | |
Total segment expense | 6,155 | | | 4,535 | | | 369 | | | — | | | 11,059 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 883 | | | (35) | | | (90) | | | (65) | | | 693 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | 181 | | | 23 | | | (12) | | | — | | | 192 | |
Earnings (loss) before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 702 | | | (58) | | | (78) | | | (65) | | | 501 | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 17 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 17 | |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 719 | | | $ | (58) | | | $ | (78) | | | $ | (65) | | | $ | 518 | |
Assets | $ | 7,949 | | | $ | 70,186 | | | $ | 2,479 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 80,614 | |
Goodwill | 2,789 | | | 1,749 | | | 292 | | | — | | | 4,830 | |
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Title | | F&G | | Corporate and Other | | | | Total | | | | | | |
Segment revenues: | (In millions) | | | | | | |
Direct title insurance premiums | $ | 2,858 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 2,858 | | | | | | | |
Agency title insurance premiums | 3,976 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 3,976 | | | | | | | |
Escrow, title related and other fees | 2,502 | | | 1,704 | | | 127 | | | | | 4,333 | | | | | | | |
Interest and investment income | 213 | | | 1,655 | | | 23 | | | | | 1,891 | | | | | | | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | (443) | | | (1,010) | | | (40) | | | | | (1,493) | | | | | | | |
Total segment revenues | 9,106 | | | 2,349 | | | 110 | | | | | 11,565 | | | | | | | |
Significant segment expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Personnel costs | 2,987 | | | 157 | | | 48 | | | | | 3,192 | | | | | | | |
Agent commissions | 3,064 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 3,064 | | | | | | | |
Other operating expenses | 1,515 | | | 102 | | | 104 | | | | | 1,721 | | | | | | | |
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves | — | | | 1,126 | | | — | | | | | 1,126 | | | | | | | |
Total significant segment expenses | 7,566 | | | 1,385 | | | 152 | | | | | 9,103 | | | | | | | |
Other segment items: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 142 | | | 324 | | | 25 | | | | | 491 | | | | | | | |
Provision for title claims losses | 308 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 308 | | | | | | | |
Market risk benefit gains | — | | | (182) | | | — | | | | | (182) | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | — | | | 29 | | | 86 | | | | | 115 | | | | | | | |
Total other segment items | 450 | | | 171 | | | 111 | | | | | 732 | | | | | | | |
Total segment expenses | 8,016 | | | 1,556 | | | 263 | | | | | 9,835 | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 1,090 | | | 793 | | | (153) | | | | | 1,730 | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | 298 | | | 158 | | | (17) | | | | | 439 | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 792 | | | 635 | | | (136) | | | | | 1,291 | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 15 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 15 | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 807 | | | $ | 635 | | | $ | (136) | | | | | $ | 1,306 | | | | | | | |
Assets | $ | 8,295 | | | $ | 54,637 | | | $ | 2,211 | | | | | $ | 65,143 | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | 2,620 | | | 1,749 | | | 266 | | | | | 4,635 | | | | | | | |
The activities in our segments include the following:
Title. This segment consists of the operations of our title insurance underwriters and related businesses. This segment provides core title insurance and escrow and other title-related services including loan sub-servicing, valuations, default services and home warranty.
F&G. This segment primarily consists of the operations of our annuities and life insurance related businesses. This segment issues a broad portfolio of annuity and life products, including deferred annuities (fixed indexed and fixed rate annuities), immediate annuities and indexed universal life insurance. This segment also provides funding agreements and pension risk transfer solutions.
Corporate and Other. This segment consists of the operations of the parent holding company, our real estate technology subsidiaries and our remaining real estate brokerage businesses. This segment also includes certain other unallocated corporate overhead expenses and eliminations of revenues and expenses between it and our Title segment.
Refer to Note L Revenue Recognition for a description of our accounting for our various revenue streams.
Note K — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following supplemental cash flow information is provided with respect to certain cash payment and non-cash investing and financing activities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | |
Cash paid for: | | (In millions) |
Interest | | $ | 200 | | | $ | 157 | | | $ | 125 | |
Income taxes | | 237 | | | 216 | | | 387 | |
Deferred sales inducements | | 319 | | | 168 | | | 87 | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Distribution of 15% of the common stock of F&G | | — | | | — | | | 421 | |
Investments received from pension risk transfer premiums | | 129 | | | 464 | | | — | |
Change in proceeds of sales of investments available for sale receivable in period | | (59) | | | 32 | | | 96 | |
Change in purchases of investments available for sale payable in period | | 82 | | | 20 | | | (25) | |
Lease liabilities recognized in exchange for lease right-of-use assets | | 55 | | | 40 | | | 70 | |
Remeasurement of lease liabilities | | 67 | | | 75 | | | 60 | |
Liabilities assumed in connection with acquisitions | | | | | | |
Fair value of assets acquired | | 789 | | | 304 | | | 266 | |
Less: Total Purchase price | | 586 | | | 299 | | | 180 | |
Liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed | | $ | 203 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 86 | |
| | | | | | |
Note L — Revenue Recognition
Disaggregation of Revenue
Our revenue consists of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | | | | | | | | | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
Revenue Stream | | Income Statement Classification | | Segment | | | | | | Total Revenue | | |
Revenue from insurance contracts: | | | | | | | | | | (In millions) | | |
Direct title insurance premiums | | Direct title insurance premiums | | Title | | | | | | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | 1,982 | | | $ | 2,858 | | | |
Agency title insurance premiums | | Agency title insurance premiums | | Title | | | | | | 2,953 | | | 2,610 | | | 3,976 | | | |
Life insurance premiums, insurance and investment product fees, and other (1) | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | F&G | | | | | | 2,941 | | | 2,413 | | | 1,704 | | | |
Home warranty | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Title | | | | | | 146 | | | 143 | | | 165 | | | |
Total revenue from insurance contracts | | | | | | | | | | 8,240 | | | 7,148 | | | 8,703 | | | |
Revenue from contracts with customers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Escrow fees | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Title | | | | | | 824 | | | 766 | | | 980 | | | |
Other title-related fees and income | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Title | | | | | | 642 | | | 633 | | | 752 | | | |
ServiceLink, excluding title premiums, escrow fees, and subservicing fees | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Title | | | | | | 318 | | | 313 | | | 342 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate technology | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Corporate and other | | | | | | 140 | | | 151 | | | 158 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | | 1,924 | | | 1,863 | | | 2,232 | | | |
Other revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan subservicing revenue | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Title | | | | | | 266 | | | 262 | | | 263 | | | |
Other | | Escrow, title-related and other fees | | Corporate and other | | | | | | 44 | | | 36 | | | (31) | | | |
Interest and investment income | | Interest and investment income | | Various | | | | | | 3,124 | | | 2,607 | | | 1,891 | | | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | | Recognized gains and losses, net | | Various | | | | | | 83 | | | (164) | | | (1,493) | | | |
Total revenues | | Total revenues | | | | | | | | $ | 13,681 | | | $ | 11,752 | | | $ | 11,565 | | | |
(1) Includes $2,217, $1,964 and $1,362 of life-contingent pension risk transfer premiums in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. | | |
Our Direct title insurance premiums are recognized as revenue at the time of closing of the underlying transaction as the earnings process is then considered complete. Regulation of title insurance rates varies by state. Premiums are charged to customers based on rates predetermined in coordination with each states' respective Department of Insurance. Cash associated with such revenue is typically collected at closing of the underlying real estate transaction. Premium revenues from agency title operations are recognized when the underlying title order and transaction closing, if applicable, are complete.
Revenues from our home warranty business are generated from contracts with customers to provide warranty for major home appliances. Substantially all of our home warranty contracts are one year in length and revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the contract.
Escrow fees and Other title-related fees and income in our Title segment are closely related to Direct title insurance premiums and are primarily associated with managing the closing of real estate transactions including the processing of funds on behalf of the transaction participants, gathering and recording the required closing documents, providing notary and home inspection services, and other real estate or title-related activities. Revenue is primarily recognized upon closing of the underlying real estate transaction or completion of services. Cash associated with such revenue is typically collected at closing.
Revenues from ServiceLink, excluding its title premiums, escrow fees and loan subservicing fees primarily include revenues from real estate appraisal services and foreclosure processing and facilitation services. Revenues from real estate appraisal services are recognized when all appraisal work is complete, a final report is issued to the client and the client is billed. Revenues from foreclosure processing and facilitation services are primarily recognized upon completion of the services and when billing to the client is complete.
Life insurance premiums in our F&G segment reflect premiums for life-contingent PRT, traditional life insurance products and life-contingent immediate annuity products, which are recognized as revenue when due from the policyholder, as well as policy rider fees primarily on indexed annuities policies, the cost of insurance on IUL policies and surrender charges assessed against policy withdrawals in excess of the policyholders' allowable penalty-free amounts. We have ceded the majority of our traditional life business to unaffiliated third-party reinsurers. While the base contract has been reinsured, we continue to retain
the return of premium rider. Other income related to riders is earned when elected by the policyholder. Surrender charges are earned when a policyholder withdraws funds from the contract early or cancels the contract.
Premium and annuity deposit collections for indexed annuities, fixed rate annuities, immediate annuities and PRT without life contingency, and amounts received for funding agreements are reported in the financial statements as deposit liabilities (i.e., contractholder funds) instead of as sales or revenues. Similarly, cash payments to customers are reported as decreases in the liability for contractholder funds and not as expenses. Sources of revenues for products accounted for as deposit liabilities include net investment income, surrender, cost of insurance and other charges deducted from contractholder funds, and net realized gains (losses) on investments. Components of expenses for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are interest-sensitive and index product benefits (primarily interest credited to account balances or the hedging cost of providing index credits to the policyholder), amortization of DAC, DSI, and VOBA, other operating costs and expenses, and income taxes.
Premiums, annuity deposits (net of reinsurance and reinsurance recoverable) and funding agreements, which are not included as revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings, collected by product type were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Product Type | (In millions) |
Fixed indexed annuities | $ | 5,828 | | | $ | 4,738 | | | $ | 4,483 | |
Fixed rate annuities | 1,277 | | | 1,147 | | | 1,522 | |
Funding agreements (FABN/FHLB) | 2,404 | | | 1,256 | | | 1,891 | |
| | | | | |
Life insurance and other (a) | 638 | | | 646 | | | 446 | |
Total | $ | 10,147 | | | $ | 7,787 | | | $ | 8,342 | |
(a) Life insurance and other primarily includes indexed universal life insurance.
Real estate technology revenues are primarily comprised of subscription fees for use of software provided to real estate professionals. Subscriptions are only offered on a month-by-month basis and fees are billed monthly. Revenue is recognized in the month services are provided.
Loan subservicing revenues are generated by certain subsidiaries of ServiceLink and are associated with the servicing of mortgage loans on behalf of its customers. Revenue is recognized when the underlying work is performed and billed. Loan subservicing revenues are subject to the recognition requirements of ASC Topic 860.
Interest and investment income consists primarily of interest payments received on fixed maturity security holdings and dividends received on equity and preferred security holdings along with the investment income of limited partnerships.
We do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, primarily related to revenue from our home warranty business, and (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue at the amount to which we have the right to invoice for services performed.
Contract Balances
The following table provides information about trade receivables and deferred revenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Trade receivables | $ | 362 | | | $ | 317 | |
Deferred revenue (contract liabilities) | 92 | | | 91 | |
Deferred revenue is recorded primarily for our home warranty contracts. Revenues from home warranty products are recognized over the life of the policy, which is primarily one year. The unrecognized portion is recorded as deferred revenue in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recognized $80 million and $84 million of revenue, respectively, which was included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the respective period.
Note M — Other Intangible Assets
The following table reconciles to Other intangible assets, net, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| | (In millions) |
Customer relationships and contracts | | $ | 435 | | | $ | 174 | |
VOBA | | 1,349 | | | 1,446 | |
DAC | | 3,036 | | | 2,215 | |
DSI | | 625 | | | 346 | |
Value of distribution asset | | 74 | | | 86 | |
Computer software | | 277 | | | 266 | |
Trademarks, tradenames, and other | | 180 | | | 94 | |
Total Other intangible assets, net | | $ | 5,976 | | | $ | 4,627 | |
The following tables roll forward VOBA by product for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed Rate Annuities | | Immediate Annuities | | Universal Life | | Traditional Life | | | | | | | Total |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, 2024 | $ | 1,025 | | | $ | 27 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | 69 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | (133) | | | (5) | | | (7) | | | (8) | | | (7) | | | | | | | | (160) | |
Actuarial model updates and refinements (a) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 63 | | | | | | | | 63 | |
Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | 892 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 184 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | 125 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,349 | |
(a)net of amortization of ($15 million).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed Rate Annuities | | Immediate Annuities | | Universal Life | | Traditional Life | | | | | | | Total |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, 2023 | $ | 1,166 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 201 | | | $ | 143 | | | $ | 73 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | (141) | | | (5) | | | (10) | | | (9) | | | (4) | | | | | | | | (169) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | 1,025 | | | $ | 27 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | 69 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,446 | |
VOBA amortization expense of $175 million, $169 million, and $180 million, was recorded in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
The following tables roll forward DAC by product for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed Rate Annuities | | Universal Life | | Total (a) |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, 2024 | $ | 1,378 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 545 | | | $ | 2,211 | |
Capitalization | 652 | | | 174 | | | 274 | | | 1,100 | |
Amortization | (156) | | | (86) | | | (38) | | | (280) | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | 1,874 | | | $ | 376 | | | $ | 781 | | | $ | 3,031 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed Rate Annuities | | Universal Life | | Total (a) |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, 2023 | $ | 971 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 348 | | | $ | 1,402 | |
Capitalization | 510 | | | 177 | | | 229 | | | 916 | |
Amortization | (103) | | | (51) | | | (32) | | | (186) | |
Reinsurance related adjustments | — | | | 79 | | | — | | | 79 | |
Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | 1,378 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 545 | | | $ | 2,211 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(a) Excludes insignificant amounts of DAC related to FABN and PRT.
