Accellent 10-Q 2008 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________ 

Form 10-Q

_______________ 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

Commission File Number: 333-130470

Accellent Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	84-1507827
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

100 Fordham Road
Wilmington, Massachusetts	01887
(Address of registrant’s principal executive offices)	(Zip code)
(978) 570-6900
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o  No   x

As of August 3, 2007, 1,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock were outstanding.  The registrant is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accellent Holdings Corp.

Table of Contents

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
	ITEM 1.	Financial Statements	3
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
		Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
	ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
	ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33
	ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	33
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION		34
	ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	34
	ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	34
	ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	34
	ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	34
	ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	34
	ITEM 5.	Other Information	34
	ITEM 6.	Exhibits	35
Signatures			36

2

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ACCELLENT INC.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

(in thousands)

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,381		$	2,746
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,329 and $1,913, respectively		51,544			49,994
Inventories		65,963			57,962
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,255			4,169
Total current assets		130,143			114,871
Property and equipment, net		130,887			128,573
Goodwill		798,827			847,213
Intangibles, net		216,914			258,904
Deferred financing costs and other assets		25,382			24,033
Total assets	$	1,302,153		$	1,373,594
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	4,010		$	4,014
Accounts payable		24,194			20,338
Accrued payroll and benefits		8,906			7,022
Accrued interest		5,419			5,171
Accrued income taxes		3,864			2,601
Accrued expenses		12,004			12,468
Total current liabilities		58,397			51,614
Notes payable and long-term debt		710,764			696,515
Other long-term liabilities		35,177			39,205
Total liabilities		804,338			787,334
Stockholder’s equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		624,221			624,058
Accumulated other comprehensive income		5,001			3,263
Accumulated deficit, including an adjustment of $(509) for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle at January 1, 2007		(131,407	)		(41,061	)
Total stockholder’s equity		497,815			586,260
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	1,302,153		$	1,373,594

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

ACCELLENT INC.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
Net sales	$	119,081		$	124,727		$	230,565		$	246,408
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization)		88,756			85,196			169,103			175,545
Gross profit		30,325			39,531			61,462			70,863
Selling, general and administrative expenses		11,740			16,278			24,227			33,259
Research and development expenses		611			896			1,351			1,872
Restructuring charges		36			568			708			2,297
Amortization of intangibles		3,735			4,301			8,036			8,602
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets		1,287			—			82,340			—
Income (loss) from operations		12,916			17,488			(55,200	)		24,833
Interest expense, net		(16,757	)		(16,312	)		(32,914	)		(32,073	)
Gain on derivative instruments		142			2,646			58			6,100
Other expense		(115	)		(395	)		(94	)		(421	)
(Loss) income before income taxes		(3,814	)		3,427			(88,150	)		(1,561	)
Income tax expense		274			1,190			1,686			2,864
Net (loss) income	$	(4,088	)	$	2,237		$	(89,836	)	$	(4,425	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

ACCELLENT INC.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands)

	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(89,836	)	$	(4,425	)
Cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		17,736			16,652
Amortization of debt discounts and non-cash interest expense		2,000			1,942
Impairment charge		82,340			—
Deferred income taxes		141			1,434
Stock-based compensation (credit) expense		(3,720	)		3,261
Impact of inventory step-up related to inventory sold		—			6,422
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments		(58	)		(6,051	)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		(29	)		175
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Increase in accounts receivable		(1,464	)		(5,809	)
Increase in inventories		(7,909	)		(5,539	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other		(84	)		429
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		5,822			(3,440	)
Repurchase of employee stock options		(395	)		(1,841	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,544			3,210
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(11,417	)		(16,233	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		119			354
Proceeds from note receivable		—			199
Acquisition of business		—			(112	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,298	)		(15,792	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt		34,000			17,000
Principal payments on long-term debt		(20,008	)		(10,047	)
Repurchase of parent company common stock		—			(89	)
Deferred financing fees		(1,657	)		(1,384	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,335			5,480
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES IN CASH:		54			74
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,635			(7,028	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,746			8,669
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,381		$	1,641
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for interest	$	30,667		$	31,050
Cash paid for income taxes		791			3,058
Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable		1,661			3,070

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

ACCELLENT INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2007

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Accellent Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), consistent in all material respects with those applied in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Interim financial reporting does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The interim financial information is unaudited, but reflects all normal adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.  Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.  The balance sheet data at December 31, 2006 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all the disclosures required by GAAP.

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accellent Acquisition Corp., which is owned by Accellent Holdings Corp.  Both of these companies were formed to facilitate the November 22, 2005 merger with Accellent Merger Sub Inc., a corporation formed by investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR) and Bain Capital (Bain). The acquisition was accomplished through the merger of Accellent Merger Sub Inc. into Accellent Inc. with Accellent Inc. being the surviving company (the “Transaction”).

The Company’s accounting for the Transaction follows the requirements of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 54, Topic 5-J, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” which require that purchase accounting treatment of the Transaction be “pushed down” to the Company resulting in the adjustment of all net assets to their respective fair values as of the date the Transaction occurred.

Nature of Operations

The Company is engaged in providing product development and design services, custom manufacturing of components, assembly of finished devices and supply chain management services primarily for the medical device industry. Sales are focused in both domestic and European markets.

The management of the Company is aligned with the three medical device markets which it serves.  As a result of this alignment, the Company has three operating segments: endoscopy, cardiology and orthopaedic. The Company has determined that all of its operating segments meet the aggregation criteria of paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, and are treated as one reportable segment.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”  FIN 48 provides a standardized methodology to determine and disclose liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions.  The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 which increased its estimated tax liabilities by $0.5 million, and increased its accumulated deficit by the same amount as of the date of adoption.  For a further discussion of FIN 48, see Note 8.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement is effective in the first fiscal quarter of 2008 and the Company will adopt the statement at that time. The Company believes that the initial adoption of SFAS 157 will not have a material effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

6

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” (SFAS 158).  SFAS 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position. It also requires the recognition as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS No. 87 or 106. The statement also has new provisions regarding the measurement date as well as certain disclosure requirements. The statement is effective at fiscal year end 2007 and the Company will adopt the statement at that time. We believe the adoption of SFAS 158 will not have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB No. 115,” (SFAS 159).  SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  This statement is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company is still evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB 108). SAB 108 provides interpretative guidance on the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements and is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company applied the provisions of SAB 108 beginning in the first quarter of 2007 and there was no impact to the consolidated financial statements.

2. Intangible Assets

The Company’s Orthopaedics reporting unit experienced a decline in net sales during the fourth quarter of 2006.  Management initially expected this reporting unit to recover during the first half of 2007.  However, during the first quarter of 2007, continued weakness in new product launches by our customers within the Orthopaedic market resulted in lower than planned Orthopaedics net sales, and an operating loss for this reporting unit.  In addition, the Company’s quarterly internal financial forecast process, which was completed during April 2007, indicated that the recovery in Orthopaedics net sales and operating profitability would take longer than originally anticipated during fiscal 2006.  The Company determined that an evaluation of potential impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for the Orthopaedic reporting unit was required as of March 31, 2007 in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142) and SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).

The Company tested the long-lived assets of its Orthopaedic reporting unit for recoverability as of March 31, 2007, and determined that the Customer Base and Developed Technology intangible assets were not recoverable since the expected future undiscounted cash flows attributable to each asset were below their respective carrying values.  The Company then determined the fair value of these intangible assets to be below their respective carrying values.  The Company utilized the services of a third party valuation specialist to assist in the determination of fair value for each intangible.  The fair value of the Customer Base intangible was determined to be $7.6 million using an excess earnings approach.  The carrying value of the Customer Base intangible was $37.7 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $30.1 million.  The fair value of the Developed Technology intangible asset was determined to be $0.4 million using the relief from royalty method.  The carrying value of the Developed Technology intangible was $0.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $0.2 million.  In addition, the Company determined that the $28.2 million carrying value of property and equipment assigned to the Orthopaedic reporting unit was not impaired.

In accordance with the requirements of SFAS 142, the Company tested goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets for impairment as of March 31, 2007.  The Company determined the value of the Orthopaedics reporting unit using the assistance of a third party valuation specialist.  The fair value of the reporting unit was based on both an income approach and market approach, and was determined to be below its carrying value.  The Company then determined the implied fair value of goodwill by determining the fair value of all the assets and liabilities of the Orthopaedics reporting unit.  As a result of this process, the Company determined that the fair value of goodwill for the Orthopaedics reporting unit was $50.0 million.  The carrying value of Orthopaedics goodwill was $98.4 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $48.4 million.  In addition, the Company’s Trademark intangible asset, which has an indefinite life, was valued in accordance with SFAS 142 using a relief from royalty method, and using the assistance of a third party valuation specialist.  The fair value of the Trademark was determined to be  $29.4 million.  The carrying value of the Trademark was $33.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $3.6 million.  The Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $1.3 million for the second quarter of 2007 to revise the impairment charge to the final determined amount.

