UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[ X ] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2011
or
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-02301
|
NSTAR Electric Company |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
| | |
Massachusetts | | 04-1278810 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
| |
800 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts | | 02199 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
(617) 424-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
[ ] Yes [ X ] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
[ ] Yes [ X ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[ X ] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ X ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
[ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
| | |
Class | | Outstanding at February 7, 2012 |
Common Stock, $1 par value | | 100 shares |
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a), (b) and (d) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
None
NSTAR Electric Company
Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2011
| | | | | | |
Signatures | | | | | 78 | |
| | |
Exhibit 31.1 | | Section 302 Certification | | | | |
Exhibit 31.2 | | Section 302 Certification | | | | |
Exhibit 32.1 | | Section 906 Certification | | | | |
Exhibit 32.2 | | Section 906 Certification | | | | |
I
Glossary of Terms
The following is a glossary of abbreviated names or acronyms frequently used throughout this report.
| | |
NSTAR Companies |
NSTAR | | NSTAR (Holding company) or NSTAR and its subsidiaries (as the context requires) |
NSTAR Electric | | NSTAR Electric Company (the Company) |
NSTAR Gas | | NSTAR Gas Company |
NSTAR Electric & Gas | | NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation |
HEEC | | Harbor Electric Energy Company |
|
Regulatory and Other Authorities |
CCC | | Cape Cod Commission |
DOE | | U.S. Department of Energy |
DOER | | Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources |
DPU | | Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities |
EFSB | | Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board |
FERC | | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
IRS | | U.S. Internal Revenue Service |
ISO-NE | | ISO (Independent System Operator) - New England Inc |
Moody’s | | Moody’s Investors Service |
MPUC | | Maine Public Utilities Commission |
NHPUC | | New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission |
NRC | | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
PURA | | Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority |
SEC | | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
S&P | | Standard & Poor’s |
| |
Other | | |
AFUDC | | Allowance for Funds Used During Construction |
AOCI | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
ARO | | Asset Retirement Obligation |
ASC | | Financial Accounting Standards Board (U.S.) Accounting Standards Codification |
CAP | | IRS Compliance Assurance Process |
CPSL | | Capital Projects Scheduling List |
CY | | Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company |
EERF | | Energy Efficiency Reconciling Factor |
GAAP | | Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America |
GCA | | Massachusetts Green Communities Act |
GHG | | Greenhouse Gas |
GWSA | | Massachusetts Global Warming Solutions Act |
HCERA | | Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act |
ISFSI | | Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation |
kW | | Kilowatt (equal to one thousand watts) |
kWh | | Kilowatthour (the basic unit of electric energy equal to one kilowatt of power supplied for one hour) |
LBR | | Lost Base Revenues |
MD&A | | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
II
Glossary of Terms (continued)
| | |
MW | | Megawatts |
MWh | | Megawatthour (equal to one million watthours) |
MY | | Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company |
NAV | | Net Asset Value |
NEH | | New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. |
NHH | | New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation |
NU | | Northeast Utilities |
OATT | | Open Access Transmission Tariff |
PAM | | Pension and PBOP Rate Adjustment Mechanism |
PBOP | | Postretirement Benefit Obligation other than Pensions |
PPA | | Pension Protection Act |
PPACA | | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act |
RMR | | Reliability Must Run |
ROE | | Return on Equity |
RTO | | Regional Transmission Organization |
SIP | | Simplified Incentive Plan |
SQI | | Service Quality Indicators |
TSA | | Transmission Service Agreement |
WRERA | | Worker, Retiree and Employee Recovery Act |
YA | | Yankee Atomic Electric Company |
| |
N/A | | Not Applicable |
III
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements may also be contained in other filings with the SEC, in press releases, and oral statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements contain words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. These statements are based on the current expectations, estimates or projections of management and are not guarantees of future performance. Some or all of these forward-looking statements may not turn out to be what NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric) expected. Actual results could differ materially from these statements. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the outcomes stated in such forward-looking statements and estimates will be achieved.
Examples of some important factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | | adverse financial market conditions including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital |
| • | | adverse economic conditions |
| • | | changes to prevailing local, state and federal governmental policies and regulatory actions (including those of the DPU, other state regulatory agencies, and the FERC) with respect to allowed rates of return, rate structure, continued recovery of regulatory assets and energy costs, financings, municipalization, and operation and construction of facilities |
| • | | acquisition and disposition of assets |
| • | | changes in tax laws and policies |
| • | | changes in, and compliance with, environmental and safety laws and policies |
| • | | new governmental regulations or changes to existing regulations that impose additional operating requirements or liabilities |
| • | | changes in available information and circumstances regarding legal issues and the resulting impact on our estimated litigation costs |
| • | | weather conditions that directly influence the demand for electricity |
| • | | ability to continue cost control processes |
| • | | ability to maintain current credit ratings |
| • | | impact of uninsured losses |
| • | | impact of adverse union contract negotiations |
| • | | damage from major storms and other natural events and disasters |
| • | | impact of conservation measures and self-generation by our customers |
| • | | changes in financial accounting and reporting standards |
| • | | changes in hazardous waste site conditions and the cleanup technology |
| • | | prices and availability of operating supplies |
| • | | failures in operational or information systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, that disrupt business activities, result in the disclosure of confidential information or otherwise adversely affect financial reporting and/or the Company’s reputation |
| • | | catastrophic events that could result from terrorism, cyber attacks, or attempts to disrupt the Company’s business, or the businesses of third parties, that may impact operations in unpredictable ways and adversely affect financial results and liquidity |
| • | | impact of service quality performance measures and standards of performance for emergency preparation and restoration of service; and |
1
| • | | impact of the expected timing and likelihood of completion of the pending merger with Northeast Utilities, either of which could be adversely affected by, among other things, (i) the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any required governmental and regulatory approvals of the pending merger; (ii) litigation brought in connection with the pending merger; (iii) the ability to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers as well as the ability to successfully integrate the businesses; and (iv) the risk that the credit ratings of the combined company or it subsidiaries may be different from what the companies expect. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this filing and NSTAR Electric undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult all further disclosures NSTAR Electric makes in its filings to the SEC. Other factors in addition to those listed here could also adversely affect NSTAR Electric. This Annual Report also describes material contingencies and critical accounting policies and estimates in the accompanying Part I, Item 1A,“Risk Factors,”in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”and in the accompanying Part II, Item 8,Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and NSTAR Electric encourages a review of these items.
2
Part I
Item 1. Business
(a) General Development of Business
NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric or the Company) is a regulated public utility incorporated in 1886 under Massachusetts law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR. NSTAR Electric serves approximately 1.1 million electric distribution customers in the City of Boston and 80 surrounding communities. NSTAR is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries in the energy delivery business serving approximately 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts. NSTAR’s retail gas distribution utility subsidiary is NSTAR Gas Company (NSTAR Gas). Reference in this report to “NSTAR” shall mean NSTAR or NSTAR and its subsidiaries as the context requires. NSTAR has a service company that provides management and support services to substantially all NSTAR subsidiaries - NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation (NSTAR Electric & Gas).
Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR Electric, provides distribution service and ongoing support to its only customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric consolidates two wholly-owned special purpose subsidiaries, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. These entities were created to complete the sale of electric rate reduction certification to a special purpose trust created by two Massachusetts state agencies. These financing transactions securitized the costs incurred related to the divestiture of generation assets and long-term power contracts. The activities of a third special purpose subsidiary, BEC Funding LLC, were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
NSTAR Electric derives its operating revenues primarily from the sale of energy, distribution, transmission and energy efficiency services to customers. NSTAR Electric’s earnings are impacted by fluctuations in unit sales of electric kWh, which have an effect on the level of distribution and transmission revenues recognized. In accordance with the regulatory rate structure in which NSTAR Electric operates, its recovery of energy and certain energy-related costs are fully reconciled with the level of energy revenues currently recorded and, therefore, do not have an impact on earnings. As a result of this rate structure, any variability in the cost of energy supply purchased will have an impact on the purchased power and transmission expense, but will not affect the Company’s net income as the Company recognizes a corresponding change in revenues.
Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
On October 16, 2010, upon unanimous approval from their respective Boards of Trustees, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities (NU) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The transaction will be a merger of equals in a stock-for-stock transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at closing, NSTAR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NU. On March 4, 2011, shareholders of each company approved the merger and adopted the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NSTAR shareholders will receive 1.312 NU common shares for each NSTAR common share that they own. Following completion of the merger, it is anticipated that NU shareholders will own approximately 56 percent of the post-merger company and former NSTAR shareholders will own approximately 44 percent of the post-merger company.
The post-merger company will provide electric and gas energy delivery services through six regulated electric and gas utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire serving nearly 3.5 million electric and gas customers. Completion of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. Acting pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 14, 2011, NU and NSTAR formally extended the date by which either party has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement should all required closing conditions not be satisfied, including receipt of all required regulatory approvals, from October 16, 2011 to April 16, 2012.
3
Regulatory Approvals on Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
Federal
On January 4, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Communications Commission. On February 10, 2011, the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired. On July 6, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Consent of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was received on December 20, 2011.
Massachusetts
On November 24, 2010, NSTAR and NU filed a joint petition requesting the DPU’s approval of their proposed merger. On March 10, 2011, the DPU issued an order that modified the standard of review to be applied in the review of mergers involving Massachusetts utilities from a “no net harm” standard to a “net benefits” standard, meaning that the companies must demonstrate that the pending merger provides benefits that outweigh the costs. Applicable state law provides that mergers of Massachusetts utilities and their respective holding companies must be “consistent with the public interest.” The order states that the DPU has flexibility in applying the factors applicable to the standard of review. NSTAR and NU filed supplemental testimony with the DPU on April 8, 2011 indicating the merger could provide post-merger net savings of approximately $784 million in the first ten years following the closing of the merger and provide environmental benefits with respect to Massachusetts emissions reductions, global warming policies, and furthering the goals of Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act.
The DPU held public evidentiary hearings during July 2011. Upon conclusion of the public evidentiary hearings on July 28, 2011, the DPU issued a briefing schedule that arranged for a series of intervenor and NSTAR and NU briefs and reply briefs culminating in the delivery of the final NSTAR and NU reply briefs on September 19, 2011. Subsequently, NSTAR and NU agreed to different intervenor motions to extend the briefing schedule, and the DPU consented to these motions. The final NSTAR and NU reply briefs were filed on October 31, 2011.
On July 15, 2011, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) filed a motion for an indefinite stay in the proceedings. On July 21, 2011, NSTAR and NU filed a response objecting to this motion. The DPU originally scheduled Oral Arguments for November 17, 2011 regarding the DOER’s Motion to Stay the proceeding, which were postponed during the fourth quarter of 2011 while NSTAR, NU and other parties made attempts to narrow and discuss the issues presented by the DOER’s Motion to Stay. On January 6, 2012, the Oral Arguments were conducted regarding DOER’s Motion to Stay. At the Oral Argument, DOER withdrew its request for a fully adjudicated rate case, which would have required an extended stay of the proceeding. NSTAR and NU await approval of the merger from the DPU.
Connecticut
On June 1, 2011, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), formerly the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC), issued a declaratory ruling stating that it lacked jurisdiction to review the NSTAR merger with NU. On June 30, 2011, the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel filed a Petition for Administrative Appeal in Connecticut Superior Court requesting that the Superior Court remand the decision back to the PURA with instructions to reopen the docket and review the merger transaction.
On January 4, 2012, the PURA issued a draft decision in Docket No. 10-12-05RE01 that revised its earlier declaratory ruling of June 1, 2011, which had concluded it did not have jurisdiction to review the pending merger between NU and NSTAR. Following oral arguments on January 12, 2012, the PURA issued its final decision on January 18, 2012 that concluded that NU and NSTAR must seek approval to merge from the PURA pursuant to Connecticut state law. On January 19, 2012, NU and NSTAR filed their merger review application with the PURA. On January 20, 2012, the PURA issued a procedural schedule that includes a draft decision on March 26, 2012 and a final decision on April 2, 2012.
4
New Hampshire
On April 5, 2011, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) issued an order finding that it does not have statutory authority to approve or reject the merger.
Maine
On May 11, 2011, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued an order approving the merger contingent upon approval by the FERC. The FERC approval was received on July 6, 2011.
(b) Financial Information about Industry Segments
NSTAR Electric operates as a regulated electric public utility; therefore, industry segment information is not applicable.
(c) Narrative Description of Business
Principal Products and Services
NSTAR Electric provides distribution and transmission service at retail to an area of 1,702 square miles. The territory served is located in Massachusetts and includes the City of Boston and 80 surrounding cities and towns, including Cambridge, New Bedford, Plymouth, and the geographic area comprising Cape Cod and Martha’s Vineyard. The population of this area is approximately 2.5 million.
NSTAR Electric’s operating revenues and sales percentages by customer class for the years 2011, 2010, and 2009 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Revenues ($) | | | Retail Electric Sales (mWh) | |
Retail: | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Commercial and industrial | | | 54% | | | | 52% | | | | 52% | | | | 68% | | | | 68% | | | | 68% | |
Residential | | | 45% | | | | 47% | | | | 47% | | | | 31% | | | | 31% | | | | 31% | |
Other | | | 1% | | | | 1% | | | | 1% | | | | 1% | | | | 1% | | | | 1% | |
Regulated Electric Distribution Rates
Retail electric delivery rates are established by the DPU and are comprised of:
| • | | a distribution charge, which includes a fixed customer charge and a demand and/or energy charge to collect the costs of building and expanding the infrastructure to deliver power to its destination, as well as ongoing operating costs. The distribution charge also includes the recovery, on a fully reconciling basis, of certain DPU-approved safety and reliability programs costs, a Pension and PBOP Rate Adjustment Mechanism (PAM) to recover incremental pension and pension benefit costs, a reconciling rate adjustment mechanism to recover costs associated with the residential assistance adjustment clause, a net-metering reconciliation surcharge to collect the lost revenues and credits associated with net-metering facilities installed by customers, and an Energy Efficiency Reconciling Factor (EERF) to recover energy efficiency program costs and lost base revenues in addition to those charges recovered in the energy conservation charge; |
5
| • | | a basic service chargerepresents the collection of energy costs, including costs related to charge-offs of uncollected energy costs, through DPU-approved rate mechanisms. Electric distribution companies in Massachusetts are required to obtain and resell power to retail customers through Basic Service for those who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. Basic Service rates are reset every six months (every three months for large commercial and industrial customers). The price of Basic Service is intended to reflect the average competitive market price for electric power. Additionally, the DPU has authorized the Company to recover the cost of its Dynamic Pricing Smart Grid Pilot Program through the Basic Service charge; |
| • | | a transition charge represents the collection of costs to be collected primarily from previously held investments in generating plants and costs related to existing above-market power contracts, and contract costs related to long-term power contracts buy-outs; |
| • | | a transmission charge represents the collection of annual costs of moving the electricity over high voltage lines from generating plants to substations located within NSTAR’s service area including costs allocated to NSTAR Electric by ISO-NE to maintain the wholesale electric market; |
| • | | an energy conservation chargerepresents a legislatively-mandated charge to collect costs for energy efficiency programs; and |
| • | | a renewable energy charge represents a legislatively-mandated charge to collect the costs to support the development and promotion of renewable energy projects. |
Rate Settlement Agreement
NSTAR Electric is operating under a DPU-approved Rate Settlement Agreement (Rate Settlement Agreement) that expires December 31, 2012. From 2007 through 2012, the Rate Settlement Agreement establishes for NSTAR Electric, among other things, annual inflation-adjusted distribution rates including a productivity offset, that are generally offset by an equal and corresponding adjustment to transition rates. Refer to the “Rate Settlement Agreement” section of the accompanying Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for more details. Pursuant to a 2008 DPU order, Massachusetts electric utilities must adopt rate structures that decouple the volume of energy sales from the utility’s revenues in their next rate case. The exact timing of the next rate case has not yet been determined.
Massachusetts Regulatory Environment
The Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs oversees the Commonwealth Utilities Commission, consisting of three commissioners. The Commonwealth Utilities Commission leads the DPU, an agency that has jurisdiction over electric, natural gas, water, and transportation matters. Massachusetts has joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a ten-state group that supports implementation of programs to reduce the production of greenhouse gases by electric power plants.
In July 2008, the Massachusetts Legislature enacted the Green Communities Act (GCA) - energy policy legislation designed: (1) to substantially increase energy efficiency, (2) foster the development of renewable energy resources and (3) provide for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in Massachusetts.
In 2008, the Massachusetts Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA) was enacted. In December 2010, a portfolio of policies designed to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions was released by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. At this time, NSTAR Electric cannot predict the effect of the GWSA on its future results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
6
Refer to the “Massachusetts Regulatory Environment” section of the accompanying Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for more details on the GCA and GWSA.
Rate Decoupling
On July 16, 2008, the DPU issued an order to all Massachusetts’ electric distribution utility companies that requires them to develop plans to decouple their distribution rates/revenues from sales volumes. This action is intended to encourage utility companies to help their customers reduce energy consumption. Decoupling of rates will allow utility companies to carry out the mandates of the GCA and at the same time collect the adequate level of revenues to maintain the quality and reliability of electric services. This order allows companies to file for a revenue adjustment representing partial recovery of lost base revenues caused by incremental energy efficiency spending until their decoupling rate plans are approved. Once decoupled rate plans are approved, revenues will be set at a level designed to recover the utility companies’ incurred costs plus a return on their investment. This revenue level will be reconciled with actual revenues received from decoupled rates on an annual basis and any over or under collection will be refunded to or recovered from customers in the subsequent year. NSTAR Electric has not yet applied for decoupled rate structures.
Sources and Availability of Electric Power Supply
For Basic Service power supply, NSTAR Electric makes periodic market solicitations consistent with DPU regulations. NSTAR Electric enters into short-term power purchase agreements to meet its Basic Service supply obligation, ranging in term from three to twelve months. NSTAR Electric fully recovers its payments to suppliers through DPU-approved rates billed to customers.
In accordance with the requirements of the GCA, in September 2010 NSTAR Electric along with other Massachusetts investor-owned utilities began to solicit bids for renewable energy supplies for approximately 3% of total annual load for between 10 and 15 year periods. In August 2011, the DPU approved three long-term renewable energy purchase agreements, representing approximately 1.6% of NSTAR Electric’s load, originally executed in December 2010. These three contracts call for NSTAR Electric to purchase all of the output and associated renewable energy credits of three wind facilities to be constructed. At December 31, 2011, the estimated commitment associated with these new contracts is approximately $9 million in 2012, $30 million in each year 2013 – 2016, and $176 million in 2017 and beyond. Refer to the “Contractual Obligations” section of the accompanying Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more details.
Market and Transmission Regulation
NSTAR Electric and most other New England electric utilities, generation owners, and marketers are parties to a series of agreements that provide for coordinated planning and operation of the region’s generation and transmission facilities and the rules by which they participate in the wholesale markets and acquire transmission services. Under these arrangements, ISO-New England Inc. (ISO-NE), a non-profit corporation whose board of directors and staff are independent from all market participants, serves as the Regional Transmission Operator (RTO) of the New England Transmission System. ISO-NE works to ensure the reliability of the system, administers the Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff subject to FERC approval, intervenes in pertinent regulatory proceedings, oversees the efficient and competitive functioning of the regional wholesale power market and determines which costs of NSTAR Electric’s major transmission facilities are regionalized throughout New England. NSTAR Electric is a New England Transmission Owner subject to FERC regulation and is a member of ISO-NE. Refer to the “FERC Transmission ROE” section of the accompanying Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for more details.
7
Transmission Rates
Transmission revenues are based on formula rates that are approved by the FERC. Tariffs are set by FERC and primarily include the Regional Network Service (RNS) and Local Network Service (LNS) rate schedules. The RNS rate, administered by ISO-NE and billed to all New England distribution companies, is reset on June 1 of each year and recovers the revenue requirements associated with transmission facilities that benefit the New England region. The LNS rate, which NSTAR Electric administers, is reset annually and recovers the revenue requirements for local transmission facilities. The LNS rate calculation recovers total transmission revenue requirements net of revenues received from other sources, thereby ensuring that NSTAR Electric recovers all regional and local revenue requirements as prescribed in the tariffs.
Transmission Capital Improvements
NSTAR Electric continues to evaluate needs for transmission improvements throughout the NSTAR service area. ISO-NE transmission project upgrades maintain transmission system reliability, improve the economic performance of the system, and are fully coordinated with other power regions. Over the next five to ten years, ISO-NE transmission projects are expected to enhance the region’s ability to support a robust, competitive wholesale power market by reliably moving power from various internal and external sources to the region’s load centers.
Additional transmission plans have been developed to further reduce the dependence on certain generating units needed for reliability and the exposure to special load-shedding contingency procedures. At various times, generating units in New England have been in “must-run” situations to maintain area reliability. Transmission improvements placed in-service have reduced costs associated with Reliability Must Run Agreements and second-contingency and voltage-control payments.
The Lower Southeastern Massachusetts (SEMA) Project consists of an expansion and upgrade of existing transmission infrastructure, and construction of a new 31 mile, 345kV transmission line that will cross the Cape Cod Canal. On December 16, 2011, ISO-NE issued formal approval for the Lower SEMA 345 kV Transmission Project to be included in the Pool Transmission Facility regional rates. At a hearing held on January 12, 2012, the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) voted unanimously to direct the EFSB Staff to prepare tentative decisions for public comment based on the EFSB’s approval of the project subject to the conditions of NSTAR Electric providing reports to the EFSB every six months on project costs and schedule of construction. Further conditions may be imposed. The Cape Cod Commission (CCC) unanimously approved the project on January 19, 2012. The cost estimate of this project is approximately $110 million; NSTAR Electric anticipates that the project will be in-service in 2012 or early 2013 dependent on the timing of final regulatory approvals.