DAC amortization expense of $280 million, $186 million, and $99 million, was recorded in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, excluding insignificant amounts related to FABN and PRT.
The following table presents a reconciliation of DAC to the table above which is reconciled to the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
| | (In millions) |
Indexed Annuities | | $ | 1,874 | | | $ | 1,378 | |
Fixed Rate Annuities | | 376 | | | 288 | |
| | | | |
Universal Life | | 781 | | | 545 | |
| | | | |
Funding Agreements | | 4 | | | 4 | |
PRT | | 1 | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 3,036 | | | $ | 2,215 | |
The following tables roll forward DSI for our indexed annuity products for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, | $ | 346 | | | $ | 200 | |
Capitalization | 319 | | | 168 | |
Amortization | (40) | | | (22) | |
Balance at December 31, | $ | 625 | | | $ | 346 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
DSI amortization expense of $40 million, $22 million, and $14 million, was recorded in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The cash flow assumptions used to amortize VOBA and DAC were consistent with the assumptions used to estimate the FPB for life contingent immediate annuities, and will be reviewed and unlocked, if applicable, in the same period as those balances. For nonparticipating traditional life contracts, the VOBA amortization is straight-line, without the use of cash flow assumptions. For indexed annuity contracts, the cash flow assumptions used to amortize VOBA, DAC, and DSI were consistent with the assumptions used to estimate the value of the embedded derivative and MRBs, and will be reviewed and unlocked, if applicable, in the same period as those balances. For fixed rate annuities and IUL the cash flow assumptions used to amortize VOBA, DAC and DSI reflect the Company’s best estimates for policyholder behavior, consistent with the development of assumptions for indexed annuities and immediate annuities. Refer to Note A Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information about accounting policies for amortization of VOBA, DAC and DSI.
F&G reviews cash flow assumptions annually, generally in the third quarter. In 2024 and 2023, F&G undertook a review of all significant assumptions and revised several assumptions relating to deferred annuity (indexed annuity and fixed rate annuity) and IUL products. For the year ended December 31, 2024, F&G updated assumptions including surrender rates, GMWB election timing, premium persistency, mortality improvement and option budgets. For the year ended December 31, 2023, F&G updated assumptions including surrender rates, GMWB election timing, premium persistency, and option budgets. All updates to these assumptions brought F&G more in line with our company and overall industry experience since the prior assumption update.
For the in-force liabilities as of December 31, 2024, the estimated amortization expense for VOBA in future fiscal periods is as follows:
| | | | | |
| Estimated Amortization Expense |
Fiscal Year | (In millions) |
2025 | $ | 145 | |
2026 | 132 | |
2027 | 121 | |
2028 | 110 | |
2029 | 100 | |
Thereafter | 741 | |
Total | $ | 1,349 | |
Definite and Indefinite Lived Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets as of December 31, 2024, consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net carrying amount | | Weighted average useful life (years) |
| (In millions) |
Customer relationships and contracts (a) | $ | 795 | | | $ | (360) | | | $ | 435 | | | 10 to 20 |
Computer software | 723 | | | (446) | | | 277 | | | 2 to 10 |
Value of distribution asset (VODA) | 140 | | | (66) | | | 74 | | | 15 |
Trademarks, tradenames, and other | 234 | | | (54) | | | 180 | | | Varies |
Total | | | | | $ | 966 | | | |
(a)Includes intangible assets acquired with ROAR and PALH. Refer to Note B Acquisitions for further details.
Other intangible assets as of December 31, 2023, consist of the following: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net carrying amount | | Weighted average useful life (years) |
| (In millions) |
Customer relationships and contracts | $ | 948 | | | $ | (774) | | | $ | 174 | | | 10 to 20 |
Computer software | 651 | | | (385) | | | 266 | | | 2 to 10 |
Value of distribution Asset (VODA) | 140 | | | (54) | | | 86 | | | 15 |
Trademarks, tradenames, and other | 146 | | | (52) | | | 94 | | | Varies |
Total | | | | | $ | 620 | | | |
Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets, which consist primarily of VODA, customer relationships, computer software and definite lived trademarks, tradenames and other, was $187 million, $152 million, and $134 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. For the amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2024, the estimated amortization expense in future fiscal periods is $172 million in 2025, $140 million in 2026, $112 million in 2027, $85 million in 2028 and $72 million in 2029.
Within definite lived trademarks, tradenames, and other is an amount established to offset MRBs with no explicit rider charges, which had a balance of $94 million and $22 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Amortization of $5 million, $1 million and $1 million was recorded in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Note N — Goodwill
A summary of the changes in Goodwill consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Title | | F&G | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
| (In millions) |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | $ | 2,620 | | | $ | 1,749 | | | $ | 266 | | | $ | 4,635 | |
Goodwill associated with acquisitions | 168 | | | — | | | 27 | | | 195 | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | $ | 2,788 | | | $ | 1,749 | | | $ | 293 | | | $ | 4,830 | |
Goodwill associated with acquisitions | 11 | | | 430 | | | — | | | 441 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2024 | $ | 2,799 | | | $ | 2,179 | | | $ | 293 | | | $ | 5,271 | |
Note O — F&G Reinsurance
The company reinsures portions of its policy risks with other insurance companies. The use of indemnity reinsurance does not discharge an insurer from liability on the insurance ceded. The insurer is required to pay in full the amount of its insurance liability regardless of whether it is entitled to or able to receive payment from the reinsurer. The portion of risks exceeding the company's retention limit is reinsured. The company primarily seeks reinsurance coverage in order to manage loss exposures, to enhance our capital position, to diversify risks and earnings, and to manage new business volume. The company follows reinsurance accounting when the treaty adequately transfers insurance risk and any acquisition cost reimbursements reduce policy acquisition costs deferred and maintenance expense reimbursements reduce direct expenses incurred. Otherwise, the company follows deposit accounting if there is inadequate transfer of insurance risk or if the underlying policy for which risk is being transferred is an investment contract that does not contain insurance risk. Refer to Note A Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more information over our accounting policy for reinsurance agreements. As of December 31, 2024, we had an immaterial amount of COR included in Prepaid expenses and other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets compared to none as of December 31, 2023.
The effects of reinsurance on net premiums earned and net benefits incurred (benefits paid and reserve changes) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 | | | | |
| Net Premiums Earned | | Net Benefits Incurred | | Net Premiums Earned | | Net Benefits Incurred | | Net Premiums Earned | | Net Benefits Incurred | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | | | | | | | |
Direct | $ | 2,346 | | | $ | 3,987 | | | $ | 2,112 | | | $ | 3,728 | | | $ | 1,522 | | | $ | 3,640 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ceded | (94) | | | (196) | | | (105) | | | (175) | | | (128) | | | (2,514) | | | | | | | | | |
Net | $ | 2,252 | | | $ | 3,791 | | | $ | 2,007 | | | $ | 3,553 | | | $ | 1,394 | | | $ | 1,126 | | | | | | | | | |
Amounts payable or recoverable for reinsurance on paid and unpaid claims are not subject to periodic or maximum limits. No policies issued by the company have been reinsured with any foreign company, which is controlled, either directly or indirectly, by a party not primarily engaged in the business of insurance. The company has not entered into any reinsurance agreements in which the reinsurer may unilaterally cancel any reinsurance for reasons other than non-payment of premiums or other similar credit issues.
Reinsurance Transactions
The following summarizes significant changes to third-party reinsurance agreements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Somerset: Effective July 1, 2024, F&G amended the existing flow reinsurance agreement with Somerset Reinsurance Ltd. (“Somerset”), a third-party reinsurer, to additionally cede the base contract benefits and GMWB riders attached under certain FIA policies on a coinsurance funds withheld quota share basis.
Kubera: F&G has a reinsurance agreement with Kubera Insurance (SAC) Ltd. (“Kubera”), an unaffiliated reinsurer, to cede certain FIA statutory reserves on a coinsurance funds withheld quota share basis, net of applicable existing reinsurance. This agreement has been amended several times to include additional FIA policies, with the latest amendment effective December 1, 2024.
Everlake and Somerset: F&G executed flow reinsurance agreements with Everlake Life Insurance Company (“Everlake”) and Somerset, third-party reinsurers, to cede certain MYGA business written effective September 1, 2023, and December 1, 2023, respectively, on a coinsurance quota share basis.
Canada Life: Effective May 1, 2020, F&G entered into an indemnity reinsurance agreement with Canada Life Assurance Company (“Canada Life”) United States Branch, a third-party reinsurer, to reinsure FIA policies with GMWB riders. In accordance with the terms of this agreement, F&G cedes a quota share percentage of the net retention of guaranteed payments in excess of account value for GMWB. Effective December 31, 2023, we entered a Recapture and Termination Agreement with Canada Life whereby 100% of the liabilities and obligations were recaptured.
The following summarizes significant changes to third-party reinsurance agreements subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2024:
Everlake Reinsurance Amendment
Effective January 1, 2025, F&G amended the existing flow reinsurance agreement with Everlake to cede future additional MYGA business for agreed upon periods to Everlake pursuant to an offer and acceptance process, rather than on a flow basis. The amendment included a cession of an inforce block of certain MYGA policies on a coinsurance quota share basis.
The following summarizes our reinsurance recoverable (in millions) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Parent Company/ Principal Reinsurers | | Reinsurance Recoverable (a) | | Agreement Type | | Products Covered | | Accounting |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Aspida Life Re Ltd | | $ | 7,844 | | | $ | 6,128 | | | Coinsurance Funds Withheld | | Certain MYGA (b) | | Deposit |
Somerset (c) | | 2,822 | | | 716 | | | Coinsurance Funds Withheld | | Certain MYGA (b) and deferred annuities | | Deposit |
| | | | | | Coinsurance Funds Withheld | | Certain FIA | | Reinsurance |
Everlake | | 1,168 | | | 509 | | | Coinsurance | | Certain MYGA (b) (d) | | Deposit |
Wilton Reassurance Company | | 1,066 | | | 1,092 | | | Coinsurance | | Block of traditional, IUL, and UL (e) | | Reinsurance |
Other (f) | | 489 | | | 536 | | | | | | | |
Reinsurance recoverable, gross of allowance for credit losses | | 13,389 | | | 8,981 | | | | | | | |
Allowance for expected credit loss | | (20) | | | (21) | | | | | | | |
Reinsurance recoverable, net of allowance for credit losses | | $ | 13,369 | | | $ | 8,960 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Reinsurance recoverables do not include unearned ceded premiums that would be recovered in the event of early termination of certain traditional life policies. |
(b) The combined quota share flow reinsurance amongst all reinsurers for 2024 varied between 30% and 90%. As of December 31, 2024, the combined quota share flow reinsurance amongst all reinsurers was 90%. |
(c) The balance represents the total reinsurance recoverable for all reinsurance agreements with Somerset. |
(d) Reinsurance recoverable is collateralized by assets placed in a statutory comfort trust by the reinsurer and maintained for our sole benefit. |
(e) Also includes certain FGL Insurance life insurance policies that are subject to redundant reserves, reported on a statutory basis, under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX. |
(f) Represents all other reinsurers, with no single reinsurer having a carrying value in excess of 5% of total reinsurance recoverable |
As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, the company had a deposit asset of $11,039 million and $7,481 million, respectively, which is reported in the Reinsurance recoverable, net of allowance for credit losses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The company incurred risk charge fees of $42 million, $39 million, and $36 million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, in relation to reinsurance agreements.
Credit Losses
The company estimates expected credit losses on reinsurance recoverables using a probability of default/loss given default model. Significant inputs to the model include the reinsurer's credit risk, expected timing of recovery, industry-wide historical default experience, senior unsecured bond recovery rates, and credit enhancement features.
The expected credit loss reserves were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | | | |
| (In millions) | | | | |
Balance at Beginning of Period | $ | (21) | | | $ | (10) | | | | | |
Changes in the expected credit loss reserve | 1 | | | (11) | | | | | |
Balance at End of Period | $ | (20) | | | $ | (21) | | | | | |
Concentration of Reinsurance Risk
As indicated above, F&G has a significant concentration of reinsurance risk with third party reinsurers, Aspida Life Re Ltd. (“Aspida Re”), Wilton Reassurance (“Wilton Re”), Somerset, and Everlake that could have a material impact on our financial position in the event that any of these reinsurers fails to perform its obligations under the various reinsurance treaties. We monitor the financial condition and financial strength of individual reinsurers using public ratings (refer to table below) and ratings reports of individual reinsurers to attempt to reduce the risk of default by such reinsurers. In addition, the risk of non-performance is further mitigated with various forms of collateral or collateral arrangements, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. We believe that all amounts due from Aspida Re, Wilton Re, Somerset, and Everlake for periodic treaty settlements, net of any applicable credit loss reserves, are collectible as of December 31, 2024. The following table presents financial strength ratings as of December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Parent Company/Principal Reinsurers | | Financial Strength Rating |
| | AM Best | | S&P | | Fitch | | Moody's |
Aspida Re | | A- | | — | | — | | — |
Somerset | | A- | | BBB+ | | — | | — |
Everlake | | A | | — | | — | | — |
Wilton Re | | A+ | | — | | A- | | — |
“—” indicates not rated
Intercompany Reinsurance Agreements
The Company executes various intercompany reinsurance agreements between its insurance subsidiaries, including off shore entities, for purposes of managing regulatory statutory capital and risk. Since these agreements are intercompany, the financial impacts are eliminated in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements included within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Some of these intercompany transactions are executed with wholly owned reinsurance subsidiaries, Corbeau Re, Inc. (“Corbeau Re”), Raven Reinsurance Company (“Raven Re”) and F&G Cayman Re (“Cayman Re”), to finance the portion of statutory reserves considered to be non-economic. The financing arrangements involve Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company reinsuring certain annuity products and their related rider benefits to the captives and the captives executing third-party financing facilities that are classified as capital for statutory purposes.