7

A summary of all charges for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):

Intangible Asset	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Impairment
Goodwill	$	98,431	$	50,045	$	48,386
Trademark		33,000		29,400		3,600
Customer base		37,745		7,600		30,145
Developed technology		579		370		209
Total	$	169,755	$	87,415	$	82,340

The Company reports all amortization expense related to intangible assets on a separate line of its statement of operations.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred amortization expense related to intangible assets which related to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006		June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Cost of sales related amortization	$	497	$	506	$	1,003	$	1,012
Selling, general and administrative related amortization		3,238		3,795		7,033		7,590
Total amortization reported	$	3,735	$	4,301	$	8,036	$	8,602

3.  Stock-Based Compensation

Employees of the Company have been granted nonqualified stock options under the 2005 Equity Plan for Key Employees of Accellent Holdings Corp. (the “2005 Equity Plan”), which provides for grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights.  The plan generally requires exercise of stock options within 10 years of grant. Vesting is determined in the applicable stock option agreement and generally occurs either in equal installments over five years from date of grant (“Time-Based”), or upon achievement of certain performance targets over a five-year period (“Performance-Based”).  The total number of shares authorized under the plan is 14,374,633.  Shares issued by Accellent Holdings Corp. (“AHC”) upon exercise are satisfied from shares authorized for issuance, and are not from treasury shares.

           As a result of the Transaction, certain employees of the Company exchanged fully vested stock options to acquire common shares of the Company for 4,901,107 fully vested stock options, or “Roll-Over” options, of AHC.  The Company may at its option elect to repurchase the Roll-Over options at fair market value from terminating employees within 60 days of termination and provide employees with settlement options to satisfy tax obligations in excess of minimum withholding rates.  As a result of these features, Roll-Over options are recorded as a liability under SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” (SFAS 123R), until such options are exercised, forfeited, expired or settled.  In accordance with SFAS 123R, the liability for Roll-Over options is recorded at fair value. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company reduced the fair value of the Roll-Over options by $2.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, due primarily to a reduction in the fair value of AHC common stock.  The decrease in the value of AHC common stock was primarily attributable to adverse business conditions impacting the Company’s Orthopaedics reporting unit.  Additionally, as a result of the exercise of Roll-Over options during the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company was required to repurchase 144,214 options at a cost of $394,937 to allow former employees to satisfy tax obligations.  As of June 30, 2007, the Company had 4,044,450 Roll-Over options outstanding at an aggregate fair value of $11,495,560 which is presented in other long-term liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.

8

The table below summarizes the activity relating to the Roll-Over options during the six months ended June 30, 2007:

	Amount of  Liability			Roll-Over Shares  Outstanding
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	16,814,056			4,305,358
Shares repurchased		(394,937	)		(144,214	)
Shares exercised		(583,467	)		(116,694	)
Fair value adjustment of liability		(4,340,092	)		—
Balance at June 30, 2007	$	11,495,560			4,044,450

The Company’s Roll-Over options have an exercise price of $1.25, and a fair value of $4.00 as of the date of the Transaction.  As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Roll-Over options had a fair value of $2.84 and $3.91, respectively, based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:

	As of June 30, 2007			As of December 31, 2006
Expected term to exercise	4.0 years			4.3 years
Expected volatility		24.00	%		27.74	%
Risk-free rate		4.92	%		4.79	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%

The Black-Scholes option pricing model used to value the Roll-Over options, Time-Based and Performance-Based options include an estimate of the fair value of Accellent Holdings Corp. common stock.  The fair value of Accellent Holdings Corp. common stock has been determined by the Board of Directors of Accellent Holdings Corp. at each stock measurement date based on a variety of factors, including the Company’s financial position, historical financial performance, projected financial performance, valuations of publicly traded peer companies, the illiquid nature of the common stock and arm’s length sales of Accellent Holdings Corp. common stock.  Third party valuations are utilized periodically to validate assumptions made.

Expected term to exercise is based on the simplified method as provided by SAB 107.  The Company and its parent company have no historical volatility since their shares have never been publicly traded.  Accordingly, the volatility used has been estimated by management using volatility information from a peer group of publicly traded companies. The risk free rate is based on the US Treasury rate for notes with a term equal to the option’s expected term.  The dividend yield assumption of 0% is based on the Company’s history of not paying dividends on common shares.  The requisite service period is five years from date of grant.

For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a credit for employee stock-based compensation expense of $2,890,119 including a $73,582 credit recorded to cost of sales and a $2,816,537 credit recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recognized a credit for employee stock-based compensation expense of $4,760,547 including a $113,571 credit recorded to cost of sales and a $4,646,976 credit recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company records employee stock-based compensation expense using the graded attribution method, which results in higher compensation expense in the earlier periods for each award than recognition on a straight-line method.  For Performance-Based options, compensation expense is recorded when the achievement of performance targets is considered probable.  The Company has determined that the achievement of performance targets for all Performance-Based options is not probable at June 30, 2007.   If in the event that financial growth targets are achieved in future periods, the Company would be required to record employee stock-based compensation expense for the Performance-Based options once the achievement of financial growth targets becomes probable.

9

Stock option transaction activity during the six months ended June 30, 2007 was as follows:

	2005 Equity Plan					Roll-Over Options
	Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price		Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		4,474,514		$	5.00		4,305,358		$	1.25
Granted		107,500			—		—			—
Exercised/ repurchased		—			—		(260,908	)		1.25
Forfeited		(2,312,467	)		5.00		—			—
Outstanding at June 30, 2007		2,269,547		$	5.00		4,044,450		$	1.25
Exercisable at June 30, 2007		349,704		$	5.00		4,044,450		$	1.25

As of June 30, 2007, the weighted average remaining contractual life of options granted under the 2005 Equity Plan was 8.7 years.  Options outstanding under the 2005 Equity Plan had no intrinsic value as of June 30, 2007.

As of June 30, 2007, the weighted average remaining contractual life of the Roll-Over options was 6.2 years.  The aggregate intrinsic value of the Roll-Over options was $11.1 million as of June 30, 2007.  The total intrinsic value of Roll-Over options settled during the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $1.0 million.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $1.4 million of unearned stock-based compensation expense that will be recognized over approximately 5.0 years based on the remaining weighted average vesting period of all outstanding stock options.

At June 30, 2007, 12,105,086 shares are available to grant under the 2005 Equity Plan For Key Employees of Accellent Holdings Corp.

During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded $566,667 of non-employee stock based compensation, including $6,667 of AHC phantom stock earned by directors of AHC in accordance with the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, $400,000 of stock earned by Capstone Consulting (“Capstone”) for integration consulting services and $160,000 earned for executive recruitment services.  For a further discussion of Capstone, see Note 11.

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded $1,040,667 of non-employee stock-based compensation, including $30,667 of AHC phantom stock earned by directors of AHC in accordance with the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, $850,000 of stock earned by Capstone for integration consulting services and $160,000 earned for executive recruiting services.

4.  Restructuring Charges

During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, all restructuring costs incurred by the Company were recorded in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” (SFAS 146).

During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recognized $36,000 of restructuring charges to adjust certain severance payments for restructuring actions taken in prior periods.

The Company recognized $0.7 million of restructuring charges during the six months ended June 30, 2007 which consisted almost entirely of severance costs to eliminate 18 positions in both manufacturing and administrative areas as part of a company-wide program to reduce costs and centralize certain administrative functions.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized $0.6 million of restructuring charges including $0.5 million of severance costs and $0.1 million of other exit costs.  Severance costs include $0.3 million for the elimination of 72 manufacturing positions in the Company’s Juarez, Mexico facility due to the expiration of a customer contract and $0.2 million for other workforce reductions.  Other exit costs relate primarily to the cost of transferring production from a closed production facility to other production facilities of the Company.

10

The Company recognized $2.3 million of restructuring charges during the six months ended June 30, 2006, including $1.7 million of severance costs and $0.6 million of other exit costs. Severance costs include $1.1 million for the elimination of 26 positions in primarily selling, general and administrative functions, $0.4 million for the elimination of 170 manufacturing positions in the Company’s Juarez, Mexico facility due to the expiration of a customer contract and $0.2 million for other workforce reductions.  Other exit costs relate primarily to the cost of transferring production from a closed production facility to other existing facilities of the Company.

The following table summarizes the recorded accruals and activity related to restructuring for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Severance			Other costs			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2006	$	1,737		$	191		$	1,928
Restructuring charges incurred		684			24			708
Payments		(1,683	)		(128	)		(1,811	)
Balance as of June 30, 2007	$	738		$	87		$	825

The accrued restructuring balance of $0.8 million at June 30, 2007 consists primarily of $0.7 million of severance costs for the various cost reduction initiatives implemented during 2006, and $0.1 million of facility closure costs.  All accrued restructuring costs at June 30, 2007 are expected to be paid within twelve months.

