FINANCING RECEIVABLES | 90 Days and Accruing
At March 31, 2023:
Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 50,961 $ 50,961 $ 1,939,129 $ 1,990,090 $ —
Mezzanine loan (4) 4,700 — — 4,700 — 4,700 —
Total $ 4,700 $ — $ 50,961 $ 55,661 $ 1,939,129 $ 1,994,790 $ —
At December 31, 2022:
Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,024,123 $ 2,052,890 $ —
Mezzanine loan (4) — — — — 4,700 4,700 —
Total $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,028,823 $ 2,057,590 $ — (1) During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 1.1 million and $ 641,000 , respectively, on three CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at March 31, 2023. (2) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $ 22.8 million, in maturity default at December 31, 2022. (3) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.5 million and $ 11.9 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (4) Fully reserved at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. At March 31, 2023 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.0 million, and one mezzanine loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 4.7 million, in payment default. At December 31, 2022 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.6 million, in payment default. Modifications During the three months ended March 31, 2023 , the Company did no t enter into any loan modifications for borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. During the three months ended March 31, 2022 , the Company entered into one agreement that extended one CRE whole loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 21.8 million, which represented 1.1 % of the total amortized cost of the portfolio." id="sjs-B4">NOTE 6 - FINANCING RECEIVABLES The following table shows the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022 (in thousands): Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 Year Ended December 31, 2022 Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period $ 18,803 $ 8,805 Provision for credit losses 5,096 12,295 Charge offs — ( 2,297 ) Allowance for credit losses at end of period $ 23,899 $ 18,803 During the three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company recorded a provision for expected credit losses of $ 5.1 million , primarily attributable to modeled increases in expected general portfolio credit risk as well as a general decline in macroeconomic conditions. At March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company individually evaluated the following loans: • One office mezzanine loan in the Northeast region with a principal balance of $ 4.7 million at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The Company fully reserved this loan in the fourth quarter of 2022, and it continues to be fully reserved at March 31, 2023. The loan entered payment default in February 2023 and has been placed on nonaccrual status. • One retail loan in the Northeast region, with a principal balance of $ 8.0 million at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, for which foreclosure was determined to be probable. The loan was modified in February 2021 to extend its maturity to December 2021 and has since entered into payment default and has been put on nonaccrual status. The loan had an as-is appraised value in excess of its principal and interest balances, and, as such, had no allowance for current expected credit losses (“CECL”) at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. • One office loan in the Southwest region, with a principal balance of $ 20.1 million and $ 20.7 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, for which foreclosure was determined to be probable. The loan had an initial maturity of March 2022, was modified three times to extend its maturity to June 2022 and has since entered into payment default and has been put on nonaccrual status. However, in exchange for payments, comprising principal paydowns, interest payments and the reimbursement of certain legal fees, received between October 2022 and April 2023, the Company has agreed to temporarily defer its right to foreclose on the property until July 2023. Additionally, at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, this loan had an as-is appraised value in excess of its principal and interest balances, and, as such, had no CECL allowance. Credit quality indicators Commercial Real Estate Loans CRE loans are collateralized by a diversified mix of real estate properties and are assessed for credit quality based on the collective evaluation of several factors, including but not limited to: collateral performance relative to underwritten plan, time since origination, current implied and/or re-underwritten loan-to-collateral value ("LTV") ratios, loan structure and exit plan. Depending on the loan’s performance against these various factors, loans are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with loans rated 1 representing loans with the highest credit quality and loans rated 5 representing loans with the lowest credit quality. The factors evaluated provide general criteria to monitor credit migration in the Company’s loan portfolio; as such, a loan’s rating may improve or worsen, depending on new information received. The criteria set forth below should be used as general guidelines. Therefore, not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each category below. Risk Rating Risk Characteristics 1 Property performance has surpassed underwritten expectations. Occupancy is stabilized, the property has had a history of consistently high occupancy, and the property has a diverse and high-quality tenant mix. 2 Property performance is consistent with underwritten expectations and covenants and performance criteria are being met or exceeded. Occupancy is stabilized, near stabilized or is on track with underwriting. 