The transactions with Raven Re and Cayman Re included the execution of letter of credits with Nomura Bank International plc (“NBI”) and Deutsche Bank AG, respectively, that are undrawn and have maximum borrowing capacities of $175 million and $400 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2024. The transaction with Corbeau Re included the execution of an excess of loss agreement (“XOL”) with Canada Life Barbados Branch that matures on December 31, 2043, and provides for coverage on losses up to $1,500 million as of December 31, 2024. With Corbeau Re, non-economic reserves were financed through the maturity date of the XOL and statutory reserves are recorded for all risks expected to be incurred after the maturity date of the XOL. The XOL is not accounted for as reinsurance as it does not satisfy the risk transfer requirements for GAAP; therefore, deposit accounting is applied.
Note P — Regulation and Equity
Regulation
Title
Our insurance subsidiaries, including title insurers, underwritten title companies and insurance agencies, are subject to extensive regulation under applicable state laws. Each of the insurance underwriters is subject to a holding company act in its state of domicile that regulates, among other matters, the ability to pay dividends and enter into transactions with affiliates. The laws of most states in which we transact business establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to issuing and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms,
accounting practices, financial practices, establishing reserve and capital and surplus as regards policyholders (“capital and surplus”) requirements, defining suitable investments for reserves and capital and surplus and approving rate schedules. The process of state regulation of changes in rates ranges from states that set rates, to states where individual companies or associations of companies prepare rate filings that are submitted for approval, to a few states in which rate changes do not need to be filed for approval.
Since we are regulated by both state and federal governments and the applicable insurance laws and regulations are constantly subject to change, it is not possible to predict the potential effects on our insurance operations, particularly the Title segment, of any laws or regulations that may become more restrictive in the future or if new restrictive laws will be enacted.
Statutory-basis financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the various state insurance regulatory authorities. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Accounting Practices and Procedures manual (“NAIC SAP”) has been adopted as a component of prescribed or permitted practices by each of the states that regulate us. Each of our states of domicile for our title insurance underwriter subsidiaries have adopted a material prescribed accounting practice that differs from that found in NAIC SAP. Specifically, in both years, the timing of amounts released from the statutory unearned premium reserve under NAIC SAP differs from the states' required practice. Statutory surplus at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was lower by approximately $33 million and $34 million than if we had reported such amounts in accordance with NAIC SAP.
Pursuant to statutory accounting requirements of the various states in which our insurers are domiciled, these insurers must defer a portion of premiums earned as an unearned premium reserve for the protection of policyholders and must maintain qualified assets in an amount equal to the statutory requirements. The level of unearned premium reserve required to be maintained at any time is determined by statutory formula based upon either the age, number of policies and dollar amount of policy liabilities underwritten, or the age and dollar amount of statutory premiums written. As of December 31, 2024, the combined statutory unearned premium reserve required and reported for our title insurers was $1,608 million. In addition to statutory unearned premium reserves, each of our insurers maintains reserves for known claims and surplus funds for policyholder protection and business operations.
Each of our insurance subsidiaries is regulated by the insurance regulatory authority in its respective state of domicile, as well as that of each state in which it is licensed. The insurance commissioners of their respective states of domicile are the primary regulators of our title insurance subsidiaries. Each of the insurers is subject to periodic regulatory financial examination by regulatory authorities.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulations that restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions of cash or property to their immediate parent company without prior approval from the Department of Insurance of their respective states of domicile. As of December 31, 2024, $1,141 million of our net assets are restricted from dividend payments without prior approval from the Departments of Insurance. During 2025, our title insurers can pay or make distributions to us of approximately $498 million, without prior approval.
The combined statutory capital and surplus of our title insurers was approximately $1,223 million and $1,225 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The combined statutory net earnings of our title insurance subsidiaries were $587 million, $503 million, and $778 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
As a condition to continued authority to underwrite policies in the states in which our insurers conduct their business, the insurers are required to pay certain fees and file information regarding their officers, directors and financial condition. In addition, our escrow and trust business is subject to regulation by various state banking authorities.
Pursuant to statutory requirements of the various states in which our insurers are domiciled, such insurers must maintain certain levels of minimum capital and surplus. Required levels of minimum capital and surplus are not significant to the insurers individually or in the aggregate. Each of our insurers has complied with the minimum statutory requirements as of December 31, 2024.
Our underwritten title companies, primarily those domiciled in California, are also subject to certain regulation by insurance regulatory or banking authorities relating to their net worth and working capital. Minimum net worth and working capital requirements for each underwritten title company is less than $1 million. These companies were in compliance with their respective minimum net worth and working capital requirements at December 31, 2024.
There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to shareholders although there are limits on the ability of certain subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, as described above.
F&G
Through our majority owned F&G subsidiary, our insurance subsidiaries, FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re file financial statements with state insurance regulatory authorities and, except for Raven Re, with the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) that are prepared in accordance with Statutory Accounting Principles (“SAP”) prescribed or permitted by such authorities, which may vary materially from GAAP. Prescribed SAP includes the Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual of the NAIC as well as state laws, regulations and administrative rules. Permitted SAP encompasses all accounting practices not so prescribed but approved by state regulators. The principal differences between SAP financial statements and financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are that SAP financial statements do not reflect VOBA, DAC, and DSI, some bond portfolios may be carried at amortized cost, assets and liabilities are presented net of reinsurance, contractholder liabilities are generally valued using more conservative assumptions and certain assets are non-admitted. Accordingly, SAP operating results and SAP capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items.
F&G's non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, F&G Life Re (Bermuda) and F&G Cayman Re (Cayman Islands) file financial statements with their respective regulators.
In our F&G segment, our principal insurance subsidiaries' statutory financial statements are based on a December 31 year end. Statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus of our wholly owned U.S. regulated insurance subsidiaries were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subsidiary (state of domicile) (a) |
| FGL Insurance (IA) | | FGL NY Insurance (NY) | | Raven Re (VT) | | Corbeau Re (VT) |
Statutory Net income (loss): | (In millions) |
Year ended December 31, 2024 | $ | 150 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | (458) | |
Year ended December 31, 2023 | (462) | | | 5 | | | 60 | | | (644) | |
Year ended December 31, 2022 | (243) | | | (15) | | | (111) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Statutory Capital and Surplus: | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2024 | $ | 1,654 | | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 168 | | | $ | 178 | |
December 31, 2023 | 2,009 | | | 86 | | | 140 | | | 171 | |
| | | | | | | |
(a) FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re are subsidiaries of FGL Insurance, and the columns should not be added together. Corbeau Re was incorporated on September 1, 2023.
Regulation - U.S. Companies
FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re’s respective statutory capital and surplus satisfy the applicable minimum regulatory requirements.
To enhance the regulation of insurers’ solvency, the NAIC adopted a model law to implement risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements for life, health and property and casualty insurance companies. All states have adopted the NAIC’s model law or a substantially similar law. RBC is used to evaluate the adequacy of capital and surplus maintained by an insurance company in relation to risks associated with: (i) asset risk, (ii) insurance risk, (iii) interest rate risk, and (iv) business risk. As of the most recent annual statutory financial statements filed with insurance regulators, the RBC ratios for each of our U.S Insurance Companies exceeded the minimum RBC requirements.
Dividends
The insurance laws of Iowa and New York regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid in any year by FGL Insurance and FGL NY Insurance, respectively.
FGL Insurance dividends are paid as declared by its Board of Directors. Pursuant to Iowa insurance law, any proposed payment of a dividend is classified as an "extraordinary dividend" if it, together with the aggregate fair market value of other dividends or distributions made during the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of capital and surplus as of the preceding December 31 or (ii) net gain from operations before realized capital gains or losses for twelve month period ending December 31 of the preceding year. No extraordinary dividends may be paid without prior approval of the IID. In addition, no ordinary dividends may be paid except from the earned profits arising from FGL Insurance's business, which does not include contributed capital or contributed surplus.
FGL Insurance did not pay dividends to its parent, Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. ("FGLH"), for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022. Pursuant to the limitations described above, it is estimated that FGL Insurance's maximum ordinary dividend capacity for 2025 is $0.
Each year, FGL NY Insurance may pay a certain limited amount of ordinary dividends or other distributions without being required to obtain the prior consent of the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”). However, to pay any
dividends or distributions in a calendar year immediately following a calendar year in which the FGL NY's net gain from operations, not including realized capital gains, was negative, approval from the NY Superintendent is required.
FGL NY Insurance has historically not paid dividends. Based on the limitations described above, it's estimated that the maximum amount of ordinary dividends FGL NY Insurance will be permitted to distribute during 2025 is approximately $10 million.
Raven Re and Corbeau Re dividends are paid as declared by their Board of Directors. Under the laws of the State of Vermont, no captive insurance company may pay a dividend out of, or other distribution with respect to, capital or surplus, without prior approval. Based on the limitations described above, no dividends may be paid in 2025 by either Raven Re or Corbeau Re without prior regulatory approval.
Prescribed and permitted practices
FGL Insurance - FGL Insurance applies Iowa-prescribed accounting practices prescribed by Iowa Administrative Code (" IAC ") Chapter 97, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments Used to Hedge the Growth in Interest Credited for Indexed Insurance Products and Accounting for the Indexed Insurance Products Reserve”, for its indexed annuities and IUL products. Under these alternative accounting practices, the equity option derivative instruments that hedge the growth in interest credited on index products are accounted for at amortized cost with the corresponding amortization recorded as a decrease to net investment income and indexed annuity reserves are calculated based on Standard Valuation Law and Actuarial Guideline XXXV assuming the market value of the equity options associated with the current index term is zero regardless of the observable market value for such options.
In addition, based on a permitted practice received from the IID, FGL Insurance carries one of its limited partnership interests which qualifies for accounting under SSAP No. 48, “Investments in Joint Ventures, Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies”, on a net asset value per share basis. This is a departure from SSAP No. 48 which requires such investments to be carried based on the investees underlying GAAP equity (prior to any impairment considerations). This limited partnership investment was redeemed as of December 31, 2024. In addition, the financial statements of Raven Re and Corbeau Re include certain permitted practices approved by the Vermont Department of Financial Regulations. Without these permitted practices, the carry value of these two entities would be zero.
The prescribed and permitted practices resulted in increases to statutory capital and surplus of $454 million and $194 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
FGL Insurance’s statutory carrying value of Raven Re reflects the effect of permitted practices Raven Re received to treat the available amount of a letter of credit as an admitted asset, which increased Raven Re’s statutory capital and surplus by $175 million and $200 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In addition, FGL Insurance’s statutory carrying value of Corbeau Re reflects the effect of permitted practices Corbeau Re received to treat the excess of loss as an admitted asset, which increased Corbeau Re’s statutory capital and surplus by $1,230 million and $765 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Refer to Note O - F&G Reinsurance for a discussion of the XOL and letter of credit.
Raven Re - Raven Re is also permitted to follow Iowa prescribed statutory accounting practice for its reserves on reinsurance assumed from FGL Insurance and also has approval to include as an admitted asset the value of a letter of credit serving as collateral for reinsurance credit taken by FGL Insurance. Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, Raven Re’s statutory capital and surplus (deficit) would be $(13) million and $(89) million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and its risk-based capital would fall below the minimum regulatory requirements. The letter of credit facility is collateralized by NAIC 1 rated debt securities. If the permitted practice was revoked, the letter of credit could be replaced by the collateral assets with Nomura’s consent (refer to discussion of letter of credit in Note O F&G Reinsurance). FGL Insurance’s statutory carrying value of Raven Re was $168 million and $140 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Corbeau Re - Corbeau Re has four permitted practices pursuant to Vermont Statute, Title 8, Chapter 141 – (8 V.S.A. § 6048k(a)(2), whereby the Vermont Department authorizes the Company to (i) account for the amount equal to the excess of loss amount (“XOL Asset”) as an asset on its statutory financial statements; (ii) calculate the reserves with respect to the Retirement Pro Contracts in accordance with the following reserving methodology: the reserves are calculated as the present value of reinsured benefits when account value equals zero less the present value of reinsurance premiums from the winning integrated stream, floored at zero and capped as necessary to keep the net statutory reserve at the net cash surrender value. For benefits associated with all other contracts (“the GMWB Riders”), the reserves are calculated as the statutory reserves for the entire contract (i.e., the base contracts plus the GMWB Riders) minus the statutory reserves for the base contracts only (“Reserve Calculation Permitted Practice”); (iii) calculate its company action level risk-based capital as defined in Section 8301(13)(A) and, calculated using the risk-based capital factors and formulas prescribed by the NAIC, applying a factor of 0.62% to the
XOL Asset Value; and (iv) annually perform a total company solvency analysis in lieu of cash flow testing and actuarial opinion and memorandum under Section 2010-2 of the Vermont Administrative Code. In addition, Corbeau Re assumes reserves that are equal to the reserves ceded by FGL Insurance which includes application of IAC Insurance 191, Chapter 97, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments Used to Hedge the Growth in Interest Credited for Indexed Insurance Products and Accounting for the Indexed Insurance Products Reserve". Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, the Company’s statutory capital and surplus (deficit) would be $(1,052) million and $(594) million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and its risk-based capital would fall below the minimum regulatory requirements. FGL Insurance’s statutory carrying value of Corbeau Re was $178 million and $171 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
FGL NY Insurance - As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, FGL NY Insurance did not follow any prescribed or permitted statutory accounting practices that differ from the NAIC's statutory accounting practices.