Regulation
NSTAR Electric and its wholly-owned regulated subsidiary, Harbor Electric Energy Company, operate primarily under the authority of the DPU, whose jurisdiction includes supervision over retail rates for distribution of electricity, and financing and investing activities. In addition, the FERC has jurisdiction over various phases of NSTAR Electric’s utility business, facilities used for the transmission or sale of energy, certain issuances of short-term debt, and regulation of accounting. These companies are also subject to various other state and municipal regulations with respect to environmental, employment, and general operating matters.
8
Plant Expenditures and Financings
The most recent estimates of NSTAR Electric plant expenditures and long-term debt maturities for 2012 and the years 2013-2016 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | 2012 | | | 2013-2016 | | | |
Plant expenditures | | $ | 455 | | | $ | 1,355 | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 450 | | | $ | 352 | | |
In the five-year period 2012 through 2016, plant expenditures are forecasted for system reliability and performance improvements, customer service enhancements, and capacity expansion in NSTAR Electric’s service territory. Of the $455 million planned electric expenditures for 2012, approximately $190 million is for transmission system improvements, including the SEMA Project discussed above.
Management continuously reviews its capital expenditure and financing programs. These programs and, therefore, the estimates included in this Form 10-K are subject to revision due to changes in regulatory requirements, operating requirements, environmental standards, availability and cost of capital, interest rates and other assumptions. Refer to the accompanying “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” preceding Item 1, “Business.”
Franchises
Through its charters, which are unlimited in time, NSTAR Electric has the right to engage in the business of delivering and selling electricity within its service territory, and has powers incidental thereto and is entitled to all the rights and privileges of and subject to the duties imposed upon electric companies under Massachusetts laws. The locations in public ways for electric transmission and distribution lines are obtained from municipal and other state authorities who, in granting these locations, act as agents for the state. In some cases the actions of these authorities are subject to appeal to the DPU. The rights to these locations are not limited in time and are subject to the action of these authorities and the legislature. Under Massachusetts law, with the exception of municipal-owned utilities, no other entity may provide electric delivery service to retail customers within NSTAR Electric’s territory without the written consent of NSTAR Electric. This consent must be filed with the DPU and the municipality so affected.
Seasonal Nature of Business
NSTAR Electric’s kilowatt-hour sales and revenues are typically higher in the winter and summer than in the spring and fall as sales tend to vary with weather conditions.
Competitive Conditions
As a rate-regulated distribution and transmission utility company, NSTAR Electric is not subject to a significantly competitive business environment. NSTAR Electric has the exclusive right and privilege to engage in the business of delivering energy services within its granted territory. Under Massachusetts law, with the exception of municipal-owned utilities, no other entity may provide electric delivery service to retail customers within NSTAR Electric’s service territory without the written consent of NSTAR Electric. Refer to the accompanying “Franchises” section of this Item 1 and to Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for a further discussion of NSTAR Electric’s rights and competitive pressures within its service territory.
Environmental Matters
NSTAR Electric is subject to numerous federal, state and local standards with respect to the management of wastes and other environmental considerations. NSTAR Electric faces possible liabilities as a result of involvement in several multi-party disposal sites, state-regulated sites or third party claims associated with contamination remediation. NSTAR Electric generally expects to have only a small percentage of the total potential liability for the majority of these sites. Noncompliance with certain standards can, in some cases, also result in the imposition of monetary civil penalties. Refer to the accompanying Item 1A, “Risk
9
Factors,” the “Contingencies - Environmental Matters” section in Item 7,“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”and toNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note K, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for more information.
Management believes that its facilities are in substantial compliance with currently applicable statutory and regulatory environmental requirements.
Number of Employees and Employee Relations
NSTAR Electric does not have any direct employees. All labor services are provided by employees of NSTAR Electric & Gas. Substantially all management, engineering, finance and support services are provided to the operating subsidiaries of NSTAR (including NSTAR Electric) by employees of NSTAR Electric & Gas. As of December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric & Gas had approximately 3,000 employees, including approximately 2,100 of whom are represented by two labor unions covered by separate collective bargaining contracts. Approximately 1,850 of these employees provide services to NSTAR Electric and are members of Local 369 of the Utility Workers of America (AFL-CIO) with whom NSTAR Electric & Gas’ contract expires on June 1, 2012. Management is optimistic that a new labor contract will be agreed upon prior to that date and further, believes that it has satisfactory relations with its employees.
(d) Financial Information about Geographic Areas
NSTAR Electric is engaged in the energy delivery business in Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric does not have any foreign operations or export sales.
(e) Available Information
NSTAR Electric files its Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K reports, and other information with the SEC. You may access materials free of charge on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.govor on NSTAR’s website atwww.nstar.com: select “Investor Relations,” “Financial Information,” then select “SEC filings” from the drop-down list. Copies of NSTAR Electric’s SEC filings may also be obtained free of charge by writing to NSTAR’s Investor Relations Department at the address on the cover of this Form 10-K or by calling 781-441-8338.
As a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR, NSTAR Electric is subject to the NSTAR Board of Trustees Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues, a Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer, General Counsel, and Senior Financial Officers pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for Trustees (Directors), Officers and Employees (Code of Conduct). NSTAR intends to disclose any amendment to, and any waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics that applies to the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer or any other executive officer and that relates to any element of the Code of Ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, in a press release, on the NSTAR website or on Form 8-K, within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. NSTAR’s Corporate Governance documents, including charters, guidelines and codes, and any amendments to such charters, guidelines and codes that are applicable to NSTAR’s executive officers, senior financial officers or directors can be accessed free of charge on NSTAR’s website at:www.nstar.com:select “Investor Relations” and “Company Information.”
The certifications of NSTAR Electric’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1, and 32.2.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
NSTAR Electric’s future performance is subject to a variety of risks, including, but not limited to those described below. If any of the following risks actually occur, NSTAR Electric’s business could be harmed. In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, investors or prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors.
10
NSTAR Electric’s operations are highly regulated, and any adverse regulatory changes could have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations and its financial position.
NSTAR Electric’s operations, including the rates charged, are regulated by the FERC and the DPU. In addition, NSTAR Electric’s accounting policies are prescribed by GAAP, the FERC, and the DPU. Adverse regulatory changes in rates and accounting policies by a regulatory authority could have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations and its financial condition.
Potential municipalization or technological developments may adversely affect the Company’s regulated electricity business.
Under Massachusetts law, no other entity may provide electric delivery service to retail customers within NSTAR Electric’s service territory without the written consent of NSTAR Electric. One potential exception is municipalization, whereby a city or town establishes its own municipal-owned utility. Although there have been no recent municipalization activities in Massachusetts, NSTAR Electric could be exposed to municipalization risk, whereby a municipality could acquire the electric delivery assets located in that city or town and take over the customer delivery service, thereby reducing NSTAR Electric’s revenues. Any such action would require numerous legal and regulatory consents and approvals. Municipalization would require that NSTAR Electric be compensated for its assets assumed. In addition, there is also the risk that technological developments could lead to more wide-spread use of distributed generation among NSTAR Electric’s customer base reducing such customers’ use of NSTAR Electric’s utility system.
Changes in environmental laws and regulations affecting NSTAR Electric’s business could increase the Company’s costs and curtail its activities.
NSTAR Electric is subject to a number of environmental laws and regulations that are currently in effect, including those related to the handling, disposal, and treatment of hazardous materials. Changes in compliance requirements or the interpretation by governmental authorities of existing requirements may impose additional costs, all of which could have an adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations.
The Company may be required to conduct environmental remediation activities for power generating sites and potentially other unidentified sites.
NSTAR Electric is subject to actual or potential claims and lawsuits involving environmental remediation activities for power generating sites previously owned and other potentially unidentified sites. NSTAR Electric divested all of its regulated generating assets under terms that generally require the buyer to assume all responsibility for past and present environmental harm. Based on NSTAR Electric’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, existing legal requirements and regulatory policies, NSTAR Electric does not believe that its known environmental remediation responsibilities will have a material adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, discovery of currently unknown conditions at existing sites, failure of current owners to assume responsibility, identification of additional waste sites or changes in environmental regulation, could have a material adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
NSTAR Electric’s operations could face negative impact from terrorism, cyber attacks, sabotage, acts of war, or other catastrophic events.
NSTAR Electric’s delivery infrastructure facilities and the generation and transmission infrastructure facilities of third parties could be direct targets of terrorism, cyber attacks, sabotage, or acts of war, etc. The costs to repair any damage to operating facilities from destructive events could be substantial. Such actions could also result in political, economic and financial market instability, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations. While it is not possible to predict the impact of a particular
11
event of this type, the impact that any threat of terrorism, cyber attack, act of war or other catastrophic event might have on the energy industry and on NSTAR Electric’s business in particular could be material.
Our business operations could be disrupted if our information technology systems fail to perform adequately or we are unable to protect the integrity and security of our customers’ information.
NSTAR Electric operates in a highly regulated industry that requires and depends on the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. Systems-related problems could adversely affect our ability to provide electric service to our customers. NSTAR Electric maintains appropriate security measures around these systems and requires its vendors to maintain stringent security measures; but technology can be vulnerable to failures or unauthorized access. NSTAR Electric’s systems and those of its vendors could fail or be compromised, resulting in disruptions in NSTAR Electric’s ability to deliver energy and provide customer service.
NSTAR Electric and its vendors take measures to protect nonpublic customer information such as personal information, customer payment card and check information pursuant to Federal and state laws. Unauthorized compromises of such information or of NSTAR Electric’s systems, particularly by those with malicious intent, could have a material adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s ability to perform important business functions. Failure to maintain the security of our customers’ confidential information, or data belonging to us, could result in the deterioration of the confidence that our customers and regulators have in us. This would subject us to potential litigation and liability, and fines and penalties, resulting in a possible material effect on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
NSTAR Electric is subject to operational risk that could cause us to incur substantial costs and liabilities.
NSTAR Electric’s business, which involves the transmission and distribution of electricity that is used as an energy source by customers, is subject to various operational risks, including incidents that expose the Company to potential claims for property damages or personal injuries beyond the scope of NSTAR Electric’s insurance coverage, and equipment failures that could result in performance below assumed levels. For example, operational performance below established target benchmark levels could cause NSTAR Electric to incur penalties imposed by the DPU, up to a maximum of two and one-half percent of transmission and distribution revenues, under applicable Service Quality Indicators. Violations of standards of performance for emergency preparation and restoration of service for gas and electric customers could also result in DPU imposed penalties up to $20 million for any related series of violations.
Increases in interest rates due to financial market conditions or changes in the Company’s credit ratings, could have an adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s access to capital markets at favorable rates, or at all, and could otherwise increase NSTAR Electric’s costs of doing business.
NSTAR Electric frequently accesses the capital markets to finance its working capital requirements, capital expenditures, and to meet its long-term debt maturity obligations. Increased interest rates, or adverse changes in the Company’s credit ratings or further deterioration in the availability of credit, would increase NSTAR Electric’s cost of borrowing and other costs that could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. In addition, an adverse change in the Company’s credit ratings could increase borrowing costs, trigger requirements that the Company obtain additional security for performance, such as a letter of credit, related to its energy procurement agreements. Refer to the accompanying Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” for a further discussion.
12
NSTAR Electric’s business is sensitive to variations in weather and has seasonal variations. In addition, severe natural events and disasters could adversely affect the Company.
Sales of electricity to residential and commercial customers are influenced by temperature fluctuations. Significant fluctuations in heating or cooling degree-days could have a material impact on electric sales for any given period. In addition, extremely severe storms, such as hurricanes and ice storms, could cause damage to NSTAR Electric’s facilities that may require additional costs to repair and have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. To the extent possible, NSTAR Electric would seek recovery of these costs through the regulatory process.
An economic downturn, increased costs of energy supply, and customers’ conservation efforts could adversely affect energy consumption and could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
Electricity consumption is significantly impacted by the general level of economic activity and cost of energy supply. Economic downturns or periods of high energy supply costs typically lead to reductions in energy consumption and increased conservation measures. These conditions could adversely impact the level of energy sales and result in less demand for energy delivery. A recession or a prolonged lag of a subsequent recovery could have an adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
NSTAR Electric’s operations may be impacted if generation supply or its transmission availability is limited or unreliable.
NSTAR Electric’s business is reliant on generation and transmission facilities that the Company does not own or control. The Company’s ability to provide energy delivery service depends on the operations and facilities of third parties, including the independent system operator and electric generators that supply NSTAR Electric’s customers’ energy requirements. Should NSTAR Electric’s ability to receive electric supply be disrupted due either to operational issues or to inadequacy of transmission capacity, it could impact the Company’s ability to serve its customers. It could also force NSTAR Electric to secure alternative supply at significantly higher costs.
Financial market performance and other changes may decrease the Company’s pension plan assets and could require additional funding beyond historic levels.
A sustained decline in the global financial markets may have a material adverse effect on the value of NSTAR Electric’s pension plan assets. This situation may increase the Company’s benefit plan funding requirements.
NSTAR Electric will be subject to various uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger with NU is pending that could adversely affect the Company’s financial results.
As discussed above in the accompanying Item 1“Business,” NSTAR is party to a Merger Agreement with NU. Before the merger may be completed, the parties must satisfy all conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, including obtaining shareholder approval in connection with the proposed merger and receipt of various regulatory approvals.
It is possible that uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees, suppliers, customers and others may have an adverse effect on NSTAR Electric. These uncertainties may impair NSTAR Electric’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause suppliers and others that deal with NSTAR Electric to seek to change existing business relationships.
The pursuit of the merger and the preparation for the integration of the companies may place a significant burden on NSTAR Electric’s management and internal resources. Any significant diversion of management attention away from ongoing business and any difficulties encountered in the merger integration process could adversely affect the Company’s financial results.
13
In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts NSTAR, without NU’s consent, from making certain acquisitions and dispositions and taking other specified actions. Under certain conditions these restrictions may prevent NSTAR from pursuing certain acquisitions or dispositions and making other changes to NSTAR’s business prior to completion of the merger or termination of the Merger Agreement.
NSTAR may be unable to obtain the approvals required to complete the merger in the anticipated time frame, or at all, or such approvals may contain material restrictions or conditions.
The merger is subject to the approval of various government agencies, including the DPU, PURA, FERC, and the U.S. Department of Justice. Such approvals may impose conditions on the completion, or require changes to the terms of the merger, including restrictions on the business, operations or financial performance of the combined company. These conditions or changes could also delay or increase the cost of the merger or limit the revenues of the combined company.
Failure to complete the merger with NU could negatively impact NSTAR’s future business and financial results.
Satisfying the conditions of the Merger Agreement and completing the merger may take longer than expected and could cost more than NSTAR expects. NSTAR must pay its own incurred costs related to the merger, including legal, accounting and other professional fees. NSTAR cannot make any assurances that it will be able to satisfy all the conditions to the merger or succeed in any litigation brought in connection with the merger. If the merger with NU is not completed, NSTAR’s financial results, share price and credit ratings may be affected.
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both NSTAR and NU, including the right to terminate the Merger Agreement if the merger is not consummated on or before October 16, 2011. On October 14, 2011, in accordance with certain provisions of the Merger Agreement, as amended, NSTAR and NU exchanged mutual notices extending the Merger Agreement to April 16, 2012, the date after which either party has the option to terminate the Merger Agreement if the conditions precedent to closing have not then been satisfied. The Merger Agreement further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, NSTAR or NU may be required to pay to the other a termination fee of $135 million and reimburse the other party for expenses up to $35 million.
If completed, the merger with NU may not achieve its intended results.
NSTAR entered into the Merger Agreement with the expectation that the merger would result in various benefits. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether NSTAR’s businesses can be integrated in an efficient and effective manner. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased costs and decreases in the amount of expected revenues generated by the combined company.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2. Properties
NSTAR Electric properties include an integrated system of transmission and distribution lines and substations, an interest in a jointly owned administration office building and other structures such as garages and service centers that are located in eastern Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric’s high-voltage transmission lines are generally located on land either owned or subject to perpetual and exclusive easements in its favor. Its low-voltage distribution lines are located principally on public property under permits granted by municipal and other state authorities.
14
At December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric’s primary and secondary distribution and transmission system consisted of 20,775 circuit miles of overhead lines, 12,145 circuit miles of underground lines, 258 substation facilities and approximately 1,183,000 active customer meters.
HEEC, NSTAR Electric’s subsidiary, has a distribution system that consists principally of a 4.1 mile 115kV submarine distribution line and a substation that is located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. HEEC provides the ongoing support required to distribute electric energy to its one customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, at that location.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of its business, NSTAR Electric is involved in certain legal matters, including civil litigation, for which it has appropriately recognized legal liabilities. Management has reviewed the range of reasonably possible court-ordered damages, settlement amounts, and related litigation costs (legal liabilities) that could be in excess of amounts recognized and amounts covered by insurance, and determined that the range of reasonably possible legal liabilities would not be material. Based on the information currently available, NSTAR Electric does not believe that it is probable that any such legal liabilities will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position. However, it is reasonably possible that additional legal liabilities that may result from changes in circumstances could have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures – Not Applicable
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The information required by this item is not applicable because all of the common stock of NSTAR Electric is held solely by NSTAR.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
Overview
NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric or the Company) is a regulated public utility incorporated in 1886 under Massachusetts law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR. NSTAR Electric serves approximately 1.1 million electric distribution customers in the City of Boston and 80 surrounding communities. NSTAR is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries in the energy delivery business serving approximately 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts, including NSTAR Electric’s customers and approximately 300,000 natural gas distribution customers in 51 communities. NSTAR has a service company that provides management and support services to substantially all NSTAR subsidiaries - NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation (NSTAR Electric and Gas).
Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR Electric, provides distribution service and ongoing support to its only customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric consolidates two wholly-owned special purpose subsidiaries, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. These entities were created to complete the sale of electric rate reduction certification to a special purpose trust created by two Massachusetts state agencies. These financing transactions securitized the costs incurred related to the divestiture of generation assets and long-term power contracts. The activities of a third special purpose subsidiary, BEC Funding LLC, were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
NSTAR Electric derives its operating revenues primarily from the sale of energy, distribution, transmission, and energy efficiency services to customers. NSTAR Electric’s earnings are impacted by fluctuations in unit sales of electric kWh, which have an effect on the level of distribution and transmission
15
revenues recognized. In accordance with the regulatory rate structure in which NSTAR Electric operates, its recovery of energy and certain energy-related costs are fully reconciled with the level of energy revenues currently recorded and, therefore, do not have an impact on earnings. As a result of this rate structure, any variability in the cost of energy supply purchased will have an impact on the purchased power and transmission expense, but will not affect the Company’s net income as the Company recognizes a corresponding change in revenues.
Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
On October 16, 2010, upon unanimous approval from their respective Boards of Trustees, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities (NU) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The transaction will be a merger of equals in a stock-for-stock transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at closing, NSTAR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NU. On March 4, 2011, shareholders of each company approved the merger and adopted the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NSTAR shareholders will receive 1.312 NU common shares for each NSTAR common share that they own. Following completion of the merger, it is anticipated that NU shareholders will own approximately 56 percent of the post-merger company and former NSTAR shareholders will own approximately 44 percent of the post-merger company.
The post-merger company will provide electric and gas energy delivery services through six regulated electric and gas utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire serving nearly 3.5 million electric and gas customers. Completion of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. Acting pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 14, 2011, NU and NSTAR formally extended the date by which either party has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement should all required closing conditions not be satisfied, including receipt of all required regulatory approvals, from October 16, 2011 to April 16, 2012.
Regulatory Approvals on Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
Federal
On January 4, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Communications Commission. On February 10, 2011, the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired. On July 6, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Consent of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was received on December 20, 2011.
Massachusetts
On November 24, 2010, NSTAR and NU filed a joint petition requesting the DPU’s approval of their proposed merger. On March 10, 2011, the DPU issued an order that modified the standard of review to be applied in the review of mergers involving Massachusetts utilities from a “no net harm” standard to a “net benefits” standard, meaning that the companies must demonstrate that the pending merger provides benefits that outweigh the costs. Applicable state law provides that mergers of Massachusetts utilities and their respective holding companies must be “consistent with the public interest.” The order states that the DPU has flexibility in applying the factors applicable to the standard of review. NSTAR and NU filed supplemental testimony with the DPU on April 8, 2011 indicating the merger could provide post-merger net savings of approximately $784 million in the first ten years following the closing of the merger and provide environmental benefits with respect to Massachusetts emissions reductions, global warming policies, and furthering the goals of Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act.
The DPU held public evidentiary hearings during July 2011. Upon conclusion of the public evidentiary hearings on July 28, 2011, the DPU issued a briefing schedule that arranged for a series of intervenor and NSTAR and NU briefs and reply briefs culminating in the delivery of the final Joint Petitioner reply briefs on September 19, 2011. Subsequently, NSTAR and NU agreed to different intervenor motions to extend the briefing schedule, and the DPU consented to these motions. The final NSTAR and NU reply briefs were filed on October 31, 2011.
16
On July 15, 2011, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) filed a motion for an indefinite stay in the proceedings. On July 21, 2011, NSTAR and NU filed a response objecting to this motion. The DPU originally scheduled Oral Arguments for November 17, 2011 regarding the DOER’s Motion to Stay the proceeding, which were postponed during the fourth quarter of 2011 while NSTAR, NU and other parties made attempts to narrow and discuss the issues presented by the DOER’s Motion to Stay. On January 6, 2012, the Oral Arguments were conducted regarding DOER’s Motion to Stay. At the Oral Argument, DOER withdrew its request for a fully adjudicated rate case, which would have required an extended stay of the proceeding. NSTAR and NU await approval of the merger from the DPU.
Connecticut
On June 1, 2011, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), formerly the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC), issued a declaratory ruling stating that it lacked jurisdiction to review the NSTAR merger with NU. On June 30, 2011, the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel filed a Petition for Administrative Appeal in Connecticut Superior Court requesting that the Superior Court remand the decision back to the PURA with instructions to reopen the docket and review the merger transaction.
