Severance Benefits would be subject to the Executive Officer’s execution and non-revocation of an effective release of claims, and continued compliance with restrictive covenants. In connection with entering into the Executive Severance Agreements, the Executive Officers and the Company have agreed to modify the Executive Officers’ existing restrictive covenant arrangements, or enter into new restrictive covenant arrangements, that would provide for a non-compete and non-solicit period of two years following the employment termination date. For purposes of the Executive Severance Agreements, “Good Reason” would be defined to include (i) a material diminution in the Executive Officer’s base salary or target annual bonus opportunity; (ii) any material diminution in the Executive Officer’s position, authority, responsibilities or reporting line; (iii) the Company’s material breach of the Executive Severance Agreement or any other agreement with the Executive Officer; or (iv) a relocation of the Executive Officer’s primary work location by more than 25 miles from the Executive Officer’s primary work location.
Item 5.03. | Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year. |
On January 13, 2025, the Company Board approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “Bylaws”), which became effective immediately (the “Bylaws Amendment”). The Bylaws Amendment added a new Article X to the Bylaws, which provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for certain legal actions involving the Company will be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. If the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks jurisdiction over such action or proceeding, the sole and exclusive forum for such action or proceeding shall be a state court located within the State of Delaware or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has subject matter jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware. The Bylaws Amendment also provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Bylaws Amendment also provides that the new Article X to the Bylaws will not apply to claims brought pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
The foregoing description of the Bylaws Amendment is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Bylaws Amendment, which is filed as Exhibit 3.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
On January 14, 2025, the Company and Parent issued a joint press release announcing the entry into the Merger Agreement. A copy of the joint press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and incorporated by reference herein.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, known as the PSLRA. Forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and, therefore, investors should not place undue reliance on them. No forward-looking statement, including any such statement concerning the completion and anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction, can be guaranteed, and actual results may differ materially from those projected. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about the business and future financial results of the equipment rental industries, and other legal, regulatory and economic developments. H&E Equipment Services uses words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “projects,” “future,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “targets,” “potential,” “continue,” “guidance” and similar expressions to identify these forward-looking statements that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA. Actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those described in the SEC reports filed by United Rentals and H&E Equipment Services, as well as the possibility that (1) United Rentals and H&E Equipment Services may be unable to obtain regulatory approvals required for the proposed transaction or may be required to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the acquisition as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; (2) the length of time necessary to consummate the proposed transaction may be longer than anticipated; (3) H&E Equipment Services’