5.  Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Comprehensive (loss) income represents net loss plus the results of any stockholder’s equity changes related to currency translation and changes in the carrying value of the effective portion of interest rate hedging instruments on the Company’s cash flows related to interest obligations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded comprehensive (loss) income of the following (in thousands):

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006		June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
Net (loss) income	$	(4,088	)	$	2,237	$	(89,836	)	$	(4,425	)
Gain on interest rate hedging instruments		2,281			—		1,381			—
Cumulative translation adjustments		248			518		357			643
Comprehensive (loss) gain	$	(1,559	)	$	2,755	$	(88,098	)	$	(3,782	)

6.  Inventories

Inventories at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Raw materials	$	22,690	$	22,556
Work-in-process		25,569		20,354
Finished goods		17,704		15,052
Total	$	65,963	$	57,962

11

7.  Short-term and long-term debt

Long-term debt at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
Credit Agreement dated November 22, 2005, term loan, interest 7.86% at June 30, 2007 and 7.37% at December 31, 2006	$	394,000		$	396,000
Credit Agreement dated November 22, 2005, revolving loan		19,000			3,000
Senior Subordinated Notes maturing December 1, 2013, interest at 10.5%		305,000			305,000
Capital lease obligations		13			21
Total debt		718,013			704,021
Less—unamortized discount on senior subordinated notes		(3,239	)		(3,492	)
Less—current portion		(4,010	)		(4,014	)
Long-term debt, excluding current portion	$	710,764		$	696,515

The Company’s senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) includes up to $75.0 million available under a revolving credit facility.  During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company drew $34.0 million in revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement, and repaid $18.0 million in revolving credit loans.  As of June 30, 2007 the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility was $19.0 million, while $5.9 million of the revolving credit facility was supporting the Company’s letters of credit, leaving $50.1 million available for additional borrowings.

The company has the option to select borrowing rates for the revolver portion of the Credit Agreement at ABR, defined under the Credit Agreement as the greater of the Prime Rate or Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or LIBOR.  As of June 30, 2007 the outstanding revolver balance of $19.0 million included $3.0 million at the ABR rate of 9.75% and $16.0 million at the LIBOR rate of 7.82%.  All of the $3.0 million of the outstanding revolver loans at December 31, 2006 incurred interest at the ABR rate of 9.5%.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Agreement and the Senior Subordinated Notes (the  “Notes”).  On April 27, 2007, the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders under the Credit Agreement, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment revises certain financial ratios and increases interest rates charged on both term loans and revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment is effective April 27, 2007.

As a result of the Amendment, the maximum ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (“Leverage Ratio”) may not exceed 8.50 to 1.00 through the quarter ended September 30, 2008, 8.00 to 1.00 for the next four quarters, declines thereafter by 1.00x on an annual basis until September 30, 2012 and declines to 4.50 to 1.00 on October 1, 2012.  The minimum ratio of consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated interest expense (“Coverage Ratio”) is amended to not be less than 1.25 to 1.00 through the quarter ended September 30, 2008, and increases on October 1 of each year through 2012 commencing October 1, 2008 to 1.35x, 1.55x, 1.75x, 2.00x and 2.10x.

In addition, the Amendment provides that for the revolving credit portion of the facility (i) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 8.00 to 1.00, the “Applicable Rate” as defined under the facility would be equal to 1.75% for ABR Loans and Swingline Loans and 2.75% for Eurodollar Loans (each as defined under the facility), with a 0.50% fee for undrawn commitments, (ii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 7.00 to 1.00 but is equal to or less than 8.00 to 1.00, the Applicable Rate would be equal to 1.50% for ABR Loans and Swingline Loans and 2.50% for Eurodollar Loans, with a 0.50% fee for undrawn commitments and (iii) in all other cases the Applicable Rate and commitment fees are as currently provided for in the original facility.  The Amendment also provides that for the term loan portion of the facility (i) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 8.00 to 1.00, the Applicable Rate is equal to 1.75% for ABR Loans and 2.75% for Eurodollar Loans, (ii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 6.00 to 1.00 but is equal to or less than 8.00 to 1.00 the Applicable Rate is equal to 1.50% for ABR Loans and 2.50% for Eurodollar Loans and (iii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio is equal to or less than 6.00 to 1.00 the Applicable Rate would be equal to 1.25% for ABR Loans and 2.25% for Eurodollar Loans.

In connection with the amendment, the Company paid approximately $1.7 million of fees to the lenders under the facility, inclusive of reimbursement of lender expenses.  As these fees were paid to the lenders in connection with the modification of the Credit Agreement, these costs were capitalized as deferred financing fees.

12

Interest expense, net, as presented in the statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 includes interest income of $69,100 and $64,692, respectively.

The Notes contain an embedded derivative in the form of a change of control put option. The put option allows the note holder to put back the note to the Company in the event of a change of control for cash equal to the value of 101% of the principal amount of the note, plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The change of control put option is separately accounted for pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The Company has determined that the change of control put option had de minimus value at both the issuance date of the Notes, November 22, 2005, and at June 30, 2007, as the likelihood of the note holders exercising the put option, should a change of control occur, has been assessed by management as being remote.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement have variable interest rates. The Company has entered into interest rate swap and collar agreements to mitigate exposures to changes in cash flows from movements in variable interest rates. The interest rate swap agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge effective November 30, 2006.  Upon designation as an accounting hedge, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap which relate to the effective portion of the hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged interest expense affects earnings.  Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap which relate to the ineffective portion of the interest rate swap are recorded in other income (expense).  For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded other comprehensive income of $2,281,722 relating to the change in fair value for the effective portion of the interest rate swap, and other income of $37,445 relating to the change in fair value for the ineffective portion of the interest rate swap.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded other comprehensive income of $1,380,683 relating to the change in fair value for the effective portion of the interest rate swap, and other income of $16,528 relating to the change in fair value for the ineffective portion of the interest rate swap.  The fair value of the interest rate swap asset at June 30, 2007 was $2,635,099.  The interest rate collar agreement has not been designated as a cash flow hedge.  Therefore, changes in the fair value of the interest rate collar are recorded as other income (expense).  For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded other income of $104,560 relating to the change in fair value of the interest rate collar.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded other income of $41,364 relating to the change in fair value of the interest rate collar.  The fair value of the interest rate collar asset at June 30, 2007 was $14,674.

8.  Income taxes

Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $0.3 million and included $0.8 million of deferred income taxes for differences in the book and tax treatment of goodwill, $0.6 million of foreign income taxes and $0.2 million of state income taxes.  These income tax expenses were partially offset by a deferred tax credit of $1.3 million due to the impairment charge of $3.6 million recorded for the Trademark intangible asset.  Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $1.2 million and included $0.8 million of deferred income taxes for the different book and tax treatment of goodwill, $0.3 million of foreign income taxes and $0.1 million of state income taxes.

Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $1.7 million and included $1.5 million of deferred income taxes for the differences in the book and tax treatment of goodwill, $1.2 million of foreign income taxes and $0.3 million of state income taxes.  These income tax expenses were partially offset by a deferred tax credit of $1.3 million due to the impairment charge of $3.6 million recorded for the Trademark intangible asset.  Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $2.9 million and included $1.4 million of deferred income taxes for the differences in the book and tax treatment of goodwill, $0.9 million of foreign income taxes and $0.6 million of state income taxes. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of its domestic federal and state deferred tax assets.  As a result, the Company continues to provide a full valuation reserve.  SFAS No.109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” prevents the netting of deferred tax assets with deferred tax liabilities related to certain intangible assets.  The Company has $15.4 million and $15.3 million of deferred tax liabilities included in other long-term liabilities on its consolidated condensed balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, relating to certain intangible assets.

The Company or certain of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As a result of the Company’s ability to carry forward federal and state net operating losses, the applicable tax years remain open to examination until three years after the applicable loss carry forwards have been used or expire. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for years before 2003.  With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. state or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.

13

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.  As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized approximately a $0.5 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of accumulated deficit.  The liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $3.5 million, all of which would have an affect on the effective income tax rate in the period recognized.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.  The Company had approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the payment of interest and penalties, respectively, accrued at January 1, 2007.

9.  Capital Stock

The Company has 50,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 1,000 shares issued and outstanding, $.01 value per share. All shares are owned by Accellent Acquisition Corp., which is owned by Accellent Holdings Corp.

The following table summarizes the activity for amounts recorded as additional paid-in capital for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

Beginning balance, January 1, 2007	$	624,058
Exercise of stock options		583
Stock-based compensation credit		(420	)
Ending balance, June 30, 2007	$	624,221

10.  Pension Plans

Components of the Company’s net periodic pension cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
Service cost	$	16		$	26		$	33		$	52
Interest cost		41			37			82			73
Expected return of plan assets		(18	)		(15	)		(35	)		(30	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		—			9			—			17
	$	39		$	57		$	80		$	112

Assuming that the actual return on plan assets is consistent with the expected annualized rate of 7.0% for the remainder of fiscal year 2007, and that interest rates remain constant, the Company would be required to make total contributions to its pension plans of $94,000 for fiscal year 2007.

