UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2008
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________________ to _____________________
Commission File Number: 001-32998
Energy Services of America Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware | | 20-4606266 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| | |
100 Industrial Lane, Huntington, West Virginia | | 25702 |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) | | (Zip Code) |
(304) 528-2791
(Registrant’s Telephone Number including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Name of Each Exchange |
Title of Class | On Which Registered |
| |
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share | American Stock Exchange |
| |
Units (each Unit consisting of one share of | American Stock Exchange |
Common Stock and two Warrants) | |
| |
Warrants (each Warrant is exercisable | American Stock Exchange |
for one share of Common Stock) | |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES o NO x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer o | Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller Reporting Company x |
| | | (Do not check if a Smaller reporting Company |
As of December 20, 2008, there were issued and outstanding 12,092,307 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on March 31, 2008, as reported by the American Stock Exchange, was $46,146,982.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Energy Services of America Corporation
Annual Report On Form 10-K
For The Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2008
Table Of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1. | Business | 1 |
| | |
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors | 10 |
| | |
ITEM 2. | Properties | 12 |
| | |
ITEM 3. | Legal Proceedings | 12 |
| | |
ITEM 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 12 |
| | |
ITEM 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 13 |
| | |
ITEM 6. | Selected Financial Data | 16 |
| | |
ITEM 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 |
| | |
ITEM 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 28 |
| | |
ITEM 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 28 |
| | |
ITEM 9. | Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 28 |
| | |
ITEM 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 28 |
| | |
ITEM 9B. | Other Information | 29 |
| | |
ITEM 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 30 |
| | |
ITEM 11. | Executive Compensation | 32 |
| | |
ITEM 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 33 |
| | |
ITEM 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 34 |
| | |
ITEM 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 34 |
| | |
ITEM 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 36 |
| | |
Signatures | | 38 |
PART I
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” which may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated” and “potential.” Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates and most other statements that are not historical in nature. These factors include, but are not limited to, general and local economic conditions, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgage, and other loans, real estate values, competition, changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing products and services.
Overview
On September 6, 2006, we completed our initial public offering of 8,600,000 units. Each unit consists of one share of our common stock and two warrants, each to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The units were sold at an offering price of $6.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $51,600,000. After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and the offering expenses, the total net proceeds to us from the public offering that were deposited into a trust fund were approximately $48,972,000.
Until August 15, 2008, we operated as a blank check company. On August 15, 2008, we completed our acquisitions of ST Pipeline, Inc. and C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. Each of ST Pipeline and C.J. Hughes are held as separate subsidiaries of Energy Services.
In connection with the acquisitions of ST Pipeline and C.J. Hughes, we issued a $3 million note, issued 2,964,763 shares of our common stock at a value of approximately $16,999,951 and paid an aggregate of $33,216,496 in cash. Moreover, in connection with the completion of the acquisitions, shareholders elected to redeem 1,622,456 shares of our common stock at a cost of $9,730,936 in the aggregate. Consequently, at September 30, 2008, we had 12,092,307 shares issued and outstanding and _-0- shares in treasury that are not considered issued and outstanding. Because the acquisitions were completed late in our fiscal year, we are providing separate business information for each of ST Pipeline and C.J. Hughes. At September 30, 2008, we had consolidated assets of $133,699,816 and cash on hand of $13,811,661. Because we completed our acquisitions in the eleventh month of our fiscal year and hold each of ST Pipeline and C.J. Hughes as separate subsidiaries, we are describing our business separately for each of ST Pipeline and C.J. Hughes.
INFORMATION ABOUT ST PIPELINE
Business Overview
ST Pipeline, Inc. was organized in 1990 as a corporation under the laws of the State of West Virginia and is engaged in the construction, replacement and repair of natural gas transmission pipelines for utility companies and private natural gas companies. The majority of ST Pipeline’s customers are located in West Virginia and the surrounding Mid-Atlantic states. ST Pipeline builds, but does not own natural gas pipelines for its customers that are part of both interstate and intrastate pipeline systems that move natural gas from producing regions to consumption regions. ST Pipeline is involved in the construction of both interstate and intrastate pipelines, with an emphasis on the latter. ST Pipeline also constructs storage facilities for its natural gas customers. ST Pipeline’s other services include liquid pipeline construction, pump station construction, production facility construction and other services related to pipeline construction. Since 2002, ST Pipeline has completed over 225 miles of pipeline, with its longest project consisting of 69 miles of pipeline. ST Pipeline is not directly involved in the exploration, transportation or refinement of natural gas.
Set forth below is information regarding the sales, assets and operating income of ST Pipeline’s business.
| | | | | | | | Year (2) | |
| | (1) | | | (3) | | | Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 8,869,656 | | | $ | 37,410,877 | | | $ | 100,385,098 | |
Operating Income | | $ | 2,097,421 | | | $ | 5,738,257 | | | $ | 27,889,843 | |
Assets | | $ | 41,602,375 | | | $ | 29,343,368 | | | $ | 33,413,342 | |
(1) | Information is as of and for the period August 15 through September 30, 2008 |
(2) | Information is as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
(3) | Information is as of and for the period January 1 through August 15, 2008 |
During 2007, ST Pipeline’s largest current project consisted of a 69 mile pipeline construction and installation project for Equitrans in Kentucky. This project comprised 92% of 2007 revenue and was substantially complete in January 2008. For 2008, the Company has focused on several smaller jobs rather than the one large job in 2007.
Our services include the removal of and/or repair of existing pipelines, installation of new pipelines, construction of pump stations, site work for pipelines and various other services relating to pipelines.
ST Pipeline is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, particularly in the areas of the siting and construction of new pipelines. The work performed by ST Pipeline on many projects relates to lines that are regulated by the US Department of Transportation and therefore the work must be performed within the rules and guidelines of the US Department of Transportation. In addition, work at the various sites must comply with all environmental laws, whether it be federal, state or local.
Customers and Marketing
ST Pipeline customers include Equitable Resources and various of its subsidiaries, Nisource/Columbia Gas Transmission, Nisource/Columbia Gas of Ohio and Dominion Resources. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, Equitable Resources/ Equitrans was ST Pipeline’s largest customer, accounting for approximately 99% and 92% of total revenues. respectively. There can be no assurance that Equitable Resources/ Equitrans or any of ST Pipeline’s other principal customers will continue to employ ST Pipeline’s services or that the loss of any of such customers or adverse developments affecting any of such customers would not have a material adverse effect on ST Pipeline’s financial condition and results of operations. However, due to the nature of ST Pipeline’s operations, the major customers and sources of revenues may change from year to year.
ST Pipeline’s sales force consists of industry professionals with significant relevant sales experience who utilize industry contracts and available public data to determine how to most appropriately market ST Pipeline’s line of products. We rely on direct contact between our sales force and our customers’ engineering and contracting departments in order to obtain new business. Due to the occurrence of inclement weather during the winter months, the business of ST Pipeline, i.e., the construction of pipelines, is somewhat seasonal in that most of the work is performed during the non-winter months.
Backlog/New Business
A company’s backlog represents orders which have not yet been processed. At September 30, 2008, ST Pipeline had a backlog of work to be completed on contracts of $1.6 million. At December 31, 2007, ST Pipeline had a backlog of work to be completed on contracts of $5.4 million. Due to the timing of ST Pipeline’s construction contracts and the long-term nature of some of our projects, portions of our backlog may not be completed in the current fiscal year.
Types of Contracts
ST Pipeline’s contracts are usually awarded on a competitive and negotiated basis. While contracts may be of a lump sum for a project or one that is based upon time and materials, most of the work is bid based upon unit prices for various portions of the work with a total agreed-upon price based on estimated units. The actual revenues produced from the project will be dependent upon how accurate the customer estimates are as to the units of the various items.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
The principal raw materials that ST Pipeline uses are metal plate, structural steel, pipe, fittings and selected engineering equipment such as pumps, valves and compressors. For the most part, the largest portion of these materials are supplied by the customer. The materials that ST Pipeline purchases would predominately be those of a consumable nature on the job, such as small tools and environmental supplies. We anticipate being able to obtain these materials for the foreseeable future.
Industry Factors
ST Pipeline’s revenues, cash flows and earnings are substantially dependent upon, and affected by, the level of natural gas exploration development activity and the levels of integrity work on existing pipelines. Such activity and the resulting level of demand for pipeline construction and related services are directly influenced by many factors over which ST Pipeline has no control. Such factors include, among others, the market prices of natural gas, market expectations about future prices, the volatility of such prices, the cost of producing and delivering natural gas, government regulations and trade restrictions, local and international political and economic conditions, the development of alternate energy sources and the long-term effects of worldwide energy conservation measures. Substantial uncertainty exists as to the future level of natural gas exploration and development activity.
ST Pipeline cannot predict the future level of demand for its pipeline construction services, future conditions in the pipeline construction industry or future pipeline construction rates.
ST Pipeline maintains banking relationships with three financial institutions and has lines of credit borrowing facilities with these institutions. After the close of the transaction with Energy Services, S.T. Pipeline has paid off the existing lines of credit from operations and anticipates establishing new lines as part of
Energy Services prior to the start of the 2009 construction season. While there is no reason to believe that such lines won’t be established, any delays getting them established could create difficulties for ST Pipeline. ST Pipeline’s facilities have been sufficient to provide ST Pipeline with the working capital necessary to complete their ongoing projects. At September 30, 2008, ST Pipeline had an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $950,542.
Competition
The pipeline construction industry is a highly competitive business characterized by high capital and maintenance costs. Pipeline contracts are usually awarded through a competitive bid process and, while ST Pipeline believes that operators consider factors such as quality of service, type and location of equipment, or the ability to provide ancillary services, price and the ability to complete the project in a timely manner are the primary factors in determining which contractor is awarded a job. There are a number of regional and national competitors that offer services similar to ST Pipelines. Certain of ST Pipeline’s competitors have greater financial and human resources than ST Pipeline, which may enable them to compete more efficiently on the basis of price and technology. ST Pipeline’s largest competitors are Otis Eastern, LA Pipeline and Apex Pipeline.
Operating Hazards and Insurance
ST Pipeline’s operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the pipeline construction business, including, for example, operating equipment in mountainous terrain, people working in deep trenches and people working in close proximity to large equipment. These hazards could cause personal injury or death, serious damage to or destruction of property and equipment, suspension of drilling operations, or substantial damage to the environment, including damage to producing formations and surrounding areas. ST Pipeline seeks protection against certain of these risks through insurance, including property casualty insurance on its equipment, commercial general liability and commercial contract indemnity, commercial umbrella and workers’ compensation insurance.
ST Pipeline’s insurance coverage for property damage to its equipment is based on ST Pipeline’s estimate of the cost of comparable used equipment to replace the insured property. There is a deductible per occurrence on rigs and equipment of $10,000, except for underground occurrence which is $25,000 per occurrence and $2,500 for miscellaneous tools. ST Pipeline’s third party liability insurance coverage under the general policy is $1.0 million per occurrence, $2.0 million in the aggregate with a self insured retention of $500,000 per occurrence. ST Pipeline’s commercial umbrella policy coverage consists of $5.0 million primary umbrella insurance and $5.0 million second layer umbrella per occurrence. ST Pipeline believes that it is adequately insured for public liability and property damage to others with respect to its operations. However, such insurance may not be sufficient to protect ST Pipeline against liability for all consequences of well disasters, extensive fire damage or damage to the environment.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
General. ST Pipeline’s operations are affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and federal, state and local laws and regulations. In particular, natural gas production, operations and economics are or have been affected by price controls, taxes and other laws relating to the natural gas industry, by changes in such laws and by changes in administrative regulations. Although significant capital expenditures may be required to comply with such laws and regulations, to date, such compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on the earnings or competitive position of ST Pipeline. In addition, ST Pipeline’s operations are vulnerable to risks arising from the numerous laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.
Environmental Regulation. ST Pipeline’s activities are subject to existing federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality, pollution control and the preservation of natural resources. Such laws and regulations concern, among other things, the containment, disposal and recycling of waste materials, and reporting of the storage, use or release of certain chemicals or hazardous substances. Numerous federal and state environmental laws regulate drilling activities and impose liability for discharges of waste or spills, including those in coastal areas. ST Pipeline has conducted pipeline construction in or near ecologically sensitive areas, such as wetlands and coastal environments, which are subject to additional regulatory requirements. State and federal legislation also provide special protections to animal and marine life that could be affected by ST Pipeline’s activities. In general, under various applicable environmental programs, ST Pipeline may potentially be subject to regulatory enforcement action in the form of injunctions, cease and desist orders and administrative, civil and criminal penalties for violations of environmental laws. ST Pipeline may also be subject to liability for natural resource damages and other civil claims arising out of a pollution event. ST Pipeline would be responsible for any pollution event that was caused by its actions. It has insurance that it believes is adequate to cover any such occurrences.
Environmental regulations that affect ST Pipeline’s customers also have an indirect impact on ST Pipeline. Increasingly stringent environmental regulation of the natural gas industry has led to higher drilling costs and a more difficult and lengthy well permitting process.
The primary environmental statutory and regulatory programs that affect ST Pipeline’s operations include the following: Department of Transportation regulations, regulations set forth by agencies such as Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and various environmental agencies including state, federal and local government.
Health And Safety Matters. ST Pipeline’s facilities and operations are also governed by various other laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, relating to worker health and workplace safety. As an example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued the Hazard Communication Standard. This standard applies to all private-sector employers, including the natural gas exploration and producing industry. The Hazard Communication Standard requires that employers assess their chemical hazards, obtain and maintain certain written descriptions of these hazards, develop a hazard communication program and train employees to work safely with the chemicals on site. Failure to comply with the requirements of the standard may result in administrative, civil and criminal penalties. ST Pipeline believes that appropriate precautions are taken to protect employees and others from harmful exposure to materials handled and managed at its facilities and that it operates in substantial compliance with all Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. While it is not anticipated that ST Pipeline will be required in the near future to make material expenditures by reason of such health and safety laws and regulations, ST Pipeline is unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these changing regulations.
Research and Development/Intellectual Property
ST Pipeline has not made any material expenditures for research and development. ST Pipeline does not own any patents, trademarks or licenses.
Legal Proceedings
ST Pipeline is not a party to any legal proceedings, other than in the ordinary course of business, that if decided in a manner adverse to ST Pipeline would be materially adverse to ST Pipeline’s financial condition or results of operations.
Facilities and Other Property
ST Pipeline operates from its main office at 5 Youngstown Drive, Clendenin, West Virginia. This property is leased at a cost of $5,000 per month. ST Pipeline believes that its properties are adequate to support its operations.
Employees
As of September 30, 2008, ST Pipeline had approximately 269 employees, of which approximately 7 were salaried and approximately 262 were employed on an hourly basis. A number of ST Pipeline’s employees are represented by trade unions represented by any collective bargaining unit. ST Pipeline’s management believes that ST Pipeline’s relationship with its employees is good.
ST Pipeline may from time to time be involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. At September 30, 2008, ST Pipeline was not involved in any material legal proceedings, the outcome of which would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
INFORMATION ABOUT C.J. HUGHES
Business Overview
C.J. Hughes Construction, Inc. was organized in 1946 as a corporation under the laws of West Virginia and is primarily engaged in the construction, replacement and repair of natural gas pipelines for utility companies and private natural gas companies. In addition, C.J. Hughes also engages in the installation of water and sewer lines and provides various maintenance and repair services for customers. The majority of C.J. Hughes’ customers are located in West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and North Carolina. C.J. Hughes builds, but does not own, natural gas pipelines for its customers that are part of both interstate and intrastate pipeline systems that move natural gas from producing regions to consumption regions as well as building and replacing gas line services to individual customers of the various utility companies. C.J. Hughes is involved in the construction of both interstate and intrastate pipelines, with an emphasis on the latter. C.J. Hughes also constructs storage facilities for its natural gas customers. C.J. Hughes’ other services include liquid pipeline construction, pump station construction, production facility construction, water and sewer pipeline installations, and other services related to pipeline construction. At September 30, 2008, C.J. Hughes had 626 employees. Since 2002, C.J. Hughes has completed over 350 miles of pipeline, with its longest project consisting of 10 miles of 20-inch pipe. C.J. Hughes is not directly involved in the exploration, transportation or refinement of natural gas.
Acquisition of Nitro Electric
In May 2007, C.J. Hughes acquired certain tangible and intangible assets of Nitro Electric Company LLC; primarily the fixed assets, employees and business franchise. No cash or accounts receivable were acquired and no liabilities were assumed. Nitro Electric has been in business since 1960. Nitro Electric’s owners had made a business decision for various reasons to cease operations. Nitro Electric had not bid on new work for several months and was preparing for closure when approached by C.J. Hughes. Although the purchase of a business in this situation posed substantial risks of recapturing contracts and business viability, the management of C.J. Hughes, along with the retained management of Nitro Electric, not only was able to accomplish this, but was able to leverage new business from C.J. Hughes’ customer base and from performing joint contracts with C.J. Hughes. Nitro Electric provides a full range of electrical contracting services to various industries. These services include substation and switchyard services, including site preparation, packaged buildings, dry and oil-filled transformer installations and other ancillary work with regards thereto. Nitro Electric also provides general electrical services such as underground, conduit/raceway, testing, cable installation, switchgear lineups as well as a full range of data and communication installation services such as fiber optics, attenuation and OTDR testing, cell/hub systems and various other electrical services to the industrial sector. Though Nitro Electric has numerous customers, its primary focus since becoming part of C.J. Hughes has been the completion of a large project for Hitachi America. That project in Council Bluffs, Iowa, was the largest project for Nitro Electric for 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2007, Nitro Electric’s operations contributed $36.1 million of revenue to C.J. Hughes’ total revenues. Unless otherwise stated, references to C.J. Hughes include Nitro Electric.
Set forth below is information regarding the sales, assets and operating income of C.J. Hughes’ business.
| | | | | | | | Year (2) | |
| | (1) | | | (3) | | | Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 19,648,032 | | | $ | 79,217,380 | | | $ | 75,305,234 | |
Operating Income | | $ | 1,695,175 | | | $ | 949,650 | | | $ | 3,990,841 | |
Assets | | $ | 95,241,942 | | | $ | 48,457,630 | | | $ | 27,248,499 | |
(1) | Information is as of and for the period August 15 through September 30, 2008 |
(2) | Information is as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
(3) | Information is as of and for the period January 1 through August 15, 2008 |
At September 30, 2008, C.J. Hughes’ largest project consists of a project for Markwest Energy to install several miles of various size pipe.
C.J. Hughes is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, particularly in the areas of the siting and construction of new pipelines. The work performed by C.J. Hughes on many projects relates to lines that are regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation and therefore the work must be performed within the rules and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Transportation. In addition, work at the various sites must comply with all Federal, state or local environmental laws.
Customers and Marketing
C.J. Hughes customers include Equitable Resources and various of its subsidiaries, Nisource/Columbia Gas Transmission, Nisource/Columbia Gas of Ohio and Pennsylvania, Kentucky American Water, Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and various state, county and municipal public service districts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, Columbia Gas of Ohio was C.J. Hughes’ largest customer, accounting for approximately 20% of total revenues. Other customers who represented over 10% of revenues in 2007 included Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC at 18% and Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania at 12%. There can be no assurance that Columbia Gas of Ohio or any of C.J. Hughes’ other principal customers will continue to employ C.J. Hughes’ services or that the loss of any of such customers or adverse developments affecting any of such customers would not have a material adverse effect on C.J. Hughes’ financial condition and results of operations.