On January 4, 2012, the PURA issued a draft decision in Docket No. 10-12-05RE01 that revised its earlier declaratory ruling of June 1, 2011, which had concluded it did not have jurisdiction to review the pending merger between NU and NSTAR. Following oral arguments on January 12, 2012, the PURA issued its final decision on January 18, 2012 that concluded that NU and NSTAR must seek approval to merge from the PURA pursuant to Connecticut state law. On January 19, 2012, NU and NSTAR filed their merger review application with the PURA. On January 20, 2012, the PURA issued a procedural schedule that includes a draft decision on March 26, 2012 and a final decision on April 2, 2012.
New Hampshire
On April 5, 2011, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) issued an order finding that it does not have statutory authority to approve or reject the merger.
Maine
On May 11, 2011, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued an order approving the merger contingent upon approval by the FERC. The FERC approval was received on July 6, 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
NSTAR Electric’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are based on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements required management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that require significant judgment and uncertainties, and potentially may result in materially different outcomes under different assumptions and conditions. The accounting policies and estimates that are most critical to the reported results of operations, cash flows and financial position are described below.
17
a. Revenue Recognition
Electric revenues are based on rates approved by the DPU and the FERC. Revenues related to the sale, transmission and distribution of energy delivery service are generally recorded when service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. However, the determination of the sales to individual customers is based on systematic meter readings throughout a month. Meters that are not read during a given month are estimated and trued-up to actual use in a future period. At the end of each month, aggregate amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of their last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled electric revenue is estimated each month based on daily territory load (customer energy requirements), estimated line losses and applicable customer rates. Accrued unbilled revenues recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $40 million and $43 million, respectively.
The level of revenues is subject to seasonal weather conditions. Electric sales volumes are typically higher in the winter and summer than in the spring or fall. As a result, NSTAR Electric realizes a higher level of revenue during the summer and winter.
NSTAR Electric’s nonutility revenues are recognized when services are rendered. Revenues are based, for the most part, on long-term contractual arrangements.
b. Regulatory Accounting
NSTAR Electric follows accounting policies prescribed by GAAP, the FERC, and the DPU. In addition, NSTAR Electric is subject to the accounting and reporting requirements of the SEC. As a rate-regulated company, NSTAR Electric is subject to the application of an accounting standard for rate-regulated entities, Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 980,Regulated Operations. ASC 980 considers the effects of regulation resulting from differences in the timing of their recognition of certain revenues and expenses from those of other businesses and industries. NSTAR Electric’s distribution and transmission businesses are subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost recovery and meets the criteria for application of ASC 980. This ratemaking process results in the recording of regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities (including cost of removal) based on the probability of current and future cash flows. Regulatory assets represent incurred or accrued costs that have been deferred because they are probable of future recovery from customers. Regulatory liabilities may represent collections from customers that have been deferred because they will be expended in the future. NSTAR Electric continuously reviews its regulatory assets to assess their ultimate recoverability within the approved regulatory guidelines. NSTAR Electric expects to fully recover these regulatory assets in its rates. If future recovery of any deferred costs ceases to be probable, NSTAR Electric would be required to charge such deferred amounts to earnings. Impairment risk associated with these assets relates to potentially adverse legislative, judicial or regulatory actions in the future.
c. Pension Benefits
NSTAR Electric sponsors the NSTAR Pension Plan (the Plan) that covers substantially all employees. As its sponsor, NSTAR Electric allocates the costs of the Plan to NSTAR Electric & Gas. NSTAR Electric & Gas charges all of its benefit costs to the NSTAR operating companies, including NSTAR Electric, on the proportion of total direct labor charged to its operating companies.
NSTAR Electric’s annual pension benefits costs are dependent upon several factors and assumptions, such as but not limited to, employee demographics, plan design, the level of cash contributions made to the plan, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on the plan’s assets and health care cost trends.
Changes in pension assets and liabilities associated with these factors are not immediately recognized as pension costs in the statements of income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of the plan’s participants. However, these factors could have a significant impact on pension assets or liabilities recognized.
18
NSTAR Electric’s Pension Plan assets are impacted by fluctuations in the financial markets. Fluctuations in the fair value of the Pension Plan assets impact the funded status, accounting costs, and cash funding requirements of this Plan. The earnings impact of increased Pension costs is substantially mitigated by NSTAR Electric’s DPU-approved pension rate adjustment mechanism. Under the PAM, NSTAR Electric recovers its pension expense through a reconciling rate mechanism. The PAM removes the volatility in earnings that could result from fluctuations in financial market conditions and plan experience.
There were no significant changes to NSTAR Electric’s pension benefits in 2011, 2010, and 2009. As further described in Note F,“Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,”in the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, NSTAR Electric’s discount rate for the Pension Plan obligation was 4.52% and 5.30% at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These discount rates align with market conditions and the cash flow projections of NSTAR Electric’s pension obligation. The expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets was 8.0% in 2011 and 2010 compared to 9.0% in 2009. Changes in these assumptions have an impact on reported pension costs and obligations.
The following table reflects the projected benefit obligation and cost sensitivities associated with a change in certain actuarial assumptions by the indicated percentage. Each sensitivity below reflects an evaluation of the change based solely on a change in that assumption.
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | | | | | |
Actuarial Assumption | | Change in Assumption | | Impact on Projected Benefit Obligation Increase/(Decrease) | | Impact on 2011 Cost Increase/(Decrease) |
Pension: | | | | | | |
Increase in discount rate | | 50 basis points | | $(74,563) | | $(7,429) |
Decrease in discount rate | | 50 basis points | | $ 73,790 | | $ 6,654 |
Increase in expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | 50 basis points | | N/A | | $(4,729) |
Decrease in expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | 50 basis points | | N/A | | $ 4,729 |
Management evaluates the appropriateness of the discount rate through the modeling of a bond portfolio that approximates the settlement of Plan obligations. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, NSTAR Electric considers past performance and economic forecasts for the types of investments held by the Plan as well as the target allocation for the investments over a long-term period. The expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets could vary from actual year-to-year returns. The actual allocation for investments may vary from the target allocation at any particular time. During 2011, NSTAR Electric contributed $125 million to the Pension Plan. In 2012, NSTAR Electric expects to contribute $25 million to the Pension Plan.
The Company is in compliance with the funding requirements of The Pension Protection Act (PPA) and the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act (WRERA) as of December 31, 2011
d. Uncertain Tax Positions
Accounting for uncertain tax positions requires management to use judgment in assessing the potential exposure from tax positions taken that may be challenged by taxing authorities. Management is required to assess the possibility of alternative outcomes based upon all facts available at the reporting date. These estimates could differ significantly from the ultimate outcome. For additional information on uncertain tax positions and estimates used therein, refer to“Income Tax Matters” included in this MD&A.
19
Investments in Yankee Companies
NSTAR Electric has an equity ownership of 14% in Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CY), 14% in Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YA), and 4% in Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MY), (collectively, the Yankee Companies). CY, YA, and MY plant sites have been decommissioned in accordance with NRC procedures. Amended licenses continue to apply to the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI) where spent nuclear fuel is stored at these sites. CY, YA, and MY remain responsible for the security and protection of the ISFSI and are required to maintain radiation monitoring programs at the sites.
Yankee Companies Spent Fuel Litigation
NSTAR Electric is part owner of three decommissioned New England nuclear power plants, Connecticut Yankee (CY), Yankee Atomic (YA) and Maine Yankee (MY) (the Yankee Companies). The Yankee Companies have been party to ongoing litigation at the Federal level with respect to the alleged failure of the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years through 2001 for CY and YA, and through 2002 for MY (DOE Phase I Damages). NSTAR Electric’s portion of the Phase I judgments amounts to $4.8 million, $4.6 million, and $3 million, respectively. The case has been going through the appeal process in the Federal courts, oral arguments were held in November 2011 and a final decision on this appeal could be received by May 2012.
In 2009, the Yankee Companies also filed for additional damages related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years after 2001 for CY and YA and after 2002 for MY (DOE Phase II Damages). Claim amounts applicable to Phase II for NSTAR Electric are $19 million, $12 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.
NSTAR Electric cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these pending decisions. However, should the Yankee Companies ultimately prevail, NSTAR Electric’s share of the proceeds received would be refunded to its customers.
The accounting for decommissioning costs of nuclear power plants involves significant estimates related to costs to be incurred many years in the future. Changes in these estimates will not affect NSTAR Electric’s results of operations or cash flows because these costs will be collected from customers through NSTAR Electric’s transition charge filings with the DPU.
Derivative Instruments
Energy Contracts
NSTAR Electric has determined that it is not required to account for the majority of its electricity supply contracts as derivatives because they qualify for, and NSTAR Electric has elected, the normal purchases and sales exception. As a result, these agreements are not reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. NSTAR Electric has a long-term renewable energy contract that does not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception and is valued at an estimated $3.4 million and $2.4 million liability as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. NSTAR Electric has measured the difference between the cost of this contract and projected market energy costs over the life of the contract and recorded a long-term derivative liability and a corresponding long-term regulatory asset for the fair value of this contract. Changes in the fair value of the contract have no impact on earnings. Refer to the accompanying Item 7A“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” for a further discussion.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Cost of Removal
The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO) is recorded in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, NSTAR Electric capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value
20
each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, NSTAR Electric either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement.
NSTAR Electric’s recognition of an ARO has no impact on its earnings. As a rate-regulated utility, NSTAR Electric establishes a regulatory asset to recognize future recoveries through depreciation rates for the recorded ARO. NSTAR Electric has certain plant assets in which this condition exists and is related to both plant assets containing hazardous materials and legal requirements to undertake remediation efforts upon retirement.
A recorded asset retirement cost liability approximates the current cost for NSTAR Electric to liquidate its legal or contractual obligations to perform actions at some point after the retirement of an asset. The following amounts were included in “Deferred credits and other liabilities: Other deferred credits” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | | | | | | | 2010 |
Asset retirement obligation | | $27 | | | | | | | | $26 |
For NSTAR Electric, the ultimate cost to remove utility plant from service (cost of removal) is recognized as a component of depreciation expense in accordance with approved regulatory treatment. The following amounts were based on the estimated cost of removal component in current depreciation rates and represent the cumulative amounts collected from customers for cost of removal, but not yet expended:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | | | | | | | 2010 |
Regulatory liability – cost of removal | | $236 | | | | | | | | $227 |
Rate and Regulatory Proceedings
a. Rate Structures
Rate Settlement Agreement
NSTAR Electric is operating under a DPU-approved Rate Settlement Agreement (Rate Settlement Agreement) that expires December 31, 2012. From 2007 through 2012, the Rate Settlement Agreement establishes for NSTAR Electric, among other things, annual inflation-adjusted distribution rates including a productivity offset that are generally offset by an equal and corresponding adjustment to transition rates.
The rates as of January 1 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | January 1, |
| | 2012 | | | | 2011 | | | | 2010 | | | | 2009 |
Annual inflation-adjusted distribution rate – SIP increase (decrease) | | 0.96% | | | | (0.19)% | | | | 1.32% | | | | 1.74% |
The adjustment increase will be 0.96% of the distribution rates, effective January 1, 2012, representing approximately $8 million during 2012. Due to low inflation factors and a productivity offset, there was a slight distribution rate reduction effective January 1, 2011. Uncollected transition charges as a result of the reductions in transition rates are deferred and collected through future rates with a carrying charge. The Rate Settlement Agreement implemented a 50% / 50% earnings sharing mechanism based on NSTAR Electric’s distribution return on equity (excluding incentives) should it exceed 12.5% or fall below 8.5%. Should the return on equity fall below 7.5%, NSTAR Electric may file a request for a general rate increase. NSTAR Electric did not exceed the 12.5%, or fall below the 8.5% distribution return on equity during 2011, 2010 or 2009.
21
Pursuant to a 2008 DPU order, Massachusetts electric utilities must adopt rate structures that decouple the volume of energy sales from the utility’s revenues in their next rate case. The exact timing of the next rate case has not yet been determined.
Basic Service Rates
Electric distribution companies in Massachusetts are required to obtain and resell power to retail customers through Basic Service for those customers who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. Basic Service rates are reset every six months (every three months for large commercial and industrial customers). The price of Basic Service is intended to reflect the average competitive market price for electric power. As of December 31, 2011, customers of NSTAR Electric had approximately 42% of their load requirements provided through Basic Service. NSTAR Electric fully recovers its energy costs through DPU-approved rate mechanisms.
b. Service Quality Indicators
SQI are established performance benchmarks for certain identified measures of service quality relating to customer service and billing performance, safety and reliability and DPU Consumer Division statistics performance for all Massachusetts utilities. NSTAR Electric is required to report annually to the DPU concerning its performance as to each measure and is subject to maximum penalties of up to two and one-half percent of total transmission and distribution revenues should performance fail to meet the applicable benchmarks.
NSTAR Electric monitors its service quality continuously, and if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and is estimable, a liability is accrued. Any settlement or rate order that would result in a different liability level from what has been accrued would be adjusted in the period that the DPU issues an order determining the amount of any such liability.
NSTAR Electric filed its final performance report for 2010 with the DPU on March 1, 2011 and a decision is pending. Based on the reports filed, no penalties were assessable for the performance year.
NSTAR Electric believes its service quality performance levels for 2011 were not in a penalty situation. The final performance report is expected to be filed with the DPU by March 1, 2012.
c. Emergency Preparation and Restoration of Service for Electric Customers
Under Massachusetts law and regulation, the DPU has established standards of performance for emergency preparation and restoration of service for electric companies. As a remedy to violation of those standards, the DPU is authorized to levy a penalty not to exceed $250,000 for each violation for each day that the violation persists up to maximum penalty of $20 million for any related series of violations.
NSTAR Electric believes that it is not in a penalty situation with respect to its performance during declared emergency events to date.
d. Regulatory Matters
Massachusetts Regulatory Environment
In 2008, the Massachusetts Legislature passed the Green Communities Act (GCA) energy policy legislation designed to substantially increase energy efficiency and the development of renewable energy resources in Massachusetts. Significant features of the GCA include:
| • | | Requires electric distribution companies to file energy efficiency investment plans to include fully reconciling funding mechanisms and incentives; |
| • | | Requires utility distribution companies to undertake various Green programs, including the solicitation of bids for long-term renewable energy procurement contracts; |
22
| • | | Increases Renewable Portfolio Standards and Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards for utilities and other electricity suppliers regarding the power that they purchase. Requirements to purchase power from new renewable resources will increase in increments of 1% per year from 4% in 2009 to 15% in 2020, plus 1% per year thereafter. Requirements to purchase from alternative portfolio resources will gradually increase from 1% in 2009 to 5% in 2020. By 2020, NSTAR Electric anticipates purchasing 27.1% of its power under these mandates, as compared to a total of 12.1% in 2009. |
The GCA allows for utilities to recover in rates the incremental costs associated with its various mandated programs. NSTAR Electric is in compliance with all requirements of the GCA.
In 2008, the Massachusetts Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA) was enacted. The GWSA contains a framework for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the Massachusetts economy, ultimately mandating reductions of GHG emissions of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, with intermediate goals for 2020, 2030 and 2040. In 2010, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs issued a policy directive establishing an intermediate goal of 25 percent for 2020. The GWSA identifies three major methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which are: clean energy, energy efficiency, and reduced energy usage. However, the implementation details for the aggregate limit are not prescribed by the GWSA and are subject to further determination. The DPU has construed the GWSA to require consideration of “reasonably foreseeable climate change impacts, including additional greenhouse gas emissions” in rendering its decisions. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the effect of the GWSA on its future results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
Electric Rate Decoupling
In 2008, the DPU issued an order to all Massachusetts’ electric distribution utility companies that requires them to develop plans to decouple their rates/revenues from sales volumes in the next general distribution rate proceeding occurring subsequent to the 2008 order implementing decoupling. This action is intended to encourage utility companies to help their customers reduce energy consumption. Decoupling of rates will allow utility companies to carry out the mandates of the GCA and at the same time collect the adequate level of revenues to maintain the quality and reliability of electric and gas services. This order allows companies to file for a revenue adjustment representing partial recovery of lost base revenues caused by incremental energy efficiency spending until their decoupling rate plans are approved. Once decoupled rate plans are approved, revenues will be set at a level designed to recover the utility companies’ incurred costs plus a return on their investment. This revenue level will be reconciled with actual revenues received from decoupled rates on an annual basis and any over or under collection will be refunded to or recovered from customers in the subsequent year. NSTAR Electric has not yet applied for decoupled rate structures.
DPU Safety and Reliability Programs (CPSL)
As part of the Rate Settlement Agreement, NSTAR Electric recovers incremental costs related to the double pole inspection, replacement/restoration and transfer program and the underground electric safety program, which includes stray-voltage remediation and manhole inspections, repairs, and upgrades. Recovery of these Capital Program Scheduling List (CPSL) billed costs is subject to DPU review and approval. From 2006 through 2011, NSTAR Electric has incurred a cumulative incremental revenue requirement of approximately $83 million, including $17 million incurred in 2011. These amounts include incremental operations and maintenance and revenue requirements on capital investments.
On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order on NSTAR Electric’s 2006 CPSL costs recovery filing. The expected recovery amount did not vary materially from the revenue previously recognized. On October 8, 2010, NSTAR Electric submitted a Compliance Filing with the DPU reconciling the recoverable CPSL Program revenue requirement for each year 2006 through 2009 with the revenues already collected to determine the proposed adjustment effective on January 1, 2011. The DPU allowed the proposed rates to go into effect on that date, subject to reconciliation of program costs. NSTAR Electric cannot predict
23
the timing of subsequent DPU orders related to this filing. Should an adverse DPU decision be issued, it could have a material adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s result of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Basic Service Bad Debt Adder
On July 1, 2005, in response to a generic DPU order that required electric utilities in Massachusetts to recover the energy-related portion of bad debt costs in their Basic Service rates, NSTAR Electric increased its Basic Service rates and reduced its distribution rates for those bad debt costs. In furtherance of this generic DPU order, NSTAR Electric included a bad debt cost recovery mechanism as a component of its Rate Settlement Agreement. This recovery mechanism (bad debt adder) allows NSTAR Electric to recover its Basic Service bad debt costs on a fully reconciling basis. These rates were implemented, effective January 1, 2006, as part of NSTAR Electric’s Rate Settlement Agreement.
On February 7, 2007, NSTAR Electric filed its 2006 Basic Service reconciliation with the DPU proposing an adjustment related to the increase of its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. This proposed rate adjustment was anticipated to be implemented effective July 1, 2007. On June 28, 2007, the DPU issued an order approving the implementation of a revised Basic Service rate. However, the DPU instructed NSTAR Electric to reduce distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. Such action would result in a further reduction to distribution rates from the adjustment NSTAR Electric made when it implemented the Settlement Agreement. This adjustment to NSTAR Electric’s distribution rates would eliminate the fully reconciling nature of the Basic Service bad debt adder.
NSTAR Electric has not implemented the directives of the June 28, 2007 DPU order. Implementation of this order would require NSTAR Electric to write-off a previously recorded regulatory asset related to its Basic Service bad debt costs. NSTAR Electric filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the DPU’s order on July 18, 2007. On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order and reaffirmed that NSTAR Electric should reduce its distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. On June 18, 2010, NSTAR Electric filed an appeal of the DPU’s order with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). In October 2010, the SJC allowed a stay of the DPU’s order pending appeal. Briefs were filed during the summer of 2011 and oral arguments were held on December 8, 2011. A decision by the SJC is expected in the first half of 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the potential pre-tax impact to earnings of eliminating the fully reconciling nature of the bad debt adder would be approximately $22 million. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the exact timing of this appeals process or the ultimate outcome. NSTAR Electric continues to believe that its position is appropriate and that it is probable upon appeal that it will ultimately prevail.
FERC Transmission ROE
NSTAR Electric earns an 11.14% ROE on local transmission facility investments. The ROE on NSTAR Electric’s regional transmission facilities is 11.64%. Additional incentive adders are available and are decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the FERC’s most recent national transmission incentive rules. The FERC may grant a variety of financial incentives, including ROE basis point incentive adders for qualified investments made in new regional transmission facilities. A 100 basis point adder, when combined with the FERC’s approved ROEs described above, results in a 12.64% ROE for qualified regional investments. The incentive is intended to promote and accelerate investment in transmission projects that can significantly reduce congestion costs and enhance reliability in the region.
FERC Proceeding Regarding Base ROE of New England Transmission Operators
On September 30, 2011, the Attorney General of Massachusetts and other ratepayer advocates representing the six New England states, filed a complaint with the FERC seeking to reduce the 11.14% base return on equity (Base ROE) used in calculating formula rates for transmission service under the ISO-NE Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT). A change in the Base ROE would adversely impact the investor-owned utilities (New England Transmission Owners, or NETOs), including NSTAR Electric, that own transmission facilities within the footprint of ISO-NE, which serves as the regional transmission organization for New England.
24
On October 20, 2011, NSTAR Electric along with the other NETOs, filed their response with the FERC. In that response, the NETOs vigorously defended the appropriateness of the current FERC-approved Base ROE. The NETOs requested that the FERC summarily dismiss the complaint. Should any unfavorable ruling by FERC result in a reduction of the Base ROE, the exposure would be limited to OATT rates assessed following the complaint date of September 30, 2011. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing or outcome of this proceeding.
As of December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric has estimated that each 10 basis point change in the authorized base ROE would change annual earnings by approximately $0.5 million.
e. Other
Energy Efficiency Plans
NSTAR Electric administers demand-side management energy efficiency programs. The GCA directed electric distribution companies to develop three-year energy efficiency plans. The first three-year plan covering the period 2010 through 2012 was approved by the DPU and represents a significant expansion of energy efficiency activity in Massachusetts. Like the historical programs, the current three-year plan includes financial incentives based on energy efficiency program performance. In addition, the DPU has stated that it will permit distribution companies that do not yet have rate decoupling mechanisms in place to implement Lost Base Revenue (LBR) rate adjustment mechanisms in order to partially offset reduced distribution rate revenues as a result of successful energy efficiency programs.
During 2011, NSTAR Electric recognized recoverable Energy Efficiency program expenses of $114.5 million.