Non-U.S. Companies
F&G's non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, F&G Cayman Re and F&G Life Re, file financial statements with their respective regulators. For the annual period ended December 31, 2023, F&G Cayman Re began to file financial statements that are prepared in accordance with SAP prescribed or permitted by such authorities, which may vary materially from GAAP. Accordingly, SAP operating results and SAP capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items.
F&G Cayman Re has two permitted practices which have been approved by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (“CIMA”). F&G Cayman Re has a permitted practice approved by CIMA to include, as an admitted asset, the value of the letters of credit (“LOCs”) acquired to support reinsurance transactions. Also, F&G Cayman Re has a permitted practice, approved by CIMA, for PRT reinsurance transactions to use U.S. statutory book value adjusted for best estimate reserve calculations (consistent with GAAP prior to ASU 2018-12, Financial Services-Insurance (Topic 944), Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts). These reserve calculations will be subject to annual assumption reviews consistent with other GAAP liability balances. If F&G Cayman Re had not been permitted to calculate PRT assumed reserves using best estimate reserve calculations or include the value of the LOCs as an admitted asset, statutory surplus would be $(64) million and $102 million as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, F&G Cayman Re’s risk-based capital would fall below the minimum regulatory requirements as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
F&G Life Re files financial statements based on GAAP.
Net income and capital and surplus of our wholly owned Cayman Islands and Bermuda regulated insurance subsidiaries under SAP and GAAP, respectively, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subsidiary (country of domicile) |
| F&G Cayman Re (Cayman Islands) | | F&G Life Re (Bermuda) |
Statutory Net income (loss): | (In millions) |
Year ended December 31, 2024 | $ | (11) | | | $ | 139 | |
Year ended December 31, 2023 | 133 | | | 151 | |
Year ended December 31, 2022 | 71 | | | (339) | |
Statutory Capital and Surplus (Deficit): | | | |
December 31, 2024 | $ | 734 | | | $ | 123 | |
December 31, 2023 | 543 | | | 11 | |
| | | |
Regulation - Bermuda
F&G Life Re is a Bermuda exempted company incorporated under the Companies Act 1981, as amended (the “Bermuda Companies Act”) and registered as a Class E insurer under the Insurance Act 1978, as amended, and its related regulations (the “Bermuda Insurance Act”). F&G Life Re is regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”).
In addition to the requirements under the Bermuda Companies Act (as discussed below), the Bermuda Insurance Act limits the maximum amount of annual dividends and distributions that may be paid or distributed by F&G Life Re without prior regulatory approval. F&G Life Re is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin, or ECR, or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such breach. If F&G Life Re were to fail to meet its minimum solvency margin on the last day of any financial year, it would be prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA. In addition, as a Class E insurer, F&G Life Re must not declare or pay a dividend to any person other than a policyholder unless the value of the assets of such insurer, as certified by the insurer’s approved actuary, exceeds its liabilities (as so certified) by the greater of its margin of solvency or ECR. In the
event a dividend complies with the above, F&G Life Re must ensure the amount of any such dividend does not exceed that excess.
Furthermore, as a Class E insurer, F&G Life Re must not declare or pay a dividend in any financial year which would exceed 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus, as set out in its previous year’s Bermuda statutory financial statements, unless at least seven days before payment of such dividend F&G Life Re files with the BMA an affidavit signed by at least two directors of F&G Life Re and its principal representative under the Bermuda Insurance Act stating that, in the opinion of those signing, declaration of such dividend has not caused the insurer to fail to meet its relevant margins. The Bermuda Companies Act also limits F&G Life Re’s ability to pay dividends and make distributions to its shareholders. F&G Life Re is not permitted to declare or pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of its contributed surplus, if it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or if the realizable value of its assets would be less than its liabilities.
F&G Life Re’s ability to pay dividends in 2025 is subject to the limitations described above.
Regulation - Cayman Islands
F&G Cayman Re is a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated under the Companies Act, as amended (2023 Revision) and licensed as a Class D insurer in the Cayman Islands under the Insurance Act, 2010 as amended and its related regulation (the “Cayman Islands Insurance Act”). F&G Cayman Re is regulated by CIMA.
F&G Cayman Re dividends are paid as declared by its Board of Directors. The dividends will be in accordance with CIMA regulatory requirements and contractual obligations and any dividends require approval by CIMA. F&G Cayman Re can only request approval for dividends if (i) the ending capital, including considerations for future business plans, will maintain a surplus over the CIMA approved and permitted target modified RBC, and (ii) contractual language pursuant to the PRT reinsurance agreement requiring a US RBC above specified target is met. As of the most recent annual financial statement filed with CIMA, the RBC ratios for F&G Cayman Re exceeded these minimum requirements. Pursuant to the limitations described above, no dividends may be paid in 2025 by F&G Cayman Re without prior regulatory approval.
The prescribed and permitted statutory accounting practices have no impact on our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Equity
On August 3, 2021, our Board of Directors approved the 2021 Repurchase Program under which we may purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2024 (the "2021 Repurchase Program"). On July 31, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a new three-year stock repurchase program effective July 31, 2024 (the "2024 Repurchase Program") under which we are authorized to purchase up to 25 million shares of our FNF common stock through July 31, 2027. We may make repurchases from time to time in the open market, in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased a total of 100,000 FNF common shares for an aggregate of $4 million or an average of $38.45 per share under the 2021 Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2021 Repurchase Program or the 2024 Repurchase Program. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 and through market close on February 21, 2025, we did not repurchase any FNF common stock under the 2024 Repurchase Program.
Note Q - Leases
Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases under ASC Topic 842 are recorded when we are party to a contract, which conveys the right for us to control an asset for a specified period of time. Substantially all of our operating lease arrangements relate to rented office space and real estate for our title operations. We generally are not a party to any material contracts considered finance leases. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities under ASC Topic 842 are recorded as Lease assets and Lease liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2024.
Our operating leases range in term from one to ten years. As of December 31, 2024, the weighted-average remaining lease term of our operating leases was 4.3 years.
Our lease agreements do not contain material variable lease payments, buyout options, residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.
Most of our leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term by varying amounts. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. We do not include options to renew in our measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities as they are not considered reasonably assured of exercise.
Our operating lease liability is determined by discounting future lease payments using a discount rate based on our incremental borrowing rate for similar collateralized borrowing. The discount rate is calculated as an average of the current
yield on our unsecured notes payable and 140 basis points in excess of the current five year SOFR swap rate. As of December 31, 2024, the weighted-average discount rate used to determine our operating lease liability was 4.7%.
We do not separate lease components from non-lease components for any of our right-of-use assets.
Our lease costs are included in Other operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and was $134 million, $137 million and $142 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We do not have any material short term lease costs, variable lease costs, or sublease income.
Future payments under operating lease arrangements accounted for under ASC Topic 842 as of December 31, 2024, are as follows (in millions):
| | | | | |
2025 | $ | 133 | |
2026 | 108 | |
2027 | 77 | |
2028 | 52 | |
2029 | 32 | |
Thereafter | 24 | |
Total operating lease payments, undiscounted | $ | 426 | |
Less: present value discount | 41 | |
Lease liability, at present value | $ | 385 | |
See Note K Supplementary Cash Flow Information for certain information on noncash investing and financing activities related to our operating lease arrangements.
Note R - Property and Equipment
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment consist of the following: | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | $ | 161 | | | $ | 163 | |
Data processing equipment | 155 | | | 145 | |
Leasehold improvements | 126 | | | 121 | |
Buildings | 93 | | | 95 | |
Land | 14 | | | 14 | |
Other | 8 | | | 6 | |
Total property and equipment, gross | 557 | | | 544 | |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (384) | | | (376) | |
Total property and equipment, net | $ | 173 | | | $ | 168 | |
Depreciation expense on property and equipment was $53 million, $55 million and $59 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Note S - Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Salaries and incentives | $ | 433 | | | $ | 373 | |
Accrued benefits | 454 | | | 437 | |
URL | 401 | | | 270 | |
Deferred revenue | 92 | | | 91 | |
Contingent consideration - acquisitions | 110 | | | 49 | |
Trade accounts payable | 191 | | | 339 | |
| | | |
Accrued recording fees and transfer taxes | 7 | | | 15 | |
Accrued premium taxes | 30 | | | 3 | |
Liability for policy and contract claims | 102 | | | 92 | |
Retained asset account | 60 | | | 81 | |
Remittances and items not allocated | 224 | | | 284 | |
Option collateral liabilities | 680 | | | 588 | |
| | | |
Other accrued liabilities | 465 | | | 387 | |
| $ | 3,249 | | | $ | 3,009 | |
The following tables roll forward URL for the universal life product for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | | | | | 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Balance at January 1, | $ | 270 | | | | | | | $ | 166 | |
Capitalization | 151 | | | | | | | 119 | |
Amortization | (20) | | | | | | | (15) | |
Balance at December 31, | $ | 401 | | | | | | | $ | 270 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
For IUL the cash flow assumptions used to amortize URL reflect the Company’s best estimates for policyholder behavior. We review cash flow assumptions annually, generally in the third quarter. In 2024, F&G undertook a review of all significant assumptions, resulting in a revision to the IUL assumptions involving premium persistency and morality improvement. In 2023, F&G undertook a review of all significant assumptions, resulting in revisions to IUL assumptions involving surrender rates, partial withdrawal rates, mortality improvement, premium persistency, and option budgets.
Note T — Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Current | $ | 360 | | | $ | 241 | | | $ | 331 | |
Deferred | 7 | | | (49) | | | 108 | |
| $ | 367 | | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 439 | |
Total income tax expense was allocated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Net earnings from continuing operations | $ | 367 | | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 439 | |
| | | | | |
Other comprehensive earnings (loss): | | | | | |
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments and other financial instruments | (35) | | | 275 | | | (1,198) | |
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency translation and cash flow hedging | (6) | | | 2 | | | (4) | |
Changes in current discount rate - future policy benefits | 59 | | | (50) | | | 203 | |
Changes in instrument - specific credit risk - market risk benefits | 1 | | | (9) | | | 18 | |
F&G 15% Distribution | (3) | | | (35) | | | 9 | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment | — | | | — | | | 2 | |
Total income tax expense (benefit) allocated to other comprehensive earnings | 16 | | | 183 | | | (970) | |
| | | | | |
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 383 | | | $ | 375 | | | $ | (531) | |
A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Federal statutory rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 1.8 | | | 2.4 | | | 2.0 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Stock compensation | (0.5) | | | (0.2) | | | (0.1) | |
Tax credits | (0.7) | | | (1.8) | | | (0.7) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | (1.0) | | | 5.0 | | | 5.4 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Benefit on Capital Loss Carryback | — | | | — | | | (1.3) | |
| | | | | |
Officers Compensation | 0.8 | | | 1.2 | | | 0.4 | |
Non-deductible expenses and other, net | (0.3) | | | 0.1 | | | (1.3) | |
Effective tax rate | 21.1 | % | | 27.7 | % | | 25.4 | % |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
| (In millions) |
Deferred Tax Assets: | | | |
Employee benefit accruals | $ | 129 | | | $ | 116 | |
| | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | 115 | | | 84 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Tax credits | 204 | | | 119 | |
| | | |
Investment securities | 775 | | | 686 | |
Capital loss carryover | 19 | | | 38 | |
| | | |
Life insurance and claim related adjustments | 451 | | | 547 | |
Funds held under reinsurance agreements | 822 | | | 500 | |
Market Risk Benefits | 56 | | | 61 | |
Bermuda corporate income tax net operating loss carryforward | 10 | | | 24 | |
| | | |
Other | 42 | | | 26 | |
Total gross deferred tax asset | 2,623 | | | 2,201 | |
Less: valuation allowance | 164 | | | 197 | |
Total deferred tax asset | $ | 2,459 | | | $ | 2,004 | |
Deferred Tax Liabilities: | | | |
Title plant | $ | (53) | | | $ | (53) | |
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets | (71) | | | (98) | |
| | | |
Other | (11) | | | (25) | |
| | | |
Depreciation | (24) | | | (29) | |
Partnerships | (198) | | | (152) | |
Value of business acquired | (283) | | | (304) | |
| | | |
| | | |
Deferred acquisition costs | (543) | | | (361) | |
| | | |
Funds held under reinsurance agreements | (945) | | | (621) | |
Title Insurance reserve discounting | (16) | | | (18) | |
| | | |
| | | |
Total deferred tax liability | $ | (2,144) | | | $ | (1,661) | |
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 315 | | | $ | 343 | |
Our net deferred tax asset was $315 million and $343 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The significant changes in the deferred taxes are as follows: the deferred tax asset for investment securities increased by $89 million primarily due to unrealized losses recorded for investment securities, of which $26 million was related to unrealized losses in our Title segment and $63 million was related to unrealized losses in our F&G segment's life insurance business. The deferred tax liability related to deferred acquisition costs increased by $182 million, which is consistent with the growth in sales in our F&G segment. The reinsurance receivable deferred tax asset increased by $322 million and the reinsurance receivable deferred tax liability increased by $324 million, both due to the increase in the Modco reinsurance in the F&G segment. The deferred tax asset relating to life insurance receivables decreased by $96 million primarily due to tax reserves increasing more than GAAP reserves by F&G. The tax credits deferred tax asset increased by $85 million, primarily due to additional corporate alternative minimum tax credits at the F&G segment’s life insurance business offset by utilization of low-income housing tax credits at the F&G segment’s life insurance business.
