Gross Premiums Written
Details of consolidated gross premiums written by line of business and by geographic area of risk insured are provided below:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | |
Line of business | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reinsurance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property catastrophe | | $ | 182,600 | | | | 67.3% | | | $ | 144,389 | | | | 79.6% | |
Property | | | 19,057 | | | | 7.0% | | | | 26,344 | | | | 14.5% | |
Short-tail specialty and casualty | | | 42,848 | | | | 15.8% | | | | 10,612 | | | | 5.9% | |
Insurance | | | 26,673 | | | | 9.9% | | | | – | | | | 0.0% | |
Total | | $ | 271,178 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 181,345 | | | | 100.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | |
Line of business | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reinsurance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property catastrophe | | $ | 344,128 | | | | 67.0% | | | $ | 302,757 | | | | 78.0% | |
Property | | | 39,115 | | | | 7.6% | | | | 50,900 | | | | 13.1% | |
Short-tail specialty and casualty | | | 84,403 | | | | 16.5% | | | | 34,701 | | | | 8.9% | |
Insurance | | | 45,778 | | | | 8.9% | | | | – | | | | 0.0% | |
Total | | $ | 513,424 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 388,358 | | | | 100.0% | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | |
Geographic area of risk insured(1) | | | | | | | | | | |
Caribbean (2) | | $ | 28,537 | | | | 10.5% | | | $ | 7,692 | | | | 4.2% | |
Europe | | | 10,352 | | | | 3.8% | | | | 17,053 | | | | 9.4% | |
Japan and Australasia | | | 24,606 | | | | 9.1% | | | | 17,874 | | | | 9.9% | |
North America | | | 165,072 | | | | 60.9% | | | | 123,682 | | | | 68.2% | |
Worldwide risks(3) | | | 36,312 | | | | 13.4% | | | | 14,058 | | | | 7.8% | |
Other | | | 6,299 | | | | 2.3% | | | | 986 | | | | 0.5% | |
Total | | $ | 271,178 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 181,345 | | | | 100.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |
| | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | | Gross premiums written | | Percentage of total | |
Geographic area of risk insured(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Caribbean (2) | | $ | 54,158 | | | | 10.5% | | | $ | 15,055 | | | | 3.9% | |
Europe | | | 75,441 | | | | 14.7% | | | | 84,021 | | | | 21.6% | |
Japan and Australasia | | | 33,756 | | | | 6.6% | | | | 29,513 | | | | 7.6% | |
North America | | | 242,823 | | | | 47.3% | | | | 214,433 | | | | 55.2% | |
Worldwide risks(3) | | | 93,480 | | | | 18.2% | | | | 39,664 | | | | 10.2% | |
Other | | | 13,766 | | | | 2.7% | | | | 5,672 | | | | 1.5% | |
Total | | $ | 513,424 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 388,358 | | | | 100.0% | |
(1) | Except as otherwise noted, each of these categories includes contracts that cover risks located primarily in the designated geographic area. |
(2) | Gross written premiums related to the Insurance segment are included in the Caribbean geographic area. |
(3) | This geographic area includes contracts that cover risks in two or more geographic zones. |
Reinsurance Segment
Overview
The net underwriting income for the Reinsurance segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $31.9 million and $75.4 million, respectively, as compared to $6.3 million and $32.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Our Reinsurance segment comprises three lines of business outlined below.
Gross Premiums Written
Gross premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $244.5 million, compared to $181.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $63.2 million, or 34.8%. Gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $467.6 million, compared to $388.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $79.2 million, or 20.4%. Details of the increase in gross premiums are detailed by line of business below.
a. | Property Catastrophe Reinsurance |
Gross property catastrophe premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $182.6 million, compared to $144.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in property catastrophe premiums written of $38.2 million, or 26.5%, was primarily due to renewing the majority of our book at equal or increased shares, the addition of new clients partially offset by the Company’s non-renewal of certain treaties that no longer met the Company’s profitability objectives.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $3.1 million of gross reinstatement premiums primarily related to China winter storms and the Memorial Day Weekend Storm in the United States, compared to $0.4 million recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2007, which was primarily related to European Windstorm Kyrill.
Gross property catastrophe premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $344.1 million, compared to $302.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in property catastrophe premiums written of $41.3 million, or 13.7%, was primarily due to renewing the majority of our book at equal or increased shares and the addition of new clients, partially offset by the Company’s non-renewal of certain treaties that no longer met the Company’s profitability objectives.
The proportion of property catastrophe gross premiums written as a percentage of total gross reinsurance premiums written (73.6%) is higher in the six months ended June 30, 2008 than we expect it to be for the remainder of the year because proportionally higher volumes of property catastrophe business are traditionally written in the first and second quarters, as compared to other quarters in the fiscal year.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $4.3 million of gross reinstatement premiums primarily related to the events noted above as well as Windstorm Emma, compared to $5.8 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2007, which was primarily related to European Windstorm Kyrill.
Gross property premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $19.1 million, compared to $26.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, representing a decrease of $7.2 million, or 27.7%. Proportional property premiums were $11.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $18.2 million for the same period in 2007. The decline of $6.3 million is primarily due to the non-renewal of contracts during the quarter and partially offset by new contracts incepting in the quarter. Non-proportional premiums were $7.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $8.2 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease of $1.0 million was primarily the result of the impact of a negative premium adjustment on a specific contract, partially offset by new contracts entered into during the quarter.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $1.5 million of gross reinstatement premiums related to a number of contracts, compared to $0.2 million recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in the gross reinstatement premiums of $1.3 million is primarily due to the losses incurred in the first and second quarters of 2008 related to traditional property per risk covers.
