Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers |
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its cash and cash equivalents with established financial institutions. As of December 31, 2013 a substantial portion of the Company’s available cash funds is in business accounts. Although the Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with multiple financial institutions, its deposits, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. |
The Company’s customers are primarily hospitals, surgical centers and distributors and no single customer represented greater than 10 percent of consolidated revenues for any of the periods presented. Credit to customers is granted based on an analysis of the customers’ credit worthiness and credit losses have not been significant. |
Revenue Recognition |
The Company derives its revenues primarily from the sale of spinal surgery implants used in the treatment of spine disorders. The Company sells its products primarily through its direct sales force and independent distributors. Revenue is recognized when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. In addition, the Company accounts for revenue under provisions which sets forth guidelines for the timing of revenue recognition based upon factors such as passage of title, installation, payment and customer acceptance. |
The Company’s revenue from sales of spinal and other surgical implants is recognized upon receipt of written acknowledgement that the product has been used in a surgical procedure or upon shipment to third-party customers who immediately accept title to such implant. |
Deferred revenues consist of products sold to distributors with payment terms greater than the Company’s customary business terms due to lack of credit history or because the distributor is operating in a new market in which the Company has no prior experience. The Company defers the recognition of revenue until payments become due and cash is received from these distributors. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance in deferred revenue totaled $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. |
Accounts Receivable |
Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides allowances for a portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices and the overall quality and age of those invoices not specifically reviewed. In determining the provision for invoices not specifically reviewed, the Company analyzes historical collection experience. If the historical data used to calculate the allowance provided for doubtful accounts does not reflect the Company’s future ability to collect outstanding receivables or if the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts may be required. |
Inventories |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost primarily determined under the first-in, first-out method. The Company reviews the components of inventory on a periodic basis for excess, obsolete and impaired inventory, and records a reserve for the identified items. The Company calculates an inventory reserve for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon historical turnover and assumptions about future demand for its products and market conditions. The Company’s biologics inventories have an expiration based on shelf life and are subject to demand fluctuations based on the availability and demand for alternative implant products. The Company’s estimates and assumptions for excess and obsolete inventory are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis. Increases in the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory result in a corresponding increase to cost of revenues and establish a new cost basis for the part. Approximately $18.4 million and $22.0 million of inventory was held at consigned locations as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements and assets acquired under capital leases are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the terms of the related leases. |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with provisions which require that goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets for impairment in December of each year, or more frequently if events and circumstances warrant. These assets are impaired if the Company determines that their carrying values may not be recoverable based on an assessment of certain events or changes in circumstances. If the assets are considered to be impaired, the Company recognizes the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets as an impairment loss. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company decided that it would not continue to market an adult stem cell product sold under the Company's private label name of Puregen. The Company also decided that it would no longer actively market two additional products. The Company expensed $1.3 million as impairment charges in cost of goods sold in the year ended December 31, 2013 for the write-off of intangible assets related to these products. |
The Company estimated the fair value in step one of the goodwill impairment test based on a combination of the income approach which included discounted cash flows as well as a market approach that utilized the Company’s market information. The income approach fair value measurements are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s discounted cash flows required management judgment with respect to forecasted sales, launch of new products, gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate and terminal rate. For purposes of calculating the discounted cash flows, the Company used estimated revenue growth rates averaging between 4% and 12% for the discrete forecast period. Cash flows beyond the discrete forecasts were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which incorporated historical and forecasted financial trends and considered long-term earnings growth rates for publicly traded peer companies. Future cash flows were then discounted to present value at a discount rate of 12%, and terminal value growth rate of 4%. Publicly available information regarding comparable market capitalization was also considered in assessing the reasonableness of the Company’s fair value. The Company’s assessment resulted in a fair value that was greater than the Company’s carrying value at December 31, 2013. In accordance with the authoritative literature, the second step of the impairment test was not required to be performed and thus no impairment of goodwill was recorded as of December 31, 2013. |
Significant management judgment is required in the forecast of future operating results that are used in the Company’s impairment analysis. The estimates the Company used are consistent with the plans and estimates that it uses to manage its business. Significant assumptions utilized in the Company’s income approach model included the growth rate of sales for recently introduced products and the introduction of anticipated new products similar to its historical growth rates. Another important assumption involved in forecasted sales is the projected mix of higher margin U.S. based sales and lower margin non-U.S. based sales. Additionally, the Company has projected an improvement in its gross margin, similar to its historical improvement in gross margins, as a result of its forecasted mix in U.S. sales versus non-U.S. based sales and lower manufacturing cost per unit based on the increase in forecasted volume to absorb applied overhead over the next ten years. Although the Company believes its underlying assumptions supporting this assessment are reasonable, if the Company’s forecasted sales, mix of product sales, growth rates of recently introduced new products, timing of and growth rates of new product introductions, gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses, or the discount rate vary from its forecasts, the Company could be exposed to material impairment charges in the future. Additionally, if the Company’s stock price decreases significantly from the closing price on December 31, 2013, the Company may be required to perform an interim analysis in 2014 that could result in an impairment charge. |
The accounting provisions also require that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for indicators of impairment. The Company is amortizing its intangible assets, other than goodwill, on a straight-line basis over a one to fifteen-year period. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
The Company assesses potential impairment to its long-lived assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived assets is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to operating results. |
Due to the Scient'x restructuring plan, the Company assessed potential impairment on certain intangible assets related to the Scient'x acquisition. Based on this assessment the projected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying amount of the intangible assets and no impairment loss was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2013. |
Foreign Currency |
The Company’s results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s primary functional currency is the U.S. dollar, while the functional currency of the Company’s Japanese subsidiary is the Japanese Yen, the Hong Kong subsidiary is the Hong Kong dollar and the functional currency of the Company’s European operations is the Euro. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. Net gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Net foreign currency gains or (losses) resulting from transactions in currencies other than the functional currencies are included in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded net foreign currency gains (losses) of approximately $(1.7) million, $(0.9) million and $0.5 million, respectively. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying value of accounts receivable, foreign cash accounts, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and current portion of debt are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of the short- term nature of those instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, management believes the fair value of notes payable, capital leases and other long-term debt approximates their carrying values. |
The Company measures its fair value of financial instruments in accordance with the established framework for fair value using “levels” which are defined as follows: Level 1 fair value is determined from observable, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 fair value is determined from quoted prices for similar items in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active. Level 3 fair value is determined using the entity’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. |
The Company reassesses the fair value of contingent consideration of $3.8 million to be settled in cash related to acquisitions on a quarterly basis using the present value of future royalty payments due. This is a Level 3 measurement. Significant assumptions used in the measurement include estimates of the royalty payments due. |
Research and Development |
Research and development expense consists of costs associated with the design, development, testing, and enhancement of the Company’s products. Research and development costs also include salaries and related employee benefits, research-related overhead expenses, fees paid to external service providers, and costs associated with the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board and Executive Surgeon Panels. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. |
In-Process Research and Development |
In-process research and development (“IPR&D”) consists of acquired research and development assets that are not part of an acquisition of a business and were not technologically feasible on the date the Company acquired them and had no alternative future use at that date or IPR&D assets acquired in a business acquisition that are determined to have no alternative future use. The Company expects all acquired IPR&D will reach technological feasibility, but there can be no assurance that commercial viability of these products will ever be achieved. The nature of the efforts to develop the acquired technologies into commercially viable products consists principally of planning, designing, developing and testing products in order to obtain regulatory approvals. If commercial viability were not achieved, the Company would likely look to other alternatives to provide these products. Until the technological feasibility of the acquired research and development assets are established, the Company expenses these costs. |
Leases |
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment and vehicles under operating leases, and certain equipment under capital leases. For facility leases that contain rent escalation or rent concession provisions, the Company records the total rent payable during the lease term on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company records the difference between the rent paid and the straight-line rent as a deferred rent liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Product Shipment Cost |
Product shipment costs are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Product shipment costs totaled $3.1 million, $2.9 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under provisions which require that share-based payment transactions with employees be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. The amount of expense recognized during the period is affected by subjective assumptions, including: estimates of the Company’s future volatility, the expected term for its stock options, the number of options expected to ultimately vest, and the timing of vesting for the Company’s share-based awards. |
The Company uses a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of its stock option awards. The calculation of the fair value of the awards using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price on the date of grant as well as assumptions regarding the following: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Estimated volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s stock price is expected to fluctuate each year during the expected life of the award. The Company’s estimated volatility through December 31, 2013 was based on a weighted-average volatility of its actual historical volatility over a period equal to the expected life of the awards. | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The expected term represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding. Through December 31, 2013, the Company calculated the expected term using a weighted-average term based on historical exercise patterns and the term from option date to full exercise for the options granted within the specified date range. | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the stock option award is granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option award. | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The assumed dividend yield is based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company used historical data to estimate the number of future stock option forfeitures. Share-based compensation recorded in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations is based on awards expected to ultimately vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company’s estimated forfeiture rates may differ from its actual forfeitures which would affect the amount of expense recognized during the period. |
The Company values equity awards with a market condition using a Monte Carlo simulation model. |
The Company accounts for stock option grants to non-employees in accordance with provisions which require that the fair value of these instruments be recognized as an expense over the period in which the related services are rendered. |
Share-based compensation expense of awards with performance conditions is recognized over the period from the date the performance condition is determined to be probable of occurring through the time the applicable condition is met. Determining the likelihood and timing of achieving performance conditions is a subjective judgment made by management which may affect the amount and timing of expense related to these share-based awards. Share-based compensation is adjusted to reflect the value of options which ultimately vest as such amounts become known in future periods. |
Valuation of Stock Option Awards |
The assumptions used to compute the share-based compensation costs for the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows: |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.1-1.8% | | | 0.9-1.2% | | | 1.2-2.5% | | | | |
| | |
Expected dividend yield | — | | | — | | | — | | | | |
| | |
Weighted average expected life (years) | 5.3-5.5 | | | 5.3-5.8 | | | 5.8-5.9 | | | | |
| | |
Volatility | 75-76% | | | 75-78% | | | 56-57% | | | | |
| | |
Compensation Costs |
The compensation cost that has been included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for all stock-based compensation arrangements is detailed as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts): |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cost of revenues | $ | 228 | | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 180 | |
|
Research and development | 719 | | | 261 | | | 289 | |
|
Sales and marketing | 459 | | | 1,695 | | | 693 | |
|
General and administrative | 2,672 | | | 1,447 | | | 1,263 | |
|
Total | $ | 4,078 | | | $ | 3,540 | | | $ | 2,425 | |
|
The amounts above include stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million, $1.3 million and $0 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the vesting of stock options and awards granted to non-employees under consulting agreements. |
Income Taxes |
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with provisions which set forth an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In making such determination, a review of all available positive and negative evidence must be considered, including scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance. |
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision. |
Net Loss per Share |
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method. For purposes of this calculation, common stock subject to repurchase by the Company and options are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their effect is dilutive. (In thousands, except per share data): |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Numerator: | | | | | |
Net loss | $ | (82,227 | ) | | $ | (15,459 | ) | | $ | (22,181 | ) |
Denominator: | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 97,111 | | | 90,870 | | | 89,165 | |
|
Weighted average unvested common shares subject to repurchase | (876 | ) | | (652 | ) | | (368 | ) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | 96,235 | | | 90,218 | | | 88,797 | |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
Options, warrants and restricted share awards | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted | 96,235 | | | 90,218 | | | 88,797 | |
|
Net loss per common share: | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.85 | ) | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, none of the outstanding redeemable preferred stock is convertible to common stock. |
The weighted-average anti-dilutive securities not included in diluted net loss per share were as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | |
Options to purchase common stock | 4,597 | | | 4,621 | | | 4,323 | | | | |
| | |
Warrants to purchase common stock | 594 | | | 594 | | | 94 | | | | |
| | |
Unvested restricted stock awards | 807 | | | 877 | | | 368 | | | | |
| | |
| 5,998 | | | 6,092 | | | 4,785 | | | | |
| | |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance that requires a company to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income either on the face of the income statement or as a separate disclosure in the notes. The new guidance became effective for our interim period ended March 31, 2013. The Company adopted this guidance and the adoption did not have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
In March 2013, the FASB issued guidance on a parent company’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. This new guidance requires that the parent release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2014. The Company does not anticipate any impact on its financial statements upon adoption. |
In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance that requires an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, unless an exception applies. The Company early adopted this guidance for the period ending December 31, 2013, which is reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2013. There was no material impact on the Company's financial statements upon adoption. |