FINANCING RECEIVABLES | 90 Days and Accruing
At June 30, 2023:
Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,164 $ 28,164 $ 1,930,876 $ 1,959,040 $ —
Mezzanine loan (4) 4,700 — — 4,700 — 4,700 —
Total $ 4,700 $ — $ 28,164 $ 32,864 $ 1,930,876 $ 1,963,740 $ —
At December 31, 2022:
Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,024,123 $ 2,052,890 $ —
Mezzanine loan (4) — — — — 4,700 4,700 —
Total $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,028,823 $ 2,057,590 $ — (1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 837,000 and $ 1.8 million, respectively, on two CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at June 30, 2023. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 333,000 and $ 669,000 , respectively, on two CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at June 30, 2023. (2) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $ 22.8 million, in maturity default at December 31, 2022. (3) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.6 million and $ 11.9 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (4) Fully reserved at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. At June 30, 2023 , the Company had two CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 28.2 million , and one mezzanine loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 4.7 million, in payment default. At December 31, 2022 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.6 million, in payment default. Modifications During the six months ended June 30, 2023 , the Company did not enter into any loan modifications for borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company entered into three agreements that extended one CRE whole loan for a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. At June 30, 2022, this loan had an amortized cost of $ 21.8 million, which represented 1.0 % of the total amortized cost of the portfolio." id="sjs-B4">NOTE 6 - FINANCING RECEIVABLES The following table shows the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022 (in thousands): Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Year Ended December 31, 2022 Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period $ 18,803 $ 8,805 Provision for credit losses 7,796 12,295 Charge offs ( 948 ) ( 2,297 ) Allowance for credit losses at end of period $ 25,651 $ 18,803 During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the Company recorded provisions for expected credit losses of $ 2.7 million and $ 7.8 million , respectively, primarily attributable to the impact from the near-term macroeconomic outlook of the commercial real estate market, including: forecasted increases in short-term interest rates, continued expected declines in commercial real estate pricing and forecasted higher unemployment rates, partially offset by improvements in property-level cash flows. In June 2023, the Company received the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on an office loan in the East North Central region with a principal balance of $ 22.8 million which resulted in a charge off of $ 948,000 against the allowance for credit losses (see Note 7). During the three months ended June 30, 2022 , the Company recorded a provision for expected credit losses of approximately $ 524,000 primarily attributable to a decline in macroeconomic factors, offset by improvements in property-level cash flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2022 , reversal of expected credit losses in the first quarter of 2022 outpaced the provision during the second quarter of 2022, resulting in a net reversal of $ 1.3 million in connection with resolutions of loans with specific reserves and continued improvements in property-level operations. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company individually evaluated the following loans: • One office mezzanine loan in the Northeast region with a principal balance of $ 4.7 million at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The Company fully reserved this loan in the fourth quarter of 2022, and it continues to be fully reserved at June 30, 2023. The loan entered payment default in February 2023 and has been placed on nonaccrual status. • One retail loan in the Northeast region, with a principal balance of $ 8.0 million at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, for which foreclosure was determined to be probable. The loan was modified in February 2021 to extend its maturity to December 2021 and has since entered into payment default and has been put on nonaccrual status. The loan had an as-is appraised value in excess of its principal and interest balances, and, as such, had no allowance for CECL at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. • One office loan in the Southwest region, with a principal balance of $ 20.1 million and $ 20.7 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 , respectively, for which foreclosure was determined to be probable. The loan had an initial maturity of March 2022, was modified three times to extend its maturity to June 2022 and has since entered into payment default and has been put on nonaccrual status. However, in exchange for payments, comprising principal paydowns, interest payments and the reimbursement of certain legal fees, received between October 2022 and July 2023, the Company has agreed to temporarily defer its right to foreclose on the property until October 2023. Additionally, at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, this loan had an as-is appraised value in excess of its principal and interest balances, and, as such, had no CECL allowance. Credit quality indicators Commercial Real Estate Loans CRE loans are collateralized by a diversified mix of real estate properties and are assessed for credit quality based on the collective evaluation of several factors, including but not limited to: collateral performance relative to underwritten plan, time since origination, current implied and/or re-underwritten loan-to-collateral value ("LTV") ratios, loan structure and exit plan. Depending on the loan’s performance against these various factors, loans are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with loans rated 1 representing loans with the highest credit quality and loans rated 5 representing loans with the lowest credit quality. The factors evaluated provide general criteria to monitor credit migration in the Company’s loan portfolio; as such, a loan’s rating may improve or worsen, depending on new information received. The criteria set forth below should be used as general guidelines. Therefore, not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each category below. Risk Rating Risk Characteristics 1 Property performance has surpassed underwritten expectations. Occupancy is stabilized, the property has had a history of consistently high occupancy, and the property has a diverse and high-quality tenant mix. 2 Property performance is consistent with underwritten expectations and covenants and performance criteria are being met or exceeded. Occupancy is stabilized, near stabilized or is on track with underwriting. 