Gross property premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $39.1 million, compared to $50.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, representing a decrease of $11.8 million, or 23.2%. Proportional property premiums were $15.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $36.1 million for the same period in 2007. The decline of $20.4 million is primarily due to the non-renewal of contracts during the first six months of 2008, downward revisions to premium estimates based upon information received from our cedents and underwriters, and the impact of increased risk retention by the ceding companies. This decrease was partially offset by the impact of new contracts signed in the first half of 2008, including $4.6 million of contracts written by Flagstone Suisse. Non-proportional premiums were $23.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $14.8 million for the same period in 2007. This increase of $8.6 million was primarily the result of increased business with existing clients.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $3.0 million gross reinstatement premiums with various traditional property per risk covers related to the application of peg loss ratios as well as known property loss events from the first quarter of 2008, compared to $0.2 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase of $2.8 million in the gross reinstatement premiums is primarily due to the losses incurred in the first and second quarters of 2008 related to traditional property per risk covers.
c. | Short-tail Specialty and Casualty Reinsurance |
Short-tail specialty and casualty reinsurance premiums were $42.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $10.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $32.2 million, or 303.8%. Proportional premiums totaled $26.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $5.6 million for the same period in 2007. The increase of $21.0 million is principally due to the addition of new clients in the second quarter of 2008 and new contracts with existing clients. Non-proportional premiums totaled $16.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2007. The increase of $11.2 million is primarily due to the addition of new specialty covers that originated from Flagstone Suisse during the second quarter of 2008.
Short-tail specialty and casualty reinsurance premiums were $84.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $49.7 million, or 143.2%. Proportional premiums totaled $38.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $8.5 million for the same period in 2007. The increase of $30.4 million is principally due to the addition of new clients in 2008, the addition of new contracts and increasing lines from existing clients. Non-proportional premiums totaled $45.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $26.2 million for the same period in 2007. The increase of $19.3 million is primarily due to the addition of new specialty covers that originated from Flagstone Suisse during the first half of 2008.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $0.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of gross reinstatement premiums primarily due to losses incurred in the year. There were no reinstatement premiums recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Premiums Ceded
Reinsurance premiums ceded for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, were $15.0 million and $nil (6.2% and 0% of gross reinsurance premiums written), respectively, representing an increase of $15.0 million. Reinsurance premiums ceded for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $20.4 million and $8.2 million (4.4% and 2.1% of gross reinsurance premiums written), respectively, representing an increase of $12.2 million. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company ceded $10.9 million of premiums to Valais Re Ltd. (“Valais Re”) which increased the amount of premiums ceded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Net Premiums Earned
As the levels of net premiums written increase, the levels of net premiums earned also increase. Reinsurance net premiums earned were $134.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $111.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $22.5 million, or 20.1%. Reinsurance net premiums earned were $262.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $213.1 million for the same period in 2007, representing an increase of $49.3 million, or 23.2%. The increases are primarily due to higher levels of premium writings.
Underwriting Expenses
a. | Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $56.2 million, or 41.8% of net premiums earned, compared to $77.3 million, or 69.1% of net premiums earned, for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in the loss ratio from the second quarter of 2007 was primarily due to less severe catastrophic events in the second quarter of 2008 than in the same period in 2007. The second quarter of 2008 experienced a major loss event due to Chinese winter storms ($14.4 million) as well as smaller loss events which totaled $15.8 million in aggregate. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008 we also revisited our loss estimates for previous catastrophe events. Based on updated estimates provided by clients and brokers, we have recorded net favorable developments for 2007 catastrophe events of $0.6 million. During the second quarter of 2007, the significant loss events were the United Kingdom floods ($31.0 million) and the New South Wales (Australia) floods ($23.5 million).
Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $96.0 million, or 36.6% of net premiums earned, compared to $125.0 million, or 58.7% of net premiums earned, for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in the loss ratio was primarily due to less severe catastrophic events during the first six months of 2008 than during the same period in 2007. Loss events for the first six months of 2008 included the events noted above as well as several smaller loss events which totaled $15.2 million in aggregate. During the first six months of 2007, the loss events included the European Windstorm Kyrill ($33.8 million), United Kingdom floods ($31.0 million), and New South Wales (Australia) floods ($23.5 million).
Acquisition costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were $24.1 million and $45.0 million, respectively, compared to $14.7 million and $27.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The acquisition cost ratio, which is equal to acquisition cost expenses over net premiums earned, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were 17.9% and 17.1% respectively, compared to 13.2% and 12.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in acquisition costs is primarily due to the increase in profit and sliding scale commission compared to the previous quarter as a result of better loss activity.
c. | General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were $22.7 million and $46.8 million, respectively, compared to $13.8 million and $28.5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in the general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007, was primarily due to the cost of additional staff and infrastructure as we continue to build our global operations and enhance our technology platform.
Insurance Segment
Overview
Because the Company consolidated Island Heritage beginning in July 2007, there are no comparative statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007. The net underwriting income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $2.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Gross Premiums Written
Gross premiums written were $26.7 million and $45.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. Contracts are written on a per risk basis and consist primarily of property lines; proportionally higher volumes of property business are traditionally written in the first two quarters of the year as compared to the other quarters in the fiscal year.
Premiums Ceded
Insurance premiums ceded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were $23.4 million and $34.1 million (87.7% and 74.5% of gross premiums written), respectively. Island Heritage’s reinsurance program, comprising excess of loss and quota share programs, renewed on April 1, 2008.
Net Premiums Earned
Net premiums earned totaled $7.5 million and $14.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Underwriting Expenses
a. | Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
Loss and loss adjustment expenses amounted to $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Acquisition costs totaled $3.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The acquisition cost ratio, which is equal to acquisition cost expenses over net premiums earned, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were 41.9% and 43.7%, respectively. Acquisition costs include gross commission costs, profit commission, premium taxes, and the change in deferred acquisition costs.
c. | General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were $1.5 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
Investment Results
The total return on our investment portfolio, excluding minority interests in the investment portfolio, comprises investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the total return on invested assets was 0.41% and 0.60%, respectively, compared to 1.35% and 3.11%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in the return on invested assets of 69.6% during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 is primarily due to the net realized and unrealized losses on the fixed maturities, equities and equity derivatives held in the investment portfolio and the decrease in interest rates over the past year. These losses were partially offset by the increase of net realized and unrealized gains on the commodity index futures. The decrease in the return on invested assets of 80.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 is primarily due to the net realized and unrealized losses on the equities and equity derivatives held in the investment portfolio and the decrease in interest rates over the past year. These losses were partially offset by the increase of net realized and unrealized gains on the fixed income investment portfolio and commodity index futures.