In 2008, pursuant to the DPU’s Guidelines relative to energy efficiency programs, it was contemplated that prior to the conclusion of year two (2011) of the first three-year program, each Massachusetts company that administers energy efficiency programs, including NSTAR Electric, would submit mid-term modifications to their programs based on customer participation and savings achieved. The NSTAR Electric 2012 mid-term modifications were submitted to the DPU in late 2011 for approval. In 2012, NSTAR Electric anticipates that its separate recoverable expenses, inclusive of program administrator incentives, will be $227 million.
Recent Major Storm Events and Service Restoration
In late August 2011, Tropical Storm Irene (Irene) presented heavy rains and damaging winds to Massachusetts and the Eastern Seaboard. Irene caused considerable damage in NSTAR Electric’s service territory. Approximately 500,000 customer outages occurred on the NSTAR Electric system in its aftermath. This represents the most severe damage event on the NSTAR Electric system in nearly 20 years. On September 15, 2011, the DPU, on its own initiative, initiated an investigation into the efforts of NSTAR Electric and one other Massachusetts electric company to restore power to their customers in the aftermath of Irene. NSTAR Electric filed a Final Event Report with the DPU regarding Irene on October 3, 2011.
In late October 2011, an unprecedented early snow storm brought heavy, wet snow and strong winds to the region, impacting the electric service of approximately 200,000 NSTAR Electric customers. On November 8, 2011, the DPU opened an additional investigation to review NSTAR Electric and two other Massachusetts electric companies and their responses to the October snowstorm. NSTAR Electric filed a Final Event Report with the DPU regarding the October snowstorm on December 16, 2011.
25
On December 20, 2011, NSTAR Electric filed a Report of Emergency Response Plan Improvements with the DPU outlining steps that had been implemented prior to and also following the October snowstorm to improve restoration performance. The DPU has announced it will conduct a further hearing regarding NSTAR Electric’s storm response on May 7, 2012.
NSTAR Electric’s DPU-approved storm accounting mechanism helps to reduce the volatility of the earnings impact of severe storm restoration events. The Company is permitted to recognize or amortize the incremental costs of severe storm restoration over several periods. The incremental cost incurred for Irene was approximately $24 million and the October snowstorm was approximately $14 million.
Transmission Capital Improvement Project – Lower SEMA
The Lower Southeastern Massachusetts (SEMA) Project consists of an expansion and upgrade of existing transmission infrastructure, and construction of a new 31 mile, 345kV transmission line that will cross the Cape Cod Canal. On December 16, 2011, ISO-NE issued formal approval for the Lower SEMA 345 kV Transmission Project to be included in the Pool Transmission Facility regional rates. At a hearing held on January 12, 2012, the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) voted unanimously to direct the EFSB Staff to prepare tentative decisions for public comment based on the EFSB’s approval of the project subject to the conditions of NSTAR Electric providing reports to the EFSB every six months on project costs and schedule of construction. Further conditions may be imposed. The Cape Cod Commission (CCC) unanimously approved project on January 19, 2012. The cost estimate of this project is approximately $110 million; NSTAR Electric anticipates that the project will be in-service in 2012 or early 2013 dependent on the timing of final regulatory approvals.
General Legal Matters
In the normal course of its business, NSTAR Electric is involved in certain legal matters, including civil litigation, for which it has appropriately recognized legal liabilities. Management has reviewed the range of reasonably possible court-ordered damages, settlement amounts, and related litigation costs (legal liabilities) that could be in excess of amounts accrued and amounts covered by insurance, and determined that the range of reasonably possible legal liabilities would not be material. Based on the information currently available, NSTAR Electric does not believe that it is probable that any such legal liabilities will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position. However, it is reasonably possible that additional legal liabilities that may result from changes in circumstances could have a material impact on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Income Tax Matters
Tax Legislation
Tax legislation enacted in December 2010 increased the benefit of bonus depreciation to 100% for tax purposes to qualified property placed in service after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012. This legislation also provided a benefit of 50% bonus depreciation in 2012. NSTAR Electric realized approximately $56 million of tax savings in 2010 and approximately $104 million in 2011 from bonus depreciation. NSTAR Electric expects to realize approximately $63 million in benefits during 2012. The positive cash flow benefit generated is an acceleration of tax benefits that NSTAR Electric would have otherwise received over 20 years.
Receipt of Federal Tax Refund for 2001-2007 Tax Years
On April 21, 2011, NSTAR Electric received a $166.8 million refund from the IRS relating to the 2001-2007 tax years. The approved settlement and receipt of the refund resolves all outstanding tax matters for these years.
26
Open Tax Years
The 2011 Federal income tax return is being reviewed under the IRS Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). CAP accelerates the examination of the return in order to resolve issues before the tax return is filed. The outcome and the timing of any potential audit adjustments are uncertain. All years prior to 2011 have been examined by the IRS.
Results of Operations
The following section of MD&A compares the results of operations for each of the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
2011 compared to 2010
Net income was $252.5 million for 2011 compared to $248.6 million in 2010. Major factors on an after-tax basis that contributed to the $3.9 million, or 1.6%, increase include:
| • | | Higher lost base revenues and performance incentives related to the impacts of Energy Efficiency programs ($7 million) |
| • | | Higher transmission revenues ($10.9 million) |
| • | | The absence in 2011 of the cumulative impact of a true-up adjustment resulting from a DPU order in May 2010 related to NSTAR Electric’s transition revenues for the years 2006-2009 ($3 million) |
These increases in earnings factors were partially offset by:
| • | | Lower electric revenues (0.7% decrease in sales) due to cooler summer weather and the impact of energy conservation programs ($5.4 million) |
| • | | Higher depreciation and property taxes ($7.3 million) |
| • | | Higher operations and maintenance expenses ($8.8 million) |
Significant cash flow events during 2011 include the following:
| • | | Cash flows from operating activities provided $721.2 million, an increase of $165.1 million as compared to 2010. The increase primarily reflects receipt of a tax refund and the associated interest totaling $166.8 million. Other favorable impacts include the timing of energy supply payments and customer collections related to these energy costs and lower income tax payments as a result of bonus tax depreciation benefits in 2011. |
| • | | NSTAR Electric invested approximately $381.2 million in capital projects to improve system reliability and capacity. |
| • | | Cash outflows from financing activities included retirement of $99.3 million in long-term and securitized debt and $171.9 million in common share dividends. |
Retail Electric Sales
The following is a summary of retail electric sales for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | |
Retail Electric Sales - MWH | | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | % Change | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Decrease | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | | | 6,749,124 | | | | 6,840,860 | | | (1.3) | | | |
Commercial, Industrial, and Other | | | | | 14,753,324 | | | | 14,812,980 | | | (0.4) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total retail sales | | | | | 21,502,448 | | | | 21,653,840 | | | (0.7) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
27
NSTAR Electric’s energy sales in 2011 decreased 0.7% compared to 2010. The decrease was weather related primarily due to a cooler second and third quarter of 2011 and a warmer than normal fourth quarter. These unfavorable weather conditions were partially offset by the first quarter weather of 2011 which had colder weather than the same period of 2010. Heating degree-days in NSTAR Electric’s service area for 2011 were up 1% from 2010.
Weather and, to a lesser extent, fluctuations in fuel costs, conservation measures, and economic conditions affect sales to NSTAR Electric’s residential and small commercial customers. Economic conditions, fluctuations in fuel costs, and conservation measures affect NSTAR Electric’s large commercial and industrial customers. In terms of customer sector characteristics, industrial sales are less sensitive to weather than residential and commercial sales, which are influenced by temperature variations. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for more detailed discussions.
NSTAR Electric’s retail peak load for 2011 reached an all-time high demand of 4,978 MW on July 22 that was 0.4% more than the previous level of 4,959 MW established in August 2006 and 4% more than the 2010 peak demand of 4,786 MW.
Weather Conditions
NSTAR Electric forecasts its sales based on normal weather conditions. Actual results may vary from those projected due to actual weather conditions, energy conservation, and other factors. Refer to the“Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” section preceding Item 1.“Business” of this Form 10-K.
The demand for electricity is affected by weather. Weather impacts electric sales primarily during the summer in NSTAR Electric’s service area. Customer heating or cooling usage may not directly correlate with historical levels or with the level of degree-days that occur (as further discussed below), particularly when weather patterns experienced are consistently colder or warmer. Also, NSTAR Electric’s business is sensitive to variations in daily weather, is highly influenced by New England’s seasonal weather variations, and is susceptible to damage from major storms and other natural events and disasters that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide energy.
As shown in the table below, weather conditions during 2011 measured by heating degree-days and cooling degree-days, respectively, were 1.7% higher/colder relating to heating degree-days and 6.9% lower/cooler related to cooling degree-days as compared to 2010, unfavorably impacting revenues from electric sales. The first two quarterly periods of 2011 measured by heating degree-days were higher/colder as compared to 2010. The third quarter of 2011 cooling degree-days were 2.6% lower as compared to 2010, unfavorably impacting revenues from electric sales. The fourth quarter of 2011 heating degree-days were 23.4% lower/warmer as compared to 2010. Weather conditions during 2011 compared to the normal 30-year average for the same annual period, were 8.8% lower/warmer and 29.6% higher/warmer for heating and cooling degree-days, respectively. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for more detailed discussions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heating Degree-Days (Boston,MA) | | Three Months Ended | | |
| | March 31 | | June 30 | | Sept. 30 | | Dec. 31 | | Total | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | | 2,913 | | | | | 733 | | | | | 44 | | | | | 1,447 | | | | | 5,137 | | |
2010 | | | | 2,624 | | | | | 503 | | | | | 34 | | | | | 1,888 | | | | | 5,049 | | |
Normal 30-Year Average | | | | 2,870 | | | | | 784 | | | | | 96 | | | | | 1,880 | | | | | 5,630 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cooling Degree-Days (Boston, MA) | | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31 | | June 30 | | Sept. 30 | | Dec. 31 | | Total | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | | - | | | 193 | | 789 | | | | 25 | | | | | 1,007 | | |
2010 | | | | - | | | 259 | | 810 | | | | 13 | | | | | 1,082 | | |
Normal 30-Year Average | | | | - | | | 176 | | 593 | | | | 8 | | | | | 777 | | |
28
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2011 increased 0.4% from 2010 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | | | | | | | Increase | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
Operating revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail distribution and transmission | | $ | 1,196.9 | | | $ | 1,190.9 | | | $ | 6.0 | | | | 0.5 | % |
Energy, transition and other | | | 1,290.4 | | | | 1,287.4 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 0.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 2,487.3 | | | $ | 2,478.3 | | | $ | 9.0 | | | | 0.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NSTAR Electric’s largest earnings sources are the revenues derived from distribution and transmission rates approved by the DPU and the FERC. Electric retail distribution revenues primarily represent charges to customers for recovery of the Company’s capital investment, including a return component, and operation and maintenance costs related to its electric distribution infrastructure. The transmission revenue component represents charges to customers for the recovery of similar costs to move the electricity over high voltage lines from the generator to the Company’s distribution substations.
The increase of $6.0 million, or 0.5%, in retail distribution and transmission revenues primarily reflects:
| • | | Increased transmission revenues primarily due to the recovery of a higher transmission investment base, including higher depreciation and property taxes ($3.7 million) | |
| • | | Increased PAM-related recovery revenues due to increased amortization of previously deferred costs ($8.3 million) | |
These increases were offset by:
| • | | Decreased distribution revenues due to decreased sales of 0.7% due to the impact of weather conditions and a negative annual inflation rate adjustment ($8.9 million) | |
Energy, transition, and other revenues primarily represent charges to customers for the recovery of costs incurred by the Company in order to acquire the energy supply on behalf of its customers and a transition charge for recovery of the Company’s prior investments in generating plants and the costs related to long-term power contracts. The energy revenues relate to customers being provided energy supply under Basic Service. These revenues are fully reconciled to the costs incurred and have no impact on NSTAR Electric’s consolidated net income. Energy, transition, and other revenues also reflect revenues related to the Company’s ability to effectively reduce stranded costs (incentive entitlements), rental revenue from electric property, and annual cost reconciliation true-up adjustments. Uncollected transition costs as a result of the reductions in transition rates are deferred and collected through future rates with a carrying charge. The $3.0 million, or 0.2%, increase in energy, transition, and other revenues is primarily attributable to higher energy efficiency revenues due to the expansion of these programs, partially offset by lower average Basic Service rates in effect due to lower energy costs. NSTAR Electric has recognized $7.1 million in 2011 of Lost Base Revenues (LBR) relating to the impacts of the Energy Efficiency Programs implemented under the GCA. LBR, which is subject to DPU approval, is being collected in rates.
Operating Expenses
Purchased power and transmission costs were $1,075.2 million in 2011 compared to $1,141.9 million in 2010, a decrease of $66.7 million, or 5.8%. The decrease in expense reflects lower Basic Service and other energy costs of $58.2 million resulting from lower energy commodity prices and lower transmission costs of $8.5 million due to a decrease in regional network support costs. NSTAR Electric adjusts its rates to collect the costs related to energy supply from customers on a fully reconciling basis. Due to this rate adjustment mechanism, changes in the amount of energy supply expense have no impact on consolidated net income.
29
Operations and maintenance expense was $366 million in 2011 compared to $351.2 million in 2010, an increase of $14.8 million, or 4.2%. One significant component of this increase in expense is higher pension and PBOP related PAM amortization costs ($6.1 million). Fluctuations in PAM amortization do not have an earnings impact as these costs are fully recovered from customers. Also contributing to the higher expense were transmission costs ($4.8 million), storm-related expenses ($3.4 million), higher maintenance costs ($2.4 million), and higher labor and labor-related costs ($1 million). Partially offsetting the increase was lower bad debt expense ($3.3 million).
Depreciation and amortization expense was $272.1 million in 2011 compared to $280.7 million in 2010, a decrease of $8.6 million or 3.1%. The decrease primarily reflects lower amortization costs related to the reduction of securitized transition costs, offset by higher depreciable distribution and transmission investments.
Energy efficiency programs expense was $175.7 million in 2011 compared to $117.1 million in 2010, an increase of $58.6 million, or 50%. These costs are in accordance with the three-year plan program guidelines established by the DPU and are collected from customers on a fully reconciling basis.
Property and other taxes were $111.5 million in 2011 compared to $104.8 million in 2010, an increase of $6.7 million, or 6.4%, reflecting higher overall property investments and higher municipal property tax rates.
Interest charges (income):
Long-term debt and transition property securitization certificate interest chargeswere $97.9 million in 2011 compared to $102.6 million in 2010, a decrease of $4.7 million, or 4.6%. The decrease in interest charges reflects scheduled principal pay downs of transition property securitization debt and the retirement of NSTAR Electric’s $125 million, 7.80% Debentures in May 2010. These reductions in interest expense were partially offset by interest expense for NSTAR Electric’s $300 million, 5.50% Debentures issued in March 2010.
Interest income and other, netwere $28.7 million of net interest income in 2011 compared to $31.4 million of net interest income in 2010, a decrease of $2.7 million, or 8.6%, due to decreased interest income on tax issues of $9.5 million, partially offset by higher interest income of $2.4 million from regulatory deferrals and $3.2 million in interest income from legal matters.
Other income (deductions):
Other incomewas $2.1 million in 2011 compared to $4 million in 2010, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 47.5%. The decrease relates primarily to lower investment earnings and lower cash surrender value of insurance policies.
Other deductionswere $1.4 million in 2011 compared to $4.7 million in 2010, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 70.2%. The decrease is related to lower funding contributions made to the NSTAR Foundation of $2.5 million.
Income tax expense:
Income tax expense was $165.7 million in 2011 compared to $162 million in 2010, an increase of $3.7 million, or 2.3%, primarily reflecting the higher pre-tax operating income in 2011.
30
Sources of Additional Capital and Financial Covenant Requirements
With the exception of a bond indemnity agreement, NSTAR Electric has no financial guarantees, commitments, debt or lease agreements that would require a change in terms and conditions, such as acceleration of payment obligations, as a result of a change in its credit rating. However, in addition to the bond indemnity agreement, NSTAR Electric could be required to provide additional security for energy supply contract performance obligations, such as a letter of credit for its pro-rata share of the remaining value of such contracts.
NSTAR Electric has no financial covenant requirements under its respective long-term debt arrangements. Pursuant to a revolving credit agreement, NSTAR Electric must maintain a total debt to capitalization ratio no greater than 65% at all times. The prescribed ratio is calculated excluding Transition Property Securitization Certificates from debt and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from common equity. The ratio includes in debt unfunded vested benefits under postretirement benefit plans, contract liability positions (including swaps and hedges), capital lease liabilities, and corporate guarantees. NSTAR Electric’s long-term debt is unsecured.
On August 1, 2011, NSTAR Electric redeemed $15 million of Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency Bonds, 5.75%, due February 2014, at par.
On March 16, 2010, NSTAR Electric sold $300 million of 5.50% Debentures due March 15, 2040. NSTAR Electric used the proceeds from the issuance of its securities for the redemption or repayment of outstanding long-term debt and short-term debt balances and general working capital purposes.
NSTAR Electric has approval from the FERC to issue short-term debt securities from time to time on or before October 22, 2012, with maturity dates no later than October 21, 2013, in amounts such that the aggregate principal does not exceed $655 million at any one time. NSTAR Electric has a five-year, $450 million revolving credit agreement that expires December 31, 2012. However, unless NSTAR Electric receives necessary approvals from the DPU, the credit agreement will expire 364 days from the date of the first draw under the agreement. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement. This credit facility serves as backup to NSTAR Electric’s $450 million commercial paper program that had $141.5 million and $227.5 million balances outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, NSTAR Electric was in full compliance with its covenants in connection with its short-term credit facilities, as the total debt to capitalization ratios were 45.4% and 46.6%, respectively.
In connection with the pending merger with Northeast Utilities, NSTAR and NSTAR Electric received waivers and executed amendments to their respective revolving credit agreements necessary to allow completion of the merger.
Historically, NSTAR Electric has had a variety of external sources of financing available, as previously indicated, at favorable rates and terms to finance its external cash requirements. However, the availability of such financing at favorable rates and terms depends heavily upon prevailing market conditions and NSTAR Electric’s financial condition and credit ratings.
NSTAR Electric’s goal is to maintain a capital structure that preserves an appropriate balance between debt and equity. Based on NSTAR Electric’s key cash resources available as previously discussed, management believes its liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to meet its current and projected cash requirements.
Performance Assurances from Electricity Agreements
NSTAR Electric continuously enters into power purchase agreements to meet its entire Basic Service supply obligations. NSTAR Electric’s power suppliers are either investment grade companies or are subsidiaries of larger companies with investment grade or better credit ratings that guaranty the supplier’s obligations. In accordance with NSTAR’s Internal Credit Policy, and to minimize NSTAR Electric risk in
31
the event the supplier encounters financial difficulties or otherwise fails to perform, NSTAR Electric evaluates the supplier’s credit and NSTAR Electric’s potential exposure (on a supplier default), and when necessary obtains letters of credit or other acceptable financial security instruments. In addition, under these agreements, if a supplier (or its parent guarantor) fails to maintain an investment grade credit rating, it is required to provide additional financial security for performance of its obligations. These agreements also include a reciprocal provision, where in the event that NSTAR Electric is downgraded below investment grade, it would be required to provide additional security for performance, such as a letter of credit. In view of current volatility in the energy supply industry, NSTAR Electric is unable to determine whether its suppliers (or their parent guarantors) will become subject to financial difficulties, or whether these financial assurances and guarantees are sufficient. In the event the supplier (or its guarantor) does not provide the required additional financial security as required under the agreement, NSTAR Electric may then terminate the agreement and collect a liquidation payment from the defaulting supplier. In such event, NSTAR Electric may be required to secure alternative sources of supply at higher or lower prices (depending on prevailing market conditions) than provided under the terminated agreements.
Financial and Performance Guarantees
On a limited basis, NSTAR Electric may enter into agreements providing financial assurance to third parties.
At December 31, 2011, outstanding guarantees totaled $11.8 million as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | |
| Surety Bonds | | $ | 8,313 | |
| Other Guarantees | | | 3,459 | |
| | | | | |
| Total Guarantees | | $ | 11,772 | |
| | | | | |
Surety Bonds
As of December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric had purchased a total of $1.9 million of performance surety bonds for the purpose of obtaining licenses, permits and rights-of-way in various municipalities. In addition, NSTAR Electric had purchased approximately $6.4 million in workers’ compensation self-insurer bonds. These bonds support the guarantee by NSTAR Electric to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, required as part of the Company’s workers’ compensation self-insurance program. NSTAR Electric has indemnity agreements to provide additional financial security to its bond company in the form of a contingent letter of credit to be triggered in the event of a downgrade in the future of NSTAR Electric’s Senior Note rating to below BBB by S&P and/or to below Baa2 by Moody’s. These indemnity agreements cover both the performance surety bonds and workers’ compensation bonds.
Hydro-Quebec Transmission Company Guarantees
NSTAR Electric has issued $3.5 million of residual value guarantees related to its equity interest in the Hydro-Quebec Transmission companies, NEH and NHH.
32
Management believes the likelihood that NSTAR Electric would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these guarantees is remote.
