Neiman Marcus 10-Q 2013 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended April 27, 2013

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to

Commission file no. 333-133184-12

Neiman Marcus, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 20-3509435 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1618 Main Street Dallas, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) 75201 (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 743-7600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨  No x

There were 1,019,728 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at May 28, 2013.

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

INDEX

		Page
Part I.	Financial Information
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 27, 2013, July 28, 2012 and April 28, 2012	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 and April 28, 2012	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 and April 28, 2012	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 and April 28, 2012	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 and April 28, 2012	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 and April 28, 2012	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
Part II.	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	43
Item 5.	Other Information	43
Item 6.	Exhibits	44
Signature		45

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except shares)	April 27, 2013			July 28, 2012			April 28,  2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,559		$	49,253		$	64,696
Merchandise inventories	995,395			939,817			945,792
Deferred income taxes	24,561			22,484			24,059
Other current assets	97,281			132,181			96,351
Total current assets	1,185,796			1,143,735			1,130,898
Property and equipment, net	897,401			894,478			887,916
Goodwill	1,263,433			1,263,433			1,263,433
Intangible assets, net	1,794,121			1,829,584			1,841,582
Other assets	73,768			70,625			76,187
Total assets	$	5,214,519		$	5,201,855		$	5,200,016
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	251,237		$	331,408		$	246,511
Accrued liabilities	437,992			393,821			452,707
Total current liabilities	689,229			725,229			699,218
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt	2,702,028			2,781,882			2,806,833
Deferred income taxes	617,713			626,605			665,126
Deferred real estate credits	104,688			107,787			105,817
Other long-term liabilities	309,649			344,809			223,330
Total long-term liabilities	3,734,078			3,861,083			3,801,106
Common stock (par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized and 1,019,728 shares issued and outstanding at April 27, 2013, 1,017,502 shares issued and outstanding at July 28, 2012 and April 28, 2012)	10			10			10
Additional paid-in capital	1,003,529			995,300			993,491
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(142,168		)	(148,792		)	(73,892		)
Accumulated deficit	(70,159		)	(230,975		)	(219,917		)
Total shareholders’ equity	791,212			615,543			699,692
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,214,519		$	5,201,855		$	5,200,016

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirteen weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Revenues	$	1,098,267		$	1,057,727
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	663,317			628,069
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	248,676			251,003
Income from credit card program	(13,315		)	(12,495		)
Depreciation expense	34,067			32,558
Amortization of intangible assets	7,251			7,529
Amortization of favorable lease commitments	4,385			4,469
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	3,607			—
Operating earnings	150,279			146,594
Interest expense, net	32,346			44,354
Earnings before income taxes	117,933			102,240
Income tax expense	47,168			39,600
Net earnings	$	70,765		$	62,640

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Revenues	$	3,529,169		$	3,340,016
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	2,230,446			2,094,808
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	790,469			771,714
Income from credit card program	(39,529		)	(38,393		)
Depreciation expense	100,947			95,713
Amortization of intangible assets	22,308			24,717
Amortization of favorable lease commitments	13,155			13,408
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	8,858			—
Operating earnings	402,515			378,049
Interest expense, net	134,765			130,533
Earnings before income taxes	267,750			247,516
Income tax expense	106,934			96,372
Net earnings	$	160,816		$	151,144

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirteen weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Net earnings	$	70,765		$	62,640
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax:
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on financial instruments	(1,284		)	48
Reclassification of realized loss on financial instruments to earnings	100			563
Change in unrealized gain on unfunded benefit obligations	885			—
Total other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax	(299		)	611
Total comprehensive earnings	$	70,466		$	63,251

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Net earnings	$	160,816		$	151,144
Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
Change in unrealized loss on financial instruments	(168		)	(2,987		)
Reclassification of realized loss on financial instruments to earnings	1,959			1,296
Change in unrealized gain on unfunded benefit obligations	4,833			844
Total other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax	6,624			(847		)
Total comprehensive earnings	$	167,440		$	150,297

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings	$	160,816		$	151,144
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense	142,686			140,188
Loss on debt extinguishment	15,597			—
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	8,858			—
Deferred income taxes	(15,501		)	(21,845		)
Other	4,265			422
	316,721			269,909
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Merchandise inventories	(55,578		)	(106,458		)
Other current assets	34,900			25,020
Other assets	1,789			(5,300		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(42,230		)	36,934
Deferred real estate credits	2,698			10,975
Funding of defined benefit pension plan	(25,000		)	(25,100		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	233,300			205,980
CASH FLOWS - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	(103,563		)	(108,565		)
Investment in foreign e-commerce retailer	(10,000		)	(29,421		)
Net cash used for investing activities	(113,563		)	(137,986		)
CASH FLOWS - FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under senior secured term loan facility	500,000			—
Repayment of borrowings under senior subordinated notes	(510,668		)	—
Borrowings under senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility	100,000			150,000
Repayment of borrowings under senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility	(180,000		)	(25,000		)
Distributions to shareholders	—			(449,295		)
Debt issuance costs paid	(9,763		)	(594		)
Net cash used for financing activities	(100,431		)	(324,889		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Increase (decrease) during the period	19,306			(256,895		)
Beginning balance	49,253			321,591
Ending balance	$	68,559		$	64,696
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	121,600		$	133,688
Income taxes	$	75,524		$	47,318

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1.Basis of Presentation

Neiman Marcus, Inc. (the Company) is a luxury retailer conducting integrated store and online operations principally under the Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman brand names.  References to “we,” “our” and “us” are used to refer to the Company or to the Company and its subsidiaries, as appropriate to the context.  We report our store operations as our Specialty Retail Stores segment and our online operations as our Online segment.

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.  In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the applicable interim periods.

The specialty retail industry is seasonal in nature, with a higher level of sales typically generated in the fall and holiday selling seasons.  Due to seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 are not necessarily comparable to, or indicative of, results of any other interim period or for the fiscal year as a whole.

The Company is a subsidiary of Newton Holding, LLC (Holding), which is controlled by investment funds affiliated with TPG Global, LLC (together with its affiliates, TPG) and Warburg Pincus LLC (collectively, the Sponsors).  The Company’s operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (NMG).  The Sponsors acquired NMG in a leveraged transaction in October 2005 (the Acquisition).  The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the amounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to July 31.  Like many other retailers, we follow a 4-5-4 reporting calendar.  All references to the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 relate to the thirteen weeks ended April 27, 2013.  All references to the third quarter of fiscal year 2012 relate to the thirteen weeks ended April 28, 2012.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2013 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended April 27, 2013.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2012 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended April 28, 2012.

A detailed description of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Use of Estimates.  We are required to make estimates and assumptions about future events in preparing our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

While we believe that our past estimates and assumptions have been materially accurate, the amounts currently estimated are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events were made.  We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicate those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  We make adjustments to our assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, encompass the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:

7

·recognition of revenues;

·valuation of merchandise inventories, including determination of original retail values, recognition of markdowns and vendor allowances, estimation of inventory shrinkage, and determination of cost of goods sold;

·determination of impairment of long-lived assets;

·recognition of advertising costs;

·measurement of liabilities related to our loyalty programs;

·recognition of income taxes; and

·measurement of accruals for general liability, workers’ compensation and health insurance claims and pension and postretirement health care benefits.

Fair Value Measurements.  Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability.  Assets and liabilities are classified using a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value as follows:

·Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

·Level 2 — Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs corroborated by market data.

·Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s estimates and assumptions.

We measure or disclose, on a recurring basis, the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities utilizing the fair value hierarchy as follows:

·we record our derivative financial instruments at fair value as more fully described in Note 4;

·we disclose the fair value of our long-term debt obligations as more fully described in Note 3; and

·as to our other financial assets and liabilities, the recorded carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

We also measure certain non-financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis, primarily long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, in connection with our evaluations of such assets for impairment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to improve the presentation and prominence of comprehensive earnings and its components as a result of convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards.  We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to reduce the complexity and costs associated with interim and annual goodwill impairment tests, by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit.  While we adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, no impairment tests have been required in year-to-date fiscal 2013.  We will perform our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 and do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance to reduce the complexity and costs associated with interim and annual indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment tests, by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets.  This guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, which is effective for us as of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  We do not expect that the implementation of this standard will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive earnings depending on the significance of the reclassifications and whether they are required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).  This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012, which is effective for us as of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  We do not expect that the implementation of this standard will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2.     Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

(in thousands)	April 27, 2013		July 28, 2012		April 28, 2012
Goodwill	$	1,263,433	$	1,263,433	$	1,263,433
Tradenames	$	1,231,405	$	1,231,960	$	1,232,237
Customer lists, net	217,941		239,694		246,945
Favorable lease commitments, net	344,775		357,930		362,400
Intangible assets, net	$	1,794,121	$	1,829,584	$	1,841,582

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as tradenames and goodwill, are not subject to amortization.  Rather, we assess the recoverability of indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and upon the occurrence of certain events.

Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization.  Customer lists and amortizable tradenames are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, ranging from four to 24 years (weighted average life of 13 years from the Acquisition).  Favorable lease commitments are amortized straight-line over the remaining lives of the leases, ranging from nine to 49 years (weighted average life of 33 years from the Acquisition).  Total estimated amortization of all Acquisition-related intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is currently estimated as follows (in thousands):

2014	$	46,881
2015	46,615
2016	45,867
2017	44,576
2018	42,789

3.Long-term Debt

The significant components of our long-term debt are as follows:

(in thousands)	Interest Rate	April 27,  2013		July 28, 2012		April 28, 2012
Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	variable	$	20,000	$	100,000	$	125,000
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility	variable	2,560,000		2,060,000		2,060,000
2028 Debentures	7.125%	122,028		121,882		121,833
Senior Subordinated Notes	10.375%	—		500,000		500,000
Long-term debt		$	2,702,028	$	2,781,882	$	2,806,833

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, we executed the following transactions, collectively referred to as the Refinancing Transactions:

·amended the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility to provide for the incurrence of an incremental term loan, increasing the principal amount of that facility to $2,560.0 million;

·repurchased or redeemed $500.0 million principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes; and

·amended the Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to allow these transactions.

The purpose of the Refinancing Transactions was to lower NMG’s future interest expense by taking advantage of current market conditions and to extend the maturity of the relevant obligation.

9

Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  At April 27, 2013, NMG had a Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility providing for a maximum committed borrowing capacity of $700.0 million.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility matures on May 17, 2016 (or, if earlier, the date that is 45 days prior to the scheduled maturity of NMG’s Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, or any indebtedness refinancing it, unless refinanced as of that date).  On April 27, 2013, NMG had $20.0 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility, no outstanding letters of credit and $610.0 million of unused borrowing availability.

Availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice.  The borrowing base is equal to at any time the sum of (a) 90% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, net of certain reserves, plus (b) 85% of the amounts owed by credit card processors in respect of eligible credit card accounts constituting proceeds from the sale or disposition of inventory, less certain reserves.  NMG must at all times maintain excess availability of at least the greater of (a) 10% of the lesser of 1) the aggregate revolving commitments and 2) the borrowing base and (b) $50 million, but NMG is not required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio.

The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides that NMG has the right at any time to request up to $300 million of additional revolving facility commitments and/or incremental term loans, provided that the aggregate amount of loan commitments under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility may not exceed $1,000 million.  However, the lenders are under no obligation to provide any such additional commitments or loans, and any increase in commitments or incremental term loans will be subject to customary conditions precedent.  If NMG were to request any such additional commitments and the existing lenders or new lenders were to agree to provide such commitments, the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility size could be increased to up to $1,000 million, but NMG’s ability to borrow would still be limited by the amount of the borrowing base.  The cash proceeds of any incremental term loans may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At April 27, 2013, borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) a defined prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 1¤2 of 1.00% or (iii) a one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin.  The applicable margin is up to 1.25% with respect to base rate borrowings and up to 2.25% with respect to LIBOR borrowings.  The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on the historical excess availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility was 2.00% at April 27, 2013.   In addition, NMG is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of unused commitments of (a) 0.375% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan utilization is 40% or more or (b) 0.50% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan utilization is less than 40%.  NMG must also pay customary letter of credit fees and agency fees.

If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the lesser of (a) the commitment amount and (b) the borrowing base (including as a result of reductions to the borrowing base that would result from certain non-ordinary course sales of inventory with a value in excess of $25 million, if applicable), NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the commitment amount.  In addition, at any time when incremental term loans are outstanding, if the aggregate amount outstanding under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the reported value of inventory owned by the borrowers and guarantors, NMG will be required to eliminate such excess within a limited period of time.  If the amount available under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is less than the greater of (i) 12.5% of the lesser of (A) the aggregate revolving commitments and (B) the borrowing base and (ii) $60 million, NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans and, if an event of default has occurred, cash collateralize letters of credit.  NMG would then be required to deposit daily in a collection account maintained with the agent under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.

NMG may voluntarily reduce the unutilized portion of the commitment amount and repay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.  There is no scheduled amortization under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility; the principal amount of the revolving loans outstanding thereunder will be due and payable in full on May 17, 2016, unless extended, or if earlier, the maturity date of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility (subject to certain exceptions).

All obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company and certain of NMG’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries (principally, Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., through which NMG conducts the operations of its Bergdorf Goodman stores, and NM Nevada Trust, which holds legal title to certain real property and intangible assets used by NMG in conducting its operations).  Currently, NMG conducts no material operations through subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  All obligations under NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of the Company, NMG and the subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility (subsidiary guarantors).

10

The facility contains a number of restrictive covenants including covenants limiting dividends and other restricted payments, investments, loans, advances and acquisitions, and prepayments or redemptions of other indebtedness.  These covenants permit such restricted actions in an unlimited amount, subject to the satisfaction of certain payment conditions, principally that NMG must have pro forma excess availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility equal to at least 15% of the lesser of (a) the revolving commitments under the facility and (b) the borrowing base, and NMG’s delivering projections demonstrating that projected excess availability for the next six months will be equal to such thresholds and that NMG has a pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) of at least 1.0 to 1.0 (or 1.1 to 1.0 for dividends or other distributions with respect to any equity interests in NMG, its parent or any subsidiary).  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility also contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million.

For a more detailed description of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

The recorded value of the outstanding borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility at April 27, 2013 approximated fair value based on similar rates offered for debt of similar remaining maturities and credit risk (Level 2 determination of fair value).

In November 2012, NMG entered into an amendment to its Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to permit the Refinancing Transactions.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In October 2005, NMG entered into a credit agreement and related security and other agreements for a $1,975.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In May 2011, NMG entered into an amendment and restatement (the TLF Amendment) of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  The TLF Amendment increased the amount of borrowings to $2,060.0 million and extended the maturity of the loans to May 16, 2018.  Loans that were not extended under the TLF Amendment were refinanced.  The proceeds of the incremental borrowings under the term loan facility, along with cash on hand, were used to repurchase or redeem the $752.4 million principal amount outstanding of Senior Notes.  The TLF Amendment also provided for an uncommitted incremental facility to request lenders to provide additional term loans, upon certain conditions, including that NMG’s secured leverage ratio (as defined in the TLF Amendment) is less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the incremental loans and the use of proceeds thereof.

In November 2012, NMG entered into a further amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility in order to provide for the incurrence of an incremental term loan, increasing the principal amount of that facility to $2,560.0 million.  The incremental term loan under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bears interest under the same terms as the previously existing Senior Secured Term Loan Facility and has the same maturity.  The proceeds of the incremental borrowing, along with cash on hand, were used to repurchase or redeem the $500.0 million principal amount outstanding of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

On February 8, 2013, NMG entered into a repricing amendment with respect to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  The amendment provided for (i) an immediate reduction in the interest rate margin applicable to the loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from (a) 3.50% to 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings and (b) 2.50% to 2.00% for base rate borrowings, (ii) an immediate lowering of the LIBOR floor for loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from 1.25% to 1.00% and (iii) the borrowing of incremental term loans, the proceeds of which were used to repay the outstanding loans of lenders that did not consent to the repricing amendment (the “Non-Consenting Lenders”) in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $99.6 million, which is the amount of loans held by such Non-Consenting Lenders on February 8, 2013.

At April 27, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was $2,560.0 million.  The principal amount of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on May 16, 2018.

At April 27, 2013, borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of 1) the prime rate of Credit Suisse AG (the administrative agent), 2) the federal funds effective rate plus 1¤2 of 1.00% and 3) the adjusted one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00% or (b) an adjusted LIBOR rate (for a period equal to the relevant interest period, and in any event, never less than 1.00%), subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin.  The applicable margin with respect to outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 3.00% at April 27, 2013.  The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was 4.00% at April 27, 2013.

Depending on its leverage ratio as defined by the credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, NMG could be required to prepay outstanding term loans from its annual excess cash flow, as defined.  Such required payments commence at 50% of NMG’s annual excess cash flow (which percentage will be reduced to 25% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio and will be reduced to 0% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio).  We were not required to prepay any outstanding term loans pursuant to the annual excess cash flow requirements in fiscal year 2012.  NMG also must offer

11

to prepay outstanding term loans at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the proceeds of certain asset sales under certain circumstances.

NMG may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility at any time without premium or penalty other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.  There is no scheduled amortization under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.

All obligations under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of NMG that guarantees the obligations of NMG under its Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  Currently, NMG conducts no material operations through subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  All obligations under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of the Company, NMG and the subsidiary guarantors.

The credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility contains a number of negative covenants and covenants related to the security arrangements for the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  The credit agreement also contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million.

For a more detailed description of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility (prior to giving effect to the Refinancing Transactions and the February 8, 2013 amendment), refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

The fair value of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was approximately $2,582.4 million at April 27, 2013, $2,047.1 million at July 28, 2012 and $2,062.6 million at April 28, 2012 based on prevailing market rates (Level 2 determination of fair value).

2028 Debentures.  NMG has outstanding $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.125% 2028 Debentures.  NMG equally and ratably secures its 2028 Debentures by a first lien security interest on certain collateral subject to liens granted under NMG’s senior secured credit facilities.  The 2028 Debentures are guaranteed on an unsecured, senior basis by the Company.  The guarantee by the Company is full and unconditional and joint and several.  Currently, the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries consist principally of Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., through which NMG conducts the operations of its Bergdorf Goodman stores, and NM Nevada Trust, which holds legal title to certain real property and intangible assets used by NMG in conducting its operations.  The 2028 Debentures include certain restrictive covenants and a cross-acceleration provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $15 million.  NMG’s 2028 Debentures mature on June 1, 2028.

For a more detailed description of the 2028 Debentures, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

The fair value of the 2028 Debentures was approximately $128.8 million at April 27, 2013, $118.1 million at July 28, 2012 and $107.3 million at April 28, 2012 based on quoted market prices (Level 2 determination of fair value).

Senior Subordinated Notes.  In November 2012, NMG repurchased and cancelled $294.2 million principal amount of its Senior Subordinated Notes through a tender offer and redeemed the remaining $205.8 million principal amount of notes on December 31, 2012 (after which no Senior Subordinated Notes remained outstanding).  NMG’s payments to holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes in the tender offer and redemption (including transaction costs), taken together, aggregated approximately $510.7 million.

Maturities of Long-term Debt.  Annual maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in millions):

2014	$	—
2015	—
2016	20.0
2017	—
2018	2,560.0
Thereafter	122.0

The previous table does not reflect future excess cash flow prepayments, if any, that may be required under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.

12

Loss on Debt Extinguishment.  In connection with the Refinancing Transactions, we incurred a loss on debt extinguishment of $15.6 million, which included 1) costs of $10.7 million related to the tender for and redemption of our Senior Subordinated Notes and 2) the write-off of $4.9 million of debt issuance costs related to the initial issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes.  The total loss on debt extinguishment was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2013 as a component of interest expense.  In addition, we incurred debt issuance costs in the second quarter of fiscal year 2013 of approximately $7.3 million, which are being amortized over the term of the amended debt facility.

Interest Expense.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27,2013			April 28,2012			April 27,2013			April 28,2012
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	$	101		$	240		$	1,363		$	240
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility	26,804			25,278			80,034			74,475
2028 Debentures	2,227			2,226			6,680			6,679
Senior Subordinated Notes	—			12,969			19,031			38,905
Amortization of debt issue costs	2,128			2,106			6,276			6,350
Other, net	1,155			1,907			5,911			4,984
Capitalized interest	(69		)	(372		)	(127		)	(1,100		)
	$	32,346		$	44,354		$	119,168		$	130,533
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			—			15,597			—
Interest expense, net	$	32,346		$	44,354		$	134,765		$	130,533

4.Derivative Financial Instruments

NMG has entered into interest rate cap agreements (at a cost of $5.8 million) for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.  The interest rate cap agreements cap LIBOR at 2.50% from December 2012 through December 2014 with respect to the $1,000.0 million notional amount of such agreements.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.50%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.50%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.50%.

Fair Value.  At each balance sheet date, the interest rate caps are recorded at estimated fair value.  The fair values of the interest rate caps are estimated using industry standard valuation models using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves (Level 2 determination of fair value).  A summary of the recorded assets with respect to our derivative financial instruments included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:

(in thousands)	April 27, 2013		July 28, 2012		April 28, 2012
Interest rate caps (included in other long-term assets)	$	26	$	531	$	974
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	$	3,801	$	5,592	$	5,515

Gains and losses realized due to the expiration of applicable portions of the interest rate caps are reclassified to interest expense at the time our quarterly interest payments are made. A summary of the recorded amounts related to our interest rate caps reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended				Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012		April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012
Realized hedging losses — included in interest expense, net	$	165	$	930	$	3,233	$	2,139

The amount of losses recorded in other comprehensive loss at April 27, 2013 that is expected to be reclassified into interest expense in the next twelve months, if interest rates remain unchanged, is approximately $1.9 million.

13

5.Investment in Foreign E-Commerce Retailer

In the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, we made a $29.4 million strategic investment in Glamour Sales Holding Limited (Glamour Sales), a privately held e-commerce company based in Hong Kong with leading off-price flash sales websites in Asia.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, Glamour Sales expanded its operations to launch a full-price e-commerce website in China under the Neiman Marcus brand. The current China Neiman Marcus website offers in-season merchandise and we fulfill these orders from our distribution facility in China. We are currently working to transition the Chinese website from Glamour Sales to our Online operation in the United States in fiscal year 2014 at which time we will fulfill orders from Chinese customers from the United States.  In February 2013, we made an additional $10.0 million investment in Glamour Sales increasing our ownership interest to 44%.   Our 44% non-controlling investment in the entity is accounted for under the equity method.  The investment is included in other long-term assets within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The carrying value of our investment at April 27, 2013 was $29.1 million after reduction for our equity in the losses of Glamour Sales.

6.Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 was 40.0% compared to 38.7% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  Our effective income tax rate for year-to-date fiscal 2013 was 39.9% compared to 38.9% for year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Our effective income tax rates exceeded the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes and the lack of a U.S. tax benefit related to the losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer in the third quarter and year-to-date fiscal 2013.

At April 27, 2013, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $3.6 million ($2.3 million of which would impact our effective tax rate, if recognized).  We classify interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense and our liability for accrued interest and penalties was $5.3 million at April 27, 2013, $5.2 million at July 28, 2012 and $7.2 million at April 28, 2012.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions.  During the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began its audit of our fiscal year 2010 and 2011 income tax returns and closed its audit of our fiscal year 2008 and 2009 income tax returns.  With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for fiscal years before 2008.  We believe our recorded tax liabilities as of April 27, 2013 are sufficient to cover any potential assessments to be made by the IRS or other taxing authorities upon the completion of their examinations and we will continue to review our recorded tax liabilities for potential audit assessments based upon subsequent events, new information and future circumstances.  We believe it is reasonably possible that additional adjustments in the amounts of our unrecognized tax benefits could occur within the next twelve months as a result of settlements with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitation.  At this time, we do not believe such adjustments will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7.Employee Benefit Plans

Description of Benefit Plans.  We currently maintain defined contribution plans consisting of a retirement savings plan (RSP) and a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan (Defined Contribution SERP Plan).  In addition, we sponsor a defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) and an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP Plan) which provides certain employees additional pension benefits.  As of the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, benefits offered to all participants in our Pension Plan and SERP Plan have been frozen.  Retirees and active employees hired prior to March 1, 1989 are eligible for certain limited postretirement health care benefits (Postretirement Plan) if they meet certain service and minimum age requirements.  We also sponsor an unfunded key employee deferred compensation plan, which provides certain employees with additional benefits.

Obligations for our employee benefit plans, included in other long-term liabilities, are as follows:

(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			July 28, 2012			April 28, 2012
Pension Plan	$	146,407		$	175,953		$	73,549
SERP Plan	114,562			117,562			99,427
Postretirement Plan	17,350			17,466			14,868
	278,319			310,981			187,844
Less: current portion	(5,904		)	(6,282		)	(5,599		)
Long-term portion of benefit obligations	$	272,415		$	304,699		$	182,245

14

As of April 27, 2013, we had $138.4 million (net of taxes of $89.9 million) of adjustments to such obligations recorded as increases to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Funding Policy and Plan Status.  Our policy is to fund the Pension Plan at or above the minimum required by law.  In fiscal year 2012, we were not required to make contributions to the Pension Plan; however, we made voluntary contributions to our Pension Plan of $29.3 million in fiscal year 2012.  In the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, we made a voluntary contribution to our Pension Plan of $25.0 million and are not required to make contributions to the Pension Plan for the remainder of fiscal year 2013.  We will continue to evaluate voluntary contributions to our Pension Plan based upon the unfunded position of the Pension Plan, our available liquidity and other factors.

Costs of Benefits.  The components of the expenses we incurred under our Pension Plan, SERP Plan and Postretirement Plan are as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012			April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Pension Plan:
Interest cost	$	5,311		$	6,190		$	15,933		$	18,570
Expected return on plan assets	(6,595		)	(6,774		)	(19,785		)	(20,322		)
Net amortization of losses	1,572			654			4,716			1,962
Pension Plan expense	$	288		$	70		$	864		$	210
SERP Plan:
Interest cost	$	1,009		$	1,204		$	3,027		$	3,612
Net amortization of losses	131			—			393			—
SERP Plan expense	$	1,140		$	1,204		$	3,420		$	3,612
Postretirement Plan:
Service cost	$	9		$	8		$	27		$	25
Interest cost	163			195			489			585
Net amortization of prior service cost	(389		)	(389		)	(1,167		)	(1,167		)
Net amortization of losses	147			106			441			318
Postretirement Plan income	$	(70	)	$	(80	)	$	(210	)	$	(239	)

8.Distributions to Shareholders

On March 28, 2012, the Board of Directors of NMG declared a cash dividend (the Dividend) of $435 per share of its outstanding common stock resulting in total distributions to our shareholders and certain option holders (including related expenses) of $449.3 million.  The Dividend was paid on March 30, 2012 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2012.

9.Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has approved equity-based management arrangements, which authorize equity awards to be granted to certain management employees for up to 115,792 shares of the common stock of the Company.  Options generally vest over four to five years and expire six to eight years from the date of grant.

The exercise prices of certain of our options escalate at a 10% compound rate per year (Accreting Options) until the earliest to occur of (i) exercise, (ii) a defined anniversary of the date of grant (four to five years) or (iii) the occurrence of a change of control.  However, in the event the Sponsors cause the sale of shares of the Company to an unaffiliated entity, the exercise price will cease to accrete at the time of the sale with respect to a pro rata portion of the Accreting Options.  The exercise price with respect to all other options (Fixed Price Options) is fixed at the grant date.

Stock Option Modification.  In connection with the payment of the Dividend in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, the Company adjusted the exercise price of 45,812 unvested options outstanding on the payment date by the per share amount of

15

the Dividend of $435 per share.  Holders of 47,055 vested options received a cash payment in respect of their vested options equal to 50% of the per share amount of the Dividend ($217.50 per share) and a decrease in the exercise price of their vested options for the remaining 50% of the per share amount of the Dividend.  There was no expense to the Company as a result of the stock option modification triggered by the payment of the Dividend as the post-modification fair values of both vested and unvested options outstanding were less than the pre-modification fair values.

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Options.  At the date of grant, the stock option exercise price equals or exceeds the fair market value of our common stock.  Because we are privately held and there is no public market for our common stock, the fair market value of our common stock is determined by our Compensation Committee at the time option grants are awarded (Level 3 determination of fair value).  In determining the fair value of our common stock, the Compensation Committee considers such factors as the Company’s actual and projected financial results, the principal amount of the Company’s indebtedness, valuations of the Company performed by third parties and other factors it believes are material to the valuation process.

We recognize compensation expense, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for stock options on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  The following table sets forth certain summary information with respect to our stock options for the periods indicated.

	Thirteen weeks ended				Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands, except number of options and per option price)	April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012		April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012
Stock compensation expense	$	2,562	$	1,868	$	7,147	$	4,901
Stock option grants:
Number of options granted	2,200		—		12,400		25,756
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	862	$	—	$	916	$	860
Stock option exercises:
Number of options exercised	1,373		—		4,288		6,504
Weighted average exercise price	$	1,187	$	—	$	1,064	$	696

10.Transactions with Sponsors

Pursuant to a management services agreement with affiliates of the Sponsors, and in exchange for ongoing consulting and management advisory services that are provided to us by the Sponsors and their affiliates, affiliates of the Sponsors receive an aggregate annual management fee equal to the lesser of (i) 0.25% of our consolidated annual revenues or (ii) $10 million.  Affiliates of the Sponsors also receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them or their affiliates in connection with services provided pursuant to the agreement.  These management fees are payable quarterly in arrears.  We recorded management fees of $8.8 million during year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $8.4 million during year-to-date fiscal 2012, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

The management services agreement also provides that affiliates of the Sponsors may receive future fees in connection with certain future financing and acquisition or disposition transactions.  The management services agreement includes customary exculpation and indemnification provisions in favor of the Sponsors and their affiliates.

11.Income from Credit Card Program

We had a marketing and servicing alliance with HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and HSBC Private Label Corporation (collectively referred to as HSBC) beginning in July 2005.  On May 1, 2012, affiliates of Capital One Financial Corporation (Capital One) purchased HSBC’s credit card and private label credit card business in the U.S. (Capital One transaction).  In connection with that purchase, HSBC assigned its rights and obligations under our agreement with HSBC to Capital One.

Pursuant to an agreement with Capital One, which we refer to as the Program Agreement, Capital One offers proprietary credit card accounts to our customers under both the “Neiman Marcus” and “Bergdorf Goodman” brand names.  Our Program Agreement currently extends to July 2015 (renewable thereafter for three-year terms), subject to the early termination provisions thereunder, including those referenced below.

Under the terms of the Program Agreement, Capital One currently offers credit cards and non-card payment plans and bears substantially all credit risk with respect to sales transacted on the cards bearing our brands.  We receive payments from Capital

16

One based on sales transacted on our proprietary credit cards.  Such payments are subject to annual adjustments, both increases and decreases, based upon the overall annual profitability and performance of the proprietary credit card portfolio.  In addition, we receive payments from Capital One for marketing and servicing activities we provide to Capital One.

The Program Agreement with HSBC included a change of control provision that would permit us to terminate such agreement following a change of control of HSBC, which occurred upon closing of the Capital One transaction. As part of our agreement with HSBC and Capital One relating to the transition of the Program Agreement to Capital One, we have the right to exercise this termination right prior to June 15, 2013.  We are currently in negotiations with Capital One to amend and extend the Program Agreement.

12.Commitments and Contingencies

Long-term Incentive Plan.  We have a long-term incentive plan (Long-term Incentive Plan) that provides for a cash incentive payable to certain employees upon a change of control, as defined, subject to the attainment of certain performance objectives.  Performance objectives and targets are based on cumulative EBITDA (as defined in the plan) percentages for rolling three year periods beginning in fiscal year 2006.  Earned awards for each completed performance period will be credited to a book account and will earn interest at a contractually defined annual rate until the award is paid.  Awards will be paid upon a change of control, as defined, or an initial public offering, as defined, subject to the requirement that, in each case, the internal rate of return to the Sponsors is positive.  As of April 27, 2013, the vested participant balance in the Long-term Incentive Plan aggregated $10.8 million.

Cash Incentive Plan.  We also have a cash incentive plan (Cash Incentive Plan) to aid in the retention of certain key executives.  The Cash Incentive Plan provides for the creation of a $14 million cash bonus pool.  Each participant in the Cash Incentive Plan will be entitled to a cash bonus upon the earlier to occur of a change of control, as defined, or an initial public offering, as defined, subject to the requirement that, in each case, the internal rate of return to the Sponsors is positive.

Litigation.  On April 30, 2010, a Class Action Complaint for Injunction and Equitable Relief was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by Sheila Monjazeb, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, against the Company, Newton Holding, LLC, TPG Capital, L.P. and Warburg Pincus LLC.  On July 12, 2010, all defendants except for the Company were dismissed without prejudice, and on August 20, 2010, this case was refiled in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County.  This complaint, along with a similar class action lawsuit originally filed by Bernadette Tanguilig in 2007, alleges that the Company has engaged in various violations of the California Labor Code and Business and Professions Code, including without limitation 1) asking employees to work “off the clock,” 2) failing to provide meal and rest breaks to its employees, 3) improperly calculating deductions on paychecks delivered to its employees and 4) failing to provide a chair or allow employees to sit during shifts.  On October 24, 2011, the court granted the Company’s motion to compel Ms. Monjazeb and a co-plaintiff to participate in the Company’s Mandatory Arbitration Agreement, foreclosing a class action in that case.  The court then determined that Ms. Tanguilig could not represent employees who are subject to our Mandatory Arbitration Agreement, thereby limiting the putative class action to those associates who were employed between December 2004 and July 15, 2007 (the effective date of our Mandatory Arbitration Agreement).  Ms. Monjazeb filed a demand for arbitration as a class action, which is prohibited under the Mandatory Arbitration Agreement.  In response to Ms. Monjazeb’s demand for arbitration as a class action, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) referred the resolution of such request back to the arbitrator.  We filed a motion to stay the decision of the AAA pending a ruling by the trial court; the trial court determined that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable due to a recent California case.  We asserted that the trial court does not have jurisdiction to change its earlier determination of the enforceability of the arbitration agreement and have appealed the court’s decision.  In addition, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a complaint alleging that the Mandatory Arbitration Agreement’s class action prohibition violates employees’ rights to engage in concerted activity, which was originally set for hearing in Los Angeles on March 18, 2013 but has been rescheduled to July 15, 2013.  We will continue to vigorously defend our interests in these matters.  Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount of loss, if any, arising from these matters.  We will continue to evaluate these matters based on subsequent events, new information and future circumstances.

We are currently involved in various other legal actions and proceedings that arose in the ordinary course of business.  With respect to the matter described above as well as all other current outstanding litigation involving the Company, we believe that any liability arising as a result of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other.  We had no outstanding irrevocable letters of credit at April 27, 2013.  We had approximately $5.4 million in surety bonds at April 27, 2013 relating primarily to merchandise imports and state sales tax and utility requirements.

17

13.Segment Reporting

We have identified two reportable segments: Specialty Retail Stores and Online (previously referred to as Direct Marketing).  The Specialty Retail Stores segment aggregates the activities of our Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman retail stores, including Neiman Marcus Last Call stores.  The Online segment conducts online and supplemental print catalog operations under the Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Neiman Marcus Last Call and Horchow brand names.  Both the Specialty Retail Stores and Online segments derive their revenues from the sales of high-end fashion apparel, accessories, cosmetics and fragrances from leading designers, precious and fashion jewelry and decorative home accessories.

Operating earnings for the segments include 1) revenues, 2) cost of sales, 3) direct selling, general and administrative expenses, 4) other direct operating expenses, 5) income from credit card program and 6) depreciation expense for the respective segment.  Items not allocated to our operating segments include those items not considered by management in measuring the assets and profitability of our segments.  These amounts include 1) corporate expenses including, but not limited to, treasury, investor relations, legal and finance support services and general corporate management, 2) charges related to the application of purchase accounting adjustments made in connection with the Acquisition including amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments and other non-cash items and 3) interest expense.  These items, while often related to the operations of a segment, are not considered by segment operating management, corporate operating management and the chief operating decision maker in assessing segment operating performance.  The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (except with respect to purchase accounting adjustments not allocated to the operating segments).  The following tables set forth the information for our reportable segments:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012			April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
REVENUES
Specialty Retail Stores	$	855,722		$	846,924		$	2,754,657		$	2,670,972
Online	242,545			210,803			774,512			669,044
Total	$	1,098,267		$	1,057,727		$	3,529,169		$	3,340,016
OPERATING EARNINGS
Specialty Retail Stores	$	135,140		$	135,633		$	366,207		$	362,192
Online	46,583			41,660			124,849			106,678
Corporate expenses	(16,201		)	(18,701		)	(44,220		)	(52,696		)
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	(3,607		)	—			(8,858		)	—
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	(11,636		)	(11,998		)	(35,463		)	(38,125		)
Total	$	150,279		$	146,594		$	402,515		$	378,049
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Specialty Retail Stores	$	24,709		$	29,833		$	83,256		$	89,356
Online	5,601			5,317			20,307			19,209
Total	$	30,310		$	35,150		$	103,563		$	108,565
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
Specialty Retail Stores	$	26,653		$	26,532		$	79,536		$	78,286
Online	6,011			4,739			17,528			13,527
Other	1,403			1,287			3,883			3,900
Total	$	34,067		$	32,558		$	100,947		$	95,713

	April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012
ASSETS
Tangible assets of Specialty Retail Stores	$	1,778,836	$	1,754,906
Tangible assets of Online	223,963		208,766
Corporate assets:
Intangible assets related to Specialty Retail Stores	2,616,572		2,663,202
Intangible assets related to Online	440,982		441,813
Other	154,166		131,329
Total	$	5,214,519	$	5,200,016

18

14.  Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

2028 Debentures.  All of NMG’s obligations under the 2028 Debentures are guaranteed by the Company.  The guarantee by the Company is full and unconditional and joint and several.  Currently, the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries under the 2028 Debentures consist principally of Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., through which NMG conducts the operations of its Bergdorf Goodman stores, and NM Nevada Trust, which holds legal title to certain real property and intangible assets used by NMG in conducting its operations.

The following condensed consolidating financial information represents the financial information of Neiman Marcus, Inc. and its non-guarantor subsidiaries under the 2028 Debentures, prepared on the equity basis of accounting.  The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Rule 3-10 under the SEC’s Regulation S-X. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations, cash flows or financial position had the non-guarantor subsidiaries operated as independent entities.

	April 27, 2013
(in thousands)	Company		NMG		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	67,834	$	725	$	—		$	68,559
Merchandise inventories	—		874,326		121,069		—			995,395
Other current assets	—		108,280		13,562		—			121,842
Total current assets	—		1,050,440		135,356		—			1,185,796
Property and equipment, net	—		791,941		105,460		—			897,401
Goodwill	—		1,107,753		155,680		—			1,263,433
Intangible assets, net	—		254,620		1,539,501		—			1,794,121
Other assets	—		43,176		30,592		—			73,768
Investments in subsidiaries	791,212		1,860,071		—		(2,651,283		)	—
Total assets	$	791,212	$	5,108,001	$	1,966,589	$	(2,651,283	)	$	5,214,519
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—	$	225,024	$	26,213	$	—		$	251,237
Accrued liabilities	—		359,214		78,778		—			437,992
Total current liabilities	—		584,238		104,991		—			689,229
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt	—		2,702,028		—		—			2,702,028
Deferred income taxes	—		617,713		—		—			617,713
Other long-term liabilities	—		412,810		1,527		—			414,337
Total long-term liabilities	—		3,732,551		1,527		—			3,734,078
Total shareholders’ equity	791,212		791,212		1,860,071		(2,651,283		)	791,212
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	791,212	$	5,108,001	$	1,966,589	$	(2,651,283	)	$	5,214,519

19

	July 28, 2012
(in thousands)	Company		NMG		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	48,308	$	945	$	—		$	49,253
Merchandise inventories	—		838,837		100,980		—			939,817
Other current assets	—		141,913		12,752		—			154,665
Total current assets	—		1,029,058		114,677		—			1,143,735
Property and equipment, net	—		788,320		106,158		—			894,478
Goodwill	—		1,107,753		155,680		—			1,263,433
Intangible assets, net	—		280,848		1,548,736		—			1,829,584
Other assets	—		41,113		29,512		—			70,625
Investments in subsidiaries	615,543		1,853,889		—		(2,469,432		)	—
Total assets	$	615,543	$	5,100,981	$	1,954,763	$	(2,469,432	)	$	5,201,855
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—	$	303,397	$	28,011	$	—		$	331,408
Accrued liabilities	—		322,699		71,122		—			393,821
Total current liabilities	—		626,096		99,133		—			725,229
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt	—		2,781,882		—		—			2,781,882
Deferred income taxes	—		626,605		—		—			626,605
Other long-term liabilities	—		450,855		1,741		—			452,596
Total long-term liabilities	—		3,859,342		1,741		—			3,861,083
Total shareholders’ equity	615,543		615,543		1,853,889		(2,469,432		)	615,543
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	615,543	$	5,100,981	$	1,954,763	$	(2,469,432	)	$	5,201,855

	April 28, 2012
(in thousands)	Company		NMG		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	63,841	$	855	$	—		$	64,696
Merchandise inventories	—		825,249		120,543		—			945,792
Other current assets	—		109,129		11,281		—			120,410
Total current assets	—		998,219		132,679		—			1,130,898
Property and equipment, net	—		784,308		103,608		—			887,916
Goodwill	—		1,107,753		155,680		—			1,263,433
Intangible assets, net	—		289,622		1,551,960		—			1,841,582
Other assets	—		45,141		31,046		—			76,187
Investments in subsidiaries	699,692		1,863,119		—		(2,562,811		)	—
Total assets	$	699,692	$	5,088,162	$	1,974,973	$	(2,562,811	)	$	5,200,016
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—	$	216,739	$	29,772	$	—		$	246,511
Accrued liabilities	—		372,376		80,331		—			452,707
Total current liabilities	—		589,115		110,103		—			699,218
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt	—		2,806,833		—		—			2,806,833
Deferred income taxes	—		665,126		—		—			665,126
Other long-term liabilities	—		327,396		1,751		—			329,147
Total long-term liabilities	—		3,799,355		1,751		—			3,801,106
Total shareholders’ equity	699,692		699,692		1,863,119		(2,562,811		)	699,692
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	699,692	$	5,088,162	$	1,974,973	$	(2,562,811	)	$	5,200,016

20

	Thirteen weeks ended April 27, 2013
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	—		$	918,242		$	180,025		$	—		$	1,098,267
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	—			557,681			105,636			—			663,317
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	—			217,753			30,923			—			248,676
Income from credit card program	—			(12,213		)	(1,102		)	—			(13,315		)
Depreciation expense	—			30,496			3,571			—			34,067
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	—			8,742			2,894			—			11,636
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	—			—			3,607			—			3,607
Operating earnings	—			115,783			34,496			—			150,279
Interest expense, net	—			32,346			—			—			32,346
Intercompany royalty charges (income)	—			50,882			(50,882		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(70,765		)	(85,378		)	—			156,143			—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	70,765			117,933			85,378			(156,143		)	117,933
Income tax expense	—			47,168			—			—			47,168
Net earnings (loss)	$	70,765		$	70,765		$	85,378		$	(156,143	)	$	70,765
Total other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax	(299		)	(299		)	—			299			(299		)
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	70,466		$	70,466		$	85,378		$	(155,844	)	$	70,466

	Thirteen weeks ended April 28, 2012
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	—		$	881,830		$	175,897		$	—		$	1,057,727
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	—			526,962			101,107			—			628,069
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	—			220,776			30,227			—			251,003
Income from credit card program	—			(11,399		)	(1,096		)	—			(12,495		)
Depreciation expense	—			29,212			3,346			—			32,558
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	—			8,773			3,225			—			11,998
Operating earnings	—			107,506			39,088			—			146,594
Interest expense, net	—			44,353			1			—			44,354
Intercompany royalty charges (income)	—			49,474			(49,474		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(62,640		)	(88,561		)	—			151,201			—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	62,640			102,240			88,561			(151,201		)	102,240
Income tax expense	—			39,600			—			—			39,600
Net earnings (loss)	$	62,640		$	62,640		$	88,561		$	(151,201	)	$	62,640
Total other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax	611			611			—			(611		)	611
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	63,251		$	63,251		$	88,561		$	(151,812	)	$	63,251

21

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended April 27, 2013
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	—		$	2,948,810		$	580,359		$	—		$	3,529,169
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	—			1,867,477			362,969			—			2,230,446
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	—			689,197			101,272			—			790,469
Income from credit card program	—			(36,062		)	(3,467		)	—			(39,529		)
Depreciation expense	—			90,667			10,280			—			100,947
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	—			26,228			9,235			—			35,463
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	—			—			8,858			—			8,858
Operating earnings	—			311,303			91,212			—			402,515
Interest expense, net	—			134,762			3			—			134,765
Intercompany royalty charges (income)	—			164,516			(164,516		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(160,816		)	(255,725		)	—			416,541			—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	160,816			267,750			255,725			(416,541		)	267,750
Income tax expense	—			106,934			—			—			106,934
Net earnings (loss)	$	160,816		$	160,816		$	255,725		$	(416,541	)	$	160,816
Total other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax	6,624			6,624			—			(6,624		)	6,624
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	167,440		$	167,440		$	255,725		$	(423,165	)	$	167,440

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended April 28, 2012
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	—		$	2,775,949		$	564,067		$	—		$	3,340,016
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	—			1,744,785			350,023			—			2,094,808
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	—			676,898			94,816			—			771,714
Income from credit card program	—			(34,954		)	(3,439		)	—			(38,393		)
Depreciation expense	—			85,433			10,280			—			95,713
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	—			28,450			9,675			—			38,125
Operating earnings	—			275,337			102,712			—			378,049
Interest expense, net	—			130,530			3			—			130,533
Intercompany royalty charges (income)	—			157,484			(157,484		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(151,144		)	(260,193		)	—			411,337			—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	151,144			247,516			260,193			(411,337		)	247,516
Income tax expense	—			96,372			—			—			96,372
Net earnings (loss)	$	151,144		$	151,144		$	260,193		$	(411,337	)	$	151,144
Total other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax	(847		)	(847		)	—			847			(847		)
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	150,297		$	150,297		$	260,193		$	(410,490	)	$	150,297

22

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended April 27, 2013
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
CASH FLOWS—OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss)	$	160,816		$	160,816		$	255,725		$	(416,541	)	$	160,816
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense	—			123,171			19,515			—			142,686
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			15,597			—			—			15,597
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	—			—			8,858			—			8,858
Deferred income taxes	—			(15,501		)	—			—			(15,501		)
Other	—			4,417			(152		)	—			4,265
Intercompany royalty income payable (receivable)	—			164,516			(164,516		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(160,816		)	(255,725		)	—			416,541			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	—			15,634			(99,055		)	—			(83,421		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	—			212,925			20,375			—			233,300
CASH FLOWS—INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	—			(92,968		)	(10,595		)	—			(103,563		)
Investment in foreign e-commerce retailer	—			—			(10,000		)	—			(10,000		)
Net cash used for investing activities	—			(92,968		)	(20,595		)	—			(113,563		)
CASH FLOWS—FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under Senior Secured Term Loan Facility	—			500,000			—			—			500,000
Borrowings under Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	—			100,000			—			—			100,000
Repayment of borrowings	—			(690,668		)	—			—			(690,668		)
Debt issuance costs paid	—			(9,763		)	—			—			(9,763		)
Net cash used for financing activities	—			(100,431		)	—			—			(100,431		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Increase (decrease) during the period	—			19,526			(220		)	—			19,306
Beginning balance	—			48,308			945			—			49,253
Ending balance	$	—		$	67,834		$	725		$	—		$	68,559

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended April 28, 2012
(in thousands)	Company			NMG			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
CASH FLOWS—OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss)	$	151,144		$	151,144		$	260,193		$	(411,337	)	$	151,144
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense	—			120,233			19,955			—			140,188
Deferred income taxes	—			(21,845		)	—			—			(21,845		)
Other	—			313			109			—			422
Intercompany royalty income payable (receivable)	—			157,484			(157,484		)	—			—
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries	(151,144		)	(260,193		)	—			411,337			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	—			20,634			(84,563		)	—			(63,929		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	—			167,770			38,210			—			205,980
CASH FLOWS—INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	—			(99,905		)	(8,660		)	—			(108,565		)
Investment in foreign e-commerce retailer	—			—			(29,421		)	—			(29,421		)
Net cash used for investing activities	—			(99,905		)	(38,081		)	—			(137,986		)
CASH FLOWS—FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	—			150,000			—			—			150,000
Repayment of borrowings	—			(25,000		)	—			—			(25,000		)
Distributions to shareholders	—			(449,295		)	—			—			(449,295		)
Debt issuance costs paid	—			(594		)	—			—			(594		)
Net cash used for financing activities	—			(324,889		)	—			—			(324,889		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(Decrease) increase during the period	—			(257,024		)	129			—			(256,895		)
Beginning balance	—			320,865			726			—			321,591
Ending balance	$	—		$	63,841		$	855		$	—		$	64,696

23

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.  Unless otherwise specified, the meanings of all defined terms in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are consistent with the meanings of such terms as defined in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements.  Please see “Other Matters — Factors That May Affect Future Results” for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company is a luxury retailer conducting integrated store and online operations principally under the Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman brand names.  We report our store operations as our Specialty Retail Stores segment and our online operations as our Online segment.

The Company is a subsidiary of Newton Holding, LLC (Holding), which is controlled by investment funds affiliated with TPG and Warburg Pincus LLC (collectively, the Sponsors).  The Company’s operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (NMG).  The Sponsors acquired NMG in a leveraged transaction in October 2005 (the Acquisition).

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to July 31.  Like many other retailers, we follow a 4-5-4 reporting calendar.  All references to the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 relate to the thirteen weeks ended April 27, 2013.  All references to the third quarter of fiscal year 2012 relate to the thirteen weeks ended April 28, 2012.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2013 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended April 27, 2013.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2012 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended April 28, 2012.

Fiscal Year 2013 Summary

A summary of our operating results is as follows:

·Revenues - Our revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 were $1,098.3 million, an increase of 3.8% compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  Our revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2013 were $3,529.2 million, an increase of 5.7% compared to year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Increases in comparable revenues were:

	Thirteen weeks ended				Thirty-Nine weeks ended
	April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012		April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012
Specialty Retail Stores	0.7	%	4.3	%	2.0	%	6.2	%
Online	15.1	%	17.5	%	15.8	%	15.2	%
Total	3.6	%	6.7	%	4.8	%	7.9	%

For Specialty Retail Stores, our sales per square foot for the last twelve trailing months were $545 as of April 27, 2013, $542 as of January 26, 2013 and $530 as of April 28, 2012.

·Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation) (COGS) - COGS increased in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 by 1.0% of revenues compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  COGS increased by 0.5% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The increases in COGS, as percentages of revenues, were primarily due to higher markdowns and promotional costs required in year-to-date fiscal 2013 as a result of lower than expected customer demand.

24

·Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation) (SG&A) - SG&A decreased by 1.1% of revenues compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2012 and decreased by 0.7% of revenues compared to year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The lower levels of SG&A expenses, as a percentage of revenues, primarily reflect 1) lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs and 2) the leveraging of payroll and other costs on higher revenues, partially offset by 3) higher planned selling and Online marketing costs incurred in connection with the continuing expansion of our omni-channel capabilities.

·Operating earnings - Total operating earnings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 were $150.3 million, or 13.7% of revenues, compared to operating earnings of $146.6 million, or 13.9% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  Our operating earnings margin decreased by 0.2% of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 primarily due to:

·an increase in COGS of 1.0% of revenues primarily due to higher markdowns and promotional costs; and

·our equity in losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer of 0.3% of revenues; partially offset by

·lower SG&A expenses of 1.1% of revenues primarily driven by lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs.

Total operating earnings in year-to-date fiscal 2013 were $402.5 million, or 11.4% of revenues, compared to $378.1 million, or 11.3% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Our operating earnings margin increased by 0.1% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 primarily due to:

·lower SG&A expenses of 0.7% of revenues primarily driven by lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs; and

·lower depreciation and amortization charges of 0.1% of revenues; partially offset by

·an increase in COGS of 0.5% of revenues primarily due to higher markdowns and promotional costs; and

·our equity in losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer of 0.3% of revenues.

·Liquidity - Net cash provided by our operating activities was $233.3 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $206.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher earnings and operational cash flows partially offset by higher working capital requirements.  We held cash balances of $68.6 million at April 27, 2013 compared to $64.7 million at April 28, 2012.  At April 27, 2013, we had $20.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, no outstanding letters of credit and $610.0 million of unused borrowing availability.

·Outlook - While economic conditions continue to improve from levels experienced during the severe economic downturn in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, consumer confidence and spending levels remain volatile and uncertain.  As a result, we continue to plan our business to balance current business trends and conditions with our long-term initiatives and growth strategies.

At April 27, 2013, on-hand inventories totaled $995.4 million, a 5.2% increase from April 28, 2012.  Based on our current inventory position, we will continue to closely monitor and align our inventory levels and purchases with anticipated customer demand.

25

OPERATING RESULTS

Performance Summary

The following table sets forth certain items expressed as percentages of net revenues for the periods indicated.

	Thirteen weeks ended				Thirty-Nine weeks ended
	April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012		April 27, 2013		April 28, 2012
Revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)	60.4		59.4		63.2		62.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)	22.6		23.7		22.4		23.1
Income from credit card program	(1.2	)	(1.2	)	(1.1	)	(1.1	)
Depreciation expense	3.1		3.1		2.9		2.9
Amortization of intangible assets	0.7		0.7		0.6		0.7
Amortization of favorable lease commitments	0.4		0.4		0.4		0.4
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	0.3		—		0.3		—
Operating earnings	13.7		13.9		11.4		11.3
Interest expense, net	2.9		4.2		3.8		3.9
Earnings before income taxes	10.7		9.7		7.6		7.4
Income tax expense	4.3		3.7		3.0		2.9
Net earnings	6.4	%	5.9	%	4.6	%	4.5	%

26

Set forth in the following table is certain summary information with respect to our operations for the periods indicated.

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in millions, except sales per square foot)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012			April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
REVENUES
Specialty Retail Stores	$	855.7		$	846.9		$	2,754.7		$	2,671.0
Online	242.6			210.8			774.5			669.0
Total	$	1,098.3		$	1,057.7		$	3,529.2		$	3,340.0
OPERATING EARNINGS
Specialty Retail Stores	$	135.1		$	135.6		$	366.2		$	362.2
Online	46.6			41.7			124.9			106.7
Corporate expenses	(16.2		)	(18.7		)	(44.2		)	(52.7		)
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	(3.6		)	—			(8.9		)	—
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	(11.6		)	(12.0		)	(35.5		)	(38.1		)
Total	$	150.3		$	146.6		$	402.5		$	378.1
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN
Specialty Retail Stores	15.8		%	16.0		%	13.3		%	13.6		%
Online	19.2		%	19.8		%	16.1		%	15.9		%
Total	13.7		%	13.9		%	11.4		%	11.3		%
CHANGE IN COMPARABLE REVENUES (1)
Specialty Retail Stores	0.7		%	4.3		%	2.0		%	6.2		%
Online	15.1		%	17.5		%	15.8		%	15.2		%
Total	3.6		%	6.7		%	4.8		%	7.9		%
SALES PER SQUARE FOOT (2)
Specialty Retail Stores	$	133		$	130		$	424		$	414
STORE COUNT
Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman full-line stores:
Open at beginning of period	43			43			44			43
Opened during the period	—			1			—			1
Closed during the period	—			—			(1		)	—
Open at end of period	43			44			43			44
Neiman Marcus Last Call stores:
Open at beginning of period	35			31			33			30
Opened during the period	—			1			2			2
Closed during the period	—			(1		)	—			(1		)
Open at end of period	35			31			35			31
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE EBITDA (3)	$	196.0		$	191.2		$	538.9		$	511.9

(1)Comparable revenues include 1) revenues derived from our retail stores open for more than fifty-two weeks, including stores that have been relocated or expanded and 2) revenues from our Online operation.  Comparable revenues exclude revenues of closed stores.  We closed our Neiman Marcus store in Minneapolis in January 2013.

(2)Sales per square foot are calculated as Neiman Marcus stores and Bergdorf Goodman stores net sales divided by weighted average square footage.  Weighted average square footage includes a percentage of quarter-end square footage for new stores equal to the percentage of the quarter during which they were open.

(3)For an explanation of EBITDA as a measure of our operating performance and a reconciliation to net earnings, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measure — EBITDA.”

27

Factors Affecting Our Results

Revenues.  We generate our revenues from the sale of high-end merchandise through our Specialty Retail Stores and our Online operation.  Components of our revenues include:

·Sales of merchandise—Revenues are recognized at the later of the point-of-sale or the delivery of goods to the customer.  Revenues are reduced when customers return goods previously purchased.  We maintain reserves for anticipated sales returns primarily based on our historical trends.  Revenues exclude sales taxes collected from our customers.

·Delivery and processing—We generate revenues from delivery and processing charges related to merchandise delivered to our customers.

Our revenues can be affected by the following factors:

·general economic conditions;

·changes in the level of consumer spending generally and, specifically, on luxury goods;

·our ability to acquire goods meeting customers’ tastes and preferences;

·changes in the level of full-price sales;

·changes in the level of promotional events conducted;

·changes in the level of delivery and processing revenues collected from our customers;

·our ability to successfully implement our expansion and growth strategies; and

·the rate of growth in internet revenues.

In addition, our revenues are seasonal, as discussed below under “Seasonality.”

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation).  COGS consists of the following components:

·Inventory costs—We utilize the retail inventory method of accounting.  Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are determined by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio, for various groupings of similar items, to the retail value of our inventories.  The cost of the inventory reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets is decreased by charges to cost of goods sold at average cost and the retail value of the inventory is lowered through the use of markdowns.  Earnings are negatively impacted when merchandise is marked down.  With the introduction of new fashions in the first and third fiscal quarters and our emphasis on full-price selling in these quarters, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are characteristic of these quarters.

·Buying costs—Buying costs consist primarily of salaries and expenses incurred by our merchandising and buying operations.

·Occupancy costs—Occupancy costs consist primarily of rent, property taxes and operating costs of our retail, distribution and support facilities.  A significant portion of our buying and occupancy costs are fixed in nature and are not dependent on the revenues we generate.

·Delivery and processing costs—Delivery and processing costs consist primarily of delivery charges we pay to third-party carriers and other costs related to the fulfillment of customer orders not delivered at the point-of-sale.

Consistent with industry business practice, we receive allowances from certain of our vendors in support of the merchandise we purchase for resale.  Certain allowances are received to reimburse us for markdowns taken or to support the gross margins that we earn in connection with the sales of the vendor’s merchandise.  These allowances result in an increase to gross margin when we earn the allowances and they are approved by the vendor.  Other allowances we receive represent reductions to the amounts we

28

pay to acquire the merchandise.  These allowances reduce the cost of the acquired merchandise and are recognized at the time the goods are sold.  We received vendor allowances of $52.8 million, or 1.5% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $53.0 million, or 1.6% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The amounts of vendor allowances we receive fluctuate based on the level of markdowns taken and did not have a significant impact on the year-over-year change in gross margin during year-to-date fiscal 2013 and 2012.

Changes in our COGS as a percentage of revenues can be affected by the following factors:

·our ability to order an appropriate amount of merchandise to match customer demand and the related impact on the level of net markdowns and promotions costs incurred;

·customer acceptance of and demand for the merchandise we offer in a given season and the related impact of such factors on the level of full-price sales;

·factors affecting revenues generally, including pricing and promotional strategies, product offerings and other actions taken by competitors;

·changes in delivery and processing costs and our ability to pass such costs onto the customer;

·changes in occupancy costs primarily associated with the opening of new stores or distribution facilities; and

·the amount of vendor reimbursements we receive during the fiscal year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation).  SG&A principally consists of costs related to employee compensation and benefits in the selling and administrative support areas and advertising and marketing costs.  A significant portion of our selling, general and administrative expenses are variable in nature and are dependent on the revenues we generate.

Advertising costs consist primarily of 1) online marketing costs, 2) advertising costs incurred related to the production, printing and distribution of our print catalogs and the production of the photographic content for our websites and 3) print media costs for promotional materials mailed to our customers.  We receive advertising allowances from certain of our merchandise vendors.  Substantially all the advertising allowances we receive represent reimbursements of direct, specific and incremental costs that we incur to promote the vendor’s merchandise in connection with our various advertising programs, primarily catalogs and other print media.  Advertising allowances fluctuate based on the level of advertising expenses incurred and are recorded as a reduction of our advertising costs when earned.  Advertising allowances aggregated approximately $51.2 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $48.7 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.

We also receive allowances from certain merchandise vendors in conjunction with compensation programs for employees who sell the vendor’s merchandise.  These allowances are netted against the related compensation expense that we incur.  Amounts received from vendors related to compensation programs were $54.0 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $48.8 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.

Changes in our selling, general and administrative expenses are affected primarily by the following factors:

·changes in the number of sales associates primarily due to new store openings and expansion of existing stores, including increased health care and related benefits expenses;

·changes in expenses incurred in connection with our advertising and marketing programs; and

·changes in expenses related to employee benefits due to general economic conditions such as rising health care costs.

Income from credit card program.  Pursuant to a marketing and servicing alliance with a third party consumer lender (the Credit Provider) under the terms of the Program Agreement, the Credit Provider offers credit cards and non-card payment plans bearing our brands and we receive income from the Credit Provider (Program Income) consisting of 1) ongoing payments based on net credit card sales and 2) compensation for marketing and servicing activities.  The Program Income is subject to annual adjustments, both increases and decreases, based upon the overall annual profitability and performance of the credit card portfolio.  We recognize Program Income when earned.  In the future, the Program Income may:

29

·increase or decrease based upon the level of utilization of our proprietary credit cards by our customers;

·increase or decrease based upon the overall profitability and performance of the credit card portfolio due to the level of bad debts incurred or changes in interest rates, among other factors;

·increase or decrease based upon future changes to our historical credit card program in response to changes in regulatory requirements or other changes related to, among other things, the interest rates applied to unpaid balances and the assessment of late fees; and

·decrease based upon the level of future services we provide to the Credit Provider.

Seasonality

We conduct our selling activities in two primary selling seasons—Fall and Spring.  The Fall season is comprised of our first and second fiscal quarters and the Spring season is comprised of our third and fourth fiscal quarters.

Our first fiscal quarter is generally characterized by a higher level of full-price sales with a focus on the initial introduction of Fall season fashions.  Aggressive marketing activities designed to stimulate customer purchases, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are characteristic of this quarter.  The second fiscal quarter is more focused on promotional activities related to the December holiday season, the early introduction of resort season collections from certain designers and the sale of Fall season goods on a marked down basis.  As a result, margins are typically lower in the second fiscal quarter.  However, due to the seasonal increase in revenues that occurs during the holiday season, the second fiscal quarter is typically the quarter in which our revenues are the highest and in which expenses as a percentage of revenues are the lowest.  Our working capital requirements are also the greatest in the first and second fiscal quarters as a result of higher seasonal requirements.

Our third fiscal quarter is generally characterized by a higher level of full-price sales with a focus on the initial introduction of Spring season fashions.  Aggressive marketing activities designed to stimulate customer purchases, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are again characteristic of this quarter.  Revenues are generally the lowest in the fourth fiscal quarter with a focus on promotional activities offering Spring season goods to customers on a marked down basis, resulting in lower margins during the quarter.  Our working capital requirements are typically lower in the third and fourth fiscal quarters compared to the other quarters.

A large percentage of our merchandise assortment, particularly in the apparel, fashion accessories and shoe categories, is ordered months in advance of the introduction of such goods.  For example, women’s apparel, men’s apparel, shoes and handbags are typically ordered six to nine months in advance of the products being offered for sale while jewelry and other categories are typically ordered three to six months in advance.  As a result, inherent in the successful execution of our business plans is our ability both to predict the fashion trends that will be of interest to our customers and to anticipate future spending patterns of our customer base.

We monitor the sales performance of our inventories throughout each season.  We seek to order additional goods to supplement our original purchasing decisions when the level of customer demand is higher than originally anticipated.  However, in certain merchandise categories, particularly fashion apparel, our ability to purchase additional goods can be limited.  This can result in lost sales in the event of higher than anticipated demand for the fashion goods we offer or a higher than anticipated level of consumer spending.  Conversely, in the event we buy fashion goods that are not accepted by the customer or the level of consumer spending is less than we anticipated, we typically incur a higher than anticipated level of markdowns, net of vendor allowances, resulting in lower operating profits.  We believe that the experience of our merchandising and selling organizations helps to minimize the inherent risk in predicting fashion trends.

30

Thirteen Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended April 28, 2012

Revenues.  Our revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 of $1,098.3 million increased by $40.6 million, or 3.8%, from $1,057.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  The increase in revenues was due to increases in comparable revenues related to a higher level of customer demand, most notably in our Online operation.  New stores generated revenues of $9.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.

Comparable revenues for the thirteen weeks ended April 27, 2013 were $1,089.2 million compared to $1,051.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, representing an increase of 3.6%.  Comparable revenues increased in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 by 0.7% for Specialty Retail Stores and 15.1% for Online.

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation).  COGS for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 were 60.4% of revenues compared to 59.4% of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  The increase in COGS by 1.0% of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 was primarily due to:

·decreased product margins of approximately 0.9% of revenues due to higher markdowns and promotional costs as a result of lower than expected customer demand; and

·higher delivery and processing net costs of approximately 0.1% of revenues as a result of lower revenues collected from our customers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation).  SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 22.6% of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to 23.7% of revenues in the prior year fiscal period.  The net decrease in SG&A expenses by 1.1% of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 was primarily due to:

·lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs of approximately 1.0% of revenues; and

·favorable payroll and other costs of approximately 0.3% of revenues primarily due to the leveraging of these expenses on higher revenues; partially offset by

·higher planned selling and online marketing costs of approximately 0.2% of revenues incurred in connection with the continuing expansion of our omni-channel capabilities.

Income from credit card program.  We earned credit card program income of $13.3 million, or 1.2% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to $12.5 million, or 1.2% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Depreciation and amortization expenses.  Depreciation expense was $34.1 million, or 3.1% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to $32.6 million, or 3.1% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Amortization of intangible assets (primarily customer lists and favorable lease commitments) aggregated $11.6 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to $12.0 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer.  In the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, we made a strategic investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer.  This investment is accounted for under the equity method and our equity in the investee’s loss was $3.6 million, or 0.3% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.

Operating earnings.  Total operating earnings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 were $150.3 million, or 13.7% of revenues, compared to operating earnings of $146.6 million, or 13.9% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  Our operating earnings margin decreased by 0.2% of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 primarily due to:

·an increase in COGS of 1.0% of revenues primarily due to higher markdowns and promotional costs; and

·our equity in losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer of 0.3% of revenues; partially offset by

·lower SG&A expenses of 1.1% of revenues primarily driven by lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs.

31

Segment operating earnings.  Segment operating earnings for our Specialty Retail Stores and Online segments do not reflect either the impact of adjustments to revalue our assets and liabilities to estimated fair value at the Acquisition date or impairment charges related to declines in fair value subsequent to the Acquisition date.  The reconciliation of segment operating earnings to total operating earnings is as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended
(in millions)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Specialty Retail Stores	$	135.1		$	135.6
Online	46.6			41.7
Corporate expenses	(16.2		)	(18.7		)
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	(3.6		)	—
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	(11.6		)	(12.0		)
Total operating earnings	$	150.3		$	146.6

Operating earnings for our Specialty Retail Stores segment were $135.1 million, or 15.8% of Specialty Retail Stores revenues, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to $135.6 million, or 16.0% of Specialty Retail Stores revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The decrease in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Specialty Retail Stores was primarily due to:

·higher markdowns and promotional costs; partially offset by

·lower SG&A expenses primarily due to lower current incentive compensation costs.

Operating earnings for our Online segment were $46.6 million, or 19.2% of Online revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared to $41.7 million, or 19.8% of Online revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The decrease in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Online was primarily the result of:

·lower product margins as a result of higher markdowns and promotional costs;

·higher delivery and processing net costs as a result of lower revenues collected from our customers; and

·higher depreciation expense; partially offset by

·leveraging of buying and occupancy costs and SG&A expenses, net of investments in marketing expenses to support our omni-channel strategies, on the higher level of revenues.

Interest expense.  Net interest expense was $32.3 million, or 2.9% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 and $44.4 million, or 4.2% of revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The decrease in net interest expense is primarily attributable to the effects of the Refinancing Transactions executed in the second quarter of fiscal year 2013.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	$	101		$	240
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility	26,804			25,278
2028 Debentures	2,227			2,226
Senior Subordinated Notes	—			12,969
Amortization of debt issue costs	2,128			2,106
Other, net	1,155			1,907
Capitalized interest	(69		)	(372		)
Interest expense, net	$	32,346		$	44,354

32

Income tax expense.  Our effective income tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 was 40.0% compared to 38.7% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.  Our effective income tax rates exceeded the federal statutory rate primarily due to:

·state income taxes; and

·the lack of a U.S. tax benefit related to the losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions.  During the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began its audit of our fiscal year 2010 and 2011 income tax returns and closed its audit of our fiscal year 2008 and 2009 income tax returns.  With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for fiscal years before 2008.  We believe our recorded tax liabilities as of April 27, 2013 are sufficient to cover any potential assessments to be made by the IRS or other taxing authorities upon the completion of their examinations and we will continue to review our recorded tax liabilities for potential audit assessments based upon subsequent events, new information and future circumstances.  We believe it is reasonably possible that additional adjustments in the amounts of our unrecognized tax benefits could occur within the next twelve months as a result of settlements with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitation.  At this time, we do not believe such adjustments will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended April 27, 2013 Compared to Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended April 28, 2012

Revenues.  Our revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2013 of $3,529.2 million increased by $189.2 million, or 5.7%, from $3,340.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The increase in revenues was due to increases in comparable revenues resulting from a higher level of customer demand, most notably in Online.  New stores generated revenues of $38.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013.

Comparable revenues for the thirty-nine weeks ended April 27, 2013 were $3,490.8 million compared to $3,331.1 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012, representing an increase of 4.8%.  Changes in comparable revenues, by quarter and by reportable segment, were:

	Fiscal year 2013						Fiscal year 2012
	Specialty Retail Stores		Online		Total		Specialty Retail Stores		Online		Total
First fiscal quarter	3.5	%	13.5	%	5.4	%	6.4	%	15.2	%	8.0	%
Second fiscal quarter	2.0	%	17.9	%	5.3	%	7.8	%	13.5	%	9.0	%
Third fiscal quarter	0.7	%	15.1	%	3.6	%	4.3	%	17.5	%	6.7	%
Year-to-date	2.0	%	15.8	%	4.8	%	6.2	%	15.2	%	7.9	%

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation).  COGS for year-to-date fiscal 2013 were 63.2% of revenues compared to 62.7% of revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The increase in COGS of 0.5% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 was primarily due to:

·decreased product margins of approximately 0.4% of revenues due to higher markdowns and promotional costs as a result of lower than expected customer demand; and

·higher delivery and processing net costs of approximately 0.1% of revenues as a result of lower revenues collected from our customers; partially offset by

·the leveraging of buying and occupancy costs by 0.1% of revenues on higher revenues.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation).  SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 22.4% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to 23.1% of revenues in the prior year fiscal period.  The decrease in SG&A expenses by 0.7% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 were primarily due to:

·lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs of approximately 0.7% of revenues; and

·favorable payroll and other costs of approximately 0.2% of revenues primarily due to the leveraging of these expenses on higher revenues; partially offset by

33

·higher planned selling and online marketing costs of approximately 0.2% of revenues incurred in connection with the continuing expansion of our omni-channel capabilities.

Income from credit card program.  We earned credit card program income of $39.5 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $38.4 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.

Depreciation and amortization expenses.  Depreciation expense was $100.9 million, or 2.9% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $95.7 million, or 2.9% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.

Amortization of intangible assets (primarily customer lists and favorable lease commitments) aggregated $35.5 million, or 1.0% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $38.1 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  The decrease in amortization expense is primarily due to certain short-lived intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer.  In the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, we made a strategic investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer.  This investment is accounted for under the equity method and our equity in the investee’s loss was $8.9 million, or 0.3% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013.

Operating earnings.  Total operating earnings in year-to-date fiscal 2013 were $402.5 million, or 11.4% of revenues, compared to $378.1 million, or 11.3% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Our operating earnings margin increased by 0.1% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2013 primarily due to:

·lower SG&A expenses of 0.7% of revenues primarily driven by lower current and long-term incentive compensation costs; and

·lower depreciation and amortization charges of 0.1% of revenues; partially offset by

·an increase in COGS of 0.5% of revenues primarily due to higher markdowns and promotional costs; and

·our equity in losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer of 0.3% of revenues.

Segment operating earnings.  Segment operating earnings for our Specialty Retail Stores and Online segments do not reflect either the impact of adjustments to revalue our assets and liabilities to estimated fair value at the Acquisition date or impairment charges related to declines in fair value subsequent to the Acquisition.  The reconciliation of segment operating earnings to total operating earnings is as follows:

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in millions)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Specialty Retail Stores	$	366.2		$	362.2
Online	124.9			106.7
Corporate expenses	(44.2		)	(52.7		)
Equity in loss of foreign e-commerce retailer	(8.9		)	—
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	(35.5		)	(38.1		)
Total operating earnings	$	402.5		$	378.1

Operating earnings for our Specialty Retail Stores segment were $366.2 million, or 13.3% of Specialty Retail Stores revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $362.2 million, or 13.6% of Specialty Retail Stores revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The decrease in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Specialty Retail Stores was primarily due to:

·decreased product margins as a result of higher markdowns and promotional costs; partially offset by

·lower SG&A expenses primarily due to lower current incentive compensation costs.

34

Operating earnings for Online were $124.9 million, or 16.1% of Online revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $106.7 million, or 15.9% of Online revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The increase in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Online was primarily the result of:

·leveraging of buying and occupancy costs and SG&A expenses, net of investments in marketing expenses to support our omni-channel strategies, on the higher level of revenues; partially offset by

·lower product margins as a result of higher markdowns and promotional costs;

·higher delivery and processing net costs as a result of lower revenues collected from our customers; and

·higher depreciation expense.

Interest expense.  Net interest expense was $134.8 million, or 3.8% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $130.5 million, or 3.9% of revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  Excluding the $15.6 million loss on debt extinguishment, net interest expense decreased by $11.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013 primarily attributable to the effects of the Refinancing Transactions executed in the second quarter of fiscal year 2013.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

	Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(in thousands)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility	$	1,363		$	240
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility	80,034			74,475
2028 Debentures	6,680			6,679
Senior Subordinated Notes	19,031			38,905
Amortization of debt issue costs	6,276			6,350
Other, net	5,911			4,984
Capitalized interest	(127		)	(1,100		)
	$	119,168		$	130,533
Loss on debt extinguishment	15,597			—
Interest expense, net	$	134,765		$	130,533

Income tax expense.  Our effective income tax rate for year-to-date fiscal 2013 was 39.9% compared to 38.9% for year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Our effective income tax rates exceeded the federal statutory rate primarily due to:

·state income taxes; and

·the lack of a U.S. tax benefit related to the losses from our investment in a foreign e-commerce retailer in year-to-date fiscal 2013.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure — EBITDA

We present the financial performance measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) because we use this measure to monitor and evaluate the performance of our business and believe the presentation of this measure will enhance investors’ ability to analyze trends in our business, evaluate our performance relative to other companies in our industry and evaluate our ability to service our debt.  EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP).  Our computation of EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.

The non-GAAP measure of EBITDA contains some, but not all, adjustments that are taken into account in the calculation of the components of various covenants in the agreements governing NMG’s Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to operating earnings or net earnings as a measure of operating performance.  In addition, EBITDA is not presented as and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.  EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.  For example, EBITDA:

·does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

·does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

35

·does not reflect our considerable interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;

·excludes tax payments that represent a reduction in available cash; and

·does not reflect any cash requirements for assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future.

The following table reconciles net earnings as reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings prepared in accordance with GAAP to EBITDA:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-Nine weeks ended
(dollars in millions)	April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012			April 27, 2013			April 28, 2012
Net earnings	$	70.8		$	62.6		$	160.8		$	151.1
Income tax expense	47.2			39.6			106.9			96.5
Interest expense, net	32.3			44.4			134.8			130.5
Depreciation expense	34.1			32.6			100.9			95.7
Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments	11.6			12.0			35.5			38.1
EBITDA	$	196.0		$	191.2		$	538.9		$	511.9
EBITDA as a percentage of revenues	17.8		%	18.1		%	15.3		%	15.3		%

Inflation and Deflation

We believe changes in revenues and net earnings that have resulted from inflation or deflation have not been material during the periods presented.  In recent years, we have experienced certain inflationary conditions in our cost base due primarily to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that have reduced the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar and, to a lesser extent, to increases in selling, general and administrative expenses, particularly with regard to employee benefits, and increases in fuel prices and costs impacted by increases in fuel prices, such as freight and transportation costs.

We purchase a substantial portion of our inventory from foreign suppliers whose costs are affected by the fluctuation of their local currency against the dollar or who price their merchandise in currencies other than the dollar.  Fluctuations in the Euro-U.S. dollar exchange rate affect us most significantly; however, we source goods from numerous countries and thus are affected by changes in numerous currencies and, generally, by fluctuations in the U.S. dollar relative to such currencies.  Accordingly, changes in the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies may increase the retail prices of goods offered for sale and/or increase our cost of goods sold.  If our customers reduce their levels of spending in response to increases in retail prices and/or we are unable to pass such cost increases to our customers, our revenues, gross margins, and ultimately our earnings, could decrease.  Foreign currency fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.

36

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash requirements consist principally of:

·the funding of our merchandise purchases;

·debt service requirements;

·capital expenditures for expansion and growth strategies, including new store construction, store renovations and upgrades of our management information systems;

·income tax payments; and

·obligations related to our defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan).

Our primary sources of short-term liquidity are comprised of cash on hand, availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and vendor financing.  The amounts of cash on hand and borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility are influenced by a number of factors, including revenues, working capital levels, vendor terms, the level of capital expenditures, cash requirements related to financing instruments and debt service obligations, Pension Plan funding obligations and tax payment obligations, among others.

Our working capital requirements fluctuate during the fiscal year, increasing substantially during the first and second quarters of each fiscal year as a result of higher seasonal levels of inventories.  We have typically financed our cash requirements with available cash balances, cash flows from operations and, if necessary, with cash provided from borrowings under our credit facilities.  We made a net $80.0 million repayment of outstanding borrowings under our Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and have outstanding borrowings of $20.0 million at April 27, 2013.

We believe that operating cash flows, cash balances, available vendor financing and amounts available pursuant to the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements through the remainder of fiscal year 2013, including merchandise purchases, anticipated capital expenditure requirements, debt service requirements, income tax payments and obligations related to our Pension Plan.

At April 27, 2013, cash and cash equivalents were $68.6 million compared to $64.7 million at April 28, 2012.  Net cash provided by our operating activities was $233.3 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to $206.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Cash provided by operating activities increased primarily due to higher earnings and operational cash flows partially offset by higher working capital requirements.

Net cash used for investing activities, primarily representing capital expenditures, was $113.6 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013 and $138.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  We incurred capital expenditures in both year-to-date fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 related to remodels of our Bergdorf Goodman and Bal Harbour stores and information technology enhancements.  During year-to-date fiscal 2013, we also incurred capital expenditures for the renovation of our Michigan Avenue Neiman Marcus store (Chicago, Illinois) as well as for the construction of a distribution facility in Pittston, Pennsylvania.  Currently, we project gross capital expenditures for fiscal year 2013 to be approximately $140 to $150 million.  Net of developer contributions, capital expenditures for fiscal year 2013 are projected to be approximately $135 to $145 million.

Net cash used for financing activities was $100.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2013 compared to a net cash used of $324.9 million in year-to-date fiscal 2012.  Net cash used for financing activities in year-to-date fiscal 2013 reflects the impact of the Refinancing Transactions executed during the second quarter of fiscal year 2013.  In connection with the Refinancing Transactions, we incurred incremental borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, as amended, of approximately $500.0 million.  These proceeds, along with cash on hand, were used to repurchase or redeem the principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes.  Our payments to holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes in the tender offer and redemption (including transaction costs), taken together, aggregated approximately $510.7 million.  In addition, we incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $9.8 million in connection with the Refinancing Transactions and the repricing amendment with respect to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  Net cash used for financing activities in year-to-date fiscal 2013 also included a net $80.0 million repayment of outstanding borrowings under our Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  Net cash used for financing activities in year-to-date fiscal 2012 reflects the net impact of the Dividend payment of $449.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

37

Financing Structure at April 27, 2013

Our major sources of funds are comprised of vendor financing, a $700.0 million Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, $2,560.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, $125.0 million 2028 Debentures and operating leases.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, we executed the following transactions, collectively referred to as the Refinancing Transactions:

·amended the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility to provide for the incurrence of an incremental term loan, increasing the principal amount of that facility to $2,560.0 million;

·repurchased or redeemed $500.0 million principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes; and

·amended the Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to allow these transactions.

The purpose of the Refinancing Transactions was to lower NMG’s interest expense going forward by taking advantage of current market conditions and to extend the maturity of the relevant obligation.

Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  At April 27, 2013, NMG had a Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility providing for a maximum committed borrowing capacity of $700.0 million.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility matures on May 17, 2016 (or, if earlier, the date that is 45 days prior to the scheduled maturity of NMG’s Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, or any indebtedness refinancing it, unless refinanced as of that date).  On April 27, 2013, NMG had $20.0 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility, no outstanding letters of credit and $610.0 million of unused borrowing availability.

Availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice.  The borrowing base is equal to at any time the sum of (a) 90% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, net of certain reserves, plus (b) 85% of the amounts owed by credit card processors in respect of eligible credit card accounts constituting proceeds from the sale or disposition of inventory, less certain reserves.  NMG must at all times maintain excess availability of at least the greater of (a) 10% of the lesser of 1) the aggregate revolving commitments and 2) the borrowing base and (b) $50 million, but NMG is not required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio.

At April 27, 2013, borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) a defined prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus ½ of 1.00% or (iii) a one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin.  The applicable margin is up to 1.25% with respect to base rate borrowings and up to 2.25% with respect to LIBOR borrowings.  The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on the historical excess availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility was 2.00% at April 27, 2013.  In addition, NMG is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of unused commitments of (a) 0.375% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan utilization is 40% or more or (b) 0.50% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan utilization is less than 40%.  NMG must also pay customary letter of credit fees and agency fees.

See Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I — Item 1 and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 for a further description of the terms of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.

In November 2012, NMG entered into an amendment to its Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to permit the Refinancing Transactions.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In October 2005, NMG entered into a credit agreement and related security and other agreements for a $1,975.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In May 2011, NMG entered into an amendment and restatement (the TLF Amendment) of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  The TLF Amendment increased the amount of borrowings to $2,060.0 million and extended the maturity of the loans to May 16, 2018.  Loans that were not extended under the TLF Amendment were refinanced.  The proceeds of the incremental borrowings under the term loan facility, along with cash on hand, were used to repurchase or redeem the $752.4 million principal amount outstanding of Senior Notes.  The TLF Amendment also provided for an uncommitted incremental facility to request lenders to provide additional term loans, upon certain conditions, including that NMG’s secured leverage ratio (as defined in the TLF Amendment) is less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the incremental loans and the use of proceeds thereof.

38

In November 2012, NMG entered into a further amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility in order to provide for the incurrence of an incremental term loan, increasing the principal amount of that facility to $2,560.0 million.  The incremental term loan under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bears interest under the same terms as the previously existing Senior Secured Term Loan Facility and has the same maturity.  The proceeds of the incremental borrowing, along with cash on hand, were used to repurchase or redeem the $500.0 million principal amount outstanding of Senior Subordinated Notes.

On February 8, 2013, NMG entered into a repricing amendment with respect to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  The amendment provided for (i) an immediate reduction in the interest rate margin applicable to the loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from (a) 3.50% to 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings and (b) 2.50% to 2.00% for base rate borrowings, (ii) an immediate lowering of the LIBOR floor for loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from 1.25% to 1.00% and (iii) the borrowing of incremental term loans, the proceeds of which were used to repay the outstanding loans of lenders that did not consent to the repricing amendment (the “Non-Consenting Lenders”) in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $99.6 million, which is the amount of loans held by such Non-Consenting Lenders on February 8, 2013.

At April 27, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was $2,560.0 million.  The principal amount of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on May 16, 2018.

At April 27, 2013, borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of 1) the prime rate of Credit Suisse AG (the administrative agent), 2) the federal funds effective rate plus ½ of 1.00% and 3) the adjusted one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00% or (b) an adjusted LIBOR rate (for a period equal to the relevant interest period, and in any event, never less than 1.00%), subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin.  The applicable margin with respect to outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 3.00% at April 27, 2013.  The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was 4.00% at April 27, 2013.

Depending on its leverage ratio as defined by the credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, NMG could be required to prepay outstanding term loans from its annual excess cash flow, as defined.  Such required payments commence at 50% of NMG’s annual excess cash flow (which percentage will be reduced to 25% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio and will be reduced to 0% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio).  NMG also must offer to prepay outstanding term loans at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the proceeds of certain asset sales under certain circumstances.

See Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I - Item 1 and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 (prior to giving effect to the Refinancing Transactions and the February 8, 2013 amendment) for a further description of the terms of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.

2028 Debentures.  NMG has outstanding $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.125% 2028 Debentures.  NMG’s 2028 Debentures mature on June 1, 2028.

See Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I - Item 1 and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 for a further description of the terms of the 2028 Debentures.

Senior Subordinated Notes.   In November 2012, NMG repurchased and cancelled $294.2 million principal amount of its Senior Subordinated Notes through a tender offer and redeemed the remaining $205.8 million principal amount of notes on December 31, 2012 (after which no Senior Subordinated Notes remained outstanding).  NMG’s payments to holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes in the tender offer and redemption (including transaction costs), taken together, aggregated approximately $510.7 million.

Interest Rate Caps.  At April 27, 2013, we had outstanding floating rate debt obligations of $2,580.0 million.  NMG has entered into interest rate cap agreements which cap LIBOR at 2.50% for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million from December 2012 through December 2014 in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.50%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.50%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.50%.

39

OTHER MATTERS

Factors That May Affect Future Results

Matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project” or “continue.”  We make these forward-looking statements based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events, as well as currently available data.  While we believe there is a reasonable basis for our forward-looking statements, they involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  Therefore, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and you should not place undue reliance on them.  A variety of factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or expected results expressed in our forward-looking statements.  Factors that could affect future performance include, but are not limited, to:

General Economic and Political Conditions

·weakness in domestic and global capital markets and other economic conditions and the impact of such conditions on our ability to obtain credit;

·general economic and political conditions or changes in such conditions including relationships between the United States and the countries from which we source our merchandise;

·economic, political, social or other events resulting in the short- or long-term disruption in business at our stores, distribution centers or offices;

Customer Considerations

·changes in consumer confidence resulting in a reduction of discretionary spending on goods;

·changes in the demographic or retail environment;

·changes in consumer preferences or fashion trends;

·changes in our relationships with customers due to, among other things, 1) our failure to provide quality service and competitive loyalty programs, 2) our inability to provide credit pursuant to our proprietary credit card arrangement or 3) our failure to protect customer data or comply with regulations surrounding information security and privacy;

Leverage Considerations

·the effects of incurring a substantial amount of indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities;

·the ability to refinance our indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities and the effects of any refinancing;

·the effects upon us of complying with the covenants contained in our senior secured credit facilities;

·restrictions on the terms and conditions of the indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities may place on our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take certain actions;

Industry and Competitive Factors

·competitive responses to our loyalty programs, marketing, merchandising and promotional efforts or inventory liquidations by vendors or other retailers;

·changes in the financial viability of our competitors;

·seasonality of the retail business;

·adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, particularly during peak selling seasons;

·delays in anticipated store openings and renovations;

40

·our success in enforcing our intellectual property rights;

Merchandise Procurement and Supply Chain Considerations

·changes in our relationships with designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise, including changes in the level of goods and/or changes in the form in which such goods are made available to us for resale;

·delays in receipt of merchandise ordered due to work stoppages or other causes of delay in connection with either the manufacture or shipment of such merchandise;

·changes in foreign currency exchange or inflation rates;

·significant increases in paper, printing and postage costs;

Employee Considerations

·changes in key management personnel and our ability to retain key management personnel;

·changes in our relationships with certain of our key sales associates and our ability to retain our key sales associates;

Legal and Regulatory Issues

·changes in government or regulatory requirements increasing our costs of operations;

·litigation that may have an adverse effect on our financial results or reputation;

Other Factors

·terrorist activities in the United States and elsewhere;

·the impact of funding requirements related to our Pension Plan;

·our ability to provide credit to our customers pursuant to our proprietary credit card program arrangement, including any future changes in the terms of such arrangement and/or legislation impacting the extension of credit to our customers;

·the design and implementation of new information systems as well as enhancements of existing systems; and

·other risks, uncertainties and factors set forth in Part I — Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2012.

The foregoing factors are not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that could impact our business.  Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise (publicly or otherwise) any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, new information or future circumstances.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events.  These estimates and assumptions affect amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  Our current estimates are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events were made.  We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicate those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances.  We make adjustments to our assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates we used in preparing the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

41

A complete description of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to improve the presentation and prominence of comprehensive earnings and its components as a result of convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards.  We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to reduce the complexity and costs associated with interim and annual goodwill impairment tests, by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit.  While we adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, no impairment tests have been required in year-to-date fiscal 2013.  We will perform our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 and do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance to reduce the complexity and costs associated with interim and annual indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment tests, by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets.  This guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, which is effective for us as of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  We do not expect that the implementation of this standard will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive earnings depending on the significance of the reclassifications and whether they are required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).  This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012, which is effective for us as of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  We do not expect that the implementation of this standard will have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We discussed our interest rate risk in Part II — Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2012.  There have been no material changes to this risk since that time.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a.  Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation as of April 27, 2013, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of our management, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act).  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, accumulated, processed, summarized, reported and communicated on a timely basis within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

b.  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

In the ordinary course of business, we routinely enhance our information systems by either upgrading our current systems or implementing new systems.  No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 27, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

42

PART II

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information contained under “Litigation” in Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I - Item 1 is incorporated herein by reference as if fully restated herein.  Note 12 contains forward-looking statements that are subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Other Matters — Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors described in Part I — Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2012.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, we granted to certain of our management employees 1,430 Fixed Price Options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $951 per option and 770 Accreting Options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $695 per option.  During the period, certain of our option holders exercised 988 Fixed Price Options with a weighted average exercise price of $1,228 per option and 385 Accreting Options with a weighted average exercise price of $1,083 per option.  The foregoing transactions were consummated without registration in reliance on the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and corresponding provisions of state securities laws, which exempt transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

43

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibit		Method of Filing
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Neiman Marcus, Inc.	Incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011.
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Neiman Marcus, Inc.	Incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith electronically
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith electronically
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Furnished herewith electronically
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Furnished herewith electronically
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Furnished herewith electronically
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Furnished herewith electronically
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document	Furnished herewith electronically
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Furnished herewith electronically
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Furnished herewith electronically

44

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

(Registrant)

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ T. Dale Stapleton	Senior Vice President	June 3, 2013
T. Dale Stapleton	and Chief Accounting Officer
	(on behalf of the registrant and
	as principal accounting officer)

45