Net investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $13.3 million and $32.0 million, respectively, compared to $20.5 million and $34.2 million for the same periods in 2007. Investment income is principally derived from interest and dividends earned on investments, partially offset by investment management fees and fees paid to our custodian bank. The components are set forth in the table below:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
Interest and dividend income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,125 | | | $ | 3,247 | | | $ | 7,971 | | | $ | 6,659 | |
Fixed maturities | | | 7,119 | | | | 11,647 | | | | 16,315 | | | | 21,522 | |
Short term | | | 12 | | | | – | | | | 138 | | | | 35 | |
Equity investments | | | – | | | | 225 | | | | – | | | | 225 | |
Other investments | | | 450 | | | | 25 | | | | 453 | | | | (67 | ) |
Amortization income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Fixed maturities | | | 4,838 | | | | 5,534 | | | | 9,351 | | | | 5,975 | |
Short term | | | 141 | | | | – | | | | 302 | | | | – | |
Other investments | | | – | | | | – | | | | 83 | | | | – | |
Investment expenses | | | (2,406 | ) | | | (147 | ) | | | (2,638 | ) | | | (187 | ) |
Net investment income | | $ | 13,279 | | | $ | 20,531 | | | $ | 31,975 | | | $ | 34,162 | |
Net investment income decreased by $7.3 million and $2.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007, principally due to a decrease in interest and dividend income as a result of significant decreases in interest rates over the past year as well as a change in the Company’s process regarding the allocation to investment income of a portion of general and administrative expenses, attributable to investment management expenses. In the current quarter, the Company allocated all investment related expenses to investment income, including salaries and overhead expenses, considered to be directly related to and supporting the investment income. The expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 were allocated in the current quarter.
Substantially all of our fixed maturity investments consisted of investment grade securities. As at June 30, 2008, the average credit rating provided by a recognized national rating agency of our fixed maturity portfolio was AA+ with an average duration of 2.7 years.
b. | Net realized and unrealized gains and losses – investments |
Our investment portfolio is structured to preserve capital and provide us with a high level of liquidity and is managed to produce a total return. In assessing returns under this approach, we include investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses generated by the investment portfolio.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on our investment portfolio amounted to a $9.3 million and $21.8 million loss, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to a $3.7 million loss and a $0.8 million gain for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. These amounts comprise net realized and unrealized gains and losses on our fixed maturities and equities portfolios, and on our investment portfolio of derivatives which includes global equity, global bond, commodity and real estate futures, TBA securities, interest rate swaps and total return swaps. The decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, was primarily due to the net realized and unrealized losses on the fixed maturities, equities, REIT funds and equity derivatives held in the investment portfolio arising from the poor performance of the U.S. and global equity markets during the period, partially offset by the increase in net realized and unrealized gains on the commodity index futures. The decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, was primarily due to the net realized and unrealized losses on the equities, REIT funds and equity derivatives held in the investment portfolio arising from the poor performance of the U.S. and global equity markets during the period, partially offset by the increase in net realized and unrealized gains on the fixed income investment portfolio and commodity index futures.
The following table is the breakdown of net realized and unrealized gains (losses) - investments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations into its various components:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) on fixed maturities | | $ | (4,052 | ) | | $ | (2,619 | ) | | $ | 12,354 | | | $ | (2,680 | ) |
Net unrealized (losses) gains on fixed maturities | | | (6,694 | ) | | | (11,824 | ) | | | (9,886 | ) | | | (8,501 | ) |
Net realized gains (losses) on equities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net unrealized (losses) gains on equities | | | (3,515 | ) | | | 3,186 | | | | (11,149 | ) | | | 3,186 | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments | | | 13,660 | | | | 6,994 | | | | (4,522 | ) | | | 6,128 | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on other investments | | | (8,738 | ) | | | 522 | | | | (8,548 | ) | | | 2,634 | |
Total net realized and unrealized (losses) gains - investments | | $ | (9,339 | ) | | $ | (3,741 | ) | | $ | (21,751 | ) | | $ | 767 | |
Net realized and unrealized losses on fixed maturities of $10.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, were primarily due to the upward shift in the yield curve, causing the market value of the bond portfolio to decrease. Net realized and unrealized gains on fixed maturities of $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were primarily due to increase in market value of the U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (“TIPs”) which was partially offset by the upward shift in the yield curve, causing the market value of the bond portfolio to decrease.
Net realized and unrealized losses on equities of $3.5 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were due to the negative performance of the emerging equity markets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Net realized and unrealized losses on other investments of $8.7 million and $8.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, were primarily due to the negative performance of the real estate markets during the quarter, and our increased position in REIT funds during the current quarter.
The following table is a breakdown of the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives included in the table above:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures contracts | | $ | 19,141 | | | $ | 9,594 | | | $ | (930 | ) | | $ | 9,732 | |
Swap contracts | | | (4,738 | ) | | | (1,905 | ) | | | (3,291 | ) | | | (3,038 | ) |
Mortgage-backed securities TBA | | | (743 | ) | | | (695 | ) | | | (301 | ) | | | (566 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives - investments | | $ | 13,660 | | | $ | 6,994 | | | $ | (4,522 | ) | | $ | 6,128 | |
Net realized and unrealized gains on futures contracts of $19.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 were primarily due to $31.0 million of gains on commodity futures, partially offset by $9.9 million of losses on U.S. and global equity futures. Net realized and unrealized losses on futures contracts of $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 were primarily due to $39.7 million of losses on U.S. and global equity futures, partially offset by $38.9 million of gains on commodity futures.
Treasury Hedging and Other
| Net realized and unrealized gains and losses – other |
The Company’s policy is to hedge the majority of its noninvestment currency and debt interest rate exposures with derivative instruments such as foreign currency swaps, forward contracts and interest rate swaps. Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) related to these derivative instruments amounted to $10.7 million and $(2.3) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $1.6 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The interest rate swap agreements entered into between the Company and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. on December 7, 2007, as well as the agreement entered into between the Company and Citibank N.A. on December 7, 2007, were unwound during the second quarter of 2008.
The following table is the breakdown of net realized and unrealized gains (losses) - other in the consolidated statements of operations into its various components:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap contracts | | $ | 8,064 | | | $ | 265 | | | $ | 672 | | | $ | 503 | |
Foreign currency forward contracts | | | 2,600 | | | | 1,317 | | | | (2,959 | ) | | | 946 | |
Reinsurance derivatives | | | 468 | | | | 258 | | | | 1,182 | | | | 397 | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives - other | | $ | 11,132 | | | $ | 1,840 | | | $ | (1,105 | ) | | $ | 1,846 | |
The primary components of the $11.1 million gain and $1.1 million loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, are as follows:
| For the three months ended June 30, 2008 | For the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
Operational hedge which comprises foreign currency forwards on our reinsurance balances: | $0.7 million | $(0.3) million |
Balance sheet hedge: | | |
- | foreign currency forwards on Flagstone Suisse’s net assets (undesignated hedge) and a portion of long term debt incurred: | $1.9 million | $(2.7) million |
- | foreign currency swaps on our subordinated debt: | $0.1 million | $1.9 million |
- | interest rate swaps on our subordinated debt: | $7.9 million | $(1.3) million |
Unrealized gains on other reinsurance derivatives | $0.5 million | $1.2 million |
Reinsurance derivatives relate to reinsurance arrangements that are structured as derivative transactions and the movement for the current period is due to realized and unrealized gains included in income.
Other Income
Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $2.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively, compared to $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. Other income includes earned revenue relating to upfront commitment fees on reinsurance contracts, aviation income and other fee income. The increase in the current quarter is primarily due to the repurchase of $11.25 million of principal amount of its outstanding $100.0 million Notes. The purchase price paid for the Notes was 81% of face value, representing a discount of 19%. The repurchase resulted in a gain of $2.0 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.1 million that were written off. The gain on early extinguishment of debt has been included in “Other income” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $4.6 million and $9.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $3.5 million and $6.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. Interest expense consists of interest due on outstanding debt securities and the amortization of debt offering expenses. The primary cause for the increase is additional debt offerings of $100.0 million and $25.0 million occurred in June and September 2007, respectively, which accordingly increased our interest expense in the first and second quarters of 2008.
Foreign Exchange
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced net foreign exchange (losses) gains of $(1.6) million and $5.1 million, respectively, compared to net foreign exchange gains of $0.1 million and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net foreign exchange gains were principally made on the net monetary asset and liability balances denominated in foreign currencies which generally appreciated against the Company and its subsidiaries’ functional currencies during the first six months of 2008. The Company’s policy is to hedge the majority of its foreign currency exposures with derivative instruments such as foreign currency swaps and forward contracts.
Income Tax Expense
The Company has subsidiaries that operate in various other jurisdictions around the world that are subject to tax in the jurisdictions in which they operate. The significant jurisdictions in which the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to tax are Canada, India, Switzerland, U.S. Virgin Islands (“USVI”) and the United Kingdom. However since the majority of our income is currently earned in Bermuda where we are exempt from income tax, the tax impact to date has been minimal. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, income tax expense was $0.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, compared to $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007, is primarily attributable to higher taxable income in jurisdictions around the world that are subject to tax as well as the acquisition of Island Heritage in July 2007, which resulted in taxable income being earned in the USVI.
Minority Interest
The results of Mont Fort have been included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, with the portions of Mont Fort’s net income and shareholders’ equity attributable to the preferred shareholders recorded as minority interest. In relation to Mont Fort, the Company recorded a minority interest expense of $3.4 million and $11.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $7.9 million and $15.6 million for the same periods in 2007.
The results of operations of Island Heritage have been included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements from July 1, 2007 onwards, with the portions of Island Heritage’s net income and shareholders’ equity attributable to minority shareholders recorded as minority interest. The Company recorded a minority interest expense of $(0.8) million and $(0.3) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. On June 30, 2008, the Company acquired an additional 16,919 shares in Island Heritage (representing 5% of its common shares) for total consideration of $3.3 million.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $39.2 million and $70.6 million, respectively, compared to $13.0 million and $48.3 million for the same periods in 2007. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, comprehensive income included $41.9 million of net income and $(2.7) million for the change in the currency translation adjustment compared to $14.7 million of net income and $(1.7) million for the change in the currency translation adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, comprehensive income included $74.8 million of net income and $(4.2) million for the change in the currency translation adjustment compared to $50.3 million of net income and $(2.0) million for the change in the currency translation adjustment for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The currency translation adjustment is as a result of the translation of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, net of transactions designated as hedges of net foreign investments. The Company has entered into certain foreign currency forward contracts that it has designated as hedges in order to hedge its net investment in foreign subsidiaries. To the extent that the contract is effective as a hedge, both the realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with the designated hedge instruments are recorded in other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. The Company designated $427.2 million and $348.3 million of foreign currency forwards contractual value as hedges, which had a fair value of $(7.8) million and $0.2 million, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company recorded $4.3 million of realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and $25.6 million of realized and unrealized foreign exchange losses on these hedges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. There were no designated hedges as of June 2007.
Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
Financial Condition
Our investment portfolio on a risk basis, at June 30, 2008, comprised 65.6% fixed maturities, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents, 22.3% equities and the balance in other investments. We do not expect significant deviation from this asset mix in the third quarter of 2008. We believe our fixed maturity securities, short term investments, equity investments, fixed income fund, REITs and derivatives held for investments can be liquidated and converted into cash within a very short period of time. However, our investments in investment funds and catastrophe bonds, which represent 3.6% of our total investments and cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2008, do not trade on liquid markets or are subject to redemption provisions that prevent us from converting them into cash immediately.
At June 30, 2008 all of our fixed maturity securities, with the exception of $0.3 million, were rated investment-grade (BBB- or higher) by Standard & Poor’s (or estimated equivalent) with an average rating of AA+. At December 31, 2007, 100.0% of our fixed maturity securities were rated investment-grade (BBB- or higher) by Standard & Poor’s (or estimated equivalent).
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the average duration of the Company’s investment portfolio was 2.7 years and 3.2 years, respectively. The duration decreased due to the lower weighting of TIPs and lower weighting of Swiss government bonds in our June 30, 2008 portfolio compared to December 31, 2007.
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had no exposure to sub-prime backed investments or collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) of sub-prime backed investments. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our holdings of Alt –A securities were $15.6 million with an average rating of AAA and $14.7 million with an average rating of AAA, respectively. Alt – A securities are defined as a classification of mortgages where the risk profile falls between prime and sub-prime. The borrowers behind these mortgages will typically have clean credit histories, but the mortgage itself will generally have some features that increase its risk profile compared to prime securities, but less risky than sub-prime backed investments. These features include higher loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios or inadequate documentation of the borrower’s income. Our exposure to traditional monoline insurers emanates from our non subprime asset-backed holdings. We have securities with credit enhancement from the traditional monoline insurers that amount to $2.5 million and $9.9 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. We do not have any collateralized loan obligations or CDO exposures in our portfolio.
At June 30, 2008, our total investments at fair market value, accrued interest receivable and cash and cash equivalents were $1.97 billion, compared to $1.87 billion at December 31, 2007. The $0.1 billion increase was mostly due to positive cash flows from operations during the six month period ended on June 30, 2008.
Other investments as at June 30, 2008 amounted to $464.1 million, compared to $293.2 million at December 31, 2007. The June 30, 2008 investments are comprised mainly of our investment in a fixed income liquidity fund of $316.3 million, our investment in catastrophe bonds of $40.1 million, our investment in private equity and hedge funds of $31.3 million, our investment in REIT funds of $69.7 million, and our investment in Alliance Re of $6.8 million. The increase in other investments during the first six months of 2008 is principally related to an increase in the fixed income liquidity fund. Other investments are recorded at fair value.
The Company attains some of its exposure to equity and real estate markets through the use of derivatives such as equity futures and total return swaps. These derivatives seek investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying markets. As at June 30, 2008, the fair value of these derivatives held by the Company was $(15.7) million, compared to $(5.7) million as at December 31, 2007.
The net payable for investments purchased at June 30, 2008 was $3.2 million, compared to $41.8 million at December 31, 2007. Net payables for investments purchased are a result of timing differences only, as investments are accounted for on a trade date basis.
Following the significant level of gross premiums written during the six months ended June 30, 2008, our insurance and reinsurance premium balances receivable, deferred acquisition costs and unearned premiums increased by $177.9 million, $20.9 million and $213.6 million, respectively, over those balances at December 31, 2007.
At June 30, 2008, we had $233.6 million of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, compared to $181.0 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $52.6 million due to reserves for the first six months of 2008 events offset by paid losses of $49.8 million. Of the balance at June 30, 2008, $163.8 million, or 70.1%, represented incurred but not reported reserves.
At June 30, 2008, our shareholders’ equity was $1.28 billion, compared to $1.21 billion at December 31, 2007 due to growth in retained earnings.
Liquidity
Cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $168.1 million from $166.9 million as compared to the same period in 2007. This increase in cash flows from operations was mainly due to higher cash operating income offset by higher paid losses in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Because a large portion of the coverages we provide typically can produce losses of high severity and low frequency, it is not possible to accurately predict our future cash flows from operating activities. As a consequence, cash flows from operating activities may fluctuate, perhaps significantly, between individual quarters and years.
Cash flows relating to financing activities include the payment of dividends, share related transactions and the issuance or repayment of debt. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash of $(29.5) million was used in financing activities, compared to $352.9 million provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007. In the first six months of 2008, the net cash used in financing activities related principally to the payment of dividends, the redemption of preferred shares in Mont Fort ILW 2 and the repayment of principal on long term debt. In 2007, the net cash provided by financing activities related to proceeds of the capital provided by the preferred investors in Mont Fort ILW 2 and Mont Fort HL, the net proceeds from the closing of our initial public offering and the net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes.
We may incur additional indebtedness in the future if we determine that it would be an efficient part of our capital structure.
Generally, positive cash flows from our operating and financing activities are invested in the Company’s investment portfolio.
For the period from October 2005 until June 30, 2008, we have had sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our liquidity requirements. We expect that our operational needs for liquidity for at least the next twelve months will be met by our balance of cash, funds generated from underwriting activities, investment income and the proceeds from sales and maturities of our investment portfolio.
Capital Resources
Our total capital resources at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
| | As at June 30, 2008 | | | As at December 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Long term debt | | $ | 255,037 | | | $ | 264,889 | |
Common shares | | | 853 | | | | 853 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 911,964 | | | | 905,316 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 2,718 | | | | 7,426 | |
Retained earnings | | | 364,649 | | | | 296,890 | |
Total capitalization | | $ | 1,535,221 | | | $ | 1,475,374 | |
The change in the amount of the long term debt at June 30, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 is due to the revaluation of the Euro-denominated Deferrable Interest Debentures and the repurchase of $11.25 million of principal of the outstanding $100.0 million Notes.