Contractual Obligations
NSTAR Electric enters into a variety of contractual obligations and other commitments in the course of ordinary business activities. The following table summarizes NSTAR Electric’s significant contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | Years Thereafter | | | Total | |
Long-term debt maturities | | $ | 401 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 302 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 900 | | | $ | 1,610 | |
Interest obligations on long-term debt | | | 85 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 51 | | | | 51 | | | | 634 | | | | 945 | |
Securitization obligations | | | 49 | | | | 43 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 92 | |
Interest obligations on transition property securitization | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6 | |
Leases of property | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | 7 | |
Leases of capital equipment | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 7 | | | | 6 | | | | 4 | | | | 10 | | | | 43 | |
Transmission obligations | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 15 | |
Purchase obligations | | | 12 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12 | |
Pension | | | 25 | | | | 75 | | | | 75 | | | | 75 | | | | 75 | | | | - | | | | 325 | |
Electric capacity obligations | | | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 7 | | | | 17 | |
Decommissioning of nuclear generating units | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 7 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 31 | |
Electric interconnection agreement | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 41 | | | | 58 | |
Renewable electric energy contracts | | | 67 | | | | 88 | | | | 87 | | | | 88 | | | | 52 | | | | 251 | | | | 633 | |
Electric energy contracts (Basic Service) | | | 411 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 411 | |
Purchase power buy-out obligations | | | 32 | | | | 27 | | | | 31 | | | | 31 | | | | 10 | | | | - | | | | 131 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total obligations | | $ | 1,114 | | | $ | 330 | | | $ | 578 | | | $ | 272 | | | $ | 199 | | | $ | 1,843 | | | $ | 4,336 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Transition property securitization payments reflect securities issued in 2005 for BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. These funding entities recover the principal and interest obligations for their transition property securitization bonds from customers of NSTAR Electric, through a component of NSTAR Electric’s transition charges and, as a result, these payment obligations do not affect NSTAR Electric’s overall cash flow.
Transmission obligations represent the obligation to support the carrying costs of facilities utilized.
Purchase obligations relate to transmission and distribution equipment, computer software and equipment, and various supplies.
Management cannot estimate projected Pension contributions beyond 2016. Refer to Note F,“Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,”in the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Electric capacity obligations reflect obligations for purchased power and are fully recoverable. As a result, these payment obligations do not affect NSTAR Electric’s results of operations.
Obligations related to the decommissioning of nuclear generating units are based on estimates from the Yankee Companies’ management and reflect the total remaining approximate cost for decommissioning and/or security or protection of the three units in which NSTAR Electric has equity investments. Decommissioning costs are fully recoverable from customers.
The electric interconnection agreement relates to a single interconnection with a municipal utility for additional capacity into NSTAR Electric’s service territory.
Renewable electric energy contract obligations represent projected payments under long-term agreements.
33
Electric energy contracts (Basic Service) represent obligations under Basic Service load provider agreements.
The purchase power buy-out obligation relates to NSTAR Electric’s execution of several agreements to buy-out or restructure certain long-term purchase power contracts. NSTAR Electric fully recovers these payments through its transition charge. These amounts represent payments by NSTAR Electric for these agreements.
Contingencies
Environmental Matters
NSTAR Electric faces possible liabilities as a result of involvement in several multi-party disposal sites, state-regulated sites or third party claims associated with contamination remediation. NSTAR Electric generally expects to have only a small percentage of the total potential liability for the majority of these sites. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, NSTAR Electric had liabilities of $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for these environmental sites. This estimated recorded liability is based on an evaluation of all currently available facts with respect to these sites.
Estimates related to environmental remediation costs are reviewed and adjusted as further investigation and assignment of responsibility occurs and as either additional sites are identified or NSTAR Electric’s responsibilities for such sites evolve or are resolved. NSTAR Electric’s ultimate liability for future environmental remediation costs may vary from these estimates. Based on NSTAR Electric’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, existing legal requirements, and regulatory policies, NSTAR Electric does not believe that these environmental remediation costs will have a material adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amounts and fair values of long-term indebtedness (excluding notes payable, including current maturities) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(in thousands) | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | |
Long-term indebtedness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(including current maturities) | | $ | 1,692,574 | | | $ | 1,909,950 | | | $ | 1,791,513 | | | $ | 1,936,680 | |
As discussed in the following section, NSTAR Electric’s exposure to financial risk results primarily from fluctuations in interest rates.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Energy Risk Management
NSTAR’s Energy Procurement Policy governs all energy-related transactions for its regulated electric and gas subsidiaries, including NSTAR Electric. This Policy is reviewed annually and is administered by NSTAR’s Risk Committee. The Committee is chaired by NSTAR’s chief executive officer and includes other senior officers. Items covered by this Policy and approved by the Committee are all new energy supply transactions, authorization limits, energy related derivative and hedging transactions, and counter-party credit profiles.
Commodity and Credit Risk
Although NSTAR Electric has material energy commodity purchase contracts, any potential market risk, including counter-party credit risk, should not have an adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s results of
34
operations, cash flows, or financial position. NSTAR Electric has rate-making mechanisms that allow for the recovery of energy supply costs from those customers who make commodity purchases from NSTAR Electric rather than from the competitive market supplier. All energy supply costs incurred by NSTAR Electric in providing energy to its retail customers are recovered on a fully reconciling basis.
In addition, NSTAR Electric has minimal cash flow risk due to the short-term nature of these contracts and the rate-making mechanisms that permit recovery of these costs in a timely manner. The majority of NSTAR Electric’s commodity purchase contracts range in term from three to twelve months. NSTAR Electric has the ability to seek cost recovery and adjust its rates as frequently as every three months for its large commercial and industrial customers and every six months for its residential customers. NSTAR Electric earns a carrying charge on under-collected commodity balances that would mitigate any incremental short-term borrowings costs. NSTAR Electric believes it is unlikely that it would be exposed to a liquidity risk resulting from significant market price increases based on the recovery mechanisms currently in place.
Interest Rate Risk
NSTAR Electric believes its interest risk primarily relates to short-term debt obligations and anticipated future long-term debt financing requirements to fund its capital programs. These short-term debt obligations are typically refinanced with fixed-rate long-term notes as needed and when market interest rates are favorable. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, all of NSTAR Electric’s long-term debt had fixed interest rates. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily based on levels of short-term commercial paper outstanding. The weighted average interest rates, excluding fees for short-term indebtedness, were 0.16% and 0.22% for 2011 and 2010, respectively. On a long-term basis, NSTAR Electric mitigates its interest rate risk through the issuance of mostly fixed rate debt of various maturities.
35
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholder and Directors of NSTAR Electric Company:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NSTAR Electric Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, NSTAR signed an Agreement and Plan of Merger on October 16, 2010 with Northeast Utilities.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 7, 2012
36
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
NSTAR Electric Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 2,487,288 | | | $ | 2,478,280 | | | $ | 2,564,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchased power and transmission | | | 1,075,215 | | | | 1,141,945 | | | | 1,265,595 | |
Operations and maintenance | | | 366,013 | | | | 351,199 | | | | 319,300 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 272,122 | | | | 280,739 | | | | 338,632 | |
Energy efficiency programs | | | 175,746 | | | | 117,091 | | | | 80,609 | |
Property and other taxes | | | 111,530 | | | | 104,810 | | | | 94,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 2,000,626 | | | | 1,995,784 | | | | 2,098,161 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Operating income | | | 486,662 | | | | 482,496 | | | | 466,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Interest charges (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 90,225 | | | | 90,744 | | | | 83,185 | |
Transition property securitization | | | 7,678 | | | | 11,826 | | | | 19,540 | |
Interest income and other, net | | | (28,666 | ) | | | (31,445 | ) | | | (25,690 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest charges | | | 69,237 | | | | 71,125 | | | | 77,035 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Other income (deductions): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income | | | 2,147 | | | | 3,961 | | | | 5,755 | |
Other deductions | | | (1,392 | ) | | | (4,737 | ) | | | (3,055 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (deductions) | | | 755 | | | | (776 | ) | | | 2,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 418,180 | | | | 410,595 | | | | 391,915 | |
Income taxes | | | 165,686 | | | | 162,020 | | | | 151,224 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 252,494 | | | $ | 248,575 | | | $ | 240,691 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Per share data is not relevant because NSTAR Electric Company’s common stock is wholly owned by NSTAR.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
37
NSTAR Electric Company
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | |
Balance at the beginning of the year | | | $ 1,158,501 | | | | $1,100,086 | | | | $1,002,255 | |
Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 252,494 | | | | 248,575 | | | | 240,691 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,410,995 | | | | 1,348,661 | | | | 1,242,946 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Deduct: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock dividends declared to Parent | | | 169,900 | | | | 188,200 | | | | 140,900 | |
Preferred stock dividends declared | | | 1,960 | | | | 1,960 | | | | 1,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 171,860 | | | | 190,160 | | | | 142,860 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the end of the year | | | $ 1,239,135 | | | | $1,158,501 | | | | $1,100,086 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
38
NSTAR Electric Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Assets | | (in thousands) | |
| | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 9,373 | | | $ | 8,964 | |
Restricted cash | | | - | | | | 17,007 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $27,118 and $29,033, respectively | | | 232,827 | | | | 227,115 | |
Accrued unbilled revenues | | | 40,380 | | | | 42,528 | |
Regulatory assets | | | 312,133 | | | | 331,772 | |
Inventory, at average cost | | | 31,222 | | | | 18,254 | |
Refundable income taxes | | | - | | | | 128,340 | |
Other | | | 247 | | | | 33,735 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 626,182 | | | | 807,715 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Utility plant: | | | | | | | | |
Electric plant in service, at original cost | | | 5,720,718 | | | | 5,468,560 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | 1,436,021 | | | | 1,351,537 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net electric plant in service | | | 4,284,697 | | | | 4,117,023 | |
Construction work in progress | | | 162,050 | | | | 87,678 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net utility plant | | | 4,446,747 | | | | 4,204,701 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Other investments: | | | | | | | | |
Equity and other investments | | | 4,211 | | | | 4,755 | |
Restricted cash - securitization | | | 3,373 | | | | 3,373 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other investments | | | 7,584 | | | | 8,128 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Deferred debits: | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory assets | | | 1,680,596 | | | | 1,676,688 | |
Other deferred debits | | | 30,241 | | | | 39,706 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred debits | | | 1,710,837 | | | | 1,716,394 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,791,350 | | | $ | 6,736,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
39
NSTAR Electric Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Liabilities and Capitalization | | (in thousands) | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 400,687 | | | $ | 687 | |
Transition property securitization | | | 48,680 | | | | 46,955 | |
Notes payable | | | 141,500 | | | | 227,500 | |
Power contract obligations | | | 31,717 | | | | 72,553 | |
Accounts payable | | | 182,035 | | | | 205,467 | |
Payable to affiliates, net | | | 124,432 | | | | 110,304 | |
Income taxes | | | 96,155 | | | | 63,622 | |
Accrued interest | | | 18,956 | | | | 18,587 | |
Other | | | 57,854 | | | | 58,470 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,102,016 | | | | 804,145 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Deferred credits and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated deferred income taxes | | | 1,310,180 | | | | 1,219,810 | |
Power contract obligations | | | 112,010 | | | | 143,224 | |
Pension liability | | | 357,685 | | | | 254,014 | |
Regulatory liability - cost of removal | | | 235,762 | | | | 226,738 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | 75,905 | | | | 66,702 | |
Other deferred credits | | | 79,837 | | | | 84,320 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred credits | | | 2,171,379 | | | | 1,994,808 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Capitalization: | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt: | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 1,199,714 | | | | 1,616,011 | |
Transition property securitization | | | 43,493 | | | | 127,860 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | | 1,243,207 | | | | 1,743,871 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Cumulative non-mandatory redeemable preferred stock | | | 43,000 | | | | 43,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Common equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, par value $1 per share, (100 shares issued and outstanding) | | | - | | | | - | |
Premium on common stock | | | 992,613 | | | | 992,613 | |
Retained earnings | | | 1,239,135 | | | | 1,158,501 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total common equity | | | 2,231,748 | | | | 2,151,114 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total capitalization | | | 3,517,955 | | | | 3,937,985 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total liabilities and capitalization | | $ | 6,791,350 | | | $ | 6,736,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
40
NSTAR Electric Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | |
Operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 252,494 | | | $ | 248,575 | | | $ | 240,691 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 272,122 | | | | 280,739 | | | | 338,632 | |
Debt amortization | | | 4,792 | | | | 4,800 | | | | 4,809 | |
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | | | 70,621 | | | | 40,204 | | | | 53,772 | |
Net changes in: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Refundable income taxes | | | 128,340 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenues | | | (3,564 | ) | | | (7,871 | ) | | | 43,949 | |
Inventory, at average cost | | | (12,968 | ) | | | 3,077 | | | | 2,474 | |
Accounts payable | | | (38,542 | ) | | | 46,976 | | | | (6,335 | ) |
Other current assets and liabilities | | | 68,918 | | | | (3,754 | ) | | | (38,922 | ) |
Regulatory assets | | | 14,764 | | | | 108,188 | | | | (9,185 | ) |
Long-term power contract obligations | | | (73,026 | ) | | | (131,780 | ) | | | (123,776 | ) |
Deferred debits and credits, net | | | 37,217 | | | | (33,128 | ) | | | 17,349 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 721,168 | | | | 556,026 | | | | 523,458 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plant expenditures (including AFUDC) | | | (381,245 | ) | | | (308,605 | ) | | | (319,454 | ) |
Proceeds on sales of property | | | 188 | | | | - | | | | 2,074 | |
(Decrease) increase in restricted cash | | | 17,007 | | | | (13,392 | ) | | | - | |
Net change in other investment activities | | | 443 | | | | 585 | | | | 1,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (363,607 | ) | | | (321,412 | ) | | | (316,131 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt issuances, net | | | - | | | | 295,194 | | | | 104,553 | |
Debt issuance costs | | | - | | | | (3,048 | ) | | | (875 | ) |
Transition property securitization redemptions | | | (82,642 | ) | | | (94,943 | ) | | | (154,031 | ) |
Long-term debt redemption | | | (16,650 | ) | | | (126,650 | ) | | | (1,630 | ) |
Net change in notes payable | | | (86,000 | ) | | | (113,500 | ) | | | (13,583 | ) |
Dividends paid | | | (171,860 | ) | | | (190,160 | ) | | | (142,860 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (357,152 | ) | | | (233,107 | ) | | | (208,426 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 409 | | | | 1,507 | | | | (1,099 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | | | 8,964 | | | | 7,457 | | | | 8,556 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | $ | 9,373 | | | $ | 8,964 | | | $ | 7,457 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Cash paid (received) during the period for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Interest, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 96,073 | | | $ | 95,849 | | | $ | 101,062 | |
| | | |
Income taxes | | $ | (62,190 | ) | | $ | 147,573 | | | $ | 112,204 | |
| | | |
Non-cash investing activity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Plant additions included in accounts payable | | $ | 34,336 | | | $ | 16,663 | | | $ | 22,584 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note A. Business Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
1. Nature of Operations
NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric or the Company) is a regulated public utility incorporated in 1886 under Massachusetts law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR. NSTAR Electric serves approximately 1.1 million electric distribution customers in the City of Boston and 80 surrounding communities. NSTAR is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries in the energy delivery business serving approximately 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts, including NSTAR Electric’s customers and approximately 300,000 natural gas distribution customers in 51 communities. NSTAR has a service company that provides management and support services to substantially all NSTAR subsidiaries - NSTAR Electric & Gas.
Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR Electric, provides distribution service and ongoing support to its only customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric consolidates two wholly-owned special purpose subsidiaries, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. These entities were created to complete the sale of electric rate reduction certificates to a special purpose trust created by two Massachusetts state agencies. These financing transactions securitized the costs incurred related to the divestiture of generation assets and long-term power contracts. The activities of a third special purpose subsidiary, BEC Funding LLC, were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
2. Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
On October 16, 2010, upon unanimous approval from their respective Boards of Trustees, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities (NU) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The transaction will be a merger of equals in a stock-for-stock transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at closing, NSTAR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NU. On March 4, 2011, shareholders of each company approved the merger and adopted the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NSTAR shareholders will receive 1.312 NU common shares for each NSTAR common share that they own. Following completion of the merger, it is anticipated that NU shareholders will own approximately 56 percent of the post-merger company and former NSTAR shareholders will own approximately 44 percent of the post-merger company.
The post-merger company will provide electric and gas energy delivery services through six regulated electric and gas utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire serving nearly 3.5 million electric and gas customers. Completion of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. Acting pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 14, 2011, NU and NSTAR formally extended the date by which either party has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement should all required closing conditions not be satisfied, including receipt of all required regulatory approvals, from October 16, 2011 to April 16, 2012.
Regulatory Approvals on Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
Federal
On January 4, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Communications Commission. On February 10, 2011, the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired. On July 6, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Consent of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was received on December 20, 2011.
42
Massachusetts
On November 24, 2010, NSTAR and NU filed a joint petition requesting the DPU’s approval of their proposed merger. On March 10, 2011, the DPU issued an order that modified the standard of review to be applied in the review of mergers involving Massachusetts utilities from a “no net harm” standard to a “net benefits” standard, meaning that the companies must demonstrate that the pending merger provides benefits that outweigh the costs. Applicable state law provides that mergers of Massachusetts utilities and their respective holding companies must be “consistent with the public interest.” The order states that the DPU has flexibility in applying the factors applicable to the standard of review. NSTAR and NU filed supplemental testimony with the DPU on April 8, 2011 indicating the merger could provide post-merger net savings of approximately $784 million in the first ten years following the closing of the merger and provide environmental benefits with respect to Massachusetts emissions reductions, global warming policies, and furthering the goals of Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act.
The DPU held public evidentiary hearings during July 2011. Upon conclusion of the public evidentiary hearings on July 28, 2011, the DPU issued a briefing schedule that arranged for a series of intervenor and NSTAR and NU briefs and reply briefs culminating in the delivery of the final NSTAR and NU reply briefs on September 19, 2011. Subsequently, NSTAR and NU agreed to different intervenor motions to extend the briefing schedule, and the DPU consented to these motions. The final NSTAR and NU reply briefs were filed on October 31, 2011.
On July 15, 2011, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) filed a motion for an indefinite stay in the proceedings. On July 21, 2011, NSTAR and NU filed a response objecting to this motion. The DPU originally scheduled Oral Arguments for November 17, 2011 regarding the DOER’s Motion to Stay the proceeding, which were postponed during the fourth quarter of 2011 while NSTAR, NU and other parties made attempts to narrow and discuss the issues presented by the DOER’s Motion to Stay. On January 6, 2012, the Oral Arguments were conducted regarding DOER’s Motion to Stay. At the Oral Argument, DOER withdrew its request for a fully adjudicated rate case, which would have required an extended stay of the proceeding. NSTAR and NU await approval of the merger from the DPU.
Connecticut
On June 1, 2011, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), formerly the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC), issued a declaratory ruling stating that it lacked jurisdiction to review the NSTAR merger with NU. On June 30, 2011, the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel filed a Petition for Administrative Appeal in Connecticut Superior Court requesting that the Superior Court remand the decision back to the PURA with instructions to reopen the docket and review the merger transaction.
On January 4, 2012, the PURA issued a draft decision in Docket No. 10-12-05RE01 that revised its earlier declaratory ruling of June 1, 2011, which had concluded it did not have jurisdiction to review the pending merger between NU and NSTAR. Following oral arguments on January 12, 2012, the PURA issued its final decision on January 18, 2012 that concluded that NU and NSTAR must seek approval to merge from the PURA pursuant to Connecticut state law. On January 19, 2012, NU and NSTAR filed their merge review application with the PURA. On January 20, 2012, the PURA issued a procedural schedule that includes a draft decision on March 26, 2012 and a final decision on April 2, 2012.
New Hampshire
On April 5, 2011, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) issued an order finding that it does not have statutory authority to approve or reject the merger.
43
Maine
On May 11, 2011, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued an order approving the merger contingent upon approval by the FERC. The FERC approval was received on July 6, 2011.
3. Basis of Consolidation and Accounting
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the results of operations, retained earnings, financial position and cash flows of NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries, Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), BEC Funding LLC, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the accompanying prior year’s consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation.
NSTAR Electric follows accounting policies prescribed by the FERC and the DPU. In addition, NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries are subject to the accounting and reporting requirements of the SEC. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. NSTAR Electric is subject to the application of ASC 980,Regulated Operations, that considers the effects of regulation resulting from the differences in the timing of recognition of certain revenues and expenses from those of other businesses and industries. The energy delivery business is subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost recovery and meets the criteria for application of ASC 980. Refer to Note C,“Regulatory Assets,” for more information.
4. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
5. Revenues
Utility revenues are based on authorized rates approved by the DPU and the FERC. Estimates of distribution and transition revenues for electricity delivered to customers but not yet billed are accrued at the end of each accounting period.
6. Utility Plant
Utility plant is stated at original cost. The cost of replacements of property units is capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The original cost of property retired, net of salvage value, is charged to accumulated depreciation. The incurred related cost of removal is charged against the “Deferred credits and other liabilities: Regulatory liability - cost of removal” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following is a summary of utility property and equipment, at cost, at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| Electric - | | | | | | | | |
| Distribution | | $ | 4,126,728 | | | $ | 3,964,499 | |
| Transmission | | | 1,386,906 | | | | 1,293,294 | |
| General | | | 207,084 | | | | 210,767 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Electric utility plant | | $ | 5,720,718 | | | $ | 5,468,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
44
7. Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of utility plant is computed on a straight-line basis using composite rates based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of property. The composite rates are subject to the approval of the DPU and the FERC. The rates include a cost of removal component, which is collected from customers during the service life of the property. The overall rates and depreciation and amortization expense of utility plant were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Overall average depreciation rate for utility plant | | | 2.96 | % | | | 2.95 | % | | | 3.06 | % |
Depreciation and amortization expense of utility plant | | $ | 163.1 | | | $ | 158.4 | | | $ | 152.2 | |
8. Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC)
AFUDC represents the estimated costs to finance utility plant construction. In accordance with regulatory accounting, AFUDC is included as a cost of utility plant and a reduction of current interest charges. Although AFUDC is not a current source of cash income, the costs are recovered from customers over the service life of the related plant in the form of increased revenue collected as a result of higher depreciation expense. Changes in AFUDC rates are directly related to changes in short-term borrowing rates.
| | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Average AFUDC rate | | 0.29% | | 0.29% | | 0.33% |
9. Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are comprised of liquid securities with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased.
In accordance with the financial assurance policy of ISO-New England Inc. (ISO-NE), NSTAR Electric had $17 million on deposit in an escrow account as of December 31, 2010. This policy was modified during 2011 resulting in the refund of this deposit to NSTAR Electric. Accordingly, this deposit is presented as a “Current assets: Restricted cash” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010.
