Exhibit 13
Selected Financial and Other Data |
(dollars in thousands, except where per share data) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | At 12/31/13 | | At 12/31/12 | | At 12/31/11 |
Total Assets | | $ | 421,848 | | | $ | 375,019 | | | $ | 377,039 | |
Loans, net | | | 276,875 | | | | 233,290 | | | | 214,083 | |
Investment securities | | | 89,645 | | | | 92,409 | | | | 57,519 | |
Federal fund sold, money market mutual | | | | | | | | | | | | |
funds and other interest-bearing deposits | | | 25,235 | | | | 21,728 | | | | 72,663 | |
Deposits | | | 358,504 | | | | 340,409 | | | | 344,777 | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 27,396 | | | | 29,437 | | | | 27,443 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year | | For the Year | | For the Year |
| | Ended 12/31/13 | | Ended 12/31/12 | | Ended 12/31/11 |
Statement of Income Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 12,004 | | | | 11,567 | | | | 11,710 | |
Total interest expense | | | 917 | | | | 1,041 | | | | 1,517 | |
Net interest and dividend income | | | 11,087 | | | | 10,526 | | | | 10,193 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 345 | | | | 320 | | | | 495 | |
Net interest and dividend income after | | | | | | | | | | | | |
provision for loan losses | | | 10,742 | | | | 10,206 | | | | 9,698 | |
Mortgage banking activities | | | 1,390 | | | | 2,266 | | | | 428 | |
Noninterest income | | | 3,126 | | | | 4,053 | | | | 2,382 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 12,599 | | | | 11,508 | | | | 10,754 | |
Income tax expense | | | 134 | | | | 707 | | | | 416 | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | | | $ | 910 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share | | $ | 1.18 | | | $ | 2.19 | | | $ | 0.64 | |
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 2.18 | | | $ | 0.63 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | 3.03 | % | | | 3.09 | % | | | 3.13 | % |
Net interest margin | | | 3.13 | % | | | 3.18 | % | | | 3.27 | % |
Return on average assets | | | 0.30 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.27 | % |
Return on average stockholders' equity | | | 7.78 | % | | | 8.39 | % | | | 3.78 | % |
Dividend payout ratio | | | 44.72 | % | | | 27.89 | % | | | 74.90 | % |
Average stockholders' equity to | | | | | | | | | | | | |
average assets | | | 7.65 | % | | | 6.84 | % | | | 7.22 | % |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report that are not historical facts may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to the Company’s anticipated future financial performance, projected growth, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations and financial condition from developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, and could be affected by many factors. The following list, which is not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, summarizes several factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or expected in these forward-looking statements:
| ● | economic conditions (both generally and in the Company’s markets) may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a continued deterioration in credit quality, a further reduction in demand for credit and/or a further decline in real estate values; |
| | |
| ● | a general decline in the real estate and lending markets may negatively affect the Company’s financial results; |
| | |
| ● | inaccuracies in management’s assumptions used in calculating the appropriate amount to be placed into the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses; |
| | |
| ● | restrictions or conditions imposed by regulators on the Company’s operations may make it more difficult for the Company to achieve its goals; |
| | |
| ● | legislative and regulatory changes (including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations) subject the Company to additional regulatory oversight which may result in increased compliance costs and/or require the Company to change its business model; |
| | |
| ● | changes in accounting standards and compliance requirements may adversely affect the businesses in which the Company is engaged; |
| | |
| ● | competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly; |
| | |
| ● | changes in the interest rate environment may reduce margins or the volumes or values of the loans the Company makes; |
| | |
| ● | competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than the Company can; |
| | |
| ● | the Company’s ability to attract and retain key personnel can be affected by the increased competition for experienced employees in the banking industry; |
| | |
| ● | adverse changes may occur in the equity markets; |
| | |
| ● | war or terrorist activities may cause deterioration in the economy or cause instability in credit markets; and economic, governmental or other factors may prevent the projected population and residential and commercial growth in the markets in which the Company operates. |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.
General
This discussion is designed to assist you in better understanding the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, and any significant changes and trends related thereto. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements.
SBT Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) is the holding company for The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc. (the “Bank”). The Company was incorporated in the State of Connecticut on February 17, 2006. The Company became the Bank’s sole shareholder pursuant to a reorganization that occurred on March 2, 2006. The Company’s only business is its investment in the Bank, which is a community-oriented financial institution providing a variety of banking and investment services.
The Bank was incorporated on April 28, 1992 and commenced operations as a Connecticut-chartered bank on March 31, 1995. The Bank's deposit accounts are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, up to the maximum applicable limits thereof. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank's main office and its corporate offices are located in the town of Simsbury, Connecticut. The Bank has branch offices in the towns of Granby, Avon, and Bloomfield, Connecticut. The Bank also maintains a business office in Canton, Connecticut. The Bank's customer base consists primarily of individual consumers and small businesses in north central Connecticut. The Bank has in excess of 21,000 deposit accounts.
The Bank offers a full range of commercial banking services to residents and businesses in its primary and secondary markets through a wide variety of mortgage programs, home equity lines and loans, FDIC-insured checking and savings accounts, and IRA and 401(k) rollovers, as well as safe deposit and other customary non-deposit banking services. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 74% of the Bank's loans are secured by residential property located in Connecticut.
The Bank has two ATMs at its main office and one ATM at each of its other branch/business office locations. The ATMs generate activity fees based upon utilization by other banks' customers. The Bank offers investment products to customers through SBT Investment Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, and through its affiliation with the securities broker/dealer, LPL Financial Services Corporation.
In May of 2010, the Bank formed NERE Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary to hold real estate primarily acquired through foreclosures. In January of 2011, the Bank formed Simsbury Bank Passive Investment Company, a subsidiary Passive Investment Company (PIC). Under current State of Connecticut statutes, Simsbury Bank Passive Investment Company is not subject to Connecticut corporation business taxes.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company received $9 million in capital through the Small Business Lending Fund (the “SBLF”) administered by the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”). The SBLF was created by the Treasury to encourage banks to increase lending to small business by providing capital to eligible banks at an adjustable dividend rate based on the volume of qualified lending. The Company’s initial weighted average dividend rate was 3%. However, as a result of its increased lending, the Company’s current weighted average dividend rate has been reduced to 1%. The Company used approximately $4.3 million of the proceeds to redeem all of the outstanding shares of preferred stock issued to the Treasury under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”).
For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company’s net income totaled $1,135,000 compared to $2,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $ 909,000 or 44%. Net income available to common stockholders after preferred stock dividends and amortization was $ 1,029,000 or $1.17 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $1,898,000 or $2.18 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2012, a 46% decrease in diluted earnings per share. The decrease in net earnings was primarily due to the reduction in mortgage banking activities as the increase in longer-term interest rates negatively impacted residential mortgage refinancing activity. Total assets as of December 31, 2013 were $422 million, compared to $375 million as of December 31, 2012.
Total revenues, consisting of net interest and dividend income plus noninterest income, were $14.2 million for 2013 compared to $14.6 million for 2012, a decrease of $0.4 million or 3%. Net interest and dividend income increased in 2013 by $561 thousand or 5% while noninterest income decreased by $0.9 million or 23% primarily due to a decrease in gain on loans sold.
The net interest margin decreased 5 basis points to 3.13% in 2013 from 3.18% in 2012. The yield on interest earning assets decreased 9 basis points to 3.39% while cost of funds decreased 6 basis points to 0.34% in 2013. The Bank experienced a greater decline in yield on assets as compared to the decline in cost of funds.
Total non-interest expenses for 2013 were $12.6 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 9.5% over 2012. The increase in expenses was primarily attributable to expenses associated with growing the Bank’s revenues. Salaries and employee benefit expenses and advertising and promotions fees increased by a total of $710 thousand during 2013 compared to 2012. Occupancy expense increased by $126 thousand in 2013 or 12% compared to 2012 due to the re-location of the Bank’s administrative offices to a larger building. Professional fees and FDIC insurance assessment decreased by a total of $22 thousand in 2013 compared to 2012. All other operating expenses were up by $277 thousand in 2013 compared to 2012. The provision for loan losses was $345 thousand in 2013 compared to $320 thousand in 2012, an increase of $25 thousand or 8%.
On December 31, 2013, outstanding loans were $280 million, an increase of $43.8 million or 19% over a year ago. The allowance for loan losses was $2.8 million or 1.0% of total loans at December 31, 2013 compared to $2.6 million or 1.0% of total loans at December 31, 2012. The profile of the Company’s loan portfolio remained relatively low-risk throughout 2013. At December 31, 2013, 66% of total loans were conventionally underwritten residential mortgages and consumer home equity lines and loans. Commercial loans represent 27% of the Company’s total loans. Other consumer loans comprise 3.8% of total loans. The Company’s exposure to commercial real estate concentrations is relatively low. Total exposure to builder and land development loans and non-owner occupied commercial real estate was $20.6 million at December 31, 2013, which represented 7% of total loans and 75% of total stockholders’ equity. The Company had non-accrual loans totaling $2.8 million equal to 1.01% of total loans at December 31, 2013 compared to non-accrual loans of $1.2 million or 0.53% of total loans at December 31, 2012. Total non-accrual loans and loans 30 or more days past due and still accruing increased to 1.36% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2013 from 0.76% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2012.
Total deposits at December 31, 2013 were $359 million, compared to $340 million at December 31, 2012. From December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, demand deposits increased $23.3 million or 25.2%, savings and NOW deposits decreased $1.8 million or 1% and time deposits decreased $3.5 million or 4.8%. At December 31, 2013, 32% of total deposits were in non-interest bearing demand accounts, 48% were in low-cost savings and NOW accounts and 20% were in time deposits.
Capital levels for the Simsbury Bank & Trust Company on December 31, 2013 were above those required to meet the regulatory “well-capitalized” designation.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
The Bank’s earnings depend largely upon the difference between the income received from its loan portfolio and investment securities and the interest paid on its liabilities, mainly interest paid on deposits. This difference is “net interest income.” The net interest income, when expressed as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets, is referred to as the net interest margin. The Bank’s net interest income is affected by the change in the level and the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as volume changes. The Bank’s net interest margin is also affected by changes in yields earned on assets and rates paid on liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest rates charged on the Bank’s loans are affected principally by the demand for such loans, the supply of money available for lending purposes, and competitive factors. These factors are in turn affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond the Bank’s control, such as federal economic policies, the general supply of money in the economy, legislative tax policies, governmental budgetary matters, and the actions of the Federal Reserve.
Net interest and dividend income, before provision for loan losses, totaled $11,087,000 in 2013, which was an increase of $561,000, or 5.3%, from 2012. Average earning assets grew to $361 million at December 31, 2013 from $337 million at December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in mortgage-backed securities and an increase in total loans. The Bank’s net interest spread and net interest margin decreased to 2.93% and 3.03%, respectively, during 2013 as compared to 3.11% and 3.20%, respectively, during 2012.
The following tables present the average amounts outstanding for the major categories of the Bank’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rates earned or paid thereon for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
NET INTEREST INCOME |
(Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended 12/31/13 |
| | | | | (1) | | | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest | | Yield |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 12,738 | | | $ | 35 | | | | 0.27 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments (1) | | | 105,771 | | | | 2,362 | | | | 2.23 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans | | | 127,805 | | | | 4,723 | | | | 3.70 | % |
Commercial loans | | | 71,680 | | | | 3,159 | | | | 4.41 | % |
Consumer loans | | | 56,332 | | | | 1,971 | | | | 3.50 | % |
Total loans | | | 255,817 | | | | 9,853 | | | | 3.85 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest bearing deposits | | $ | 374,326 | | | $ | 12,250 | | | | 3.27 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | | 35,529 | | | | 28 | | | | 0.08 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 147,657 | | | | 253 | | | | 0.17 | % |
Certificates of deposit | | | 72,344 | | | | 613 | | | | 0.85 | % |
Total Deposits | | | 255,530 | | | | 894 | | | | 0.35 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities sold under agreements to | | | | | | | | | | | | |
repurchase | | | 3,265 | | | | 4 | | | | 0.12 | % |
FHLB Borrowings | | | 9,575 | | | | 19 | | | | 0.20 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 268,370 | | | $ | 917 | | | | 0.34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | | $ | 11,333 | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | | | 2.93 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | | | | | | 3.03 | % |
NET INTEREST INCOME |
(Dollars in thousands) |
| | For the Year Ended 12/31/12 |
| | | | | (1) | | | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest | | Yield |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 37,494 | | | $ | 99 | | | | 0.26 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments (1) | | | 81,407 | | | | 2,064 | | | | 2.53 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans | | | 104,071 | | | | 4,536 | | | | 4.36 | % |
Commercial loans | | | 57,089 | | | | 2,930 | | | | 5.13 | % |
Consumer loans | | | 56,992 | | | | 2,190 | | | | 3.84 | % |
| | | 218,152 | | | | 9,656 | | | | 4.43 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | $ | 337,053 | | | | 11,819 | | | | 3.51 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings deposits | | | 44,630 | | | | 39 | | | | 0.09 | % |
Certificates of deposit | | | 135,130 | | | | 214 | | | | 0.16 | % |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 75,430 | | | | 784 | | | | 1.04 | % |
| | | 255,190 | | | | 1,037 | | | | 0.41 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities sold under agreements to | | | | | | | | | | | | |
repurchase | | | 3,317 | | | | 4 | | | | 0.12 | % |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 258,507 | | | $ | 1,041 | | | | 0.40 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | | $ | 10,708 | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | | | 3.11 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | | | | | | 3.20 | % |
| | For the Year Ended 12/31/11 |
| | | | | (1) | | | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest | | Yield |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 46,980 | | | $ | 110 | | | | 0.23 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments (1) | | | 62,979 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 2.95 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans | | | 98,328 | | | | 4,731 | | | | 4.81 | % |
Commercial loans | | | 52,735 | | | | 2,904 | | | | 5.51 | % |
Consumer loans | | | 55,888 | | | | 2,339 | | | | 4.19 | % |
Total loans | | | 206,951 | | | | 9,974 | | | | 4.82 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | $ | 316,910 | | | $ | 11,941 | | | | 3.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | | 39,415 | | | | 34 | | | | 0.09 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 126,065 | | | | 481 | | | | 0.38 | % |
Certificates of deposit | | | 76,339 | | | | 974 | | | | 1.28 | % |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 241,819 | | | | 1,489 | | | | 0.62 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities sold under agreements to | | | | | | | | | | | | |
repurchase | | | 3,314 | | | | 28 | | | | 0.84 | % |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 245,133 | | | $ | 1,517 | | | | 0.62 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | | $ | 10,424 | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | | | 3.15 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | | | | | | 3.29 | % |
(1) | On a fully taxable equivalent basis based on a tax rate of 34%. Interest income on investments includes a fully taxable equivalent adjustment of $246,000 in 2013, $252,000 in 2012 and $231,000 in 2011. |
The following tables set forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the rate column and the volume column. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionally based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
| | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
| | compared to | | compared to |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| | Increase (Decrease) | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | Due to | | Due to |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Net | | Volume | | Rate | | Net |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and dividend income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold and overnight | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
deposits | | $ | (70 | ) | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (64 | ) | | $ | (30 | ) | | $ | 19 | | | $ | (11 | ) |
Investments | | | 423 | | | | (125 | ) | | | 298 | | | | 431 | | | | (224 | ) | | | 207 | |
Loans | | | 893 | | | | (696 | ) | | | 197 | | | | 514 | | | | (832 | ) | | | (318 | ) |
Total interest-earning assets | | $ | 1,246 | | | $ | (815 | ) | | $ | 431 | | | $ | 915 | | | $ | (1,037 | ) | | $ | (122 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | 5 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 5 | |
Savings deposits | | | 22 | | | | 17 | | | | 39 | | | | 37 | | | | (304 | ) | | | (267 | ) |
Time deposits | | | (31 | ) | | | (140 | ) | | | (171 | ) | | | (11 | ) | | | (179 | ) | | | (190 | ) |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | (16 | ) | | | (127 | ) | | | (143 | ) | | | 31 | | | | (483 | ) | | | (452 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities sold under agreements to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
repurchase | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | | (24 | ) |
FHLB advances | | | 19 | | | | - | | | | 19 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 3 | | | | (127 | ) | | | (124 | ) | | | 29 | | | | (505 | ) | | | (476 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in interest income | | $ | 1,243 | | | $ | (688 | ) | | $ | 555 | | | $ | 886 | | | $ | (532 | ) | | $ | 354 | |
Provision for Loan Losses
Provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by the Bank’s management based on such factors as historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, the amount of non-performing loans, regulatory policies, generally accepted accounting principles, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of loans in the Bank’s portfolio.
Each month, the Bank reviews the allowance for loan losses and makes additional provisions to the allowance, as needed. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the allowance increased $198,000, net of charge-offs and recoveries. The total allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2013 was $2,792,000 or 1.0% of outstanding loans. This compares with a total allowance for loan losses of $2,594,000 at December 31, 2012, which represented 1.10% of outstanding loans. During 2013, the Bank charged off eleven loans for a total of $154,000 compared to twelve loans for a total of $210,000 during 2012. The Bank recovered six loans for $7,000 in 2013 compared to eight loans for $15,000 in 2012. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense
The following tables set forth the various components of the Bank’s noninterest income and noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
| | NONINTEREST INCOME | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For Year | | | | | For Year | | | | | For Year | | | |
| | Ended | | % of | | Ended | | % of | | Ended | | % of |
| | 12/31/2013 | | Income | | 12/31/2012 | | Income | | 12/31/2011 | | Income |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | $ | 488 | | | | 15.6 | % | | $ | 495 | | | | 12.2 | % | | $ | 511 | | | | 21.5 | % |
Safe deposit fees | | | 91 | | | | 2.9 | % | | | 82 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 90 | | | | 3.8 | % |
Writedown of securities | | | (17 | ) | | | -0.5 | % | | | (12 | ) | | | -0.3 | % | | | - | | | | - | |
Gain on sales of investments | | | 126 | | | | 4.0 | % | | | 125 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 445 | | | | 18.7 | % |
Mortgage banking activities | | | 1,390 | | | | 44.5 | % | | | 2,266 | | | | 56.0 | % | | | 428 | | | | 18.0 | % |
Investment services fees and commissions | | | 231 | | | | 7.4 | % | | | 171 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 178 | | | | 7.5 | % |
Other income | | | 817 | | | | 26.1 | % | | | 926 | | | | 22.8 | % | | | 730 | | | | 30.5 | % |
Total noninterest income | | $ | 3,126 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,053 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,382 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | NONINTEREST EXPENSE | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For Year | | | | | For Year | | | | | For Year | | | |
| | Ended | | % of | | Ended | | % of | | Ended | | % of |
| | 12/31/2013 | | Income | | 12/31/2012 | | Income | | 12/31/2011 | | Income |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | $ | 6,880 | | | | 54.6 | % | | $ | 6,271 | | | | 54.5 | % | | $ | 5,623 | | | | 52.3 | % |
Occupancy expense | | | 1,185 | | | | 9.4 | % | | | 1,059 | | | | 9.2 | % | | | 1,098 | | | | 10.2 | % |
Equipment expense | | | 290 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 275 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 255 | | | | 2.4 | % |
Professional fees | | | 543 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 577 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 753 | | | | 7.0 | % |
Advertising and promotions | | | 756 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 655 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 490 | | | | 4.6 | % |
Forms and supplies | | | 144 | | | | 1.1 | % | | | 173 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 187 | | | | 1.7 | % |
Insurance | | | 280 | | | | 2.2 | % | | | 256 | | | | 2.2 | % | | | 434 | | | | 4.0 | % |
Loan expenses | | | 138 | | | | 1.1 | % | | | 45 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 65 | | | | 0.6 | % |
Postage | | | 86 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 93 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 82 | | | | 0.8 | % |
Other expenses | | | 2,297 | | | | 18.2 | % | | | 2,104 | | | | 18.3 | % | | | 1,768 | | | | 16.4 | % |
Total noninterest expense | | $ | 12,599 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 11,508 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 10,755 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by approximately $927,000 to $3,126,000 from $4,053,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease of approximately $876,000 in mortgage banking activities. For the year ended December 31, 2012, noninterest income increased by approximately $1,671,000 to $4,053,000 from $2,382,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was due primarily to an increase of approximately $1,838,000 in mortgage banking activities, which more than offset a $320,000 decrease in gain on sales of available-for-sale securities.
At December 31, 2013, the Bank had 21,123 deposit accounts, a decrease of 500 accounts or 2.3% from the number of accounts at December 31, 2012 and a slight increase of 117 accounts over the number of accounts at December 31, 2011. SBT Investment Services, Inc.’s revenues increased by approximately $60,000 in 2013 compared to 2012.
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $12,599,000, an increase of approximately $1,091,000 or 9.5% over 2012. The increase in 2013 was primarily related to an increase of approximately $609,000 in salaries and employee benefits, an increase of $126,000 in occupancy expense and a net increase of approximately $356,000 in all other expenses.
Salaries and employee benefits comprised 54.6% of total noninterest expense during 2013, as compared to 54.6% in 2012. Occupancy expense and equipment expense, at approximately 9.4% in 2013 and 9.2% in 2012, respectively, continued to be the other major category of noninterest expense.
Financial Condition at Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
The following tables set forth the average balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities, and capital accounts for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
(In Thousands)
| | For the Year Ended | | | For the Year Ended | | | For the Year Ended | |
| | 12/31/2013 | | | 12/31/2012 | | | 12/31/2011 | |
| | Average | | | % of | | | Average | | | % of | | | Average | | | % of | |
ASSETS | | Balance | | | Total Assets | | | Balance | | | Total Assets | | | Balance | | | Total Assets | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 8,489 | | | | 2.2 | % | | $ | 10,240 | | | | 2.9 | % | | $ | 9,525 | | | | 2.8 | % |
Investment securities | | | 105,771 | | | | 26.8 | % | | | 83,033 | | | | 23.3 | % | | | 63,737 | | | | 19.1 | % |
Fed funds sold and overnight deposits | | | 12,738 | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 36,010 | | | | 10.1 | % | | | 45,579 | | | | 13.7 | % |
Loans, net | | | 253,151 | | | | 64.2 | % | | | 215,680 | | | | 60.5 | % | | | 204,582 | | | | 61.4 | % |
Premises and equipment | | | 1,073 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 864 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 611 | | | | 0.2 | % |
Accrued interest and other assets | | | 13,097 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 10,650 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 9,203 | | | | 2.8 | % |
Total assets | | $ | 394,319 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 356,477 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 333,237 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Demand and NOW deposits | | $ | 131,494 | | | | 33.3 | % | | $ | 117,094 | | | | 32.8 | % | | $ | 102,442 | | | | 30.7 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 147,657 | | | | 37.5 | % | | | 135,130 | | | | 37.9 | % | | | 126,065 | | | | 37.8 | % |
Time deposits | | | 72,344 | | | | 18.3 | % | | | 75,430 | | | | 21.2 | % | | | 76,339 | | | | 22.9 | % |
Total deposits | | | 351,495 | | | | 89.1 | % | | | 327,654 | | | | 91.9 | % | | | 304,846 | | | | 91.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | 9,575 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Accrued interest and other liabilities | | | 5,368 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 4,452 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 4,320 | | | | 1.3 | % |
Total liabilities | | | 366,438 | | | | 92.9 | % | | | 332,106 | | | | 93.2 | % | | | 309,166 | | | | 92.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | 9,918 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 9,697 | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3,515 | | | | 1.1 | % |
Preferred stock | | | 8,970 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 8,933 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 9,268 | | | | 2.8 | % |
Retained Earnings and accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | | 8,993 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 5,741 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 11,288 | | | | 3.4 | % |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 27,881 | | | | 7.1 | % | | | 24,371 | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 24,071 | | | | 7.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | $ | 394,319 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 356,477 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 333,237 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Investment Portfolio
In order to maintain a reserve of readily marketable assets to meet the Bank’s liquidity and loan requirements, the Bank purchases United States Treasury securities and other investments. Sales of “federal funds” (short-term loans to other banks) are regularly utilized. Placement of funds in certificates of deposit with other financial institutions may be made as alternative investments pending utilization of funds for loans or other purposes.
Securities may be pledged to meet security requirements imposed as a condition for receipt of deposits of public funds and repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2013, the Bank had 37 securities with a carrying value totaling $15,418,000 pledged for such purposes.
As of December 31, 2013, the Bank’s investment portfolio consisted of U.S. government and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and money market mutual funds. The Bank’s policy is to stagger the maturities of its investments to meet overall liquidity requirements of the Bank.
The following table summarizes the amounts and distribution of the Bank’s investment securities held as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
| | INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | Amortized | | Unrealized | | Unrealized | | Fair | | |
| | Cost | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | | Yield |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | $ | 13,061 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 12,816 | | | | 1.08 | % |
Due after five to ten years | | | 5,706 | | | | - | | | | 275 | | | | 5,431 | | | | 1.46 | |
Total U.S. Government and agency securities | | | 18,767 | | | | - | | | | 520 | | | | 18,247 | | | | 1.20 | |
State and municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 301 | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | 303 | | | | 3.00 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 3,412 | | | | 86 | | | | 98 | | | | 3,400 | | | | 3.08 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 10,067 | | | | 303 | | | | 100 | | | | 10,270 | | | | 3.47 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 0.00 | |
Total state and municipal securities | | | 13,780 | | | | 391 | | | | 198 | | | | 13,973 | | | | 3.36 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total corporate debt securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | |
Due within one year | | | 9 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9 | | | | 3.98 | |
Due after one to five years | | | 761 | | | | 14 | | | | - | | | | 775 | | | | 2.60 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 2,660 | | | | 49 | | | | 11 | | | | 2,698 | | | | 2.39 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 32,886 | | | | 31 | | | | 1,281 | | | | 31,636 | | | | 1.85 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | 20,483 | | | | 32 | | | | 1,065 | | | | 19,450 | | | | 2.44 | |
Total mortgage-backed securities | | | 56,799 | | | | 126 | | | | 2,357 | | | | 54,568 | | | | 2.10 | |
SBA loan pools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 611 | | | | 50 | | | | - | | | | 661 | | | | 4.60 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5.04 | |
Total SBA loan pools | | | 611 | | | | 50 | | | | - | | | | 661 | | | | 4.99 | |
Preferred stocks | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total available-for-sale securities | | $ | 89,957 | | | $ | 567 | | | $ | 3,075 | | | $ | 87,449 | | | | 2.25 | % |
| | INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | Amortized | | Unrealized | | Unrealized | | Fair | | |
| | Cost | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | | Yield |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and agency securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | $ | 18,758 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,825 | | | | 1.06 | % |
Due after five to ten years | | | 12,002 | | | | 19 | | | | 11 | | | | 12,010 | | | | 1.39 | |
Total U.S. Government and agency securities | | | 30,760 | | | | 86 | | | | 11 | | | | 30,835 | | | | 1.19 | |
State and municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | | 825 | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | 830 | | | | 4.59 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 2,622 | | | | 192 | | | | - | | | | 2,814 | | | | 3.74 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 8,566 | | | | 563 | | | | 3 | | | | 9,126 | | | | 3.36 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | 1,585 | | | | 196 | | | | - | | | | 1,781 | | | | 4.02 | |
Total state and municipal securities | | | 13,598 | | | | 956 | | | | 3 | | | | 14,551 | | | | 3.59 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 2,006 | | | | 52 | | | | 5 | | | | 2,053 | | | | 2.34 | |
Total corporate debt securities | | | 2,006 | | | | 52 | | | | 5 | | | | 2,053 | | | | 2.34 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | | 52 | | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | 54 | | | | 3.25 | |
Due after one to five years | | | 78 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | 79 | | | | 4.06 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 5,294 | | | | 118 | | | | 3 | | | | 5,409 | | | | 2.25 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 18,305 | | | | 308 | | | | 6 | | | | 18,607 | | | | 1.90 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | 19,008 | | | | 172 | | | | 72 | | | | 19,108 | | | | 2.10 | |
Total mortgage-backed securities | | | 42,737 | | | | 601 | | | | 81 | | | | 43,257 | | | | 2.04 | |
SBA loan pools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 115 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | 116 | | | | 4.60 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 895 | | | | 113 | | | | - | | | | 1,008 | | | | 5.04 | |
Total SBA loan pools | | | 1,010 | | | | 114 | | | | - | | | | 1,124 | | | | 4.99 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stocks | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total available-for-sale securities | | $ | 90,111 | | | $ | 1,809 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 91,820 | | | | 2.25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| | Amortized | | Unrealized | | Unrealized | | Fair | | | | |
| | Cost | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | | Yield |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and agency securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 502 | | | | 1.49 | % |
Due after five to ten years | | | 12,000 | | | | 43 | | | | 3 | | | | 12,040 | | | | 1.37 | |
Total U.S. Government and Agency securities | | | 12,500 | | | | 45 | | | | 3 | | | | 12,542 | | | | 1.37 | |
State and municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | | 499 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 504 | | | | 5.10 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 1,518 | | | | 55 | | | | - | | | | 1,573 | | | | 3.72 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 7,261 | | | | 387 | | | | 1 | | | | 7,647 | | | | 3.61 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | 3,638 | | | | 251 | | | | - | | | | 3,889 | | | | 3.69 | |
Total state and municipal securities | | | 12,916 | | | | 698 | | | | 1 | | | | 13,613 | | | | 3.70 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 500 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | 503 | | | | 5.00 | |
Total corporate debt securities | | | 2,009 | | | | 1 | | | | 29 | | | | 1,981 | | | | 2.83 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 2,509 | | | | 4 | | | | 29 | | | | 2,484 | | | | 3.26 | |
Due within one year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after one to five years | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2 | | | | 5.26 | |
Due after five to ten years | | | 376 | | | | 9 | | | | - | | | | 385 | | | | 3.63 | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 6,518 | | | | 107 | | | | 12 | | | | 6,613 | | | | 2.39 | |
Due beyond fifteen years | | | 11,785 | | | | 162 | | | | 47 | | | | 11,900 | | | | 2.25 | |
Total mortgage-backed securities | | | 7,936 | | | | 138 | | | | 107 | | | | 7,967 | | | | 3.15 | |
SBA loan pools | | | 26,617 | | | | 416 | | | | 166 | | | | 26,867 | | | | 2.57 | |
Due after one to five years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due after ten to fifteen years | | | 130 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | 133 | | | | 4.63 | |
Total SBA loan pools | | | 1,101 | | | | 119 | | | | - | | | | 1,220 | | | | 5.09 | |
| | | 1,231 | | | | 122 | | | | - | | | | 1,353 | | | | 5.04 | |
Preferred stocks | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total available-for-sale securities | | $ | 55,773 | | | $ | 1,285 | | | $ | 199 | | | $ | 56,859 | | | | 2.61 | % |
Loan Portfolio
General
The following tables present the Bank’s loan portfolio as of December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
| | | | | LOAN PORTFOLIO | | | | |
| | | | | (Dollars in Thousands) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | For the Year Ended |
| | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2012 |
| | | | % of Total | | | | % of Total |
| | Balance | | Loans | | Balance | | Loans |
Commerical & industrial | | $ | 18,432 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 13,991 | | | | 6.0 | % |
Real estate-construction and land development | | | 7,773 | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2,982 | | | | 1.3 | % |
Real estate - residential | | | 137,539 | | | | 49.5 | % | | | 118,316 | | | | 50.3 | % |
Real estate - commercial | | | 48,814 | | | | 17.5 | % | | | 41,978 | | | | 17.9 | % |
Municipal | | | 8,488 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 1,478 | | | | 0.6 | % |
Home equity | | | 46,742 | | | | 16.8 | % | | | 45,245 | | | | 19.2 | % |
Consumer | | | 10,664 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 11,053 | | | | 4.7 | % |
Total Loans | | $ | 278,452 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 235,043 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (2,792 | ) | | | | | | | (2,594 | ) | | | | |
Deferred costs, net | | | 1,215 | | | | | | | | 841 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loans | | $ | 276,875 | | | | | | | $ | 233,290 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | LOAN PORTFOLIO | | | |
| | | | | (Dollars in Thousands) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | For the Year Ended |
| | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2010 |
| | | | % of Total | | | | % of Total |
| | Balance | | Loans | | Balance | | Loans |
Commerical & industrial | | | 15,145 | | | | 7.0 | % | | $ | 13,568 | | | | 6.6 | % |
Real estate-construction and land development | | | 1,307 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 4,987 | | | | 2.4 | % |
Real estate - residential | | | 99,691 | | | | 46.1 | % | | | 100,650 | | | | 49.2 | % |
Real estate - commercial | | | 39,723 | | | | 18.4 | % | | | 31,294 | | | | 15.3 | % |
Municipal | | | 1,807 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 2,034 | | | | 1.0 | % |
Home equity | | | 48,485 | | | | 22.5 | % | | | 47,746 | | | | 23.3 | % |
Consumer | | | 9,913 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 4,512 | | | | 2.2 | % |
Total Loans | | | 216,071 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 204,791 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (2,469 | ) | | | | | | | (2,326 | ) | | | | |
Deferred costs, net | | | 482 | | | | | | | | 327 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loans | | $ | 214,084 | | | | | | | $ | 202,792 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | LOAN PORTFOLIO | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2009 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | % of Total | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance | | Loans | | | | | | | | |
Commerical & industrial | | | 12,901 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
Real estate-construction and land development | | | 6,745 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
Real estate - residential | | | 109,334 | | | | 56.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
Real estate - commercial | | | 28,721 | | | | 14.9 | % | | | | | | | | |
Municipal | | | 2,015 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
Home equity | | | 29,075 | | | | 15.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
Consumer | | | 4,474 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
Total Loans | | | 193,265 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (2,211 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred costs, net | | | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loans | | $ | 191,304 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Bank’s commercial loans are made for the purpose of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, or for other business purposes. Such loans include loans with maturities ranging from thirty days to two years and “term loans,” which are loans with maturities normally ranging from one to ten years. Short-term business loans are generally intended to finance current transactions and typically provide for periodic principal payments, with interest payable monthly. Term loans normally provide for fixed or floating interest rates, with monthly payments of both principal and interest.
The Bank’s construction loans are primarily interim loans made to finance the construction of commercial and single-family residential property. These loans are typically short-term. The Bank generally pre-qualifies construction loan borrowers for permanent “take-out” financing as a condition to making the construction loan. The Bank occasionally will make loans for housing construction or for acquisition and development of raw land.
The Bank’s other real estate loans consist primarily of loans made based on the borrower’s cash flow and which are secured by deeds of trust on commercial and residential property to provide another source of repayment in the event of default. It is the Bank’s policy to restrict real estate loans without credit enhancement to no more than 80% of the lower of the appraised value or the purchase price of the property depending on the type of property and its utilization. The Bank offers both fixed and floating rate loans. Maturities on such loans typically range from five to thirty years. However, Small Business Administration (SBA) and certain other real estate loans easily sold in the secondary market are made for longer maturities. The Bank has been designated an approved SBA lender. The Bank’s SBA loans are categorized as commercial or real estate depending on the underlying collateral. Also, the Bank has been approved as an originator of loans that can be sold to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, there were 305 loans with a total principal balance of $69,220,000 that were sold, resulting in a gain of $1,058,000 for the Bank. For the year ended December 31, 2012, there were 302 loans with a total principal balance of $60,914,000 that were sold, resulting in a gain of $2,113,000 for the Bank. During the year ended December 31, 2011, there were 94 loans with a total principal balance of $18,123,000 that were sold, resulting in a total gain of $427,000 for the Bank.
Consumer loans are made for the purpose of financing automobiles, various types of consumer goods, and other personal purposes. Consumer loans generally provide for the monthly payment of principal and interest. Most of the Bank’s consumer loans are secured by the personal property purchased with the proceeds of such consumer loans.
With certain exceptions, the Bank is permitted under applicable law to make extensions of credit to any one borrowing entity and its related affiliates of up to 15% of the Bank’s capital and reserves. An additional 10% is permitted under applicable law if the credit is fully secured by qualified collateral. The Bank sells participations in its loans when necessary to stay within its lending limits. As of December 31, 2013, these lending limits for the Bank were $4,488,644 and $7,481,074, respectively.
Loan Concentrations
The Bank does not have any significant concentrations in its loan portfolio by industry or group of industries. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 74% of the Bank’s loans were secured by residential real property located in Connecticut. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 88% of the Bank’s loans were secured by residential real property located in Connecticut.
Loan Portfolio Maturities and Interest Rate Sensitivity
The following table summarizes the maturities and interest rate sensitivity of the Bank’s loan portfolio.
As of December 31, 2013 |
(in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Over One | | Over | | | |
| | Or Less | | to Five Years | | Five years | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 8,579 | | | $ | 9,853 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,432 | |
Real estate - construction and land development | | | 7,773 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 7,773 | |
Real estate - residential | | | 57,632 | | | | 76,458 | | | | 50,191 | | | | 184,281 | |
Real estate - commercial | | | 51,744 | | | | 817 | | | | 2,597 | | | | 55,158 | |
Municipal | | | 2,144 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,144 | |
Consumer | | | 3,805 | | | | 6,859 | | | | - | | | | 10,664 | |
Total loans | | $ | 131,677 | | | $ | 93,987 | | | $ | 52,788 | | | $ | 278,452 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans with fixed interest rates | | $ | 25,677 | | | $ | 76,631 | | | $ | 50,569 | | | $ | 152,877 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans with variable interest rates | | | 106,000 | | | | 17,356 | | | | 2,219 | | | | 125,575 | |
Total Loans | | $ | 131,677 | | | $ | 93,987 | | | $ | 52,788 | | | $ | 278,452 | |
The following tables set forth the Bank’s loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and unadvanced portions of loans at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT |
(In thousands) |
| | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/13 | | 12/31/12 | | 12/31/11 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Commitments to originate loans | | $ | 10,488 | | | $ | 13,459 | | | $ | 4,571 | |
Standby letters of credit | | | 857 | | | | 175 | | | | 293 | |
Unadvanced portion of loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | | | 5,456 | | | | 1,778 | | | | 70 | |
Commercial lines of credit | | | 14,265 | | | | 11,383 | | | | 8,059 | |
Consumer | | | 677 | | | | 689 | | | | 674 | |
Home equity lines of credit | | | 40,075 | | | | 32,550 | | | | 28,715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 71,818 | | | $ | 60,034 | | | $ | 42,382 | |
Non-Performing Assets
Interest on performing loans is accrued and taken into income daily. Loans over 90 days past due are deemed “non-performing” and are placed on a nonaccrual status unless the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. Interest received on nonaccrual loans is credited to income only upon receipt and in certain circumstances may be applied to principal until the loan has been repaid in full, at which time the interest received is credited to income. The Bank had 15 nonaccrual loans with a balance of approximately $2,849,000 as of December 31, 2013; 11 nonaccrual loans with a balance of approximately $1,240,000 as of December 31, 2012; 19 nonaccrual loans with a balance of approximately $2,306,000 as of December 31, 2011; 19 nonaccrual loans with a balance of approximately $2,300,000 as of December 31, 2010 and 21 nonaccrual loans with a balance of approximately $3,200,000 as of December 31, 2009. Gross interest that would have been recorded if the nonaccrual loans had been current was approximately $127,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013; approximately $80,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012; approximately $137,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011; approximately $136,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and approximately $77,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The amount of interest on nonaccrual loans included in net income was approximately $29,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013; approximately $12,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and approximately $29,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011; approximately $61,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and approximately $18,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Bank had $3,000 and $0, respectively of loans more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest. As of December 31, 2011, the Bank had one loan of approximately $204,000 that was more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest. As of December 31, 2010, the Bank had no loans more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had two loans with a balance of approximately $202,000 that were more than 90 days past due and still accruinginterest.
When appropriate or necessary to protect the Bank’s interests, real estate pledged as collateral on a loan may be taken by the Bank through foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Real property acquired in this manner by the Bank is referred to as “other real estate owned” (“OREO”), and is carried on the books of the Bank as an asset, at the lesser of the Bank’s recorded investment or the fair value less estimated costs to sell. As of December 31, 2013 the Bank did not have any OREO property on its books. As of December 31, 2012, there was $213,000 in OREO property held by the Bank. As of December 31, 2011, the Bank held no OREO property. As of December 31, 2010, there was $350,000 in OREO property held by the Bank. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank did not hold any OREO property.
A loan whose terms have been modified due to financial difficulties is reported as a troubled debt restructure (“TDR”) loan. All TDR loans are placed on nonaccrual status until the loan qualifies for return to accrual status. Loans qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the restructured terms of the loan agreement for a minimum of six months. The Bank did not modify any loans as a TDR loan during the year ending December 31, 2013. The Bank modified one loan as a TDR during the year ended December 31, 2012 with a balance of approximately $68,000. The Bank modified two loans as TDR during the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 with an aggregate balance of approximately $571,000 and $408,000, respectively. The Bank had no TDR loans as of December 31, 2009.
The risk of nonpayment of loans is an inherent feature of the banking business. That risk varies with the type and purpose of the loan, the collateral which is utilized to secure payment, and ultimately, the creditworthiness of the borrower. In order to minimize this credit risk, the Bank requires that most loans be approved by at least two officers, one of whom must be an executive officer. Commercial loans greater than $500,000, as well as other loans in certain circumstances, must be approved by the Loan Committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors.
The Bank has an internal review process to verify credit quality and risk classifications. In addition, the Bank maintains a program of annual review of certain new and renewed loans by an outside loan review consultant. Loans are graded from “pass” to “loss,” depending on credit quality, with “pass” representing loans that are fully satisfactory as additions to the Bank’s loan portfolio. These are loans which involve a degree of risk that is not unwarranted given the favorable aspects of the credit and which exhibit both primary and secondary sources of repayment. Classified loans identified in either review process are added to the Bank’s Internal Watch list and an additional allowance for loan losses is established for such loans if appropriate. Additionally, the Bank is examined regularly by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the State of Connecticut Department of Banking at which time a further review of the loan portfolio is conducted.
The Bank had criticized and classified loans with a combined outstanding balance of $10,237,000 as of December 31, 2013; $8,979,000 as of December 31, 2012; $9,571,000 as of December 31, 2011; $6,589,000 as of December 31, 2010 and $9,382,000 as of December 31, 2009.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for potential losses in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made by charges within operating expenses in the form of a provision for loan losses. All loans that are judged to be uncollectable are charged against the allowance while any recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management conducts a critical evaluation of the loan portfolio monthly. This evaluation includes an assessment of the following factors: the results of the Bank’s internal loan review, any external loan review; any regulatory examination; loan loss experience; estimated potential loss exposure on each credit; concentrations of credit; value of collateral; any known impairment in the borrower’s ability to repay, and present and prospective economic conditions.
The following tables summarize the Bank’s loan loss experience, transactions in the allowance for loan losses, and certain prominent ratios at or for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
| | At or for the | | At or for the |
| | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2012 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,594 | | | $ | 2,469 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | (40 | ) | | | (113 | ) |
Commercial | | | (54 | ) | | | (25 | ) |
Construction and land development | | | - | | | | (49 | ) |
Commercial and industrial | | | (2 | ) | | | - | |
Consumer | | | (58 | ) | | | (23 | ) |
Total charge-offs | | | (154 | ) | | | (210 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | 4 | | | | 5 | |
Construction and land development | | | - | | | | 1 | |
Consumer | | | 3 | | | | 9 | |
Total recoveries | | | 7 | | | | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans (charged-off) recovered | | | (147 | ) | | | (195 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | 345 | | | | 320 | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 2,792 | | | $ | 2,594 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
BALANCES | | | | | | | | |
Average total loans | | $ | 255,817 | | | $ | 218,152 | |
Total net loans at end of period | | $ | 276,875 | | | $ | 233,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
RATIOS | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to average assets | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.73 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to loans at end of period | | | 1.0 | % | | | 1.11 | % |
| | At or for the | | At or for the |
| | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2010 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,326 | | | $ | 2,211 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | (20 | ) | | | - | |
Commercial | | | (68 | ) | | | - | |
Construction and land development | | | (160 | ) | | | - | |
Commercial and industrial | | | (69 | ) | | | (627 | ) |
Consumer | | | (40 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
Total charge-offs | | | (357 | ) | | | (647 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | - | | | | 1 | |
Construction and land development | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | 5 | | | | 6 | |
Total recoveries | | | 5 | | | | 7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans (charged-off) recovered | | | (352 | ) | | | (640 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | 495 | | | | 755 | |
Balance at end of period | | | 2,469 | | | | 2,326 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
BALANCES | | | | | | | | |
Average total loans | | $ | 206,951 | | | $ | 202,181 | |
Total net loans at end of period | | $ | 214,084 | | | $ | 204,792 | |
| | | | | | | | |
RATIOS | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to average assets | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.80 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to loans at end of period | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.14 | % |
| | At or for the | | | | |
| | Year ended | | | | |
| | 12/31/2009 | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,017 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | - | | | | | |
Commercial | | | - | | | | | |
Construction and land development | | | - | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | (226 | ) | | | | |
Consumer | | | (132 | ) | | | | |
Total charge-offs | | | (358 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | 3 | | | | | |
Construction and land development | | | - | | | | | |
Installment loans to individuals | | | 2 | | | | | |
Total recoveries | | | 5 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans (charged-off) recovered | | | (353 | ) | | | | |
Provision for loan loss | | | 547 | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | | 2,211 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
BALANCES | | | | | | | | |
Average total loans | | $ | 184,089 | | | | | |
Total net loans at end of period | | $ | 193,265 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
RATIOS | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to average assets | | | 0.82 | % | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to loans at end of period | | | 1.14 | % | | | | |
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2013 | | | | 12/31/2012 | | |
| | Allocation of | | % of loans | | Allocation of | | % of loans |
| | Allowance | | by Category | | Allowance | | by Category |
Real estate - residential | | $ | 1,189 | | | | 49.4 | % | | | 1,051 | | | | 50.3 | % |
Real estate - commercial | | | 748 | | | | 17.5 | % | | | 586 | | | | 17.9 | % |
Real estate - construction and land development | | | 211 | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 142 | | | | 1.3 | % |
Commerical and industrial | | | 239 | | | | 9.7 | % | | | 219 | | | | 6.0 | % |
Home equity | | | 303 | | | | 16.8 | % | | | 362 | | | | 19.2 | % |
Consumer | | | 102 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 99 | | | | 3.8 | % |
Unallocated | | | - | | | | - | | | | 135 | | | | 1.5 | % |
Total | | $ | 2,792 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 2,594 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2011 | | | | 12/31/2010 | | |
| | Allocation of | | % of loans | | Allocation of | | % of loans |
| | Allowance | | by Category | | Allowance | | by Category |
Real estate - residential | | $ | 22 | | | | 46.1 | % | | $ | 68 | | | | 49.1 | % |
Real estate - commercial | | | 385 | | | | 18.4 | % | | | 377 | | | | 15.3 | % |
Real estate - construction and land development | | | 573 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 465 | | | | 2.4 | % |
Commerical and industrial | | | 1,092 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 1,198 | | | | 6.6 | % |
Municipal | | | 37 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 34 | | | | 1.0 | % |
Home equity | | | 194 | | | | 22.4 | % | | | 91 | | | | 23.3 | % |
Consumer | | | 166 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 93 | | | | 2.3 | % |
Total | | $ | 2,469 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,326 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2009 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Allocation of | | % of loans | | | | | | | | |
| | Allowance | | by Category | | | | | | | | |
Real estate - residential | | $ | 106 | | | | 56.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
Real estate - commercial | | | 341 | | | | 14.9 | % | | | | | | | | |
Real estate - construction and land development | | | 450 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
Commerical and industrial | | | 1,229 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
Municipal | | | 38 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
Home equity | | | 47 | | | | 15.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,211 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
Deposits
Deposits are the Bank’s primary source of funds. At December 31, 2013, the Bank had a deposit mix of 43% checking, 37.5% savings and 19.5% certificates of deposit. Thirty-two percent of the total deposits of $359 million were noninterest bearing at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012, the Bank had a deposit mix of 42% checking, 37% savings, and 21% certificates of deposit. Twenty-seven percent of the total deposits of $340 million were noninterest bearing at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2011, the Bank had a deposit mix of 43% checking, 34% savings, and 23% certificates of deposit. Thirty percent of the total deposits of $344.8 million were noninterest bearing at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2013, $54.6 million of the Bank’s deposits were from public sources compared to $45.7 million of the Bank’s deposits at December 31, 2012. The Bank’s net interest income is enhanced by its percentage of noninterest bearing deposits.
The Bank’s deposits are obtained from a cross-section of the communities it serves. No material portion of the Bank’s deposits has been obtained from or is dependent upon any one person or industry. The Bank’s business is not seasonal in nature. The Bank accepts deposits in excess of $100,000 from customers. Those deposits are priced to remain competitive. Through the Promontory Interfinancial Network LLC’s Certificate of Deposit Accounts Registry Service (CDARS) program, the Bank had brokered deposits of $2,010,000 as of December 31, 2013 compared to $4,544,000 as of December 31, 2012 and $9,017,000 as of December 31, 2011.
The Bank is not dependent upon funds from sources outside the United States and has not made loans to any foreign entities.
The following tables summarize the distribution of average deposits and the average annualized rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
AVERAGE DEPOSITS |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | | | For the Year Ended | | | | For the Year Ended | | |
| | 12/31/2013 | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | |
| | Average | | Average | | Average | | Average | | Average | | Average |
| | Balance | | Rate | | Balance | | Rate | | Balance | | Rate |
Demand deposits | | $ | 95,965 | | | | 0.00 | % | | $ | 72,464 | | | | 0.00 | % | | $ | 63,027 | | | | 0.00 | % |
NOW Deposits | | | 35,529 | | | | 0.08 | % | | | 44,630 | | | | 0.09 | % | | | 39,415 | | | | 0.09 | % |
Saings Deposits | | | 147,657 | | | | 0.07 | % | | | 135,130 | | | | 0.16 | % | | | 126,065 | | | | 0.38 | % |
Time Deposits | | | 72,344 | | | | 0.85 | % | | | 75,430 | | | | 1.04 | % | | | 76,339 | | | | 1.28 | % |
Total average deposits | | $ | 351,495 | | | | 0.25 | % | | $ | 327,654 | | | | 0.32 | % | | $ | 304,846 | | | | 0.49 | % |
The following tables indicate the maturity schedule for the Bank’s time deposits of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
SCHEDULED MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS OF $100,000 OR MORE |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| | Balance | | % of Total | | Balance | | | | Balance | | |
Three months or less | | $ | 7,987 | | | | 26.9 | % | | $ | 10,169 | | | | 32.5 | % | | $ | 12,881 | | | | 37.2 | % |
Over three throughsix months | | | 4,913 | | | | 16.5 | % | | | 3,180 | | | | 10.1 | % | | | 8,168 | | | | 23.6 | % |
Over six months through twelve months | | | 5,913 | | | | 19.9 | % | | | 5,960 | | | | 19.0 | % | | | 7,084 | | | | 20.5 | % |
Over twelve months | | | 10,890 | | | | 36.7 | % | | | 12,022 | | | | 38.4 | % | | | 6,468 | | | | 18.7 | % |
Total | | $ | 29,703 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31,331 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 34,601 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Liquidity and Asset-Liability Management
Liquidity management for banks requires that funds always be available to pay anticipated deposit withdrawals and maturing financial obligations promptly and fully in accordance with their terms. The balance of the funds required is generally provided by payments on loans, sale of loans, liquidation of assets, borrowings and the acquisition of additional deposit liabilities.