14

11. Related Party Transactions

In connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into a management services agreement with KKR pursuant to which KKR will provide certain structuring, consulting and management advisory services.  Pursuant to this agreement, KKR will receive an annual advisory fee of $1.0 million, such amount to increase by 5% per year.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company incurred KKR management fees and related expenses of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred KKR management fees and related expenses of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.  As of June 30, 2007, the Company owed KKR $0.3 million for unpaid management fees which are included in current accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.  In addition, an entity to whom KKR provides financing, Capstone, provides integration consulting services to the Company.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company incurred $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of integration consulting fees for the services of Capstone.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of integration consulting fees for the services of Capstone.  As of June 30, 2007 the Company owed Capstone $1.0 million for unpaid consulting fees, $0.1 million of which are included in current accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and $0.9 million to be paid in common stock of AHC which is included in other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

12.  Contingency

On July 23, 2007, the Company was notified by the Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future and Montgomery Neighbors for a Clean Environment of their intent to file a citizen suit against the Company and an unrelated party based upon alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Hazardous Site Cleanup Act.  To date, no such suit has been filed.  The alleged violations relate to the emission of trichloroethylene (“TCE”) by the Company’s facility in Collegeville, Pennsylvania.  Such emissions are authorized by permit.  The Company believes that they have complied with all applicable emission limits for TCE,  and intends to vigorously defend any action that may be filed in this regard.

13.  Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

In connection with Accellent Inc.’s issuance of the Notes, all of its domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) guaranteed on a joint and several, full and unconditional basis, the repayment by Accellent Inc. of such Notes. Certain foreign subsidiaries of Accellent Inc. (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have not guaranteed such indebtedness.

The following tables present the unaudited consolidating statements of operations for three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 of Accellent Inc. (“Parent”), the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, the unaudited condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the unaudited condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

15

Consolidating Statements of Operations —

Three months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	111,894		$	7,292	$	(105	)	$	119,081
Cost of sales		—			84,395			4,466		(105	)		88,756
Selling, general and administrative expenses		23			11,025			692		—			11,740
Research and development expenses		—			503			108		—			611
Restructuring charges		—			36			—		—			36
Amortization of intangibles		3,735			—			—		—			3,735
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets		1,287			—			—		—			1,287
(Loss) income from operations		(5,045	)		15,935			2,026		—			12,916
Interest (expense) income, net		(16,759	)		2			—		—			(16,757	)
Gain on derivative instruments		142			—			—		—			142
Other (expense) income		—			(168	)		53		—			(115	)
Equity in earnings of affiliates		17,574			1,623			—		(19,197	)		—
Income tax (benefit) expense		—			(182	)		456		—			274
Net (loss) income	$	(4,088	)	$	17,574		$	1,623	$	(19,197	)	$	(4,088	)

Consolidating Statements of Operations —

Three months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	119,720		$	5,035		$	(28	)	$	124,727
Cost of sales		—			82,223			3,001			(28	)		85,196
Selling, general and administrative expenses		73			15,725			480			—			16,278
Research and development expenses		—			796			100			—			896
Restructuring charges		—			568			—			—			568
Amortization of intangibles		4,301			—			—			—			4,301
(Loss) income from operations		(4,374	)		20,408			1,454			—			17,488
Interest (expense) income, net		(16,334	)		22			—			—			(16,312	)
Gain on derivative instruments		2,646			—			—			—			2,646
Other expense		—			(371	)		(24	)		—			(395	)
Equity in earnings of affiliates		20,299			1,198			—			(21,497	)		—
Income tax expense		—			958			232			—			1,190
Net income (loss)	$	2,237		$	20,299		$	1,198		$	(21,497	)	$	2,237

16

Consolidating Statements of Operations —

Six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	217,437		$	13,462	$	(334	)	$	230,565
Cost of sales		—			161,117			8,320		(334	)		169,103
Selling, general and administrative expenses		47			22,850			1,330		—			24,227
Research and development expenses		—			1,118			233		—			1,351
Restructuring charges		—			708			—		—			708
Amortization of intangibles		8,036			—			—		—			8,036
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets		82,340			—			—		—			82,340
(Loss) income from operations		(90,423	)		31,644			3,579		—			(55,200	)
Interest expense, net		(32,914	)		—			—		—			(32,914	)
Gain on derivative instruments		58			—			—		—			58
Other (expense) income		—			(247	)		153		—			(94	)
Equity in earnings of affiliates		33,443			2,847			—		(36,290	)		—
Income tax expense		—			801			885		—			1,686
Net (loss) income	$	(89,836	)	$	33,443		$	2,847	$	(36,290	)	$	(89,836	)

Consolidating Statements of Operations —

Six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	236,488		$	10,143	$	(223	)	$	246,408
Cost of sales		6,422			163,239			6,107		(223	)		175,545
Selling, general and administrative expenses		73			32,212			974		—			33,259
Research and development expenses		—			1,673			199		—			1,872
Restructuring charges		—			2,297			—		—			2,297
Amortization of intangibles		8,602			—			—		—			8,602
(Loss) income from operations		(15,097	)		37,067			2,863		—			24,833
Interest (expense) income, net		(32,061	)		(13	)		1		—			(32,073	)
Gain on derivative instruments		6,100			—			—		—			6,100
Other (expense) income		—			(478	)		57		—			(421	)
Equity in earnings of affiliates		36,633			2,282			—		(38,915	)		—
Income tax expense		—			2,225			639		—			2,864
Net (loss) income	$	(4,425	)	$	36,633		$	2,282	$	(38,915	)	$	(4,425	)

17

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Parent		Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	6,117	$	2,264	$	—		$	8,381
Receivables, net		—		48,512		3,075		(43	)		51,544
Inventories		—		62,220		3,743		—			65,963
Prepaid expenses and other		4,690		4,108		95		(4,638	)		4,255
Total current assets		4,690		120,957		9,177		(4,681	)		130,143
Property, plant and equipment, net		—		121,061		9,826		—			130,887
Intercompany receivable		—		—		5,278		(5,278	)		—
Investment in subsidiaries		181,495		17,092		—		(198,587	)		—
Goodwill		798,827		—		—		—			798,827
Intangibles, net		216,914		—		—		—			216,914
Deferred financing costs and other assets		24,169		1,111		102		—			25,382
Total assets	$	1,226,095	$	260,221	$	24,383	$	(208,546	)	$	1,302,153
Current portion of long-term debt	$	4,000	$	10	$	—	$	—		$	4,010
Accounts payable		—		22,358		1,911		(75	)		24,194
Accrued liabilities		—		31,860		2,971		(4,638	)		30,193
Total current liabilities		4,000		54,228		4,882		(4,713	)		58,397
Note payable and long-term debt		710,760		4		—		—			710,764
Intercompany payable		873		4,373		—		(5,246	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		12,647		20,121		2,409		—			35,177
Total liabilities		728,280		78,726		7,291		(9,959	)		804,338
Equity		497,815		181,495		17,092		(198,587	)		497,815
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,226,095	$	260,221	$	24,383	$	(208,546	)	$	1,302,153

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	693	$	2,053	$	—		$	2,746
Receivables, net		—			47,837		2,195		(38	)		49,994
Inventories		—			54,927		3,035		—			57,962
Prepaid expenses and other		117			3,901		151		—			4,169
Total current assets		117			107,358		7,434		(38	)		114,871
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			119,692		8,881		—			128,573
Intercompany receivable		21,628			101,548		5,080		(128,256	)		—
Investment in subsidiaries		147,694			15,478		—		(163,172	)		—
Goodwill		847,213			—		—		—			847,213
Intangibles, net		258,904			—		—		—			258,904
Other assets, net		22,855			1,078		100		—			24,033
Total assets	$	1,298,411		$	345,154	$	21,495	$	(291,466	)	$	1,373,594
Current portion of long-term debt	$	4,000		$	14	$	—	$	—		$	4,014
Accounts payable		7			18,929		1,440		(38	)		20,338
Accrued liabilities		(5,390	)		30,355		2,297		—			27,262
Total current liabilities		(1,383	)		49,298		3,737		(38	)		51,614
Note payable and long-term debt		696,508			7		—		—			696,515
Other long-term liabilities		17,026			148,155		2,280		(128,256	)		39,205
Total liabilities		712,151			197,460		6,017		(128,294	)		787,334
Equity		586,260			147,694		15,478		(163,172	)		586,260
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,298,411		$	345,154	$	21,495	$	(291,466	)	$	1,373,594

18

Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows—

Six  months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(34,876	)	$	36,083		$	3,337		$	—	$	4,544
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		—			(9,972	)		(1,445	)		—		(11,417	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		—			119			—			—		119
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(9,853	)		(1,445	)		—		(11,298	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt		34,000			—			—			—		34,000
Principal payments on long-term debt		(20,000	)		(8	)		—			—		(20,008	)
Intercompany receipts (advances)		22,533			(20,816	)		(1,717	)		—		—
Deferred financing fees		(1,657	)		—			—			—		(1,657	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		34,876			(20,824	)		(1,717	)		—		12,335
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash		—			18			36			—		54
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			5,424			211			—		5,635
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		—			693			2,053			—		2,746
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	—		$	6,117		$	2,264		$	—	$	8,381

Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows—

Six  months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

	Parent			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(27,579	)	$	28,172		$	2,617		$	—	$	3,210
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		—			(14,826	)		(1,407	)		—		(16,233	)
Transferred assets		—			—			—			—		—
Proceeds from sale of equipment		—			354			—			—		354
Proceeds from note receivable		—			199			—			—		199
Acquisition of business		(4	)		(108	)		—			—		(112	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(4	)		(14,381	)		(1,407	)		—		(15,792	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt		17,000			—			—			—		17,000
Principal payments on long-term debt		(10,000	)		(47	)		—			—		(10,047	)
Intercompany receipts (advances)		22,056			(19,631	)		(2,425	)		—		—
Repurchase of parent company stock		(89	)		—			—			—		(89	)
Deferred financing fees		(1,384	)		—			—			—		(1,384	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		27,583			(19,678	)		(2,425	)		—		5,480
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash		—			28			46			—		74
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		—			(5,859	)		(1,169	)		—		(7,028	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		—			6,813			1,856			—		8,669
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	—		$	954		$	687		$	—	$	1,641

19

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Some of the information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, certain statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases you can identify these “forward-looking statements” by words like “may,”  “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those indicated in these statements as a result of certain factors as more fully discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” contained in our annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2007 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 333-130470) for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein.

We undertake no obligation to update publicly or publicly revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-Q to “Accellent,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Accellent Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, which were acquired pursuant to the Transaction (as described below).

Overview

We believe that we are the largest provider of outsourced precision manufacturing and engineering services in our target markets of the medical device industry.  We offer our customers design and engineering, precision component manufacturing, device assembly and supply chain management services. We have extensive resources focused on providing our customers with reliable, high quality, cost-efficient, integrated outsourced solutions. Based on discussions with our customers, we believe we often become the sole supplier of manufacturing and engineering services for the products we provide to our customers.

We primarily focus on the leading companies in three large and growing markets within the medical device industry: cardiology, endoscopy and orthopaedics. Our customers include many of the leading medical device companies, including Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Smith & Nephew, St. Jude Medical, Stryker, Tyco International and Zimmer. While net sales are aggregated by us to the ultimate parent of a customer, we typically generate diversified revenue streams from these large customers across separate divisions and multiple products.  During the first six months of 2007, our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 54.8% of net sales with two customers each accounting for greater than 10% of net sales.  Although we expect net sales from our largest customers to continue to constitute a significant portion of our net sales in the future, Boston Scientific has transferred a number of products assembled by us to its own assembly operation.  This transfer was essentially complete as of the end of our second quarter of 2006.  Our 2007 net sales from Boston Scientific relating to the transferred products will decrease annually by approximately $11 million as compared to our 2006 sales of these products to Boston Scientific.

On November 22, 2005, we completed our merger with Accellent Acquisition Corp., or AAC, an entity controlled by affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., or KKR, pursuant to which Accellent Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AAC, merged with and into Accellent Inc., with Accellent Inc. being the surviving entity (the “Transaction”).

Our Orthopaedics reporting unit experienced a decline in net sales during the fourth quarter of 2006.  Management initially expected this reporting unit to recover during the first half of 2007.  However, during the first quarter of 2007, continued weakness in new product launches by our customers within the Orthopaedic market resulted in lower than planned Orthopaedics net sales, and an operating loss for this reporting unit.  In addition, our quarterly internal financial forecast process, which was completed during April 2007, indicated that the recovery in Orthopaedics net sales and operating profitability would take longer than originally anticipated during fiscal 2006.  We determined that an evaluation of potential impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for the Orthopaedic reporting unit was required as of March 31, 2007 in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142) and SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).  As a result of these impairment tests, we recorded an impairment charge of $82.3 million in the first half of 2007.

20

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth percentages derived from the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, presented as a percentage of net sales.

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net Sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of Sales		74.5			68.3			73.3			71.2
Gross Profit		25.5			31.7			26.7			28.8
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		9.9			13.1			10.5			13.5
Research and Development Expenses		0.5			0.7			0.6			0.8
Restructuring Charges		0.1			0.5			0.3			0.9
Amortization of Intangibles		3.1			3.4			3.5			3.5
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets		1.1			—			35.7			—
Income from Operations		10.8			14.0			(23.9	)		10.1

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net Sales

Net sales for the second quarter of 2007 were $119.1 million, a decrease of $5.6 million, or 4.5%, compared to net sales of $124.7 million for the second quarter of 2006.  The decrease in net sales is the result of the Boston Scientific transfers which decreased net sales by $4.3 million, and a $3.6 million decrease in sales volume, primarily in the orthopaedic market.  These increases were partially offset by $1.8 million in higher precious metals pass-through charges to our customers, and $0.5 million of favorable currency translation on foreign net sales.  One customer, Johnson & Johnson, accounted for greater than 10% of net sales for the second quarter of 2007.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the second quarter of 2007 was $30.3 million compared to $39.5 million for the second quarter of 2006.  The $9.2 million decrease in gross profit was a result of a less favorable product mix which decreased gross profit by $4.1 million, a decrease in sales volume which reduced gross profit by $3.5 million and increases in our manufacturing costs of $1.8 million.  The increase in manufacturing costs was the result of $0.6 million of increased depreciation expense, $0.4 million to transfer production of certain products within our manufacturing facilities, $0.4 million of employment grants received in the 2006 period which offset production costs in that period and other net cost increases of $0.4 million.  These increases were partially offset by $0.2 million of favorable currency translation on foreign net sales.

Gross margin was 25.5% of net sales for the second quarter of 2007 compared to 31.7% of net sales for the second quarter of 2006.  The decrease in gross margin is attributable to a less favorable product mix which reduced gross margin by 3.4%, increased manufacturing costs which decreased gross margin by 1.5%, lower absorption of our fixed cost structure due to lower net sales which reduced gross margin by 0.8% and the pass through of precious metals charges to our customers for which we do not earn a profit which reduced gross margin by 0.5%.

21

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses were $11.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $16.3 million for the second quarter of 2006.   The $4.6 million decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to a reduction in non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.4 million primarily due to the decrease in value of Accellent Holdings Corp. common stock as of June 30, 2007.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development, or R&D, expenses for the second quarter of 2007 were $0.6  million compared to $0.9  million for the second quarter of 2006, primarily due to higher research material costs in the 2006 period.

Restructuring  Charges

During the second quarter of 2007, we recognized $36,000 of restructuring charges to adjust certain severance payments for restructuring actions taken in prior periods.

We recognized $0.6 million of restructuring charges during the second quarter of 2006 including $0.5 million of severance costs and $0.1 million of other exit costs.  Severance costs include $0.3 million for the elimination of 72 manufacturing positions in the Company’s Juarez, Mexico facility due to the expiration of a customer contract and $0.2 million for other workforce reductions.  Other exit costs relate primarily to the cost of transferring production from a closed production facility to our other production facilities.

All restructuring related costs incurred during the second quarter of 2007 and 2006 were recorded in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” (SFAS 146).

Amortization

Amortization of intangible assets was $3.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $4.3 million for the second quarter of 2006.  The reduction was a result of the impairment of certain intangible assets recorded during the first half of 2007, which reduced the amount of assets subject to periodic amortization.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We tested the long-lived assets of our Orthopaedic reporting unit for recoverability as of March 31, 2007 and determined that certain intangible assets were not recoverable.  We recorded an estimated impairment charge of $81.0 million during the first quarter of 2007.   We recorded an additional impairment charge of $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 to revise the impairment charge to the final determined amount.

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net, increased $0.5 million to $16.8 million for the second quarter of 2007, compared to $16.3 million for the second quarter of 2006.  The increase was primarily the result of higher interest rates on our senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”).

On April 27, 2007, the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders under the Credit Agreement, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment increases the maximum Leverage Ratio and decreases the minimum Coverage Ratio, as well as increases interest rates charged on both term loans and revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment was effective April 27, 2007.  The interest rate on the term loan portion of the Credit Agreement increased by 0.5%, and interest rate on the revolving credit portion of the Credit Agreement increased by 0.25% as a result of the Amendment.

22

Gain on Derivative Instruments

We have entered into interest rate swap and collar agreements to reduce our exposure to variable interest rates on our term loan under our Credit Agreement.  During the second quarter of 2007, we realized  $0.1 million of unrealized gains on our derivative instruments.  During the second quarter of 2006, we recorded a gain of $2.6 million on our derivative instruments, comprised primarily of unrealized gains in the change in fair value of the instrument.  Our interest rate swap contract was redesignated as a cash flow hedge during the fourth quarter of 2006, therefore changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap during the second quarter of 2007 have been recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense for the second quarter of 2007 was $0.3 million and included $0.8 million of deferred income taxes for the difference between book and tax treatment of goodwill, $0.6 million of foreign income taxes and $0.2 million of state income taxes.  These income tax expenses were partially offset by a deferred tax credit of $1.3 million due to the impairment charge of $3.6 million recorded for our Trademark intangible asset.   Income tax expense for the second quarter of 2006 was $1.2 million and included $0.8 million of non-cash deferred income taxes for the different book and tax treatment for goodwill, $0.3 million of foreign income taxes and $0.1 million of state income taxes.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net Sales

Net sales for the first half of 2007 were $230.6 million, a decrease of $15.8 million, or 6.4%, compared to net sales of $246.4 million for the first half of 2006. The decrease in net sales is the result of  the Boston Scientific transfers which decreased net sales by $10.3 million, and a $8.5 million decrease in sales volume, primarily in the orthopaedic market.   These decreases were partially offset by $1.9 million in higher precious metals pass-through charges to our customers, and $1.1 million of favorable currency translation on foreign net sales.  Two customers, Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic, each accounted for greater than 10% of net sales for the first half of 2007.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the first half of 2007 was $61.5 million compared to $70.9 million for the first half of 2006.  The $9.4 million decrease in gross profit was a result of a less favorable product mix which decreased gross profit by $8.0 million, a decrease in sales volume which reduced gross profit by $6.1 million and increases in our manufacturing costs of $2.1 million.  The increase in manufacturing costs was the result of $1.1 million of increased depreciation expense, $0.7 million to transfer production of certain products within our manufacturing facilities, $0.4 million of employment grants received in the 2006 period which offset production costs in that period and other net cost decreases of $0.1 million.  These increases were partially offset by $6.4 million of incremental expense recorded during the first half of 2006 for the step-up of inventory acquired in the Transactions and $0.4 million of favorable currency translation on foreign net sales.

Gross margin was 26.7% of net sales for the first half of 2007 compared to 28.8% of net sales for the first half of 2006.  The decrease in gross margin is attributable to a less favorable product mix which reduced gross margin by 3.5%, increased manufacturing costs which decreased gross margin by 0.7%, lower absorption of our fixed cost structure due to lower net sales which reduced gross margin by 0.4% and the pass through of precious metals charges to our customers for which we do not earn a profit which reduced gross margin by 0.3%.  These decreases in gross margin were partially offset by the expense recorded in the first half of 2006 for the step-up of inventory acquired in the Transactions which decreased gross margin by 2.8%.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses were $24.2  million for the first half of 2007 compared to $33.3 million for the first half of 2006.   The $9.1 million decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to a reduction in non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $7.9 million and a reduction in compensation related expenses of $1.4 million.

23

 The reduction in non-cash stock-based compensation expense includes a $4.0 million credit recorded for non-cash stock-based compensation during the first half of 2007 to reflect the decrease in fair value of our liability for certain stock options rolled over by management in the Transaction.  The liability for these stock options decreased due to the decrease in fair value of Accellent Holdings Corp. common stock from $5.00 per share at December 31, 2006 to $4.00 a share at June 30, 2007.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development, or R&D, expenses for the first half of 2007 were $1.4  million compared to $1.9  million for the first half of 2006, primarily due to a $0.3 million reduction in research material costs and a $0.2 million reduction in compensation related costs.

Restructuring Charges

We recognized $0.7 million of restructuring charges during the first half of 2007 consisting almost entirely of severance costs to eliminate 18 positions in both manufacturing and administrative areas as part of a company-wide program to reduce costs and centralize certain administrative functions.

We recognized $2.3 million of restructuring charges during the first half of 2006, including $1.7 million of severance costs and $0.6 million of other exit costs.  Severance costs include $1.1 million for the elimination of 26 positions in primarily selling, general and administrative functions, $0.4 million for the elimination of 170 manufacturing positions in the Company’s Juarez, Mexico facility due to the expiration of a customer contract and $0.2 million for other workforce reductions.  Other exit costs relate primarily to the cost to transfer production from a closed production facility to our other existing facilities.

The following table summarizes the recorded accruals and activity related to restructuring for the first half of 2007 (in thousands):

	Severance			Other Costs			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2006	$	1,737		$	191		$	1,928
Restructuring charges incurred		684			24			708
Payments		(1,683	)		(128	)		(1,811	)
Balance as of June 30, 2007	$	738		$	87		$	825

All restructuring related costs incurred during the first half of 2007 and 2006 were recorded in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 146.

Amortization

Amortization of intangible assets was $8.0 million for the first half of 2007 compared to $8.6 million for the first half of 2006.  The reduction was a result of the impairment of certain intangible assets recorded during the first half of 2007, which reduced the amount of assets subject to periodic amortization.

24

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We tested the long-lived assets of our Orthopaedic reporting unit for recoverability as of March 31, 2007 and determined that the Customer Base and Developed Technology intangible assets were not recoverable since the expected future undiscounted cash flows attributable to each asset were below their respective carrying values.  In accordance with SFAS 144, we then determined the fair value of these intangible assets to be below their respective carrying values.  We utilized the services of a third party valuation specialist to assist in the determination of fair value for each intangible.  The fair value of the Customer Base intangible was determined to be $7.6 million using an excess earnings approach.  The carrying value of the Customer Base intangible was $37.7 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $30.1 million.  The fair value of the Developed Technology intangible asset was determined to be $0.4 million using the relief from royalty method.  The carrying value of the Developed Technology intangible was $0.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $0.2 million.

In accordance with the requirements of SFAS 142, we tested goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets related to our Orthopaedic reporting unit for impairment as of March 31, 2007.  We determined the value of the Orthopaedics reporting unit using the assistance of a third party valuation specialist.  The fair value of the reporting unit was based on both an income approach and market approach, and was determined to be below its carrying value.  We then determined the implied fair value of goodwill by determining the fair value of all the assets and liabilities of the Orthopaedics reporting unit.  As a result of this process, we determined that the fair value of goodwill for the Orthopaedics reporting unit was $50.0 million.  The carrying value of Orthopaedics goodwill was $98.4 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $48.4 million.  In addition, our Trademark intangible asset, which has an indefinite life, was revalued in accordance with SFAS 142 using a relief from royalty method, and the assistance of a third party valuation specialist.  The fair value of the Trademark was determined to be $29.4  million.  The carrying value of the Trademark was $33.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $3.6  million.  We recorded an impairment charge of $1.3 million for the second quarter of 2007 to revise the impairment charge to the final determined amount.

A summary of all charges for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for our first half of 2007 is as follows (in thousands):

Intangible Asset	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Impairment
Goodwill	$	98,431	$	50,045	$	48,386
Trademark		33,000		29,400		3,600
Customer Base		37,745		7,600		30,145
Developed Technology		579		370		209
Total	$	169,755	$	87,415	$	82,340

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net, increased $0.8 million to $32.9 million for the first half of 2007, compared to $32.1 million for the first half of 2006.  The increase was primarily the result of higher interest rates on our Credit Agreement.

Gain  on Derivative Instruments

We have entered into interest rate swap and collar agreements to reduce our exposure to variable interest rates on our term loan under our Credit Agreement.  During the first half of 2007, we realized  $0.1 million of unrealized gains on our derivative instruments.  During the first half of 2006, we recorded a gain of $6.1 million on our derivative instruments, comprised primarily of unrealized gains in the change in fair value of the instrument.  Our interest rate swap contract was redesignated as a cash flow hedge during the fourth quarter of 2006, therefore changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap during the first half of 2007 have been recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

25

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense for the first half of 2007 was $1.7 million and included $1.5 million of deferred income taxes for the difference between book and tax treatment of goodwill, $1.2 million of foreign income taxes and $0.3 million of state income taxes.  These income tax expenses were partially offset by a deferred tax credit of $1.3 million due to the impairment charge of $3.6 million recorded for our Trademark intangible asset.   Income tax expense for the first half of 2006 was $2.9 million and included $1.4 million of non-cash deferred income taxes for the different book and tax treatment for goodwill, $0.9 million of foreign income taxes and $0.6 million of state income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal source of liquidity are our cash flows from operations and borrowings under our Credit Agreement, entered into in conjunction with the Transaction, which includes a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and a seven-year $400.0 million term facility. Additionally, we are able to borrow up to $100.0 million in additional term loans, with the approval of participating lenders.

At June 30, 2007, we had $5.9 million of letters of credit outstanding and $19.0 million of outstanding loans which reduced the amounts available under the revolving credit portion of our Credit Agreement resulting in $50.1 million available under the revolving credit facility.

During the first half of 2007, cash provided by operating activities was $4.5 million compared to $3.2 million for the first half of 2006.  The increase in cash provided by operations is primarily due to a $10.7 million reduction in operating assets and liabilities due primarily to smaller increases in working capital and $1.4 million in lower payments to repurchase stock options from terminated employees.  These increases in cash provided by operations were partially offset by a $10.8 million reduction in profits due to lower net sales.

During the first half of 2007, cash used in investing activities totaled $11.3 million compared to $15.8 million for the first half of 2006. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was attributable to lower capital spending costs incurred during the first half of 2007.  The decrease in capital expenditures is primarily due to timing, as we expect capital expenditures for the second half of 2007 to increase.  Capital expenditures incurred during the first half of 2007 included $1.8 million for the implementation of the Oracle enterprise resource planning system, or ERP system, throughout our entire business, compared to $2.6 million in the same period of 2006.

During the first half of 2007, cash provided by financing activities was $12.3 million compared to $5.5 million for the first half of 2006.  The increase was primarily due to $7.0 million in increased net borrowings on the revolving credit portion of our Credit Agreement.

We anticipate that we will spend an additional $16.0 to $19.0 million on capital expenditures for the remainder of 2007. Our Credit Agreement contains restrictions on our ability to make capital expenditures. Based on current estimates, our management believes that the amount of capital expenditures permitted to be made under our Credit Agreement will be adequate to grow our business according to our business strategy and to maintain our continuing operations.

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, including a maximum ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (“Leverage Ratio”) and a minimum ratio of consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated interest expense (“Coverage Ratio”).  Both of these ratios are calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter based on our trailing twelve month financial results. On April 27, 2007, the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders under the Credit Agreement, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment increases the maximum Leverage Ratio and decreases the minimum Coverage Ratio, as well as increases interest rates charged on both term loans and revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement.  The Amendment was effective April 27, 2007.

As a result of the Amendment, the Leverage Ratio may not exceed 8.50 to 1.00 through the quarter ended September 30, 2008, 8.00 to 1.00 for the next four quarters, declines thereafter by 1.00x on an annual basis until September 30, 2012 and declines to 4.50 to 1.00 on October 1, 2012.  The Coverage Ratio is amended to not be less than 1.25 to 1.00 through the quarter ended September 30, 2008, and increases on October 1 of each year through 2012 commencing October 1, 2008 to 1.35x, 1.55x, 1.75x, 2.00x and 2.10x.

26

In addition, the Amendment provides that for the revolving credit portion of the facility (i) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 8.00 to 1.00, the “Applicable Rate” as defined under the facility would be equal to 1.75% for ABR Loans and Swingline Loans and 2.75% for Eurodollar Loans (each as defined under the facility), with a 0.50% fee for undrawn commitments, (ii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 7.00 to 1.00 but is equal to or less than 8.00 to 1.00, the Applicable Rate would be equal to 1.50% for ABR Loans and Swingline Loans and 2.50% for Eurodollar Loans, with a 0.50% fee for undrawn commitments and (iii) in all other cases the Applicable Rate and commitment fees are as currently provided for in the original facility.  The Amendment also provides that for the term loan portion of the facility (i) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 8.00 to 1.00, the Applicable Rate is equal to 1.75% for ABR Loans and 2.75% for Eurodollar Loans, (ii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio exceeds 6.00 to 1.00 but is equal to or less than 8.00 to 1.00 the Applicable Rate is equal to 1.50% for ABR Loans and 2.50% for Eurodollar Loans and (iii) for so long as the Leverage Ratio is equal to or less than 6.00 to 1.00 the Applicable Rate would be equal to 1.25% for ABR Loans and 2.25% for Eurodollar Loans.

In connection with the amendment, we paid approximately $1.7 million of fees to the lenders under the facility, inclusive of reimbursement of lender expenses.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures and necessary working capital will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.  Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our senior secured credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity requirements for the next 12 months. However, no assurance can be given that this will be the case.

Other Key Indicators of Financial Condition and Operating Performance

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and the related ratios presented in this Form 10-Q are supplemental measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

EBITDA represents net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to give effect to unusual items, non-cash items and other adjustments, all of which are required in calculating covenant ratios and compliance under the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes and under our senior secured credit facility.

We believe that the inclusion of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in this Form 10-Q is appropriate to provide additional information to investors and debt holders about the calculation of certain financial covenants in the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes and under our Credit Agreement. Adjusted EBITDA is a material component of these covenants.  For instance, the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes and our Credit Agreement contain financial covenant ratios, specifically total leverage and interest coverage ratios that are calculated by reference to Adjusted EBITDA. Non-compliance with the financial ratio maintenance covenants contained in our Credit Agreement could result in the requirement to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under such facility, while non-compliance with the debt incurrence ratios contained in the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes would prohibit us from being able to incur additional indebtedness other than pursuant to specified exceptions.

We also present EBITDA because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of high yield issuers, many of which present EBITDA when reporting their results. Measures similar to EBITDA are also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. We believe EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparison from period to period and company to company by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting relative interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense).

27

In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, as permitted by the terms of our indebtedness, we eliminate the impact of a number of items we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operations and for the other reasons noted above. For the reasons indicated herein, you are encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and whether you consider it appropriate. In addition, in evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

· they do not reflect our cash expenditures for capital expenditure or contractual commitments;

· they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital requirements;

· they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our indebtedness;

· although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect cash requirements for such replacements;

· Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations, as discussed in our presentation of “Adjusted EBITDA” in this report; and

· other companies, including other companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or reduce our indebtedness. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. For more information, see our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this report.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA for the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006		June 30, 2007			June 30,2006
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) TO EBITDA:
Net (loss) income	$	(4,088	)	$	2,237	$	(89,836	)	$	(4,425	)
Interest expense, net		16,757			16,312		32,914			32,073
Income tax expense		274			1,190		1,686			2,864
Depreciation and amortization		8,683			8,479		17,736			16,652
EBITDA	$	21,626		$	28,218	$	(37,500	)	$	47,164

28

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
EBITDA	$	21,626		$	28,218		$	(37,500	)	$	47,164
Adjustments:
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge		1,287			—			82,340			—
Restructuring and other charges		36			568			708			2,297
Stock-based compensation — employees		(2,890	)		1,547			(4,761	)		3,261
Stock-based compensation — non-employees		567			—			1,041			—
Employee severance and relocation		338			93			435			174
Chief executive recruiting costs		—			—			225			—
Impact of inventory step-up related to inventory sold		—			—			—			6,422
Currency translation loss		104			294			148			294
Gain on derivative instruments		(142	)		(2,646	)		(58	)		(6,100	)
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment		32			157			(30	)		175
Management fees to stockholder		318			262			611			512
Adjusted EBITDA	$	21,276		$	28,493		$	43,159		$	54,199

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as such term is defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table sets forth our long-term contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Payment due by period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Senior secured credit facility (1)	$	584,781	$	36,818	$	72,680	$	89,461	$	385,822
Senior subordinated notes (1)		513,518		32,469		64,940		64,940		351,169
Capital leases		13		9		4		—		—
Operating leases		45,649		6,149		11,941		10,758		16,801
Purchase obligations (2)		24,683		24,683		—		—		—
Other long-term obligations (3)		35,177		3,383		563		10,091		21,140
Total	$	1,203,821	$	103,511	$	150,128	$	175,250	$	774,932

________________________

(1) Includes principal and interest payments.

(2) Purchase obligations consist of commitments for material, supplies and machinery and equipment incident to the ordinary conduct of business.

(3) Other long-term obligations includes share-based payment obligations of $12.6 million, environmental remediation obligations of $3.7 million, accrued compensation and pension benefits of $2.8 million, deferred income taxes of $15.4 million and other obligations of $0.7 million.

29

Critical Accounting Policies

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis and the effects of revisions are reflected in the unaudited consolidated financial statements in the period they are determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies impact our judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition.  The amount of product revenue recognized in a given period is impacted by our judgments made in establishing our reserve for potential future product returns. We provide a reserve for our estimate of future returns against revenue in the period the revenue is recorded. Our estimate of future returns is based on such factors as historical return data and current economic condition of our customer base. The amount of revenue we recognize will be directly impacted by our estimates made to establish the reserve for potential future product returns. To date, the amount of estimated returns has not been material to total net revenues. Our allowance for sales returns was $0.7 million  and $1.1 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  We estimate the collectibility of our accounts receivable and the related amount of bad debts that may be incurred in the future. The allowance for doubtful accounts results from an analysis of specific customer accounts, historical experience, credit ratings and current economic trends. Based on this analysis, we provide allowances for specific accounts where collectibility is not reasonably assured.  Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.6 million and $0.9 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

Provision for Inventory Valuation.  Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon future demand forecasts. Excess and obsolete inventory are valued at their net realizable value, which may be zero. We periodically experience variances between the amount of inventory purchased and contractually committed to and our demand forecasts, resulting in excess and obsolete inventory valuation charges.

Valuation of Goodwill, Trade Names and Trademarks.  Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill and certain of our other intangible assets, specifically trade names and trademarks, have indefinite lives.  In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill and our other indefinite life intangible assets are assigned to the operating segment expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. We have assigned our goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets to three operating segments. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets are subject to an annual impairment test, or more often if impairment indicators arise, using a fair-value-based approach.  In assessing the fair value of goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets, we make projections regarding future cash flow and other estimates, and may utilize third-party appraisal services. If these projections or other estimates for one or all of these reporting units change, we may be required to record an impairment charge. We performed an interim impairment test on the goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets during the first half of 2007, and as a result, recorded an impairment charge of $52.0 million.  