NSTAR Electric also has restricted cash representing the funds held in escrow on behalf of the Company to secure a portion of principal and interest on the Transition Property Securitization Certificates. These amounts will be released upon final payment of the Transition Property Securitization Certificates and are presented in “Other investments: Restricted cash – securitization” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
10. Use of Fair Value
NSTAR Electric uses a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets, and is applicable to fair value measurements of derivative contracts and other instruments that are subject to mark-to-market accounting. Refer to Note I,“Fair Value Measurements,” for more information.
The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. For its long-term debt, management estimates are based in part on quotations from broker/dealers or interest rate information for similar instruments. The carrying amount of cash and temporary investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term borrowings and other current liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity and/or frequent repricing of those instruments.
45
11. Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes the current tax obligation or benefit and the change in net deferred income tax liability for the period. Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between financial and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities. Income tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions are recognized when the company determines that it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be ultimately sustained. Refer to Note E,“Income Taxes,” for more information.
12. Equity Method of Accounting
NSTAR Electric uses the equity method of accounting for investments in corporate joint ventures in which it does not have a controlling interest. Under this method, it records as income or loss the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses of the joint ventures with a corresponding increase or decrease in the carrying value of the investment. The investment is reduced as cash dividends are received. NSTAR Electric participates in several corporate joint ventures in which it has investments, principally its 14.5% equity investment in two companies, New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. (NEH) and New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation (NHH) that own and operate transmission facilities to import electricity from the Hydro-Quebec system in Canada. NSTAR Electric also retains equity investments ranging from 4% to 14% in three regional nuclear facilities (CY, MY, and YA), all of which have been decommissioned in accordance with the federal NRC procedures.
13. Interest Income and Other, net
Major components of interest income and other, net were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Regulatory deferrals carrying charges | | $ | 29,415 | | | $ | 26,984 | | | $ | 22,476 | |
Income tax related interest (expense) income | | | (2,023 | ) | | | 7,443 | | | | 6,735 | |
Other interest income (expense) | | | 1,205 | | | | (2,767 | ) | | | (3,266 | ) |
Short-term debt | | | (263 | ) | | | (601 | ) | | | (717 | ) |
AFUDC | | | 332 | | | | 386 | | | | 462 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest income and other, net | | $ | 28,666 | | | $ | 31,445 | | | $ | 25,690 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other interest income (expense) includes interest expense on life insurance policies, loan facility charges, and interest on customer deposits, partially offset by interest income on legal matters.
14. Other Income (Deductions)
Major components of other income were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Earnings, dividends, and other income related to equity investments | | $ | 505 | | | $ | 836 | | | $ | 891 | |
Interest and rental income | | | 810 | | | | 928 | | | | 2,090 | |
Income from life insurance policies | | | 822 | | | | 2,188 | | | | 2,542 | |
Miscellaneous other income, net | | | 10 | | | | 9 | | | | 232 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income | | $ | 2,147 | | | $ | 3,961 | | | $ | 5,755 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
46
Major components of other deductions were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
NSTAR Foundation funding contributions | | $ | - | | | $ | (2,606 | ) | | $ | (1,736 | ) |
Other charitable contributions | | | (829 | ) | | | (727 | ) | | | (785 | ) |
Miscellaneous other deductions | | | (563 | ) | | | (1,404 | ) | | | (534 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other deductions | | $ | (1,392 | ) | | $ | (4,737 | ) | | $ | (3,055 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
15. Related Party Transactions
The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets include $75.9 million and $66.7 million in “Deferred credits and other liabilities - Payable to affiliates” as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This amount is composed of payments received from affiliates as a result of the Company’s role as the sponsor of the NSTAR Pension Plan.
The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income as of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, include a net allocation of affiliated companies’ expenses of $193 million, $192 million, and $197 million, and affiliated companies’ interest income of $0.0 million, $0.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively. Operating expenses are charged between NSTAR Electric and its affiliated companies on a cost sharing method based on proportionate rendering of services.
16. Purchase and Sales Transactions with ISO-NE
NSTAR Electric has several remaining long-term power contracts that it sells through ISO-NE at daily market prices, which are not used to satisfy NSTAR Electric’s Basic Service energy requirements. NSTAR Electric is required by the DPU to credit all proceeds from these energy sales back to its customers. NSTAR Electric may not execute new long-term energy supply agreements without approval of the DPU. NSTAR Electric records the proceeds from the sales of these contracts as a reduction to “Purchased power and transmission” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
| | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Proceeds from sales of long-term power contracts | | $148.4 | | $162.0 | | $147.1 |
17. Variable Interest Entities
Amended consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities became effective for NSTAR Electric on January 1, 2010. This amended guidance did not have an impact on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
NSTAR Electric has certain long-term purchase power agreements with energy facilities where it purchases substantially all of the output from a specified facility for a specified period. NSTAR Electric has evaluated these arrangements under the variable interest accounting guidance and has determined that these agreements represent variable interests. NSTAR Electric is not considered the primary beneficiary of these entities and does not consolidate the entities because it does not control the activities most relevant to the operating results of these entities and does not hold any equity interests in the entities. NSTAR Electric’s exposure to risks and financial support commitments with respect to these entities is limited to the purchase of the power generated at the prices defined under the contractual agreements. NSTAR Electric’s involvement with these variable interest entities has no material impact on the Company’s financial position, financial performance, or cash flows.
47
18. Subsequent Events
Management has reviewed subsequent events through the date of this filing and concluded that no material subsequent events have occurred that are not accounted for in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosed in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note B. Asset Retirement Obligations and Cost of Removal
The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO) is recorded in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, NSTAR Electric capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement.
NSTAR Electric’s recognition of an ARO has no impact on its earnings. NSTAR Electric establishes a regulatory asset to recognize future recoveries through depreciation rates for the recorded ARO. NSTAR Electric has certain plant assets in which this condition exists and is related to both plant assets containing hazardous materials and legal requirements to undertake remediation efforts upon retirement.
A recorded asset retirement cost liability approximates the current cost for NSTAR Electric to liquidate its legal or contractual obligations to perform actions at some point after the retirement of an asset. The following amounts were included in “Deferred credits and other liabilities: Other deferred credits” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | 0000000 | | 0000000 |
| | December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Asset retirement obligation | | $27 | | $26 |
For NSTAR Electric, the ultimate cost to remove utility plant from service (cost of removal) is recognized as a component of depreciation expense in accordance with approved regulatory treatment. The following amounts were based on the estimated cost of removal component in current depreciation rates and represent the cumulative amounts collected from customers for cost of removal, but not yet expended:
| | 000000000 | | 000000000 |
| | December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Regulatory liability – cost of removal | | $236 | | $227 |
Note C. Regulatory Assets
Under the traditional revenue requirements model, electric rates are based on the cost of providing energy delivery service. Accounting rules require companies to defer the recognition of certain costs when incurred if future rate recovery of these costs is probable. This is applicable to NSTAR Electric’s distribution and transmission operations.
Regulatory assets represent costs incurred that are probable of recovery from customers through future rates in accordance with agreements with regulators. These costs are expensed when the corresponding revenues are received in order to appropriately match revenues and expenses.
48
Regulatory assets consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Retiree benefit costs | | $ | 828,909 | | | $ | 675,486 | |
Goodwill | | | 478,850 | | | | 496,158 | |
Securitized and other energy-related costs | | | 368,520 | | | | 496,416 | |
Energy contracts (including Yankee units) | | | 143,727 | | | | 215,598 | |
Income taxes, net | | | 48,827 | | | | 26,471 | |
Redemption premiums | | | 18,171 | | | | 20,748 | |
Purchased energy costs | | | (7,368 | ) | | | (35,457 | ) |
Other | | | 113,093 | | | | 113,040 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current and long-term regulatory assets | | $ | 1,992,729 | | | $ | 2,008,460 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense recorded to “Depreciation and amortization” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income on certain regulatory assets for 2011, 2010, and 2009, was $109.0 million, $122.3 million, and $186.4 million, respectively. The amortization of other regulatory assets is recorded to “Purchased power and transmission” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Retiree benefit costs
Retiree benefit related regulatory assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are $828.9 million and $675.5 million, respectively. (Refer to Note F,“Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” for further details.) NSTAR Electric recovers its qualified pension expenses through a reconciling rate mechanism (PAM). NSTAR Electric recognizes a regulatory asset as an offset for the liability that is recognized for the funded status of the Pension plan, because NSTAR Electric will eventually recover these amounts in rates when they are recognized in expense. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, this asset was $353 million and $247.4 million, respectively, for the Pension Plan. NSTAR Electric does not earn a carrying charge on this amount.
NSTAR Electric does earn a carrying charge in accordance with PAM on the excess cumulative contributions it has made over what it has cumulatively recognized as expense. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, these balances were $443 million and $389.3 million of the retiree benefit regulatory asset, respectively.
The remainder of regulatory assets in this category consist of deferred costs of $32.9 million and $38.8 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These earn a carrying charge based on short-term interest rates.
In March 2010, the President signed the PPACA and the HCERA into law. These laws changed the tax treatment for retiree prescription drug expenses by eliminating the tax deduction available to the extent that those expenses are reimbursed under Medicare Part D, beginning in 2013. Because the tax benefits associated with these future deductions were reflected as deferred income tax assets in the consolidated financial statements, the elimination of the tax deductions resulted in a reduction in deferred tax assets of $13.9 million. As a result of its rate recovery mechanism, NSTAR Electric established a regulatory asset for this amount to reflect the anticipated future collection from customers due to the law change. NSTAR Electric also established an additional regulatory asset of $9 million and a related increase in deferred tax liabilities to reflect a tax gross-up for revenue requirement purposes. The tax law change had no material impact to NSTAR Electric’s reported earnings. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the remaining regulatory asset related to this matter was $15.2 million and $22.9 million, respectively, which are included in the balances above.
49
Goodwill
The Company’s goodwill originated from the merger that created NSTAR in 1999. As a result of a rate order from the DPU approving the merger, NSTAR Electric is recovering goodwill from its customers and, therefore, NSTAR Electric has determined that this rate structure allows for amortization of goodwill over the collection period. Goodwill along with related deferred income taxes is being amortized over 40 years, through 2039, without a carrying charge.
Securitized and other energy-related costs
A portion of these energy-related regulatory assets constitute Transition Property collateralizing the Securitization Certificates issued by NSTAR Electric’s subsidiaries, BEC Funding LLC, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC. The collateralized amounts at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $98.4 million and $182.7 million, respectively. The certificates are non-recourse to NSTAR Electric. The activities of BEC Funding LLC were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
Also included are other costs related to purchase power contract divestitures and certain costs related to NSTAR Electric’s former generation business that are recovered with a return through the transition charge and amounted to $259.8 million and $296.5 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These cost recoveries primarily occur through September 2016 for NSTAR Electric and are subject to adjustment by the DPU.
The remaining energy-related regulatory assets consist of other transition costs and other recoverable charges of $10.3 million and $17.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Energy contracts
At December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, $109.6 million and $174.2 million represent the contract termination liability related to certain purchase power contract buy-out agreements that NSTAR Electric executed in 2004 and their future recovery through NSTAR Electric’s transition charge. Since no cash outlay was incurred by NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Electric recognized this regulatory asset as a result of recording the contract termination liability. NSTAR Electric does not earn a return on this regulatory asset. The contracts’ termination payments will occur over time and will be collected from customers through NSTAR Electric’s transition charge over the same time period. The cost recovery period of these terminated contracts is through September 2016.
The unamortized balance of the costs to decommission the CY, YA, and MY nuclear power plants was $30.8 million and $39.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All three nuclear units were notified by the NRC that their respective former plant sites were decommissioned in accordance with NRC procedures and regulations. NSTAR Electric’s liability for CY decommissioning and its recovery ends at the earliest in 2015, for YA in 2014, and for MY in 2013. However, should the actual costs exceed current estimates, NSTAR Electric could have an obligation beyond these periods that would be fully recoverable. These costs are recovered through NSTAR Electric’s transition charge. NSTAR Electric does not earn a return on decommissioning costs, but a return is included in rates charged to NSTAR Electric by these plants. Refer to Note K, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for further discussion.
The remaining balance at December 31, 2011 and 2010 of $3.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively, represents an asset recorded to offset a derivative liability recorded for the fair value of a long-term renewable energy contract. Refer to Note D,“Derivative Instruments,” for further details.
50
Income taxes, net
This regulatory asset balance reflects deferred tax reserve deficiencies that are currently being recovered from customers and excludes a return component. Partially offsetting these amounts is a regulatory liability associated with unamortized investment tax credits. The increase from 2010 to 2011 is due primarily to adjusting deferred taxes for amounts previously flowed-through to customers for regulatory purposes.
Redemption premiums
These amounts reflect the unamortized balance of redemption premiums on Debentures that are amortized and recovered over the life of the respective debentures pursuant to DPU approval. The decrease reflects the amortization of these redemption premiums. There is no return recognized on this balance.
Purchased energy costs
The purchased energy costs at December 31, 2011 and 2010 relate to deferred electric Basic Service costs. Basic Service is the electricity that is supplied by NSTAR Electric when a customer has chosen not to receive service from a competitive supplier. The market price for Basic Service costs may fluctuate based on the average market price for energy. Amounts incurred for Basic Service are recovered on a fully reconciling basis without a return. The over-collected position of purchased energy costs is presented as a reduction of regulatory assets rather than as a regulatory liability. This is because the amount of the over-collected Basic Service position is exceeded by regulatory assets that will be collected from the same classes of retail electric customers that this over-collected Basic Service position will be returned to.
Other
Amounts included consist of deferred transmission costs, DPU-approved safety and reliability program costs, other DPU costs, and asset retirement obligation costs. Deferred transmission costs represent the difference between the level of billed transmission revenues and the current period costs incurred to provide transmission-related services that will be recovered over a subsequent twelve-month period with carrying charges. The costs associated with the safety and reliability programs are pending a decision by the DPU. (See“DPU Safety and Reliability Programs (CPSL)” in Note K,“Commitments and Contingencies”).
Note D. Derivative Instruments
Energy Contract
NSTAR Electric has determined that it is not required to account for the majority of its electricity supply contracts as derivatives because they qualify for, and NSTAR Electric has elected, the normal purchases and sales exception. As a result, these agreements are not reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. NSTAR Electric has a long-term renewable energy contract that does not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception and is valued at an estimated $3.4 million and $2.4 million liability as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. NSTAR Electric has measured the difference between the cost of this contract and projected market energy costs over the life of the contract, and recorded a long-term derivative liability and a corresponding long-term regulatory asset for the value of this contract. Changes in the value of the contract have no impact on earnings. The fair value of the renewable energy contract deemed to be a derivative and the balance sheet position of this agreement is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | December 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
Renewable Energy Contract – Non-hedging instrument | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Account: | | | | | | | | |
Deferred credits and other liabilities – Power contract obligations | | $ | 3,376 | | | $ | 2,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liability for non-hedging derivative instrument | | $ | 3,376 | | | $ | 2,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
51
Note E. Income Taxes
NSTAR Electric recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Net regulatory assets of $48.8 million and $26.5 million and corresponding net increases in accumulated deferred income taxes were recorded as of December 31,2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase from prior year is due primarily to recording deferred income taxes on amounts previously flowed-through to customers for regulatory purposes. The regulatory assets represent the additional future revenues to be collected from customers for deferred income taxes.
Accumulated deferred income taxes and unamortized investment tax credits consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | $ | 906,347 | | | $ | 764,767 | |
Goodwill | | | 187,829 | | | | 194,618 | |
Power contracts | | | 41,334 | | | | 76,763 | |
Purchased power | | | 102,472 | | | | 115,837 | |
Pension expense | | | 135,914 | | | | 110,069 | |
Other | | | 102,260 | | | | 118,035 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | 1,476,156 | | | | 1,380,089 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 64,157 | | | | 69,444 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net accumulated deferred income taxes | | | 1,411,999 | | | | 1,310,645 | |
Accumulated unamortized investment tax credits | | | 10,724 | | | | 12,109 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax liabilities and investment tax credits | | $ | 1,422,723 | | | $ | 1,322,754 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment tax credits are amortized over the estimated remaining lives of the property that generated the credits.
For Federal income tax purposes, NSTAR Electric files its return as part of the NSTAR consolidated income tax return. As such, the amount of current and deferred Federal income tax expense or benefit is calculated based on NSTAR Electric’s stand alone taxable income. NSTAR Electric is obligated to pay or receive from NSTAR its share of current Federal tax expense or benefit. NSTAR Electric’s deferred Federal income tax liability represents future income tax payments to NSTAR.
Components of income tax expense were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Current income tax expense | | $ | 95,065 | | | $ | 121,816 | | | $ | 97,452 | |
Deferred income tax expense | | | 72,006 | | | | 41,612 | | | | 55,202 | |
Investment tax credit amortization | | | (1,385 | ) | | | (1,408 | ) | | | (1,430 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense | | $ | 165,686 | | | $ | 162,020 | | | $ | 151,224 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The effective income tax rates reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the reasons for their differences from the statutory Federal income tax rate were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Statutory tax rate | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % |
State income tax, net of Federal income tax benefit | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
Other | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective tax rate | | | 40 | % | | | 39 | % | | | 39 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
52
Receipt of Federal Tax Refund for 2001-2007 Tax Years
On April 21, 2011, NSTAR Electric received a $166.8 million refund from the IRS relating to the 2001-2007 tax years. The approved settlement and receipt of the refund resolves all outstanding tax matters for these years.
Open Tax Years
The 2011 Federal income tax return is being reviewed under the IRS Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). CAP accelerates the examination of the return in order to resolve issues before the tax return is filed. The outcome and the timing of any potential audit adjustments are uncertain. All years prior to 2011 have been examined by the IRS.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no unrecognized tax benefits of a permanent nature that if recognized would have an impact on the Company’s effective tax rate. NSTAR Electric did not have a reserve for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Interest on Tax Positions
NSTAR Electric recognizes interest accrued related to tax positions in “Interest income and other, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Related penalties, if applicable, are reflected in “Other deductions” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. No penalties were recognized during 2011, 2010, and 2009. The amount of interest (expense) income recognized on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income and the total amount of accrued interest (payable) receivable included in “Other current liabilities” and “Other current assets” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Interest (expense) income on tax positions | | $(2.0) | | $7.4 | | $6.7 |
| | |
| | December 31, | | |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | |
Accrued tax interest (payable) receivable | | $(0.7) | | $32.7 | | |
Note F. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
NSTAR Electric recognizes an asset or liability on its balance sheet for the funded status of its Pension Plan. The pension asset or liability is the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and the projected benefit obligation as of year-end. As a result of NSTAR Electric’s approved regulatory rate mechanism for recovery of pension and postretirement costs, NSTAR Electric has recognized a regulatory asset for the majority of its pension and postretirement costs in lieu of taking a charge to AOCI.
NSTAR Electric sponsors the NSTAR Pension Plan (the Plan), that covers substantially all employees of NSTAR Electric & Gas. Retirement benefits are based on various final average pay formulas.
The Plan uses December 31st for the measurement date to determine its projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the purposes of determining the Plan’s funded status and the net periodic benefit costs for the following year.
53
The following tables for NSTAR Electric’s Pension Plan present the change in benefit obligation, change in the Plan’s assets, the funded status, the components of net periodic benefit cost and key assumptions used:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation, beginning of the year | | $ | 1,184,630 | | | $ | 1,091,660 | |
Service cost | | | 26,007 | | | | 23,564 | |
Interest cost | | | 60,963 | | | | 61,794 | |
Plan participants’ contributions | | | 15 | | | | 18 | |
Actuarial loss | | | 138,032 | | | | 75,029 | |
Settlement payments | | | (3,769 | ) | | | (3,879 | ) |
Benefits paid | | | (59,593 | ) | | | (63,556 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation, end of the year | | $ | 1,346,285 | | | $ | 1,184,630 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Change in Plan assets: | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of Plan assets, beginning of the year | | $ | 930,616 | | | $ | 862,038 | |
Actual return on Plan assets, net | | | (3,669 | ) | | | 110,995 | |
Employer contribution | | | 125,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
Plan participants’ contributions | | | 15 | | | | 18 | |
Settlement payments | | | (3,769 | ) | | | (3,879 | ) |
Benefits paid | | | (59,593 | ) | | | (63,556 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Fair value of Plan assets, end of the year | | $ | 988,600 | | | $ | 930,616 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Funded status, end of year | | $ | (357,685 | ) | | $ | (254,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The entire difference between the actual and expected return on Plan assets is reflected as a component of unrecognized actuarial net gain or loss.
Amounts recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Deferred credits and other liabilities – Pension liability | | $ | (357,685 | ) | | $ | (254,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in regulatory assets:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Prior service credit | | $ | 559 | | | $ | 1,305 | |
Accumulated actuarial loss | | | (786,214 | ) | | | (621,813 | ) |
Cumulative employer contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost | | | 427,970 | | | | 366,494 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net unrecognized periodic pension benefit cost reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets | | $ | (357,685 | ) | | $ | (254,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
54
The accumulated benefit obligation for the qualified pension plan was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Accumulated benefit obligation | | $ | 1,271.3 | | | $ | 1,119.6 | |
Weighted average assumptions were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Discount rate at the end of the year | | | 4.52 | % | | | 5.30 | % | | | 5.85 | % |
Expected return on Plan assets for the year | �� | | 8.0 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 9.0 | % |
Rate of compensation increase at the end of the year | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.0 | % |
The Plan’s discount rates are based on a bond portfolio model that approximates the Plan liabilities. The Plan’s expected long-term rates of return are based on past performance and economic forecasts for the types of investments held in the Plan as well as the target allocation of the investments over a long-term period. Actuarial assumptions also include an assumed rate for administrative expenses and investment expenses, which have averaged approximately 0.6% of assets for 2011, 2010, and 2009.