C.J. Hughes’ sales force consists of industry professionals with significant relevant sales and work experience who utilize industry contacts and available public data to determine how to most appropriately market C.J. Hughes’ services. We rely on direct contact between our sales force and our customers’ engineering and contracting departments in order to obtain new business. Due to the occurrence of inclement weather during the winter months, the business of C.J. Hughes (i.e., the construction of pipelines) is somewhat seasonal in that most of the work is performed during the non-winter months.
Nitro Electric’s customers include Hitachi of America, American Electric Power, Toyota and numerous other local companies. Due to the large job that was underway in 2007, Hitachi of America was the largest customer of Nitro Electric, accounting for approximately 63% of total revenues for the period that Nitro Electric was owned by C.J. Hughes (May through December). Other customers who represented over 10% of revenues of Nitro Electric included Toyota (18%) and American Electric Power (11%). While Nitro Electric had a large portion of its resources devoted to the Hitachi of America project in 2007, it is believed that in 2008 and beyond, there are many opportunities to widen the customer base. However, there can be no assurance that Hitachi of America’s business will continue and in fact the above described project was completed in early 2008. Further, while it appears likely that most of Nitro Electric’s other customers will continue to do business with Nitro Electric, no assurances can be given to that occurring.
As with C.J. Hughes, the sales force for Nitro Electric consists of industry professionals with significant sales and work experience who utilize industry contacts and available public data to determine how to most appropriately market Nitro Electric’s services. They rely on direct contact between their sales force and the customer’s engineering and contracting departments in order to obtain new business. While inclement weather can have some effect on Nitro Electric’s business, that effect is much less than the effect of inclement weather on C.J. Hughes.
Backlog/New Business
A company’s backlog represents orders or contracts which have not yet been completed. At September 30, 2008, C.J. Hughes had a backlog of work to be completed of $25.4 Million. At December 31, 2007, C.J. Hughes had a backlog of work to be completed on contracts of $54.2 million. At September 30, 2008, Nitro Electric had a backlog of approximately of $13.7 Million. At December 31, 2007, Nitro Electric had a backlog of approximately $16.4 million. Due to the timing of C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric construction contracts and the long-term nature of some of our projects, portions of our backlog may not be completed in the current fiscal year.
Types of Contracts
The contracts for C.J. Hughes are usually awarded on a competitive and negotiated basis. While contracts may be a lump sum for a project or one that is based upon time and materials, most of the work is bid based upon unit prices for various portions of the work. The actual revenues produced from the project will be dependent upon how accurate the customer estimates are as to the units of the various items.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
The principal raw materials that we use are metal plate, structural steel, pipe, fittings and selected engineering equipment such as pumps, valves and compressors. For the most part, the largest portion of these materials are supplied by the customer. The materials that C.J. Hughes purchases would predominately be those of a consumable nature on the job, such as small tools and environmental supplies. These materials are available from a variety of suppliers. We anticipate being able to obtain these materials for the foreseeable future.
Industry Factors
C.J. Hughes’ revenues, cash flows and earnings are substantially dependent upon, and affected by, the level of natural gas exploration, development activity and the levels of integrity work on existing pipelines. Such activity and the resulting level of demand for pipeline construction and related services are directly influenced by many factors over which C.J. Hughes has no control. Such factors include, among others, the market prices of natural gas, market expectations about future prices, the volatility of such prices, the cost of producing and delivering natural gas, government regulations and trade restrictions, local and international political and economic conditions, the development of alternate energy sources and the long-term effects of worldwide energy conservation measures. Substantial uncertainty exists as to the future level of natural gas exploration and development activity.
C.J. Hughes cannot predict the future level of demand for its pipeline construction services, future conditions in the pipeline construction industry or future pipeline construction rates.
Competition
The pipeline construction industry is a highly competitive business characterized by high capital and maintenance costs. Pipeline contracts are usually awarded through a competitive bid process and, while C.J. Hughes believes that operators consider factors such as quality of service, type and location of equipment, or the ability to provide ancillary services, price and the ability to complete the project in a timely manner are the primary factors in determining which contractor is awarded a job. There are a number of regional and national competitors that offer services similar to ours. Certain of C.J. Hughes’ competitors have greater financial and human resources than C.J. Hughes, which may enable them to compete more effectively on the basis of price and technology. Our largest competitors are Otis Eastern, LA Pipeline and Apex Pipeline.
The electrical contracting industry is also a highly competitive business, though the capital costs are less in that business and the primary costs are labor and supervision. Electrical contracts are usually awarded through a competitive bid process. While Nitro Electric believes that operators consider factors such as quality of service, type and location of equipment, or the ability to provide ancillary services, price and the ability to complete the project in a timely manner are the primary factors in determining which contractor is awarded a job. There are a number of regional and national competitors that offer services similar to ours. Certain of Nitro Electric’s competitors have greater financial and human resources than Nitro Electric, which may enable them to compete more effectively on the basis of price and technology. The largest competitors for Nitro Electric are Green Electric and Summit Electric, Inc.
Operating Hazards and Insurance
C.J. Hughes’ operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the pipeline construction business, including, for example, operating equipment in mountainous terrain, people working in deep trenches and people working in close proximity to large equipment. These hazards could cause personal injury or death, serious damage to or destruction of property and equipment, suspension of drilling operations, or substantial damage to the environment, including damage to producing formations and surrounding areas. C.J. Hughes seeks protection against certain of these risks through insurance, including property casualty insurance on its equipment, commercial general liability and commercial contract indemnity, commercial umbrella and workers’ compensation insurance.
C.J. Hughes’ and Nitro Electric’s insurance coverage for property damage to its equipment is based on both companies’ estimates of the cost of comparable used equipment to replace the insured property. There is a deductible per occurrence on equipment of $2,500. Third-party liability insurance coverage for both C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric under the general policy is $1,000,000 per occurrence, with a self-insured retention of $0 per occurrence. The commercial umbrella policy has a self-insured retention of $10,000 per occurrence, with coverage of $10,000,000 per occurrence.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
General. C.J. Hughes operations are affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and federal, state and local laws and regulations. In particular, natural gas production, operations and economics are or have been affected by price controls, taxes and other laws relating to the natural gas industry, by changes in such laws and by changes in administrative regulations. Although significant capital expenditures may be required to comply with such laws and regulations, to date, such compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on the earnings or competitive position of C.J. Hughes. In addition, C.J. Hughes’ operations are vulnerable to risks arising from the numerous laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.
Environmental Regulation. C.J. Hughes’ and Nitro Electric’s activities are subject to existing federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality, pollution control and the preservation of natural resources. Such laws and regulations concern, among other things, the containment, disposal and recycling of waste materials, and reporting of the storage, use or release of certain chemicals or hazardous substances. Numerous federal and state environmental laws regulate pipeline activities and impose liability for discharges of waste or spills, including those in coastal areas. C.J. Hughes has conducted pipeline construction in or near ecologically sensitive areas, such as wetlands and coastal environments, which are subject to additional regulatory requirements. State and Federal legislation also provide special protections to animal and marine life that could be affected by C.J. Hughes’ activities. In general, under various applicable environmental programs, C.J. Hughes may potentially be subject to regulatory enforcement action in the form of injunctions, cease and desist orders and administrative, civil and criminal penalties for violations of environmental laws. C.J. Hughes may also be subject to liability for natural resource damages and other civil claims arising out of a pollution event. C.J. Hughes would be responsible for any pollution event that was caused by its actions. It has insurance that it believes is adequate to cover any such occurrences. While Nitro Electric’s business is usually performed in plant type situations, there are still risks associated with environmental issues that may occur in those locations.
Environmental regulations that affect C.J. Hughes’ and Nitro Electric’s customers also have an indirect impact on both companies. Increasingly stringent environmental regulation of the natural gas industry and the electrical utility companies has led to higher costs and a more lengthy permitting process.
The primary environmental statutory and regulatory programs that affect C.J. Hughes’ and Nitro Electric’s operations include the following: Department of Transportation regulations, regulations set forth by agencies such and FERC and various environmental agencies including state, Federal, and local government.
Health and Safety Matters. C.J. Hughes’ and Nitro Electric’s facilities and operations are also governed by various other laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, relating to worker health and workplace safety. As an example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued the Hazard Communication Standard. This standard applies to all private-sector employers, including the natural gas exploration and producing industry. The Hazard Communication Standard requires that employers assess their chemical hazards, obtain and maintain certain written descriptions of these hazards, develop a hazard communication program and train employees to work safely with the chemicals on site. Failure to comply with the requirements of the standard may result in administrative, civil and criminal penalties. C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric believe that appropriate precautions are taken to protect employees and others from harmful exposure to materials handled and managed at its facilities and that it operates in substantial compliance with all Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. While it is not anticipated that C.J. Hughes or Nitro Electric will be required in the near future to make material expenditures by reason of such health and safety laws and regulations, C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these changing regulations.
Research and Development/Intellectual Property
C.J. Hughes has not made any material expenditures for research and development. C.J. Hughes does not own any patents, trademarks or licenses.
Properties
C.J. Hughes owns and operates its main office at 75 West Third Avenue, Huntington, West Virginia 25703. C.J. Hughes will lease temporary locations on an as-needed basis to accommodate its operations based on the projects it is working on.
Legal Proceedings
C.J. Hughes is not a party to any legal proceedings, other than in the ordinary course of business, that if decided in a manner adverse to C.J. Hughes would be materially adverse to C.J. Hughes’ financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
An effective registration statement may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise his, her or its warrants.
No warrants will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless at the time a holder seeks to exercise, a prospectus relating to common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is current and the common stock has been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the warrants. Under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts to meet these conditions and to maintain a current prospectus relating to common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. Additionally, we have no obligation to settle the warrants for cash in the absence of an effective registration statement or under any other circumstances. The warrants may be deprived of any value, the market for the warrants may be limited and the holders of warrants may not be able to exercise their warrants if the prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not current or if the common stock is not qualified or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the warrants reside. Consequently, the warrants may expire unexercised or unredeemed.
We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise while a prospectus is not current, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants, in whole or in part, at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at the price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of the common stock equals or exceeds $8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period following proper notice of such redemption. Such redemption can and may occur while a prospectus is not current and therefore the warrants are not exercisable. If this occurs, your warrants would be worthless.
Private placement warrants have a superior exercise right to warrants received in our initial public offering.
Warrants issued in the private placement may be exercised pursuant to an exemption to the requirement that the securities underlying such warrant be registered pursuant to an effective registration statement. Therefore, such warrants may be exercised whether or not a current registration statement is in place. The warrants received in our initial public offering are not issued under this exemption, therefore they may only be exercised if a current registration statement is in place. We are required only to use our best efforts to maintain a current registration statement; therefore, the warrants issued in our initial public offering may expire worthless.
The loss of key executives could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of key executives consisting of Marshall T. Reynolds, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jack M. Reynolds, a director and our President. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our executive management team. Although we currently intend to retain our existing management , we cannot assure you that such individuals will remain with us for the immediate or foreseeable future. We do not have employment contracts with any of our current executives. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of these executives could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our initial stockholders, including our officers and directors, control a substantial interest in us and this may influence certain actions requiring a stockholder vote.
Our initial stockholders (including all of our officers and directors) collectively own approximately 50.4% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock (including shares underlying warrants that are currently exerciseable). Since the Officers and Directors own a significant portion of the shares outstanding, they have a significant influence over any items that might require a shareholder vote.
Failure to maintain a current prospectus relating to the common stock underlying our warrants may allow our warrants to expire worthless.
No warrants will be exercisable unless at the time of exercise a prospectus relating to common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is current and the common stock has been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of our warrants. Under the terms of a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York, as warrant agent, and us, we have agreed only to use our best efforts to maintain a current prospectus relating to common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain a current prospectus. In the absence of an effective registration statement, we have no obligation to settle the warrants in cash, and the warrants may expire unexecuted or unredeemed. The warrants may be deprived of any value and the market for the warrants may be limited if the prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not current or if the common stock is not qualified or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the warrants reside.
Our outstanding warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult to effect a business combination using our common stock as consideration.
In connection with our initial public offering and the private placement, as part of the units, we issued warrants to purchase 20,276,923 shares of common stock. We also issued an option to purchase up to 450,000 units to Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, which, if exercised, will result in the issuance of an additional 900,000 warrants. To the extent we issue shares of common stock to effect a business combination, the potential for the issuance of substantial numbers of additional shares upon exercise of these warrants and the option could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle in the eyes of a target business as such securities, when exercised, will increase the number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and reduce the value of any shares issued to complete the business combination. Accordingly, our warrants and the option may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase the cost of the target business. Additionally, the sale, or even the possibility of sale, of the shares underlying the warrants and the option could have an adverse effect on the market price for our securities or on our ability to obtain future public financing. If and to the extent these warrants and the option are exercised, you may experience dilution to your holdings.
If our initial stockholders exercise their registration rights, it may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and the existence of these rights may make it more difficult to effect a business combination.
Our initial stockholders may request that we register the resale of the 2,150,000 shares of common stock they acquired prior to our initial public offering and our five directors (as well as a sixth individual) may request us to register for resale of the shares of common stock underlying the 3,076,923 warrants they purchased in the private placement at any time. If our initial stockholders exercise their registration rights with respect to all of their initial shares of common stock as well as have the securities underlying their warrants registered, then there will be an additional 5,226,923 shares of common stock eligible for trading in the public market. The presence of this additional number of shares of common stock eligible for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the existence of these rights may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase the cost of the target business, as the stockholders of the target business may be discouraged from entering into a business combination with us or will request a higher price for their securities as a result of these registration rights and the potential future effect their exercise may have on the trading market for our common stock.
Our operating companies are subject to the business cycles of their customers and accordingly downturns in the cycles for any of the customers could result in lower performance
Our operating companies rely on the various projects put out for bid by their customers. Accordingly, should there be a downturn in their business or their abilities to finance projects, it could have a negative affect on the performance of the operating companies and therefore Energy Services.
We maintain our executive offices at 100 Industrial Lane, Huntington, West Virginia 25702. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
At September 30, 2008, we were not involved in any legal proceedings, the outcome of which would be material to our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On August 15, 2008, we held a special meeting of stockholders at which the following matters were considered and voted upon:
| ● | Proposal 1: the adoption and approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2008, by and between the Company and ST Pipeline, Inc.; |
| | |
| ● | Proposal 2: the adoption and approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2008, by and between the Company and C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc.; |
| | |
| ● | Proposal 3: the approval of an amendment to Energy Services’ certificate of incorporation to change the Company’s name to “Energy Services of America Corporation.”; |
| | |
| ● | Proposal 4: the approval of an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to remove Article V from the certificate of incorporation after the closing of the acquisitions, as Article V will no longer be applicable to the Company.; and |
| | |
| ● | Proposal 5: the approval of a proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting, if necessary for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. |
The votes for the proposals above were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
Proposal 1 | | | 7,453,900 | | | | 1,622,600 | | | | 25,503 | |
Proposal 2 | | | 7,453,900 | | | | 1,622,600 | | | | 25,503 | |
Proposal 3 | | | 7,446,220 | | | | 1,574,038 | | | | 81,745 | |
Proposal 4 | | | 7,452,790 | | | | 1,545,668 | | | | 103,545 | |
Proposal 5 | | | 7,878,484 | | | | 1,172,674 | | | | 50,845 | |
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Our units, common stock and warrants are listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbols ESA.U, ESA and ESA.WS, respectively. Prior to October 3, 2006, only the units traded on the American Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices for the units, common stock and warrants during each of the last two fiscal years.
Units
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2006 | | $ | 6.35 | | | $ | 5.75 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | | 6.75 | | | | 6.17 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2007 | | | 7.46 | | | | 6.45 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2007 | | | 7.34 | | | | 6.00 | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2007 | | $ | 6.92 | | | $ | 6.57 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 | | | 7.46 | | | | 6.15 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 | | | 7.45 | | | | 6.70 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 | | | 9.09 | | | | 6.50 | | | | – | |
Common Stock
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2006 | | $ | 5.40 | | | $ | 5.25 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | | 5.85 | | | | 5.35 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2007 | | | 5.93 | | | | 5.50 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2007 | | | 5.80 | | | | 5.54 | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2007 | | $ | 5.80 | | | $ | 5.61 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 | | | 5.87 | | | | 5.65 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 | | | 5.92 | | | | 5.56 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 | | | 5.90 | | | | 5.20 | | | | – | |
Warrants
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2006 | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | | 0.71 | | | | 0.44 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2007 | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.56 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2007 | | | 0.91 | | | | 0.57 | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2007 | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | – | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 | | | 0.92 | | | | 0.20 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 | | | 0.89 | | | | 0.35 | | | | – | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 | | | 1.27 | | | | 0.54 | | | | – | |
As of September 30, 2008, there was one holder of record of our units, twenty one holders of record of our common stock and seven holders of record of our warrants.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to completion of a business combination. The payment of any dividends will be within the discretion of our then board of directors. It is the present intention of our board of directors to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, our board does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.
(c) Energy Services of America Corp. did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the relevant period, other than the redemption of 1,622,456 shares undertaken in connection with the acquisitions. The shares were repurchased between August 19 and August 27 at a price of $5.9976 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $9,730,936.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
Not required for smaller company filer
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of Energy Services in conjunction with the “Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial information “ appearing in this section of this annual report as well as the historical financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere herein. Among other things, those historical consolidated financial statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the following information.
Forward Looking Statements
Within Energy Services’ financial statements and this discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations, there are included statements reflecting assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs about future events that are intended as “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and other words of similar meaning.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve or rely on a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict or beyond Energy Services' control. Energy Services has based its forward-looking statements on management’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available to management at the time the statements are made. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied and forecasted by forward-looking statements and that any or all of Energy Services’ forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions and by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.
All of the forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements that may accompany such forward-looking statements or that are otherwise included in this report. In addition, Energy Services does not undertake and expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or otherwise.
Overview
Energy Services was formed on March 31, 2006, to serve as a vehicle to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business. It operated as a “Blank Check Company” until August 15, 2008 at which time it completed the acquisitions of ST Pipeline, Inc. and C J Hughes Construction Company, Inc. S.T. Pipeline and C.J. Hughes are considered predecessor companies to Energy Services. The discussion of financial condition and operating results include the results of the two predecessors prior to the acquisition. This discussion is based in part on pro-forma income statement information. The Company acquired ST Pipeline for $16.2 million in cash and $3.0 million in a promissory note. The C J Hughes purchase price totalled $34 million, one half of which was in cash and one half in Energy Services common stock. The acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method and the financial results of both acquisitions are included in the results of Energy Services from the date of acquisition.
Since the acquisitions, Energy Services has been engaged in one segment of operations which is the providing of contracting services for energy related companies. Currently Energy Services primarily services the Gas, Oil and Electrical industries though it does some other incidental work. For the Gas industry, the Company is primarily engaged in the construction, replacement and repair of natural gas pipelines and storage facilities for utility companies and private natural gas companies. Energy Services is involved in the construction of both interstate and intrastate pipelines, with an emphasis on the latter. For the Oil industry the Company provides a variety of services relating to pipeline, storage facilities and plant work. For the Electrical industry, the Company provides a full range of electrical installations and repairs including substation and switchyard services, site preparation, packaged buildings, transformers and other ancillary work with regards thereto. Energy Services’ other services include liquid pipeline construction, pump station construction, production facility construction, water and sewer pipeline installations, various maintenance and repair services and other services related to pipeline construction. The majority of the Company’s customers are located in West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and North Carolina. The Company builds, but does not own, natural gas pipelines for its customers that are part of both interstate and intrastate pipeline systems that move natural gas from producing regions to consumption regions as well as building and replacing gas line services to individual customers of the various utility companies. The Company had consolidated operating revenues of $28.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 of which 13% was attributable to electrical customers, 81% to natural gas customers, 2% for the oil industry, 3% for governmental entities and 1% for all other customers.