Valuation of Long-lived Assets.  Long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives. We assess the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable through projected undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. When we determine that the carrying value of intangible assets and fixed assets may not be recoverable, we measure impairment by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the related fair value. Estimated fair value is generally based on projections of future cash flows and other estimates, and guidance from third-party appraisal services.  We performed an interim impairment test on certain Orthopaedic reporting unit intangible assets during the first half of 2007, and as a result, recorded an impairment charge of $30.3 million.

30

Self Insurance Reserves.  We accrue for costs to provide self-insured benefits under our workers’ compensation and employee health benefits programs.  With the assistance of third-party workers’ compensation experts, we determine the accrual for workers’ compensation losses based on estimated costs to resolve each claim. We accrue for self-insured health benefits based on historical claims experience.  We maintain insurance coverage to prevent financial losses from catastrophic workers’ compensation or employee health benefit claims.  Our financial position or results of operations could be materially impacted in a fiscal quarter due to a material increase in claims.  Our accruals for self-insured workers’ compensation and employee health benefits at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $3.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

Environmental Reserves.  We accrue for environmental remediation costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and a reasonable estimate of the liability can be made. Our remediation cost estimates are based on the facts known at the current time including consultation with a third-party environmental specialist and external legal counsel. Changes in environmental laws, improvements in remediation technology and discovery of additional information concerning known or new environmental matters could affect our operating results.

Pension and Other Employee Benefits.  Certain assumptions are used in the calculation of the actuarial valuation of our defined benefit pension plans. These assumptions include the weighted average discount rate, rates of increase in compensation levels and expected long-term rates of return on assets. If actual results are less favorable than those projected by management, additional expense may be required.

Share Based Payments.  We adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective transition method, which requires that we record stock compensation expense for all unvested and new awards as of the adoption date.  Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated.  Under the fair value provisions of SFAS 123R, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.  Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating the expected term of stock options, expected volatility of the underlying stock, and the number of stock-based awards expected to be forfeited due to future terminations.  In addition, for stock-based awards where vesting is dependent upon achieving certain operating performance goals, we estimate the likelihood of achieving the performance goals.  Differences between actual results and these estimates could have a material impact on our financial results.

Income Taxes.  We estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as goodwill amortization, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we increase or decrease our income tax provision in our consolidated statement of operations. If any of our estimates of our prior period taxable income or loss prove to be incorrect, material differences could impact the amount and timing of income tax benefits or payments for any period.

We also provide liabilities for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 48, or FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”  FIN 48 requires that we evaluate positions taken or expected to be taken in our income tax filings in all jurisdictions where we are required to file, and provide a liability for any positions that do not meet a “more likely than not” of being sustained if examined by tax authorities.  At January 1, 2007, we had $3.5 million accrued for uncertain tax positions, and we expect this liability to increase by approximately $0.3 million by December 31, 2007.

31

Hedge Accounting.  We use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps and collars to reduce our risk to variable interest rates on our senior secured credit facility.  We have documented our swap agreement as a cash flow hedge in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”  As a result, changes in the fair value of our swap agreement are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings.  Our swap agreement will continue to qualify for this hedge accounting treatment as long as the hedge meets certain effectiveness criteria.  We determine the effectiveness of this hedge using the Hypothetical Derivative Method as described in the Derivative Implementation Group Issue No. G-7 (“DIG G-7”).  DIG G-7 requires that we create a hypothetical derivative with terms that match our underlying debt agreement.  To the extent that changes in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative mirror changes in the fair value of the swap agreement, the hedge will be considered effective.  The fair values of the swap agreement and hypothetical derivative are based on a discounted cash flow model which contains a number of variables including estimated future interest rates, projected reset dates, and projected notional amounts.  A material change in these assumptions could cause our hedge to be considered ineffective.  If our swap agreement is no longer treated as a hedge, we would be required to record the change in fair value of the swap agreement in our results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, or FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 provides a standardized methodology to determine and disclose liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions.  We adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 which increased our estimated tax liabilities by $0.5 million.  For a further discussion of FIN 48, see Note 8 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement is effective in the first fiscal quarter of 2008 and we will adopt the statement at that time.  We believe that the adoption of SFAS 157 will not have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” (SFAS 158).  SFAS 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position. It also requires the recognition as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS No. 87 or 106. The statement has also new provisions regarding the measurement date as well as certain disclosure requirements. The statement is effective for our 2007 year end and we will adopt the statement at that time. We believe that the adoption of SFAS 158 will not have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB No. 115,” (SFAS 159).  SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  This statement is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company is still evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretative guidance on the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements and is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company applied the provisions of SAB 108 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and there was no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

32

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

We are subject to market risk associated with change in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to market risk associated with change in the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Federal Funds Rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in connection with outstanding term loans under our senior secured credit facility for which we have an outstanding balance at June 30, 2007 of $394.0 million with an interest rate of 7.86%. We have entered into interest rate swap and collar agreements to limit our exposure to variable interest rates.  At June 30, 2007, the notional amount of the swap contract was $250.0 million, and will decrease to $200.0 million on February 27, 2008, to $150.0 million on February 27, 2009 and to $125.0 million on February 27, 2010.  The swap contract will mature on November 27, 2010. We will receive variable rate payments (equal to the three-month LIBOR rate) during the term of the swap contract and are obligated to pay fixed interest rate payments (4.85%) during the term of the contract.  At June 30, 2007, we also had an outstanding interest rate collar agreement to provide an interest rate ceiling and floor on a portion of our LIBOR-based variable rate debt.  At June 30, 2007, the notional amount of the collar contract in place was $100.0 million and will decrease to $75.0 million on February 27, 2008. The collar contract will mature on February 27, 2009.  The Company will receive variable rate payments during the term of the collar contract when and if the three-month LIBOR rate exceeds the 5.84% ceiling.  The Company will make variable rate payments during the term of the collar contract when and if the three-month LIBOR rate is below the 3.98% floor.  During the period when our interest rate swap and collar agreements are in place, a 1% change in interest rates would result in a change in interest expense of approximately $2.0 million per year.  Upon the expiration of the swap agreement, a 1% change in interest rates would result in change in interest of approximately $4 million per year.

Foreign Currency Risk

We operate several facilities in foreign countries. Our principal currency exposures relate to the Euro, British pound and Mexican peso. We consider the currency risk to be low, as the majority of the transactions at these locations are denominated in the local currency.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), as of June 30, 2007, our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. We are in the process of implementing the Oracle ERP system throughout the entire company.  During the second quarter of 2007, we completed the sixth manufacturing location implementation of Oracle.  The implementation of Oracle during the second quarter of 2007 modified our existing controls to conform to the Oracle ERP system.

There were no additional changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our first fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

33

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.

On July 23, 2007, we were notified by the Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future and Montgomery Neighbors for a Clean Environment of their intent to file a citizen suit against us and an unrelated party based upon alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Hazardous Site Cleanup Act.  To date, no such suit has been filed.  The alleged violations relate to the emission of trichloroethylene (“TCE”) by our facility in Collegeville, Pennsylvania.  Such emissions are authorized by permit.  We believe that we have complied with all applicable emission limits for TCE,  and we intend to vigorously defend any action that may be filed in this regard.

In a separate matter, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) has filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging recent amendments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) National Air Emissions Standards for hazardous air pollutants from halogenated solvent cleaning operations.  These revised standards exempt three industry sectors (aerospace, narrow tube manufacturers and facilities that use continuous web-cleaning and halogenated solvent cleaning machines) from facility emission limits for TCE and other degreaser emissions.  Our Collegeville facility meets current EPA control standards for TCE emissions and is exempt from the new lower TCE emission limit since we manufacture narrow tubes.  Nevertheless, we have begun to implement a process that will reduce our TCE emissions from the Collegeville facility.  However, this process will not reduce our TCE emissions to the levels required by the new standard.  If the narrow tube exemption were no longer available to us, we may not be able to reduce our Collegeville facility TCE emissions to the levels required by the new EPA standard, resulting in a reduction in our ability to manufacture narrow tubes, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

For a discussion of our potential risks or uncertainties, please see Part I, Item 1A, of Accellent Inc.’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of Accellent Inc.’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

No unregistered equity securities of the registrant were sold and no repurchases of equity securities were made during the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Our ability to pay dividends is restricted by our senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Accellent Inc.’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

34

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibits
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Executive Chairman
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Vice President of Finance
31.3*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Accounting Officer
32.1*	Section 1350 Certification of Executive Chairman
32.2*	Section 1350 Certification of Vice President of Finance
32.3*	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

_________________

* Filed herewith.

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Accellent Inc.
August 3, 2007	By:	/s/  Kenneth W. Freeman
		Kenneth W. Freeman
		Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)

	Accellent Inc.
August 3, 2007	By:	/s/  Alan L. Bortnick
		Alan L. Bortnick
		Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer)

	Accellent Inc.
August 3, 2007	By:	/s/  Timothy S. Mathews
		Timothy S. Mathews
		Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

36

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibits
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Vice President of Finance
31.3*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Accounting Officer
32.1*	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2*	Section 1350 Certification of Vice President of Finance
32.3*	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

________________

* Filed herewith.

37