Letter of Credit Facility
Under the terms of certain reinsurance contracts, our reinsurance subsidiaries may be required to provide letters of credit to reinsured in respect of reported claims and/or unearned premiums. In August 2006, the Company entered into a $200.0 million uncommitted letter of credit facility agreement with Citibank N.A. In April 2007, the Company increased its uncommitted letter of credit facility agreement from $200.0 million to $400.0 million. As at June 30, 2008, $72.1 million had been drawn under this facility, and the drawn amount of the facility was secured by $80.1 million of fixed maturity securities from the Company’s investment portfolio. As at December 31, 2007, $73.8 million had been drawn under this facility, and the drawn amount of the facility was secured by $82.0 million of fixed maturity securities from the Company’s investment portfolio.
In September 2007, the Company entered into a $200.0 million uncommitted letter of credit facility agreement with Wachovia Bank N.A. While the Company has not drawn upon this facility as at June 30, 2008, if drawn upon, the utilized portion of the facility will be secured by an appropriate portion of securities from the Company’s investment portfolio.
Restrictions and Specific Requirements
Bermuda law limits the maximum amount of annual dividends or distributions that can be paid by Flagstone to the Company and in certain cases requires the prior notification to, or the approval of, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”). As a Bermuda Class 4 reinsurer, Flagstone may not pay dividends in any financial year which would exceed 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus, as shown on its statutory balance sheet in relation to the previous financial year, unless at least seven days before payment of those dividends, it files an affidavit with the BMA signed by at least two directors and Flagstone’s principal representative, which states that in their opinion, declaration of those dividends will not cause Flagstone to fail to meet its prescribed solvency margin and liquidity ratio. Further, Flagstone may not reduce by 15% or more its total statutory capital as set out in its previous year’s financial statements, without the prior approval of the BMA. Flagstone must also maintain, as a Class 4 Bermuda reinsurer, paid-up share capital of $1.0 million.
Flagstone and Flagstone Suisse, respectively, are licensed or admitted as an insurer or reinsurer in Bermuda and Switzerland and are not licensed in any other jurisdiction. Because many jurisdictions do not permit insurance companies to take credit for reinsurance obtained from unlicensed or non-admitted insurers on their statutory financial statements unless appropriate security mechanisms are in place, we anticipate that our reinsurance clients will typically require Flagstone to post a letter of credit or other collateral.
Flagstone Suisse is licensed to operate as a reinsurer in Switzerland and is also licensed in Bermuda through the Flagstone Suisse branch office. Swiss law permits dividends to be declared only after profits have been allocated to the reserves required by law and to any reserves required by the articles of incorporation. The articles of incorporation of Flagstone Suisse do not require any specific reserves. Therefore, Flagstone Suisse must allocate any profits first to the reserve required by Swiss law generally, and may pay as dividends only the balance of the profits remaining after that allocation. In the case of Flagstone Suisse, Swiss law requires that 20% of the company’s profits be allocated to a “general reserve” until the reserve reaches 50% of its paid-in share capital.
In addition, a Swiss reinsurance company may pay a dividend only if, after payment of the dividend, it will continue to comply with regulatory requirements regarding minimum capital, special reserves and solvency requirements.
Island Heritage is domiciled in the Cayman Islands and is not subject to statutory minimum capital requirements under its Class A Domestic Insurance License. In addition, there are no restrictions on the payment of dividends from Island Heritage.
Flagstone Africa is licensed to operate as a reinsurer in South Africa and is subject to statutory minimum capital requirements under applicable legislation. In addition, a South African reinsurance company may pay a dividend only if, after payment of the dividend, it will continue to comply with regulatory requirements regarding minimum capital, special reserves and solvency requirements.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Valais Re is a special purpose Cayman Islands exempted company licensed as a restricted Class B reinsurer in the Cayman Islands and formed solely for the purpose of entering into certain reinsurance agreements and other risk transfer agreements with subsidiaries of Flagstone. We have entered into a reinsurance agreement with Valais Re that provides us with $104 million of aggregate indemnity protection for certain losses from global catastrophe events.
The Company has determined that Valais Re has the characteristics of a variable interest entity that are addressed by FASB Interpretation No. 46R ‘‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities’’ (‘‘FIN 46R’’). In accordance with FIN 46R, Valais Re is not consolidated because the Company does not hold a variable interest and as such is not the primary beneficiary.
We are not party to any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an affiliated entity unconsolidated with us is a party, other than that noted above with Valais Re, that management believes is reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
We measure and manage market risks and other risks as part of an enterprise-wide risk management process. The market risks described in this section relate to financial instruments, primarily in our investment portfolio, that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, credit risk premiums or spreads, foreign exchange rates and equity prices.
We believe that we are currently principally exposed to four types of market risk: interest rate risk, equity price risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates. Our fixed maturity portfolio is exposed to interest rate risk. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these investments. As interest rates rise, the market value of our fixed maturity portfolio falls and we have the risk that cash outflows will have to be funded by selling assets, which will be trading at depreciated values. As interest rates decline, the market value of our fixed income portfolio increases and we have reinvestment risk, as funds reinvested will earn less than is necessary to match anticipated liabilities. We expect to manage interest rate risk by selecting investments with characteristics such as duration, yield, currency and liquidity tailored to the anticipated cash outflow characteristics of the reinsurance liabilities of the Company. In addition, from time-to-time, the Company enters into interest rate swap contracts as protection against unexpected shifts in interest rates, which would affect the fair value of the fixed maturity portfolio. By using swaps in the portfolio, the overall duration or interest rate sensitivity of the portfolio can be altered.
As at June 30, 2008, the impact on our fixed maturity securities and our cash and cash equivalents, from an immediate 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would have resulted in an estimated decrease in market value of 2.5%, or approximately $39.0 million. As at June 30, 2008, the impact on our fixed maturity securities, cash and cash equivalents, from an immediate 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an estimated increase in market value of 2.8%, or approximately $43.4 million.
