Exhibit 99.3
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND MAZU NETWORKS, INC.
The following unaudited pro forma combined consolidated financial statements are based on the historical financial statements of Riverbed Technology, Inc. and Mazu Networks, Inc. (“Mazu”) after giving effect to Riverbed’s acquisition of Mazu on February 19, 2009, and the assumptions, reclassifications and adjustments described in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 is presented as if the acquisition of Mazu had occurred on September 30, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007, are presented as if the Mazu acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2007 and were carried forward through each of the aforementioned respective periods.
The allocation of the purchase price used in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements is based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. These preliminary estimates and assumptions could change significantly during the purchase price measurement period as we finalize the valuations of the net tangible assets and intangible assets. Any change could result in material variances between our future financial results and the amounts presented in these unaudited condensed combined financial statements, including variances in fair values recorded, as well as expenses and cash flows associated with these items.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are prepared for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of or intended to represent the results that would have been achieved had the transaction been consummated as of the dates indicated or that may be achieved in the future. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that we may achieve with respect to the combined companies.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the historical financial statements of Mazu for the year ended December 31, 2007 included as Exhibit 99.1, the historical financial statements of Mazu as of and for the nine-months ended September 30, 2008 included as Exhibit 99.2, and other information pertaining to us and Mazu contained in this Form 8-K/A.
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
September 30, 2008
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | | Pro Forma | | | | | Pro Forma | |
| | Riverbed Technology, Inc. | | | Mazu Networks, Inc. | | | Adjustments | | | | | Combined | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 117,324 | | | $ | 3,798 | | | $ | (27,512 | ) | | A | | $ | 93,610 | |
Marketable securities | | | 164,180 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 164,180 | |
Trade receivables, net | | | 43,245 | | | | 1,961 | | | | — | | | | | | 45,206 | |
Inventory | | | 13,796 | | | | 340 | | | | 303 | | | B | | | 14,439 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 11,418 | | | | 366 | | | | 258 | | | C, N | | | 12,042 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 349,963 | | | | 6,465 | | | | (26,951 | ) | | | | | 329,477 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets, net | | | 21,614 | | | | 657 | | | | (324 | ) | | D | | | 21,947 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,334 | | | E | | | 10,334 | |
Intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23,500 | | | F | | | 23,500 | |
Other assets | | | 9,146 | | | | 135 | | | | (108 | ) | | G, N | | | 9,173 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 380,723 | | | $ | 7,257 | | | $ | 6,451 | | | | | $ | 394,431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 18,539 | | | $ | 426 | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 18,965 | |
Accrued compensation and related benefits | | | 13,029 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 13,029 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 27,469 | | | | 1,530 | | | | — | | | | | | 28,999 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 40,451 | | | | 5,086 | | | | (3,700 | ) | | C | | | 41,837 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | | — | | | | 658 | | | | (658 | ) | | A | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 99,488 | | | | 7,700 | | | | (4,358 | ) | | | | | 102,830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue non-current | | | 9,836 | | | | 128 | | | | (73 | ) | | C | | | 9,891 | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | 3,803 | | | | (3,803 | ) | | A | | | — | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 302 | | | | 402 | | | | 9,909 | | | H | | | 10,613 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total long-term liabilities | | | 10,138 | | | | 4,333 | | | | 6,033 | | | | | | 20,504 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock | | | — | | | | 47,549 | | | | (47,549 | ) | | I | | | — | |
Common stock and additional paid-in-capital | | | 318,067 | | | | 680 | | | | (680 | ) | | I | | | 318,067 | |
Deferred stock-based compensation | | | (1,469 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | (1,469 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (45,189 | ) | | | (53,005 | ) | | | 53,005 | | | I | | | (45,189 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (312 | ) | | | | | | | — | | | | | | (312 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 271,097 | | | | (4,776 | ) | | | 4,776 | | | | | | 271,097 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 380,723 | | | $ | 7,257 | | | $ | 6,451 | | | | | $ | 394,431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | | Pro Forma | | | | | Pro Forma | |
| | Riverbed Technology, Inc. | | | Mazu Networks, Inc. | | | Adjustments | | | | | Combined | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 185,574 | | | $ | 6,582 | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 192,156 | |
Support and services | | | 55,547 | | | | 3,611 | | | | — | | | | | | 59,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 241,121 | | | | 10,193 | | | | — | | | | | | 251,314 | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of product | | | 45,153 | | | | 1,275 | | | | 2,220 | | | J | | | 48,648 | |
Cost of support and services | | | 20,151 | | | | 453 | | | | — | | | | | | 20,604 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 65,304 | | | | 1,728 | | | | 2,220 | | | | | | 69,252 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 175,817 | | | | 8,465 | | | | (2,220 | ) | | | | | 182,062 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | | | 100,992 | | | | 9,066 | | | | 1,111 | | | J, L | | | 111,169 | |
Research and development | | | 43,278 | | | | 3,265 | | | | — | | | | | | 46,543 | |
General and administrative | | | 29,925 | | | | 1,039 | | | | (40 | ) | | L | | | 30,924 | |