As of December 31, 2024, we have net operating losses ("NOLs") on a pretax basis of $547 million, of which $44 million relates to our Title segment and $503 million relates to our F&G segment's life insurance business, which are available to carryforward and offset future federal taxable income. The Title segment NOLs are U.S. federal NOLs arising from acquisitions made since 2012, including Buyers Protection Group, Inc., Digital Insurance Holdings, Inc. and THL Corporations (ServiceLink). Most of the NOLs are subject to an annual Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitation. These losses will begin to expire in year 2034 and we fully anticipate utilizing the Title segment losses prior to expiration with the exception of $25 million of gross net operating losses that are offset by a $25 million valuation allowance in the Title segment. The F&G NOLs are indefinite life U.S. federal NOLs arising from the life insurance business.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had $204 million and $119 million of tax credits, respectively, some of which have expiration dates and will begin to expire between 2029 and 2044. The credits primarily consist of general business credits and corporate alternative minimum tax credits, including $164 million associated with our F&G segment's life insurance business. The F&G segment's corporate alternative minimum tax credit has an indefinite life. We anticipate the remainder of the credits will be utilized prior to expiration with the exception of $30 million relating to general business credits in our Title segment which have a corresponding $30 million valuation allowance recorded.
As of December 31, 2024, a full valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset related to the Bermuda corporate income tax net operating loss carryforward of $10 million was recorded. The net change in the Bermuda corporate income tax net loss operating carryforward valuation allowance was a $14 million decrease for the year ended December 31, 2024.
As of December 31, 2024, a valuation allowance of $119 million on the net deferred tax asset for capital losses was recorded, of which $71 million related to the Title segment and $48 million related to the F&G segment. The net change in the capital loss valuation allowance was a $20 million decrease for the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease to the valuation allowance was primarily due to fluctuations in the bond and equity markets, and to capital gains and losses generated in 2024.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no unrecognized tax benefits.
F&G's life insurance subsidiaries, as well as certain F&G non-life subsidiaries file separate tax returns from the FNF consolidated group. Prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024, includes: $20 million of deferred tax assets related to the FNF consolidated group as well as $6 million of tax receivables and $295 million of deferred tax assets related to F&G subsidiaries who file separate tax returns. As of December 31, 2023, prepaid expenses and other assets included $26 million of tax receivables related to the FNF consolidated group as well as $28 million of tax receivables and $372 million of deferred tax assets related to the F&G subsidiaries.
We continue to be a participant in the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Compliance Assurance Process that is a real-time audit. The 2024 U.S. federal income tax return remains open to examination by the IRS. We file income tax returns in various foreign and US state jurisdictions. Our state income tax returns for the 2020 through 2024 tax years remain subject to examination by state jurisdictions. The F&G life insurance group files a separate consolidated return with the IRS. The F&G federal income tax returns for 2020 through the current period remain open to examination by the IRS.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has developed guidance known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion Pillar Two minimum tax rules, or Pillar Two, which generally provide for a minimum effective tax rate of 15% and are intended to apply to tax years beginning in 2024. As of December 31, 2024, based on the countries in which we do business that have enacted legislation, the Company does not expect these rules to have a material impact on our income tax provision.
The Company considers its non-U.S. earnings to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. to the extent these earnings are not subject to the U.S. income tax under an anti-deferral tax regime. Given our intent to reinvest these earnings for an indefinite period of time, the Company has not accrued a deferred tax liability on these earnings. A determination of an unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable.
Note U - Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Purchase Plan
During the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, our eligible employees could voluntarily participate in our employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) sponsored by us. Pursuant to the ESPP, employees may contribute an amount between 3% and 15% of their base salary and certain commissions. We contribute varying amounts as specified in the ESPP.
We contributed $34 million, $30 million and $36 million to the ESPP in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, in accordance with our matching contribution.
FNF 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
During the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, we have offered our employees the opportunity to participate in our 401(k) profit sharing plan (the “401(k) Plan”), a qualified voluntary contributory savings plan that is available to substantially all of our employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 40% of their pre-tax annual compensation, up to the amount allowed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. During the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we made an employer match on the 401(k) Plan of $0.50 on each $1.00 contributed up to the first 6% of eligible earnings contributed to the 401(k) Plan by employees. The employer match was $46 million, $45 million and $50 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and was credited based on the participant's individual investment elections in the FNF 401(k) Plan.
Omnibus Incentive Plan
In 2005, we established the FNT 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “Omnibus Plan”) authorizing the issuance of up to 8 million shares of common stock, subject to the terms of the Omnibus Plan. On October 23, 2006; May 29, 2008; May 25, 2011; May 22, 2013; and June 15, 2016, the shareholders of FNF approved amendments to increase the number of shares for issuance under the Omnibus Plan by 16 million, 11 million, 6 million, 6 million and 10 million shares, respectively. The primary purpose of the increases were to assure that we had adequate means to provide equity incentive compensation to our employees on a going-forward basis. The Omnibus Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares, performance units, other cash and stock-based awards and dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2024, there were 2,357,220 shares of restricted stock and no stock options outstanding under the Omnibus Plan. Awards granted are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
F&G Omnibus Incentive Plan
On June 1, 2020, in connection with the acquisition of F&G, we assumed the shares that remained available for future awards under the FGL Holdings 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “F&G Omnibus Plan”) and converted such shares into 2,096,429 shares of FNF common stock that may be issued pursuant to future awards granted under the F&G Omnibus Plan and 2,411,585 shares of FNF common stock that may be issued pursuant to outstanding stock options under the F&G Omnibus Plan. Each unvested stock option assumed under the F&G Omnibus Plan was converted into an FNF stock option and vests solely on the passage of time without any ongoing performance-vesting conditions. The options vest over a 3 year period, based on the option's initial grant date, and have a contractual life of 7 years. As of December 31, 2024, there were no shares of restricted stock and 100,000 stock options outstanding under the F&G Omnibus Plan.
FNF stock option transactions under the Omnibus Plan for 2024, 2023, and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Exercisable |
Balance, January 1, 2022 | 996,113 | | | $ | 25.53 | | | 996,113 | |
Exercised | (996,113) | | | 25.53 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | — | | | $ | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
FNF stock option transactions under the F&G Omnibus Plan for 2024, 2023, and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Exercisable |
Balance January 1, 2022 | 1,527,936 | | | $ | 35.97 | | | 1,072,584 | |
| | | | | |
Exercised | (352,614) | | | 38.79 | | | |
Canceled | (2,715) | | | 28.00 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | 1,172,607 | | | $ | 35.15 | | | 1,172,607 | |
Exercised | (502,414) | | | 30.31 | | | |
Canceled | (26,570) | | | 38.07 | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | 643,623 | | | $ | 38.80 | | | 643,623 | |
| | | | | |
Exercised | (543,623) | | | 38.74 | | | |
| | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2024 | 100,000 | | | $ | 39.10 | | | 100,000 | |
FNF restricted stock transactions under the Omnibus Plan in 2024, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Balance, December 31, 2021 | 1,639,226 | | | $ | 41.97 | |
Granted | 994,548 | | | 40.83 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Vested | (792,230) | | | 41.44 | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | 1,841,544 | | | $ | 41.59 | |
Granted | 966,093 | | | 44.44 | |
Canceled | (23,975) | | | 41.42 | |
Vested | (908,267) | | | 40.26 | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | 1,875,395 | | | $ | 43.69 | |
Granted | 1,604,119 | | | 60.23 | |
Canceled | (16,603) | | | 45.92 | |
Vested | (1,105,691) | | | 47.21 | |
Balance, December 31, 2024 | 2,357,220 | | | $ | 53.28 | |
FNF restricted stock transactions under the F&G Omnibus Plan in 2024, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Balance, January 1, 2022 | 718,641 | | | $ | 40.24 | |
Granted | — | | | — | |
Canceled | (78,551) | | | 37.79 | |
Vested | (138,542) | | | 34.11 | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | 501,548 | | | $ | 42.31 | |
Granted | — | | | — | |
Canceled | (15,965) | | | 45.63 | |
Vested | (304,104) | | | 42.87 | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | 181,479 | | | $ | 41.08 | |
Granted | — | | | — | |
Canceled | (13,082) | | | 48.28 | |
Vested | (168,397) | | | 40.53 | |
Balance, December 31, 2024 | — | | | $ | — | |
The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
| | | Weighted | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | Average | | Weighted | | | | | | Average | | Weighted | | |
| | | Remaining | | Average | | | | | | Remaining | | Average | | |
Range of | Number of | | Contractual | | Exercise | | Intrinsic | | Number of | | Contractual | | Exercise | | Intrinsic |
Exercise Prices | Options | | Life | | Price | | Value | | Options | | Life | | Price | | Value |
| | | (In years) | | | | (In millions) | | | | (In years) | | | | (In millions) |
$0.00 - $39.10 | 100,000 | | | 0.97 | | $ | 39.10 | | | $ | 2 | | | 100,000 | | | 0.97 | | $ | 39.10 | | | $ | 2 | |
| 100,000 | | | | | | | $ | 2 | | | 100,000 | | | | | | | $ | 2 | |
We account for stock-based compensation plans in accordance with GAAP on share-based payments, which requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payments be recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of each award. Using the fair value method of accounting, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award at the grant date and recognized over the service period. Fair value of restricted stock awards and units is based on the
grant date value of the underlying stock derived from quoted market prices. In 2024, we issued a $50 million restricted stock grant to our chairman, of which one quarter of the grant vested immediately, with the remaining three quarters vesting in equal installments over a period of three years on each anniversary of the grant date. The total fair value of restricted stock awards granted in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $97 million, $43 million and $41 million, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock awards, which vested in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $76 million, $51 million and $38 million, respectively. Option awards are measured at fair value on the grant date using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model. The intrinsic value of options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $9 million, $8 million and $16 million, respectively. Net earnings attributable to FNF Shareholders reflects stock-based compensation expense amounts of $82 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, $60 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 and $49 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, which are included in personnel costs in the reported financial results of each period.
At December 31, 2024, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option grants and restricted stock grants is $98 million, which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.83 years.
Pension Plan
In 2000, FNF merged with Chicago Title Corporation ("CTC"). In connection with the merger, we assumed CTC’s noncontributory defined contribution plan and noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”). The Pension Plan covers certain CTC employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s average monthly compensation in the highest 60 consecutive calendar months during the 120 months ending at retirement or termination. Effective December 31, 2000, the Pension Plan was frozen and there will be no future credit given for years of service or changes in salary. The accumulated benefit obligation is the same as the projected benefit obligation due to the pension plan being frozen as of December 31, 2000. Pursuant to GAAP on employers’ accounting for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans, the measurement date is December 31.
On May 1, 2023, we elected to terminate the Pension Plan, subject to approval by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation and the receipt of a favorable determination letter from the IRS. Upon termination, the account balance of each participant in the Pension Plan shall become fully vested. Each remaining participant or beneficiary in the Pension Plan shall be given one of the following options with respect to termination of the Pension Plan: (i) a lump-sum distribution of the participant's account balance; or (ii) an annuity benefit equal to the participant’s account balance.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we distributed substantially all of the Pension Plan assets to the participants or beneficiaries of the Pension Plan. As of December 31, 2024, the project benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets were immaterial. The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation as of December 31, 2023 was 4.67%. As of December 31, 2023, the projected benefit obligation was $64 million and the fair value of plan assets was $54 million. The net pension liability and net periodic expense included in our financial position and results of operations relating to the Pension Plan is not considered material for any period presented.
Note V - Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Concentration of Risk
In the normal course of business, we and certain of our subsidiaries enter into off-balance sheet credit arrangements associated with certain aspects of the title insurance business and other activities.
We generate a significant amount of title insurance premiums in Texas, California, Florida, Pennsylvania and Illinois. Title insurance premiums as a percentage of the total title insurance premiums written from those five states are detailed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Texas | 13.8 | % | | 14.3 | % | | 15.0 | % |
California | 12.9 | % | | 13.0 | % | | 12.0 | % |
Florida | 10.2 | % | | 10.7 | % | | 10.6 | % |
Illinois | 5.8 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 5.3 | % |
Pennsylvania | 5.2 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 5.2 | % |
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and trade receivables.
We place cash equivalents and short-term investments with high credit quality financial institutions and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution. Investments in commercial paper of industrial firms and financial institutions are rated investment grade by nationally recognized rating agencies.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up our customer base, thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk. We control credit risk through monitoring procedures.