As at June 30, 2008, we held $201.7 million, or 24.5%, of our fixed maturity and short term investment portfolio in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. These assets are exposed to prepayment risk, which occurs when holders of underlying loans increase the frequency with which they prepay the outstanding principal before the maturity date and refinance at a lower interest rate cost. The adverse impact of prepayment is more evident in a declining interest rate environment. As a result, the Company will be exposed to reinvestment risk, as cash flows received by the Company could be accelerated and will be reinvested at the prevailing interest rates.
The Company uses interest rate swap contracts in the portfolio as protection against unexpected shifts in interest rates, which would affect the fair value of the fixed maturity portfolio. The Company also uses interest rate swaps to manage its borrowing costs on long term debt. As of June 30, 2008, there were no interest rate swaps in the portfolio. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded $8.0 and $0.3 million of realized and unrealized gains on interest rate swaps, respectively.
The interest rate swap agreements entered into between the Company and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. on December 7, 2007, as well as the agreement entered into between the Company and Citibank N.A. on December 7, 2007, were unwound during the second quarter of 2008.
Equity Price Risk
We gain exposure to the equity, commodities and real estate markets through the use of various index-linked futures, exchange traded funds, total return swaps and global REIT funds. The total of such exposure as of June 30, 2008 was $626.2 million. However, from a fair value perspective, futures and swaps positions are valued for only the unrealized gains and losses, but not for the exposure. As a result, the fair value of these positions as at June 30, 2008 amounted to $191.9 million and was recorded in both equities and other investments and the net realized and unrealized gains of $1.3 million and net realized and unrealized losses of $29.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The total exposure of the index-linked futures was $382.5 million as at June 30, 2008.
Credit Risk
The Company has exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed maturity securities. Our risk management strategy and investment guidelines have been defined to ensure we invest in debt instruments of high credit quality issuers and to limit the amount of credit exposure with respect to particular ratings categories and any one issuer. As at June 30, 2008, the majority of our fixed maturity investments consisted of investment grade securities with an average rating of AA+. The Company believes this high-quality portfolio reduces its exposure to credit risk on fixed income investments to an acceptable level.
The Company does not have any exposure to credit risk as a holder of sub-prime backed investments. The Company does not allow sub-prime investment by any investment manager. At December 31, 2007, all sub-prime assets within the investment portfolio had been liquidated. At June 30, 2008, we held $15.6 million of Alt-A securities with an average rating of AAA, including one security valued at $0.3 million with a rating of B.
To a lesser extent, the Company also has credit risk exposure as a party to over-the-counter derivative instruments. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our exposure by counterparty and ensure that counterparties to these contracts are high-credit-quality international banks or counterparties. These derivative instruments include foreign currency forwards contracts, currency swaps, interest rate swaps and total return swaps.
In addition, the Company has exposure to credit risk as it relates to its trade balances receivable, namely insurance and reinsurance balances receivable. Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable from the Company’s clients at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, were $314.5 million and $136.6 million, respectively, including balances both currently due and accrued. The Company believes that credit risk exposure related to these balances is mitigated by several factors, including but not limited to credit checks performed as part of the underwriting process, monitoring of aged receivable balances, our right to cancel the cover for non-payment of premiums, and our right to offset premiums yet to be paid against losses due to the cedent. Since our inception in October 2005, we have recorded $1.3 million in bad debt expenses.
While the Company does not rely heavily on retrocessional reinsurance, we do require our reinsurers to have adequate financial strength. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors its concentration of credit risk on an ongoing basis.
In addition, consistent with industry practice, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with reinsurance brokers. We frequently pay amounts owed on claims under our policies to reinsurance brokers, and these brokers, in turn, pay these amounts to the ceding insurers that have reinsured a portion of their liabilities with us. In some jurisdictions, if a broker fails to make such a payment, we may remain liable to the ceding insurer for the deficiency. Conversely, in certain jurisdictions, when the ceding insurer pays premiums to reinsurance brokers for payment to us, these premiums are considered to have been paid and the ceding insurer will no longer be liable to us for those amounts, regardless of whether we have received the premiums.
For risk management purposes, we use Catastrophe bonds to manage our reinsurance risk and treat the catastrophe risks related to Catastrophe bonds as part of the underwriting risks of the Company. Catastrophe bonds are selected by our reinsurance underwriters however they are held in our investment portfolio as low risk floating rate bonds. We believe that amalgamating the catastrophe risk in the Catastrophe bonds with our other reinsurance risks produces more meaningful risk management reporting.
Foreign Currency Risk
Premiums, Reserves, and Claims
The U.S. dollar is our principal reporting currency and the functional currencies of our operating subsidiaries are generally their national currencies, except for Bermuda subsidiaries, whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar. We enter into reinsurance contracts where the premiums receivable and losses payable are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. When we incur a loss in a non-U.S. dollar currency, we carry the liability on our books in the original currency. As a result, we have an exposure to foreign currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates between the time premiums are collected and converted to the functional currency (either U.S. dollars or Swiss francs), and the time claims are paid.
With respect to loss reserves denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies, our policy is to hedge the expected losses with forward foreign exchange purchases. Expected losses means incurred and reported losses and incurred but not reported losses. We do not hedge expected catastrophe events. However, upon the occurrence of a catastrophe loss and when the actuarial department has estimated the loss to the Company, we purchase foreign currency promptly on a forward basis. When we pay claims in a non-base currency, we either use the proceeds of a foreign currency forward contract to do so, or buy spot foreign exchange to pay the claim and simultaneously adjust the hedge balance to the new lower exposure.
Investments
The majority of the securities held in our investment portfolios are held by Flagstone, where they are measured in U.S. dollars, and in Flagstone Suisse, where they are measured in Swiss francs. At the time of purchase, each investment is identified as either a hedged investment, to be maintained with an appropriate currency hedge to U.S. dollars or Swiss francs as the case may be, or an unhedged investment, one not to be maintained with a hedge. Generally, fixed income investments will be hedged, listed equity investments may or may not be hedged, and other investments such as real estate and commodities will not be hedged.