3 Property performance lags behind underwritten expectations. Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has some tenancy rollover. 4 Property performance significantly lags behind underwritten expectations. Performance criteria and loan covenants have required occasional waivers. Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has a large amount of tenancy rollover. 5 Property performance is significantly worse than underwritten expectations. The loan is not in compliance with loan covenants and performance criteria and may be in default. Expected sale proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the loan at maturity. The property has a material vacancy rate and significant rollover of remaining tenants. An updated appraisal is required upon designation and updated on an as-needed basis. All CRE loans are evaluated for any credit deterioration by debt asset management and certain finance personnel on at least a quarterly basis. Mezzanine loans may experience greater credit risks due to their nature as subordinated investments. For the purpose of calculating the quarterly provision for credit losses under CECL, the Company pools CRE loans based on the underlying collateral property type and utilizes a probability of default and loss given default methodology for approximately one year after which it immediately reverts to a historical mean loss ratio. Credit risk profiles of CRE loans at amortized cost were as follows (in thousands, except amounts in the footnote): Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Rating 4 Rating 5 Total (1) At March 31, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ 1,532,268 362,903 $ 43,958 $ 50,961 $ 1,990,090 Mezzanine loan — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ — $ 1,532,268 $ 362,903 $ 43,958 $ 55,661 $ 1,994,790 At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ 1,635,376 $ 309,491 $ 85,226 $ 22,797 $ 2,052,890 Mezzanine loan — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ — $ 1,635,376 $ 309,491 $ 85,226 $ 27,497 $ 2,057,590 (1) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.5 million and $ 11.9 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Credit risk profiles of CRE loans by origination year at amortized cost were as follows (in thousands, except amounts in the footnotes): 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Prior Total (1) At March 31, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2 $ 14,759 $ 480,017 $ 944,121 $ 52,722 $ 26,949 $ 13,700 $ 1,532,268 Rating 3 — 52,619 203,273 34,387 27,887 44,737 362,903 Rating 4 — — 43,958 — — — 43,958 Rating 5 — — — — 42,936 8,025 50,961 Total whole loans, floating-rate 14,759 532,636 1,191,352 87,109 97,772 66,462 1,990,090 Mezzanine loan (rating 5) — — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ 14,759 $ 532,636 $ 1,191,352 $ 87,109 $ 97,772 $ 71,162 $ 1,994,790 Current Period Gross Write-Offs (3) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Prior Total (1) At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2 $ 526,606 $ 1,003,060 $ 64,944 $ 26,977 $ 13,789 $ — $ 1,635,376 Rating 3 — 192,490 44,657 27,881 44,463 — 309,491 Rating 4 — — — 20,742 64,484 — 85,226 Rating 5 — — — 22,797 — — 22,797 Total whole loans, floating-rate 526,606 1,195,550 109,601 98,397 122,736 — 2,052,890 Mezzanine loan (rating 5) — — — — 4,700 — 4,700 Total $ 526,606 $ 1,195,550 $ 109,601 $ 98,397 $ 127,436 $ — $ 2,057,590 (1) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.5 million and $ 11.9 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (2) Acquired CRE whole loans are grouped within each loan’s year of origination. (3) There were no charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2023. At both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 , the Company had one additional mezzanine loan included in other assets held for sale that had no carrying value. Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis The following table presents the CRE loan portfolio aging analysis at the dates indicated for CRE loans at amortized cost (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): 30-59 Days 60-89 Days Greater than 90 (1) Total Past Due Current (2) Total Loans Receivable (3) Total Loans > 90 Days and Accruing At March 31, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 50,961 $ 50,961 $ 1,939,129 $ 1,990,090 $ — Mezzanine loan (4) 4,700 — — 4,700 — 4,700 — Total $ 4,700 $ — $ 50,961 $ 55,661 $ 1,939,129 $ 1,994,790 $ — At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,024,123 $ 2,052,890 $ — Mezzanine loan (4) — — — — 4,700 4,700 — Total $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,028,823 $ 2,057,590 $ — (1) During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 1.1 million and $ 641,000 , respectively, on three CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at March 31, 2023. (2) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $ 22.8 million, in maturity default at December 31, 2022. (3) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.5 million and $ 11.9 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (4) Fully reserved at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. At March 31, 2023 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.0 million, and one mezzanine loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 4.7 million, in payment default. At December 31, 2022 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.6 million, in payment default. Modifications During the three months ended March 31, 2023 , the Company did no t enter into any loan modifications for borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. During the three months ended March 31, 2022 , the Company entered into one agreement that extended one CRE whole loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 21.8 million, which represented 1.1 % of the total amortized cost of the portfolio. |