Note W - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted Pronouncements
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The amendments in this update improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expense categories that are regularly provided to the CODM and included in each reported measure of a segment’s profit or loss. In addition, the amendments enhance interim disclosure requirements that are currently required annually, clarify circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss, and contain other disclosure requirements. The amendments in this update are incremental to the current requirements of Topic 280 and do not change how a public entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates those operating segments, or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments. We adopted this standard using the retrospective approach for all periods presented as required. Refer to Note J Segment Information for additional information.
In March 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-02, Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structure Using the Proportional Amortization Method (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this update permit reporting entities to elect to account for their tax equity investments, regardless of the tax credit program from which the income tax credits are received, using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2024, as required, and there was no material impact to our audited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note T Income Taxes for further information.
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. The amendments in this update affect all entities that have investments in equity securities measured at fair value that are subject to a contractual sale restriction and clarify that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. The amendments also clarify that an entity cannot, as a separate unit of account, recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction. Additionally, the amendments require the following disclosures for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions: the fair value of equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions reflected in the balance sheet, the nature and remaining duration of the restriction(s), and the circumstances that could cause a lapse in the restriction(s). The amendments in this update do not change the principles of fair value measurement, rather, they clarify those principles when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to a contractual sale restriction and improve current GAAP by reducing diversity in practice, reducing the cost and complexity in measuring fair value, and increasing comparability of financial information across reporting entities that hold those investments. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2024, and it did not have a material impact on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures upon adoption.
Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments in this update enhance the transparency of the income tax disclosures by expanding on the disclosures required annually. The amendments require entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state, and foreign income taxes, in addition to providing details about the reconciling items in some categories if above a quantitative threshold. Additionally, the amendments require annual disclosure of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted for annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis, and, retrospective application is permitted. We do not currently expect to early adopt this standard and are in the process of assessing its impact on our disclosures upon adoption.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The amendments in this update enhance transparency of certain expense captions by disclosing more granular information of specific expenses within those captions such as personnel costs, depreciation, and amortization. The amendments also require disclosure of qualitative description of amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated. The amendments in this update are effective for all public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments should be applied either
prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We do not expect to early adopt this standard and are in the process of assessing its impact on our disclosures upon adoption.
Note X - Market Risk Benefits
The following table presents the balances of and changes in MRBs associated with indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed rate annuities | | Indexed Annuities | | Fixed rate annuities | | |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Balance, beginning of period, net liability | $ | 314 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 164 | | | $ | 1 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of period, before effect of changes in the instrument-specific credit risk | $ | 209 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | 1 | | | |
Issuances and benefit payments | 109 | | | — | | | (10) | | | — | | | |
Attributed fees collected and interest accrual | 147 | | | — | | | 131 | | | — | | | |
Actual policyholder behavior different from expected | (5) | | | — | | | 27 | | | — | | | |
Changes in assumptions and other | 24 | | | — | | | 29 | | | — | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Effects of market related movements | (162) | | | — | | | (70) | | | — | | | |
Balance, end of period, before effect of changes in the instrument-specific credit risk | $ | 322 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 209 | | | $ | 1 | | | |
Effect of changes in the instrument-specific credit risk | 98 | | | — | | | 105 | | | — | | | |
Balance, end of period, net liability | $ | 420 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 314 | | | $ | 1 | | | |
Less: reinsured market risk benefits | 61 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Balance, end of period, net of reinsurance | $ | 359 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 314 | | | $ | 1 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average attained age of policyholders weighted by total AV (years) | 67.98 | | 72.58 | | 68.28 | | 72.59 | | |
Net amount at risk | $ | 1,327 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1,059 | | | $ | 2 | | | |
The following table reconciles MRBs by amounts in an asset position and amounts in a liability position to the MRBs amounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | |
| Direct | | Reinsured | | Net | | Direct | | Reinsured | | Net | |
| (In millions) |
MRB Asset | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities | $ | 128 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 189 | | | $ | 88 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 88 | | |
Fixed rate annuities | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | |
Total MRB Asset | $ | 128 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 189 | | | $ | 88 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 88 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
MRB Liability | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indexed annuities | $ | 548 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 548 | | | $ | 402 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 402 | | |
Fixed rate annuities | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | | |
Total MRB liability | $ | 549 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 549 | | | $ | 403 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 403 | | |
The net MRB liability increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily as a result of collection of attributed fees, interest accrual, MRB reserves for contracts issued within the period, and changes in actuarial assumptions. These increases were partially offset by the effects of market related movements, including the impacts of higher risk-free rates and increases in the equity market related projections.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, notable changes made to the inputs to the fair value estimates of MRBs calculations included an increase in risk-free rates leading to a favorable change in the MRBs associated with indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities; increases in the equity market related projections resulted in a decrease in the net amount at risk associated with indexed annuities, leading to a favorable change in the value of the associated MRBs; and an increase in the rider benefit utilization assumption, leading to an unfavorable change in the value of the associated MRBs.
The net MRB liability increased for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of attributed fees collected, increases as a result of actual policyholder behavior different than expected and changes in assumptions as discussed below. These increases were partially offset by the effects of market related movements, including the impacts of higher risk-free rates and increases in the equity market related projections.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, notable changes made to the inputs to the fair value estimates of MRBs calculations included a significant increase in risk-free rates leading to a favorable change in the MRBs associated with indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities; increases in the equity market related projections resulted in a decrease in the net amount at risk associated with indexed annuities, leading to a favorable change in the value of the associated MRBs; and F&G’s credit spread decreased, lead to a corresponding unfavorable change in the MRBs associated with both indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities.
In 2024 and 2023, F&G undertook a review of all significant assumptions and revised several assumptions relating to our deferred annuities (indexed annuities and fixed rate annuities) with MRBs. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we updated assumptions including surrender rates, rider benefit election utilization, mortality improvement, and option budgets. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we updated assumptions including surrender rates, partial withdrawal rates, mortality improvement, and option budgets. All updates to these assumptions brought us more in line with our Company and overall industry experience since the prior assumption updates. These updates, in total, led to increases in the net MRB liability for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Note Y — Contractholder Funds
The following tables summarize balances of and changes in contractholder funds’ account balances:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
| Indexed annuities | | Fixed rate annuities | | Universal Life | | FABN (b) | | FHLB (b) |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 27,164 | | | $ | 13,443 | | | $ | 2,391 | | | $ | 2,613 | | | $ | 2,539 | |
Issuances | 6,649 | | | 5,125 | | | 208 | | | 600 | | | 1,804 | |
Premiums received | 120 | | | 1 | | | 495 | | | — | | | — | |
Policy charges (a) | (195) | | | — | | | (315) | | | — | | | — | |
Surrenders and withdrawals | (3,832) | | | (1,479) | | | (101) | | | — | | | — | |
Benefit payments | (495) | | | (315) | | | (18) | | | (820) | | | (1,606) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest credited | 821 | | | 667 | | | 157 | | | 71 | | | 117 | |
Other | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | | | (2) | |
Balance, end of year | 30,235 | | | 17,442 | | | 2,817 | | | 2,463 | | | 2,852 | |
Embedded derivative adjustment (c) | 219 | | | — | | | 79 | | | — | | | — | |
Gross liability, end of period | 30,454 | | | 17,442 | | | 2,896 | | | 2,463 | | | 2,852 | |
Less: Reinsurance recoverable | 861 | | | 11,009 | | | 877 | | | — | | | — | |
Net liability, after reinsurance recoverable | $ | 29,593 | | | $ | 6,433 | | | $ | 2,019 | | | $ | 2,463 | | | $ | 2,852 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average crediting rate | 2.90 | % | | 4.42 | % | | 6.20 | % | | N/A | | N/A |
Net amount at risk (d) | N/A | | N/A | | $ | 74,279 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Cash surrender value (e) | $ | 27,865 | | | $ | 16,266 | | | $ | 2,177 | | | N/A | | N/A |
(a) Contracts included in the contractholder funds are generally charged a premium and/or monthly assessments on the basis of the account balance.
(b) FABN and FHLB are considered funding agreements that are investment contracts which follow the interest method of accounting, and therefore are not subject to ASU 2018-12 disclosure requirements. However, the Company has elected to present the liability for these agreements within the disaggregated roll forward as we believe it will provide meaningful information for users of the financials.
(c) The embedded derivative adjustment reconciles the account balance to the gross GAAP liability and represents the combination of the host contract and the fair value of the embedded derivatives.
(d) For those guarantees of benefits that are payable in the event of death, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the current guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance at the balance sheet date.
(e) These amounts are gross of reinsurance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
| Indexed Annuities | | Fixed rate annuities | | Universal Life | | FABN (b) | | FHLB (b) |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 24,766 | | | $ | 9,358 | | | $ | 2,112 | | | $ | 2,613 | | | $ | 1,982 | |
Issuances | 4,722 | | | 5,061 | | | 199 | | | — | | | 1,256 | |
Premiums received | 103 | | | 1 | | | 382 | | | — | | | — | |
Policy charges (a) | (182) | | | — | | | (261) | | | — | | | — | |
Surrenders and withdrawals | (2,005) | | | (1,142) | | | (90) | | | — | | | — | |
Benefit payments | (526) | | | (240) | | | (27) | | | (53) | | | (763) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest credited | 270 | | | 405 | | | 76 | | | 54 | | | 64 | |
Other | 16 | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | | | — | |
Balance, end of year | 27,164 | | | 13,443 | | | 2,391 | | | 2,613 | | | 2,539 | |
Embedded derivative adjustment (c) | 243 | | | — | | | 84 | | | — | | | — | |
Gross liability, end of period | 27,407 | | | 13,443 | | | 2,475 | | | 2,613 | | | 2,539 | |
Less: Reinsurance recoverable | 17 | | | 7,520 | | | 894 | | | — | | | — | |
Net liability, after reinsurance recoverable | $ | 27,390 | | | $ | 5,923 | | | $ | 1,581 | | | $ | 2,613 | | | $ | 2,539 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average crediting rate | 1.40 | % | | 4.85 | % | | 3.44 | % | | N/A | | N/A |
Net amount at risk (d) | N/A | | N/A | | $ | 60,389 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Cash surrender value (e) | $ | 25,099 | | | $ | 12,505 | | | $ | 1,872 | | | N/A | | N/A |
(a) Contracts included in the contractholder funds are generally charged a premium and/or monthly assessments on the basis of the account balance.
(b) FABN and FHLB are considered funding agreements that are investment contracts which follow the interest method of accounting, and therefore are not subject to ASU 2018-12 disclosure requirements. However, the Company has elected to present the liability for these agreements within the disaggregated roll forward as we believe it will provide meaningful information for users of the financials.
(c) The embedded derivative adjustment reconciles the account balance to the gross GAAP liability and represents the combination of the host contract and the fair value of the embedded derivatives.
(d) For those guarantees of benefits that are payable in the event of death, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the current guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance at the balance sheet date.