Other charges | | | 11,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 11,000 | |
Other acquisition-related costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | 550 | | | K | | | 550 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 185,195 | | | | 13,370 | | | | 1,621 | | | | | | 200,186 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (9,378 | ) | | | (4,905 | ) | | | (3,841 | ) | | | | | (18,124 | ) |
Other income, net | | | 5,059 | | | | (260 | ) | | | 151 | | | M | | | 4,950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | | | (4,319 | ) | | | (5,165 | ) | | | (3,690 | ) | | | | | (13,174 | ) |
Provision for income taxes | | | 8,335 | | | | — | | | | (1,224 | ) | | N | | | 7,111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (12,654 | ) | | $ | (5,165 | ) | | $ | (2,466 | ) | | | | $ | (20,285 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.18 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (0.29 | ) |
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share | | | 70,915 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 70,915 | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, 2007 | | | Pro Forma | | | | | Pro Forma |
| | Riverbed Technology, Inc. | | Mazu Networks, Inc. | | | Adjustments | | | | | Combined |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 196,622 | | $ | 10,264 | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 206,886 |
Support and services | | | 39,784 | | | 3,844 | | | | — | | | | | | 43,628 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 236,406 | | | 14,108 | | | | — | | | | | | 250,514 |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of product | | | 51,068 | | | 2,803 | | | | 2,960 | | | J | | | 56,831 |
Cost of support and services | | | 14,856 | | | 324 | | | | — | | | | | | 15,180 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 65,924 | | | 3,127 | | | | 2,960 | | | | | | 72,011 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 170,482 | | | 10,981 | | | | (2,960 | ) | | | | | 178,503 |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | | | 95,652 | | | 10,982 | | | | 1,566 | | | J, L | | | 108,200 |
Research and development | | | 39,696 | | | 4,046 | | | | — | | | | | | 43,742 |
General and administrative | | | 24,834 | | | 1,113 | | | | (68 | ) | | L | | | 25,879 |
Other acquisition-related costs | | | — | | | — | | | | 550 | | | K | | | 550 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 160,182 | | | 16,141 | | | | 2,048 | | | | | | 178,371 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 10,300 | | | (5,160 | ) | | | (5,008 | ) | | | | | 132 |
Other income (expense), net | | | 9,733 | | | (362 | ) | | | 154 | | | M | | | 9,525 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | | | 20,033 | | | (5,522 | ) | | | (4,854 | ) | | | | | 9,657 |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | 5,235 | | | — | | | | (1,678 | ) | | N | | | 3,557 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 14,798 | | $ | (5,522 | ) | | $ | (3,176 | ) | | | | $ | 6,100 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share, basic | | $ | 0.22 | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.09 |
Net income per share, diluted | | $ | 0.20 | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.08 |
Shares used in computing basic net income per share | | | 68,020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 68,020 |
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share | | | 73,244 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 73,244 |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRO FORMA PRESENTATION
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheets as of September 30, 2008, and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and for the year ended December 31, 2007, are based on the historical financial statements of Riverbed Technology, Inc. and those of Mazu Networks, Inc. after giving effect to the Mazu acquisition on February 19, 2009 and the assumptions, reclassifications and adjustments described in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
We account for business combinations pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). In accordance with SFAS No. 141(R), we are required to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Significant assumptions and estimates have been made in determining the purchase price and the allocation of the purchase price in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. These preliminary estimates and assumptions are subject to change during the purchase price measurement period as we finalize the valuations of the net tangible assets, intangible assets and contingent consideration. In particular, the final valuations of identifiable intangible assets, the fair value of the contingent consideration and associated tax effects may change significantly from our preliminary estimates. These changes could result in material variances between our future financial results and the amounts presented in these unaudited condensed combined financial statements, including variances in fair values recorded, as well as expenses and cash flows associated with these items.
Accounting Periods Presented
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 is presented as if the Mazu acquisition had occurred on September 30, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007, are presented as if the Mazu acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2007.
Reclassifications
The following reclassifications have been made to the presentation of Mazu’s historical balance sheet in order to conform to Riverbed’s presentation:
| • | | Deferred cost of revenue of approximately $0.3 million was reclassified from inventory to prepaid expenses and other current assets. |
The following reclassifications have been made to the presentation of Mazu’s historical statement of operations in order to conform to Riverbed’s presentation
| • | | Revenue from related parties has been reclassified to product revenues; |
| • | | Selling, general and administrative expenses have been separately classified as either sales and marketing expenses or general and administrative expenses. |
2. PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION
We acquired Mazu Networks, Inc. (“Mazu”) on February 19, 2009, by means of a merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary with and into Mazu, such that Mazu became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. We acquired Mazu, among other reasons, to meet enterprise and service provider customer demands by extending our suite of WAN optimization products to include global application performance, reporting and analytics.
