Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Service and Licensing Obligations We have entered into service and licensing agreements with third party vendors to provide various services, including network access, equipment maintenance and software licensing. As the benefits of these agreements are experienced uniformly over the applicable contractual periods, we record the related service and licensing expenses on a straight-line basis, although actual cash payment obligations under certain of these agreements fluctuate over the terms of the agreements. Our future minimum payments under non-cancellable contractual service and licensing obligations as of March 31, 2024 were as follows (in thousands): For the Years Ending December 31, 2024 (remainder) $ 3,784 2025 1,141 2026 — 2027 — 2028 — Thereafter — Total $ 4,925 Operating Leases Refer to Note 10 – Leases for commitments related to our operating leases. Self-Insurance We provide comprehensive major medical benefits to our employees. Effective January 1, 2023, we began maintaining a substantial portion of our U.S. employee health insurance benefits on a self-insured basis with up to $0.3 million per individual per year and a maximum claim liability of $22.5 million. As a result, we record a self-insurance liability based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. As of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, we had a self-insurance liability balance of $2.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in the “Accrued compensation and benefits” line on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contingencies From time to time, we receive inquiries from governmental bodies and also may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We assess contingencies to determine the degree of probability and range of possible loss for potential accrual in our condensed consolidated financial statements. An estimated loss contingency is accrued in the condensed consolidated financial statements if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal proceedings or other contingencies could result in material costs, even if we ultimately prevail, and we may from time to time enter into settlements to resolve such litigation. Legal costs incurred in connection with the resolution of claims, lawsuits and other contingencies generally are expensed as incurred. There were no material litigation-related accruals recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2024 or 2023. The following discussion is limited to the Company's material on-going legal proceedings: Legal Proceedings Derivative Actions – On July 7, 2020, a derivative lawsuit captioned Chernet v. Flanders et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-04477-SK (N.D. Cal.) (the “Chernet” matter) was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On October 13, 2020, a derivative lawsuit captioned Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund v. Flanders et al., Case No. 20CV371555 (Cal. Super. Ct.) (the “Lincolnshire” matter) was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. The complaints were brought against the Company’s then-chief executive officer, Mr. Flanders, its then-chief financial officer, Mr. Yung, its then-chief operating officer, Mr. Francis, and the then-current members of the Board of Directors (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”), and name the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaints allege, among other things, that the Individual Defendants made or caused the Company to make materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material information regarding the Company’s accounting and modeling assumptions, rate of member churn, profitability and internal controls for the period of March 2018 through the present. The Chernet and Lincolnshire complaints purport to assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and waste of corporate assets. The Chernet lawsuit also alleges that the Individual Defendants violated Sections 14(a), 10(b), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and asserts claims for abuse of control and gross mismanagement. The Chernet and Lincolnshire complaints seek damages, restitution, attorneys’ fees and costs, and certain measures with respect to the Company’s corporate governance and internal procedures, and (in the Lincolnshire lawsuit) equitable and/or injunctive relief. On August 12, 2020, the court stayed the Chernet matter pending the resolution of the then-anticipated motion to dismiss the consolidated securities class action. On December 11, 2020, the court stayed the Lincolnshire matter, also pending the resolution of the motion to dismiss in the consolidated securities class action. On October 5, 2021, a third derivative lawsuit, captioned Badwal v. Flanders et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-07795 (N.D. Cal.) (the “Badwal” matter) was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Badwal complaint purports to assert a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, an insider trading claim, and violations of Section 14(a), 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act. The Badwal complaint seeks damages, declaratory relief, corporate governance measures, equitable and injunctive relief, restitution and disgorgement, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On November 29, 2021, the federal court consolidated the Chernet and Badwal matters under the caption In re eHealth, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (the “Federal Derivative Action”). On August 12, 2021, the court granted-in-part and denied-in-part defendants’ motion to dismiss the securities class action. In December 2021, the parties entered into a stipulation to further stay the Federal Derivative Action pending the appointment of a new lead plaintiff in the securities class action, which was so ordered by the court on December 14, 2021. As discussed above, on November 9, 2022, the court appointed a new lead plaintiff in the securities class action. On December 9, 2022, plaintiffs in the Federal Derivative Action filed a verified consolidated stockholder derivative complaint on behalf of the Company against certain current and former members of its Board of Directors and certain of its officers. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, insider trading, and violations of Sections 14(a), 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act. The complaint seeks damages, declaratory relief, corporate governance measures, equitable and injunctive relief, restitution and disgorgement, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On January 3, 2023, pursuant to a joint stipulation, the court ordered all proceedings in the Federal Derivative Action stayed pending the resolution of the securities class action. On July 28, 2023, the Lincolnshire matter was stayed pending the resolution of the securities class action, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation. On January 10, 2024, the Court entered the parties’ stipulated order voluntarily dismissing the Federal Derivative Action. On February 29, 2024, the parties stipulated to the voluntary dismissal of the Lincolnshire matter, and on March 4, 2024, the Santa Clara County Court entered an order dismissing the matter without prejudice pursuant to the stipulation. |