Financing
When the Company or its subsidiaries issues a debt or equity financing in a currency other than the functional currency of that company, our practice is to hedge that exposure. The contractual amount of these contracts as at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $481.5 million and $311.1 million, and had a fair value of $(8.3) million and $(7.1) million, respectively. The Company designated $427.2 million of foreign currency forwards contractual value as hedges, which had a fair value of $(7.8) million as of June 30, 2008. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded net realized and unrealized gains of $2.6 million and net realized and unrealized losses of $3.0 million on foreign currency forward contracts, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded $4.3 million of realized and unrealized gains and $25.6 million of realized and unrealized losses, respectively, directly into comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment for the effective portion of the hedge.
The Company entered into a foreign currency swap in relation to the Euro-denominated Deferrable Interest Debentures recorded as long term debt. Under the terms of the foreign currency swap, the Company exchanged €13.0 million for $16.7 million, will receive Euribor plus 354 basis points and pay LIBOR plus 371 basis points. The swap expires on September 15, 2011 and had a fair value of $4.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, as at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Foreign currency exchange contracts will not eliminate fluctuations in the value of our assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies but rather allow us to establish a rate of exchange for a future point in time. Of our business written in the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, approximately 27% and 29%, respectively, was written in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we had net realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains of $5.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
The Company does not hedge currencies for which its asset or liability exposures are not material or where it is unable or impractical to do so. In such cases, the Company is exposed to foreign currency risk. However, the Company does not believe that the foreign currency risks corresponding to these unhedged positions are material.
Effects of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our combined results of operations, except insofar as inflation may affect interest rates.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains, and the Company may from time to time make, written or oral “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. In particular, statements using words such as “may”, “should”, “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential”, or words of similar import generally involve forward-looking statements.
Important events and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ include, but are not necessarily limited to: market conditions affecting the Company’s common share price; the possibility of severe or unanticipated losses from natural or man-made catastrophes; the effectiveness of our loss limitation methods; our dependence on principal employees; the cyclical nature of the reinsurance business; the levels of new and renewal business achieved; opportunities to increase writings in our core property and specialty reinsurance and insurance lines of business and in specific areas of the casualty reinsurance market; the sensitivity of our business to financial strength ratings established by independent rating agencies; the estimates reported by cedents and brokers on pro-rata contracts and certain excess of loss contracts where the deposit premium is not specified in the contract; the inherent uncertainties of establishing reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, our reliance on industry loss estimates and those generated by modeling techniques; unanticipated adjustments to premium estimates; changes in the availability, cost or quality of reinsurance or retrocessional coverage; changes in general economic conditions; changes in governmental regulation or tax laws in the jurisdictions where we conduct business; the amount and timing of reinsurance recoverables and reimbursements we actually receive from our reinsurers; the overall level of competition, and the related demand and supply dynamics in our markets relating to growing capital levels in the reinsurance industry; declining demand due to increased retentions by cedents and other factors; the impact of terrorist activities on the economy; and rating agency policies and practices.
These and other events that could cause actual results to differ are discussed in more detail from time to time in our filings with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by U.S. federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management has performed an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our second fiscal quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| |
| |
| NONE |
| |
| |
| |
| There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously described in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
| |
| |
| |
| NONE |
| |
| |
| |
| NONE |
| |
| |
| |
| On May 16, 2008 the Company held its Annual General Meeting of shareholders. Shareholders were asked to vote upon the resolutions set out below. The following tabulation indicates the number of shares voted for or against, or withheld, or abstaining with respect to each resolution after giving effect to the voting limitations contained in the Company’s Bye-laws: |
Election of Directors
| 1) | electing the following persons as directors to hold office until the Company’s next Annual General Meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed or their offices are otherwise vacated: |
| FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON VOTE |
GARY BLACK | 71,569,178 | 0 | 27,128 | 0 |
THOMAS DICKSON | 71,577,678 | 0 | 18,628 | 0 |
JAN SPIERING | 71,577,678 | 0 | 18,628 | 0 |
WRAY T. THORN | 71,569,027 | 0 | 27,279 | 0 |
| In accordance with the Company’s Bye-Laws the Class A Directors, Mark J. Byrne, Stewart Gross, E. Daniel James and Marc Roston have terms which expire at the 2009 Annual General Meeting. The Class C Directors, David A. Brown, Stephen Coley, Dr. Anthony Knap and Peter F. Watson have terms which expire at the 2010 Annual General Meeting. |
| 2) | to appoint Deloitte & Touche, independent auditors, to serve as our independent auditors for the 2008 Fiscal year until our 2009 Annual General Meeting, and to refer the determination of the auditors’ remuneration to the Board of Directors: |
| FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON VOTE |
| 71,568,754 | 25,562 | 1,990 | 0 |
| 3) | to approve an amendment to the Company’s Performance Share Unit Plan: |
| FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON VOTE |
| 61,692,974 | 1,217,956 | 25,432 | 8,659,945 |
| 4) | to approve the list of Designated Company Directors for certain subsidiaries of the Company: |
| FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON VOTE |
| 71,540,666 | 31,008 | 24,632 | 0 |
| |
| |
| |
| At the Company’s Annual General Meeting of shareholders held on May 16, 2008, the PSU Plan was amended to increase the maximum number of PSUs that can be issued under the PSU Plan from 2.8 million to 5.6 million and to increase the maximum number of common shares that can be issued under the PSU Plan from 5.6 million to 11.2 million. |
| |
| |
| |
| The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index, and such Exhibit Index, are filed or incorporated by reference as a part of this report. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| FLAGSTONE REINSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ David Brown | |
| | David Brown | |
| | Chief Executive Officer | |
| | | |
| | (Authorized Officer) | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ James O’Shaughnessy | |
| | James O’Shaughnessy | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | |
| | | |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) | |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit |
10.1 | | Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited Performance Share Unit Plan, as amended and restated. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |