Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 28, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). |
Reclassifications | ' |
Reclassifications |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the accompanying financial statements to conform with current year classifications. |
Fiscal Period | ' |
Fiscal period |
Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday nearest December 31 of the related year. The periods ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, consisted of 52 weeks. |
Principles of Consolidation | ' |
Principles of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements present the results of the operations, financial position and cash flows of PGTI and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Segment Information | ' |
Segment information |
We operate as one operating segment, the manufacture and sale of windows and doors. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting estimates involved in applying our accounting policies are those that require management to make assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made and those for which different estimates reasonably could have been used for the current period. Critical accounting estimates are also those which could have a material impact on the presentation of PGTI’s financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue recognition |
We recognize sales when all of the following criteria have been met: a valid customer order with a fixed price has been received; the product has been delivered and accepted by the customer; and collectability is reasonably assured. All sales recognized are net of allowances for discounts and estimated credits, which are estimated using historical experience. We record provisions against gross revenues for estimated credits in the period when the related revenue is recorded. These estimates are based on factors that include, but are not limited to, analysis of credit memorandum activity. |
Cost of Sales | ' |
|
Cost of sales |
|
Cost of sales represents costs directly related to the production of our products. Primary costs include raw materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. Manufacturing overhead and related expenses primarily include salaries, wages, employee benefits, utilities, maintenance, engineering and property taxes. |
|
Cost of sales was impacted negatively by $4.1 million by consolidation and restructuring charges recorded for the year ending December 31, 2011, related to plant consolidation. |
Shipping and Handling Costs | ' |
Shipping and handling costs |
Shipping and handling costs incurred in the purchase of materials used in the manufacturing process are included in cost of sales. Costs relating to shipping and handling of our finished products are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and total $10.6 million, $9.0 million, and $11.6 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
Advertising | ' |
Advertising |
We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses was $0.7 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
Research and Development Costs | ' |
Research and development costs |
We expense research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs included in cost of sales were $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand or highly liquid investments with an original maturity date of three months or less. |
Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | ' |
Accounts and notes receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts |
We extend credit to qualified dealers and distributors, generally on a non-collateralized basis. Accounts receivable and notes receivable are recorded at their gross receivable amount, reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts that results in the receivable being recorded at its net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessments of the amount which may become uncollectable in the future and is determined through consideration of our write-off history, specific identification of uncollectable accounts based in part on the customer’s past due balance (based on contractual terms), and consideration of prevailing economic and industry conditions. Uncollectable accounts are written off after repeated attempts to collect from the customer have been unsuccessful. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 28, | | | December 29, | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | $ | 21,334 | | | $ | 14,513 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (513 | ) | | | (516 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,821 | | | $ | 13,997 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, there were $0.6 million, $0.2 million, and $0.9 million of trade notes receivable, respectively, for which there was an allowance of $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, included in other current assets and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
Self-Insurance Reserves | ' |
Self-insurance reserves |
We are primarily self-insured for employee health benefits and for years prior to 2010 for workers’ compensation claims. Our workers’ compensation reserves are accrued based on third-party actuarial valuations of the expected future liabilities. Health benefits are self-insured by us up to pre-determined stop loss limits. These reserves, including incurred but not reported claims, are based on internal computations. These computations consider our historical claims experience, independent statistics, and trends. Changes to actual workers’ compensation or health benefit claims incurred and interest rates could have a material impact on our estimated self-insurance reserves. For 2013, 2012, and 2011 we are fully insured with respect to workers’ compensation. |
Warranty Expense | ' |
|
Warranty expense |
|
We have warranty obligations with respect to most of our manufactured products. Warranty periods, which vary by product components, generally range from 1 to 10 years, although the warranty period for a limited number of specifically identified components in certain applications is a lifetime. However, the majority of the products sold have warranties on components which range from 1 to 3 years. The reserve for warranties is based on management’s assessment of the cost per service call, the lag time between order ship dates and warranty service dates, and the number of service calls expected to be incurred to satisfy warranty obligations on recorded net sales. The reserve is determined after assessing Company history and through specific identification. Expected future obligations are discounted to a current value using a risk-free rate for obligations with similar maturities. The following provides information with respect to our warranty accrual. |
|
During the year, we recorded warranty expense at an average rate of 1.30% of sales. This rate is lower than the average rate of 1.81% of sales accrued in fiscal year 2012, due to improved quality and lower costs of service claims experienced in the recent past few years. We assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual on a quarterly, and yearly basis, and adjust the previous amounts recorded, if necessary, to reflect the change in estimate of the future costs of claims yet to be serviced. |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued Warranty | | Beginning | | | Charged to | | | Adjustments | | | Settlements | | | End of | |
of Period | Expense | Period |
| | (in thousands) | |
Year ended December 28, 2013 | | $ | 3,858 | | | $ | 2,992 | | | $ | (419 | ) | | $ | (3,765 | ) | | $ | 2,666 | |
Year ended December 29, 2012 | | $ | 4,406 | | | $ | 3,157 | | | $ | (512 | ) | | $ | (3,193 | ) | | $ | 3,858 | |
Year ended December 31, 2011 | | $ | 4,326 | | | $ | 3,346 | | | $ | 188 | | | $ | (3,454 | ) | | $ | 4,406 | |
|
The accrual for warranty is included in accrued liabilities and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012. The portion of warranty expense related to the issuance of product is $1.6 million, $0.7 million, and $1.1 million and is included in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. The portion related to servicing warranty claims including costs of the service department personnel is included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, and is $2.2 million, $2.3 million, and $2.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011. |
Inventories | ' |
Inventories |
Inventories consist principally of raw materials purchased for the manufacture of our products. We have limited finished goods inventory as all products are custom, made-to-order products. Finished goods inventory costs include direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The reserve for obsolescence is based on management’s assessment of the amount of inventory that may become obsolete in the future and is determined through company history, specific identification and consideration of prevailing economic and industry conditions. |
Inventories consist of the following: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 28, | | | December 29, | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 11,305 | | | $ | 10,477 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Work in progress | | | 329 | | | | 256 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Finished goods | | | 1,274 | | | | 796 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Inventories | | $ | 12,908 | | | $ | 11,529 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment | ' |
Property, plant and equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Depreciable assets are assigned estimated lives as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building and improvements | | | 5 to 40 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 3 to 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vehicles | | | 5 to 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer Software | | | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. |
Long-Lived Assets | ' |
Long-lived assets |
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of long-lived assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, and depreciation is no longer recorded. |
In January 2011, as part of the North Carolina consolidation, we reviewed the fair value of the Salisbury property based on an appraisal of the value of the property which we consider, Level 2 inputs, and the value of furniture and fixtures and machinery and equipment for impairment. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $4.6 million to adjust the carrying value of the property and an impairment charge of $0.9 million to write-off the value of certain personal property that was abandoned. Also, in 2011, we sold the Lexington, North Carolina facility and the selling price less the closing costs resulted in an additional impairment of less than $0.1 million. |
In the second quarter of 2012, we entered into an agreement to list the Salisbury, North Carolina facility for sale with an agent, at which time the asset was moved to assets held for sale in the accompanying balance sheet. We closed on the sale of the property in the first quarter of 2013. In that the purchase price less closing costs was in excess of the current carrying cost, no change to the carrying cost was necessary. |
Computer Software | ' |
Computer software |
We capitalize costs associated with software developed or obtained for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that computer software being developed will be completed and placed in service. Capitalized costs include: |
(i) external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining computer software, |
(ii) payroll and other related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the software project, and |
(iii) interest costs incurred, when material, while developing internal-use software. |
Capitalization of such costs ceases no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended purpose. |
Capitalized software as of December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012, was $13.7 million and $13.0 million, respectively. Accumulated depreciation of capitalized software was $12.9 million and $12.1 million as of December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012, respectively. |
Depreciation expense for capitalized software was $0.8 million, $1.0 million, and $0.9 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
We review the carrying value of capitalized software and development costs for impairment in accordance with our policy pertaining to the impairment of long-lived assets. |
Other Intangibles | ' |
Other intangibles |
Other intangible assets consist of trade names, customer-related and intellectual intangible assets. The useful lives of trade names were determined to be indefinite and, therefore, these assets are not being amortized. Customer-related intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years. Intellectual intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of three years. The impairment evaluation of intangible assets with indefinite lives is conducted annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. The evaluation is performed by comparing the carrying amount of these assets to their estimated fair value. |
If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible assets, then an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value. The estimated fair value is generally determined on the basis of discounted future projected cost savings attributable to ownership of the intangible assets with indefinite lives which, for us, are our trade names. (See Note 5) |
The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with past performance and are also consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in our current operating plans. Such assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions. |
|
The determination of fair value used in that assessment is highly sensitive to differences between estimated and actual cash flows and changes in the related discount rate used to evaluate fair value. Estimated cash flows are sensitive to changes in the Florida housing market and changes in the economy among other things. |
Deferred Financing Costs | ' |
Deferred financing costs |
Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the debt instrument to which they relate. Unamortized deferred financing costs totaled $2.1 million and $1.9 million at December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012, respectively. |
On May 28, 2013, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the various financial institutions and other persons from time to time parties thereto as lenders (the “Lenders”), SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), as collateral agent, as swing line lender and as a letter of credit issuer, and the other agents and parties thereto. The Credit Agreement establishes new senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate amount of $105.0 million, consisting of an $80.0 million Tranche A term loan facility maturing in five years that will amortize on a basis of 5% annually during the five-year term, and a $25.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in five years that includes a $5.0 million swing line facility and a $10.0 million letter of credit facility. (See Note 7) |
As part of the new debt agreement, we incurred $3.6 million in total issue costs. Of the total costs, $2.0 million was capitalized as debt discount, $1.3 million was included in our deferred financing costs, and $0.3 million was expensed in selling, general, and administrative expenses. As we incurred the new debt, we reviewed the amount of unamortized deferred financing costs from the previous debt. Of the remaining unamortized balance, we expensed in other expense, net $0.3 million, and the remaining amount of the unamortized balance will continue to be amortized over the term of the new debt. |
Amortization of deferred financing costs is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. There was $1.0 million of amortization for the year ended December 28, 2013, $0.9 million for the year ended December 29, 2012, and $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. |
Estimated amortization of deferred financing costs is as follows for future fiscal years: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 | | $ | 501 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2015 | | | 477 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 | | | 463 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2017 | | | 449 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | | 179 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,069 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instruments | ' |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
We utilize certain derivative instruments, from time to time, including forward contracts and interest rate swaps and caps to manage variability in cash flow associated with commodity market price risk exposure in the aluminum market and interest rates. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. Additional information with regard to derivative instruments is contained in Note 8. |
|
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with the guidance under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the Codification which requires us to recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship based on its effectiveness in hedging against the exposure and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. |
|
Our forward contracts are designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk). The Derivatives and Hedging topic of the Codification provides that the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument be reported as a component of other comprehensive income and be reclassified into earnings in the same line item in the income statement as the hedged item in the same period or periods during which the transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on these derivative instruments, if any, is recognized in other income/expense in current earnings during the period of change. |
|
|
|
On occasion, cash flow hedges may no longer qualify to be designated as hedging instruments; at that time future changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. When a cash flow hedge is terminated, if the forecasted hedged transaction is still probable of occurrence, amounts previously recorded in other comprehensive income remain in other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. |
|
As of December 28, 2013, we did not have cash on deposit with our commodities broker related to funding of margin calls on open forward contracts for the purchase of aluminum. The net liability position of $479 thousand on December 28, 2013, is included in accrued liabilities and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as it relates to open contracts with scheduled prompt dates in 2014 and 2015. |
|
For statement of cash flows presentation, we present net cash receipts from and payments to the margin account as investing activities. |
|
On September 16, 2013, we entered into two interest rate caps and one interest rate swap. The first is a one year interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million that was designated as a cash flow hedge that protects the variable rate debt from an increase in the floating one month LIBOR rate of greater than 0.50%. The second is a two year interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $20.0 million that was designated as a cash flow hedge that protects the variable rate debt from an increase in the floating one month LIBOR rate of greater than 0.50%. The swap is a forward starting forty two months interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million that effectively converted a portion of the floating rate debt to a fixed rate of 2.15% that starts September 28, 2014, with a termination date of May 18, 2018. At December 28, 2013, the fair value of our interest rate caps was in an asset position of $34 thousand and our interest rate swap was a liability position of $0.6 million. (See Note 8) |
Financial Instruments | ' |
Financial instruments |
Our financial instruments, not including derivative financial instruments discussed in Note 9, include cash, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable whose carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. Our financial instruments also include long-term debt. The fair value of our long-term debt is based on debt with similar terms and characteristics and was approximately $77.3 million as of December 28, 2013, and approximately $37.5 million as of December 29, 2012, both of which approximate carrying value as of those dates. |
Concentrations of Credit Risk | ' |
Concentrations of credit risk |
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are due primarily from companies in the construction industry located in Florida and the eastern half of the United States. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history, and generally collateral is not required. |
We maintain our cash with several financial institutions. The balance exceeds federally insured limits. At December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012, such balance exceeded the insured limit by $29.7 million and $18.7 million, respectively. |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ' |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
Comprehensive income (loss) is reported on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Accumulated other comprehensive loss is reported on the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. |
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges, to the extent effective, are included in other comprehensive income (loss). Reclassification adjustments reflecting such gains and losses are recorded as income in the same period as the hedged items affect earnings. Additional information with regard to accounting policies associated with derivative instruments is contained in Note 8. |
Stock Compensation | ' |
Stock compensation |
We use a fair-value based approach for measuring stock-based compensation and, therefore, record compensation expense over an award’s vesting period based on the award’s fair value at the date of grant. Our Company’s awards vest based only on service conditions and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis for each separately vesting portion of an award. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and we have applied an estimated forfeiture rate to unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These estimates will be revised in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. We recorded compensation expense for stock based awards of $1.0 million before tax, or $0.01 per diluted share after-tax effect, $1.4 million before income tax, or $0.02 per diluted share after-tax effect, and $1.8 million before income tax, or $0.03 per diluted share after-tax effect, in the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
Income and Other Taxes | ' |
Income and other taxes |
We account for income taxes utilizing the liability method. Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect consequences on future years of differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities measured using the enacted statutory tax rates and tax laws applicable to the periods in which differences are expected to affect taxable earnings. We have no material liability for unrecognized tax benefits. However, should we accrue for such liabilities, when and if they arise in the future, we will recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of our income tax provision. |
Sales taxes collected from customers have been recorded on a net basis. |
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share | ' |
|
Net income (loss) per common share |
|
We present basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. We follow the “two class” method of accounting for earnings per share due to the fact that our unvested restricted stock awards, which are immaterial as of December 28, 2013, are participating securities. |
|
Our weighted average shares outstanding excludes underlying options of 0.5 million and 5.5 million for the years ended December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively, because their effects were anti-dilutive. |
|
The table below presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share, including a reconciliation of weighted average common shares: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 28, | | | December 29, | | | December 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 26,819 | | | $ | 8,955 | | | $ | (16,898 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares – Basic | | | 48,881 | | | | 53,620 | | | | 53,659 | | | | | | | | | |
Add: Dilutive effect of stock compensation plans | | | 3,330 | | | | 1,642 | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares – Diluted | | | 52,211 | | | | 55,262 | | | | 53,659 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.17 | | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities | ' |
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-11 Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. Subsequently, in February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-1, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. These updates amended the guidance related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities, including recognized financial instruments and derivatives. We have adopted the guidance effective on December 29, 2012, and have provided the required information in Note 8. |
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | ' |
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The guidance amends the requirements of ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. The goal behind the amendments is to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. It does not change current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. We have adopted the guidance effective December 29, 2012, and have provided the required information in Note 16. |