Components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Service cost | | $ | 26,007 | | | $ | 23,564 | | | $ | 21,301 | |
Interest cost | | | 60,963 | | | | 61,794 | | | | 61,712 | |
Expected return on Plan assets | | | (71,377 | ) | | | (62,782 | ) | | | (58,120 | ) |
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost | | | (746 | ) | | | (746 | ) | | | (746 | ) |
Recognized actuarial loss | | | 48,677 | | | | 50,474 | | | | 53,272 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost before allocation to affiliates | | $ | 63,524 | | | $ | 72,304 | | | $ | 77,419 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company, as a sponsor of the Plan, allocated net costs and was reimbursed by its affiliated companies the following amounts:
| | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Allocated and reimbursed net pension costs | | $10.2 | | $11.6 | | $12.4 |
Employer contributions in 2011 of $125 million were made to the Pension Plan. During 2012, NSTAR Electric anticipates contributing approximately $25 million to its Pension Plan trust.
Certain postretirement health care benefits are available to certain active NSTAR Electric & Gas and retired non-union employees in conjunction with the Group Welfare Benefit Plan for Retirees of NSTAR (GWB Plan). Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, the Company funds these benefits through a 401(h) subaccount of the Pension Plan, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Assets included in the 401(h) subaccount must only be used for postretirement health care benefits. Assets in the trust beyond those in the 401(h) subaccount must be used to pay pension benefits and cannot be used to pay postretirement health care benefits.
55
The estimated benefit payments for the Pension Plan for the next ten years are as follows:
| | | | |
(in thousands) | | | |
2012 | | $ | 76,555 | |
2013 | | | 75,258 | |
2014 | | | 75,751 | |
2015 | | | 78,085 | |
2016 | | | 78,211 | |
2017 - 2021 | | | 404,525 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 788,385 | |
| | | | |
Investment objectives:
The primary investment goal of the Pension Plan is to achieve a return equal to or better than the median corporate plan over the long-term. Risk is regularly evaluated, compared and benchmarked to plans with a similar investment strategy. The Plan also attempts to minimize risk by not having any single security or class of securities with a disproportionate impact on the Plan. The Company currently uses over 20 asset managers to manage its plan’s assets. As a guideline, assets are diversified by asset classes (Equity, Fixed Income, Real Estate, Alternative Investments) and within these classes (i.e., economic sector, industry), such that, for each asset manager:
| • | | No more than 6% of an asset manager’s equity portfolio market value may be invested in one company |
| • | | Each equity portfolio should be invested in at least 20 different companies in different industries |
| • | | No more than 50% of each equity portfolio’s market value may be invested in one industry sector, and |
| • | | No more than 5% of a fixed income manager’s portfolio may be invested in the security of an issuer, except the U.S. Government and its agencies. |
Investment Valuation of Pension Assets:
Investments stated at fair value as determined by quoted market prices for identical assets (Level 1) include:
| • | | Shares of registered investment companies valued at fair value as determined by quoted market prices, based upon net asset value (NAV) |
| • | | Domestic and foreign common equity securities and real estate investment trusts valued using quoted market prices of a national securities exchange |
| • | | U.S. Government securities valued on an active trading market |
| • | | Futures contracts valued at the last settlement price at the end of each day on the exchange upon which they are traded |
Investments stated at estimated fair value using significant observable inputs (Level 2) include:
| • | | Interest bearing cash in an institutional short-term investment vehicle valued daily |
| • | | Fixed income investments consisting of domestic and foreign corporate bonds, foreign government securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and other securitized vehicles are valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service, which determines valuations using methods based on market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities, which are generally recognized by institutional traders |
| • | | Domestic preferred equity securities valued by a pricing service |
| • | | Common/collective trusts valued at NAV without adjustment |
56
Investments valued at estimated fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) include:
| • | | Hedge funds and limited partnerships valued at NAV without adjustment |
| • | | An immediate participation guarantee contract with an insurance company stated at contract value, which approximates fair value |
Significant Investment Risks of Level 3 Investments:
Certain real estate limited partnerships have long-term lock-up provisions (7-10 years) that are intended to allow for an orderly investment and dissolution of the partnership as the underlying properties are sold. Certain hedge funds have instituted temporary redemption restrictions as of December 31, 2011. Others have monthly, quarterly or annual restraints on redemptions or may require advance notice for a redemption. Management does not believe that these liquidity restrictions impair the Plan’s ability to transact redemptions at NAV, which the Plan utilizes for fair value for those investments.
The Pension Plan also had $26 million of unfunded investment commitments to real estate limited partnerships at December 31, 2011. These commitments must be fulfilled by June 2013.
The fair value of the Pension Plan’s assets at December 31, 2011 by asset class, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | |
(in millions) | | Total | | | Active Market Prices (Level 1) | | | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Asset Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities (44% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic companies | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | - | |
Foreign companies | | | 5 | | | | 4 | | | | 1 | | | | - | |
Common/collective trusts | | | 340 | | | | - | | | | 340 | | | | - | |
Limited partnerships | | | 41 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity securities | | | 464 | | | | 81 | | | | 342 | | | | 41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed income securities (34% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest bearing cash | | | 50 | | | | - | | | | 50 | | | | - | |
Domestic government securities | | | 49 | | | | 30 | | | | 19 | | | | - | |
Foreign government securities | | | 28 | | | | - | | | | 28 | | | | - | |
Domestic and foreign corporate bonds | | | 123 | | | | - | | | | 123 | | | | - | |
Mortgage backed securities | | | 8 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8 | |
Registered investment companies | | | 94 | | | | 54 | | | | 40 | | | | - | |
Guaranteed annuity contract | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed income securities | | | 355 | | | | 84 | | | | 260 | | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate investments (10% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Limited partnerships | | | 111 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total real estate | | | 111 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alternative investments (12% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hedge funds | | | 127 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total alternative investments | | | 127 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total (prior to 401(h) allocation) | | | 1,057 | | | | 165 | | | | 602 | | | | 290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of 401(h) account | | | (68 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | (19 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets of Pension Plan | | $ | 989 | | | $ | 155 | | | $ | 563 | | | $ | 271 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
57
The fair value of the Pension Plan’s assets at December 31, 2010 by asset class, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 | |
| | | | |
(in millions) | | Total | | | Active Market Prices (Level 1) | | | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Asset Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities (46% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic companies | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 81 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | - | |
Foreign companies | | | 9 | | | | 8 | | | | 1 | | | | - | |
Common/collective trusts | | | 327 | | | | - | | | | 327 | | | | - | |
Limited partnerships | | | 45 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 45 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity securities | | | 463 | | | | 89 | | | | 329 | | | | 45 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed income securities (29% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest bearing cash | | | 20 | | | | - | | | | 20 | | | | - | |
Domestic government securities | | | 46 | | | | 27 | | | | 19 | | | | - | |
Foreign government securities | | | 20 | | | | - | | | | 19 | | | | 1 | |
Domestic and foreign corporate bonds | | | 113 | | | | - | | | | 112 | | | | 1 | |
Mortgage backed securities | | | 7 | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 6 | |
Registered investment companies | | | 81 | | | | 52 | | | | 29 | | | | - | |
Guaranteed investment contract | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed income securities | | | 290 | | | | 79 | | | | 200 | | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate investments (9% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Limited partnerships | | | 86 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 86 | |
Hedge funds | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total real estate | | | 89 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alternative investments (16% of total): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hedge funds | | | 158 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total alternative investments | | | 158 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total (prior to 401(h) allocation) | | | 1,000 | | | | 168 | | | | 529 | | | | 303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of 401(h) account | | | (69 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (37 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets of Pension Plan | | $ | 931 | | | $ | 156 | | | $ | 492 | | | $ | 283 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The assets of the Pension Plan include a 401(h) account that has been allocated to provide health and welfare postretirement benefits under the NSTAR GWB Plan. The Pension Plan 401(h) account is a subset of the Pension Plan assets and is not reflected as a component of the Pension Plan net assets.
58
The following reflects the weighted average asset allocation percentage of the fair value of the Pension Plan’s assets for each major type of asset as of December 31st as well as the targeted ranges:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Plan Assets | | | Target | | | |
Asset Class | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | Ranges | | | Typical Benchmark |
Equity securities | | | 44% | | | | 46% | | | | 35%-50 | % | | MSCI ACWI |
Debt securities | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 25%-40 | % | | Barclays Aggregate |
Real Estate | | | 10% | | | | 9% | | | | 5%-15 | % | | NCREIF Property Index |
Alternative | | | 12% | | | | 16% | | | | 10%-20 | % | | HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 100% | | | | 100% | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| | | | | |
(in millions) | | Hedge Funds | | | Limited Partnerships | | | Guaranteed Annuity Contract | | | Other | | | Total | |
Ending balance at December 31, 2009 | | | $ 259 | | | | $ 78 | | | | $ 4 | | | | $ - | | | | $341 | |
Actual return on plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date | | | (5 | ) | | | 19 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 14 | |
Relating to assets sold during the period | | | 8 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9 | |
Purchases, sales, and settlements | | | (101 | ) | | | 33 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 8 | | | | (61 | ) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance at December 31, 2010 | | | $ 161 | | | | $ 131 | | | | $ 3 | | | | $ 8 | | | | $303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized) reported inDeferred Debits – Regulatory Assets and Deferred Credits – Pension and Postretirement Liability captions on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date | | | (5 | ) | | | 6 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | |
Relating to assets sold during the period | | | (2 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2 | ) |
Purchases | | | - | | | | 17 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 17 | |
Sales | | | (27 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (29 | ) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance at December 31, 2011 | | | $ 127 | | | | $ 152 | | | | $ 3 | | | | $ 8 | | | | $290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. | Other Postretirement Benefits |
NSTAR Electric supports a portion of NSTAR’s GWB Plan. The GWB Plan provides health care and other benefits to retired employees who meet certain age and years of service eligibility requirements. These benefits include health and life insurance coverage. Under certain circumstances, eligible retirees are required to contribute to the cost of postretirement benefits.
NSTAR Electric’s other postretirement benefits are not vested and the Company has the right to modify any benefit provision, including contribution requirements, with respect to any current or former employee, dependent or beneficiary, subject to applicable laws at that time.
To fund these postretirement benefits, NSTAR, on behalf of NSTAR Electric and other subsidiaries, makes contributions to various Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trusts that were established pursuant to section 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code.
59
The funded status of the GWB Plan cannot be presented separately for NSTAR Electric since the Company participates in the GWB Plan trusts with other subsidiaries. NSTAR Electric accounts for the obligations of the GWB Plan as if it were a multiemployer plan, recognizing only unpaid contributions that are due as a liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. GWB Plan assets are available to provide benefits for all GWB Plan participants who are former employees of NSTAR Electric and other subsidiaries of NSTAR.
The net periodic postretirement benefits costs allocated to NSTAR Electric were $26 million, $33 million, and $36 million, in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
NSTAR Electric contributes proportionately into a defined contribution 401(k) plan for substantially all employees of NSTAR Electric & Gas. Matching contributions (which are equal to 50% of the employees’ deferral up to 8% of eligible base and cash incentive compensation subject to statutory limits) included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income amounted to $8.7 million, $8.1 million, and $7.8 million, in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
Note G. Capital Stock
Cumulative Preferred Stock
Non-mandatory redeemable series:
NSTAR Electric has two outstanding series of non-mandatory redeemable preferred stock. Both series are part of a class of NSTAR Electric’s Cumulative Preferred Stock. Upon any liquidation of NSTAR Electric, holders of the Cumulative Preferred stock are entitled to receive the liquidation preference for their shares before any distribution to the holder of the common stock. The liquidation preference for each outstanding series of Cumulative Preferred Stock is equal to the par value ($100 per share), plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
Par value $100 per share, 2,890,000 shares authorized and 430,000 shares issued and outstanding:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | | | | |
| | Current Shares | | Redemption | | December 31, | |
Series | | Outstanding | | Price/Share | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
4.25% | | 180,000 | | $103.625 | | | $18,000 | | | | $18,000 | |
4.78% | | 250,000 | | $102.80 | | | $25,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-mandatory redeemable series | | | $43,000 | | | | $43,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
60
Note H. Indebtedness
NSTAR Electric’s long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Debentures: | | | | | | | | |
4.875%, due October 2012 | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | 400,000 | |
4.875%, due April 2014 | | | 300,000 | | | | 300,000 | |
5.625%, due November 2017 | | | 400,000 | | | | 400,000 | |
5.75%, due March 2036 | | | 200,000 | | | | 200,000 | |
5.50%, due March 2040 | | | 300,000 | | | | 300,000 | |
Bonds: | | | | | | | | |
7.375% Sewage facility revenue bonds, due through May 2015 (HEEC) | | | 5,058 | | | | 6,708 | |
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency (MIFA) bonds | | | | | | | | |
5.75%, due February 2014 | | | - | | | | 15,000 | |
Transition Property Securitization Certificates: | | | | | | | | |
4.13%, due through September 2011 | | | - | | | | 30,044 | |
4.40%, due through March 2013 | | | 92,172 | | | | 144,771 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total principal | | | 1,697,230 | | | | 1,796,523 | |
Unamortized debt discount | | | (7,709 | ) | | | (8,583 | ) |
Unamortized debt premium | | | 3,053 | | | | 3,573 | |
Amounts due within one year | | | (449,367 | ) | | | (47,642 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 1,243,207 | | | $ | 1,743,871 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Consistent with the recovery in utility rates, discounts, redemption premiums and related costs associated with the issuance and redemption of long-term debt of NSTAR Electric are deferred and amortized as an addition to interest expense over the life of the original or replacement debt.
On April 6, 2009, the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s new two-year financing plan to issue an additional $500 million in long-term debt securities. On October 9, 2009, in connection with this filing, NSTAR and NSTAR Electric filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC to issue debt securities from time to time in one or more series. On November 17, 2009, NSTAR sold $350 million of fixed rate (4.5%) Debentures due November 15, 2019. NSTAR used the proceeds from the issuance of these securities for the repayment of outstanding short-term debt balances and general working capital purposes.
NSTAR Electric anticipates filing a new two-year financing plan with the DPU during 2012 seeking approval to issue long-term debt securities.
On August 1, 2011, NSTAR Electric redeemed $15 million of Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency Bonds, 5.75%, due February 2014, at par.
Sewage facility revenue bonds are tax-exempt, subject to annual mandatory sinking fund redemption requirements and mature through 2015. Scheduled redemptions of $1.65 million were made in 2011 and 2010. The interest rate of the bonds was 7.375% for both 2011 and 2010.
The Transition Property Securitization Certificates issued by NSTAR Electric’s subsidiaries, BEC Funding LLC, BEC Funding II, LLC and CEC Funding, LLC (Funding companies), are each collaterized with separate securitized regulatory assets with combined balances as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Securitized regulatory asset | | $ | 98.4 | | | $ | 182.7 | |
61
NSTAR Electric, as servicing agent for the Funding companies collected the following amounts:
| | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Customer collections on securitized regulatory assets | | $90.3 | | $110.7 |
Funds collected from the companies’ respective customers are transferred to each Funding companies’ Trust on a daily basis. These Certificates are non-recourse to NSTAR Electric. On March 15, 2010, BEC Funding LLC retired its final series of outstanding Transition Property Securitization Certificates.
The aggregate principal amounts of NSTAR Electric’s long-term debt (including securitization certificates and sinking fund requirements) due in the five years subsequent to 2011 are approximately:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | Thereafter |
Aggregate long-term debt principal amounts due | | $450 | | $45 | | $302 | | $5 | | $- | | $900 |
2. | Financial Covenant Requirements and Lines of Credit |
NSTAR Electric has no financial covenant requirements under its respective long-term debt arrangements. Pursuant to a revolving credit agreement, NSTAR Electric must maintain a total debt to capitalization ratio no greater than 65% at all times. The prescribed ratio is calculated excluding both Transition Property Securitization Certificates from debt and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from common equity. The ratio characterizes as debt unfunded vested benefits under postretirement benefit plans, contract liability positions (including swaps and hedges), capital lease liabilities, and corporate guarantees. NSTAR Electric’s long-term debt is unsecured.
On March 16, 2010, NSTAR Electric sold $300 million of 5.5% Debentures due March 15, 2040. NSTAR Electric used the proceeds from the issuance of these securities for the redemption or repayment of outstanding long-term debt and short-term debt balances and/or general working capital purposes.
NSTAR Electric has approval from the FERC to issue short-term debt securities from time to time on or before October 22, 2012, with maturity dates no later than October 21, 2013, in amounts such that the aggregate principal does not exceed $655 million at any one time. NSTAR Electric has a five-year, $450 million revolving credit agreement that expires December 31, 2012. However, unless NSTAR Electric receives necessary approvals from the DPU, the credit agreement will expire 364 days from the date of the first draw under the agreement. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement. This credit facility serves as backup to NSTAR Electric’s $450 million commercial paper program that had $141.5 million and $227.5 million outstanding balances at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, NSTAR Electric was in full compliance with its covenants in connection with its short-term credit facilities, as the total debt to capitalization ratios were 45.4% and 46.6%, respectively.
In connection with the pending merger with Northeast Utilities, NSTAR Electric received waivers and executed amendments to their revolving credit agreements necessary to allow completion of the merger.
Historically, NSTAR Electric has had a variety of external sources of financing available, as previously indicated, as favorable rates and terms to finance its external cash requirements. However, the availability of such financing at favorable rates and terms depends heavily upon prevailing market conditions and NSTAR Electric’s financial condition and credit ratings.
62
Average aggregate short-term borrowing and associated interest rates (generally money market rates) were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Average short-term borrowings | | $162.0 | | $276.8 |
Short-term average interest rate | | 0.16% | | 0.29% |
Note I. Fair Value Measurements
NSTAR Electric discloses fair value measurements pursuant to a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP. NSTAR Electric follows a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to determine fair value and requires the Company to classify assets and liabilities carried at fair value based on the observability of these inputs. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include active exchange-traded equity securities.
Level 2 – Quoted prices available in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable, and inputs derived principally from market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs from objective sources. These inputs may be based on entity-specific inputs. Level 3 inputs include all inputs that do not meet the requirements of Level 1 or Level 2.
The renewable energy contract was valued based on the difference between the contracted price and the estimated fair value of remaining contracted supply to be purchased. Inputs used to develop the estimate included on-line regional generation and forecasted demand.
The following represents the fair value hierarchy of NSTAR Electric’s financial liability that was recognized at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011. Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring Fair Value Measures: | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 | |
(in millions) | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Renewable Energy Contract(a) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | December 31, 2010 | |
(in millions) | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Renewable Energy Contract(a) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
(a) | | - | | Included in “Deferred credits and other liabilities: Power contract obligations” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets |
63
The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis where the determination of fair value includes significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
| | |
Rollforward of Level 3 Measurements |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
(in millions) | | Renewable Energy Contract |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2010 (Liability) | | $ (2) |
Total losses included on balance sheet as a regulatory asset | | (1) |
| | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ (3) |
| | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, net accounts receivable, other current assets, certain current liabilities, and notes payable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these securities.
The fair values of long-term indebtedness (excluding notes payable, including current maturities) are based on the quoted market prices of similar issues. Carrying amounts and fair values as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | |
Long-term indebtedness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(including current maturities) | | $ | 1,692,574 | | | $ | 1,909,950 | | | $ | 1,791,513 | | | $ | 1,936,680 | |
Note J. Contracts for the Purchase of Energy
As a Massachusetts distribution company, NSTAR Electric is required to obtain and resell power to retail customers through Basic Service for those who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. Basic Service rates are reset every six months (every three months for large commercial and industrial customers). The price of Basic Service is intended to reflect the average competitive market price for power. For Basic Service power supply, NSTAR Electric makes periodic market solicitations consistent with DPU regulations. NSTAR Electric enters into short-term power purchase agreements to meet its Basic Service supply obligation, ranging in term from three to twelve months. NSTAR Electric fully recovers its payments to suppliers through DPU-approved rates billed to customers.
Note K. Commitments and Contingencies
1. | Service Quality Indicators |
SQI are established performance benchmarks for certain identified measures of service quality relating to customer service and billing performance, safety and reliability and DPU Consumer Division statistics performance for all Massachusetts utilities. NSTAR Electric is required to report annually to the DPU concerning its performance as to each measure and is subject to maximum penalties of up to two and one-half percent of total transmission and distribution revenues should performance fail to meet the applicable benchmarks.
NSTAR Electric monitors its service quality continuously, and if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and is estimable, a liability is accrued. Any settlement or rate order that would result in a different liability level from what has been accrued would be adjusted in the period that the DPU issues an order determining the amount of any such liability.
64
NSTAR Electric filed its final performance report for 2010 with the DPU on March 1, 2011 and the report is pending a decision by the DPU. Based on the reports filed, no penalties were assessable for the performance year.
NSTAR Electric believes that its service quality performance level for 2011 was not in a penalty situation. The final performance report is expected to be filed with the DPU by March 1, 2012.
Emergency Preparation and Restoration of Service for Electric Customers
Under Massachusetts law and regulation, the DPU has established standards of performance for emergency preparation and restoration of service for electric companies. As a remedy to violation of those standards, the DPU is authorized to levy a penalty not to exceed $250,000 for each violation for each day that the violation persists up to a maximum penalty of $20 million for any related series of violations.
NSTAR Electric believes that it is not in a penalty situation with respect to its performance during declared emergency events to date.