Energy Services’ customers include many of the leading companies in the industries it serves, including Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Spectra Energy, Equitable Resources, Hitachi and Nisource. The Company enters into various types of contracts, including competitive unit price, cost-plus (or time and materials basis) and fixed price (lump sum) contracts. The terms of the contracts will vary from job to job and customer to customer though most contracts are on the basis of either unit pricing in which the Company agrees to do the work for a price per unit of work performed or for a fixed amount for the entire project. Most of the Company’s projects are completed within one year of the start of the work. On occasion, the Company’s customers will require the posting of performance and/or payment bonds upon execution of the contract, depending upon the nature of the work performed.
The Company generally recognizes revenue on unit price and cost-plus contracts when units are completed or services are performed. Fixed price contracts usually results in recording revenues as work on the contract progresses on a percentage of completion basis. Under this accounting method, revenue is recognized based on the percentage of total costs incurred to date in proportion to total estimated costs to complete the contract. Many contacts also include retainage provisions under which a percentage of the contract price is withheld until the project is complete and has been accepted by the customer.
Seasonality: Fluctuation of Results
Our revenues and results of operations can and usually are subject to seasonal variations. These variations are the result of weather, customer spending patterns, bidding seasons and holidays. The first quarter of the calendar year is typically the lowest in terms of revenues because inclement weather conditions causes delays in production and customers usually do not plan large projects during that time. While usually better than the first quarter, the second quarter often has some inclement weather which can cause delays in production, reducing the revenues the Company receives and/or increasing the production costs. The third quarter usually is least impacted by weather and usually has the largest number of projects underway. The fourth quarter is usually lower than the third due to the various holidays. Many projects are completed in the fourth quarter and revenues are often impacted by customers seeking to either spend their capital budget for the year or scale back projects due to capital budget overruns.
In addition to the fluctuations discussed above, the pipeline industry can be highly cyclical, reflecting variances in capital expenditures in proportion to energy price fluctuations. As a result, our volume of business may be adversely affected by where our customers are in the cycle and thereby their financial condition as to their capital needs and access to capital to finance those needs.
Accordingly, our operating results in any particular quarter or year may not be indicative of the results that can be expected for any other quarter or any other year. You should read “Understanding Gross Margins” and “Outlook” below for discussions of trends and challenges that may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Understanding Gross Margins
Our gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of salaries, wages and some benefits to employees, depreciation, fuel and other equipment, equipment rentals, subcontracted services, portions of insurance, facilities expense, materials and parts and supplies. Various factors, some controllable, some not impact our gross margin on a quarterly or annual basis.
Seasonal. As discussed above, seasonal patterns can have a significant impact on gross margins. Usually, business is slower in the winter months versus the warmer months.
Weather. Adverse or favorable weather conditions can impact gross margin in a given period. Periods of wet weather, snow or rainfall, as well severe temperature extremes can severely impact production and therefore negatively impact revenues and margins. Conversely, periods of dry weather with moderate temperatures can positively impact revenues and margins due to the opportunity for increased production and efficiencies.
Revenue Mix. The mix of revenues between customer types and types of work for various customers will impact gross margins. Some projects will have more margins while others that are extremely competitive in bidding may have narrower margins.
Service and Maintenance versus installation. In general, installation work has a higher gross margin than maintenance work. This is due to the fact that installation work usually is more of a fixed price nature and therefore has higher risks involved. Accordingly, a higher portion of the revenue mix from installation work typically will result in higher margins.
Subcontract work. Work that is subcontracted to other service providers generally has lower gross margins. Increases in subcontract work as a percentage of total revenues in a given period may contribute to a decrease in gross margin.
Materials versus Labor. Typically materials supplied on projects have smaller margins than labor. Accordingly, projects with a higher material cost in relation to the entire job will have a lower overall margin.
Depreciation. Depreciation is included in our cost of revenue. This is a common practice in our industry, but can make comparability to other companies difficult.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related benefits to management, administrative salaries and benefits, marketing, communications, office and utility costs, professional fees, bad debt expense, letter of credit fees, general liability insurance and miscellaneous other expenses.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the Pro Forma Statements of operations data and such data as a percentage of revenues for the years indicated (dollars in thousands) This information is based upon and should be read in conjunction with the more detailed information included in the section titled “Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information”.
| | Year ended | | | | | | Year ended | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | | September 30, | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | Percent | | | 2007 | | | Percent | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract Revenues | | $ | 208,240 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 133,091 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of Revenues | | | 176,166 | | | | 84.6 | % | | | 115,393 | | | | 86.7 | % |
Gross Profit | | | 32,074 | | | | 15.4 | % | | | 17,698 | | | | 13.3 | % |
General and administrative expenses | | | 6,913 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 4,660 | | | | 3.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations before taxes | | | 25,160 | | | | 12.1 | % | | | 13,038 | | | | 9.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | 349 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 448 | | | | 0.3 | % |
Interest Expense | | | (1,662 | ) | | | -0.8 | % | | | (1,454 | ) | | | -1.1 | % |
Other Income (Expense) | | | 1,233 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 259 | | | | 0.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before Income taxes | | | 25,080 | | | | 12.0 | % | | | 12,290 | | | | 9.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | | 10,078 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 5,171 | | | | 3.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 15,002 | | | | 7.2 | % | | $ | 7,120 | | | | 5.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share - Basic | | $ | 1.24 | | | | | | | $ | 0.59 | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share - Diluted | | $ | 1.03 | | | | | | | $ | 0.51 | | | | | |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following tables set forth summary financial information for our pro forma consolidated results for the years ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007. The information is presented to show what the consolidated income statements would have looked like had the transactions with ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes been completed at the beginning of each of those years. The information includes such adjustments as deemed necessary to reflect the transactions in a proper manner. This information should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto as well as the financial statements for the various entities included elsewhere in this document.
The unaudited pro forma information is for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations that we would have reported had the merger transactions been completed as of the date presented and should not be taken as representative of our future consolidated results of operations.
Energy Services of America Corporation |
ST Pipeline, Inc./C J Hughes |
Pro Forma Combined, Condensed, Consolidated Statement of Income |
Year ended September 30, 2008 |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | ST Pipeline | | | ST Pipeline | | | | | | C J Hughes | | | C J Hughes | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Energy Services of | | | January 1, 2008- | | | December | | | ST Pipeline | | | January 1, 2008- | | | December | | | C J Hughes | | | | | | | |
| | America Corporation | | | August 15, 2008 | | | 31 2007 | | | Pro Forma Adjustments | | | August 15, 2008 | | | 31 2007 | | | Adjustments | | | Adjustments | | | Combined | |
| | Audited | | | Audited | | | Unaudited | | | | | | Audited | | | Unaudited | | | | | | | | | Unaudited | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract Revenues | | $ | 28,517,688 | | | $ | 37,410,877 | | | $ | 37,520,704 | | | | | | $ | 79,217,380 | | | $ | 25,573,278 | | | | | | | | | $ | 208,239,927 | |
Cost of Revenues | | | 23,830,404 | | | | 30,676,571 | | | | 22,409,225 | | | $ | 1,210,813 | (1) | | | 74,794,447 | | | | 22,428,832 | | | $ | 816,113 | (1) | | | | | | 176,166,405 | |
Gross Profit | | | 4,687,284 | | | | 6,734,306 | | | | 15,111,479 | | | | (1,210,813 | ) | | | 4,422,933 | | | | 3,144,446 | | | | (816,113 | ) | | | - | | | | 32,073,522 | |
General and administrative expenses | 1,350,246 | | | | 996,049 | | | | 419,290 | | | | | | | | 3,473,283 | | | | 674,345 | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,913,213 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income( loss) from operations | | | 3,337,038 | | | | 5,738,257 | | | | 14,692,189 | | | | (1,210,813 | ) | | | 949,650 | | | | 2,470,101 | | | | (816,113 | ) | | | - | | | | 25,160,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | 1,585,074 | | | | 34,675 | | | | - | | | | (513,160 | )(2) | | | - | | | | 91,897 | | | | (543,081 | )(2) | | | (306,545 | )(5) | | | 348,860 | |
Interest Expense | | | (220,274 | ) | | | (142,940 | ) | | | - | | | | (225,000 | )(3) | | | (707,622 | ) | | | (366,488 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (1,662,324 | ) |
Other Income (Expense) | | | 111,301 | | | | 932,101 | | | | 204,133 | | | | | | | | 164,709 | | | | (178,747 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 1,233,497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 4,813,139 | | | | 6,562,093 | | | | 14,896,322 | | | | (1,948,973 | ) | | | 406,737 | | | | 2,016,763 | | | | (1,359,194 | ) | | | (306,545 | ) | | | 25,080,342 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | | 2,001,981 | | | | - | | | | | | | | 7,803,777 | (4) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 395,109 | (4) | | | (122,618 | )(6) | | | 10,078,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 6,562,093 | | | $ | 14,896,322 | | | $ | (9,752,750 | ) | | $ | 406,737 | | | $ | 2,016,763 | | | $ | (1,754,303 | ) | | $ | (183,927 | ) | | $ | 15,002,093 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | | | 10,750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,964,763 | | | | (1,622,456 | ) | | | 12,092,307 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares - diluted | | 13,160,643 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,964,763 | | | | (1,622,456 | ) | | | 14,502,950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share - basic | | $ | 0.26 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1.24 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share - diluted | | $ | 0.21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1.03 | |
Energy Services of America Corporation |
ST Pipeline, Inc./C J Hughes |
Pro Forma Combined, Condensed, Consolidated Statement of Income |
Year ended September 30, 2007 |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | ST Pipeline | | | Oct 1-Dec | | | | | | | | | Oct 1-Dec | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Energy Services of | | | December | | | 31 2007, | | | ST Pipeline | | | | | | 31 2007, | | | C J Hughes | | | | | | | |
| | America Corporation | | | 31. 2007 | | | adding 2006 | | | Adjustments | | | 31. 2007 | | | adding 2006 | | | Adjustments | | | Adjustments | | | Combined | |
| | Audited | | | Audited | | | Unaudited | | | | | | Audited | | | Unaudited | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract Revenues | | | | | $ | 100,385,098 | | | | (27,441,017 | ) | | | | | $ | 75,305,234 | | | $ | (15,158,476 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 133,090,839 | |
Cost of Revenues | | | | | | 70,948,130 | | | | (13,291,520 | ) | | $ | 1,210,813 | (1) | | | 68,096,279 | | | | (12,387,188 | ) | | $ | 816,113 | (1) | | | | | | 115,392,627 | |
Gross Profit | | | | | | 29,436,968 | | | | (14,149,497 | ) | | | (1,210,813 | ) | | | 7,208,955 | | | | (2,771,288 | ) | | | (816,113 | ) | | | - | | | | 17,698,212 | |
General and administrative expenses | $ | 385,773 | | | | 1,547,125 | | | | (1,400 | ) | | | | | | | 3,218,114 | | | | (489,242 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 4,660,370 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income( loss) from operations | | | (385,773 | ) | | | 27,889,843 | | | | (14,148,097 | ) | | | (1,210,813 | ) | | | 3,990,841 | | | | (2,282,046 | ) | | | (816,113 | ) | | | - | | | | 13,037,842 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | 2,612,835 | | | | 45,939 | | | | 1,088 | | | | (843,961 | )(2) | | | - | | | | 28,962 | | | | (893,170 | )(2) | | | (504,154 | )(5) | | | 447,539 | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | (298,799 | ) | | | (28,067 | ) | | | (225,000 | )(3) | | | (1,063,198 | ) | | | 160,666 | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,454,398 | ) |
Other Income (Expense) | | | | | | | 307,524 | | | | (13,829 | ) | | | | | | | 118,135 | | | | (152,681 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 259,149 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 2,227,062 | | | | 27,944,507 | | | | (14,188,905 | ) | | | (2,279,774 | ) | | | 3,045,778 | | | | (2,245,099 | ) | | | (1,709,283 | ) | | | (504,154 | ) | | | 12,290,131 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | | 846,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,590,331 | (4) | | | 275,000 | | | | - | | | | (339,101 | )(4) | | | (201,662 | )(6) | | | 5,170,568 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 1,381,062 | | | $ | 27,944,507 | | | $ | (14,188,905 | ) | | $ | (6,870,105 | ) | | $ | 2,770,778 | | | $ | (2,245,099 | ) | | $ | (1,370,182 | ) | | $ | (302,493 | ) | | $ | 7,119,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 10,750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,964,763 | | | | (1,622,456 | ) | | | 12,092,307 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares - diluted | | 12,688,930 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,964,763 | | | | (1,622,456 | ) | | | 14,031,307 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share - basic | | $ | 0.13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share - diluted | | $ | 0.11 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.51 | |
Notes to pro forma income statements
(1) | These adjustments represent the added depreciation created from the mark to market of the fixed assets of ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes as required by purchase accounting |
| |
(2) | These adjustments reflect the interest income lost from the cash payments made to the shareholders of ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes, etc. had the transaction been completed at the beginning of each period and therefore not earning interest. |
| |
(3) | This adjustment is to reflect the added interest cost that would have occurred relating to the notes issued to the Shareholders of ST Pipeline had the transaction been in place for the respective periods |
| |
(4) | ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes were both Sub S corporations and therefore had no Federal income taxes. These entries are to reflect the estimated taxes for these companies had they been a part of Energy Services during the respective periods. |
| |
(5) | In accordance with the bylaws of Energy Services, shareholders had the right to vote against the transactions and request their shares be redeemed. These entries reflect the lost interest income from the purchase of those shares so redeemed. |
| |
(6) | These entries are to reflect the tax savings related to the interest income lost on the payments to redeem shares. |
2008 compared to 2007- Pro Forma basis
Revenues. Revenues increased by $75.1 million or 56.5% to $208.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues as the result of the added revenues from Nitro Electric which was acquired by CJ Hughes in May of 2007 and accordingly revenues were only included from that time forward. .
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues increased by $60.8 million or 52.7% to $176.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. The driver of this increase was primarily the Nitro Electric acquisition by CJ Hughes in May of 2007 and the inclusion of that information from that time forward in 2007
Gross Profit. Gross profits for 2008 were $32.1 Million. This was an increase of $14.4 million or 81.2% over the 2007 gross profit of $17.7 million. As explained above this was a result of Nitro Electric performance only being included from May of 2007 forward.
Selling general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative increased by $2.2 million (48.3%)to $6.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily driven by the acquisition of Nitro Electric by CJ Hughes and the inclusion of Nitro performance from that time forward.
Income from Operations. Income from operations increased $12.1 million or 93% to $25.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 from $13.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2007. This is a function of the previous categories.
Interest Income. Interest income was about even with the prior year at $349,000 for 2008 and $448,000 for 2007.
Interest Expense Interest Expense increased by $208,000 to $1.7 million at September 30, 2008. This increase was driven primarily by added borrowings on lines of credit and for equipment purchases.
Other Income. Other income increased by $974,000 to $1.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 over the 2007 amount of $259,000. This increase was driven by the rental of equipment to outside parties.
Net Income. Net Income increased by $7.8 million or 110.7% to $15.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 from a net income of $7.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2007. The increase occurred due to the various changes as previously discussed.
2008 for Energy Services
Energy Services for 2008 had sales of $28.5 million, a net income of $2.8 million which resulted in earnings per share of $0.26 basic and $0.21 fully diluted. These results included results from the acquired companies from August 15, 2008 through September 30, 2008. The results also included $1.6 million in interest income from the trust fund which was disbursed as discussed in the financial conditions section.
Comparison of Financial Condition
The Company had total assets at September 30, 2008 of $133.7 million. Some of the primary components of the balance sheet were accounts receivable which totaled $38.6 million up $8.4 million from the prior year balances of the operating companies. Other major categories of assets at September 30, 2008 included cash of $13.8 million and fixed assets of $33.3 million. Liabilities totaled $73.4 million up $15.2 million from 2007. This increase was primarily due to borrowings to fund the purchase of fixed assets.
At the end of 2007, the Company had $50.7 million of funds in a trust account being held for the completion of acquisitions totaling at least 80% of the funds. That balance grew to $51.5 million by August 15, 2008. Upon completion of the ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes acquisitions on August 15, 2008, the Company disbursed those funds with $33.2 million in cash going to the acquired companies’ shareholders, $9.7 million to redeem those Energy Services shareholders electing redemption, $1.0 million to pay the underwriting deferred fee and the remaining $7.5 million to the Company to be used for general corporate purposes.
Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ Equity rose from $40.0 million at September 30, 2007 to $60.4 million at September 30, 2008 due to a combination of the additional shares issued with regards to the C. J. Hughes Acquisition and the Net Income for the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents on hand at September 30, 2008 which totaled $13.8 million along with our credit facilities available to us and our anticipated future cash flows from operations will provide sufficient cash to meet our operating needs. However, with the current energy shortage nationwide and the increased demand for our services, we could be faced with needing significant additional working capital. Also, current general credit tightening resulting from the general banking and other economic contraction that has occurred in the second half of 2008, has impaired the availability of credit facilities for future operational needs. A prolonged restriction in borrowing capacity may limit the growth ability of the Company.
Sources and uses of Cash
As of September 30, 2008, we had $13.8 million in cash , working capital of $17.4 million and long term debt net of current maturities of $25.9 million. The maturities of the total long term debt is as follows
2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | |
$ | 11,239,357 | | | | 6,985,979 | | | | 1,661,923 | |
Off-Balance Sheet transactions
Due to the nature of our industry, we often enter into certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business that result in risks not directly reflected in our balance sheets. Though for the most part not material in nature, some of these are:
Leases
Our work often requires us to lease various facilities, equipment and vehicles. These leases usually are short term in nature, one year or less though at times we may enter into longer term leases when warranted. By leasing equipment, vehicles and facilities, we are able to reduce are capital outlay requirements for equipment vehicles and facilities that we may only need for short periods of time. The Company currently rents two pieces of real estate from stockholders-directors of the company under long-term lease agreements. The one agreement calls for monthly rental payments of $5,000 and extends through January 1, 2012. The second agreement is for the Company’s headquarter offices and is rented from a corporation in which two of the Company’s directors are shareholders. The agreement began November 1, 2008 and runs through 2011 with options to renew past that. It calls for a monthly rental of $7,500 per month.
Letters of Credit
Certain of our customers or vendors may require letters of credit to secure payments that the vendors are making on our behalf or to secure payments to subcontractors, vendors, etc. on various customer projects. At September 30, 2008, the Company was contingently liable on an irrevocable Letter of Credit for $950,542 to guarantee payments of insurance premiums to the group captive insurance company through which the Company obtains its general liability insurance.
Performance Bonds
Some customers, particularly new ones or governmental agencies require us to post bid bonds, performance bonds and payment bonds. These bonds are obtained through insurance carriers and guarantee to the customer that we will perform under the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the insurer make payments or provide services under the bond. We must reimburse the insurer for any expenses or outlays it is required to make. Depending upon the size and conditions of a particular contract, we may be required to post letters of credit or other collateral in favor of the insurer. Posting of these letters or other collateral will reduce our borrowing capabilities. Historically, the company has never had a payment made by an insurer under these circumstances and do not anticipate any claims in the foreseeable future. At September 30, 2008, we had $26.1 million bonds issued by the insurer outstanding.
Concentration of Credit Risk
In the ordinary course of business the company grants credit under normal payment terms, generally without collateral, to our customers, which include natural gas and oil companies, general contractors, and various commercial and industrial customers located within the United States. Consequently, we are subject to potential credit risk related to business and economic factors that would affect these companies. However, we generally have certain statutory lien rights with respect to services provided. Under certain circumstances such as foreclosure, we may take title to the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of receivables. The company had only two customers that exceeded ten percent of revenues for the year ended September 30, 2008. This was Equitable Resources and Spectra which accounted for 69% of revenues.
Litigation
The Company is a party from time to time to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. These actions typically seek, among other things, compensation for alleged personally injury, breach of contract and/or property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all such lawsuits, claims, and proceedings, we record reserves when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, separately or in aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Related Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we enter into transactions from time to time with related parties. These transactions typically would not be material in nature and would usually would relate to real estate, vehicle or equipment rentals.
Inflation
Due to relatively low levels of inflation during the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, inflation did not have a significant effect on our results.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal periods, as it relates to financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 also requires certain tabular disclosures related to results of applying SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. On February 12, 2008, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities Based on the assets and liabilities on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Based on the assets and liabilities on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141 (R ) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. Assets and liabilities that arose from business combinations which occurred prior to the adoption of FASB No. 141 ( R) should not be adjusted upon the adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R). SFAS No. 141 ( R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination; establishes the acquisition date as the measurement date to determine the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. As it relates to recognizing all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, costs an acquirer expects but is not obligated to incur in the future to exit an activity of an acquiree or to terminate or relocate an acquiree’s employees are not liabilities at the acquisition date but must be expensed in accordance with other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, during the measurement period, which should not exceed one year from the acquisiton date, any adjustments that are needed to assets acquired and liabilities assumed to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of that date will be adjusted retrospectively. The acquirer will be required to expense all acquisition- related costs in the periods such costs are incurred other than costs to issue debt or equity securities. SFAS No. 141 ( R) will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at the date of adoption, but it could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows in the future when it is applied to acquisitions which occur in the fiscal year beginning October 1 , 2009.
In April 2008, the FASB issued staff position FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. FSP142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS NO. 142. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure its fair value and to enhance existing disclosure requirements relating to intangible assets. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and should be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, we will adopt FSP 142-3 on October 1, 2009. We do not expect FSP 142-3 to have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at the date of adoption, but it could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows in future periods.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based on our pro forma consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. Management believes the following accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue when services are performed except when work is being performed under a fixed price contract. Revenue from fixed price contracts are recognized under the percentage of completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for each contract. Such contracts generally provide that the customer accept completion of progress to date and compensate us for services rendered, measured typically in terms of units installed, hours expended or some other measure of progress. Contract costs typically include all direct material, labor and subcontract costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation. Costs. Provisions for the total estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and their effects are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Self Insurance The Company is insured at one subsidiary for general liability insurance through a captive insurance company. While the Company believes that this arrangement has been very beneficial in reducing and stabilizing insurance costs, the Company does have to maintain a letter of credit to guarantee payments of premiums. Should the Captive experience severe losses over an extended period, it could have a detrimental affect on the Company.
Current and Non Current Accounts Receivable and Provision for Doubtful Accounts The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts when collection of an account is considered doubtful. Inherent in the assessment of the allowance for doubtful accounts are certain judgments and estimates relating to, among others, our customer’s access to capital, our customer’s willingness or ability to pay, general economic conditions and the ongoing relationship with the customer. While most of our Customers are large well capitalized companies, should they experience material changes in their revenues and cash flows or incur other difficulties and not be able to pay the amounts owed, this could cause reduced cash flows and losses in excess of our current reserves. At September 30, 2008, the management review deemed that the allowance for doubtful accounts was adequate to cover any anticipated losses.
Outlook
The following statements are based on current expectations. These statements are forward looking, and actual results may differ materially.
Recently our customers have been experiencing high demand for their products, particularly Natural Gas. Accordingly, we normally would expect to see projected spending for our customers on their transmission and distribution systems increasing dramatically over the next few years. However, with the current uncertainty in the economy the demand for the customer’s project could wane and also their ability to fund planned projects could be reduced. The Company’s backlog at September 30, 2008 was $41 million and while adding additional business projects appears likely, no assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in bidding on projects that become available. Moreover, even if the Company obtains contracts, there can be no guarantee that the projects will go forward if the current economic instability continues.
If the increased demand experienced in fiscal 2008 continues, we believe that the Company will continue to have opportunities to continue to improve both revenue volumes and the margins thereon. However, as noted above, if the current economic conditions persist, growth could be limited.
If growth continues , we will be required to make additional capital expenditures for equipment to keep up with that need. Currently, it is anticipated that in fiscal 2009, the Company’s needed capital expenditures will be between $2.0 and $4.0 million dollars. However, if the customer demands continue to grow, this number could change dramatically. Significantly higher capital expenditure requirements could of course put a strain on the Company’s cash flows and require additional borrowings.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks, primarily related to increases in fuel prices and adverse changes in interest rates, as discussed below.
Interest Rate. Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates to our borrowings from banks. Some of our loans have variable interest rates. Accordingly, as rates rise, our interest cost would rise. We do not feel that this risk is significant,
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial Statements are included as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
We have engaged Arnett & Foster, Certified Public Accountants, P.L.L.C. (“Arnett & Foster”) as our new independent registered public accounting firm, effective October 1, 2008. We continued our relationship with Castaing, Hussey & Lolan LLC, CPAs (“CHL”) as its independent registered public accounting firm through the preparation and filing on August 13, 2008 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter period ended June 30, 2008. On October 1, 2008, the Company notified CHL that it was dismissing CHL as principal accountants.
CHL’s reports on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. Arnett & Foster has been engaged to audit our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ending September 30, 2008. The engagement of Arnett & Foster was approved by our Audit Committee.
In connection with the audits of the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and the subsequent interim period, there were (1) no disagreements with CHL on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of CHL, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their opinion and (2) no reportable events.
Arnett & Foster was engaged by the Company on October 1, 2008 to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ending September 30, 2008. During the period beginning October 1, 2006 through the date of this Report, the Company did not consult with Arnett & Foster regarding any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that Energy Services of America Corporation files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the most recent fiscal year.
| /s/ Marshall T. Reynolds | |
| Marshall T. Reynolds | |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| /s/ Larry A. Blount | |
| Larry A. Blount | |
| Chief Financial Officer | |
(c) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
With the acquisition of the two operating companies in the fourth quarter of the Company’s fiscal year, the Company has had to evaluate the controls at those companies and also the process of bringing those companies into Energy Services. Management believes that there are no material weaknesses in the internal controls of the two operating companies that will materialy affect Energy Services of America Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Officers
Our directors and executive officers at September 30, 2008 are as follows:
| | | | |
Marshall T. Reynolds | | 71 | | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer |
Jack M. Reynolds | | 43 | | Director |
Edsel R. Burns | | 57 | | Director and President |
Neal W. Scaggs | | 71 | | Director |
Joseph L. Williams | | 63 | | Director |
Richard A. Adams | | 40 | | Director |
Keith Molihan | | 66 | | Director |
James Shafer | | 65 | | Director |
Douglas Reynolds | | 32 | | Director |
Eric Dosch | | 30 | | Director |
Larry A. Blount | | 59 | | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Marshall T. Reynolds has served as our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer since our inception. Mr. Reynolds has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Directors of Champion Industries, Inc., a commercial printer, business form manufacturer and supplier of office products and furniture, from 1992 to the present, and sole shareholder from 1972 to 1993; President and General Manager of The Harrah & Reynolds Corporation, from 1964 (and sole shareholder since 1972) to present; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Portec Rail Products, Inc.; Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Radisson Hotel in Huntington, West Virginia; and Chairman of the Board of Directors of McCorkle Machine and Engineering Company in Huntington, West Virginia. Mr. Reynolds also serves as a Director of the Abigail Adams National Bancorp, Inc. in Washington, D.C.; Chairman of the Board of Directors of First Guaranty Bank in Hammond, Louisiana; and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. in Huntington, West Virginia. Mr. Reynolds is the father of Jack Reynolds and Douglas Reynolds.
Jack Reynolds served as President, Chief Financial Officer and a member of our Board of Directors of from our inception through October 1, 2008. Mr. Reynolds has been a Vice President of Pritchard Electric Company since 1998. Pritchard is an electrical contractor providing electrical services to both utility companies as well as private industries. Mr. Reynolds also serves as a Director of Citizens Deposit Bank of Vanceburg, Kentucky.
Edsel R. Burns has been a Director since our inception and was appointed President of the Company on October 1, 2008. Mr. Burns was President and Chief Executive Officer of C. J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. from September of 2002 to October 1, 2008. From January 2002 to September of 2002, Mr. Burns was self-employed as an independent financial consultant to banks. From June of 2001 to December 2001, Mr. Burns was the Chief Financial Officer for Genesis Health Systems, a holding company for a collaborative group of three hospitals, two in Huntington, West Virginia and one in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. Mr. Burns is a Certified Public accountant and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants as well as the West Virginia and Ohio societies of CPAs. He also is on the Board of Directors of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc.
Neal W. Scaggs has been a Director since our inception. Mr. Scaggs has been president of Basiden Brothers, Inc. (retail and wholesale hardware) from 1963 to the present. Mr. Scaggs is on the Boards of Directors of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., Champion Industries, Inc. and Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Joseph L. Williams has been a Director since our inception. Mr. Williams is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Basic Supply Company, Inc., which he founded in 1977. Mr. Williams was one of the organizers and is a Director of First Sentry Bank, Huntington, West Virginia. Mr. Williams also serves as a Director of Abigail Adams National Bancorp, Inc., in Washington, D.C. Mr. Williams is also Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Bank & Trust Co., in Richmond, Virginia. Mr. Williams is a Director of the West Virginia Capital Corporation and the West Virginia Governor’s Workforce Investment Council. He is a former Director of Unlimited Future, Inc. (a small business incubator) and a former Member of the National Advisory Council of the U.S. Small Business Administration. Mr. Williams is a former Mayor and City Councilman of the City of Huntington, West Virginia. He is a graduate of Marshall University with a degree in finance and is a member of its Institutional Board of Governors.
Richard A. Adams, Jr. was appointed to the Board of Directors on August 15, 2008. Mr. Adams has been the President of United Bank, Inc., a subsidiary of United Bankshares, Inc. since 2007. Prior to his appointment as President, Mr. Adams was the Executive Vice President of United Bank, Inc. He is also Executive Vice President of United Bankshares, Inc., a multi-state bank holding company doing business in Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C.
Keith Molihan was appointed to the Board of Directors on August 15, 2008. Mr. Molihan is a retired executive director of the Lawrence County Community Action Organization. Mr. Molihan has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ohio River Bank, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Farmers Bank of Eminence Kentucky and Chairman of the Board EMEGA Turbine Technology, as well as President of the Lawrence County Ohio Port Authority and President of the Southeast Ohio Emergency Medical organization.
James Shafer was elected to the Board on November 19, 2008. Mr. Shafer is president and until its sale to Energy Services was the owner of S.T.Pipeline.
Douglas Reynolds was elected to the Board on November 19, 2008. Mr. Reynolds is an attorney for Reynolds & Brown, PLLC. Mr. Reynolds is the President of the Transylvania Corporation and is Chairman of C.J. Hughes Construction Company, and a director of The Harrah and Reynolds Corporation, and Portec Rail Products, Inc. Mr. Reynolds is a graduate of Duke University and holds a law degree from West Virginia University. Mr. Reynolds is the son of Director Marshall T. Reynolds and brother of Jack M. Reynolds.
Eric Dosch was elected to the Board on November 19, 2008. Mr. Dosch has served as credit department manager with First Guaranty Bank located in Hammond, Louisiana since December 2005. Prior to that time Mr. Dosch served as credit officer with First Guaranty Bank since October 2003. Prior to his association with First Guaranty Bank, Mr. Dosch was an analyst with Livington & Jefferson, a private asset management firm located in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Larry A. Blount was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company on October 1, 2008.. Mr. Blount graduated from West Virginia State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration and Accounting. He is also a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Blount was employed by Union Boiler Company, in various capacities, including Staff Accountant, Internal Auditor, Chief Accountant and Controller, from 1980-1996. From 1996-2003 he was Controller and Vice-president of Accounting and Finance for Williams Group International. He served as Divisional Accounting Manager for Alberici Constructors from 2003-2005. From 2005-2007, Mr. Blount served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer for Nitro Electric Company.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Our executive officers and directors and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock are required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission disclosing beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock. Securities and Exchange Commission rules require disclosure if an executive officer, director or 10% beneficial owner fails to file these reports on a timely basis. Based on our review of ownership reports required to be filed for the year ended September 30, 2008, no executive officer, director or 10% beneficial owner of our shares of common stock failed to file ownership reports on a timely basis.
Code of Ethics
Energy Services of America Corp. has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to Energy Services of America Corp.’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14 to this Form 10-K. A copy of the Code will be furnished without charge upon written request to the Secretary, Energy Services of America Corp., 100 Industrial Lane, Huntington, West Virginia.
Board Committees
Our board of directors has an audit committee. Our board of directors has adopted a charter for this committee as well as a code of ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and employees.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consisted of Messrs. Burns, Scaggs, and Williams until the completion of the acquisition of ST Pipeline and CJ Hughes. Following the completion of the acquisitions , the audit committee consisted of Messers Scaggs, Williams, Adams and Molihan with Mr. Scaggs acting as the chairman of the committee. The independent directors we appoint to our audit committee are independent members of our board of directors, as defined by the rules of the SEC. Each member of our audit committee is financially literate, and our board of directors has determined that Mr. Adams qualifies as an audit committee financial expert; as such term is defined by SEC rules.
The audit committee reviews the professional services and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and our accounts, procedures and internal controls. The audit committee also recommends the firm selected to be our independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit, reviews and evaluates with the independent public accounting firm our annual audit and annual consolidated financial statements, reviews with management the status of internal accounting controls, evaluates problem areas having a potential financial impact on us that are brought to the committee’s attention by management, the independent registered public accounting firm or the board of directors, and evaluates all of our public financial reporting documents.
Other Committees
Our board has determined that the independent members of our board of directors will perform the duties of the nominating committee and the compensation committee of the board of directors. As a result, the independent directors will (i) identify individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors and recommend to the board of directors the nominees for election to the board of directors, (ii) recommend director nominees for each committee to the board of directors, (iii) identify individuals to fill any vacancies on the board of directors, (iv) discharge the board of directors’ responsibilities relating to compensation of our directors and officers and (v) review and recommend to the board of directors, compensation plans, policies and benefit programs, as well as approve chief executive officer compensation.
Nomination of Directors
The Company has not undertaken any material changes with respect to the procedures for election of directors since its last disclosure of these procedures.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
No executive officer or director has received any cash compensation for services rendered during the year ended September 30, 2008.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The compensation committee is comprised of our independent directors. Under the board’s policies, Mr. Marshall Reynolds, Mr. Jack Reynolds, and any other director who is also an executive officer, will not participate in the Board of Directors’ determination of compensation for their respective offices in the future if compensation is given to executive officers.
Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation
As of the end of fiscal 2008, no compensation has been paid to any executive officer. Consequently, the independent members of the Board of Directors have not met in their capacity as the Compensation Committee and have not formulated any policies on executive compensation. If we offer compensation in the future to our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, we will adopt standards and policies to govern compensation.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of September 30, 2008 by:
| ● | each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock; |
| | |
| ● | each of our officers and directors; and |
| | |
| ● | all our officers and directors as a group. |
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(2) | | | | |
Marshall T. Reynolds | | | 4,661,864 | (3) | | | 30.20 | % |
Jack M. Reynolds | | | 506,924 | (4) | | | 4.17 | % |
Edsel R. Burns | | | 861,415 | (5) | | | 7.08 | % |
Larry A. Blount | | | — | | | | — | |
Neal W. Scaggs | | | 431,415 | (6) | | | 3.55 | % |
Joseph L. Williams | | | 184,424 | (7) | | | 1.52 | % |
Richard M. Adams | | | — | | | | — | |
Keith Molihan | | | — | | | | — | |
Douglas Reynolds | | | 1,284,815 | | | | 10.56 | % |
Eric Dosch | | | --- | | | | --- | % |
James Shafer | | | 9,800 | | | | .08 | % |
All directors and officers as a group (11 individuals | | | | | | | | |
| | | 7,930,857 | (8) | | | 50.44 | % |
(1) | The business address of each person is 100 Industrial Lane, Huntington, West Virginia 25702. |
(2) | In accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner for purposes of this table of any shares of common stock if he has sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to such security, or has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days from the date as of which beneficial ownership is being determined. As used herein, "voting power" is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and "investment power" is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Includes all shares held directly as well as by spouses and minor children, in trust and other indirect ownership, over which shares the named individuals effectively exercise sole or shared voting and investment power. |
(3) | Includes 3,342,303 shares underlying warrants . |
(4) | Includes 76,924 shares underlying warrants . |
(5) | Includes 76,924 shares underlying warrants . |
(6) | Includes 76,924 shares underlying warrants . |
(7) | Includes 76,924 shares underlying warrants . |
(8) | Includes shares underlying warrants . |
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Transactions with Certain Related Persons
The Company Leases it’s headquarter Offices from a corporation in which two directors, Douglas Reynolds and Jack Reynolds are significant shareholders. One of the Company’s subsidiaries, ST Pipeline, leases it’s offices from Director James Shafer. Management feels that the rentals are comparable to similar rates for similar space in independent transactions. From time to time, the Company may purchase office supplies or furniture from Chapman Printing, Co. which is owned in part by Marshall Reynolds.
We will reimburse our officers and directors for any reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by them in connection with certain activities on our behalf such as identifying and investigating possible target businesses and business combinations. There is no limit on the amount of accountable out-of-pocket expenses reimbursable by us, which will be reviewed only by our board or a court of competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement is challenged.
Board Independence
The Board of Directors consists of a majority of “independent directors” within the meaning of the American Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Adams, Dosch, Molihan, Scaggs and Williams are “independent directors” within the meaning of such standards.
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that the independent directors of the Board of Directors shall meet in executive sessions periodically, which meetings may be held in conjunction with regularly scheduled board meetings. Three executive sessions were held during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and three were held during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008..
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Castaing Hussey & Lolan, LLC
Audit Fees
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, we paid Castaing, Hussey & Lolan, LLC. (Castaing) $13,965 for the services they have performed in connection with the audit of our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the review of the quarterly financial statements contained in Form 10Q for the year ended September 30, 2007. During the year ended September 30, 2008, we paid Castaing $17,025 for services provided in conjunction with filing of the Company’s Forms 10-Q and the definitive proxy statement for the approval of the acquisition proposals.
Audit-Related Fees
During fiscal 2007 Castaing did not render any audit assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements. During Fiscal 2008 Castaing was paid $4,860 for acquisition related accounting services.
Tax Fees
During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, we paid Castaing $2,170 and $1,555, respectively for tax compliance services.
All Other Fees
During fiscal 2008 and 2007, there were no fees billed for products and services provided by Castaing other than those set forth above.
Arnett and Foster, P.L.L.C.
Audit Fees
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we paid no fees to Arnett & Foster relating to the Audits of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2008. We have paid $5,000 in fees since September 30, 2008 relating to the 2008 Audit.
Audit- Related Fees
During fiscal 2008, Arnett and Foster did not render any audit assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements
Tax Fees
During fiscal 2008 Arnett and Foster provided no tax services to the Company.
All Other Fees
During fiscal 2008 there were no other fees billed by Arnett and Foster for products and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm other than those set forth above.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman when expedition of services is necessary. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All of the fees paid in the audit-related, tax and all other categories were approved per the pre-approval policies.
Changes in Independent Registered Public Accountants
We have engaged Arnett & Foster, Certified Public Accountants, P.L.L.C. (“Arnett & Foster”) as our new independent registered public accounting firm, effective October 1, 2008. We continued our relationship with Castaing, Hussey & Lolan LLC, CPAs (“CHL”) as its independent registered public accounting firm through the preparation and filing on August 13, 2008 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter period ended June 30, 2008. On October 1, 2008, the Company notified CHL that it was dismissing CHL as principal accountants.
CHL’s reports on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. Arnett & Foster has been engaged to audit our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ending September 30, 2008. The engagement of Arnett & Foster was approved by our Audit Committee.
In connection with the audits of the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and the subsequent interim period, there were (1) no disagreements with CHL on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of CHL, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their opinion and (2) no reportable events.
Arnett & Foster was engaged by the Company on October 1, 2008 to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ending September 30, 2008. During the period beginning October 1, 2006 through the date of this Report, the Company did not consult with Arnett & Foster regarding any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The exhibits and financial statement schedules filed as a part of this Form 10-K are as follows:
| (a)(1) | Financial Statements | |
| | | |
| | Energy Services of America Corporation | |
| ● | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-1 |
| ● | Report of Castaing, Hussey & Lolan, LLC Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-2 |
| ● | Balance Sheets, September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 | F-3 |
| ● | Statements of Income, Period Ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 | F-4 |
| ● | Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Period Ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 | F-5 |
| ● | Statements of Cash flows, Period Ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 | F-6 |
| ● | Notes to Financial Statements. | F-7 |
| | | |
| | C.J. Construction Company, Inc. | |
| | | |
| ● | Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm | G-1 |
| ● | Balance Sheet, August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | G-2 |
| ● | Statement of Income, Period Ended August 15, 2008 and December 31 , 2007 | G-3 |
| ● | Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, Period Ended August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | G-4 |
| ● | Statement of Cash Flows, Period Ended August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | G-5 |
| ● | Notes to Financial Statements. | G-6 |
| | | |
| | S.T. Pipeline, Inc. | |
| | | |
| ● | Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm | H-1 |
| ● | Balance Sheets, August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | H-2 |
| ● | Statementsof Income and Retained Earnings , Period Ended August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | H-3 |
| ● | Statements of Cash Flows, Period Ended August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | H-4 |
| ● | Notes to Financial Statements. | H-5 |
| (a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules | |
| | | |
| | No financial statement schedules are filed because the required information is not applicable or is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes. | |
| | | |
| (a)(3) | Exhibits | |
Exhibit No. | Description |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.* |
3.2 | Bylaws.* |
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to the Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation.* |
4.1 | Specimen Unit Certificate.* |
4.2 | Specimen Common Stock Certificate.* |
4.3 | Specimen Warrant Certificate.* |
4.4 | Form of Unit Purchase Option.* |
4.5 | Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant.* |
10.1 | Letter Agreements among the Registrant, Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, and Officers and Directors.* |
10.2 | Form of Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant.* |
10.3 | Form of Stock Escrow Agreement between the Registrant, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders.* |
10.4 | Form of Letter Agreement between Chapman Printing Co. and the Registrant regarding administrative support.* |
10.5 | Advance Agreement between the Registrant and Marshall T. Reynolds, dated March 31, 2006.* |
10.6 | Form of Amended Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders.* |
10.7 | Warrant Placement Agreement between Marshall T. Reynolds, Edsel Burns, Douglas Reynolds, Jack Reynolds, Neal Scaggs, Joseph Williams and Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated.* |
14 | Code of Ethics* |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
______________________________
* | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Energy Services of America Corp. (file no. 333-133111), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 2006, as amended. |
| | |
| (b) | The exhibits listed under (a)(3) above are filed herewith. |
| | |
| (c) | Not applicable. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ENERGY SERVICES OF AMERICA CORPORATION |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: December 26, 2008 | By: | /s/ Marshall T. Reynolds | |
| | Marshall T. Reynolds | |
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | (Duly Authorized Representative) | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Marshall T. Reynolds | | Chairman of the Board, | | December 26, 2008 |
| Marshall T. Reynolds | | Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Jack M. Reynolds | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Jack M. Reynolds | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Edsel R. Burns | | President and Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Edsel R. Burns | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Larry A. Blount | | Secretary/Treasurer, Chief | | December 26, 2008 |
| Larry A. Blount | | Financial Officer | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Neal W. Scaggs | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Neal W. Scaggs | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Joseph L. Williams | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Joseph L. Williams | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Richard M. Adams, Jr. | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Keith Molihan | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Keith Molihan | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Douglas Reynolds | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Douglas Reynolds | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ Eric Dosch | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| Eric Dosch | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
By: | /s/ James Shafer | | Director | | December 26, 2008 |
| James Shafer | | | | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Energy Services of America CorporationHuntington, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Energy Services of America Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Energy Services of America Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We were not engaged to examine management's assessment of the effectiveness of Energy Services of America Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.
/s/ Arnett & Foster, P.L.L.C.
Charleston, West Virginia
December 29, 2008
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Energy Services of America Corporation
Huntington, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Energy Services of America Corporation (formerly Energy Services Acquisition Corp.) (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2007 and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Energy Services of America Corporation as of September 30, 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Castaing, Hussey & Lolan, LLC
December 19, 2007
Energy Services of America Corp. | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | |
| | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
Assets | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Current Assets | | | | | | |
Cash | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 13,811,661 | | | $ | 756,782 | |
Cash and cash equivalents in trust | | | - | | | | 49,711,430 | |
Cash held in trust from Underwriter | | | - | | | | 1,032,000 | |
Accounts Receivable-Trade | | | 38,578,810 | | | | - | |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | | (363,819 | ) | | | - | |
Retainages Receivable | | | 6,303,690 | | | | - | |
Other Receivables | | | 182,598 | | | | - | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings | | | | | | | | |
on uncompleted contracts | | | 5,272,669 | | | | - | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 1,121,101 | | | | 26,447 | |
Total Current Assets | | | 64,906,710 | | | | 51,526,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment, at Cost | | | 33,851,552 | | | | - | |
less Accumulated Depreciation | | | (548,089 | ) | | | - | |
| | | 33,303,463 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 35,489,643 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 133,699,816 | | | $ | 51,526,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 15,040,033 | | | $ | - | |
Lines of credit and short term Financing | | | 9,796,208 | | | | - | |
Accounts Payable | | | 11,336,680 | | | | - | |
Accrued Expenses and other Current Liabilities | | | 9,364,341 | | | | 167,564 | |
Loans from Stockholders | | | | | | | 150,000 | |
Due to Underwriter | | | | | | | 1,032,000 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on | | | | | | | | |
uncompleted contracts | | | 509,227 | | | | - | |
Federal Income Tax Payable | | | 1,238,414 | | | | - | |
State Income Tax Payable | | | 223,047 | | | | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 47,507,950 | | | | 1,349,564 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current maturities | | | 18,272,186 | | | | - | |
Long-term debt, payable to shareholder | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | |
Deferred Income Taxes Payable | | | 1,662,463 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 73,442,599 | | | | 1,349,564 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Common Stock subject to possible redemption | | | | | | | | |
1,719,140 shares at redemption value | | | - | | | | 10,143,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value | | | - | | | | - | |
Authorized 1,000,000 sharers, none issued | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock, $.0001 par value | | | | | | | | |
Authorized 50,000,000 shares | | | | | | | | |
Issued and outstanding 10,750,000 shares, inclusive of | | | | | | | | |
1,719,140 shares subject to possible redemption for 2007 | | | | | | | | |
and 12,092,307 issued and outstanding for 2008 | | | 1,209 | | | | 903 | |
Additional Paid in Capital | | | 55,976,368 | | | | 38,564,710 | |
Retained Earnings | | | 4,279,640 | | | | 1,468,482 | |
Total Stockholders' Equity | | | 60,257,217 | | | | 40,034,095 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 133,699,816 | | | $ | 51,526,659 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Energy Services of America Corp. | |
Consolidated Income Statements | |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Revenue | | $ | 28,517,688 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenues | | | 23,830,404 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | 4,687,284 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 1,350,246 | | | | 385,773 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 3,337,038 | | | | (385,773 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 1,585,074 | | | | 2,612,835 | |
Other nonoperating income (expense) | | | 111,352 | | | | - | |
Interest expense | | | (220,274 | ) | | | - | |
Gain (Loss) on sale of equipment | | | (51 | ) | | | - | |
| | | 1,476,101 | | | | 2,612,835 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 4,813,139 | | | | 2,227,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | 2,001,981 | | | | 846,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 1,381,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share basic | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share diluted | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.11 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Energy Services of America Corp. | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity | |
For the years Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | |
| | Common Stock | | | Additional Paid | | | Retained | | | Stockholders' | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | in Capital | | | Earnings | | | Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2006 | | | 9,030,860 | | | $ | 903 | | | $ | 38,734,491 | | | $ | 87,420 | | | $ | 38,822,814 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additional offering costs | | | - | | | | - | | | | (14,981 | ) | | | - | | | | (14,981 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accretion relating to common stock subject to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
possible redemption | | | - | | | | - | | | | (154,800 | ) | | | - | | | | (154,800 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,381,062 | | | | 1,381,062 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2007 | | | 9,030,860 | | | | 903 | | | | 38,564,710 | | | | 1,468,482 | | | | 40,034,095 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of Common Stock in CJ Hughes acquisition | | | 2,964,763 | | | | 296 | | | | 16,999,655 | | | | - | | | | 16,999,951 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accretion related to common stock subject to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
possible redemption | | | - | | | | - | | | | (138,642 | ) | | | - | | | | (138,642 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
96,684 shares reclassed from "Subject to Redemption" | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,622,456 of a possible 1,719,140 redeemed | | | 96,684 | | | | 10 | | | | 550,645 | | | | | | | | 550,655 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,811,158 | | | | 2,811,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2008 | | | 12,092,307 | | | $ | 1,209 | | | $ | 55,976,368 | | | $ | 4,279,640 | | | $ | 60,257,217 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Energy Services of America Corp. | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | | September 30, 2007 | |
Operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 1,381,062 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | | | | | | | | |
used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | 548,089 | | | | - | |
(Gain)Loss on sale/disposal of equipment | | | 51 | | | | - | |
Provision for deferred taxes | | | 25,520 | | | | | |
Accrued Income and Accretion on Investments in Trust | | | | | | | (562,257 | ) |
Decrease in contracts receivable | | | 252,748 | | | | - | |
Increase in retainage receivable | | | (3,099,778 | ) | | | - | |
Increase in Other Receivables | | | (79,105 | ) | | | - | |
Increase in cost and estimated earnings | | | (1,029,139 | ) | | | - | |
Increase in prepaid expenses | | | (516,397 | ) | | | (26,447 | ) |
Increase in accounts payable | | | 1,716,035 | | | | - | |
Increase in accrued expenses | | | 489,363 | | | | 80,039 | |
Decrease in billings in excess of cost | | | (613,161 | ) | | | - | |
Increase in Income Taxes Payable | | | 1,338,836 | | | | - | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | 1,844,220 | | | | 872,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of Investments held in Trust Fund | | | (21,000,000 | ) | | | (41,071,000 | ) |
Proceeds from maturites of Investments held in Trust | | | 71,743,430 | | | | 41,071,000 | |
Investment in property & equipment | | | (182,440 | ) | | | - | |
Cash paid in excess of cash received in acquisition | | | (28,901,591 | ) | | | - | |
Net cash used by investing activities | | | 21,659,399 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Payment of deferred fee to underwriter | | | (1,032,000 | ) | | | - | |
Payment of Loan from Stockholder | | | (150,000 | ) | | | - | |
Payment of Offering Costs | | | - | | | | (192,996 | ) |
Net borrowings (proceeds) on LOC and Short term Debt | | | 1,343,512 | | | | - | |
Principal payments on Debt | | | (879,265 | ) | | | - | |
Cash paid for redemption of shares | | | (9,730,987 | ) | | | - | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | (10,448,740 | ) | | | (192,996 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 13,054,879 | | | | 679,401 | |
Cash beginning of year | | | 756,782 | | | | 77,381 | |
Cash End of Year | | $ | 13,811,661 | | | $ | 756,782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 220,274 | | | $ | - | |
Income Taxes Paid | | $ | 671,500 | | | $ | 764,375 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activity: | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property & equipment under financing agreements | | $ | 438,938 | | | $ | - | |
Common Stock issue for Acquisitions | | $ | 16,999,951 | | | $ | - | |
Note Payable issue for Acquisitions | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | $ | - | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
ENERGY SERVICES OF AMERICA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION:
Energy Services of America Corporation, formerly known as Energy Services Acquisition Corp., (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on March 31, 2006 as a blank check company whose objective was to acquire an operating business or businesses. On September 6, 2006 the Company sold 8,600,000 units in the public offering at a price of $6.00 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and two common stock purchase warrants for the purchase of a share of common stock at $5.00. The warrants could not be exercised until the later of the completion of the business acquisition or one year from issue date. The Company operated as a blank check company until August 15, 2008. On that date the Company acquired S.T. Pipeline, Inc. and C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. with proceeds from the Company’s Initial Public Offering. S. T. Pipeline and C. J Hughes will be operated as wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company.
S.T. Pipeline, Inc. (S.T) was incorporated in May 1990 under the laws of the State of West Virginia. S.T. engages in the construction of natural gas pipelines for utility companies in various states, mostly in the mid-Atlantic area of the country. S.T.’s contracts are primarily fixed price contract with some cost-plus service work performed as requested. All of the Company’s production personnel are union members of the various related construction trade unions and are subject to collective bargaining agreements that expire at varying time intervals.
C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. (C.J. Hughes) is a general contractor primarily engaged in pipeline construction for utility companies. C.J. Hughes operates primarily in the mid-Atlantic region of the country. Nitro Electric Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of C. J. Hughes, is involved in electrical contracting providing its services to the power and refining industry. Nitro Electric operates primarily in the mid-Atlantic region of the country. Contractors Rental Corporation, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of C.J. Hughes is involved in main line pipeline installation and repairs in the mid-Atlantic region of the country as well. All of the C.J. Hughes, Nitro Electric, and Contractors Rental production personnel are union members of various related construction trade unions and are subject to collective bargaining agreements that expire at varying time intervals.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Energy Services include the accounts of Energy Services and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to Energy Services include Energy Services and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years’ financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and loss during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Energy Services considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, contracts receivable, retainage receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. At September 30, 2007 the financial assets of the Company consisted of the investments held in Trust. The carrying value of such amounts reported at the applicable balance sheet dates approximates fair value.
Investments Held in Trust
The Company had no restricted investments at September 30, 2008. The Company’s restricted investments held in the Trust Fund at September 30, 2007 were comprised of an institutional money fund and a United States Treasury Bill with a maturity of November 01, 2007 in the amounts of $40,242,191 and $10,501,239, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts when collection of an account or note receivable is considered doubtful, and receivables are written off against the allowance when deemed uncollectible. Inherent in the assessment of the allowance for doubtful accounts are certain judgments and estimates including, among others, the customer’s access to capital, the customer’s willingness or ability to pay, general economic conditions and the ongoing relationship with the customer. Retainage billed but not paid pursuant to contract provisions will be due upon completion of the contracts. Based on the Company’s’ past experience management considers all amounts classified as retainage receivable to be collectible. All retainage receivable amounts are expected to be collected within the next fiscal year.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs which extend the useful lives or increase the productivity of the assets are capitalized, while normal repairs and maintenance that does not extend the useful life or increase productivity of the asset are expensed as incurred. Plant and equipment are depreciated principally on the straight- line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets:
buildings 39 years; operating equipment and vehicles 5-7 years; and office equipment, furniture and fixtures 5-7 years.
Goodwill and other intangibles
Goodwill will be assessed annually for impairment. In the event that the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with goodwill are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss would be recognized. For the year ended September 30, 2008, no impairment loss has been recognized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
A long-lived asset shall be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset would be compared to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market value is required.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from fixed price contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for each contract. These contracts provide for a fixed amount of revenues for the entire project. Such contracts provide that the customer accept completion of progress to date and compensate us the services rendered, measured in terms of units installed, hours expended or some other measure of progress. Contract costs include all direct material, labor and subcontract costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, tools and expendables. The cost estimates are based on the professional knowledge and experience of the Company’s engineers, project managers and financial professionals. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and others all affect the total estimated costs at completion. The effects of these changes are recognized in the period in which they occur. Provisions for the total estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. The current asset “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed for fixed price contracts. The current liability “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized for fixed price contracts.
Revenue on all costs plus and time and material contracts are recognized as billed.
Advertising
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expense was $2,200 and $-0- for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company and all subsidiaries file a consolidated income tax return on a fiscal year basis. The Company began filing tax returns for the year ended September 30, 2006 and therefore all prior Company tax retuns are still subject to audit. Both C J Hughes and S T Pipeline filed as S Corporations prior to their acquisition by the Company, therefore any audits of those companies tax returns would result in an adjustment to the pass-through income to the shareholders at the time, and would not create any liability to the Company.
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the underlying assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. FIN No. 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure, present and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or to be taken on a tax return.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year, and diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year adjusted for all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, except in cases where the effect of the common stock equivalent would be antidilutive. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate to the warrants issued to the initial shareholders and as part of the units in the Company’s initial public offering.
Collective Bargaining Agreements
Certain Energy Services subsidiaries are party to collective bargaining agreements with unions representing certain of their employees. The agreements require such subsidiaries to pay specified wages and provide certain benefits to the union employees. These agreements expire at various times and have typically been renegotiated and renewed on terms that are similar to the ones contained in the expiring agreements.
Under certain collective bargaining agreements, the applicable Energy Services subsidiary is required to make contributions to multi-employer pension plans. If the subsidiary were to cease participation in one or more of these plans, a liability could potentially be assessed related to any underfunding of these plans. The amount of such assessment, were one to be made, cannot be reasonably estimated.
Litigation Costs
The Company reserves when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Litigation costs are expensed as incurred.
Segments
The Company has determined that its operations are conducted in only one business segment, which is the providing of contracting services to energy related companies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal periods, as it relates to financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 also requires certain tabular disclosures related to results of applying SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. On November 14, 2007, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities. Based on the assets and liabilities on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Based on the assets and liabilities on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141 (R ) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. Assets and liabilities that arose from business combinations which occurred prior to the adoption of FASB No. 141 ( R) should not be adjusted upon the adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R). SFAS No. 141 ( R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination; establishes the acquisition date as the measurement date to determine the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to
evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination.
As it relates to recognizing all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, costs an acquirer expects but is not obligated to incur in the future to exit an activity of an acquiree or to terminate or relocate an acquiree’s employees are not liabilities at the acquisition date but must be expensed in accordance with other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, during the measurement period, which should not exceed one year from the acquisition date, any adjustments that are needed to assets acquired and liabilities assumed to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of that date will be adjusted retrospectively. The acquirer will be required to expense all acquisition- related costs in the periods such costs are incurred other than costs to issue debt or equity securities. SFAS No. 141 ( R) will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at the date of adoption, but it could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows in the future when it is applied to acquisitions which occur in the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2009.
In April 2008, the FASB issued staff position FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. FSP142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS NO. 142. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure its fair value and to enhance existing disclosure requirements relating to intangible assets. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and should be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, we will adopt FSP 142-3 on October 1, 2009. We do not expect FSP 142-3 to have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at the date of adoption, but it could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows in future periods.
3. ACQUISITIONS
S.T. PIPELINE Inc.
On January 22, 2008 S.T. Pipeline entered into a merger agreement with the Company. The agreement called for the stockholders of S.T. Pipeline to receive total consideration of $19 million, reduced by the book value of certain assets to be distributed to the stockholders of the Company. All except $3 million was paid to the stockholders at closing. The remaining $3 million consists of deferred payments to the stockholders over three years with an interest at a simple rate of 7.5% per annum.
The transactions closing was conditioned upon the receipt of Energy Services shareholders approval and holders of less than 20% of the shares of Energy Services common stock voting against the transaction and electing to convert their Energy Services common stock into cash from the trust fund established in connection with Energy Services initial public offering, among other conditions. At the August 15, 2008 shareholders meeting the shareholders of Energy Services approved the purchase and the agreement was closed
The purchase price paid by Energy Services for S.T. Pipeline consisted of cash of $16,216,000 and a note payable of $3,000,000.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase with the purchase price, including acquisition costs of $322,738, allocated as follows:
Current Assets | | $ | 23,713,942 | |
Non-Current Assets | | | 103,493 | |
Property and Equipment | | | 11,580,000 | |
Goodwill | | | 4,177,363 | |
Total Assets acquired | | | 39,574,798 | |
Current Liabilities | | | 17,554,830 | |
Long-Term liabilities | | | 2,481,230 | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 20,036,060 | |
Total Purchase Price | | $ | 19,538,738 | |
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired net assets. Energy Services anticipates to continue to realize meaningful operational and cost synergies, such as enhancing the combined service offerings, expanding the geographic reach and resource base of the combined company, improving the utilization of personnel and fixed assets. Energy Services believes these opportunities contribute to the recognition of the substantial goodwill.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
On February 13, 2008 the Company entered into a letter of intent to acquire C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. C.J. Hughes is underground utility service company located in Huntington, West Virginia. On February 21, 2008 the company entered into a merger agreement with C.J. Hughes Construction. The agreement called for a total purchase price of approximately $34.0 million which would be paid as follows: each share of C.J. Hughes Class A voting stock and Class B non-voting stock would be converted into the right to receive $36,896 in cash and 6,434.70 shares of Energy Services common stock. The stock and cash portions of the transaction each total approximately $17.0 million.
At the August 15, 2008 shareholders meeting the shareholders of Energy Services approved the merger and the agreement was closed on that date.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase with the purchase price, including acquisition costs of $322,577, allocated as follows:
Current Assets | | $ | 27,738,924 | |
Property and Equipment | | | 21,566,588 | |
Goodwill | | | 31,312,280 | |
Total Assets acquired | | | 80,617,792 | |
Current Liabilities | | | 26,311.989 | |
Long-Term liabilities | | | 18,346,628 | |
Deferred Tax Liability | | | 1,636,943 | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 46,295,560 | |
Total Purchase Price | | $ | 34,322,232 | |
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired net assets. Energy Services anticipates to continue to realize meaningful operational and cost synergies, such as enhancing the combined service offerings, expanding the geographic reach and resource base of the combined company, improving the utilization of personnel and fixed assets. Energy Services believes these opportunities contribute to the recognition of the substantial goodwill.
The results of operations of the acquired companies subsequent to the acquisition dates are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. The following unaudited pro forma information for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of each year.
| | Years Ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Contract Revenues | | $ | 208,240,000 | | | $ | 133,091,000 | |
Net Income | | $ | 15,002,000 | | | $ | 7,120,000 | |
Earnings per share basic | | $ | 1.24 | | | $ | .59 | |
Earnings per share diluted | | $ | 1.03 | | | $ | .51 | |
4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill is as follows:
| | Years Ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Impairment | | | - | | | | - | |
Acquisition of ST Pipeline | | | 4,177,363 | | | | - | |
Acquisition of CJ Hughes Construction | | | 31,312,280 | | | | - | |
Balance at end of year | | $ | 35,489,643 | | | $ | - | |
5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:
Activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts consists of the
following:
| | Year Ended September 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Charged to expense | | | - | | | | - | |
Deductions for uncollectible receivables written off, net of recoveries | | | (286 | ) | | | - | |
Current year additions from acquisitions | | | 364,105 | | | | - | |
Balance at end of year | | $ | 363,819 | | | $ | - | |
6. UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
Costs, estimated earnings, and billings on uncompleted contracts as of September 15, 2008 and 2007 are summarized as follows:
| | Year Ended September 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Costs incurred on contracts in progress | | $ | 57,723,456 | | | $ | - | |
Estimated earnings, net of estimated losses | | | 6,562,540 | | | | - | |
| | | 64,285,996 | | | | - | |
Less Billings to date | | | 59,522,554 | | | | - | |
| | $ | 4,763,442 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | | $ | 5,272,669 | | | $ | - | |
Less Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted | | | 509,227 | | | | - | |
Contracts | | $ | 4,763,442 | | | $ | - | |
7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
| | Year Ended September 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Property and Equipment consists of the following: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 702,000 | | | $ | - | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | | 253,944 | | | | - | |
Operating equipment and vehicles | | | 32,859,797 | | | | - | |
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures | | | 35,811 | | | | - | |
| | | 33,851,552 | | | | - | |
Less Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | | | 548,089 | | | | - | |
Property and equipment net | | $ | 33,303,463 | | | $ | - | |
8. SHORT-TERM DEBT
Short-term debt consists of the following:
Lines of credit of $10.8 million have been established with local banks. Interest rates range from prime plus ½% to prime plus l% percent. $3.5 Million of the Line of Credit is guaranteed by a major shareholder of Energy Services of America. The Company has $1.1 million available on the line at September 30, 2008.
9. LONG-TERM DEBT
A summary of long-term debt as of September 30, 2008
| | | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Note payable to a Bank, payable in monthly installments of | | | | | | | |
$9,217, including interest at 8%, maturity date of June 10, 2010, | | | | | | | |
secured by equipment acquired with the proceeds of this note. | | $ | 179,769 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Note payable to a finance company, payable in monthly | | | | | | | |
installments of $2,180, including interest at 8.375%, | | | | | | | |
maturity date of September 14, 2009, secured by equipment | | | | | | | |
acquired with this note. | | | 25,052 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to various finance companies, payable in monthly | | | | | | | |
installments totaling $9,672, including interest at rates ranging | | | | | | | |
between 0% and 8%, with varying maturity dates from March, | | | | | | | |
2008, through December, 2008, secured by vehicles and | | | | | | | |
equipment acquired with the notes. | | | 1,343,586 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks and credit unions, payable in monthly | | | | | | | |
installments totaling $11,925, including interest at rates ranging | | | | | | | |
between 4.5% and 8.0%, maturity dates varying between June, 2008, | | | | | | | |
through March, 2009, secured by vehicles acquired with the notes. | | | 2,171,384 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to former shareholders and current officer of acquired | | | | | | | |
company, payable at 0% interest as accounts receivables | | | | | | | |
outstanding at the date of purchase are collected | | | 10,934,813 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Note payable to bank, due in monthly installments of $5,000, | | | | | | | |
including interest at 6.75%, final payment due September 2012, | | | | | | | |
secured by real estate, vehicles, and equipment | | | 398,016 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to finance companies, due in monthly installments | | | | | | | |
totaling $132,444, including interest ranging from 1.0% to 7.92%, | | | | | | | |
through December 2012, secured by equipment | | | 10,799,191 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks, due in monthly installments totaling | | | | | | | |
$108,497, including interest at prime plus 0.5% to 8.75%, final | | | | | | | |
payments due April 2010 through July 2011, secured by | | | | | | | |
equipment, receivables, and intangibles | | | 4,432,008 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Notes payable to individuals, due in annual installments of | | | | | | | |
$1 million with interest at 7.5% | | | 3,028,400 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Note payable to shareholder, interest rate at prime, note | | | | | | | |
matures in August of 2010 | | | 6,000,000 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 39,312,219 | | | - | |
Less Current Maturities | | | 15,040,033 | | | - | |
Total Long term Debt | | $ | 24,272,186 | | $ | - | |
Maturities of long‐term debt for the next five years are as follows:
| 2009 | | $ | 15,040,033 | |
| 2010 | | | 17,239,357 | |
| 2011 | | | 3,985,979 | |
| 2012 | | | 1,661,923 | |
| 2013 | | | 648,991 | |
Thereafter | | | | 735,936 | |
| | | $ | 39,312,219 | |
10. INCOME TAXES
The components of income taxes are as follows:
| | | Years Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
Federal | Current | | $ | 1,654,414 | | | $ | 695,000 | |
| Deferred | | | 25,520 | | | | 0 | |
| Total | | | 1,679,934 | | | | 695,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
State | Current | | | 322,047 | | | | 151,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense | | $ | 2,001,981 | | | $ | 846,000 | |
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 34 percent on income from operations as indicated in the following analysis:
| | Year Ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Statutory rate | | | 34.0 | % | | | 34.0 | % |
Effect of state income taxes | | | 7.6 | | | | 4.0 | |
Effective tax rate | | | 41.6 | % | | | 38.0 | % |
Deferred income taxes are provided for significant difference between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax reporting. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The income tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to the deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
| | September 30, | |
| | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Deferred Tax Liabilities | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment | | $ | 1,662,463 | | | $ | -0- | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax liability | | $ | 1,662,463 | | | $ | -0- | |
On October 1, 2007 The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company does not believe that it has any unrecognized tax benefits included in its consolidated financial statements. The Company has not had any settlements in the current period with taxing authorities, nor has it recognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits, if applicable, in general and administrative expenses. During the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 the Company did not did not recognize any interest or penalties in its consolidated financial statements, nor has it recorded an accrued liability for interest or penalty payments.
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended 2007, and 2008 is illustrated below:
| | Year Ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Net Income from continuing operations available | | | | | | |
to common shareholders | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 1,381,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding basic | | | 10,917,788 | | | | 10,750,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive warrants | | | 2,451,172 | | | | 1,938,930 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted | | | 13,368,960 | | | | 12,688,930 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Income per share- basic | | $ | .26 | | | $ | .13 | |
Net Income per share- diluted | | $ | .21 | | | $ | .11 | |
12. WARRANTS AND UNIT PURCHASE OPTION
On September 6, 2006, the Company sold 8,600,000 units ("Units") in the Public Offering at a price of $6.00 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company's common stock, $.0001 par value, and two Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants ("Warrants"). Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share commencing on the later of the consummation by the Company of a Business Acquisition, or one year after the Effective Date and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the date of the Public Offering. The Company may redeem the Warrants for a redemption price of $0.01 per Warrant at any time if notice of not less than 30 days is given and the last sale price of the Common Stock has been at least $8.50 on 20 of the 30 trading days ending on the third day prior to the day on which notice is given. A total of 17,200,000 warrants were issued in the IPO and all are still outstanding and unexercised.
Preceding the public offering the initial shareholders of the Company purchased an aggregate of 3,076,923 warrants at $.65 per warrant from the Company in a private placement offering. The warrants sold in the Private Placement were identical to the warrants sold in the public offering, except that the private placement warrants are not registered at this time. The 3,076,923 warrants are all still outstanding and unexercised.
The Company issued to the underwriter at the time of closing of the Offering a unit purchase option, for $100, to purchase up to 450,000 units at an exercise price of $7.50. The unit purchase option shall be exercisable any time, in whole or in part, between the first anniversary date and the fifth anniversary date of the Public Offering.
For the public warrants and the unit purchase option, the Company is only required to use its best efforts to cause a registration statement covering the resale of the public warrants, units and the securities comprising the units and, once effective, only to use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement. There are no contractual penalties for failure to effect the registration of the public warrants, units and the securities comprising the units. Additionally, in no event, is the Company obligated to settle the public warrants, the option, the units or the warrants included in the units, in whole or in part, for cash in the event it is unable to effect the registration of the public warrants, units and the securities comprising the units. The holder or holders of the public warrants or options do not have the rights or privileges of holders of common stock, including any voting rights, until such holder or holders exercise the options and receive shares of the Company's common stock.
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Companies have advances from a stockholder of $6,000,000. The unsecured advance bears interest at prime, resulting in interest of $38,763 for the period of August 16, 2008 through September 30, 2008. Certain Energy Services subsidiaries routinely engage in transactions in the normal course of business with each other, including sharing employee benefit plan coverage, payment for insurance and other expenses on behalf of other affiliates, and other services incidental to business of each of the affiliates.
All revenue and related expense transactions, as well as the related accounts payable and accounts receivable, have been eliminated. Revenue and costs of $5,490,688 and -0- were eliminated for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 respectfully.
14. LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company leases various equipment and office space under operating lease agreements with terms up through 60 months with renewal options of up to an additional 60 months. The Company also leases vehicles from certain stockholders and spouses under cancelable operating leases.
The future minimum lease payments under operating leases as of September 30, 2008, are as follows:
2009 | | | 287,190 | |
2010 | | | 305,039 | |
2011 | | | 261,381 | |
2012 | | | 160,747 | |
2013 | | | 25,316 | |
15. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
Revenues for the period of August 16, 2008 through September 30, 2008 were $28,517,688. Two major customers made up 41% and 28% respectively of the total. Receivables from major customers at September 30, 2008 was $25,922,000, which represented 67% of the total receivables at September 30, 2008. Virtually all work performed for major customers was awarded under competitive bid fixed price or unit price arrangements. During the period of August 16, 2008 to September 30, 2008 the Company’s major customers operated within the natural gas transmission and distribution industry within the Company’s market area. The loss of a major customer could have a severe impact on the profitability of operations of the Company. However, due to the nature of the Company’s operations, the major customers and sources of revenues may change from year to year.
16. RETIREMENT AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
C.J. Hughes has a 401-K retirement plan for union employees under which the employees can contribute up to 15% of eligible wages and C.J. Hughes will match $.25 for each dollar contributed up to 6% of eligible wages. Since the acquisition of C.J. Hughes on August 15, 2008 through the year ended September 30, 2008, C.J. Hughes contributed $1,800 to the plan.
Additionally, C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric have a 401-K retirement plan for all administrative employees under which the employees can contribute up to 15% of eligible wages and C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric will match $.25 for each dollar contributed up to 6% of eligible wages. Since the acquisition of C.J. Hughes and its subsidiary Nitro Electric on 8-15-08 through the year ended September 30, 2008 contributions to this plan have been $6,500.
17. CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Companies to credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and contract receivables. The Companies place their cash with high quality financial institutions. At times, the balances in such institutions may exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. As of September 30, 2008, the Companies uninsured bank balances totaled approximately $5.955 Million. The Companies perform periodic credit evaluations of its customer’s financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Credit losses consistently have been within managements expectations.
18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
During the normal course of operations, the companies are subject to certain subcontractor claims, mechanic’s liens, and other litigation. Management is of the opinion that no material obligations will arise from any pending legal proceedings. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the financial statements for such litigation.
19. CONDENSED PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Energy Services of America Corporation (Parent Only) | | | | | | |
Balance Sheets | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 7,125,033 | | | $ | 756,782 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents in trust | | | - | | | | 49,711,430 | |
Cash held in trust from Underwriter | | | - | | | | 1,032,000 | |
Prepaid Expenses | | | 210,907 | | | | 26,447 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property Plant and Equipment , at cost | | | | | | | | |
less accumulated depreciation | | | 19,944 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investments in Subsidiaries | | | 55,954,071 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 63,309,955 | | | $ | 51,526,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 1,028,400 | | | $ | 0 | |
Accrued Expenses | | | 24,338 | | | | 167,564 | |
Loans from Stockholders | | | | | | | 150,000 | |
Due to Underwriter | | | | | | | 1,032,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current maturities | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 3,052,738 | | | | 1,349,564 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Common Stock subject to Possible redemption | | | | | | | | |
1,719,140 shares at redemption value | | | - | | | | 10,143,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | 60,257,217 | | | | 40,034,095 | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 63,309,955 | | | $ | 51,526,659 | |
Energy Services of America Corporation (Parent Only) | | | | | | |
Income Statements | | | | | | |
Statements of Income | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | September 30 | | | September 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
General & Administrative Expenses | | $ | 341,140 | | | $ | 48,552 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss from operations before taxes | | | (341,140 | ) | | | (385,773 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from trust fund investments | | | 1,574,211 | | | | 2,612,835 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes and increase in equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | | | 1,233,071 | | | | 2,227,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | | 515,000 | | | | 846,000 | |
Income before increase in equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | | | 718,071 | | | | 1,381,602 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase in equity in undistributed | | | 2,093,087 | | | | -0- | |
Earnings of subsidiaries | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 1,381,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share- basic | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share- diluted | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.11 | |
Energy Services of America Corporation | | | | | | |
Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | For the year | | | For the year | |
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,811,158 | | | $ | 1,381,062 | |
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | | | | | | | | |
operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Increase in equity in income of subsidiaries | | | (2,093,087 | ) | | | - | |
Changes in: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued Income and accretion on investments held in trust fund | | | - | | | | (562,257 | ) |
Accrued Expenses and Prepaids | | | (327,686 | ) | | | 53,592 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Cash provided by operating activities | | | 390,385 | | | | 872,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Investment in property & equipment | | | (19,944 | ) | | | - | |
Cash paid in acquisitions | | | (33,832,633 | ) | | | - | |
Purchase of investments held in Trust Fund | | | (21,000,000 | ) | | | (41,071,000 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities of Investments held in trust fund | | | 71,743,430 | | | | 41,071,000 | |
Net Cash provided by Investing Activities | | | 16,890,853 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Payment of deferred fee to underwriter | | | (1,032,000 | ) | | | - | |
Payment of Loan from Stockholder | | | (150,000 | ) | | | - | |
Payment of Offering Costs | | | | | | | (192,996 | ) |
Cost paid for redemption of shares | | | (9,730,987 | ) | | | - | |
Net Cash (used) provided by Financing Activities | | | (10,912,987 | ) | | | (192,996 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 6,368,251 | | | | 679,401 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of Period | | | 756,782 | | | | 77,381 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of Period | | $ | 7,125,033 | | | $ | 756,782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activity: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued and unpaid offering costs | | | - | | | | - | |
Income Taxes paid | | $ | 861,000 | | | $ | 764,375 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Common Stock issued for acquisitions | | $ | 16,599,951 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note Payable issued for acquisitions | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
The Board of Directors
C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc.
Huntington, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. and affiliates (the Companies) as of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companies’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companies internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Companies as of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008, and the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Charleston, West Virginia
December 19, 2008
C. J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. | |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
AUGUST 15, 2008 AND DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,525,250 | | | $ | 2,319,045 | |
Contracts receivable, less allowance for doubtful | | | | | | | | |
accounts of $364,105 for 2008 and $37,500 for 2007 | | | 16,572,056 | | | | 7,864,873 | |
Retainage receivable | | | 3,203,912 | | | | 1,379,482 | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on | | | | | | | | |
uncompleted contracts | | | 4,243,530 | | | | 3,751,245 | |
Inventories | | | 1,275,661 | | | | 1,483,736 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 194,176 | | | | 246,812 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 29,014,585 | | | | 17,045,193 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Land | | | 328,274 | | | | 328,274 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 21,175,386 | | | | 12,002,368 | |
Automotive equipment | | | 8,026,941 | | | | 6,345,130 | |
Buildings | | | 631,550 | | | | 631,550 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 249,614 | | | | 289,505 | |
Property and equipment | | | 30,411,764 | | | | 19,596,827 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (12,937,534 | ) | | | (11,362,336 | ) |
| | | 17,474,230 | | | | 8,234,491 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment in subsidiary | | | - | | | | - | |
Goodwill | | | 1,968,815 | | | | 1,968,815 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 48,457,630 | | | $ | 27,248,499 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and stockholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 2,217,331 | | | $ | 1,844,192 | |
Line of credit | | | 5,750,000 | | | | - | |
Short-term notes payable | | | 800,000 | | | | - | |
Current portion of capital lease obligations | | | 1,479,063 | | | | 110,220 | |
Accounts payable | | | 8,892,605 | | | | 3,778,952 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings | | | 475,723 | | | | 386,616 | |
Distributions payable to shareholders | | | 492,867 | | | | | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 6,204,398 | | | | 2,725,275 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 26,311,987 | | | | 8,845,255 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, net of current portion | | | | | | | | |
Debt to banks and finance companies | | | 6,519,647 | | | | 6,995,343 | |
Capital lease obligations | | | 5,826,981 | | | | 13,461 | |
Advance from shareholder | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 44,658,615 | | | | 21,854,059 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minority interest | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | | | | | | |
Class A, voting, $10 par value; authorized 1,000 shares; | | | | | | | | |
issued and outstanding 10 shares | | | 100 | | | | 100 | |
Class B, non-voting, $10 par value; authorized 4,000 shares; | | | | | | | | |
issued and outstanding 490 shares | | | 4,900 | | | | 4,900 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 4,724,705 | | | | 4,727,551 | |
Retained earnings (deficit) | | | (584,589 | ) | | | 1,007,990 | |
Less treasury stock, 39 shares, at cost | | | (346,101 | ) | | | (346,101 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 3,799,015 | | | | 5,394,440 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 48,457,630 | | | $ | 27,248,499 | |
C. J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) | |
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | Percent of | | | | | | Percent of | |
| | Amount | | | Revenues | | | Amount | | | Revenues | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 79,217,380 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 75,305,234 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of revenues | | | 74,794,447 | | | | 94.4 | % | | | 68,096,279 | | | | 90.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 4,422,933 | | | | 5.6 | % | | | 7,208,955 | | | | 9.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expenses | | | 3,473,283 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 3,218,114 | | | | 4.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 949,650 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 3,990,841 | | | | 5.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (707,622 | ) | | | -0.9 | % | | | (1,063,198 | ) | | | -1.4 | % |
Finance and other | | | 164,709 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 48,812 | | | | 0.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (542,913 | ) | | | -0.7 | % | | | (1,014,386 | ) | | | -1.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax expense | | | 406,737 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 2,976,455 | | | | 4.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | - | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 275,050 | | | | 0.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before variable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
interest entity | | | 406,737 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 2,701,405 | | | | 3.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Income) loss attributable to variable | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | |
interest entity | | | - | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 69,323 | | | | 0.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net income (loss) | | | 406,737 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 2,770,728 | | | | 3.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings (deficit), beginning of period | | | 1,007,990 | | | | | | | | (1,762,738 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions | | | (1,999,316 | ) | | | | | | | - | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings (deficit), end of period | | $ | (584,589 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1,007,990 | | | | | |
C. J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 406,737 | | | $ | 2,770,728 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) | | | | | | | | |
provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | - | | | | (69,323 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 1,585,838 | | | | 1,295,630 | |
Provision for bad debts | | | 313,053 | | | | 19,622 | |
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment | | | 1,102 | | | | (7,871 | ) |
Deferred tax benefit | | | - | | | | - | |
(Increase) decrease in operating assets, net of effects of | | | | | | | | |
acquired company | | | | | | | | |
Contracts receivable | | | (9,020,236 | ) | | | (3,177,232 | ) |
Retainage receivable | | | (1,824,430 | ) | | | (689,020 | ) |
Cost in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | | | (492,285 | ) | | | (2,081,972 | ) |
Inventories | | | 208,075 | | | | (32,051 | ) |
Prepaid and other | | | 52,636 | | | | 89,675 | |
Increase in operating liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 5,113,653 | | | | 1,036,656 | |
Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings | | | 89,107 | | | | 386,616 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 3,479,123 | | | | 835,637 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | | (87,627 | ) | | | 377,095 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Net assets acquired from asset acquisition | | | - | | | | (2,722,484 | ) |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | (2,387,739 | ) | | | (1,047,651 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | 33,963 | | | | 30,877 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (2,353,776 | ) | | | (3,739,258 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Cash distributed to stockholders | | | (1,506,449 | ) | | | - | |
Net borrowings (proceeds) on line of credit | | | 5,750,000 | | | | (525,000 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of short-term notes payable | | | 800,000 | | | | - | |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | | - | | | | 506,650 | |
Principal payments on long-term debt | | | (1,306,485 | ) | | | (1,064,246 | ) |
Payments on capital lease obligations | | | (86,613 | ) | | | (130,065 | ) |
Proceeds from shareholder advances | | | - | | | | 6,000,000 | |
Purchases of treasury stock | | | (2,845 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 3,647,608 | | | | 4,787,339 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,206,205 | | | | 1,425,176 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 2,319,045 | | | | 893,869 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 3,525,250 | | | $ | 2,319,045 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncash investing and financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of equipment under financing or borrowing agreement | | $ | 8,472,904 | | | $ | 2,796,801 | |
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
1. Description of Business and Entity Structure
C.J. Hughes Construction Company, Inc. (C.J. Hughes) is a general contractor primarily engaged in pipeline construction for utility companies. C.J. Hughes is licensed in six eastern states with the majority of its contracts concentrated in West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and North Carolina. Nitro Electric Company, Inc. (Nitro Electric), a wholly-owned subsidiary of C.J. Hughes, is primarily involved in the electrical contracting industry, providing electrical construction services to industrial and commercial markets. Nitro Electric (formerly known as NEC Acquisition Company, Inc.) was formed on April 29, 2007 for the purpose of buying certain assets and assuming certain liabilities of an unrelated entity.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46R (FIN 46R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, these financial statements include the accounts of Contractors Rental Corporation (CRC), an entity considered a variable interest entity for which C.J. Hughes is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. C.J. Hughes leases equipment from CRC on a job-by-job basis and also provides management services, including purchasing materials, supervising construction, and performing accounting services. CRC also performs subcontract work for C.J. Hughes on certain construction contracts.
C.J. Hughes, Nitro Electric and CRC are collectively referred to as the Companies.
On August 15, 2008, the Companies were involved in a merger with Energy Services Acquisition Corp. Energy Services Acquisition Corp. was later renamed Energy Services of America Corporation. See Note 11 for additional details of the transaction.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric, its wholly-owned subsidiary, as well as CRC for which management has determined that C.J. Hughes is the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46R. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated.
Cash
The Companies consider cash deposits and temporary investments having an original maturity of less than three months to be cash. Cash is stated at cost which approximates fair value.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, contracts receivable, retainage receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying value of such amounts reported at the applicable balance sheet dates approximates fair value.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Contracts Receivable
Contracts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, and do not bear interest. Contracts receivable are written off when they are deemed to be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on factors such as the financial condition of customers, age of receivables and payment history.
Retainage Receivable
Retainage receivable represents amounts previously billed to customers that are withheld for a certain period of time generally until project acceptance by the customer. At August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Management considers all amounts classified as a retainage receivable to be collectible.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of supplies and equipment parts and are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based upon the first-in, first-out method.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs which extend the useful lives or increase the productivity of the assets are capitalized, while normal repairs and maintenance that do not extend the useful life or increase the productivity of the asset are expensed as incurred. Plant and equipment are depreciated principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets; buildings 35 years; machinery and equipment 3 - 7 years; furniture and equipment 5 years; and automotive equipment 3 - 7 years.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Goodwill
On April 27, 2007, NEC Acquisition Company, Inc. (now known as Nitro Electric) completed the purchase of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities from an unrelated third-party. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. The following is the allocation of the purchase price of $2,722,484, which exceeded the preliminary estimated fair value of the net assets acquired by approximately $1,969,000 as follows:
Property and equipment | | $ | 1,043,801 | |
Total assets acquired | | | 1,043,801 | |
| | | | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 36,387 | |
Capital lease obligations | | | 253,745 | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 290,132 | |
Net assets acquired | | | 753,669 | |
Purchase price | | | 2,722,484 | |
| | | | |
Excess allocated to goodwill | | $ | 1,968,815 | |
Goodwill is accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and accordingly is not amortized but is evaluated at least annually for impairment. As of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Management has determined that there has been no goodwill impairment, and as such, no loss has been recognized for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, respectively. Management determined that the factors which contributed to the goodwill were the management that would be acquired, the seasoned workforce, ability to obtain entry in other markets, and the future earnings potential of the entity.
Other Long-Lived Assets
If facts and circumstances suggest that a long-lived asset may be impaired, the carrying value is reviewed for recoverability. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the assets will not be recovered, as determined based on projected undiscounted cash flows related to the asset over its remaining life, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value through an impairment loss.
Revenue and Cost Recognition
Revenues from contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Revenue is calculated by dividing the actual direct costs incurred by the total estimated costs multiplied by the contract price. This method is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of the progress on contracts. Contract costs include all direct material, direct labor, and subcontractor costs. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Advertising
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expense was $10,200 for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008, and was $10,253 for the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and loss during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
C.J. Hughes and Nitro Electric with the consent of their stockholders have each elected under the Internal Revenue Code to be an S-Corporation. As such, these entities are not subject to income tax and all taxable income is passed through to the individual stockholders. CRC is a C-Corporation as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. Current income tax expense for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 was approximately $0, and for year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $275,000, respectively. At August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, CRC did not have any deferred tax assets or liabilities. In the event of an examination of the tax return, the tax liability of the stockholders could be changed if an adjustment in the Companies’ income is ultimately sustained by the taxing authorities.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
| | August 15, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 328,274 | | | $ | 328,274 | |
Buildings | | | 631,550 | | | | 631,550 | |
Machinery and Equipment | | | 21,175,386 | | | | 12,002,368 | |
Furniture and Fixtures | | | 249,614 | | | | 289,505 | |
Automotive Equipment | | | 8,026,940 | | | | 6,345,130 | |
| | | 30,411,764 | | | | 19,596,827 | |
Less Accumulated Depreciation | | | 12,937,534 | | | | 11,362,336 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 17,474,230 | | | $ | 8,234,491 | |
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
4. Uncompleted Contracts
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts are as follows:
| | August 15, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Revenues earned on uncompleted contracts | | $ | 36,806,443 | | | $ | 39,316,412 | |
Less billings to date | | | 32,562,913 | | | | 35,565,167 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 4,243,530 | | | $ | 3,751,245 | |
5. Related-Party Transactions
The Companies received advances from a stockholder of $6,000,000 during the year ended December 31, 2007. The unsecured advance bears interest at prime, resulting in interest expense of $235,458 and $324,417 recognized during the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively. In accordance with the agreement with the shareholder, there are no amounts due in 2008. Therefore, the entire amount has been classified as long-term on the balance sheet.
In addition, the affiliates of the Companies routinely engage in transactions in the normal course of business with each other, including sharing employee benefit plan coverage, payment for insurance and other expenses on behalf of other affiliates, and other services incidental to business of each of the affiliates. All revenue and related expense transactions, as well as the related accounts payable and accounts receivable, have been eliminated.
A summary of transactions among the Companies is as follows:
| | August 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Subcontractor Revenue – CRC | | $ | 16,941,365 | | | $ | 9,799,187 | |
Subcontractor Expense - CJ Hughes | | | 16,941,365 | | | | 9,799,187 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equipment Rental Income – CRC | | | 52,444 | | | | 79,911 | |
Equipment Rental Expense - CJ Hughes | | | 52,444 | | | | 79,911 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Subcontractor Revenue - Nitro Electric | | | 30,883 | | | | 224,441 | |
Subcontractor Expense - CJ Hughes | | | 30,883 | | | | 224,441 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Management fee income - CJ Hughes | | | 100,000 | | | | 300,000 | |
Management fee expense – CRC | | | 100,000 | | | | 300,000 | |
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
6. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | August 15, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Note payable to bank, due in monthly installments of $5,000, including interest at 7.26%, final payment due September 2012, secured by real estate, vehicles, and equipment | | $ | 405,236 | | | $ | 420,432 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to finance companies, due in monthly installments totaling $128,387, including interest ranging from 1.0% to 7.92%, final payments due January 2008 through December 2012, secured by equipment | | | 3,746,368 | | | | 3,259,163 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks, due in monthly installments totaling $64,616, including interest at prime plus .5%, final payments due April 2010 through July 2011, secured by equipment, inventory, receivables, and intangibles | | | 3,750,645 | | | | 4,046,224 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks, due in monthly installments totaling $12,168, including interest ranging from prime to 7.5%, final payments due May 2008 through August 2010, secured by equipment | | | 168,415 | | | | 237,359 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks, due in monthly installments of $31,713, including interest at 8.75%, final payment due August 2010, unsecured | | | 666,314 | | | | 876,357 | |
| | | 8,736,978 | | | | 8,839,535 | |
Less current maturities | | | 2,217,331 | | | | 1,844,192 | |
| | $ | 6,519,647 | | | $ | 6,995,343 | |
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
6. Long-term Debt (Continued)
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows as of August 15, 2008:
2009 | | $ | 2,217,331 | |
2010 | | | 2,153,306 | |
2011 | | | 1,536,428 | |
2012 | | | 714,978 | |
2013 | | | 147,245 | |
Thereafter | | | 1,967,690 | |
| | $ | 8,736,978 | |
Interest paid during the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, was $719,351 and $702,259, respectively.
The Company has lines of credit with banks in amounts not to exceed $6,500,000. Advances under these lines bear interest ranging from prime to prime plus .5%. Advances are available up to the lesser of the line amounts or a borrowing base calculated on the Company’s contracts receivable and equipment. The lines are secured by contracts receivable and equipment, and are guaranteed by a shareholder. The lines of credit, which expire June 2009, impose certain financial covenants upon the Company, including a minimum tangible net worth and a minimum current ratio. The balance outstanding on the lines on August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $5,250,000 and $0, respectively.
The Company has a line of credit with a bank in an amount not to exceed $500,000. Advances under the line bear interest at prime. The line is secured by certain equipment and expires in November 2008. The balance on the line was $500,000 and $0 on August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Company has an unsecured short-term note payable with a bank. The note bears interest at 5% and is payable in full in January 2009. The balance due on this note was $800,000 on August 15, 2008.
7. Lease Obligations
The Companies lease various equipment and office space under operating lease agreements with terms up through 48 months. The Companies also lease vehicles from certain stockholders and spouses under cancelable operating leases. Rent expense paid for operating lease obligations for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $152,492 and $123,233, respectively. Rent expense paid to related parties was $113,765 for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008, and $89,524 for the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
7. Lease Obligations (Continued)
The future minimum lease payments under operating leases on August 15, 2008, are as follows:
2009 | | $ | 145,730 | |
2010 | | | 155,039 | |
2011 | | | 111,381 | |
2012 | | | 70,747 | |
2013 | | | 17,816 | |
| | $ | 500,713 | |
The Companies lease certain automotive and operating equipment under agreements that are classified as capital leases. The cost of the equipment under capital leases is included in the balance sheets as property and equipment and was $8,097,013 and $322,635 at August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Accumulated amortization of the leased equipment at August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was approximately $454,467 and $91,081, respectively. Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.
The future minimum lease payments required under the capital leases and the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of August 15, 2008, are as follows:
2009 | | $ | 1,678,886 | |
2010 | | | 1,606,876 | |
2011 | | | 1,602,207 | |
2012 | | | 1,411,609 | |
2013 | | | 1,411,609 | |
Thereafter | | | 340,611 | |
| | | | |
Future minimum lease payments | | | 8,051,798 | |
| | | | |
Less: Amount representing interest | | | (745,754 | ) |
| | | 7,306,044 | |
| | | | |
Less: Current maturities of capital lease obligations | | | 1,479,063 | |
| | | | |
Long-term capital lease obligations | | $ | 5,826,981 | |
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
8. Retirement and Employee Benefit Plans
C.J. Hughes has a 401(k) retirement plan for union employees under which the employees can contribute up to 15% of eligible wages and C.J. Hughes will match $.25 for each dollar contributed up to 6% of eligible wages. During the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, C.J. Hughes contributed $8,695 and $14,834 to the plan, respectively.
Additionally, C.J. Hughes has a 401(k) retirement plan for all non-union employees under which the employees can contribute up to 15% of eligible wages and C.J. Hughes will match $.25 for each dollar contributed up to 6% of eligible wages. During the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, C.J. Hughes contributed $23,869 and $33,083 to the plan, respectively.
Nitro Electric has a 401(k) retirement plan for all eligible employees under which the employees can contribute up to 15% of eligible wages and Nitro Electric will match $.50 for each dollar contributed up to 6% of eligible wages. During the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, Nitro Electric contributed $25,893 and $23,374 to the plan, respectively.
The Companies have an employee benefit trust (the Trust) which provides health and death benefits covering substantially all employees of the Company. The Trust is non-contributory for most non-union employees. Union employees and some administrative employees make partial contributions to the Trust. The Companies make periodic contributions to the Trust based on funding policies and methods which are consistent with the objectives of the Trust. The contributions made by the Companies for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 were approximately $1,581,000 and $1,143,000, respectively. At August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company accrued for an estimated liability for claims incurred but unpaid of $75,000 and $75,000, respectively.
9. Credit Risk and Concentrations
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Companies to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and contract receivables. The Companies place their cash with high quality financial institutions. At times, the balances in such institutions may exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $100,000. As of August 15, 2008, the Companies’ uninsured bank balances totaled approximately $2,935,000. The Companies perform periodic credit evaluations of their customers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral. Credit losses consistently have been within management’s expectations. At August 15, 2008, five customers comprised 60.4% of the contracts receivable balance.
C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 15, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
9. Credit Risk and Concentrations (Continued)
Nitro Electric generated 4.2% from one customer and C J Hughes Construction Company generated 22.5% from one customer of the total consolidated revenue for the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008. As of August 15, 2008, Nitro Electric had one customer which comprised 3.4% and C J Hughes Construction Company had one customer which comprised 29.9% of the total consolidated accounts receivable.
C J Hughes generated 37.3%, 7.5%, and 6.7% of their revenues from three customers during the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
During the normal course of operations, the Companies are subject to certain subcontractor claims, mechanic’s liens, and other litigation. Management is of the opinion that no material obligations will arise from any pending legal proceedings. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the financial statements for such litigation.
11. Subsequent Event Note
On August 15, 2008, the Companies were involved in a merger with Energy Services Acquisition Corp. (later renamed Energy Services of America Corporation). With a total purchase price of $34.3 million the merger involved the purchase of each share of C.J. Hughes outstanding Class A and Class B stock for $36,896 in cash and 6,434.70 shares of Energy Services Common Stock. The allocation of the purchase price included approximately $34,947,000 in current assets, $21,567,000 in fixed assets, $2,466,000 in other assets, and $31,312,000 in goodwill. Liabilities assumed totaled approximately $55,970,000.
Subsequent to August 15, 2008, the Companies paid distributions to shareholders totaling $492,867.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
ST Pipeline, Inc.
Clendenin, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ST Pipeline, Inc. as of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008, through August 15, 2008, and the year ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ST Pipeline, Inc. as of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008, through August 15, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 14 to the financial statements, effective the close of business on August 15, 2008, the Company was acquired by Energy Services Acquisition Corporation pursuant to a merger agreement between the Company and Energy Services Acquisition Corporation that was entered into on January 22, 2008.
| /s/ ARNETT & FOSTER, P.L.L.C. | |
Charleston, West Virginia
December 29, 2008
BALANCE SHEETS
August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
Assets | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Current Assets | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,434,178 | | | $ | 3,960,685 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 21,895,683 | | | | 26,485,359 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 384,081 | | | | 205,064 | |
Total current assets | | | 23,713,942 | | | | 30,651,108 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated | | | | | | | | |
depreciation | | | 5,525,933 | | | | 2,661,453 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term notes receivable and other assets | | | 103,493 | | | | 100,781 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 29,343,368 | | | $ | 33,413,342 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 12,144,704 | | | $ | 262,247 | |
Lines of credit | | | 1,902,696 | | | | 6,935,419 | |
Accounts payable | | | 728,040 | | | | 1,285,288 | |
Accrued and withheld liabilities | | | 2,132,725 | | | | 421,486 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on | | | | | | | | |
uncompleted contracts | | | 646,665 | | | | 604,589 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 17,554,830 | | | | 9,509,029 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current maturities | | | 2,481,230 | | | | 175,996 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 20,036,060 | | | | 9,685,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock ($20 par value; 3,750 shares authorized | | | | | | | | |
and issued; 3,700 shares outstanding) | | | 75,000 | | | | 75,000 | |
Retained earnings | | | 10,187,998 | | | | 24,609,007 | |
Less: cost of treasury stock, 50 shares | | | (955,690 | ) | | | (955,690 | ) |
| | | 9,307,308 | | | | 23,728,317 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 29,343,368 | | | $ | 33,413,342 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
ST PIPELINE, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
For the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and the Year Ended December 31, 2007
| | | | | For the year | |
| | For the period | | | ended | |
| | Jan. 1 through Aug. 15 | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Contract revenues | | $ | 37,410,877 | | | $ | 100,385,098 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 30,676,571 | | | | 70,948,130 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 6,734,306 | | | | 29,436,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | | 996,049 | | | | 1,547,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 5,738,257 | | | | 27,889,843 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 34,675 | | | | 45,939 | |
Other nonoperating income | | | 922,363 | | | | 306,147 | |
Interest expense | | | (142,940 | ) | | | (298,799 | ) |
Gain on sale of equipment | | | 9,738 | | | | 1,377 | |
| | | 823,836 | | | | 54,664 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 6,562,093 | | | | 27,944,507 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings, beginning of year, | | | | | | | | |
as previously stated | | | 24,609,007 | | | | 5,735,899 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Dividend distributions | | | (20,983,102 | ) | | | (9,071,399 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings, end of year | | $ | 10,187,998 | | | $ | 24,609,007 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Unaudited pro forma income data (see note 14) | | | | | | | | |
Net income as reported | | $ | 6,562,093 | | | $ | 27,944,507 | |
Pro forma provision for income taxes (unaudited) | | | 2,624,837 | | | | 11,177,803 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Pro forma net income (unaudited) | | $ | 3,937,256 | | | $ | 16,766,704 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
ST PIPELINE, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the period from January 1, 2008 through August 15, 2008 and the Year Ended December 31, 2007
| | | | | For the | |
| | For the period | | | year ended | |
| | Jan. 1 through Aug. 15 | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 6,562,093 | | | $ | 27,944,507 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net | | | | | | | | |
cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 884,723 | | | | 973,199 | |
Gain on sale of property, plant, and | | | | | | | | |
equipment | | | (9,738 | ) | | | (1,377 | ) |
Change in current assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 4,589,677 | | | | (19,679,833 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | (179,017 | ) | | | 56,558 | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess | | | | | | | | |
of billings on uncompleted contracts | | | 293,258 | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | (557,248 | ) | | | 684,524 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 1,711,238 | | | | (1,198,990 | ) |
Billings in excess of costs and | | | | | | | | |
estimated earnings on | | | | | | | | |
uncompleted contracts | | | 42,076 | | | | (113,645 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 13,043,804 | | | | 8,958,201 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net collections from long-term notes receivable | | | (2,712 | ) | | | (28,219 | ) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | | | (68,369 | ) | | | (583,566 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant, | | | | | | | | |
and equipment | | | 33,573 | | | | 37,248 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (37,508 | ) | | | (574,537 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Dividend distributions | | | (10,048,289 | ) | | | (9,071,399 | ) |
Proceeds from line of credit, net of (repayments) | | | (5,032,723 | ) | | | 4,280,857 | |
Payments on long-term debt | | | (451,791 | ) | | | (313,909 | ) |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | | - | | | | 63,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (15,532,803 | ) | | | (5,040,851 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | | | | | | | |
and cash equivalents | | | (2,526,507 | ) | | | 3,342,813 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of year | | | 3,960,685 | | | | 617,872 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of year | | $ | 1,434,178 | | | $ | 3,960,685 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow | | | | | | | | |
information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash payments for interest | | $ | 142,940 | | | $ | 298,799 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing | | | | | | | | |
and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment acquired | | | | | | | | |
through long-term debt | | $ | 3,704,669 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Dividend distribution note payable to shareholders | | $ | 10,934,813 | | | $ | - | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
ST Pipeline, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in May 1990 under the laws of the State of West Virginia to engage in the construction of natural gas pipelines for utility companies. The Company's contracts are primarily under fixed-price and occasional cost-plus service contracts. The Company grants credit to all its customers, most of whom are located in West Virginia and the surrounding mid-Atlantic states. Effective at the close of business on August 15, 2008, the Company was acquired by Energy Services Acquisitions Corp. pursuant to a merger agreement entered into on January 22, 2008.
All of the Company’s production personnel are union members of the various related construction trade unions and are subject to collective bargaining agreements that expire at varying time intervals.
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows: Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2007 financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications did not affect net income.
Revenue and cost recognition: Revenues from construction contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method in the ratio that costs incurred bear to total estimated costs. The revenues from unit price and cost-plus contracts are recognized when units (usually contractually established pipeline footage) of pipeline are installed and completed or as services are performed. Contract costs include all direct material, labor, subcontracted, and equipment costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance. General and administrative expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Revenues related to claims are recognized when collected.
The asset “costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. Such revenues are expected to be billed and collected within one year on uncompleted contracts. The liability “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.
Revisions in revenues, costs, profit estimates, and measurements of the extent of progress toward completion are made in the year such revisions can be reasonably estimated. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated loss is accrued.
Cash and cash equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At times, such balances may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.
Accounts receivable: The Company grants credit to its customers on terms contractually established by the construction contracts with each customer. Accounts receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management has determined that no allowance for doubtful receivables is necessary as of August 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received. The Company generally does not have collateral for its receivables, but rely upon its right to file liens on the owner’s property. Interest is not charged on trade accounts receivable.
Property, plant, and equipment: Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations on a straight – line basis over their estimated service lives of 5 to 7 years for equipment and 15 to 40 years for buildings and related improvements.
Income tax status and distributions: The stockholders of ST Pipeline, Inc. elected S Corporation status. By electing S Corporation status, income taxes on the earnings of the Company will be payable personally by the stockholders of the Company. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the accompanying financial statements for federal and state income taxes.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dividend distributions may be declared periodically in amounts that will cover the individual income tax liabilities arising from the taxable income of the Company.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective for years beginning after December 15, 2007. This interpretation is intended to clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements, in accordance with FASB 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by prescribing a more-likely-than-not threshold to recognize any benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Tax positions that meet the recognition threshold are reported at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Fair Value Measurement: In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Fair Value Option: In February 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years’ financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year.
Note 2. Cash Concentrations
As of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, the Company had amounts on deposit at financial institutions of which approximately $1,067,000 and $2,141,000, respectively, were uninsured under current banking insurance regulations.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Accounts Receivable
Balances as of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, are as follows:
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Billed receivables | | | | | | |
Completed contracts | | $ | 317,152 | | | $ | 790,962 | |
Contracts in progress | | | 19,415,773 | | | | 15,391,212 | |
Unbilled receivables | | | | | | | | |
Retainages on completed contracts | | | | | | | 1,921,035 | |
Retainages on contracts in progress | | | 2,162,758 | | | | 8,382,150 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 21,895,683 | | | $ | 26,485,359 | |
The primary industry served by the Company within its market area has traditionally been the natural gas transmission and distribution industry. As of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, all of the Company’s outstanding accounts receivable was unsecured and due directly from business entities operating within this industry. Payment of these receivables depends primarily upon the available revenues generated by these business entities.
Note 4. Uncompleted Contracts
Costs, estimated earnings, and billings on uncompleted contracts as of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, are summarized as follows:
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts | | $ | 94,069,235 | | | $ | 63,454,130 | |
Estimated earnings | | | 35,924,601 | | | | 29,145,461 | |
| | | 129,993,836 | | | | 92,599,591 | |
Billings through period | | | (130,640,501 | ) | | | (93,204,180 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (646,665 | ) | | $ | (604,589 | ) |
Included in the accompanying balance sheets under the following captions:
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings | | | | | | |
on uncompleted contracts | | | (646,665 | ) | | | (604,589 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (646,665 | ) | | $ | (604,589 | ) |
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5. Backlog
The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on contracts during the period of January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007. Backlog represents the amount of revenue the Company expects to realize from work to be performed on uncompleted contracts in progress as of the balance sheet date and from contractual agreements on which work has not yet begun.
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Backlog balance, January 1 | | $ | 5,418,764 | | | $ | 57,280,068 | |
| | | | | | | | |
New contracts entered into during | | | | | | | | |
the period January 1 to August 15, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
and year ended December 31, 2007 | | | 38,724,591 | | | | 48,523,794 | |
| | | 44,143,355 | | | | 105,803,862 | |
Less contract revenue earned during | | | | | | | | |
the period January 1 to August 15, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
and year ended December 31, 2007 | | | (37,410,877 | ) | | | (100,385,098 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Backlog balance, as of August 15, 2008 | | $ | 6,732,478 | | | $ | 5,418,764 | |
and year ended December 31, 2007 | | | | | | | | |
Note 6. Major Customers
Revenues for the period of January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007 include $37,378,794 and $100,379,587 ,respectively, in revenues which represent approximately 98% and 99%, respectively, of total revenues, from two major customers during the period of January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007. Receivables from major customers for the period of January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, amount to $21,578,556 and $26,376,953, respectively, which represents approximately 99% and 99%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. Virtually all work performed for major customers was awarded under competitive bid fixed price arrangements. During the period of January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, the Company's major customers operated within the natural gas transmission and distribution industry within the Company's market area. The loss of a major customer could have a severe impact on the profitability of operations of the Company. However, due to the nature of the Company's operations, the major customers and sources of revenues may change from year to year.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7. Property, Plant and Equipment
A summary of property plant and equipment as of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, is as follows:
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | - | | | $ | 47,446 | |
Building and building improvements | | | - | | | | 202,957 | |
Office furniture, fixtures, and equipment | | | 52,704 | | | | 52,704 | |
Construction equipment | | | 9,972,427 | | | | 6,420,601 | |
Vehicles and trailers | | | 4,639,034 | | | | 4,550,687 | |
| | | 14,664,165 | | | | 11,274,395 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (9,138,232 | ) | | | (8,612,942 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,525,933 | | | $ | 2,661,453 | |
Note 8. Lines of Credit, Letter of Credit, and Subsequent Event
The Company has available a line of credit agreement with a local community bank which provides that the Company may borrow up to $3,000,000. Borrowings under the line bear interest payable monthly at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 1% and are secured by all of the equipment of the Company and assignment of personal life insurance policies of the stockholder-officers of the Company. The balances payable under this arrangement are due on demand. As of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, outstanding borrowings were $315,834 and $2,335,146, respectively. The amount available for additional borrowings under this arrangement as of August 15, 2008, amounted to $2,684,166. This arrangement is due to expire October 2, 2008.
The Company also has available a line of credit agreement with a large regional bank which provides that the Company may borrow up to $3,500,000. Borrowings under the line bear interest payable monthly at the lending bank’s prime rate and are secured by all assets of the Company. The balances payable under this arrangement are due on demand. As of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, outstanding borrowings were $1,586,863 and $2,600,273, respectively. The amount available for additional borrowings under this arrangement as of August 15, 2008, amounted to $1,913,137. This arrangement is due to expire June 5, 2009.
BB&T Additional Line of Credit of $5,000,000 expired on 7/5/08. There is no balance as of August 15, 2008.
The Company was also contingently liable on an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $950,542 as of August 15, 2008. This arrangement was entered into by the Company and the aforementioned large regional bank to guarantee the payment of insurance premiums to the group captive insurance company through which the Company obtains its general liability insurance coverage (Note 11). Any amounts advanced under this arrangement bear interest payable monthly at the bank’s prime lending rate with the principal amounts due upon demand.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9. Long-term debt
A summary of long-term debt as of August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007 follows:
| | August 15, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Note payable to a Bank, payable in monthly installments of | | | | | | |
$9,217, including interest at 8%, maturity date of June 10, 2010, | | | | | | |
secured by equipment acquired with the proceeds of this note. | | $ | 187,643 | | | $ | 249,334 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note payable to a finance company, payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments of $2,180, including interest at 8.375%, | | | | | | | | |
maturity date of September 14, 2009, secured by equipment | | | | | | | | |
acquired with this note. | | | 27,043 | | | | 42,944 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note payable to a finance company, payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments of $3,361, including interest at 5.5%, | | | | | | | | |
maturity date of August 6, 2008, secured by equipment | | | | | | | | |
acquired with this note. | | | - | | | | 19,828 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to various finance companies, payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments totaling $9,672, including interest at rates ranging | | | | | | | | |
between 0% and 8%, with varying maturity dates from March, | | | | | | | | |
2008, through December, 2008, secured by vehicles and | | | | | | | | |
equipment acquired with the notes. | | | 1,381,785 | | | | 64,174 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to banks and credit unions, payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments totaling $11,925, including interest at rates ranging | | | | | | | | |
between 4.5% and 8.0%, maturity dates varying between June, 2008, | | | | | | | | |
through March, 2009, secured by vehicles acquired with the notes. | | | 2,094,650 | | | | 61,963 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes payable to shareholders, payable on demand at 0% interest | | | | | | | | |
as accounts receivable outstanding as of August 15, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
are collected. | | | 10,934,813 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 14,625,934 | | | | 438,243 | |
Less current maturities | | | 12,144,704 | | | | 262,247 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 2,481,230 | | | $ | 175,996 | |
Maturities of long term debt are as follows
2009 | | $ | 12,144,704 | |
2010 | | | 1,187,448 | |
2011 | | | 997,622 | |
2012 | | | 296,160 | |
| | $ | 14,625,934 | |
Interest paid on debt during the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007 was $142,940, and $298, respectively.
An additional $5,000,000 was paid to Jim and Sue Shafer in October 2008.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10. Leases and Related Party Lease Commitments
The Company frequently leases equipment on a short-term basis for use on its construction projects. Rental expense for these instances during the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $3,834,000 and $6,393,000 respectively.
The Company rents real estate and related facilities that are owned by stockholder-officers of the Company under long-term lease agreements. The monthly rental for these facilities is $3,750 per month, and the expense incurred and paid under these arrangements for the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007, amounted to $30,000 and $45,000, respectively.
This lease was originally set to run through January 12, 2012, but was replaced by a new lease effective September 1, 2008 due to the acquisition of ST Pipeline Inc. by Energy Services of America. The new lease is for a period of three years at a monthly rate of $5,000 per month.�� Future minimum lease amounts are as follows:
September – December 2008 | | $ | 20,000 | |
2009 | | | 60,000 | |
2010 | | | 60,000 | |
January – August 2011 | | | 40,000 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 180,000 | |
Note 11. Related Party
The Company obtains its business general liability insurance coverage through a group captive insurance company domiciled in the Cayman Islands, within which the Company has an 8% equity interest. Premiums expense incurred with this related entity for the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007 approximated $483,655 and $1,967,000, respectively. The balance due on premium as of August 15, 2008 was $92,283.62 which is the final payment for 2008. No amounts were due to the captive insurance company for premium payments as of year ended December 31, 2007.
Note 12. Employee Benefit and Retirement Plans
The Company contributes to union-sponsored, multi-employer retirement plans. Contributions are made in accordance with negotiated labor contracts. The passage of the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (the Act) may, under certain circumstances, cause the Company to become subject to liabilities in excess of contributions made under collective bargaining agreements. Generally, liabilities are contingent upon the termination, withdrawal, or partial withdrawal from the plans. As of August 15, 2008, the Company has not undertaken to terminate, withdraw, or partially withdraw from any of the plans within which union employees are currently participating. However, the Company has been assessed a withdrawal liability of $161,719 by the Steelworkers’ Pension Fund resulting from the Company’s discontinuance of contributions during the year ended December 31, 2003, as the employees of the Company that were represented by the Steelworkers’ local union no longer desired to be represented by that union. The withdrawal liability was assessed and still payable as of August 15, 2008. The company agreed to settle and pay this liability by October 31, 2008 in return for the Pension Fund waiving all penalties and interest that would have been assessed.
Under the Act, liabilities would be based upon the Company's proportionate share of each plan’s unfunded vested benefits. The company receives periodic correspondence from several pension funds concerning the funding levels but does not receive any information that would determine its share of unfunded vested benefits, if any.
ST PIPELINE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, the Company contributed approximately $1,717,000 and $3,531,000, respectively, to these multi-employer union retirement plans.
The Company also contributes to union-sponsored, multi-employer plans that provide health and welfare and other benefits. Contributions are made in accordance with negotiated labor contracts. During the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, the Company contributed approximately $2,309,000 and $5,974,000, respectively, to these multi-employer union plans.
Note 13. Contingencies
During the normal course of operations, the Company is subject to certain claims from subcontractors, mechanic liens and other litigation. Management is of the opinion that no material obligation will arise from any pending litigation, and that any such loss obligations are fully insured. Accordingly, no provision has been included in the financial statements for such litigation.
Note 14. Subsequent Event
On January 22, 2008, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Energy Services Acquisition Corp. The agreement calls for the stockholders of the Company to receive total consideration of $19 million, reduced by the book value of certain assets to be distributed to the stockholders of the Company. All except $3 million is to be paid to the stockholders at closing. The remaining $3 million consists of deferred payments to the stockholders over three years with an interest at a simple rate of 7.5% per annum.
Effective at the close of business on August 15, 2008, the Company was acquired by Energy Services Acquisitions Corp. pursuant to a merger agreement entered into on January 22, 2008. The stockholders of Energy Services Acquisition Corp. approved the merger agreement at a special meeting on August 15, 2008, to be effective the close of business on that date.
Additionally, under the agreement, the stockholders of the Company are entitled to receive as dividend distributions the earnings of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, less $4.2 million, as well as 95% of the Company’s net income earned up to the 2008 month ending immediately prior to the date of closing. During the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, the Company’s dividend distributions of 2007 earnings approximated $9 million leaving approximately $7 million of 2008 earnings that could be distributed prior to the closing date of the agreement. The agreement also provides that if sufficient cash is not available prior to or as of the date of closing, then the difference would be distributed as a short-term non-interest bearing note payable to the stockholders. Cash was not available at closing, leaving approximately 10.9 million due and payable.
Upon the completion of the acquisition by Energy Services Acquisition Corp., the Company’s previously elected S Corporation status would immediately terminate. The net income or loss of the Company subsequent to the merger would then be included on the consolidated income tax return of Energy Services Acquisition Corp. The unaudited pro forma income data presented on the statement of income and retained earnings reflect the estimated income taxes that would have been incurred and the resulting net income for the period January 1, 2008 to August 15, 2008, and year ended December 31, 2007, as if the Company had not elected S Corporation status.
H-12