The Company accounts for income tax in accordance with ASC No. 740 which requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting of income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
It is the Company’s policy that revenue from product sales or services will be recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB No. 104”), which superseded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 101”). SAB No. 104 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company will defer any revenue for which the product was not delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.
The Company accounts for awards made under its two stock-based compensation plans pursuant to the fair value provisions of ASC No. 718. ASC No. 718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, using a fair-value based method, for costs related to all share-based payments including stock options. ASC No. 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC No. 718 and estimates its fair value based on using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. This model also requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including:
These factors could change in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation expense in future periods. In the future, we may elect to use different assumptions under the Black-Scholes valuation model or a different valuation model, which could result in a significantly different impact on our net income or loss.
The Company’s determination of fair value of share-based payment awards is made as of their respective dates of grant using the Black Scholes option valuation model. Because the Company’s options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, the Black Scholes option valuation model may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of the Company’s options. Although the fair value of the Company’s options is determined in accordance with ASC No. 718, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction. The calculated compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options.
See also Note 6 – Stock Based Compensation of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our accounting policies for stock-based compensation.
There were various accounting standards and interpretations issued during the nine month period ended September 30, 2016, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operations, or cash flows.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2016 to the three months ended September 30, 2015
Revenues:
We had revenues totaling $29,051 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $36,133 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The decrease of $7,082 is due to the termination of programmatic marketing services by our two largest customers during the second quarter of 2015.
SG&A Expenses
SG&A expenses totaled $32,893 for the six months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $48,871 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The improvement is due to headcount and other SG&A reductions in response to the loss of our two largest customers during the second quarter of 2015.
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Taxes:
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Taxes totaled $15,818 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $24,702 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The improvement is due to the aforementioned decrease in headcount and other SG&A reductions.
Net Income (Loss):
Net Loss totaled $(15,818) for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to Net Income totaling $2,067 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The decrease of $17,885 is due to the fact that we had income from discontinued operations totaling $26,769 during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the Company recording no income from discontinued operations during the current year.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to the nine months ended September 30, 2015
Revenues:
We had revenues totaling $83,958 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $374,240 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The decrease of $290,282 is due to the termination of programmatic marketing services by our two largest customers during the second quarter of 2015.
SG&A Expenses
SG&A expenses totaled $100,081 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $277,049 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The improvement is due to headcount and other SG&A reductions in response to the loss of our two largest customers during the second quarter of 2015.
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Taxes:
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Taxes totaled $61,212 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $64,441 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The improvement is due to the aforementioned headcount and other SG&A reductions.
Net Income (Loss):
Net Loss totaled $(61,212) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to Net Income of $76,806 for the corresponding period in the prior year. The decrease of $138,018 is due to the fact that we had income from discontinued operations totaling $141,247 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the Company recording no income from discontinued operations during the current year.
- 14 -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2016, we had negative working capital totaling $870,510 which included cash of only $166. Our revenue generating operations consist only of our marketing company, Enversa. Enversa’s revenues have declined steadily for the prior several years and the Company is not currently generating positive operational cash flow.
The Company’s only secured debt is the note payable to the Company’s CEO, Scott Beck (the “Senior Note”). On December 31, 2014, the Company did not make its regularly scheduled payment totaling $12,746 on the Senior Note which constituted an event of default. Mr. Beck did not call default but there can be no assurance that, as the Company’s senior secured lender, he will not do so. It is anticipated that the Company will amend the Senior Note at some future point but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in amending the terms of the Senior Note. Should we be unsuccessful in executing an amendment or an extension, Mr. Beck, as the senior secured lender, could move to seize the underlying collateral which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
We had no investing or financing activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
We have no other bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. There can be no assurance that, going forward, our operations will generate positive operating cash flow. We will most likely need to obtain additional capital in order to further expand our operations. We are currently investigating other financial alternatives, including additional equity financing. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. However, there can be no assurance that any additional financing will become available to us, and if available, that such financing will be on terms acceptable to us. If the Company cannot secure alternative financing or find a merger partner in enough time to engage its auditors, the Company will be unable to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K and this will be the Company’s last public filing.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and its chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2016. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of that date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, were not effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Remediation Plan
Management determined that a material weakness existed due to an inability to appropriately segregate duties in the accounting department due to the number of personnel in the accounting department. Management has included additional reviews and controls to mitigate the size of the accounting department and the overlap of responsibilities. Management believes the foregoing efforts will effectively remediate this material weakness but the Company can give no assurance that the additional controls will be effective. As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify the remediation plan described above. We cannot assure you that, as circumstances change, any additional material weakness will not be identified.
- 15 -
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
On March 30, 2011, the Company entered into a subordinated $389,942 promissory note (the “Senior Note”) with Scott N. Beck, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Interest on the outstanding principal amount under the Senior Note is payable at the Company’s discretion at a rate of 6.25% per annum and monthly principal payments totaling $12,746 were due beginning December 31, 2014. The Company did not make the regularly scheduled payment and has not made any of the subsequent payments, which constituted an event of default under the Senior Note.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
| | | | |
Exhibit Numbers | | Description | | Method of Filing |
| | | | |
3.1 | | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation For Nevada Profit Corporations of CornerWorld Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 6, 2015) | | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our chief executive officer | | (1) |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our chief financial officer | | (1) |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification by our chief executive officer | | (2) |
32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification by our chief financial officer | | (2) |
101 | | Interactive Data Files of Financial Statements and Notes. | | (3) |
__________
| |
(1) | Filed herewith. |
(2) | Furnished (and not filed) herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. |
(3) | To be submitted by amendment. |
- 16 -
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| CORNERWORLD CORPORATION |
| Registrant |
| |
November 21, 2016 | /s/ V. Chase McCrea III |
| V. Chase McCrea III |
| Chief Financial Officer |
- 17 -