3 Property performance lags behind underwritten expectations. Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has some tenancy rollover. 4 Property performance significantly lags behind underwritten expectations. Performance criteria and loan covenants have required occasional waivers. Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has a large amount of tenancy rollover. 5 Property performance is significantly worse than underwritten expectations. The loan is not in compliance with loan covenants and performance criteria and may be in default. Expected sale proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the loan at maturity. The property has a material vacancy rate and significant rollover of remaining tenants. An updated appraisal is required upon designation and updated on an as-needed basis. All CRE loans are evaluated for any credit deterioration by debt asset management and certain finance personnel on at least a quarterly basis. Mezzanine loans may experience greater credit risks due to their nature as subordinated investments. For the purpose of calculating the quarterly provision for credit losses under CECL, the Company pools CRE loans based on the underlying collateral property type and utilizes a probability of default and loss given default methodology for approximately one year after which it immediately reverts to a historical mean loss ratio. Credit risk profiles of CRE loans at amortized cost were as follows (in thousands, except amounts in the footnote): Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Rating 4 Rating 5 Total (1) At June 30, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ 1,353,353 514,179 $ 63,344 $ 28,164 $ 1,959,040 Mezzanine loan — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ — $ 1,353,353 $ 514,179 $ 63,344 $ 32,864 $ 1,963,740 At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ 1,635,376 $ 309,491 $ 85,226 $ 22,797 $ 2,052,890 Mezzanine loan — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ — $ 1,635,376 $ 309,491 $ 85,226 $ 27,497 $ 2,057,590 (1) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.6 million and $ 11.9 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Credit risk profiles of CRE loans by origination year at amortized cost were as follows (in thousands, except amounts in the footnotes): 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Prior Total (1) At June 30, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2 $ 37,643 $ 444,948 $ 791,217 $ 52,703 $ 26,842 $ — $ 1,353,353 Rating 3 — 77,350 316,281 34,286 27,794 58,468 514,179 Rating 4 — 19,348 43,996 — — — 63,344 Rating 5 — — — — 20,139 8,025 28,164 Total whole loans, floating-rate 37,643 541,646 1,151,494 86,989 74,775 66,493 1,959,040 Mezzanine loan (rating 5) — — — — — 4,700 4,700 Total $ 37,643 $ 541,646 $ 1,151,494 $ 86,989 $ 74,775 $ 71,193 $ 1,963,740 Current Period Gross Write-Offs $ — $ — $ — $ — $ ( 948 ) $ — $ ( 948 ) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Prior Total (1) At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2 $ 526,606 $ 1,003,060 $ 64,944 $ 26,977 $ 13,789 $ — $ 1,635,376 Rating 3 — 192,490 44,657 27,881 44,463 — 309,491 Rating 4 — — — 20,742 64,484 — 85,226 Rating 5 — — — 22,797 — — 22,797 Total whole loans, floating-rate 526,606 1,195,550 109,601 98,397 122,736 — 2,052,890 Mezzanine loan (rating 5) — — — — 4,700 — 4,700 Total $ 526,606 $ 1,195,550 $ 109,601 $ 98,397 $ 127,436 $ — $ 2,057,590 (1) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.6 million and $ 11.9 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (2) Acquired CRE whole loans are grouped within each loan’s year of origination. At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 , the Company had one additional mezzanine loan included in other assets held for sale that had no carrying value. Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis The following table presents the CRE loan portfolio aging analysis at the dates indicated for CRE loans at amortized cost (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): 30-59 Days 60-89 Days Greater than 90 (1) Total Past Due Current (2) Total Loans Receivable (3) Total Loans > 90 Days and Accruing At June 30, 2023: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,164 $ 28,164 $ 1,930,876 $ 1,959,040 $ — Mezzanine loan (4) 4,700 — — 4,700 — 4,700 — Total $ 4,700 $ — $ 28,164 $ 32,864 $ 1,930,876 $ 1,963,740 $ — At December 31, 2022: Whole loans, floating-rate $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,024,123 $ 2,052,890 $ — Mezzanine loan (4) — — — — 4,700 4,700 — Total $ — $ — $ 28,767 $ 28,767 $ 2,028,823 $ 2,057,590 $ — (1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 837,000 and $ 1.8 million, respectively, on two CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at June 30, 2023. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 , the Company recognized interest income of $ 333,000 and $ 669,000 , respectively, on two CRE whole loans with a principal payment past due greater than 90 days at June 30, 2023. (2) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $ 22.8 million, in maturity default at December 31, 2022. (3) The total amortized cost of CRE whole loans excluded accrued interest receivable of $ 12.6 million and $ 11.9 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. (4) Fully reserved at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. At June 30, 2023 , the Company had two CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 28.2 million , and one mezzanine loan, with a total amortized cost of $ 4.7 million, in payment default. At December 31, 2022 , the Company had three CRE whole loans, with total amortized costs of $ 51.6 million, in payment default. Modifications During the six months ended June 30, 2023 , the Company did not enter into any loan modifications for borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company entered into three agreements that extended one CRE whole loan for a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. At June 30, 2022, this loan had an amortized cost of $ 21.8 million, which represented 1.0 % of the total amortized cost of the portfolio. |