FINANCING RECEIVABLES | NOTE 6 - FINANCING RECEIVABLES The following tables show the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and year ended December 31, 2017 and the allowance for loan and lease losses and recorded investments in loans and leases at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in thousands): Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Commercial Real Estate Loans Direct Financing Leases Total Commercial Real Estate Loans Syndicated Corporate Loans Direct Financing Leases Total Allowance for loan and lease losses: Allowance for loan and lease losses at beginning of period $ 5,328 $ 735 $ 6,063 $ 3,829 $ — $ 465 $ 4,294 Provision for (recovery of) loan and lease losses, net (799 ) — (799 ) 1,499 3 270 1,772 Loans charged-off — — — — (3 ) — (3 ) Allowance for loan and lease losses at end of period $ 4,529 $ 735 $ 5,264 $ 5,328 $ — $ 735 $ 6,063 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Commercial Real Estate Loans Direct Financing Leases Total Commercial Real Estate Loans Syndicated Corporate Loans Direct Financing Leases Total Allowance for loan and lease losses ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 2,500 $ — $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ — $ 735 $ 3,235 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 2,029 $ 735 $ 2,764 $ 2,828 $ — $ — $ 2,828 Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Loans and Leases: Amortized cost ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 26,008 $ — $ 26,008 $ 7,000 $ — $ 886 $ 7,886 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 1,355,520 $ 824 $ 1,356,344 $ 1,283,150 $ — $ — $ 1,283,150 Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Credit quality indicators Commercial Real Estate Loans CRE loans are collateralized by a diversified mix of real estate properties and are assessed for credit quality based on the collective evaluation of several factors, including but not limited to: collateral performance relative to underwritten plan, time since origination, current implied and/or reunderwritten LTV, loan structure and exit plan. Depending on the loan's performance against these various factors, loans are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with loans rated 1 representing loans with the highest credit quality and loans rated 5 representing loans with lowest credit quality. The factors evaluated provide general criteria to monitor credit migration in the Company's loan portfolio, as such, a loan's rating may improve or worsen, depending on new information received. The criteria set forth below should be used as general guidelines, and, therefore, not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each category below. Loans that are performing according to their underwritten plans generally will not require an allowance for loan loss. Risk Rating Risk Characteristics 1 • Property performance has surpassed underwritten expectations. • Occupancy is stabilized, the property has had a history of consistently high occupancy, and the property has a diverse and high quality tenant mix. 2 • Property performance is consistent with underwritten expectations and covenants and performance criteria are being met or exceeded. • Occupancy is stabilized, near stabilized or is on track with underwriting. 3 • Property performance lags behind underwritten expectations. • Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has some tenancy rollover. 4 • Property performance significantly lags behind underwritten expectations. Performance criteria and loan covenants have required occasional waivers. • Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has a large amount of tenancy rollover. 5 • Property performance is significantly worse than underwritten expectations. The loan is not in compliance with loan covenants and performance criteria and is in default. Expected sale proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the loan at maturity. • The property has material vacancy and significant rollover of remaining tenants. • An updated appraisal is required. CRE loans are evaluated for any credit deterioration by debt asset management and certain finance personnel on at least a quarterly basis. Loans are first individually evaluated for impairment; and to the extent not deemed impaired, a general reserve is established. The allowance for loan loss is computed as (i) 1.5% of the aggregate face values of loans rated as a 3, plus (ii) 5.0% of the aggregate face values of loans rated as a 4, plus (iii) specific allowances measured and determined on loans individually evaluated, which are loans rated as a 5. While the overall risk rating is generally not the sole factor used in determining whether a loan is impaired, a loan with a higher overall risk rating would tend to have more adverse indicators of impairment, and therefore would be more likely to experience a credit loss. Credit risk profiles of CRE loans at amortized cost were as follows (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Rating 4 Rating 5 Held for Sale Total At March 31, 2018: Whole loans (1) $ 52,010 $ 1,179,981 $ 118,688 $ 4,841 $ 7,000 $ — $ 1,362,520 Preferred equity investment (2) — 19,008 — — — — 19,008 Legacy CRE whole loans (3)(4) — — — — — 63,882 63,882 $ 52,010 $ 1,198,989 $ 118,688 $ 4,841 $ 7,000 $ 63,882 $ 1,445,410 At December 31, 2017: Whole loans (1) $ 65,589 $ 1,040,883 $ 171,841 $ 4,837 $ 7,000 $ — $ 1,290,150 Legacy CRE whole loans (3)(4) — — — — — 63,783 63,783 $ 65,589 $ 1,040,883 $ 171,841 $ 4,837 $ 7,000 $ 63,783 $ 1,353,933 (1) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $7.0 million , that was in default at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . (2) The Company's preferred equity investment is evaluated individually for impairment and excluded from the general reserve calculation. (3) Legacy CRE whole loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. (4) Includes three and two legacy CRE whole loans that were in default with total carrying values of $40.5 million and $22.5 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , respectively. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , the Company had one CRE whole loan designated as an impaired loan with a risk rating of 5 due to short term vacancy/tenant concerns and a past due maturity of February 2017. The loan is collateralized by a retail shopping center in the Southeast region, as defined by the NCREIF, and had an amortized cost of $7.0 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . The Company obtained an appraisal of the collateral in 2016, indicating a fair value of $4.5 million , which it relied upon as a practical expedient for determining the value of the loan at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . No additional provision was recorded on the loan for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 . This loan was in default at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . At March 31, 2018 , the Company had four legacy CRE whole loans and one mezzanine loan included in assets held for sale with total carrying values of $57.3 million , comprising total amortized cost bases of $63.9 million less a valuation allowance of $6.6 million . At December 31, 2017 , the Company had four legacy CRE whole loans and one mezzanine loan included in assets held for sale with total carrying values of $61.8 million , comprising total amortized cost bases of $63.8 million less a valuation allowance of $1.9 million . The mezzanine loan had no fair value at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . The Company obtained updated appraisals for one legacy CRE whole loan held for sale collateralized by a hotel in the Pacific region, as defined by the NCREIF, in April 2018. For the remaining three legacy CRE whole loans held for sale, the Company continued to rely on its appraisals obtained in 2016, as a practical expedient, in determining fair value at March 31, 2018 . Two of the four legacy CRE whole loans required a specific reserve upon transfer to held for sale in 2016 and are comprised of the following: • One CRE whole loan collateralized by an office property in the Mountain region, as defined by the NCREIF, with an initial par value of $17.7 million . Upon transfer to held for sale in 2016, this loan was written down to its estimated fair value of $11.0 million , which remains the carrying value at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . No additional valuation adjustments were recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 . The loan matured in May 2017 and is currently in default; • One CRE whole loan collateralized by a hotel in the Pacific region, as defined by the NCREIF, with an initial par value of $29.5 million . Upon transfer to held for sale in 2016, this loan was written down to its estimated fair value of $24.0 million . At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , the loan had a carrying value of $18.0 million and $22.5 million , respectively. An additional fair value adjustment of $4.7 million , which included protective advances of $172,000 , to reduce the carrying value was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2018 . This adjustment was recorded based on the receipt of updated appraisals in April 2018 and was recognized in fair value adjustments on financial assets held for sale in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. No valuation adjustments were recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2017 . The loan has a maturity date in January 2019 and is currently in default. The remaining two legacy CRE whole loans required no specific reserve upon transfer to held for sale in 2016. One loan is collateralized by a retail shopping center in the Pacific region, as defined by the NCREIF, and had a carrying value of $11.5 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . The loan had a maturity date in December 2017 and is currently in technical default. The second loan is collateralized by a retail shopping center in the Pacific region, as defined by the NCREIF, and had a carrying value of $16.8 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . The loan has a maturity date in January 2019. For these two loans, the Company determined that no additional valuation adjustments were necessary for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 . At March 31, 2018 , 49.4% , 31.4% and 19.2% of the Company's legacy CRE whole loans were concentrated in retail, hotel and office, respectively, based on carrying value. Of these loans, 80.8% and 19.2% are within the Pacific and Mountain regions, respectively, as defined by NCREIF. At December 31, 2017 , 45.8% , 36.4% and 17.8% of the Company's legacy CRE whole loans were concentrated in retail, hotel and office, respectively, based on carrying value. Of these loans, 82.2% and 17.8% are within the Pacific and Mountain regions, respectively. Except as previously discussed, all of the Company's CRE loans and its preferred equity investment were current with respect to contractual principal and interest at March 31, 2018 . Direct Financing Leases The Company recorded no provision for lease losses against the value of its direct financing leases during the three months ended March 31, 2018 . The Company recorded a $139,000 provision for lease losses during the three months ended March 31, 2017 . The Company held $89,000 and $151,000 of direct financing leases, net of reserves, at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , respectively. Loan Portfolios Aging Analysis The following table presents the loan portfolio aging analysis as of the dates indicated at amortized cost (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): 30-59 Days 60-89 Days Greater than 90 Days Total Past Due Current Total Loans Receivable (1) Total Loans > 90 Days and Accruing At March 31, 2018: Whole loans (2) $ — $ — $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 1,355,520 $ 1,362,520 $ — Preferred equity investment — — — — 19,008 19,008 — Legacy CRE whole loans (3) — — 47,057 47,057 16,825 63,882 11,516 Total loans $ — $ — $ 54,057 $ 54,057 $ 1,391,353 $ 1,445,410 $ 11,516 At December 31, 2017: Whole loans (2) $ — $ — $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 1,283,150 $ 1,290,150 $ — Legacy CRE whole loans (3) 11,516 — 11,000 22,516 41,267 63,783 — Total loans $ 11,516 $ — $ 18,000 $ 29,516 $ 1,324,417 $ 1,353,933 $ — (1) Excludes direct financing leases of $89,000 and $151,000 , net of reserves, at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , respectively. (2) Includes one CRE whole loan, with an amortized cost of $7.0 million , that was in default at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 . (3) Includes three and two legacy CRE whole loans that were in default with total carrying values of $40.5 million and $22.5 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , respectively. Impaired Loans The following tables show impaired loans as of the dates indicated (in thousands): Recorded Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Specific Allowance Average Investment in Impaired Loans Interest Income Recognized At March 31, 2018: Loans without a specific valuation allowance: Whole loans $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Loans with a specific valuation allowance: Whole loans $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ (2,500 ) $ 7,000 $ — Total: Whole loans $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ (2,500 ) $ 7,000 $ — At December 31, 2017: Loans without a specific valuation allowance: Whole loans $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Loans with a specific valuation allowance: Whole loans $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ (2,500 ) $ 7,000 $ — Total: Whole loans $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ (2,500 ) $ 7,000 $ — Troubled-Debt Restructurings ("TDR") There were no TDRs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 . |