(e) These amounts are gross of reinsurance
The following table reconciles contractholder funds’ account balances to the contractholder funds liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | |
| 2024 | | 2023 | |
| (In millions) |
Indexed annuities | $ | 30,454 | | | $ | 27,407 | | |
Fixed rate annuities | 17,442 | | | 13,443 | | |
Immediate annuities | 286 | | | 311 | | |
Universal life | 2,896 | | | 2,475 | | |
Traditional life | 5 | | | 5 | | |
Funding Agreement-FABN | 2,463 | | | 2,613 | | |
FHLB | 2,852 | | | 2,539 | | |
PRT | 6 | | | 5 | | |
Total | $ | 56,404 | | | $ | 48,798 | | |
Annually, typically in the third quarter, we review assumptions associated with reserves for policy benefits and product guarantees. During the third quarter of 2024 and for the year ended December 31, 2024, based on policyholder behavior, experience and interest rate movements, we reflected updates to surrender assumptions for recent and expected near term policyholder behavior, as well as updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds. These changes resulted in a decrease in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $89 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
During the third quarter of 2023 and for the year ended December 31, 2023, based on increases in interest rates and pricing changes, we updated certain indexed annuities assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the embedded derivative component within contractholder funds and also aligned reserves to actual policyholder behavior. These changes resulted in an increase in total benefits and other changes in policy reserves of approximately $73 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
The following tables present the account values by range of guaranteed minimum crediting rates and the related range of difference, in basis points, between rates being credited to policyholders and the respective guaranteed minimums:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 |
Range of guaranteed minimum crediting rate | At Guaranteed Minimum | | 1 Basis Point-50 Basis Points Above | | 51 Basis Points-150 Basis Points Above | | Greater Than 150 Basis Points Above | | Total |
Indexed Annuities | (In millions) |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 23,540 | | | $ | 1,236 | | | $ | 492 | | | $ | 1,846 | | | $ | 27,114 | |
1.51%-2.50% | 875 | | | 1 | | | 684 | | | 1,242 | | | 2,802 | |
Greater than 2.50% | 303 | | | 2 | | | — | | | 14 | | | 319 | |
Total | $ | 24,718 | | | $ | 1,239 | | | $ | 1,176 | | | $ | 3,102 | | | $ | 30,235 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Rate Annuities | | | | | | | | | |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 57 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 773 | | | $ | 14,407 | | | $ | 15,257 | |
1.51%-2.50% | 4 | | | 7 | | | 20 | | | 462 | | | 493 | |
Greater than 2.50% | 804 | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | 881 | | | 1,692 | |
Total | $ | 865 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 798 | | | $ | 15,750 | | | $ | 17,442 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Universal Life | | | | | | | | | |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 2,421 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 2,452 | |
1.51%-2.50% | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Greater than 2.50% | 364 | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 365 | |
Total | $ | 2,785 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 2,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 |
Range of guaranteed minimum crediting rate | At Guaranteed Minimum | | 1 Basis Point-50 Basis Points Above | | 51 Basis Points-150 Basis Points Above | | Greater Than 150 Basis Points Above | | Total |
Indexed Annuities | (In millions) |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 22,392 | | | $ | 1,444 | | | $ | 526 | | | $ | 1,953 | | | $ | 26,315 | |
1.51%-2.50% | 196 | | | 1 | | | 24 | | | 250 | | | 471 | |
Greater than 2.50% | 377 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 378 | |
Total | $ | 22,965 | | | $ | 1,446 | | | $ | 550 | | | $ | 2,203 | | | $ | 27,164 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Rate Annuities | | | | | | | | | |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 23 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 1,532 | | | $ | 10,271 | | | $ | 11,851 | |
1.51%-2.50% | 5 | | | 8 | | | 23 | | | 453 | | | 489 | |
Greater than 2.50% | 893 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 204 | | | 1,103 | |
Total | $ | 921 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 1,559 | | | $ | 10,928 | | | $ | 13,443 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Universal Life | | | | | | | | | |
0.00%-1.50% | $ | 1,987 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 2,013 | |
1.51%-2.50% | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Greater than 2.50% | 361 | | | 16 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 378 | |
Total | $ | 2,348 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 2,391 | |
Note Z — Future Policy Benefits
The following table summarizes balances and changes in the present value of expected net premiums and the present value of the expected FPB for nonparticipating traditional contracts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Traditional life | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | |
Expected net premiums | | (In millions) |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 722 | | | $ | 797 | | |
Beginning balance at original discount rate | | 874 | | | 974 | | |
| | | | | |
Effect of actual variances from expected experience | | (4) | | | (1) | | |
Balance adjusted for variances from expectation | | 870 | | | 973 | | |
| | | | | |
Interest accrual | | 17 | | | 19 | | |
Net premiums collected | | (107) | | | (118) | | |
| | | | | |
Ending Balance at original discount rate | | 780 | | | 874 | | |
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions | | (149) | | | (152) | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 631 | | | $ | 722 | | |
| | | | | |
Expected FPB | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 2,071 | | | $ | 2,151 | | |
Beginning balance at original discount rate | | 2,492 | | | 2,665 | | |
| | | | | |
Effect of actual variances from expected experience | | 44 | | | (24) | | |
Balance adjusted for variances from expectation | | 2,536 | | | 2,641 | | |
| | | | | |
Interest accrual | | 54 | | | 56 | | |
Benefits payments | | (222) | | | (205) | | |
| | | | | |
Ending Balance at original discount rate | | 2,368 | | | 2,492 | | |
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions | | (435) | | | (421) | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 1,933 | | | $ | 2,071 | | |
| | | | | |
Net liability for future policy benefits | | $ | 1,302 | | | $ | 1,349 | | |
Less: Reinsurance recoverable | | 513 | | | 413 | | |
Net liability for future policy benefits, after reinsurance recoverable | | $ | 789 | | | $ | 936 | | |
| | | | | |
Weighted-average duration of liability for future policyholder benefits (years) | | 6.28 | | 7.36 | |
The following tables summarize balances and changes in the present value of the expected FPB for limited-payment contracts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | PRT |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | |
| | (In millions) |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 4,189 | | | $ | 2,165 | | |
Beginning balance at original discount rate | | 4,351 | | | 2,475 | | |
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions | | (3) | | | (9) | | |
Effect of actual variances from expected experience | | (11) | | | (7) | | |
Balance adjusted for variances from expectation | | 4,337 | | | 2,459 | | |
Issuances | | 2,324 | | | 2,041 | | |
Interest accrual | | 240 | | | 109 | | |
Benefits payments | | (484) | | | (258) | | |
| | | | | |
Ending Balance at original discount rate | | 6,417 | | | 4,351 | | |
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions | | (363) | | | (162) | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 6,054 | | | $ | 4,189 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net liability for future policy benefits, after reinsurance recoverable | | $ | 6,054 | | | $ | 4,189 | | |
| | | | | |
Weighted-average duration of liability for future policyholder benefits (years) | | 7.78 | | 8.23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Immediate annuities |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | |
| | (In millions) |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1,415 | | | $ | 1,429 | | |
Beginning balance at original discount rate | | 1,788 | | | 1,858 | | |
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions | | — | | | — | | |
Effect of actual variances from expected experience | | (27) | | | (15) | | |
Balance adjusted for variances from expectation | | 1,761 | | | 1,843 | | |
Issuances | | 30 | | | 22 | | |
Interest accrual | | 59 | | | 51 | | |
Benefits payments | | (118) | | | (128) | | |
| | | | | |
Ending Balance at original discount rate | | 1,732 | | | 1,788 | | |
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions | | (435) | | | (373) | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 1,297 | | | $ | 1,415 | | |
| | | | | |
Net liability for future policy benefits | | $ | 1,297 | | | $ | 1,415 | | |
Less: Reinsurance recoverable | | 109 | | | 116 | | |
Net liability for future policy benefits, after reinsurance recoverable | | $ | 1,188 | | | $ | 1,299 | | |
| | | | | |
Weighted-average duration of liability for future policyholder benefits (years) | | 12.63 | | 12.47 | |
The following tables summarize balances and changes in the liability for DPL for limited-payment contracts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | |
| | Immediate annuities | | PRT | | Immediate annuities | | PRT | |
| | (In millions) | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 4 | | |
Effect of modeling changes | | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | — | | |
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions | | — | | | (8) | | | — | | | 1 | | |
Effect of actual variances from expected experience | | 8 | | | — | | | 16 | | | 5 | | |
Balance adjusted for variances from expectation | | 95 | | | 2 | | | 89 | | | 10 | | |
Issuances | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 3 | | | — | | |
Interest accrual | | 1 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 1 | | |
Amortization | | (9) | | | (1) | | | (7) | | | (1) | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 90 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 10 | | |
The following table reconciles the net FPB to the FPB in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The DPL for Immediate Annuities and PRT is presented together with the FPB in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and has been included as a reconciling item in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | |
| | (In millions) |
Traditional life | | $ | 1,302 | | | $ | 1,349 | | |
Immediate annuities | | 1,297 | | | 1,415 | | |
PRT | | 6,054 | | | 4,189 | | |
Immediate annuities DPL | | 90 | | | 87 | | |
PRT DPL | | 6 | | | 10 | | |
Total | | $ | 8,749 | | | $ | 7,050 | | |
The following table provides the amount of undiscounted and discounted expected gross premiums and expected future benefits and expenses for nonparticipating traditional and limited-payment contracts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Undiscounted | | Discounted |
| | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 |
Traditional life | | (In millions) |
Expected future benefit payments | | $ | 2,705 | | | $ | 2,935 | | | $ | 1,948 | | | $ | 2,075 | |
Expected future gross premiums | | 914 | | | 1,082 | | | 681 | | | 789 | |
Immediate annuities | | | | | | | | |
Expected future benefit payments | | $ | 3,189 | | | $ | 3,291 | | | $ | 1,297 | | | $ | 1,413 | |
Expected future gross premiums | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
PRT | | | | | | | | |
Expected future benefit payments | | $ | 10,038 | | | $ | 6,709 | | | $ | 6,054 | | | $ | 4,350 | |
Expected future gross premiums | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
The following table summarizes the amount of revenue and interest related to nonparticipating traditional and limited-payment contracts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross Premiums (a) | | Interest Expense (b) |
| | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
Traditional life | | $ | 111 | | | $ | 123 | | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 39 | |
Immediate annuities | | 18 | | | 24 | | | 23 | | | 59 | | | 51 | | | 60 | |
PRT | | 2,217 | | | 1,964 | | | 1,362 | | | 240 | | | 109 | | | 50 | |
Total | | $ | 2,346 | | | $ | 2,111 | | | $ | 1,522 | | | $ | 336 | | | $ | 197 | | | $ | 149 | |
(a) Included in Life insurance premiums and other fees on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
(b) Included in Benefits and other changes in policy reserves (remeasurement gains (losses) (a)) on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The following table presents the weighted-average interest rate:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Traditional life | | | | | | |
Interest accretion rate | | 2.34 | % | | 2.33 | % | | 2.32 | % |
Current discount rate | | 5.44 | % | | 5.03 | % | | 5.37 | % |
Immediate annuities | | | | | | |
Interest accretion rate | | 3.17 | % | | 3.14 | % | | 3.07 | % |
Current discount rate | | 5.45 | % | | 4.98 | % | | 5.21 | % |
PRT | | | | | | |
Interest accretion rate | | 4.72 | % | | 4.61 | % | | 3.20 | % |
Current discount rate | | 5.54 | % | | 5.03 | % | | 5.40 | % |
The following tables summarize the actual experience and expected experience for mortality and lapses of the FPB:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2024 |
| | Traditional life | | Immediate annuities | | PRT |
Mortality | | | | | | |
Actual experience | | 1.4 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 2.7 | % |
Expected experience | | 1.5 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Lapses | | | | | | |
Actual experience | | 0.1 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Expected experience | | 0.5 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 |
| | Traditional life | | Immediate annuities | | PRT |
Mortality | | | | | | |
Actual experience | | 1.7 | % | | 3.2 | % | | 3.2 | % |
Expected experience | | 1.4 | % | | 1.8 | % | | 2.3 | % |
Lapses | | | | | | |
Actual experience | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Expected experience | | 0.3 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| December 31, 2022 |
| Traditional life | | Immediate annuities | | PRT |
Mortality | | | | | |
Actual experience | 1.5 | % | | 3.0 | % | | 1.9 | % |
Expected experience | 1.3 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Lapses | | | | | |
Actual experience | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Expected experience | 0.3 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
The following table provides additional information for periods in which a cohort has a net premium ratio (“NPR”) greater than 100% (and therefore capped at 100%) (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | December 31, 2024 |
| | | | | | Cohort X | | Description |
NPR before capping | | | | | | 108 | % | | Term with return of premium Non-NY Cohort |
Reserves before NPR capping | | | | | | $ | 1,147 | | | Term with return of premium Non-NY Cohort |
Reserves after NPR capping | | | | | | 1,174 | | | Term with return of premium Non-NY Cohort |
Loss Expense | | | | | | 27 | | | Term with return of premium Non-NY Cohort |
F&G realized actual-to-expected experience variances and made changes to assumptions during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 as follows:
Traditional life
The traditional life line of business primarily consists of policies that were sold prior to 2010. As this line of business continues to age, benefit payments made from these contracts will be the primary driver of the emergence of reserves, decreasing the reserve balance.
Significant assumption inputs to the calculation of the FPB for traditional life include mortality, lapses (including lapses due to nonpayment of premium and surrenders for cash surrender value), and discount rates (both accretion and current). We review the cash flow assumptions annually, typically in the third quarter. In 2024, F&G made an adjustment to the calculation to reflect additional actuarial precision, unrelated to the assumptions, driving an increase to the FPB liability. In 2023, F&G undertook a review of all significant assumptions and revised the lapse assumption, resulting in a slight decrease to the FPB. There have been no other significant changes.
Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2024 from that utilized in 2023 resulting in increased discount rates that drove a decrease to the FPB. Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2023 from that utilized in 2022, resulting in decreased discount rates that drove a material increase to the FPB.
Immediate annuities (life contingent)
Significant assumption inputs to the calculation of the FPB for immediate annuities (life contingent) include mortality and discount rates (both accretion and current). We review the cash flow assumptions annually, typically in the third quarter. In 2024 and 2023, F&G undertook a review of the significant cash flow assumptions and did not make any changes to mortality. Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2024 from that utilized in 2023 resulting in increased discount rates that drove a decrease to the FPB. Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2023 from that utilized in 2022, resulting in decreased discount rates that drove a material increase to the FPB.
PRT (life contingent)
The PRT line of business has issued a significant volume of contracts for both 2024 and 2023, which is the primary impact in increasing the reserve balance in each of those periods.
Significant assumption inputs to the calculation of the FPB for PRT (life contingent) include mortality and discount rates (both accretion and current). Additionally, for PRT contracts with deferred payment streams retirement age and elected payment form are significant assumptions. We review the cash flow assumptions annually, typically in the third quarter. In 2024 and 2023, F&G undertook a review of the significant cash flow assumptions and did not make any changes to mortality. Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2024 from that utilized in 2023 resulting in increased discount rates that drove a decrease to the FPB. Market data that underlies current discount rates was updated in 2023 from that utilized in 2022, resulting in decreased discount rates that drove a material increase to the FPB.
Premium deficiency testing
F&G conducts annual premium deficiency testing for its long-duration contracts except for the FPB for nonparticipating traditional and limited-payment contracts. F&G also conducts annual premium deficiency testing for the VOBA of all long-duration contracts. Premium deficiency testing is performed by reviewing assumptions used to calculate the insurance liabilities and determining whether the sum of the existing contract liabilities and the present value of future gross premiums is sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits to be paid to or on behalf of policyholders and settlement costs and recover unamortized present value of future profits. Anticipated investment income, based on F&G’s experience, is considered when performing premium deficiency testing for long-duration contracts. During 2024, F&G did not pass premium deficiency testing for the traditional life block of business, related to the recoverability of VOBA. Due to that result, F&G began accruing a liability in the fourth quarter of 2024 that increases the amortization of traditional life VOBA. The liability balance was immaterial at December 31, 2024. During 2023, F&G was not required to establish any additional liabilities as a result of premium deficiency testing.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their control objectives.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has adopted the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Item 9B. Other Information
During the year ended December 31, 2024, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement," as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K, except as described below.