2. | Contractual Commitments |
Leases
NSTAR Electric has leases for facilities and equipment, including agreements for use of transmission facilities of other providers. The estimated minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases for the years after 2011 are as follows:
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 10,938 | | |
2013 | | | 10,007 | | |
2014 | | | 7,133 | | |
2015 | | | 6,269 | | |
2016 | | | 4,934 | | |
Years thereafter | | | 10,376 | | |
| | | | | |
Total lease commitments | | $ | 49,657 | | |
| | | | | |
The total expense for leases and transmission agreements, including short-term rentals, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Lease and transmission agreements expense | | $19.8 | | $19.2 | | $22 |
Transmission
NSTAR Electric is a member of ISO-NE and is subject to the terms and conditions of the ISO-NE tariff. NSTAR Electric must pay for regional network services through that period to support the pooled transmission facilities requirements of other New England transmission owners whose facilities are used by NSTAR Electric. NSTAR Electric must, along with other transmission owners and market participants, fund a proportionate share of the RTO’s operating and capital expenditures. These payments were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Regional network transmission expense | | $228.4 | | $235.7 | | $182.6 |
65
Energy Commitments
NSTAR Electric is currently recovering payments it is making to suppliers from its customers. NSTAR Electric has financial and performance assurances and financial guarantees in place with those suppliers to protect the Company from risk in the unlikely event any of its suppliers encounter financial difficulties or fail to maintain an investment grade credit rating. This condition principally relates to NSTAR Electric’s energy supply contract to provide Basic Service to its customers. In connection with certain of these agreements, in the event NSTAR Electric should receive a credit rating below investment grade, it would be required to obtain certain financial commitments, including but not limited to, letters of credit. Refer to Note J, “Contracts for the Purchase of Energy”for a further discussion.
The following represents NSTAR Electric’s long-term energy related contractual commitments:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | Years Thereafter | | | Total | |
Electric capacity obligations | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 17 | |
Transmission obligations | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 15 | |
Renewable electric energy contracts | | | 67 | | | | 88 | | | | 87 | | | | 88 | | | | 52 | | | | 251 | | | | 633 | |
Purchase power buy-out obligations | | | 32 | | | | 27 | | | | 31 | | | | 31 | | | | 10 | | | | - | | | | 131 | |
Electric energy contract (Basic Service) | | | 411 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 411 | |
Electric interconnection agreement | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 41 | | | | 58 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total long-term energy related contractual commitments | | $ | 519 | | | $ | 125 | | | $ | 127 | | | $ | 127 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | 299 | | | $ | 1,265 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric capacity obligations represent remaining capacity costs of long-term contracts that reflect NSTAR Electric’s proportionate share of capital and fixed operating costs of certain generating units.
Transmission obligations represent the obligation to support the carrying costs of facilities utilized.
Renewable electric energy contract obligations represent projected payments under long-term agreements.
Purchase power buy-out obligations represent the buy-out/restructuring agreements for contract termination costs that reduce the amount of above-market costs that NSTAR Electric will collect from its customers through its transition charges. These agreements require NSTAR Electric to make monthly payments through September 2016.
Electric energy contracts (Basic Service) represent obligations under Basic Service load provider agreements.
The electric interconnection agreement relates to a single interconnection with a municipal utility for additional capacity into NSTAR Electric’s service territory.
3. | Electric Equity Investments |
NSTAR Electric has an equity investment of approximately 14.5% in two companies, NEH and NHH, that own and operate transmission facilities to import electricity from the Hydro-Quebec system in Canada. As an equity participant, NSTAR Electric is required to guarantee, in addition to its own share, the obligations of those participants who do not meet certain credit criteria.
NSTAR Electric has an equity ownership of 14% in CY, 14% in YA, and 4% in MY, (collectively, the Yankee Companies). CY, YA and MY plant sites have been decommissioned in accordance with NRC procedures. Amended licenses continue to apply to the ISFSI’s where spent nuclear fuel is stored at these sites. CY, YA and MY remain responsible for the security and protection of the ISFSI and are required to maintain radiation monitoring programs at the sites.
66
The accounting for decommissioning and/or security or protection costs of these three decommissioned nuclear power plants involves estimates from Yankee Companies’ management and reflect total remaining costs of approximately $39 million to be incurred for CY, YA and MY. Changes in these estimates will not affect NSTAR Electric’s results of operations or cash flows because these costs will be collected from customers through NSTAR Electric’s transition charge filings with the DPU.
Yankee Companies Spent Fuel Litigation
NSTAR Electric is part owner of three decommissioned New England nuclear power plants, the Yankee Companies. The Yankee Companies have been party to ongoing litigation at the Federal level with respect to the alleged failure of the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years through 2001 for CY and YA, and through 2002 for MY (DOE Phase I Damages). NSTAR Electric’s portion of the Phase I judgments amounts to $4.8 million, $4.6 million, and $3 million, respectively. The case has been going through the appeal process in the Federal courts, oral arguments were held in November 2011 and a final decision on this appeal could be received by May 2012.
In 2009, the Yankee Companies also filed for additional damages related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years after 2001 for CY and YA and after 2002 for MY (DOE Phase II Damages). Claim amounts applicable to Phase II for NSTAR Electric are $19 million, $12 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.
NSTAR Electric cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these pending decisions. However, should the Yankee Companies ultimately prevail, NSTAR Electric’s share of the proceeds received would be refunded to its customers.
4. | Financial and Performance Guarantees |
On a limited basis, NSTAR Electric may enter into agreements providing financial assurance to third parties.
At December 31, 2011, outstanding guarantees totaled $11.8 million as follows:
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | | | | |
Surety Bonds | | $ | 8,313 | | |
Hydro-Quebec Transmission Company Guarantees | | | 3,459 | | |
| | | | | |
Total Guarantees | | $ | 11,772 | | |
| | | | | |
Surety Bonds
As of December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric has purchased a total of $1.9 million of performance surety bonds for the purpose of obtaining licenses, permits and rights-of-way in various municipalities. In addition, NSTAR Electric has purchased approximately $6.4 million in workers’ compensation self-insurer bonds. These bonds support the guarantee by NSTAR Electric to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, required as part of the Company’s workers’ compensation self-insurance program. NSTAR Electric has indemnity agreements to provide additional financial security to its bond company in the form of a contingent letter of credit to be triggered in the event of a downgrade in the future of NSTAR Electric’s Senior Note rating to below BBB by S&P and/or to below Baa2 by Moody’s. These indemnity agreements cover both the performance surety bonds and workers’ compensation bonds.
Hydro-Quebec Transmission Company Guarantees
NSTAR Electric has issued approximately $3.5 million of residual value guarantees related to its equity interest in the Hydro-Quebec Transmission Companies, NEH and NHH.
67
Management believes the likelihood that NSTAR Electric would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these guarantees is remote.
NSTAR Electric faces possible liabilities as a result of involvement in several multi-party disposal sites, state-regulated sites or third party claims associated with contamination remediation. NSTAR Electric generally expects to have only a small percentage of the total potential liability for the majority of these sites. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, NSTAR Electric had liabilities of $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for these environmental sites. This estimated recorded liability is based on an evaluation of all currently available facts with respect to these sites.
Estimates related to environmental remediation costs are reviewed and adjusted as further investigation and assignment of responsibility occurs and as either additional sites are identified or NSTAR Electric’s responsibilities for such sites evolve or are resolved. NSTAR Electric’s ultimate liability for future environmental remediation costs may vary from these estimates. Based on NSTAR Electric’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, existing legal requirements, and regulatory policies, NSTAR Electric does not believe that these environmental remediation costs will have a material adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
6. | Regulatory and Legal Proceedings |
Rate Settlement Agreement
NSTAR Electric is operating under a DPU-approved Rate Settlement Agreement (Rate Settlement Agreement) that expires December 31, 2012. From 2007 through 2012, the Rate Settlement Agreement establishes for NSTAR Electric, among other things, annual inflation-adjusted distribution rates including a productivity offset, that are generally offset by an equal and corresponding adjustment in transition rates. The rates as of January 1 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 1, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Annual inflation-adjusted distribution rate – SIP increase (decrease) | | 0.96% | | (0.19) % | | 1.32 % | | 1.74% |
The adjustment increase will be 0.96% of distribution rates, effective January 1, 2012. Due to low inflation factors and a productivity offset, there was a slight distribution rate reduction effective January 1, 2011. Uncollected transition charges as a result of the reductions in transition rates are deferred and collected through future rates with a carrying charge. The Rate Settlement Agreement implemented a 50% / 50% earnings sharing mechanism based on NSTAR Electric’s distribution return on equity (excluding incentives) should it exceed 12.5% or fall below 8.5%. Should the return on equity fall below 7.5%, NSTAR Electric may file a request for a general rate increase. NSTAR Electric did not exceed the 12.5%, or fall below the 8.5% distribution return on equity during 2011, 2010 or 2009.
Pursuant to a 2008 DPU order, Massachusetts electric utilities must adopt rate structures that decouple the volume of energy sales from the utility’s revenues in their next rate case. The exact timing of the next rate case has not yet been determined.
DPU Safety and Reliability Programs (CPSL)
As part of the Rate Settlement Agreement, NSTAR Electric recovers incremental costs related to the double pole inspection, replacement/restoration and transfer program and the underground electric safety program, which includes stray-voltage remediation and manhole inspections, repairs, and upgrades. Recovery of these Capital Program Scheduling List (CPSL) billed costs is subject to DPU review and approval. From 2006 through 2011, NSTAR Electric has incurred a cumulative incremental revenue requirement of approximately $83 million, including $17 million incurred in 2011. These amounts include incremental operations and maintenance and revenue requirements on capital investments.
68
On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order on NSTAR Electric’s 2006 CPSL costs recovery filing. The expected recovery amount did not vary materially from the revenue previously recognized. On October 8, 2010, NSTAR Electric submitted a Compliance Filing with the DPU reconciling the recoverable CPSL Program revenue requirement for each year 2006 through 2009 with the revenues already collected to determine the proposed adjustment effective on January 1, 2011. The DPU allowed the proposed rates to go into effect on that date, subject to reconciliation of program costs. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing of subsequent DPU orders related to this filing. Should an adverse DPU decision be issued, it could have a material adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Wholesale Power Cost Savings Initiatives
The Rate Settlement Agreement includes incentives to encourage NSTAR Electric to continue its efforts to advocate on behalf of customers at the FERC to mitigate wholesale electricity cost inefficiencies that would be borne by regional customers. As a result of its role in two RMR cases, NSTAR Electric had sought to collect $9.8 million annually for three years and began collecting some of these incentive revenues from its customers effective January 1, 2007, subject to final DPU approval. Through December 31, 2009, approximately $18.9 million had been collected from customers for the Wholesale Power Cost Savings Initiatives.
On November 30, 2009, the DPU denied NSTAR Electric’s petition. NSTAR Electric refunded the $18.9 million to customers in 2010. The DPU order had no impact on earnings as the Company did not reflect the amounts collected in revenues.
Basic Service Bad Debt Adder
On July 1, 2005, in response to a generic DPU order that required electric utilities in Massachusetts to recover the energy-related portion of bad debt costs in their Basic Service rates, NSTAR Electric increased its Basic Service rates and reduced its distribution rates for those bad debt costs. In furtherance of this generic DPU order, NSTAR Electric included a bad debt cost recovery mechanism as a component of its Rate Settlement Agreement. This recovery mechanism (bad debt adder) allows NSTAR Electric to recover its Basic Service bad debt costs on a fully reconciling basis. These rates were implemented, effective January 1, 2006, as part of NSTAR Electric’s Rate Settlement Agreement.
On February 7, 2007, NSTAR Electric filed its 2006 Basic Service reconciliation with the DPU proposing an adjustment related to the increase of its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. This proposed rate adjustment was anticipated to be implemented effective July 1, 2007. On June 28, 2007, the DPU issued an order approving the implementation of a revised Basic Service rate. However, the DPU instructed NSTAR Electric to reduce distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. Such action would result in a further reduction to distribution rates from the adjustment NSTAR Electric made when it implemented the Settlement Agreement. This adjustment to NSTAR Electric’s distribution rates would eliminate the fully reconciling nature of the Basic Service bad debt adder.
NSTAR Electric has not implemented the directives of the June 28, 2007 DPU order. Implementation of this order would require NSTAR Electric to write-off a previously recorded regulatory asset related to its Basic Service bad debt costs. NSTAR Electric filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the DPU’s order on July 18, 2007. On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order and reaffirmed that NSTAR Electric should reduce its distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. On June 18, 2010, NSTAR Electric filed an appeal of the DPU’s order with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). On October 10, 2010, the SJC allowed a stay of the DPU’s order pending appeal. Briefs were filed during the summer of 2011 and oral arguments were held on December 8, 2011. A decision by the SJC is expected in the first half of 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the potential pre-tax impact to earnings of eliminating the fully reconciling nature of the bad debt adder would be
69
approximately $22 million. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the exact timing of this appeals process or the ultimate outcome. NSTAR Electric continues to believe that its position is appropriate and that it is probable upon appeal that it will ultimately prevail.
FERC Proceeding Regarding Base ROE of New England Transmission Operators
On September 30, 2011, the Attorney General of Massachusetts and other ratepayer advocates representing the six New England states, filed a complaint with the FERC seeking to reduce the 11.14% base return on equity (Base ROE) used in calculating formula rates for transmission service under the ISO-NE Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT). A change in the Base ROE would adversely impact the investor-owned utilities (New England Transmission Owners, or NETOs), including NSTAR Electric, that own transmission facilities within the footprint of ISO-NE, which serves as the regional transmission organization for New England.
On October 20, 2011, NSTAR Electric along with the other NETOs, filed their response with the FERC. In that response, the NETOs vigorously defended the appropriateness of the current FERC-approved Base ROE. The NETOs requested that the FERC summarily dismiss the complaint. Should any unfavorable ruling by FERC result in a reduction of the Base ROE, the exposure would be limited to OATT rates assessed following the complaint date of September 30, 2011. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing or outcome of this proceeding.
As of December 31, 2011, NSTAR Electric has estimated that for each 10 basis point change in the authorized base ROE would change annual earnings by approximately $0.5 million.
Legal Matters
In the normal course of its business, NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries are involved in certain legal matters, including civil litigation, for which it has appropriately recognized legal liabilities. Management has reviewed the range of reasonably possible court-ordered damages, settlement amounts, and related litigation costs (legal liabilities) that would be in excess of amounts accrued and amounts covered by insurance, and determined that the range of reasonably possible legal liabilities would not be material. Based on the information currently available, NSTAR Electric does not believe that it is probable that any such legal liabilities will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position. However, it is reasonably possible that additional legal liabilities that may result from changes in circumstances could have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
No event that would be described in response to this item 9 has occurred with respect to NSTAR Electric Company or its subsidiaries.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined underRule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
NSTAR Electric is continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations and of its internal controls. This results in modifications to its processes throughout the Company. However, there has been no change in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
70
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in theExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). A system of internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, NSTAR Electric’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on the criteria established in a report entitled“Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission” and the interpretive guidance issued by the SEC in Release No. 34-55929. Based on this evaluation, NSTAR Electric management has evaluated and concluded that NSTAR Electric’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s registered public accounting firm was not required to issue an attestation on its internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to rules of the SEC.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
Part III
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The Company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR, does not directly incur audit fees. All fees for services performed by NSTAR’s independent registered public accounting firm on behalf of NSTAR and its subsidiaries, including NSTAR Electric, are billed to NSTAR. These audit fees are proportionately allocated among NSTAR and its subsidiaries. Information regarding audit fees incurred by NSTAR for services provided by its registered public accounting firm will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the year ended December 31, 2011.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
| | |
1. Financial Statements: | | |
| | Page |
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | 36 |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 | | 37 |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 | | 38 |
| |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 | | 39 - 40 |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 | | 41 |
71
Refer to the exhibits listing beginning below.
72
Incorporated by reference unless designated otherwise:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Exhibit | | | | SEC Docket |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 2 | | | | Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
2.1 | | (i) | | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Northeast Utilities, NU Holding Energy 1 LLC, NU Holding Energy 2 LLC and NSTAR dated as of October 16, 2010 | | 2.1.i | | | | 001-14768 NSTAR 8-K dated October 18, 2010 (for agreement entered into October 16, 2010) |
| | | | | |
| | (ii) | | Amendment 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Northeast Utilities, NU Holding Energy 1 LLC, NU Holding Energy 2 LLC and NSTAR dated as of November 1, 2010 | | 2.1.ii | | | | 001-14768 NSTAR Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
| | | | | |
| | (iii) | | Amendment 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Northeast Utilities, NU Holding Energy 1 LLC, NU Holding Energy 2 LLC and NSTAR dated as of December 16, 2010 | | 2.1.iii | | | | 001-14768 NSTAR Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 3 | | | | Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
3.1 | | | | Restated Articles of Organization | | 3.1 | | | | 001-02301 Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994 |
| | | | | |
3.2 | | | | NSTAR Electric Company Bylaws dated April 19, 1977, as amended January 22, 1987, January 28, 1988, May 24, 1988, November 22, 1989, July 22, 1999, September 20, 1999, January 2, 2007 and March 1, 2011 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 4 | | | | Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
4.1 | | | | Indenture dated September 1, 1988, between NSTAR Electric Company and the Bank of New York (as successor to Bank of Montreal Trust Company) | | 4.1 | | | | 001-02301 Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1988 |
| | | | | |
4.2 | | | | Votes of the Board of Directors of NSTAR Electric Company taken October 8, 2002 re $500 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured debentures ($400 million, 4.875% due in 2012 and $100 million, floating rate due in 2005) | | 4.2 | | | | 001-02301 Form 8-K dated October 11, 2002 |
| | | | | |
4.3 | | | | A Form of 4.875% Debenture Due April 15, 2014 | | 4.3 | | | | 001-02301 Form 8-K dated April 15, 2004 |
73
| | | | | | | | | | |
4.4 | | | | A Form of 5.75% Debenture Due March 15, 2036 | | 99.2 | | | | 001-02301 Form 8-K dated March 17, 2006 |
| | | | | |
4.5 | | | | A Form of 5.625% Debenture Due November 15, 2017 | | 99.2 | | | | 001-02301 Form 8-K dated November 20, 2007 and February 13, 2009 |
| | | | | |
4.6 | | | | A Form of 5.50% Debenture Due March 15, 2040 | | 99.2 | | | | 001-02301 Form 8-K dated March 11, 2010 |
| | | | |
| | | | Management agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of any other agreements or instruments of NSTAR Electric Company and its subsidiaries defining the rights of holders of any non-registered debt whose authorization does not exceed 10% of total assets. | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 10 | | | | Material Contracts | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
10.1 | | | | NSTAR Electric Company Restructuring Settlement Agreement dated July 1997 | | 10.12 | | | | 001-02301 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 |
| | | | | |
10.2 | | | | Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (NEA A PPA), dated August 19, 2004, by and between Boston Edison and Northeast Energy Associates L.P. | | 10.18 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.3 | | | | Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (NEA B PPA), dated August 19, 2004, by and between ComElectric and Northeast Energy Associates L. P. | | 10.19 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.4 | | | | Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (CECO 1 PPA), dated August 19, 2004 by and between ComElectric and Northeast Energy Associates L. P. | | 10.20 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
| | | | | |
10.5 | | | | Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (CECO 2 PPA), dated August 19, 2004 by and between ComElectric and Northeast Energy Associates L. P. | | 10.21 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
| | | | | |
10.6 | | | | The Bellingham Execution Agreement, dated August 19, 2004 between Boston Edison, ComElectric and Northeast Energy Associates L. P. | | 10.22 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
74
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Transmission Agreements | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
10.7 | | | | Second Restated NEPOOL Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric utilities operating in New England, dated August 16, 2004 | | 10.2.1.1 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.8 | | | | Transmission Operating Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various electric transmission providers in New England and ISO New England Inc., dated February 1, 2005 | | 10.2.1.2 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.9 | | | | Market Participants Service Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric utilities operating in New England, NEPOOL and ISO New England Inc., dated February 1, 2005 | | 10.2.1.3 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.10 | | | | Rate Design and Funds Disbursement Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric transmission providers in New England, dated February 1, 2005 | | 10.2.1.4 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | |
10.11 | | | | Participants Agreement among NSTAR Electric, various electric utilities operating in New England, NEPOOL and ISO-New England, Inc., dated February 1, 2005. | | 10.2.1.5 | | | | 001-14768 Form 10-K of NSTAR for the year ended December 31, 2006 |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 12 | | | | Statement re Computation of Ratios | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
12.1 | | | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Year ended December 31, 2011 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
12.2 | | | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements for the Year ended December 31, 2011 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 21.1 | | | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 23.1 | | | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 31 | | | | Rule 13a - 15/15d-15(e) Certifications | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
31.1 | | | | Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
75
| | | | | | | | | | |
31.2 | | | | Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exhibit 32 | | | | Section 1350 Certifications | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
32.1 | | | | Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
32.2 | | | | Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Exhibit 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Exhibit 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Exhibit 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Exhibit 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Exhibit 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | |
76
SCHEDULE II
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Additions | | | Deductions | | | | |
Description | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | | Provisions Charged to Operations | | | Recoveries | | | Accounts Written Off | | | Balance At End of Year | |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | $ | 29,033 | | | $ | 22,737 | | | $ | 3,893 | | | $ | 28,545 | | | $ | 27,118 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2010 | | $ | 26,379 | | | $ | 29,889 | | | $ | 3,954 | | | $ | 31,189 | | | $ | 29,033 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2009 | | $ | 25,431 | | | $ | 29,639 | | | $ | 3,642 | | | $ | 32,333 | | | $ | 26,379 | |
77
| | | | |
FORM 10-K | | NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY | | DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
| | | | NSTAR Electric Company | | |
| | | | (Registrant) | | |
| | | |
Date: February 7, 2012 | | By: | | /s/ R. J. WEAFER, JR. | | |
| | | | Robert J. Weafer, Jr. | | |
| | | | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | | |
| | | | (Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of the 7th day of February 2012.
| | | | | | |
Signature | | | | Title | | |
| | | |
/s/ THOMAS J. MAY | | | | Chairman, President, Chief Executive | | |
Thomas J. May | | | | Officer and Director | | |
| | | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | |
/s/ JAMES J. JUDGE | | | | Senior Vice President, | | |
James J. Judge | | | | Chief Financial Officer and Director | | |
| | | | (Principal Financial Officer) | | |
| | | |
/s/ DOUGLAS S. HORAN | | | | Senior Vice President/Strategy, Law and | | |
Douglas S. Horan | | | | Policy, General Counsel and Director | | |
78