One method banks utilize for acquiring additional liabilities is through the acceptance of “brokered deposits” (defined to include not only deposits received through deposit brokers but also deposits bearing interest in excess of 75 basis points over market rates), typically attracting large certificates of deposit at high interest rates. The Company is a member of Promontory Interfinancial Network LLC’s Certificate of Deposit Accounts Registry Service (CDARS). This allows the Company to offer its customers FDIC insurance on deposits in excess of $250,000, which reflects the deposit insurance limits currently in effect, by placing the deposits in the CDARS network. Accounts placed in this manner are considered brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $2,010,000 of deposits in the CDARS network compared to $4,544,000 of deposits in the CDARS network as of December 31, 2012. The Company had no other brokered deposits as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Liquidity of a financial institution, such as a bank, is measured based on its ability to have liquid assets sufficient to meet its short-term obligations. The net sum of liquid assets less anticipated current obligations represents the basic liquidity surplus of the Company. The Company maintains a portion of its funds in cash deposits in other banks, federal funds sold, and available-for-sale securities to meet its obligations for anticipated depositors’ demands in the near future. As of December 31, 2013, the Company held $32.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, net of required FRB reserves of $6.4 million and $72.0 million in available-for-sale securities, net of pledged investments of $15.4 million, for total liquid assets of $104.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s anticipated short-term liability obligations were $75.8 million, which resulted in a basic liquidity surplus of $28.4 million that represented 7% of total assets. As of December 31, 2012, the Company held $29.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, net of required FRB reserves of $4.7 million, and $77.0 million in available-for-sale securities, net of pledged investments of $14.8 million, for total liquid assets of $106.4 million. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s anticipated short-term liability obligations were $43.2 million, which resulted in a basic liquidity surplus of $62.3 million that represented 17% of total assets.
The careful planning of asset and liability maturities, and the matching of interest rates to correspond with these maturities, is an integral part of the active management of an institution’s net yield. To the extent that maturities of assets and liabilities do not match in a changing interest rate environment, net yields may be affected. Even with perfectly matched re-pricing of assets and liabilities, risks remain in the form of prepayment of assets, timing lags in adjusting certain assets and liabilities that have varying sensitivities to market interest rates and basis risk. In its overall attempt to match assets and liabilities, management takes into account the rates and maturities, offered in connection with its certificates of deposit and provides for the extension of variable rate loans to borrowers. The Company has generally been able to control its exposure to changing interest rates by maintaining floating interest rate loans, shorter term investments and a majority of its time certificates of deposit with relatively short maturities.
The table below sets forth the interest rate sensitivity of the Bank’s interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, using the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio. For the purposes of the following table, an asset or liability is considered interest rate-sensitive within a specified period when it can be re-priced or matures within its contractual terms.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 | |
| | Due Within | | | Due in | | | Due After One | | | Due After | | | | |
| | Three | | | Three to Twelve | | | Year to Five | | | Five | | | | |
| | Months | | | Months | | | Years | | | Years | | | Total | |
Rate sensitive assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 724 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 724 | |
Available-for-sale securities (at fair value) | | | 2,503 | | | | 7,031 | | | | 48,724 | | | | 29,191 | | | | 87,449 | |
Total loans | | | 105,032 | | | | 26,646 | | | | 93,986 | | | | 52,788 | | | | 278,452 | |
| | $ | 108,259 | | | $ | 33,677 | | | $ | 142,710 | | | $ | 81,979 | | | $ | 366,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate sensitive liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | $ | 1,863 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 35,391 | | | $ | 37,254 | |
Savings deposits | | | 88,056 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 48,190 | | | | 136,246 | |
Time deposits | | | 15,991 | | | | 29,170 | | | | 23,828 | | | | - | | | | 68,989 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 4,390 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,390 | |
FHLB advances | | | 30,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 30,000 | |
| | $ | 140,300 | | | $ | 29,170 | | | $ | 23,828 | | | $ | 83,581 | | | $ | 276,879 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate sensitivity gap | | $ | (32,041 | ) | | $ | 4,507 | | | $ | 118,882 | | | $ | (1,602 | ) | | $ | 89,746 | |
Cumulative gap | | $ | (32,041 | ) | | $ | (27,534 | ) | | $ | 91,348 | | | $ | 89,746 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative gap ratio to total assets | | | -7 | % | | | -6 | % | | | 22 | % | | | 22 | % | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | |
| | Due Within | | | Due in | | | Due After One | | | Due After | | | | |
| | Three | | | Three to Twelve | | | Year to Five | | | Five | | | | |
| | Months | | | Months | | | Years | | | Years | | | Total | |
Rate sensitive assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 2,094 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,094 | |
Available-for-sale securities (at fair value) | | | 8,559 | | | | 26,607 | | | | 34,241 | | | | 22,413 | | | | 91,820 | |
Total loans | | | 81,542 | | | | 22,740 | | | | 82,475 | | | | 48,286 | | | | 235,043 | |
| | $ | 92,195 | | | $ | 49,347 | | | $ | 116,716 | | | $ | 70,699 | | | $ | 328,957 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate sensitive liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | $ | 2,402 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 45,640 | | | $ | 48,042 | |
Savings deposits | | | 84,996 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 42,230 | | | | 127,226 | |
Time deposits | | | 17,878 | | | | 28,349 | | | | 26,244 | | | | - | | | | 72,471 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 3,569 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,569 | |
FHLB advances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | 108,845 | | | $ | 28,349 | | | $ | 26,244 | | | $ | 87,870 | | | $ | 251,308 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate sensitivity gap | | $ | (16,650 | ) | | $ | 20,998 | | | $ | 90,472 | | | $ | (17,171 | ) | | $ | 77,649 | |
Cumulative gap | | $ | (16,650 | ) | | $ | 4,348 | | | $ | 94,820 | | | $ | 77,649 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative gap ratio to total assets | | | -4 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 21 | % | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 | |
| | Due Within | | | Due in | | | Due After One | | | Due After | | | | |
| | Three | | | Three to Twelve | | | Year to Five | | | Five | | | | |
| | Months | | | Months | | | Years | | | Years | | | Total | |
Rate sensitive assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold & overnight deposits | | $ | 2,024 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,024 | |
Available-for-sale securities (at fair value) | | | 7,315 | | | | 10,312 | | | | 21,977 | | | | 17,255 | | | | 56,859 | |
Total loans | | | 72,145 | | | | 21,268 | | | | 78,780 | | | | 43,878 | | | | 216,071 | |
| | $ | 81,484 | | | $ | 31,580 | | | $ | 100,757 | | | $ | 61,133 | | | $ | 274,954 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate sensitive liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings deposits | | $ | 2,269 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 43,112 | | | $ | 45,381 | |
Time deposits | | | 80,969 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 37,968 | | | | 118,937 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 21,218 | | | | 38,587 | | | | 16,876 | | | | - | | | | 76,681 | |
FHLB advances | | | 3,548 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,548 | |
| | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | 108,004 | | | $ | 38,587 | | | $ | 16,876 | | | $ | 81,080 | | | $ | 244,547 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate sensitivity gap | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative gap | | $ | (26,520 | ) | | $ | (7,007 | ) | | $ | 83,881 | | | $ | (19,947 | ) | | $ | 30,407 | |
| | $ | (26,520 | ) | | $ | (33,527 | ) | | $ | 50,354 | | | $ | 30,407 | | | | | |
�� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative gap ratio to total assets | | | -7 | % | | | -9 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 8 | % | | | | |
Since interest rate changes do not affect all categories of assets and liabilities equally or simultaneously, a cumulative gap analysis alone cannot be used to evaluate the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity position. To supplement traditional gap analysis, the Bank performs simulation modeling to estimate the potential effects of changing interest rates. This process allows the Bank to explore complex relationships among re-pricing assets and liabilities over time in various interest rate environments.
The Company’s Executive Committee meets at least quarterly to monitor the Bank’s investments and liquidity needs and oversee its asset-liability management. Between meetings of the Executive Committee, management oversees the Bank’s liquidity.
Capital Reserve
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) defines specific capital categories based upon an institution’s capital ratios. The capital categories, in declining order, are: (i) “well capitalized”; (ii) “adequately capitalized”; (iii) “under-capitalized”; (iv) “significantly under-capitalized”; and (v) “critically under-capitalized.” Under FDICIA and the FDIC’s prompt corrective action rules, the FDIC may take any one or more of the following actions against an “under-capitalized” bank: restrict dividends and management fees; restrict asset growth; and prohibit new acquisitions, new branches or new lines of business without prior FDIC approval. If a bank is “significantly under-capitalized,” the FDIC may also require the bank to raise capital; restrict the interest rates a bank may pay on deposits; require a reduction in assets; restrict any activities that might cause risk to the bank; require improved management; prohibit the acceptance of deposits from correspondent banks and restrict compensation to any senior executive officer. When a bank becomes “critically under-capitalized” (i.e., the ratio of tangible equity to total assets is equal to or less than 2%), the FDIC must, within 90 days thereafter, appoint a receiver for the bank or take such action as the FDIC determines would better achieve the purposes of the law. Even where such other action is taken, the FDIC generally must appoint a receiver for a bank if the bank remains “critically under-capitalized” during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on which the bank became “critically under-capitalized.”
The regulations implementing these provisions of FDICIA provide that a bank will be classified as “well capitalized” if it (i) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5%; (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%; (iii) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%; and (iv) meets certain other requirements. A bank will be classified as “adequately capitalized” if it (i) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) at least 4% or (b) at least 3% if the bank was rated 1 in its most recent examination and is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth; (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4%; (iii) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%; and (iv) does not meet the definition of “well capitalized.” A bank will be classified as “under-capitalized” if it (i) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) less than 4% or (b) less than 3% if the bank was rated 1 in its most recent examination and is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth; (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%; or (iii) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%. A bank will be classified as “significantly under-capitalized” if it (i) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of less than 3%; (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3%; or (iii) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%. An institution will be classified as “critically under-capitalized” if it has a tangible equity to total assets ratio that is equal to or less than 2%. An insured depository institution may be deemed to be in a lower capitalization category if the FDIC has determined (i) that the insured depository institution is in unsafe or unsound condition or (ii) that, in the most recent examination of the insured depository institution, the insured depository institution received and has not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the categories of asset quality, management, earnings, or liquidity.
As of December 31, 2013, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized,” the Bank must maintain minimum Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based, and total risk-based ratios as set forth in the table below. Management of the Bank believes there are no conditions that have changed the Bank’s category since December 31, 2013.
At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Bank’s capital exceeded all minimum regulatory requirements and the Bank was considered to be “well capitalized” as defined in the regulations issued by the FDIC.
| | Actual | | | Actual | | | Actual | | | Well | |
| | 12/31/2013 | | | 12/31/2012 | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Capitalized | |
Bank: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) | | | 7.09 | % | | | 7.73 | % | | | 7.46 | % | | | 5.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) | | | 11.92 | % | | | 13.44 | % | | | 13.19 | % | | | 6.00 | % |
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | | | 13.08 | % | | | 14.68 | % | | | 14.44 | % | | | 10.00 | % |
The current risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the 1988 capital accord of the International Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a committee of central banks and bank supervisors and regulators from the major industrialized countries that develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. A new international accord, referred to as Basel II, became mandatory for large or “core” international banks outside the U.S. in 2008 (total assets of $250 billion or more or consolidated foreign exposures of $10 billion or more) and emphasizes internal assessment of credit, market and operational risk, as well as supervisory assessment and market discipline in determining minimum capital requirements. It is optional for other banks. In December 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervisors of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel Committee, published its “calibrated” capital standards for major banking institutions, referred to as Basel III. Under these standards, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, banking institutions will be required to maintain heightened Tier 1 common equity, Tier 1 capital, and total capital ratios, as well as maintaining a “capital conservation buffer.” The Tier 1 common equity and Tier 1 capital ratio requirements will be phased-in incrementally between January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2015; the deductions from common equity made in calculating Tier 1 common equity will be phased-in incrementally over a four-year period commencing on January 1, 2014; and the capital conservation buffer will be phased-in incrementally between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. The Basel Committee also announced that a countercyclical buffer of 0% to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital will be implemented according to national circumstances as an extension of the conservation buffer.
In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved revisions to their capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules that implement the revised standards of Basel III and address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Federal Reserve Board’s final rules and the FDIC’s interim final rules apply to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more, and top-tier savings and loan holding companies (“banking organizations”). Among other things, the rules establish a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement 4.5% of risk-weighted assets and increase the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets). Banking organizations will also be required to have a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules) and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% (unchanged from current rules). The rules also limit a banking organization’s ability to pay dividends, engage in share repurchases or pay discretionary bonuses if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The rules become effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning in January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and would increase by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019 at 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. Management is currently evaluating the provisions of these rules and their expected impact on the Company and the Bank.
Inflation
The impact of changes in the general price level of goods or services on financial institutions, either through inflation or deflation, may differ significantly from the impact exerted on other companies. Banks, as financial intermediaries, have numerous assets and liabilities whose values are affected by both inflation and deflation. This is especially true for companies, such as a bank, with a high percentage of interest-rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. Banks seek to reduce the impact of inflation or deflation, and the coincident increase or decrease in interest rates, by managing their interest-rate-sensitivity gap. The Company attempts to manage its interest-rate-sensitivity gap and to structure its mix of financial instruments in order to minimize the potential adverse effects inflation or deflation may have on its net interest income and, therefore, its earnings and capital.
Based on the Company’s interest-rate-sensitivity position, the Company may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates in the short term. As such, management of the money supply and interest rates by the Federal Reserve to control the general price level of goods or services has an indirect impact on the earnings of the Company. Also, changes in interest rates may have a corresponding impact on the ability of borrowers to repay loans made by the Company.
Options Outstanding
The Company previously issued options to purchase shares of its common stock under the SBT Bancorp 1998 Stock Plan (the “1998 Plan”). As of March 28, 2014, there were options outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 31,500 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock at a price of between $29.00 and $31.50 per share and which will expire between the years 2015 and 2016. The 1998 Plan expired in March 2008.
Following shareholder approval in 2011, the Company established the SBT Bancorp, Inc. 2011 Stock Award and Option Plan (the “2011 Plan”), effective June 1, 2011, to provide stock awards and options to employees, officers and directors of the Company in order to attract them to the Company, give them a proprietary interest in the Company, and to encourage them to remain in the employ or service of the Company. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards or options under the 2011 Plan is 100,000 shares. As of March 28, 2014, 29,794 shares of restricted stock have been granted to directors and officers of the Bank and the remaining number of shares and options to be granted under the 2011 Plan was 70,206. The 2011 Plan will expire on March 16, 2021.
During 2013, the Company granted 10,000 shares of restricted stock with an award value of $234,000, or $23.39 per share. During 2012, the Company granted 10,570 shares of restricted stock with an award value of $251,000, or $23.75 per share. The restricted shares vest over a three-year period. During 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense related to the restricted shares awarded in the amount of $156,000 and $82,000, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company’s equity plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and changes during the years ended on such dates is presented below:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | Weighted-Average | | | | | | Weighted-Average | |
Fixed Options | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at beginning of year | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | | | | 32,811 | | | $ | 30.07 | |
Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,311 | ) | | | 15.65 | |
Outstanding at end of year | | | 31,500 | | | | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | | 30.67 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at year-end | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | |
Weighted-average fair value of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
options granted during the year | | | N/A | | | | | | | | N/A | | | | | |
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2013:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable | |
| | | | | | Weighted-Average | | | | | | |
| | | Number | | | Remaining | | Number | | | | |
Exercise Price | | | Outstanding | | | Contractual Life | | Exercisable | | | Exercise Price | |
$ | 31.50 | | | | 21,000 | | | 1.97 years | | | 21,000 | | | $ | 31.50 | |
| 29.00 | | | | 10,500 | | | 2.48 years | | | 10,500 | | | | 29.00 | |
$ | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | 2.14 years | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | |

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
SBT Bancorp, Inc.
Simsbury, Connecticut
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SBT Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of SBT Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 5, 2014

SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
ASSETS | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 13,355 | | | $ | 12,372 | |
Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank | | | 24,165 | | | | 19,276 | |
Money market mutual funds | | | 346 | | | | 358 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 724 | | | | 2,094 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 38,590 | | | | 34,100 | |
Interest-bearing time deposits with other banks | | | - | | | | 3,789 | |
Investments in available-for-sale securities (at fair value) | | | 87,449 | | | | 91,820 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost | | | 2,196 | | | | 589 | |
Loans held-for-sale | | | 2,861 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loans | | | 279,667 | | | | 235,884 | |
Less allowance for loan losses | | | 2,792 | | | | 2,594 | |
Loans, net | | | 276,875 | | | | 233,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment, net | | | 1,618 | | | | 824 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 1,074 | | | | 1,019 | |
Other real estate owned | | | - | | | | 213 | |
Bank owned life insurance | | | 6,729 | | | | 6,520 | |
Other assets | | | 4,456 | | | | 2,855 | |
Total assets | | $ | 421,848 | | | $ | 375,019 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | $ | 116,015 | | | $ | 92,670 | |
Savings and NOW deposits | | | 173,500 | | | | 175,268 | |
Time deposits | | | 68,989 | | | | 72,471 | |
Total deposits | | | 358,504 | | | | 340,409 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 4,390 | | | | 3,569 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | 30,000 | | | | - | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,558 | | | | 1,604 | |
Total liabilities | | | 394,452 | | | | 345,582 | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, senior non-cumulative perpetual, Series C, no par; | | | | | | | | |
9000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012; | | | | | | | | |
liquidation value of $1,000 per share | | | 8,976 | | | | 8,964 | |
Common stock, no par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; | | | | | | | | |
issued and outstanding 900,264 shares and 899,850 shares, respectively, | | | | | | | | |
in 2013 and 888,724 shares and 888,310 shares, respectively, in 2012 | | | 10,136 | | | | 9,901 | |
Retained Earnings | | | 10,347 | | | | 9,819 | |
Treasury stock, 414 shares at December 31, 2013 and 2012 | | | (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Unearned compensation restricted stock awards | | | (401 | ) | | | (368 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | | (1,655 | ) | | | 1,128 | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 27,396 | | | | 29,437 | |
Total liabilities and sotckholders' equity | | $ | 421,848 | | | | 375,019 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Interest and dividend income: | | | | | | |
Interest and fees on loans | | $ | 9,853 | | | $ | 9,656 | |
Interest on debt securities: | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 1,529 | | | | 1,166 | |
Tax-exempt | | | 477 | | | | 489 | |
Dividends | | | 4 | | | | 7 | |
Other interest | | | 141 | | | | 249 | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 12,004 | | | | 11,567 | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | |
Interest on deposits | | | 894 | | | | 1,037 | |
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | 19 | | | | - | |
Total interest expense | | | 917 | | | | 1,041 | |
Net interest and dividend income | | | 11,087 | | | | 10,526 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 345 | | | | 320 | |
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses | | | 10,742 | | | | 10,206 | |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 488 | | | | 495 | |
Writedown of securities (includes losses of $57 and $70, net of $40 and $58, respectively, recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, before taxes) | | | (17 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Gain on sales of investments | | | 126 | | | | 125 | |
Mortgage banking activities | | | 1,390 | | | | 2,266 | |
Investment services fees and commissions | | | 231 | | | | 171 | |
Other service charges and fees | | | 686 | | | | 798 | |
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies | | | 209 | | | | 208 | |
Other income | | | 13 | | | | 2 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 3,126 | | | | 4,053 | |
Noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 6,880 | | | | 6,271 | |
Occupancy expense | | | 1,185 | | | | 1,059 | |
Equipment expense | | | 290 | | | | 275 | |
Loss on sales and other writedowns of other real estate owned | | | 87 | | | | 38 | |
Professional fees | | | 543 | | | | 577 | |
Advertising and promotions | | | 756 | | | | 655 | |
Forms and supplies | | | 144 | | | | 173 | |
Correspondent charges | | | 318 | | | | 344 | |
FDIC assessment | | | 188 | | | | 176 | |
Postage | | | 86 | | | | 93 | |
Directors’ fees | | | 264 | | | | 229 | |
Data processing | | | 619 | | | | 502 | |
Other expense | | | 1,239 | | | | 1,116 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 12,599 | | | | 11,508 | |
Income before income tax expense | | | 1,269 | | | | 2,751 | |
Income tax expense | | | 134 | | | | 707 | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | |
Net income available to common stockholders | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 1,898 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share | | $ | 1.18 | | | $ | 2.19 | |
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 2.18 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands)
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities | | | (2,783 | ) | | | 411 | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | | | (2,783 | ) | | | 411 | |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (1,648 | ) | | $ | 2,455 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unearned | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Compensation | | | | | | | |
| Preferred Stock | | Common | | | Retained | | | Treasury | | | Restricted Stock | | | Comprehensive | | | | |
| Series A | | | Series B | | | Series C | | | Stock | | | Earnings | | | Stock | | | Awards | | | (Loss) Income | | | Total | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,952 | | | | 9,620 | | | | 8,360 | | | | (7 | ) | | | (199 | ) | | | 717 | | | | 27,443 | |
Net income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,044 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,044 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 411 | | | | 411 | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (134 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (134 | ) |
Preferred stock amortization (accretion) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12 | | | | - | | | | (12 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Stock based compensation | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 82 | | | | - | | | | 82 | |
Restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 251 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (251 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Tax benefit - vested restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2 | |
Common stock issued | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 28 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 28 | |
Dividends declared common stock ($.50 per share) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (439 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (439 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,964 | | | | 9,901 | | | | 9,819 | | | | (7 | ) | | | (368 | ) | | | 1,128 | | | | 29,437 | |
Net income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,135 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,135 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2,783 | ) | | | (2,783 | ) |
Preferred stock dividends | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (94 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (94 | ) |
Preferred stock amortization (accretion) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12 | | | | - | | | | (12 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Stock based compensation | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 156 | | | | - | | | | 156 | |
Restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 234 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (234 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Forfeited restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (45 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 45 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Tax benefit - vested restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 7 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 7 | |
Common stock issued | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 39 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 39 | |
Dividends declared common stock ($0.56 per share) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (501 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (501 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 8,976 | | | $ | 10,136 | | | $ | 10,347 | | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (401 | ) | | $ | (1,655 | ) | | $ | 27,396 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands)
| 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
Interest capitalized on interest-bearing time deposits with other banks | | | (106 | ) | | | (150 | ) |
Amortization of securities, net | | | 592 | | | | 495 | |
Writedown of available-for-sale securities | | | 17 | | | | 12 | |
Gain on sales of available-for-sale securities | | | (126 | ) | | | (125 | ) |
Change in deferred origination costs (fees), net | | | (374 | ) | | | (359 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | 345 | | | | 320 | |
Loans originated for sale | | | (72,081 | ) | | | (60,914 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale | | | 70,278 | | | | 63,027 | |
Gain on sales of loans | | | (1,058 | ) | | | (2,113 | ) |
Loss on sales of other real estate owned | | | 45 | | | | 38 | |
Writedown of other real estate owned | | | 42 | | | | - | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 252 | | | | 220 | |
Accretion on impairment of operating lease | | | (44 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Increase in other assets | | | (175 | ) | | | (516 | ) |
Increase in interest receivable | | | (55 | ) | | | (55 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in taxes receivable | | | (148 | ) | | | 676 | |
Deferred income tax expense | | | 205 | | | | 164 | |
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance | | | (209 | ) | | | (208 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to stock based compensation | | | (7 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Stock based compensation | | | 156 | | | | 82 | |
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities | | | (12 | ) | | | 382 | |
Increase (decrease) in interest payable | | | 3 | | | | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | | (1,325 | ) | | | 2,966 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Maturities and redemptions of interest-bearing time deposits with other banks | | | 3,895 | | | | 1,089 | |
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | | | (1,607 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | | | - | | | | 91 | |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | | | (35,183 | ) | | | (67,730 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | | | 23,361 | | | | 28,761 | |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | | | 11,493 | | | | 4,249 | |
Loan originations and principal collections, net | | | (28,134 | ) | | | (14,941 | ) |
Loans purchased | | | (15,429 | ) | | | (4,603 | ) |
Recoveries of loans previously charged off | | | 7 | | | | 15 | |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned | | | 126 | | | | 111 | |
Purchases of bank owned life insurance policies | | | - | | | | (2,140 | ) |
Investment in limited partnership | | | - | | | | (381 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,088 | ) | | | (360 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (42,559 | ) | | | (55,859 | ) |
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(In Thousands)
(continued)
| 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Net increase (increase) in demand deposits, NOW and savings accounts | | | 21,577 | | | | (158 | ) |
Decrease in time deposits | | | (3,482 | ) | | | (4,210 | ) |
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 821 | | | | 21 | |
Net change in short-term advances | | | 30,000 | | | | - | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 39 | | | | 28 | |
Excess tax benefit related to stock based compensation | | | 7 | | | | 2 | |
Dividends paid - preferred stock | | | (94 | ) | | | (134 | ) |
Dividends paid - common stock | | | (494 | ) | | | (436 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 48,374 | | | | (4,887 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 4,490 | | | | (57,780 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 34,100 | | | | 91,880 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 38,590 | | | $ | 34,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures: | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 914 | | | $ | 1,048 | |
Income taxes paid (received) | | | 77 | | | | (133 | ) |
Loans transferred to other real estate owned | | | - | | | | 362 | |
Increase in common stock dividends held in escrow | | | 7 | | | | 3 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SBT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS
On March 2, 2006, The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc. (the “Bank”) reorganized into a holding company structure. As a result, the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBT Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and each outstanding share of common stock of the Bank was converted into the right to receive one share of the common stock, no par value, of the Company. The Company files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
The Bank is a state chartered bank which was incorporated on April 28, 1992 and is headquartered in Simsbury, Connecticut. The Bank commenced operations on March 31, 1995 engaging principally in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and investing those deposits in securities, residential and commercial real estate, consumer and small business loans.
NOTE 2 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiary conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and predominant practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized below to assist the reader in better understanding the consolidated financial statements and other data contained herein.
USE OF ESTIMATES:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary the Bank and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, SBT Investment Services, Inc. and NERE Holdings, Inc. SBT Investment Services, Inc. was established solely for the purpose of providing investment products, financial advice and services to its clients and the community. NERE Holdings, Inc. was established to hold real estate. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash items, due from banks, Federal Home Loan Bank interest-bearing demand and overnight deposits, Federal Reserve Bank interest-bearing demand deposits, money market mutual funds and federal funds sold.
Cash and due from banks as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes $7,453,000 and $4,842,000, respectively, which is subject to withdrawals and usage restrictions to satisfy the reserve requirements of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and Bankers’ Bank Northeast.
SECURITIES:
Investments in debt securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts computed so as to approximate the interest method. Gains or losses on sales of investment securities are computed on a specific identification basis.
The Company classifies debt and equity securities into one of three categories: held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. These security classifications may be modified after acquisition only under certain specified conditions. In general, securities may be classified as held-to-maturity only if the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Trading securities are defined as those bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. All other securities must be classified as available-for-sale.
| -- | Held-to-maturity securities are measured at amortized cost in the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses are not included in earnings, or in a separate component of capital. They are merely disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. |
| -- | Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses are not included in earnings but are reported as a net amount (less expected tax) in a separate component of capital until realized. |
| -- | Trading securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses for trading securities are included in earnings. |
For any debt security with a fair value less than its amortized cost basis, the Company will determine whether it has the intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either condition is met, the Company will recognize a full impairment charge to earnings. For all other debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and do not meet either condition, the credit loss portion of impairment will be recognized in earnings as realized losses. The other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors will be recorded in other comprehensive income.
Declines in marketable equity securities below their cost that are deemed other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.
As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB), the Company is required to invest in $100 par value stock of the FHLB. The FHLB capital structure mandates that members must own stock as determined by their Total Stock Investment Requirement which is the sum of a member’s Membership Stock Investment Requirement and Activity-Based Stock Investment Requirement. The Membership Stock Investment Requirement is calculated as 0.35% of a member’s Stock Investment Base, subject to a minimum investment of $10,000 and a maximum investment of $25,000,000. The Stock Investment Base is an amount calculated based on certain assets held by a member that are reflected on call reports submitted to applicable regulatory authorities. The Activity-Based Stock Investment Requirement is calculated as 3.0% for overnight advances, 4.0% for FHLB advances with original terms to maturity of two days to three months and 4.5% for other advances plus a percentage of advance commitments, 0.5% of standby letters of credit issued by the FHLB and 4.5% of the value of intermediated derivative contracts. Management evaluates the Company’s investment in FHLB stock for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Based on its most recent analysis of the FHLB as of December 31, 2013, management deems its investment in FHLB stock to be not other-than-temporarily impaired.
LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE:
Loans held-for-sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses are provided for in a valuation allowance by charges to operations.
Interest income on mortgages held-for-sale is accrued currently and classified as interest on loans.
LOANS:
Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or payoff, are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for amounts due to borrowers on unadvanced loans, any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.
Interest on loans is recognized on a simple interest basis.
Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred, and the net amount amortized as an adjustment of the related loan's yield. The Company is amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the related loans.
Residential real estate loans are generally placed on nonaccrual when reaching 90 days past due or in process of foreclosure. All closed-end consumer loans 90 days or more past due and any equity line in the process of foreclosure are placed on nonaccrual status. Secured consumer loans are written down to realizable value and unsecured consumer loans are charged-off upon reaching 120 or 180 days past due depending on the type of loan. Commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans and leases which are 90 days or more past due are generally placed on nonaccrual status, unless secured by sufficient cash or other assets immediately convertible to cash. When a loan has been placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed against interest on loans. A loan can be returned to accrual status when collectability of principal is reasonably assured and the loan has performed for a period of time, generally six months.
Cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans are credited to principal to the extent necessary to eliminate doubt as to the collectability of the net carrying amount of the loan. Some or all of the cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans is recognized as interest income if the remaining net carrying amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. When recognition of interest income on an impaired loan on a cash basis is appropriate, the amount of income that is recognized is limited to that which would have been accrued on the net carrying amount of the loan at the contractual interest rate. Any cash interest payments received in excess of the limit and not applied to reduce the net carrying amount of the loan are recorded as recoveries of charge-offs until the charge-offs are fully recovered.
The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income with an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on an annual basis. A reporting system is in place which provides management with frequent reports related to loan quality, loan production, loan delinquencies and non-performing or potential problem loans.
Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating historical and projected profitability and cash flow to determine the borrower’s ability to repay their obligation as agreed. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Commercial and industrial loans are made primarily based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral supporting the loan facility. The cash flow of the borrower may not be as expected and the collateral supporting the loan may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable and inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee. Some loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent upon the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.
Commercial real estate loans are subject to the underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those underwriting standards for real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow dependent and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher principal balances and longer repayment periods. Repayment of these loans is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the principal business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or the economy in general. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. This diversification reduces the exposure to adverse economic conditions that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk-rating criteria. The Company also utilizes third-party experts to provide environmental and market valuations, in addition to economic conditions and trends within a specific industry. The Company also tracks the level of owner occupied commercial real estate loans within its commercial real estate portfolio. At December 31, 2013, approximately 82% of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.
With respect to land developers and builders that are secured by non-owner-occupied properties that the Company may originate from time to time, the Company generally requires that the borrower have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten based upon a financial analysis of the developers and property owners and construction cost estimates, in addition to independent appraisal valuations. These loans will rely on the value associated with the project upon completion. These cost and valuation estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans generally involve the disbursement of substantial funds over a short period of time with repayment substantially dependent upon the success of the completed project. Sources of repayment of these loans would be permanent financing upon completion or sales of developed property. These loans are closely monitored by onsite inspections and are considered to be of a higher risk than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to general economic conditions, availability of long-term financing, interest rate sensitivity, and governmental regulation of real property.
The Company originates consumer loans utilizing a computer-based credit-scoring analysis to supplement the underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by staff and management. This continual review, coupled with the high volume of borrowers of smaller dollar loans, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by regulatory requirements, which include but are not limited to a maximum loan-to-value of 75%, collection remedies, the number of such loans that a borrower can have at one time, and documentation requirements.
The Company engages an independent loan review firm that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Board of Directors. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification process and assessment decisions made by the relationship managers and credit officer, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
General Component:
The general component of the allowance for loan losses is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors stratified by the following loan segments: residential real estate, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and consumer. Management uses a rolling average of historical losses based on a time frame appropriate to capture relevant loss data for each loan segment. This historical loss factor is adjusted for the following qualitative factors: levels/trends in delinquencies; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards and other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices; experience/ability/depth of lending management and staff; and national and local economic trends and conditions. There were no changes in the Company’s policies or methodology pertaining to the general component of the allowance for loan losses during 2013.
The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as follows:
Residential real estate: The Company generally does not originate loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80 percent without obtaining private mortgage insurance for any amounts over 80% and does not grant subprime loans. All loans in this segment are collateralized by owner-occupied residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Commercial real estate: Loans in this segment are primarily income-producing properties throughout the Farmington Valley in Connecticut. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties are adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management periodically obtains rent rolls annually and continually monitors the cash flows of these loans.
Construction loans: Loans in this segment primarily include speculative real estate development loans for which payment is derived from sale of the property. Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions.
Commercial loans: Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Consumer loans: Loans in this segment are generally unsecured and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower.
Allocated Component:
The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential real estate loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a troubled debt restructuring agreement.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
The Company periodically may agree to modify the contractual terms of loans. When a loan is modified and a concession is made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"). All TDRs are initially classified as impaired.
UNALLOCATED COMPONENT:
An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general reserves in the portfolio.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Cost and related allowances for depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the respective accounts with any gain or loss included in income or expense. Depreciation and amortization are calculated principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated lives are 3 to 20 years for furniture and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the life of the lease or the estimated life of the improvements.
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND IN-SUBSTANCE FORECLOSURES:
Other real estate owned includes properties acquired through foreclosures and properties classified as in-substance foreclosures in accordance with ASC 310-40, “Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors.” These properties are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any writedown from cost to estimated fair value required at the time of foreclosure or classification as in-substance foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Expenses incurred in connection with maintaining these assets, subsequent writedowns, and gains or losses recognized upon sale are included in other expense.
In accordance with ASC 310-10-35, “Receivables – Overall – Subsequent Measurements,” the Company classifies loans as in-substance repossessed or foreclosed if the Company receives physical possession of the debtor’s assets regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place.
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
ASC 825,“Financial Instruments,” requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets' fair values.
Interest-bearing time deposits with banks: The fair values of interest bearing time deposits with banks are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for deposits with similar terms to investors.
Securities: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
Loans held-for-sale: Fair values for loans held-for-sale are estimated based on outstanding investor commitments, or in the absence of such commitments, are based on current investor yield requirements.
Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans are estimated by discounting the future cash flows, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
Deposit liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits, regular savings, NOW accounts, and money market accounts are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances: Fair values of Federal Home Loan Bank advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: The carrying amounts of securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximate their fair values.
Off-balance sheet instruments: The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments and the unadvanced portion of loans, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation with the counterparties at the reporting date.
ADVERTISING:
The Company directly expenses costs associated with advertising as they are incurred.
INCOME TAXES:
The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the temporary differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the amounts related to such temporary differences are realized or settled.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
At December 31, 2013, the Company has stock-based employee compensation plans which are described more fully in Note 18. The Company accounts for the plan under ASC 718-10, “Compensation – Stock Compensation – Overall.” During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, $156,000 and $82,000, respectively, in stock-based employee compensation was recognized.
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
The Company defines unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities that are included in computing EPS using the two-class method.