On September 24, 2024, Sandra D. Morgan, a Director on our Board of Directors, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (the "Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading agreement") that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c). The Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading agreement was entered into during an open trading window and in accordance with our insider trading policies. Ms. Morgan was not aware of any material, nonpublic information concerning us or our securities upon adoption of the Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement.
The Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement provided for the sale, on December 24, 2024, of 35% of an aggregate 5,979 of FNF common stock, or 2,092 shares, which were received by Ms. Morgan upon the vesting of restricted stock awards in November 2024. The Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement terminated upon the execution of all trades as defined in the Morgan Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10
Codes of Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all our directors, officers and employees. The purpose of these codes is to: (i) promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest; (ii) promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure; (iii) promote compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; (iv) ensure the protection of our legitimate business interests, including corporate opportunities, assets and confidential information; and (v) deter wrongdoing. Our codes of ethics are designed to maintain our commitment to our longstanding standards for ethical business practices. Our reputation for integrity is one of our most important assets and each of our employees and directors is expected to contribute to the care and preservation of that asset. Under our codes of ethics, an amendment to or a waiver or modification of any ethics policy applicable to our directors or executive officers must be disclosed to the extent required under Securities and Exchange Commission and/or New York Stock Exchange rules. We intend to disclose any such amendment or waiver by posting it on our website at www.investor.fnf.com.
Copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available for review on our website at www.investor.fnf.com.
Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading and Related Procedures
We have adopted an Insider Trading and Tipping Policy prohibiting insider trading and provides related procedures governing the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of the registrant's securities. This policy also prohibits tipping or disclosing material nonpublic information ("MNPI") to outsiders. This policy is applicable to all directors, officers, employees, their immediate family, and any entities controlled by them who have regular access to MNPI. A copy of the insider trading policy is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report.
Items 10-14.
Within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year, we intend to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the remaining matters required by these items.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements. The following is a list of the Consolidated Financial Statements of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in Item 8 of Part II:
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules. The following is a list of financial statement schedules filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(a) (3) The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are set forth on pages to this Form 10-K:
| | | | | |
Exhibit Number | Description |
2.1 | |
2.2 | |
2.3 | |
3.1 | |
3.2 | |
4.1 | |
4.2 | |
4.3 | |
4.4 | |
4.5 | |
4.6 | |
4.7 | |
4.8 | |
4.9 | |
4.10 | Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2020, by and among Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc., Fidelity National Financial, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2020). |
4.11 | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit Number | Description |
4.12 | |
4.13 | |
| | | | | |
4.14 | |
4.15 | |
4.16 | |
4.17 | |
4.18 | |
4.19 | |
4.20 | |
4.21 | |
4.22 | |
4.23 | |
4.24 | |
4.25 | |
4.26 | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2024, among F&G Annuities & Life, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2024). |
4.27 | |
4.28 | |
4.29 | |
10.1 | |
10.2 | |
10.3 | |
10.4 | |
10.5 | |
| | | | | |
10.6 | |
10.7 | |
10.8 | |
10.9 | |
10.10 | |
10.11 | |
10.12 | |
10.13 | |
10.14 | |
10.15 | |
10.16 | |
10.17 | |
10.18 | |
10.19 | |
10.20 | |
10.21 | |
10.22 | |
10.23 | |
10.24 | |
10.25 | |
| | | | | |
10.26 | |
10.27 | |
10.28 | |
10.29 | |
10.30 | |
10.31 | |
10.32 | |
10.33 | |
10.34 | Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2020, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2020) |
10.35 | |
10.36 | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit Number | Description |
10.37 | |
10.38 | |
10.39 | |
10.40 | Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2022, by and among F&G Annuities & Life, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the borrower, the guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2022) |
10.41 | |
10.42 | |
10.43 | |
10.44 | |
10.45 | |
10.46 | |
10.47 | Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2024, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2024). |
10.48 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2024, by and among F&G Annuities & Life, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the borrower, the guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2024). |
10.49 | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit Number | Description |
19.1 | |
21.1 | |
23.1 | |
31.1 | |
31.2 | |
32.1 | |
32.2 | |
97.1 | |
101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document (2) |
101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101 |
(1) A management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K
(2) The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | |
| By: | /s/ Michael J. Nolan | |
| | Michael J. Nolan | |
| | Chief Executive Officer | |
Date: February 28, 2025
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Michael J. Nolan | | Chief Executive Officer | | February 28, 2025 |
Michael J. Nolan | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Anthony J. Park | | Chief Financial Officer | | February 28, 2025 |
Anthony J. Park | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ William P. Foley, II | | Director and Chairman of the Board | | February 28, 2025 |
William P. Foley, II | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Raymond R. Quirk | | Director and Executive Vice Chairman of the Board | | February 28, 2025 |
Raymond R. Quirk | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Douglas K. Ammerman | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Douglas K. Ammerman | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Halim Dhanidina | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Halim Dhanidina | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Thomas M. Hagerty | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Thomas M. Hagerty | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Daniel D. (Ron) Lane | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Daniel D. (Ron) Lane | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Sandra D. Morgan | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Sandra D. Morgan | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Heather H. Miller | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Heather H. Miller | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ John D. Rood | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
John D. Rood | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Peter O. Shea, Jr. | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Peter O. Shea, Jr. | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Cary H. Thompson | | Director | | February 28, 2025 |
Cary H. Thompson | | | | |
SCHEDULE II
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
(Parent Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 |
ASSETS |
Cash | $ | 534 | | | $ | 397 | |
Short-term investments | 252 | | | 487 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | 3 | | | 3 | |
Notes receivable | 212 | | | 268 | |
Investments in and amounts due from subsidiaries | 8,882 | | | 7,949 | |
Property and equipment, net | 2 | | | 3 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 433 | | | 318 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Total assets | $ | 10,318 | | | $ | 9,425 | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
Liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | $ | 385 | | | $ | 358 | |
Income taxes payable | 51 | | | — | |
Deferred tax liability | — | | | 29 | |
Notes payable | 2,128 | | | 2,126 | |
Total liabilities | 2,564 | | | 2,513 | |
Equity: | | | |
| | | |
FNF common stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 600 shares as of December 31, 2024 and 2023; outstanding of 275 and 273 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and issued of 331 and 329 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | — | | | — | |
| | | |
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, none | — | | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | 5,976 | | | 5,913 | |
Retained earnings | 5,982 | | | 5,244 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings | (2,052) | | | (2,119) | |
Less: Treasury stock, 56 shares as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, at cost | (2,152) | | | (2,126) | |
Total equity of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. common shareholders | 7,754 | | | 6,912 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 10,318 | | | $ | 9,425 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
SCHEDULE II
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
(Parent Company)
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions, except per share data) |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Other fees and revenue | $ | 38 | | | $ | 33 | | | $ | (37) | |
Interest and investment income and realized gains | 76 | | | 74 | | | 43 | |
Recognized gains and losses, net | 2 | | | (31) | | | (42) | |
Total revenues | 116 | | | 76 | | | (36) | |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Personnel expenses | 94 | | | 70 | | | (11) | |
Other operating expenses | 28 | | | 47 | | | 15 | |
Interest expense | 76 | | | 77 | | | 92 | |
Total expenses | 198 | | | 194 | | | 96 | |
Losses before income tax benefit and equity in earnings of subsidiaries | (82) | | | (118) | | | (132) | |
Income tax benefit | (20) | | | (29) | | | (33) | |
Losses before equity in earnings of subsidiaries | (62) | | | (89) | | | (99) | |
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries | 1,332 | | | 606 | | | 1,393 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net earnings attributable to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. common shareholders | $ | 1,270 | | | $ | 517 | | | $ | 1,294 | |
| | | | | |
Retained earnings, beginning of year | $ | 5,244 | | | $ | 5,225 | | | $ | 4,818 | |
Dividends declared | (532) | | | (498) | | | (490) | |
Distribution of F&G to FNF common shareholders | — | | | — | | | (397) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net earnings attributable to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. common shareholders | 1,270 | | | 517 | | | 1,294 | |
Retained earnings, end of year | $ | 5,982 | | | $ | 5,244 | | | $ | 5,225 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
SCHEDULE II
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
(Parent Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Net earnings | $ | 1,270 | | | $ | 517 | | | $ | 1,294 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries | (1,332) | | | (606) | | | (1,393) | |
Depreciation and amortization | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Stock-based compensation | 82 | | | 57 | | | 48 | |
| | | | | |
Net change in income taxes | 5 | | | (262) | | | 748 | |
Net (increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | (113) | | | (72) | | | 41 | |
Net increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | 27 | | | 70 | | | (51) | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (60) | | | (295) | | | 688 | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | |
Purchase of F&G preferred stock | (250) | | | — | | | — | |
Net proceeds from (purchases of) short-term investment activities | 235 | | | 82 | | | (509) | |
| | | | | |
Additions to notes receivable | (1) | | | (12) | | | (87) | |
Collection of notes receivable | 55 | | | 47 | | | 79 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 39 | | | 117 | | | (517) | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Debt service payments | — | | | — | | | (400) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Dividends paid | (532) | | | (500) | | | (489) | |
Purchases of treasury stock | — | | | (6) | | | (553) | |
Exercise of stock options | 21 | | | 15 | | | 39 | |
Payment for shares withheld for taxes and in treasury | (22) | | | (17) | | | (15) | |
| | | | | |
Additional investments in non-controlling interests | (12) | | | (12) | | | (2) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net dividends from subsidiaries | 703 | | | 689 | | | 140 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 158 | | | 169 | | | (1,280) | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 137 | | | (9) | | | (1,109) | |
Cash at beginning of year | 397 | | | 406 | | | 1,515 | |
Cash at end of year | $ | 534 | | | $ | 397 | | | $ | 406 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements |
SCHEDULE II
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
(Parent Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. transacts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries. The Parent Company Financial Statements should be read in connection with the aforementioned Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
B. Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2024 | | 2023 |
| | (In millions) |
4.50% Notes, net of discount | | $ | 447 | | | $ | 446 | |
| | | | |
3.40% Notes, net of discount | | 646 | | | 644 | |
2.45% Notes, net of discount | | 595 | | | 594 | |
3.20% Notes, net of discount | | 444 | | | 444 | |
Revolving credit facility | | (4) | | | (2) | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 2,128 | | | $ | 2,126 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
C. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Cash paid during the year: | | | | | |
Interest paid | $ | 73 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 95 | |
Income tax payments | 229 | | | 213 | | | 459 | |
D. Cash Dividends Received
We have received cash dividends from our title insurance underwriters and F&G of $0.6 billion, $0.4 billion, and $0.8 billion during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Schedule III
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
F&G Supplementary Insurance Information
(in millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2024 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F&G Segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred acquisition costs | $ | 3,036 | | | $ | 2,215 | | | $ | 1,411 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits, losses, claims and loss expenses | 8,749 | | | 7,050 | | | 5,021 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other policy claims and benefits payable | 102 | | | 92 | | | 109 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Life insurance premiums and other fees | 2,860 | | | 2,413 | | | 1,704 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and investment income | 2,719 | | | 2,211 | | | 1,655 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses | (3,791) | | | (3,553) | | | (1,126) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs | (280) | | | (191) | | | (99) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other operating expenses, net of deferrals | (203) | | | (146) | | | (102) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Schedule IV
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
F&G Reinsurance
(In millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2024 | Gross Amount | | Ceded to other companies | | Assumed from other companies | | Net Amount | | Percentage of amount assumed to net |
Life insurance in force | $ | 10,906 | | | $ | (1,370) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 9,536 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Premiums and other considerations: | | | | | | | | | |
Traditional life insurance premiums | 129 | | | (94) | | | — | | | 35 | | | — | |
Life-contingent PRT premiums | 2,217 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,217 | | | — | |
Annuity product charges and other fees | 655 | | | (47) | | | — | | | 608 | | | — | |
Total premiums and other considerations | $ | 3,001 | | | $ | (141) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,860 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2023 | Gross Amount | | Ceded to other companies | | Assumed from other companies | | Net Amount | | Percentage of amount assumed to net |
Life insurance in force | $ | 8,448 | | | $ | (1,436) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,012 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Premiums and other considerations: | | | | | | | | | |
Traditional life insurance premiums | 148 | | | (105) | | | — | | | 43 | | | — | |
Life-contingent PRT premiums | 1,964 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,964 | | | — | |
Annuity product charges and other fees | 455 | | | (49) | | | — | | | 406 | | | — | |
Total premiums and other considerations | $ | 2,567 | | | $ | (154) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,413 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2022 | Gross Amount | | Ceded to other companies | | Assumed from other companies | | Net Amount | | Percentage of amount assumed to net |
Life insurance in force | $ | 6,296 | | | $ | (1,524) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,772 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Premiums and other considerations: | | | | | | | | | |
Traditional life insurance premiums | 160 | | | (128) | | | — | | | 32 | | | — | |
Life-contingent PRT premiums | 1,362 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,362 | | | — | |
Annuity product charges and other fees | 360 | | | (50) | | | — | | | 310 | | | — | |
Total premiums and other considerations | $ | 1,882 | | | $ | (178) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,704 | | | — | % |
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm