Item 8.01 Other Events.
As previously announced, on August 8, 2022, Avalara, Inc., a Washington corporation (“Avalara” or the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Avalara, Lava Intermediate, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Lava Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Avalara (the “Merger”), with Avalara continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.
Supplemental Disclosures in Connection with Transaction Litigation
This Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Form 8-K”) is being filed to update and supplement the definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) filed by the Company on September 12, 2022 and mailed by the Company to its stockholders commencing on September 12, 2022. The information contained in this Form 8-K is incorporated by reference into the Proxy Statement. Terms used in this Form 8-K, but not otherwise defined, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Proxy Statement.
Following the announcement of the Merger Agreement and as of the date of this Form 8-K, eight lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Merger on behalf of purported individual stockholders of the Company—James Albrecht v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-7486 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 1, 2022), Ryan O’Dell v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-7720 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 9, 2022), Stephen Bushansky v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-7882 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 14, 2022), Michael Rubin v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-08042 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 20, 2022), Anthony Morgan v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-08077 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 21, 2022), Edward Benes v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-08079 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 21, 2022), Susan Finger v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-08092 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 22, 2022), and Shannon O’Neill v. Avalara, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-8140 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 26, 2022). These lawsuits (collectively, the “Actions”), name the Company and individual officer(s) and members of the Company’s board of directors as defendants (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints in the Actions allege that the preliminary version of the Proxy Statement, together with the Proxy Statement (collectively, the “Proxy Statements”), were materially deficient and therefore misleading in certain respects in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. Specifically, the complaints in the Actions allege, among other things, that the Proxy Statements failed to disclose certain information relating to the Company’s financial projections, Goldman Sachs’ financial analyses, potential conflicts of interest, and the process and events that preceded the signing of the Merger Agreement.
Avalara believes that the Actions are without merit and that no further disclosure is required to supplement the Proxy Statement under applicable law; however, to eliminate the burden, expense, and uncertainties inherent in such litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the Company has agreed to make certain supplemental disclosures to the Proxy Statement as set forth below. Nothing in these supplemental disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable law of any of the disclosures set forth herein. The Defendants have vigorously denied, and continue vigorously to deny, that they have committed any violation of law or engaged in any of the wrongful acts that were alleged in the Actions.
Supplements to the Proxy Statement
The supplemental disclosures to the Proxy Statement set forth in this Form 8-K below should be read alongside the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety, and to the extent that information in this Form 8-K differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement, this Form 8-K shall supersede the information in the Proxy Statement. Defined terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.
1. | The section of the Proxy Statement entitled “The Merger—Background of the Merger” is hereby supplemented as follows: |
| A. | By adding the underlined and bolded text below to the seventh full paragraph on page 36 (such paragraph beginning with “Over the course of the end of May…”) of the Proxy Statement: |
Over the course of the end of May and the first week of June, Party A, Party B, Party C, Party D, Party E, Vista and Party G entered into confidentiality agreements with Avalara. The confidentiality agreements included a prohibition on the counterparty contacting debt or equity financing sources without Avalara’s prior approval, as well as a standstill provision, which did not prohibit the counterparty from making private acquisition proposals to Avalara and that fell away upon the announcement of the proposed merger (and which provided that such standstill provisions would fall away, among other things, upon the announcement of certain similar potential extraordinary transactions involving Avalara). As Party B had already engaged in discussions with an institutional co-investor regarding a potential acquisition of Avalara prior to being contacted by Goldman Sachs, Party B requested consent from Avalara to contact such institutional co-investor as a potential financing source in connection with the potential sale process. Following discussions between Avalara senior management and representatives of Goldman Sachs, Avalara’s senior management determined it was in the best interests of Avalara, and consistent with the directions of the Board, to permit Party B to contact such institutional co-investor as a potential financing source. Party F informed Goldman Sachs that it did not wish to participate in the potential sale process and did not execute a confidentiality agreement.