The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each share of common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Earnings per common share is calculated by dividing earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income allocated to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The objective of this ASU is to enhance current disclosures. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-06, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution.” The amendments in this update clarify the applicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The amendments in this update do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, the amendments require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” The objective of the amendments in this ASU is to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013; and should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU scope that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments in this ASU are being issued to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. The guidance provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. Additionally, the amendments require disclosures about an entity’s plan for liquidation, the methods and significant assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities, the type and amount of costs and income accrued, and the expected duration of the liquidation process. The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” The amendments in this ASU permit the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (OIS) to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815, in addition to Treasury Obligations of the U.S. government (UST) and the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amendments also remove the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The amendments apply to all entities that elect to apply hedge accounting of the benchmark interest rate under Topic 815. The amendments are effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance for the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendments in this ASU are expected to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and will better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. The amendments apply to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that invest in qualified affordable housing projects through limited liability entities that are flow-through entities for tax purposes as follows:
1. | For reporting entities that meet the conditions for and that elect to use the proportional amortization method to account for investments in qualified affordable housing projects, all amendments in this ASU apply. |
2. | For reporting entities that do not meet the conditions for or that do not elect the proportional amortization method, only the amendments in this ASU that are related to disclosures apply. |
The amendments in this ASU permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional amortization method, the investment should be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment in accordance with Subtopic 970-323. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. For all entities other than public business entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-02, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Accounting for Goodwill.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities except for public business entities and not-for-profit entities as defined in the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification and employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting. An entity within the scope of the amendments that elects to apply the accounting alternative in this ASU is subject to all of the related subsequent measurement, derecognition, other presentation matters, and disclosure requirements within the accounting alternative. The amendments in this ASU allow an accounting alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. An entity within the scope of the amendments that elects the accounting alternative in this ASU should amortize goodwill on a straight-line basis over 10 years, or less than 10 years if the entity demonstrates that another useful life is more appropriate. An entity that elects the accounting alternative is further required to make an accounting policy election to test goodwill for impairment at either the entity level or the reporting unit level. The accounting alternative, if elected, should be applied prospectively to goodwill existing as of the beginning of the period of adoption and new goodwill recognized in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted, including application to any period for which the entity’s annual or interim financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.” The objective of the amendments in this ASU is to reduce diversity by clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The amendments in this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. For entities other than public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments in this ASU using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. The Company is reviewing this ASU to determine if there will be a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENTS IN AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
Debt and equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets according to management’s intent. The amortized cost of securities and their approximate fair values are as follows as of December 31:
| Amortized | | | Gross | | | Gross | | | | |
| Cost | | | Unrealized | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | |
| Basis | | | Gains | | | Losses | | | Value | |
| (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations | | | | | | | | | | |
and agencies | | $ | 18,767 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 520 | | | $ | 18,247 | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 13,780 | | | | 391 | | | | 198 | | | | 13,973 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 56,799 | | | | 126 | | | | 2,357 | | | | 54,568 | |
SBA loan pools | | | 611 | | | | 50 | | | | - | | | | 661 | |
Money market mutual funds | | | 346 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 346 | |
| | | 90,303 | | | | 567 | | | | 3,075 | | | | 87,795 | |
Money market mutual funds included in cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and cash equivalents | | | (346 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (346 | ) |
| | $ | 89,957 | | | $ | 567 | | | $ | 3,075 | | | $ | 87,449 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and agencies | | $ | 30,760 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 30,835 | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 13,598 | | | | 956 | | | | 3 | | | | 14,551 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | 2,006 | | | | 52 | | | | 5 | | | | 2,053 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 42,737 | | | | 601 | | | | 81 | | | | 43,257 | |
SBA loan pools | | | 1,010 | | | | 114 | | | | - | | | | 1,124 | |
Money market mutual funds | | | 358 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 358 | |
| | | 90,469 | | | | 1,809 | | | | 100 | | | | 92,178 | |
Money market mutual funds included in cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and cash equivalents | | | (358 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (358 | ) |
| | $ | 90,111 | | | $ | 1,809 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 91,820 | |
The scheduled maturities of securities were as follows as of December 31, 2013:
| | Fair | |
| | Value | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Due after one year through five years | | $ | 13,119 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 8,831 | |
Due after ten years | | | 10,270 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 54,568 | |
SBA loan pools | | | 661 | |
| | $ | 87,449 | |
| | | | |
During 2013, proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities amounted to $11,493,000. Gross realized gains on those sales amounted to $126,000. The tax expense applicable to these gross realized gains amounted to $43,000. During 2012, proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities amounted to $4,249,000. Gross realized gains on those sales amounted to $125,000. The tax expense applicable to these gross realized gains amounted to $42,000.
There were no securities of issuers that exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2013.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total carrying amounts of securities pledged for securities sold under agreements to repurchase and public deposits were $15,418,000 and $14,819,000, respectively.
The aggregate fair value and unrealized losses of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more are as follows:
| | Less than 12 Months | | | 12 Months or Longer | | | Total | |
| | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | |
| | Value | | | Losses | | | Value | | | Losses | | | Value | | | Losses | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
corporations and agencies | | $ | 18,247 | | | $ | 520 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,247 | | | $ | 520 | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 3,340 | | | | 198 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,340 | | | | 198 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 42,185 | | | | 1,958 | | | | 6,240 | | | | 359 | | | | 48,425 | | | | 2,317 | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | | 63,772 | | | | 2,676 | | | | 6,240 | | | | 359 | | | | 70,012 | | | | 3,035 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | 331 | | | | 40 | | | | 331 | | | | 40 | |
Total temporarily impaired and other- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
than-temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 63,772 | | | $ | 2,676 | | | $ | 6,571 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 70,343 | | | $ | 3,075 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
corporations and agencies | | $ | 2,989 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,989 | | | $ | 11 | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 720 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 720 | | | | 3 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | 495 | | | | 5 | | | | 495 | | | | 5 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 8,642 | | | | 20 | | | | 118 | | | | 3 | | | | 8,760 | | | | 23 | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | | 12,351 | | | | 34 | | | | 613 | | | | 8 | | | | 12,964 | | | | 42 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | 280 | | | | 58 | | | | 280 | | | | 58 | |
Total temporarily impaired and other- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
than-temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 12,351 | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 893 | | | $ | 66 | | | $ | 13,244 | | | $ | 100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The investments in the Company’s investment portfolio that are temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2013 consist of debt issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states and U.S. government corporations and agencies. Company management considers investments with an unrealized loss as of December 31, 2013 to be only temporarily impaired because the impairment is attributable to changes in market interest rates and current market inefficiencies. Company management anticipates that the fair value of securities that are currently impaired will recover to cost basis. As management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.
The following table summarizes other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt securities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | Mortgage-Backed | | | Mortgage-Backed | |
| | Securities | | | Securities | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 70 | |
Less: unrealized other-than-temporary losses | | | | | | | | |
recognized in other comprehensive loss (1) | | | (40 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2) | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 12 | |
(1) Represents the noncredit component of the other-than-temporary impairment on the securities.
(2) Represents the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment on securities.
Activity related to the credit component recognized in earnings on debt securities held by the Company for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:
| | Mortgage-Backed | |
| | Securities | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | $ | 12 | |
Additions for the credit component on debt securities in which | | | | |
other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized | | | 17 | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | 29 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2013, securities with other-than-temporary impairment losses related to credit that were recognized in earnings consisted of two private label collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). The par value of these three securities were written down by $17,000 by the issuers.
Activity related to the credit component recognized in earnings on debt securities held by the Company for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:
| | Mortgage-Backed | |
| | Securities | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | $ | 0 | |
Additions for the credit component on debt securities in which | | | | |
other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized | | | 12 | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | $ | 12 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2012, securities with other-than-temporary impairment losses related to credit that were recognized in earnings consisted of two private label collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). The par value of these two securities were written down by $12,000 by the issuers.
NOTE 4 - LOANS
Loans consisted of the following as of December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 18,432 | | | $ | 13,991 | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | |
Construction and land development | | | 7,773 | | | | 2,982 | |
Residential | | | 137,539 | | | | 118,316 | |
Commercial | | | 48,814 | | | | 41,978 | |
Municipal | | | 6,344 | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 46,742 | | | | 45,245 | |
Municipal | | | 2,144 | | | | 1,478 | |
Consumer | | | 10,664 | | | | 11,053 | |
| | | 278,452 | | | | 235,043 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (2,792 | ) | | | (2,594 | ) |
Deferred loan origination costs, net | | | 1,215 | | | | 841 | |
Net loans | | $ | 276,875 | | | $ | 233,290 | |
The following tables set forth information regarding the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment:
| | Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | and Land | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Residential | | | Commercial | | | Development | | | Home Equity | | | and Industrial | | | Consumer | | | Unallocated | | | Total | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 1,051 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 362 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | 135 | | | $ | 2,594 | |
Charge-offs | | | (40 | ) | | | (54 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2 | ) | | | (58 | ) | | | - | | | | (154 | ) |
Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | 7 | |
Provision (benefit) | | | 178 | | | | 216 | | | | 69 | | | | (59 | ) | | | 18 | | | | 58 | | | | (135 | ) | | | 345 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 1,189 | | | $ | 748 | | | $ | 211 | | | $ | 303 | | | $ | 239 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,792 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | | 1,189 | | | | 748 | | | | 211 | | | | 303 | | | | 239 | | | | 102 | | | | - | | | | 2,792 | |
Total allowance for loan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
losses ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
balance | | $ | 1,189 | | | $ | 748 | | | $ | 211 | | | $ | 303 | | | $ | 239 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,792 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | $ | 175 | | | $ | 924 | | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,325 | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | | 137,364 | | | | 54,234 | | | | 7,551 | | | | 46,738 | | | | 20,576 | | | | 10,664 | | | | - | | | | 277,127 | |
Total loans ending balance | | $ | 137,539 | | | $ | 55,158 | | | $ | 7,773 | | | $ | 46,742 | | | $ | 20,576 | | | $ | 10,664 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 278,452 | |
| | Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | and Land | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Residential | | | Commercial | | | Development | | | Home Equity | | | and Industrial | | | Consumer | | | Unallocated | | | Total | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 750 | | | $ | 573 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 422 | | | $ | 194 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 2,469 | |
Charge-offs | | | (113 | ) | | | (25 | ) | | | (49 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (23 | ) | | | - | | | | (210 | ) |
Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | 5 | | | | 9 | | | | - | | | | 15 | |
Provision (benefit) | | | 414 | | | | 38 | | | | 168 | | | | 20 | | | | (208 | ) | | | (81 | ) | | | (31 | ) | | | 320 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 1,051 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 362 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | 135 | | | $ | 2,594 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | | 1,051 | | | | 586 | | | | 142 | | | | 362 | | | | 219 | | | | 99 | | | | 135 | | | | 2,594 | |
Total allowance for loan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
losses ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
balance | | $ | 1,051 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 362 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | 135 | | | $ | 2,594 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | $ | 180 | | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 163 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 467 | |
Ending balance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively evaluated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
for impairment | | | 118,136 | | | | 41,859 | | | | 2,819 | | | | 45,240 | | | | 15,469 | | | | 11,053 | | | | - | | | | 234,576 | |
Total loans ending balance | | $ | 118,316 | | | $ | 41,978 | | | $ | 2,982 | | | $ | 45,245 | | | $ | 15,469 | | | $ | 11,053 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 235,043 | |
The following tables present the Company’s loans by risk rating as of December 31:
| Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | and Land | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | |
| Residential | | | Commercial | | | Development | | | Home Equity | | | and Industrial | | | Consumer | | | Total | |
| (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grade: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pass | | $ | - | | | $ | 50,520 | | | $ | 6,042 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,425 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 74,987 | |
Special mention | | | - | | | | 2,661 | | | | 1,163 | | | | - | | | | 1,175 | | | | - | | | | 4,999 | |
Substandard | | | 1,601 | | | | 1,977 | | | | 568 | | | | 116 | | | | 976 | | | | - | | | | 5,238 | |
Loans not | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
formally rated | | | 135,938 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 46,626 | | | | - | | | | 10,664 | | | | 193,228 | |
Total | | $ | 137,539 | | | $ | 55,158 | | | $ | 7,773 | | | $ | 46,742 | | | $ | 20,576 | | | $ | 10,664 | | | $ | 278,452 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | and Land | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | |
| | Residential | | | Commercial | | | Development | | | Home Equity | | | and Industrial | | | Consumer | | | Total | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grade: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pass | | $ | - | | | $ | 36,748 | | | $ | 2,381 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 13,048 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 52,177 | |
Special mention | | | - | | | | 3,778 | | | | 438 | | | | - | | | | 2,268 | | | | - | | | | 6,484 | |
Substandard | | | 572 | | | | 1,452 | | | | 163 | | | | 155 | | | | 153 | | | | - | | | | 2,495 | |
Loans not | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
formally rated | | | 117,744 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 45,090 | | | | - | | | | 11,053 | | | | 173,887 | |
Total | | $ | 118,316 | | | $ | 41,978 | | | $ | 2,982 | | | $ | 45,245 | | | $ | 15,469 | | | $ | 11,053 | | | $ | 235,043 | |
Credit Quality Indicators: As part of the ongoing monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) weighted average risk rating of commercial loans; (ii) the level of classified and criticized commercial loans; (iii) non performing loans; (iv) net charge-offs and (v) the general economic conditions within the State of Connecticut.
The Company utilizes a risk rating grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its commercial loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 7. A description of each rating class is as follows:
Risk Rating 1 (Superior) – This risk rating is assigned to loans secured by cash.
Risk Rating 2 (Good) – This risk rating is assigned to borrowers of high credit quality who have primary and secondary sources of repayment which are well defined and fully confirmed.
Risk Rating 3 (Satisfactory) – This risk rating is assigned to borrowers who are fully responsible for the loan or credit commitment, which has primary and secondary sources of repayment that are well defined and adequately confirmed. Most credit factors are favorable, and the credit exposure is managed through normal monitoring.
Risk Rating 3.5 (Bankable with Care) – This risk rating is assigned to borrowers who are fully responsible for the loan or credit commitment and the secondary sources of repayment are weak. These loans may require more than the average amount of attention from the relationship manager.
Risk Rating 4 (Special Mention) – This risk rating is assigned to borrowers which may be adequately protected by the present debt service capacity and tangible net worth of the borrower, but which have potential problems that could, if not checked or corrected, eventually weaken these assets or otherwise jeopardize the repayment of principal and interest as originally intended. Most credit factors are unfavorable, and the credit exposure requires immediate corrective action
Risk Rating 5 (Substandard) – This risk rating is assigned to borrowers who have inadequate cash flow or collateral to satisfy their loan obligations as originally defined in the loan agreement. Substandard loans may be placed on nonaccrual status if the conditions described above are generally met.
Risk Rating 6 (Doubtful) – This risk rating is assigned to a borrower or portion of a borrower’s loan with which the Company is no longer certain of its collectability. A specific reserve allocation is assigned to this portion of the loan.
Risk Rating 7 (Loss) – This risk rating is assigned to loans which have been charged off or the portion of the loan that has been charged down. “Loss” does not imply that the loan, or portion of, will never be paid, nor does it imply that there has been a forgiveness of debt.
Loans not formally rated include residential, home equity and consumer loans. As of December 31, 2013, $196.1 million of the total residential, home equity and consumer loan portfolio of $197.7 million were not formally rated. As of December 31, 2012, $173.9 million of the total residential, home equity and consumer loan portfolio of $174.6 million were not formally rated. The performance of these loans is measured by delinquency status. The Company underwrites first mortgage loans in accordance with FHLMC and FNMA guidelines. These guidelines provide for specific requirements with regard to documentation and loan to value and debt to income ratios. Home equity loan and line guidelines place a maximum loan to value ratio of 80% on these loans and the Company requires full underwriting disclosure documentation for these loans. These underwriting factors have produced a high performance loan portfolio. Total delinquent loans, consisting of loans past due 60 days or more, increased from 0.54% of total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2012 to 1.17% of total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
An age analysis of past-due loans, segregated by class of loans is as follows as of December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 90 Days | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 90 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | or More | | | | |
| | | | | | | | or More | | | Total | | | Total | | | Total | | | Past Due | | | Nonaccrual | |
| 30–59 Days | | | 60–89 Days | | | Past Due | | | Past Due | | | Current | | | Loans | | | and Accruing | | | Loans | |
| (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | - | | | $ | 720 | | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 1,973 | | | $ | 135,566 | | | $ | 137,539 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,597 | |
Commercial | | | - | | | | - | | | | 924 | | | | 924 | | | | 47,890 | | | | 48,814 | | | | - | | | | 924 | |
Construction and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
land development | | | - | | | | - | | | | 204 | | | | 204 | | | | 7,569 | | | | 7,773 | | | | - | | | | 222 | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | 94 | | | | 83 | | | | 177 | | | | 46,565 | | | | 46,742 | | | | - | | | | 83 | |
Municipal | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6,344 | | | | 6,344 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial and industrial | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 18,432 | | | | 18,432 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Municipal | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,144 | | | | 2,144 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | 128 | | | | - | | | | 26 | | | | 154 | | | | 10,510 | | | | 10,664 | | | | 3 | | | | 23 | |
Total | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 814 | | | $ | 2,490 | | | $ | 3,432 | | | $ | 275,020 | | | $ | 278,452 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 2,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | - | | | $ | 490 | | | $ | 563 | | | $ | 1,053 | | | $ | 117,263 | | | $ | 118,316 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 821 | |
Commercial | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 41,978 | | | | 41,978 | | | | - | | | | 119 | |
Construction and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
land development | | | - | | | | - | | | | 163 | | | | 163 | | | | 2,819 | | | | 2,982 | | | | - | | | | 163 | |
Home equity | | | 25 | | | | 36 | | | | - | | | | 61 | | | | 45,184 | | | | 45,245 | | | | - | | | | 120 | |
Commercial and industrial | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 13,991 | | | | 13,991 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Municipal | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,478 | | | | 1,478 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | 110 | | | | - | | | | 17 | | | | 127 | | | | 10,926 | | | | 11,053 | | | | - | | | | 17 | |
Total | | $ | 135 | | | $ | 526 | | | $ | 743 | | | $ | 1,404 | | | $ | 233,639 | | | $ | 235,043 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,240 | |
Information about loans that meet the definition of an impaired loan in ASC 310-10-35 is as follows as of and for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | Unpaid | | | | | | Average | | | Interest | |
| Recorded | | | Principal | | | Related | | | Recorded | | | Income | |
| Investment | | | Balance | | | Allowance | | | Investment | | | Recognized | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | 175 | | | $ | 175 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 178 | | | $ | 6 | |
Commercial | | | 924 | | | | 924 | | | | - | | | | 929 | | | | 3 | |
Home equity | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | - | | | | 5 | | | | - | |
Construction and land development | | | 222 | | | | 222 | | | | - | | | | 212 | | | | - | |
Total impaired with no related allowance | | $ | 1,325 | | | $ | 1,325 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,324 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total impaired with an allowance recorded | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | 175 | | | $ | 175 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 178 | | | $ | 6 | |
Commercial | | | 924 | | | | 924 | | | | - | | | | 929 | | | | 3 | |
Home equity | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | - | | | | 5 | | | | - | |
Construction and land development | | | 222 | | | | 222 | | | | - | | | | 212 | | | | - | |
Total impaired loans | | $ | 1,325 | | | $ | 1,325 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,324 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | 180 | | | $ | 180 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 15 | |
Commercial | | | 119 | | | | 119 | | | | - | | | | 115 | | | | 7 | |
Home equity | | | 5 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 6 | | | | - | |
Construction and land development | | | 163 | | | | 163 | | | | - | | | | 257 | | | | 62 | |
Commercial and industrial | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 70 | | | | 5 | |
Total impaired with no related allowance | | $ | 467 | | | $ | 467 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 897 | | | $ | 89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total impaired with an allowance recorded | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | 180 | | | $ | 180 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 15 | |
Commercial | | | 119 | | | | 119 | | | | - | | | | 115 | | | | 7 | |
Home equity | | | 5 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 6 | | | | - | |
Construction and land development | | | 163 | | | | 163 | | | | - | | | | 257 | | | | 62 | |
Commercial and industrial | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 70 | | | | 5 | |
Total impaired loans | | $ | 467 | | | $ | 467 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 897 | | | $ | 89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
There were no loans modified as a troubled debt restructure during the year ended December 31, 2013.
The following tables set forth information regarding troubled debt restructured loans that were restructured during the year ended December 31, 2012:
| | | | | | | Pre-Modification | | | | Post- Modification | |
| | Number of | | | | Outstanding Recorded | | | | Outstanding Recorded | |
| | Contracts | | | | Investment | | | | Investment | |
| | (Dollars In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Troubled Debt Restructurings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 1 | | | | $ | 66 | | | | $ | 72 | |
| | | 1 | | | | $ | 66 | | | | $ | 72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contracts | | | | Recorded Investment | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | (Dollars In Thousands) | | | | | | |
Troubled Debt Restructurings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
That Subsequently Defaulted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 1 | | | | $ | 68 | | | | | | |
| | | 1 | | | | $ | 68 | | | | | | |
There was one loan modified as a troubled debt restructure during 2012. Past-due principal, interest and legal fees were capitalized to the loan to bring all payments current. The loan was individually evaluated for impairment and it was determined that no related allowance allocation was necessary. The loan was reported as impaired and was on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2012.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings.
The balance of mortgage servicing rights included in other assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1,414,000 and $822,000, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights of $925,000 and $774,000 were capitalized in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization of mortgage servicing rights was $300,000 in 2013 and $106,000 in 2012. The fair value of these rights was $1,671,000 and $1,036,000 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Following is an analysis of the aggregate changes in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights for the years ended December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 5 | |
Additions | | | 86 | | | | 41 | |
Reductions | | | (53 | ) | | | (37 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 9 | |
Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $147,955,000 and $88,728,000 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
NOTE 5 - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of premises and equipment as of December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Leasehold improvements | | $ | 1,370 | | | $ | 1,290 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 2,968 | | | | 2,284 | |
| | | 4,338 | | | | 3,574 | |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (2,720 | ) | | | (2,750 | ) |
| | $ | 1,618 | | | $ | 824 | |
NOTE 6 - DEPOSITS
The aggregate amount of time deposit accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $29,703,000 and $31,331,000, respectively.
For time deposits as of December 31, 2013, the scheduled maturities for years ended December 31 are:
| | (In Thousands) | |
2014 | | $ | 40,005 | |
2015 | | | 17,095 | |
2016 | | | 4,117 | |
2017 | | | 4,856 | |
2018 | | | 2,916 | |
Total | | $ | 68,989 | |
As of December 31, 2013, the Bank had one depositor with total deposits of $22,081,000 or 6.16% of the Company’s total deposits.
NOTE 7 - SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of funds borrowed from customers on a short-term basis secured by portions of the Company's investment portfolio. The securities which were sold have been accounted for not as sales but as borrowings. The securities consisted of debt securities issued by U.S. government sponsored enterprises, corporations and agencies and states and municipalities. The securities were held in safekeeping by the Federal Home Loan Bank and Merrill Lynch, under the control of the Company. The purchasers have agreed to sell to the Company substantially identical securities at the maturity of the agreements. The agreements mature generally within three months from date of issue.
NOTE 8 - FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
Advances consist of funds borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB). There were $30,000,000 in FHLB advances outstanding as of December 31, 2013. All advances outstanding at December 31, 2013 mature in January 2014.
Borrowings from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral, consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages secured by one to four family properties and other qualified assets.
The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB in the amount of $1,525,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no advances outstanding under this line of credit.
NOTE 9 - INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The components of income tax expense are as follows for the years ended December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Current: | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | (72 | ) | | $ | 541 | |
State | | | 1 | | | | 2 | |
| | | (71 | ) | | | 543 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | 205 | | | | 164 | |
State | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | 205 | | | | 164 | |
Total income tax expense | | $ | 134 | | | $ | 707 | |
The reasons for the differences between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | % of | | | % of | |
| | Income | | | Income | |
Federal income tax at statutory rate | | | 34.0 | % | | | 34.0 | % |
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from: | | | | | | | | |
Tax-exempt income | | | (23.2 | ) | | | (9.2 | ) |
Other | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.9 | |
Effective tax rates | | | 10.6 | % | | | 25.7 | % |
The Company had gross deferred tax assets and gross deferred tax liabilities as follows as of December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | $ | 800 | | | $ | 753 | |
Deferred compensation | | | 220 | | | | 181 | |
Impairment of operating lease | | | 24 | | | | 39 | |
Write-down of securities | | | 10 | | | | 4 | |
Restricted stock awards | | | 16 | | | | 12 | |
Charitable contribution carry over | | | 93 | | | | 37 | |
Other | | | 80 | | | | 20 | |
Alternative minimum tax carryforward | | | 413 | | | | 368 | |
Net unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities | | | 853 | | | | - | |
Gross deferred tax assets | | | 2,509 | | | | 1,414 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | (250 | ) | | | (131 | ) |
Deferred loan costs/fees | | | (413 | ) | | | (286 | ) |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | (481 | ) | | | (280 | ) |
Net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities | | | - | | | | (581 | ) |
Gross deferred tax liabilities | | | (1,144 | ) | | | (1,278 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 1,365 | | | $ | 136 | |
Deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 have not been reduced by a valuation allowance because management believes that it is more likely than not that the full amount of deferred taxes will be realized.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had no operating loss carryovers for income tax purposes.
It is the Company’s policy to provide for uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no material uncertain tax positions related to federal and state income tax matters. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities for the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013.
In January of 2011, the Bank formed a subsidiary Passive Investment Company (PIC). Under State of Connecticut statutes, such a company is not subject to Connecticut corporation business taxes. Provided that the Bank meets the mandated statutory requirements, the Company’s Connecticut corporation business taxes should be significantly reduced or eliminated.
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2013 the Company was obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for bank premises and equipment expiring between June 2014 and September 2020. Certain leases contain renewal options. The cost of such renewals is not included below. The total minimum rental due in future periods under these existing agreements is as follows as of December 31, 2013:
| | (In Thousands) | |
2014 | | $ | 860 | |
2015 | | | 767 | |
2016 | | | 541 | |
2017 | | | 497 | |
2018 | | | 508 | |
Thereafter | | | 912 | |
Total | | $ | 4,085 | |
Certain leases contain provisions for escalation of minimum lease payments contingent upon percentage increases in the consumer price index. Total rental expense amounted to $708,000 and $564,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
On November 28, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with its data processing servicer which ends in five years, and automatically continues for three years, unless terminated by either party with notice. A second amendment to this November 2008 agreement was signed between the parties on June 27, 2013 that extends the renewal term through April 19, 2019, an extension of the first renewal term for sixty (60) months. Under the agreement, the Company must pay a termination fee as described in the agreement if the Company terminates the agreement with notice, before the end of this extended agreement.
NOTE 11 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. This guidance also allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis.
In accordance with ASC 820-10, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
Level 1 - Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Level 3 - Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company did not have any significant transfers of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended December 31, 2013.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value for December 31, 2013 and 2012.
The Company’s cash instruments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.
The Company’s investment in obligations of states and municipalities, mortgage-backed securities and other debt securities available-for-sale are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For these securities, we obtain fair value measurements from independent pricing services. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, trading levels, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the instrument’s terms and conditions.
Level 3 is for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Subsequent to inception, management only changes Level 3 inputs and assumptions when corroborated by evidence such as transactions in similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalization and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt markets, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows.
The Company’s impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 inputs based upon appraisals of similar properties obtained from a third party. For Level 3 inputs, fair values are based on management estimates.
Other real estate owned values are estimated using Level 2 inputs based upon appraisals of similar properties obtained from a third party. For Level 3 inputs, fair values are based on management estimates.
The following summarizes assets measured at fair value as of December 31:
ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
| | | | | Active Markets for | | | Other Observable | | | Unobservable | |
| | | | | Identical Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | |
| | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2013: | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. government | | | |
corporations and agencies | | $ | 18,247 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,247 | | | $ | - | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 13,973 | | | | - | | | | 13,973 | | | | - | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 54,568 | | | | - | | | | 54,568 | | | | - | |
SBA loan pools | | | 661 | | | | - | | | | 661 | | | | - | |
Totals | | $ | 87,449 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 87,449 | | | $ | - | |
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
| | | | | Active Markets for | | | Other Observable | | | Unobservable | |
| | | | | Identical Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | |
| | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities issued by U.S. government | | | | | | | | | | | | |
corporations and agencies | | $ | 30,835 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 30,835 | | | $ | - | |
Obligations of states and municipalities | | | 14,551 | | | | - | | | | 14,551 | | | | - | |
Corporate debt securities | | | 2,053 | | | | - | | | | 2,053 | | | | - | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 43,257 | | | | - | | | | 43,257 | | | | - | |
SBA loan pools | | | 1,124 | | | | - | | | | 1,124 | | | | - | |
Totals | | $ | 91,820 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 91,820 | | | $ | - | |
Under certain circumstances we make adjustments to fair value for our assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis. The following table presents the assets carried on the consolidated balance sheet by caption and by level in the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2012, for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded:
ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | |
| | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
| | | | | Active Markets for | | | Other Observable | | | Unobservable | |
| | | | | Identical Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | |
| | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | $ | 213 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 213 | |
Totals | | $ | 213 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 213 | |
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, all of which are held or issued for purposes other than trading, are as follows as of December 31:
| December 31, 2013 | |
| Carrying | | | Fair Value | |
| Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
| (In Thousands) | |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 38,590 | | | $ | 38,590 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 38,590 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | 87,449 | | | | - | | | | 87,449 | | | | - | | | | 87,449 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 2,196 | | | | 2,196 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,196 | |
Loans held-for-sale | | 2,861 | | | | | | | | - | | | | 2,909 | | | | 2,909 | |
Loans, net | | 276,875 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 277,539 | | | | 277,539 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 1,074 | | | | 1,074 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,074 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 358,504 | | | | - | | | | 358,961 | | | | - | | | | 358,961 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | 4,390 | | | | - | | | | 4,390 | | | | - | | | | 4,390 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 30,000 | | | | - | | | | 30,000 | | | | - | | | | 30,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 | |
| Carrying | | | Fair Value | |
| Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
| (In Thousands) | |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 34,100 | | | $ | 34,100 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 34,100 | |
Interest-bearing time deposits with other banks | | 3,789 | | | | - | | | | 3,892 | | | | - | | | | 3,892 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | 91,820 | | | | - | | | | 91,820 | | | | - | | | | 91,820 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 589 | | | | 589 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 589 | |
Loans, net | | 223,290 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 239,465 | | | | 239,465 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 1,019 | | | | 1,019 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,019 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 340,409 | | | | - | | | | 340,857 | | | | - | | | | 340,857 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | 3,569 | | | | - | | | | 3,569 | | | | - | | | | 3,569 | |
The carrying amounts of financial instruments shown in the above table are included in the consolidated balance sheets under the indicated captions. Accounting policies related to financial instruments are described in Note 2.
NOTE 12 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to originate loans, unadvanced funds on loans and standby letters of credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for loan commitments is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to originate loans are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include secured interests in mortgages, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance by a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the maximum potential amount of the Company’s obligation was $857,000 and $175,000, respectively for financial and standby letters of credit. The Company’s outstanding letters of credit generally have a term of less than one year. If a letter of credit is drawn upon, the Company may seek recourse through the customer’s underlying line of credit. If the customer’s line of credit is also in default, the Company may take possession of the collateral, if any, securing the line of credit.
Notional amounts of financial instrument liabilities with off-balance-sheet credit risk are as follows as of December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Commitments to originate loans | | $ | 10,488 | | | $ | 13,459 | |
Standby letters of credit | | | 857 | | | | 175 | |
Unadvanced portions of loans: | | | | | | | | |
Construction loans | | | 5,456 | | | | 1,778 | |
Commercial lines of credit | | | 14,265 | | | | 11,383 | |
Consumer | | | 677 | | | | 689 | |
Home equity lines of credit | | | 40,075 | | | | 32,550 | |
| | $ | 71,818 | | | $ | 60,034 | |
There is no material difference between the notional amounts and the estimated fair values of the above off-balance sheet liabilities.
NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and companies in which they have significant ownership interest were customers of the Bank during 2013. Total loans to such persons and their companies amounted to $3,889,000 as of December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2013 principal payments totaled $2,227,000 and advances amounted to $2,172,000.
Deposits from related parties held by the Company as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $6,076,000 and $4,669,000, respectively.
During 2013 and 2012, the Company paid $63,000 and $64,000, respectively, for rent and related expenses of the Company’s Granby branch office to a company of which a bank director is a principal. The rent expense for the Granby branch included in Note 10 amounted to $43,000 in 2013 and $43,000 in 2012.
NOTE 14 - SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Most of the Company's business activity is with customers located within the state. There are no concentrations of credit to borrowers that have similar economic characteristics. The majority of the Company's loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by real estate located in the state of Connecticut.
NOTE 15 - OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
The components of other comprehensive (loss) income, included in stockholders’ equity are as follows during the years ended December 31:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities | | $ | (4,108 | ) | | $ | 736 | |
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income | | | (109 | ) | | | (113 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income before income tax effect | | | (4,217 | ) | | | 623 | |
Income tax expense (expense) | | | 1,434 | | | | (212 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | | $ | (2,783 | ) | | $ | 411 | |
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax | | $ | (1,655 | ) | | $ | 1,128 | |
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (1,655 | ) | | $ | 1,128 | |
NOTE 16 - REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
As of December 31, 2013, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.
The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To Be Well | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Capitalized Under | |
| | | | | | | | For Capital | | | Prompt Corrective | |
| | Actual | | | Adequacy Purposes | | | Action Provisions | |
| | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | |
| | (Dollars In Thousands) | |
As of December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | $ | 31,433 | | | | 13.08 | % | | $ | 19,227 | | | ≥ | 8.0 | % | | $ | 24,033 | | | ≥ | 10.0 | % |
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | 28,641 | | | | 11.92 | | | | 9,613 | | | ≥ | 4.0 | | | | 14,420 | | | ≥ | 6.0 | |
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | | | 28,641 | | | | 7.09 | | | | 16,150 | | | ≥ | 4.0 | | | | 20,188 | | | ≥ | 5.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | $ | 30,637 | | | | 14.68 | % | | $ | 16,694 | | | ≥ | 8.0 | % | | $ | 20,868 | | | ≥ | 10.0 | % |
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | 28,043 | | | | 13.44 | | | | 8,347 | | | ≥ | 4.0 | | | | 12,521 | | | ≥ | 6.0 | |
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | | | 28,043 | | | | 7.73 | | | | 14,520 | | | ≥ | 4.0 | | | | 18,150 | | | ≥ | 5.0 | |
The declaration of cash dividends is dependent on a number of factors, including regulatory limitations, and the Company's operating results and financial condition. The stockholders of the Company will be entitled to dividends only when, and if, declared by the Company's Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore. The declaration of future dividends will be subject to favorable operating results, financial conditions, tax considerations, and other factors.
Under Connecticut law, the Bank may pay dividends only out of net profits. The Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval is required for dividend payments which exceed the current year’s net profits and retained net profits from the preceding two years. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank is restricted from declaring dividends to the Company in an amount greater than $3,063,000.
NOTE 17 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Company sponsors a 401(k) savings and retirement plan. Employees who are 21 years of age and employed on the plan's effective date are immediately eligible to participate in the plan. Other employees who have attained age 21 are eligible for membership on the first day of the month following completion of 90 days of service.
The provisions of the 401(k) plan allow eligible employees to contribute subject to IRS limitations. The Company's matching contribution will be determined at the beginning of the plan year. The Company's expense under this plan was $125,000 in 2013 and $105,000 in 2012.
The Company entered into Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements with current and former executive officers. The agreements require the payment of specified benefits upon retirement over specified periods as described in each agreement. The total liability for the agreements included in other liabilities was $648,000 at December 31, 2013 and $533,000 at December 31, 2012. Expenses under these agreements amounted to $142,000 and $170,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Payments made under the agreements were $27,000 and $5,000, respectively for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
The Company entered into employment agreements (the “Agreements”) with the Executive Officers of the Company. The Agreements provide for severance benefits upon termination following a change in control as defined in the agreements in amounts equal to cash compensation as defined in the agreements, and fringe benefits that the Executive(s) would have received if the Executive(s) would have continued working for an additional two years. The agreements also include provisions to accelerate vesting for stock option plans; or for additional credit for years of service under benefit plans.
NOTE 18 - STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The SBT Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan (“1998 Plan”) provided for the granting of options to purchase shares of common stock or the granting of shares of restricted stock up to an aggregate amount of 142,000 shares of common stock of the Company. Options granted under the 1998 Plan may have been either Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified options (“NQOs”) which do not qualify as ISOs. Effective March 17, 2009, no additional restricted stock awards or stock options may be granted under the 1998 Plan.
On May 10, 2011, the stockholders of SBT Bancorp, Inc. approved the SBT Bancorp, Inc. 2011 Stock Award and Option Plan (“2011 Plan”). The 2011 Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of common stock or the granting of shares of restricted stock up to an aggregate amount of 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company. Options granted under the 2011 Plan may be either Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified options (“NQOs”) which do not qualify as ISOs.
The exercise price for shares covered by an ISO may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant. All options must expire no later than ten years from the date of grant.
During 2013 and 2012, the Company granted 10,000 shares and 10,570 shares, respectively, of restricted stock with an award value of $234,000 and $251,000, respectively, or $23.40 and $23.75 per share, respectively. The restricted shares vest over a three year period. During 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense related to the restricted shares awarded in the amounts of $156,000 and $82,000, respectively. The recognized tax benefit related to this expense was $53,000 in 2013 and $28,000 in 2012.
A summary of the status of the restricted stock awards as of December 31 and changes during the years ending on that date is presented below:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | Weighted-Average | | | | | | Weighted-Average | |
| | Number of | | | Grant | | | Number of | | | Grant | |
Fixed Options | | Shares | | | Price | | | Shares | | | Price | |
Non-vested restricted stock awards | | | | | | | | | | | | |
at beginning of year | | | 18,042 | | | $ | 22.29 | | | | 11,206 | | | $ | 20.21 | |
Restricted shares granted | | | 10,000 | | | | 23.39 | | | | 10,570 | | | | 23.75 | |
Shares vested | | | (6,536 | ) | | | 21.88 | | | | (3,734 | ) | | | 20.21 | |
Shares forfeited | | | (1,982 | ) | | | 22.62 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Non-vested restricted stock awards | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
at end of year | | | 19,524 | | | $ | 22.95 | | | | 18,042 | | | $ | 22.29 | |
As of December 31, 2013, the unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to the non-vested restricted stock awards was $401,000. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
The Company did not grant any stock options in 2013 and 2012.
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan as of December 31 and changes during the years ending on that date is presented below:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | Weighted-Average | | | | | | Weighted-Average | |
Fixed Options | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at beginning of year | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | | | | 32,811 | | | $ | 30.07 | |
Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,311 | ) | | | 15.65 | |
Outstanding at end of year | | | 31,500 | | | | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | | 30.67 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at year-end | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | |
Weighted-average fair value of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
options granted during the year | | | N/A | | | | | | | | N/A | | | | | |
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2013:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted-Average | | | | | | |
| | | Number | | | Remaining | | Number | | | | |
Exercise Price | | | Outstanding | | | Contractual Life | | Exercisable | | | Exercise Price | |
$ | 31.50 | | | | 21,000 | | | 1.97 years | | | 21,000 | | | $ | 31.50 | |
| 29.00 | | | | 10,500 | | | 2.48 years | | | 10,500 | | | | 29.00 | |
$ | 30.67 | | | | 31,500 | | | 2.14 years | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 30.67 | |
As of December 31, 2013, compensation costs related to stock options granted under the Plans have been fully recognized. There were no shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
NOTE 19 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for net income available to common stockholders are as follows:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In Thousands, Except Share Data) | |
Basic earnings per share computation: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | |
Preferred stock net accretion | | | (12 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Cumulative preferred stock dividends | | | (94 | ) | | | (134 | ) |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 1,898 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | | | 872,411 | | | | 867,087 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 1.18 | | | $ | 2.19 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share computation: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 2,044 | |
Preferred stock net accretion | | | (12 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Cumulative preferred stock dividends | | | (94 | ) | | | (134 | ) |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 1,898 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, before dilution | | | 872,411 | | | | 867,087 | |
Dilutive potential shares | | | 4,576 | | | | 5,119 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution | | | 876,987 | | | | 872,206 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 2.18 | |
| | | | | | | | |
NOTE 20 - PREFERRED STOCK
On August 11, 2011, as part of the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) Small Business Lending Fund program (the “SBLF”), the Company entered into a Small Business Lending Fund – Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the Secretary of the Treasury (the “Secretary”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, and the Secretary agreed to purchase, 9,000 shares of the Company’s Senior Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “SBLF Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $9,000,000. The SBLF Preferred Stock was issued pursuant to the SBLF program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that was created to encourage lending to small business by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.
The transaction described above closed on August 11, 2011. The SBLF Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks senior to the Company’s common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Company.
The SBLF Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and will pay non-cumulative dividends quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2011. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first 10 quarters during which the SBLF Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” or “QSBL” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). Based upon the increase in the Bank’s level of QSBL over the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, at December 31, 2013, the dividend rate payable by the Company on the Series C Preferred Stock is 1.00%. For the second through ninth calendar quarters, the dividend rate may be adjusted between one percent (1%) and five percent (5%) per annum to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. If the level of the Bank’s qualified small business loans declines so that the percentage increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline level is less than 10% then the dividend rate payable on the SBLF Preferred Stock would increase. For the tenth calendar quarter through four and one half years after issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between one percent (1%) and seven percent (7%) based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After four and one half years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9% (including a quarterly lending incentive fee of 0.5%).
The SBLF Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Company misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the SBLF Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on the Company’s Board of Directors.
The SBLF Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time at the Company’s option, at a redemption price of 100% of the liquidation amount plus accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption for the current period, subject to the approval of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Under the terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock, the Company may only declare and pay a dividend on the common stock or other stock junior to the SBLF Preferred Stock, or repurchase shares of any such class or series of stock, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Company’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Signing Date Tier 1 Capital, as set forth in the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company fixing the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the SBLF Preferred Stock, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the SBLF Preferred Stock (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each one percent increase in QSBL over the baseline level.
NOTE 21 - LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 22 - RECLASSIFICATION
Certain amounts in the prior year have been reclassified to be consistent with the current year's statement presentation.
Shareholder Data
The bid price of the stock of the Bank’s parent company, SBT Bancorp, Inc., is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (symbol: “SBTB”). At December 31, 2013, there were 900,264 shares of the Company's common stock issued, of which 899,850 shares were outstanding. As of March 30, 2014, the Company had approximately 1,100 shareholders of record. There is a limited market for the Company’s common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low price for the periods indicated.
| | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
Fourth Quarter | | $ | 32.00 | | | $ | 23.05 | | | $ | 35.00 | | | $ | 21.00 | |
Third Quarter | | $ | 35.00 | | | $ | 20.65 | | | $ | 23.00 | | | $ | 20.65 | |
Second Quarter | | $ | 35.00 | | | $ | 20.65 | | | $ | 26.00 | | | $ | 19.50 | |
First Quarter | | $ | 35.00 | | | $ | 19.50 | | | $ | 20.00 | | | $ | 16.05 | |
The above over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not reflect actual transactions.
Dividends
The Company’s shareholders are entitled to dividends when and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Connecticut law prohibits the Company from paying cash dividends except from its net profits, which are defined by State statues.
On August 11, 2011, the Company issued 9,000 shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the “SBLF Preferred Stock”), to the U.S, Treasury. The SBLF Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks senior to the Company’s common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution, and winding up of the Company.
The SBLF Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and will pay non-cumulative dividends quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2011. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first 10 quarters during which the SBLF Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” or “QSBL” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) by the Bank. Based upon the increase in the Bank’s level of QSBL over the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the dividend rate for the initial calendar quarter was set at 3.0671111%. For the second through ninth calendar quarters, the dividend rate may be adjusted between one percent (1%) and five percent (5%) per annum to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. As a result of increases in the Bank’s level of QSBL, the Company’s current dividend rate is 1%. If the level of the Bank’s qualified small business loans declines so that the percentage increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline level is less than 10%, then the dividend rate payable on the SBLF Preferred Stock would increase. For the tenth calendar quarter through four-and-one-half years after issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed between one percent (1%) and seven percent (7%) based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After four-and-one-half years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9% (including a quarterly lending incentive fee of 0.5%).
The terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock impose limits on the ability of the Company to pay dividends and repurchase shares of common stock. Under the terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock, no repurchases may be effected, and no dividends may be declared or paid on preferred shares ranking pari passu with the SBLF Preferred Stock, junior preferred shares, or other junior securities (including the common stock) during the current calendar quarter and for the next three calendar quarters following the failure to declare and pay dividends on the SBLF Preferred Stock, except that, in any such quarter in which the dividend is paid, dividend payments on shares ranking pari passu may be paid to the extent necessary to avoid any resulting material covenant breach.
Under the terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock, the Company may only declare and pay a dividend on the common stock or other stock junior to the SBLF Preferred Stock, or repurchase shares of any such class or series of stock, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Company’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Signing Date Tier 1 Capital, as set forth in the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company fixing the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the SBLF Preferred Stock, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the SBLF Preferred Stock (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each one percent increase in QSBL over the baseline level.
In 2013, the Company declared and paid cash dividends on common stock of $122,000 on each of March 15, 2013, June 14, 2013, and September 13, 2013, respectively. The Company also declared and paid cash dividends on common stock of $123,000 on December 13, 2013. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the SBLF Preferred Stock, the Company declared and paid cash dividends on the SBLF Preferred Stock of $22,500 on March 30, 2013, $22,500 on June 30, 2013, $25,917 on September 30, 2013 and $22,500 on December 30, 2013.
In 2012, the Company declared and paid cash dividends on common stock of $104,000 on each of March 15, 2012, June 15, 2012, and September 17, 2012, respectively. The Company also declared and paid cash dividends on common stock of $122,000 on December 17, 2012. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the SBLF Preferred Stock, the Company declared and paid cash dividends on the SBLF Preferred Stock of $62,000 on March 30, 2012, $27,000 on June 30, 2012 and $23,000 on each of September 30, 2012 and December 30, 2012, respectively.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during 2013. The Company’s common stock is the only class of equity securities that is registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
SBT Bancorp, Inc.
Board of Directors *Chairman of Committee | | | | Officers |
| | | | |
Robert J. Bogino Chairman of the Board Retired President and Co-Owner Bogino & DeMaria, Inc. Compensation & Human Resources Committee Corporate Governance Committee* Executive Committee Loan Committee James T. Fleming President Connecticut Automotive Retailers Association Audit & Compliance Committee Corporate Governance Committee | | Nicholas B. Mason Retired Chief Financial Officer Savings Bank of Manchester Audit & Compliance Committee Corporate Governance Committee Michael D. Nicastro President Central Connecticut and Greater Bristol Chambers of Commerce Audit & Compliance Committee Loan Committee George B. Odlum, Jr., DMD Retired General Dentistry Audit & Compliance Committee* Executive Committee | | Martin J. Geitz President and Chief Executive Officer Richard J. Sudol Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Gary R. Kevorkian Secretary Susan D. Presutti Assistant Secretary |
Martin J. Geitz President and Chief Executive Officer The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc. Executive Committee Loan Committee Gary R. Kevorkian Attorney at Law Compensation & Human Resources Committee* Executive Committee Loan Committee Jerry W. Long President and CEO PCC Technology Group Compensation & Human Resources Committee Loan Committee | | Vice Chairman President and Treasurer CASLE Corporation Compensation & Human Resources Committee Executive Committee* Loan Committee* Ann G. Taylor Senior Vice President and General Counsel Connecticut Children's Medical Center Compensation & Human Resources Committee Corporate Governance Committee Penny R. Woodford Real Estate Agent Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Audit & Compliance Committee Corporate Governance Committee | | |
The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc.
Board of Directors | | Officers | | Employees |
| | | | |
All SBT Bancorp, Inc. Directors Directors Emeriti Richard C. Anthony Consultant Jackson F. Eno Senior Financial Advisor & PIA Program Portfolio Manager Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Jane F. von Holzhausen Sales Manager Avon Office Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Evan W. Woollacott Retired Vice Chairman and Commissioner Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control Lincoln S. Young Retired Chief Executive Officer Turbine Engine Services Corp. | | Executive Officers Martin J. Geitz President and Chief Executive Officer Richard J. Sudol Senior Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer Gary W. Burdick Senior Vice President & Chief Commercial Banking Officer David H. MacKenzie Senior Vice President & Chief Mortgage & Consumer Lending Officer Howard R. Zern Executive Vice President & Chief Retail Banking, Technology Operations Officer Gary R. Kevorkian Secretary Senior Vice Presidents Terry L. Boulton Vice Presidents Joan A. Beresford Robin J. DiNicola David F. Donofrio Charlene M. Faselle Laurie E. Krause Stephen J. LaFlamme Thomas J. Mango Jocelyn A. Mitchell Matthew B. Morrell Craig S. Porter Susan D. Presutti, Assistant Secretary Kenneth S. Sklodosky Sanjeev Sood Stephen R. Vaughan Barbara J. Wallace Assistant Vice Presidents Deborah L. Barber Krista A. Moran Robbin D. Myers Peter G. Sepelak, Jr. Sophie S. Stevens Assistant Treasurers Margot M. Byrne Lori L. Ethier Barbara J. Hanifin Elizabeth Lindstrom Lisa A. Morgan Romualdo A. Polce Nathan G. Adajian | | Maribel Amaro Kevin Belmonte Mary Lou Bidwell Teresa A. Blesso Kathleen Bonzani Katherine P. Cain Megan Chrusciel Carol D. Clifford Catherine A. Cook Alyssa F. Davies Nicole A. Decker Roger M. DelGiorno Chiara DiFronzo Phyllis S. England-Lewis Theresa H. Fortier Shirley T. Gentry Jose A. Gonzalez Veronica A. Grados Cheryl P. Guillot Deanna Halstead-Francis Leslie S. Kane Susan LeBel Jaclyn Levesque Ann G. Lisitano Bethany M. Marks Cindy Matthews Kelly A. Meuser Christine L. Miller Jordan Moore Cathy B. Perkins Susan S. Pohlod Patricia A. Pschirer Dennis J. Rainville Cindy L.C. Ramkissoon Patrick Rider Antoinette M. L. Rochester Margaret E. Rose Jacob B. Rosenstein Carol A. Shaver Megan B. Shufelt Sheri L. Sireci Joyce E. Slate Irene M. Smith Jean M. Spalla Melanie S. Switzer Maria Theodoratos Marleen A. Townsend Luann M. Vinson Denise M. Walker Margaret Washer Shannon D. White |
| | | |
| | | |
SBT Bancorp, Inc.
Office:
86 Hopmeadow Street
Simsbury, Connecticut 06089
U.S. Mail:
P.O. Box 248
Simsbury, CT 06070
(860) 408-5493
Fax: (860) 408-4679
simsburybank.com
Notice of Shareholders' Meeting |
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of SBT Bancorp, Inc., the holding company for The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc., will be held at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 981 Hopmeadow Street, Simsbury, Connecticut. |
|
Independent Auditors | Legal Counsel |
| |
Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C. 83 Pine Street West Peabody, MA 01960-3635 | Day Pitney LLP Counselors at Law 242 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103-1212 |
| |
Transfer Agent | Shareholder Contact |
| |
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 59 Maiden Lane Plaza Level New York, NY 10005 Shareholder Relations: (800) 937-5449 Trading Symbol SBTB | Susan D. Presutti, Assistant Secretary SBT Bancorp, Inc. Office: 86 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury, CT 06089 U.S. Mail: P.O. Box 248 Simsbury, CT 06070 (860) 408-5493 |
COPIES OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K WILL BE FORWARDED WITHOUT CHARGE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO:
Gary R. Kevorkian, Secretary
SBT Bancorp, Inc.
Office:
86 Hopmeadow Street
Simsbury, CT 06089
U.S. Mail:
P.O. Box 248
Simsbury, CT 06070
- 71 -