The estimated acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred, assets acquired and the liabilities assumed for Mazu are presented below, represents our best estimates.
Preliminary Fair Value of Consideration Transferred
Pursuant to the merger agreement we made payments totaling approximately $23.1 million in cash for all of the outstanding securities of Mazu promptly following the closing. In addition, we will potentially make additional payments (“acquisition-related contingent consideration”) totaling up to $22.0 million in cash, based on achievement of certain bookings targets for the one-year period from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 (the “Earn-Out period”), with up to $16.6 million to be paid to Mazu shareholders and up to $5.4 million to be paid to former employees of Mazu as an incentive bonus provided generally that such former Mazu employees are employees of Riverbed at the time the acquisition-related contingent consideration is earned.
The total acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred is estimated at $33.0 million, which includes the initial payments totaling $23.1 million in cash and the estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration to be paid to Mazu shareholders totaling $9.9 million. The total acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred is estimated as follows:
| | | |
(in thousands) | | |
Payment to Mazu shareholders | | $ | 23,051 |
Acquisition-related contingent consideration | | | 9,909 |
| | | |
Total acquisation-date fair value | | $ | 32,960 |
| | | |
In accordance with SFAS 141(R), a liability will be recognized for an estimate of the acquisition date fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration based on the probability of achievement of the bookings target. Any change in the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date, including changes from events after the acquisition date, such as changes in our estimate of the bookings targets, will be recognized in earnings in the period the estimated fair value change. The fair value estimate assumes a probability weighted bookings of approximately $21.5 million. Actual achievement of bookings below $16.0 million would reduce the liability to zero and achievement of bookings of $35.0 million or more would increase the liability to $16.6 million. A change in fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration could have a material affect on the statement of operations and financial position in the period of the change in estimate.
We estimated the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined by SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect our own assumptions in measuring fair value. The estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration of $9.9 million includes amounts to be distributed directly to shareholders, discounted at 13%, but excludes a fair value estimate of $3.8 million to be paid to former employees of Mazu.
The estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration of $3.8 million to be paid to the former employees of Mazu is considered compensatory and will be recognized as compensation cost, recorded in operating expense, over the Earn-Out period provided generally that such former Mazu employees are employees of Riverbed at the time the acquisition-related contingent consideration is earned.
Preliminary Allocation of Consideration Transferred
Under the purchase method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired, and liabilities assumed were recognized and measured as of the acquisition date based on their estimated fair values as of the February 19, 2009, the acquisition date. The excess of the acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred over estimated fair value of the net tangible assets and intangible assets was recorded as goodwill.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Estimates of deferred tax assets both current and non-current are subject to change, pending the finalization of certain tax returns.
| | | | |
(in thousands) | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,582 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2,569 | |
Other tangible assets | | | 1,481 | |
Intangible assets | | | 23,500 | |
| | | | |
Total identifiable assets acquired | | | 30,132 | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | | | (2,379 | ) |
Loan payable | | | (5,004 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | (1,500 | ) |
| | | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | (8,883 | ) |
| | | | |
Net identifiable assets acquired | | | 21,249 | |
Goodwill | | | 11,711 | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 32,960 | |
| | | | |
Intangible Assets
Management engaged a third-party valuation firm to assist in the determination of the fair value of the intangible assets. In our determination of the fair value of the intangible assets we considered, among other factors, the best use of acquired assets, analyses of historical financial performance and estimates of future performance of Mazu’s products. The fair values of identified intangible assets were calculated using an income approach and estimates and assumptions provided by Mazu’s and our management. The rates utilized to discount net cash flows to their present values were based on a weighted average cost of capital of 19%. This discount rate was determined after consideration of the rate of return on debt capital and equity that typical investors would require in an investment in companies similar in size and operating in similar markets as Mazu. The following table sets forth the components of identified intangible assets associated with the Mazu acquisition and their estimated useful lives:
| | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Useful life | | Fair Value |
Existing technology | | 5 years | | $ | 12,100 |
Patents | | 5 years | | | 2,700 |
Maintenance agreements | | 5 years | | | 6,100 |
Customer contracts | | 5 years | | | 2,000 |
Trademarks | | 3 years | | | 600 |
| | | | | |
Total intangible assets | | | | $ | 23,500 |
| | | | | |
In accordance with FSP No. 142-3, we determined the useful life of intangible assets based on the expected future cash flows associated with the respective asset. Existing technology is comprised of products that have reached technological feasibility and are part of Mazu’s product line. There were no in-process research and development assets as of the acquisition date. Patents are related to the design and development of Mazu’s products and this proprietary know-how can be leveraged to develop new technology and products and improve their existing products. Customer relationships and service agreements represent the underlying relationships and agreements with Mazu’s installed customer base. Trademarks represent the fair value of the brand and name recognition associated with the marketing of Mazu’s products and services. Amortization of existing technology and patents is included in cost of revenue, and amortization expense for customer relationships and trademarks is included in operating expenses.
Goodwill
Of the total estimated purchase price, approximately $11.7 million was allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. In accordance with the SFAS No. 142, goodwill resulting from business is tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain indicators are present). In the event that management determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, we will incur an accounting charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Deferred Revenues
In connection with the purchase price allocation, we estimated the fair value of the service obligations assumed from Mazu as a consequence of the acquisition. The estimated fair value of the service obligations was determined using a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs relating to fulfilling the obligations plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to assume the service obligations. The estimated costs to fulfill the service obligations were based on the historical direct costs and indirect costs related to Mazu’s service agreements with its customers. Direct costs include personnel directly engaged in providing service and support activities, while indirect costs consist of estimated general and administrative expenses based on normalized levels as a percentage of revenue. Profit associated with selling efforts was excluded because Mazu had concluded the selling efforts on the service contracts prior to the date of our acquisition. The estimated research and development costs associated with support contracts have not been included in the fair value determination, as these costs were not deemed to represent a legal obligation at the time of acquisition. We recorded $1.5 million of deferred revenue to reflect the estimate of the fair value of Mazu’s service obligations assumed.
Pre-Acquisition Contingencies
We have evaluated and continue to evaluate pre-acquisition contingencies related to Mazu that existed as of the acquisition date. If these pre-acquisition contingencies that existed as of the acquisition date become probable in nature and estimable during the remainder of the measurement period, amounts recorded for such matters will be made in the measurement period and, subsequent to the measurement period, in our results of operations.
3. PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Pro forma adjustments giving effect to the acquisition and the related financing in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are as follows:
| A. | To record cash paid for Mazu common stock of $23.1 million and the paydown of Mazu’s loan payable of $4.5 million at the acquisition date. |
| B. | To record the fair value of Mazu inventories purchased as part of the acquisition at estimated selling prices less the sum of costs of selling and a reasonable profit margin for the sales efforts. |
| C. | To adjust Mazu deferred revenue and deferred cost balances to the estimated fair value of the obligation. |
| D. | To record the difference between the fair value and the historical carrying amounts of Mazu property and equipment. Mazu’s property and equipment consists primarily of evaluation product and computer equipment, which will not be used in the future operations and is considered to have no alternate market value. |
| E. | To record estimated goodwill for the Mazu acquisition. |
| F. | To record acquired Mazu indentified intangible assets. |
| G. | To adjust the fair value of the deferred financing costs of the Mazu warrants to zero. |
| H. | To record the estimated contingent consideration to be paid to the former shareholders of Mazu upon certain performance targets being met. |
| I. | To eliminate Mazu’s historical stockholders’ equity |
| J. | To record amortization expense related to the acquired Mazu indentified intangible assets as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. The following table sets forth this amortization: |
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | Year ended December 31, 2007 |
Cost of product | | $ | 2,220 | | $ | 2,960 |
Sales and marketing | | | 1,365 | | | 1,820 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,585 | | $ | 4,780 |
| | | | | | |
| K. | To record direct acquisition costs of $0.6 million for legal, accounting, valuation and other professional services. |
| L. | To record the impact on depreciation as if the acquisition and related fair value adjustments to the historical carrying amounts of Mazu property and equipment had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. |
The following table sets forth this depreciation:
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | | Year ended December 31, 2007 | |
Sales and marketing | | $ | (254 | ) | | $ | (254 | ) |
General and administrative | | | (40 | ) | | | (68 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (294 | ) | | $ | (322 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| M. | To record the impact on interest expense had the paydown of Mazu’s loan payable and the extinguishment of Mazu’s warrants on the acquisition date occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. |
| N. | To record the pro forma income tax impact at the weighted average estimated income tax rates applicable to the jurisdictions in which the pro forma adjustments are expected to be recorded. The pro forma combined provision for income taxes does not reflect the amounts that would have resulted had Riverbed and Mazu filed consolidated income tax returns during the periods presented. |
The following table sets forth these estimated provisions:
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | | Year ended December 31, 2007 | |
Total proforma adjustments recorded | | | | | | | | |
before provision for income taxes | | $ | (3,690 | ) | | $ | (4,854 | ) |
Estimated effective tax rate | | | 33.2 | % | | | 34.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Estimated provision for income taxes applicable to pro forma adjustments | | $ | (1,224 | ) | | $ | (1,678 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |